The Livestream examines recent Republican electoral losses, attributing them to demographic shifts and identity politics while proposing radical voting restrictions like IQ tests and English-only ballots. The host frames the crisis as a civilizational battle between Christianity and globalism, criticizing the Democratic Party's rise of figures like Zohran Mamdani and predicting a future humanization of Hitler. Discussions cover Freemasonry, MKUltra experiments, and the necessity of biblical authority over "Christless conservatism," concluding that countering societal decay requires spiritual warfare and rejecting pacification through entertainment to preserve heritage American dominance. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Crushing Political Opponents00:14:46
Leave us a five star review on your favorite podcast platform.
I get it.
It's annoying.
Everybody asks, but I'm going to tell you why.
When you give us a positive review, what that does is it triggers the algorithm so that our podcast shows up on more people's news feeds.
You and I both know that this ministry is willing to talk about things that most ministries aren't.
We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears.
All right.
We have a Muslim socialist who has just been elected mayor of the largest city here in the United States of America, New York City.
And we need to talk about that.
We need to talk about how that happened.
The simple answer is women and foreigners.
Women and foreigners.
Demographics is destiny.
Absolutely.
All politics is identity politics.
I don't care what James Lindsay or anybody else, any neocon, Israel first, mega person tells you.
Identity politics is politics.
That's the way that it works.
And sadly, there's really only three primary groups that have been trained and utterly persuaded, convinced to never think of themselves as their own in group as an identity.
That would be conservatives, that would be Christians, and that would be white people.
So everybody else in the world thinks in these terms.
Every minority ethnic group, every other religion, Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Every other ethnic group, religious group, or political party or affiliation thinks in terms of it's us versus them.
This is our group.
We are our own in group.
We are an identity.
But Christians don't think this way, sadly, at least not modern Christians.
Conservatives do not think this way.
And white people, those of European descent, do not think this way.
And so there's no sense of really banding together to save.
Our inheritance, to save our country, to preserve what has been passed down to us so that we can then give it to our children's children.
And until that changes, we will be slaughtered.
There's another factor here with the midterm elections.
It was a blue wave with these recent elections that happened yesterday.
And I think part of it, Nick Fuentes on Tucker Carlson, he said this, and he's right.
He said that when it comes to beating the left and the neocons, they would be liberals.
Just the same.
It's a sliding scale, but you have left liberals and right liberals, right?
That's Democrats and the GOP, right?
And then there's the right wing that just wants to reject liberalism altogether, okay?
But beating neocons and progressives, all that being liberals, the only way you do it is you actually have to crush them.
You have to crush them in ethical, God glorifying ways, okay?
Just to put a disclaimer on what I mean by crushing them politically, economically, Crushing them, doing all this in just ways.
But if you don't, then all you've actually done is just stirred up the hornet's nest.
And I think that's what we're seeing.
We are seeing that in Trump's first year, in this second term of the Trump administration, he has poked the hornet's nest, but he has not actually brought about any decisive victories, any decisive change.
We're not getting mass deportations.
We're still supporting Israel.
We're bombing Iran on Israel's behest.
We're not actually winning.
Right?
You're going to be so sick of winning.
I'm not.
I'm not even close to being sick of winning.
I would like to win.
Maybe I could be sick of winning if we had some winning.
All we've really done is just enough memes, right?
The DHS, like there won't be a Shire Pippin.
That's cute, okay?
But start memeing.
I'd love to see the DHS keep memeing after they actually produce some mass deportations.
All we've really done is antagonize the left.
We haven't beat them, we haven't crushed them.
And we know what they're capable of, we know what they're willing to do.
We're talking about a group of people who, at the end of the day, they don't merely make arguments.
They shoot conservatives in the neck with real bullets in front of their wife and children.
They will attempt to assassinate a presidential candidate like they did with Trump twice.
This is who we're facing.
If you don't utterly crush these people, then they will kill you.
They will.
They've made that abundantly clear.
It's not just one guy shot Charlie Kirk, thousands of people came out with TikTok videos.
Laughing about it.
One of the people who was just elected in Virginia blatantly said that he hopes that his political opponent would be killed, shot and killed, as well as his political opponent's children.
This is who we're up against.
These are not people to have reasonable discourse with.
These are not people that, well, we'll push back a little bit and see what happens.
No, you have to utterly crush them.
You have to completely win.
We don't need to have debates with Zoran.
Zoran should be beaten in an election, fair and square.
No, he should be deported.
He should be deported.
Omar Fatwa, whatever his name is.
Like, he literally looks like the bad guy on Captain Phillips with Tom Hanks.
I'm the captain now.
What are you doing in my country?
Ilhan Omar, why are you here?
Well, you need to beat us in the democratic process.
No, you need to be on a plane.
And this is the moderate, Christian, compassionate solution.
You need to be.
Deported.
It's not your country.
You don't belong here.
Foreigners need to be deported.
Women need to be quiet.
You need to be quiet.
The universal suffrage of our democratic system has to be completely done away with, right?
As a wise man once said, the problem with democracy is that the people are retarded.
So democracy is for the retarded, by the retarded, of the retarded.
We need an overhaul.
We need to crush our political opponents.
Stop poking.
The hornet's nest and just making them mad so that we ultimately get slaughtered and lose more of our country.
Demographics is destiny.
I don't care if that makes you racist.
It's the reality.
You must understand and accept it.
All politics is identity politics.
Christians versus demons, right?
European descent versus globalism and foreign invasion, third worldism.
And men who love the women in their lives.
But should love them enough to say, you don't get to drive the car anymore because you keep driving it off of a cliff.
This is where we're at.
It takes political will.
You need political will.
You have to be unapologetic.
You have to be courageous.
You have to say, enough is enough, not just, oh, well, as long as I can grill in my backyard on the 4th of July.
And, you know, the group that wants to be left alone will always lose to the group that wants to win.
We don't have the political will.
Trump, God bless him, but let's just be honest.
Trump is not behaving and acting the way that he needs to behave and act.
We've got him quoting Napoleon on social media.
He who saves his country violates no law, but we're not seeing that action.
Oh, a federal judge said this.
Great.
Jail.
Oh, Ilhan Omar is saying this.
Great.
Deportation.
Oh, this has happened.
No, you're done.
We need to cross the Rubicon.
We need to win.
It is time for an American Caesar to rise.
If Trump is the precursor, great.
God bless him.
But now get out of the way for the right man to rise.
We need the great man.
And we need the political will of millions of great men standing behind him, saying, We're not content to just preserve the last remnants of a civilization we once knew and loved.
We want it all back.
We will return.
That's what has to happen.
That's what we're going to be talking about in today's episode.
Let's get to it.
Good afternoon.
All right.
Could we say it's a good afternoon, though, after last night?
Is that fair?
Last night was absolutely terrible.
But at the same time, honestly, I'm just going to go on record and say, good.
Yeah.
Oh, New Yorkers lost their city.
Good.
Do I like that?
I mean, it's, you know, once upon a time, you know, America's finest, right?
Once upon a time, it was a landmark, a bastion of who we were as a society.
1950s, you have.
Three crosses lit up the night before Easter on three of the largest towers in the city.
So it's sad.
It's sentimental.
I'm an American.
I love this country.
I hate that we've lost New York, but honestly, let's be real.
New Yorkers don't deserve a city.
New Yorkers don't deserve a city.
They voted it away.
And I honestly feel like it's sad, but that 20 to 24 cycle, the dark ages of the auto pen, that's kind of what it took to get people to vote for Trump.
And then Trump has not produced.
Sadly, I feel like I wish we were already there, but obviously we're not.
I feel like we just have to get punched in the face repetitively again and again, a few more times to finally muster the will to say, okay, that's it.
I don't care what they call me.
I don't care if they call me a bigot or a racist or a sexist.
By God, we'll have our home again.
Rewind 10 months.
Not that long ago, guys.
This is less than a year, and it's January 2025.
Trump is inaugurated.
And there's about two months there where the vibes, not necessarily the actions, but my goodness, the vibes were at an all time high.
And we even did an episode.
Dude, the Democrats, where are they going to go?
They had no stars.
They had no momentum.
They had no youth energy behind them.
You guys remember the cover of the New York Magazine where it was like the cool kids in town and it was the MAGA balls and it was Doge coming in.
It was cutting USAID.
I think we were cheering for some good things that genuinely happened.
That was only 10 months ago.
And last night, the GOP and the Republican Party.
Of which, to be honest, we probably despise him close to as much as we despise the Democrats.
There are good men that caucus with the Republican Party that we love and support.
So, that is not all of them, the whole thing corrupt whatsoever.
But the GOP and the Republican Party that have been selling you out for 20 years got absolutely destroyed.
I'm going to go through some of the statistics on how bad it was, because I don't think people have a sense just how historic in one year Trump has been in office 10 months even.
So, we're one year from the election, 10 months from his inauguration.
Look at some of the shifts here.
So, this is in Virginia.
Where Republicans were absolutely destroyed.
Every single county in Virginia shifted blue.
Every single county.
This is from Christian Hines Democrats flipped Virginia House District 66.
Now, in Virginia, they're called House of Delegates, not House of Representatives.
So this is your state level.
Nicole Cole defeating Bobby.
Bobby, help me out.
Someone with better eyesight.
Guy named Bobby.
He was elected.
Bobby Orock.
Bobby Orock.
1989.
He has been the Republican incumbent sailing to victory again and again in the Virginia House of Delegates for 25 years.
Last night, his seat flipped.
In Georgia, two Democrats won by 20 plus points.
It was the first time Democrats have won a state level race in Georgia in 20 years.
Omar Fatah lost to Jacob Frey.
The Jewish mayor of Minneapolis who cried at George Floyd's casket.
So that was about the only bright spot.
But everywhere else, among young men, among women, among every single demographic, you saw the GOP get destroyed.
Check this out.
One of the big themes last year has been immigration.
Immigration, immigration, and immigration from a certain place in South Asia.
It's like Singapore, no, India.
Indian American voters swing to Sherrill.
That's Mickey Sherrill, candidate for governor, New Jersey race after GOP rhetoric backlash.
Democrat Mickey Sherrill won decisively against Republican Jack Citarelli in New Jersey's.
2025 governor campaign capturing 66% of the vote in Edison Township's Indian American community compared to Citarelli's 34%, reversing Republican gains from 2024.
The shift, Dinesh D'Souza highlighted it, showed how anti immigrant rhetoric alienated high skilled, doing quote marks there, South Asian voters.
The shift was something like 60 points.
60 points in a year from Trump back to the Democrats because of our rhetoric on immigration, among other things.
But this highlighted, especially in this Indian community.
That shifted some 60 points.
So, whether it was with young men, whether it was in states that Trump won, like Georgia, an absolute bloodbath.
And the GOP, I'll pass it to you guys, so much of it they deserve.
Virginia, like, well, how did we lose?
Abigail Spanberger, a Jewish woman running for governor of Virginia.
Remember, we have a Republican, had a Republican governor right now.
He won in 2022, Glenn Youngkin.
Well, we ran, it was a black woman who wasn't even supportive of President Trump.
That's who the GOP offered us up.
And it's like, why were young men not excited to come out in Virginia and vote for Winsome Sears for governor?
Boy, I really sit here scratching my head.
I can't believe it.
I don't know why.
You gave us terrible candidates, and the left, like you said, they're angry.
The hornet's nest is stirred up.
And they came out in droves.
I like Deacon St. John.
Stirring The Hornet Nest00:15:39
He said that it kind of feels like all the momentum we had a year ago has been undone.
They found their heroes, they found their populists, and they're out for blood.
Yep.
Yeah.
It's incredible to look at that, too, because I'm.
Just based on my recollection, that has to be the quickest that momentum from an election like we had in 2024 has ever been lost.
I mean, it's not uncommon for the midterms after the incumbent party wins for them to pull back a little bit.
Like that's two years, roughly two years after the incumbent president has come into office.
But like Wes said, we're talking about 10 months here.
And yeah, it's just, I think there's a lot of things going on.
We can talk about those things.
I think the infighting, the Republican Party, Has it helped?
I mean, you think even on the back of Charlie Cook's death, I mean, just in the last couple months, I mean, over the Israel issue, over the war in Gaza, like all of these things, Republicans and the Trump administration largely has, I mean, really just target fire on their own, on so many of the people, right?
So many of the people.
Epstein files.
Epstein files.
I mean, dopes.
That did not help.
Yeah.
So there's just so many things that you think about over the last 10 months and the vibes that we came and riding in to Trump's second term.
We're going to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours.
We're going to, these tariffs are going to bring so much money.
You know, we're going to be able to.
The Supreme Court looks poised to strike them down as legitimate.
So the tariffs are now going to be off the table in 2026.
Yep.
A huge part of it, too.
Like, let's be honest, it's no longer left versus right in the traditional, you know, ways that we've thought about in recent decades, you know, throughout the course of my entire lifetime for sure.
It's, you know, conservative versus, you know, progressive or liberal.
That's not really the framework.
It's becoming more and more, I think, America first versus globalist, or nationalist versus communist, is in many ways the way to think about it.
So, I do think it's significant to mention in the case of New York City mayor, Zoran Mandavi, is that how you say it?
Mandani.
Mandani.
Okay, whatever.
I'm not, I'm not ever, it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
I'm never going to pronounce his name correctly on principle because can I get a Civil War registry check real quick on Zoran?
Let me take a look here.
Zoran, it must be right next to Patel.
When it comes to the signing of the Declaration of Independence, how many Zorans were on?
Yeah.
So, anyway, yeah, he doesn't deserve his name to be correctly pronounced, which works out, you know, famously for me because I couldn't do it even if my life depended on it.
But my point is, there's a few reasons why he won, and it's worth exploring.
So, one that I have to point out there was a clip that was going around.
I don't know if we, I don't think we have it prepared.
I guess we could find it for the second segment, you know, after the first commercial break if we wanted to show it.
But it was him, you know, against all the, you know, the different, you know, opposition that he was running against.
And they were asked, you know, if you're elected mayor, Where would be the first place if you were to travel for foreign relations?
Where's the first place that you would go?
They all said Israel.
One guy said Israel and Ukraine.
And he said, nowhere.
He said, I would help to see how I can serve Jews right here in New York or help to serve these people right here in New York.
I wouldn't travel anywhere.
I would stay in New York and focus on the problems here at home.
So that's like the most common sense.
Yep.
Right.
I mean, it's a tragedy.
The tragedy of New York.
Caring for the city of New York.
Crazy, right?
Absolutely.
But what it is, is it's left wing populism.
It's like Trump came to power on this right wing populism and the Democrats didn't know what to do about it.
And finally, they figured it out.
And this is what people like AOC and Mom Dhani represent this populism and this kind of rhetoric.
I'm for the people.
We're going to win against the powers that be, all of these corrupt, ossified politician establishments.
I'm an outsider.
And I'm an outsider, exactly.
And they're taking Trump's playbook.
And that's the most frightening thing about it.
It's like if MAGA doesn't get its.
It's a game together.
If it doesn't figure this out, we could see this is just the beginning, really, of a massive wave, something like we saw in 2016, basically for the last 10 years on the right.
Yep.
So, why was Juan elected?
One, I really do think because he, it's not that he was anti Israel, I think that actually would have probably made him even more popular.
But everybody else is still Miga, you know, make Israel great again.
And he was like, no, I'm just going to stay in New York.
So that helped.
Two, he kind of both ended it.
You know what I mean?
Like the best of both worlds.
So he did not have an Israel shilling rhetoric campaign.
But then behind the scenes, I mean, there are plenty of photos with him with Jews in New York shaking hands.
You know, the Jews were supporting him.
All these rabbis came out, you know, supporting him.
It's like, well, Jews hate Muslims.
No, Jews hate Muslims in the Middle East that threaten their Zionism, their homeland, right?
Jews love Muslims in the West.
Right, Islam is the broom of Judaism that sweeps clean the West for Jewish rule.
Um, I'm not saying all Jews, every single one of them.
I don't think that Yoram Herzoni would agree with that, for instance.
Uh, but let's, I mean, this is a fact.
You can just go and look at all the pictures.
There were a ton of Jewish rabbis in New York that were supporting a Muslim.
It's like, how does that happen?
How do Jews support a Muslim?
And it's like, oh, because uh, Jews hate Muslims.
But they hate Christians more.
And just to be clear, Momdani himself, he said this publicly.
He has all sorts of pro Israel initiatives happening.
So, like this schema where we're saying, oh, he's a Muslim and he opposes Israel and he had that.
No, he doesn't.
He doesn't.
He's bringing in Jewish pro Israel education.
But my point was he was at least logical, intelligent enough when he's on the campaign stage during a debate and asked a trick question of, hey, where's the first place you would go if you're elected mayor?
I mean, that's so odd.
That should have been viewed by everyone as, oh, that's a trick question.
The first place I would go?
Nowhere.
If I'm elected mayor, the first thing I do is I don't go anywhere.
I stay here and I serve the people of the city where I've been elected mayor.
And he just had the right answer.
So, no.
Is he anti Israel?
No.
He's like, believe it or not, he's a, how can you be a socialist Muslim?
The same way you can be a pro Israel Muslim, it turns out, of which he absolutely is.
So, in the real sense, objectively, he's pro Israel.
In the real sense, objectively, he's shaking hands under the table with tons of Jewish rabbis in New York.
Who helped in their campaign and their funding to get him elected.
But at least in his public rhetoric on the debate stage during the campaign for the election, he had enough common sense to not say, Yeah, the first thing I would do is hop on a plane after being elected and leave the city that I've been elected to serve and go to Israel and serve them instead.
Every single one of his opponents literally said, Yeah, first thing I do is go to Israel.
So that's number one.
Here's number two How did he get elected?
White women.
White liberal young women, women under the age of 30, came out in droves and voted for Zoran.
And a lot of it being because of his policies, economic policies, and taxpayer funded childcare.
White women, if they don't kill their babies in the womb through abortion, they at least want to be able to give up their babies at the age of one year old to go to state funded, city funded childcare.
I saw posts about that today of, you know, 30 year old white women.
Um, praise God, you know, the timing is perfect.
You know, Zoran's been elected just in time by the time, and they're holding a baby in an ergo.
This is like a seven month old baby saying, uh, just in time, uh, so that when my baby turns a year old, someone else can raise them for free, tax funded.
Um, so white women, so he got elected because, uh, because he's not pro Israel.
No, of course he's pro Israel, uh, but at least in his public rhetoric on the debate stage, he had the common sense not to say that out loud.
So that was part of it.
Being seemingly New York first.
And you should look at that and read between the lines and think strategically.
If you want to win, if the GOP wants to win, they need to think in those terms.
I don't want to jump ahead, but he didn't say at one point he would arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he stepped foot in New York.
He did.
That's a big one.
I don't know if you were going to get to it.
But he also said, hey, I think this guy's a war criminal.
Yes.
And he did win.
That was a huge, yeah.
So he called Netanyahu a war criminal and won an election.
He had white young liberal women come out in droves, won an election.
And he was supported by foreigners.
Demographics is destiny.
Look at New York.
New York is, I think, the latest demographics is 34%.
36%.
36% white Americans, European descent.
I thought you were saying foreign born.
Yeah, I think 34% around there.
34% that are not foreign born or are?
White Americans.
You've got about 4% that were born in outlying islands or two American parents.
So that's 36% foreign born, 4% kind of outlying, and then 60% actually born, of which about 40% you've got.
Like I said, Europeans.
Okay.
So you're saying, so then I got it backwards, right?
So it's more like 36% are foreigners.
Yes.
Okay.
But still, that's significant.
And they do.
85%.
Right.
And there's a huge breakdown of New Yorkers, those who were born in New York, who had been there for more than 10 years, they broke for Cuomo, Andrew Cuomo, the real competitor.
Those who had been in New York for a lot shorter, many of them foreigners, some of them probably just transplants, they voted for Mam Donning.
So, in other words, he was elected for being New York first, in his case, not, you know, America first, but like New York first and not Israel first, and naming Netanyahu as a war criminal.
That's one.
Two, appeasing women.
Appeasing young liberal women.
And then number three, foreigners.
And my point is you know, when I look at the GOP, if they're actually going to be solid and righteous and God fearing, they can actually only do one of those.
They can be America first and not Israel first and say similar things about Netanyahu that Zoran did.
They can do that.
You can actually change that and that would be a positive change.
That would be without compromise.
That would be a step in the right direction.
The other two, you actually cannot do without compromising.
And this is my point that I'm getting at.
The other two, appeasing liberal women, requires compromise.
It requires allowing for abortion, tax funded childcare from the age of one year old and on.
All these things that you actually can appease those things, but it's all would be negative.
It'd all be compromised.
And then third, appealing to a bunch of immigrants and a bunch of foreigners, which again would be compromised.
So when I think of like, What's the way out?
I guess what I'm building up to is this.
There is not a democratic way out.
There's not a democratic way out.
You cannot get out through our sacred democracy.
There comes a point of critical mass where your nation is already invaded.
You already have too many foreigners who want things that are not conducive with the welfare, the good of the native population.
You know, 27 year old liberal white women, far too much of a voice and far too much political power, and all they want is trash.
And so it's like, okay, well, then what we have to do is we have to, we need to, you know, it's all about education.
We need to educate the voter.
And so we need to, you know, sit these young, you know, white women down and give them, you know, lectures from Prager U, you know, Dennis Prager, you know, on the virtues of capitalism and blah, And these foreigners, you know, we need to make it easier for them to assimilate.
And no, There comes a certain point where it's not persuasion.
It's not compelling.
It's not educating.
There comes a certain point where you can vote your way into communism.
You can't vote your way out.
You can vote your way in.
You can't vote your way out.
There comes a point where it's like, no, he who saves his country violates no law.
There comes a certain point where you actually have to cross a Rubicon.
You have to say, I'm sorry, but democracy, the problem with democracy is that the people are retarded.
And so we cannot fear God and uphold democracy.
We have to choose, right?
Like I tweeted out today, I said, you have a choice save America or empower women to vote.
But you can't do both, right?
Or you could apply it to abortion save babies or allow women to vote.
But you can't do both.
I mean, women, look, they polled women for the last presidential election in 2024.
The number one issue for men was the economy.
How can I provide?
Number one issue for women was abortion rights.
How can I murder my children?
You don't appeal to that group.
You have to simply say, Oh, I see.
I see your desires.
I see your concerns.
They're absolutely wicked.
And so you no longer get to be a part of the political apparatus.
Because we love you, you don't get to drive because women can't drive.
Right.
And that applies in more ways than one.
And just a point to illustrate that, which I found amusing, honestly, was I think Bill Ackman, Pershing Square Capitol.
I think at one point leading up to the election, the mayoral election, he's spending one to $2 million a day against Mamdani.
And I think it was last night after the election, the polls closed, or maybe even this morning, he tweets, just take off the Cuomo hat, put on the Mamdani hat.
And he says, I'll do anything to help.
And that just helps to illustrate the kind of landscape we're talking about in a city like New York.
Like, there is no meaningful change going to arise from either candidate.
They all are more or less the same thing, packaged differently.
And you just have someone like Cuomo coming from the establishment, and he just has different constraints, but he actually is a socialist.
He wants the same things.
Like, we're all aware of that.
Mom Dhani comes from the populist side of things and says, Actually, I'm going to make you the enemy, Cuomo.
I'm going to make the establishment up in Albany the enemy.
I'm going to make people like Bill Ackman the enemy.
But I'm to the same end.
And so, to your point, Joel, what we're talking about is if you actually want to see meaningful change in the way that the city is governed, if you actually want to protect the heritage Americans that live there, and I mean, don't get it fooled.
There are heritage Americans who live in New York City whose families have lived there for 10 generations.
Attacking Universal Suffrage00:14:38
And they have watched before their very eyes the entire landscape of the city change.
And that's a really sad thing.
And they have essentially no power.
Based on what's happening in the city and the way that it's corrupt, but also up in Albany, they have no power to actually ever see that change through the democratic process.
It's been the demographics of the city have changed so thoroughly, so thoroughly and completely that it really is unrecognizable to the New York City of even 50 years ago.
I will say there is a vibe shift though.
I see Defiant Baptist in the comments and he's saying, I advocated repealing the 19th Amendment last night.
All the replies have been very positive.
And I remember three years ago, Going like uber viral, thanks to Right Wing Watch per usual, saying somebody asked me, like, if you could wave the magic wand and make America a Christian nation tomorrow, would women in that Christian nation have the right to vote?
And I said, I didn't mince words.
I just immediately said, no.
And he said, why?
And I said, because if we could have a Christian nation tomorrow, but women were able to vote, then within 50 years, we would no longer have a Christian nation.
That's simply the way that it works.
And it's not because women aren't Christian.
It's not because women don't love the Lord.
It's because they're not fit for politics.
Politics is war without the bullets.
Women were not designed by God for war.
They're designed to squeeze the cheeks of little toddlers.
That's what women are designed for.
And when they're in their proper role, it's a good and wonderful, beautiful thing.
But women are not political.
And so they should not be in politics.
My point is that when I said that three years ago and it went viral, I mean, I got death threats.
You know, I still get death threats, you know, for various things.
But People hated it.
It wasn't just the death threats from a bunch of progressives, but I mean, it was all the usual suspects with Big Con Inc. coming out and blasting me in the comments and retweeting me.
Can you believe this chauvinistic, you know, misogynistic, blah, I don't know if you've noticed, but Defiant Baptist is right.
I, you know, I've been doing some repeal the 19th posting myself, and it has changed in the last three years.
There's still people who are upset and who don't like it, but there is more support than I ever thought we would see in my lifetime, much less just three years later.
So people are starting to wake up.
But at the end of the day, you're still not going to be able to achieve it through.
You're not going to get women to come out and vote away their vote.
You're not going to democratically get rid of the democratic system, right?
That's like, yeah, it's like standing in a basket and then trying to lift it.
You have to get outside, right?
You have to step outside of the current framework, of the current system.
So these are things that actually just have to be done, not just.
Compelled or persuaded or voted on.
These are things that have to be done.
And we've rescinded constitutional amendments before.
Support grew for prohibition, banning of all sale and use of alcohol in the early 1900s.
And the Constitution, 38 states required to ratify it, was actually amended.
I think it was what, Antonio, 10 years later, the results are so disastrous.
We came back and said, nope, that was not great.
We have done it before.
And believe it or not, you can do it again.
You can come in and say, you know what?
The 19th Amendment is repealed.
This is who will vote from now on.
We've given our list before.
You can do it.
It's been done before.
It totally can happen.
Yeah.
And people would be upset.
It would be really upset.
It's tough with the franchise because once you give someone the right to vote, it's really hard to take away and get them to agree to it.
But again, like Prohibition is a good example because it was actually the temperance movement.
It was like a strong arm, it wasn't actually that popular.
It's so funny.
We're talking about the 19th Amendment, but even if you talk about Prohibition, the culprits are the same.
No, seriously.
I mean, the temperance movement was feminist.
Yeah.
It was women that were mad that their husbands were staying out late drinking with the boys.
Now, to be fair, some of that was literal alcoholism to the sinful degree of drunkenness.
Some of those men were actually abusing alcohol.
But not all of them.
But yes, but you're right.
You actually can change things.
You actually can peel back and turn back the clock and take things away.
And people are mad about it always, always.
But that doesn't mean that it can't be done.
And the question isn't will people agree or will they be mad?
The question is.
Is the current status quo viable?
If it's not, then it doesn't matter who's going to be upset.
What matters is it in a very short time, if we're not there already, we won't have a country.
So, what's the alternative?
The alternative is you just literally give away your homeland or you upset foreigners and women.
Yeah, I would pick the latter.
I liked what you said about those things that Christians can't do because one of the things.
Think about a husband who's the head of his home.
And let's imagine he had 10 children.
And he said, You know what?
I want to derive my power from the just consent of the governed.
So he got down.
He said, All right, we're going to poll all the kids.
How do we feel about spanking?
How do we feel about discipline?
Well, I'm going to go out on a limb and say, Well, the kids, if it was put up to them, they'd say, Nope, that's not popular.
We don't want that.
When it comes to the demographic, the people, the populace, and then you have the elected, the sovereign, the one who would be, he's a father, a civil father in a sense.
The tough love that they need is not something they will ever vote for.
So, you need this.
I think about the will for repentance, the stomach for repentance.
We have to repent of this.
We have to send these people home.
We have to undo these constitutional amendments.
The people themselves that need the discipline will never, in fact, vote for it.
The children in the home are never going to vote for the spankings that they require to learn discipline and to learn obedience.
And so, at a certain point, you have to say, Wait, they're never ever going to choose this for themselves.
They are never in mass going to say, We see that this is good.
We see that it's right.
It'll be painful for a little while, but we can handle it.
They never will.
And so, the democratic process, if you're looking to it, well, surely the people wake up and surely they'll say, We're ready.
We're going to take the steps of repentance.
No, they have to be led to it.
That's the story of the judges.
That's the story of the kings.
That's the story of the prophets.
The prophet, the king, the judge, the great man says, You guys are off the rails, but I'm going to help you get back to it.
But we don't want to.
It's not popular.
51% haven't said we're going to do it.
Too bad.
We're doing it anyway.
Correct.
And it's like part of it is I understand to a lot of people you say repeal the 19th Amendment.
And I think even Defiant Baptist did offer clarification that that was sarcasm.
That it was actually a bunch of leftist women.
I got a lot of positive remarks.
But here's the thing though.
Even if the actual resolution to the effects of the 19th Amendment aren't Repealing the 19th Amendment per se.
The reason we talk about it is because it's important to, I'm going to use this word, deconstruct the post war consensus.
Because you can easily say, we need strong borders.
And then it's like, okay, but then you're disagreeing with the assumptions of the Obama coalition.
It's like, well, I disagree with that.
Well, then you're disagreeing with the assumptions of the Civil Rights Act.
Well, I disagree with that.
Well, then you're disagreeing with the assumptions of the early 20th century.
And it's like, it goes directly to the 19th Amendment.
And so, even from a, you know, just simply polemics and rhetoric and the dialogue over these issues, you have to be able to come out and say, this is the reason, this is the beginning of all of the things that we're currently criticizing.
So, in that way, we have to be intellectually consistent, understanding again that the actual resolution, the actual solution, might be something entirely different than repealing the.
And we've done an episode on voting and we've talked about there are more stipulations than just all men, right?
And so, what does it look like to refactor the franchise?
It's not necessarily repealing the 19th Amendment.
Yep.
Nathan, go up in the comments just a little bit.
I want to read a couple of the comments and we'll go to our first commercial break.
Go up some.
Go, go, go.
Stop.
Right there.
Jess said Shouldn't conservative women continue to vote in accordance with their fathers and husbands until such a time as the 19th Amendment is repealed?
Otherwise, there would just be that many less red votes.
Answer to that yes.
I just want to clarify.
In the meantime, godly women should vote in godly ways in accordance with their godly husbands.
Until such an occasion as the 19th Amendment being repealed or whatever takes place.
So, in the meantime, yes, you need to be shrewd.
You need to be wise.
Do not be a beautiful loser.
Do not purity spiral and say, well, I don't think that women should vote.
And therefore, you know, we're going to go ahead and we're already losing the vote.
And now we're going to take every conservative, godly woman and subtract those votes too.
Do not be a purity spiraling idiot.
Do not be a beautiful loser.
Be shrewd, be wise, be strategic.
They should vote until God and His sovereignty repeals the 19th Amendment, whether it happens or whether it doesn't.
Go up.
There's more.
Another comment.
This is keep going, Right here.
Okay.
This is Michael Brown.
Michael Brown said the 19th is never going to be repealed.
We need to be realistic here.
What I would say to that is you are probably right.
Okay.
So I'm not saying that you're not being realistic or, you know, that you're not accurate in the statement that you just made.
But what I am saying is that if something of that measure doesn't happen, then we will lose our country.
So again, women can vote or you can have a country, but you can't do both.
Women can vote or you can have a country.
You can't do both.
Go up one more, a little bit more, a little bit more.
Cool dude, he said, a little bit higher, a little bit higher, a little bit higher.
Let's see, stop right there.
He said, I don't know, bros, repeal the 19th seems like a long shot.
Maybe just repeal voting for everyone.
That is actually beautiful.
So I want to take a minute on that real quick.
I think, so taking that with Michael and the comment that he made about, you know, let's be realistic, the 19th is never going to be repealed.
You're probably right about that.
And so, probably what would have to happen.
Is you would just have to change the democratic system altogether.
There's probably no realistic scenario where you can repeal women's vote and only repeal women's vote.
It would be glorious.
It would be wonderful.
Christ would be pleased.
The country would be saved.
Our children would rejoice.
I mean, it would be awesome.
But we live in a wicked nation, and so it's probably not going to happen.
But it is actually, as crazy as it sounds, it is actually statistically probably more likely, more possible.
To simply do away with our sacred democracy altogether than simply to do away with it for half the country.
That's probably the more likely scenario.
And so I'm going to continue to be a 19th Amendment disrespecter, right?
I feel like that's my role.
I'm going to stay in my lane for such a time as this.
This is how God's called me, it's how He built me.
I'm going to continue to talk about it.
But for those of you who are trying to be a little bit more strategic, I do agree.
And I've talked to people behind the scenes who I will not name because it'll ruin their livelihood to be associated with me.
But There does seem to be a common consensus among some right wing Christians that the more strategic and plausible rhetoric is to simply attack universal suffrage as a whole, instead of just saying 19th Amendment, 19th Amendment, to just point out the flaws of universal suffrage as a whole.
And so, for instance, arguments along those lines being more strategic, what's more plausible, what's more, you know, this actually more realistic could actually happen by the grace of God.
It is more strategic to make arguments like this.
Okay.
If you're going to vote in an election, you should be paying taxes, a net positive contributor to taxes here in America.
Right.
That's a, that's a, you know, we talk about common sense policies, you know, have a decent chance at winning the day.
Okay.
Well, that is common sense.
So now you're not just picking one group like women and saying, well, women can't vote because, you know, I hold to Christian values and I don't think it's biblical.
A lot of people don't hold to Christian values.
They hate Christ.
They hate biblical traditional Christianity and they're going to have an aversion towards that.
But if you say, look, I'm just coming from a common stance standpoint, you know what?
If you're going to have a say in the future direction of the country, you should be contributing financially to that country where you get a say.
Voting is not a right, it's a privilege.
So, starting with that rhetoric.
So, first, Voting should be viewed as a privilege, not a universal right.
You do not have a universal right to voting.
Voting is a privilege, and that privilege should be earned by some kind of net positive contribution.
So, over the course of your life, up to date, you have paid more in taxes than you have taken in taxes.
Well, that gets rid of a lot of Democrat voters right there.
That would help tremendously.
Here's another one I've heard guys propose IQ tests, right?
It can be super simple, but before you vote, there's a 10%.
10 little questionnaire that you have to answer.
It takes five minutes and it's timed.
So it's five minutes, pass or fail.
You have to get at least seven of the 10 questions correct.
It's pretty basic.
And you might think, well, that's not going to stop anybody.
That will stop about half of the country.
Our country is retarded.
We have people who can't even read who are voting in our elections.
There was controversy because Andrew Cuomo, as a candidate for mayor in New York City, his name was hidden kind of in the corner.
And the fear is that, well, his name is down at the bottom and Madani's is at the top.
That's going to predispose people to vote for the person at the top.
Think about that.
They can't even be bothered.
Correct.
Read the whole sheet.
That's right.
Find the candidate you want to vote for.
He's going to get a boost just because he's at the top of the sheet.
Just because of placement.
Even something shorter than intelligence.
His name was on there twice.
And some ballots, yeah.
Something shorter than intelligence, which is actually being debated right now, is English proficiency.
Voting In A Christian Nation00:07:08
Right.
That's a very obvious one.
It's like, why are our ballots in different languages?
Exactly.
Yep.
So, yeah, ballots that are only in English, a 10 questionnaire, 10 questions that's timed, only five minutes, and you have to get seven of them correct.
Net positive taxpayer up to date at that moment in your life.
In addition to that, you could also say that you must be born here.
Now, you guys have heard us talk about this before.
I prefer that you're a heritage American.
So, not just that you're born here, but you can go back multiple generations.
But again, talking about what's realistic, right?
So, I'm just dealing with the comments because there's guys in the comments, and you're not wrong, guys.
I'm not picking on you.
You're bringing up a good point.
Like, okay, Joel, in principle, you're right, but it feels very unlikely.
So, do we have any kind of pragmatic strategy to start pushing the ball in that direction that might be plausible?
So, I'm giving you that, all right?
So, you have to be born here.
I would like it to be 10th generation.
I would like it to be, you know, your name is in the Civil War registry.
You know, those kinds of things.
But that's probably not going to happen.
So, are you at least born here?
Okay.
Well, that would knock Zoran out from voting, much less actually being voted on for mayor of New York City.
The guy was born in Uganda.
He's a Muslim born in Uganda who is a socialist, borderline communist.
So, not only would he not be elected, he wouldn't even be able to vote in an election.
So, ballots in English only.
IQ test, 10 questions, timed, five minutes.
Got to get seven of them correct.
Have to actually pay taxes and not just be a drain on the tax system, and you have to be born here.
Does that repeal the 19th Amendment?
No.
But what you're attacking through that line of logic with that strategy is you're attacking universal suffrage altogether.
And if you attack a major ideology rather than a group of people, you usually have more of a chance at success.
Now, at the end of the day, the reason why we talk about groups of people, like, hey, no foreigners.
Or, hey, no Muslims.
It needs to be Christian.
It needs to be American, not just paper Americans, but actual Americans.
Demographics matter.
And oh, yes, men, God fearing men and not women.
At the end of the day, the real battle is not just a political battle, it is a battle for civilization.
It is a war, it's a religious war, it's a race war.
These things actually exist.
However, if we're talking winnable strategies, It is far more plausible, more winnable, instead of saying, hey, you know what, only this group of people is allowed to vote based off of sex or race or religion.
Do I think that that's right?
Yeah, I think it's right.
I think it would be perfectly fair for Japan to say only Japanese people can vote.
There is nothing unbiblical about that.
No one has been done any wrong.
It is not unjust.
It is not unbiblical.
It is not wicked.
That is permissible.
That is morally permissible.
Do I think that that's going to fly?
No, I'm not an idiot.
That's probably not going to fly.
But if you made it based off of demographics, which people?
You need to be an American to vote in America.
You need to be a male to vote.
We have biblical arguments for that.
You need to be a Christian, right?
Well, no religious test for, you know, blah, Okay, but that was wrong.
And so we should fix it, right?
Well, somebody said it.
Well, I don't care.
They were wrong.
I don't care who said it.
It's either true or it's not.
No, you should be a Christian to vote in a Christian nation.
Well, we're not a Christian nation.
Okay, well, we used to be.
Well, I don't know if we ever were.
Well, then we should have been, and we should be now.
So, it really doesn't matter.
It's a moot point.
We should be a Christian nation because the triune God is the true God, and all other gods are false gods.
And we should worship Christ because Christ is king.
So, I don't care what was said once upon a time or who said it.
We should be a Christian nation, and therefore, Christians should vote.
Men should vote because they're called to be heads of households and determine the direction.
Men were built for politics.
Politics is war minus the bullets.
Women and children do not belong in war.
So, all these are principled arguments.
But if we're talking pragmatic because we just want to push the ball and get some gains and start standing at least a snowflake's chance in hell at making a difference, then it is a civilizational battle.
It is demographics.
It is religion, Christianity versus Islam, Christianity versus Judaism, Christianity versus Hinduism.
That's what it really is.
That's the truth.
And you have to know that, right?
You don't say that.
I'll say that.
You just quietly not, right?
You hide your power levels.
You agree with that, I'll be the one to say that.
In terms of what you say, as we're trying to actually change the landscape and we're trying to be pragmatic and strategic, that's what it is, right?
It is religion, it is demographics, it is male headship.
But in terms of our strategy and what we employ, the rhetoric that we use, make it about viewpoints, make it about ideology, make it about, you know, because those things, honestly, they're just people will still reel and be upset.
But there are far less of an aversion towards those kinds of things.
So make it about hey, we need to make sure that the people who are voting in our elections can at least pass the most elementary IQ test ever created by man.
Or we need to make sure that people who vote in our elections can actually read the ballot in English.
We need to make sure that people who vote in our elections are a net positive taxpayer.
It's a privilege, not a right, to vote.
And if you haven't contributed to the nation, then you shouldn't get a say in directing the nation in the future.
Those are things that we could do, really basic things.
And also, you should be born in America.
I like it to be third generation.
I like it to be fifth generation, but we could start there, just born in America.
If you just did that, net positive tax paying, born in America, basic IQ test, and the ballot is in English, Democrats would never win an election ever again for the entire history of mankind.
Yeah.
And just to add to that, I think that's great and that's all right.
And just to show, I mean, even an aside or a tertiary point to that is just to show how holistic politics is, is that there are other things that happen.
Uh, making winning the hearts of men, making them masculine men because you got to remember, like demographically speaking, it's single childless women who are voting for Mom Dhani, they've never had a meaningful relationship with the masculine man in their life.
And so, pro marriage policies, encouraging masculine men, ending abortion all of these things also shrink the demographic naturally through time.
That so, you want to talk about practical things that the Republican Party even is purportedly pushing for.
These are all things that move us gradually in the right direction as well.
So There's so many things to do practically outside of repealing the 19th Amendment that move the ball.
Securing Your Retirement Gold00:04:39
Agreed.
All right, let's go to our first commercial break and we will be right back.
The silver is mine and the gold is mine, declares the Lord of Hosts.
Yet your retirement dollars keep shrinking daily as Washington prints money out of thin air.
Genesis Gold Group aligns financial guidance with godly principles when others serve only profit.
Their faith centered approach to gold IRAs stands apart in an industry that has forgotten what true stewardship actually means.
Why gamble your family's future on Wall Street's paper promises?
Your 401k and IRA deserve better protection.
Genesis Gold Group transforms your vulnerable retirement accounts into physical gold, something real, something tangible, something that God created with inherent value.
Their faith driven experts walk you through every step, helping you shield your life's work from the financial storms up ahead.
No high pressure tactics, no hidden fees, just guidance rooted in timeless principles of sound stewardship.
So the decision is simple watch your retirement evaporate through inflation or secure it in God's precious metal.
Take action now.
Go and visit RightResponseBibleGold.com.
You can visit today for your free book, The Bible and Gold, and join the thousands of believers who sleep soundly knowing their future is anchored in something unshakable.
Again, that's rightresponsebiblegold.com.
Safeguarding your legacy with God's timeless treasure.
When it comes to your financial future, are you planning forward or backwards from your desired results?
What type of financial culture do you want to create for your family and for your children's children?
We are not called to be wise as doves.
Therefore, simpleton planning simply won't cut it.
Joe Garrison helps families develop and implement a long term culture of excellent financial management.
He starts with your goals, your tithing plan, your retirement, and the legacy that you want to build for your generations.
And then he works backwards to build a real actionable plan to get your family on track.
Now, many of my personal friends have benefited from the financial wisdom of Joe Garrison that he shared for their specific situations.
Do you want to work with someone who strives?
For alpha with your investing, hates taxes, and brokers' insurance, start planning smart.
Call Joe Garresey at 615 767 2555.
Again, that's 615 767 2555.
Or you can find him by going to backwardsplanningfinancial.nm.com.
Again, that's backwardsplanningfinancial.nm.
In, as in Nancy, M, as in Ministries.com.
When we think about what powers our modern world, fighter jets, clean energy, even the phone that's in your hand, we rarely stop to ask the question, what powers our power?
See, it all comes down to a handful of critical minerals, and most of these minerals come from overseas.
Now that is a problem.
Saga Metals is working to fix this problem.
Their mission?
Build a secure, independent future for North America by developing domestic sources of titanium, lithium, and uranium, the materials that our economy and defense depend on.
Their flagship project in Labrador, Canada spans 160 square kilometers, with a 15,000 meter drill program underway driving a potentially world class titanium resource.
Saga has also partnered with global mining leader Rio Tinto.
Which can invest up to $44 million in Saga's lithium project, a major vote of confidence.
Now, Saga Metals trades publicly under SAGMF in the US and SAGA, that's Saga, in Canada.
Meaningful Progress For 202800:12:39
With the race to secure supply chains heating up, a company with assets like these won't stay under the radar for very long.
So, learn more at SagaMetals.com.
Again, that's SagaMetals.com.
Well, essentially, one year from today, we're going to have our midterm midterms.
These were kind of your governor races.
There were some constitutional amendments in California and Virginia.
But our real midterms for the House of Representatives, the Senate seats that are up, they're going to happen about a year from today, and that'll be your 2026 midterms.
And to kind of lay out for you the rest of the decade, you need to be thinking in political cycles four year cycles for presidency if you're going to be involved in politics, and then every two years.
Now, presidency is the big one, right?
Everybody and their brother come out.
And if you have a populist on the ticket like a Trump, he's going to, all the ships are going to go up.
So you have your four year cycles, and we've just started our four year cycle.
Obviously, we had the election last year.
We're just a year away now at this point from the midpoint of the cycle, which is the 2026 midterms.
And what it's looking like, I think right now, the betting market, they're predicting about a 73% chance that Democrats, polymarket, they're going to retake the House of Representatives.
So if you think about your three chambers of government, you have the presidency, the executive branch, the Senate, and the House.
By Democrats taking the House, that means no legislation that Trump wants, Trump's agenda, is going to pass the House for the rest of his term.
He will be a lame duck president.
So practically speaking, think about it.
All right, so four years.
But halfway through, his party could lose control of the House, in which case he wouldn't be able to pass anything more.
Guys, we're already halfway done, essentially, potentially, with the most meaningful part of Trump's presidency.
If in 2028, the Democrats take the presidency, right?
If this momentum carries on, we continue to see a blue wave, which for the record is an expected backlash against the incumbent.
But if the blue wave continues and Republicans don't have an answer, if they don't field a good candidate, you can imagine Democrats taking the presidency.
So you could see a President Gavin Newsom.
They have the potential to retake the Senate.
I think it's about 30%, 40% chance.
And they would have the House.
And if you rewind to 2008, that's how Barack Obama came in to his first term with Democrats.
They had a super majority at the time, but they controlled all three chambers.
And if the GOP does not get its act together, 20 years will have passed since Barack Obama.
Barack Obama is one of the most progressive presidents of our lifetime.
Bill Clinton looks like Ronald Reagan compared to Barack Obama, especially his second term.
And 20 years have passed.
Well, and then.
And we got all this legislation passed, and we had this MAGA movement, and that did a lot right, and we made serious gains.
No, actually, you would start 2029 the same way you started 2009 Democrat president, Democrat senator, Democrat house.
No meaningful progress made.
And the progress that they made, the Otto Penn presidency, 2021 through 2024.
Demographics of the nation are not meaningful progress.
No meaningful progress.
They've forever changed.
No meaningful progress on rolling it back.
Right.
No meaning on the policies, no meaningful progress on rolling it back.
But lots of meaningful progress.
For the left, right?
Demographics permanently changed, gay marriage, all these different things.
It's, I mean, and like, we just have to be honest.
I know it's fun.
You know, it's fun to like, I voted for this, you know, post, I voted for this, you know, like, got what I voted for, you know, hashtag winning.
Guys, you sound stupid.
Like, you just need to know, like, and I'm talking to people that I love right now, like, you sound stupid.
You're losing influence.
You're losing credibility because people have eyes, right?
I mean, that was the whole line.
That was the whole rhetoric against the left, was like they were asking us to not believe our lying eyes, right?
Mostly peaceful riots, you know.
Meanwhile, you know, you have a reporter, you know, saying that and there's buildings on fire behind them, you know, and we laughed at that.
We, and rightfully so, we laughed at it because it was preposterous, because it was ridiculous.
It's like, dude, I have eyes.
Well, in the same way, every young man in the country has eyes.
And what his eyes are telling him, the reality of the situation, is that Trump has not accomplished a quarter of what he said he would.
And he is halfway through his second term, for all intents and purposes.
When you look at what the data is currently telling us with the results of the midterms coming up a year from now, and the fact that, so when I say halfway, it's like, well, he's only one year into four years.
He's only a quarter of the way.
No, but halfway.
In terms of the first half of his second term, where he could actually do something, because he's going to be hamstrung for the second half unless something radically changes.
But that's what we're currently looking at.
And it's important to say that out loud.
It's important to be able to say, look, I pray for Trump.
I'm grateful for Trump in many ways.
But at the same time, to be honest, the guys who are all in on MAGA right now are losing credibility.
They are losing trust.
They are losing the respect of every young man on the right in our country because those young men are going to believe their lying eyes.
They have eyes in their head, they can see the reality.
And the reality is that it's not looking good.
Listen to this statistic.
This is from Dominique Michael Trippi.
President Trump reaches a net approval rating, this is just from today, of negative 55 among voters under the age of 30.
Falling a drastic 63 points from a February high of plus eight, according to an economist, you gov data, a collapse in approval rating of 63 percent.
Now, some of that, so listen to these exit polls out of Virginia, New Jersey, and New York City young men, 18 to 29 years old, plus 14 for Abigail Spanberger, that's the Democrat governor of Virginia, plus 10 for Mickey Sherrill, plus 40 for Mamdani.
Now, that's not breaking up out, of course, like white men, foreign born.
Men that started life as women, we know what we're talking about there.
But overall, there for sure is a contingency of young men that are gay.
Gen Z, if anything, it's more divided than ever.
You've got a lot of based young guys.
Yeah, you do.
And you've got just a lot of gay Gen Zers.
Turns out millennials are pretty based.
Did you see those recent graphics?
I was pleasantly encouraged.
I never thought my generation would wake up.
But back to the Trump data, nobody likes this guy.
The young men are way farther to the right.
They liked the vibes, you know, the New Yorker cover article.
That was great.
They're done with him.
The data shows right now, short of changing something, they're done with him.
They are to the right.
There's a bunch of Gen Z on the left.
They're super gay.
That is the reality as you have to deal with it.
And this is why your nomination process, 2028, is so important.
Vance is, for all intents and purposes, like him or not, the heir apparent right now.
But it is so important for us to win that he is pushed as far to the right to capture the energy, the youth, and the excitement of the young men.
So when that time comes, he can speak to them and resonate with them.
I don't know if Trump would win what he won a year ago today.
I don't know if young men, young people would win.
And now it's even worse, right?
Because the Democrats have a playbook.
They have the Momdani playbook.
They know how to run a candidate like this.
There's going to be a ton of copycats.
Yeah, because part of the reason they lost was, yeah, Trump had some wind in his sails.
There's no doubt about that.
That's true.
But also part of it is, I mean, he was running against Kamala Harris.
I mean, and they were stuck with her.
It's not like she was necessarily their pick.
It was just, look, you guys decided to go with Biden.
Who was literally already a corpse back in 2020, you know?
And then, you know, the dementia set in and the debate came.
You know, the media covered for him as long as they could, but then the debate came.
It became apparent to everyone oh, my goodness, who's running the country?
Because it certainly isn't this guy.
You were stuck with Kamala as your only alternative.
And Trump won.
But Trump won, let's be honest, for two reasons.
One, he really did have some momentum then.
He really did.
Yeah.
But two, and like the failed assassination attempt, like his life coming, you know, within an inch.
The McDonald's photo shoot, I loved it.
The McDonald's photo shoot, the mug shot.
There were some iconic moments.
I'm not going to say, oh, it was just Kamala, the alternative, but Trump really did have some providential moments.
But those weren't necessarily things that he was doing.
Those were providential.
It's not like Trump planned his almost assassination.
Some of those were just supernatural moments in the providence of God that took place that just paid off mileage in PR.
He had winning sales at that moment.
But that's one factor, Trump's momentum.
The other factor is Kamala.
But now, what Antonio said is really insightful.
The left, I think, has learned from that, right?
They're not just putting the woke away, they've learned from that.
And they will not be running a Kamala in 2028.
They're going to be running a Zoran type of person.
And here's the deal you're going to have a lot of young people who are going to say, I can't afford to live.
Yeah, I'll do it.
And they're not going to be voting because he's a Muslim, because he's a foreigner.
They'll do it strictly based off of economic policies, you know, exclusively just because of that.
And so you get like some guy who, not Kamala, but who's retarded, but you get like some guy who's intelligent, he's well spoken, like Obama.
Obama, Obama, love him or hate him, I hate him, you know, but like Obama could speak.
The dude was an orator, the dude could speak.
He was articulate.
He was, you know, half black.
That didn't hurt.
That helped him, you know, and so they're gonna, it's gonna be like an Obama type of person.
It's gonna be some articulate, you know, well groomed Muslim socialist, you know, or this out of the other, something like that.
And if you think like, oh, we've got it in the bag, you are fooling yourself.
Yeah.
You're fooling yourself.
Especially if all JD Vance has to run on is kind of more the same of what we had right now.
So he's gonna get up and there's already the optic.
We have to admit that is there.
He's married to an Indian woman.
He's married to a foreigner.
She seems like a great woman.
A lot of young guys don't like that.
So he's already kind of starting from behind.
His ties to Peter Thiel, nobody likes that either.
So he's starting down.
And if his record to run on, think about Kamala Harris.
And she didn't manage anything.
So it's like, well, what'd you do?
Well, you were vice president for three years.
Well, for her, it would probably be even less than JD Vance.
For sure, less.
But if we think JD Vance has it just right there, we're going to run on a great MAGA record.
No, he could get trounced.
And we've seen this.
This is why MAGA candidates lose because.
They carry all of the baggage of Trump without any of the gifts.
And say what you will about Trump as an executive, he's mediocre, but as a marketer, if you want vibes, if you want turnout, if you want a great candidate.
And great rhetoric on immigration.
It was great.
Yeah, it was.
But then the guys, like you said, they'll take the baggage, but they won't have that rhetoric on immigration or that harder line about American politics.
And then think about him as a cudgel to his opponents.
He's great at that.
He's great at labeling them, he's great at putting them in a box and pigeonholing them.
And now you're going to have people like Momdani who are merging without Trump having blasted them.
And they're not going to have any of that baggage that Trump has assigned to them either.
And that's really what we're up against.
We're losing Trump.
The GOP has no identity outside of Trump.
That's why you don't see turnout when Trump's not on the ballot.
And that's exactly what happened.
It really was in Virginia and New Jersey.
It was just a turnout game.
You saw the Democratic candidates got 80 to 85% of the turnout from the 2024 election.
Republicans were below 70%.
Mass, wide, wide gap.
And it's because Trump's not on the ballot and the GOP has a real problem.
Yeah.
The Democrats, for a while, they were the low propensity party.
So low propensity means less likely to come out.
Republicans have now become that.
AKA, nobody's motivated to go out and vote because they're like, these guys suck.
Your candidates suck.
You're offering a slop.
Turnout Without Trump00:05:04
I cannot be bothered to leave my house.
Like, who?
There was some black woman holding a gun or something.
Yeah, that was Winston Sears, the Republican candidate for governor of Virginia.
And what were some of the highlights of her career?
Well, she wasn't even mega.
So I don't even know.
You have a black woman who seems very nice, who's a never trumper.
Yep.
And that's what the GOP people were saying.
She was lieutenant governor for Virginia, like under Glenn Youngkin.
That's crazy.
I can't believe she lost.
I can't believe it.
Of course.
Shocking.
Of course she lost.
Of course she lost.
No young man under 30 was excited to go out and campaign and knock doors and go to bed.
Hey, babe, wake up.
Chat, are we back?
We've got a black woman who's a never trumper running against a Jewish woman for governor of our state.
Right.
Yeah.
Boy.
Yeah.
Very excited for this.
Yeah.
So we're going to have to get it together.
Uh, gonna have to get it together, and Vance is you know the heir apparent, uh, that's for sure.
Uh, but he's gonna have to get it together, yeah.
Um, either get it together or get out of the way, uh, because he's uh, he is not a shoe in by any stretch of the imagination.
Uh, his approval very much is tied to Trump, which is tanking by the day, tanking by the day.
And uh, and I'll be honest, it's really hard for him to be based on immigration and those kinds of you know that kind of rhetoric when.
His son's name is Vivek, and he is married not just to an Indian woman, but an Indian woman who has still, after being married to him for what, a decade plus, has still not converted to Christianity.
I mean, that's like, and I know he's addressed that a little bit recently, and I think that's good.
I think he needs to lean into that, you know, and I know that that's a hard line to walk with.
You know, you want to honor your wife, you love her, he loves her, he's called to love her.
He shouldn't have married her, but he did now.
And so, the best thing that he can do to honor the Lord biblically.
It is to remain in that marriage and to love his unbelieving spouse, right?
First Corinthians 7 addresses this, but he's going to have to walk that line of honoring my wife as best I can, but also making it clear to the voters, This is not what I stand for.
I did something wrong.
Like he, he sinned.
It is a sin, biblically speaking, it was a sin for him to marry his wife.
That's different than being in a state, a continual state of sin.
So, biblically speaking, he is not in ongoing sin by virtue of being married to an unbelieving wife, but it was a sin to marry her in the first place, and that needs to be said.
As respectfully as he can towards her, but that does need to be said.
This is not what I'm promoting.
This is not what I advocate for.
I hope that others would learn from my mistake.
I love my wife.
I'm praying for her conversion, blah, blah, blah.
That's something that he's going to have to lean into.
And here's the deal I'll be honest, I don't know if it's possible.
I don't know if that, I'm talking about it as though it's a tightrope.
I don't know if it's possible.
I don't know if it is actually possible for him to truly honor his wife in the ways that he's called to as her husband, but also assure Americans.
That he doesn't stand for that.
Right.
Because it basically is kind of like the two are diametrically opposed.
It requires him to publicly disparage his wife in order to assure the voter base that he's not just going to, you know, stand for limitless H1Bs from India.
So he's either going to, you know, disparage his wife, which he shouldn't do, or honor his wife, but give no assurance to the voters.
And here's the thing life has consequences for the decisions that we made.
It could be that that decision that he made.
Means that he's just can't be the guy.
I'm sorry.
He won't be the guy.
You can't be the guy.
And so it may be that Vance has to step back.
Chances are he won't.
And as things currently rest, unless God does something, he won't step back.
He'll run and he'll lose because the Democrats are not putting forward hackling Kamala Harris again.
They're going to put someone forward who is wicked.
We can trust that.
You can take that to the bank.
Absolutely wicked and will be a disaster for America, just like Obama was.
But they're going to put someone forward who is intelligent, sharp, strategic, shrewd, likable.
Kamala wasn't any of those things.
She was just a black woman.
You know, that's all she was.
But I think the Democrats have learned their lesson.
They're going to do more.
It's funny.
It's like the GOP is where Democrats were, right?
Like the Virginia race.
So it's like, what are we going to do?
Well, we're going to put forward a black woman, right?
Well, wait a second.
We just saw that lose a year ago.
Against Trump.
Yeah.
And so it's like, write that down, write that down.
Good play, good play.
Yeah, great play.
We'll run that one ourselves.
So, right now, man, I'm not saying that we should black pill, but we have Marco Rubio waiting in the wings.
Good God.
But we should be realistic, right?
Avoiding Naive Optimism00:03:16
There is a difference between being optimistic and hoping in the Lord versus being naive and foolish.
And we're just not going to do that on this channel.
Like, if you're going to listen to us, we assure you right now, we, We do not do make believe and pretend, you know, got what I voted for.
We don't do that on this channel.
So, if you're looking for that, if you're looking for somebody to pat you on the head and console you and say, everything's great, you know, like we're based, we're winning, you know, we're fine, like that's just not true.
There are plenty of guys who will do that, but that's not what we do.
So, we are also not going to black pill.
We're not going to despair because despair is not a Christian virtue.
We're not allowed to despair by virtue of Christ's commands to us do not fear.
So, we're not going to fear.
We're not going to spiral, doom spiral.
But at the same time, we're also not going to be naive.
We're going to be honest and say, it ain't great.
It is not looking good.
We need to make some serious decisions or we are in big trouble.
Is there anything else you want to look at for this segment?
Because we got a lot of super chats.
That was it.
All right, let's go to our final commercial break.
We will be right back.
If you have a super chat and you want to send it in, send it in now so that we can get to it.
We'll be dealing with the super chats.
That's always the priority honoring those people who are honoring us by giving towards this ministry.
And I'll be honest, you guys have been doing a great job.
We're super grateful and super humbled by your generosity and your financial support.
But you have been so supportive that we have literally, the streams have been going longer than usual.
And all we have time for is getting to the super chats because there's so many of them.
So we are making sure by way of our policy to hit every single super chat.
But we are having pretty much zero time left over for anything that's not a super chat.
So if you want your comment or your question read live on the air, Then send it as a super chat.
Also, a couple points of order make sure to hit subscribe if you're watching us on YouTube, Write Response Ministries on YouTube.
Hit subscribe and click the bell so you'll actually be notified when we broadcast live, which is three times a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 3 p.m. Central Time.
And we broadcast live three times a week, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, 3 p.m. Central Time, not only on YouTube, but also simultaneously on X.
Those are the two platforms.
It all comes out on Spotify and Apple, our website, our app, everything else within a couple hours.
But if you want to catch the stream live, there are two platforms where we do that YouTube.
And X on X, uh, just go ahead and search our handle, it's at right response M, M as in ministries, at right response M, and give us a follow.
Same thing, even on X, click the bell so that you'll be notified not only with our live streams, but with all of my ridiculous, spicy tweets in the middle of the night, uh, that upset you know the internet.
Uh, it's lots of fun.
You'll find all sorts of uh, commentary about apple pie, rhubarb pie, pumpkin pie, pecan pie.
Uh, there's been a lot of pie posting uh, this last week and made some waves with that.
So There's your homework.
Subscribe on YouTube, click the bell, subscribe on X, click the bell, and get us in a super chat right now during this commercial break so that we can read it live on the air when we come back.
The Danger Of Centralized Power00:02:20
The danger of centralized power is often represented by the word king.
As Americans, we hate the word king.
Civilian ownership of body armor is about helping people to have increased power to resist tyrants and criminals.
And so, Armored Republic is about helping you to preserve your God given rights.
To the honor of the Lord Jesus Christ because he is the King of Kings and he governs kings and he will judge them.
This is Armored Republic and in a republic there is no king but Christ.
We are free craftsmen and we are honored to be your armor spread of choice.
Hey friends, Grey Toad Tallow is a family business making skin care the way that it should be simple and clean.
The company began as a personal mission to find healthier, more affordable solutions to common skin problems without the chemicals that are found in most products today.
Now, that search led to crafting balms from grass fed, grass finished animals that were naturally rich in vitamins and healthy fats, which is exactly what your skin craves.
These balms fight Dryness, they calm eczema and psoriasis, along with other stubborn skin issues, without containing all the nasty toxins.
Gray Toad Tallow offers everyday soaps, balms, and beard balm for men.
To experience some of their products, grab a balm sample pack.
Each batch is made with care in their home and shipped directly to their customers.
For skin care, the way that God designed, natural, clean, and effective, Visit graytoedtallow.com.
Use code WRITE15 for 15% off your order today.
Again, that's graytoedtallow.com.
And if you want 15% off, then add the promo code WRITE15 today.
Humanizing Historical Figures00:15:51
All right, super chats.
Here we go.
Brown Anglo Saxon Protestant.
He said, gave us two bucks.
We appreciate it.
He said, New York City 2001.
Never forget New York City 2025.
We forgot.
That's absolutely true.
There's something to be said for horseshoe theory.
And I really think that at some level, what you have to recognize is that there really was this sentiment of no way are we going to be ruled by Muslims here in America.
Americans, gosh darn it.
We're Americans, gosh darn it.
But what happened, though, is we're completely against, full aversion towards jihad, towards Sharia law, towards the totalitarian ideology of Islam.
And so then there was such an aversion.
But the void wasn't filled.
It wasn't replaced by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ and the Christian faith.
So it was just this aversion of what they deemed as being authoritarian, totalitarian, Sharia law, jihad, terrorism, these kinds of things.
And so it was just running to the direct opposite, a full embrace of inclusivity and diversity and equity, those kinds of things, which ironically gets you a Muslim mayor 14 years later.
Isn't that interesting?
To be honest, it's kind of, you know.
The 2001 Twin Towers and 2025 Zoran election is really just a microcosm that's indicative of the World War II.
Never again, right?
Never again.
Okay, so never again.
So, what are we going to do as an alternative?
Well, because we're terrified of even the slightest potential of an authoritarian figure in leadership in any Western country, we're going to embrace globalism instead of nationalism.
We're going to embrace full inclusivity instead of dogma or standards.
And then what happens is that through those kinds of policies, eventually it paves the road for a Muslim type figure to come in and rule in the West.
And so to say authoritarianism is the problem, so we'll embrace a laissez faire, you know, everyone's included kind of policy mentality, that doesn't actually fix the problem.
The void has to be filled with Christ.
Christless conservatism is not the answer.
Christless conservatism is not the answer.
Ultimately, just gets you Islam or Hinduism or Jewry or whatever.
It has to be Christ.
So, you actually do need dogma.
You do need standards.
You do need biblical authority.
You do need strong masculinity.
You do need these things.
And Christianity is the only answer.
Apart from it, you are hopeless.
Okay.
2001, it's like, never forget 2025.
We forgot 2025.
2050, please forget.
As in, hopefully, we forget the last 50 years.
And that'll be our slogan then.
Yep.
King Jerd, a wonderful supporter, sent $2.
Thanks, King.
I'm very sorry, ladies, but it's time to repeal the 19th.
So true.
But.
You get more time to be in the kitchen and to do what your heart loves, which is to bake food for your husband and for your kids.
Yeah, amen.
Okay.
This dude rocks.
He gave us $10.
We appreciate that.
He said between Doug Wilson recently mocking Brian Sauvay in his No Quarter November video and choosing to defend Ali Beth Stuckey, who is his target audience, who is his target audience.
I don't know how Moscow will fit in the future of the right wing.
Neither do I. I'm not sure.
No enemies on the right is something that.
I think I try to prescribe to.
I believe in the principle.
And it's not just no enemies to the right, but even no enemies on the right.
So that would include people who might be a little bit to the left of myself personally, but they're still on the right side of the equation.
I think that that's the right sentiment.
That feels like the right strategy.
But it is difficult if that individual is attacking you or attacking your friends.
And so.
That makes it really difficult.
Obviously, there's not going to be some public partnership for the foreseeable future or perhaps ever again.
But I was hoping that even if there's not a public partnership, there could at least be just kind of a quiet, I'm going to leave you alone.
But it seems as though even that is unlikely.
And so I don't know.
I don't know what place Moscow will fill.
I don't know what that will turn into.
But what I do know is.
That we're going to keep doing what we feel like the Lord has called us to do.
And we're going to do our best to not pick fights.
But if Moscow picks fights with us or with our friends, then we will retaliate in kind.
Okay.
Next.
RicoTD sent $10.
Thanks, Rico.
What do you make of the amount of Freemasonic influence in the USA founding till now?
Good question.
Plus, thoughts on the Austrian painter man.
He seems to be making a comeback online and in modern right wing ism.
I want to give it to Antonio for the Freemason part.
I think you would know more about that.
But I'll just say on the Austrian Painter, definitely, a lot of people don't see this.
So they're not on certain platforms.
They're not on Instagram.
You guys have to understand like there are reels, so short video clips with his voice translated into English, not just on X, Instagram, owned by Facebook, with hundreds of thousands of likes.
Not views, millions, tens of millions of views, hundreds of thousands of likes of people with their full government name saying, you know what, this guy was right.
And oftentimes they're portions pulled from.
That are most relevant to today.
So, whether it be what Germany was experiencing in the 1920s with Bolshevism, with perversion, there's different things that he says, very much so applicable.
And I would say, just last thought on him, there's kind of two characters of him.
Like, here he was, the Christian prince in the last stand of the Christian Europe.
No, I don't think so.
He was the worst person that ever lived.
No, also not true.
He's actually a pretty complex character.
And understanding in Martyr Maid's new series, Daryl Cooper, go listen to his series on World War II.
He was a human being.
And he's complex.
He doesn't fit in either one of these boxes.
For all you think of him, he was one of the great men of the last century.
He is the story of the 20th century.
And when Westerners say great man, he means in the technical sense, the great man.
It doesn't mean that he is the great man and the good man are not always the same.
No.
Not always.
So, like Napoleon, a great man.
That's what I was going to say.
Morally good, more.
No.
But a man that drove history.
Correct.
And I think what history is doing right now with Hitler is actually very similar to what happened with Napoleon.
So, at first, Napoleon was demonized, then for a brief moment, starting to be, you know, lionized.
And then eventually, as time goes on, what happens is you go demonize, lionize, humanize.
And I think that that's probably what will happen to Hitler.
So it's like demonized, you know, for 80 years, Hollywood's cooking out, you know, like 15 films annually about how bad Hitler was.
You know, it's like Schindler's list just repeated again and again and again.
Angel Studios is just like every month cranking them out.
Holocaust museums, you know, in every town in America.
It's a traveling exhibition.
The number of the Holocaust victims goes up annually every single year.
You know, like, how is this happening?
You know, and that's the demonized phase.
And I think that that phase is probably done.
And I think that what we're seeing and what we'll probably see, not for a long time, but for at least a window, will probably be some of the exact opposite because people are like, well, we're done with all the gay sex furries and gay race communism and trans this and trans that.
And the books that were being burned in Weimar Germany in the 19th century.
And there is some overlap.
And so young people will see that and they're going to be like, well, maybe he was right because it's got to be better than what we have now.
And so it was demonized for 80 years.
I think you'll see not 80 years of lionizing.
But I think you'll see a briefer window of some lionizing.
And then eventually, probably 20, 30, maybe 50 years from now, Hitler will be spoken of in similar ways as Napoleon.
Here were some really bad things.
No, he wasn't the last Christian prince.
He used Christian rhetoric.
A lot of people in Germany were, I believe, genuine Christians.
They were Lutherans.
So Germany was absolutely a Christian nation.
But Hitler himself, because of what he said about the occult over here or what he did over there, he himself, was he regenerate?
Probably not.
Similar to like Trump.
You know, it's like Trump uses a lot of Christian rhetoric.
A lot of Christians voted for him.
Is Trump himself personally born again?
Is he regenerate?
I am inclined to say no.
Doesn't seem like he understands the gospel, you know, the gospel of free grace and forgiveness of sins through faith in Jesus Christ.
You know, so I think eventually that will probably be where the ship lands with Hitler.
It'll go from demonizing for 80 years, lionizing maybe for five, 10 years, and then starting to humanize.
And humanized doesn't mean that you don't still point out the negative things.
It's like people today can talk about Napoleon without freaking out, without trying to murder someone and calling them a Nazi.
They can just say, hey, Napoleon was a great man.
Here are some things that he did that we think are atrocious.
But here are some other things, and here's the context of what was going on.
Here's his military brilliance that he undeniably had.
Yeah, I feel like the Christian worldview affords us the sober reading of history to be able to say, I support everything that he did that was Christian, right?
That was biblical.
And it's like, it is interesting that you think about the way Hitler has been characterized for so long.
It's like, if you asked me, what do you think of John F. Kennedy?
I'd be like, what exactly?
Right.
And I think we can say the same thing about Hitler.
You'd be hard pressed to find a man who was raised in a country that had been steeped, we could say in a continent, that had been steeped in Christian thought for over a millennia, and him not to have things that resonate, things that comport with the Christian worldview, whether it be.
On women, whether it be on masculinity and all of these things.
And these are the kinds of things that are clipped out and actually, and they're shown, they're put into reels and Instagram, and they go viral.
And I think that's what that effort is.
The effort is to say, look, it's more complex than this.
It's more nuanced than this.
And I will say older men disparaging younger men with a simple blanket statement of every single thing ever totally was wrong.
Young man, you shouldn't even for the first second read, think, consider, and objectively evaluate.
That is not working.
And if you want to absolutely be tuned out, then you go to young men and you club them over the head and say, don't even think about it.
Yeah, he said that.
Yep, that's written down.
Let's talk about it.
Yeah, let's look at the larger context.
They were facing Bolshevism.
That's how to address it.
Not a do not listen.
Do not think about this.
You cannot even harbor these thoughts.
That will not work.
Yeah, that'll work ish for another five to 10 years.
Five to 10 months.
That's what I'll get at.
But then, you know, boomers will be gone.
Right.
And the next generation has already made it abundantly clear the next generation of young men that that strategy is not going to be viable.
So, all right, real quick.
There was a Freemason part.
The Freemason.
And I'll admit, I don't know a ton about Freemasonry.
What I have looked into, it's bizarre to say the least the rituals, the.
Initiation process.
There's a lot of just bizarre elements to it.
In terms of its influence in the founding, its influence in the country, I think it's been a lot of it sensationalized.
And so you kind of got to take some of the stories that you hear about Freemasons and their actual influence in the government with a grain of salt.
But it is interesting.
It's something I'd like to look more into as well.
Cool.
Will Nelson, he gave us $10.
Thanks, Will.
We appreciate it.
He said, We are not going to vote our way out of this.
We all need to examine ourselves and repent because.
We are under God's judgment.
That's true.
Lots of prayer and fasting is needed over the next few years.
That's absolutely true.
There is a battle for civilization.
It's a religion war.
Sadly, I'm not happy about this.
I don't want it to be the case, but there is an element of it being a race war.
There really is an anti white discrimination that we're seeing.
The quiet part is being said out loud.
So there's this religious war, there's a race war, there's even a battle of the sexes, which, again, shouldn't be that way, but it is.
But underlining all of it, it's not this or that, it's this and that.
Both of these things are true.
Underlining all of that, it's a spiritual war.
And as Christians, we can never get away from that.
So we engage in politics and we think in the realm of the political.
And we're not just pietists, but we are not pietists, but we are pious and we are Christians.
And so, yes, we acknowledge that there is ultimately a spiritual war.
Light versus darkness, and that the weapons of our warfare are spiritual weapons, and prayer and fasting is one of them.
And God does bless repentance.
So, yes, and amen.
We are Christians at the end of the day.
We will never get away from that.
Okay.
This dude rock sent $2.
Michael Knowles, this is a quote, his jobs are more tasteful for women.
They are more modest.
I liked Michael Carey had a good article.
There's modest and feminine, like you think of a tight short dress.
That is feminine in a sense, but it's not modest.
And then a hijab is modest, like objectively.
That is a modest dress.
Right.
But it's not feminine.
Biblical femininity and modesty meet where it's tasteful.
It is modest, but it also is distinctly feminine.
It's not a black sack.
So, Michael Knowles, yeah, kind of based it, it is more tasteful than super skimpy, but it doesn't meet the mark either.
The goal is not just cover everything, the goal is to be feminine.
Right.
It's not just modesty, but it's also beauty.
Right.
And you're right, Wes.
That's well said.
The Christian ethic, the Islamic ethic is modesty.
The secular ethic is beauty.
The Christian ethic is both.
How can we have feminine beauty and modesty meeting together?
And that has been utterly lost in the West.
Antonio, will you take the next one?
Yeah.
Eli McCowan's daddy sent $5 and says, Heard from my son.
He's not come out of the basement since Antifa became a terrorist group.
I've not heard his squeaky voice.
Keep going, guys.
Great troll.
Great troll.
That's a good troll.
Good five dollar troll, right?
For the low, low price of $5.
He got that comment and that name read on the air.
Totally worth it.
Free YouTube channel, five bucks.
Look at the entertainment you can get.
Yep.
Brought joy to thousands of people.
All right, here we go.
The world that once was.
He gave us a $10 super chat.
We appreciate that.
Thank you.
He said, Hi, Joel.
The Anastasis Center, a Lib EO, like Eastern Orthodox EO?
Yeah.
Oh, a Lib EO denomination organization here in Massachusetts began an egalitarian feminist series.
Check it out for the LOLs, for the laughs, since you're in.
Two episodes.
Oh, wow.
I made two episodes.
That's great.
I love, you know, just making it into pieces of content without even knowing it.
It's like, hey, man, you must be working overtime.
Actually, I was asleep for the night and I made an appearance on an episode.
So he said, you're in two episodes so far as a patriarchal bad guy, as a patriarchal bad guy, but it is insufferable.
I appreciate that.
I will not be checking it out because it will be insufferable.
Ecclesiastical Polity Debates00:15:13
I'm going to take your word for it.
You're going to send Defiant Baptist in.
That's our top clipping guy.
Send him in.
What are they saying?
Come out with the good.
That's what Defiant Baptist exists for.
By his own admission, he regularly says, I watch trash and slop so that you don't have to.
God bless him.
So he'll go through, he'll wade through the slop, take the pertinent pieces of information.
That way we can watch.
He's like a miner going deep into the mine, coming back out with clips for us.
We're like, I have no idea it was so bad over there.
So we can watch for 60 seconds and he's willing to watch for 60 minutes.
God bless him.
That's a service to the body of Christ, the Lord's work.
Yeah, this is the Lord's work.
You guys should be praying and sending your gratitude to Defiant Baptists.
I mean, the guy is watching hours and hours of slop in order to keep us informed without having to watch it ourselves.
That is a ministry.
Okay, next one, Antonio.
Yeah, Jonah Olmime sent $5.
Have you considered becoming an Anglican, Episcopal?
No, no, no, no.
Episcopal.
Episcopal, sorry.
It seemed very consistent with Christian nationalism and American.
Christianity.
I agree.
Anglicanism, so have I considered?
Well, I mean, like in terms of like secret fantasies, yeah, I have.
So Episcopal, no.
Anglican, maybe.
In a realistic sense, no.
I'm not going to become Anglican, but I do appreciate it.
It has my respect, not Anglicans necessarily today, because Anglicans today are ultimately either Papists, they just go all the way, right?
They're Anglo Catholic, you know, but then the Catholic, the tail wags the dog, and they're basically Romanist or.
They really are Anglican, but they're also really libs and gay.
But once upon a time, once upon a time, Anglicanism was pretty based.
And one of the reasons I just want to give you credit to Jonah Olmein, because you're right in the sense that I do think that there is a consistency, there's a conduciveness between Anglicanism and Christian nationalism, in the sense that it keeps with the American ethos.
Of a pan Protestant Christian nation that is our founding, and I am a Protestant, so both theological conviction and our heritage, because Anglican is Protestant, but also because of the polity, a lot of different Protestant denominations, right?
So take soteriology aside and other theological tenets and just look at ecclesiastical polity, just look at like church governance.
Baptist, it's democracy.
I mean, that's what it is.
Baptist polity is democracy.
Methodist, for the most part, there's a little bit of A hybrid there, but it's democracy.
Like a lot of the Protestant, American Protestant denominations that are the largest Protestant denominations in our country are like, in terms of their ecclesiastical polity, they're libs.
It's universal suffrage.
I mean, in Baptist churches, true Baptist churches, congregational, it's actually more democratic than even our secular government.
Not only do the women get a vote, but so do the kids.
If you've got an eight year old who's baptized, he can get up there with his mom and dad and vote the pastor out of the church over the color of the carpet.
It's like, yeah, Baptists are based.
Baptists are based.
Priests of all believers.
Yeah, priests of all believers means that eight year olds can fire their pastor and get a vote.
Like, no, that's just lib.
That's not the Bible.
The Bible unapologetically espouses hierarchy, it does not espouse democracy.
So, no, that's not actually in the spirit of the scripture.
It's really not.
So, Anglicanism, I think I know what you're saying.
I think you're speaking more so in the realm of polity, ecclesiastical polity.
Anglicanism has a way, and so does Episcopalianism, but I would prefer Anglican, has a way of embracing hierarchy in terms of governance.
And in that vein, as a case study or an example, I would point to England.
Now, granted, England's super gay and overrun by foreigners.
But there is a reason that England was either Catholic or Protestant.
But when it was Protestant, it was not Baptist.
It was never Baptist.
And for the record, on that note, it was never Presbyterian either.
When England was Protestant, it was Anglican.
And the reason why is because the ecclesiastical polity of Anglicanism in its embrace of God's natural order and hierarchy was conducive with a monarchical system.
And so, yes, I do think that Anglicanism is more conducive to even a pan Protestant Christian nationalism than, for instance, Baptist theology is.
But will I, you know, switch teams?
No, I don't think I will.
But I am willing to be at least objective and admit some of the deficiencies of Baptist theology and give the Anglicans their due.
Okay, next.
Fine, Baptist.
Speak of the devil.
Speak actually of the great man.
Every right wing boss babe, he sent $5.
Every right wing boss babe like Ali Bestucky should have to go on record on the 19th Amendment.
That is a great litmus test.
What do you think of the 19th Amendment?
Anything less than repeal?
It should be gone.
Like, oh, hang on.
We're dealing with a lib.
Yeah.
That's a good point.
J.D. Peabody, he sent us $20.
Thank you.
We appreciate that.
He said, thoughts on the current court examining their Voter Rights Act and the possibility of it being the crack in the dam for other measures, i.e., 19th repeal, et cetera.
Initial arguments were positive, but faith in J. Roberts, Justice Roberts and Co., is at an all time low.
What do you guys think?
Any thoughts on that?
Certainly not going to lend towards 19th repeal.
Yeah.
There's certain court decisions that are within the kind of Overton window.
Questioning and a big one is a Burger Fell versus Hodges legitimization.
And we know because Clarence Thomas wrote in the decision on Roe v. Wade that, hey, we should revisit some of the ones that we have considered.
And he recently, just even like a month ago, he signaled in that direction.
And American support for gay marriage is falling.
It's fallen recently to a low 55%.
So practically, culturally, the momentum's there.
And the court itself has said, yeah, we might reconsider this.
So I think those are within the Overton window.
Now, once you take a Burger Fell versus Hodges, maybe you start to look at the Civil Rights Act.
I don't know, but practically speaking, some of these other dominoes are going to fall first before you've got the 19th Amendment, Civil Rights Act, other decisions like that.
And just historically, the Supreme Court has always been very reluctant to visit or you could say overturn legislation.
Now, Obergefell's different.
It's their decision.
They can reverse their decision two decades later and no problem, but to actually go one decade later.
One decade later.
Yep.
And yeah, so it's just a little bit more complex.
I think it's very unlikely that.
They actually take a crack at legitimate legislation, but we will see.
They can surprise us.
Yep.
Okay.
Next one is from Sea Dog.
Sea Dog gave us 20 bucks.
Thanks, Sea Dog.
We appreciate it.
He said, I had all but left organized Christianity until a certain very controversial man suggested you.
Radical times call for radical measures.
Was it the Austrian painter?
No, it was the Austrian painter's heir apparent.
Yep.
His Mexican cousin.
Yeah, his Mexican cousin.
I assume that he's probably referencing Nick.
Nick Fuentes gave me a shout out, I think, on Monday or something like that, which was like right after his interview on Tucker.
So he had a ton of viewers that night on his live stream.
And so I'm assuming that that's who you're referencing.
Thanks for coming over and giving us a shot.
Don't abandon organized Christianity.
You just don't get to do that.
You don't get to abandon the church.
Well, the church sucks.
Yeah, but it's still the bride of Christ.
Like, that's just not an option.
That's like saying, well, my wife, you know, she's, you know, she's honorary, she's insubordinate, you know, she's rebellious, she's this, she's that, but she's still your wife.
And so, yeah, you don't get to leave your family in the biological sense.
You also don't get to leave your family in the spiritual sense.
So I'm glad that you're giving us a shot.
We're glad that you're here.
Stay with us.
Thank you for the support.
We love you.
We'll be praying for you.
Don't give up on Christ Church because it is an oxymoron, it is a lie from the pit of hell.
To think, I didn't give up on Jesus, I just gave up on his church.
No, it doesn't work that way.
You give up on his church, and inevitably, you will be picked off by he who prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking who he may devour.
That's what the Bible says of the devil.
Who are those that the devil, like a lion, prowls to and fro, looking for who he can devour?
It's the antelope that has been separated from the herd.
Those are the ones who get picked off.
There are no lone wolves when it comes to Christianity.
So, even the church in disarray is still the body of Christ.
Don't give up.
Stay with the body of Christ.
And if it's possible, and maybe it's not, for a lot of guys, it's not, but if it's possible, pray and ask the Lord and work and build and save and do what you can to reposition yourself and your family to live in a place where there is a solid.
Local church that you can be a part of, so that you can be a part of the body of Christ and not be insufferable every single Sunday morning.
That's the ideal.
That's the goal.
In the meantime, go to church, be a part of the body of Christ.
And if your church is terrible, do your best and supplement what is lacking with Christian ministries like ours.
And we're glad you're here.
All right.
Next one, Antonio, you take it.
It's Mike Peters.
Yep.
Mike Peters sent $10.
Thanks for that and says, I'm a tax paying, land owning, heritage American, 1750s with five children.
I'd gladly give up my right to vote if it means we can keep a Christian nation.
Why can't women see this day of fold?
Amen.
God wills it.
Amen.
Any thoughts?
I respect the sentiment.
I would only say the only reasons I'm hesitant to say something like that is if you give up your right to vote, you better hope your guy's in office.
I mean, you think about it, it's like you have voting is really your only leverage.
Can you imagine your Christian prince supporting Israel and you have actually no recourse to change it?
So that's really the only caveat you'd have to get to a point where you felt, you know, we felt like, yep, this is our guy.
Now I would, now I'd be fine not voting.
I don't think we're there yet.
I don't think we're anywhere near that.
Yeah, I don't think we're there yet either.
But I think he's just painting the hypothetical, saying if.
So what he's saying, I think, assumes not like, hey, nobody gets to vote and we're going to have a communist rule the nation.
I think he's assuming if we had the great man, the Christian prince, and he had finally arrived, then I would.
Amen to that.
And amen to that.
Yeah.
Okay.
Simiot.
That was a good.
I think so.
Simiot.
Okay.
This is $10 from Simiot.
Thank you.
We appreciate that.
I'm going to say the name one more time because it's kind of fun.
Simiot.
We appreciate that, Simeon.
He said, way off topic.
All right, my fave.
But I'm curious for y'all's opinion on MKUltra.
All right, let's do this one short.
MKUltra, it absolutely exists.
And I think that the FBI and the government has brainwashed many people and maybe even Kanye West.
That's my opinion.
Any thoughts?
I'm a little skeptical of some of the brainwashing stuff.
Part of my degree was psych.
And so there's been a lot of studies because you can imagine if you could influence people or hypnotize them at a movie theater to buy popcorn.
I mean, your profits would be incredible.
There's even like debunked studies that try to prove that.
A lot of them really have come up bunk.
It's just, it's really hard to make people do what you want them to do, especially at an on demand level, incognito.
So I'm more skeptical of some of the claims, but for sure, in the 60s, 70s, and 80s, the CIA and our intelligence agencies, they were trying, they were taking, giving people LSD to see if they could use, at minimum, to see if that was possible.
Yep.
Yep.
So did they actually succeed in brainwashing different people?
I'm personally more skeptical, but for sure, they were doing stuff they shouldn't have.
Well, my position isn't so much that the hypnotic of like, you know, that they're giving, you know, MKUltra to these individuals to get them to do precise things like, you know, fulfill an assassination, you know, or something like that.
But so not so much like such specific control that it gets someone to do precisely what you want.
But to get someone just to be insane and out of their right mind and appear crazy so that they would be discredited in the public eye and not taken seriously.
To get them just to shoot themselves in the foot.
So, not even do what you want, but just do something stupid so that they wouldn't be taken seriously.
I think that's not only possible, but I personally think even likely.
And yeah, Kanye West, just throwing it out there.
Or he could just be retarded.
I don't know.
But, you know, in love, hopes, all things, in the spirit of charity, I'd like to think maybe, you know, maybe he was drugged.
Who knows?
Swinters 07.
You want to read this one?
Yep.
Sent $5 and says, do you think our political climate would.
End up looking like the UK?
If so, is that inevitable?
What an offensive question.
Are we going to end up like the Brits?
We're Americans, darn it.
Well, we used to be Americans.
Now, half the country is Muslims and Indians.
Some of us are Americans.
Some of us are Americans.
I don't think it will.
England is uniquely demoralized, uniquely destroyed.
They have a broader system as far as political parties go.
They have a stupid, it's like multi party.
It's just tough.
It's a tougher system.
We have a two party system.
We're Americans.
We have more land.
We have more space.
We have a little bit richer of a heritage.
I like to think better things.
I think the great man will come from America, will rescue our Anglo brothers, our British brothers on the other side of the sea.
So, I'm optimistic.
We'll go fix.
America has to get fixed first.
It's going to be a little bit, it's going to take a while.
The great man, I don't think we even know who he is, but he'll appear.
And it could take 10, 20 years.
And then we'll go fix England.
I think that's.
And liberate the rest of Christendom.
Yeah, it's a different founding ethos, I think, in America.
It's like the best thing about Americans is that they're rebellious, but also the worst thing about Americans is they're rebellious.
That's so insightful.
And that's why I don't think we'll be like England.
So, on the one hand, it's going to be harder for America to fix itself.
Because we're rebellious.
We have like a built in aversion towards hierarchy, towards order, towards authority.
Like we, you know, the no kings rally, like we hate kings.
Libs hate kings, but so do conservatives.
Everybody, they're like, authority?
Moving To A Good Church00:17:23
No, thank you.
I'm my own man, this atomistic, individualistic, you know, everyone's a snowflake, everyone's unique.
So that's terrible, right?
So that's what makes it hard because I don't think we're going to fix it through individualism.
No, I think it's going to be a great man who rallies the country and People saying, I'm willing to die for that man.
We may not call him a king.
Maybe we do, maybe we don't, but he will be kingly, whether it's in formality and his title or whether it's merely function.
And that's going to be hard to get there as Americans with such a rebellious spirit.
On the flip side, though, Antonio is absolutely right.
For America to be demoralized and defeated to the same degree as certain European countries like France or England, that also is less likely because of that independent, rebellious type of.
So, America, in some ways, you could argue it's kind of a catch 22.
It's harder to fix because fixing requires order, humility, hierarchy.
But it's also harder to compromise it, you can disseminate, but to utterly crush, that's really hard because you're talking about a giant landmass with people who can live in the woods and keep their fighting spirit alive.
5,000 bullets a piece.
Yeah, exactly.
So, that's harder.
Okay, Mrs. Ingham.
$10 from Mrs. Ingham.
No comment, no question, but just $10 support.
Thank you so much.
We appreciate that.
Very kind.
This dude rocks.
$10 from him.
He said, Joel, will sermons resume uploads on the Right Response channel?
Any future books planned?
And then, Wes, shout out to the Vatican for Mater Populae.
I can't do Latin.
You do it.
Mater Populae Fidelis.
There you go.
A step in the right direction, declaring Christ as the mediator.
Right.
I saw all the stuff about Mary co redemptrix.
That got shot down.
The Vatican was considering dogmatizing Mary's title as a co redemptrix with Christ, and they rejected it.
Good.
Good for them.
Praise God.
In terms of sermons on the channel, so we're not quite ready to announce what we've got in store next year.
It's massive.
It's massive, and it's going to blow your minds, and people will wail into the void.
I mean, there will be so much coping and so much seething.
It's going to blow your mind, but many of you will be ecstatic.
You're like, Babe, wake up.
This is insane.
It's going to be great.
But there are going to be significant changes.
So, going into the new year, we may not post our sermons.
All right, so I'm going to probably get yelled at by Nathan from the back room.
I'm not going to give too much away here, but basically, our thinking, I just want to give you a little bit of reasoning.
We're not just trying to unnecessarily deprive you guys, especially you guys who are having trouble finding a solid church.
We're not trying to hurt you or deprive you from biblical content and sermons.
But we're kind of at a point now where on the ground, because I am still a local minister.
On the ground, we just want to protect our congregation.
And so we want to provide for the larger body of Christ as many resources as possible.
But then in our local capacity, and for myself as a minister, we have an obligation and a duty to protect our congregation locally.
And so we're trying to not bring too much heat and controversy to our local church.
So we're basically going to next year, we're going to try to get.
A little bit more of a clear separation between here's a local church that I pastor on the ground, and we're probably going to continue recording the sermons.
But right now, we're leaning towards recording the sermons and emailing them the next day, Sunday night or Monday morning, to the membership of the church, but only the membership of the church.
And the purpose for that is so that it'll still happen.
My enemies will still find a way, but at least making it not so easy for them.
It's one thing if people blast me and I go viral, you know, and, you know, the Houston Chronicle writes some article about me or what, like, okay, but I made that choice, right?
I made that choice.
But I don't want every single congregant in my local church for their own identity and livelihood and their job and all those kinds of things to be at risk.
So we're just thinking we need a cleaner separation.
And the thing is, if we're posting the sermons with right response, you know, online, even if we post them online through, you know, the name of the church, Uh, still, if there's video attached, you're gonna see my ugly mug.
You're gonna see them.
I know who that is.
I saw him viral over here.
I'm seeing him preach over there.
The connection will be made, and then you know, we've had reporters show up at the church, you know, and that will probably continue as we have more notoriety, you know, in the future.
So, trying to keep the church a little bit more anonymous is basically what I'm saying.
So, we're moving locations with the church, we're getting our own building with the church, we're probably going to be giving the sermons exclusively to the membership of the church and not publicizing them.
On the internet.
And all of that is, again, not to deprive the larger body of Christ.
That is not the motive whatsoever.
It really makes me sad in many ways because I know that people have been blessed all over the country and all over the world.
And we want to continue to be a blessing as best we can.
But my first obligation is to protect the local congregation.
And I don't want those sermons to be publicized in such a way that the dots can be easily connected between what I'm doing publicly with the podcast and this, that, and the other to the local church and my preaching.
And then reporters show up.
You know, in the flesh, you know, at our church and can find our address and start, you know, going around questioning, interrogating people and then trying to get people fired.
So, long story short, what we're probably going to do is we'll probably, I know that we're a couple weeks behind, we're probably going to go back retroactively and post the sermons that we're currently missing.
So, I know that's probably where the question arises from.
We'll go back and we'll post those sermons so you'll be able to listen to them continuing in our series through the Gospel according to Matthew.
And we'll probably keep posting the sermons weekly to the end of this year.
But unfortunately, it brings me no joy to say this, but unfortunately, I think for simply security and safety and protecting those who are part of our local congregation, we are going to stop posting sermons online starting next year.
I think that's what we're going to have to do.
And in terms of books planned, actually, yes, we have a book planned.
I can't give you the title, can't give you the theme, can't give you.
Anything because it is a surprise.
But we will have a book that will be released next year and at the beginning of 2026, and it's going to be a banger.
So we're really excited about that.
Okay, Antonio, next one.
Yep.
Titus Weller sent $10 and says, No black pill, make Christ America's king again.
Amen.
Amen.
All right.
Table and the Trenches, 1999.
Very kind, very generous.
Thanks so much.
I was reprimanded by an elder in my church for listening to your podcast, Brian Tove and Nick Fuentes.
That's That's terrible.
I'm sorry.
Do I look for another church or stay and try to reform?
I do have some influence in my church.
Yeah, if you have influence, I've said this a number of times.
So, guys, you know, email me all the time like, should I stay and try to reform my church?
And I'll ask, like, okay, well, what is your station at your local church?
Well, I'm a member and I've been there for six months.
It's like, okay, you're not going to be able to change the church.
But if you have some influence, especially if you are an ordained officer of the church, maybe you're a deacon, maybe you're an elder, then it might be worth a shot.
In terms of just leaving the church, don't leave something until you have somewhere to go.
Let me say that again.
Do not leave your church, no matter how bad it might be, until you have somewhere else to go.
You cannot, guys, listen to me.
I know you follow me, but that's why I feel this moral kind of pastoral obligation because you guys follow me online.
You're not allowed to be perpetually churchless.
I know that the pickings are slim.
I understand.
I know.
I know.
But you can't just be churchless for two years, three years.
You can't do that.
So that means that you're going to have to move to a good church.
Or in humility, tolerate a bad church.
Those are your options.
You're not allowed to be churchless.
And so, no, you should not just immediately leave your church.
And the big thing that I want to point out here is I'm just going off of your wording.
It's all I have to go off of.
But you said you were reprimanded.
If you were writing and saying, I've been placed under church discipline, or I was excommunicated, or the elders have publicly informed the whole church and shamed me and my family, like there would be, you know, there is a line, right?
There would be some kind.
Criteria that, if met, I would say, okay, that's way out of line.
Yeah, you need to immediately leave that church.
But if it's just reprimanded, I take that, I'm assuming, meaning I was pulled aside by my elders and I was wrongfully corrected, but it was a private correction.
Well, I think they were probably wrong for that, for listening to my podcast or listening to Brian Sauvay.
I think that's wrong, but tolerable.
Wrong, but tolerable.
I think you can put your head down and keep.
Keep plugging away.
So, no, I would not leave the church if that's all that has happened.
But I would, you know, have my eyes peeled and looking around.
Is there another church nearby that we could go to where something like this wouldn't happen?
Okay, Antonio, you want to do the next one?
Yep.
Matthew Mastronardi, the great reassessment, sent $20.
Thanks for that.
And says, Joel, I was born in the U.S., my dad is an immigrant, my mom is an American, and on her side, we have family that fought for the South.
I am a Christian.
According to your beliefs, should I be eligible to hold office?
No.
So, what I was arguing, I appreciate this.
You sound like a great guy.
God bless you.
You're a brother in Christ.
You're a Christian.
Christ is king.
Amen.
We love you.
We appreciate you.
So, please don't take this the wrong way.
But the standard does matter.
So, what I, if you're kind of going off of the earlier portion of this episode, I was talking about in the realm of pragmatism and using strategic rhetoric that we think is winnable, right?
So, how do you get the ball all the way down the field?
Well, the first way is you ask the question, how can I just move the ball one more yard?
So, in terms of the next step, that's where I was saying, okay, well, we should have criteria for voting.
You know, you got to at least be born in the country.
But if you're asking me in terms of principle, so not pragmatism, what's the next step?
But principle, what's the ideal?
What's the standard?
The standard would be that you must be a heritage American to hold office in this country.
And furthermore, going even further than what you asked, you didn't ask for it, but I'm going to give it to you anyways.
Not only should a non heritage American not be able to hold office, but a non heritage American ideally should not be able to vote.
So when I said you must be born here to vote, I was giving the pragmatic best next step, thinking, What is rhetoric that would still be offensive to 60% of the country, but would be at least somewhere within the pale, even if it's on the far right edge of the pale, to where it might be just pragmatic, just tolerable enough to eventually, if we just keep pushing it on social media loud enough and frequently enough, that rhetoric might win?
So that's the context when I was saying you need to be born here to vote.
Pragmatic.
In terms of principle, know that if your parents moved here 20 years ago, And, you know, they moved, especially from a non Western country.
They moved from, you know, Pakistan, a Muslim country or a Hindu country or whatever, you know.
Then, no, God bless you.
You're a brother in Christ.
You're a Christian.
And if you're an upstanding citizen, then I can even argue that I'm glad you're here.
And just to clarify, he says his mom, it sounds like, isn't a heritage American.
Well, hold on.
That's not what I read.
Let me see it again.
Where is it?
My mom is American.
On her side, we have family that fought for the South.
Fought for the South when?
Civil War.
I imagine Civil War.
Okay.
Fuck.
Well, I'm thinking, like, you know, battle for the South and Iraq.
Battle for the Alamo, you know, like Texas South.
Like, are we talking, you know, like, what battle?
What are we.
But I think that the question would be my dad is an immigrant.
My mom, let's say, is a heritage American.
So I've gone on record, I'm going to hold to it.
Third generation on both sides.
Or fifth generation on one side, third generation on both sides, or more, or fifth generation on one side or more.
So, based off of that, that would probably put you at fifth generation.
It was so over for him.
It's like, I can't do it.
And then it comes back.
So, based off of that, then yes, you would be able to vote.
And personally, I would say he could also hold office.
In the future, though, encourage your mom not to marry an immigrant if she ever finds herself in that place again.
I'm sure your dad's a great guy.
But CJD Vance, you know, point A, we need to stop marrying people from the other side of the world.
Find a spouse here if you can.
Okay.
So, yes, you'd be able to vote, you'd be able to hold office.
But again, like I was saying, it does matter.
Being an American has to mean something.
And if anyone from anywhere can come here and be an American, then being an American means nothing.
That's what we're trying to hedge against.
We're not trying to be mean spirited towards the rest of the world.
We're just trying to say that.
It means something to be Japanese, and it should mean something to be American, too.
Okay, next one.
All right.
Brown Anglo Saxon Protestant, just a little bookend here.
$4.99.
Thank you, sir.
Progress for the sake of progress, and this is reference to voting rights for women, must be discouraged for our tried and tested traditions often require no tinkering.
Dolores Umbridge.
So he's quoting her, right?
You're looking at me skeptically.
Harry Potter.
Yeah, professor.
Harry Potter.
She's actually evil, but yeah.
Never mind that one.
Progress for the sake of progress must be discouraged for our tried and tested traditions often require no tinkering.
That's a rare Dolores W, I think.
Rare.
That's a rare Dolores W. I've got to say that that is correct.
That's true.
But if Dolores was really based, she would just go home and bake a pie.
All right.
Okay.
Invictus Christus.
He gave us $10.
He said, I'd like to get your thoughts on Samuel Say.
All right.
We're going there.
I used to like his material, but recently he's become a shill for Israel.
That is sadly true.
Disappointing to see him take this position.
Was he really on our team?
I think he really was on our team, but our team was retarded.
So he really was on the team.
And when I say our team was retarded, I want to be honest here.
I'm including myself.
The reality is, you just have to realize that both Christianity and the West, Western civilization, we got so far off the rails for decades.
That we're all learning in real time.
So I'm not going to sit here and pretend, right?
I can't, even if I wanted to.
You could just go back three years ago.
You can find the recording and be like, here's Joel disagreeing with Joel.
And people think, oh, I owned him.
People are doing this with Matt Walsh.
I find this so funny.
People are like, I missed Matt Walsh back in 2017.
And I think Matt Walsh had actually a great response.
The best response would be leaving the Daily Wire.
We'll still hold out hope.
I think it's going to happen eventually.
But in the meantime, his response was, well, they showed some article that he wrote where he said, we need to stand against the far left and the far right.
You know, fascist or racist, you know, Nazis, whatever.
And people are basically saying, I miss, you know, the old Matt Walsh and, you know, 2017 Matt Walsh.
And Walsh responded to this in a tweet maybe a week ago.
And he said, he said, you miss 2017 Matt Walsh.
And you're saying, like, I changed and that that change inherently, you know, proves compromise.
You know, that that change is just inherently somehow negative.
And he said, well, 2017 Matt Walsh did not see his friend get shot in the neck.
2017, Matt Walsh didn't see people locked in their homes for months.
2017, Matt Walsh didn't see people lose their careers and not be able to provide for their family because they wouldn't take a foreign substance injected in their arm.
2017, Matt Walsh, and he just went on and on, and it was a great way to articulate his point.
Compromise And Sanctification00:02:42
He was saying, Yeah, I changed because life changes people because you learn.
And really, here's the thing so let's just argue the alternative, okay?
So here's the alternative.
There's Matt Walsh, and it's like, well, Matt Walsh is contradicting what Matt Walsh said eight years ago in 2017.
Okay, here's the alternative.
My name is Joel Berry, and I have never changed or repented or developed or improved or grown at all in the last 15 years.
How is that a brag?
Right?
I mean, think about it.
Those are your two choices.
So people will always say it as a gotcha, like some great indictment.
Oh, Matt Walsh, Joel Webbin, disagreeing with Joel Webbin.
Correct.
I'm a Christian.
The whole Christian life is a life of repentance.
Repentance means to change.
I'm constantly developing, constantly by the grace of God, improving, constantly growing, going from glory to glory to glory, sanctifying, improving, maturing.
Right?
That's life for the Christian.
That's life.
How in the world is it a point of pride to say, in 15 years, I have developed in nothing?
I have grown in nothing.
I have changed in nothing.
I have learned nothing.
Why are we bragging about that?
I've been consistently stupid for 20 years.
How is that a positive tenant?
So, yes, people change.
So, was Samuel Say on the team?
Yes, he really was on the team.
The team was retarded.
And I was on the team too, and part of the retardation.
And praise God, the team is improving.
The team is learning.
The team is growing.
That's a good thing.
And here's the reality when the train gets so far off the rails, this didn't happen overnight, it happened over decades.
For decades, Western civilization, the historic traditional Christian faith, it was derailed so severely that you don't figure it all out in six months, right?
You don't fix those kinds of problems, that degree of compromise in six months.
Instead, what happens is you realize, man, we were wrong on this.
We should repent.
And then a year later, oh, we were also wrong on this.
We need to repent for that also.
We were also wrong on this.
We need to repent for that also.
It is a process.
It's the process of sanctification.
Justification is a moment, sanctification is a process.
And that's what's happening on the right.
People are realizing oh, you know what?
The Process Of Repentance00:05:32
I don't actually just want to go back to 2014.
Oh, I actually don't just want to go back to the 1990s.
Oh, I don't want to just go back to the 1950s.
Oh, I want to go all the way back.
I want to get back to biblical.
Fidelity.
I want to get back to the true foundation of Western civilization.
Oh, it was all a lie.
I don't want to just repent and reject the most severe implications of liberalism.
No, I actually want to overturn liberalism itself.
It's all an anomaly, it's all an aversion towards a hierarchy, towards the created order, towards God's natural design for his image bearing.
Creatures, no, God made male and female, and it's not enough to just say women can't be in combat.
No, women should not be leading anything, women should not be lecturing any man.
They need to go home.
Oh, you know what?
The Tower of Babel having uh everyone gathered in one place that was actually a bad thing.
And God, He confused their languages not just as a judgment so that the Tower of Babel would be reversed in Acts chapter 2 with Pentecost.
That's gay, that's bad exegesis, that's not what the scripture is.
Is teaching the Tower of Babel was both God's judgment for man's pride and thinking he could elevate himself to the level of God.
Let's build a tower that stretches to the heavens.
But it also was God's judgment towards man saying, Let us not be dispersed and separated to fill the earth, which was the very thing that God commanded man to do in the cultural mandate in the garden in Genesis chapter 2 be fruitful and multiply and spread out, fill the earth and exercise dominion over it.
So, God, what He was doing at the Tower of Babel. was not just judging mankind for his arrogance, thinking he could build a tower to the heavens, that he could be as God and make a name for himself, but also God was judging him for his refusal to spread out.
And so, God's confusing of their languages was a judgment wrapped in mercy because it was a catalyst that quickly got man back on track.
It forced man to do what God originally designed him to do and what would have naturally taken place, anyways, over time, people spreading out, different dialects and languages emerging and cultures and this and that.
Because if you want every tribe, tongue, and nation in heaven, you've got to have tribe, tongue, and nation distinctions on earth.
And if all you have is just some global soup, Then you don't get every tribe, tongue, and nation in heaven.
God created a world with distinctions.
So, getting back to male and female, what it actually means, getting back to understanding tribes and nations and that the nations can be distinct and that doesn't mean it doesn't necessitate hatred or anger towards anyone.
It just recognizes God's plan and the goodness of God's plan.
That's where we're at right now.
There are some guys on the right who are saying, no, we actually need to repent of this and this and that we need to repent.
Of everything, a full fledged repentance that reserves nothing, right?
A full fledged repentance.
And the reality is that Samuel Say really was on the team, but the team is repenting further.
And Samuel Say, for fairly obvious reasons, let's just be honest.
I'm not saying this makes him a monster or a bad guy or anything like that.
I like him.
I like him.
I don't think he's a bad guy.
I don't have any ill will towards him.
But he's not going to follow us all the way down to where the train actually ends in these tracks of repentance.
Why?
Because he was born in Ghana and then grew up in Canada.
Like, full repentance for Samuel Say has some pretty clear implications that I don't think he wants.
And I don't blame him.
I don't blame him.
So, no, he's not going to be our guy.
And that doesn't mean he's a monster.
That also doesn't mean that he's not a Christian.
We don't need to do that.
We don't need to be so rash.
So, he's an op.
He's not even converted.
No.
Samuel says, a brother in Christ, in God's providence, he was used at a critical time.
He did a lot of good.
And the reality is that we need to take the ball even further for obvious reasons.
He's not going to take the ball further.
And so at this point, we can have respect and kindness, but we have to be able to look at the Samuel says and say, We love you.
We don't hate you.
We're not denying your salvation.
You're a brother in Christ, and I'll see you on the other side.
But as for me and my house, we have to go down the full road of repentance.
You're willing to go halfway.
I have to go all the way.
The Lord Jesus has called me to a full life of repentance.
I'm not just going to repent for the last decade because America has not been rebelling against the Lord for just the last decade.
We're going to repent further.
But Samuel says, You're not going to find that name in the Civil War registry.
And so I can see why he would want to go back, but only so far.
And I think that what that, so you don't have to attach malice.
I think you can look at that, connect those dots, and.
And have sympathy and brotherly love, but also recognize okay, he's not going to be on the team.
And I'm going to have to go the next leg of the race without him.
Full Road Of Repentance00:02:42
Some guys will, they'll be with you.
I mean, Lord of the Rings, you know, there's some guys, it's like they only go so far.
But then when you finally make the whole journey all the way back to Mordor to actually destroy the ring, turns out at the very end, right, the company of this many guys from the start, it's dwindled.
And at the very end, it's just you and Sam.
And, uh, That just might be what it is.
Okay, next.
Nick Kilmer?
Oh, well, in this case, I was thinking Samwise Gouncey.
I was going to say, it won't be you and Sam.
It won't be Sam.
It'll be you and somebody else.
Okay.
Nick Kilmer.
Okay.
$5.
Thanks, Nick.
How do you think they're going to try to gain control of this young right wing generation?
Everyone I know is far right now.
I don't.
You, I mean, you take the masculine energy, you destroy it with porn, you destroy it with a toxic living environment, and you just take them and you pacify them.
That's how you do it.
Yeah, young man, I know you care for your country, but.
Netflix has a new series, Love is Blind, Dating on the Spectrum.
I know you're really feeling it.
I know you don't have a job, but here's the deal Universal basic income and a great new video game just came out.
You pacify them.
That's one way that you do it.
Dude, through entertainment, through social media, through food.
That would do it, actually.
Yeah.
That would do it.
You take away the edge, the fire, the sense of loss.
I see an America that was lost.
I want to get it back.
I understand that, but could I interest you?
In another music festival coming to you.
That's what you do.
It's kind of like, I can't endorse it.
I have seen it.
I must admit, I have seen it.
But I can't say that it was a moral movie to watch.
But the other guys, remember that?
With Markie Mark, you know, and Mark Wahlberg and Will Ferrell.
Will Ferrell.
Yeah.
And they're like, they're onto this guy who's like so clearly corrupt, you know, as detectives.
And they go in and they're like, we're going to get him.
We're going to nail him, you know, dead to rights.
And it's like, Well, guys, can I interest you in front row tickets to Mama Mia?
It's not a game.
Yeah, he's like, it's not a bribe.
And then it blacks out, and the very next scene is they're at the Knicks game or they're at the Mama Mia concert.
And then they're leaving.
They're like, son of a gun.
We fell for it again.
Wes is absolutely right.
That'll be what it is.
It'll just be essentially bribing young men.
Okay, last one.
Blocked out $16.89, $2.
We need to get Andrew Cox as a special guest.
Yeah, a few people have said that.
I don't even know who he is.
There's too many Andrews.
There's Andrew Wilson.
Right.
That's one other Andrew.
That's a lot of Andrews.
Andrew Visker.
I've heard Andrew Cox.
Is he good?
What does he do?
What is he talking about?
I got to look into him.
Supporting The Ministry Growth00:01:10
I'll look into this.
Oh, you're saying you're good.
I've heard the name.
I know it's a man that exists in our sphere.
All right.
I'll have to look into it.
Okay.
We'll look into it.
Thanks for the recommendation.
Thanks for tuning in.
My goodness.
That was a lot of super chats.
I mean, I can't complain.
It took a long time, but it was very generous on the part of all of you.
We are at, simultaneously watching between YouTube and X, we are at 3,962.
Up 3,961.
People are dropping off now here at the end, but almost at 4,000 people simultaneously watching between X and YouTube.
Lots of super chats, lots of engagement.
And I just got to say from the bottom of my heart, means the world.
Thanks, guys.
You are putting us on the map.
You guys being faithful listeners, supporting, sharing the videos, engaging with us on X, giving us super chats, supporting the ministry, all these things.
It's incredible over the course of 2025 how much we've grown.
It really is incredible.
And it's all thanks to you.
We appreciate it.
And Lord willing, let's see, today's Wednesday.
So we will see you on Friday, Lord willing, at 3 p.m. Central Time.