Health Ranger - Mike Adams - Brighteon Broadcast News, Sep 11, 2025 - Assassination of Charlie Kirk will prove to be a TIPPING PO

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 11, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:33:09

Brighteon Broadcast News, Sep 11, 2025 - Assassination of Charlie Kirk will prove to be a TIPPING PO

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Bridey on Bring it on Bridey on Let So it's been a difficult day for many of us.
	I was rattled, as I'm sure you are rattled by the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
	And oh, I I forgot to say uh uh this is a Brighton Broadcast News for Thursday, September 11th, yes, September 11th, 9-11, uh 2025, the the anniversary of the infamous 2001 9-11 Twin Towers brought down, building seven, obviously control demolition, obviously a total inside job, obviously deep state operation, by the way.
	Um question whatsoever about it.
	And that was designed to push the Patriot Act and also, of course, to pit the United States into a war posture with the enemies of Israel in the Middle East, and while also expanding surveillance on the American people.
	So that's what 9-11 was all about.
	It was uh create an emergency, get the people to react and respond, and get them to support your tyrannical laws that you have ready to go.
	It just happened to be pre-written.
	Oh, here, let's spy on the terrorists, and all the American people cheered, yay, let's spy on the terrorists.
	And then it turns out you're the terrorists, or you're designated terrorists.
	So that was 9-11 in 2001.
	Now we have September 10th.
	Yesterday, Charlie Kirk being assassinated.
	In a shocking manner, uh obviously I'm not going to play the videos, but they're they're very horrifying to see.
	Um hearing of that, um, Charlie Kirk was he was uh at a university in Utah, he was giving a speech like he often does in front of very large enthusiastic crowds of uh college students and some college professors, etc.
	And uh the thing about Charlie is he he had a lot of courage to engage with a lot of left-wing people on college campuses.
	So he was speaking, he was answering questions from the crowd, and we've come to find out he was also wearing body armor.
	He was wearing body armor with a white t-shirt that I think said freedom on top of the body armor.
	Uh I don't know what level of body armor he was wearing.
	I don't know if it was 3A or level 4, you know, or what.
	Ceramic plates, I don't know.
	Hard to tell.
	A shooter, clearly with a a rifle of some kind, and a shooter who we believe was stationed in a building or on the roof of a building, it's said 200 yards away, uh, fired one shot, and the shot actually ricoched off the top of the body armor.
	And that ricochet caused the bullet to go upward directly through Charlie's neck where it severed his carotid artery.
	And he he bled out right there.
	Um I saw that shot, I knew he's not gonna make it.
	And Michael Jon also posted a video.
	Michael Jon has seen a lot of people shot at close range.
	And again, I'm not gonna show you this video, obviously.
	It's it's too graphic, and I don't want to I don't want to mean any disrespect to Charlie Kirk.
	Um his family's been put through hell, obviously, over this and and so on.
	But even Michael Jon also said that when you see someone shot like that, and he has seen that at close range, uh, that person's gone.
	Okay, you you know, you lose five pints of blood in like 10 seconds.
	Yeah.
	And that was it.
	Uh there was no ambulance on the scene.
	They threw him in the back of an SUV, drove to the hospital, and uh later he was pronounced dead, but I think he he he was dead before he even got there, is my guess.
	So this is a very shocking image.
	This is psychologically extremely shocking to much of America, especially conservatives in America.
	And even to everybody, this signifies that speech assassinations have come to America.
	Charlie Kirk was assassinated in broad daylight.
	And the pieces that are coming together seem to indicate that this was definitely a professional job, because there are all kinds of strange things surrounding this.
	It looks like it was a professional hit.
	So not just a disgruntled, you know, left-wing college student, not just a crazed trans shooter, probably not.
	This was almost undoubtedly, I mean, who who's responsible for most assassinations?
	High-level assassinations throughout U.S. history.
	Uh only two organizations, the CIA and Mossad.
	So this was almost certainly either CIA or Mossad.
	And possibly both.
	We don't know yet.
	But it has a lot in common with the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt on President Trump, which was also clearly carried out by the deep state with the help of a compromised Secret Service and a compromise FBI at that time.
	Remember that was when Biden was president.
	And then they had a patse ready to go.
	They had a patse on the roof, ready to go, and conveniently they shot and killed the patsey, and then they put a little bow tie on it.
	We got the guy, end of investigation, right?
	But we all know that that guy was not a lone shooter.
	He wasn't the lone shooter.
	And the fact that there were at least two decoys involved in this operation, one a man who uh seemed to indicate he was in the crowd, and for some reason he seemed to indicate that he was the shooter.
	And when police uh glommed onto him and they were walking him out, and he was screaming.
	I saw the video, he was screaming, shoot me, shoot me.
	And uh this guy was some kind of crazed left-wing guy uh who has an odd history and some weird transgenderism photos surface, but he's not the shooter.
	He didn't have a weapon, but he distracted police onto him, and he's being charged with obstruction of law enforcement, by the way.
	But he wasn't the shooter.
	However, he he may have served the purpose of distracting police from the real shooter who got away.
	And then there was another guy who was apparently in the audience, a guy with a wood stock air rifle, you know, like a pellet gun, which is very odd.
	And the police visited him.
	I saw the video of his arrest.
	He was taken in for questioning, as was the first guy, Mr. Shoot Me Shoot Me guy.
	Uh both of them were questioned by the FBI and then released.
	They were released.
	And uh Kash Patel, uh at the time I'm recording this, which is close to midnight, uh, Kash Patel said uh essentially, we don't have the shooter in custody.
	Uh the the the two people that we did have, we let them go.
	They're not the shooter.
	So the real shooter got away, which seems to also indicate that this is a professional job filled with actors and distractions and so on, in order to get away with the shooting for a very specific reason.
	I wonder what that reason is.
	What is that reason?
	Uh the reason is because they're going to roll out a patsy.
	They're going to roll out a patse that almost certainly did not carry out the shooting, but the patsy determines the narrative.
	And this is what I want to encourage you to watch for very carefully here.
	Watch for who they rolled out as the patsi, and today being 9-11, it would be the perfect day to roll out a patsi in remembrance of you know 9-11, and then Netanyahu could seize the moment and say, you know, be very afraid of Islam or whatever Netanyahu's gonna say.
	This looks like an operation that could very easily involve Netanyahu, but we'll get to that.
	Uh, First, before I do get to that, I do want to just say that I am I'm devastated by this shooting of Charlie Kirk.
	And I I have I've been shaken by this.
	I was actually interviewing uh Christopher Sullivan as this news was breaking, and I'm going to play that interview for you here today.
	And both Christopher and I at one point we just couldn't, we just couldn't continue the interview.
	So we wrapped it up, and we were both devastated, and we offered prayers for Charlie Kirk's family members and prayers for America, begging God to help this nation heal.
	Because what we are what we're witnessing and what we're about to see, and for those of you listening from outside America, please listen, because I'm here in America and I'm seeing what's about to happen, and I'm extremely concerned that this event is going to cause an outbreak, a domino effect of extreme violence.
	Uh even uh I I wouldn't call it civil war, but but kinetic type of activities, regional war, perhaps.
	And this is, you know, Charlie Kirk founded Turning Point USA, TP USA, and his death really does signify a turning point for America, this or a tipping point, uh same initials.
	But I saw so many people today saying they're they are now radicalized, like conservatives saying this.
	They're done tolerating the left, because many many conservatives are blaming this on the left, even though we don't yet know who the shooter is.
	There's a lot of obviously left-wing media that is complicit in spreading smears and hatred about conservatives like Charlie Kirk.
	So there's a lot of hatred being directed at the political left right now, and there are people that seem to be indicating that they are ready to just start shooting leftists or you know, go into war with the left.
	And and I just I want to urge everybody listening, do not do not be um do not be swept into the emotional vengeance response.
	It's a very dangerous spiral, and that may be exactly what the controllers want.
	Because this event, this assassination of Charlie Kirk has every indication of an intelligence operation and the Hegelian dialectic um approach, you know, problem reaction solution.
	They want the American people to fight with each other and to forget that the real war is the globalists who are at war with humanity.
	It's you know, the Bill Gates of the world and the vaccine companies and the GMO mosquitoes and everything, they're at war with human populations, but they don't want you to think about that.
	They would rather that you fight each other, kill off a bunch of each other, and then that's a cover story for their planned financial reset, you see.
	Or, you know, they they need anarchy as a cover story.
	And if they can't get World War III with Russia because Russia refuses to launch nukes, then they're gonna start war and anarchy domestically in France, in the UK, in Germany probably, and in the United States starting now.
	And all it took was one bullet striking one uh prominent conservative influencer who was uh uh greatly loved by uh a large number of people.
	Now, Charlie Kirk was 31, so he's a generation younger than myself, and he appealed to younger people, obviously, and he appealed to college students, and that generation is very popular among people of his age.
	Uh Charlie Kirk, though I I did not agree with everything that he said, and I was uh at times, I mean I didn't I didn't comment on Charlie Kirk very much, but I do think a couple of times I commented about Charlie Kirk wondering why is he covering up, why is he making excuses for Israel's genocide?
	Uh although in the last couple of months that that has really changed, and Charlie began to really question uh Israel and question Gaza.
	And I've got some videos to play for you on that that will show you that.
	But the thing is, you see, that that created the friction because TPUSA is one of the organizations that's a result of the Israeli influence factory.
	Let's just call it that.
	So, I mean, I don't think this is a secret, but wealthy Israeli people, uh, they they manufacture people like Ben Shapiro.
	Ben Shapiro is a is a manufactured um personality, an influencer, funded by Israel to a large extent.
	And the way that they manufactured Ben Shapiro is they did the same thing, they had him go to college campuses and interact with the students and create uh conflict and debate, and they even managed to get Ben Shapiro banned at some universities, and they would really evoke a strong hatred left-wing response, and then that would be used to uh amplify the fame of Ben Shapiro, and they they actually created Ben Shapiro out of nothing.
	It took a lot of money and then public relations and you know, a lot of investments and time and positive articles in conservative media, Breitbart, etc.
	Took years to make Ben Shapiro.
	Well, Charlie Kirk uh is another person that comes out of that same system of sort of heavily funded, manufactured organizations that are backed by Israel in order to influence, in this case, uh the next generation of young Americans to bring them over to the conservative side first and then to the pro-Israel side.
	And the reason this is important for Israel is because Israel has the support of the boomers who are Christians, most of them, especially those who grew up on the Schofield Bible, and they were taught that Israel can do no wrong, you know, and they believed it.
	But those people tend to be like 60 years and older, and many of them are, of course, dying off of old age or sometimes vaccines or what have you.
	And the younger generations are completely fed up with Israel and the genocide in Gaza.
	Uh the younger generations despise Israel.
	And so Israel is in a demographic emergency where they need support from younger people.
	Hence the effort to uh heavily fund and then influence these various organizations, like uh Turning Point USA.
	Uh but Charlie Kirk began to really question that.
	He didn't want to be uh trapped in a narrative control situation, that became clear.
	And he began to speak out against Jewish Americans funding uh wokism and funding uh border invasions, and he began to speak out against Israeli control over his speech, and he even openly complained in some interviews that he wasn't able to criticize Israel, uh that they would jump on him more than they would jump on an Israeli.
	And so there was a lot of Zionist narrative control that Charlie Kirk was suffering under.
	And then, according to Harrison Smith, uh who's a host at InfoWars, I know Harrison, um, Harrison Smith had tweeted out, seems like it was a month ago or something like that.
	He said that he had been told from a high-level source inside uh TP USA that Charlie Kirk believed that if he crossed Israel that they would assassinate him.
	And uh so you know Charlie Kirk had had expressed these fears of being assassinated by Israel.
	Uh that's that's not my conclusion.
	That's that's what Charlie said, or or the people around him also said uh and said that to Harrison Smith, and that's been confirmed.
	Harrison uh confirmed that today.
	So that doesn't necessarily mean, you know, that Mossad took the shot, but it's something we have to consider.
	So let's go back to the Patsy, whoever they're gonna roll out as the Patsy.
	Now, I would imagine that Kash Patel, who appears to be completely controlled by Zionist influences at this point, sadly, because I've interviewed Cash before, and he didn't used to be that way.
	But apparently, if you join the Trump administration, you have to swear loyalty to Israel.
	I mean, they've all had to do that, including Bon Gino and others.
	So it looks to me like the FBI is going to be rolling out a patsi that will fit the narrative that they want to push for their political purposes.
	So think with me about this.
	Who are the possible candidates of the patsies they're going to roll out?
	And again, I don't mean any disrespect to Charlie Kirk about this.
	I I want to be clear.
	I honor his courage, I honor his work, his life, his effort, you know, incredible bravery, an incredibly brilliant young man, and he was really beginning to question the Israeli influence factor over his own organization.
	And he was getting really red-pilled, actually.
	And so I don't mean any disrespect to Charlie in uh pursuing these questions.
	But if we want to respect the memory of Charlie Kirk, we should really try to find out who's behind this.
	That only makes sense.
	And I have a feeling that there's going to be a grand deception that's rolled out to try to convince us that this Patsy did it, and that's not even going to be true.
	It's kind of like the JFK assassination.
	They rolled out Lee Harvey Oswald.
	He wasn't the shooter.
	He was not the shooter.
	I mean, JFK was assassinated by the intelligence community.
	Some people claim that Israel was even involved in that.
	Depends on, you know, whose books you read.
	Jim Mars did books on this.
	Roger Stone did a book on the assassination of JFK.
	And uh Oliver Stone did, you know, a film on it, but that film kind of glossed over a few important details.
	Uh, nevertheless, the assassinations go way back.
	And they always come down to two parties, the CIA and Mossad.
	And it's always for narrative control.
	So ask yourself who they're gonna roll out as the Patsy.
	Let's go through the list of possible candidates and then examine what the possible narratives would be.
	So uh obviously uh you saw the the subway train stabbing of the Ukrainian girl.
	She was stabbed in the neck by this criminal young black male who had been released by left-wing judges apparently 14 times after assaulting women.
	They kept letting him back onto the streets because you don't have to have any qualifications at all to be a left-wing judge, it turns out.
	You don't even have to be an attorney, you don't have to pass any tests, it's just you're a judge, okay.
	Well, you saw that, and some people believe that that was engineered or or or planted in order to create racial tension.
	So, what if the patsy they roll out is a black person, huh?
	Well, then that's designed to create racial tension, obviously.
	Because combined with the black subway stabber, you know, that's gonna create, obviously, in the minds of some people who who tend to leap to conclusions about skin color.
	They're gonna say, Oh, these black people are there, they killed our our hero.
	We got to crack down on black, you know, and and that's that's crazy.
	You know, that's not the right answer, obviously.
	We shouldn't judge people by their skin color.
	Although there is a crime problem, let's be clear, and uh according to FBI statistics, black males carry out the vast majority of violent crimes in America.
	There's there's no question about that.
	That's in the statistics.
	But we shouldn't turn it into a race war.
	So, but that's just one candidate.
	And I don't think that's the candidate that the deep state's gonna choose.
	The next candidate would be they'll roll out a transgender shooter.
	That's a possibility because of course many of the school shootings have involved transgenders.
	Even a recent shooting was a transgender individual.
	Now you notice that the left-wing media will say that a man can become a woman, and then when that man is a woman, you have to refer to that woman as she or she and her, and uh she's she's the best woman ever, except when she shoots up a school, in which which case she instantly reverts to being a white male, according to the media.
	All of a sudden she's a white male again.
	What happened to the woman part?
	Oh, we forgot about that.
	The shooter's a white male.
	So that's the way they do that.
	They don't say it's a transgender, they say it's a white male.
	But trans shooters have become an increasing pattern that people are noticing.
	So would the FBI roll out a trans shooter in order to push an agenda of cracking down on transgenderism or LGBT or left-wing media or hormone treatments of children, who knows.
	But I could see this coalescing into a war on trans, especially given that Charlie Kirk very aggressively spoke out against transgenderism.
	That was one of his main points.
	And I I think that Charlie Kirk was correct when he talked about transgenderism.
	I mean, I didn't hear hardly any of his speeches, but the things I have heard, I mean, it makes sense to me.
	You're a man or you're a woman, you know, and everything else is your imagination.
	But that doesn't fly on college campuses today where all these young leftists are living in a delusional fairy tale land.
	So conceivably one of them got really angry, and then somehow managed to hire two decoys, and then somehow scrambled onto the roof, and then managed to aim a shot to go right over the ballistic plate, you know, just hit the very top of it.
	Um I don't know if I buy that.
	But that's something that they they might roll out.
	So let's definitely be clear about that.
	It's a possibility.
	Okay, the uh the next candidate they might roll out is uh an angry liberal white male leftist, you know, just like an angry leftist, uh more like a Marxist, let's say, like an Antifa type of character, you know, somebody who loves communism and Marxism and hates Charlie Kirk and uh someone who's uh trained in in rifles a little bit.
	Uh you don't even need very much training, by the way.
	That's a 200-yard shot.
	That's not a long shot.
	That's a very that's considered very close range for any kind of rifle caliber.
	I mean, even even uh a 556 round, that's close range.
	A 308 round, close range, you know, any of any of the rounds that size and higher, um, that's that's a close range shot.
	So it's not even a difficult shot.
	It wouldn't take much training for somebody to do to take this shot, but it would take coordination to have access to the roof, to you know, to hire the decoys, to have an escape route planned.
	There are other factors involved here.
	So clearly this involves some significant level of planning, and I I very much doubt it's a spontaneous angry leftist, although that is one of the narratives that's being talked about out there.
	And uh by the way, it's possible that by the time you hear this, the FBI may release the uh the details on the shoot, the so-called shooter, who I'm calling the patsy, because I immediately do not trust what the FBI tells us.
	Whoever they roll out, I'm gonna say like that's not the shooter, but that's who they want us to think is the shooter.
	Okay.
	So anyway, uh angry leftist is another possible category.
	But then the last category, which I think is the most likely category, is they're gonna roll out somebody who's like a free Palestine person, somebody with ties to Islam, somebody with ties to Iran or Qatar.
	And they're gonna use this to push the pro-Israel narrative.
	And this is my big concern.
	So the Patsy will look Islamic, will have, you know, an Islamic-sounding name, will have like a social media history of hating Israel and hating America or whatever, and they're gonna roll this person out, and then they're gonna use this to push censorship laws to censor anybody who's critical of Israel.
	That's the most likely scenario here.
	This is an agenda that's being pushed, and they want to push the agenda so much that they, the the deep state or the intelligence community, they were willing To murder Charlie Kirk in order to push this narrative.
	And this, I mean, some people think that Israel carried this whole thing out in order to push the narrative that's going to benefit Israel.
	I mean, that's a possibility.
	I guess we'll know when we see the Patsy.
	Again, the Patsy tells you who's behind it.
	Whoever the Patsy is, the party behind it is the opposite of the Patsy.
	If it's, you know, again, if the Patsy is Islamic, the party behind it is probably Israel.
	If the Patsy is a transgender, the party behind it is probably, you know, conservative America first group or something.
	Or the, or you know, or maybe some pro-America CIA department.
	If the Patsy is a transgender, then it's somebody in the Trump administration that's trying to uh silence left-wing, you know, LGBT groups, right?
	So the Patsy tells you who the party is who who pulled this off, but the party is the opposite of the Patsy.
	So whoever the Patsy is, don't believe it.
	That's just the story.
	That's going to be the official story.
	This is like a I mean, in a weird way, this is kind of like a Sandy Hook scenario unfolding in real time.
	And whoever they roll out here, that's going to be the official narrative, and there will be no tolerance of any disagreement with the official narrative.
	Just like with Sandy Hook or just like with 9-11 or other shootings, you will be forced to go along with the official narrative, even though there's going to be questions.
	Like, what?
	What is that?
	Like, there's already questions about some of the video frames, weird things happening that some of it looks like maybe compression artifacts, or some people say it's AI video artifacts.
	I I don't I'm not buying that story.
	I don't think it's an AI deepfake of the shooting because there were a lot of live witnesses there who saw it firsthand.
	But there will be questions.
	There are questions about the decoys, questions about the FBI handling.
	You know, obviously, there are going to be a lot of questions.
	But if if the intelligence community actually ran this, they're going to move very quickly to shut down all the questions and roll out one official narrative, just like the government did with 9-11.
	And you notice after 9-11, they rapidly cleaned up all the debris to eliminate the evidence of the thermite, didn't they?
	Oh, yeah, they had the dump trucks and the bulldozers and the excavators in there very quickly.
	So they got to destroy the evidence.
	What did they do with the Butler Pennsylvania shooting?
	They shot the guy on the roof, and then what did they do?
	Oh, they hosed down the roof, destroying all the evidence, you know, blood evidence, maybe clothing fibers, you know, DNA evidence, whatever.
	They hosed it down.
	So in a hurry, the FBI destroyed the crime scene.
	That's what they do.
	That's a sign that it's a planned event.
	And some people might use the term false flag.
	Just remember that false flag doesn't mean that the event did not happen.
	It means that the event did happen, but that you are being deceived because the attribution of the event is being directed to someone who actually is not responsible for it.
	That's what a false flag means.
	I mean, it comes out of naval warfare where a ship would fly the flag of another country and then attack a ship or attack a port, and then they sail back out to sea and then they put up their own flag, you know.
	And so that's why it's called a false flag, because it was about what flag the ship was flying.
	So a false flag operation, again, is an operation that is real.
	You know, Charlie Kirk really did get shot.
	He he really was killed.
	But who's behind it?
	Well, we're probably going to be deceived about that, is my guess.
	And you can already see a lot of competing narratives in this, a lot of narratives.
	From the pro-Israel influencers, like Laura Loomer, let's say, or Mark Levin or Ben Shapiro, they're instantly blaming the left.
	This is all about leftism or Islam.
	You know, these are angry Islamic people, or these are angry leftists.
	But for a lot of other people who are not funded by Zionists, you know, they they're beginning to question Israel's possible role in this as well.
	So what I thought I would play for you here are a series of short clips of Charlie Kirk.
	Actually uh recently getting really red-pilled and speaking out about Epstein and uh speaking out about Gaza and Jewish donors, etc.
	Uh, this is really important to consider because it shows that Charlie Kirk, even though for years, he absolutely um excused Israel's actions in in Gaza.
	You know, Charlie Kirk was was defending Israel almost all the time.
	But that began to shift just in the last couple of months.
	So check out some of these clips and decide for yourself.
	To my knowledge, all of these are you know unedited, legit clips, but they are snippets out of the larger conversation with different hosts.
	So uh check these out.
	Here we go.
	It's nothing new that if you're in the Intel agencies, you want to try and get as much blackmail on powerful people as possible.
	Easy, not hard.
	And this is no longer just speculation.
	First of all, the evidence that shows that Epstein was a creation of either Mossad, Israeli intelligence, American intelligence, Saudi intelligence, or maybe he was just a hired gun.
	Maybe he was just the guy that countries would go to and park a couple hundred million bucks and say, hey, can you get one of the members of the royal family with a 13-year-old so we can get them to do what we want to do?
	Members of Congress are actively being blackmailed.
	The Epstein playbook is being used on a daily basis.
	All right, so that was Charlie Kirk talking about Jeffrey Epstein, who he said was a creation of either Massad or Israeli intelligence or American intelligence, and that Epstein's task was to compromise people.
	And uh yes, I mean, you and I know that.
	You know, Whitney Webb knows that.
	Everybody knows that.
	But you're not allowed to talk about it.
	Trump wants to cover it up, Israel wants to cover it up.
	Charlie Kirk started talking about this.
	So there's um instant friction with his uh the the donors, you know, the the funders who are behind uh TP USA in in large degree.
	Now, here's another clip where he talks about Jewish donors and how they've actually worked to destroy America.
	So, you know, check out this clip.
	Here we go.
	And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits.
	This is a beast created by secular Jews, and now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened?
	And it's not just the colleges, it's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it.
	It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more, draw a line of the sand.
	I don't care if you hate me.
	All right, so there's Charlie talking about Jewish donors.
	And I think a lot of people would find that, you know, very surprising because Charlie is known as being a strong defender of Israel.
	But again, things were really starting to shift for Charlie Kirk recently.
	Uh check out what he had to say about Gaza.
	I'm gonna play a third clip for you here.
	Charlie Kirk on Gaza.
	Here we go.
	I've been in Israel many times.
	The whole country's a fortress.
	When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially.
	I find this very hard to believe.
	I've been to that Gaza border.
	You cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that's an IDF soldier.
	Right?
	The whole country is surveilled.
	And so let me just let me just kind of go through this.
	We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this.
	The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war.
	It's not an exaggeration.
	This judicial stuff, they were pro there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because BB Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution.
	That's not an exaggeration, right?
	He said the judicial branch has too much power.
	There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu, where they anticipated tens Of thousands of people to take to the streets.
	That's all gone, Patrick.
	Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead.
	I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked.
	Was there a stand down order?
	Was there a stand down order?
	Six hours?
	I don't believe it.
	Israel's the side of new size New Jersey.
	When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's 45 minutes.
	Six hours.
	They're live streaming the killing of Jews.
	Was did somebody in the government say stand down?
	That is a legitimate non-conspiracy question.
	The whole country is the IDF.
	The whole country is.
	And you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kibbutzes and schools and by...
	Okay, so in that clip, you see Charlie Kirk asking a question that is not allowed to be asked, which is did Israel have a stand down order on October 7th?
	In other words, was Netanyahu behind a plan to allow Israel to be attacked so that he would have a narrative to wipe out Gaza.
	And I think that more and more people have come to the realization that yes, that sounds exactly like what Netanyahu would do.
	And that this has never been about self-defense.
	This has been about total genocide, total ethnic cleansing of Gaza to take over the country and wipe it out.
	In fact, Netanyahu recently announced that that's exactly the plan.
	We're just going to take it over now.
	He always has another reason.
	Oh, well, there's there's still terrorists, there's still tunnels.
	We have to bomb these buildings now.
	We have to take that city now.
	We have to push them out now because they might still hurt us.
	So we basically we got to kill them all.
	You know, that that's Net Yahu.
	Charlie Kirk was beginning to ask those questions.
	And believe me, those questions, you're not allowed to ask those questions if you're taking money from wealthy Jewish donors.
	Okay.
	So he's actually talking about Jewish donors as his organization is taking money from some of those very same Jewish donors.
	And Jewish donors, let me tell you, they are very demanding about narrative control.
	And I think I shared the story with you, but a couple of years ago, there was an article that we had published on natural news.com, and I forgot what it was even about.
	I don't know if it was it was about maybe it was about like Israel banning uh genetic testing.
	Because they don't want anybody to have genetic tests in Israel, because then the truth would come out that most of the so-called Israelis are you know fake.
	They're fake Israel, they're actually Europeans who came in and took over.
	And the actual sons of Abraham, you know, are the Palestinians, but they don't want genetic testing in Israel.
	I think that's what it was about.
	I had an article about that.
	I got a call from someone, I'm not going to name this person, but someone who's very high level in the Trump administration right now.
	I got a call from that person who said to me, Hey Mike, uh, one of our Jewish donors uh saw your article and they want you to take it down.
	I'm like, what?
	Um yeah, they want you to take it down, they don't like it.
	And I'm like, well, I don't answer to them.
	I mean, they're not Jewish donors to me.
	He's like, no, they're Jewish donors to us, but I'm just calling you as a courtesy.
	It's okay if you say no.
	I mean, he was actually very polite.
	This man is a is a polite man.
	But he asked me to take it down.
	I said no.
	And he said, okay, I'm I I'm okay with that.
	But I just I I was obliged to make the call.
	So um, but then I think what happened is I I I thought about it for a few days, and I I took a look at the article, and I did think that, you know, maybe the article could sort of provide better context for the issue.
	So I think I did have my editor like add some context to the article, but I didn't take it down.
	Uh so I I did something just to provide better information.
	And then I think we put an edited, you know, tag on it or something.
	But you know, I'm I'm not gonna take articles down because a Jewish donor through someone I know calls and and complains.
	I mean, are you kidding me?
	I don't I'm not your little street bitch, okay.
	So, you know, I publish what is true.
	Now, if there's something I can do to improve it, yeah, I'm willing to do that, but I'm you know, I'm not your whipping boy, I I'm not your slave.
	No, no, thank you.
	But Charlie, Charlie Kirk was part of an organization that depended on that money, you see.
	And whoever controls the purse strings of your organization like that, if it's a donor-driven organization, well, guess what?
	Who are you going to appease?
	I mean, folks, look at Brightpart, Brightbart.com.
	How does Breitbart.com operate?
	They can't possibly earn enough money from their advertising revenue.
	No.
	They are subsidized.
	You know, I mean, look at Ben Shapiro, look at Mark Levin, look at all these people.
	They are subsidized.
	There's a flow of money that goes in that direction.
	And Charlie Kirk was you know, he founded an organization that took that money and then began to question some of the the motives or the or the narratives of some of these donors.
	I mean, I just played you video.
	There's more.
	Let's check out this video, which is another example.
	I mean, I want you to hear this from Charlie Kirk's own words.
	This is not my conclusion.
	Uh, you can hear him talk about it.
	Let's go to clip number four.
	Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.
	Now, I don't like generalizations.
	Not every Jewish person believes that.
	But it is true, the anti-defamation league was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter.
	It is true that some of the largest financiers of left-wing anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans.
	They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that.
	In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer um going to be administered to colleges, right?
	Mark Rowan, Leon Copperman.
	Can we get that full list?
	It's very powerful.
	The part of the tw so that's totally true.
	And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this.
	So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the internet.
	Tucker Carlson was in uh interviewing Candace Owens.
	We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that uh Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas.
	We said this by the way, last week, and people came after us.
	We actually said it in a different way.
	We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti-Semites.
	But listen to this.
	Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.
	So in in that clip, clip number four, you can hear Charlie saying that it's the the Jewish donors that are funding the cultural Marxism.
	It was the ADL that was supporting Black Lives Matter and Antifa.
	You've also heard Michael Jan in multiple interviews talk about how the illegal immigration invasion of America was largely carried out and heavily funded by HIAS, the Hebrew immigrant aid society.
	Yeah.
	So they take you know Jewish money and then they use it to invade America and overthrow America with illegals and and then some of these other Jewish organizations that use the money to fund Antifa Black Lives Matter or ADL, which defends the violence of radical left-wing Marxist groups.
	So that's what Charlie Kirk was talking about.
	Now, obviously you're not supposed to talk about this if you're funded in part by wealthy Jewish donors or Israeli-linked donors, okay?
	So Charlie Kirk was getting a lot of pushback.
	And some of these video clips are from more than a year ago, but he was sort of accelerating this this red pilling in more recent times.
	Here's um here's another clip, uh, clip number Five I want to play for you here that gives you another example of this of things that Charlie was beginning to notice.
	Take a look.
	And my moral character is being put into question.
	And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like we're just gonna try to we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do.
	And that's really really weird, isn't it, Megan?
	That's not right.
	Wrong headed.
	I I'll tell you this for me.
	So I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand.
	I mean, I realize and I've of course reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer.
	He says, I think he would have told me he didn't say he had any of those connections.
	I hear all that.
	That doesn't mean it's not true.
	I think all these things should be explored.
	It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein.
	But uh saying that, and also saying he might be a U.S. uh asset, etc., doesn't make you anti-Semitic.
	That's a fucking crazy.
	All right, there you go.
	Sorry about the profanity there from uh Meghan Kelly.
	But this is her and and Charlie Kirk talking about how they get so much pushback for any time if they fail to follow the Israeli narrative 100%, if they deviate, you know, one percent from the pro-Israel narrative, they get just completely attacked and smeared.
	And you know Charlie Kirk was beginning to really notice that clearly.
	Now, next I want to play a one-minute clip of a man who was an eyewitness at the assassination uh at the university there in Utah.
	Uh listen to what he says over the next one minute, because this this young man has some very good questions about what's going on, and he he's not sure that it's just a lone shooter.
	So check this out.
	We'll go uh clip number six.
	Here we go.
	After I got done uh talking to him, I really couldn't exit because there's such a big crowd.
	Uh and I so I turned around and like 10 to 20 seconds later, after uh I got done talking to Charlie, he was I saw that he was shot in the neck and that he was squirting blood everywhere.
	But I I was piecing things together, and it was really weird because the second guest that I talked to when it before I went and asked him the question, what I what I was gonna ask him, he was talking to him about how he was gonna ask about transgenderism or something like that.
	But not and nothing about shootings.
	And this is the irony that came to me, which was like right when he asked that, not like five, ten seconds later, he was shot.
	And not only that, right after that, someone confessed to it who had no weapon, which makes me think that it was clearly a setup and that multiple people were involved.
	So but prior to that, that's all I saw because everyone was squirming.
	I didn't see anyone fire a shot.
	I think it had to come from elevated position for sure.
	So yeah, some interesting eyewitness observations right there.
	Uh and that man's testimony seems to indicate that he he thinks it might be a coordinated, you know, trans shooter or or a trans revenge type of plot.
	So again, there are all kinds of you know theories currently about what's going on, and we can't draw our conclusions until we get a lot more information.
	And one big piece of information that we need, of course, is we need to see the patsy that the FBI is gonna roll out.
	And I suspect that's gonna happen in the next 24 hours.
	Uh but it it may never happen.
	If if you know, if it's a true uh Mossad operation, you know, the real shooter will never be found, but they will have a patsy because they need to tie up loose ends, you know, that they need the Lee Harvey Oswald of the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	All right, so I want you to pay attention to the messaging in all of this, and I want you to be ultra ultra critical in your thinking.
	Do not believe anything that you hear from the FBI, the DOJ, the Trump administration, or the left-wing media.
	You know, forget about the New York Times, CNN, or even the CIA media, Washington Post.
	I I want you to discount every single thing that you hear from any of those sources for the next several days.
	And you're going to have much better success actually going online on social media and sorting it out there.
	And of course, you can use brightown.social, where it's an uncensored, open discussion about what's going on.
	You can go on X, but X is a lot more censored.
	You know, X doesn't allow links to Brighton, for example, if you can believe that.
	Unbelievable.
	But that's true.
	So go on social media to get the best information here.
	There's also Gab, you know, there's Telegram, there's Brighton.io, which is our decentralized blockchain driven social media platform.
	And of course, our platforms are all free.
	You can use them, you know, free of charge.
	But do not trust the FBI on this.
	I think they're going to lie to our faces about this shooter.
	I mean, we'll see.
	We'll see.
	All right.
	And I will, of course, keep you posted.
	And please understand that I'm recording this, you know, maybe 12 hours before you hear it.
	So there could be a lot of information that comes out in that time that I'm not aware of at the time I'm recording it.
	So please give me a little bit of leeway if anything I've said here seems to contradict what you now know, because I cannot read the future, it turns out.
	I've tried the crystal ball, it doesn't work.
	You know, so I'm just going with the information I have.
	I shook the magic eight ball, turned it over, and it it said maybe.
	You know, that's it.
	Remember that old ball?
	I don't know if if you're the same age as I am.
	When we were kids, we had this like it's like a black ball that is just the dumbest toy ever, but you you shake it up and then you look at it, and like an answer floats up to the surface of something like maybe, or not yet, you know.
	What?
	What is this stupid thing?
	It was like the dumbest toy ever.
	But that was the 1970s.
	Okay, now I want to shift gears, but still on the subject of um Charlie Kirk and the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
	I want to talk about the ramifications of this.
	I believe this is a very dangerous turning point for America.
	It's not Charlie's fault.
	Uh Charlie was on the right track.
	I think Charlie was well, again, Charlie was really beginning to awaken to the depth of what he had gotten himself into.
	When you play with the deep state and you know, Israeli donors, and you start talking about Epstein and Mossad, whatever, you're in some dangerous territory.
	So not blaming Charlie at all.
	What I'm saying is that his death is a psychologically very potent moment for America.
	It's uh it's a tipping point in the minds of a lot of conservatives who are fed up with the left-wing, the left-wing attacks on men, the left-wing attacks on the family, the left-wing, you know, feminization of men, and how men are depicted in TV commercials and movies.
	They're always weak and stupid, especially white men.
	Black men are competent, and black women are always in charge.
	You notice that, but white men are depicted as stupid, you know, dumbass, useless people.
	And that's a culture war.
	That's a culture war waged by the left.
	And that culture war has consequences.
	And the shooting of Charlie Kirk may in fact be one of the consequences of that war.
	We don't yet know.
	We just because we don't know who's behind it yet.
	But that war, the culture war is very dangerous for a nation.
	It's actually part of a Marxist effort to overthrow a nation.
	And the assassination of Charlie Kirk has brought a lot of people to the point where they feel like in their minds, they're done trying to get along with the left.
	They're done with quote tolerance.
	And many people are expressing right now that they're ready to go to war.
	Like they're ready to pick up rifles and start, you know, going to town or whatever.
	Uh, And again, I I urge all of you to uh you know reject violence.
	Violence is not the answer to this.
	Uh but I think some uh arrests would be very appropriate.
	So let me tell you what I suggest we do, and you know, you can take it or leave it, but I I think we should wage mass arrests of all the Democrats who cheated in elections, which is all of them, by the way, there are none of them who did not cheat.
	So that's ever every single Democrat who cheated should be arrested and prosecuted and removed from office.
	In addition, every single corporate media network or outlet and every single tech company, that's Google, Facebook, you know, YouTube, all of them, Vimeo, you name it, if they conspire against America,
	if they conspired to censor Americans over the 2020 election, for example, or if they censored Americans during the COVID years, or any media outlet that knowingly deceived the public about things like Hunter Biden's laptop, or claiming that Trump was run by the Russians, you know, the Russia-Russia-Russia collusion hoax.
	It was a total hoa.
	I believe that those corporations, those publishers, those companies who engage in that behavior, if there is evidence, conclusive evidence that they did that, they should be completely dismantled.
	And their executives should be arrested and prosecuted for treason against America.
	See, you know, it's one thing to publish something and make an honest mistake.
	Because all of us in the publishing business from time to time, we've made an honest mistake.
	Maybe we've misquoted something or we've had to correct something, or you know, or the information changed, or whatever, or there are also honest mistakes in drawing conclusions.
	You and I might witness the same thing and we might draw different conclusions, but we're doing so in good faith.
	And this is what I've always said about independent media is that myself and others that I know in independent media, like Alex Jones and InfoWars and you know Harrison Smith and Owen Schreuer, etc., and so many others like world alternative media.
	We we always act in good faith.
	We aren't a hundred percent perfect, but we never knowingly deceive America.
	Never.
	The corporate media knowingly deceives.
	So knowingly deceiving the public should be grounds for for having your corporation, you know, dismantled.
	In other words, if if you're a member of the press, especially, or you claim to be a member of the press, you have a social obligation to attempt to tell the truth.
	And if you don't, if you deliberately lie, that's a crime in my mind.
	That that's a crime against America because you are destabilizing the country.
	And I suspect that depending on who the FBI rolls out as the patsy here, there may very well be an effort by the Trump administration to go after left-wing media and shut them down.
	And I can already see how that's gonna shape up.
	It'll be all these cries from the left.
	Oh my god, Trump is attacking the First Amendment.
	Well, not that there's a distinction.
	The First Amendment means you can yell fire if you're by yourself walking around in your backyard.
	You can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
	In other words, you can't yell fire when it causes harm to others around you.
	You can't knowingly lie, especially about something very significant like elections or you know, the president being compromised by Russia or whatever, or COVID or vaccines.
	You can't knowingly lie without causing, I mean, you you will cause harm, and that makes you culpable.
	So for far too long, we've allowed the left-wing media, including NPR and New York Times, which is a disgrace to the history of journalism, and CNN, nothing but a you know fake news network, we have allowed them to lie to America, to brainwash America to induce Trump derangement syndrome and to brainwash people with all kinds of sorcery into thinking that men can become women for God's sake.
	And that that is a kind of dangerous, toxic brainwashing that is just poison to our country.
	Poison to our nation.
	Our nation cannot survive if we allow that deliberately weaponized, destructive fake news reporting to continue.
	And again, I don't have any issue with somebody who accidentally publishes something that turns out to be factually incorrect that they have to correct.
	I'm talking about weaponized, you know, conspiratorial weaponized speech that is designed to harm America.
	That's what the New York Times is.
	That's what all these, you know, these blue city newspapers of Seattle Times or LA Times, Chicago Tribune, whatever.
	They're all weaponized.
	They are deliberately trying to harm this nation as much as possible.
	They try to rig elections.
	They try to discredit America as much as possible.
	And that's that's different from the way I approach it.
	Yeah, I will complain about Trump's policies, but I do so out of a love for America.
	I want America to do better.
	These left-wing media corporations, they want America to be destroyed.
	That's the difference.
	You know, I complain out of a sense of like, can't we just can't we be smarter about this?
	Why are we destroying our supply chains?
	You know, I'll complain about Trump's tariffs.
	Like, why are we punishing India for God's sake?
	We need trade with India.
	But a left-wing newspaper will lie about everything to try to destroy America.
	They don't want America to do well.
	That's the difference.
	The intention matters.
	I operate out of good faith.
	Left-wing media operates out of bad faith.
	Every day they wake up and they ask themselves, what can they do to hurt America today?
	Every day a Democrat wakes up in America, they ask themselves, what can they do to destroy society?
	How many criminals can they let back on the streets?
	How many illegals can they sweep into the country?
	How many elections can they rig?
	How many drug cartels can they invite into their neighborhoods?
	You know, that's the way Democrats think.
	How many white people can they destroy today?
	You know, because they're anti-white, they're anti-America.
	How many men can they destroy?
	That's the way Democrats think.
	And I think America's fed up with that.
	The uh the ever-infamous Milo Yanopoulos even tweeted out uh the response to this event is that the response must be peaceful, permanent, and laser focused on those responsible for the state we are in, he says.
	Every network news operation, CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates, Meta, and Alphabet, which refers to Google, seize their assets, he says, shut them down, do it today.
	Milo's speech there reflects what a lot of people are feeling, and I absolutely agree that Google should be completely shut down.
	So should Meta.
	All of the tech giants that continue with censorship, including YouTube.
	You you still can't talk about the dangers of vaccines on YouTube.
	Every one of those tech giants should be seized and shut down, completely dismantled because they are a danger to our society.
	We need decentralization of technology, decentralization of search, decentralization of AI engines, decentralization of publishing.
	What's been toxic to this country is the consolidation by companies like Google that have become traitors to America.
	Google is an evil traitorous corporation.
	So is Meta.
	But who did Trump invite to the White House recently?
	Oh, the all the heads of Google and Meta and Microsoft.
	You know, he had Bill Gates right there.
	Hey, Bill, how's it going?
	How's the depopulation experiments?
	You know, doing great, Mr. Trump.
	We're getting them with them with the skeeters.
	I mean, it's sick.
	It's it's like Trump is inviting exactly the wrong people to the White House.
	He should be arresting them, not inviting them to the White House.
	But I'm not the only one who feels that way, obviously.
	And again, the assassination of Charlie Kirk is it's a tipping point for America where I am concerned that we're going to see this spill over into a lot of escalating violence.
	Violence between left and right.
	And that's part of the plan, obviously, by the controllers.
	They want the American people to kill each other off.
	Number one, that achieves depopulation.
	Number two, the anarchy and lawlessness allows Trump to declare a bigger emergency.
	Martial law, troops in the streets.
	You notice Trump already wants troops in Chicago and in LA and New York and probably Denver and other cities.
	And, you know, there are a lot of civil liberties concerns over the militarization of the domestic, you know, continental United States and its major cities.
	Are you okay with soldiers on the streets?
	Well, guess what?
	You start having civil war between left and right in some of these cities.
	Trump's going to declare an emergency, and most Americans will support it.
	They'll say, Yeah, we need troops on the streets for our security.
	And you remember how that quote goes.
	The people who are willing to give up their liberty for security end up with neither.
	And they they deserve neither also, because you when you make that compromise, you give up your liberty for security, the security apparatus never goes away.
	And you end up with in a permanent police state.
	And then one day Trump is gone from the White House, somebody else sweeps in, uses that same infrastructure to weaponize it against you, whoever you happen to be.
	Maybe you're a Christian, maybe you're a gun owner, maybe you're a white male, maybe you're a white female, maybe you're Islamic.
	You know, it's going to be weaponized against you, too.
	All of us, ultimately.
	So be very careful about that.
	But the more violence there is, the easier it is for Trump to justify emergency rule.
	And also remember that there is a financial reset that has to happen pretty soon because the U.S. is bankrupt.
	Well, they need a cover story for that.
	So in effect, they either need World War III or they need a bunch of riots.
	Like they need cities to burn.
	So there's an emergency, and then they can do all kinds of interesting things with banks and you know, gold revaluation, Federal Reserve, etc.
	And anybody who complains or who loses money, they just say, well, sorry, but the riots did it, you know.
	It was the riots, or it was the terrorism, or it was Russia, or it was Iran, or you know, it was the dirty bomb, or whatever it ends up being.
	That's the excuse.
	And that's how history unfolds, actually.
	The government screws you and takes everything you own and gives you some story, and then you know, you live on in poverty until you die, and then the next generation gets screwed the same way.
	That's pretty much the history of Western civilization right there.
	Government's just ripping off all their people.
	So in other words, the the coming years are going to be, well, the coming weeks are going to be very crazy.
	The coming months are going to be crazy.
	We are looking at the fall of, well, maybe not the fault.
	We're looking at the uh severe disruption of America.
	And but we are looking at the fall of Western civilization, kind of a slow fall, but it's happening.
	And notice there are riots in Paris right now.
	Notice the UK is just about to collapse into financial destitution.
	Notice the industrial base in Germany is being destroyed.
	Notice that the Bureau of Labor Statistics just had to readjust their their jobs numbers.
	They had to remove 911,000 jobs.
	Yep.
	911, huh?
	Why do you think they chose that number?
	911.
	911,000 jobs.
	That was the downward revision That just happened a couple days ago from the BLS.
	See, these this is it's not a coincidence that they just chose 9-11, okay?
	It's not a coincidence that Charlie Kirk was shot on 9-10.
	It's not a coincidence.
	Whatever's going to happen today also probably will be something crazy.
	Not a coincidence.
	These are planned events.
	There's a script.
	And if you don't know what the script is, then you are a victim of it.
	Then you know, you're like a you're like a canoe without a paddle headed for a waterfall.
	All you can do is just hope you survive the fall.
	But if you are informed, as most of you are listening to this, then you have a chance.
	You know, then you're like, uh, yeah, I heard there's a waterfall coming up.
	You know, maybe we should ditch the canoe and swim to shore.
	You have outs.
	You know, you've got safe passage if you maneuver early enough.
	And that's true financially, getting out of fiat currency and getting into gold and silver, obviously.
	That's also true with uh food, instead of waiting for food scarcity and food riots, you know, you can learn to grow food or stock up on some food or or both.
	You know, shore up your food supply.
	Uh all the things that I teach about preparedness and survival, these things can help you tremendously in what's coming.
	Because this country is about to go into a period of real anarchy, of real lawlessness.
	I think more shootings begin today, actually.
	Or if not today, this weekend.
	I I think it's gonna be really, I think it's gonna be regional war.
	Um again, depends on who the Patsy is.
	So let me let me uh qualify it.
	If they roll out a Patsy that is a radical leftist, then that's gonna be very bad for the uh for America because there'll be intense probably warfare between conservatives and leftists in various venues across America.
	I I mean I don't even know if I want to mention, but obviously the power grid is very vulnerable.
	I interviewed an expert on that very point.
	Uh that interview ran last week.
	And let's say if there were angry conservatives that wanted to really punish um liberals, let's say, what's the easiest way for them to do that?
	Take out the power grid substations that power the cities.
	Just plunge the cities into darkness, you know?
	And sadly, our power grid is not at all protected.
	That was the that was the topic of my interview with this expert last week.
	So, you know, the power grid's very vulnerable, bridges are vulnerable, obviously, all the infrastructure, railroad tracks that leftists love to attack railroad tracks because they hate transportation.
	Um leftists like to attack oil pipelines, you know.
	So they'll probably try to bomb pipelines in in red states or ports.
	Um conservatives might try to you know attack the power grid in blue cities or the water supply to blue cities, or what happens if you just cut off like food delivery trucks to a city like Los Angeles or a smaller city, you know, you you you start hijacking trucks on the highway or whatever.
	I mean, uh I'm obviously opposed to all of this, and I I'm only saying these things as a warning to try to warn you of what's coming.
	But I hope it doesn't go there, but I'm afraid that's exactly where it's going.
	And obviously, the best way to make it through all of that is number one, do not participate in any of that insanity and be as far away as possible from the liberal cities.
	Because if the liberals go insane and they start shooting off their AK-47s with their you know communist headbands and everything, and and their uh Che shirts, you know, um you don't want to be near that.
	If they start stopping roads, uh stopping cars that come into the city and dragging people out of the cars and beating you know white men in the streets.
	You don't want to be there, obviously.
	So we're gonna see a real fracturing of this nation.
	And in certain areas, this could this could really escalate to a civil war.
	And You know, I'm saddened to say that this might make my prediction come true.
	My prediction has been that America as we know it will cease to exist by the end of 2025.
	I've had that prediction for what, like seven years now.
	And uh I never knew how that was gonna happen, but I just thought there's so much tension between left and right.
	You know, that the philosophies of leftists, which are obviously insane, are incompatible with human civilization.
	You actually can't have a sustainable society if you follow leftism, because leftism is it's pure delusion, you know, thinking that men can become women, thinking you need tampon vending machines in men's restrooms, for example.
	We're thinking that you can just print money endlessly and it has no economic consequences.
	Like these are delusional ideas.
	We're thinking that you don't need police.
	You can just let criminals back out onto the streets, everything's gonna be fine.
	No, they keep on raping and robbing and killing and stabbing, it turns out you actually have to lock up criminals.
	But Democrats never realize that.
	So Democrats are utterly incompatible with civilization, or at least what Democrats have become.
	I should say leftism in America, because a lot of former Democrats have become more conservatives or independents, because how can you remain a Democrat today unless you're completely insane?
	You know, it's like if if you're still a Democrat, there's something wrong with your brain.
	You know, clearly.
	But now we've reached the point where the clash between the left and the right is probably inescapable.
	At some point, there's got to be a shaking out to decide how are we going to run our societies?
	Are we gonna have police?
	Are we gonna lock up criminals and let them roam free?
	Are we gonna let leftists shut down highways by standing in the roads?
	Or we're gonna drag them out of the way?
	We're gonna run them over, you know.
	What what's what's the policy gonna be?
	These decisions there's a reckoning that's taking place right now.
	And we're going to have to decide how we run America, economic policies and social welfare policies, and even food stamps.
	You know, you've got an entire population in America just living on food stamps, nothing but junk food.
	And then in some states, the junk food's been taken away from them recently, and they're shocked.
	I can't buy Dr. Pepper on my food stamps.
	No, you can't.
	And by the way, you know, you could lose a few pounds anyway.
	The food stamps have been a little too generous for you.
	I don't think you're starving.
	You know, I mean, people are figuring this out.
	Food stamps were supposed to be for people who were starving to death, who didn't have any food.
	These people have plenty of food, junk food.
	That's gotta stop.
	It's insane.
	But you see, we we've got to rethink how society functions.
	And also with the collapse of the dollar.
	We're gonna have to rethink what is money, what is value, what counts as an asset?
	Well, uh dollars in the bank, not an asset, because you have a hundred percent exposure to counterparty risk if the bank goes under.
	Uh gold in your hands, that's a real asset.
	Or food in your hands, that's an asset.
	A home garden that produces food, soil, land, you know, water, rainwater tanks, or uh or a spring that produces water, farmland.
	You know, these things are real assets.
	An oil well, for God's sake, you know, a copper mine.
	I mean, these are real assets.
	Whereas what a lot of what modern society thinks assets are, has been nothing but delusion, you know, like treasuries.
	Oh, you own treasuries, a bunch of IOUs from a broke government, a broke ass government.
	IOUs are worthless, you know, ultimately.
	Or transgenderism and and some of the other insane delusions, like thinking that, well, you know, we have to, we have to let black people get automatic A's on college exams for racial equity, you know, like for some reason these woke universities are like if your skin color is dark, you don't actually have to earn your degree.
	We'll just give it to you, you know, Dr. Johnson or whatever.
	Oh, Oh, you're a doctor now.
	See, we just gave it to you.
	Didn't even have to pass a medical exam.
	You know, it's crazy that we even have racial-based grading in America.
	That that's got to end.
	Or uh racism against Asians in the California school system, the universities.
	They penalize you for being Asian.
	Because they figured, oh, the Asians are just too smart.
	If we actually let Asians just be fully Asian, then they're going to get like 90% of the of the college entrance slots.
	So we have to penalize the Asians, we have to give bonuses to these other groups.
	And then that way, then it'll be equality.
	No, no, it's incompetence.
	Whatever happened to being colorblind.
	You should let the most qualified students get the university spots, you know, whether they're Asian, black, white, Latino, Eskimo, Indian, whatever.
	You know, I mean, as long as they're Americans.
	Um, let them in.
	Let them get the slots.
	I mean, you gotta earn your way.
	We need to live in a meritocracy, not a woke occasion, which is insanity.
	But again, all of this has to be sort of shaken out now.
	And the election of Trump has been a big part of this.
	The Trump administration clearly going to war against left-wing wokism in many different ways, and going after, you know, the sanctuary cities and the woke judges in many different ways.
	Uh but that alone is not going to solve this problem.
	It's going to have to come down to the people who stand up for what's right.
	And this assassination of Charlie Kirk, this has been a moment where a lot of people just feel like they're fed up.
	They're fed up with the BS, with the wokism, with the being shouted down by radical leftists.
	Like this is this is a moment like enough is enough.
	We've had it.
	That's the attitude that I'm seeing right now.
	So be very mindful of where this goes.
	Be very safe.
	Uh watch your surroundings.
	Don't anger people.
	Like, don't honk at people on the roads, you know, just to like like rage honking, you know.
	Not a good idea.
	You might get shot.
	Um try to be understanding of other drivers, etc.
	Uh definitely stand up for your rights uh culturally with your civil rights, you know, you have a second amendment right, but don't use firearms to initiate violence.
	If you have to, you can use them in self-defense to halt violence, but don't go out looking for violence.
	This is a time to be safe.
	It's a time to shore up your own defenses, your own preparedness, and make sure you're ready for all kinds of craziness to spill out of control over the next few months.
	Like the shot that killed Charlie Kirk is the shot heard round the country, not round the world, but round the country.
	Like if there's one shot that could be said to begin Civil War 2.0, it's it's that one bullet that tragically killed Charlie Kirk.
	That is going to set into motion a whole series of events that puts us in a whole different timeline that wasn't even a possibility yesterday.
	So ask yourself, Qui bono, who benefits?
	Who benefits from the killing of Charlie Kirk?
	Who benefits from the rage?
	Who benefits from the civil war or who benefits from the anger being directed onto the Patsy, whoever that Patsy happens to be?
	Always ask yourself, who benefits?
	You know, again, if the Patsy's Islamic or Iranian, well, Israel benefits, obviously.
	If the Patsy is uh a transgender shooter, then you know the conservatives benefit, it's a war on transgenders, which also comes with its own issues because not all transgenders are crazy shooters, it turns out, you know.
	I mean, there's already a lot of talk that we should ban all transgenders from owning guns, which is a red flag law.
	And given that transgenderism is just a state of mind, isn't it true that a transgender can just change their mind in a moment and say, okay, now I'm male again, so I can keep my gun.
	But later on I'm gonna be female, because it's just a state of mind.
	So banning transgenders from owning guns doesn't even mean anything since transgenderism is a mental illusion.
	It's like, what are you even talking about?
	You can't ban guns from people who have a certain state of mind that's highly flexible.
	I mean, what if they say, nah, now I'm a I'm a snow leopard.
	You can ban guns from snow leopards?
	Ah, I'm a snow leopard with opposable thumbs.
	I can work the safety on AR.
	You know, I can I can push the mag release button.
	See, with my paw, you know.
	But you see what I mean?
	Like, this is the insanity of what we're looking at right now.
	You're gonna see the craziest things that we've ever lived through in the weeks and months ahead.
	And frankly, by the end of this year, I don't know that we're gonna have a country left.
	Not the one that we currently recognize.
	I don't know.
	I mean there are parts of this country right now, like the blue cities, that you can't even recognize as America.
	And I don't know how we change that.
	You know, you go to certain parts of California, and the wokism is so ingrained into the culture that it would take generations to bring those people out of their sorcery and their delusions, you know.
	So I don't even know how you do it.
	And the same thing's true in Austin, Texas.
	There are people in Austin, Texas, who are so delusional, living in fairy tale fantasy land, alternate dimensional realities, you know, and they think that we're crazy.
	Oh, you own guns?
	Yeah, you're crazy.
	No, no, we own guns in case you go crazy and try to come, you know, out to where we live and take our stuff.
	That's when you're gonna realize that we're not playing around when it comes to defending our own property, you see.
	Again, not looking for violence, not gonna go into the city and hunt people down.
	But if if you crazy people come out and you think you're gonna rampage through a bunch of looting through you know, neighborhoods or whatever, you're just you're not gonna get very far.
	It's just trust me, don't try it.
	All right, so that's that's my take on things, folks.
	And and please understand that the bottom line is I'm calling for peace, but I'm also calling for us to stand up for what's right.
	And we do need to take a stand against the mass mental illness of the radical left.
	Wokism and DEI and all that nonsense, mutilating children, convincing them that they're transgender.
	I mean, that's child abuse.
	That's a crime.
	They should be arrested.
	But ultimately, I believe in peace.
	I believe in in human dignity.
	Uh, I obviously oppose what Israel's doing in Palestine.
	It's a war crime, it's genocide.
	I oppose the deep state operations that are carrying out these assassinations and so much more.
	I oppose the lies of the corporate media.
	I oppose the censorship of big tech.
	And I oppose the entire vaccine industry and all of its mass murder of children.
	And I was gonna talk about that today because there's been a lot of breaking news, but then Charlie Kirk got shot, and so obviously that completely changed the focus here.
	I shouldn't say Charlie Charlie Kirk got shot.
	That's that's the wrong voice.
	Uh, someone shot Charlie Kirk.
	It's not his fault.
	So in wrapping this up, what you and I need to do, I believe, is you know, number one, pray, pray for America, and then plan.
	Plan on how to be safe, given the anarchy that is about to be unleashed, that you're gonna witness.
	You're gonna see it.
	Maybe in your own town, your own community, wherever.
	You're gonna see craziness.
	So be ready in every way that you can.
	Be ready to leave the area or de-escalate the violence, or if they come to you, be ready to take a stand.
	You know, if they come to your property or threaten your your family or your person, etc.
	That's where you take a stand.
	So, in order to do this, I encourage you, number one, have backup supplies, obviously, of food and equipment and all the things you need.
	And you know, I'll mention the websites.
	Obviously, you can support us, healthranger store.com to get backup organic food supplies and a whole lot more, even iodine in case there's a nuclear event, or you just need supplementary hydine, which is a dietary supplement.
	Uh, we've got high-end supplements and superfoods and and all kinds of things.
	Freeze-dried organic fruits in number 10 cans, the steel cans, very long-term storage.
	So, to the extent that you want to stock up on food, or even garden seeds that are heirloom non-GMO seeds, we've got that.
	HealthRangerstore.com.
	And then when you need backup communications and you need a solar generator, etc., talk to our friends at the satellite phone store, SAT123.com, and by the way, go easy on those folks.
	They're devastated because they worked with Charlie Kirk.
	They know Charlie Kirk.
	You know, Tina, who I've had in many interviews, she you know, she met with Charlie Kirk and she knew him.
	She's devastated by this.
	I talk with her.
	I mean, I want to respect her privacy, but she's just devastated by it.
	And uh the satellite phone store, I don't know, if you call them today and they just don't even answer the phone, that's why.
	Maybe they just took the day off.
	I I really don't know.
	Some people are really shaken up by by this.
	But try again the following day if if if they're not there.
	I don't know.
	Tina may have given everybody the day off.
	I really don't know.
	Uh in terms of other gear, uh, go to Rangerdeals.com and there, understand I've got affiliate links to our partners that sell things like ballistic vests.
	You might not have thought you needed a ballistic vest.
	And it turns out, you know, maybe you do.
	They're legal in most states, not New York State, but in most states, and you can get those, use discount code ranger, and you can get different ratings of different uh chest plates, etc.
	Uh, if you do get a ballistic plate, I want to encourage you.
	This is what I was taught by the Navy SEALs guys that I trained with.
	Uh, you need to wear that front plate really high, very high, like higher than it feels like it should be.
	That front plate should be almost in your Adam's apple.
	And and you you may have noticed that the way Charlie was wearing that front plate was not that high.
	Um there's a tendency among people who wear chest plates to wear them too low, which still exposes like the upper heart and the throat area, etc.
	Now you can survive a shot to your belly, to your gut, you know, as long as it doesn't sever your spine.
	So, like pull that plate up, wear it high.
	And if you're a woman wearing one of the plates, you know there are plates with curves for a woman's shape, and to make it you know less uncomfortable.
	It's never gonna be great.
	You know, it is gonna feel like you're in a giant breast press, okay.
	Just saying.
	Um, but if you're in a situation where you need you think you need ballistic armor, you know, probably comfort is not your highest priority.
	Like, I would also wonder what are you doing there?
	Maybe try not to be there in the first place.
	But if you have to be somewhere where you need uh ballistic armor, get it from our partners there at rangerdeals.com, and then wear it high, high in the front.
	Also, you should note that the satellite phone store, their dark bags, their backpacks, they have ballistic material, 3A plus protection, which protects against I think almost all handgun rounds.
	I'm not sure if it covers the 44 Magnum, and I think it covers like full metal jacket 556 rounds from an AR-15.
	But it doesn't stop the higher powered rounds.
	Uh be sure to check the stats if you're interested in that.
	But the nice thing about having a ballistic backpack is you can you know you can carry a backpack, it's got Faraday bags in it.
	So, like one of them has four different Faraday compartments in it to protect you know your mobile phone, protect your privacy, protect you from the the cell towers, you know, reading your cell phone and everything, or your credit cards, or whatever.
	But then if there is a shooting, if there is an emergency, you can you can either turn that backpack around and wear it on your front, and now it's kind of like a chest plate, and it's got ballistic protection on the front.
	Or if you're fleeing the scene, which might be the best idea, you just keep it on your back and run away.
	And if a round comes and hits you in the back, well, you know, the ballistic plate takes it, or ballistic material.
	It's not a it's not a steel plate or even a ceramic plate, but it's uh it's Kevlar layered type of material that stops uh stops bullets.
	So those products are available now.
	I don't I don't know what the inventory is, but again, that's sat123.com.
	What a world we live in, huh?
	That we even have to talk about that.
	But that's the reality.
	Um also when it comes to self-defense, our partners there are ShieldArms.com that have the Glock 43X models, which is what I carry.
	And then they've got folding AR-15s and many other very interesting firearms and magazines.
	That's ShieldArms.com.
	Uh discount code Ranger saves you a bundle.
	So, you know, folks, get prepared.
	Um, be mindful.
	Watch the gold and silver markets too, because this is going crazy.
	In fact, let me check that before I let you go here.
	Uh gold was over 3600.
	Uh, let's see where it is in the overnight markets right now as I'm recording this.
	Uh yeah, it's like uh 3629, something like that right now.
	Silver has been bouncing around in the lower 41 dollar range, which is really something.
	Um I suspect it'll be in the 40 dollar range.
	I don't know if it'll drop below 40, but it might.
	You may recall a few months ago I bought silver at 30, because I talked about it on this podcast.
	I was really happy to get it at 30.
	Now it's 40.
	It's like, whoa, I mean, I just gained, you know, a third in dollar value.
	Yeah, because well, the dollar's collapsing and metals are going higher.
	So if you want metals, go to metalswithmic.com, and that'll take you to battalion medals.
	And that helps support us.
	They are our affiliate sponsor, and they have very honest pricing.
	Great family-run business.
	Check it out.
	Metalswithmike.com.
	Um, as far as silver and gold, well, the guest we have coming up here, Christopher Sullivan, he's an expert in digital assets, uh, crypto, different kinds of crypto.
	But we do talk about gold and silver in this interview.
	Many people I interview think that silver is going to go to $100 an ounce in 2026.
	Uh, I don't know.
	Don't take this as investment advice.
	I have no idea.
	But I don't think the dollar is going to get more valuable.
	I think the dollar is going to continue to crumble, which means that gold and silver designated in dollars, it's going to be a larger and larger number over time.
	I mean, that's very clear to me.
	But I don't want to make specific predictions about when, you know, like it it's it's $500 by Christmas.
	No, I don't think that's going to happen.
	I wouldn't be surprised, but I don't that's not a prediction.
	We'll see.
	Um gold could be $5,000.
	I just don't know when.
	I mean, it will surely be $5,000.
	I mean, gold will hit 10,000 at some point.
	But when that day comes, what is that dollar going to buy you at the grocery store?
	You know, if gold hits $10,000 an ounce, you know, a hamburger might be $50 a pound.
	So it's like, well, your dollar just collapsed.
	So the gold isn't really gaining value.
	It's just, it takes more and more dollars to buy the same amount of gold.
	You see.
	Anyway, you've heard all this before.
	So you're you're on the up and up here.
	All right.
	Uh thank you for your support.
	Thank you for your prayers for Charlie Kirk and his family.
	Thank you for being prepared.
	Thank you for being informed.
	We need more people like you and I who can help bring some stability and resilience to this world.
	Pray for us all, okay.
	And Enjoy the interview with Christopher Sullivan here, and I'll have an interview for you tomorrow with Jeffrey Prather.
	So here we go.
	Enjoy the interview.
	Take care.
	Welcome to today's interview on well, the financial demise of the dollar.
	What's happening with the West?
	What's happening with gold and silver, crypto, uh gold revaluation, and so much more.
	My special guest today is Christopher Sullivan, who has been featured on our show, Decentralized TV.
	He's with uh Hyperion Decimus or Hyperion Decimus.com is the website.
	Uh, welcome, Christopher.
	It's great to have you back on.
	Yeah, thanks.
	Great to be with you, Mike.
	Uh thank you for joining me at such short notice, too.
	I reached out to you because I I feel like there's an emergency collapse in the dollar, and uh France is burning, Japan just lost its prime minister, and it's about to suffer an economic collapse.
	Uh uh, Great Britain is about to suffer a debt collapse, might need an IMF bailout, etc.
	And uh unsurprisingly, gold is hitting all-time record highs and silver keeps cranking.
	Uh, what do you make?
	Big picture.
	You've got six months to talk about it.
	Um, for for someone who's been an asset manager for 20 years and then trading since I was 17, consuming voraciously uh data, data, data, data.
	I will say right now, the confluence of things sloshing around the system is is not only difficult to track and keep up with, but it's like the quantity of it is insane.
	And like you mentioned, not only do we have N number of debt bubbles on top all over the earth, we're already at the point of six euro countries, Eurozone countries having discussions with the IMF about a bailout.
	But I was like, wait, you guys are already financing it, you've already lowered rates eight, nine times this cycle uh since raising them briefly in 22.
	You know, we're just gonna perpetuate this forever and never get an actual write down.
	And you know, it's it's everything's too big to fail.
	And you've got companies out there, two to four trillion in market cap.
	Shipping is all screwed.
	It's it's literally, I mean, it's kind of amazing everything's still functioning, Mike, to be honest.
	I mean, at least that's like a little bit of silver lining.
	But a lot of things are not functioning, right?
	I mean, uh, I don't know if you travel much, but have you been to a U.S. airport recently versus airports anywhere else?
	It's I mean, it's like a third world country.
	My whole adult life, we've been waiting for an infrastructure bill, Mike.
	And then, you know, with airports, you can bond them, and then they're they can also have private investors like Blackstone did LaGuardia's update, right?
	Yeah, and so the facade and the and the building itself, great, but then operations and staffing, not so great.
	Um, yeah, I'm ashamed.
	Or Orlando is kind of my local airport.
	And every time I go through it, it's a travesty.
	We're one of the busiest airports on Earth, Florida is flush with billions of cash reserves.
	Um, and and this is what we're dealing with.
	You know, it's it's embarrassing as a human being, and it's despicable, but all of it is part and parcel too.
	We're gonna cap captivate you with fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
	We're gonna inconvenience you to piss you off and bring down your frequency, lower your consciousness, and control you.
	Like I put that and deception, mass deception, which brings us to the uh Bureau of Labor Statistics and the jobs numbers.
	So why why is 900 plus thousand uh jobs or the the revision?
	Tell us why that matters, Christopher.
	Uh, because I I almost can't stop vomiting over that.
	Uh, let me let me give a little cop caveat, right?
	So as an asset manager, macro is is probably 85% what leads everything.
	And so what does macro mean?
	That means macroeconomic statistics.
	Which ones have correlation, which ones have alpha?
	For the majority, it's G20, and then you can break it into G7 data.
	You want to upload, monitor, and wait the data points coming in on every macro point, whether that is mortgages, GDP, or in this case, jobs numbers.
	So what kind of malpractice are we running as a govern as a US government where we need constant revisions, and then you're telling me the Delta is 911,000?
	That's like not like a modest rounding era.
	Um, but also some people would say secret code 911, which is tomorrow as we're recording this, you know.
	Like, what's the deal with September 11th and 9-11, 911,000 jobs?
	I'm not, you know, I'm not saying that it's a cult or anything, but it's weird when these numbers keep coming back.
	I I would argue that it's it's certainly not a coincidence because the probability of a number being round, like 911,000 even is extraordinarily low in and of itself.
	So without any overlay to our awareness as students of historic history that the whatever you want to call them, the cabal, the globalists, they love their numerology, they love their symbology, because in effect they have to get your implicit permission before they roll out whatever agenda they're rolling out.
	So, yes, that that did have a little bit of eerie, whoa, that's ironic, 9-11.
	And then the fact that these are always even numbers tell you they're complete bullshit anyways.
	Right.
	Right.
	But I mean, also the the size of this adjustment tells you that we've been living in a fake economy.
	And the the all of the top economic decisions from this president and the previous one have been based on just absolute theater.
	Right?
	I mean, how would you describe it?
	Yeah, it's it's some case I'll I'll mention kind of both both angles.
	In some cases, when when you're appraising it, you you kind of can't blame them when when you're faced with the depths of how bad this can get and how fast it can get, if you're not perpetuating the charade and you know, falling victim to playing parts in a theater, um, which is arguably what all of them are doing.
	I I really think that if let's say you and I had to go run it, um, we're probably gonna be like, all right, let's just default and we'll start over and we'll just deal with the short-term pain.
	But a lot of people can't handle that 401ks, IRAs, pension, like everything's off, like instantaneously.
	Yes, and so they've got to they've got to basically seduce and or medicate the public into just not being aware, and especially both professional investor class and you know, family office high net worth investors, most of those are conscious of it, but still play along anyways.
	Well, well, right, I understand what you're saying, but when the economy is so bad that you have to weave illusions to keep the faith alive, it's like, well, you know, the emperor has no clothes here.
	Yeah, or already you've lost the game.
	Yeah, you've lost it.
	The only green shoots I can point out uh coming out of the administration is Bissent is running what what I would call a version of Operation Twist at Treasury, and to his credit, it's like keeping the lights on.
	He's he's rolling rolling down maturities, changing durations, and it is saving 15 bips here, 40 bips here for the federal government interest cost.
	Um, and it's pretty heroic how he's trading it.
	So that's one like good element of it.
	But when you're dealing with almost 38 trillion now of debt, and then between liabilities or call it welfare of state plus interest, we're almost at 90% of the entire expenditure of the government.
	So unbelievable.
	It's it's already dysfunctional.
	It's unsustainable.
	Like I can't help but think that the reason gold and silver are skyrocketing right now is because all over the world, not just the central banks, but other entities that I'll mention are uh just shifting, you know, they're dumping treasuries or rolling out of them and rolling into gold and silver, and sometimes rolling into crypto.
	But did you hear that in China they just announced that all the the large insurance companies have to hold a minimum of one percent of their reserves in physical gold?
	Like that's going that alone is gonna increase gold demand globally by 25% or something.
	I mean, yeah, there, I mean, there's a t it there's a lot of paper to overcome in terms of price action, Mike.
	But um, as far as physical, there was a pretty big mismatch at last month's expiry in the United States for Comex, which is about 50 to 54 million ounces.
	I don't have the number exactly in front of me.
	Of gold?
	No, silver.
	Oh, of silver.
	Okay, I was gonna say with gold, it it was a few million.
	So that condition's been present since about January, each maturity.
	So I think you've got uh at least how how I'm extrapolating is unlike previous corrections or recessions slash depressions, this one is very much gonna be about counterparty risk, right?
	Absolutely.
	And and that's why you're seeing in order of operations, if it's you and I, Mike, and we've got the the treasury balance of the United States, what resources are we going to purchase to protect that capital?
	And in order of operations, it is going to be gold, silver, probably palladium, platinum, vanadium, and maybe a few other rare earths.
	Then we're gonna go to unfortunately these still trade now, water futures, and then we're gonna go to Bitcoin and privacy tokens.
	Right.
	And you know, and and include some ag in there.
	But that's where we're at is that gold has quite often had an eight, nine week lead on Bitcoin, and the same large swaths of purchases in gold are actually occurring in Bitcoin a few days later.
	So and I I think what's what's common about gold and Bitcoin is that no government can counterfeit either one.
	Correct.
	And I I believe, but I love your reaction, and feel free to call me out if you think I'm wrong.
	But I think we're about to enter a post fiat currency era.
	I mean, every nation, every central bank, every large investor is rushing into commodities and and crypto.
	Again, non-counterfeitable value.
	Uh does that make sense?
	It it does, and and you can see you can see it from many different prisms, Mike.
	You're you're absolutely correct.
	Number one, and I'm gonna point out like this this is giving people like maybe an investable idea, but there the spread between SP and commodities in terms of valuations is the widest in history.
	And you say, well, well, Chris, then we have hyperinflation now.
	Well, yeah, but that's not that's not even giving commodities a huge boost here.
	So I I think in terms of rotating to where you might be safer, um the commodity production companies, which are quote unquote value stocks, have been underperforming in the SP for the last 15 years, right?
	Yeah.
	Basically the big seven, mag seven, ten, whatever the hell, have soaked up about 11 to 17 trillion of market cap and left value and small cap essentially dead to the side.
	So I think you could very confidently rotate out of stuff that just has valuations that are cuckoo for cocoa puffs and go into natural resource companies, often that pay dividends.
	And yeah, they might get whacked 20, 30 percent if the market corrects 60, but you're gonna get paid a dividend.
	They're not they're not gonna just disappear overnight because people don't want to use TikTok or Instagram anymore, right?
	Well, well, well, right, but uh yeah, everything you said I I agree with.
	And I I want to take it a little bit further here.
	I'm very concerned about the stability of society when people lose their their assets.
	Um, you know, you've heard like Gerald Salenti saying when people lose everything, they lose it, or when they have nothing left to lose, they lose it.
	Um there was uh I'm not gonna get into this, but there was looks like an assassination attempt on a prominent conservative influencer that just happened, and I'm monitoring the reaction to that.
	I'm very concerned that things are about to collapse into kinetic I don't know, I don't want to use the term civil war because it's not like you know the 1860s, but we're talking about instability and violence and people losing their shit, basically.
	Well, and if what you're talking about with you know with dollar and debt, it's only gonna feed into that cycle.
	What do you make of it?
	It uh all I can say is that this has been the game in the agenda for some time now.
	You could argue a more modern extrapolation of of when this started could be when you know 9-11 and then when China was added to the WTO, and then we we in earnest exported the wealth of the United States of America in the form of the manufacturing and industrial base.
	Um and this is the culmination of a strategy highlighted by Smedley Butler, you know, war is a racket when all else fails, they take you to war.
	That doesn't necessarily mean world war, although that's also in cue right now as well.
	Um, but I I would like, and and Charlie is a fantastic human being.
	He's a uh beautiful beautiful guy bringing light and wisdom to young men who need it very, very much, and I think had a huge hand in bringing people to the light, to truth, and being able to stand up for themselves.
	I think he certainly has some responsibility for uh any sort of conservative registrations on the voter side for young men, and uh I hope and pray that he is alive and well and that his family um is coping with this tragedy the best they can.
	Um but you know, I I with that highlight, I I think the enemy is in the Eccles building.
	The enemy is in the Capitol building, the enemy is in the city state of Washington, not our fellow Americans.
	That's right, 100%.
	And so we don't want to want to get us to fight each other, and that's the wrong answer.
	Right.
	Um this is Hegelian dialectic, and and largely like you see gold, right?
	And you and I are texting, going, holy shit, holy shit, right?
	And then look at the news cycle the last seven days.
	Okay, well, that is showing you all right, purchasers of gold, large blocks of Bitcoin, why is that happening?
	Big money is nervous about counterparty risk.
	Okay, that now the the cabal or whoever, you know, the the they sees, oh shit, the financial markets might show the truth to people.
	We gotta do all these you know false flags and and gear up for World War 66 million infinity, whether it's domestic in the United States, domestic in the UK, domestic in France, you know, the those are arguably already scenes of war, you know, beginning in 2015 when all of the refugees were imported for cultural diversity purposes.
	You know, it's it's insane.
	Um and now that the financial markets, which are the only thing people can point to to pay for their meals and have the illusion of wealth, could combust near term.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And we're like we're seeing in France, you know, riots in the streets, burning uh parts of Paris.
	Um and that's actually for a very similar reason.
	Think about it.
	The austerity measures that Macron was trying to put in place, uh rejected by the people because you know, who wants to lose their government pension, right?
	You know, who wants to get less money on government benefits?
	Obviously, nobody does, but the problem is the numbers don't add up anymore across you know many Western European nations as well as the United States and others, and so this is inevitable.
	This uh this washout of you know, like the the truth sucks when you're broke, you know what I mean?
	It's just this, but there's no way to avoid you you can't kick the can down the road forever.
	So this the this reckoning is arriving.
	That's that's my point.
	It it is it is ever present.
	I mean, uh in kind of the best case scenario, if you if you remember when it came on in April, kind of marked the low in the in the SP, and I gave a couple different scenarios.
	The upside, the most bullish one, the most upside potential played out, and that was like a 6410 price target, is what I was saying.
	There may be, and and I predictions are not without any fault, but there may be a few more subdivisions before upside exhaust, but we're we're looking at an order of magnitude of just weeks or a few months, and I think it's gonna be difficult to keep papering over this.
	Uh it's already very difficult.
	You had a Major um lender, subprime lender, actually in Texas, go bankrupt today.
	You've got 6.4% of mortgages already delinquent, and you've got subprime autos exploding in delinquencies, much both of those much higher than 08 and through 2010 levels.
	And so the macro picture is already worse than it was when the SP was 700.
	And it's currently above 6400.
	So you're you're talking about the big short scenario in both auto loans and residential.
	Everything.
	Literally.
	And commercial buildings.
	No, it's every it's everything.
	Everything.
	What the money printing cycle did, right?
	So before 2009, essentially.
	So the bailout was 786 billion, which they like blow in three hours now, by the way, Mike.
	You know, so that that saved Wall Street and the financial system in Q4 of 2008, but they're blowing that in you know a few hours at this point.
	And I I think people should go on the US debt clock dog over and like watch it real time.
	The rate of change will make you will make you not.
	Yeah.
	So start hiding your gold as you watch that.
	I mean, it's like, oh my God.
	That's where a mix of gold and Bitcoin is great, because I I know you probably do bullion like me.
	Well, we can't like get semi-drugs and take this stuff away.
	And then like a little hard drive, you have a lot of control of a lot of a lot of asset.
	Um, and that's a really big big thing towards sovereignty in my opinion, to have the bullion in in your homestead and to have your assets off exchange in in custody.
	But back to the point on the demolition of the markets.
	Well, no, let me let me add, I I agree with you.
	Diversification here is absolutely key, but I mean diversifying out of the failing system.
	But we don't counterparty risk is going to be absolutely the issue here.
	I completely agree with you, which also brings me you know to like Bitcoin ETFs and gold ETFs.
	That like I don't trust any paper from anybody.
	No, though, and and for all the investors that are listening, sure, it's fine to have allocations to those in your portfolio, your your traded or liquid portfolio, but you can't compare uh GLD, which we'll pick on, which is gold futures, by the way,
	that maybe has 20% of it anchored to actual collateral at best to bullion in either uh warehouse storage facility safe that you pay for and and it's expensive, it's about four and a half percent a year to do it properly, or you have it you know, in in many of your properties up in a secure safe, like and there's only so much of that you can do.
	So this is more about preservation and doing what you can for your peace of mind because we are all going to lose with what's coming.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And and gold, what what gold is gonna go down when it starts, Mike?
	It's not gonna go up.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, people are gonna be trying to cover their their bets in other markets, and they're gonna be offloading everything they can.
	Correct.
	So I but yeah.
	I I think how you could see gold could get in the 4200 range in the next few weeks to months, and then when it reverses, which I'm not seeing any signs of that, we have really overbought conditions.
	We're gonna have some pullbacks as this continues in its in its current parabola form.
	Yeah, um, but once it goes like inside of that 10 degree, 20 degree channel, that's when it's time to really position yourself and and just be ready with this is what I'm gonna own.
	I know what's coming.
	If it doesn't, great, either way I win, and and just be fully prepared.
	Because the main thing that these people are doing, these people being the cabal, they're screwing up this, right?
	They're taking your consciousness down, they're they're trying to take all of your personal power, personal wealth, personal control, personal health away from you know, your own sphere of influence and your own command.
	And so I I'm fully fine with like if it happens when we get off the phone, Mike, whatever.
	My the net asset value that we have in dollars is at best an illusion.
	Totally.
	I don't I don't even really consider the dollars.
	I consider ounces of metal.
	And and true investment investors, real families that have built billions, they don't look at the valuation in Swiss francs or Euros.
	They look at the quantity of assets they have, not what it's valued.
	And that's I've slowly learned that because I didn't come from a you know billionaire dynasty.
	So I've slowly learned that being a professional investor the last 20 years.
	And I think the point of us sharing that with others is so that they can have some solace when they think they have N number of USD fiat now, and then it's not only is the purchasing power going to go down, but then the NAV of it in those terms is also going to decline.
	Yeah.
	I want to mention your website and your your company, what you do, Hyperion Decimus.com.
	Can you give our audience a uh a briefing of the case?
	Yeah, we're you work with Roman and Greek authors.
	No, I'm kidding.
	Um we've got two digital asset-only hedge funds.
	They're private funds designed to lift people out of fiat and be super secure in very diversified venue strategies and cold custody so that people who are not going to put all of their money in one or two tokens and try and have all of that um on their hard drives can essentially take from call it growth or equity exposure of their traditional portfolio,
	get it in a situation where it does have asymmetric upside, but also has the privacy and the protection benefits of the tech infrastructure to run a digital asset hedge fund.
	And when you say digital assets, is it mostly crypto or is it crypto plus some other things?
	No, it's all it's all crypto.
	All crypto.
	All liquid, you know, Bitcoin's a large portion of Monero, uh, a few other like Zcash uh has been in the portfolio.
	So we trade, we we combine holding some fundamentally sound crypto assets in cold off exchange, as well as trade algorithms for profit on exchange.
	Okay.
	So it's a blend of both.
	Okay, got it.
	Well, let me ask you how concerned are you about the brute force proof of work attack on Monero.
	Yeah, it was uh sloppy, is maybe the best light I can paint it in.
	However, I think now that we've we've gone through it and there's been a recovery, it was done with somewhat like benevolence to highlight that capability so that it didn't have that risk going forward.
	Um I like how the team reacted.
	It was maybe a little longer in reaction than I would have liked, but I think it resolved well.
	And you know, I we actually bought the dip uh because it didn't.
	Well, how how did the team react?
	Because I don't know the details.
	It it was shock at first, right?
	Because I I don't think they were really aware that they were vulnerable to that.
	Uh-huh.
	And there was a I forget the name of the group, but there was a specific group that did it and then didn't actually take any of the money out uh uh out as a result of the attack.
	Well, I don't think they ever uh attained 50% though.
	Correct.
	They they just they just went forward with an attack that effectively was a benevolent one to highlight the uh vulnerability of the network.
	Uh and just for audience, if they had succeeded, it would have allowed them to take over every transaction of Monero.
	They could have basically emptied everybody's wallets instantly.
	Yep.
	Yeah.
	Um now Bitcoin is not vulnerable to that because Bitcoin has much, much larger, you know, distributed compute behind it.
	Yeah, you see the the hash rate, right?
	Mike, you follow that.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, you need another planet.
	You need like Earth 2 to have a hash rate to compete with Bitcoin on Earth one.
	It's really incredible when people who are not technologists do not understand the security of the network that that hash rate proves in real time.
	And it's it's an I like I can't love it enough because I just want transparency.
	I'm fine with assuming some level of price risk or technology risk, but I I don't think it's highlighted enough that the security of Bitcoin's network blows away.
	It makes Apple, Google, Oracle, AWS look like their kindergartners.
	Yeah, yeah.
	In terms of network security.
	Well, right.
	Okay.
	I I I hear you, I agree with you on that point.
	Um let's shift gears.
	I've got a couple more questions for you about let's talk about revaluation of gold.
	Um the government doing it or the the treasury doing it.
	Yep.
	Um this uh Trump's effort to get I think it's Lisa Cook out of the Fed board.
	Uh and by the way, the Supreme Court, or I'm sorry, another court just handed Trump a temporary defeat on that.
	She cannot be fired by Trump right now, even though she apparently lied on her mortgage applications.
	Um Trump wants to control the Federal Reserve Board, I believe, so that the Fed will go along with a revaluation effort involving the Fed and the Treasury.
	Uh have you looked into this?
	And do you think that that's likely?
	Because you know on the books, gold is still only valued at 42 dollars and something, and that's obviously way outdated.
	Well, what do you what do you think of this?
	Uh yeah, I think one way to put lipstick on a pig, so to speak, is um with what they accomplished in the genius bill.
	Ironically, Mike, it actually was kind of genius.
	So what that did, folks, is it opened up Treasury bill access by forcing stable coins to be collateralized one to one with treasuries.
	So you've already had dozens of stable coins issued.
	It's going to end up being a few trillion just in a 12 month period, which can offset the selling that's occurred from the BRICS countries in treasury.
	So a lot of that selling, 95% of it's already been absorbed.
	So this opens up markets for treasuries, gives any wallet user in any country's whatever the T bill yield is.
	It actually puts liquidity in banks to give bank reserves where now they're at zero, folks.
	Like it's it's terrifying, Mike.
	There's literally no bank reserves.
	So that was quite smart to create liquidity for treasuries that'll also lower the interest rate, despite whatever the Fed says.
	Because the Fed doesn't actually control rates, the bond market does.
	They just pretend they they set them.
	Um and then with respect to gold revaluation, if they can actually audit Fort Knox to establish the tonnage that the U.S. taxpayer owns in reserves, and you just go to current price and you factor in a few trillion of treasury bills, you're looking at two to three years worth of capex that's saved almost instantaneously.
	Now, if they go to a reval upwards and say, okay, we're we're taking you know silver four or five hundred gold twenty twenty twenty-five thousand bitcoin four or five hundred thousand with what they already own, you're covering 15 to 17 trillion of the debt.
	So I do think, again, I call it lipstick on a pig, but this would maybe put us in a correction and recession environment, then all out Armageddon.
	So even if they do pull that off, Mike, we're still gonna have a bunch of counterparties go down, a wild and large correction, especially in residential real estate, but also in equities and bonds, and but may be able to stave off the lights going off and there not being any counterparties.
	Oh man, yeah, things things are gonna get very very difficult for a lot of people who who aren't following this information.
	Um yeah, Mike, you're you're a gentleman and a hero for exposing people to this.
	This is reserved on purpose for the highest echelon of societies globally, as you know, Mike.
	The information on this and how to how to have independent financial knowledge is kept on purpose.
	I've learned this real time because I'm self-taught, and and you're exposing this at a very high magnitude to people in every element, whether it's health, self-sovereignty, and and technology.
	You're giving people more than I see any of your counterparts give.
	I'm you know, I'm I'm so far beyond trying to just you know run a business.
	Uh I'm in the let's help save humanity mode 24-7.
	It's like that's why we're doing our AI engine to try to empower people and bypass censorship, give people knowledge.
	And you know, our engine is trained on honest money, it's trained on Austrian economics, it's trained on you know the Federal Reserve creature from Jekyll Island, all of it.
	Um and that's you know that's information that's been lacking from the public discourse.
	You know, people have been treated to this junk food diet of Jim Kramer and other you know, CNBC nonsense just to keep them locked into a system that is designed to screw them.
	Yeah, it's it's slavery.
	And honestly, like I I played football, I I surf big waves like physical pain is nothing like mental, Mike, you know.
	And to bear witness, I just my children, like and you and I've discussed this, they don't have phones, they're getting bullied at school for not having phones, like literally getting called poor.
	Wow.
	Nine year old, nine-year-old daughter.
	And should Daddy, are we poor?
	Like, God, well, maybe in the way that they think.
	Um, right.
	One of my previous guests has uh often predicted that America is about to become Venezuela, and by that, what he means is the collapsing middle class.
	And there are all kinds of social problems that come with that, such as increasing crime, desperation, um, food lines, you know, when governments then intervene in the supply chain, you know, one one chicken per week, and now you have to have a biometric scan at the grocery store because we have to control the food,
	and we have to have price controls, and so then you then you have supply demand imbalances that result in black markets, then you have to have police arresting the black market people who met in a parking lot to sell a chicken, you know, like all this shit.
	Pardon my language, I'm a little bit disturbed because of the shooting of Charlie Kirk, honestly.
	I'm very disturbed by what's happening in this country.
	And because I I see where it's going, and I think you do too, Christopher.
	You see where this is headed.
	This is not good.
	We are this this country's falling apart.
	I I would almost go ahead and say it has it's it's fallen apart, like not falling, it's fallen.
	And I think the the green shoots are in effect like you were just perfectly describing forced decentralization, right?
	And I think people sh really need to think locally and hopefully before this all goes down, like really know your neighbors, really build community protocols, and have action plans for scenarios like in Florida, we get hit by so many hurricanes.
	We have that protocols, like just second nature come April, May, right?
	Okay, well, who's gonna be in charge of vegetables and fruits, who's gonna be in charge of eggs, who's gonna be charge of firearms, who's gonna be in charge of finance, who's gonna be in charge of comms.
	This isn't that hard to negotiate amongst a dozen or two neighbors of you, and you've literally gotten further than you would have without it, and more than likely you're helping heal all of what's wrong with society at the same time.
	So I I really am a big advocate for that.
	And the more we get ahead of scarcity, because that's what they want to you know, um, effectively force on all of us, we really have that opportunity.
	The moment that window closes, Mike, it it really can get mad maxi.
	Um, I think maybe not as bad because everybody's fat and retarded, but um, you know, it's nine.
	What's the the rule of the historic?
	It's not you're nine meals away from chaos.
	Nine meals from anarchy, I think.
	Or from anarchy, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Um, and not the good anarchy, the the bad animal.
	Um right, not not anarcho-capitalism.
	No, um I let me just interrupt our conversation here because Charlie Kirk's been pronounced dead.
	Uh is what I'm seeing from multiple sources online.
	And leftists are celebrating it all over Reddit, they're celebrating it.
	Mainstream media is mocking it, saying, Oh, it must have been one of his own fans that accidentally shot him in celebration.
	That's it.
	I think that was NBC.
	I mean, the the vile nature of that.
	Uh the shooter, again, I I apologize, Christopher, for even bringing this in, but this is happening in real time as you and I are talking.
	This is relevant to what we're talking about.
	That This is going to result in a domino effect of outrage and violence and conflict in America.
	And I I can't help but think that whoever set up this shooting wanted that to happen.
	I mean, it's just like you said, the Hegelian dialect dialectic is in play right now.
	And Charlie Kirk is his latest victim.
	The world lost a big light.
	It's very sad.
	Um I I'd love to just remind your viewers who obviously care, Mike, that the tree of liberty.
	You know, it was just refreshed with the blood of a patriot.
	And um, we should return the favor.
	I mean, what what you're what you're meaning is we we should we should join the cause for liberty.
	I just want to do that.
	Well, I mean it's time for the blood of the tyrants, is what I mean, Mike.
	Um, maybe not maybe more metaphorically, but you know, yeah, yeah.
	I just I just want to be the way you said it could have been misinterpreted.
	That's all I'm saying.
	Yeah, correct.
	And I was quoting it it gets put to Henry and Jefferson, so we'll just attribute it to both of them.
	Um but yeah, it's very very sad.
	He was a good patriot, good man, good father, and did a lot of a lot of great for young young men, especially.
	Um there's also been there's a there's a high school that's erupted in another mass shooting just now.
	I don't uh um there are conflicting reports, by the way, on Charlie Kirk.
	Some people are saying he's still alive.
	Glenn Beck an hour ago said he had a pulse.
	That's never good when they say he's still got a pulse, you know.
	That's not a good sign either.
	But multiple accounts are saying that uh he's been pronounced dead.
	So again, I apologize, Christopher.
	I I didn't know.
	It's heavy because I you know I've been around him at at different conferences, and I'm sure you have too.
	Like he's a he's a good human.
	Um and and it it wouldn't be so dark, and I wouldn't be so torn up if it was some just lone wolf crazed lunatic, but because we know and we're conscious of this being some master plan and agenda, it is really, really frustrating.
	Yeah, yes, and the the ramifications of this are going to be widespread, and uh I can I can only I can only pray for this country at this point because there are elements that want to start a civil war, and I believe, as you know, Christopher, that they need a cover story for the financial reset.
	Uh uh 100%.
	But that's why the phrase, if all else fails, they take you to war.
	Well, let's look, let's appraise what the WHO and UN and the WEF want.
	What are they trying to sell us on?
	They're trying to sell us on depopulation.
	Well, how does that play in?
	Well, if we're gonna play cover for financial collapse, what do we have to do, Mike?
	We have to create a war that accomplishes our depopulation agenda on both sides because we fund both sides of that war, and then we're eliminating our resistance by destroying the youth 18 to 35, who then would be the benefactor of any assets that their bloodline has accumulated.
	And people need to understand how multi-factored that agenda really is and how cunning it is.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, forgive me getting angry, but um, I'm I'm I'm angry too.
	I'm I'm trying to control myself here because again, you and I we we know the playbook, you know, we've seen it throughout history and in America's history.
	We know where this goes.
	And I'm I am very I mean, I have so many concerns right now rushing through my mind.
	I'm concerned, for example, that maybe the shooter will be an MK Ultra uh Islamic person.
	And then you're gonna have the same thing after 9-11.
	You're gonna have everybody in America just like hating people because they look Middle Eastern, you know, hating Sikhs because they don't understand Sikhism is not Islam, you know.
	Oh my god.
	I mean, we've been through this before.
	And it's insane.
	And it it becomes a nation of hatred and suspicion and and violence, and and all the wrong people get demonized and marginalized.
	But you that's how these events are often engineered.
	If that is indeed what happened, we don't know yet.
	Okay, Christopher, yeah.
	All we can do is pray for his family, pray for this country, and hope that there's enough patriots left.
	Because if there's not it it's kind of lights out across the planet, like you, you know.
	Well, and you know, there's so much violence everywhere.
	It just in the last 24 hours, 79 more Palestinians killed in Gaza, you know, children being shot there, just you know, bombing in Qatar, uh, you know, burning on the streets of Paris.
	Um I I don't think humanity makes it out of this alive.
	You know, we've got the rise of the robots coming, you know, got the AI systems.
	Uh I I've been commenting on some of the have you ever heard the term uh AI maximalist?
	Yes, yeah.
	So the AI maximalists think that AI will solve all of humanity's problems and make life a perfect utopia for humans.
	I'm like, are you kidding me?
	No, that they will end crime by ending humanity.
	That's like what how do you not see where the machines are going to be taken in this, you know?
	I I think some of those, or maybe even most of those talking head maximalists are just shills because a lot of what we're seeing on the financial side on the stock side of this, is it's they're they're creating this hyperbolic narrative so that smart money can dump on dumb money.
	Um because you know better than most, Mike.
	LLMs in of themselves are are only as good as the data they're trained on.
	Well, I compare yours or Perplexity or Deep Seek, perfectly for coding at least, to a chat GBT, and it's like who's got the ADD in the room, right?
	And then you look and and research what data sets or sites it's trained on, you're like, well, duh, no wonder it's lying about history, it can't really do complex mathematics, and it's it lacks the ability to have logic and reason.
	So uh I'm not I don't I'm not I'm certainly no maximalist, but I think there's huge benefits to productivity efficiencies.
	Um it's another tool in the tool set, but if wielded by the wrong power, yes.
	Well, let me let me share this with you.
	You know, I use AI to write a lot of code, and I came up with a query the other day I want to share with you that is incredibly disturbing and or a prompt, because you see, when I share this with you, you'll you'll see what I'm talking about.
	We've already achieved AGI.
	If if five years ago, if you showed people five years ago what AI can do today, they would have said that's AGI.
	Let me let me give you an example.
	So a lot of people who don't really understand what AI is doing, they think it's just a word prediction engine.
	And it's not.
	And here's why.
	I can take I can take a giant Python script of like 5,000 lines or whatever, and I can give it to I can just paste it into an AI engine that's good at coding, and I can add the prompt.
	Explain to me in plain language what this program does.
	And sure enough, it will process all the code and it will come back with a couple of paragraphs and bullet points of what the code does.
	That is not word prediction.
	That is conceptually structuring, you know, the action of the code and kind of simulating it in in your fake AI brain and thinking about what will this do, translating that into language and explaining it to me, the human, Christopher, that is so far beyond word prediction.
	Oh, yeah.
	That is intelligence.
	It and like I was saying, if it's got great training on vast, and the insane thing is with the hardware, how vast and how fast the quantities of data it can be trained on, um, which only enhance the capabilities you just described.
	But I mean we have strategies, Mike, that are 5,000, 8,000 lines of code.
	And you can run, I can tell it a prompt to run a new factor optimization, and within less than 120 seconds, I've got a response.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	It's it's it's horsepower that even as much as good of hardware technologists as as we are, and we have our own internal proprietary software that we're running execution algos, trading out, and blah, blah, blah.
	It's really quite epic, and I'm not trying to be arrogant.
	We're not painting the picture bright enough on the magnitude that you just described.
	It's it's a leapfrog, it's a leapfrog at home.
	Absolutely.
	I what I'm finding is that when I try to talk to people about AI and where it's going and what it means, it's like I mean, I don't I don't want to be insulting, but it's like trying to teach a pigeon to play chess, right?
	It's like the person doesn't even understand the realm of the words that we are talking about, or even the concepts of what are transformers, you know, what's what is a language model, what's a reasoning model, etc.
	It's like that's not even in their wheelhouse, and so they have no idea what's about to happen, which is you know, the the mass replacement of cognitive jobs, that is computer jobs, desk jobs, anything that you do at a desk with a computer and a keyboard and a mouse, that's obsolete in about two years by any human.
	I mean, yeah, all the only delta would be the timeline, right?
	Correct.
	And then correct humanity is gonna have to choose.
	Like, do we want to go more analog?
	Or do we want to be governed by AI?
	Because if we don't disintermediate with some you know, agreed upon process and plan, then it's gonna get there within the timeline you just said.
	Yeah.
	And because of the burden, and I that's that's not a nice word, because of the requirement of the social welfare state across Earth, that the cabal decided to implement to hide the inflation to debt slave and obligate the productive class and to destroy wealth building, right?
	Because that condition exists, and unlike in the Great Depression, where eighty plus percent of households had subsistence farming, right now it's you would know better than me, but it's around two percent, right?
	You're you don't want 47% with no access to to food because then they come they come for you.
	So we're we're in a really different and more precarious spot than previous depressions, and largely you can look at Weimar Republic, which was was right after the Great Depression.
	I'm sorry, right before the Great Depression, because Hitler got them out of it by the time we had the Great Depression.
	Um people had a lot more civility, had a lot more manners and had a lot more honor with how they conducted themselves, of any ethnicities, right?
	Or or religions, yeah.
	And now it's like you watch the video of the pretty young girl, and that's the fellow citizens aren't helping or doing anything.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I mean, it really is.
	I mean, look at Western Europe.
	Those countries, look at the UK, they've lost the rule of law, they've lost any self-preservation tendency to protect their own culture, their own borders.
	Uh you know, the the churches are being burned in France, Germany is uh it's an industrial collapse on steroids.
	Western Europe's lost, man.
	I I I actually don't see Western Europe recovering from this at all.
	It's it's really again, it's it's sad.
	And I I think that they're they're like five years ahead of on the plan in the United States.
	But with what just happened, I don't think people I know people aren't paying attention to the minutiae of geopolitical plus macroeconomics, but yeah, what was negotiated with um India, Russia, and China was okay.
	The the West deep state blows up the pipeline.
	I forget the name that was in the ocean, Mike.
	Um the north nordstream pipeline.
	Northstream, thank you, that Seymour Hirsch highlighted in his great journalistic work.
	But they just agreed to run through Mongolia.
	Now that's going to open up gold mining and rare earth mining that's not gonna that's not open currently.
	They're gonna go past to the side of India and get it into China, and they they they spent years negotiating this, they finally agreed on price.
	Well, what is that gonna do for those economies, right?
	They're not gonna have hyperinflation in energy, they're going to have transport shipping, they're going to be able to have ag resources because Nat gas is a huge input to fertilizer, as you know, Mike.
	Absolutely.
	But what are we doing?
	We're letting the the vestiges of a multi-hundred-year-old dynastic cabal dictate to the entire Western culture what what our terms are.
	Yeah, and that pipeline that you mentioned, I I covered that in detail.
	It it's a game changer for the world.
	That's called the power of Siberia too.
	Correct.
	Yes, exactly.
	And it it's the construction cost is only something like 16 billion.
	It's going to move 50 billion cubic meters of gas per year.
	Which means it pays off in the first year.
	Um wait, didn't Gavin Newsom get one train car for 30 billion?
	Yeah, right, right.
	A train that goes nowhere.
	Um but this is going to move gas from the Yamal gas fields that used to supply this gas to Germany.
	See, that this is what's critical.
	So Germany's industry was powered by this Russian gas from Yamal, which is in the upper northwest, you know, portion of Russia, a massive country.
	Instead, that's going to go to northern China to feed China's industrial base, to feed China's factories, to feed China's energy producing gas turbines that provide terawatt hours to freaking AI data centers, which is gonna mean that you know China can do AI research for one-tenth the cost of the U.S. doing AI research.
	Mike, would they be able to mine Bitcoin cheaper?
	Yeah, I imagine, right?
	I mean, it's like you're basically getting energy for pennies out of a pipeline.
	I mean, you know, per cubic meter over time.
	It's gonna be it's gonna be it's almost free.
	You know, like cheap Russian gas, man, that powers everything.
	And everybody doesn't get it.
	As much as uh we can be critical of all of those countries individually, at the macro level, this is an epic policy for the people at the bottom up.
	And then when I when I look at China, the globalists brought them into the World Trade Organization for many reasons, but the million two were to bankrupt America and to set up the manufacturing base and basically prey on slave labor in China.
	Well, now move forward to 2016.
	Xi Jinping double crosses them, takes over the bank, now requires their banks, which are outside of the uh you know Rothschild banking system to recruit to hold gold, right?
	And then, oh, by the way, you guys just financed us having modern tech manufacturing, transport shipbuilding, ag, right?
	And then now we're gonna use it to feed and and supply our own population.
	Haha morons, right?
	I mean, that that just happened in the last 40 years.
	Yep.
	Right under our nose.
	Well, and I think looking at sorry to die tribe a little more, looking at the condition for women, and I've a daughter and a wife looking at the condition for women In Europe.
	It is an abject failure of men.
	All over the planet that women are subjected to that.
	And everybody should be ashamed of themselves.
	It makes me sick that women and girls are subjected to that terror and fear on a daily basis in their own home country.
	It's disturbing and disgusting.
	And I know the globalists get off on it because they're sick demonic.
	You know what's.
	And it people men need to step up and play their role.
	And that's to protect and provide for women and children.
	And it's just disturbing, Mike.
	I think at some point the only way it's saved is if they're pushed far enough to revolt, Mike.
	I I don't see any other way.
	And remember the the weakening of the male has been pushed through pop culture, movies, TV.
	Every movie now shows white men as being weak, subservient uh to a woman.
	All the male heroes have been replaced with little petite 110-pound women who can beat up hulking men.
	You know, I mean, it's it's been an assault on our culture, and of course, that it's gonna bear poison fruit, and that's what we're seeing.
	Correct.
	I that's why they they had that agenda, Mike.
	You just articulated, because oh, if we deplete the masculinity of Western men, sedate them, rape them of their resources, rape them of their ideology, rape them of their self-worth, then we can take advantage and terrorize their women and children.
	Yeah, and then indoctrinate them, and then oh, by the way, we're gonna convince kids that they can just pick whatever gender they can be.
	Oh, and if they pick the one we want it to be, we'll just chop everything off free of charge on the taxpayer.
	Sweet.
	Like, come on.
	Everybody now we are both affected by the Charlie news, so I'm I'm angrier than I don't know.
	No, I know, and and Trump Trump just tweeted that it's confirmed that Charlie Kirk has has died.
	So it's just, you know, we we should probably end this conversation right now.
	I I need to process all this.
	But this the you and I are actually living through what we're talking about here.
	I mean, this is the kind of craziness and spontaneous violence that we are going to see more and more.
	This America, I mean, talk about turning point USA.
	This is a turning point for America.
	Things are gonna get far worse from here.
	I can feel it, I can see it.
	Yeah.
	Um I hope we can learn from our mistakes and and unite and and take the battle to our real enemy.
	Or all of that pain and suffering that's on deck, both financially and mentally, will be for nothing.
	Yeah.
	That's right.
	All right.
	Uh Christopher, I'm I'm sorry to end this on such a down note, but let uh let me give out your website again, Hyperion Decimus.com with a Latin spelling of decimus there.
	Um and let's let's let's make a point to talk again soon, hopefully on a better day.
	Um in the meantime, you have any final words to wrap this up?
	Just praying for his family, and uh that's kind of all consuming at this point, man.
	Um I know.
	I I I gotta cancel the rest of my day.
	I just can't.
	It's it's really sad.
	I gotta process where this is what this means and for our country for our futures, and the fact that it's uh it was apparently a rifle, a rifle round from 200 yards away, so this is starting to push a lot like Butler.
	Yeah, like the attempt on Trump.
	Yeah, I'm not shocked, Mike.
	You know, I'm not shocked.
	So all right.
	Yeah.
	Well, Christopher, um God bless you, God bless America.
	Pray for pray for peace, and uh we'll we'll talk again later.
	All right, buddy.
	All right, thanks.
	Take care.
	Enjoy our collagen peptide chocolate coconut drink next.
	Formulated with collagen, coconut milk, rich cocoa, monk fruit, and pink Himalayan salts.
	Delicious and nourishing.

▲