All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 20, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
50:06
🔴 The Gavin Newsom 2028 Campaign Begins... And It Sucks 2025-08-20 18:07
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And overweight women don't need to worry about being pregnant.
He didn't take into account black guys.
So there is little Gates that's like 90% there.
So this overweight, genderqueer, food-based activist didn't go over well with young Gen Z men.
Oh, who'd have seen that coming?
Almost as failed as their campaign, the DNC, to reach bloods in South Central.
They just can't read the bullet-riddled room.
Not quite there.
What about their ill-fated campaign, pandering towards Mexicans?
Vote DNC.
Is muycaliente.
Also, by the way, Gates, just to be clear, his comments weren't specifically directed at her.
The View was the one who did that.
And so people think he was personally attacking her, which by the way, I have no problem with.
But he actually wasn't.
No, he was just saying in general.
I'm holding that against.
Well, apparently she was fired by the DNC, but she says she was never hired.
So it's an office space situation.
Well, didn't they do that?
Harry Sisson?
Not Sisson.
Sorry.
Who was the guy?
Who's the guy that they put in charge or vice chair of the DNC?
Not Sistin, sorry.
I get that.
David Hogg.
David Hogg.
I get the pansy liberal guys all confused.
And then immediately moved on from him very quickly.
Put her in charge of getting Gen Z mails.
I'm like, who are you asking about this?
What consultant is telling you to do this?
Because it doesn't resonate with anybody and it's failing.
In fact, do me a favor, rehire her.
Please rehire.
Please put Gavin Newsom on the ticket, in fact.
I can't even get excited anymore about any of this shit.
They're insane.
Yeah.
They're insane.
I can't even.
Well, look at it this way.
I'm paid to.
I'm on stage.
You and I have the tendency to, you know, look at the glass half empty.
That's often the burden that those in comedy have to have to bear.
Think of it this way.
The fruits of your labor now, right?
You get to reap what you've sown in that they are so crazy, you kind of just get to sit back and let them do their thing.
And now everyone's going to know that what you've been saying for decades, all the missed opportunities, all the doors closed because you were too radical.
Everyone's going to know it's true because they say it.
As long as they have a tribute for me at my funeral or some shit.
I will.
Because I got no ink, no love from this fucking business.
Well, you do from.
I tell you what.
I will personally build you.
Thank you.
I will build you a mausoleum.
You've done enough, Stephen.
I'm going to build you a mausoleum and I'm going to turn it into a haunted house with negative ethnic Italian stereotypes.
Everyone who wants to pay their respects has to get a heart attack.
There you go.
Well, no, it's going to say, here lies Nick DiPaolo, the man who made Anna Navarro lose weight.
That is the absolute.
And you know what?
What's his name again?
Gerald.
No, I'm serious.
I take sleeping pills now and I'm all foggy.
Oh, God.
I forget about this road.
Anna Navarro.
Oh, Anna Navarro.
I'm telling you, she should send me a Whitman sampler.
I entered J.B. Pritcha into the fat jokes and a few other people.
And I watch.
I give them about a month.
And sure enough, after Gutfelt does 19 of those jokes, they stop.
Well, here's the thing.
That's when I see it.
I know I'm like, that's Nick, because I don't think.
No, no.
Let me clarify, though.
But now they're doing way too many.
Yes.
I introduce them.
Of course.
But then I back off.
And then a lot of the other guys, you know, use them.
Yeah.
I think they go to that well a lot, but whatever.
Well, here's the thing, though.
You know it well enough to know, like, Chris Christie knows he's fat.
But you decide, like, you know what's going to sting more?
The person who is kind of chubby, but no one else is pointing out, Ana Navarro.
This is going to hurt more.
And it did.
It did.
She went right in the bathroom, started purging.
Thank God.
Yes.
Dodge facing.
Yes, she did.
So, yes, I introduced these little nuggets.
And that one, she really, I want to meet her and go, you're welcome.
There you go.
It's just funny to me where it's like, okay, the negative stereotype of Democrats are that they are perpetual college activists, genderqueer, who are gross, right?
Homely, unkempt.
And then the DNC says, yeah, let's send one out to reach young men.
And you know what?
At the same time, let's demonize the hot girl, Sidney Sweeney, and say that's racist.
Let's just tell white men that what you want is racist and we don't want to be involved with the things that you, and we'll try and force feed them abroad like this.
And they wonder why it doesn't work.
That's how you know it's not about politics.
I always say this about these ugly left-wing liberal broads.
They're pissed.
at how they were made by God.
That's what cuts like a laser straight to their soul.
It's so mean, but accurate.
That's their beef.
It's their beef is with their maker, who's a guy, by the way.
Of course.
And that's who their beef is with.
And this bubbles up in school when they get picked on and they carry it the rest of their lives and they go to the Democrat Party for help.
That's what you're fighting.
You're fighting ugly, unpopular kids who got bullied.
I'm glad I bullied the kids.
They had it coming.
They grew up to be real assholes.
Well, I was bullied.
And here's the thing.
And I was bullied.
Plenty of concern.
By one guy.
This is when, when you look at the payphone.
Can you bring up the Newsom, the first Newsom Vance picture again that they show?
What they're effectively saying is, hey, look, guys.
Look, guys, our guy peaked in high school.
Hey, sure, Vance was chubby.
But you know what happened?
Unlike liberals, he went into the Marines and he improved himself.
I guarantee you he was probably bullied.
That's the difference.
He didn't just say, hey, everyone, actually, I'm going to require that you love me and praise me.
That's right.
He went into a fighting force and then he clawed his way.
And people say the American dream is dead.
Okay, let me prove to you that it's him and Ben Carson, which shows you it's not a race thing either.
Very similar as far as their upbringing, poor, drug problems, surrounded by violence.
You know about MK Ultra and monarch thinking, monarch training.
That's how he's bred, Newsom.
Oh, yeah.
Those kids, they go to private schools when they're bred to do what they're doing today.
Yeah.
They are bred to people don't realize that.
Yeah, I talked to one of his business partners when I think it was when he was governor of, I'm sorry, mayor.
And I didn't bring, I wasn't really super into politics at the time, but he's, I just like, I don't really like Evan Newsom.
And he's like, oh, man, he was one of his business partners.
He's like, that guy has been bred, raised for one purpose only.
He has been, I'm telling you, this was after like tons of great alcohols.
And this guy that I was talking to is a very, very cool guy.
He was just like, yeah, this guy's got one purpose.
They're just breeding him to run for president.
There's a whole, there's a bunch of them.
I mean, there's a whole book about this shit.
That's what they, he's put on the literally raised to do that, like you'd raise a kid to be an athlete.
Well, let's just look at, let's look at, what was her name?
Juliana.
What was her name?
Juliana a carbohydrate.
Olivia Juliana.
Okay.
So you just look at the DNC.
Let's look at what they're offering.
And I mean this.
Let's look at the problem in this country, okay?
Particularly with young men that you see.
Young men are struggling.
You see those stats.
You see them in college admissions.
You see them in crime stats.
You see them in depressive disorder stats.
You see them in pornography stats.
You see them in being single, struggling with relationships.
Okay, so there's a struggle.
So what does the left offer?
Right?
If there's a problem, the solution they offer is, okay, let's use, first off, you have chubby panda.
Let's just, I guess, scratch that out because I don't even know what that is.
Hey, be a furry.
It's fine.
Was that going to help the young man?
No.
Just be whatever you want.
Identify however you want.
It's the world that needs to change.
Does that help the people right now who need help?
Let's go to Olivia Giuliana.
Hey, are you a young man?
Let's say it's a young, let's say it's a young Vance.
Let's say it's a young me.
Okay.
I went through a phase where I was pretty chubby.
I was short and chubby and then tall and skinny.
Hit a growth spurt.
So I'm going, all right, I have a problem right now where I don't know how to socialize.
I don't really know what my future looks like with AI.
A chubby, young kid right now.
Well, it doesn't really help me.
Be a furry.
I'm just going to be even more weird despite you trying to tell me that everyone else should accept it.
I can't change the rest of the world.
Let me go to Olivia Giuliana.
Hey, what advice do you have?
Uh-huh.
All bodies are beautiful.
Stay fat.
That's fine.
Don't need to change.
Okay, got it.
All choices are legitimate.
Okay, so I could just be genderqueer, change it on any given day.
Sure.
Okay, that won't lead to happiness or stability or any kind of meaningful relationship.
All right, let me look at the joy reads of the world.
Okay, no, I'm racist, so I need to take a back seat.
All right, I got it.
I'm just afraid of competing with black people, even though I have higher SAT scores, even though I have higher scores in high school and I'm more extracurriculars.
Okay, just take a back seat because I'm a white guy.
All right, I got it.
I'm still fat.
I still don't have any future prospects.
Hold on.
Where should I move?
Maybe there's more opportunity.
Oh, I should be accepting of sanctuary cities and rampant crime, and there's nothing I can do, catch and release.
Okay, you know what?
Maybe I'll start.
Hey, I know you guys aren't telling me this, but I decided to start a business.
Oh, wait, people can rip me off to the tune of $999 because something oppressive.
Four fathers.
Okay, I got it.
So now I'm bankrupt.
There is nothing that they offer you as an individual that can improve your life.
There's a lot that they offer you that will make your life a worse place to be.
If you followed all of the advice from the left, and I mean this, you would have a worse life.
I'd be surprised if you didn't end up contemplating suicide.
Now, contrast that with, let's just use Vance as an example.
Hey, I'm from a small town or I'm from the inner city.
I'm fat.
I'm out of shape.
I don't have a dad.
My parents, who I do have or step parents, are addicted to drugs.
There are no economic prospects here since the mine closed down.
Oh, wait, what can I do?
I can take control over some facets and start.
What did Jordan Peter?
Oh, I can make my bed.
Okay, I'll start with that.
Vance, oh, I can try and get to college.
I can lose some weight.
I can join the Marines.
Then I can go to an Ivy League school.
Wait a second.
I have some control over my own destiny.
Huh.
If you're just talking, just treat it like a self-help book, right?
Because we often just lose the policy.
Okay, it's national policy, a federal policy, it's a state policy.
Your life.
Who is giving you advice for your life that will make your life better?
And even more importantly, who is giving you advice that will allow you to make your community better, to make your family better?
It's clear as day.
You can say you don't like judgment all you want.
All right, fine.
Let's do the no judgment zone as far as morality.
Let's take that off the table.
Let's just look at the results objectively.
Someone's reading the self-help book, all the advice, the proposed prescriptions from today's left, and someone's reading a self-help book, all of the advice and proposed prescription from traditional conservative America.
Which one's going to give you a life worth living?
Here's the thing: conservatism in the United States, it's actually not new.
It really isn't.
The ideas, the philosophy, that's why it's rooted in Judeo-Christian beliefs.
It's not new, it's just new to actually codify it into practice, to codify: hey, you, because God gives you free will, because you are allowed to make your own decisions, because you are not bow to a can you can make your own decisions.
Life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
We're going to codify this to make sure that you can do it.
You can read Marcus Aurelius, you can read Meditations, one of my favorite books.
You can read it in an afternoon.
If you want an answer to what ails you, it's hey, why do you give these other people power over you?
They can't harm you.
You can harm you.
Hey, get up, set a routine, do your intense activities at the beginning of the day.
Make a plan, stick with it, and accept that you may not get the rewards that you anticipate, but do it because it's the right thing to do.
And if you do that consistently, you're going to look back and find yourself better off than the people who didn't think about doing the right thing to do.
Self-help book from the Democrat Party, the DNC Youth Summit, self-help book from this show or from the conservative wing of America, which one makes your life better?
We have a very clear answer.
No wonder the Democrats are losing territory with Gen Z. And look, if you find yourself being a liberal fat piece of crap still and diet and exercise are not enough, ask your doctor if Nick Zempic is right for you.
Yes.
It's the same people who will shun that.
That's just big pharma.
More vaccine, more MRNA, please.
Well, that's the problem.
And I now know why they can't be happy.
It is the pursuit of happiness.
These people can't go.
If happiness is going at any more than like a brisk walk, they're never going to catch up.
That's right.
They're just too fat.
It's the pursuit that's going to kill them.
It's just so.
And I know we're joking, but it's like this.
Your blood pressure is 1,100 over 971.
They think they can give you happiness on a silver platter.
Like it's something that can be done to your house or downloaded.
It's like, no, we give you the opportunity to find happiness.
And you know where that is.
You're looking in the wrong places for it.
No, no, no.
No, think about it.
If the left is the party of the poor and the downtrodden, they want to keep you poor and downtrodden.
That's right.
And I've talked about this a lot.
Like people used to say the Republicans are the party of the rich and Democrats are the party of the poor.
No, it's actually really, really, here's where you have a very clear voting split.
The ultra, ultra-wealthy billionaires, those in the too big to fail class, Democrat.
The 43% used to be 47% of Americans who are not paying federal income tax because they make so little and many of whom choose not to work, Democrat.
Okay.
So Democrat, Democrat.
Anywhere from middle to upper middle class, actually lower middle class, but working class.
Lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, too wealthy, excluding the Jeff Bezos of the world, the billionaires of the world.
Overwhelmingly Republican, meaning someone who works and pays maybe a couple grand in taxes because they don't have that much to take home.
If they are working, if they are paying anything in taxes, they're going to, you can bet your life if you had to, playing the odds games, they're going to vote Republican.
Yeah.
Democrat down here, people who will never contribute, who only want handouts.
Democrat, people who want the same handouts, the corporate welfare that you see, the Walmarts of the world, the Amazons of the world who loved COVID lockdown policy.
Who, who, who hated it?
Who suffered?
Anyone working, paying taxes in this country, lower middle class through wealthy class, Republican.
Just to be clear, let's just put that to bed right now.
The poor, the rich.
No, no, no, no, no.
That's the only place where you see a very stark voting pattern.
And yeah, there's win some, lose some in that sort of middle, but it tends to be overwhelmingly Republican.
You know, law-abiding tax-paying citizens who don't own a giant tech company and don't take welfare.
If they meet all those prerequisites, you know how they're going to vote.
All right.
And they're not a liberal white woman.
That's true.
That's one exception.
There's so many white women.
And it's out of this false compassion.
That's because without, without the support of a man in their life, they would be that group that doesn't pay 43% income tax because liberal white women tend to get useless degrees and don't find employment, but they have a sugar daddy.
And so they're protected and insulated.
They go from dad, their real daddy, to new daddy, who they, you know, 70% of the filings, they divorce.
So they're insulated from the horrors of the world.
They haven't had to make it through.
Just think of a J.D. Vance, what he had to go through.
Just think of a Hegas, what he had to go through.
Just think, look, I'll say it's not killing people, but Nick, myself, do you have any idea how many times they had to sleep on a couch or be in God knows where, United States, for 50 bucks a pop for a gig to try and build.
That's not the same as someone who takes out a student loan that they don't believe they have to pay back to get a gender studies degree.
And I'm sorry, it's definitely more of a struggle than a black American in the inner city who's never worked or a Native American on a reservation who's never worked.
Definitively, I, Gerald, Nick, people in here have faced more struggle.
The problem is that you blame people for overcoming it.
And you say, yeah, must be nice.
Right.
You think it must be nice?
You think it must be nice?
Do you know?
Do you know what the days look like to get to that point?
The pride-swallowing siege that will never fully tell you about.
Oh, my gosh.
All right.
Let's take some chats.
All right.
Let's see.
First chat from Revins Padawan.
Hey, why is Dana Bash dressed like Don Sherry?
Sorry, let's go.
Revins Padawan asks, question for the crew.
Shouldn't the general philosophy with divorce/slash alimony be if my money wasn't enough for you to stay, you don't need it when you leave?
Yep.
Simple.
Yep.
I mean, listen, this has really gotten crazy.
Like, so, so take an extreme example for this to kind of make the point.
Let's say that a guy goes out there, gets married, doesn't really have anything to his name, and goes out and doesn't have any kids.
The wife stays at home, doesn't really do anything, and he goes out and is an athlete, or he starts a business.
Let's call him Paul McCartney.
Let's say, yeah, let's say he makes $100 million.
Is a fake lake involved in this equation?
Giant number, $100 million, makes $100 million.
Never had kids, so wife is not really kind of doing that part of the equation, which a lot of people would say, okay, that's what you're in this relation.
Like, I love you.
I want to have a great life with you.
I want to have kids.
And you're going to keep the family, the home, and everything.
Let's say she does none of that stuff.
She's sitting around eating bond bonds, going out in the backyard in the pool on some giant, I don't know, stupid pink, inflatable raft that cost $100.
Wow, this is getting very specific.
That kind of stuff, right?
Just doing absolutely nothing.
And then says, no, no, no, I want to file for a divorce and now I want to take the $50 million that is rightfully mine.
Well, you didn't do anything for that.
You can't say, like, oh, I supported him through that.
No, you didn't.
You sat there and basically used him as a wallet, like we've talked about.
You just ran up the credit card bills and bought whatever you wanted, did whatever you wanted, had the girls' weekend, did all those things.
And I'm using an extreme example.
It's probably not all that extra.
That's not that extreme.
It's very common.
Not all that extreme.
To make the point, do you really think that that person should be entitled to half in that situation?
And why?
And women, you might get this like defensive thing that comes up, but ask yourself why.
Flip it.
If you, as a woman, were to be the one who's a model, an actress, or a businesswoman who started a business and your man is sitting over there pounding beers all day, doing the Al Bundy, hand down.
Let's call him Tom Arnold.
Let's call him Tom Arnold.
There we go.
Would he be?
And I would make the same case.
I would make the exact same case and say, of course, he wouldn't be in line for half of that.
I don't think that's fair at all for either one.
Right.
So why are we doing this?
And now you can just go down the sliding scale.
Like, when is enough enough?
Yeah.
When is enough enough in these situations?
Like, it really is.
It's a bad situation for a lot of guys to be in, and especially with the laws the way they are in this country.
And I'm coming at it from a Christian perspective when it shouldn't be like this in the first place.
And we need to do a lot of work on the front end to make sure the back end doesn't look so bad.
Well, here's where I agree with the Muslims.
No, I mean, listen, you say stuff like that, and it's kind of a joke.
And it's like it solves parts of the problem, but it's not a problem.
Let's meet in the middle something.
It's like, yeah, you got to.
Right now, you got to be able to talk about this.
You have a multi-billion dollar.
Can someone research, send me what the divorce, the legal divorce industry is in this country?
I don't know how many millions.
So there's a multi-billion dollar industry.
By the way, you can see billboards for this that incentivizes someone to break a contract.
There really isn't any other industry where that's the case.
And this is not an extreme example.
We know multiple people like this who were very successful, very wealthy, got married with the truest of intentions, were cheated on by someone who didn't financially contribute, by the way, and also didn't contribute in other notable ways.
Woman cheated on him and took half.
I know people who are going through that now.
That's not uncommon.
That's not an exception.
That's the rule.
And I know you could say, well, it's not really, it's not really designed against men.
It's designed against sort of, you know, to sort of balance from the primary earner.
Yeah, but then you look, women will leave men if they earn more than men statistically to an overwhelming degree.
Women don't like to be with a man who earns less than them.
Not all, not all, not all, not all.
You have to say that, but that's a general rule.
What's the number as far as a divorce?
$28 billion.
$28 billion.
$28 billion trying to sell you on the idea of your freedom and your happiness if you just sign on this dotted line.
They're the only ones that win, by the way.
Yeah.
Most people that get divorced don't have enough resources to pay those attorneys.
They scrounge everything together, and at the end of the day, they get the document.
It's three and five years later, and they've got nothing to their name.
What's the breakdown ethnicity of lawyers?
I don't know.
I'd be willing to bet a lot of vowels in the last name.
Shoes have a lot of vowels in it.
Yeah.
I mean.
Leave a witch, Goldstein.
Diabolio.
Yeah.
You know, listen, you know what money is.
All right.
There's divorce lawyers.
I'm guaranteed divorce.
But yeah, no, it's a, I agree.
Now, I understand the idea, of course, of child support.
Also, the problem, though, is that's kind of imposed by the courts because many men would, not only would many men like primary or full custody, it's almost never granted.
But here's something you also need to know, that abuse, domestic abuse is actually higher from women to men.
It's just often not reported.
You can see it reported in lesbian couples.
Say that again, please.
Domestic abuse is higher from women to men than men to women.
What do you mean?
Women abuse?
Women hitting men.
Yeah, it's just not considered abuse because men don't report it, right?
It's less powerful.
Yeah, it's less powerful.
I find that hard to believe.
Okay, it is, but here's the thing.
It's often underreported.
Then you look at couples, gay couples.
Those are gay couples.
It almost doesn't exist.
Lesbian couples, through the roof.
And then you can look at the numbers of abuse of children, both physical and emotional.
It's much higher in single mother households than single father households.
We've been led to believe that's just an inescapable fact.
But the court system says, unless it's so beyond the pale, literally a current active drug problem, well, we got to err on the side of the mom.
And you have dads who want to take care of their kids.
You have dads who want to step up.
And I think there are plenty of men.
Believe me, I've talked about this for long enough, so I don't need to do it anymore.
Plenty of men who refuse to step up.
I get it.
But what about the men who did step up and who want to step up?
Not saying they're perfect, who are precluded.
Precluded because of the system.
The quickest way to get rich in this country, if you are an attractive woman, is marry a rich guy.
And it doesn't matter if you cheat on him or not, take his stuff.
And there's a $20-something billion dollar industry that'll help you do it.
Yep.
And so what's the problem?
Like, what's the problem?
Where do we find ourselves?
Young men are saying, I'm not doing it.
And the more successful a man becomes, the less likely he is to sign that state marital contract.
That's not a good thing.
I'm not saying this because I'm saying this because I'm pro-marriage.
And it's not going to last.
And you're not going to like the way society ends up if you continue down this path.
And it's just no matter what it is, it's like the men will be faulted for things that both people do.
We're always going to go.
And I'm not saying if the man does this and he shouldn't do this and he should, yeah, but no one should do it.
It's a wash.
It's a wash.
There was a case of, he was a black guy.
I was listening to a radio talk show quite a while ago.
But some woman he was seeing said, oh, this is your child.
And she wanted, you know.
And they did a test.
And he still had to pay.
And he still had to pay.
Yep.
That's when I went, holy.
I mean, I knew it was off the rails.
Texas?
It sounds like something.
It might have been.
I thought it was a lot of people.
You have women who have kept the who have taken the used condoms from the trash from famous athletes and seminated themselves to have children so that they can live on that.
I tried that.
It didn't work.
I busted into a paperwork.
I grabbed Tom Brady's and I was guzzling it.
Apparently, it doesn't work.
Think about Tom Brady.
Think about Tom Brady.
Oh, I know.
Think about that guy.
I know.
And people go, she goes, he wasn't a very present father.
That was the big thing, right?
And I remember so many people sided with her.
She was said that?
Yeah.
He wasn't a very present father.
In the pocket.
Yeah.
Well, she was, and now she's with her jiu-jitsu coach, who, by the way, was her coach while she was married.
I'm sure nothing developed there.
No emotions.
Oh, my God, that little hole.
And it seems like he's pretty involved because he bought another house that's just a few houses down away from where he would be required to live as a primary resident so he can be near the kids.
Also look at the story of before he got married and how he took care of the kids.
Hey, I know he probably isn't going to have a work-life balance because he's the greatest quarterback who's ever lived.
Kind of takes a little bit of work and effort.
Did you get married to him when you were in the NFL or when he was in the NFL?
Yes.
Did he marry you when you had a supermodel career?
Yes.
What did you guys expect was going to happen that you guys were going to be like the nine to fivers?
Like, that's not the case.
One of you.
And why does she need any of his money?
Did she get any?
Yes.
I mean, she was already a zillion.
She was rich.
I mean, I think the financial issue wasn't as big, though.
No, it wasn't.
But the reputational issue that he has to deal with.
And I don't even, I don't even, I don't know all that much about Tom Brady.
I just know what I see, that that guy clearly wants to be involved in his kids' lives and the kids love their dad.
And there was a black baby that really messed it up.
Yeah, well, that was well.
I don't know.
It's just strange.
Yeah.
Downward-facing communist.
What?
And it's like, look, hey, here's the deal.
There's no guesswork.
Hey, you both have burning careers.
Okay, one, he has to put on the back burner.
This idea that he'll support my dreams and I'll support his.
He can't do it.
Can't.
You got to pick one.
You got to support it.
That has to be the primary focus if you're going to talk about earning and you want that kind of a lifestyle.
And that means someone has to put on the back burner.
I would say in that case, the greatest quarterback who ever lived.
Hey, that's a priority.
And you know what's crazy?
The big thing was when he didn't retire.
And he should be home and he's not retiring.
Yeah, I don't know if you know this.
It's very, very rare for someone to come out of retirement and win again.
Do you think that maybe he knew he had more in the tank?
God was phenomenal.
You know?
How about people that are thinking about getting married?
Don't you look at like Tom Brady and her?
She's a supermodel.
Yeah.
Zillionaire.
He's the greatest quarterback.
And it still doesn't work out.
It still doesn't work out.
What's the chances of you that worked at CBS and your plumber husband?
Yeah.
Not plumber.
They actually made good, though.
Pick another fire.
And she filed against him.
She filed against him.
He didn't file against her.
It was the old Bill Hicks.
I think he was on Letterman.
Do you remember that where he said, you know, it goes back to Adam and Eve, where God said to them, he said, okay, you're in the Garden of Eden.
This is paradise.
You both are one.
You will never suffer.
You will never feel pain.
You will never die.
You will be immortal.
And you will be one with me for all of eternity.
And Eve said, there's got to be something more.
And that's the message.
Look, are men, and this is, let me laser in on this.
Are men ever told, hey, man, there's something more out there for you.
Go find yourself, leave your family.
Never.
Are there entire series and films and books that are praised that tell women to do exactly that?
Yes, there are, and you know there are.
Two very different lines of messaging.
And guys, what did you think when Stephen said that part about men going and finding themselves and leaving their family?
Immediately, we all had like a visceral reaction to the ship.
What a piece of shit.
Yes, exactly.
Leaving and abandoning his family.
How could he do that?
And there's been men that have done that.
And every single time that happens and it comes up in the media, we're like, what a piece of crap.
Right.
What an absolutely terrible.
Nobody asked.
Nobody.
Giselle took the kids away from her dad.
The piece of crap?
Yeah.
For me, it's enough.
Yeah, Gavin Newsome, piece of crap, cheating on his wife.
Yeah, absolutely.
Yep.
Anybody who does it, you want to call Trump?
Fine, Trump.
In that regard, yeah.
All right, take it easy.
Hold on.
Hey, listen.
But I've never held Trump out as a moral authority.
No, of course.
I've never said that this is the guy we need to look through to for our morals.
But these guys are trying to paint him as somebody I'm moral and he's not.
When I found out he cheated, I returned my stakes.
Did you return your diploma from Trump University?
And the wine.
This is weird.
It just has the word Phoenix crossed out and says Trump.
Give me a little Trumpage.
No, it's the Trump DeVry.
Here we go.
No, look.
We got to fix it.
We do have to fix it because there's just too many examples, high-profile examples of this happening that get out of the media and guys are going, what are we doing?
And it's not just that it happens.
Yeah.
Because bad things happen all the time.
People decry it.
It's that when this happens, nobody, nobody stands up for the guy.
It's always right.
Exactly.
It's just this natural kind of tendency that we have.
Did you buy her flowers?
That's what it is.
For the last 40 years, Hollywood, I don't care if it's commercials, sitcoms, movies, it's been about, it's been hijacked by the women's movement.
Right?
Everything, I can sit down with you, watch anything, and point out the woman always has to get the last word in.
Yep.
Whether it's a sitcom, I mean, there's a lot of women anger.
Every other commercial is a woman kicking a heavy bag for Maxi pads.
Yeah, exactly.
Every commercial is a woman boxing or acting like there's so much women anger, and it's been going on forever.
And if I'll sit in a movie, I can't even, my wife watch TV with me because I can't, it's been ruined.
I read Judge Bork's book, Slouching Towards Gamora back in the 80s, and it just, it was all the stuff that I was thinking, didn't have the balls to say.
Right.
And then this guy, who's 10 times smarter, a thousand times smarter, pretty much said, and I couldn't watch a movie or a TV show the same way again.
Yeah.
And once you're enlightened, I can't, that's why I haven't gone to a theater.
Well, you know, it's funny is put it this way: here's how you know it's true.
Okay.
If you watch movies, if you watch TV, have you ever, and I mean this, have you ever watched a film or a television show where the man walks out on his family and it isn't immediately known that the writers are using this as a tool to paint the character as a piece of shit?
The answer is no.
Of course, you're immediately, okay, he's the bad guy.
How often do you watch a show where a woman does that and she's empowered?
Even if it's 20%, we know it's far more than that.
That's how you know.
Let's grab another chat.
All right, next chat from Monsterette.
After reality TV came to be, I witnessed people, especially women, emulating the behavior seen on those shows.
Could it be blamed for the dating divorce gold digger issues of today?
No.
Partially.
It's been going on forever.
But it's all of it.
It's like you say, it definitely is a culture which media plays a role in.
And by the way, of course, the Democrat Party would be on board with this because families, strong nuclear families, are much harder to govern.
And that's why.
That's why we have marriage laws.
Before we get to the same sex thing, the reason that we have marriage laws was to create strong nuclear families so we could have self-governance before any other form of municipal or state governance.
So, and you look at it, you know, you look at the welfare policies and the model cities program and great society and all this stuff, great societies.
You go, oh, okay.
Maybe it's an accident, but it is a little bit, I guess it's one of those things at a certain point when you say, well, where is it?
How is this an accident where you couldn't have crafted policy to destroy the nuclear family more effectively?
It wouldn't be possible.
Yep.
Incentivize single motherhood.
Okay.
Scare men off from getting married through divorce laws.
All right.
Tell young women that they can have it all.
Okay.
Tell young men that they don't have a choice.
They should sit back and shut up.
And by the way, abandon their post as leaders in the household and community.
All right, got it.
And then punish men financially if they still decide to take the risk and get married.
And make LGBT mainstream, trans, mainstream.
That's all an attack on the nuclear family.
It's right out of the Marxist playbook.
Yep.
I'll even go one step further and say before we get to it.
No, same-sex couple is not the same as a couple.
And it's not the same standard from a household that has clear roles.
In other words, a dual income household where both share all same responsibilities and it's a democracy is not as legitimate in the form of a nuclear family as a head of household, one person who's a primary earner and one person who takes care of the family.
If you're paying someone else to raise your kids, that is not the same as, that's not the ideal, okay?
Each one is less legitimate than the previous example.
And it doesn't start with same-sex couples.
It starts with the feminism.
That's where it starts.
And by the way, you do know when people talk about corporate overlords and corporate influence, you do realize that women getting into the workforce.
It was post-Industrial Revolution where these guys thought, hey, we can get cheaper labor if we double the workforce.
Hey, women, look, you can have your freedom.
You can have your own thing.
Isn't that great?
Well, here's the thing.
People will say, hey, if you're a domestic woman, if you're a woman who stays home and takes care of the family and takes care of the kids, you're a slave.
He's treating you like a slave.
Okay.
Well, what is it when you have to punch the clock nine to five to someone else who gets to dictate every single thing you do and doesn't even love you?
That's not slavery.
Enjoy it.
It's a life sentence.
Yeah.
Enjoy it.
My dad reported to the same office for 46 years.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Are you shitting me?
Yeah.
I do stand on something I love.
I'm about year 38.
I can't wait to get out.
Yeah.
Folks, it shouldn't still be good.
Don't get me wrong.
They pull you back in.
Exactly.
The funny bone pulls me back every single time.
That chuckle hut pulls me back.
Giggle fudge.
Pulls me back.
You're being run out of the funny town, aren't you?
By the five families.
All right, next chat.
All right, next chat from Taho Micah.
Do you think if women were held accountable for cheating, divorce rates would go down?
Yes.
Maybe young men would be more willing to get married in today's society.
I don't know.
I think so.
I think if men look at the laws and go, wait, there's some protections if I'm wronged as in any other contract.
Yes, I think it would help.
I think you have to get rid of no-fault divorce.
I've talked about this.
No-fault divorce was actually, funny enough, spearheaded by people like Hugh Hefner, Kinsey, who believe that men are sexual animals who should be able to have sex with everyone they want and not honor their marriage vows, and in which case, right, they shouldn't be punished for it.
So they thought, hey, no-fault divorce will allow men to cheat and it'll be consequence-free.
Because before that, you kind of had one of three primary reasons.
There were some exceptions, but it would either be infidelity, in which case you paid.
It would be physical abuse, in which case you paid.
But if it didn't meet those two, it would be abandonment by whoever filed for divorce, in which case, okay, you deal with your own consequences.
So infidelity, we all knew that, abuse or abandonment.
But then when we said no false, we removed the accountability for abandonment where it's a completely consequence-free decision.
So Kinsey, Hugh Hefner wanted no-fault divorce.
Then it got taken over by feminists who said, oh, you know what?
We'll just change this so that it always actually harms the primary earner.
So it didn't allow, and by the way, it shouldn't have allowed men to cheat, right, consequence-free.
What it allowed was anyone to leave at any point.
And there's no actual moral grounds for cheating because either way, if you're the one who cheats, you can still leave and take half because you probably cheated because you're unhappy, right?
That's his fault.
That's right.
It's his fault because he didn't make you happy.
And then you look at the statistics where men typically don't, even when offered, take alimony when it's a very rare instance of them earning less.
It's just often men don't.
Like I'm willing to bet that this guy, Jay Cutler, probably didn't take half of her makeup empire.
I'd be surprised if he did.
That would be a rarity.
So yeah, I do think that all helps.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat from Eric Skinner.
Sitting in the CEO's office with his feet on the desk.
Oh, by the way, after the show Friday, can I scooch early on Friday?
I just turn around and look at the whole thing.
Yeah, I know, but I just don't want to leave anyone holding the bag.
Okay, fine, go.
Because I have an MRI to do, and then I also wanted to do something else before the MRI.
Still got a big golden buy house.
Yeah.
Go buy a house.
That's like a hard day for you.
And make some bad decisions.
All right.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat.
Eric the Campbell.
Since Nick is a huge fan, can you discuss the collapse of WNBA ratings without Clark since they allowed the players to beat the hell out of their money ticket for being a straight white?
I don't know anything about it.
Answers.
Nick, have the ratings gone down significantly?
They're saying ratings crash.
Apparently, this guy says so.
I believe.
I don't follow these zombies, but I really.
I mean, Zulu's.
I got it all wrong.
It works.
It's terrible.
But yeah, no, Caitlin Clark, it is unbelievable.
She shows up out of nowhere, and she's unbelievable.
Even all the ex-NBA players, the black dudes, they actually disagree with the young black women that are beating on her and stuff, going, she's that good, man.
She's that good.
And they treated her.
I do a thing called Reverse the Races on my show.
If that was a black woman in a white league, I mean, there'd be lawsuits.
There'd be, they beat on, that's their meal ticket.
Yeah.
And they treat why she hasn't picked up and gone to Europe and made a ton of money, which she's probably still thinking of doing, is beyond me.
So they're tearing up their own meal ticket out of what?
It's pure racism.
Well, it's not just racism.
Well, she's a straight woman.
Half the league's gay.
And, you know, the majority are black.
And she's a straight white woman.
Yeah.
And she's the best player.
So it's pure racism, sexism, whatever you want to call it.
All the stuff that white guys get blamed for.
That's what's going on.
And I got to believe.
I mean, they didn't have ratings before she showed up.
So why would they, if she's playing?
Best thing for their ratings were.
Didn't you have a proposal for that?
Yeah.
I'm trying to invent a t-shirt cannon, only it shoots dildos.
And I mean, and you have a bunch of fat lesbians.
Blow a phallic-shaped hole for the guy who catches it.
I have a bunch of fat lesbians in the upper balcony.
It's like throwing salmon to a whatever.
Anyways, talk myself into a corner.
No, I think the analogy is very apt.
Let's grab another channel.
The league crashes and burns.
Well, it's going to because research points out that Sophie Cunningham is also out for the season for her other hot teammates.
I know.
That's a double blast.
And Steven, you can relate to this.
She's like an enforcer.
Oh, yeah.
She protects Caitlin.
And then they took her out.
She got hurt.
But there's some normal play.
Well, but she would take no crap from the black chicks.
Right.
If they followed Caitlin Hart, she'd go right back at him, elbow the.
And she's the best-looking one in the league.
Yeah, well, that's what counts primarily with me because I don't follow anything else with the WNBA.
You should think I'm watching it for the dunking.
Here's your stats.
Nationally televised WNBA games starting 55% since Clark's injury.
It's down 55%?
Down 55%.
That's tough.
Do you understand how much power she has if that league made money?
Yeah.
Hey, Portnoy, you still want to buy a team for $500 million in Boston?
Well, you know what?
Oh, is that what he said?
That's exactly what he said.
If somebody wanted to sell me a WNBA team, I would buy $500 million.
I would buy it right now for this boss.
I like that guy.
I hate him, that I like him, that I hate him.
He goes wherever the wind blows.
But here's the thing: the left should be happy about it because remember Joy Reed and not Joy Reid, what was the name of the SEALs, saying that Harriet Tubman was only helped by people who benefited from white supremacy.
So that's a problem.
Well, I guess the white viewers who make up the majority of this country benefited from white supremacy and you didn't want their viewership.
So they finally heard you.
Next chat.
Next chat.
Got what you wanted.
From Galatis.
How can we convert more scientists and researchers?
I'm talking about smart, capable Americans trapped in the left-wing incentive structures.
By the way, Galatis, that's a very good way to put it, trapped in the incentive structures.
Because a lot of researchers and a lot of people who work in the scientific field, right, they're beholden to grants.
And so if you talk about them, like, well, there's no way that this could possibly be funded.
We need the government to do this.
And the fact is, often the private sector would step up and do it.
You'd be amazed how very intelligent people, for example, you see with Asians a lot.
But I'm sorry, excuse me, but in that letter, didn't she say left-wing smart?
Did I breathe that?
Yeah, she was trying to say a lot of people who are scientists and work in those fields.
Yeah, left of their smart.
Yeah, they tend to be very left.
So leave them where they are.
I want to do them.
Well, yeah, but they're trying to say, like, how do we get these people who are smart over to our side?
They're fucking left-wing.
They're not going to change.
They're book smart.
I think what she's also saying is that they're trapped in the incentive structure.
For example, with hold on, but for example, with COVID and with climate change.
No, Nick, that's the third time you've offered.
If you came out against any of those things, if you came out against climate change or anything with any other opinions, scientifically, they would just excommunicate you.
You would lose your ability to earn a living.
You wouldn't be able to publish.
You wouldn't be able to do research.
Maybe there's a lot of people trapped there that are not actually left-wing, but they're like, well, I can't do anything other than what I'm supposed to be doing according to the grant structure or according to what the dean says or whatever, right?
Yeah.
That's probably a little bit of the point.
I'll tell you this.
Yes, I agree with you.
There are a lot of people you can't change, but a lot of them just, they've never actually, they're very limited in scope.
So no one has spoken their language.
It's never actually affected them because the default is grant from government, do work, that's great.
You see it a lot with Asians.
And what do I mean by that?
I mean that you look at Asian Americans as a consistent Democrat voting block and it makes no sense.
And I've had conversations with quite a few and many of them were blissfully unaware about the controversies at Brown and Harbor.
Harvard, yeah.
The Supreme Court ruling.
You go, well, hold on a second.
Why do you vote Democrat?
Well, I'm a pro-immigrant.
I come from China.
Yeah, but what about the fact that your son's going to have to get, you know, about 80 points higher in the SATs?
And they've actually started declining people from these schools where you want to send them because they're Asian.
Well, no, no, no, no, no, fair.
Exactly.
So that's the party of the Democrat Party.
They think that actually that should go to a black person regardless of performance.
Well, why?
No, you do reward lazy.
Exactly.
Crazy.
And then, sorry, and it's pronounced Chinese.
And you speak it and it plants a seed.
I would say with the scientific community, and again, I'm not a scientist.
People say, you're not a scientist.
But I look like one.
Delegitimizing it.
Yeah, I look like a Bruce Banner after taking too much serum that then led to shrinking.
You won't like me when I'm angry.
I need the shot.
I don't know either.
With the scientific community, like, you know, I was actually, I believe, published, but certainly was accepted with the fat pride as a method of self-care in the era of Trump as C. Matheson.
I just put on a sweater, a prosthetic fake boob, said I was a tranny, and it was accepted.
And so people who, even if they're limited in scope, they don't understand everything else, but many of them do value, even if they're misled, the scientific process or what they view as the purity.
You can chip away at it by showing them the illegitimacy of that field.
The more they see, hey, by the way, you weren't published, but this was fat pride as self-care in the era of Trump.
Hey, I don't know if you know this.
This was published, this research that says a BMI of, well, it's not even on the chart, blood type pudding is just as healthy as someone who is fit.
I don't know if you know this, but there's published research that now says, hey, maybe cholesterol, blood pressure, and BMI doesn't matter at all.
How much have you been?
Yep.
How much have you been published?
And if you do that, then they start to lose faith in their own institution.
A lot of people, unfortunately, it's very selfish.
And this is why I don't believe you should vote merely in your own self-interest.
I understand many people do.
They don't care about it until it affects their thing, until it affects their line of work.
Sometimes it doesn't affect them until it affects their family directly.
And that's why you saw so many people change in COVID.
I will tell you this: it's still a demographic problem, but I have never seen more politically apathetic suburban white women become rapidly anti-Democrat in my lifetime than COVID.
Why?
Because it affected them.
And they believed the schools were looking out for their kids.
And not only do they have to start homeschooling, right?
That starts where you go, oh my gosh, the stress of this, I don't think I can do it.
And then you realize, well, wait a second, actually, I'm kind of able to do this.
And wait a second, I can do it in two hours a day.
And wait a second, they're performing better than when they were studying nine hours a day.
And wait a second, the teachers who are supposed to be caring for my children, who I pay through my tax dollars, don't want to come back, even though we know that they're not at risk.
Wait a second, my husband's business is shut down?
What?
And they start to realize that what they thought, this sort of prism that they've been viewing everything through, is not legitimate.
So I saw it with COVID.
A lot of people who didn't pay attention.
A lot of people will never pay attention until it ends up at their doorstep.
Do that more with the scientific community.
And I can't do that.
It would require scientists.
I mean, I can only do so many silly fat papers to get them published.
And that'll help a little bit.
Or it could end up being like the black community where the needle never moves, but you always hope it does.
Next chat, final chat.
All right.
Final chat from I suck at making usernames.
Good.
Question for the crew.
My husband learned by watching his parents that mom is in charge.
She has an explosive temper.
So he doesn't take charge as much as I would like him to.
How can we work on this?
Until he does.
And by the way, that's a tough one.
And here's the thing: you're going to see more of that because men have been told and they're wrong for wanting what men have always wanted.
And they're shamed for having expectations.
So if a woman sets boundaries, often she's, these are general rules.
There are exceptions, of course, of course, sleeping with the enemy, all that shit.
If a woman sets boundaries, she's empowered, she's strong, she's independent.
If a man sets boundaries, he's controlling.
And you see that a lot.
Where a man is afraid to say, let's say you're in a world, and this is very common, where the man is the only one who works.
You know how it always was throughout all of society.
So you're talking about white people.
Go ahead.
Yeah.
He's the only one who works.
And he comes home after a 10-hour shift.
And what does society say?
Like, you've been working all day, sweetheart.
And you go, here, mommy needs a break.
Here are the kids.
And the man deep inside was like, well, I kind of signed up for 100% of the earning.
And since it's the hardest job in the world, being a mom, you treat it like a job.
And so it's not 50-50.
It's 100 and 100.
Maybe there's 2% there.
Maybe there's taking out the trash, of course, fixing something if a drain gets clogged.
But I would like it if, oh, I can't say that I'd like it if I came home and there was a warm meal because you'll say, what am I your personal chef?
I would like it if, oh, I can't say that if I came home and you were on all fours, my wife in the bedroom in a negligent, because you'll say you're a whore.
I would like it if, oh, I can't say that I'd like to come home to a nice, welcoming clean house because then you'll say that you're nothing but my maid.
Well, I don't want to enslave you, so do whatever you want.
And then, like you see, it's hard to respect that man.
Well, what do we, that's why we're talking about changing this as far as you personally with your husband.
That is, you know, a lot of people just sort of gloss over this.
The toxic femininity.
It makes a man scared to see a very unnatural dynamic that is the byproduct of feminism, a woman in charge of the household.
And so he thinks that either he's emulating it because it's all he knows, he's scared, or he thinks it's the right thing to do.
Now, unfortunately, to get him to a point of leadership so that you can, well, let's be honest, not only respect him, but likely be attracted to him because it's an attractive quality.
It is to all women ever.
You don't need to feel guilty about that.
You might need to lead him initially.
And think of it more like this: give him permission to.
Say, look, I know kind of how you were raised, but don't say, you need to do this.
And you just say, tell me what to do.
Say, tell me what to do, Daddy.
What you say goes.
That's what I like.
Deal with a raging erection and continue to make baby steps.
Give him permission to because you're trying to combat decades of societal collapse and he doesn't know.
He may not be capable of that yet, of leadership, because he never had it instilled in him.
But I guarantee you this: at this point in time, he may have the ability, he may not, but he doesn't know.
So, first, figure out if he knows and don't coach him.
Try to avoid taking the lead.
Give him permission to do exactly what God called him to do and exactly what every single society ever before the year 1960 expected him to do.
So, if it sounds like I'm shaming women here, I just want to be clear.
I do think that there is an imbalance, and I do think that men don't have people who stand in the pocket.
And I certainly don't think that men often have someone who stands in the pocket who believes in being chased where you can, who believes in being loyal, who believes in loving his wife as they love the church.
You often get red pill, you get the Andrew Tates of the world, or you get people who say, Be a doorman.
Right?
But I do think that there should be shame for men.
There used to be.
You're not providing for your family.
You're not protecting your family.
You're not wearing it.
It used to be, I guess we know who wears the pants in that household.
And you're combating decades of feminism saying that that is an offensive trope.
Why can't she wear the pants?
Well, you're living it.
You're living it.
So let's bring back, I guess we know who wears the pants in that household.
And that man going, what?
No.
Woman, make me a sandwich because it's better than what you're living.
Try it that way.
We'll see you tomorrow.
That's what I know.
▲
Export Selection