Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 19, 2024 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:34:30

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #960

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	- Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the podcast for Friday, the 19th of July.
	I'm joined by Harry and Bo, and thank God it's Friday.
	It's nearly the weekend.
	Best day of the week, right?
	Best podcast of the week.
	It's going to be a great podcast.
	It's really warm.
	It's really warm apart from in this studio.
	For some reason, our air conditioning in the office has been broken for the last two days, so it's absolutely And the sun finally decided to come out in Britain as well, as of yesterday.
	Yeah, I know, who could have predicted that?
	But this office, this studio is wonderfully air-conditioned for some reason, so this is why this podcast is going to be so good.
	But anyway, so today we're going to be talking about Britain in flames, what the Labour Party is going to do to us, and one of my favourite things I'm really looking forward to, Trumpamania!
	It's running wild, brother!
	It's going to be so great.
	We live in idiocracy, but let's all just lean into it at this point.
	We're not in control of the flow of history.
	We're just going to enjoy it.
	Unfortunately, part of the flow of history is, of course, bad news.
	So we'll begin with the bad news and end with the good news.
	And so last night it turned out that Britain was basically in flames.
	Again.
	So there were riots in Leeds and London, both of a distinctly ethnic character, and both for reasons that I don't really care about.
	But let's just jump straight into it, shall we?
	So there was a riot in Leeds.
	Apparently it was the Roma Gypsy community in Leeds that were rioting, who, as Dili Hussain points out here, mostly identify as Christian and are here legally.
	Don't care.
	Don't care, they're in the wrong country.
	Yeah, but the point is, apparently, and now this isn't entirely verified, this is basically just rumour, because the media isn't doing their job and going and investigating it, so we've got to go with what we've got on Twitter, but it seems that one Roma family, one of their children injured themselves somehow, social services were called, and the community resisted social services, and therefore the police were called, and then the wider community
	resisted the police and the riot police and the police were essentially forced out of the community and they started burning uh buses and various other things that were throwing on fires in the middle of their streets tipping over police cars yeah tipping over police cars and it all seems to have got out of hand so amazing so So just to be clear, right, social services are basically evil, right?
	They are basically the arm of the administrative state.
	This job is entirely to take your children away from you.
	However, do I trust the rumor of the story?
	Well can I just say, that's true, to an extent, but there will be actual cases where kids are being abused or whatever, and should righteously be taken away from their abusive parents.
	Their kids are sort of sold into marriage, being nonced on, all sorts of stuff.
	100%.
	And there have been a couple of high-profile deaths of children who were repeatedly abused by their parents or step-parents, whose social services didn't intervene with recently.
	My wife constantly terrorises me with these stories.
	And of course it's also a terrible cliche that kids do badly in care.
	They can then be abused in care as well.
	We're not saying that doesn't happen.
	Of course it doesn't happen.
	It's literally one of the problems where the grooming gangs got a lot of their victims and where Jimmy Savile got a lot of his.
	So the whole system is pretty awful.
	I don't like the managerial philosophy that underpins it, but sometimes there is a just cause for it.
	It also has many failings of its own.
	And I just, I don't really know how to say it, but I just don't really trust the word of people on the street on this one either.
	So we don't know exactly what has happened yet, but we do know what happened in the aftermath.
	Are you suggesting the Roma community, Roma Gypsy community, might not be entirely truthful sometimes, ever?
	That's not one of their things, is it?
	I'm not suggesting any such thing.
	Oh, I am.
	Anyway, so riots broke out in Hare Hills because the police were called, as you can see, and they started tipping over police cars.
	Now, I think it's important to remember the demographic breakdown of this.
	In fact, we'll get to the demographics in a Because you'll see this is a very multicultural success story, this mob rioting.
	There are lots of men with beards and lots of men without beards.
	So there have been people on Twitter, I mean, such as Dilly saying, oh, this is the Roma Gypsy community.
	No, I don't think it is just the Roma Gypsy community.
	I think it's the entire multicultural community that seems to be turning out to tip over police cars.
	Everyone that wants to destroy the rule of law in our island.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	That's basically it.
	That resent and despise the police in and of itself.
	Yeah.
	Also let's not forget the general trend that we've observed for years now that people of diverse backgrounds tend to see one person causing trouble and then a few more join in and then the entire community joins in because it's just a bit of fun and it's not their country, it's not their home, well it might be their home, they don't see it that way, they don't care.
	And a lot of these people are clearly not Roma gypsies.
	Yeah, and if you look at a lot of their faces, they're laughing, they're smiling, they're having a great time.
	They've wanted to do this for ages.
	And these are adult men doing this.
	Like, this is on teenagers.
	Like, look at these guys, there's about 40.
	You know, this is just the most irresponsible behaviour.
	And these guys are clearly not Roma Gypsies, sorry.
	They're clearly from India, Pakistan or Bangladesh.
	Just the way that is.
	And so, anyway.
	Uh, this councillor, Ali, uh, Moffin Ali, as you may remember, he was elected a Green councillor, uh, for Leeds, and, uh, came out and was like... What, what, what platform was he, uh?
	He was running on the Allah o Akbar platform.
	Oh yeah, a classic green plank, if I remember.
	The Green Alliance is just the funniest thing in the world, because it's just open Islamists complaining about Gaza, and then people complaining about climate change.
	Liberals complaining about climate change.
	But this is what he had to say about it.
	We've got councillor Mohsin Ali, who's a local councillor for Gippon Highlands.
	Councillor, what's happening actually?
	Do you have any idea how it started?
	How it started isn't exactly clear.
	I mean, what's happened is it's an absolute travesty what's happened.
	Our community has been let down for so long, whether it's by the local government, whether it's by the national government, whether it's by the local authorities.
	Our community has been badly let down.
	Our community has been badly neglected.
	We've suffered massively from underinvestment.
	This sort of thing was just bubbling under the surface.
	It took an action by social services, whether it's right or wrong.
	I can't be the judge of that.
	I don't know the details.
	Whether it was right or wrong, I don't know.
	But that action sparked a gathering of people.
	The police had that contained.
	It was peaceful.
	It was noisy.
	I mean, there was a lot of criminal damage done, but it wasn't to this extent.
	Flames burning behind him.
	burning behind him encouraged the crowds to become even more violent and this is when the very peaceful we've had uh looting taking place a a delivery van had all its fridges and all that everything else taken out and set on fire this bus behind us they were attacking this bus so i got onto the bus i got the bus driver off i got the two passengers off and i escorted them around the back right so wait so they they set all of the provisions and things in these vans on fire -
	Yeah, there's some delivery vans. - So I thought it was under investment.
	I thought they needed things.
	Surely if it was just for survival, these people would be, you know, stealing food and then going immediately home, right?
	How does that not sound like some kind of extortion?
	It's like, look, this was always bubbling under the surface.
	Give us money or it might happen again in the future.
	Like, I'm sorry, you're not entitled to my money.
	I don't want you to have it.
	And if you're going to burn your own communities down, okay, well then that's not my fault or my problem.
	I'm not responsible for that.
	You're responsible for that.
	If you're poor, well, what percentage of you are actually employed?
	Yeah, what possessed Quest?
	You were already leeching off of our benefit system already.
	The reasoning is that there wouldn't be this resentment or hatred bubbling under the surface if they'd had more investment, i.e.
	sort of more social Just more of our money.
	A better social welfare net.
	If we just gave them more of our money, then they would be happy.
	I don't agree with that.
	I don't believe you.
	More facilities for the youth.
	Yeah.
	More access to pool tables and things.
	But also just more money.
	They just want more money.
	I'm not giving you my money.
	We already gave you a stupid amount of money in the first place.
	You're already part of wrecking the economy through the housing crisis.
	You don't deserve our money.
	You don't need our money.
	If there had been more youth centres in Hare Hill, where the youth could have had access to ping pong tables, then this would never have happened.
	But that's the thing, it wasn't the youth.
	It was 40 year old men.
	Obviously none of it makes any sense.
	Look at them.
	Obviously it's inspired by a clap of... The adult men are doing it.
	It's a type of, what it really is, I mean let's be honest, is a type of cultural, religious and ethnic resentment towards our country in general, towards our rule of law.
	Yeah, but what they're doing by rejecting the rule of law is setting themselves up as a kind of autonomous self-governing colony.
	Sectarianism.
	Yeah, they're saying that the British law does not apply in their area.
	And it's like, okay, fair enough.
	Now, I just want to actually defend Councillor Ali here, because in this video you can see him actually trying to stop the disorder.
	The problem is, this is him just behind the bin, pushing it away from the fire, right?
	And he is, in the video, there he is, the little chap there.
	He's trying to stop this happening, right?
	So, okay, well done.
	You get points for that.
	You know, definitely the right thing to do to try and stop your local community from burning itself down.
	Well done.
	He did the responsible thing.
	The answer is not Gibbs.
	But also immediately then ran interference for it on camera.
	Of course, but he was trying to stop it, so credit where it's due.
	Again, if we gave all of these people money, would the resentment go?
	No.
	If we gave all of these people money, if we gave them, say, 50 grand a year each, would they cooperate with the police?
	Would they suddenly form a functioning society?
	Well, we can look at the countries where they're from and we can say no.
	Definitively, no.
	So Andy Ngo had looked into this, this is where I've got most of the information that I'm using by the way, which we've already summarised so I'll carry on, but he's got the multiple angles of the attacks on the police and the riot police were driven out apparently and just, I mean, there are, you know, there are youths, there are adults, it's just, like, it's the entire community.
	How are we supposed to ever live with these people indefinitely?
	Well, there's a reason that this community is very lacking in native English people.
	Well, I was going to say, very disappointing to see...
	Yeah, but you don't know who he is.
	Yeah, he might just be a really nice guy.
	He could be a gypsy.
	Yeah, he could be.
	He could be from Romania or Bulgaria, but you don't know who he is.
	Okay.
	So anyway, there were, yeah, as you can see, attacking the police cars, setting fire to buses, which again, why, why do this?
	Okay.
	Well, I don't like, I don't like the social services.
	I don't like the police, but what's the local bus service got to do with that?
	Like, don't you get the bus service to your place of work?
	Probably not!
	I've always thought, ever since the LA riots, which I remember, when I was younger, I've always thought, even when I was a kid, I thought, it's insane to destroy your own community.
	Yeah, yeah it is.
	Completely insane.
	It's because they've got no investment in it.
	They don't feel like it.
	So yeah, the riot police were chased out, as we've already seen, and Her Hills was just left to burn for hours because the riot police were not present.
	What are you doing?
	If you're the riot police, you've got shields, you've got batons, and you've got training, and you've got numbers.
	Do they have water cannons?
	Yeah.
	Water cannons tend to help with this kind of thing.
	I think water cannons were banned in Britain, if I remember rightly.
	But the thing is, you're the riot police.
	There is a violent mob, as the councillor pointed out.
	The job then is to go in and club them into submission.
	That's what they do with the English.
	That's fine.
	You've got a mob literally burning down stuff in the street, looting.
	Total anarchy.
	No, you have to go and bat on them into submission.
	That's what the riot police are for.
	It's literally their job.
	But nope, they got chased out somehow.
	So brilliant.
	Love it.
	Anyway, let's have a look at the demographics of Hare Hills, shall we?
	So I just went on the 2021 census.
	So North Hare Hill, 9%, 9.3% English.
	South Hare Hill, 16.3% English.
	South Hare Hill, 16.3% English.
	So overwhelmingly not British.
	Now, the Gypsy population, the Roma population, very low as well.
	3.2% and 1.4%, right?
	So what you can see from this is that the, I mean, that means they're literally going to number in the hundreds.
	So when we see these big gangs or crowds on the streets, and you can see the multi-ethnic makeup of them, it's not just the Roma who are out protesting.
	And just in case anyone was wondering, the Asian population of Hare Hills, well, it's 57.1 in the north and 36.2 in the south.
	Asian?
	What, like Singapore people?
	People from Malaysia?
	Well, when they say Asian, they don't mean Middle Eastern, they don't mean Oriental, they mean subcontinental South Asians.
	Or Asian Welsh, as you can see there.
	The census springs up!
	But the point is, This is an ethnic issue.
	This is an ethnic colony.
	So is sectarianism a complete failure of multiculturalism?
	Multiculturalism has always been a lie.
	Throughout all of history, if you force people that are completely different ethnically, religiously, culturally, and you force them to live together, it will end terribly.
	Well, I think it's worth finessing this a little bit.
	Because there's not a problem when you have a person from another ethnic group who moves to this community and intermarries, right?
	Historically, this was always the way it had to be integrationist.
	You have to marry a local member of the local community so your children are then part of that community and so you are integrated into it.
	That's what that means.
	Multiculturalism is to say, right, the The Bangladeshis go here, the Indians go here, the Roma go here, and you have essentially enclaves and a set of kind of feuding states that have always got their barriers up.
	So you are not creating any kind of conditions for integration, you are in fact segregating.
	That's what multiculturalism produces.
	And just to be clear, I'm 100% in favor of integration.
	They have to intermarry in my Not all of these people though.
	None of those people though, because they've already, you know, taken their chance.
	They've blown it.
	And what I would say is now that we're under the Labour technocracy, the managerial technocracy that Labour will usher in, if this is going to be a new Blairism, it's all going to be based around digital IDs and mass surveillance technology.
	Well, we've got multiple different angles of a lot of this going on.
	Surely it can't be that hard for our Labour overlords to look at the faces of everybody who's in those riots, identify them... Check the benefit rolls!
	No!
	Round them up!
	Round them up!
	Check their countries of origin.
	Yeah, and get them on the next plane out of town.
	Yeah, I do think that anyone involved in this kind of civil unrest should just be deported.
	There's no excuse to throw rocks and stones at riot police, or just the police generally.
	We've got a fantastic solution to your economic debt privation.
	You go home.
	Anyway.
	So, concurrent to that, in Leeds, there were riots in London.
	Huh.
	What was going on in London?
	Were they also worried about social services?
	Let's find out.
	Huh.
	Well, these aren't Roma.
	These appear to be Bangladeshis.
	And as the caption here tells us, oh, there was a Bangladeshi man shot by police in Bangladesh.
	So the Bangladeshi community in Whitechapel, which is a very large community, Whitechapel being the place where there is now a Bangladeshi language on the signage, right?
	That's where they've put the signs up in Bangladeshi language because of course many of them don't speak English so they don't know they're at Whitechapel.
	That has to be translated for them.
	Well they're out in the streets to protest this because apparently in Bangladesh some students, I don't even really know what the situation is to be honest, but some students have been uprising against the Bangladeshi government, it's been a brutal crackdown, a bunch of students have been killed and now they're out protesting on the streets of London for some reason.
	But don't worry, don't worry.
	As we saw in the beginning of that footage, we've got some fat, out-of-shape police officers who can deal with this.
	Thank God the Mets are in fighting form.
	Andy Ngo again reporting.
	Because literally riots are happening in Bangladesh, so they're rioting here in solidarity.
	Oh yeah, there was also a stabbing in Wigan.
	Yeah, just in broad daylight.
	Yeah, I put that link in.
	Yeah, okay, let's see what Imam Tweedie has to say about this.
	Some countries, and you imported the garbage that the Muslim countries wanted to put in prison or isolate away from society.
	You went and you imported them.
	Why?
	For cheap labor.
	But these Islamist extremists, they don't want to work.
	They want free welfare.
	They don't have time to work.
	That's a good point.
	And there was a Saudi minister who made the exact same point as well, saying, look, you don't understand Islam because you're Westerners.
	You don't understand.
	These are people we don't respect and treat well in our countries.
	And also, it's not the heavily capable, upwardly mobile people who have gone because they're succeeding in our societies.
	You're not taking our best, is what he said.
	But anyway, Yeah, like I said, there was a stabbing in Wigan, as you can see there, chap with a knife.
	Absolute chaos.
	Absolute chaos.
	Any word from Keir Starmer?
	Well, not at the time of recording.
	Keir Starmer's last tweet was, Ukraine is and always will be at the heart of my government's agenda.
	Cut and paste somebody else's words.
	Doubtless, but why is Ukraine the heart of the British government's agenda when we have such chaos here at home?
	Angela Rayner, Second-in-Command, Deputy Leader.
	Nope, no statement from there.
	Nothing to say.
	It was a shame because I expected Angela Rayner might actually come out and say something.
	But they did bring Zelensky to the Parliament, to the Cabinet today, to address the new Labour Cabinet in number 10.
	Thank God.
	Thank God Zelensky was there.
	Still can't get himself a proper shirt, trying blazer.
	No, I don't know what's wrong with it.
	I mean, it's not like he hasn't had enough money before I know.
	But Nigel Farage made a statement, one of the few people to actually do so, saying, well, look, the politics of the subcontinent are currently playing out in the streets of Leeds.
	Don't say I didn't warn you.
	They're like, well, or there were gypsies in Leeds.
	Well, there were also Muslims and subcontinental people there and also happening in London.
	So we're seeing it.
	We're constantly seeing it.
	Yeah.
	I know what will help that.
	Let's make it a chairman of the party.
	Well, you know, different subject.
	That'll speak to the base.
	But anyway, one person who did make a statement was Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
	No, this is old.
	Oh, this is an old one, sorry.
	She is our Home Secretary, though, so just get a feel for her politics.
	Yeah, she is an insufferable white leftist, but she actually did make a statement.
	Um, there we go.
	I'm appalled at the scenes and attacks on police and vehicles and public transport and leads tonight.
	Disorder of this nature has no place in our society.
	Okay, so what are you gonna do?
	Well, I mean, you can see me there, replying to a what about the riots in London as well, but they're apparently fine.
	What is the policy solution, ultimately, for all this?
	Exactly.
	Well, Karl, this is the solution.
	You say, I'm so terribly sorry to hear this has happened, and then you don't do anything about it, and then it happens again, and you release another meaningless statement.
	Good point.
	I mean, again, like Tony Blair would have these people removed.
	So I don't know what she's waiting for.
	But anyway, and there is a change in the air.
	People like, hang on, we don't have to live with these people.
	This is from the RNC, obviously.
	So I think that what reform, at the last election I voted for reform and it was to move the Overton window to show that we can destroy a party like the Tories and it isn't a completely wasted vote to vote for one of the smaller parties.
	We move the Overton window that way.
	The next The final, perhaps the most essential move for the Overton window is to the realisation that re-migration is necessary.
	The only thing, the only actual policy prescription for all of this is re-migration.
	There's an article I wrote a couple of years ago now that these people need to go back.
	They have to.
	There's no other way.
	There's no other way.
	So just to not be so hard-line on things, because the sort of more soft-souled people say, well hang on a second.
	What?
	All of them.
	You say, well, hang on.
	How about we just begin with the people who are involved in the riots?
	Yeah, let's start with criminals at least.
	Foreign criminals.
	People who are...
	Start with that, okay.
	...from other places and commit crimes in Britain should just be sent home.
	Again, people will say, but won't that be difficult?
	How do we track these people down?
	Listen, even without the fact that we've got their faces on camera, we have so many different ways of tracking these people.
	The government already knows where these people are.
	When it comes to certain subsets of criminals in London, they literally post their locations and gang territories on the internet on interactive maps.
	We've got the most advanced surveillance state in the history of mankind.
	It's not actually that hard.
	It's really not that hard.
	Operation Slur, a word that I can't use, from America in the 1950s, Dwight D. Eisenhower, with the technology that they had available to them then.
	Where are you when we need you, Ike?
	50 officers at first involved and managed to deport over a million Mexicans who were in the country illegally.
	Where are you when we need you, Ike?
	Yeah, we have precedent on this, being able to do incredible things as long as you have the political will.
	It's happened lots and lots of times throughout history.
	The mass removal of certain demographics from certain countries for expedient reasons.
	Because you sort of have to, otherwise it's the death of your nation.
	And it's one reason why I can't continue to support reform or any other party that isn't explicitly for re-migration.
	Because that is what is needed.
	Anything short of that is multicultural.
	Anything short of that will end in sectarianism and will end in just more and more of what we've seen.
	I think there's a more nuanced conversation to be had about it, but I think that the baseline has to be foreign criminals must go.
	Will Labour do this?
	Well, we'll find out in a minute, actually, because we're going to now talk about what are the Labour Party going to do to us?
	Mostly bad, some of it not so bad.
	So some of it, slightly better.
	But if we can go on to the next one, please, Jack.
	Should we go through the Rumble Rants?
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	Do you want to go through the Rumble Rants while Jack gets that?
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, we'll need to scroll through them.
	So the first one, BaldEagle1787, who's quite a regular contributor on the Rumble Rants.
	Thank you very much.
	$5.
	Scroll up.
	The West never got over slavery.
	We've just exported it and let illegals in and pay them next to nothing to make ourselves feel better.
	More slaves today than any point in history.
	Certainly in Leicester East.
	Just gonna say that, yeah.
	Literally saying, what was that?
	Certainly in Claudia Webb's constituency.
	Was that Indian enslaving Vietnamese people?
	Something like that, wasn't it?
	It was something... I can't remember exactly what the breakdown was.
	I do think there is something to this analysis though, because essentially what you've imported in is a slave labourer class doing all of the menial stuff that you don't want to do in your own country or don't want the natives...
	Pret.
	Yep.
	And then you pay them meager wages and have them living in squalid conditions.
	And then they riot.
	The difference is that a lot of them don't work, so we're giving them board and food for nothing in return.
	And of course, they riot and we do nothing about it.
	Well, it's for enrichment.
	Cultural enrichment.
	The actual indentured slavery in Leicester and all over Britain certainly wasn't white natives enslaving sub-Saharan Africans or Caribbean people.
	Whatever it was, it wasn't that.
	No.
	Right.
	Obviously true.
	No.
	Nolong Pork for $1 says, how many founding stock British are going to get charges for being grossly offensive for mentioning this?
	So I guess we'll find out when we get our knocks on the door.
	The last Russian for $2 if they haven't kicked in 100 plus people's doors through at 5am this morning making a huge number of arrests.
	It's going to be 2011 all over again, only the English will be held to account.
	Probably Russian again for $2.
	Why would they care about buses?
	They speed around in luxury white German cars, Mercedes, Audis, BMWs, all bought totally legitimately, probably with income from their vape and phone and barber shops.
	Very profitable businesses I hear.
	Barber shops, there's loads of profit to be made in them when there's five in a row.
	It's a lot of grooming to be done though.
	Uh, Bonzi... Of the hair, of course.
	Yeah, sure, yeah.
	BonziBuddy23 for $1 says something that I think we're all going to have contention with, which is, I don't subscribe to the conservative pipe dream that there will ever be mass deportations.
	It's a logistical nightmare.
	The best anyone can hope for is a balkanisation of the country in the long term.
	Sorry, I appreciate the money, but I see that as a spineless take.
	Yeah, nonsense, that's slave speak.
	Hang on, so...
	It's all about Will.
	He's pessimistic about it.
	It's about Will, logistically.
	But I think it can be done.
	We are the music makers.
	As I mentioned, in a much less technologically advanced time, Eisenhower got 750 people to deport over a million.
	Well, don't worry.
	It's possible.
	Starmer actually has some good plans for the removal of foreign criminals, and so we should get on board.
	What better place to start?
	Exactly, but I'll let you carry on.
	We've got two more.
	Another one from Russian for $100.
	$1.
	Don't get ahead of yourself.
	But if you want to send it in, yeah.
	Thank you for mentioning him stopping the bin from being pushed into the fire.
	I had it wrong on your stream last night, Carl, so I'm glad you corrected.
	I was going to super chat if it wasn't mentioned.
	And again from Nolong Pork, $2.
	Illegals destroying cities is a feature, not a bug, but who is writing this unique code for the Western world?
	Our elites and their financial backers.
	So, let's go on to what Labour are going to do to us.
	Because most of it is going to be, of course, utterly terrible.
	Some of it isn't bad, though.
	So recently Labour set out their agenda in the King's Speech.
	For anyone who doesn't know, the King is given a script to read by the current ruling government and says, my government will do this.
	And so 35 bills were announced in the King's Speech.
	As the Telegraph points out, there are no clues about tax rises or spending cuts.
	Huh.
	Didn't mention any numbers.
	Interesting.
	Didn't mention any numbers about immigration either, but we'll get to that in a minute.
	Responsibility appears designed to draw more attention to the failures of Liz's trust than fixing problems that are going to come up again.
	Interesting.
	So what was absent, I think, was interesting, was votes for 16 year olds.
	Now, I think much has been made of the Zoomers going based.
	If you look at the actual breakdown, it's only about 8% of them, they're just very loud on social media.
	But obviously, this is something that's bothered Keir Starmer, I guess, and that wasn't in it.
	After Germany, I think they don't want to even, even whatever our plans show, they don't want to risk it.
	I think all parties of all political persuasions do that thing of promising stuff In order to get into power, and then when they get into power, just drop it.
	So I think they all do.
	But I feel like leftist parties, or particularly sort of more centrist leftist parties, are the worst for it.
	If you get a real hardline commie, someone like Hugo Chavez or something, they actually do do what they promise they're going to do.
	Yeah, and the country collapses, yes.
	And when you get a wishy-washy lefty like Labour, they're sort of the worst for it.
	I feel, often, it seems in my experience.
	But yeah, no, so that's great.
	Yeah, don't give 16, 17 year olds a vote.
	If anything, raise the voting age.
	Yeah, 35 years old, property owning, white man.
	Yeah, male.
	Obviously that's a joke.
	One thing that also was left out was forcing members of the House of Lords to retire at the age of 80.
	Which, I mean, I'm not even that bothered about that to be honest.
	Life peers or hereditary peers or both?
	Well, just the life peers, but they will remove hereditary peers.
	The House of Lords is going to be filled with Labour donors.
	It's going to be a crony house.
	When he reads that before he has to go out and actually read it out loud, does Charles read that and start sweating?
	Because that's a tradition that goes back centuries.
	That's the question, isn't it?
	So what Charles is doing is presiding over the dismantling of his own kingdom, the republicization of his own constitutional kingdom.
	And so it's like, right, there's something quite dark about it, really.
	That he's got no choice but to do this, or feels he has no choice.
	I mean, technically, he has actually got all the power.
	He could do whatever he wanted.
	Here's the thing I'll say about hereditary peers that perhaps Americans don't know, or other countries in the world don't have such a thing.
	When you look at it objectively, it is inherently unfair It is that somebody's yeah right but that's the point yeah it's inherently unfair but it's one of our traditions it served us really well yeah and it's actually not anywhere near as bad as just packing it with Lib Dem donors yeah or whatever and and but the thing is the people that hate it the most are sort of commie globalist traitor types which we'll get to in a minute so the thing is it's like not that I love the concept of hereditary peerage
	It's that all the people, all the worst people despise it more.
	Yeah, and on that same note, it's not that replacing it with only people who've been granted peerages by Starmer or whoever is going to be a more fair system.
	Like you mentioned, it'll just mean that it will fill up instead with people who can afford to give the most money to Labour, which is also unfair to the little man if you're really concerned about Mr Little over here.
	It'll be crony capitalists.
	Literally, it'll be a plutocracy.
	Personally, I'm a Luke Wall monarchist.
	I don't particularly like Prince Charles at all, but the concept of... King Charles.
	Sorry, King Charles, sorry.
	Yeah.
	But the concept of monarchy, you know, I've done so much content about the monarchy, obviously I'm fascinated by it.
	It's a really important part of our history and heritage.
	We're a constitutional monarchy, so it's not like the monarch really has anything to do with the levers of power or anything.
	But the fact that people like Clive Lewis Well I was going to bring Clive Lewis up there.
	Yeah exactly, I'm totally for it.
	The reason was recently when the MPs were sworn in and Clive Lewis was like, I want to pledge allegiance to the people of my constituency, blah blah blah, I hate the monarchy basically.
	And he was forced to bend the knee and retake his pledge properly, sensibly, like he ought.
	And making leftists bend the knee, I'm totally in favour of that.
	So yeah, I'm a bit of a royalist in that regard, because the leftists don't want it, and I'm in favour of it, because it actually doesn't affect my life at all in any way, shape or form.
	And it's historic, as you said, it's proper that England is a kingdom.
	We always have been, we always should be.
	Having a constitutional monarchy like after the Civil War and after the Glorious Revolution and stuff, that served us really quite well.
	Yes, yes.
	And another thing as well, I've met a bunch of the Lords.
	They're not bad chaps.
	The ones that I met seem really decent.
	And actually concerned, I mean, I met the sort of base ones.
	But we're interested in the future of the country.
	And there is something to be said for having people who own some of the country.
	OK, you're the Duke of Buckinghamshire or something like that, you know, the Earl of wherever.
	OK, you at least... A vested interest.
	Yeah, you have a feeling of possession of the land, right?
	So you're concerned about what happens to it and the people who live in it.
	And because you can't be voted out, you're not worried about the democratic rigmarole of every four or five years, oh, I've got to persuade constituents.
	No, you can focus on the long game.
	You can think in long terms about the future health of the civilization.
	So I think there is actually an advantage to the Lords that is not being given due credit.
	Well here's another advantage as well to any kind of monarchical system, which is that despite what you would be told when you're learning about political theory and such in schools, it's actually much easier to hold to account than whatever gigantic blob of managerial bureaucracy that we have right now.
	If you know that there's a king, And he's in charge, and everybody beneath him are his minions of one form or another, and you can actually go and say, well, this thing's gone wrong, so it's this lord's fault.
	It's the king's fault.
	It's this person's fault.
	And you can't do that with Whitehall.
	What happens with Whitehall?
	It all goes on in offices and endless meetings behind closed doors that we have absolutely no control over.
	They would like you to believe that we do because we have the democratic system, whereas that's a smokescreen.
	Now that's a great point.
	You can at least name the person in charge.
	This is the problem with the EU bureaucracy.
	Obviously a huge amount goes on with whatever they have for the civil service there, but you couldn't name a single person who's responsible for any of these things.
	You can't name who's responsible for the legislation, you can't name who's responsible for the enforcement.
	A classic example, the Magna Carta.
	What happened?
	The king was misbehaving, saw the lords, So just to be clear, in Britain we aren't citizens.
	We are subjects of the crown.
	In America you're a citizen because it's a republic.
	In France you're a citizen because it's a republic.
	where we go into the cartoon detail.
	So just to be clear, in Britain, we aren't citizens.
	We are subjects of the crown.
	In America, you're a citizen because it's a republic.
	In France, you're a citizen because it's a republic.
	We're not a republic.
	But the king is not a personal monarchy.
	It's not an absolute monarchy.
	They have very, very little power.
	In fact, the government of the day, Keir Starmer, whoever, says, read out our agenda and get every single word exactly right.
	That's how little power our monarch has.
	And to be honest with you, I would kind of prefer it if he would turn around and say, you know what, I'm here to protect the hereditary rights of Englishmen, actually.
	So maybe I won't do some of the things that you're asking.
	Yeah, but he's a wet globalist.
	I know, I know.
	Anyway, moving on.
	So Keir Starmer is actually probably going to smash the criminal gangs.
	Now, he wrote an article in The Sun.
	Fair enough.
	I have to say, he writes worse than ChatGPT.
	Like, he writes in these weird single sentences.
	I mean, just, like, just... So he writes like he talks, then?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Form a paragraph.
	Horribly and boring.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's incredibly boring.
	Very low grade.
	But he is going to bring about this border security command, which is going to shut down gangs smuggling routes and dismantles their networks.
	I think he probably will do that, actually.
	So, fair enough.
	You've got word from Tone, from UpOnHire, that that will undercut reform.
	No, no, it's not just that.
	I mean, yeah, he did get that.
	But it's not just that.
	Keir Starmer is the letter of the law legalistic bureaucrat.
	He was a lawyer.
	He ran the CPS, didn't he?
	Exactly.
	There were a few laws that he wasn't applying to certain people.
	But this sort of thing is totally off the grid.
	Note the person-smuggling, criminal, drug-smuggling, criminal gangs.
	Keir Starmer will have absolutely no problem destroying them because not only of what they're doing intrinsically bad, but they're also defying the letter of the law.
	Whereas opening the borders and bringing in millions of people legally, totally fine.
	It's done by the letter of the law.
	That's the way Keir Starmer looks at things.
	So he might stop the boats, but you'll still get millions more people flooding our towns.
	But they'd still be legally here, not illegally.
	Nandini Hussain can say you've got no right to complain about that.
	Exactly, exactly.
	And in fact, the border force has already begun just simply taking migrants back to France.
	This could have been done at any time, and apparently they came out and said, this isn't a change of policy.
	I said, what do you mean this wasn't a change of policy?
	You didn't do this under the Conservatives.
	So why are you suddenly able to do it now?
	And what it is, is that the Labour Party have the keys to the kingdom.
	They are part of the liberal managerial global order, and therefore the civil service and all the institutions of state just cooperate.
	Whereas they didn't cooperate with the Conservatives, because the Conservatives are idiots.
	Senior civil servants then.
	So let's assume Preeti Patel and Suella Brethren did ask them to do this.
	If that is the case, and they just simply refuse to, if that is the case, which I'm not even entirely convinced of, but let's say it is, then those senior civil servants The buck stops with them.
	They're guilty of that crime then.
	You would think, but Sweller-Braveman at a NatCon speech said, well everyone's blaming the Blob or the institutions and that's not really true.
	I was prevented from doing my job by Sunak.
	Sunak expressly, she calls him out expressly saying he intervened in her plans to do exactly this sort of thing.
	So no, it was the traitorous nature of the Conservative Party that got in the way.
	Well, isn't it that senior civil servants can only be removed by the Prime Minister?
	Yes.
	Yeah, so Sunak refused to do that.
	Sunak was the person blocking it.
	She called him out by name.
	She said, look, the institutions were, of course, against us, but we were the government.
	We could have done something if we wanted.
	Sunak expressly interceded there.
	She remained Home Secretary for months under him, though.
	Yeah.
	There we go.
	At least she ended up calling it out eventually.
	I still love her speech.
	I get sub.
	I suck.
	I failed.
	Support me.
	That was the speech in sum.
	She is unfortunately the best the Conservatives have.
	I met her as well at NatCon.
	She seemed like a really nice person.
	She does seem on side.
	She's just a part of the system.
	So she's operating within those limits.
	But yeah, so 70 migrants were caught crossing one day.
	It's a border foster service in France.
	Shows it is possible.
	We should just be doing that intrinsically, obviously.
	But anyway, thousands of prisoners are going to be released.
	Oh, by the way, on this, no word of what they're actually going to do with the illegals that have already come across under the Conservative tenure.
	There have been rumours and mutterings of, well, we're going to get them processed as soon as possible.
	What that probably means is just letting them out.
	Just letting them go.
	Just giving them the right stamp.
	Stamp, stamp, stamp.
	We're not getting our money back on that one.
	Can we get a rebate from the red government?
	Nope.
	No, incidentally, Sunak gave 490 million pounds to Macron over this and Macron just let them keep coming.
	We gave 290, 250 million, something like that to Rwanda.
	We're not going to get a refund for that.
	And Starmer just comes in and just like, right, no, they're just going to go back.
	Okay, fine.
	At least that can be done.
	One French cop stabbed one dinghy one time popping it.
	That cost us 400 odd million pounds, did it?
	Yeah, so this is the fast-track plans to allow 90,000 migrants to plan for deportation to Rwanda to claim asylum in the UK.
	Of course they are, of course they are.
	Anyway, moving on because we're running out of time, there's so much to cover.
	Thousands of prisoners are going to be released in September because the Conservatives used to just let them out after they'd served 50% of their sentence, but now they're going to let them out when they've served 40% of their sentence because there's going to be a total breakdown of law and order if we don't release everyone from the prisons.
	Really?
	That's weird, because I would have thought it'd be the opposite.
	Yeah, the exact opposite.
	Yeah, but what do I know?
	Anyway, the prison population in the UK, I went and looked it up.
	You're going to like this, Beau, you're going to love this.
	So, on page four, let me get down to page four, there's a nice little graph where you can see that... Can we make that a bit bigger, please, Jack?
	Just so it's a bit more clear.
	You can see in about 1997, something happened.
	The prison population spikes.
	Didn't really affect Scotland as much, did it?
	No, but it still went up.
	It still went up, but... In England and Wales, though, in the late 90s, something happened.
	Must have been those tough on... Some Labour MPs did something.
	Yeah.
	No, I think it must have been those Labour tough on crime policies.
	That must have been it.
	Quite possibly, but we do have the numbers.
	Foreign nationals make up 12% of the prison population, and people of ethnic minorities make up 27% of the prison population, compared to the 18% of the general population.
	So the question is, why are they here?
	Why are we housing foreigners in our prisons disproportionately?
	Well, that's a great question.
	The Liberal Party are like, you know what, that's a good point.
	We do need to save money.
	So actually, Labour are going to deport the foreign criminals.
	The Conservatives could have done this.
	They could have done that.
	Fourteen years.
	All of this, I just want to say, I'll wait to see before it happens.
	Sure, but I think they probably will do this.
	Like smashing the boat gangs.
	Great you're saying it, but the Tories said it.
	Wait till it actually happens.
	Then I will give credit where it's due.
	The Tories didn't even say it though.
	They didn't say they were going to smash the boat gangs.
	They said they were going to stop the boats.
	And the Tories are the ones who allowed so many foreign criminals to take up so much space in our prisons.
	This is 10,422 foreign nationals in jail.
	Personally, I'm in favor of bringing back scourging.
	So I just think that if you're a foreign national, you commit a crime in Britain, you should be flogged and deported immediately.
	Right.
	I don't think that's unreasonable.
	But yeah, so, and this is 12% of all prisoners, which is costing the taxpayer nearly £500 million a year.
	Again, why didn't the Conservatives do this?
	Point of contention, would that be a public flogging?
	Well, yeah.
	Perhaps in Marble Arch, somewhere like that?
	I think that anyone who's flogged for committing a crime, a violent crime, should be flogged in public, obviously.
	And there are still many market towns across the country still have public stocks.
	That they're out and available in public squares.
	I mean, there's no reason we can't use them.
	Yeah.
	So generally on immigration, though, Labour have been very cagey about the numbers, as in they haven't given us any numbers.
	They've got an immigration policy in their manifesto.
	They've got three basic points, which are we're going to boost Britain's skills.
	So they're going to bring in people to fill skill gaps.
	They're going to reform the points-based immigration system.
	Not sure how that's going to work.
	And they're going to ban hiring from overseas for employers and recruitment agencies who break employment law.
	But they're not giving any numbers, any targets or anything like that.
	So who knows?
	I think the legal immigration is still going to be through the roof.
	And so obviously all these legal migrants have to live somewhere.
	Therefore, boom!
	Mandatory housing targets.
	That's right.
	We're going to house all of these legal migrants all over the green belt.
	Wonderful.
	One of our nice green sunlit areas.
	Look at that feckless pair right there.
	I know.
	Jesus Christ, that fills me with confidence.
	I don't know about you.
	In a way though, I am kind of pleased that we finally have a government that actually accurately represents Britain.
	Right?
	Incompetent middle managers and council estate slags.
	Labour Party, right?
	They are actually something that is genuinely, authentically British.
	So there is something to be happy about.
	LOL!
	You get what you voted for!
	LOL!
	Vote harder next time!
	LOL!
	Anyway, um... I mean, what was it, only 20% of the electorate actually voted for them in the first place.
	Overwhelming majority!
	Democracy works!
	And what they promised the last couple of screens you put up, where it's their immigration policy, they're going to do this and that.
	I just simply don't believe them.
	Oh, they're not going to reduce numbers.
	I just simply don't believe it.
	They'll reduce the illegals, they won't reduce the legals.
	It's literally a factor of 10 to 1, the problem.
	So anyway.
	But right, so they're going to build houses.
	They're going to make you build houses.
	Mandatory housing targets.
	So that means that if they're going to like, you know, house a load of new foreigners in your area, you will lose the right to block house building.
	Literally, no.
	We're just going to say you can't object to us building these houses there.
	You've got no choice, because Stalmer is going to govern the country like he governed his party, like Stalin.
	He's genuinely like that.
	Moreover, they're going to force the landowners to sell the land if they don't agree to it voluntarily, and they're going to make sure they don't get, quote, excessive payouts.
	So they're probably going to screw them over a bit.
	And just to be clear, the green areas there, that's where they're going to be building.
	It's like, right.
	Okay.
	So the countryside.
	In the suburbs around the biggest urban areas.
	The rural areas around the biggest urban areas.
	More urban sprawl.
	It's just going to be concreted over house foreigners.
	You can see though that Greenbelt is probably one of the only things that stops Manchester and Preston and other large cities from all being joined into some gigantic megacity, megatropolis, dystopian nightmare in the northwest.
	They will have Britain like a coruscant where it's just the whole area is covered with cityscape.
	Yeah, and labor is going to make it mandatory.
	They're going to force you to sell your land and they're going to stop locals from being able to block it.
	Lovely.
	So anyway, next on the list is banning the absurd ban on onshore wind farms.
	Sorry, do you not want your entire country to look like Cybertron covered in engineered pylons and windmills?
	Well, too bad that's going to happen, which of course, quote, delights environmentalists and energy experts.
	Energy experts will be advocating for nuclear.
	Yeah.
	Anyone knows this.
	A dozen nuclear power stations, job done.
	What about the voting public?
	Well, they've been told that they don't have a say.
	It's overridden already.
	Oh, I thought that, lol, we voted for this though, lol.
	Yeah, well, the Green Party, incidentally, are the ones coming out against this, actually.
	Because as one local MP pointed out, the pylons are ugly and people don't like it.
	They don't want this sort of thing.
	A shockingly sensible statement.
	It is.
	But then Miliband is in the parliament being like, well, hang on a second.
	You want green energy, but you don't want the infrastructure to support green energy.
	Aren't you a hypocrite?
	It's like brilliant.
	Brilliant.
	Amazing.
	Amazing.
	Lee Anderson has assessed that this will cost you something like £8.5 billion for this GB Energy company.
	To see Ed Miliband at the dispatch box on the government side of the house is... actually turns my stomach.
	Yeah, it's gross.
	But, uh, anyway.
	Just to remember that Ed Miliband isn't even English.
	Well, I mean, he eats bacon sandwiches, so... Oh, okay, sorry, sorry.
	Kind of eats it.
	Um, anyway.
	Moving on, Labour are going to devolve power to the devolution deserts in England.
	What good is that, though, if you're just going to override them from the central government?
	Devolve power?
	OK, we don't want the energy pylons or new houses built here.
	Too bad.
	Enjoy your devolved power, chumps.
	Doesn't matter in any way, shape or form.
	It's going to give new powers to mayors and combined authorities to do really petty things, while the central government is just going to override them completely.
	It's the only thing to weaken Westminster.
	Starkey talked about how one of Blair's main, in a meta sense, main things he did was to destroy the power of Parliament with all sorts of devolution and quangos and all sorts of things.
	Just keep doing it.
	Just keep doing it.
	It's terrible.
	It's been a disaster for our country, but just keep doing it.
	Go further with that.
	They're mad.
	They're mad.
	Just the thing on the Ed Miliband thing.
	I don't know why that's surprising because I was like, well, lots of people in our Parliament aren't English.
	Like loads of them, but the Conservative Party.
	Exactly, and you wonder why that none of them have any care for our history, our culture, or destroying half of the countryside.
	To be fair, Miliband's probably more integrated than most of the people in the Parliament these days, so I think he's probably... Which is why he's eagerly destroying the countryside.
	Nah, he's just an idiot.
	I don't think Ed Miliband feeling foreign is the issue really.
	I mean there are definitely lots of people in the Parliament who do feel foreign.
	I just don't think Miliband's one of them.
	Anyway, so Stammer's also going to hand powers to unions, workers and tenants in the King's Speech.
	So if you are an enterprising fellow in the United Kingdom, well, your job, your life is going to be made a lot more difficult.
	And this is the particular one, as one of those enterprising fellows, you know, the sort of person who starts a small business, starts employing people.
	Oh yeah, he's also going to keep the ban on cigarette sales, which is okay.
	Cringe.
	Sorry, I'm trying to get through this as much as possible.
	I'm going to ruin everything.
	The VAT on private school fees.
	This is atrocious because they all seem to think, so what they're going to do is make sure that private schools now have to pay VAT.
	Now the reason that you don't have private schools paying VAT is to make it affordable for the aspiring middle class to give their children an excellent education.
	An education that is better than what a state school can provide.
	And this is an example of just one of the opinions you get on it.
	Well, I've got no sympathy.
	I can't believe all these rich people.
	It's like, no, no, you're mistaking that not all private schools are eaten, actually.
	The only people this doesn't affect are, in fact, the super rich.
	Because when you're a multi-millionaire or a billionaire, you can afford to pay the VAT rise.
	When you say someone like myself, who isn't even earning six figures a year or seven figures a year, No, I'm not even earning six figures a year, right?
	But I send my children to a private school, you're affecting me.
	You're affecting my kids and their education.
	It's not like my kids come from a billionaire background.
	Classic leftist policy, the politics of resentment.
	100%.
	That you're a kulak.
	Yep, exactly.
	You've got a little bit of money, so you're the enemy now.
	You're the class enemy now.
	100%.
	That's exactly what this is.
	And of course, lots of private schools pointing out, this is a race to the bottom.
	What are you talking about?
	We're not all eaten.
	You know, we're not the billionaire, you know, princes don't send their sons to like, you know, some Yorkshire private school that costs 10 grand a year.
	You know, I mean, 10 grand a year, that's a lot of money, but if you're earning 50 grand a year, you'd be like, okay, we'll go without, I won't buy a car or something.
	I'll send my kid to a private school.
	That's me being upwardly mobile and building generational wealth.
	And the Labour Party is like, smash that down.
	You're not having that.
	And so I'm really resentful about this.
	I really hate this policy.
	But on the plus side, there are going to be billions more to Ukraine.
	Billions!
	It's the centre of Osama's government.
	Building houses for Somalis and Afghans.
	So that's what the VAT rise is for, presumably?
	No, the VAT rise for the school, for the schools in particular, is to make sure that they can hire 6,500 new teachers for the foreign children who will be educated in British schools.
	That's why.
	That's literally the reason.
	We're building foreign people houses, we're going to be educating their children, and I'm going to be paying for it.
	Wonderful.
	Now this is just more money for the war in Ukraine.
	So this will probably be like debt-backed money printing.
	Great.
	100%.
	Anyway, so what will the Lead Party do that's actually quite good?
	One of the few things is renationalizing the railways because we have simply the worst railways in Europe.
	And I will explain why in a second.
	Basically, by 2025 and into the 2030s, a load of the existing railway contracts after the privatisation of the Tories are going to be... Was it the Tories?
	No, it might have been under Labour, actually.
	Sorry, what?
	Was it Blair or the Tories who privatised the rails?
	I can't remember exactly when it happened.
	I think it might have been Blair.
	It's more of a process, really, isn't it?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I can't remember.
	Maybe they bring it up in the article.
	But anyway, the rails were privatized and therefore sold off to a bunch of private companies.
	We'll get on to who owns those in a second.
	And so they're going to bring in legislation that will just simplify the rail system, bring on the public ownership.
	Actually, that is a good thing.
	Because we're getting screwed.
	You know why we're getting screwed?
	Guess who owns our railways?
	That's right, the Europeans.
	The Europeans own our railways.
	Why do we let our rivals and competitors in Europe own our goddamn railways, right?
	So the West Coast Main Line, connecting London, Birmingham, Manchester and Glasgow, are operated by the Italian state rail operator...
	The State Rail Operator, Trenitalia.
	I've used Italian trains, they're terrible.
	Ours are worse, right?
	The German State Railway, Deutsche Bahn, operates four British railways, including the London Overground, the Grand Central Line to Sunderland.
	Seven UK railways are operated by partly owned Dutch State Railway, or sorry, operated or partly operated by Dutch State Railway, I can't pronounce, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, something like that.
	Right, including Mersey Rail, ScotRail and West Midlands Railway.
	And seven railways are operated fully or partly by the French State Railway, including a bunch of other transports for Wales and Thameslink and stuff like that.
	So out of the 30 UK railways, six are owned and operated by private companies or British government authorities.
	It wasn't privatised, it was given to the governments.
	You have to say very quickly because a lot of people out there that our audience are sort of right-leaning or they would say it's the idea that nationalising anything is sort of the policy of a red, of a socialist.
	But it's not necessarily the case, because if you think about it, you either have something nationalised, controlled from Westminster or Whitehall, or the French own it, or the Chinese own it, like our steel.
	You either have a nationalised steel industry, or the Chinese own it.
	Well, then surely it's the lesser of two evils.
	Exactly.
	To have it nationalised.
	It's still going to be run by a bunch of incompetents that might not still have our interests at heart in London, or rather that than Beijing or Paris.
	Sure, but it's literally the Germans, the Dutch, the Italians and the French who own our railways.
	But it's the state Those states own our railways, so they're not private.
	They're not privatised.
	They're national.
	It's bizarre, isn't it?
	It's perverse.
	It's perverse.
	Just for other nations.
	No, we should bring them back.
	For what I would say are right-wing reasons.
	Not for left-wing reasons, no.
	Because don't like those foreigners having our industry.
	Right-wing reasons, okay?
	There is a good reason to do this, and... Xenophobia for the win.
	I'm not even joking, right?
	They're exploiting us, right?
	We are paying the most expensive train journeys in all of Europe, right?
	So for comparable distances in Germany, it costs £9 to travel 120 miles from Berlin to Dresden, whereas a similar journey from London to Birmingham is £35.
	It's unbelievable, like to get from here to London is £50.
	It's like, that's an hour!
	That is unbelievable.
	Like, to go from Madrid to Barcelona is £53, whereas to get from the same distance from London to Edinburgh is £106.
	So we're being totally rinsed here?
	No, this absolutely should.
	And the final thing, just to close this off, is that for some reason the Conservatives decided to make it that you probably wouldn't get prosecuted for stealing less than £200 worth of goods, and the Liberal Party are like, yeah, we're going to get rid of that, because that's bonkers.
	It's like, yes, that is bonkers.
	I don't know why the Conservatives did it.
	No, that's legitimately good.
	I mean, credit where credit's due, even if it's one tiny bit of their policy programme, that is better, surely.
	So the Labour Party are going to do a bunch of stuff that's absolutely atrocious and will continue to ruin the country.
	But they will deport foreign criminals, return the boats to the continent, renationalise the railways so the foreigners don't get to control them, and make shoplifting a crime again.
	Thank God.
	Thank God something good's happening.
	Anyway.
	More Rumble Rants.
	While you read these, I'm very sorry.
	I'm about to wet myself with you.
	Oh my god, Harry.
	I know, I drink...
	Such a big man, you've got a tiny bladder.
	I've drank over three litres of water today.
	So, anyway.
	I'll allow it.
	I'll be back.
	The Last Russian says, Avanti took over from Virgin and the Mantrest in London, Well, they've got every incentive to do so.
	One third of the trains, but all but abolish customer service.
	I used to always take the trains and now drive to London.
	Well, they've got every incentive to do so, right?
	They've got every incentive to lower the standard of the service because they're doing it for profit, for the profit of another country.
	Unbelievable.
	I saw a story a couple of months ago saying this girl, I think she was going from Liverpool to London or maybe from Newcastle to London or something like that and it was cheaper to get a Ryanair or EasyJet or something to like Madrid and then back to London.
	It was cheaper to do that.
	100%.
	The air, it is cheaper to fly than it is to take the trains in this country.
	It's insane.
	And it's because we're being exploited by foreign countries.
	BinarySurfer says, I wanted to deport these people, NAS legal immigrants, but I don't know what NAS means.
	It's meant mess.
	Oh.
	But I don't see it happening as the Overton window is too far away from reaching that for migrant demographic bomb goes off and they become majority.
	I don't know.
	I mean, just if we just start by deporting loads of the illegals, that should be a great start.
	And just loads of criminals.
	Anyone who comes here and commits a crime should just be gone.
	And their dependents.
	Again, people won't go for that, man.
	People won't go for that.
	But, you know, being practical and realistic about what can be done, there is a very strong moral argument that if you come here and commit a crime, you should just be deported and not be allowed back.
	You've had mass chain migration.
	Why not mass chain re-migration?
	Because the Labour Party would be like, well, what have those people done wrong?
	And unfortunately they'll have a point.
	That person hasn't committed a crime.
	Bald Eagle says such should have been such.
	Not sure that was in response to.
	Oh wait, probably the previous one.
	Bald Eagle says the housing plan is nothing more than Labour changing all the Conservative areas into new Labour voting blocks.
	Remember though there is no such thing as replacement theory.
	Well that's a great point as well.
	Like they're going to be housing literally the foreigners in the suburbs around where the English people flee to and then there'll be another sort of corona of houses around them which is now the New Foreigners.
	My vision of a nightmarish vision of Britain is that eventually there'll be only, there'll be small enclaves of the native white British in small rural towns.
	Yeah, that's what's going to happen.
	Someone like Avebury or something.
	There'll be a small enclave of us left and the rest of the country is also, in and of itself, also split up into ethnic and religious and cultural sectors.
	That's inevitable, judging by what's happening.
	Hello again.
	That's Cameron's big society for you.
	Yes.
	That's Blair's vision of Britain.
	As we're on a time limit, I'm going to keep going quickly.
	Not Just A String says, so Labour does a better job than the Tories by the virtue that the Civil Service worships Labour and the Tories refuse to put actually upstanding people in charge.
	Correct.
	Although the Tories could have done something about it which didn't.
	Yeah, because the Civil Service is Labour.
	Yeah, but the Tories could have done something about that.
	Anyway, Sean says, a Wall Street firm with connections to the Bush family, Bush, senior director of CIA and FBI, shorted Trump's businesses and JD Vance's businesses in billions of dollars, millions of shares the day before.
	Interesting, but I haven't looked into it, so I can't comment on that.
	But that's weird.
	If true, yeah.
	Yeah.
	So PHUK says, we want things to stay the same, but more things will have to change.
	Lampedusa.
	And Carl, in our haste to make up for the evils of World War Two, we've recreated the circumstances that led to World War One.
	Our countries are balkanized and we live with communities who hate us.
	Unfortunately, sadly true.
	What evils?
	I thought we fought against Mr. Hitler.
	Alright, may I have the mouse?
	You may indeed have the mouse.
	Thank you, thank you very much.
	So, I think we've gone over enough miserableness today.
	We have.
	I think our grey, rainy, depressing, endless politics have depressed everyone enough.
	So let's look at what's happening over in sunshine and rainbows land, that is being America.
	Because there's some fun stuff going on over there after the RNC, which has had some controversy, some discussion around the RNC hosting undesirables, but there's been some fun.
	And yes, I'm going to head it off at the pass right now.
	America is idiocracy, okay?
	Massively so.
	America is idiocracy, but to us, to us Brits over here, I just want some fun.
	Yeah, it's at least exciting.
	I just want some fun.
	I want to get all happy.
	I want to get riled up about something.
	Whereas in England, it's like being beaten down again and again and again.
	And so screw it.
	I'm going to have some fun.
	So the RNC is going to come up in a bit.
	But first, let's talk about what's going on over in Democrat land.
	It's not looking good for Joe.
	It's really, it's really not looking good for Joe.
	It's only because he named Trump as VP.
	Trump's playing both sides, you see.
	That way he always comes out on top.
	Maybe he meant Don Jr.
	Maybe, maybe.
	But yeah, here's a picture of Joe with his old friend Barack, who's told him, no, don't do it.
	Don't do it.
	This is terrible.
	I mean, he told him that he didn't need to run in the first place.
	He said, you don't need to do this, Joe.
	Biden's like, no, I do.
	And now he's like, look, you just have to stop.
	Yeah, and then Joe says, what?
	Who are you?
	You're the black man.
	Yeah, I mean, he literally called one of his, uh... Secretary of Defense, I think it was.
	Yeah, he was just like, the Secretary of the Black Man.
	It's like, oh my God, Joe.
	Yeah.
	So apparently Biden's becoming, and this is according to the New York Times, he's becoming more receptive to please for him to stand aside.
	I assume they went in one ear out the other before.
	He probably didn't remember that anybody said them to him.
	Mr. Obama, who served with Mr. Biden, Adam Schiff, one of them.
	Schiff.
	prominent democrat to express concerns on thursday after similar private warnings from three senior figures to the president were made in the last week he told several allies he was worried about biden's poll ratings and believes he should seriously consider standing down to protect the party and his legacy his ever so shining glowing if anything legacy amazing and uh there's adam schiff one of them skiff schiff
	Schiff.
	i don't know but i do know that there is full-blown um rebellion going on within the party right now because details have been leaks of meetings between biden and top democrats uh on wednesday revealing that nancy pelosi chuck schumer and hakeem jeffries have all warned that he's on course to lose the white house and both branches of congress In November, neither Mr. Schumer nor Mr. Jeffries, the Democrat leaders, have denied the claims.
	It would be so sweet if not only Trump won, but he got Congress and the Senate.
	If that happened, it's the Senate which is the... I mean, it's vital, all three are vital, but it's the Senate one which is sort of most in doubt, it seems to me, or is least likely to actually get.
	If he got both of them, oh man, that would be so sweet.
	He might be able to get stuff done.
	Yeah, he might be able to.
	Well, he would be able to, there'd be nothing stopping him.
	Well, assuming they're never Trumpers.
	Sure, but like, you know, with a generally sort of pro-Trump Supreme Court as well.
	Right, yeah.
	Also, there's rumours that Pelosi is running her own Dump Biden campaign.
	Wouldn't you?
	One of the most successful traders of all time, Nancy Pelosi.
	Oh yeah.
	She's got the money to fund that sort of thing.
	The thing is I'm very pro-Biden at this point.
	Why?
	Because he's shit.
	Because he's absolutely atrocious and he's taking the entire left in the United States down with him.
	So I'm totally pro-Biden now.
	Oh, you want him to run for the Democrat ticket?
	Absolutely.
	Well, so do I. I thought you'd all of a sudden flipped.
	No, no.
	To lock in the Donald's win.
	Right, right, right, right.
	To really destroy them.
	Didn't Barry Obama in the 2020, didn't Baz in 2020, when it was who they were going to pick?
	Because there was loads of Bernie bros in 2020, weren't there?
	I don't think he backed Biden, did he?
	Uh, he did, but it was very late.
	That's right, it was at the last minute.
	I think Biden was put forward as the establishment Dem candidate to ensure that nobody who was further to the left of him, and it could be business as usual.
	And also, even then everybody knew that he was dementia riddled, not quite as bad, maybe?
	Things have got a lot worse.
	Yeah, things have got worse, but even back then they knew that he was just a puppet.
	And the thing is, as well, it was very much like Boris coming out and endorsing Sunak, where it's like, right at the last moment, and I'm being pushed into this.
	Yeah, and when you say that it will lock in Trump's victory, it absolutely will, because so new polls are showing that Trump is leading Biden in all seven swing states, while some previously safe democratic states, including Virginia, are looking like they could flip.
	Great stuff.
	Because one guy takes a bullet, one guy can't finish a sentence.
	Biden!
	Biden!
	Anybody who isn't just ideologically possessed at this point, even on the left, has to go, I mean, at least the guy can form coherent sentences.
	I mean, loads of them were just like, wow, Trump did look kind of heroic, didn't he?
	He looked kind of cool, guys.
	Yeah, he was kind of badass.
	Yeah.
	Meanwhile, Schumer and other senior Democrats have successfully delayed a bid to nominate Biden earlier than the DNC that's going on in August, a prospect that had been floated by his allies as a way of heading off the coup.
	So they are definitely going to try and coup him.
	And things are already being put into place for that because Democratic donors are already being rallied to raise money for Kamala Harris.
	OK, yeah, no, I'm on the Harris train.
	Harris!
	Harris!
	She's even worse than Biden!
	Can you imagine the polls?
	Well, the polling's been done.
	She does even worse than Biden does.
	Brilliant.
	Well, fantastic.
	So, the people giving this information to Politico have made sure to stay anonymous.
	Of course they have.
	Because they don't want to be seen as actively working on a coup within the party.
	But according to them, donor advisors have begun collecting pledges from female Democratic donors, because it's the sisterhood.
	They've all got to stick together.
	While a woman's political organisation has begun speaking to its donor base in an effort to ensure an initial wave of contributions to a potential Harris campaign, according to people familiar with the efforts.
	Madden has let go for Kamala over someone like Gavin Newsom.
	Not that Gavin Newsom is massively popular, but Harris is less popular than Biden.
	She's so obnoxious and everyone sees it.
	But as far as I'm aware, because she's already Vice President, if they coup Biden, they would also have to find some way of couping her to get her to step down voluntarily.
	So, this is a complete implosion by the looks of it.
	Either you're stuck with Biden, you're stuck with Kamala, or the party destroys itself.
	Oh, it's so good, isn't it?
	The Americans must be tired of winning.
	Clearly, strongest country, leader of the free world.
	I've just got to live vicariously through my American friends.
	At least you're doing well.
	You know, we suck, but you guys are doing brilliant.
	So that's how the Democratic Party is doing.
	How's the Republican Party doing?
	Because they've been having the RNC, it's been going on for a few days now.
	Trump gave his speech last night, or this morning, wherever you are, depending on your time zone, and there's been some surprises with it.
	The first one being that the RNC was not getting entirely glowing praise at first, mainly because of involvements like this.
	Amber Rose, who I'd never heard of before, apparently she's some ex of Kanye West's and OnlyFans thought, decided to get up and give a speech.
	I decided to watch it on YouTube, it was five minutes long, and it's literally just her saying, you know, like, I want it so gas is cheaper and that my children can have a future.
	You know, typical platitudes.
	But it's the fact that she's an OnlyFans thought that kind of looks bad.
	Also, apparently the pioneer of the slut walk.
	Do you guys know what that is?
	I know what a slut walk is, yeah.
	Okay, explain, please.
	It's a feminist endeavor where lots of sluts get together, dress in very revealing ways, then walk through the streets and say, we're not asking for it.
	And she's an abortion rights advocate as well, so very trad, very, you know.
	Well, the thing is, I think that with these sorts of things, Everyone is correct that, of course, she's not the ideal person to come up and speak, but there's no point being a purist about it.
	At this point, you just want as large a number of people coming over to your side as possible to drain all of the energy out of the opponents to get as much of a majority in the House, the Congress, and the Presidency as possible.
	If I could be very, very judgmental for a moment.
	Absolutely.
	It's not like me.
	I can voice an opinion, I don't know if you can do it.
	Forehead tattoos do speak volumes about an individual.
	If you're out there considering whether you might get your first forehead tattoo, I advise against it.
	She's also an abortion activist.
	So like I said, not exactly a great representative.
	So there's been some controversy.
	Her speech itself was boring.
	It was completely rotten by the numbers.
	And of course she came up and did the thing that the Republicans absolutely love.
	She fellated how not racist all of the white people in the audience were.
	My family's multi-racial and it turns out, bingo!
	Good job guys, you're not racist!
	And then all of the old boomers in the crowd give themselves a pat on the back and they go, yes, that's all we ever wanted to hear!
	Like I said, I don't think there's any point, you know, standing in the way of victory that's happening here, because there is a victory happening here.
	Loads of people are coming over to Trump from either being unaligned or being Democrat aligned.
	Let it happen.
	We'll get a massive win.
	The win is not coming from putting this woman up in front, it's coming from Trump.
	Hang on, hang on, that's not true.
	I'm just saying I wouldn't put this person as a speaker at an event.
	Sure, but what is... I think there are a lot of people on the online right who fail to understand that This is about coalition building, right?
	This is about showing other communities that actually know you are a safe place for them to go and so actually this does have an effect on that.
	I mean, I think you're absolutely both right.
	Broadly speaking, you're absolutely right.
	Let's build the biggest coalition we possibly can.
	But does she represent a big and important part of that coalition?
	No.
	The whore vote.
	The forehead tattoo whore.
	I mean, we'll take it.
	The Trump train will take them.
	But should we put her front and centre?
	Yeah, but the thing is, again, there's... Is there no attractive goths you could have got instead?
	It's who you're talking to.
	She's talking to women who were sold down the river by feminism, right?
	So she's saying, well, look, you know, because a lot of them are going to be sort of her age and do have kids and are like, why does everything cost so much all of a sudden?
	And so she's talking to those people saying, and this is where Trump is weakest as well with women, right?
	Trump is, that's his weakest demographic.
	She's still on OnlyFans.
	This isn't somebody who's been sold down the river by feminism and realised... I'm not saying she's not.
	Oh no, I've done so wrong.
	I'm not saying she's not, but you are never going to win over a bunch of people with a hardline right-wing position who are not hardline right-wingers.
	And so, getting someone to be like, well look, this is going to make the economy better, Fine.
	You know, this is going to give a future to your kids.
	Fine.
	Like I said, I'm not a fan of her either, but it was only five minutes.
	You know, I think people are being excessive.
	It was five minutes.
	It still is not five minutes I would have given over to this woman.
	I think the exact same message can be made by much better people.
	Also, I think that you have done your classic and gone, oh, it's only the online right.
	No, there are plenty of people who do not represent the online right who've complained about this as well.
	Even Normies from the National Review, for instance, which is not an online right publication.
	God, we're not listening to the National Review now, are we?
	I'm trying to.
	They are a counterfactual proof of my point.
	Either way, one of the biggest things that came of it, which I saw, I joked about the other month that wouldn't it be funny if, wouldn't it be great if, and then it actually happened.
	I only learned about this the other day.
	Hulk Hogan, for some reason, now I know I've just got done saying that Amber Rose is not the type of person that you want representing your movement.
	Hulk Hogan absolutely is.
	I stand by this 100%.
	Hulk Hogan is a true American.
	He's a real American.
	He is a real American.
	He says his prayers.
	He eats all of his vitamins.
	He fights for the rights of every man.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	There you go.
	And yeah, it's just funny.
	And it's funny to hear him come out and say all this because I mean, Hulk Hogan's been involved in a few controversies in his time.
	But then he comes out and he says that Donald Trump is his hero, which is great.
	You're gonna speak to him.
	I can't wait.
	This is gonna be like body slamming the giant at Wrestlemania.
	What brought you out here?
	Why are you here?
	Well, you know, Bret, I get tired of remaining silent.
	You know, I sat back and watched the borders collapse.
	I watched the economy collapse.
	You know, I watched the price of gas, the price of food.
	Everything just do an upside down flip.
	And when they took a shot at my hero, Donald Trump, I realized that I couldn't be silent anymore.
	You know, I had to step up.
	I had to be a real American just like all these real Americans here and Donald Trump.
	I have a voice too and I want people to know it's time to talk.
	It's time not to be silent anymore.
	Yeah, real American.
	The future of patriotism.
	Listen, if Donald Trump is Hulk Hogan's hero, who are you not to vote for him?
	Who are you to say no?
	Is Jesse the Body Venturer still alive?
	Get him on board.
	Centrist libertarian almost, I don't know, but either way, people have compared politics to wrestling, and kayfabe in particular, for years, and it's very, I appreciate that now the smoke screen is gone, the veil is down, the curtains are pulled apart, and yes, now you do just have, at the Republican National Convention, Hulk Hogan cutting a promo.
	He actually did that.
	Yeah, do you want to see it?
	Because people have been sharing this, but they don't know, they don't, Say that actually the first four minutes of his 10 minutes is him actually just cutting a promo on the crowd as well.
	Check it out.
	And now we have more of the speakers, it looks like, who are going to be underway, including...
	He's doing all the moves.
	That's so good.
	Trump's loving it.
	He's absolutely loving it.
	Let me tell you something, brother.
	That's what I mean, everything.
	You know something?
	When I came here tonight, there was so much energy in this room, I felt maybe I was in Madison Square Garden getting ready to win another world title.
	Or maybe I thought The vibe was so intense, the energy was so crazy, it felt like maybe I was gonna press that no-good stinky giant over my head and slam him through the mat, brother.
	But what I found out was I was in a room full of real Americans, brother.
	And at the end of the day, with our leader up there, my hero, that gladiator, we're gonna bring America back together, one real American at a time, brother.
	And where is it?
	Let's cut to the good stuff.
	Last week, when they took a shot at my hero, and they tried to kill the next president of the United States, Enough was enough!
	And I said, let Trumpamania run wild, brother!
	Let Trumpamania rule again!
	Let Trumpamania make America great again!
	Trumpamania?
	Yeah.
	I love this.
	And then he starts flexing.
	He's still got decent arms and shoulders.
	He's 70.
	He's 70.
	It's a septuagenarian.
	- Yep. - USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! - I mean, honestly. - Trump's loving it.
	Have you ever seen anything more American?
	Well, that's what I love about this, is that all of this, including the AnyFans thought, is genuine, like, incarnation of Americanism, right?
	Yeah.
	Trump, he is, like, the real American.
	And they're all flocking to him now.
	You know, like, taking the bullet through the air and then standing up and being like, no, no, let's keep going.
	That was it.
	The floodgates are open.
	All the pro-American billionaires, like, you know, I'm supporting Trump.
	Elon's giving him $45 million a month.
	It's just, the floodgates are open.
	That's 100% Donald Trump, it looks like.
	If politics is a crowd participation sport, which it absolutely is, then why don't we have more of Hulk Hogan and others like him getting up and cutting promos?
	This was new to me, I didn't know this happened.
	But my take on it is, I'm sort of mixed.
	One, it's brilliant.
	And funny, and great.
	It's amazing!
	Really great, it's amazing.
	But at the same time, it's pretty embarrassing.
	Okay, government is a really serious business.
	Being a president you're a statesman.
	Not in America, not anymore.
	You're a state, you're supposed to be a statesman.
	Yeah, but demolishing the libs is also serious business.
	Yes.
	And that's how it looks.
	So I don't want to pour cold water on it unnecessarily.
	But well, you said idiocracy.
	Oh yeah.
	I mean.
	There's something more going on.
	I like Terry Hogan.
	There's something more going on here though.
	This is like the sort of unification of the American spirit that's happening under Donald Trump.
	Whereas the Democrats are totally anti-American.
	They hate America.
	They hate Americans.
	They want to replace them with foreigners.
	They want to destroy the American way of life.
	And so this is the way I look at I'm looking at this genuinely kind of mythological.
	This is the rallying cry before the battle.
	Yeah, the battle is a really serious thing.
	But like, you know, you need to everyone have the same spirit animating them before.
	And that's what's happening here.
	I have to choose between Trumpamania or The Squad.
	Well, yeah, exactly.
	Obvious choice.
	And also, let's not pretend like this is anything new either, because what was Donald Trump doing before he was president?
	Well, he was a TV star, and he was actually on WrestleMania 23.
	That's where all of the classic images come from.
	Him spearing Vince McMahon, shaving Vince McMahon's head, taking a stone-cold stunner from Steve Austin.
	Yeah, he took a stunner.
	Yeah.
	I thought that happened.
	It was a terrible sell.
	It wasn't the best sell.
	Still better than Vince McMahon's though, because McMahon never could take a stunner.
	I just love that this is how things are playing out.
	Yeah, but this is America now.
	This isn't the time of, you know, a well-measured statesman anymore.
	This is the time where America has gone full retard.
	No, no, this is about drawing up the spirit and using it to crush the aliens, the illegals, the anti-American people who are constantly trying to tear your republic down.
	You can't convince me it's not awesome.
	I said this on Twitter, but to get it out to a slightly larger audience, Rad Lib, Radical Liberation had a good take on AA the other day.
	Where Trump He looked like he was down for a moment.
	It could have been that he was shot dead.
	He could have been down.
	And when he rose... When he hawked up.
	Yeah, when he did the... When he came back to life.
	It was like a baptism.
	It was like a metaphorical death and rebirth.
	And in that moment, he has kind of transcended mere celebrity or just a mere politician.
	He is now iconic in all sorts of ways.
	He will be up there with some of the greatest real American heroes.
	I don't think that we're going to have a more iconic political moment this century.
	I'd be shocked if we did.
	But, of course, the most important thing that happened was not just Hulk Hogan ripping his shirt off and flexing, as much as I wish that... Something more awesome than that happened?
	Well, Donald Trump got up and gave his first speech since the shooting.
	And it's a very long speech, it's about an hour and a half.
	Really?
	Yeah, it's quite a big one.
	Was this a flex on Joe Biden?
	Yeah, he can form sentences for longer than 22 minutes.
	I can get shot and then get... Yeah, actually, that's a good point.
	Donald Trump gets shot, gives an hour and a half long speech.
	Joe Biden absolutely defecates himself on a public debate.
	Can't go for more than 22 minutes on a regime interview.
	Tries to kiss the wrong woman walking off the stage.
	It's just embarrassing.
	He actually can't talk for more than about 90 seconds before he fails.
	He loses his train of thought.
	He goes, well, whatever.
	Or just says the wrong word.
	The second half of the speech was mainly him doing his normal thing, saying we're going to take the borders back.
	Everything that's happened in the country for the past three years since I left has been absolutely terrible.
	He does a weird dig at Bukele.
	I didn't understand it at all.
	Yeah, very strange.
	He made the implication... He made the suggestion that Bukele, instead of actually locking up the prisoners, was sending them here to America instead.
	Which doesn't seem to be true.
	I don't know the truth of that.
	It sounds more like something that Venezuela was doing.
	Well, we know Venezuela.
	Yeah, and he was also seemingly switching quite freely from Venezuela and El Salvador.
	So I don't know if he got them mixed up or something.
	But for the most part, it was a decent speech.
	But the most important part was easily the first 20 or so minutes of it, where he was talking about what happened to him when he was shot, gave the story of it, how he felt.
	He also gave a rather touching...
	There was a rather touching moment...
	Jack, I can't see because the camera is in the way.
	It was just yesterday, because I haven't seen this yet.
	It was only yesterday.
	Could you skip to 17 minutes and 12 seconds, please?
	Yeah, that's right where the camera is for me.
	And then play it.
	So, he'd just been speaking about Cory Comperatore, the man who died defending his family, former fire chief.
	People began applauding.
	And what did he have on stage?
	APPLAUSE APPLAUSE APPLAUSE APPLAUSE His outfit.
	his fire outfit yeah you know a real excellent moment and it's not just that donald trump has taken a bullet for you
	it's that people have now officially died for donald trump and for saving their own families so So...
	Yeah, this has been a baptism for Trump.
	Absolutely, and then they take a moment of silence for him as well, as well as the two other people who were critically injured in the shooting.
	So, very impressive, very respectful.
	He also talks about how they've raised among donors of his about, I think, $6.5 million for the families of the people who were injured and Corey Comparatore's family.
	Obviously, that will never bring him back, but It's the most you can really do for that situation.
	But then he talks, as I mentioned, about what happened to him.
	And it's really interesting to hear him talk about his feelings in the moment when he was down on the ground.
	Why it was that he needed to get up and let everybody know that he was okay and that they were going to be okay.
	As you already know... Where is it?
	Thank you.
	But I'm not.
	And I'll tell you, I stand before you in this arena only by the grace of Almighty God.
	In watching the reports over the last few days, many people say it was a providential moment. many people say it was a providential moment.
	Probably was.
	When I rose, surrounded by Secret Service, the crowd was confused because they thought I was dead.
	And there was great, great sorrow.
	I could see that on their faces as I looked out.
	They didn't know I was looking out.
	They thought it was over.
	But I could see it.
	I wanted to do something to let them know I was okay.
	I raised my right arm, looked at the thousands and thousands of people that were — Breathlessly waiting and started shouting, fight, fight, fight.
	Thank you.
	Once my clenched fist went up and it was high into the air, you've all seen that.
	The crowd realized I was okay and roared with pride for our country like no crowd I have ever heard before.
	Never heard anything like this.
	Good stuff. - Yeah.
	Yeah, it was a really fantastic speech, and just the fact that, again, that's about the most emotion you can get out of a Donald Trump speech, but it was really, really impressive, and he said that it was the only time, the only time he's going to speak about it, because it's very painful.
	It was a hit, maybe, of him choking up a touch there, nearly.
	Yeah, there really was.
	It's nice to see a bit of the humanity.
	Well, it is a thing.
	If you were very nearly assassinated... It changed you.
	Yeah.
	I've never heard about God like that before.
	It's gonna be traumatic.
	There's no way around that.
	There will be some trauma with that.
	I hate to do it, but we're running out of time.
	Yeah, there's the RNC for you so far.
	Right, well, we'll go to the Rumble Rants quickly.
	If I can get the mouse, wherever it is.
	There it is.
	Josie says, Yes, Harry, we've gone full retard, but we need that retard strength to do what needs to be done and reclaim our country.
	True.
	Bald Eagle says, yes, Harry, we've gone full retard, but we need that retard strength to do what needs to be done and reclaim our country.
	Well, I was going to say...
	There you go.
	I was going to say, I mean, this whole thing is what people taking their country back looks like.
	You know, it's what it looks like, you know, like it's the unity of it.
	It's just amazing.
	Um, Nolong Pork says, Hulk had to speak after that close match and narrow win Trump had with The Undertaker last Saturday.
	Well, I was, I said on Twitter, look, The Undertaker really needs to come out for Biden.
	I realize he's a Republican, but it's the kayfabe, man.
	He's got to literally come out with Biden with a casket.
	I endorse Joe Biden.
	Point to the casket.
	Exactly.
	It's got to happen.
	Come on.
	Uh, and TheRastRussian says, need a petition to have, uh, boom suspended mics like they have on Joe Rogan.
	Uh, they don't have boom suspended mics on Joe Rogan and Tim Paul.
	I don't know why you think they do.
	You see the mics, they talk to you.
	The brutal bo-isms we've been treated to today have been divine, thank you.
	Mason says, the biggest reason Kamala is being considered to replace Biden is that she can still use the war chest built for the Biden-Harris ticket.
	Also, Carl, please stop banging the desk.
	Sorry, I apologize.
	Pat says, we're never going to live down Joe Biden.
	Well, I don't know.
	I think Biden will be forgotten, to be honest.
	You could redeem yourselves.
	Josie's Angel says, J.D.
	Vance is so loved because he's authentically American in a way Rubio and the others aren't.
	He's young enough to not have made too many backroom deals.
	Probably true.
	Probably true.
	Baldy Eagle says there's going to be a massive legal battle going on at the DNC.
	There are several states where there were no primaries and the delegates from those states have to vote for the winner in that primary.
	Yeah, that's interesting.
	Carl, I love the Trump hat but you maybe watched Tim class so that's a net zero.
	Next time tell him to slow down.
	I like Tim, he's a good lad.
	Binary Surf says, who's ready for the press secretary Hogan giving CNN a cuck reporter, and I repeat myself, an atomic leg drop instead of submitting to the struggle session?
	Oh yeah!
	After that performance he has to be the press secretary, right?
	I think Vivek Ramaswamy.
	He's the guy who should be the press secretary, to be honest.
	I disagree.
	He's good.
	I'm not saying I like him, but he's good at dealing with these sorts of people.
	So he'd be good for that.
	Anyway, let's go to the video.
	I just wish Randy Savage was still alive.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	Oh, the berries are out.
	Oh, lovely.
	Yeah.
	Adorable.
	My kids love going berry picking.
	Let's go to the next one.
	In the aftermath of the Trump shooting, it seems like cancel culture has flipped and now it's conservatives targeting and successfully cancelling all the crazy wokesters.
	And they're saying, oh, that might not be good because we don't want to be just as evil as all those people who cancelled us.
	And I say, cancel them.
	Cancel them hard.
	We need to use cancel culture to promote faith, family, freedom.
	Well, you know what?
	We're going to be talking about cancel culture in lads hour, half an hour after the podcast.
	So we'll get into our opinions there.
	Are there any more, Jack?
	Unfortunately, I have a lot of friends and family that are disengaged normies and have been fed nothing but mainstream media propaganda.
	Unfortunately, when the news of Trump's new assassination broke, their first gut reaction was something similar to, I'm sad they missed.
	If China then got them fired and essentially doxxed, I would be furious.
	I'm not saying don't feed people their own medicine, but people like this are not active combatants in the culture war who have tried to cancel people.
	We should be smart about who we attack.
	We'll talk about this in the lads hour as well, because there's a lot to go over.
	Hello, so today is a beautiful sunny English day and this is my garden.
	You guys said yesterday that you like videos which tend to show a little bit of greenery just as it means to cleanse the palette for a while.
	Unfortunately my garden is not even as green as I'd like it to be yet because I'm still waiting on some specific composting to come through but it's still thriving as best as it can.
	That's very, very nice.
	I'm so glad summer is finally here.
	We've got at least four more days of it.
	Yeah, I know, yeah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Summer night parties at the Botanic Gardens are good, but are they 30 euro good?
	That is nice.
	As a naval power, Britain has a complex history with armies.
	For some of its history, Great Britain supplemented their army by renting German armies instead through the practice of Soldatenhandel, or soldier's trade.
	Though legally auxiliaries, King George's Hessians were seen by Americans as mercenaries and foreign interlopers.
	Of the 25,000 Hessians sent to America, some 5,000 remain freely, either being captured and simply staying, or slipping away unseen from camp and making a new life among the German-Americans.
	Yeah, I always thought that was a major mistake.
	Why are you sending foreign troops to put down the uprising in America?
	I find it interesting how the Met Police can issue and easily enforce a dispersal order for native football fans.
	I know, but like, bad optics is what I'm saying.
	I find it interesting how the Met Police can issue and easily enforce a dispersal order for native football fans.
	However, as soon as the diverse third world imported fifth columnists decide to boogaloo, the police flee in terror.
	Hey! Hey!
	Hey!
	We're police officers.
	We're not trained to handle this kind of violence.
	That's fucking crazy.
	Look at that, guys.
	What are you doing?
	What are you doing?
	Sorry, these guys aren't Roman Gypsies.
	Also, look.
	There's their faces.
	And also, our football fans don't go that mental.
	Don't go that mental.
	They might throw a few chairs from outside a cafe.
	We don't burn down buses.
	Our football fans might be hooligans, but they're not savages.
	I like rushing it.
	My tax pounds.
	Somehow also my tax pounds.
	Clearing up, yeah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	That new law is predictive crime.
	The government is not granting themselves the ability to proactively charge you with any crime, merely hate crimes.
	Not the real ones.
	So while we're not quite at the point of opening up the moose-jaw gulag just yet, in a sense it's actually kind of worse.
	Rather than a sledgehammer of mass arrest potential, the government is essentially granting themselves a fine scalpel to selectively destroy any individuals they find politically undesirable while leaving the veil of normality intact.
	Though even if it does get through, Pierre Polivier has concretely said that he'd destroy any hate speech legislation that Trudeau has ever passed.
	Hope springs eternal.
	What's being built there?
	Is it a kill dozer?
	I don't think we should say.
	That would be very base.
	Anyway, we're going to have to end there.
	So sorry for the people who have left other comments.
	I know this round we had a lot to cover.

▲