Nick Fuentes defends his America First movement against a schism, dismissing critics like Dan Bilzerian as "low IQ" influencers who prioritize performative anti-Semitism over the strategic hijacking of the GOP. He contrasts his disciplined plan to defeat Vivek Ramaswamy and secure JD Vance's loss in 2028 with what he calls the chaotic, ideologically disjointed "America First United" conference. While mocking rivals for their lack of policy prescriptions and focusing on geopolitical containment of China rather than Middle East conflicts, Fuentes asserts that true sovereignty requires infiltrating Republican infrastructure rather than engaging in wasteful primaries or relying on "grifters," ultimately framing his movement as the only path to restoring American identity against a globalist agenda. [Automatically generated summary]
You have been looking at no more than projections of a conjured reality.
Also known as a mirage.
But we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means, on the people expanding their sphere of influence.
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An overflowing of love.
An overflowing of self-giving love.
So much of it, it cannot be contained.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children.
Even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
Because the Republicans are better than the Democrats.
Here's a little perspective.
Let's say that Kamala Harris had won the election in 2024.
If Kamala doubled down on supporting Ukraine as Trump has, if Kamala bombed Iran, there'd be riots in the streets.
People would say our illegitimate president, who cheated her way into the nomination, she's expanding the war, she's expanding World War III into the Middle East.
Everybody would say this is illegitimate, this is like a crime.
But because it was Trump, 90% of Republicans supported Trump bombing Iran on Israel's behalf.
Because it was Trump.
If it was Kamala, do you think 90% of Republicans would have supported it?
Absolutely not.
Democrats wouldn't support it, independents wouldn't support it, and Republicans would not support it.
And it's time to just say it outright Donald Trump is the Matrix president, okay?
In 2016, Hillary Clinton was the Matrix candidate.
In 2020, Joe Biden was the matrix candidate.
But in 2024, Donald Trump was.
And why?
After October 7th, the Jews knew that the Republican Party, controlled by AIPAC, controlled by Israel, and with Trump in office, they were going to let Israel do whatever they wanted to do.
It's clear.
It's obvious.
And the media is in on it.
Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and the media are all in on it because Trump is their matrix candidate.
That's why CNN is friendly to them.
That's why Silicon Valley gave him hundreds of millions of dollars.
That's why Wall Street did.
And Trump is just dispensing the favors corporate tax cuts for Wall Street, bombing Iran for Israel.
This is the story of the 2024 election.
And here's the red pill that nobody's ready for JD Vance is the Matrix candidate.
They ordered Trump to nominate him.
Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Tucker Carlson ordered Trump to pick JD Vance.
Party.
And they played the parties off of each other.
They've done it forever.
When Israel was under attack, they played into the right wing because they knew that the Republican Party would say things like, There's a Muslim takeover of America.
Trump said he was going to bomb Iran.
We're tough.
So they leaned into the Republican cultural stuff.
That's why Charlie Kirk says Islam is taking over America because that kind of Islamophobic rhetoric plays well with the right wing.
That's why they did it.
There's no Muslim takeover of America.
There's a Jewish takeover of America, obviously.
And the Republicans are involved in it just as much as the Democrats.
And this is what they don't want you to hear.
Nick Fuentes Rising00:03:19
unidentified
Nick Fuentes, they are getting stronger.
I don't want to pretend, oh no, they're totally relevant.
They have made peace with Egypt, Jordan, Emirates, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia.
They have destroyed the regime in Iraq, Syria, and soon to be Iran.
And what this gives them is unbridled, unlimited power.
To do what exactly?
Well, most likely to expand their territory.
Who exactly would stop that?
The answer is nobody.
If Israel controls that region, how rich, how powerful can they become?
My issue with Iranian regime change is that we are creating an Israeli superpower that not even we will be able to restrain.
Look at how they have used us like an instrument.
They stole a nuclear arsenal from us.
They got all of this military technology from us.
We defeated their foes.
And now we have essentially handed this to them.
Now they're ready to cut the umbilical cord and become their own superpowers.
We endured the cost.
We paid the money.
Our soldiers died.
Our country burned so that an Israeli superpower could be born.
And now our country will be in the wreckage.
Handed to Them00:11:45
unidentified
15 seconds, guidance is internal.
5.
4.
Ignition sequence 5.
We are the best guest player in the world without a doubt, aren't we?
5.
15 seconds, guidance is internal.
4.
Ignition sequence 5.
Second to none,
And we Side
to side, I sweat shot.
I assume you're looking at me.
We can go low to high.
I just have fun treating like nobody else can see.
I could be mean tonight, but that's not what I'm trying to be.
I could be mean tonight, no.
I'm trying to be nice.
I'm trying to be nice.
I'm trying to be hey, i'm trying to be shut up,
just quit it.
Remember when I grabbed my shit, I said, no buys, i'm dipping.
Remember when I said I changed, i'm new, i'm here, I listen, I know why this shit so mean, but i'm really trying to fix it.
Fix it, we can go side to side.
I sweat you, I assume you're lookin' at me You can go low with a high, it's half on you that like nobody else can see I could be mean tonight, but that's not what I'm tryna be I could be mean tonight, I'm trying to be nice, I'm trying to be nice, I'm trying to be, hey, I'm trying to be
Afterwards, we saw him heading straight towards the mountains, some 70 kilometers away.
Dr. Ainley explained that even if he caught him and brought him back to the colony, he would immediately head right back for the mountains.
A year and a half ago, people said, I just can't even imagine Trump bringing us to war in Iran.
Ace, I be from the back, she gripping them covers like she on her last leg She look like she belong on the cover, this whole game covered everything I'm gonna buy a bottle of banana, but she is not getting wet in rain V wants to interview Nick Fuente Get the word out Ten whole vibes in this brewing,
we just ate ten whole thousand for dinner I got a pent-up type of aggression, I'm bout to go mental, tryna suppress it It don't make no noise, it's a press I spent y'all whole life on my necklace Couldn't tell which one I like better, so I'm getting both kinds of that shit I'm taking that dinner, I got y'all whole crying off of my it's undeniable.
He's winning.
He's sort of undeniable in the space.
He's everywhere now.
He's enormously huge at this point.
He's on a generational run.
It's freaking on fire.
Clearly a sender.
It's spelled F U E N T E S. Very proud to present Nick Fuentes.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using.
Algorithm using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
This would be the third time that Israel has threatened to use nukes to force the United States to help them.
The first time was in 1973.
When Syria and Egypt launched a surprise attack on Israel, which started the Yom Kippur War on October 6th, 1973, almost 50 years exactly before October 7th, Israel was almost overrun.
And the United States was reluctant to provide them with the military support that they needed to defend themselves.
So the Prime Minister of Israel, Golda Meir, called up Nixon.
We're like the SWAT team of Free Thought, and I go on with this battle ram at the door, and then they come in with these laser beams and have that information.
So it's totally fair for us to recognize that the countries around Russia, no, we shouldn't be invading or torturing them or oppressing them, of course.
But that's their sphere.
And big picture, holy smokes, you do not want the two largest powers in the world, apart from the United States, to get together and align against us.
In 2026, in the midterms, we are showing up, and the Gripers are showing up with us.
unidentified
Days after
the September attacks, there were countless rumors about strange coincidences surrounding the events.
One report about a group of Middle Eastern men spotted the morning of September 11th parked just across the river from New York City has not gone away.
No one's allowed to say that the blood is a quintessential part of this, that the blood of our People is something that is essential.
That we are different.
that America was different because we are different.
It's Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions.
Is our religion is based on the bearing of suffering the sake of even those that persecute us an overflowing of love an overflowing of self-giving love so much of it it cannot be contained
unconditional absolute standard of love for all of god's children even those that are misguided even those that persecute us even the most heinous among us that is what makes us different That is what makes us good.
unidentified
Ever since I got on this keto diet, ever since I got on the in-tempo, ever since I got on a carnivore diet, shut the fuck up.
Well, it's going to be a controversial show, I'm sure.
Maybe a definitive show.
We'll see.
But it is good to be back with you here tonight on Monday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
Big show.
So much to get into.
And the news cycle is not doing us any favors.
I didn't do a show on Friday because there was nothing going on.
I didn't want to talk about drama, but nothing has happened since.
Nothing has happened this weekend.
Nothing has happened today.
And so tonight, we're going to be finally getting into it and our featured story.
What can we even call it?
We're going to talk about the mutiny, coup, schism, civil war that has been brewing in the America First movement.
I would say, however, it reflects a general schism in the Israel critical space more broadly.
And the reason being is we are America First and we are Israel critical.
And I think that America First, as a right wing nationalist faction, has always been a faction within the broader Israel critical space or ecosystem on social media.
Of course, there are other factions.
And I said this at the very beginning of the year.
These factions realistically have very little in common with us.
And not just stylistically, although that's the case, but also in terms of substance and ideology.
I think the other big pillars of the Israel critical space are the far left, represented by Hassan Piker and Ryan Grimm, Glenn Greenwald, characters like this, although Glenn's a little bit better than the others.
And then you also have the Muslims, I think, which relate to the far left, but they're obviously also distinct.
And there's a distinct Muslim element that is pro Palestine, pro Iran, in favor of Arab or Muslim sovereignty, and that's clearly for their own reasons.
And then you have lots of other unaligned people that are sort of in the middle that might be vaguely left wing or vaguely right wing or might be Muslim or something, but are maybe a little bit less ideological and less articulate.
And don't fit neatly into any particular camp.
And so tonight I want to talk a little bit about what is going on.
And in my opinion, what has been going on for the past six months or a couple years, what is, like I said earlier, been brewing for some time.
And that is clearly that there are irreconcilable differences in the Israel critical space.
And that is why I'm characterizing it as a true schism.
And I think that's okay.
I think we saw last week a lot of drama, a lot of attacks, personal attacks, accusations, things like that.
But I think that the end result, which is necessary, is that there has to be a fork, has to be a parting of ways.
And we'll talk a little bit about what I mean by this.
People are characterizing it as a civil war, a mutiny.
They're coming to take America first, they're coming to attack the Groypers.
And I would say rather, It is that there is an end to this ecumenical mentality that we are going to bring together every type of person who is antagonistic or hostile or critical of the Jews and Israel.
I don't think that was ever going to work.
And I think that that is very obvious right now.
And I think the positive development, a positive result, is that the Groypers and me and America First are really charting our own way away from these people, away from these other people.
I do not wish to be associated with them.
I do not like them.
I do not agree with them.
And I think that a refined movement in the longer term is without a doubt and without question.
The best possible outcome.
And I'll lay out my case for that.
We'll talk about what I mean by that.
And I will just say at the outset, I think that Dan Bilzerian, who attacked me last week, and the people surrounding him, people, maybe I'm using that word loosely, of course, maybe they resemble people, but are in reality closer to beasts or animals to borrow a concept.
Dan Bilzerian and these people around him.
I do believe they represent actually the perfect foil, the perfect foil for me and for us as we trudge on.
And the reason being is for the past several years, I would say since 2022 and maybe 2023, I and this movement and all of you in the Groypers, and you know this, we have all been characterized as Jew-obsessed Jews.
Evil, satanic, hateful, caring only about Israel, only about our antipathy towards one group to the exclusion of every other issue and every other priority.
And I believe that was always a mischaracterization.
And I have always disagreed with that forcefully.
Nevertheless, this is how people have seen us.
And I think the only reason they've seen us in that way is because we simply give the issue its due.
If you want to understand power in this country and in the world, you will not be able to explain it without understanding the centrality of organized Jewry at the transnational global level.
You cannot understand the GOP, the Democratic Party, American politics, geopolitics in the Middle East.
You cannot understand it without seeing the central role that is played, again, by organized Jewry.
And how all of that is animated by Jewish nationalism, Jewish supremacy, and the Jewish religion.
So, for years, because we were one of the only groups, but not the only, one of the only groups that would acknowledge this, people said, that is what we are about.
That is what we are.
That's all we are.
And that's the only issue that we care about.
And it's the only lens through which we can see the issues.
And our understanding of it is actually very base and simple.
And we misunderstand it by characterizing Jews as monolithic.
All of these things were said.
But obviously, that was not the case.
And now we actually have a perfect foil, I think, to show people what that really looks like.
You think that Groypers, America First, Nick Fuentes are monomaniacally obsessed with Jews, have no positive vision, have no values, motivated only by hatred?
Well, wait until you see the people that hate us.
Wait until you see the people that, for the past five days, Have been spreading lies, making things up, smearing me, attacking me, throwing everything at the kitchen sink.
Because in their mind, I and this show are not anti Semitic enough, do not talk about Jews and Israel enough, have not done enough, have not said enough, have not made our position or our allegiances clear enough.
Yes, there is a faction that believes that Nick Fuentes and the Groypers are not obsessed with Jews enough.
And what is disturbing is there is clearly a distinct faction, I think largely on the internet.
That is like this.
And I do not want to be associated with that.
I don't want to be lumped in with that.
And I am glad that they have taken that step and separated themselves.
And I think now people can see very clearly two different visions and two different ideologies and two different propositions for how all of this is going to go in the next few years.
So we're going to talk all about that.
If that sounds vague, I will.
Spell it out very explicitly and very specifically tonight.
We're going to get into it.
We're going to be talking all about the drama, all about the mutiny, the coup, the civil war, all of it.
And I do think it's important.
I actually won't say it's drama, there's elements of drama in it, but let's be honest, it's something that needs to be addressed.
It has needed to be addressed for a long time.
And I also said this at the beginning of the year we are living in a bubble.
A glut of anti Jewish, anti Israel, Israel critical content on the internet.
We all know it.
We've all seen it.
You know exactly what I'm talking about, which is that for 10 years and longer, actually, for decades, let's say, nobody was allowed to talk about Jews in Israel, much less in a critical way or a negative way or in an extreme way.
All of a sudden, in the past several years, there were a couple of things that changed that changed that phenomenon.
And these developments were one, social media was liberalized.
And by liberalized, I mean it was opened up, it became more permissive.
Elon Musk acquired Twitter.
Meta relaxed their moderation policies on Instagram and Facebook.
And so did Google with YouTube.
So all of a sudden, there was a wide open lane.
And this really began around 2023, 24, and 25 that people were really able to speak freely about these issues.
That's number one.
And number two, obviously, October 7th.
October 7th happened, and the brutality of the Israelis and the transparency with which organized Jewry has manipulated these events, it's been unignorable and so blatant and so provocative and offensive to anybody with a conscience that everybody has become aware of this.
So it is really these two things that have changed the dynamic.
And what's happened in the past several years, it's the same thing that happened to all of us.
Everybody who has been watching this show, everybody who has been in this space, We all know what it was like realizing that we were lied to.
We call this being red pilled.
What does it mean to be red pilled?
It means to realize your reality was a lie.
The way you thought the world is, the way you thought the world worked, was actually a fabrication, it was manufactured, it was a deception.
And it's very disorienting to be red pilled.
And it's hard to know then what is true and what is false.
And it's hard to know how much of what we were led to believe was true and what was false.
It's very disorienting.
And we know that for a lot of people, they struggle to handle this.
And so they will follow a lot of red herrings.
They'll go down the rabbit hole, so to speak, and some people will believe every conspiracy theory, and some people will walk away from it.
They'll embrace the blue pill.
There's a lot of different ways it can go.
And what's effectively happened in the past several years is that almost everybody has been red pilled.
And I think this has induced something like a mass psychosis, which is people are disoriented.
And not everybody is super intelligent, and not everybody has a deep background knowledge of history and religion and politics.
And people are really struggling to make sense of everything.
And they're not going to get it right away because these issues, when we talk about how power works, and we talk about Judaism and Jewish nationalism and Zionism and Israel, these are complex topics.
These are enormous topics.
They involve thousands of years of history and theology and eschatology and political science and all kinds of things.
People are not always going to get it right.
And I think what has effectively happened is that there has been so much curiosity and interest in the subject.
It has created a giant class of influencers that are going to feed this appetite for conspiracy and intrigue and radicalism and things that are magical and far fetched.
And like I said, it has created a bubble like effect where there are a lot of perverse incentives.
The content that is being pumped out, as opposed to the way it used to be, is not being created by scholars and intellectuals who embraced a taboo topic that was almost illegal, like a clandestine topic, but they did it because they cared that much or they were autistic or super intelligent and they were hobbyists and they existed on forums.
Now you have a lot of influencers that are merely filling a market demand.
There's an appetite for conspiracy, so give them conspiracy.
There's an appetite for Anything anti Jewish, give them everything anti Jewish.
There's an appetite for historical conspiracies, give them every historical conspiracy.
And I think everybody can recognize the space has become polluted with slop.
And whereas we used to have, maybe arguably at one point, there were some standards, now there are no standards.
And whereas at one time we had the best ideas and we were the only ones that were right, now our side is embracing some of the worst ideas.
And we're frequently debunked, and these terrible ideas are being ripped apart and torn down all the time.
And our credibility is really taking a big hit.
And I think it threatens to derail and disorganize all the progress that we've made.
And so, anyway, so we're going to get into these things.
We're going to talk about it, but that's going to be our big story.
It is worthwhile to discuss this because how we handle this is going to determine whether we actually achieve reform.
At the end of the day, our goal is American sovereignty.
Let's be very clear at the outset.
What is it that we represent?
We represent America first.
And this implies the existence of America last.
America first, as a rally in crime, means America is not being put first.
We need to take power to put America first.
Well, who stands in the way?
Who are the usurpers and interlopers?
It is all of these organized special interests, the chief among them is.
They're doing it with foreign aid to Israel, fighting Israel's war against Iran.
They're doing it in education when they have the Department of Education coming into the Middle Eastern Studies Department at Harvard and telling them, you must teach a pro Israel curriculum.
It's at Homeland Security when they're looking at 50,000 visa holders to see if they ever criticized Israel on Twitter.
These are just a few examples of how a Republican administration proclaiming America first and make America great again has actually been usurped and subverted.
By Jewish money, by organized Jewry to put their group first.
So, at the outset, this is our goal, and we seek to achieve this through politics.
Now, do not misunderstand what I mean by politics.
I'm not talking strictly about voting.
Politics is all these other manners of trying to get at the levers of power in a society without going to war, without a violent uprising.
And so that involves.
The private sector and the public sector.
It involves NGOs and nonprofits and activist groups.
Yes, it involves running candidates.
It also involves the bureaucracy.
It involves the universities, the technology sector.
It involves all the different sectors of elite society where the decision making power is concentrated.
And so the question before us ultimately we want American sovereignty.
We want Americans putting America first to get back in charge.
How do we go about putting the right people in the right places to make this happen?
That's really the question.
And I think that it's very important how we talk about the Israel issue going forward, whether this political movement is actually going to gain any traction or have any success.
So we're going to get into it.
If we have time, we'll talk a little bit about the war in Iran, although I can already tell I don't think that we will.
So we'll probably just save it for tomorrow.
So we're going to get into all this, we're going to lay it out.
Before we do, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button.
Leave a comment.
Let me know what you think about the show.
Remember to check out our merch store at fuentes.store.
We have our spring and summer collection.
If you want to support the show, subscribe at americafirst.plus.
$15 a month.
You get access to the archive every episode of the show.
$100 a month.
You get access to the group chat with me.
And I'm not giving you a lot with the drama the past five days, but the group chat has been eating.
I've been giving everybody in the group chat all the inside baseball.
I've been in there.
Like every day, and giving everybody what they want.
And I like that because I can't always say everything in public because you know how that goes.
But in private, I can really tell you what's up.
So subscribe.
That's AmericaFirst.plus.
Also, remember last week, our Super Chat platform got shut down by the Canadian media.
Entropy, which we've used for years, they got shut down, they got debanked.
Go figure.
So, you're not able to super chat on entropy anymore.
Going forward, if you want to send a super chat at the end of the show, it's af.plusslash super chat.
I also think if you just type in af.plus, it'll take you to the super chat, whatever, extension.
So, that's like for a phone.
I don't know what you would say.
af.plusslash super chat.
That's how you can send in a super chat.
Check us out.
All right.
So, we're going to get into it.
We're going to dive into what you've all been waiting for, what you've all wanted to hear.
And obviously, last week, there's been a lot of weird things that have been going on.
And I want to say at the outset, I don't know what is going on.
It could be a conspiracy.
It could be coordinated.
There are certainly aspects of coordination, which we will discuss.
I don't know.
It could all be a coincidence.
And we could attribute it to malice or we can attribute it to foolishness.
I don't know, but we're going to lay out the facts.
And I think that really, we're going to get into some of the drama and the he said, she said, and allegations.
But the big picture and the headline to me, Has nothing to do with any of that.
And I want to make that very explicit at the beginning.
We're going to talk about who said what and when and who started it.
We're going to do a little bit of that.
And we're going to talk about some of these events and we can speculate about how coordinated it is and what the goal is.
But I want to make it clear that that is not really all that important.
I will say at the very beginning, the most important thing, the headline out of all of this, and this is a question I want you to keep in mind.
Is what kind of movement do you want to be a part of?
That's really the question.
And you can take Dan Bilzerian.
I actually think he is the perfect avatar of his movement.
And you could take me.
And you could look at these two side by side and what we've done and our lives and what we're about.
And to me, that's really what matters.
And I will make the case for myself at the very beginning.
When I started this show, there was a need.
There was a need for a movement that was more radical than Trump that would live up to and fulfill his original vision of making America great again and putting America first.
I saw Trump as a great leader in 2016, as a pioneer, somebody who was talking specifically about three big issues.
He was talking about how our foreign policy was being hijacked by neocons and by Israel, even by AIPAC, which he explicitly mentioned in 2015.
To bring us to war in Iraq and ultimately in Iran and elsewhere.
And that's putting America last.
And Americans are dying and we're spending money to fight other people's wars.
But he also talked about immigration.
And he said that our country is being invaded.
We need to build a wall to create distinction and separation between America and the rest of the world.
Because what has been happening is that we have been invaded by non white immigrants for the most part who are fundamentally changing the character of the country.
And that is not putting Native Americans first.
America has a distinct character, heritage, identity.
And when you bring in 70 million people in 30 years, all from the third world, they're destroying what it is to be an American.
That's a critical pillar.
And the last one is on trade.
Where America derives its power and its strength, not just economically and militarily, but also morally, is its productivity.
We're a factory, we're an engine.
We're a workshop.
That is what makes us a superpower.
And what else has coincided with the wars and with the immigration is the deindustrialization of America.
We've lost all the workshops, all the factories, all the industry.
We don't make anything anymore.
And when we don't make anything, we become idle.
And when we become idle, we get on drugs and we kill ourselves.
And women have all the jobs.
And then women don't want to date the men because they make all the money.
And all the communities.
Die because the only jobs are in hospitals and schools and government administration.
This is what's happening between the two coasts.
And so these were the three big policy areas, but there's also dimensions above that, too.
It is that America's lost its way as a Christian country.
It's lost its way as a European country.
These are identity based issues.
And so, whereas Trump maybe had the right idea on those three big policy areas, arguably the two deficits are that he was not talking about the meaningful ways in which we're losing our sense of self as flesh and blood people, but also losing our sense of self spiritually and morally as a Christian nation.
And we're becoming something like a hedonistic, degenerate, Pluralistic nation that has no values, has no morals.
We've embraced pornography and gambling and all kinds of other vices.
I mean, you can see them.
And so the America First movement, when I started it, arose from this need for something more progressive than Trumpism.
Call it America First, call it right wing nationalism.
We want to bring America back.
And we're embracing a positive vision where we're looking at young people.
And pause.
And we want them to get excited about a future where they're going to be able to get a job, start a family, where there's some sense of a moral compass or fabric in the country.
There's also a social fabric because we have things in common with each other.
Like, yeah, we look similar.
We all speak English.
We all come from a similar place or a similar background.
And what's more, we are going to be taken care of by our own government.
We're actually going to have our civil rights, freedom of speech.
We're also going to be able to access the political system, even if we've criticized Israel.
This is the positive vision that we set out to achieve.
And we're trying to achieve that through politics, primarily by infiltrating and hijacking the Republican Party.
This has really been my mode.
This has been my MO for 10 years.
For as long as I've been doing this show, I have been saying the left is irredeemable, diabolical, evil.
Our only hope is that we are the successors to the Trump movement.
Trump destroyed the old GOP, created a vacuum, and we need to fill it.
We need the young men watching the show that know what is going on, that know the score.
We need them to enthusiastically show up and get involved and become the future leadership of the opposition party.
You don't have to like the GOP.
I don't.
You don't have to like movement conservatism.
I don't either.
But the infrastructure and the institutions, what they represent on the right wing is the organized opposition.
To the left.
All of that infrastructure, all these institutions, all that stuff, it is there for the taking.
And if young, energetic, radical people show up and want it more in a generation, we will control the opposition.
We can use it as a vehicle to take on the left in the way that Trump did.
Trump ran a hostile takeover of the GOP.
And as the leader of the party, he waged a challenge against the left.
Not as a conservative, but as a nationalist.
This is what he did in 2016.
The only problem is he was not sophisticated enough.
He was not an ideologue.
He did not have a cadre of personnel.
There were all sorts of flaws.
Maybe he just didn't want it bad enough.
But there was an opportunity to have a hostile takeover of the GOP, of all that infrastructure, get it behind him, and use that as a challenge against the left, take over the country.
And win the battle.
I still believe that is our best bet.
Obviously, the left and the Democrats, we're not infiltrating that.
Their ideology is corrupted to the core.
I think that a third party option, our system is not built for that.
It's just too expensive, too difficult, hard to achieve.
I have always said that our MO is going to be getting in the GOP, whether in elected office or climbing up the bureaucracy as staffers, interns, in the conservative media space, wherever, in the private sector side.
But we need to see leadership roles across the board.
And it will take time, it will take a generation or two.
But in 10, 20 years, we're going to be all of the leadership.
We are going to be what is left.
And maybe there will be a time to catch a falling knife when a calamity befalls the country, an opportunity presents itself.
It's all in the timing.
And then we're able to take advantage and move in.
Something like that seems to be the way to go.
Okay.
That's my general idea.
And I'm not, that's a broad stroke overview, but that's sort of the idea.
On the other side, we see a movement.
And like I said, this results from this glut and bubble of Israel critical content.
It seems that there is no ideology.
There is no idea, no grand plan, no values, no policy prescription, other than it's the Jews.
We don't like Jews and we don't like Israel.
And that's it.
And we saw this at a conference that took place last week.
They called it America First United.
They might as well have called it America First without Nick Fuentes.
And let me just give you a survey of some of the people that were there.
They brought in an Hispanic Democrat.
Who got on the stage and said that we need to apologize and give reparations for colonialism and slavery?
And then they brought up a woman who wore a t shirt that said, Docs Ice.
And then they brought up a Muslim in a hijab who gave some sort of Muslim prayer at the beginning.
And then they brought up a candidate, Dan Bilzerian, who has said in the past, We need to go to war with Israel to exterminate Israel.
I want to kill Israelis, is what Dan Bilzerian has said.
And you look at this collection of people, and you know you've seen it on Twitter and elsewhere.
There are no commonalities.
There's nothing positive, propositionally or in terms of sentiment.
There's no vision, no plan, nothing other than we don't like Jews, we don't like Israel, we hate Israel.
And these seem to be the two visions.
Now, obviously, like I said, America first, the only way we're going to achieve that is to confront Jewish power.
There's no other way to go there because that is the primary obstacle.
You're not going to put America first without confronting the institutional force that is putting themselves first, and that is organized Jewry.
And it does come from the exclusionary supremacist Jewish religion, it does come from their fifth column ideology of Jewish nationalism.
And as a transnational entity, that clearly poses a problem.
But of course, it goes well above and beyond.
We don't like them.
We're going to get them.
We don't like Israel.
It goes far above and beyond that.
We actually have a vision of what we want the country to be, what's going to hold the country together, who we are.
We want to talk about other things as well.
There are other problems happening in the country, too.
And it's also not motivated by hatred, spite, animosity.
It's motivated by a genuine love, actually, for our country, for our God, for our families.
And it is only because of that love that we need to confront the evil that's hurting us.
And so, anyway, to me, that's the big picture.
But I want to go back to the beginning of the story and I want to talk about a little bit about what happened last week.
So, last week they hold this conference, which I just mentioned.
They called it America First United.
It's organized by a woman named Amy Dangerfield, who, as I understand, is not even a resident in the United States of America.
She's an Australian foreign national who's working on a green card.
She organized this conference and it was a complete and total disaster.
They called it America First United.
And like I said, they tried to bring in all of these different people that don't like Israel, and it didn't quite work.
And I've been saying this for a long time.
I've been saying this since the beginning of the year.
Because the left and the right are fundamentally at odds.
Muslims, and I would say American nationalists, in some ways are fundamentally at odds.
Now, some types of those people might incidentally be a part of the coalition, but what must have primacy is American nationalism.
We're not sharing it with the left.
We're not sharing it with foreigners and Muslims.
American nationalism is the primary faction, primary ideology.
And if Muslims or left wing people are okay with being a part of that coalition as a subordinate, then that is okay.
But the idea that you're bringing them together with any degree of parity, like there's any equivalency, it's never going to work because there is a deep conflict of values.
And in any case, that was the conceit.
They're bringing all these people together in one room.
We all don't like Israel.
It was a disaster.
It doesn't look good.
The staging was bad.
The audio was terrible.
Nobody showed up.
They had something like 50 guests.
400 people watched it live.
Now, I didn't go to the event, and I wasn't even in the same state.
I didn't endorse it.
I had nothing to do with it.
The event was so bad that everybody that already doesn't like me said that it was my event because they saw something that was such an optical disaster.
They just saw it as ammunition that would make me look bad.
They said it's a terrible conference.
That was Nick Fuentes' secret conference.
He's secretly supporting it, and that just goes to show it's a total failure.
Now, I didn't really think anything of it.
I thought it was sort of an embarrassing sideshow.
I tried to distance myself from it, and why would I not?
I had nothing to do with it.
Then there was a New York Times article that came out about the event, and this is where I started to get a little bit suspicious.
So they throw this event, and like I said, it's not a star studded lineup.
50 people showed up, 400 people watched the live stream.
I didn't even know about it until a couple of weeks ago.
And yet, there was a New York Times journalist that attended the event and then wrote an article about it in the New York Times, which appeared on the front page a few days later.
And the article, the headline of the article was Can there be an America First movement without Nick Fuentas?
So, what's the big idea there?
They put together this conference.
We're bringing in Muslims and left.
Left wing people and these candidates and all these others, it's really a big nothing.
Nobody goes, nobody watches it, nobody really major even shows up in person.
As I understand, Dan Bilzerian was their big guest.
He could not attend in person because he had a paintball tournament.
I'm not making that up.
So, you know, bigger priorities.
And yet there was a New York Times journalist there covering it.
And then he does a big piece about it on the front page a few days later.
And like I said, the headline is, America First without Nick Fuentes.
It says, Build as the first bipartisan event uniting America First candidates and influencers opposed to AIPAC, Endless Wars, and the Epstein cover up, the gathering last Saturday afternoon was an effort to expand a movement closely associated with Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist influencer and outspoken anti Semite.
The event was sparsely attended.
Many of the around 50 guests were dressed in their Sunday best suits and loafers.
Ms. Dangerfield, The organizer said, We felt like we had to do something.
She is a recent convert to the America First program, but it has become her political home.
She's eager to see it coalesce into a coherent force.
She said, We were sick of staying online and just complaining about things, saying, I wish things were different, said Ms. Dangerfield, who is in the process of obtaining citizenship.
We have to get people elected that are for Americans, that want to put Americans in America first.
More pressing concerns, however, seem to be weighing on the younger segment in attendance.
As one conference goer in his early 30s put it to me, or a loss.
Another sizing up the crowd said, Welcome to Chud Hell.
The concerns echoed the dynamics that govern most social functions.
Was it uncool to be here?
Were the guests also deeply uncool?
As footage of the conference appeared online throughout the day, critics on social media began to ridicule the event.
They mocked its tiny audience, its low production value, and a speaker list that lacks star power.
Viewers of the event stream on the platform Rumble observed that only about 500 people had tuned in.
As Ms. Dangerfield scanned her social media mentions, she suggested that a successful version of America First might not be one helmed by Mr. Fuentes.
Instead, she offered it might be best embodied by figures like James Fishback or even Dan Bilzerian.
She said, I love Nick.
I respect Nick, but there is a difference between podcasting and doing something.
So, was this the real conceit?
Of the conference, it seems that that was the plan, which is to put on a big event, call it America first, and then insinuate that unlike me, they're doing something.
They're unhappy with me, they're unhappy with the movement because to them, all I'm doing is online, I'm podcasting, I'm complaining.
They need to take it from my hands to do something.
Do what?
Terrible conferences with audio problems and run candidates that lose primaries.
That's what we need to do, says who?
A foreign national from Australia who used to work for Adam Sosnick.
What was she known for before?
Kissing women on a live stream, being some kind of cam girl, and working for Adam Sosnick at Valutainment.
She's an Australian national, not even a citizen.
She's now going to helm America first.
She can't even vote.
She says, I never wanted to attack Nick Fuentes.
It's not about going after him.
And yet they've got a New York Times journalist there with the headline.
Is this America First without Nick?
She says to the press, she says to the New York Times, yes, it is.
The America First is going to work without Nick because we're doing something.
He's a podcaster.
All he does is complain.
What also emerges from the event is an interview between Jake Shields and some guy.
This was filmed at the event, and the guy says, We need real macho alpha male Christians to lead the movement.
Nick Fuentes has done his part, but his time is over.
We need to step it up.
Jake Shields says, yeah, he can't be the leader.
He doesn't have the leadership qualities.
Later in the week, Tucker Carlson goes on his show and he says in an interview with Tyler Oliveira that Nick Fuentes is all about himself.
And one day there's going to be a movement of people that are actually going to do something and they want to build a movement and it's going to be more radical than him.
So I'm starting to see a pattern.
You do a conference where people go and say, We need America First without him.
You have a New York Times journalist putting a piece.
Based on this event that is a total nothing, saying it's America first without Nick Fuentes.
You do an interview, and one of the speakers and one of the guests say, Yeah, it's time for him to step aside.
He can't be the leader.
Tucker Carlson says on his show, Yeah, he's all about himself.
He's not building a movement.
We need somebody else.
And then the coup de grace comes last Thursday when Dan Bilzerian puts on Twitter, and it's a full frontal attack.
I didn't, you know, it's like Pearl Harbor.
Nick Fuentes is a Fed.
First, he says Democrats are going to kill us, then he backs.
Amy Acton, he didn't support Casey Push.
All this guy does is cause drama.
And then there was a full court attack, full spectrum attack from about a handful of other influencers, one of which said he was called in advance and told to attack me.
I'm talking, of course, about the YouTuber Arval, Eric Orwell, longtime enemy.
He put out a 26 minute video after Dan Bilzerian put out the tweet and said he had the courage to make his statement.
After Dan called him on the phone and told him it was go time, Lucas Gage said the same thing.
So apparently, there was some kind of effort behind the scenes calling everybody saying, We're going to move against this guy tonight.
This is the big night.
We're making our move.
It's like the Ides of March.
It's like Julius Caesar.
All right, Arville.
All right, you know, coal burner comedian.
All right, retard alert, you know, punch drunk idiot.
And for the past five days, I've been subject to full spectrum attack by every enemy, every adversary in the extended America First universe, leveling every accusation that we've all heard before.
It started with, you're not doing anything in real life.
Then it was, you're attacking Casey Bush.
Then it was, you endorsed a Democrat.
Then it was, you're a Fed.
Now it's just, you're queer.
We don't like you.
You're anti family.
You sold the quarters.
Now it's just everything.
Everyone saying everything in some kind of coordinated attack to what?
Once and for all, defeat me?
Once and for all, make me go away?
It doesn't work like that.
It's never worked like that.
So, this is a little bit of what has been going on.
And, like I said, I am not going to get too into the weeds about the he said, she said, and accusations and things like that.
But this is what has been going on for the past week.
And by the way, this has followed a series of attacks.
Against my clips on Instagram and my super chats on the show.
So far in the past two months, there was a major hit piece by The Atlantic and by Jonathan Greenblatt at the ADL.
They're specifically targeting my clips from my show on Instagram and Facebook, trying to get them banned quite successfully.
Simultaneously, there was a massive 4,000 word hit piece in The Washington Post attacking my super chats.
And an associated attack on my Super Chat platform by the state sponsored Canadian broadcasting company that actually led to my Super Chat platform being shut down.
All of this has transpired in the past three or four weeks.
Attacks on the clips, which is how I've become so notorious and infamous in the past year.
Attacks on the super chats, which is how I fund this operation.
And then ultimately, attacks on my reputation from the inside.
Not from the outside, where the outside attacks could be characterized as exactly that, where you could say this is coming from MAGA, this is coming from the left, it's coming from Mark Levin, or it's coming from Laura Loomer.
Now the attacks are coming from the inside.
Well, I want to talk specifically about some of what has been said, and specifically with regard to Dan Bilzerian, what exactly happened here.
So, I don't know why Dan Bilzerian suddenly says, I'm a Fed.
I've known him for two years now.
We talk regularly, I've been to his house multiple times.
And I would say that we sort of agree on the broad strokes of the issue.
We're both against Trump.
We're both against the war in Iran.
We're both against AIPAC.
We both understand that it's not just Zionists.
It's Jewish nationalism, Jewish supremacy, it's Jewishness, which is making these people put America last.
Like we're sort of on the same page in many ways.
And yet we've had a falling out that has been in slow motion for the past year, roughly.
And the first time I met Dan Bilzerian, I said this on Twitter, this was a little bit troubling.
The first time I met him, I flew out to Las Vegas, I went to his house.
He was very gracious as a host.
I go to his house, and the first thing that happens, and this is a little strange, is they make me sign an NDA.
I got to give him my driver's license.
I got to take a picture of my face.
I got to sign a thing.
Never experienced that before.
And I've met Ye, and I've met Trump, and I've met a lot of famous people.
I've never had that happen before.
Cameras all over the house recording audio and video.
Never seen that before.
So I go, whatever.
I go into the house, we talk.
He has us put our phones away.
He says, We're talking about serious stuff.
We're talking about the Jews, Israel.
It's me, him, Jake Shields, one other guy.
He says, Let's put our phones in the kitchen over here.
We go outside in the patio.
Jake Shields and the other guy walk ahead.
And this is where I think Jake is confused.
And they go ahead into the bouncy pit or the trampoline room or whatever.
It's so gauche.
I mean, talk about N word rich.
They go ahead into the trampoline room.
Dan Bilzerian and I walk outside.
He tells me, So, how easy do you think it would be, or how hard do you think it would be to kill some of these Israelis?
Fast forward a little bit later in the year, I do a big interview with Tucker Carlson.
Tucker challenges me about blood guilt and how I'm anti Semitic and accusing Jews of being responsible for all the problems.
I say, Tucker, we cannot divorce neoconservatives and the wars in the Middle East and AIPAC and Israel from Judaism.
Israel is the Jewish state.
Neocons are Jewish leftists.
I said, it's inextricably connected, Jewish nationalism and all the things you talk about.
I do an interview with Jack Neal.
I do another interview after that.
I get another call from Dan Bilzerian.
He said, You didn't talk about Jews on any of your interviews.
I said, well, Dan, I said, I did.
I said, I did talk about it with Jack.
I did talk about it with Tucker.
I did talk about it with these other people.
It's in there.
He said, yeah, but you didn't talk about it enough.
You should have spent the whole interview talking about that.
I said, Dan, if you want to persuade people, you can't have them thinking that you're the Jew guy.
I said, you have to present as well rounded.
I said, and people want a little bit of diversity.
You know, they want different topics.
They want to see that you're a well rounded person.
You could talk about other things.
I said, Ann, when you're going on someone else's platform, you can't always control the questions they're going to ask, the topics they want to cover.
And you got to be sensitive.
Some people don't want to be censored.
Some people don't want you to bring it on their platform and get them banned.
I said, So, you know, I'm trying to be a little bit tactful.
He goes, Oh, okay.
You know, well, you need to talk about Jews more, blah, blah.
And then this is, we were off to the races after this.
Why did you say you like Stalin?
Hitler went to war with Stalin to save the Christians from the Jewish communists.
Why are you not?
Saying Charlie Kirk was killed by Israel.
He's obviously killed by Israel.
Why are you supporting ICE?
ICE is Jewish.
Why are you?
And it became then a loop of paranoia and suspicion and purity spiraling, which is somehow because I don't dedicate all my time to talking about Jews, I don't blame Jews for literally everything or absolutely everything, or I don't talk about it in the most extreme or violent ways.
Somehow I'm a disruptor.
I'm not a true anti Semite or something.
This is a little bit of how it's gone.
And finally, it culminated in this argument over Casey Push.
Casey Push is running in the primary against Vivek Ramaswamy.
He got destroyed.
He lost 82 to 18%.
And ever since his loss in this Ohio governor's race, all of his personnel have come out on Twitter and said he's a terrible candidate.
He's a raging, rageaholic, real anger problems.
He turned down opportunities from the White House.
He didn't want to do events.
He was micromanaging everything.
This is multiple field directors, multiple personnel from the campaign saying he's terrible.
And just to tell you, I heard all these things early on.
I heard all of this in February.
I called up my political director in February that manages these things.
They don't know if they're going to be on the ballot.
There's all these problems.
I said, Well, then let's not even bother.
I said, If we want to defeat Vivek Ramaswamy, the only way to go, we're not going to overcome Trump's endorsement, Vance's endorsement.
Vivek has a 100 to 1 money advantage.
I said, we're not going to beat him in the primary.
We're just going to need to provide that 1% to 5% in the general.
You can't swing the primary because to win the primary, you need 60% of Republicans or 51% of Republicans to revolt in a race where you're outspent and you don't have any of the endorsements and you don't even have a good candidate.
100 to 1.
Whereas in the general, the Democrats are maybe 50 50 against the Republican.
We just need to give them a little push over the edge.
I said, we'll just focus on the general.
Well, this was my idea going into the Ohio primary.
Yeah, you know, Casey Bush isn't going to win.
That's okay.
We're focused on the general.
Dan Bilzerian texts me, Why didn't you endorse Casey Bush?
I said, Well, he's going to lose.
He lost.
He lost 80 20.
I said, What does that do for any of us to just lose?
I said, If I'm associated with that, all the liberal media are going to say the Groypers try to get into politics and they lost.
They try to translate it into electoral success.
It didn't happen.
I said, So, you know, I couldn't have saved them even if I tried.
If I tried, I would have gotten blamed for the loss.
That's why I recused myself.
He comes out and says, This guy didn't endorse Casey Push.
Clearly, he's acting like a Fed.
Days later, Dan Bilzerian says, I don't give an F about an Ohio governor's race.
Why would I care?
That doesn't matter to me.
These are some of the conversations that are happening.
And this is why I say, overall, this really paints a picture for you of really two different kinds of movements here.
If you've been watching my show for a long time, you know that we think deeply about geostrategy in the Middle East.
We think deeply about why Israel does what it does, why America does what it does, why Iran does what it does.
And we talk about the dynamics between states and we talk about the strategic angle about the missiles, the nukes, the regional proxies, the drones, the straight.
We think deeply and talk about these things.
And the same goes for party politics.
We actually want to make a difference.
And so we are looking at races and ways that we can actually win, like where we can focus our energy and resources where we can make a difference and actually get something tangible, actually get a tangible victory or benefit.
And we talk about this all the time.
We talk about the different factions.
We talk about Little Tech and JD Vance and his alliance with Tucker Carlson and their schism with Marco Rubio and his backing in Florida.
With Susie Wiles and Mike Waltz and all the other Florida creatures and Ballard.
We talk about all these things.
And what has been happening for the past two years is basically a gorilla who doesn't know anything about politics or government and doesn't even want to know, isn't even interested in learning, hitting his head against a wall saying, It's the Jews.
It's the Jews.
What's the answer?
It's the Jews.
How are we going to take over the GOP?
It's the Jews.
How are we going to get America first?
It's the Jews.
What are your thoughts?
What are your policies, Mr. Congressman?
Mr. Representative, what are your policies?
It's the Jews.
Well, can you name a policy?
We're going to help people.
What are you going to do about Israel?
Go to war with them.
These are the two different visions.
Now, some people call me a liar.
They said that, you know, when I said that Dan Bilzerian is talking to me about killing Israelis, they said I made that up.
Jake Shields said, Oh, you made that up.
He never said that.
He said it in public at least twice.
On Sneeko's stream earlier in April, this is from a news source.
It says during a stream with Sneeko, who has also spread anti Semitic conspiracy theories, Dan Bilzerian said he supports exterminating Israel.
And that he would sign up tomorrow and go fucking put boots on the ground and go fucking kill Israelis.
Yeah, that sounds like a typical Dan Bilzerian sentence.
I would fucking put fucking boots on the ground and fucking kill fucking Israelis.
It's not like that's the only thing you talk about or the only thing you can talk about.
It's like a dog learning a trick.
It's like a dog that knows one trick.
He goes from show to show, from Alex Jones to Piers Morgan to Patrick Bed David, and he's so impressed with himself giving the same little monologue, giving the same little soliloquy.
So I think it's just fucking Jews, and I think Auschwitz is fake, and I think they did 9 11, and yeah, we've all heard that before.
You've said it before.
We've heard it before.
Been saying it for two years.
Everyone's been saying it for two years, and we've all heard that.
And now we want to know the specifics here.
A little specificity, a little nuance.
Now we want to know what's the big plan?
What's the big idea?
Where are we going with this?
You want to take it from the internet into the real world?
Now look, we don't need to get into A lot of granular detail to understand why none of this is serious.
None of this is going to work.
I don't want to be associated with this.
I don't know any decent person that would be.
I don't know any decent person that would want to touch this with a 10 foot pole.
You want to say that Israel controls our foreign policy?
You're right.
You want to say that we shouldn't be in a war with Iran right now?
You're right.
You want to say AIPAC should be registered under FARA?
You're right.
You want to say that Trump is controlled by Netanyahu and Mark Levin?
You're right.
You want to get on TV and say, I want to exterminate Israel.
I want to fucking go to war with Israel.
Give me a gun.
I'm going to go and kill all of them.
Who wants, what decent person wants to be a part of that?
Sorry, what serious person?
What intelligent person?
Who among us that is actually serious about doing everything that it takes to actually succeed in politics wants to be anywhere near that?
That is a disaster.
That is a liability.
That is a, and by the way, I'm just going to say what we're all thinking.
How long before some nut job goes out there and does exactly that and says, Dan Bilzerian told me to?
God forbid.
And I don't want that to happen because I don't like to see people die and I don't want to see everybody get shut down.
But that's not a game.
It's not funny.
It's not cool.
It doesn't make you a tough guy, Mr. Five Nine Royhead.
Nobody is impressed with that.
Nobody is impressed with you.
You think because you take steroids and you pay girls to pose with you in your daddy's house, paid for by your daddy's company, and you go on an interview and you say, Give me a fucking gun, I'm gonna fucking kill people.
You think anybody is impressed with that little act?
You think anybody finds that heroic, courageous, brave?
You wanna get a gun and kill people?
We're waiting.
I would never encourage that.
It's a tough guy shtick.
And it has no place in a serious political movement.
None of that, none of that has any place in a serious political movement.
All that is is a giant fucking liability.
You talk like that, you're gonna get some false flag, and they're writing your name on the rifle in white sharpie.
That's what's gonna happen next.
You talk like that, they're gonna take away free speech.
They're trying to.
What do you think they're talking about at every World Jewish Congress?
What do you think they're talking about at every one of these summits?
What do you think the ADL is talking about?
The ADL is going on TV this week and saying Trump is doing a great job at rooting out anti Semitism.
What do you think happens when a social media celebrity with 16 million followers goes on a live stream with a young Gen Z streamer and says, We're going to fucking kill Israelis?
What do you think happens after that?
You are begging, begging them to break all of our backs and bring censorship down on us.
You are begging the telecom companies to take away the websites.
You're begging Homeland Security to knock on everybody's door that has ever talked to you.
So, you know what, tough guy, you know what, gorilla, you did us a huge favor.
Now, nobody can ever say that we have anything to do with each other because I don't want to be associated with that.
You're going around talking about killing Ben Shapiro, killing Israelis, give me a gun.
Good luck with that.
Good luck with that.
Good luck with the slut running the 50 person conference.
Good luck with your campaign against Randy Fine.
And by the way, he's running against Randy Fine in Florida's sixth district.
You live in Las Vegas.
You live in Las Vegas.
You're running in Eastern Florida.
That's for openers.
Hey, everybody, do you want to know the average age of a Republican primary voter?
In the district in which Dan Bilzerian wants to win the Republican primary, it's 57.2 years old.
Donald Trump carried that district by 30 points last year.
So you think that a social media alpha guru is going to go into that district saying, go to war with Israel, fuck Trump?
He's going to win the 57 year old Republican primary voters.
And he's going to do it with no money.
He's going to do it in three months.
And he's going to do it from the fun house with the trampoline and the paintball field in Las Vegas.
How's that going to happen?
Oh, and by the way, he's also going to do it by alienating the number one Israel critical live streamer in the country as well, in addition to Dave Smith, in addition to Asmund Gold, in addition to everybody else.
Because that's doing something, right?
We're over here complaining that's doing something.
Well, riddle me this How does losing primaries do anything for anybody?
Casey Bush losing 82 to 18, what does that do?
Other than waste everybody's time and money.
Losing against Randy Fine, what does that do?
Other than make us look like losers and waste everybody's time and money.
I don't believe that we're going to take the country back when the masses wake up.
In some explosion, some groundswell of popular support, and take the country with the pitchforks and torches with the pimp vape salesmen and kickboxers leading the charge?
No, I don't believe in that.
Because the masses are fickle, easily dissuaded, disorganized, lack expertise.
They're never going to take us to the promised land.
They're easily manipulated, easily tricked.
As you can see, So, I'm not begging.
I'm not arguing.
I don't need to anymore.
This is a year of refinement.
This is a year where the movement gets smaller and we weed out the people that we don't need.
We don't, the last thing we need or want is people talking about killing and exterminating Israelis.
I don't want anything to do with that.
That's evil.
I want to exterminate Israel.
Yeah, I'm not with that.
That's evil.
I don't think Palestine should be exterminated.
I don't think Israel should.
I don't think anybody should be exterminated.
I don't want to pick up a gun and kill anybody.
I'm a Christian.
What I want is young people to engage in the political process peacefully and lawfully and in a way that is good for themselves and their development and their well being and their family to take our sovereignty back.
That is what I want.
You want to talk about fuck a group of people, pick up a gun and kill them, exterminate them?
I want nothing to do with that.
Nothing to do with that.
I don't want to be anywhere near that.
That's not going to work.
That's not my conscience.
That's not who I am.
You think that's cool.
You think that's edgy.
You just turned 16.
You're low IQ.
Fuck you.
You want to go and be a part of that?
Knock yourself out.
We don't want you.
This is a year of refinement.
This is Gideon's army.
I don't need 3 million.
I need 300.
I only need the best and brightest.
I only need the people that actually get it.
People that care enough to do the research and the homework.
People that care enough to listen.
People that care enough that they're actually even gonna be here in a year, two years, five years.
Not people that got into this because they're in a lot of legal problems with their dad's company.
Not people that got into this because they got punched in the face six million times.
Not people that got into this because they just have nowhere else to go and that's all they can contribute.
So I want nothing to do with any of these people.
They're hurting us more than they're helping us, and they have been for a long time.
So you want low IQ, anti Semitism, you want a retard right.
You want schizo conspiracy, exterminate Israelis, left right fusion.
You go and do that.
And to you, I say good luck.
My mission this year remains.
And by the way, I'm not going away.
What are you going to do?
Call me a gay Mexican fed again?
Oh, no.
Oh, by what are we going to do?
I've never heard that one before.
We're not going away.
I'm doing this show every night, most nights, five nights a week sometimes.
I'm doing this show every night.
For years, and my explicit mission is to defeat Vivek Ramaswamy in Ohio, Democrats win the midterms in 26, and we make sure that JD Vance and Marco Rubio lose in 2028.
That is my mission.
That is all I care about at this point in time.
That is my overriding priority.
I'm not trying to win a dick measuring contest with the roid head, I'm not trying to win a social media argument with somebody that got their face caved in in the UFC.
I'm not interested in these intramural sideshow debates with idiots.
What I am interested in is taking over the GOP.
And by the way, we're going to do it with or without them.
We did before, we will now.
I'm not looking for knuckleheads.
I am looking for the best and brightest, the geniuses.
Yeah, I'm looking for the refined people.
I'm not looking for the alpha muscular Christians that are going to take the country back.
I'm looking for the actually intelligent, sophisticated, refined people that are deadly serious about this, that are going to give their lives to this, not in some ecstatic martyrdom, not in some violent sacrifice, but they're going to give their lives to it.
With the monotony every single day, bit by bit, when we're winning, when we're losing, climbing the ladder in the bureaucracy and everywhere else, choosing at all possible times the most advantageous thing so that we can eventually become the kingmakers and the decision makers in politics.
That's what I'm interested in.
I am not interested in being whatever.
We're interested in creating that shadow empire, that invisible empire of Groypers.
And to the extent we're engaging in electoral politics, I'm interested in derailing.
The biggest threat to America first, which is coming from the Peter Thiel network.
That is the biggest threat, actually.
The biggest threat, and I said this last week, is that we will be squelched and suffocated, deprived of oxygen, throttled in the crib by Vance, by Peter Thiel, by Tucker Carlson, Joe Kent, David Sachs, this coalition of pro Russia, pro Israel, little tech, PayPal mafia people.
They are fighting against us for the succession of the MAGA movement.
That is the only fight that matters right now.
And that's actually just a little bit too complicated for people with an 85 IQ to understand.
And that's okay.
You hold down the fort.
You keep posting Israel every day.
You got that covered, okay?
Here's your crayons.
Here's your magic markers.
Here's your placemat.
You can go and tweet Israel and everybody's replies every day, forever.
You're holding down the fort on that one.
We over here will worry about the hostile takeover of the GOP.
We will worry about.
Defeating Vivek Ramaswamy, making that a referendum on the GOP, and ultimately turning the tide in 2028.
That's my mission.
That's my sole focus.
So, that's a little bit about where we are in the movement right now.
Like I said, I'm defiant.
No, there's no love lost there.
I mean, you guys are idiots.
You don't know what you're doing at all.
You're going to lose, and it doesn't make any sense.
And I told Dan, I told him, when you're ready to get serious, then you call me.
When you're ready to stop posting the same nonsense every day, trying to impress everybody with your little memorized speech, because you don't know anything else other than that, when you're serious, when you want to think about politics, when you want to think politically, then you give me a call.
At this point, though, I'm not answering.
We don't need that.
It's just a load of not.
And I don't think anybody is missing that right now.
We need all these earnest losers, all these earnest losers.
You know, that say, well, I'm, at least I'm doing something.
Fucking up your audio, making us look like idiots, humiliating us, and then losing elections, wasting our time and money.
Stop what you're doing.
At least we're doing something.
Please stop.
There is no path to victory that runs through going out knowing you're going to lose.
I want to go out to win.
If I run for office, I'm going to want to win.
If I support somebody for office, I want them to win.
If I do a conference, I want it to look good and be attended by a lot of people and watched by a lot of people online.
At least we're doing something.
Like you get a participation trophy.
This is the legacy of Oliver Anthony.
All of these losers trying their best, and ultimately they don't care enough.
If you care, you put in the effort.
If you really care, you do the work.
You don't just tell you, well, that's all I can do.
Well, that's all the time we have.
That's all the money we have.
If you really care, you meet the moment, you rise to the occasion, you analyze the problem, you dig deep, and you do the impossible to overcome the odds.
That is what is required.
That is how we have to think, that is how we have to act.
There are no participation medals.
Hey, not bad for only being in the race for five months.
Not bad for only raising 100 grand.
Not bad.
You lost by 60 points.
Not bad.
You shouldn't have gone out at all.
You should have had some strategy where we actually get something.
That's what I just love.
So, and ultimately, that is what separates this movement from everybody else.
And let me just tell you, and this is the part you're really not going to like.
That is what separates the people that are actually running our country from the people that aren't.
And maybe you need to hear that.
There is some aspect of learned helplessness that comes with the Jewish question.
It's just true.
And that's a tough pill to swallow.
And you might not like to hear that, but it's true.
The difference between Joe Lonsdale, Alex Karp, Sean McGuire, all these people that are the architects of our future and our lives, all of these people that have increased their power.
These are all people that have taken ownership.
And you can sit there and say, well, that's not fair.
Well, they had this and they had that, and but it doesn't fucking matter.
That's life.
That's reality.
Reality is a fact.
Get with it.
We have to be better.
Don't put it on them, put it on yourself.
Are you doing, are you the smartest?
If you can't tell me the difference between the House and the Senate, you can't complain that you don't run the country because you don't know what you're talking about.
You don't get to impact the planet or the country or anything if you can't.
Make a change inside and ask more of yourself.
Be the smartest you can be.
Be the most competitive.
Take ownership of the result.
And if you do all that and then you lose, at least he could say he gave it your all.
But there is no, hey, not bad for a day late and a dollar short.
Hey, don't be that way.
So, no, we will continue to demand the best.
This is a filter.
You didn't cut it.
You wanted low IQ conspiracies.
You wanted a purity spiral.
You wanted me and my audience to get behind you and cheerlead you.
Why?
Because you gave that speech.
You said the right words.
It's not good enough.
It's not good enough and it's not going to work.
So I'm going to continue to bet on my MO.
I'm going to continue to bet on myself and the Groypers and America First and a positive vision for the future that is Christian and American and pro white and America First.
And you can take your movement that is based on alpha male posturing, tough guy talk about killing and hating people, negativity, always anti, always complaining.
Spiraling about the same issue, and we can go our separate ways.
I said, You're a roided out guy who's compensating.
No one thinks you're tough, you know?
I'm like, So we don't need to go there.
It's just political.
And he literally said, I'm not even exaggerating.
He goes, I'm 5'9.
That's average height.
Google it.
You're short.
That was.
I was like, whoa, that's crazy.
That's, I'm like surprised that that worked.
Cause you think they would have patched that?
Dude, this is broken.
You would have thought they would have patched that one.
It's like you're 45 years old, you're a roided out midget, you pay girls to be with you.
You would have thought that he would have heard that so many times, it just would have, you know, washed right off, you know, would have just, but no, no, it didn't.
And that kind of tells you all you need to know, I think, doesn't it?
People think that following a leader means I'm in it when I feel like it and I'm out when I don't.
Leadership means I've been here, and that doesn't mean I was here first, it's mine.
No, it means I've seen all these things play out the Trump administration, primary campaigns, infiltrate.
I've seen it all.
I've watched it for 10 years, longer.
I've seen it all play out.
I've seen enough of it play out.
And I've got a lot of experience doing a lot of different things.
And so, part of following a leader in a movement is you actually have to defer to their judgment.
And if it fails, then so be it.
But you don't get to confidence check and say, I don't know, I think we need a course correction.
It doesn't work like that.
I'm the captain of the ship.
And this is something I learned a long time ago.
You know, people that are going to head out when it gets heated, people that are going to head out when they're feeling froggy, those are not people you want alongside you.
I need people that have absolute confidence in my ability.
If you don't, bye.
I'm not going to get confidence checked by some numb nuts.
Chase all these knuckleheads running primary campaigns that are going to lose?
No, sorry.
We don't operate on their timeline.
I don't operate on the timeline of some YouTuber who decides to run in a primary and raises no money.
That's not my timeline.
You know, we have to.
My principles are that we need to focus our resources.
Focus them.
We have to be selective, choose our battles very carefully, and direct our resources in a concentrated way.
That's the only way we can win because you need to understand something.
We don't have a lot of resources.
The other side has infinite money.
When AIPAC wants to win a primary, a primary, you know what they do?
They helicopter in 10 fucking million dollars.
And they do that in multiple races.
Do we have a hundred million dollars to spend every two years?
We're lucky if we got a half a million.
A million, two million.
So there's this principle called defeating in detail.
If we pick the battle, if we pick the battlefield, pick the opponent, and if we concentrate and focus our resources in a place where it makes a difference, this is how we're going to win.
This is how we make impact.
Now, this idea, like, let's just run a bunch of primary people and I don't know, maybe one of them's going to win, you know, that doesn't work.
It doesn't work that way.
So, that's not my people's clamoring for let's just do something.
I'm not going to just do anything.
Whenever, wherever.
We are going to continue to be the conservative, strategic, tactical movement with a long term vision.
You want to go and run into a brick wall.
You want to do the Death Star trench run.
You want to do the suicide mission and waste all your time and money.
That's your prerogative.
But I move slowly and deliberately and intentionally.
And when I go out, I want to go out and win.
I don't want to, you know, let's just throw together a conference.
Who cares if it works or not?
Let's just run for office.
Who cares if we lose?
I care.
I want to win.
I want to do a good job.
So, anyway, so don't be, you know, this confidence checking me.
I feel like I'm the only one that this happens to.
Am I?
I must be the problem.
Sometimes I think that, and sometimes I don't.
But have you ever noticed that my life is like a comic book?
You just have this extended universe of villains that, every now and again, a new villain emerges to try to ruin my day and upset my apple cart.
And every once in a while, they all combine and get together once and for all to destroy me.
Who else does this happen to?
I've never seen anything like it.
It doesn't happen to Tucker.
It doesn't happen to Alex Jones.
It doesn't happen to any of these people.
Just me.
It's just like, I don't know.
The planets align, there's a blood moon, and then it's like all of these extended universe antagonists from the previous seasons of the show, from season three, from season five, they like all combine into like a super team to like, once and for all, we're going to take them out.
It's like, Leave me alone!
Why are you always attacking me?
Why does it's literally like a TV show?
My life is like a serial, it's like a TV show.
It's crazy.
I am the chosen one, it seems.
I'm like Anakin, I'm like Luke.
They got to protect me on Tatooine.
But, right?
Am I the only one that notices this?
Like, where else does this happen where it's like I've never seen anything like it?
And people have enemies and people don't get along with each other.
People got their ops and everything.
But it's like me, like I said.
There's like this whole cast of characters.
And then every once in a while, something happens and they all get together and they're like, all right, this is it.
And it's just funny.
You flatter me.
It's amusing to me.
You flatter me.
All of this for me, all this to take me down.
I'm like, I'm actually like Palpatine, not to be cringe, not to be cringe.
But yeah, anyway.
It does make me laugh a little bit when they are.
And it is kind of like it's a little frustrating because I'm like, here we go again.
Here we go.
It's this old Laurel Loomer clinking the glasses.
Oh, gay fed.
Blah, blah, blah.
You know, so it's a little annoying.
But then sometimes I have to just sit back and laugh and be like, this is all for me.
You know, sometimes I have to like sit back, sit back with the crown and just be like, this is all.
They're all trying to get me.
I'm the one they want.
It's all for me.
Bring it on.
Bring it on.
They all, you know, they all assemble outside the gates, outside the castle walls here in Berwyn, crossbow and everything.
And it's like, you think about all the villains.
You got John Lyons trying to kill me, that bitch down the street just suing me, Arval in the trailer park, Dan Bilzerian, Jake Shields.
My life is like one of those action movies where there's just like one guy.
Where it's like, you're just like, how's he going to get out of this one?
And then he does.
It's like one of those movies like Jason Bourne, James Bond, Jack Bauer, Mission Impossible.
It's just like there's a guy, he's got it.
Like he's the guy.
And he's hanging out of an airplane or like there's a bomb in the park or whatever, you know, and the guy, you're just like, he's going to, how's he going to get out of this one?
It ignores that the real containment against China is all about the first island chain.
That's really what matters.
It's not an energy problem.
Because how do we contain China?
We contain them in the first island chain.
We don't need to contain the oil in Venezuela and the oil in Iran and the energy elsewhere.
First of all, China runs on coal and renewables.
That's first of all.
So, yes, China gets oil from Iran, they get oil from Venezuela, but look at their energy mix.
It's mostly coal and renewables.
We're different.
We run on a lot of oil.
They don't.
So that's one aspect of it.
But here's the other.
If we wanted to blockade China, we blockade them in the first island chain, which is Japan, Taiwan, Philippines.
You know, we're trying to constrict them around that first line of islands.
And so it's all about reinforcing, first and foremost, Taiwan.
That arguably is the weakest link in the chain.
That's the one that's close to China.
China debatably has a claim to it.
That's the one they have designs on.
And if they take over Taiwan, well, then they are able to have ports that are against the Pacific Ocean.
They're able to get their submarines out, their carriers out.
They break the chain.
So there's a few things going on.
One, we're prioritizing that.
Like, that's really the line of defense against China, not energy.
And then the other aspect of it is how do we defend the island chain?
It's going to be with interceptors, THAAD systems, Patriot missile batteries.
These are all things we're expending in Iran.
So, the China hawks don't want us to be in Iran.
There are China hawks, and they want us to bring the fight to China.
And what they are united in is they want us out of Ukraine, out of Iran.
They want us reinforcing the island chain.
They want us reinforcing Taiwan because there's only a finite supply of THAAD systems and Patriot missile batteries and the interceptors that they shoot, and we're wasting all of them.
So, the China hawks, like Tucker, Tucker's a China hawk.
I don't know if you remember this.
Nobody remembers this, but when Tucker was on Fox News, he was always railing against China, always.
Because he and Peter Thiel, and for that matter, Elbridge Colby in the Pentagon, the top policymaker in the Pentagon right now, they're all prioritizers.
And what that means is they want to prioritize combating China over fighting Russia or fighting Israel's wars in the Middle East.
And so the reason Tucker is so gung ho about our other allies in the Middle East, the Arabs, Is because that is how we are going to hand off the security architecture to these other countries, to our partners.
And they will have collective security and they will be able to balance against Iran, let's say, or manage counterterrorism and nonproliferation while we go and fight in Asia.
So that's the big idea there.
So, no, I mean, it's just wrong.
If the China hawks want us out of Iran, who are the China hawks?
Tucker, Teal, Elbridge Colby.
Elbridge Colby, it's a lie.
They said he's no longer a China hawk.
He is.
So he wrote the new national security strategy for the Pentagon.
And the way there, it was either the NDS and the NSS.
He wrote both of these white papers, and they both talk about hemispheric defense, prioritizing the Caribbean and Latin America.
I'm encouraging people to take what they learn, hide it, and then gain power slowly.
And this is threatening to them because they can't filter those people out, they can't identify them, they can't read their minds.
And so Groypers are in their walls and they don't know it.
Now, if we put up the flag and say, hey, come to the Groyper chapter meeting, hey, come to your monthly Groyper meeting, it's like one guy gets exposed and then everybody gets exposed.
And so we have to be very careful about that.
That's one.
And two, when it comes to candidates, again, I really question how viable that is.
I am willing to support anybody if they have a chance of winning.
And even then, in what form do we help?
Does it help for me to endorse them?
It might.
It also might really hurt.
Because I'm, you know, it's the same thing with Dan.
Like, you're going to run saying, I'm going to kill Israelis.
Like, you can't run if you talk like that.
You just, it's not going to work.
So, you know, Dan told me, I, this is just an illustrative conversation.
It's so funny.
He told me, you haven't sacrificed shit.
I was going to sell my company for $800 million.
I said, well, you're a fucking retard.
I said, because.
Do you think we need $800 million or you to tweet fuck Israel every day?
I said, which do you think would be better for the movement, you fucking idiot?
I said, first of all, that's not true.
Second of all, if that were true, then you're the world's biggest idiot.
He goes, I sacrificed everything.
You haven't sacrificed anything.
He goes, I was going to sell my company for $800 million.
I said, then you're retarded.
Because what did you allegedly give up on $800 million for?
To tweet fuck Israel under everybody's replies?
Because that's all you're doing.
To go into somebody's replies and say, it's the fucking Jews, you cuck.
It's fucking Israel, damn it.
It's like, I'll take the $800 million, please.
The $800 million would have been way better.
You couldn't have taken the $800 million.
And it's like, but bro, you're lying.
That's not even true.
Your company's under investigation by the FBI.
So that's not even true.
But even if it were, like, either you're lying, like everything, or it's true and you're an idiot, which you are.
But that's a perfect example.
I'm going to light a billion dollars on fire so that I could run for Congress from Las Vegas and lose.
And tweet to an increasingly smaller audience.
It's crazy.
I said, You lit $800 million on fire.
You're an idiot.
I said, Tell me I'm wrong.
I'll literally pull it up.
I mean, because that's literally what I said.
And it was so funny because I'm just like, That's insane.
Let me scroll up.
He said, I tanked an $800 million sale in a company I own half of.
I said, Why would you do that?
That is retarded.
$800 million war chest or losing a congressional race and being shadow banned on Twitter?
Hmm, let's see.
He said, because I wanted to expose the JQ.
I said, you could have done more with $800 million than blabbing on Twitter, retard.
Do you disagree?
He said, I've already done everything in life.
I fucked thousands of hot girls, been famous for 15 years, made hundreds of millions.
You talk to guys online like an OnlyFans bitch.
I choose freedom of speech over money.
I said, you blew it.
Money buys power.
You chose to run your mouth instead of being strategic.
He said, You've never had money.
I said, Well, my daddy wasn't a scammer.
So it's like that, but okay, that's just like a little insight.
I'm like, Dude, 400 million are running your mouth on Twitter.
He goes, I fucked thousands of girls.
I'm like, Okay, cool.
You should have taken the 400 million.
You don't have any money.
Okay, like, and neither do you now.
So I guess that makes two of us like, You see what I have to, okay?
Do you see what I have to deal with?
I'm under like impossible.
It is impossible.
Now, okay, do you envy me now?
Who wants to be the movement leader?
Please.
Take my job, for example.
No, please take it.
Like, okay, who wants to be the movement leader?
Anyone want to sign up to babysit these fucking idiots?
Whenever I'm in the middle of a fucking battle, it's always like somebody that can be associated with me who puts out a bait tweet that everybody takes unironically and uses against me.
Basil tweets, I just donated 10 grand to Randy Fine.
Immediately picked up.
Immediately they picked it up and said, Look, this Groyper just.
It's always somebody.
Congratulations.
This time it was you.
No, but that's okay.
It was funny.
You know what?
I'm glad you find it funny.
Glad you see the funny side.
That's great.
No, but I'm teasing.
It was objectively funny.
At my expense, okay, fine.
But I do appreciate all the support.
The Basilians have been defending me.
Basilians are not Groypers.
Groypers are not Basilians, but they have been the Basilians, the Apollonians.
And this guy has never betrayed me, never talked shit about me.
He's never said a bad word about me.
He's probably the most loyal best friend I've had.
And I don't want to say that because I have a lot of good friends, but you know, you got to find a guy like Beardson because this guy's like loyal to the finish.
He's a great guy, heart of gold.
And he takes a lot of shit and he takes it in stride.
That's a good man.
You know, he gets a lot of abuse.
People attack him a lot and he's funny.
He's got a huge following on Twitter.
He's still funny to this day.
You know, a lot of people burn out, they have one funny bit, then it's over.
He's still funny.
He's got that profile picture, still gets me, man.
So he's a good dude.
07s to you, Beardson.
You're the man.
We got to hang out or something, man.
But it is, right?
I mean, you're old enough to remember the whole Patrick Little, Paul Nealon debacle.
This has literally all happened before.
What if I told you that eight years ago, this exact same thing happened?
I wouldn't endorse some like psycho, anti Jew primary candidate who had no chance of winning.
So he crashed out on me, pretended to be a Marine, but wasn't really.
That happened eight years ago.
It already happened.
And everybody dogged on me saying, I hated the troops and I don't want to do anything.
It all happened eight years ago with Paul Nealon and Patrick Little.
As everyone niches down, I hope you achieve your goal of only retaining the genius, Machiavellian, successful, charismatic, rich, handsome, and sophisticated following.
And war analysis is really compelling, but some of your best monologues are when you talk about Christ in the movement and why it's right, it validates it all.
Yeah, we'll see what kind of problems this causes for me tomorrow.
But that's all I got for you.
Remember to smash the follow button, smash the like button, leave a comment.
I'm on the air Monday through Friday.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thank you to our top super chatters.
Huge special thank you to John Dave Irving.
Hey, good to hear from you, buddy.
It's been a minute.
Diversity stole my bike.
Tenrio Chevrolet Groyper.
Six or seven million.
Excuse me.
TB Coda, Tanya Williams, Hoplite Emerald.
Jay Diet, Line Dancing, Nick, Infamous Nutsack, Chief Grief, Rapist Hitler, Crooked Flush, Weeping Wagey, Green Jelly, Snafu Zoomer, Pumpkin Master, Donan the Bilzerian, Eco Boost Owner, Trend Balone Acetate, Canuck, Drewish Question, Like I'm Little Retarded, CJ, Apartment G, Red Pilled Yesterday, Vindicated AF, Fentanyl is Good For You, Lex Luthor, Mr. JPC, and Chad Champion.
Special thank you to all of them.
Thanks to all our super chatters, everybody that watches.