Health Ranger - Mike Adams - BBN Sep 12, 2025 - FBI plants FAKE rifle prop to steer narrative away from the real culprits...

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 12, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

03:50:44

BBN Sep 12, 2025 - FBI plants FAKE rifle prop to steer narrative away from the real culprits...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I want to show you something here today that's going to break your brain, pretty sure.
	And this is Brighton Broadcast News for Friday, September 12th, 2025.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	This is groundbreaking.
	I interviewed Jeffrey Prather yesterday, and then he interviewed me for his show today, or earlier today.
	I'm recording this around midnight.
	And Jeffrey Prather is an accomplished firearms instructor and a tactical shooter, you could say he's got lots of skills.
	He worked with the DEA.
	I mean, he was a DEA agent, and then he worked with DIA, and he ran border operations and all kinds of things in his history.
	Anyway, he's a firearms instructor.
	I'm a long-range rifle shooter for steel targets.
	I do not hunt, as you know, because I do not.
	It's against my religion to kill animals, it turns out.
	It's against my faith.
	But anyway, that's a different story.
	So I hit long-range steel targets, so I know a lot about long-range shooting.
	And Jeffrey Prather knows a lot about firearms and especially pistols or combat shooting, you know, ARs, M4s, things like that.
	So he and I got together to analyze the situation with the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	May he rest in peace, by the way.
	God bless his family.
	What a tragedy.
	What a senseless tragedy.
	I'm still upset.
	And I think America will never be the same.
	Well, for reasons I talked about yesterday.
	But anyway, I want to add something here right up front.
	Kind of a, well, a correction, I think, something I learned from Jeffrey today, which was that I think my analysis yesterday was wrong when I thought that the bullet ricocheted off the armor plate that Charlie Kirk was wearing.
	I was saying I thought it hit the top of the ballistic armor and then ricocheted up.
	But then I realized today as I was talking with Jeffrey and listening to him, I realized that that can't be true because there would have been a lot more damage to the t-shirt.
	There would be spalling of the round through the t-shirt and burn marks or whatever.
	I mean, just some shredding of the t-shirt at that spot.
	And that did not happen.
	The ballistic armor that Charlie Kirk wore, it did lurch upward dramatically, but that could have been explained by just the kinetic shock moving through his body at the moment of impact.
	So what Jeffrey Prather says is that this was a deliberate, accurate shot targeting Charlie's neck and that the sniper knew exactly what they were doing.
	And it was a downward angle shot designed to pierce the carotid artery or sever the spine or what have you.
	I don't want to get graphic here.
	And that that shot was a precision shot.
	So I tend to agree with Jeffrey after hearing him explain that.
	And I'm always open to information from experts, obviously, to help us sort of guide or navigate our way to understanding the truth of what happened.
	That's our goal here.
	I think in the memory of Charlie Kirk, we owe it to him to investigate and to get to the bottom of this.
	You know, the question of the year is who killed Charlie Kirk?
	Just like a few years ago, Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.
	Well, we know Charlie Kirk didn't kill himself.
	So who killed Charlie Kirk?
	We hope to get to the bottom of that.
	Now, I do not believe that it was just some, well, I don't believe it was a lone actor, a lone wolf.
	I think this was coordinated.
	This has all the signs of being extremely well coordinated.
	And Jeffrey Prather and I talk about that.
	So I want to play the two interviews back to back.
	One is the first one is me interviewing him on the day that Charlie Kirk was shot.
	And then the next one is him interviewing me earlier today, which is as I'm recording this.
	It's still September 11th.
	So I'm going to play those back to back at the end of today's broadcast.
	But something else came out since then or during the day today.
	The FBI released the following photo of the rifle.
	All right, now here's a photo.
	What do you notice?
	Okay, those of you who know anything about long-range shooting with rifles or hunting with rifles or sport shooting or whatever, what do you notice about this rifle and the optic?
	What do you notice?
	So, you know, immediately, I'm drawn to the fact that this is bizarre.
	Remember, the FBI says this is the rifle.
	But as anyone who's ever shot a rifle, especially in a prone position, would know, you can't shoot this rifle from a prone position.
	And you know why?
	Because the optic is about four or five inches back too far into your face.
	You see how the optic is placed on the rifle, how it's very far back, where the eye relief section of the optic is hanging over like a third of the butt stock.
	Yeah, that's not shootable.
	And if you were to even try to shoot that, you would have a black eye or you would have a cut on your forehead, a bad one.
	Okay.
	Everybody who's a rifle shooter knows this.
	Everybody who's a rifle shooter has at one time or another put their face a little too close to the scope, you know, and pulled the trigger and paid the price.
	We've all done it.
	And that's how you learn not to put your eye on the on the scope.
	Don't have that rifle scope jammed up into your face.
	That's how you learn.
	You get whacked and then you learn, oh, okay.
	This rifle scope should have been placed much farther forward than the current configuration.
	Now, I know that you're saying, well, the breech, which is the gap there, the breach is in the way.
	How do you mount this when the breach is there?
	Well, there are all kinds of rifle scope mounting solutions, even for rifles like this.
	What is this?
	Like a Mauser style 30 caliber, something like that, bolt action.
	This is a, it's like a World War II gun, basically.
	There's all kinds of mounting solutions with a couple of screws and the right plate.
	You could put a Picatinny rail on top of it.
	And then you would mount your scope with the rifle scope mounting rings to the Picatinny rail.
	And this scope looks like it's, I don't know, what is that?
	Like a, is that a 20 millimeter tube or is it a 24 millimeter tube or larger 30 millimeter tube?
	I mean, I can't tell from the photo, but you can get rings for whatever it is.
	You can buy them on Amazon, okay?
	And you could mount that rifle scope correctly to where you could actually shoot it.
	In the current configuration, you can't shoot it.
	All right.
	So in other words, this rifle is pure theater.
	The FBI is jerking our chain, as the FBI always does.
	The FBI is busy covering up the real evidence, no doubt, like they always do.
	And they're rolling out the fake evidence to create a narrative.
	And what is this narrative?
	Now, remember, again, this rifle is not shootable in this configuration.
	And if you ask 100 snipers, you know, get your best friend top, you know, Army Ranger Scout Sniper, SWAT team, you know, 50 gold medals.
	You get the best guy that you could find.
	You ask them, is this rifle shootable?
	They'll say, oh, hell no.
	It's a prop.
	It's a joke.
	You can't shoot this rifle like that.
	Nobody would even try.
	You would mount the scope appropriately before you would even try to manage it.
	Also, we're told that the magnification of this rifle scope is 4 to 8x.
	And those of you who are shooters, you will instantly realize something about that as well.
	4 to 8x.
	In other words, the least amount of magnification is 4x.
	And then the highest is 8x.
	Now, you're probably laughing along with me at this.
	It's a general rule of thumb.
	All long-range shooters know that the optical magnification that you need is roughly about 2x for 200 yards, 3x for 300 yards, 4x for 400 yards, etc.
	So 8X might be useful if you're shooting 800 yards, which this round is capable of with some significant loss of accuracy, but you can do it.
	I mean, you probably can't hit a four-inch target at 800 yards, but you could probably hit a 16-inch target at 800 yards with pretty basic shooting skills.
	So the question is, if the shooter knew that this was going to be 200 yards, that's what we're being told.
	And obviously this shooter pre-planned all of this, so they would have used, you know, a satellite image and a map or a laser rangefinder, you know, like the guy used in the Butler shooting.
	He had a laser rangefinder, which you can buy on Amazon, you know, I mean, for like 40 bucks.
	He would know this was 200 yards.
	You wouldn't put this rifle scope on a rifle if you're trying to shoot something at 200 yards.
	And do you know why?
	Because too much magnification causes you to lose your target and you're losing all peripheral vision around the target.
	You know, there's such a thing as too much magnification.
	You want the magnification to match the range.
	Like I said before, if you're shooting 200 yards, frankly, 2x is fine.
	I mean, U.S. Marines used to train at 300 yards with iron sights.
	And they could hit a man-sized target easily in the chest at 300 yards with iron sights.
	No optics at all.
	I mean, no glass.
	And I know people who can shoot 600-yard targets with iron sights with rifles.
	And they're good at it.
	They can easily hit a 12-inch target at 400 to 600 yards without a rifle scope.
	I'm not kidding.
	They're mostly older guys who can do this.
	I'm not one of them.
	I use a rifle scope.
	But there are some guys who can hit targets with iron sights.
	So the point is, you don't need this much magnification.
	It's actually working against you.
	And then the fact that this rifle, we're told by the FBI that there were cartridges, or as common people say, bullets, but cartridge is the correct word, actually.
	So there were cartridges, which is an unfired round that were found with this rifle.
	And those cartridges were apparently inscribed with like pro-Antifa and pro-what was it?
	Transgenderism or Trans Tifa as it's being called.
	So I haven't seen the inscriptions, but the FBI says that there was writing on the cartridges that was pro-transgenderism and pro-Antifa.
	Okay.
	But clearly this is a prop.
	So clearly, you know, immediately there are so many questions.
	If you were a shooter and you knew you could only shoot one round because it is a bolt action rifle, you're not going to be able to pop off all kinds of rounds, right?
	So you know you get one shot.
	Why would you even bring five rounds and just to write things on them?
	Especially if you're going to ditch the rifle in the woods and the writing might be a clue of how they could find you.
	Like if you were trying to get away with this, which the shooter apparently was trying to get away, you wouldn't leave, you wouldn't write things on the bullets, you know?
	You wouldn't.
	Unless you plan to get caught, which clearly he did not plan to get caught.
	And he still hasn't been caught as of the moment I'm recording this anyway.
	So this looks like a completely made up narrative by the FBI.
	Completely made up narrative.
	And it's clear that the FBI is trying to blame transgenders and radical left-wing Antifa types.
	Okay?
	So this is a false flag operation that's intended to blame transgenders and radical leftists.
	Now, don't get me wrong.
	I am not, you know, I'm not a fan of transgenderism, especially when it's used to indoctrinate children.
	I've spoken out against that indoctrination and the surgical mutilations of children, etc.
	And I'm certainly not a fan of Antifa, but I'm especially not a fan of being lied to by the FBI.
	And it's clear that right now the FBI is lying to us.
	So I'm going to defend.
	Well, I'm going to try to defend the truth is what I'm saying.
	I'm not.
	This prop is fabricated and it's designed to lead you down a rabbit hole.
	Frankly, it's designed to get you to hate transgenders or to hate Antifa.
	Like that's the mission is to hate transgenders, but it's a psyop.
	It's a manipulation.
	And that's why hatred is such a dangerous thing.
	If you believe the fake planted rifle evidence, then you might run around hating all transgenders.
	When, of course, even if this shooter was a transgender, it's not all transgenders, is it?
	And you know how, you know, anytime there's a white guy involved in a shooting, and then the corporate media says, all white people are violent and bad, you know, and you and I are saying that's crazy.
	You can't blame all white people for the actions of one white guy.
	Same thing is true with black people, right?
	Yeah, a black guy shoots and kills somebody.
	You can't say all black people are that way.
	Well, it's the same thing with transgenders, folks.
	And again, I'm not defending their lifestyle choices or whatever, but even if one transgender took the shot, that does not indict all transgenders.
	And we have to be clear about this and we have to engage in reason on this because you know where this is going.
	If you start to say things like, well, all transgenders are bad and therefore we have to take away all guns from all transgenders.
	And then the next guy says, well, let's take away their bank accounts too.
	You're like, yeah, yeah, get them.
	We got to hate on the trans, you know, take away their bank accounts.
	You know, and pretty soon, you're doing to transgenders exactly what the radical left did to conservatives, which was to take away your bank accounts, you know, put you on a list, make it so you couldn't travel, you know, ban your business from operating.
	And that's what the left did.
	And we speak out against that.
	So I am not going to be tricked into hating on transgenders just because the FBI planted a bunch of fake evidence that wants me to hate transgenders.
	I'm not falling for it.
	And I advise you to think carefully about this as well.
	We should not just hate on a group of people because the FBI planted fake evidence.
	Now, the reason this evidence is so compelling to a lot of people is because there have been transgender mass shooters.
	Like six of them or maybe more, mostly younger.
	Like there was a Catholic school that I think there was a mass shooting, turned out to be a transgender.
	Numerous various shootings.
	I can't name them all, but you've seen them over the last year or so in the media.
	These shootings sometimes turn out to be transgender shooters.
	And then there's a lot of argument about that.
	Well, you know, they're mentally ill.
	Some people would say.
	Well, perhaps they're under the influence of all the gender bender drugs.
	Perhaps they've been abused by their parents and convinced to cut off their genitals.
	So yeah, maybe they are in dire need of counseling help.
	And, you know, maybe their parents are crazy libtards or something.
	Yeah, that could very well be true.
	And there have been transgenders that have engaged in mass shootings.
	No question about it.
	So that's why this FBI evidence is so compelling to people because a lot of people will say, aha, aha, see, it's them transgenders again, you know, something like that.
	And I admit that it's a very easy, kind of lazy conclusion to jump to.
	Say, ah, it's the transgenders.
	Clearly, they're crazy.
	They're violent.
	I don't think that's who's behind this at all.
	And not only do we have this rifle scope picture that clearly shows that this rifle could not be the rifle that was used to shoot Charlie Kirk, but now we have a video that's been released.
	I'm going to play it for you here that shows the alleged shooter leaping off the roof of the building from which he supposedly shot, but he has no rifle at all.
	Right.
	So how did he put it in the forest if he didn't have it on the roof?
	I mean, we could write a song about this, but check out this video.
	It's only 40 seconds or something.
	There's something wrong here.
	I'm going to narrate this.
	So here we go.
	All right.
	So here, this is a screen capture from Fox News.
	It says, authorities share a new video of person on the roof.
	Here's the guy climbing off the roof, the guy in the black clothing and whatever, and no rifle.
	And he leaps to the ground.
	He's on the grass, and he looks like he hurt himself a little bit there, and no rifle.
	Okay, so it's just repeating the same thing.
	So, this is the guy that was running around on the roof that everybody assumes is the shooter, but there's no rifle.
	So, how could he put the rifle in the woods if he didn't have it getting off the roof?
	Did he throw it all the way to the woods from the roof?
	It's like, is he a is he like a gold medal in the javelin event in the Olympics or something?
	Um, I don't even know how far away the forest is, but it sounds like it's not right there.
	They found it in the woods, you know, that sounds like a ways away, a place you hike to, you know.
	Anyway, so they found it in the woods, and I understand there's a couple of trees right there, but you wouldn't call that the woods, would you?
	No, you say if they found it there, they'd say, Oh, we found it under a tree on the lawn because that's what's there.
	So, they found it in the woods, according to the FBI, but the guy didn't have it on the roof.
	At least in this video, we don't see it.
	So, there's another hole being blown in the narrative, and I'm wondering if this guy is supposed to be the Patsy, there's always a Patsy, and this is what I mentioned yesterday: that the Patsy is going to tell you who's behind it because they want you to react against the Patsy.
	So, probably, this is my current guess, although it's always subject to change.
	My current guess is the FBI, which they are the experts at recruiting people to unwittingly carry out acts of terrorism or that will be portrayed as terrorism.
	They probably scoped out all the social media accounts of the people in the area or through other means, you know, asking around.
	They found like who's the craziest nut job that we can find here.
	And they found a guy, you know, maybe from his social media posts or whatever, and then they probably approached him or they had a girl approach him or something, you know, like a pretty girl.
	They say, Hey, um, we we want to we want to pay you to help us film this event, and we'll pay you a thousand dollars if you'll just take a camera with you and go to this roof and just film it from up there.
	We just want a top-down view of the event, and we'll give you a thousand dollars, and you know, she'll be all flirty or whatever, and the guy was he'll be drooling and like, okay, you know, and so they pay him some money, they give him a little, you know, a little camera or something, and they even show him how to get up on the roof.
	They put him on the roof.
	This guy is, of course, going to be the fall guy, but he doesn't actually do the shooting.
	So, this is a lot like Butler in the sense that there's another person who actually takes the shot, a person who's a professional, a person who is part of the international team, shall we say,
	from another interesting country that would take this shot that would take out Charlie Kirk from roughly the same direction from the building, but from a hidden point of view, a hidden shooter, in other words.
	And then their plan is to get Charlie Kirk out of the way, and because Charlie Kirk was beginning to get red-pilled and he was beginning to question things about Israel.
	And then, what happened today is that Ben Shapiro announced that he's going to take Charlie Kirk's place and he's going to go do the college campus events.
	So, they got Charlie Kirk out of the way and they put in the Zionist loyalist Ben Shapiro because Ben is reliably Zionist, let's say.
	And Ben will never go off script because, well, he just saw what happens, possibly, if you do.
	So, they took out Charlie Kirk.
	They blame it on a Patsy who's probably got a history of LGBT.
	And then they plant a fake rifle with obviously messed up rifle scope in the woods with fake inscriptions written on the cartridges that makes no sense that they would even be there.
	And the inscriptions point to transgenderism and Antifa.
	Got it?
	That is how it's shaping up right now.
	That's what it looks like.
	Now, our confidence level, or I should say, my confidence level in this is not 90%.
	Right now, I would say that's about 70%.
	There could be conflicting information that comes in.
	Maybe they catch the guy.
	He will probably confess if they do catch him, but the confession obviously can be forced or faked.
	So don't believe a confession.
	There could be other factors that show up, other pieces of evidence.
	Obviously, there's an ongoing investigation.
	So I'm going to say I'm 70% sure this was a kill team operation involving the FBI and probably the CIA and probably Mossad.
	And they took out Charlie Kirk and they had a Patsy ready to go to blame it on the Patsy.
	And here we go.
	We're going to see the Patsy probably caught pretty soon, maybe by the time you hear this.
	And that's going to be the official narrative.
	And then anybody who disagrees with that official narrative is going to be called an anti-Semite.
	You know, you can already hear that happening.
	Oh, Netanyahu has officially denied that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, by the way.
	That's suspicious.
	You know, nothing is more true than when Netanyahu officially denies it.
	You're like, oh my God, now we know that's the least honest human being on the planet.
	Anything he says has to be distrusted by default, especially involving these kinds of big events.
	So nobody in their right mind trusts Netanyahu.
	It doesn't mean, though, that Israel is for sure behind this, but that's just the way this is leaning.
	So I want to play for you, just to give you an example of this, there's a lot of discussion among various podcasters, various analysts out there.
	Obviously, this is a very intense topic.
	It's garnered a lot of attention.
	And sadly, it's also generated all kinds of insane celebration from radical leftists who are just overjoyed that Charlie Kirk was shot and killed.
	And it exposes the sickening psychology of the radical left.
	I mean, they are truly mentally ill, those of them who are celebrating this for sure.
	But liberalism is a mental illness.
	Clearly, liberalism is a mental illness.
	And even to believe that transgenderism is possible, it's a kind of mental illness too, because, you know, to think that a man can become a woman and that men can have periods and, you know, that why does Mary have a penis?
	You know, I mean, these are insane ideas.
	So people who believe that, in my view, they are mentally ill.
	So leftism is a mental illness.
	But note that I'm also saying that I don't believe transgenders should be, you know, you shouldn't hate on transgenders just because the FBI planted fake evidence.
	So I'm also saying that this is a false flag to blame transgenderism.
	I do want to be clear about that.
	That's what it looks like right now.
	Again, this might change, but even though I think that the idea of transgenderism is a form of mental illness, I do not ever wish to falsely accuse a group of people of something that they did not do in this case, you see.
	So I believe in meritocracy.
	I believe in truth.
	Regardless of which side of the political aisle that truth falls on, I'm sticking with the truth.
	And sometimes it's not popular to tell the truth.
	But I'm going to say it the way I see it.
	And right now, this looks like a false flag.
	But I want to play for you this other video from a couple of podcasters who I don't even know these people.
	I'm just showing you this as an example, an example of the kind of dialogue that's taking place out there because a lot of people are suspecting Israeli involvement in this, which is why Netanyahu had to come out and deny it, which just makes it even more suspicious.
	But let me play this for you.
	And I don't even know the names of these people, but this is indicative of what we're seeing.
	So check this out.
	I know it's way too soon to even talk about something like this, but I think the American public deserves to know the truth about what happened to Charlie Kirk.
	This is a source that I trust very much.
	And this is coming from the top levels of government.
	And they were having dinner with people, senators in the Senate Foreign Intelligence Committee.
	They are not openly saying this at this point.
	Of course not.
	But in private conversation, they're saying, hey, this looks like potentially Israel is behind this.
	Wow.
	And then in terms of getting to the actual evidence itself, a very close friend of Charlie Kirk's put out there, Charlie didn't want to put out this tweet himself, but he told a friend to put it out on the internet and said, hey, if I go against Israel, I think they will kill me.
	And when did he say this?
	This was August 13th.
	So less than a month ago.
	I can see Charlie over the last few months sort of take in new information and have his mind shift a little bit, right?
	He used to be an Israeli loyalist.
	Then he starts to sort of mildly criticize Israel in that, hey, I don't think, you know, we shouldn't be allowed as an American to question the acts of a foreign government.
	I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti-Semite.
	I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government without backlash than actual Israelis do.
	And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?
	And he publicly stated, hey, maybe Epstein was Mossad.
	He certainly had a lot of connections to Israeli ex-prime ministers.
	And there's also this clip where he questions how October 7th happened.
	Was there a stand down order?
	Six hours?
	I don't believe it.
	Israel's decided New Jersey.
	When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's 45 minutes.
	Six hours.
	They're live streaming the killing of Jews.
	Did somebody in the government say, stand down?
	That is a legitimate non-conspiracy question.
	I mean, this is a big problem for Israel.
	Charlie Kirk was maybe the most influential figure on the right, especially with people under the age of 30.
	And when you start to have somebody that influential as a conservative is say, hey, we need to maybe reassess this relationship.
	There's something weird going on.
	This is a warning to people in the media to say, hey, you need to stop this right now because you could be next.
	Okay, so apparently that was from a podcast called Today-ish with James and Danny.
	I have no idea who these people are.
	I'm not endorsing their show, but I think that what they're saying here is indicative of, and it's, look, these are intelligent questions.
	It's indicative of what I'm seeing more and more across the board of lots of people asking, especially young people asking, because younger people in America do not trust Israel at all.
	And I would say any informed person does not trust Israel, but there tends to be sort of a default automatic Israel faith among a lot of older senior citizens, let's say, mostly who grew up on the Schofield Bible and went to church a lot and were just beaten into their heads that Israel can do no wrong.
	There are quite a few people like that, but even many of those people are starting to change their minds as they realize what's going on.
	But on the younger side of things, the younger people absolutely despise what Israel has become.
	They are wholly opposed to the genocide and the lies of Netanyahu.
	And so if this whole operation, as a thought experiment, if this was Netanyahu and Mossad trying to take out Charlie Kirk to silence somebody who was beginning to question Israel in order to insert Ben Shapiro into the role, who is not popular among young people, by the way.
	Oh, man, that's not going to go over well.
	But if this was the effort, it could very easily backfire.
	And it could cause even more distrust of Israel than ever before.
	And what if there's a piece of evidence that comes out that clearly shows that the FBI is lying to us?
	And frankly, I think that rifle is a smoking gun piece of evidence, you know, in a pun kind of way there.
	Smoking gun photo, because we all know that you couldn't shoot that rifle like that.
	But a lot of younger people may not know that, so that may not be compelling to them.
	What if there's a piece of evidence that comes out that is just shocking that either it makes Israel complicit, or maybe there's a whistleblower who comes out, goes public, somebody in the intelligence community, somebody in the Trump administration.
	Who knows?
	Somebody comes out or some piece of evidence is revealed that convincingly proves that this was an Israeli hit job, then Israel will be in dire straits.
	They will not only lose the youth in America, they will lose almost all of America and the rest of the world.
	I mean, that would be absolutely fatal for Israel's reputation, which is already in shreds right now.
	You know, there's barely any reputation remaining for Israel.
	And I have no doubt.
	I mean, Israel carries out assassinations in Lebanon, in Iran, in Syria, in Jordan, obviously in Gaza.
	Israel carries out assassinations.
	I mean, Israel was involved in 9-11.
	You know, Israel, with the Pagers, they're experts in explosives.
	They're experts in using rocket launchers to hit people in their homes and kill them and their families.
	They've done this all over the Middle East.
	Nobody is better at killing people than Israel.
	I mean, they assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists, for example.
	Israel, they're experts at killing people.
	And that's not even debatable.
	That's a known skill set.
	So the question is, would they kill somebody that used to be a strong Israel supporter who begins to step out of line?
	Would they kill that person to send a message?
	Would they kill that person to replace them with Ben Shapiro?
	Or is this completely off track and Israel has nothing to do with it?
	And Netanyahu is a stand-up guy.
	And this is just some lone nut transgender person that we're about to see rolled out, the Patsy.
	I mean, what do you think?
	And I want you to know, I don't approach these situations trying to find the conspiracy angle.
	That's never my approach.
	I only approach these trying to find out what really happened, period.
	And I would love to be able to just believe the FBI.
	I would love to think that, you know, gosh, Cash Patel and Dan Bongino, they got a handle on this thing now.
	And no more BS from the FBI now.
	These aren't the Hunter Biden laptop days.
	You know, this isn't the, what was it, Meal Team 6 photo of the FBI agents kneeling down before the LGBT flags.
	Remember that?
	Oh my God, what a disgrace.
	I would love to be able to say those days are over.
	The FBI is so much better now.
	It's, you know, it's solid now.
	It's under good leadership and they're driven by the evidence.
	I would love to say that.
	And then they roll out this stupid rifle photo and I'm like, come on.
	We're not stupid.
	It's like whoever was responsible for faking the evidence at the FBI, like they don't know how rifle scopes work.
	They don't.
	They're like, just put the scope, you know, on the top and then just show it to the people.
	Just believe anything.
	Oh, let's write, you know, let's write Antifa on the bullet.
	It's like, are these FBI counterfeit artists, are they retarded?
	I mean, seriously, it's worse than a Hollywood prop.
	I mean, there are people in Hollywood do a far better job with prop guns than the FBI.
	They should have called Hollywood.
	It's like, hey, we got to fake a shooting, you know.
	Can you give us a fake gun prop?
	Looks like something that would be used to assassinate JFK, you know?
	Can you give us one?
	And Hollywood would do a better job.
	Somehow they screwed this whole thing up.
	All of you who are rifle shooters, you know instantly that I'm telling you the truth.
	You one look at that picture.
	You're like, nope, that's not a functioning rifle.
	Why?
	Because of your face.
	That's why your face is in the way.
	So I saw a video of a guy.
	Of course, I'm not going to say who it is, but there's a prominent person in the freedom, the liberty movement, who went out to shoot a .50 caliber bolt action rifle.
	And sure enough, he got his face a little too close to that scope.
	And that scope split his forehead vertically.
	It was like the left side of the scope.
	It just ripped his forehead in half.
	I mean, the skin, not the bone.
	He was bruised.
	And he must have used super glue or something to put because the skin was just really separated.
	That's what happens if you fire a 50 caliber too close to your face.
	So word to the wise, be very careful around 50 caliber bolt action rifles.
	They kick.
	They kick.
	See, I prefer the .50 caliber semi-auto Barrett because the semi-auto action of the Barret, the autoloader, takes some of the kinetic energy away from, you know, from the kick of the rifle.
	So it doesn't kick as bad as a bolt action.
	Bolt actions are known to kick you in the ass hard or kick you in the face hard.
	So you need to be cautious about that.
	All right.
	Now, I've got a couple of special reports for you here.
	And then I've got the two interviews involving Jeffrey Prather.
	And those two interviews are going to be about two hours, you know, in total, or a little bit less than that.
	But I've got a couple of special reports that I want to play for you.
	And I think you'll find these interesting.
	One of them is called Censorship is What Led to the Murder of Free Speech Hero Charlie Kirk.
	And yes, I'm going to call Charlie Kirk a free speech hero at this point because I think that's accurate.
	Again, I didn't agree with everything that he said.
	And I think I criticize him maybe once or twice online in a non-vicious way, you know, just like, are you kidding me?
	When he was probably saying something like really pro-Zionist or something.
	I don't even remember.
	But there's no question that he's a free speech hero.
	Okay.
	And there's no question that censorship by the tech giants and by left-wing media and at universities and so on, censorship created the conditions that encourage kind of left-wing violence and encourage violence as a means of resolving problems.
	So even if you think that there was a, even if you think that, let's say, Mossad took out Charlie Kirk, well, there's still the radical left cheering it.
	And it's censorship that has led to the conditions of these radical leftists cheering the tragic murder of a father, of an American man, a father, a 31-year-old father and husband who clearly did not deserve to die for his speech.
	But because of the environment of extreme censorship, we now have leftists who are living in their thought bubbles where they think that anybody who disagrees with them should be killed.
	They do.
	They consider the left, they consider speech to be an act of violence.
	And in their minds, then, in order to defend themselves from that violence, they believe they have the right to shoot you and kill you.
	They think that is self-defense, to kill you for your speech.
	These arguments are routinely made by people on the left, including university students.
	So I want to play this first special report for you here.
	Censorship is what led to the murder of free speech hero Charlie Kirk.
	And then we'll continue with another special report on the other side.
	So censorship is part of what got Charlie Kirk shot and killed.
	Censorship.
	And this is a conversation that we need to have.
	I've been speaking out against censorship for, well, over 10 years now because I was deplatformed beginning in 2014 from YouTube.
	Google is arguably the most evil corporation on planet Earth today.
	And Google engages in extreme censorship.
	Censorship of the truth about COVID, the truth about vaccines, censorship of natural cures, censorship of anything that is pro-Trump.
	Google and YouTube helped rig the election in 2020.
	And they fought against Trump winning in 2016 and 2024.
	Google's evil.
	But it's not just Google.
	It's Vimeo.
	It's LinkedIn, which also banned me many years ago.
	It's Facebook.
	It's Microsoft.
	It's almost all the tech giants.
	They engage in censorship.
	And the reason that Charlie Kirk was shot and killed, regardless of who you think was behind it, whether you think it's a transgender radical or whether you think it was Mossad, either way, it was because of censorship is the only reason that his speech seemed radical to certain people.
	In other words, you go to a college campus today, and because of extreme censorship by leftists, censoring all reason and rationality, censoring the truth about transgenderism mutilation of children, censoring all conservative views, censoring all truth about economics, censoring the truth about history, etc.
	Because of that, if you go onto a college campus and you say something that is completely normal, like, hey, the Second Amendment wasn't about hunting, it was about shooting tyrants, you know, then, and that's what it was, that's history, then you're going to be called a radical, crazy extremist, and this is going to be a bunch of radical left-wing college campus people that want to kill you.
	Again, it's only because of censorship that the radical left is so offended by truthful speech.
	And it's why the radical left thinks that speech is violence and why they want to kill anybody who says anything that they disagree with.
	And that's the way it's been on college campuses now for 15, 20 years.
	Colleges and universities are no longer bastions of freedom of thought.
	They're no longer freedom zones.
	They are indoctrination factories that churn out woke idiots who are, in effect, terrorists now.
	They want to kill everybody with whom they disagree.
	And possibly that's what just happened with Charlie Kirk.
	And I say it's time now in America to dismantle all of those organizations that engage in censorship, that is viewpoint discrimination.
	Dismantle them, tear them down.
	In fact, send in the U.S. Marshals, arrest the executives, and prosecute them for violations of civil rights of the American people.
	If you are Google, if you are Facebook, if you are YouTube, if you're Vimeo, and you engage in viewpoint discrimination, you do not, in my opinion, have the right to operate in the United States of America, a country founded on principles of freedom of speech,
	and then those principles being further elucidated in the Bill of Rights a few years later, you know, after the signing of the Constitution itself.
	So if you don't support the First Amendment, if you don't support freedom of speech, if you don't practice it in your business, and if you are maliciously censoring just one side of the conversation, especially if you are in a dominant position as a dominant publisher like the New York Times or a dominant search engine like Google,
	which has like 98% of the search traffic or something like that, or the dominant social media platform like X, if you censor, you should be dismantled, not allowed to operate, period.
	By doing that, the radical left would be exposed to some shocking truths.
	Like their delusional world would be rattled and shattered.
	And that's necessary because they're living in a world of insane delusions where they think a man can become a woman and they think, you know, Trump is Hitler or, you know, they're suffering from Trump derangement syndrome.
	And by the way, that's different from when I criticize Trump.
	I will criticize Trump or praise Trump based on what Trump is doing.
	On any given week, you know, I might have something positive, I might have something negative, but it's thoughtful and it's rational and I can back it up.
	When the left criticizes Trump, they're not criticizing him based on any reason.
	They're just enraged with Trump derangement syndrome because they've been indoctrinated by the radical left-wing sources that censor all opposing views.
	They censor any positive information about Trump.
	They do that on purpose to turn leftists, especially left-wing youth, into radical terrorists.
	And that's all by design, okay?
	And it's time to end that.
	It's time to tear down the radical left-wing media that deliberately lie to harm America.
	They knowingly publish falsehoods about Hunter Biden's laptop being Russian disinformation.
	No, they knew that was a lie.
	They publish lies that are handed over to them by Hillary Clinton or other Democrats, and they republish the lies to harm America or to harm Trump or to harm our economy.
	They want to hurt America and they use their dominant positions of a near monopoly on speech in order to achieve that.
	And that's not what the First Amendment is protecting.
	You don't get to weaponize your speech against America if you are the dominant paper of record, let's say the New York Times that gets automatically high rankings in Google, automatically put into all the news feeds of all the browsers and all the news sources, automatically put into the AI engines, etc.
	Because the New York Times has the dominant position, it has a special responsibility to avoid viewpoint discrimination, to avoid information that is deliberately harmful to America, and to avoid lying to their own readers and lying to the country.
	And that's why these established papers like the New York Times or the Washington Post or the LA Times, they need to be held to a much higher standard than a small independent media organization.
	that doesn't have even a tiny fraction of the same reach.
	And these large platforms like Google, like X, which, by the way, X is still censoring my platform, Brightion, maliciously censoring it, even under Elon.
	And we've sued X, and they've refused to stop their censorship, by the way, in case you're wondering.
	We've also sued Google.
	We've sued Meta, etc.
	That lawsuit is still pending.
	It's slowly working its way through the court system.
	We've sued these organizations and we sued the DOD together.
	We sued the U.S. government because the U.S. government, especially under Joe Biden, was also engaged in all this censorship.
	But I believe that these tech companies that have these dominant positions, they also have a special responsibility to avoid censorship and to make sure that both sides of an argument are allowed to be presented.
	Now, I understand, obviously, you do have to take down like direct threats of violence or illegal, you know, bomb-making instructions or how to make a nuclear weapon in your basement if you're stupid enough to try.
	But I understand taking that stuff down or stalking videos and snuff videos.
	I mean, yes, of course, we censor those kinds of videos as well.
	But those are illegal videos that are a threat to individuals, obviously.
	So I don't have any disagreement with taking down that kind of information.
	But what YouTube does is they say that if you criticize vaccines, then that's encouraging self-harm.
	That's a lie.
	YouTube is lying.
	And all these tech giants, especially during COVID, they would say, well, we don't allow you to post anything that contradicts the CDC.
	Well, the CDC is a criminal organization run by demons.
	And the CDC was lying.
	They knew they were lying.
	The FDA was lying.
	Fauci was lying.
	Fauci is a terrorist, a bioweapons terrorist.
	And so what Google was saying and what Meta was saying, what YouTube was saying is that you're only allowed to speak on YouTube if you parrot the positions of a bioterrorist.
	That's still the official position on YouTube.
	YouTube is a terrorism hub of true misinformation that is deliberately designed to harm Americans and to achieve depopulation, to kill people.
	And that's a crime in my mind.
	That's why YouTube executives should be arrested and prosecuted.
	They are engaged in a criminal conspiracy to harm humanity right now.
	And through censorship, they silence the voices of truth and reason that are trying to help humanity.
	Now, people out there may or may not agree with what I have to say, but you certainly can't disagree with the fact that I say these things because I have compassion for humanity.
	I care about my fellow human beings.
	And I care about people of all races and religions and colors and ethnicities.
	And I speak up for the children of Gaza.
	And I defend even members of Islam against religious discrimination.
	And I speak up for gun rights for black people, for example, etc.
	I even defend gun rights for non-felony transgenders.
	If you happen to be a transgender, it doesn't mean that your Second Amendment rights are instantly violated.
	That's crazy.
	I don't support red flag laws against anybody.
	And each person has to be judged based on their actions when it comes to gun rights.
	So don't say that I'm someone who is discriminatory against any of these groups.
	No, I support free speech for everyone.
	But I do not support censorship and the weaponization of censorship in order to try to harm people.
	I mean, I'm operating out of good faith.
	I may not be 100% correct, but I am trying to be correct.
	I'm trying to help people.
	I'm trying to empower and uplift humanity.
	I'm trying to give people the tools and the knowledge that they need to be healthier, that they need to be more wise, that they need to survive the financial collapse that's happening in real time.
	I am working in good faith.
	The corporate media is working in bad faith.
	They know what they're doing.
	They know they're harming people.
	They know they're lying.
	They know they're evil.
	And they love it.
	They celebrate it.
	They know that when they advocate abortion, that they're advocating the murdering of unborn human babies.
	They know it and they love it because they're demons, okay?
	They love child sacrifice rituals.
	That's why they love vaccines also.
	It's abortion and vaccines, depopulation, birth control, whatever.
	Anything that can reduce the number of humans on the planet, they love it.
	Because they, the big corporate media and big tech, they are operating in bad faith.
	They despise humanity.
	They despise truth.
	They despise America.
	They despise liberty.
	They are evil.
	And they need to be dismantled and taken down.
	Absolutely dismantled.
	You are no longer allowed to broadcast.
	Boom.
	Goodbye, CNN.
	Goodbye, ABC, CBS, NBC.
	All lies.
	Nothing but false propaganda designed to harm and controlled by globalist narratives that are themselves designed to rip this country apart.
	You want to save America?
	You got to detox from the poison.
	The poison is big media and big tech.
	The New York Times is poison.
	Google is poison.
	Meta, Facebook, Zuckerberg, poison, poison, poison.
	Bill Gates, mosquito-borne poison, you know, food supply poison, mRNA poison.
	These people, in my view, are mass murderers.
	And that's why it's so frustrating that Trump invites them to the White House, has them over for dinner, celebrating some of the worst mass murderers, some of the worst criminals, you know, the CEO of Google, et cetera.
	Unbelievably evil criminal, in my view, who should be arrested and prosecuted.
	I wish Trump would invite them to the White House and put them in handcuffs.
	But instead, he's sitting down to do business with them.
	You see, I criticize Trump too.
	But I criticize Trump from the perspective of wanting Trump to do better, wanting Trump to help put America on track and arrest the criminals, prosecute the criminals.
	That should include Fauci, for God's sake.
	Where are the arrests of James Comey and John Brennan and Hillary Clinton?
	Where are the arrests of these people that committed treason?
	Where are the arrests of the people that rigged the 2020 election, that knowingly cheated and stole and harmed America?
	Where are those arrests, by the way?
	I mean, that's a different podcast, but you and I are both running out of patience for that.
	But I say the arrests need to be expanded.
	And if they aren't, you're going to see more conservatives like Charlie Kirk shot and killed in America.
	Because the left uses violence and uses censorship to silence everybody they don't like.
	And the left-wing media and left-wing tech giants, they advocate, they support the indoctrination of leftists who become these terrorists.
	And also, I should mention, if you think that Israel killed Charlie Kirk, which is a viable theory, I mean, Charlie Kirk was beginning to wake up and to question Israel and question the genocide, question Gaza, et cetera.
	Well, remember, Israel wants censorship in America.
	Israel's pressuring all the platforms to banish any speech that's critical of Israel.
	That's also censorship.
	That's right-wing censorship.
	Whereas the left wants, of course, radical left-wing censorship.
	Both of them are bad.
	The ADL is just as evil as any other organization that's calling for censorship.
	We have the right to criticize Israel.
	And we have the right to criticize the transgenderism push.
	We have the right to criticize the Marxists that are in the schools that are indoctrinating our children.
	And yes, those people themselves also have the right to go online and, you know, regurgitate their Marxist ideas.
	But we will counter them.
	We will counter them with reason and we will win.
	And that's why they hate us so much.
	That's why they want to shoot conservatives because they can never beat an informed conservative in a debate.
	Charlie Kirk proved that again and again.
	And just for the record, I don't agree with everything Charlie Kirk said, especially when he was shilling for Israel for many years.
	I absolutely disagreed with that.
	But in his death, I have come to find out more about Charlie Kirk and how he was really waking up.
	He was beginning to question Israel and Jewish donors and their role in pushing cultural Marxism.
	I mean, these are quotes right out of Charlie Kirk's mouth.
	He was waking up, and some people believe that's why he was killed, by the way.
	And I don't know.
	We don't know yet.
	It's too early to tell.
	But I'm gaining more respect for Charlie Kirk after his death than I had for him before his death.
	And I'm regretful that that's the case.
	I wish I had known him better before his death.
	But, you know, his demographic and my demographic are not the same.
	We're a generation apart.
	I wasn't really in his world and he wasn't in mine, etc.
	But I've gained more respect for him after his passing.
	And it's important to understand that censorship is part of the reason why Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
	And I think that in Charlie's memory, we should do everything we can to end radical left-wing censorship and radical right-wing censorship.
	We should end censorship.
	We should make it illegal to censor based on viewpoint discrimination in America.
	And if you're a company that censors users based on what they're saying about vaccines or what they're saying about politics or what they're saying about money or what they're saying about globalism or depopulation agendas, if you are censoring, then you should be arrested.
	And especially the large platforms and the large publishers, they have a special responsibility, as I said, and they should be subjected to even tighter scrutiny over these very issues.
	So that's my take on it.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for listening.
	God bless America.
	Thank you for your support.
	I'm here every day fighting for humanity and fighting for freedom, fighting for survival, fighting for knowledge.
	And I appreciate your support.
	You can follow me on Brighteon.com.
	You can use our free AI engine, Enoch.
	That's at brighteon.ai.
	And if you would like the world's cleanest, most heavily scrutinized foods and superfoods, organics, storable foods, nutritional supplements, personal care products, ultra-clean, no toxic fragrances, no garbage, shop with us at healthrangerstore.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Take care.
	All right, continuing with the broadcast today.
	And remember, we still have coming up two interviews with Jeffrey Prather.
	One where he's interviewing me.
	Well, actually, first I'm interviewing him, which happened a day earlier.
	And then the second one is him interviewing me, which happened, I don't know, it's like 10 hours ago as the time I'm recording this.
	Okay, so it's back-to-back.
	It's like the Jeffrey Prater, Mike Adams, you know, telethon or something.
	So you get two of us back to back.
	But we talk about a lot of different things, including Venezuela, including the bombing of Qatar, including shipping routes, trade routes, China, Russia, Ukraine, Western Europe, energy.
	We talk about a lot of really interesting things.
	It's not just wall-to-wall, you know, Charlie Kirk shooting analysis.
	Although that is a very important subject, we did venture into many other areas as well.
	But next, I want to play for you my second special report today, which proposes that we pass the Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act, which I think in the podcast I shortened it to just the Charlie Kirk Law or the Charlie Kirk Act.
	And I'm serious about this.
	This is not a gimmick.
	I think that we need to get behind this idea of a Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act that would outlaw viewpoint discrimination by the tech giants and also by corporate media and universities, etc.
	We need to have a level playing field of free speech where everybody, including conservatives, has the right to speak, including those who are skeptical about vaccine safety, including those who are critical of Joe Biden and the rigged 2020 election, for example, including those who are critical of the U.S. involvement in Ukraine or Israel or what have you.
	We need to have a level playing field of free speech in America.
	So I'm proposing the Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act.
	And I'm going to contact my congressperson and my senators, and I'm going to propose this law to them and see what they say.
	So check out this special report, and then we'll continue on the other side.
	I'm proposing that we reaffirm free speech protections in America by passing the Charlie Kirk law.
	I'm not a fan of just creating more laws that restrict things, obviously, or restrict people or restrict speech.
	Instead, this needs to be a law that makes it mandatory for large online platforms, tech platforms in particular, but other platforms and universities to embrace freedom of speech, which should have been enshrined in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, but has been violated by big tech and big government and big media, big publishers, universities, you name it.
	They have engaged in radical censorship.
	against the American people, and through their censorship, they have created division.
	And it's that division that is leading to violence and possibly revolts or civil wars or other things.
	But this division is tearing America apart.
	And it's because only one side of every conversation is allowed to be heard or published or shared.
	And that's the radical left-wing side.
	Whether it's about climate or vaccines or whether it's about transgenderism or LGBT, whether it's about Trump or economics or welfare or gun rights or anything else, the only position that is allowed to be heard and repeated is the left-wing position.
	That's true in Wikipedia.
	It's true on social media.
	It's true in search engines like Google.
	And it's true in the corporate media, which is nothing but left-wing lies and propaganda constantly, like CNN, for example, or the New York Times.
	This is the source of division, or one of the sources.
	There are many, but this is a primary source.
	And what we must do is, as I'm proposing, let's pass a Charlie Kirk law that says, if you are a significant platform for information, that would be a search engine, social media site, a large newspaper, or a university, or any other significant institution, we could define the size, we could define the reach, then it is actually illegal for you to engage in viewpoint discrimination.
	You cannot discriminate against people just because you don't like their politics or just because you don't like their advocacy for natural medicine or just because you don't like the fact that they support the Second Amendment or the First Amendment or the Fourth Amendment, whatever.
	No viewpoint discrimination censorship can be allowed or tolerated in a free society.
	To be free, we cannot allow corporations to encroach upon the First Amendment of the people.
	And I know what some people will say, well, you're saying that the government should restrict the rights of these platforms, their right to censor.
	No, you don't have a right to censor when you are functioning as part of the public discourse infrastructure.
	You do not have a right to censor.
	You should be barred from censorship.
	Now, if it's a small message board or platform somewhere that it's specifically a niche platform and it doesn't have a big reach of millions of people, that's different.
	I'm talking about the major platforms, the tech giants, the publishers.
	They have a special responsibility to avoid censorship and to make sure that they are open to the different viewpoints that should be part of the debate about a democracy or really our constitutional republic.
	So censorship should be banned.
	In other words, those organizations that engage in malicious, weaponized censorship should be barred from operating in the United States of America.
	And that action itself is not censorship.
	That is opposing censorship.
	It is saying, if you censor, you cannot function in this society because we are a free society and we will respect the voices of others like Charlie Kirk or conservative voices or the voices that are critical about the climate cultism or voices that are critical about vaccines, voices that talk about natural cancer cures, voices that are critical about the president, whoever the president happens to be.
	There should never be censorship of people just because of their political views.
	And I insist that this applies to people of every political persuasion.
	I don't care if you're a leftist, if you're a conservative, if you're middle of the road, independent, libertarian, you have the right to speak.
	And any organization that systematically suppresses your right to speak, if they are a large enough platform, they should be fined into oblivion until they change their ways and support freedom of speech.
	So that means that the algorithms at Google, the algorithms at Facebook, the algorithms at YouTube, they all have to be changed.
	YouTube will ban you for questioning the safety of vaccines.
	YouTube will ban you for talking about natural cancer cures or talking about the globalist depopulation agenda.
	Those algorithms have to be wiped clean.
	You got to start over.
	Same thing with the large publishers.
	New York Times will never honestly cover any story.
	They will always cover it from a malicious, weaponized, anti-human, anti-America point of view to cause the maximum amount of damage to society.
	And I don't want government to run the media, but I do want government to stop the media from engaging in malicious, weaponized censorship to block the other side of the story.
	You can't have a country that functions if the media is controlled by the CIA, which is what the case is right now.
	I mean, in essence, a dark segment of the government is already controlling the media to push CIA narratives.
	That's who controls Wikipedia.
	That's who controls AI.
	And yeah, even the main AI engines like ChatGPT, they are being weaponized against you.
	They are trained to tell you that all vaccines are safe and effective.
	They are trained to lie to you about climate change, to say that carbon dioxide is dangerous.
	That's all because the AI engines of the main companies like OpenAI, et cetera, they are getting orders from the CIA of what they have to say.
	And also the ADL and the Zionist regime, they're trying to push AI into making sure there's never any criticism of Jews or any criticism of Israel.
	And I'm sorry, but that's not okay.
	You don't get special protections in AI for one particular group of people.
	I mean, AI should, in my opinion, should be pro-human that is supporting all of humanity.
	I honor the dignity of all human beings and I want to help protect the health and livelihoods of all human beings.
	And in my book, that includes Jewish people.
	That includes Islam.
	That includes, you know, people who are gay.
	Just because someone's gay, that's not my lifestyle, but I don't want to punish them for being gay.
	That's, you know, that's their choice.
	They still have a free speech right, and they still have a Second Amendment right.
	So I am pro-human and pro-liberty in this.
	And that means we have to dismantle those institutions that are anti-liberty, that are deliberately causing harm, that are weaponizing censorship against their political opponents like Charlie Kirk.
	And these organizations like Google and big tech, et cetera, they are, in my view, they are complicit in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
	That's why we should name this the Charlie Kirk law.
	Again, it's a law that will enforce that these tech platforms, publishers, and universities, they cannot engage in viewpoint discrimination, which means they cannot discriminate against conservatives.
	They cannot discriminate against white people because universities do that right now.
	They also discriminate against Asian people in the California school system in particular.
	And that's wrong.
	It should be a meritocracy.
	But the big newspapers, the big media magazines, they cannot willfully engage in censorship of reality just to push a destructive anti-America agenda that is designed to cause harm.
	It is intended to cause harm to this country.
	These organizations are operating in bad faith.
	They know it.
	That is their goal.
	And they are achieving the results they want.
	They are achieving the violence they want.
	They are complicit in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
	And that's an outcome that they wanted.
	And some of them, like TMZ, its staff, applauded and cheered when they learned that Charlie Kirk was shot because TMZ is a bad faith publisher of slanted information that's designed to harm the American people, in my view.
	And that has got to stop.
	We have to stop all the cultural propaganda that's in the movies where it's always anti-white and anti-men and there's always a gay lesbian couple in every movie now.
	They're planted in every movie.
	There's always like two dudes kissing or whatever.
	That is scripted and it's funded.
	It's a propaganda campaign for cultural Marxism that has infiltrated movies and television and the late-night comedy shows, which are all anti-America.
	All of that needs to be shut down.
	Shut it all down.
	If you function as a broadcaster and you are working deliberately to harm America and to dismantle the values that America was founded on, values of liberty, values of family, values of truth, if you are working against those, you have no right to function in this society as a broadcaster.
	Your broadcast license should be revoked.
	Your assets should be seized.
	You should be shut down.
	Your executives should be arrested.
	And we've come to that point because the radical left, they've taken over the media, they've taken over universities, they've taken over Hollywood, and they will stop at nothing until they murder every last conservative in America.
	They want to murder everybody.
	They cheer it.
	They celebrate it.
	And they hide behind the First Amendment to actually weaponize their censorship, but only censoring one side.
	And that's the side that they hate, which happens to be the side of truth, the side of liberty, the side of America.
	So we cannot let them distort and pervert the First Amendment and claim that they have the right to censor because that's a First Amendment right.
	No, the First Amendment isn't the right to censor.
	It's the right to speak.
	And the right to speak implies that you have the right to speak in the public forum of the day, whatever that happens to be.
	And today, that's social media.
	Today, that's on the internet.
	That's through search engines.
	You have the right to speak.
	Just like they should never censor you and cut you off from phone lines because of what you say on the phone, they have no right to cut you off on a platform like YouTube because of your speech on YouTube.
	YouTube functions as a public conduit.
	I know it's run by a company by Alphabet, but it has become the place where public conversations take place that are part of the debate of our Constitutional Republic.
	And thus, our Congress needs to pass the Charlie Kirk law to force YouTube to stop censoring the American people.
	You have to force them.
	You have to fine them a billion dollars a day or shut them down if they continue to censor based on viewpoint discrimination.
	And notice carefully, I am not attacking free speech at all.
	I'm saying that everybody should be allowed to speak freely.
	I am not saying that, oh, we should flip this around and censor everybody on the left, silence the left.
	No, I'm saying don't silence the left.
	Don't silence the right.
	Don't silence anybody else.
	That everybody has the right to speak.
	And if people don't want to hear that person, that's fine.
	If you're on YouTube and there's a channel that you don't like, you don't have to watch the video.
	But YouTube has no right to censor people because of the content of their speech, period.
	Except if it's obviously if it's like, you know, violent stalking behavior, making death threats, you know, criminal speech, obviously, should not be allowed on the platform.
	But I'm talking about non-criminal speech that is just viewpoints and opinions and analysis.
	All of it should be enforced to be allowed on the platform because the platform functions as the conversation hub for much of America.
	And remember, I've been censored on YouTube for many years.
	I've been completely deplatformed because of my advocacy for natural medicine and because of my opposition to climate cultism and because of my opposition to transgender indoctrination of children, etc.
	YouTube says you're not allowed to speak if you hold those views.
	And that's wrong.
	It's time for our government to step in and to show up at alphabet offices and say, look, you have a choice.
	You either respect the First Amendment for all Americans, you allow everybody to speak on your platform, or we're going to shut you down.
	And we're going to arrest your executives.
	we're going to criminally prosecute you for violating the civil rights of the American people.
	That's what needs to happen to YouTube, to Meta, to Google.
	Google engages in viewpoint discrimination on search results.
	They banish pages that talk about natural medicine or conservatism or honest money or real history, etc.
	They ban those pages.
	They ban the entire sites.
	Same thing with Wikipedia.
	Wikipedia is a radical left-wing slander machine.
	The same thing with Reddit.
	Reddit will ban you if you're conservative.
	They'll ban you if you support natural medicine.
	They'll ban you if you oppose vaccines.
	Same thing is true across all of these tech platforms and all these institutions, universities, etc.
	Universities want to ban Charlie Kirk from speaking at their venue.
	And that's why they shot and killed him, or somebody did, because they didn't want him to be able to speak.
	Well, now that Charlie Kirk is dead, I would really like to hear from him even more than before.
	I want to know where he was going with things that he was saying.
	But I don't have the opportunity to do that because he's been censored out of this realm.
	I mean, shooting someone is the ultimate expression of censorship.
	But killing somebody's YouTube channel is another form of censorship.
	And that's what YouTube does every single day.
	They will kill people's channels, even though that person is actually trying to help people, trying to help America, trying to contribute knowledge and information to the people of the world.
	YouTube will ban your channel because you're a threat to big pharma's profit model, or because you support Trump, or because you support the Second Amendment, or whatever.
	It's time for this to end.
	And I'm contacting my congressmen and my senators, and I'm saying, look, we need a new law.
	We need a Charlie Kirk law.
	Just name it in honor of Charlie Kirk.
	May he rest in peace.
	Name it in honor of Charlie Kirk and say, free speech must be guaranteed to all Americans on all of the large platforms and venues in the digital space, which is everything online that is of a certain size or larger.
	Every online publisher, every online search engine, every Wikipedia type of organization, every social media, etc.
	On my platforms, my company's platforms, Brighteon.social, Brighteon.io, Brighteon.com, we don't censor.
	We don't censor at all.
	There's no viewpoint discrimination.
	Anybody can come on and talk about whatever they want, as long as it's not illegal stalking or violent behavior or other illegal things, like teaching people how to make bombs or whatever.
	No, we don't allow that.
	But I'm not talking about that.
	I'm talking about viewpoints.
	So I call it the Charlie Kirk law.
	Share the link to this podcast if you support this idea.
	And understand that you can't even share this link on X because Elon Musk continues to censor links to Brighteon.
	Yeah, still censored under Elon, even though he claims that X is a free speech platform.
	It isn't.
	It's a heavily censored platform.
	And we are shadow banned everywhere.
	And shadow banning is a form of censorship.
	And it's time for that to end.
	It's time for that to end.
	Shadow banning should be illegal.
	If people want to follow somebody, they should be able to see that person's content.
	All the algorithms that suppress people based on their speech, all those algorithms should be outlawed from these large platforms and large publishers.
	Anything in the digital space.
	We have to have freedom of speech guaranteed to all Americans.
	So support me in this by sharing this podcast.
	Share the idea of the Charlie Kirk law and contact your members of Congress in the House and the Senate and urge them to support this law and understand that some of them will oppose it because they want to censor criticism of Israel.
	They want to censor for their pet projects.
	So they don't support freedom of speech.
	I support freedom of speech for everyone, regardless of their political leanings or the content of their speech.
	And the more speech we have, the healthier we are and the more free we are as a society and the less violence we'll have because we'll be able to actually talk about ideas online where the good ideas should win out in the end and bad ideas would be ridiculed.
	Instead of right now, all the platforms censor the good ideas and just promote the stupid ideas like the woke ideas and tampons and men's restrooms.
	It's just stupid.
	But that becomes the standard.
	And then everything else that opposes that is labeled extremism.
	Really?
	No, what's extreme is you idiots who think that men can become women.
	That's stupid and that's extreme.
	It's time to guarantee freedom of speech for all Americans.
	Support the Charlie Kirk Act.
	And thank you for listening.
	I'm Mike Adams, the health ranger, one of the most censored voices in the history of our country.
	And I'm also the founder of Brighteon.com and naturalnews.com.
	God bless you all.
	God bless America.
	Take care.
	All right.
	Welcome back to the show.
	Now, I do want to add here, just in case I wasn't clear enough about this, there are things that Charlie Kirk said that I completely disagree with.
	And for example, he has said that gay people are a disease.
	I disagree with that.
	I do not think gay people are a disease.
	And I do not think that all trans people are evil either.
	I think that kind of rhetoric, maybe he regrets saying that.
	I don't know.
	But that diminishes the importance of the argument of understanding culturally what's actually happening.
	I'm a pro-liberty person when it comes to social issues.
	I tend to say that what people do in their own private lives is their own business.
	Because who am I to judge what they do in their living rooms or their bedrooms or at their rave parties or whatever?
	Whatever freaky stuff they're into.
	I might mock some of the furry party stuff, which is always fun to laugh at.
	It's like, yeah, you dressed up as a dog.
	You see these photos.
	Like, that is so hilarious.
	Like, do you guys have sex dressed as dogs?
	I mean, to this day, I'm curious about that question.
	Like, do they really, do they bark and howl at each other?
	That's funny to me.
	That's hilarious.
	But I still say that they have the right to do that in their own private, like, you know, furry puppy dog parties or whatever.
	That's their business.
	As long as it's consenting adults engage in whatever freaky business they're into.
	Oh, you dressed up as Peter Pan with the green tights today.
	Huh?
	Yeah, Peter Pan meet Fido, you know, whatever.
	Like, okay, use your imagination.
	It could be hilarious.
	Whatever it is, none of my business.
	Now, when you start pushing that onto children, then it's society's business.
	Because then you have teachers and counselors in the schools pushing it on students.
	That's evil.
	And that should be crimes.
	You know, I mean, that should be a criminal offense.
	And in some cases, you have parents pushing transgenderism onto their own children and actually putting their children on gender bender chemicals and even mutilations.
	And that's a crime too, in my opinion.
	I'm a big supporter of parental rights overall, but if a child is like talking to their kids and like, yeah, you should cut off your balls, you know, that's child abuse.
	Sorry, that's child abuse.
	So I would not say gay people are a disease.
	And I disagree with anybody that makes that designation.
	I would say that that's a different kind of lifestyle choice, relationship choice that those people have made on their own.
	And there are lots and lots of gay people who have actually high integrity in their actions towards others.
	You can't say that being gay is synonymous with being a bad person.
	And there are a whole lot of Bible-thumping Christians who are horrible people, who are cheaters and liars and genocide supporters and all kinds of things like that.
	So you can't tell me that being straight makes you a good person in every case.
	No, it doesn't.
	Or that being gay makes you a bad person in every case.
	No, it doesn't.
	Or that being even transgender makes you a crazy murderer.
	No, it doesn't.
	We got to stop with that kind of language.
	Stop with those accusations.
	That's the kind of infighting among society that the globalists want.
	They want you to hate on some other group.
	And because they want us killing each other.
	Now, do I have anger at times myself?
	Yeah, I'm angry at people who lie.
	I'm angry at people who censor.
	That's a kind of violence.
	Censorship leads to violence.
	Censorship should be a crime also, I believe.
	And also pushing depopulation bioweapons jabs.
	That's a crime in my eyes.
	That's clearly a crime.
	So am I angry at certain individuals or certain groups?
	Yes, if they're pushing depopulation and human suffering and deception and harming people, pushing toxic herbicides and pesticides, for example, or toxic GMOs and then lying about it and fudging the science and paying off the regulators, et cetera.
	Yeah, sure.
	I'm angry about that.
	But I can't get angry about what people do in their own private homes.
	That's their own business.
	You see where I'm coming from on that?
	Now, you know, in some cities, like naked gay dudes, like marching in the streets and twerking in front of children.
	And then it's advertised as a family-friendly event.
	And then, you know, moms bring their six-year-old kids there.
	They're like, yeah, mommy, you know, because it's like a 60-year-old, obese, like, fat dude, like twerking in the kids' face.
	Like, no, God, no.
	Like, that's horrible.
	That should be a crime.
	And at some of these events, they ride naked on bicycles.
	And I don't even want to know how that works.
	Like, which side of the banana seat does the banana go on?
	I don't even know how that works.
	To me, it seems like a ball-crushing afternoon, frankly.
	But whatever they're into, they should do it at home.
	You guys can ride naked bicycles in your basement together.
	That's fine, but just don't do it on the public streets is my point.
	Some of these dudes, man, you need some extra strong sanitizers after those events, you know?
	Hope those aren't rental bikes.
	My God, you thought the bowling alley shoes were bad that you rented, huh?
	Think about your bike rental.
	Yeah, there's a naked fat guy sitting on this for like five hours sweating in the summer heat.
	Yeah.
	Have fun.
	Please, God, no.
	Do you have antiviral spray?
	You know, please.
	That's a good case for chlorine dioxide right there.
	Like, I want a vat of chlorine dioxide and I want you to dump the bicycle in the chlorine dioxide for like an hour.
	And then we might think about riding it.
	No, just throw the seat in a dumpster and set it on fire.
	Get a new seat.
	That's all.
	That's the right answer.
	But anyway, see, what I espouse is, you know, righteous anger at those who are deceivers, those who are liars, those who are harming others, which includes, you know, anybody that's bombing children, obviously.
	But I have a lot of, otherwise, a lot of tolerance for people of different ethnicities or different religions or different skin colors or even different sexual orientations, etc.
	I believe in a balance of tolerance in society.
	That is, tolerate people being different, but do not tolerate naked dudes twerking in the streets in children's faces.
	So, you know, there's a point where it's gone too far and you need to stop it in public.
	Like LGBT flags on the crosswalks.
	Please.
	We should, I mean, that, how is that even legal?
	Who gets to just paint their symbols, their graffiti all over the crosswalks?
	It's a public roads, for God's sake.
	Should be no LGBT symbols on any crosswalks because if you allow LGBT, then you would have to allow everybody's symbols, wouldn't you?
	And then it'd be like the Church of Satan would want to have, you know, satanic crosswalks.
	You're walking across like images of Satan giving you a high five on the crosswalk.
	You made it to the other side.
	Now follow me.
	You know, whatever weird messaging.
	There could be like Nazi groups that would want to have like Nazi crosswalks, you know, where you walk in a, in a square pattern around and around again.
	You never make it to the other side.
	That would be the Nazi crosswalks.
	You know, every group would want their crosswalks.
	Even the furries, the furry people.
	Like, yeah, you're walking across the crosswalk.
	Oh, there's like a naked furry dog looking creature painted there on the road.
	That's kind of sick.
	What is that?
	You know, you're like, hurry, hurry, son.
	Let's get across this crosswalk.
	Don't look down because you don't want to know what's down there.
	You know, freaky stuff.
	By the way, I just have a question for any of the gay listeners out there.
	Why is it that in pop culture, like gay men are depicted as very handsome, fit, you know, like really cut.
	Like working out at the gym all day, you know, thin waist, broad shoulders, you know, sharp jawlines.
	Like that's how they're depicted in pop culture.
	And then when you see the gay naked parades, it's like fat slobs walking down like the most gross looking people imaginable in the middle of the street.
	You're like, oh, please, like, get that out of my Twitter feed, you know, for God's sake.
	Why is there such a difference between the way gay people are depicted in pop culture versus how they actually are naked on the streets?
	I'm just wondering.
	I've got a question about that.
	Anyway, that's my riff on why I disagree with people calling gay people a disease.
	I think that there are people who are kind of diseased, like there are evil people.
	And again, there's plenty of those people that go to church and some of them, you know, they totally support Israel bombing children.
	That's a mental illness.
	You know, that's a sickness to celebrate the death of children in Gaza.
	I'm far more concerned about that than I am what two gay dudes do in their own private bedroom away from the public streets.
	You know, seriously.
	I would be like on my list of important things to get done.
	Like number one would be stop bombing children.
	That should be number one.
	Stop the slaughter of innocent people.
	So there you go.
	And then obviously next on the list is stop censorship.
	Stop viewpoint discrimination and make sure that everybody can speak freely, which would finally, I think, bring back some dialogue in society.
	And that's what we desperately need.
	All right.
	So kind of wrapping up the broadcast portion here before we go to the interviews, I do want to say I'm very concerned about where things are headed in this country.
	And I do think it's critical to restore freedom of speech before things devolve even further.
	And I do think that censorship obviously is one of the main reasons why there's so much disagreement in this country because the political left lives in a bubble, a delusional bubble, and they never hear any reason or rationality outside of their bubble at all.
	And that's, again, that's a big part of this problem.
	I'm also concerned about what's going to happen in terms of the increasing kinetic conflicts between left-wing and right-wing groups.
	And I don't know what that's going to look like, but I can sense the tension out there.
	And clearly, everybody's armed in one way or another.
	Some people don't know how to mount rifle scopes, but most conservatives do.
	Clearly, the FBI doesn't.
	You know, we're probably going to see some instability.
	It's going to be more dangerous to be out in the cities.
	I'm very concerned about this, and I'd like to appeal to all of you listening to help de-escalate any kind of violence.
	Don't contribute to it.
	Definitely secure yourself and secure your home.
	Be safe against violence, but don't go out obviously escalating it in any way whatsoever.
	And in terms of securing yourself, there's lots and lots of great choices.
	This is a good time to remind you to practice your firearm skills, whether it's an AR-15 or a folding AR, which is very convenient.
	There's pistol skills, which are more difficult to master.
	So it's a good time to shore up on your pistol skills, get some more practice.
	Palmetto State Armory also, they just released a, what is it?
	It's a nine millimeter jackal.
	No, they released the jackal in 308 Winchester.
	Actually, yeah, I should remember that because I bought one and I haven't even taken it out of the box.
	That looks really interesting, but it's for bigger guys like me who can handle a pistol in 308 Winchester, which is really unusual.
	If you don't want something so beefy, you can get a nine millimeter jackal, J-A-K-L, at Palmetto State Armory.
	They're not a sponsor or anything.
	They have a really good platform.
	But as a sponsor, we have Shield Arms that makes ARs that are folding pistols with the arm braces.
	Really outstanding configuration.
	And you can get those in standard 5.56 or 300 Blackout, which is a very versatile round.
	I actually recommend that you get these pistols in 300 Blackout.
	It works so much better with the short pistol barrels, by the way.
	They cycle better.
	I don't like 5.56 for anything shorter than the standard 16-inch barrel or maybe 12 inches on the short side.
	That's as short as I would go with 5.56.
	But 300 Blackout can cycle well in lots of different pistol configurations.
	And it's just got more mass to it.
	It's got more mass.
	It's versatile.
	It's better for close encounters, shall we say, or road rage encounters if you have to defend yourself against some crazy road rager.
	A folding 300 blackout pistol in your vehicle, where legal, keep it legal.
	That's a very useful tool.
	Do I have one in my vehicle?
	Well, I live in Texas.
	I follow the local gun laws and the gun laws allow me to defend myself.
	So I don't know, you do the math.
	But my first inclination, of course, is to leave the area.
	I'm not looking for a firefight.
	I would rather disengage and leave.
	But if it comes to it, I'm going to defend my life and my property.
	No question about it.
	So that's at shieldarms.com.
	You can use discount code Ranger to save.
	I think it's something like 10%.
	Or you can check out our other deals at rangerdeals.com.
	Lots of affiliate links there, including on Gold and Silver, by the way.
	And then finally, you can support our online store if you want to shore up your food supplies.
	That's HealthRangerStore.com.
	And we sell nutritional supplements and superfoods, ultra-clean, almost all certified organic, laboratory tested, lots of solutions for people and very happy customers all over the world.
	So check that out at healthrangerstore.com and thank you for supporting us.
	All right.
	With that said, we're going to jump into the back-to-back interviews.
	The first one is myself interviewing Jeffrey Prather on Wednesday, the day that Charlie Kirk was shot.
	And as I was interviewing Jeffrey Prather, the shooting had just happened, so we didn't really have much information.
	But it's Jeffrey Prather.
	And then the second hour is him interviewing me earlier today.
	And we talk a lot about the shooting and other related events.
	So enjoy the rest of the episode today.
	Have a great weekend.
	I may post something this weekend.
	I'm not quite sure.
	I think there's a furry rally with naked bicycle dudes that I, oh, no.
	Oh, did I say that out loud?
	No, I'm kidding.
	Hell no.
	No, I have some ranch work to do.
	I also got to change the oil on my zero turn mower.
	It turns out.
	It's like, yeah, there's a task that's been waiting for a while.
	Got to clean out the chicken cage.
	Yeah, my weekend's not that exciting, actually.
	But I love the lifestyle.
	So you have a good weekend, and I'll be back with you soon.
	All right.
	Welcome, everybody, to this interview today with Jeffrey Prathor, America's intelligence officer.
	His website is jeffreyprather.com.
	And his show, The Prayer Point, airs every Tuesday and Thursday.
	We'll talk about that coming up.
	Welcome, Jeffrey Prayther.
	It's an honor to have you back on, sir.
	Thanks for having me, Mike.
	Good to be back with you.
	It's great to have you back.
	And as always, there are so many things happening in the world that just demand good, honest, high-integrity analysis.
	And I think that's what you bring to the table.
	I just want to mention, you know, you were a whistleblower.
	You were calling out corruption within the government.
	You know, you've, you've worked with the DEA and the DIA and, you know, border operations smuggling, human trafficking, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, you name it.
	And you dared to tell the truth and they went after you for it.
	So that, and now, you know, you're, you're America's intelligence officer.
	You answer to the people, not the establishment.
	Is that a pretty good description?
	Is that fair?
	That's, that's fair and more than fair.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Well, great.
	I just, I just want people to know where you're coming from on this.
	I've known you for years now.
	We've done many, many interviews together.
	And I think history is unfolding now faster than ever and more dangerously than ever.
	And I'd like to start with your analysis of the Venezuela situation.
	Venezuela, I think, has the largest oil reserves in the world or close to it, even perhaps as much as Russia, which is really saying something.
	What do you make of the current posturing of the United States military seemingly wanting to threaten Venezuela, possibly for a decapitation strike?
	Well, Trump has just changed the cartel wars.
	I'm saying that Trump has multiple wars to wage.
	He's got to wage the unrestricted warfare against China, which he's doing through the tariff wars, which I thought he was doing pretty good.
	He's got to wage a war against the deep state, which he's capitulated in, as far as I can see.
	But he's also got the cartel wars.
	Of course, one of the cartels that he declared war on was the Sinaloa cartel, the one I fought and became a whistleblower over.
	But besides hitting now two drug boats, he's actually said that he wants to conduct operations against Venezuela, which is very different than going after the cartels, which he has labeled as terrorist groups.
	Terrorists are non-nation-state entities for the most part, although Qatar today is talking about Israel as a nation-state entity as a terrorist group, but maybe we'll get to that.
	But Trump is now saying he wants to wage war against Venezuela and inside Venezuela.
	And so that is a real change.
	And that is very, very significant.
	That's a totally new inflection point.
	Right.
	And you and I both, I think, share the same concerns over this.
	But, you know, a few months ago, Trump was talking about using military forces on the ground in Mexico to go after the cartels.
	Now talking about it in Venezuela.
	And Jeffrey, I don't think this is about fentanyl.
	I mean, for years, we've been told that China is the one working with Mexican cartels to smuggle fentanyl.
	I think this is about oil.
	I mean, I think it's really about resources.
	And drugs are just the excuse.
	But am I wrong about that?
	Or would you agree with that?
	Or what are your thoughts?
	Well, I am unsure about that.
	Of course, the fentanyl is coming in through the western coast of Mexico from China.
	And fentanyl, I think, is a straight bioweapon masquerading as drugs through Venezuela.
	And I've actually worked Venezuela.
	That's where all the human trafficking is coming through along with drugs.
	So I think this is partly that.
	I mean, we have a lot of oil as well.
	We don't really need Venezuelan oil with Trump going back to opening up American oil fields.
	But having spent a lot of time in Central and South America, I do think that we do need a presence there.
	For the war on terrorism, after 9-11, we basically left Central and South America.
	And now the result is that China influence has returned and the narcos are controlling all the plazas up from South America.
	So it's a bold move, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad move because you have to interdict at the source as well.
	And so in my day, we did that through special forces, Seventh Special Forces.
	My old group is the Latin America group.
	So, for example, they've been all over Central and South America.
	They've had a constant presence in Colombia for a long time.
	And then the Drug Enforcement Administration's snowcap program, which I was a snowcap operator, which is where you went back to a light leaders course, a light ranger course, and then you deployed with host nation military and police counter-drug in Central and South America is a very effective way of doing that because you're filling in the vacuum there that will be filled by the drug cartels.
	So I'm not necessarily seeing this as a bad thing at all.
	This is definitely in our sphere of influence.
	It's definitely overwhelming us with drugs and illegals and terrorists.
	And I'm not so sure it's about oil because I think we have enough oil on our own.
	Yeah, I absolutely understand that.
	But where I was coming from on that is that Trump is attempting to control the international oil trade, for example, threatening India and China for purchasing oil from Russia.
	And I think Trump wants Venezuela to refuse to sell oil to anybody that Trump is sanctioning, which could be charged.
	I mean, it seems like there's an energy chokehold maneuver that Trump is attempting to pull off.
	And I think that's why it might involve Venezuela.
	That's all.
	No, that's certainly a factor, and you can't ignore that factor at all.
	But if he's doing that, then what's going on with Qatar?
	Because that's another, not oil, but natural gas.
	The Qatar offshore natural gas field is an incredible.
	That's why they're so rich when they were nothing before.
	And he seems to have endangered all of that, at least on the surface, although I suspect there's a lot of skullduggery behind just what went on.
	Yeah, I absolutely agree with you on that very point.
	Do you think then that this is going to coalesce into some kind of precision ground action, like Navy SEALs team or something like that, trying to do something in Venezuela?
	And also, you know, what gives Trump ⁇ I mean, we've got to talk about rule of law here.
	You know, under what law, under what international law does America have the right to go in and just conduct military operations without a declaration of war and on foreign soil like that?
	That's a great question.
	And I've seen mistakes in the media talking about this because whether it's overt or not is the government of Venezuela is not controlling, at least overtly, the cartels, the human trafficking cartels and drug cartels that come through there.
	Now, they're paid off.
	They're threatened and everything, just like the government of Mexico as well, but not overtly.
	So Trump up till now has not targeted the government of Venezuela, nor, for example, the government of Mexico.
	That's very different.
	And what he did with the military coming into Mexico, very briefly, was, again, my old group, Southern Special Forces Group, went down there and did a brief training mission.
	Although I'm sure that's being followed up.
	What's unique about that is that had not happened before.
	We were in a lot of countries.
	I was never in Mexico in special forces.
	I was in Guatemala right below it, but not in Mexico.
	I was in Mexico as a Drug Enforcement Administration special agent, but we were still unarmed in my day after Kiki Cameron, although we carried our guns anyway under our shirt.
	So that was a big inflection point of just having the military begin to open that door.
	And this would be another big inflection point of going back into Venezuela.
	We've been in Venezuela before.
	SEALs, SEALs are for raids and snatches.
	So in that regard, coming off of the ships, raiding and hitting drug labs would certainly be a SEAL mission.
	In my day, it was a snow-capped mission with host military and police counter-drug.
	But if you want to really have a long-standing effect, then you want special forces to go in there and do training ops where you mold and change the culture of the military establishment, which I've often said that as America's empire continues to decline, we will look like Venezuela.
	It's not going to be zombies.
	It's going to be Venezuela.
	And what's that look like?
	That means reduced or no middle class, a lot of poverty, a lot of elite.
	The police respond in teams.
	When I was running around Caracas, the police drove around in four or six-man teams because there's armed gangs.
	They actually shot orphan groups running around, you know, kids, orphans that band together as well.
	And we look a lot like Venezuela now.
	So I think this could be a valid effort.
	I'm certainly willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, at least for the moment, on that.
	Yeah, me too.
	I'm curious and wondering where this is going, but I'm also a little bit disturbed or more than a little bit disturbed by the fact that, you know, I mean, let's back up.
	Remember when Hillary Clinton and the Democrats were saying, you know, let's just drone strike Julian Assange or others.
	And basically, the Democrats were saying that anybody we call a terrorist, we could just bomb them and kill them completely outside any due process or rule of law or anything.
	And there was a lot of criticism of that from the right.
	But now MAGA fully embraces that policy.
	that Trump can just say, oh, it's a boat of terrorists.
	And then J.D. Vance celebrates, oh, we blew them up.
	They were trafficking drugs or weapons or whatever they say.
	But then you look at the boat, 11 people were in it.
	Clearly, that's probably not a drug trafficking operation.
	You have 11 people in there.
	Are you concerned about the fact that we could just say, hey, they're terrorists, we blew them up?
	End of story.
	Oh, certainly.
	And having done boat interdictions, 600 kilos of cocaine on a cigarette boat off the coast of Nicaragua, I found both videos very suspicious.
	They just didn't look like drug boats at all.
	And the second one, besides the gunner being a terrible shot, not knowing how to fire a 50 cal very well, it very much looks staged.
	I'll say that.
	But again, I think that was a psyop.
	I think that was part of a psyop to put the cartels on notice and put the government on notice.
	Of course, when that much money is involved, nobody is going to take notice of that.
	So where this goes, we will see.
	But it could be kinetic maritime blockades on the eastern seaboard of South America and on the western seaboard of Central America.
	Primarily, of course, on the Western seaboard blockading, I think this is already happening.
	Chinese ships which bring fentanyl precursors and then the eastern seaboard of South America stopping the human trafficking from coming in.
	What's really noticeable, though, and where the real effect would be, not on these little small boats, but actually going on the container ships where the real amounts are coming in.
	And I don't really see, and that's something the SEALs could do also very well.
	They could fast rope onto those.
	They can get on those.
	They know how to do that.
	But that's a very labor-intensive mission as well, because there's so many containers.
	But they have a lot of good technology, but that's where they really should be focused right now.
	Because right now it almost looks like they just want to eliminate the competition.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And that's a very frequent theme, I think, that we encounter.
	But I remember a few years ago, you may know more details than I'm recalling, but I believe that the bank HSBC was involved in money laundering for drug trafficking.
	And at one point, didn't HSBC own a container ship that was held in a U.S. port somewhere on the East Coast because it was suspected of being a drug trafficking container ship?
	Does that ring a bell?
	That does ring a bell.
	And we've seen JPMorgan Chase with the usual cast of characters.
	And the FTC just hit Pornhub, their parent company, ALO, I believe, for $5 million in 2023.
	They hit them for child trafficking.
	And now they're hitting them for child porn as well, which $5 million is nothing.
	It's a drop in the bucket, but it is a start.
	And so I also see, because warfare is a multi-dimensional endeavor.
	And so I'm hoping that that is coordinated to some degree.
	Well, I mentioned the banks because, you know, like you said, bombing these small boats does seem like a bit of distraction theater when the real bulk of drug trafficking is moving through the big banks, the big boats.
	The big people are being paid off with big money.
	Nothing's stopping that, it seems.
	Nope, it doesn't appear to be.
	And that's what I would love to.
	I would be, if I saw SEALs fast roping on container ships, I'd be a lot more impressed than I see, you know, a .50 caliber raking a little dinghy.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	Okay.
	All right.
	So I guess we'll just have to stay tuned and see what happens in Venezuela and also with Mexico.
	Now, let's talk about Mexico for a second because the president clearly is under the control of the narcos, and she has threatened Trump, saying, you know, if you send troops into Mexico, we will consider that an act of war.
	What do you think is going to happen next with Mexico?
	Well, hypothetically, allegedly, under the previous Trump administration, there just may have been special operations troops, SEALs, and special forces in Mexico.
	Yes.
	Just guessing here.
	And they may have been there with the implicit approval of the government of Mexico.
	So if that were the case, and I highly suspect it to be based upon personal experience and personal sources, then I would think that that could happen again.
	Now, that's not to say, you know, when Seventh went down there for that little exercise, everybody's like, oh, yeah, they're going to get these.
	They thought it was kind of like some kind of movie or something.
	And this is a decade-long fight as you develop the indigenous forces.
	And you got to change the whole culture of plomo oplata, letter silver that exists down there, where you've actually got to build up the Mexican forces so that they're not so corrupt, so they have pensions.
	The Federalists now finally do have pensions.
	I remember I used to do a lot of these conferences, and the last few I was at, you know, they were saying, hey, we used to look like the Sinaloan cowboys.
	We even dressed like them.
	Now we got pensions.
	We're changing.
	So there was an upward movement.
	It's a long fight, but that's how that should be waged.
	Yeah, and talk about the demand side in the U.S. because it seems to me that the obvious place to interdict this is better border security.
	But we have a massive border, a lot of waterways, rivers, and coastline, et cetera, very porous.
	How effective can better border security be?
	Well, now that Trump has brought the military into it and is bringing military JAG, Judge Advocate General attorneys down there, I think it can be a lot more effective.
	And it's really their job.
	It's not posse comitatus to defend the border.
	That's the actual.
	I agree.
	Now, I worked a lot with Joint Task Force 6 back in the day, and it used to be a lot of aggression, more aggressive.
	And things happened.
	There was a Marine patrol down there, and one of them shot a kid on the other side.
	Then there were also some special forces hide sites dug in, LPO listing post, observation post, and somebody published an article saying that the planes are still flying through, which embarrassed customs air back in the day and their Blackhawk interdiction capability.
	So politically, that went away as well.
	And actually, that's how kind of I ended up getting dual credentialed on the war on drugs.
	I was a DEA special agent and DIA and military, you know, and at that time, DOD, CIA, DEA, DOJ, they all wanted a piece of the pie of the drug, of the counter-drug money that was flowing.
	So everybody wanted to do that.
	But DOD found it very hard to prosecute because unless you're really just going to kill them, it's hard.
	Gothic Serpent, which is Black Hawk Down, showed what happens when the military tries and turns into policemen as opposed to killing the enemy and capturing the terrain and destroying their will to fight.
	That was the mission creep in Black Hawk Down.
	So it can be done if it is carefully executed, but it is at least a decade, maybe multi-decade long missions to make it effective.
	It does make sense to do it from the Mexican-American border, Mexican-Arizona, Texas border, and through Venezuela as well.
	Those are two prongs that you would do a pincher movement.
	Makes total sense to me.
	But it remains to be seen, you know, how serious it is.
	I'm not even really disturbed by the images of the small boats because that's psyops.
	But I haven't heard about container ships being searched.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Next question.
	How much has the effort to remove illegal immigrants from America, how much has that also disrupted the illegal drug trade?
	Because I think the White House is claiming there's been a million illegals removed.
	I happen to know because I'm in Texas, there are a lot of self-deportations happening.
	So that number is probably larger than a million.
	It might be 2 million.
	I mean, possibly even larger.
	But what's the impact of this in terms of securing America from the drug trade?
	Well, it's essential.
	So it's the dark economy of the deep state is weapons, drugs, and people.
	They all go together.
	They go through the same plazas.
	They go through the same people.
	The same people that run kids, run drugs, run weapons.
	Fast and Furious proved that guns for drugs.
	That's my whistleblowing days.
	So is it making a difference?
	Certainly, it's making a difference.
	The ratio of it, of the deportations, is disappointing because the massive numbers that Peto Joe and Jose Petos let in under the guise of the DRAMR program and all that other nonsense, we are way behind in those kinds of numbers.
	But are things happening?
	Yeah.
	And is that making a difference?
	Certainly.
	And I said that you would see the cartels are not going to give up territory easily.
	And so we've seen an uptick in domestic cartel violence against law enforcement.
	And it would be labeled that is criminal elements as opposed to Trump's war.
	So where the cartels are clearly identified in American cities, then I could foresee that you'd have federal task forces, unfortunately, with the FBI in there.
	And we've already seen that in DC.
	And it looks like that's going to be a model that's going to go out to other cities.
	And so because a lot of that resistance is cartel subterfuge, because they don't want their logistics transshipment points interrupted.
	And they're going to fight and kill for those.
	But really, that's the drug war happening.
	That's not just cops getting shot by criminals.
	That's cartel terrorists shooting to maintain their, because if you shoot enough cops in that area, then they back off.
	That's what you've seen in Tucson, for example, for a long time, because they want that line through New Gallus to Tucson to Phoenix.
	And then from there, you can go west to Los Angeles or east to Detroit, St. Louis, New York.
	Yeah, Tucson's really changed since the days that I lived there.
	And bad.
	I mean, the last time I checked, TPD was losing like four officers a month.
	They're down like 800.
	They said a while back that, you know, if you call 911, you may get a recording.
	I personally saw cops sitting in graveyards and stuff because they were just riding it out to retirement because they knew they weren't going to get backed up on anything.
	So that's crazy.
	When I lived in Tucson, I was a board member of the Tucson Police Foundation.
	And that was when the chief of police was, I'm not making this up.
	It was Miranda.
	Like, that was his name.
	He was terrible.
	I remember.
	You remember him?
	Yeah.
	So even then, they were short staffed.
	And I remember them saying they were 300 officers short to be able to police the city with all the vacations and the shift changes.
	And now it's far worse.
	Okay.
	Let's shift gears.
	I want to shift gears to the Middle East unless there's anything else you want to add to the South American question.
	No, but I well, that was my area I worked.
	I think I did a lot of good work there.
	I think we need a presence there.
	The presence, the special forces presence was to, and at least in my day, was to make the host country military and police more ethical.
	That is, don't just trample on the people, help them.
	In Honduras in Central America, we did a ton of med readies, medical readiness training missions where we'd go into a village and we'd deworm, and there were vets and dentists.
	I actually got to pull teeth.
	And as we did that across the country, we got waves.
	And the military who are usually looked on as tyrants in those countries, that changed.
	Of course, after 9-11, everybody pulled out.
	Everybody goes to the Middle East and the vacuum was filled by the drug cartels and by the Chinese.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Okay.
	Let's pivot to the Middle East.
	Just recently, of course, shocking the world and earning massive widespread condemnation, Israel bombed Qatar or Qatar.
	People pronounce it different ways.
	How do you pronounce it, Jeffrey?
	Qatar.
	Qatar.
	Okay.
	Well, you and I are the same then.
	So apparently, there was supposed to be a negotiation with Hamas negotiators.
	Trump had tweeted out and really encouraged them to negotiate.
	And then, just like with Iran, then the negotiators are, well, there was an attempt to murder them.
	And importantly, Israel clearly Israel had cleared airspace through numerous countries.
	The U.S. military obviously stood down its air defenses, which brings up many questions about Gulf nations.
	And then Qatar was bombed.
	Qatar has denounced it.
	Trump has even tried to distance himself a little bit from Netanyahu, not that much.
	But of course, China and even, heck, even Kirstarmer in the UK denounced the attack.
	And that's saying something.
	The Saudis have denounced it, etc.
	What's your take on this incident?
	Well, this is very consistent with Israel's seeking a greater Israel to build the third temple to install their false messiah.
	They bombed Lebanon, they bombed Yemen, they bombed Syria, and they bombed Qatar.
	But the bombing of and the Syrian bombing, I think, was Turkish weapons.
	So they didn't bomb Turkey yet, but they are clearly continuing to be very aggressive.
	But I do see this as very different than the Gaza genocide that you and I have both stood for and called out.
	This is not the Gazans inside their civilians.
	This is their external negotiating force, which, and I think only one of them was really killed, Al-Haya.
	I think one of them was a Qatari security official, probably the security official assigned to that group.
	But their precision strike didn't seem to get all of them.
	But this is not like the gunning down of and starving of the Gazan civilians.
	This is the affluent outside of Gaza, so-called negotiating team that was not willing to move forward with really anything.
	So I think that Trump gave them a warning through Israel.
	Hey, you guys need to negotiate.
	But the Hamas, the outside Hamas team said their directions back to inside Gaza is don't surrender because Gaza has always been this foil for the Muslim world against Israel.
	Both Israel has wanted it and the Muslim world have used them for that.
	They could easily have enrolled them into Saudi Arabia anytime.
	They're tribalist, so they don't fit in anywhere.
	Nobody really wants them, but everybody wants to use them.
	But it's not the same thing as the military murder of civilians in Gaza.
	It is a strike against the negotiating team that wasn't really negotiating.
	So I'm not sure that Israel gave Trump exact notice ahead of time.
	They may have just said, we're going to hit.
	Or they may have called, as they're saying, 10 minutes before.
	But then Trump has already been caught in a lie saying that he had, I can't think of the guy's name, the negotiator, the U.S. negotiator, liaison to the Hamas group.
	Was it Witkoff or someone else?
	Witkoff.
	Yeah, I think it's Witkoff that he then called Qatar.
	And then so Qatar could then alert them.
	But the Qatari prime minister, the Sheikh, has come out and said that is a lie.
	He's actually called Trump a liar that they got the word at 10 minutes, exactly 10 minutes afterwards.
	After, yeah.
	So that's very, very significant.
	Now, but he may be lying too.
	He may, because I've also heard that they were overstaying their welcome as well there.
	But this is, Jeffrey, it's very hard to see what's really going on here.
	Yeah, clearly.
	Well, it's the Middle East.
	But this is the second time now that Trump has lined up so-called negotiators to be bombed.
	The previous one in June with Iran.
	And in each case, Trump would publicly encourage them, you must come to the table.
	You must negotiate.
	We're going to find peace.
	We're going to have a peace deal.
	And clearly, you don't reach peace by murdering the negotiators.
	You know, diplomatically, well, I like your take on this, but I think this is very dangerous to America's reputation in situations far outside of this, like Russia or China, because who could trust America to ever negotiate in good faith after these two incidents?
	Oh, no doubt.
	And we've had the same thing under Obama, where Obama would betray everyone as well.
	Peto Joe, Jose Petos, actually did some moving forward of things with Qatar.
	And that's a dangerous game to play as well.
	But it's clear that Trump is totally captured by Israel and Netanyahu and are doing just whatever they want done or just responding to it.
	We know he clearly buys Israeli intelligence more than he buys American intelligence, which is too bad because one of the few cabinet members who really seem to be doing anything is Gabbard, exposing what she can.
	I've actually been impressed lately with what she's trying to bring about.
	But Trump is clearly captured, and this weakens not only his standing in the Middle East, but domestically as well.
	It splits his base from the American Christian Zionists and do whatever Israel wants to the real America firsters who really see through the facade of Israeli Zionism happening.
	But it's not the same thing as the murder of innocents in Gaza by any means.
	And all parties may have been informed, including the Qataris.
	But clearly, El Adid, I think it is, a military base, that large military base, our largest in the area, stood down on that.
	We were certainly aware of that.
	There was coordination ahead of time.
	The UAE president has flown into Qatar.
	But if we look at it, this is all about resources as well.
	And this is all about, you know, because war is really fighting over stuff.
	I want your stuff or I want your woman or I want your kids or I want your stuff.
	This is about, as far as Qatar goes in that area, this is the natural gas field right off their coast underwater there.
	And for that seaway to remain open and American ally customers, and I think Trump has really endangered that.
	And I can really see Qatar turning to Russia, who would be happy to get all that liquefied natural gas from Qatar as well.
	Right now, it's going to Japan.
	It's going to South Korea.
	It's going to American allies.
	But for Trump, who usually looks at logistics and resources very closely and understands that, like he did with the Panama Canal, which I think he did a great effort with the Panama Canal, getting the ununiformed Chinese troops neutralizing them on the canal.
	And I got a lot of time there as well.
	It seems that he's overlooked that completely here.
	And I don't understand why, except that he is totally captured by Israel.
	Right, right.
	Well, clearly that's the case.
	But you said something there I want to check back with you.
	Why would Russia want to buy LNG from Qatar when Russia's got so much of its own?
	I didn't follow that.
	Well, so they don't really need it, but they don't want America and their enemies to have it.
	So a lot of it's also going to, I believe, yeah, to European allies as well.
	Absolutely.
	Zhe and Putin just came out and condemned Israel for this.
	So Trump has, rightfully so, started the tariff war against China's unrestricted 20-year warfare.
	And he is wrongly, you know, in my view, seeing Russia as an enemy for defending itself against the genetic weaponry launched through the bio labs that Obama set up.
	But regardless, Putin's been collecting resources for a long time, building that.
	And China has begun to side with Russia as well because Russia is, of course, winning, was winning, is winning, will win Ukraine.
	I've said that forever.
	And so Trump is really, it looks to me where he's usually pretty smart about this, is really isolating himself across the world for Israel, who betrays him anyway and marginalizes him whenever they can.
	It may be that he did convert to Judaism, as the rumors say in the future.
	Well, I am very concerned about the implications for the economic futures of the American people because of Trump's complicity with Israel, going along with Israel.
	Now, there are repercussions here that are very real for Americans.
	And like you said, America is becoming Venezuela.
	The middle class is being wiped out.
	And that traces back directly to the fact that fewer and fewer countries are willing to buy U.S. Treasury debt.
	So because of that, then we have to print more of our own money through the Fed to buy our own treasuries, which then increases the money supply, causes more inflation, causes food to go up.
	The government's statistics of the CPI is the CP lie.
	It's not 2.7% inflation.
	You know, it's, come on, it's 20% inflation for anybody who buys food or buys health insurance or car insurance or home insurance, right?
	But it's directly tied to our support for Israel, actually.
	So there's an economic cost to the American people, the impoverishment of America, while the average Israeli citizen gets about $300,000 in assistance from the United States per year because of the overall aggregate support that we provide Israel.
	So Israelis have free health care while the American people are losing their homes and being impoverished because of Trump's complicity with Israel and his blindness to Israel's war crimes and genocide.
	And don't forget, there's a lot of governments collapsed.
	Japan just went through another prime minister.
	France, the same.
	Nepal is burning their former government officials alive.
	But I think it all goes back really to the deep state, the double government, which I call the intelligence community, the Praetorian Guard in America, running the scenes behind the scenes, pulling the strings of the puppet masters.
	And they are in league with the Global Cabal.
	And part of the Global Cabal is the intelligence structure in Israel, the Mossad.
	And we also can't, you know, cannot forget that this is September 11th, tomorrow.
	So I think there's a lot to be said about that as well.
	And so Trump may be getting, I think Mossad has definitely infiltrated our intelligence community as well, not Gabbard, but that's a fight where the CIA is really coming after Gabbard, which is a good fight that's good to see.
	The DNI, the Director of National Intelligence, the ODNI, the Office of Director of National Intelligence was taken away from the CIA because they were so corrupt, given to somebody from the military at Bowling Air Force Base.
	He used to visit that all the time.
	But the CIA has been really pushing back and taking over.
	Averil, the former head, is increasing CIA control as well.
	And so probably CIA and Mossad influence is aligned while DIA is not.
	And remember, there was the DIA analyst who said that the one-time strike would not take out the Iran nuclear capacity.
	I agreed with that.
	I concurred with that.
	And that has since been proven correct as well.
	Just like they didn't take out all of the negotiating team.
	And they never want to really finish the job.
	Of course, they need this.
	They need the war.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	And let me also remind our audience of an additional economic consequence, which is that the leaders of Qatar had promised $1.5 trillion in investment in the United States.
	And Trump, of course, celebrated that.
	Trump seems to be going all over the world and demanding everybody pay tribute to the U.S. or else you'll be punished with tariffs, et cetera.
	And these countries, even Japan and SoftBank out of Japan has pledged, what was it, like half a trillion dollars.
	I mean, these trillions, this is a substantial sum of investment in the United States.
	A lot of it's to build data centers, for example.
	Well, is Qatar now going to pull out and say, you know, screw you.
	You didn't even defend our airspace, which was the whole point of having the military base in our country.
	If you can't defend our airspace, why are you even here?
	Why are we giving you money?
	Isn't that question coming up in everybody's mind?
	The airspace and the airplane that they just gave him as number one is going to become mimetic weaponization warfare number one, I think, in coming weeks.
	And again, I just think that Mossad is continuing to contort and minimalize Trump, and he just is either somehow extorted or blind to it, because all he's doing is damage.
	I talk to people all the time is, hey, I was a Trump supporter.
	No more.
	And why are we doing this for Israel?
	I'm seeing conversations between young believers who are respectfully arguing with their parents as why are we kowtowing to Israel?
	Israel is not the chosen people anymore.
	The Vineyard parable makes that very clear.
	But they've been taught that by their American Christian Zionist pastors, and they still buy it.
	The elders do.
	So that also seems to be the deep state's other plan here is to minimize and marginalize Trump.
	And it is certainly working.
	The only thing I can say is, well, RFK is not perfect by any means.
	I really got to say, I liked him up on Capitol Hill, you know, fighting alone, standing alone and telling the truth, because if nothing else, it really showed the American people that 95 to 98% of them up there are traitors and liars and they are big pharma whores.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And since you brought up some of the Christian Zionist brainwashing, I tweeted out something, and I don't mean this in a derogatory way to all boomers, but I said many boomers believe two things, that, number one, that vaccines can do no harm and that Israel can do no wrong.
	And both of those are just blatantly false.
	But these have been persistent delusions that are believed without question by a very large number of people, including many senators, who, frankly, big pharma wouldn't even have to give Bernie Sanders tens of millions of dollars.
	He's so pro-vaccine anyway.
	That's his brainwashing.
	But go ahead.
	Yeah, you're responsible.
	This also fulfills the deep state mission of it was Iran.
	Remember, let's go back to Butler, which has never been solved and never will be because the FBI is the cleanup team for the covert operations and they no longer have a rally point like the Twin Towers going down.
	Remember, since it's tomorrow, the Twin Towers went down.
	They even had it on the patch on the TSA.
	They took it off the patch because that was a rallying point for all Americans.
	Now, but they learn from their mistakes.
	So there is no rallying point.
	It just kind of fades into obscurity as the FBI sits on everything as well.
	But this really sits with the deep state mission of controlling the country because Trump was extremely popular.
	And this is the, remember, I said three wars, cartel war, tariff war, deep state war, fight in two, captured in one.
	And it makes total sense to me anyway, because with the Butler plot, you know, Crooks was somehow an Iranian agent with encrypted accounts all over the place.
	And so it takes the heat off of them so that they can continue to do what they've been doing.
	That, I think, is the domestic deep state motive for all this.
	I've already elaborated on Israel's greater Israel, one world messiah motive, and those two purposes align very nicely.
	There's far too much violence in our world, and it continues to be carried out for political purposes, all kinds of acts of terrorism.
	I do want to acknowledge that, although we don't have all the details that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck just moments before you and I started recording, Jeffrey, reportedly now he's in critical condition in the hospital.
	I have a photo freeze frame from the video that was taken.
	It looks like a handgun shot, but a front of the neck entry, like almost dead center.
	That is not looking good.
	I want to just pray for Charlie Kirk to be safe and denounce the violence.
	But Jeffrey, how is this indicative of the U.S. collapsing into Venezuela?
	We've got people shooting speakers on college campuses now.
	Well, certainly prayers.
	I'm glad you brought that up.
	Prayers for Charlie Kirk and his family.
	But I don't believe in coincidences and timing is everything and continuing to build a cascade of crisis in here.
	What benefits out of all this is the deep state, the federal government, then continues to grow.
	And I wouldn't be surprised if we hear something about Hamas associated with this.
	I saw a story where Trump was at dinner in D.C. and they said Hamas group is closing and Secret Service lets them close and doesn't do their job.
	And it was Code Pink.
	Code Pink is ridiculous and irritating, but it's hardly a Hamas terrorist group.
	But the implication of the story is what you want to see happening.
	And so I think this is continuing to build to bring more religious war in America.
	I've taken a lot of flack from a lot of listeners because I've called out Israel.
	And I try and go over and explain things to them.
	But I think that's the real purpose is, again, religious war in America, divide Jew, Christian, and Muslim against each other because the racist war really kind of failed, didn't take off like it did in South Africa.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But I'm glad you're calling it out because you're a man of principles, and I share many of those principles with you.
	And yeah, I've taken a lot of heat too, especially when I say things like, you know, hey, if you think Jesus is going to come out of the sky and lift you up and praise you for supporting the mass bombing of women and children and doctors, then you need to go back and reread the Bible.
	Start on page one.
	I concur with you, brother.
	The same thing with the rapture is they think they're going to be taken away.
	If you read it closely, it's the other way around.
	Yeah, well, I don't even buy into the rapture narrative as it is promoted.
	As is promoted, it's completely wrong.
	But Jeshua says, it will be as in the days of Noah.
	Well, who gets swept away?
	But everybody else, we got to remain.
	The good have to endure and the bad are taken away.
	But that's not how, again, all the good news preachers and prosperity gospel liars and Christmongers get your hot Jesus sell it.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So, Jeffrey, we've covered some interesting topics here, very important topics, but I want to give out your website, jeffreyprather.com.
	Jeffrey is spelled J-E-F-F-R-E-Y.
	Don't forget the E, jeffreyprather.com.
	Tell us about your show, Prayer Point, and what you cover.
	It's every Tuesday and Thursday, 1 p.m. Central Time.
	And then because I was a whistleblower on Fast and Furious, and because I worked on the Contra thing, I expose government cover-ups quite a bit.
	And so I give an insider's perspective because I was really deeply inside all of those organizations and unaware of a lot of the bad stuff back in the day.
	And I have a lot of guests like that.
	I have a lot of heroes, guys I've worked with, you know, Ed Morales, the hero of the Miami gunfight, is an old friend of mine.
	He did undercover for me.
	We're both firearms instructors.
	You know, fascinating interviews.
	Had the Green Berets horse soldiers on.
	You see the bottle back there signed by Sergeant Major Vince McKella.
	Fascinating heroes, not killing a lot of people, but overthrowing the Taliban government within months.
	And then we were done.
	We could have left.
	And just giving an alternative perspective, really, of what the mainstream news media is telling you because it's all lies.
	That's why you got to listen to Mike and me and others to get the truth.
	Absolutely.
	100%.
	Well, Jeffrey, I also want to mention that every interview I've ever done with you has become part of the training of our AI engine, Enoch, which, of course, refers to hidden knowledge.
	So it's a perfect name.
	But you've influenced the model and it's becoming very popular among people who want truth from AI.
	So folks may find that.
	Yeah, Brighteon.ai.
	I've seen some of them.
	I've seen my cartoon image of me.
	I look pretty good.
	Well, our model doesn't do images, but all of your text, everything that you've ever said in our interviews has been trained into the model.
	So you can even use it.
	You can ask it about something that you and I spoke about and/or an analysis.
	It's very good.
	It's at brighteon.ai.
	It's free to use.
	So feel free to check that out.
	And Jeffrey, oh, I also want to mention: don't you have how do people financially support you?
	Isn't that a patreon.com/slash JeffreyPrayther is where you can find all my proofs, all my intelligence analysis, and daily training videos at the Point Patriot level, $25 a month.
	And I do daily training videos.
	I actually have students nationwide where I teach handgun martial arts.
	I teach Bujinkan martial arts as well and talk about everything from horsemanship to swordsmanship and do breakdowns.
	And yeah, in fact, I'm doing a class tonight, a live class tonight.
	That's what I love about you because you master skills, you teach them.
	And these are all the skills that I like also.
	It's like, you know, firearms and swords, martial arts.
	I'm not a horseman.
	I have a ranch buggy instead.
	I use a diesel engine.
	I wish I were a horseman.
	I don't have those skills.
	So I'm a little bit envious of your horsemanship.
	Horses, they're so spiritual.
	A four-legged, side-eyed prey letting a two-legged, front-eyed predator on their backs is a spiritual connection.
	So that's natural native horsemanship.
	It's very cool stuff.
	Wow.
	100%.
	Okay.
	Well, thank you, Jeffrey.
	It's always an honor to have you on.
	Thank you for your analysis.
	God bless you and take care.
	God bless Mike.
	Thank you.
	All right.
	Thank you for listening, folks.
	You can catch more interviews at brightion.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, and thank you for listening today.
	God bless you all.
	And prayers for Charlie Kirk, whatever the outcome may be for him and his family.
	Thanks for listening.
	Like the towers, a republic is fallen, but the revolution to rescue it has begun.
	How do we do it?
	Not with demonic Democrats and Republican rats.
	Not with CIA, FBI, and State Department who murder and rape children and import fellow cartel and Taliban pedoes to do the same.
	Instead, look to those who did and died, who served and sacrificed.
	Remember NYFD Chief Palmer and Fire Marshal Bucha, who understood the danger, ran into the towers and died there so that others may live.
	Remember Tom Burnett, Mark Bingham, Todd Beamer, and Jeremy Glick, who gathered intel, made a plan, said the Lord's Prayer, then shouted their war cry.
	Let's roll and counterattacked on Flight 93.
	Remember Jeremy's mother-in-law, who told his wife Liz, make him brave.
	Remember Liz telling him, you are brave.
	You are strong.
	You should do this.
	Then having sent her husband to her death, went into the bathroom to throw up.
	Remember Rick Ruscola, Britt, that American paratrooper, survivor of the Ayatrang battle, who predicted the 9-11 air attack, evacuated almost as many as were lost, then died going back in to save more.
	Remember the firefighters who responded unasked nationwide and sacrificed their health and lives, rescuing the living and recovering the dead.
	Remember real Avengers, ODAs 595 and 555, who inserted deep behind enemy lines in Afghanistan with no QRF and overthrew the Taliban government within weeks.
	Resist, rebel, refuse, and revolt.
	The traitors and all of their rules and ruses emulate our heroes, dead and alive.
	The way is hard, but true, and so must we become.
	I'm a retired SOCOM soldier, former DIA intelligence collector, and ex-DEA special agent, targeted by the deep state, turned whistleblower warrior, served and sabotaged, rejected and redeemed, failed and forgiven, betrayed and saved, rejecting revenge, humbled and blessed, repurposed in redemption as chaplain, leader, teacher, and truth teller.
	Now, America's intelligence officer, following God, leading my family, and any that choose to join on our long trail of tears walk to freedom and faith.
	Welcome.
	I'm Jeff Prather, and this is the Prater point.
	We are way past condolences and condemnations.
	We say we are one nation, but we're not.
	We are two very different peoples.
	They call us racist, bigots, sexists, fascists, and their favorite threat to democracy.
	Not to debate, but to label, to demean and dehumanize, because it's always easier to kill when you dehumanize those you want to murder.
	Charlie Kirk is dead because the left couldn't bear the thought of a peaceful man debating them and winning.
	But murdering Charlie is going to be remembered as his greatest turning point.
	The day where America finally woke up to what this fight really is.
	It's not a civil dispute among fellow countrymen.
	It's a zero-sum war between diametrically opposed worldviews, which cannot peaceably coexist together.
	One side will win and one side will lose.
	Charlie tried to win that fight debate through discussion, through peaceful resolution of differences, and the other side murdered him.
	Not because he was extreme or inciting violence or any other hyperbolic slur they throw at him.
	They murdered him because he was effective, because he was unafraid, because he inspired others and made them feel like they had a voice, that they were not alone.
	And he did it at the very institutions which have fomented so much hatred towards conservatives.
	Don't stand in solidarity with the other side of the aisle.
	Defeat them.
	Defeat the Satanists whose sacrament is the killing of babies in the womb and raping of children, turning cities into cesspools, and that murdered Charlie Kirk.
	Social media is aflame right now with leftist celebrations of Charlie's death, but the left does not understand what has just happened because they ignore scripture, fallen human nature, and history.
	They have no morals, so they lack a Yamamoto.
	They are neither geniuses nor Goliaths.
	They are just failures with father wounds, and they don't realize they have awakened a slumbering David and filled us with terrible resolve.
	Courtesy of Nick Freitas, First Special Forces Group, 18 Bravo, and my old friend Kirk Wald.
	Lots to cover today.
	Very special guest coming on, Mike Adams.
	It's great to be with us.
	I see Stay Brood there.
	I'm not putting up advertisements today out of respect for 9-11, but I certainly do recommend staybrood.com, teamamerica.com as well.
	So what we're going to be talking about today, Mike Adams is going to be on to talk about the Charlie Kirk assassinations and 9-11 and how they are all tied in.
	And highlights are, and I'm putting a lot, I'm just blasting stuff out on Patreon as fast as I can and on locals, the bodyguards hand signals.
	Those are obviously clear hand signals.
	I'm very familiar with them, classic hand signals.
	The decoy shooter that was arrested, very familiar with that.
	The tranny engraved rounds that were found with yet another Mauser.
	If you don't know, Oswald's rifle was initially labeled a Mauser.
	It was actually a manliker, but Mausers have been used to kill many heads of state from Yugoslavia to Spain.
	And Charlie had doubted October 7th already because he had been on that border and like General Flynn said, you know, there's a IDFer within AR-15.
	Actually, he met M16 every 15 feet.
	And his Israel point of view was turning as well.
	If you can listen to his conversations with Megan Kelly, they were starting to question the American Christian Zionist narrative.
	And that cannot be tolerated.
	Just like I have been besieged lately by pro-Zionist forces from the young nationally syndicated columnist who would not respond.
	And he said, Oh, I liked your interview with Kirk, if you recall.
	But Kirk didn't come on that day.
	So he was prepped.
	Just like in the old days when Jared Armitage came after me with the MSPB document pretending it was a court document, you can never find that stuff unless someone has given it to you.
	Who gives it to you?
	The government gives it to you.
	And also, Latin Fall Day, there was a private jet that came into right before the shooting, left right after, and turned off its transponder.
	Very much like Uvalde.
	Remember, I showed that video of the two guys watching the Ovalde shooter Ramos go into the school.
	And so the tranny is a distraction for that as well.
	And like Crooks, the killer was tracked for an hour on the roof.
	And then afterwards, they see him escaping.
	They see where he's going.
	They've got the rifle.
	They've got the tranny engraved bullets.
	The only thing they don't have is the shooter.
	And why not?
	Because the FBI is yet again on the case.
	And the FBI is going to obfuscate and cover up for the shooter because they are in on it as well.
	But again, and I'll get into all those details as I talk with Mike Adams.
	And I just did an interview with him yesterday.
	So I've been asking to get him on.
	So he generously said he would come on today.
	And I'm going to be on with Sean of SGT talking about this on Friday.
	And then, of course, I will be in Iowa.
	I will be speaking in Iowa on Saturday as well.
	I am not going to be silenced because that is the point of real sniping.
	Sniping is a force multiplier.
	It's a psychological operation where you kill one person, but then you scare 200.
	It's really terrorism.
	It's really to oppress you.
	To literally, oppress means to bend down.
	That is to get your head down so you are not next.
	And so that's the real psyop.
	That's the real force multiplication value of sniping.
	And that's the idea here.
	Charlie could have been hit anywhere.
	He could have been hit at home.
	He could have been hit at the grocery store.
	That was not the purpose of this hit.
	The purpose of this hit was a high-profile hit, just like JFK, meaning we can reach out and touch you.
	And that's very interesting too.
	But the reaction is not going to be what they expected because they don't study history.
	They don't understand fallen human nature.
	They believe in human secularism and communism and socialism, which does not follow human nature.
	So this is going to build the resistance.
	This is going to be Charlie's biggest turning point ever.
	This is going to consolidate those who have been on the fence.
	And this is the Christic protocol that we have learned.
	The Romans thought that they would wrap up with Yeshua with just one more crucifixion, but they did not.
	And the same thing is going to happen here on the very college campuses.
	So prayers for Charlie Kirk, his family, his poor wife, and little kids.
	But this is his greatest turning point, and people are going to really begin to pay attention to that.
	But it's not just the left, and it's certainly not the trannies.
	All signals, all indications, and there's a lot of intelligence information indications, and there's a lot of evidence indicating this goes back to Israel.
	And that is because, again, Charlie was questioning the Israeli narrative.
	He's been going along with that.
	And I just posted on my Substack there today that he had a recent conversation with Megan Kelly where he was doubting the Israeli narrative as she was because they were being criticized for daring to think outside the box.
	And if you combine that with Tucker Carlson's recent Pierce Morgan interview, there you see the resistance building.
	So there are liberty luminaries who are really telling the truth.
	You know, Alex Jones, me, Mike Adams.
	And then slowly that seeps over to other mainstream folks like Tucker Carlson, who then have been kicked off as well, or Glenn Beck.
	And then they are turned around, they're interviewed by guys like Pierce Morgan, who are CNN died in the Wool Liberals, and they start to understand what is going on.
	And so that's how we are waging this fourth generation resistance movement against the fifth generation democide.
	And of course, I'm never advocating anything illegal, immoral, unethical, or violent, although the left does continually, blatantly and openly.
	And there were guys in the crowd that were cheering.
	There were people coming to the prayer session that night.
	A guy drove up in a truck.
	and said, frack Charlie Kirk.
	And unfortunately, the crowd took the bait.
	And that's a huge mistake that the crowd took that bait.
	I teach that to my young martial arts students.
	I push the young guys.
	And then as they come back in, I'm like, who's controlling this fight?
	First, they say, I am.
	And I'm like, nope.
	And they go, oh, you are.
	Yeah, because you're reacting.
	You're coming right back into my fight.
	And then I say, now push me.
	When they push me, I let them push me.
	I walk away.
	I go into a bathroom.
	I spread soap on the floor.
	I pick up the garbage can.
	When they come in from the bright light into the darkness, their eyes haven't adjusted.
	They slip on the soap.
	I would hit them with the garbage can.
	I don't really hit them with the garbage can.
	I explained what I would do to them.
	And then I would quietly leave them in the bathroom.
	And then I would leave.
	So I would not be connected with it.
	And nobody saw anything.
	That's fighting on your terms.
	But responding to the push is simply fighting on their terms.
	And that's not what we want to do ever.
	But unfortunately, they were easily goaded into this.
	People still don't understand that it's a mental fight first.
	Just like Sun Tzu says, you want to defeat your, if you know yourself and your enemy, you'll never be defeated.
	And you defeat the enemy before you ever meet them.
	They're still falling for this over and over.
	And so we've got to get past that.
	But it's pretty funny because there's an internal ATF email that has linked showing they've got the weapon, which is like a Mauser.
	They've got engraved bullets with pro-tranny stuff on there, but they don't have the shooter.
	Well, why not?
	Because the FBI, again, obfuscated and let them go.
	They've got this jet that came in and left.
	So this is planted disinformation.
	I'm very, very certain of that.
	I'm also very, very certain about the shooting.
	This was precision shooting.
	This isn't like the incompetents who have been set up on Trump at all.
	This shot cut the subcarotid artery, and you should watch it.
	You should see what real violence looks like and may have gone and cut the spine if the angle's right.
	And coming down, going down the spinal cord, I'm pretty sure he was dead immediately.
	And that's very sophisticated shooting because my sources say he was wearing a vest.
	But there were signals from the audience that are very obvious.
	So this is totally a professional hit.
	It looks like it's setting up the trannies and the left, but it really all indications really go towards Israel and Mossad because Israel is now bombing 360 targets in Gaza.
	There was also Colorado shooting as well.
	But let's find out what my good friend and guest Mike Adams has to say about this because I'm sure he's got some new stuff that I haven't gotten yet on it.
	So Mike, thank you so much for making time and coming on.
	Thank you, Jeffrey.
	It's an honor to join you and thanks for having me on.
	It's a solemn day, though.
	I was really rattled.
	I'm very saddened.
	And I want to offer prayers to the surviving family members of Charlie Kirk and all those who are impacted by this act of violence.
	Amen, brother.
	I am right there with you and we both post our sermons and believe in Yeshua, but the other side clearly does not.
	They don't want to debate.
	They just want to kill.
	It's about democide.
	But I hope you heard what I was summarizing there.
	There was a jet that came in and left, turned off its transponder.
	They've got a weapon.
	They've got engraved bullets.
	They've got video for an hour beforehand, just like Kirk.
	They just don't have the shooter.
	This looks like a total setup to me.
	And all indications also point to Israel because Charlie had already questioned the October 7th narrative because he'd been on the border and he was starting to question the Israeli narrative with Megan Kelly, just like Tucker had convinced, I think, Pierce Morgan recently in his documentary interview.
	What do you say?
	So that's clearly that's one of the dominant theories that somehow Mossad is setting up trans violence as the fall guy, so to speak, or the fall girl, whatever, the fall trans, the Patsy for this, right?
	The Lee Harvey Oswald of this.
	That's a theory.
	We don't know yet.
	But I heard some of what you said.
	And I love the fact that I can talk with you about ballistics, you know, because you're incredibly accomplished, accomplished with firearms and firearms training.
	I'm an accomplished long-range rifle shooter on steel targets.
	And so we can talk about these things.
	And I want to ask you, did you see the frame by frame showing that, you know, clearly Charlie Kirk was wearing a chest plate?
	I don't know the ballistics level of protection of that plate, but that plate got rocked.
	That plate heaved up.
	And there's some people who believe that perhaps the top of into his neck.
	That seems like something we should consider because the plate, it's very clear the plate was struck and there's only one round fired.
	And have you seen that, Jeffrey?
	The plate?
	I haven't seen that.
	I've heard that explanation, but I haven't seen the plate move.
	I did have sources that were saying that he was plated up.
	Clearly, he's clearly wearing, it had the, you know, the typical plate cut.
	I mean, you can see the shape of it.
	But as you know, Jeffrey, a lot of people wear those chest plates too low.
	There's a tendency to wear them too low.
	Like you really want them hiked up, almost like you're choking on it because obviously you have a lot of vital.
	Yeah, you want it right about here.
	That's right.
	You just want to be able to bend.
	You still got to be able to bend your head.
	But yeah, a lot of people wear them way too low.
	Absolutely.
	And I was taught this by the special forces guys that I trained with.
	They're like, ah, your plate's too low.
	You're just going to get shot in the throat.
	They don't hold back.
	So is it possible that the shooter wasn't as skilled as we thought?
	That that shooter was aiming center mass and actually didn't do a great job of that.
	It went a little bit high and it hit the top of the plate and then ricocheted into his neck.
	That's just a scenario that we should consider.
	No, it's certainly possible.
	A couple of things it would have to be.
	It could not be the new polycarboard plates like that I use that float and are less than three pounds, because even at the lip of those things, they will catch the bullet.
	It's got to be a metal plate.
	It's probably a metal plate, not a ceramic plate.
	Yep.
	Slightly an old-time military metal plate that would then frange that round up.
	Exactly.
	But I didn't see why I kind of doubt that is because I don't see any splatter behind him for that.
	And people have talked about that.
	It would be key to actually look at the plate, obviously, and then we would know if that's ever made available to us.
	I'm sure the plate is part of the FBI's evidence right now.
	Yes.
	And I am just exasperated.
	Why do everybody, does everybody keep deferring to the FBI?
	Because they never do anything except obfuscate and cover up.
	And this is a murder.
	It's a political murder.
	It's an assassination, but I don't see where the FBI has any real jurisdiction here.
	Well, and the other thing, I agree with you on this point.
	And I'm very suspicious of the discovery of this rifle that is supposed to have anti- or trans violence inscriptions on some rifle rounds.
	Because if you're a shooter and you have a bolt action rifle, you know you only have one shot.
	Why would you put inscriptions on the other rounds if you plan to escape?
	Now, this is clearly disinformation.
	This is clearly a planned release.
	There's no doubt.
	Looks like it.
	I assess this is highly, highly probable that this was released purposefully.
	And I'm sorry to hear Crowder falling for this and publicizing it.
	But they think they're breaking something, but I don't buy any of it.
	But to get back to the ballistics, because you are a long-range shooter, we're both shooters, is I've heard that theory.
	And again, when bullets hit, they do all kinds of weird stuff.
	For example, in my five-day pre-deployment class that we did for over 250 times and there were units, 250 units, not individuals.
	And we had government contracts with every military branch, including the Coast Guard, all the intelligence agencies.
	We put like 21,000 people through those courses.
	We did a ballistics demonstration on concrete, on wood, on cars, on cinder blocks, so they'd see what the rounds would do because the movies show that you get these sparkings off cars and stuff.
	So, you know, one time a round came back and lodged under a guy's arm, even though, and we've done this hundreds of times.
	Bullets do all kinds of crazy things.
	Oh, yeah.
	It's very difficult to predict.
	But what I saw was precision shooting that looks like it hit the karate on a downward trajectory to maybe cut the spine, cut the heart, and then go downward and do the most damage through the torso, you know, almost vertically, diagonally, which is an ideal.
	That's better than shooting somebody perpendicularly.
	A lot of people don't realize that, but it's a lot better to shoot them because you're going down through the whole body.
	And one reason I, so that I think could also account for the plate movement as well.
	It could.
	And also, also then fits the lack of blood spatter.
	So to me, that combined with the guy's exit out of there.
	But also, we haven't even talked about the bodyguards' hand signals, which were clear.
	I have no idea that the guys were given hand signals.
	Before presses his ear, another guy touches his arm.
	Those are classics.
	If you don't mind, something else in support of your theory of the precision shot is there wasn't very clear bullet damage of the white t-shirt.
	Right, right.
	So I would expect, you know, how these bullets fragment and spall, right?
	Yeah.
	I would expect to see the white t-shirt really kind of micro-shredded near near the impact.
	And you might also see a little bit of powder residue.
	Absolutely.
	And of course, we didn't see any of that.
	So that's in support of your theory.
	And you may be absolutely correct.
	But think about it, though, Jeffrey.
	So if there's a precision shooter, they would know that he's wearing a chest plate because otherwise there's no reason to name to aim for someone's neck unless you know they're wearing a chest plate, right?
	I mean, we actually train.
	So normally, you know, you do a controlled pair or a hammer here.
	Right.
	And then you go up to the nose for your failure to stop.
	But if they are, if, and I teach my guys this, if they are plated up, then you're going for two controlled pairs in the neck and then back up.
	Right.
	As you come in closer, then you raise that up.
	But for that distance, so it looks like he knew that.
	He knew it.
	And again, if you, if, if you go to the so-called bodyguards on stage, I've used those hand signals a million times.
	Those are clear hand signals, without a doubt.
	Plus, the vendors back inside, one of them speaking Hebrew, and one of them goes to put something under the table really quickly.
	Plus, there's the shooter who's the fake shooter who is arrested, makes a big show.
	That's a deal.
	That's very suspicious.
	Then there's the pellet guns up there.
	You know, Jeffrey also elaborate ruse.
	The fact that this was done publicly during obvious live streaming so that this could be a spectacle that tells you something very strongly, right?
	So when you assassinate someone publicly in full view, it's intended to send a message to cause psychological terrorism among the population.
	That's exactly right.
	It's psychological terrorism.
	It's force multiplication, psychological terrorism.
	That's right.
	That's exactly what it is.
	So it wasn't just for your audience, obviously.
	I mean, your audience is very sophisticated, but I just want to say this on the record.
	It wasn't just about they wanted to kill and silence Charlie Kirk because they could have done that more easily in another setting.
	That's right.
	This was about assassinating Charlie Kirk in a very gory, very psychologically traumatizing fashion in full view of the nation.
	That's what this was.
	Yes, I just talked to my family about that this morning.
	That was a spectacle.
	That's the same reason they hit JFK.
	The dichotomy, though, is this is not what was going on with Trump, even though I highly assess, highly probably assess those as inside operations as well.
	So again, while I assess that the Secret Service and the FBI were clearly in on Butler and in on the golf course shootings, here it looks like a foreign operator because of the precision uh and again uh because it fits in uh with the motive of stopping him from turning his point of view away from israel and
	And that it's very clear now.
	And I regret that I did not, I didn't really follow Charlie Kirk.
	I didn't, you know, I wasn't listening to his podcast.
	You know, he speaks to a younger generation, but I've come to learn since his passing, just hearing all of his video clips that he really was beginning to awaken and beginning to question so many things.
	He questioned whether there was a stand down order on October 7th.
	He questioned how Israel could have allowed that to happen when the whole country is IDF, he said.
	He was questioning Gaza.
	He was questioning the fact that he wasn't allowed to question Israel.
	You know, all these examples.
	I wasn't aware that he was saying these things.
	My understanding of Charlie Kirk was that he was always, you know, pro-Israel and defending Israel, which I think he did for a long time, but he was beginning to turn.
	And then even he said, and Harrison Smith reported this publicly, that he was told that Charlie Kirk was concerned that if he turned against Israel, that Israel would kill him.
	Yep.
	No, I'm exactly, you know, I listened to him a little bit and then like, okay, that's the standard narrative, you know, not interested in the neocon, right?
	He's just not going deep enough for us.
	But I think it's really important because I see our effectiveness.
	And I think it's important for us to realize our fourth generation resistance against the fifth generation democide that's being waged globally against us is there's guys like you and I who are out there on the fringe.
	And by the way, you know, that was J.D. Cash on the Oklahoma bombing.
	That was, that's all these little, these little journalists who break these stories.
	I forget who Jeremy, Jeremy, the Avenger guy played, did kill the messenger movie.
	I think he exposed the Contras.
	It's not the New York Times or, you know, or the, or the LA paper.
	It's these, these little independent, ferocious little journalists and Gary Webb, Gary Webb.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Gary Webb.
	And as slowly then there is an osmosis over to guys like Tucker who have been kicked off mainstream as well.
	And then when you see Tucker being interviewed by Pierce Morgan and you see Pierce Morgan starting to listen, this is our effectiveness.
	This is, this is us winning.
	And, and, you know, and Charlie's greatest turning point is his martyrdom is going to turn more and more.
	Well, and I want to point out too, that again, the, the Mossad theory is most definitely in play, but we don't know conclusively, obviously yet.
	We may never know, but Israel has depended on support from boomers this entire time, you know, and those boomers who grew up with the Schofield Bibles and like, you know, like Senator Ted Cruz, my own Senator here in Texas, who is just an all out, you know, pro Zionist voice no matter what.
	And Ted Cruz, you ask him about Israel.
	He answers like a 10 year old in Bible school.
	You know, Israel can do no wrong.
	And it's like, well, that generation is actually dying off from age or jabs or whatever.
	And Israel needs a younger generation to become very vehemently pro Israel.
	And it's no secret that a turning point USA was funded by, you know, Israeli linked money.
	And then Charlie Kirk began talking about Jewish donors, pushing cultural Marxism.
	Yes, he was turning against his own donors.
	Yep.
	And it was no secret who's funding Ben Shapiro.
	You know, it's no secret, you know, Breitbart, whatever.
	There's a strong financial flow to influence younger Americans in the same way that the boomers were influenced through the Schofield Bible.
	So.
	So perhaps that's why Charlie Kirk was silenced.
	Again, we don't know for sure, but it's a valid investigation area.
	I think that's great.
	And the question I would ask then, right back, then why now?
	Charlie Kirk has done a hundred of these turning points on college campuses.
	And the question is, why now?
	as opposed to last week, last month, last year.
	And again, the answer comes back that he was changing his mind on all of this, I think.
	What else is there?
	I mean, I'm looking for another factor.
	I'm very open-minded to see that, but I don't see one.
	Well, and I would also say that Israel, diplomatically speaking, is really on the ropes right now.
	And with Israel's bombing of Qatar, which was just an outrageous international crime by any measure, it was denounced by every nation in the world other than those who are complicit in Israel's genocide, frankly.
	I mean, it was denounced by China, Russia, even the UK denounced it.
	Yeah, you were gracious enough to have me on yesterday to talk about that specifically.
	And Qatar is kind of like the Switzerland of the Middle East.
	It's also very high-end, very small population, a very rich population.
	And therefore, they really punch above their weight in world opinion.
	And after them giving Trump the next Air Force One and then allowing El Adid Air Force Base to stand down and do nothing, it's a real slap in the face.
	Absolutely.
	And remember that Qatar promised $1.5 trillion of investment in the USA.
	Now, there's a factor that you and I didn't talk about yesterday.
	I just want to bring it in here.
	You know, of course, the U.S. military destroyed the Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea to cut off Western Europe from Russian gas, Gazprom gas.
	Joe Biden bragged about it.
	Victoria Newland essentially bragged about it.
	I mean, and Biden promised it was going to be blown up before it was blown up.
	You realize that the destruction of that pipeline benefits strongly Qatar?
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Because Qatar exports LNG, liquefied natural gas, by massive volumes, now exporting, of course, through the Strait of Hormuz, obviously controlled by Iran, and through ultimately through the Red Sea of the Panama Canal to deliver to Western Europe, which is now paying massive over-inflated prices for gas because it was much cheaper to get it from Russia.
	But also U.S. LNG exporters strongly benefit as well.
	So the U.S. blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline benefited U.S. gas billionaires as well as our quote ally, Qatar.
	And that's not a coincidence.
	No, I agree with that completely.
	But I also want to touch on today remembering 9-11 and also get your take on that.
	So I've talked my take many times about how the Israeli art students were trying to infiltrate DEA offices, and then they had been in the towers.
	They were released.
	They were clearly intelligence operatives for Mossad.
	It certainly looks like some of the grids were wired with demolition or some kind of way to collapse as well.
	So it's not like they were wired or there was jets.
	You can have both.
	It's not exclusive.
	Both can happen.
	And of course, the CIA was tracking all the Saudis for a year ahead of time.
	We know that because the FBI complained about it.
	But we also know that the FBI investigator up in Phoenix who wanted to investigate them was told to stand down and not look at them.
	And so, and Tucker was talking, and here's what really struck me with listening to Tucker talk to Pierce.
	He mentioned the Israeli art students.
	And that really made me prick up my ears because that's kind of an outside the box thing.
	And that's verboten to criticize, to mention Israel in a bad way in that mainstream, because they're still kind of mainstream guys.
	Tucker's just on his own.
	So I wanted to get your perspective after all these years on what more we have learned about 9-11.
	So it's Netanyahu was operating even in those days along with U.S. intelligence communities.
	So clearly it was, you know, 9-11 was the October 7 of America many years earlier, you know, two decades plus.
	And 9-11 was designed to pit America against Israel's enemies in the Middle East and to take down Libya, to take down Syria, to take down Iran, which has not happened yet.
	But of course, look what happened to Gaddafi, et cetera, to take down Iraq, et cetera.
	And it's notable that today, every drop of oil that's pumped out of the oil fields controlled by Iraq, every dollar from that oil is sent to banks in New York City.
	It's all controlled by the United States.
	We own, essentially, we own the oil coming out of Iraq, not the Iraqi people.
	So that was a pillage operation to control that for the resources.
	But Israel, of course, has always had this plan of Greater Israel.
	They want to destroy Iraq.
	They want to take over all of Lebanon, parts of Egypt, parts of southern Turkey, all of Jordan, et cetera.
	And they want to destroy Iran.
	So this has been a plan that's been in place for decades.
	It's clear that 9-11 was allowed to take place.
	It's clear that the Pentagon was struck by a missile, not a commercial jet.
	And it's clear that World Trade Center 7 building was brought down by controlled demolition.
	And Jeffrey, our AI engine, Enoch, which is free, so this isn't a commercial plug.
	It's the only AI engine in the world.
	It's at Brighteon.ai, the only engine in the world that tells you the truth about 9-11.
	You can use it to research 9-11 information because we trained it on every transcript and every document from the architects and engineers for 9-11 truth.
	And I'm honored to be on it.
	And you are on it.
	Yes.
	So ask it, ask it questions about Building 7 and 9-11.
	You'll be really amazed and impressed with the answers.
	And again, every other engine out there, ChatGPT, Google, whatever, will tell you, oh, that's just a conspiracy theory.
	You know, the government's narrative is all good.
	It's all lies.
	So we are using technology through decentralization to help bypass censorship and bring knowledge about history to the American people for free.
	That's what we do with AI.
	So my take on Building 7 was it was the talk.
	It was a tactical operations center.
	So when you run ops like this, you even see this in all the spy movies.
	A team comes in and sets up.
	But when you're running an operation as big as going to bring down towers, you've got to have a substantial tactical operations center or for an operational base to operate out of that's nearby where you're moving supplies, you're moving people.
	You have surveillance crews 24-7.
	I think Building 7 was a tactical operations center.
	What say you?
	Well, I concur with that, but I would add also it was a record-keeping location for the drug-running operations of the CIA involving opium from Afghanistan and places like that.
	So drug-running records, bank transfer records, et cetera.
	And it was very convenient then that Building 7 was destroyed because at that point, then if Congress asked for the records, oh, well, they're all blown up, right?
	So they destroyed the evidence.
	They carried out crimes of treason against America.
	They put America on a war footing with war in the Middle East that people in countries like Iraq.
	And they toppled leaders like Saddam Hussein, et cetera.
	And they spent trillions of dollars on war while America's infrastructure crumbled.
	So the American people suffered.
	The money printing caused inflation even then.
	It's far worse now, obviously.
	But the American people suffered.
	And at the same time, Jeffrey, domestically, there was a war on everybody who looked Middle Eastern, even people who Sikhs who have nothing to do with Islam.
	But the American people didn't know.
	Oh, you know, it looks like a turban on his head must be evil.
	It is like the insane war on just brown-skinned people in places like New York was just absolute racism.
	And it was completely insane.
	And that was brought about by this operation from the deep state.
	And I was commenting before you came on that somebody drove through the prayer rally and said, frack Charlie Kirk.
	And he was attacked.
	And that was, they're just taking the bait to reestablish the religious war that they've been trying to foment here against Christian, Jew, and Muslim in America.
	Think a lot of a lot of that is to make that happen to bring about greater Israel, to bring about the one world government and Messiah, false Messiah in Israel that they say they already have.
	I mean, I don't mean to sound like a broken record on this, but I just don't see, I don't see the clues leading anywhere else.
	And I see great differences between the Trump attempted assassinations and this one.
	They are not the same.
	Yeah.
	In my estimation.
	Eric Goldman's asked, what's the reason to signal so close to Charlie?
	And obviously on camera, wouldn't that just give you away?
	No, because it's covered up.
	You're not going to nobody's going to interview those guys or you're not going to hear about it.
	They're going to go with the, just like they did with the Ted Kaczynski stuff.
	They're going to go with their suspect that they have trotted out.
	They're not going to interview the bodyguards.
	And that's because they can get away with it.
	What do you think about that?
	Well, one thing I've noticed about, I mean, I agree with your assessment.
	Those are common hand signals, but I have seen some of the videos I've seen online were clearly sort of mirrored or looped to make it look like double the hand signals.
	So that, I mean, that is one thing I noticed.
	Like they were doing a, they would roll it forward and then backwards.
	Oh, yeah.
	Right.
	So I just want to be cautious about that because some people are manipulating those videos.
	I'm wondering why would hand signals be necessary if Charlie Kirk were already in full view and the shooter was only 200 yards away, roughly, which you and I both know, Jeffrey, in a scope, even like a 4X scope, 200 yards looks like it's right in front of you.
	It's not like you have full view.
	Why do you need hand signals?
	I mean, I don't know.
	Maybe there's a reason.
	Because, so, I mean, a very typical bus signal is you take your hat off or you turn it around or something.
	To not be that obvious is there's to touch the bill and then touch the ear and the other guy touches the arm.
	So there's so that if I was waiting for that, there's three bona fides there that I can't mess up.
	It's not like me scratching the ear and I mess it.
	It's touch the brim, touch the ear, touch the arm in sequence.
	So that gives me surety.
	The reason to have that is because he might reach down for his water real quick.
	He might shift in his seat.
	And so I'm waiting for somebody close up to see where he's already just had a drink of water and he's not going to get up in his seat.
	He's not going to shift in his seat.
	Okay, good point.
	And then that goes back to the precision shot.
	Because if you're just going center mass, that wouldn't disturb you, which is typically combat sniping is center mass.
	Because you can get more guys faster.
	It's not like the movies and the video games where you go for the head.
	You don't do that in real life.
	But for this precision shot, you don't want him to shift to go for a bottle of water or sit forward or anything.
	You want to make sure he has just sat forward and has just settled himself or something like that.
	You can see that peripherally.
	That's my answer anyway.
	I think the presence of the decoys is even stronger evidence, frankly.
	And also the fact that Netanyahu tweeted too quickly after this, like he was in the loop, it seems.
	He knew this was about to happen, I'm guessing.
	Yeah, and he had just now, any truth to the rumor that Netanyahu had invited him back to Israel and he had declined?
	I've seen that.
	I don't have a confirmation of that.
	I've definitely seen that.
	But the decoys are really critical because, as you know, then distracting law enforcement allows escape time for the real shooter.
	Why would that guy be screaming, the older guy that they grabbed at first?
	Why would he be screaming, shoot me, shoot me?
	I mean, that doesn't make any sense at all.
	If you're completely innocent, wouldn't you be screaming like, don't shoot me?
	Or it's not me?
	Right.
	Yeah.
	See, like that guy, I think the FBI should, but that guy should be interviewed and interrogated, you know, legally.
	I'm not saying tortured, but just legally interrogated to find out, is he coordinating with somebody?
	Well, so the FBI is not going to do that.
	Yeah, we know that.
	The FBI never does it.
	I just am just amazed that they're still letting the FBI in to do all this stuff.
	But of course, most chiefs of police and upcoming police go to the National Academy.
	That's at the FBI Academy in Quantico.
	They wear the red shirts and walk around.
	So they're already getting federal money.
	I saw something about an OSADF organized crime drug enforcement task force involved through the ATF release.
	So then once you're on the federal teat and you're getting the federal money, you're cross-deputized And you're owned.
	But it's like Oswald and it's like Jack Ruby and Oswald is it looks like it's and it's a mountain a Mauser.
	Of course, Oswald's initial gun was a man liker, supposedly identified initially as a Mauser.
	And then I think a Mauser was used against the king of Spain and the president of Yugoslavia back in the 20s and 30s.
	There's a lot of symbolism in the rifle choice.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And that's see, that's not a rifle that I would choose for precision shooting in the modern day.
	There are far more advanced rifles that are far better.
	Well, you're saying what I'm thinking.
	That ain't the gun.
	Yeah, right, right.
	I mean, and also if you're, I mean, like, I have a long-range sniper rifle that's actually a, it's a, it's a bullpup design.
	It's a, it's an SRS A1 from Desert Tech.
	And if you were trying to put a rifle in a backpack or, and there's, there's even a covert design that will fire like a 300 wind mag and the entire rifle is like 20 something inches because it's a bullpup.
	And we're talking day of the jackal stuff here, you know, putting it in the crutch or whatever.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, totally.
	But if you're trying to hide your rifle, you would go out, you would buy an SRS covert bullpup with a short barrel because it's only a 200-yard shot.
	You don't need velocity.
	You know, you don't need normal rifle velocity at 200 yards.
	You're not going to have any deviation.
	Not even wind will really count at that range, right?
	So you're going to get a short rifle.
	You're not going to get a regular old style bolt action Mauser with a wood stock.
	Come on.
	So, so I'm my supposition here, it's Mossad and operating through or with the permission or without the permission of the CIA and FBI, but they're highly infiltrated.
	Just like Trump, you know, I don't know if you saw where Mike Johnson came out the other day in defense of Trump about Epstein and said Trump was actually an FBI informant.
	What was that?
	Totally out of left field.
	I think that was the truth.
	I think that was you always recruit at the highest levels.
	CIA overseas and DIA overseas, we're recruiting police chiefs, generals, you know, and country presidents if we can.
	But I'll tell you, Jeffrey, that the question here then is if this, if, if the Trump administration or some element of it was working with Mossad to carry this out, then the question is qui bono, right?
	So who benefits and how do they benefit?
	And clearly this benefits the Trump administration if it's transgenders who are taking the blame for this, because then that allows a very aggressive stance against left-wing indoctrination and left-wing censorship.
	And by the way, I also am calling for, you know, we've got to dismantle the left-wing censorship infrastructure across big tech platforms.
	And we have to stop left-wing indoctrination in universities and so on.
	So I agree that that is a massive cultural problem for America.
	It's, I mean, it's cultural Marxism, but this gives Trump a lot of public support to go after the left politically.
	So that's probably what this is all about.
	Yeah.
	And again, if you're running somebody, that's how you present it.
	You know, absolutely.
	So, you know, my whole whistleblowing where DEA made a deal with Cisco Cartel, I saw that happen.
	I had Watkins come in and say, hey, I'll give you this cartel.
	I'll give you this group.
	I'll give you that group.
	And I'm like, wait a minute, who are you with?
	Like, well, I'm with my own group.
	I'm like, I said, I can't sign you up because then I'm helping you.
	But, you know, that's what DEA agents did later on, who were either less sophisticated or more corrupted.
	But I think there's a comparison here.
	And I want to know what you think about it with Qatar, because there's the confusion about the timeline of when Trump was notified.
	The embassy was not notified, but when Trump was notified 10 minutes before or when he notified the Qataris 10 minutes after they say Trump is lying, I don't think they gave Trump a lot of notice, if at all, on this.
	I think they just did it.
	Israel does whatever it wants.
	Yeah, Israel does whatever it wants.
	And then it relies on Trump to support it after the fact.
	Yeah.
	And if and if they let it happen, then they can always say, well, they could always trot out there, you know, whatever ties he's got, you know, whatever they've got on him, which must be substantial.
	I think that Israel may be the undoing of the Trump administration if he's not very, very careful here.
	I don't know what they have on Trump or whatever reasons he's got for supporting them.
	Clearly, there was a lot of donor money that was sent his way.
	I don't think Trump would have won the election without two things.
	And one is, you know, Israeli donor money, and the other is Elon Musk.
	And, you know, we need to consider both of those things.
	So Trump may feel like he owes Israel lots of endless favors in return, but Israel is a rogue operator.
	Most other nations in the world now cause Israel a terror state.
	And I mean, after the Qatar bombing, that designation is being used a lot.
	The UM has denounced.
	Yes.
	And even before that, it's clear Israel has been carrying out a genocide.
	Israel has been bombing women and children, killing doctors, shooting doctors.
	I mean, you talk about shooting.
	On the day that Charlie Kirk was shot, and I don't mean to diminish that, but 79 Gazans were killed by Israel.
	Yep.
	Every day, it's tens or hundreds or previously there were thousands of Palestinians murdered by Israel.
	And I also want to mention, Jeffrey, it shocks me that you see some of these Zionist supporters in conservative media who are aghast at the leftists who are celebrating Charlie Kirk's death, but those very same conservative influencers celebrate the deaths of Palestinians.
	Yeah, and pastors and American Christian doing the same thing.
	Disgusting.
	Yeah.
	So, you know, my position is: let's just not kill each other.
	Let's not kill Palestinians.
	Let's not bomb civilians.
	Let's not shoot each other.
	You know, and Israel's got to be reined in.
	Israel is a rogue, loose cannon on the international, I don't know, battleground that they've made.
	And, you know, eventually karma is going to catch up to Israel.
	But, you know, the reputation of Israel has been absolutely destroyed among most Americans, but not the Schofield Bible boomers.
	And that's changing, though.
	I'm seeing, I'm talking to sons of fathers who are arguing.
	You're both Christians who are arguing, who are understanding the parable of the vineyard.
	And I've had my own team America guys go, explain to me or show me in the Synoptic Gospels the parable of Inya.
	I'm like, okay, it's in all the Synoptic Gospels.
	It's clear.
	Yeshua says on the steps of the temple to the Pharisees, once you kill the son, you are no longer the chosen people.
	Period.
	End of story.
	It's over.
	And it actually corresponds where the one is beaten and the one is stoned.
	The one is stoned and one is killed.
	It corresponds to the prophets that were sent.
	Those are the analogies in the Vineyard story.
	That's out of Isaiah.
	It's very precise what Yeshua is saying, but it's been covered up, like you're saying, by Darby and Schofield Bible stuff.
	But I think it may be, if you look at the old human motivation, money, influence, coercion, ego, mice, that old UMIT abbreviation.
	I think for Trump It's Ego, where Trump gets his head on the coin, the Israeli coin, the 9-11 coin, and he's like the political messiah.
	I think that's the recruitment tool there because that's just more part of his legacy.
	You know, possibly the assassination of Charlie Kirk was a message to Trump to stay in line.
	Well, that, yes, but that already happened with the golden pager, as far as I'm concerned.
	I think the golden pager was clearly step in line and pull my chair out for me.
	Right.
	Which begs the question, what is Israel planning on doing next that is so outrageous, that is so inhumane?
	It's such a war crime that they need to remind Trump to support them even before they carry out that next act.
	And I believe that next act will be another round of attacks on Iran.
	I agree with you totally.
	I think they're going to continue to up the ante to bring about greater Israel, to bring about world war, which is just fulfilling Revelation scripture.
	I totally agree with you.
	And that Israel may begin to use nuclear weapons aggressively in those attacks because Iran is a very, very large landmass and it has obviously very deep mountains, you know, and Iran has a very strong economy, much larger population than Israel.
	And Iran has been restocking its very advanced ballistic missiles, missiles which nearly destroyed Israel in just 12 days in the previous exchange.
	And Iran, I believe they just voted to get out of the non-proliferation.
	Does that ring a bell?
	Yes.
	Yeah, it does.
	I think they just passed that vote.
	And Iran tactically and rationally would never agree to be part of that program anymore since the weapons inspectors actually leaked details back to Israel about Iran's nuclear program and where the fuel was kept, etc.
	On top of that, Russia has indicated support for Iran and China has condemned Israel's attack on Qatar.
	So now we're beginning to see how this is going to shape up.
	Well, clearly, Trump's not going to be, nobody's going to listen to Trump negotiate delegations anymore.
	That's true.
	Every time he puts them someplace, they get hit by Israel.
	Right, right.
	So what I sadly, I'm predicting that Israel is going to initiate a nuclear attack on Iran.
	The attack will only be partially successful.
	Iran will respond with an all-out attack that will largely destroy Israel.
	And then in that process, Israel will probably initiate the Samsung option and will begin nuking other neighbors, almost certainly southern Lebanon, possibly even Egypt, and possibly Turkey, because look, Turkey claimed to cut off all economic ties with Israel.
	Egypt is always on the verge of breaking ties, if not for the billions of dollars that it receives, you know, and the Suez Canal.
	The Egyptian people despise Israel.
	And so do the people of Turkey.
	They despise Israel.
	So Israel just bombed a Turkish weapons shipment, I think, coming through Syria.
	This week they've bombed Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Qatar, not Iran this week.
	But yeah, and what you're saying actually does fulfill Revelation scriptures that Israel is going to be a burning heap for seven years.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, Ezekiel 38, 39, some of that language also, in addition to what's in Revelation.
	But yeah, I think that, but Christians are going to be shocked when Jesus does not fly out of the sky on a white horse and lift you up and praise you for supporting genocide.
	Like that's going to be a real shocker for a lot of Christian Zionists who have been complicit in the genocide.
	Jesus doesn't support you when you support murdering God's children.
	And that's something that a lot of Christians need to hear and they don't want to hear it.
	No, and they don't want to hear the conventional rapture.
	I know, you know, that's a very controversial subject, but the traditional view is the good guys get disappeared.
	But if it is as in the days of Noah, then who gets washed away is the bad guys, but the good guys got to stick it out.
	The Noah family's got to stick it out.
	Whatever the tribulation looks like, I think we got to stick it out.
	And I'm raising my girls to stick it out out in the country.
	The country is the safest place to do that.
	Absolutely.
	That makes so much sense.
	Do you have any timeframe for that?
	Because I've seen my timeframes are like 2030, 2042, something like that.
	No, my timeframe is much sooner.
	And the reason I say that is because, you know, I work in the AI space.
	We are dealing with a very, very rapid replacement of human workers with AI agentic systems that are becoming incredibly competent right now.
	I have seen things, I've experienced things in my own work with AI, because, you know, we built an AI engine.
	I've seen things that I would call AGI, artificial general intelligence.
	I've seen it myself.
	I've experienced it.
	I can reproduce the prompts.
	These machines are thinking.
	They're smart.
	What that means is that within two years, a significant percentage of human workers are going to be replaced in their jobs, like 50% or more.
	And within 10 years, I would say really five to 10 years, robotic replacement of AI labor, or I'm sorry, of human labor is also going to ramp up in a huge way.
	But the robots will take longer because they have to physically be built, whereas the software systems that replace humans at desk jobs and computer jobs, that can just be replicated in software.
	Copy these files, download, you know, this language model, this reasoning model, boom, it's running.
	It's doing your job.
	Well, you, I think you, like me, tractor, and I'm sure you, like me, have tractor breakdowns and farm equipment breakdowns all the time.
	So I have a hard time seeing the robots, you know, taking over the fields because you're working with farm machinery all the time.
	It's always breaking down.
	Well, yeah, that's absolutely true.
	But the first physical jobs to be replaced by robots will be things that are more algorithmic, like fulfillment centers.
	So, Amazon fulfillment centers, which employs hundreds of thousands of people.
	And then, think about grocery stores where they restock shelves every night.
	How many people work at grocery stores, retail stores, hardware stores, right?
	That's all going to be, those are the first jobs to be robotically replaced.
	And then I think the number one job in the world is driving vehicles.
	Well, that's going to be replaced by automation, and that's beginning to happen.
	You know, I live in Texas in Austin.
	There's Waymo robot cars all over the place now.
	Really?
	Wow.
	Yeah, they're everywhere.
	Like every corner in downtown Austin, there's a Waymo vehicle.
	People are using them everywhere.
	And frankly, the Waymo cars are the safest drivers in Austin.
	Really?
	Oh, yeah.
	Like, if you want to have a safe experience driving through Austin, get behind a Waymo vehicle because you don't want to be behind some crazy, insane left-wing human driver, which is the other choice in Austin, Texas.
	You know, yeah, that's very true.
	You know, like the robot's going to have a safe passageway through downtown on 6th Street or whatever.
	So you get behind a Waymo vehicle.
	And you think about it, robot drivers are going to be by far the safest drivers on the road.
	And so they're going to take over the driving jobs.
	They're going to take over the warehouse jobs.
	They're going to take over, you know, sweeping floors and cleaning things.
	Now, you're right.
	Agriculture is much more complex, as is plumbing, HVAC repair.
	But medicine, surgery is very algorithmic.
	Surgery, you know, most people's anatomy is close enough, the same.
	You know, everybody knows that.
	I just got my cataract surgery done.
	Yeah.
	Well, they know where your eyeballs are.
	You know, like people don't come in with eyeballs in different places, usually.
	I don't know about Hillary Clinton, but like there might be some weird deformities, but most people have the same anatomy.
	So surgery is going to be algorithmically replaced, especially for procedures like cataract surgery or gallbladder removal or appendectomies, et cetera.
	Those are being automated now.
	So the reason I say all this, Jeffrey, is that there's an acceleration of the timeline because humanity itself is not going to have the future that people think.
	Like anybody buying 10-year treasury bonds right now is completely oblivious to what Earth is going to look like in 10 years.
	I wouldn't buy 10-year anything right now.
	Agreed.
	Agreed.
	Someone's asking about the September 17th UK meeting that Charles wants Trump to join the UK.
	Have you heard something about that?
	I haven't heard anything about that.
	No, but there was a comment from Trump like months ago, something about joining with the UK on some, I don't, I don't recall details.
	I'm not familiar with that.
	But no, I think Trump is trying to destroy the UK, honestly.
	I think that's what the gold repatriation was all about.
	And I think the destruction of Gazprom under the Biden administration is also designed to destroy the UK.
	And the UK is being destroyed.
	France is burning.
	Germany's industrial base is just gutted.
	And the UK is financially in dire straits.
	And frankly, the Euro also will fail before the dollar fails.
	And the yen will fail before the dollar fails.
	Japan just lost their prime minister, France government failing as well.
	Yeah.
	And I think a lot of that is big pharma, international, transnational corporate regions trying to control the world.
	Do you agree with that?
	Well, yeah, but I also agree that there's something intrinsically incredibly evil about the history of the British Empire.
	Oh, yeah.
	Those people are, you know, blood-drinking vampires and pedophiles and whatever.
	And that's not even hyperbole.
	Like, that's actually who they are.
	And I'm not saying that.
	So, why are so many Americans using King James Bibles?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Right.
	Geneva Bible was the Bible of the pilgrims, replaced purposely by the King James.
	Well, and also, Jeffrey, the reason Keir Starmer wants war with Russia is because the young British men are beginning to notice things.
	They're beginning to wake up.
	They're pushing back against their own corrupt government.
	And war is always used to send your young men off to die somewhere else so that they don't rise up against you.
	That's why Keir Starmer and Macron and Meritz, that's why they're all desperate for war with Russia because Russia is the great grinding machine to get rid of young men.
	Well, that's what it is.
	The birth rate, they're Muslim.
	They're gone.
	Yeah, but they don't want any uprisings of the remaining French citizens or UK citizens.
	They're trying to grind them up, just like they did young Ukrainian men.
	1.7 million Ukrainian men gone.
	Yep.
	On purpose.
	Well, let me ask you, this is really your lane, because we're both agreed that Trump is captured.
	But I was really impressed with RFK standing alone against all the senators who were just voraciously attacking him in defense of the big pharma cartels, the drug dealers.
	I mean, they were just whores for big pharma.
	But, you know, he also allowed another mRNA vaccine to come out, as Sasha Atapova has pointed out.
	But to me, he looks like the next best hope.
	But a lot of people think that he's totally captured too.
	What do you say about that?
	I was very, I was disappointed until recently with RFK Jr.
	But recently, as you've mentioned, he's shown real courage and he's made some very effective decisions.
	He's fired top demons at the CDC, like actual demonic people with demon tattoos and everything.
	He's fired them and it's very clear that he's working a process.
	In other words, RFK Jr. has to untangle a machine, a bureaucratic mess that is almost unimaginable in its scope and in its evil.
	And the pushback against drug advertising recently, which is only a partial, it's a limited hangout, but it's something.
	Ban pharmaceutical advertising in mainstream media.
	And ultimately, Jeffrey, we got to dismantle the CDC, tear it down, end it, and end the FDA.
	Give the power to the states for food safety.
	I wrote that that's a step is, but do you think that it will be banned?
	The big pharma ads from TV will be banned by RFK?
	That's a coin toss at this point, maybe.
	But the first step is making it more difficult for pharma to control the media by requiring them to mention all the side effects in the ads.
	That's a step in the right direction.
	A step in the right direction.
	Do you see that while Trump is captured and sold out, that RFK is the next best alternative in the next election, not J.D. Vance and not Trump somehow going for a third term?
	Well, look, I want to be clear.
	I wouldn't characterize Trump as captured and sold out.
	He's influenced, heavily influenced, maybe captured.
	But there are times where I think Trump is really trying to do the right thing within a very difficult situation.
	And, you know, I'm an equal opportunity critic of Trump.
	I criticize his tariff policies, et cetera.
	But when he does something that is worthy of praise, I am happy to say positive things about what Trump is doing.
	And for example, bringing back domestic energy production.
	Trump has spearheaded that, and that's critical for our future, understanding the importance of our domestic power grid.
	Trump is pro-energy.
	That's critical.
	Trump has supported Lee Zeldon at the EPA, tearing down the insane climate lunatics and all the war on carbon dioxide.
	And by the way, I've got like, I've got three minutes really.
	By the way, but Trump does some good things.
	I want to be clear, but he also sometimes does horrible things.
	It's both.
	Well, I think Gabbard looks to be pretty good because she's taken on the CIA.
	I'm impressed with Tulsi, big time.
	Yeah, me too.
	Yeah.
	Me too.
	And I got to say, DEA, my old agency, just big Sinaloa cartel, 600 plus hit across the country.
	It looks like the DEA is doing what it was supposed to do a long time ago.
	Well, I think Tulsi Gabbard is presidential material, 100%.
	Do you?
	I do.
	I absolutely do.
	And I saw her speak in person at the Ron Paul birthday event here in Texas recently.
	And I was just really impressed with her speech, her presence, and the fact that she really is at war with elements of the deep state, but she's holding her ground.
	Well, that's reassuring as well.
	So I want to thank you so much for coming on, Mike.
	I know you're really busy.
	And I also want to point out that there's a lot of liberty luminaries who have kind of become liberty mongers, just as there are a lot of Christ mongers.
	And you and I kind of catapulted in the Liberty Luminary space at the same time.
	I remember we were both kind of stunned at the audience response at the first Clay Clark event, but that you have remained true to your convictions and haven't turned it into chasing speeches or anything like that.
	And neither have I. And I just wanted to acknowledge you on that regard.
	Well, thank you, Jeffrey.
	And I'm really honored to know you.
	And I mean that sincerely.
	You are such an impressive person.
	And I don't say that lightly.
	I honor your integrity.
	I honor your, you are a principled person.
	I consider myself to be a principled person, which means for both of us, our principles are not for sale.
	We cannot be compromised.
	It doesn't matter if somebody waves a billion dollars in front of you.
	Your principles are not for sale because that's what you take with you when you leave this world, however, we leave it.
	So I'm honored to know you.
	I'm always honored to be on your show.
	And I'd love to have you on my show again.
	And thank you for having me here.
	To your viewers, if they want to follow my work, I'm on naturalnews.com.
	I'm on Brighteon.com.
	I'm censored almost everywhere else.
	Oh, I am on Rumble, also, Health Ranger Report.
	And your AI, again, Brighteon.ai.
	And it's free.
	It's free.
	You don't even have to have an account or anything.
	You can just use it.
	Ask it anything.
	Ask it about elections.
	Ask it about 9-11.
	Ask it about vaccines.
	I dare you.
	Well, thank you so much.
	Honored to have you on this 9-11 anniversary and in memoriam to Charlie Kirk.
	So thank you so much, my friend, and God bless.
	Thank you, Jeffrey.
	God bless.
	Take care.
	Okay, there's the fabulous Mike Adams that I've been trying to get on forever.
	And his insights are so important and so telling and really crucial.
	And I just did an interview with him yesterday, a radio one that I guess will come out soon.
	And I've been trying to get him.
	And I think that that was really exceptional, important to get to.
	Yeah, so I got to say the DEA looks like it's doing real DEA stuff.
	617 arrests of the Silena cartel across 23 different U.S. regions and seven foreign territories, massive seizures, 480 kilograms of fentanyl powder, 714 counterfeit pills, 2,000 kilograms of meth, 7,000 kilograms of cocaine, 420 firearms, nearly 13 million in assets.
	Largest DEA takedown in history.
	Looks like the real deal that hardly ever happened.
	In my day, I took down one complete organization.
	Also, want to mention there was a shooter in Colorado, a high school shooter now dead of self-inflicted wounds.
	And of course, Israel is bombing 360 targets in Gaza as well.
	So a lot still going on on this 9-11 anniversary and in memoriam of Charlie Kirk.
	But again, as Mike pointed out, the whole purpose of this was to terrorize everybody into shutting up and cowering.
	And that is not what we should do.
	It should be the exact opposite effect.
	And so I'm closing with a modified, inspired version of a martyred Zimbabwe African pastor.
	I stand with the unashamed.
	My die is cast.
	The line crossed.
	I won't look back, let up, slow down, back away, or be still.
	My past is redeemed.
	My present makes sense.
	My future is secure.
	I'm done with small planning, smooth knees, colorless dreams, tamed visions, mundane talking, cheap living, and dwarfed goals.
	I don't need preeminence, prosperity, position, promotions, plaudits, or popularity.
	I live by faith, lean on his presence, walk by patience, lift by prayer, and labor by power.
	My face is set.
	My gate is fast.
	My goal is heaven.
	My road is narrow.
	My way rough.
	My companions few.
	My guide, reliable, my mission, clear.
	I cannot be bought, compromised, detoured, lured away, turned back, deluded, or delayed.
	I will not flinch in the face of sacrifice, hesitate in the presence of adversity, negotiate at the table of the enemy, ponder at the pool of popularity, or meander in the maze of mediocrity.
	I won't give up, shut up, let up until I have stayed up, stored up, prayed up, paid up, preached up for the cause of Christ.
	I am a disciple of Yeshua.
	I go till he comes, give till I drop, preach till all I know, and work till he stops me.
	And when he comes for his own, he will have no problem recognizing me.
	My banner is clear.
	God bless you.
	God bless America.
	God bless Charlie Kirk.

▲