Tuesday War Room: FBI Subpoenas Minnesota Dems For Obstructing ICE & Trump Shows Media Faces of Deported Criminal Illegals, As He Mulls Greenland Takeover…PLUS, Globalists Confronted In Davos & MORE!
Harrison Smith and guests expose how Indian networks exploit H-1B visas via "body shops," replacing American workers at firms like USAA and Capital One, with Texas as a key hub under Governor Greg Abbott’s policies. They link this to the WEF’s Davos "mother of all deals" trade pact, criticizing mass immigration as a tool to erode Western norms while ignoring AI’s supposed labor solutions. Smith warns of a globalist-inspired domestic crisis, counting violent illegals in censuses and granting welfare, while dismissing leftist activism as a "spiritual dead end." The episode culminates in claims of orchestrated chaos—from Hamas terrorists entering the U.S. to Europe’s deliberate economic sabotage via Ukraine war and ESG policies—suggesting Western decline is engineered rather than inevitable. [Automatically generated summary]
I'll be joined by Matt Forney, pretty much right off the bat as soon as we're done with the Daily Dispatch.
We'll welcome him into the studio.
We'll talk about mostly the takeover, the takeover of American industry by hostile foreigners that are here on fraudulent visas.
A lot of them from India.
The big story today, most of the big stories today come out of Davos, the World Economic Forum, where they are meeting.
And as we described yesterday, in accordance to the lockstep document, they are trying to set the groundwork, build the foundations for a new new world order since their plans for total centralized control of the entire world ran into a major roadblock.
That is us, that is Donald Trump and the movement he represents.
And so now they're changing their tactics because they are, after all, only human and they have to contend with human will.
And we are that will.
Let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch.
Your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 20th of January, 2026.
Israeli forces mass around Church of the Nativity, intimidating Bethlehem Christians.
Late last night, Sunday, January 19th, two days ago, Israeli military forces were observed gathering in and around the Church of Nativity in Manger Square in Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank.
According to eyewitnesses and local sources, residents reported a heavy military presence, including armed patrols, vehicles, troop concentrations in the immediate vicinity of the church complex and surrounding streets.
And videos of this have just been released.
This, of course, is in line with what we've been reporting on.
I like the fact that Israel is at this point trying to annex the Shepherds Field, where the Shepherds were alerted by an angel that Jesus was born.
Major moves in the West Bank there as Israel attempts to widen its territory.
Meanwhile, Palantir CEO says AI to make large-scale immigration obsolete.
Oh, well, good thing we destroyed our countries for it then.
Well, that's not going to bite us in the ass, right?
I mean, we imported tens of millions, or I guess in total, hundreds of millions of hostile foreigners into Western Europe and America.
Of course, the claim that it was going to fill out the pension funds was always ridiculous on the face of it.
But now we have AI, and so I guess it was all unnecessary.
So I guess we'll ask them politely to go home, and I'm sure they will.
Meanwhile, manhunt for suspect who shot two Portland police officers during Antifa action at ICE facility.
Authorities are searching for a suspect who shot two law enforcement officers in Oregon on Monday evening.
A Portland police department, the Portland Police Department, was alerted about an armed man issuing a threat in the Sullivan's Gulch neighborhood.
Responding officers encountered a white male in his mid-30s who opened fire on them.
Two officers were rushed to the local hospital and are now in stable condition, PPD explained in a press release, which included images of that suspect.
I had to guess.
I would suggest he's probably hanging around the ICE facility if I had to guess.
Meanwhile, Besant says mainstream media is causing hysteria over Greenland and is downplaying the treasury dumping threat.
The story at Infowars.com, Asian and European stocks, along with U.S. equity index futures, are deeply in the red this morning as tensions between President Trump and Europe intensify over Greenland.
And we'll return to this in a little bit, but something's going on with Greenland.
I mean, it was like kind of like a meme at the beginning of Trump's administration.
Here we are exactly one year in.
And like crazy things are happening over Greenland.
I mean, Europe is talking about selling off a bunch of American assets in an attempt to essentially destroy the dollar over what's happening with Greenland.
This kind of came out of nowhere, but it's having major geopolitical consequences.
I think I may have some sort of answer as to why that is.
We'll return to that in just a little bit.
It is about national security.
Mostly it's about AI.
Finally, we have this U.S. airstrike kills al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorists linked to ISIS gunmen who killed two U.S. soldiers and an interpreter in Syria.
So Syria will be another big topic of conversation today as things are getting crazy there, courtesy of the CIA-backed Islamic dictator terrorist Joe Lani.
That's your daily dispatch.
Matt Forney joins me on the other side of this short commercial break.
Go to thealexjonesstore.com and get a really cool hat.
Any order, you get a free hat, this Infowars hat, which I should probably wear.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined in studio now by Matt Forney.
You can follow him on X at Matt Forney.
That's at M-A-T-T-F-O-R-N-E-Y.
He's a writer, editor, and investigative journalist originally from Syracuse, New York, now based in New York City.
He authors the substack publication, The Visa Files, where he delivers in-depth reporting on H-1B visa abuse, Indian ethnic nepotism in tech and corporate workplaces, offshoring, and related issues impacting American workers.
And, you know, the sheer number of Indian people, I think, is like daunting.
Like, people don't respect how many Indians there are in India, let alone the rest of the world.
You know, I think it's 1.4 billion is the official count now, which means every single person in America of every race, the color, creed, whatever, every single American citizen could be replaced with an Indian.
There'd still be a billion Indians in India waiting to get over there.
Like, there is no limit where it'll be like, okay, all of the Indians that wanted to come here are here.
We're done now.
I mean, it is an endless source of population.
Why would we be opening our gates?
Because Western Europe's doing it too.
I got a video maybe we can go to in a little bit at the World Economic Forum now, Ursula Vanderlayen basically saying Europe's opening up its doors to India too.
I remember growing up in the 90s, and again, like you knew maybe one or two Indian people.
There's like an Indian kid in your class, and again, the gas station.
But now, like, everywhere, like, I live in, I came back to the U.S. from living abroad for several years, and like every small town, upstate New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, everywhere I go, it's Indians.
Indians run the gas station, Indians at Costco.
That's a thing I got to experience recently.
Just it's a complete point, again, where we cannot ignore this Americans.
Because it's actually in cooperation with the Indian government who's using their role in trade disputes or multilateral agreements to get these concessions.
And the people, but I mean, do they really even need to do that?
Because I'm sure I don't think they're having to twist the arms of the Americans or the Western countries.
They've got there's a lot of corporations that like this cheap labor.
And of course, there's the vote issue.
You know, something like 61% of Indian Americans voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.
Those are factors as well.
But the Indian government is pushing it in an organized way.
Other countries do this, but like India is so forward, so prevalent in this simply because there's way more Indians and the government is way more organized in pushing this.
Most recently, I was reporting on how Indians have taken over the IT department at the employee retirement system.
For those of you not in Texas, that's responsible for managing the retirement payouts of civil servants.
I was told by an insider that unqualified Indians are coming in.
It's the usual pattern.
What happens is an Indian will get into a position of power, hiring manager, CTO, whatever, and then suddenly everyone below them will become Indian because they only hire their own.
This has happened across so many corporations, and now it's happening at both state and local government, particularly here in Texas.
And do you have the same level of fraud with the Indians that you do with the Somalis?
Because again, it's not a matter of, and we talked about this actually in a, you're doing a new show called the Matt Forney Show that I don't know if you want to get into.
It's not out yet, but soon.
Soon, soon, very soon.
Maybe we can get some details on that.
But we pre-recorded an episode and we were talking about the whole scam, the whole fraud, diversity scam that's happening.
And one of the things that I like to point out is there's not a big problem with theft in the Somali community.
They don't steal from one another.
A lot of times they'll leave their doors unlocked and they're all going in and out of each other's houses.
It's total trust, no theft at all, because it's not like these people are just genetically disposed to stealing things.
It's a collective action of one group stealing from another group when they do these scams.
They steal from people they perceive as outsiders.
This happens with Indians as well.
The Indian fraud is way, way bigger than the Somali fraud, and it's everywhere.
The reason the Somalis got popped is because, well, there's been a lot of attention on them recently.
But also, we saw all the memes, the quality learing center, blatant, you know, daycares that had nobody there, shut down in the middle of the day.
That, again, was something that you could not ignore at all levels.
Whereas Indians have way more sophisticated fraud schemes.
One of the most popular ones is there will be 50 or so body shops, which are just firms that contract Indians out to various corporations for IT roles, headquartered at one address.
I recently investigated a few of these in New Jersey.
You'll see like 50 body shops headquartered in one corporate suite in Island or Princeton or wherever.
Nobody's there.
They're not even listed on the directory or on the entrance.
And if you ask people in the building, other tenants, like, oh, I'm looking for, I don't know, Alpha Tech or whatever it's called, they won't even know.
Essentially, the body shops are one of the primary means of bringing in Indians into this country through fraud.
They have their own departments back in India.
They will contract out in bulk contracts to various corporations.
Pretty much any corporation you can think of is enrolled with body shops.
They work for far less.
The body shops themselves get a kickback for everyone they bring in.
And again, the bulk contracts are where they will sign, they will put more labor to these corporations than is actually necessary for the job.
USAA, which is headquartered down in San Antonio, has been a major, I don't want to say victim, but like a major place where this is going on.
I was told by insiders that because these bulk contracts, they bring in way too many Indians, more than necessary for the job.
So they'll have these Indians just sitting around doing nothing or doing make work jobs, the equivalent of digging a hole and then filling it back in again.
They can't dismiss them because that would invalidate the entire contract.
And of course, we've talked a lot in the last year or so about the way the H-1B visa scam is just.
It's a scam.
I mean, the whole thing is a scam from top to bottom in the sense that, you know, the companies will technically fulfill what they're obligated to do in terms of advertising.
You know, we have a position open, but they'll do it in a way that is deliberately designed so that nobody applies.
So they can then go, hey, nobody applied to this job.
Yeah, what they do is that they are legally required to solicit, put job ads out, and they can only bring in the H-1Bs or other people on visas if no Americans apply.
What they will do is they do the bare minimum.
They'll put an ad in the Sunday paper of wherever it is.
And who reads the paper?
I have not read a physical paper in maybe 10 years.
So they can claim, oh, no one applied for this job that we made it deliberately difficult to access.
So we need the Indians now.
We need foreigners.
I've seen examples from Connecticut newspapers, the San Francisco Chronicle.
Even in the case of the San Francisco Chronicle ads for tech positions at Volkswagen and wherever, they will say in the ad, mail your resume.
Yeah, the ostensible purpose of the H-1B visa was to bring, was to plug existing gaps in the American labor force.
It was not meant to, like you said, replace it wholesale.
That's what it's being used for now.
And we're in a situation where like tons of new STEM graduates, guys, Americans in engineering and whatnot, cannot find work.
And it's gotten to the point where if you have a STEM, if you major in STEM, you're more likely to be unemployed than someone with a useless liberal arts major.
I think I'm not sure if it was STEM or not, but it was, you know, basically the latest is saying you're just as likely to be unemployed if you have a college degree or if you don't.
You can assume that, you know, nine out of 10 Indians who apply for a job, their education will be faked.
They can outright buy their degrees.
Or I have some personal experience with this.
There's been an entire industry of college ghostwriters who will do work for college students for money.
Indians, foreigners in general, are massive users of this, not just Indians, but also Chinese, Arabs, Africans.
In many cases, the clients can barely speak English.
And an explosion of it used to be slanted more towards the Chinese, but ever since, say, the Canadians started bringing in tons of Indian students at colleges like Conestaga, there are so many Indians just using these services.
I believe ChatGPT has depressed it a bit, but like that industry still exists.
There are even cases where if an Indian has a video interview and they're not qualified for the job because all their credentials are faked, there are services where they will hire another Indian who looks like them to conduct the video interview.
Yeah, and it seems like it happened so quietly and for so long that it's almost like by the time we realize the issue, by the time the wider public realized the issue, it almost seems like it's too late.
There's 10 million of them here and they're, you know, they're embedded and they have political offices.
How did this, why did this happen so quietly?
Like, why is it just now that everybody is suddenly looking around going, what the hell are we doing?
Well, like I said, a lot of them seem to have come in under the Biden administration because I left America in 2017, came back last year.
There were not nearly as many Indians around everywhere.
They certainly weren't in places like Middletown, New York or Poughkeepsie or wherever.
But what I see happening is, again, it's gotten to the point where nobody can really ignore it.
And actually, I got a report from an insider at Cognizant, which is a major body shop.
These body shops do occasionally hire Americans, but they only do so if that American has specialized knowledge that they basically want to train their Indians and then they get rid of the Americans or the Canadians or wherever.
Cognizance, according to this report, after Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election, they fired all of their senior American staffers.
That seems to have been like the lynch point where everything just became Indian.
And what a lot of corporations are doing now is because of the restrictions that Trump has imposed on H-1Bs, they're going to try and move offshore jobs to India themselves using what are called global capability centers.
Home Depot has them.
Google's building one.
Microsoft is building one.
So if they can't bring the Indians here, they're just going to take the jobs out of America and put them in India.
And this is your latest from thevisafiles.substack.com, Matt Forney's Substack.
The Indian invasion seizing Texas government from within from fraudulent hires to rigged votes, the hidden threat to the lone star state.
It's really not that hidden, but it's you know, it's it's weird because it's one of these things that you go to some of these newly built subdivisions just outside of Austin and it's 10,000 homes as far as the eye can see, sort of cookie cutter, you know, neighborhoods being built, and every single home is owned by an Indian.
Yeah, I mean, I've only been here for a few days, but like I've seen that, you know, continuously, just Indians, Indians, Indians.
It's almost to the point where it seems like Texas has more non-whites per capita than a place like New York City, a place that was traditionally an immigrant, an immigrant destination.
They are, as you said, harassing their critics online.
You know, they try to get them banned off of X. They've got whole Telegram groups dedicated to this.
I have heard from other journalists that they will try and physically stalk journalists who are covering this.
They will try to, because they're Indians in every corporation.
They will try to mess with your bank accounts.
They'll try to mess with your car insurance or whatever.
And they've also ramped up their lobbying.
Amanda Baralada at WND has done a lot of good reporting on various unregistered agents of the Indian government that are trying to embed themselves in the Trump administration.
And of course, you've got, like, say, the Georgia law that's trying to make hindophobia hate crime.
More recently, also around that same time in California, there was an attempt to, I forget the name of the law, but there was a law that would have made transnational repression a serious crime in California law.
And this was perceived as being targeted at Indians because primarily Indians, the Indian government will straight up assassinate political enemies, their own domestic political enemies on American and Canadian soil.
There was a case about three years ago of a Sikh leader in Canada who was assassinated by agents of the Indian government, which famously led to Trudeau growing a bit of spine and expelling some Indian diplomats.
There's a case going on in New York City right now of an attempted assassination on a Sikh leader by an agent of the Indian government.
And it's actually funny because his lawyer tried to get his connections to the Indian government, just exclude that from evidence in the trial.
And the judge said, nah.
So they do stuff like that.
But going back to that California law, Gavin Newsom vetoed it because he, I forgot what his reasoning was, but he's another politician who's completely in the pocket of the Indian lobby.
These are the things that they are trying to do.
They're trying to entrench their perceived dominance in American law after taking over corporations.
They would ideally, if they can, make criticizing them a crime.
A lot of this started when Narendra Modi became the president of India.
I believe that was in the early 2010s.
He is the one who's been pushing this aggressive immigration to other countries and the aggressive as a form of Indian nationalism.
Again, the term they use for it is Hindutva.
They are he sees it as a sort of conquest project because if India went into a hot war with the United States or any first world country, they would lose.
They would lose.
If you've seen the ridiculous chances they did the border, the border with Pakistan, like, you know, like they're kicking up as high as they can.
They wouldn't win a hot war.
So they're trying to conquer countries from within through mass immigration, taking control of key industries, including a national security.
I've covered the infiltration at places like Boeing and Iron Mountain.
And the thing is, in many ways, this is a bigger threat than, say, illegal immigration because, like, okay, that's bad and we should get them all out.
But, like, say, the primary occupation of like illegal aliens from Central America or whatever, you know, they're in menial, unskilled positions.
Whereas Indians, you know, they're working at banks, they're working at defense contractors.
And we're talking about India, and we're talking about Indians and the infinite supply of them that apparently every Western country is just desperate to get their hands on.
We have this video from Ursula Vanderleyen.
This is from earlier today at the WEF Davos meeting.
Clip number 14.
Ursula Vanderland says the EU is on the cusp of making, quote, the mother of all deals with India.
Isn't that exciting, Matt?
Aren't you excited to hear about the mother of all deals?
There's still work to do, but we are on the cusp of a historic trade agreement.
Indeed, some call it the mother of all deals.
One that would create a market of 2 billion people, accounting for almost a quarter of global GDP.
And crucially, that would provide a first-mover advantage for Europe with one of the world's fastest-growing and most dynamic continents.
Europe wants to do business with the growth centers of today and the economic powerhouses of this century, from Latin America to the Indo-Pacific and far beyond.
Europe will always choose the world, and the world is ready to choose Europe.
Well, another rationale beyond the ones we've already discussed, well, first off, I have to point out that that woman looks and sounds like a villain from Mary Poppins.
We don't have enough of a labor force because nobody's having kids.
We need to bring in immigration.
I've heard that from so many people.
I've heard that from so-called libertarians who support open borders, the left, corporate leaders, et cetera.
That's just another excuse, which the whole AI revolution was supposed to solve that by just automating everything.
But again, the joke on X now is that AI just stands for Neller Indian.
If you remember those, if you've ever been to one of those Amazon self-checkout things where the cameras supposedly see what you're picking up and they just charge you when you leave.
There's actually Starbucks in Midtown Manhattan that still does that.
But as it turns out, it wasn't AI.
It's a bunch of Indians watching the camera and just pressing buttons.
And there's the video recently of the hotel lobby where instead of having somebody there to greet you in the lobby, it's a video of some Indian dude at home, but he's there video conferencing to sign you into your hotel.
Well, simply because I think there's just part of it is an anti-white mentality.
Part of it is, I think at least in the U.S., there's a lot of people on the right who still have this image of Indians as being hardworking, smart, intelligent immigrants.
It's like they've turned against illegal immigration, but from Central America, Somalis, obviously.
But they still think of Indians as being like, you know, they saw that image from like 20, 30 years ago of like APU and the gas station.
Which is so funny because the left freaked out at that and there was the big cancel culture event where they there was a whole documentary about it, the problem with APU.
The problem with Apu, right?
And so they get rid of Apu and claim that he's a damaging, you know, Indian stereotype.
And as soon as he's out of the way, the reality about India comes rushing in.
And God, we wish they were like Apu.
I mean, again, no, no offense to Indians, but my God, I've seen some documentaries about that place.
And it's just, it's one of these ironies where the left apparently loves India.
Corporations love India.
And like, you're talking about a culture that was burning their wives when their husbands died up until the British came and forced them to stop doing that.
It's like this is not a progressive, like forward-thinking culture that you're bringing in.
A lot of it comes just down to our different perceptions of morality, us versus the third world.
There's the, we generally, you know, Westerners interpret morality through guilt-based, whereas the third world tends to be very shame-based, you know, guilt-based that comes from Christianity.
The idea of behind guilt, they're not the same thing, guilt and shame.
The idea behind guilt is that you know you have done something wrong.
The idea behind shame is that you are wrong.
Shame is more focused on image.
That's where you get to varying degrees.
Like you have face culture in places like China and Japan.
You have honor killings in the Muslim world.
You had blood feuds in Albania.
I lived in Albania for a while.
And in India, it manifests the term that famously goes around is Izat.
Basically, Izat basically reduces life down to a win or a zero-sum game.
If you're not winning, you're losing.
The goal in a culture like that is to screw people over before they screw you over.
And if you're in India, I can't really fault anyone for thinking like that.
If you're in a culture where everyone is scamming everyone else, you have to scam back.
You have to adapt.
The problem is when they come over in massive amounts and apply that thinking to our society.
And I know our regular audience is hearing my internal monologue right now because I just repeat this over and over because I think people don't understand what we're losing fundamentally when we talk about becoming a third world nation or going more towards the third world nation.
It starts a snowball effect that is really impossible to interrupt because people start scamming, other people start scamming.
Suddenly the scam gets so big that if you're not scamming, you're going to lose.
So then you have to scam.
And once that starts, once that feedback loop gets in motion, it's really hard to interrupt.
Yeah, I lived in Mexico for four years, and Mexico is not nearly as bad as India, but you still have a lot of this third world morality culture.
In Mexico, I lived in a very nice neighborhood in Guadalajara, like the equivalent of a nice part of Brooklyn.
I still have bars on the windows of my apartment, even on the back, which is completely sealed off from the outside in case, I guess, ninjas try to do a home invasion.
If you have a utility bill, they don't send it in the mail.
They will send someone physically to post it on your door because so many Mexicans, I guess, if they were sent for the mail, they'd just like, oh, I never got the bill.
When it comes to anything, like, 7-Elevens that are open 24-7 will shut down the, will close the door at 11 p.m. and you have to order for the window.
Stuff like that to get around the fact that it's a high crime society, a low-trust society.
That mentality is coming to America.
I've seen it everywhere.
I mean, you can walk into a Walgreens or wherever and like everything is locked down.
You have to ask a clerk to open it up.
Stuff like that.
One of my friends was talking about how Panera Bread had the Unlimited Sips Club.
And for the longest time, you could just walk in if you were a member, grab a cup and just fill up, operate on the honor system.
But too many people were taking advantage of it for free.
So now you have to ask, ring it up and get it from the clerk.
Yeah, I reported recently on a huge kickback, alleged kickback scheme at Capital One, where a bunch of body shops were deliberately promoting unqualified people and getting kickbacks.
And another thing with the body shops is that it's not, what will happen is big body shops like Cognizance will often push their contracts down to smaller, unknown body shops.
So the actual people who end up at the corporation could be five or six levels removed from the body shop that actually signed the contract with the corporation.
It's just one level of kick, a massive level of kickbacks and fraud.
Yeah, a lot of tech workers will report to me like across every industry when Indians come into their teams.
The Indians oftentimes cannot speak comprehensible English.
I mean, they're unqualified in every other respect, but they can't even communicate.
So that adds so much more lead time to projects as there's just constant communication frustrations.
And a lot of this comes down to labor redundancy, like I was saying earlier with Indians that, you know, the corporations that employ way more Indians, way more Indians than they need.
That's a very third world labor model.
Like I said, I lived in Mexico for a while.
I lived in the Philippines for a while.
In the Philippines, in these places, labor is very inexpensive.
So corporations, businesses will employ way more people than they actually need.
If you go to like a Jollibee or a McDonald's in Manila, you will interact with no fewer than four people.
There's someone in line who takes your order, then you go up and pay for it at the cash register, then someone brings out your order, and then there's one dude who just sits around doing nothing until you stand up, at which point he instantly grabs your trash and throws it in the trash can.
You don't see this in America because, well, number one, labor was traditionally more expensive here because there's fewer people.
But Americans, traditionally, we come up with more efficient ways of doing things through technological progress.
The inventions like, you know, Eli Whitney popularizing the assembly line, the cotton gin, any invention you can think of that makes life easier.
When you have this much cheap labor coming in, there's no motivation to innovate.
I mean, when was the last time a major scientific innovation came out of Mexico or the Philippines or India for that matter?
And of course, it would be one thing if the technology that was being applied actually the benefits went to the customers, but it never does.
It seems like whether the people are being replaced with Indians or computers, it's like, shouldn't the cost of the service go down if you're paying so much less?
And that's part of it and a key part of it.
But really, it's just sort of one aspect of the reason why they're bringing in so many Indians because they can pay them pennies on the dollar, dirt cheap.
And the Indians who have come from a dirty hovel in Mumbai are thrilled with a one-room apartment in the middle of an American city.
Yeah, a lot of body shops will pressure their own, the people they bring in, saying, you have to accept these terrible contracts or we will cancel your visa and you're going home.
That's a big aspect of why a lot of Indians are replacing Americans in these fields.
Indians tend to be more submissive.
It's not just due to the visa issue.
That's a major issue, major problem to be sure.
But also the people they're bringing are very servile to authority.
They're less likely to speak out when they're being mistreated.
They're less likely to speak out when their superior is doing something illegal.
They don't whistleblow.
So the mass entry of Indians basically allows corporations to treat their workers like complete dirt and get away with possibly illegal things that they wouldn't be able to do if they were still employing Americans.
You can say it's the case with everybody because nobody grows up really with the same level of independence that Americans do.
And this idea that you're responsible and that you have to do the right thing even when nobody else does, that's not a cultural imperative in a lot of these other places.
But, you know, just looking at like the rivers where they just have open sewage spilling out at 10 million gallons a day into the river that they get their drinking water from.
And it's like, guys, there's nothing guaranteeing that the rivers in America don't become just like this.
It's only because we choose to preserve our nature that it's preserved.
I mean, this has been an issue with on the border for a while.
Like illegal aliens coming in just trashing the environment.
The Sierra Club used to complain about it, but then they got a huge influx of money from a donor who told them, stop talking about anything related to immigration.
There are people like, you know, I've been in limited contact with people in the government, so have other people in my circle.
We've got politicians who are opening on their side, like Chip Roy, I believe, is one.
Eric Schmidt, the senator from Missouri, is another.
They're trying to shut off the flow of mass immigration.
But there are a lot of things that could be done right now.
I think Trump has to do more, obviously, but he has made some good moves.
The 100,000 fee for H-1Bs, we now have proof that they're deliberately slow-walking new visa applications in India.
They just take forever.
Stuff like that.
That's all good, but we need more stuff.
I would recommend just, you know, the government needs to, since every financial transaction is tracked, I mean, under Biden, we had to start reporting any income over $600 to the IRS.
They had the ability to track the money that's flowing out of here to India.
We've got a remittance tax.
That's a good thing.
They could easily say, just start freezing the bank accounts of anyone who's engaged in all this.
Now, there's a lot of corruption to unwind.
Like I said, it's like a Matroska doll of some of these body shops.
But they're engaged in open disorder.
I've actually had public conversations with Harmee Dylan about this on X. One major pressure point is the Indians discriminating against American citizens.
That's illegal under the Civil Rights Act.
It says you can't discriminate under employment on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin.
I'm forgetting the other one.
But basically, you can't discriminate against someone for being an American citizen.
So a lot of them are getting hit by that.
Actually, a few already have.
Cognizant got in trouble because they were found to be discriminating against American citizens.
And the fines need to be increased.
I believe Cognizant only got fined about $500 million, which is a drop in the bucket given how much money is coming in.
We need to start, you know, the left used to use the term corporate death penalty to basically say any corporation caught engaging in this level of malfeasance should just be shut down by the government.
That needs to happen.
It's not going to be overnight.
But for what people can do, again, pressure your representatives, pressure your politicians, support politicians like Ron DeSantis, who have been very good on this, and just don't shut up about it.
Because if we don't solve this now, it's just going to get worse.
The fraud stuff is going to take a lot longer and a lot more concerted investigation.
I'm doing my part, you know, reporting on it.
But, you know, again, if you know about this, you know, if you're not involved in this world, again, pressure your politicians, you know, support politicians who are taking the right side on this issue.
If you are in the tech industry observing this stuff, reach out to journalists.
You know, reach out to me.
You know, I'm easy to get a hold of.
I report on this stuff extensively.
There's tons of other people doing the same thing.
A lot of the activism on X right now, that's where all this is going on.
And we need people doing that because we don't know.
I mean, I'm not in a big tech company, so I don't know when your whole office gets fired and Indians get brought in and you have to train them for a month and then you're let go.
We don't know that even happened.
So, unless you tell us, unless you reach out and tell us these stories, then we can get it to a wider audience and maybe fix some of this stuff.
Matt Forney is an incredible resource for all this at Matt Forney on X, MattFourney.com.
The government's coughing up billions in settlements, papering over the festering wounds of dispossession in order to slice Canada up into fragmented provinces under a new world order.
unidentified
Another possible outcome of all this land grab activity going on in Canada right now is that if this continues, what's going to happen is Canada is going to break apart in a very short period of time.
We're talking a few short years, maybe.
And Saskatchewan and Alberta are going to separate.
And that will immediately be horrific for our already brutalized economy.
Threats of other occurrences such as the rise in the far right.
unidentified
There will come a day that we will see far more radical extremists and terrorists coming out of Europe because of lack of decision-making, trying to be politically correct.
This is the end of civilization as we know it and a predatory AI globalist robot economy take over.
This is the equivalent of Pearl Harbor when the Japanese struck.
This is the first official launch of the end of the rest of our lives.
Now, remember, I'm the one that laid this out absolutely specifically that Bill Gates is the front man for the large robber baron fortunes headed up by IBM that his mother captained.
His father ran the World Eugenics Society after it was made illegal in Europe and it went underground.
They run the whole thing.
And they believe they are exterminating you to save the earth.
And I'll just say something.
I'm not going to join Bill Gates because it forfeits your soul.
But if you go along with this and if you don't spread the word and if you don't stand up for your children and others, you are deserving of what happens to you.
Because if you're going to let these people kill you and your family, then you deserve what happens to you.
unidentified
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever.
The fight will continue.
Be sure to follow us on X at RioAlexJones and at AJN Live.
And now you can download the number one news app in the world.
Go to alexjonesapp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced.
Second hour is on for this Tuesday evening broadcast.
Hope everybody's doing well.
Well, folks, the global government is meeting as we speak on a secluded mountaintop in Switzerland to decide the fate of the world without our input.
And again, that really does need to be the intro to the World Economic Forum and Davos as a whole, is the understanding that this is and was always meant to be a true global government.
Not one that you get to vote on, not one that's democratic by any means, but it's the managing structure that was designed from the outset to be able to morph into a fully fledged and acknowledged global government.
Right now, it's just the global government sort of de facto.
It's sort of the de facto global government.
Because you understand what's happening right now is that the world leaders, you know, heads of state, heads of corporations that are bigger than states like BlackRock, are getting together in Congress.
You know, Congress just means a gathering to plot out the next year, to decide on programs and agendas that they will all then be dispersed to their various nations to then carry out.
It is a government for all intents and purposes.
It's actually more like the original American government.
Remember, it was never really intended that we would have like professional politicians.
What it's supposed to be is that the leaders of industry and finance and, you know, the most powerful and important people in your community then go to represent your community for a period of time and then they go home again.
That's why Congress is in recess for half the year because originally you're supposed to not do it full time.
So it'd be, okay, we all go to DC, we have a couple weeks of meetings, we decide some stuff, and then we all go back home.
That's what the World Economic Forum is.
It is a global government.
It's unelected, but it's a government.
And they put Larry Fink at the head of it because he's in charge of BlackRock, which is sort of the underlying financial shadow government of America.
And so we got lots of videos from the World Economic Forum that I'd like to lay out for you.
And I'm really glad that I spent an hour yesterday going over the lockstep document and explaining how the world elite see this transformation, see the way that populism is rising around the globe.
They see it as an existential threat, as they should, and they're fortressing themselves.
The world elite, the world controllers, the powers that be, are going into fortress mode as they attempt to weather the populist storm that rages around them.
So I don't even know where to start.
We got so much out of the World Economic Forum.
Trump also giving a speech today with a lot of great points in it, his one-year anniversary of being inaugurated.
So we got a lot of stuff to talk about.
But let's stick with Ursula, I guess.
Our good friend Ursula van der Leyen, who, by the way, is like just the noble of the noble, the nobility of the nobility.
And that's, again, another thing to realize about the World Economic Forum.
It's really not, you know, strictly the best and the brightest.
It's not like all these people are geniuses.
A lot of them are just, you know, the sort of remaining husks of once great noble families that still retain the name and influence in their countries to get appointed to positions that they don't deserve.
Let's go to clip number 12 here.
Ursula at the WEF says, this was the year the dollar, or she talks about the year the dollar was delinked from gold.
This is actually a very important clip, again, in considering what the global government has in store for us in the future.
Digital money seems to be very much on the top of their minds.
And the decision to delink the U.S. dollar from gold.
In an instant, the foundations of the Bretton Woods system and the entire global economic order set up after the war effectively collapsed.
But it also had two major effects.
It inadvertently created the conditions for what would become a truly global order, and it provided a sharp lesson for Europe and on the need to strengthen its economic and political power.
It was a warning to reduce our dependencies, in this case, on a foreign currency.
The world may be very different today, without any question.
But I believe the lesson is very much the same.
That geopolitical shocks can and must serve as an opportunity for Europe.
And in my view, the seismic change we are going through today is an opportunity, in fact, a necessity to build a new form of Euro.
I mean, she's previewing, she's letting everybody know, like, this is what we mean when we say the great reset or, you know, looking into the future, like what the plans are.
Like, they understand that the global system itself is a monetary system, is a banking system.
And it's that system that has to be replaced if they want the order replaced.
They're talking about digital currency.
They're talking about introducing some sort of global digital currency that can be tracked and controlled and is totally divorced from anything real at all.
Do you think these people were mad that the dollar got off of gold?
They're not mad.
No, no, they, they, that's fine with them.
They're saying this is what marks major global transformations our currency, like what currency is based on.
So that's what they're introducing to everybody.
That's what they're preparing everybody for.
This is the Sheikh Al Feni, governor of Qatar's central bank, also talking about the rollout of digital currencies at Davos today.
It's kind of weird how the World Economic Forum and the Davos meeting used to be so into climate change.
Remember how they would talk about nothing but climate change for a long time?
And now this year, it's like not even a concern.
The only reason they're even bringing it up is because they're going to justify billions of more immigrants into Western countries off the basis of climate disasters, climate change-based migration.
But they don't really care about climate change anymore.
Like, it's just so obvious.
It's just so obvious that you're paying attention.
They just want control and they do not care about anything else.
They were pitching climate change because that was an easy excuse to control people.
But then they developed AI and they figured that's a better way to control people, but we need lots of energy to produce it.
So climate change is getting in the way of that.
Climate change goes out the window.
And now they're super dedicated and very, you know, excited about the possibilities of AI saving the world.
You would just think that a global elite conference like this would have like consistent things they're going for year over year.
You wouldn't expect it to change 180 degrees in a single year, but that's essentially what's happened here.
I mean, obviously, he's trying to lay the groundwork, the justification, the initial arguments for an AI God.
I think that's pretty obvious.
What the hell is he talking about?
Things that consist of words are going to be taken over by AI.
And so religions are made of words.
It's kind of a weird synthesis of like this weird techno-babble religion these guys adhere to while still trying to like form it into the mold of Judaism.
It's very strange.
It's like you would think somebody who's Jewish would be like.
You know, the Jews are special because God appeared to like revealed himself to them.
It's not because of the books, not because of the words in the book, and of course in Christianity we believe Jesus is literally the word right, the logos.
It's just.
I mean anybody else feel like we just watched a little mini presentation by Satan?
Anybody else feel like that was Satan trying to convince us to eat an apple or something like that?
It's just.
The whole thing is like this weird pseudo intellectual occultist play acting they're doing and they're all a bunch of little weirdos.
But obviously, putting words in the right order because some algorithmic calculation has determined that's correct does not actually mean you're a thinking being and doesn't actually mean that you have insight into the spiritual depth of the word of God.
But I think to you, vol Noah Harari, the machines are just clever enough that we should treat them like that.
If you're clever enough it's, you might as well treat it like spiritual significance, these absolute weirdos.
Should we stick with Yuval Noah Harari because this dude is just – I mean he's saying all this ridiculous stuff.
But the number one, the overarching theme of the World Economic Forum is a world order in retreat and a defeated army of billionaires trying to reform their ranks before they're scattered completely and run down by the pursuing enemy.
And they keep saying it over and over.
And you've got sort of two different wings of the bird here.
You've got the people like Macron or Carney who are saying the new world order is being destroyed and that's horrible and we need to find a way to replace it.
And you have people like Howard Lutnick who's saying, yeah, your New World Order is destroyed and we destroyed it.
This is as well a shift towards a world without effective collective governance and where multilateralism is weakened by powers that obstruct it or turn away from it.
Did I not tell you yesterday, verbatim, exactly what he just said?
I need to run out and grab the packet again.
I need the strategic development of technology in the future.
I need the lockstep document.
Didn't I tell you this was all pre-planned?
All of this is following a script that was written at least 15 years ago.
Oh, the world order is under threat.
I guess we all have to isolate ourselves and fortress ourselves because the multilateral agreements aren't as strong as they once were.
Just if you were watching yesterday, you must feel like you were watching deja vu if you saw some of these clips this morning.
Let's go back to Emmanuel Macron again, following verbatim, word for word, the instructions handed out by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 about Plan C, the retreat and fortress yourselves strategy of the globalists to weather the popular storm currently engulfing the world.
And I can multiply the examples of international bodies weakened or left by the key economies.
We are killing the structure where we can fix the situation and the common challenges we have.
Without collective governance, cooperation gives way to relentless competition.
Competition from the United States of America through trade agreements that undermine our export interests, demand maximum concessions, and openly aim to weaken and subordinate Europe, combined with an endless accumulation of new tariffs that are fundamentally unacceptable, even more so when they are used as leverage against territorial sovereignty.
So yeah, this has to do with Greenland, I guess, or Venezuela.
The whole thing is just like, what are we even watching?
What even is this?
If I wanted to destroy Europe, you know what I would do?
I'd open its borders.
I'd have an extremely powerful, strong, and dysfunctional welfare system.
I mean, everything these people have done to Europe is why it's being destroyed at this moment.
And like actually destroyed, like literally physically destroyed.
There's the crown, the French crown that was stolen from the Louvre has now been found and pictures of it have been released.
And the thing is crushed.
It's like, you know, looks like it's made of paper and somebody just balled it up.
It's been destroyed.
Like Notre Dame, like that church in Amsterdam from New Year's Eve.
Like every single European city that you can get a video of, you don't see a single European there.
So what the hell are they talking about?
Trump's trying to destroy Europe.
He's like, they want competition.
Yeah, competition's good.
competition is healthy.
It's a lack of competition.
That means that Europe is currently wallowing in its abject failure to maintain its prosperity, let alone grow it.
And that's not an easy thing to do.
You just let people alone.
They're going to build things.
They're going to create things.
They're going to have babies.
They're going to get together and make movies and music and film.
People are just going to do it.
You have to actually intervene to stop that happening.
Like Europe was literally the only like civilized area in the entire world 100 years ago.
And the last hundred years, we have gone from everything to nothing.
Like I always think about it like one of these games like Civilization or Rome Total War, you know, risk, but computer games.
And if you were to go back 100 years, 110 years, right?
Early 1900s, 1910s, it's like if you ever play these games, there's different sort of paths that you can research or like investigate.
And so, you know, maybe if you're a warlike people, you'll put a bunch of points into, you know, battle strategy and the manufacturing of weapons.
And so, you know, you'll have one state that has, you know, 10 ranks on military, but they don't really do agriculture or, you know, science or whatever else.
Well, if you go back to like 1910, Europe is all their, you know, power bars are all the way full on technology, all the way full on religion, all the way full on science, all the like everything.
Like we just, as if we've been playing the game for a hundred years and everybody else just signed on the server and they're all starting basically at zero or one or two.
And no offense, but like early 1900s, there were still places in Africa that were uncontacted, still big swaths of the Amazon that had never been photographed or explored or anything.
In China, their whole entire society was pretty much exactly the same as it was in the 1600s.
You know, Japan had made some deliberate attempt to modernize, but they were still playing catch up very much by the early 1910s.
It was Europe dominating completely.
So if you ever play a game like that, like imagine what it would take to lose that game.
Imagine you start off with all the gold and all the science and all the academics and all the religious institutions, all the societal developments that most people have to grind hours and hours to build up.
You start with that and yet you lose.
How do you lose that?
You lose that by sabotage.
You lose that from forces on the inside, not the outside.
And so for Emmanuel Macron to talk about American competition wanting to take over Greenland or wanting to kickstart the European economy so that they aren't just endlessly dependent on our welfare, telling them to invest their own money into NATO.
These are the things that will actually save Europe.
These are the things that will actually build Europe up.
You need competition.
You have been degrading continuously for a century and a half at this point.
And it's only accelerated over the last two decades where absolutely everything the European leadership has done has seemed perfectly designed to bring about their absolute and irreversible destruction.
That's what I'm saying.
Why it's so like, it's just like, what am I even watching right now?
How is it that these people who spend all of their time and all of their efforts into deliberately destroying Europe?
And you can't argue that it's anything but, I mean, is there anything about Europe that is that has improved in the last 30 years?
Anything?
Literally anything.
Transportation, building, nothing's important.
It's all gotten worse.
All of it has gotten worse to the point now that it's actually not even Europe.
So, for them, for Emmanuel Macron, I mean, this is weird.
I mean, it's really bizarro World Twilight Zone up there on a mountain in Switzerland.
But they're all getting it.
They're all understanding that their house of cards, built out of a bunch of ridiculous lies, can only be maintained with a silent, submissive, and basically crushed populace.
And when people can speak freely, when they can educate themselves and each other about what's actually going on, the world order that they've built entirely out of deception comes crumbling down.
And it's basically like they are trying to ignore that fact.
They're pretending to acknowledge it, just like we showed yesterday, and we'll show again today.
They acknowledge, like, well, there's this lack of trust, but they refuse to, for a single moment, take responsibility for that lack of trust.
They are not changing their behavior.
They have not suddenly learned to embrace nationalism like Emmanuel Macron apparently is trying to make people think that he has.
They've understood that this is a necessary strategic pivot in order to continue their incredibly destructive and for the case of Europe, suicidal agenda.
We're turning to the other side.
We'll show you a lot more videos from what they're saying at the World Economic Forum.
I think we have to analyze issues not just with our brains, but also with our heart, and with an understanding that ultimately we have to serve not ourselves, but society.
unidentified
Come, Liebeschusser, you tried your best.
Yes, you failed to reunite them, but look at it this way: you saved his boys, and that's what counts.
Compromise, my friend, is the essence of diplomacy, and diplomacy is the cornerstone of love.
But they are, I mean, they are changing their attack in ways that I never expected.
I never would have thought that they'd admit the things that they're admitting.
And it's obvious what they're admitting.
They don't need to admit it for me to know it, but they're basically admitting that the fundamental foundational underpinnings of their entire world order are totally fraudulent.
It's crazy.
I'll show you the video here.
Let's go to clip number 58.
This is Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England, who helped spearhead a lot of the COVID-19 lockdowns, current prime minister of Canada, who just yesterday or the day before, we had the video of him talking about teaming up with China to help establish the new world order, as he puts it.
And here he is at Davos admitting that the entire concept of an international rules-based order was always a lie.
We knew the story of the international rules-based order was partially false.
That the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient.
That trade rules were enforced asymmetrically.
And we knew that international law applied with varying rigor depending on the identity of the accused or the victim.
This fiction was useful.
And American hegemony, in particular, helped provide public goods, open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security, and support for frameworks for resolving disputes.
So we placed the sign in the window.
We participated in the rituals.
And we largely avoided calling out the gaps between rhetoric and reality.
This bargain no longer works.
Let me be direct.
We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.
Over the past two decades, a series of crises in finance, health, energy, and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration.
But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons.
Tariffs as leverage.
Financial infrastructure as coercion.
Supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited.
You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration when integration becomes the source of your subordination.
I feel like I can't watch a video now without hearing the, it's not this, it's this.
It's like the only thing AI, I mean, I got videos you all know Herari celebrating the creativity of AI, however his gay little voice sounds.
It's not very creative.
It kind of does the same thing over and over.
And I just heard it there in Mark Carney's speech.
But do you understand what he's saying?
He's saying it was a pleasant fiction, this rules-based international order.
It never existed.
It was a little lie that we were all happy to go along with until it no longer served us.
Why is it no longer serving us?
Because America is no longer choosing to voluntarily subject ourselves to the whims of hostile foreigners.
That's what's happening.
What he's saying is that we never had the ability to force the United States to adhere to our demands, to our play acting, the presumption of them to dictate to the world what is allowed and what isn't.
And America just went along with that for a long time.
And now he's saying America's not going along with that anymore.
The illusion of international law that America's participation helped to uphold is no longer valid because it's obvious to anybody these international so-called rules-based orders are applied with incredible arbitrariness.
It doesn't matter.
These things aren't real.
The international rules-based order, the laws of international cooperation only apply to the enemies of the New World Order.
It was always just the New World Order forcing everybody to play by their rules.
That's all.
And the New World Order doesn't force itself to play by its own rules.
I mean, the most obvious example would be something like Israel, who at this moment is bulldozing the UNRWA United Nations food supply charity for the Gazans.
They're bulldozing it, and Smocherk is out there on the ground, actively helping to destroy it and saying we're going to kill everybody here.
Of course, the ICC has charged and convicted Benjamin Nyahu and several other Israeli leaders of committing genocide.
And like that might be, That kind of was, in a lot of ways, the deathblo to the international order is the understanding that at a time when the international rules-based order had a role to play, had an obligation to step in, they have been utterly incapable of even moderating the behavior of Israel, let alone stopping or punishing it.
Remember, I said this when we got the Gaza ceasefire in the summer, going a lot of people aren't happy with this.
And part of the reason people aren't satisfied with the conclusion of the war, even though a lot of people are happy that Gazans aren't being murdered at a rate that they were the two years prior, because it felt like an inadequacy.
It felt like we've been through this before, and every other time, countries that behave this way were subjected to the Nuremberg trials.
But this time, they're allowed just to sort of say they're stopping, and then they don't even stop.
But, like, okay, so the whole rules-based order has been shown to be a giant fraud, right?
Because if the rules-based order existed for any reason, this would be the reason to literally stop genocide.
They can't, they won't.
Incapable or unwilling.
It kind of doesn't matter.
The point is, the international rules-based order doesn't exist.
Now, if you're Russia, it exists in a very real way because the moment that you violate a single letter of the law, the so-called international order will come down on you like a ton of bricks.
As we've explained over and over and over, they like pitching globalism as the end to war.
The whole argument of the League of Nations and then the United Nations and then globalism as a concept, even the trade agreements and the interconnectivity of economies.
I mean, it was all predicated on the idea that, well, you aren't going to go to war with somebody that you need.
You aren't going to go to war with somebody that supplies your medicine or whatever else.
So, by interconnecting the world and by establishing international bodies that can presume to have authority over countries, then you can avoid war forever.
And in a way, that's true because you need nation states to go to war.
And a nation state going to war with a nation state for a particular period of time until one wins and the other loses and then there's a settlement.
That form of war is going away.
What we have now, what exists at this point, I'm not predicting.
I mean, what is happening at this moment is that you have a new world order system that is simply at war with everybody outside of the system.
And that's the real construct of globalism.
And it's the construct that exists in Brave New World in 1984, 1984 specifically, because they had this, you know, continual warfare, whether it was East Asia or, you know, whatever else.
It didn't matter.
The point was they were always at war.
Well, we're always at war and we're always going to be at war against any faction that is not folded completely into the globalist system.
I don't think we're going to go to war with China anytime soon because they're fully in the system, fully controlled, no problems there.
But look at the Middle East.
I mean, Syria has been in a state of war and continues to be in a state of war like they have been for the last 15, 20 years.
The war between Israel and Palestine, I mean, it has fits and starts and big conflagrations and then it simmers for a while, but it's been going on for 50 years and more, 75 years at this point.
Slow burn sort of war.
That's the actual desired construct of the global order is all of these countries are in blocks with each other, are controlled and managed by this international group.
And any country that doesn't want to go along with it is considered a rogue nation and is slated for total destruction through sanctions and military activity.
Any small group of people that want to break away will be considered traitors and domestic terrorists and whatever else and will be destroyed piecemeal that way.
That is the new world order that they're aiming towards, that they're trying to create and that they're trying to build.
And they're admitting now that because America is going its own way and not adhering to the demands of the international bodies that are incapable of enforcing their dictates, since we're not willingly and voluntarily subjecting ourselves to the demands of people who hate us, they're freaking out because America was supposed to be the engine that built all of this stuff and then was destroyed.
But we have broken free.
We have rebelled at the last moment and are refusing to go along with it.
And that's put them all on the back foot, but they aren't giving up and they're only really doubling down on their intentions while disguising them.
Let's go to clip 30 here at Davos, WEF co-chair and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink openly acknowledges that the global elite have lost public trust.
And, you know, I mean, you know what he means by regain the trust, right?
Silence the people that don't trust us.
They're not trying to do anything to regain trust.
And it's so funny when they're like, yeah, there's some truth to the criticisms.
And it's like, what?
The criticisms that you're a psychopathic cabal of anti-human demons that are, you know, systematically buying up the world so you can eradicate competition?
You're saying there's some truth to that?
What part of that is true?
Because all of it is terrible.
Like, what do you mean?
There's some truth to that.
There's some good reasons why we don't trust you.
So you're kind of admitting to manufacturing the crises that you then take advantage of to enslave us.
I mean, that's the criticism.
That's why we don't trust you because you take the most important and impactful and like world-changing events and you lie about them to us brazenly.
And then you silence people who are telling you the truth.
So are you going to stop doing that?
I mean, the World Economic Forum was on the forefront of the COVID lockdowns, helping to organize and strategize about that.
You deliberately stoked fear of a virus to force people to like die alone in their hospital rooms, hugging their families through plastic sheets.
And you're like, yeah, there's some truth to that.
Yeah, there's some truth to the fact that all that was completely manufactured and we caused just inconceivable mental human suffering and physical death across the world totally based on nothing and because we hate you.
And yeah, there's some truth to that.
Yeah, yeah, we know.
No, we know.
Now, if they wanted to be trusted, they would do things that were trustworthy.
They don't care about being trusted as long as they have the power to do something about it.
And again, it just put this in context with what Mark Carney was just saying.
Like that statement from Mark Carney, I'm just blown away that he would ever make that statement.
It is such an admission of everything that they're lying about and trying to deceive us about.
And admitting basically that, like, while they had us in their thrall, they didn't do enough.
They didn't get us quite locked down enough.
And we broke out.
It really is amazing.
Because basically, what Larry Fink is saying is, like, yeah, when we, you know, before the popular, the rise of populism, people figured out what we were doing, you know, the whole international rules-based order, like the topic of our trust was immaterial because we just had the ability to impose things on people whether they believed us or not.
Now they don't have that ability, just like they used to have a lot of, you know, faith in the international rules-based order, but then countries just figured out we don't have to listen to them.
There's nothing that will be done about it.
And so now they can't play that charade anymore.
They can't, you know, wield that assumed and fabricated power.
Like they're admitting not just that they lost, but that their victory was always hollow and was always an illusion.
And we could have broken out at any time.
It is really something to behold.
Mark Carney go, yeah, the international rules-based order was always kind of a lie.
And now we can't, we, Canada and Europe, are being forced to acknowledge that we are not on the same level as America, that our concerns are not as important as American concerns.
That we can't shove America around when America just says no.
They have no leverage.
They have no ability to make us do anything.
Their entire power structure was built on an illusion, and Donald Trump has shattered that illusion.
I'm very excited to hear what he says to Davos, honestly.
Again, I mean, the whole thing is totally absurd.
Let's go to clip 22 here.
This is Alex Karp from Palantir.
We all know him.
Here's him talking about the way he views the world and his political perspective.
Man, this whole thing is just weird.
It's just bizarre.
I mean, maybe this type of stuff makes sense in the context of a bunch of out-of-touch trillionaires on a mountaintop in Switzerland plotting, plotting and planning and scheming.
But to the rest of us, this is all kind of sounds like nonsense.
I still view myself as a card-carrying progressive, and I think it's the single most important thing a progressive could do is go around and say, yeah, but the revolution that's coming is going to expose the actual market value of what you're doing, whether we want it or not.
Like, it's like, I don't even want to know the market value of some of this stuff, but it is over and over a relative rapid period of time.
So next three years, you're just going to get market value, honesty in all sorts of characters, communities and micro communities.
And the best thing you can do if you are in a community, whether that is a large community like Germany or a large community, larger like America, is, and you really care for the people you're representing, is to say, yeah, but let's we have to kind of look closely at what load we can bear.
Sorry, I'm just trying to figure out what these world controllers are even saying half the time.
What are they even saying?
So he's a card-carrying progressive.
Of course, progressivism is all about the fundamental transformation of societies away from their traditional construct towards a globalized structure based on equality.
And this guy is the guy who is, he's the big American patriot.
He's the big European patriot.
Progressivism is the word that describes anti-European activity.
What is this weirdo talking about?
Let's go to 27, another clip from Larry Fink.
I mean, from Alex Karp talking to Larry Fink, these two deeply unimpressive individuals.
But of course, he also brags about Gotham, the Palantir program, single-handedly stopping the rise of the far right in Europe.
And of course, the far right in Europe is just that portion of the population that doesn't want to be suicidally replaced by a bunch of foreigners.
The far right in Europe are the just native Europeans wanting to continue to exist.
So, yeah, no, things have not gone well for Europe.
You are a very large part of the reason that is.
And everybody else at the World Economic Forum, who, of course, were the engineers behind the immigration system.
We were the people who created the monetary system that requires infinite growth.
And then they're the people that poison the water and the food and the minds of the Europeans so that they aren't having children, so that the birth rate drops so that the pension system that was set up as a Ponzi scheme necessitating infinite growth required more bodies to be brought in.
But they're also the people that set up the welfare system that allows the people that were brought in to not get jobs, live off the state, and make the problem they were supposed to solve infinitely worse.
So what are we talking about here exactly, Alex Carp?
What have you done for the European people ever other than silence, censor, possibly kill them?
Palantir CEO suggests AI bolsters civil liberties, warns Europe falling behind at U.S. and China, says AI trends really do make it hard to imagine why we should have large-scale immigration.
We never should have had large-scale immigration.
Now that AI is here, I guess it's another reason why we don't need it, but we never needed it.
I think what I'm going to do, because I got a lot of, I got a lot more clips from Davos, but these people really are unimpressive.
They really are.
You listen to him talk, and you're like, maybe dumb people think what you just said was smart because you use some big words, but I'm a pretty smart guy.
I can tell exactly what you're saying.
I know the meaning of all the words that you're saying, and I can put them together.
I get it.
And you're not making any sense.
You're just gibbering.
Just a bunch of gibberish coming out.
So I think what I'm going to do is a little compare and contrast.
We've watched a couple of clips of the most slimy, dishonest, unimpressive scumbags the world has ever seen try to seem like they know what's going on or have a political view that's in any way sincere.
And now that we've shown you the utterly unimpressive and insincere scumbags that are ruling over us, I am just going to play Nick Fuentes for the first five minutes of the next hour.
We got a five-minute break at the top of the hour, five-minute segment at the top of the hour.
I think I'm going to let Nick Fuentez and his appearance from Tim Poole's podcast play for five minutes because that really is the thing that I, that's like the big takeaway I always get at Davos.
Is you watch these people and you just go, how did these people get anywhere?
It's got to be corruption.
It's got to be a cabal.
It's got to be fraud being committed because in any real system of meritocracy or even popularity, these people would never make it out of the bottom ranks.
It's all fraud.
It's all scans.
It's all nepotism and who you know and manipulation and the banks putting people who will serve them, not who's best at whatever it is they're being assigned to do.
So we'll show Nick Fuentez on the other side because I think we'd be in a different world if we had like intelligent, thoughtful, sincere people actually running these things rather than this cabal of frauds, miserable perverts.
By the way, can we just appreciate that these people are on their back foot?
Can we appreciate the fact that we went from 10 years ago, these people just going, here's what we're going to do.
Climate change, we're going to starve them all to death.
We're going to lock them all in their houses when we release a virus and these dumbass cattle aren't going to know what hit them.
But enough people tuned into InfoWars, enough people watched the reports and saw the truth for their own eyes and started listening and paying attention to who these people are and what they were doing.
Then now they're on the back foot.
Now they're trying to justify their existence and trying to scramble to create, you know, little agreements between countries to replace the international world order that has crumbled at our feet.
These activists have been disrupting law enforcement for a decade plus, and the repercussions are always slap on the wrist, minor charges, rubber bullets.
ICE is at enforcing real law.
They're not doing crowd control, so they're armed with lethal munitions.
And these activists, because they've never felt consequences, quote, why did you have real bullets?
You know, I don't think we should send in the troops.
I'll tell you why.
I think that the goal of this Sololinsky's rule for radicals, the left, the communist momentum wants the government to establish a fascist crackdown so they can say, see, we told you they're fascist, and then rally a communistic communal revolution against the government.
Well, Nick, I was going to say, just as far too as like antagonizing the left, I mean, don't you think they would sort of escalate this way anyway, even with or without Trump in office?
Because I look at the Trump administration.
I'm like, look, whatever concerns anyone may have, it's at least buying us time.
It's giving us breathing room.
And for me, that means it's worthwhile to throw a support behind.
I mean, like negative migration is like huge, I would say, going forward.
And I think that, you know, there's arguments that like, well, when a Republican's in charge, it buys us time to organize and do things like that.
But it's like Elon bought Twitter when Biden was in charge.
Censorship got relaxed when Biden was in charge.
I feel like the right was never more powerful than a year ago or two years ago in 2024.
That's when we were in our like apogee.
And when Trump gets in power, it's the opposite.
Like all the censorship happened in Trump's first term.
Charlottesville happened in his first term.
BLM happened in his first term.
The VATS was created in his first term.
And, you know, you're right.
The left probably would have gotten charged up anyway.
I think, though, that let's say Trump lost the election in 24, Kamala gets in.
I don't think they have as much momentum because the difference is if it's like a continuation of the Democrats, there's still this like right-wing anger saying this is an illegitimate government.
Kamala never won a primary.
If she brings us to war, doubly so, no one believes the election's legit.
But Trump wins.
And now the right wing is complacent because the right wing says, we won.
Let's go home.
You know, you think people are doing something with the breathing room.
They're not.
The left is breathing.
The left is getting excited.
And I would have supported Trump if I had confidence that he would use what he gets to actually blow up some of these things.
Really was probably one of the best appearances Nick's ever done, I have to say.
It was very good.
And I agree completely.
Couldn't agree more.
You know, it was interesting.
I was just watching that segment of Nick Fuentez on Tim Pool.
And of course, I agree with everything they're saying, but I'm going through the stack of news while it's happening.
It's just like a confirmation of everything that's being said from the Federalists.
Trump's do-nothing Minnesota response is an embarrassment.
While Trump overzealously obsesses about acquiring Greenland and other foreign policy ventures, AI, and swapping Rhino Senator Bill Cassidy with a Rhino House member, a major American state is continuing its rapid descent into third world despotism.
By now, most Americans have seen the viral incident of the anti-ICE agitators, which included media hack Don Lemon, storming a church in St. Paul, Minnesota over the weekend in an apparent violation of federal law.
While Lemon harassed the church's pastor about why he wasn't okay with demented leftists infringing on his congregation's worship service, the group's other members screeched in the faces of attending families.
The anarchists reportedly believed one of the church's pastor was a member of ICE.
Members of the Trump administration quickly took to social media to pledge accountability for the incident.
Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed that the Justice Department will prosecute federal crimes and ensure the rule of law prevails, while the White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said that President Trump will not tolerate the intimidation and harassment of Christians in their sacred places of worship.
But that was a lie.
But that was a lie.
They're being tolerated.
It is being tolerated as we speak.
Nothing is being done.
Except the president has already tolerated this type of leftist-led intimidation and harassment throughout Minnesota for weeks.
The primary reason those left-wing anarchists felt comfortable enough storming the church is because Trump and his administration have given them zero reason to feel any, to fear any real accountability for their actions.
Left-wing violence and harassment against ICE agents and everyday residents has been occurring in Minneapolis and across the state for weeks.
And it goes on and on.
And Trump is doing nothing about it.
Trump's pathetic and weak response is already an embarrassment.
But should he continues, this impotent strategy, the anarchy currently unfolding is bound to get much, much worse.
Continued abdication, abdication of proper law enforcement will further embolden leftist agitators to take more egregious and increasingly violent actions against ICE and non-leftists in Minnesota.
And once their allies operating in other cities and states see there's no real consequence from the Trump administration for this apparent lawbreaking, the violence will, in all likelihood, spread like wildfire across the country, culminating in a quote-unquote summer of love 2.0.
And it'll probably be worse.
It'll probably be worse than this so-called summer of love.
I mean, it's already seemingly worse, and we're sort of just at the tip of it, tip of the iceberg here.
And I got to admit, I'm seeing nothing that hints that Trump, like at this point, it's just one of those things.
At this point, the fact that Trump hasn't done anything means he's not going to do anything.
If already the conditions haven't been met, if we haven't qualified for the insurrection act, like when is that ever going to happen?
I don't think it's ever going to happen.
And I think it's less likely the closer we get to the midterms.
But I don't even think this is their real plan.
In fact, we know what their real plan is.
And it's, again, one of these things where I can't help but look forward and just, you know, I'd love to be wrong, but without any intervening action from the Trump administration, it's pretty obvious what the pattern of behavior is going to be here.
And like going back, do you think Trump regrets not doing something in 2020 to stop what was going on, if for no other reason than to stop the mail-in ballot scam from going forward?
I mean, that alone would have been reason enough in 2020 to impose martial law on certain locations.
Going, no, they're using this excuse of a virus, this emergency, to unconstitutionally alter the voting system in a way that makes it impossible to ever tell if we've elected the right person.
We can't allow this to happen.
But he didn't do any of that.
He didn't intervene.
He didn't stop the riots.
He didn't crack down.
He lost the election.
They spent the next four years trying to throw him in jail or shoot him in the head.
And then they had the J6 fabricated event, the false flag, in which they sent thousands of Trump supporters, many of whom totally innocent, most of whom didn't even really break a law, let alone a violent action.
But they all were imprisoned, some cases, solitary confinement for two years, totally torturing the American people.
And we've gotten absolutely no relief for any of that.
And so, like, in a way, it's almost like, I hope I'm wrong.
I hope Trump does do something.
I hope things go a different way.
I don't think I am.
And I think, kind of like with the QAnon stuff, it's like we almost have to act as if we know the conclusion and that it's the worst conclusion possible.
In other words, there's no benefit in acting as if everything's in control and Trump is going to crack down and we're all going to be fine.
Because if that doesn't happen, you're totally unprepared.
If it does happen, great.
But if it doesn't, which almost certainly won't, then you're just wasting your time and you're going to be flat-footed when the hammer comes down.
Or we can just go, look, Trump is not who he thought he was or he's not doing what he should be doing.
He's not going to crack down on these people.
They're only going to increase their violence.
They're only going to increase their radicalism.
They're going to elect radicals.
Those radicals are going to get into office and they do not give a damn about the Constitution.
They do not give a damn about morality or America.
I mean, genuinely, these people are awful.
And we have an example of this with Virginia, some of the new laws they immediately pass.
I mean, within 48 hours of getting power in Virginia, they're passing laws to legalize discriminating against white people, to let rapists out without bail.
I mean, deliberately making everything less safe, everything worse.
And by the way, they made it like illegal to check ID at the polling place.
So I doubt Virginia is going to flip back red anytime soon.
They've basically made their party permanent in Virginia, barring some major revolutionary event.
And they did it, by the way, with the new governor, who is a literal product of the CIA.
She is a former CIA agent.
So they elect a CIA agent who immediately makes crime legal, makes it legal to discriminate against white people and makes it illegal to have secure elections.
Now, imagine that, only on the national level, when they get rid of the filibuster, shove everything through.
And we've already seen the way that their judge networks are completely corrupt, have absolutely no sense of even pretending that they're acting in good faith and, you know, unbiased in an unbiased way.
They're just leftist activists in judge rubs.
So it's not like the judges are going to stop and intervene and say, wait, this is a violation of their basic human rights.
They don't give a damn either.
And when you think back to 2020, 2021, and you realize like they not only threw people in prison for peacefully protesting in torturous conditions many times, and these people have never, again, nothing's ever been done to them.
I mean, the people that did this are still being given high-profile cases in the Trump administration.
Valentine, this woman, Valentine, whatever her name is, was the one who pressured people to try to claim that Trump was encouraging them to go riot in the Capitol.
She is still in charge.
It's just like it really sucks, but I'm not like a fear monger.
I don't want you to be scared.
I'm not trying to say that everything is destroyed and be blackpilled, but it's reality.
And I'm not so delusional to think that America is immune to this sort of stuff.
When you study history, the one thing you learn is that nothing is permanent.
What's the line from the Godfather?
If there's one thing you learn from history, it's that anybody can be killed.
Well, the one other thing you learn from history is that any system can collapse.
Any country can devolve into not just things don't work that well, but reign of terror, blood in the streets, running for your life, wondering where your family is.
Like things can get insane very, very quickly, especially if the left tries to get rid of the First Amendment and starts arresting people for speech.
Like that's the point it's going to have to kick off.
And it's going to get really messy.
And I just hope enough Americans still retain that spark of the rebel, read enough Soljanitson to know that your love of liberty and willingness to fight and die for it may be the deciding factor in the very near future because we know what their plan is.
Their plan is to take over unions, take over industries, consolidate their networks for the next two years so they can launch the May Day 2028 mass strike across the whole country where they're going to shut down the economy and make demands that we basically become a communist state.
It is literally a second Bolshevik revolution, not in a way that is hyperbolic and, oh my God, you know, Obamacare, next thing we're going to be in the gulags.
No, it is a, it is, we are literally following step by step all of the prerequisites that are necessary before a genuine, full-fledged revolution.
Like, I really want people to take this seriously.
I don't think people are.
I'll post stuff about this and you still get that old played out comment: well, at least we'll get to be friends in the gulag.
I'm like, yeah, that's not funny.
No, they're really going to throw us in a gulag.
I mean, maybe I have a different perspective on this because I'm like friends with people like Stuart Rhodes.
If you're friends with somebody, like they're going to send armed men to your house to haul you away, throw you in a concrete box, rig a show trial against you, and then you're going to be trapped in a cell for the next 20 years of your life if you're lucky.
Most people in these revolutions just get murdered.
So it's like, what is plan B for us?
Because plan A is Trump and it ain't happening.
And if it does happen, great.
But for the sake of literally me getting to see the age of 40, like, yeah, I'm going to have to start sort of acting as if I know that by 2028, America will be in a full-fledged state of communist revolt and that I'm probably going to have to have a group of people hold up somewhere defending our lives.
And if you think I'm wrong, I just crack a history book.
I mean, I don't know what else to tell you.
These things are not unavoidable.
We could easily, easily defeat all of this.
I'm talking about an event that is scheduled for two years from now.
At any point in the next two years, we could intervene.
We could arrest the people doing it easily.
No problem at all.
If I were you, I would bookmark this episode and I'd come back to this two years from now and you tell me if anybody has done anything.
This is why I said on X yesterday: in 2020, Trump did nothing to stop BLM.
They rioted, they burned cities, attacked cops, murdered people, destroyed priceless works of art.
It created a lawless, autonomous zone where a child was murdered and nothing happened to any of them.
Then they stopped hiring white men, defunded the police, eliminated bail, elected radicals, rewrote school curriculum, and funneled billions of dollars to their NGO networks.
Those few rioters who actually were arrested never got charged, of course, but have now been given gigantic payouts from the cities, New York, Philadelphia, Seattle.
They have all paid tens of millions of dollars into the hands of the rioters that burned their cities down in 2020.
Then MAGA protested the stolen election, so they arrested thousands of regular people and threw the most prominent activists in prison for 20 years for terrorism, even if they never planned anything and were in a totally different state when the actual riot happened.
So my question is: what if that happens again?
In other words, what if these protests continue to grow?
What if they continue to get more violent?
What if judges continue to block federal deployment of troops and Trump adheres to their demands for some inexplicable reason?
What if they're able to, you know, weather this storm and a year from now, Tim Waltz and Keith Ellison and Jacob Fry are not only still in their positions, maybe they've gotten some sort of promotion.
Maybe Ellison is the governor at that point and Tim Waltz is running for president or something.
I mean, it's not hard to see how, absent any intervention from Trump, there is absolutely no barrier to this snowball that has already been rolling down the hill of communist revolution getting bigger and bigger and bigger to the point where two years from now, we will be in a state of Russia in 1917.
Or we could choose to stop it at any point.
Literally any point, but we're not going to.
So there you go.
Again, it's a bummer, but Trump really wants Greenland, so that's what he's focusing on.
I mean, we've got an insurrection.
You know, there's this gigantic scam network across the whole country stealing literally tens of billions of dollars with cooperation with the very local authorities that are encouraging their constituency to rise up against ICE and commit violence against them.
So, I mean, what are we doing exactly?
I mean, I would never be stupid enough to say that like Kamala Harris would be better than Trump by any means.
But part of me at this point is kind of like, man, what if they succeeded in arresting Trump?
What if he was in jail and like JD Vance had to run instead?
Or what if we, you know, I don't, obviously Trump is better than the Democrats, but not by much.
I mean, I don't know.
Seems like maybe somebody else could have done a better job.
I don't know.
I mean, it's a bummer.
Again, we're one year into Trump's second administration.
And he pardoned the January Sixers.
That was good.
He closed the border.
Excellent work.
And the vaccine stuff's been good, RFK.
What else, though?
What else have we gotten so far?
Nothing as far as I can tell.
I mean, the things that we have gotten, I don't want.
Don't actually matter.
Wow, we just stole the president of Venezuela.
Whoopty freaking do.
Prices are still incredibly high.
People are still not hiring white people.
Our birth rate is still in the toilet.
We're still being flooded by H-1B visas.
What have we gotten?
What have we benefited from Trump's administration so far?
Even the deportations are lower than they were under Barack Obama, except the way that we're going about them is inspiring the outrage and the leftist communist agitation.
That's seating the groundwork for the full-fledged revolution.
So, yeah, I mean, it's inexplicable on the face of it.
But it's also almost inconceivable.
It's like this was kind of our last chance.
And the guy said he was going to do all the things we wanted him to do, and now he's just not.
And so, in a way, there's like personal betrayal.
This is like betrayal on a planetary level.
And it's like affecting the entire course of human history for the next 10,000 years or however long we're around.
So, you know, it's like kind of a gigantic, unimaginably big deal that nothing is being done about this.
And at a certain point, it's on us for falling for it and believing in it and adhering to the learned helplessness that we've been indoctrinated into, where we just keep begging the Trump administration to do something, anything, and they keep not doing anything.
And then that's just the cycle that we're in.
And we just repeat that over and over.
Eventually, we've got to break out of that cycle and we just got to go, okay, well, we're doing it ourselves then.
Let the chips fall where they may.
There's only one thing that's worse than war, and it's being conquered without fighting.
And that's what's happening right now.
So I hope you get Greenland, Trump.
That'll make everything better, right?
Gosh, if only we had Greenland.
I'm pretty sure the reason we want Greenland is because we're going to start World War III directly with Russia, and we want to be able to defend ourselves from Greenland if they start launching missiles.
So like they really, really want to kick off World War III directly with Russia.
We know it's what Europe's doing.
We know the American deep state is fully invested in that.
But maybe they feel like they can't do it until they get Greenland because there's got to be something that explains the incredible and random and seemingly arbitrary demands about Greenland that kind of came out of nowhere and are now dominating the American presidency while we face a complete insurrection at home and a communist revolution within two years.
We'll get back to that on the other side.
And I honestly don't even know what to do at this point because stories like this, remember Wars.
California Governor Newsom sides with Europe over America, urges EU citizens to, quote, stand tall against Trump and calls world leaders pathetic for rolling over to the president of the United States.
It's like when we live in a world where Americans will vote for a guy who like genuinely like hates America and is like siding with our opponents.
I don't know how to deal with a world where people just let this happen and don't care and are on his side.
You're American, dumbass.
You're fighting against America.
Our system is supposed to not allow that to happen because the people are supposed to care, but they don't.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Final segment of the war room.
I got a lot of videos to show you.
I think we'll start with.
Let's start with clip one here.
The theme tying all these together will be a couple things.
One, that you cannot look at the actions of the New World Order, however you want to define that, the actions of the WEF and the UN and the governments of Europe and America.
You cannot look at their behavior over the last two decades and not see that they are being deliberately destroyed by their own leadership.
That is obvious.
There's no other explanation because the decisions they're making, it's not like they seemed good at the time and turned out to be wrong.
They were always and inevitably going to have the outcomes that they've had, which have been universally negative for the people of Europe and America.
That's one thing, is that there's no debate.
You can come up with your justifications for it, your explanations for it.
You cannot deny the fact that the European and American leadership has done everything it can for the last two decades to destroy Europe and America.
It's not an accident.
The other thing is the unrelenting inability of the liberals to recognize this fact and to put these two things together and to have just even the bare minimum self-preservation instinct to recognize when they're under attack.
It really is pathetic.
So let's start with clip number one here.
The Democrat Open Border Plan to enrich a single party, to establish and entrench single party rule explained in under two minutes.
Let's watch.
unidentified
The Democrat Open Borders plan to entrench single party rule, explained in under two minutes.
One, flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world.
Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual U.S. states so far.
Two, prioritize the needs of these millions of non-citizens over the needs of the American citizen with free flights, buses, hotels, meals, and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them.
Three, keep them in the country at all costs, even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape.
Attack the language used to describe the criminals as opposed to the criminals themselves.
Slander critics as racist.
Four, ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets.
Codify permanent status and ensure non-cooperation with ICE.
Five, count the non-citizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the House of Representatives.
As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts, a tremendous amount of electoral power.
Six, wage a massive, heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail-in ballots.
No signature verification and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud.
Seven, lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat Party.
Eight, win elections.
Nine, entrenched single-party rule has been achieved.
From At Western Linzman, really an incredible production.
And of course, the really interesting thing about it, you should really think about this, is that you can replace the word America with Europe, and it perfectly applies.
Isn't that interesting?
Why is it?
That both America and Europe, despite being entirely different continents with entirely different political setups, with entirely different characters, entirely different population pressures, America's got an ocean separating it from the Middle East.
And yet, both of these two political bodies, Europe and America, followed exactly the same playbook point by point to flood their countries with foreigners and then entrench the foreigners as a permanent bloc in opposition to the native class.
Is that even possible To have happened without collaboration, coordination, orchestration, and conspiracy?
Absolutely not.
It would be crazy enough for one group to be doing this because it's suicidal on the face of it, because it's obviously so horrifically damaging to the fabric of your entire society and your ability to exist into the future.
It is retarded to do any of this.
So just one place doing this would be absurd, but it's happening in every single European diaspora country from Australia to Ireland to America, whether they were colonizers or not, whether they were on which side of World War II, like nothing matters except that every single white country in the entire world at the exact same time engaged in this utterly suicidal behavior for no discernible reason.
Really interesting how coordinated all of this was and how identical these two programs have been run in America and Europe, just with different sort of language and justifications for why they had to destroy your countries, why you had no choice, why it was very mean to not destroy your country for the sake of millions of hostile foreigners that you created as refugees by bombing their home countries.
It really is just, it's probably the greatest crime that's ever been committed.
I don't have words to describe what it is we're living through at this moment.
It's probably the greatest crime in the history of human beings.
Can't think of much that has destroyed more in a more permanent and irreversible way that has caused more strife and pain and suffering.
I mean, this has been the murder of a continent, the slow, torturous murder of a continent that is being prevented from fighting back by its own leadership.
And this is true for all European countries, but I would point something like Ireland as maybe the most egregious and horrifying example of this place that was always a subject of imperial power, was always kept under the boot of the UK.
They didn't colonize anybody.
They weren't out there imposing their will on an unwilling populace ever.
They were the ones being imposed upon.
They're the ones that were treated like dirt by the rest of Europe.
And even when they came over to America, and despite never doing anything to anyone, Ireland has been betrayed and murdered by its own people.
And it is hard to fathom that level of destruction being wrought on purpose by design and with evil intentions.
Let's go to clip number 56 here because this relates to at least one of the points in that multi-step process to destroy America.
The fact about counting the census, counting illegal aliens in the census, and the unwillingness or incapacity for liberals to even comprehend what's being said because, well, maintaining their ideology and their positions depends on them being willfully ignorant, pretending to be stupid because reality is against them.
My family, I was born in New York, like in 1979, and we went back to Iran and the revolution started, and they wouldn't let Jews leave.
My father was threatened with his life.
He said he was going on a medical conference, flew to Vienna, left the passports of me, my sister, and my mother in the government's hands so that they knew we weren't escaping.
Because when the Biden administration let all these people in without checking who they are, they let in a Hamas terrorist who participated in October 7th.
Tens of thousands of terrorists and tens of thousands of Chinese nationals and tens of thousands of Venezuelan gang members.
I mean, what is the justification for this?
How do you even like steelman the argument from the other side?
I don't know.
I mean, it's just another one of these things where there, as far as I can tell, there's no valid argument for why you would count illegal aliens in a census.
It just makes absolutely no goddamn sense.
And we just never get to debate it.
So it just happens.
It's just insane.
It just is actually insane.
Why do illegal immigrants count on the census?
Why do they get welfare?
Why any of this stuff?
It is crazy the liberals never ask themselves questions.
They never concern themselves with what ulterior motives might possibly be hiding behind the just, I don't know, pablum that they're given, the just boilerplate.
We're fighting for all humans, okay?
And like, that's enough.
They just, as long as you say something like that as a leftist, you can just be like, and anyway, here's my new bill to poison elementary school food.
And they're just like, cool, great.
Fine.
It just, you know, I don't know.
What else could you do that just has no explanation how it would benefit anybody ever except for bad people?
Like, they just do it and then cause racists for opposing it.
It's really strange.
Residing in Louisiana, accused of ties to Hamas-led October 7th attack.
But I don't, I mean, it's like the least of my worries.
I'm honestly more concerned about the, you know, Israeli snipers that are walking around us, having just got off a mission where they killed children for fun.
That's not the concern.
The concern is, why are we counting them in the census?
Why is our government dominated by Democrats when the actual people that live in this country don't vote for them?
Why is our system built to allow foreigners to not just have a say, but in many cases, have a say over and above actual citizens?
God only knows how many places in the country where the American people who lived and born, whose family built the place, it would be Republican except it's Democrat because a bunch of foreigners come in and cheat in the elections.
It really just happens over and over.
Let's go to clip number 47 here.
This is Greg Gutfeld last night delivering a very powerful monologue about the state of Minnesota.
Yes, yes, because that is actually not the story here.
The story is, yes, the story is how you got here.
And you won't admit that that is the reason why we're faithful.
This isn't about immigration.
It isn't about ICE.
It isn't about Trump.
It is about suicidal empathy that is driven by a rescue fantasy.
You have all of these young middle-aged women going out there because they have some kind of emptiness in their lives that are going out there in this kind of rescue delusion, helping people they don't know, strangers who are guilty of crimes.
How can you defend that?
This is not protesters going to a church.
That is a mob.
The people that invented the phrase safe spaces are breaking it up, frightening kids, right?
These are the people that call us fascists and they're hunting people.
These are the people that claim to defend women and yet are defending men who abuse women.
These are the people that call us homophobic and yet they want to out ICE guys for using, I don't know, gay sex apps.
Let's be honest here.
Fry's a pussy.
He's scared of these people or else he would stand up for it, calling it love.
There's no such thing as a mob with love.
And imagine showing this tape to Don Lemon 10 years ago, 15 years ago, and saying, is this where you saw yourself, Lemon?
Crashing a church service, scaring kids, attacking a pastor?
Was this your hope and dream to do this?
Radicalization is gradual.
Black Lives Matter is now bad guys matter.
And now you'll defend anything.
You're defending rapists.
These are the people you're defending.
And I'm going to go back.
No, no, no, no, you had your chance.
You brought this up.
Where are the police?
You know, when you have Hamas supporters and Jewish students, police make the separation.
Antifa, proud boys, police make the separation.
Pro-life and feminists, police make the separation.
Somehow, that separation is not even here, even when the leaders are framing this as protesters versus persecutors, because that's part of this fantasy world that you live in.
And yet they decide that they don't need cops to separate it.
The ICE agents aren't supposed to deal with that.
That's what the police do.
So you got to ask yourself, why aren't the police there?
Because it's a deliberate thing to create this spectacle.
And then I'll finish.
This is not an isolated thing.
These rescue fantasies exist because the real power of women, which is in the roles of community, whether it's wife, mother, work, teaching, that stuff has been marginalized by our modern leftist culture that has to be replaced by activism.
Your life is meaningless unless you're out there screaming at a cop's face.
You have all these sad people out there in this liberation role playing and you're egging it on.
You should not be egging this on, Jessica.
You know, we had this, this is a time for brave women.
We saw the rise of the internet dad, whether it was Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, Mike Rowe, Scott Adams.
These are Joe Rogan.
These are people that decided to help young men find meaning in life, whether it is through service or hard work, constructive activities.
Where is the internet mom?
The women who step up and show younger women out of this spiritual dead end, because it is a spiritual dead end, and how apt it is that they end up in a church screaming at people.
You know, this activism doesn't produce anything but suffering because it replaces what is truly meaningful in people's lives.
And that's what I meant about the backdrop.
It is not about good.
It is not about the police officer.
It's about how we got here and why we've talked about this over and over again.
Whether it was George Floyd, whether it was ICE, whether it was the border guard with the whip.
It's all the same.
It's a desire to be part of this rescue fantasy because your life's so freaking empty.
Now, I got to say, you know, typically I don't like when people try to like psychiatriz, you know, apply psychiatry or like therapy language to what's motivating people because I think a lot of times people are motivated by what they say they're motivated by.
And honestly, I'm usually annoyed because it's usually focused on right-wingers, where it's like people are, you know, would get up and just be like, I don't want my child to be a minority in their own homelands.
People are like, this is really about the, let's psychoanalyze exactly why somebody would say this.
And it's like, maybe because they're just telling the truth.
But in this case, in this case, I think he's exactly right.
I think it's undeniable he's exactly right.
I think if you find honest women at these protests, I've seen videos.
They'll acknowledge that he's exactly right.
And in a way, it's sort of undeniable, right?
Ask these people, like, what is it that inspires you to come out here?
And it's like, well, I just have this desire to defend people and I'm going to be a hero.
And I mean, it's, you know, works for some of them.
I mean, they feel like they're heroes.
It's just that there's no risk to it.
And what they're doing isn't actually heroic.
Like we've got this one.
This video went viral of a woman, liberal white woman in Minneapolis, crying hysterically because ICE exists.
And she's just like bawling and just like, wow!
And just like crying so hard.
ICE was there because they're arresting two men.
Kong Meng Veng wanted for sexual assault, gang activity, and assault.
And Lu Mao wanted for sexual assault of a minor, rape, kidnapping, and domestic violence.
You get this is incompatible, right?
This doesn't make any sense.
In reality, what's happening here is completely nonsensical.
In the imaginary world of make-believe that the leftists inhabit, this woman is heartbroken by the inhumanity of ICE just hauling people away from their family.
It doesn't exist, right?
She's crying.
She thinks Bigfoot got shot.
It doesn't exist, lady.
So in reality, this woman is bawling, weeping, shuddering in emotion because two fat Asian pedophiles are getting arrested.
Like, imagine like opening up a newspaper and being like, huh, some gang member named Vang and some child kidnapping rapist named Mao just got arrested.
The war between Russia and Ukraine was a war between the U.S. financial industrial complex and Europe.
And Europe is already subordinate to the same financial industrial complex.
It was an asset-stripping operation.
It was to asset strip the manufacturing base of Germany.
It was to make unaffordable energy to Germany.
It was to weaken the economy.
They simultaneously used ESG and renewable energy and climate change to switch off all their nuclear energy.
They blew up Nord Stream pipeline so that they couldn't get the energy that Europe needs and Germany needs to maintain its manufacturing base.
And then they bankrupted it with QE debt and COVID and investing in brand new renewable energy where that investment was never going to succeed because only China could do it.
And so once you break Germany and the manufacturing base, you break Europe.
You do Brexit, you separate out UK, you strategically destroy every aspect of Europe, and then you use covert operations.
So in 2014, they did a regime change in Ukraine.
They ended up with Zelensky.
Zelensky works for the military industrial complex.
He's literally an actor.
Yep.
You get the, you install Starma, you install Mertz, you install Macron, you install, you know, you, you give different flavors.
You do the right-wing ones, you do the left-wing ones.
And their job is to create a narrative around how we're defending democracy.
And that you, while everyone's addicted to drugs, homeless, going through a cost of living crisis, choosing between eating and heating, you're still okay sending $3 billion over to Ukraine that can spent back up into the U.S. stock market to prop up the dollar, or you can spend it into the German military industrial complex, but all of it is being spent into the military-industrial complex.
There ain't nobody trying to stop a war right now.
Russia will own Ukraine and the financial industrial complex will own the rest of it.
Couldn't if you think all of this is an accident, if you think all this is a coincidence, if you think all of these policies that have directly and irrefutably contributed to the total collapse of Europe are all just accidents, then you're a fool.
I'm sorry to let you know.
But I doubt you believe that because you're watching us on Infowars.
Let me introduce you to Ultimate Life Force from theAlexJonesStore.com.
We call this a triple action spike protein detox and it was developed in order to combat the spike protein toxins from the COVID-19 jabs.
But you don't have to have taken a jab to be susceptible to this, especially with the offloading that happens with these spike proteins.
But whether or not you're concerned about spike protein toxification, you're going to want this Ultimate Life Force, a precision detox formula trusted by InfoWarriors the world over.
Every four capsule serving of this stuff floods your body with 400 milligrams of pharmaceutical grade NAC to skyrocket glutathione, your body's master antioxidant.
It also has 100 micrograms of selenium in its most bioavailable form, supercharging detoxification at the cellular level.
It also has 4,000 fibronolytic units of natokinase and 80,000 units of serapeptase, two powerhouse enzymes clinically shown to break down unwanted fibrin and protein buildup that can linger for years.
500 milligrams of bromelain plus concentrated turmeric with bioperin for rapid systemic anti-inflammatory relief you feel in days, not weeks.
This isn't just another supplement.
It's the exact protocol leading health pioneers recommend for long-hauler recovery, post-viral clarity, and reclaiming true vitality.
Users report sharper thinking, deeper sleep, lighter breathing, and energy that keeps climbing week after week.
One capsule bottle, 30 days, one decision that can change everything.
It's Ultimate Life Force.
Clear the past, own your future, order now from thealexjonesstore.com.
unidentified
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever.
The fight will continue.
Be sure to follow us on X at RealAlexJones and at AJN Live.
And now you can download the number one news app in the world.