All Episodes
Previous Next
July 23, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
01:01:26
🔴BREAKING: Tulsi Drops Major Receipts Proving Obama Treason over Trump Russia Hoax 2025-07-23 18:08
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I read two.
Okay, that's a watch.
So in the UK, it's dependent on the victim's perception.
So harassment basically includes, and this is a quote, annoyance, inconvenience, or anxiety.
So for example, a man was arrested for sharing a meme of pride flags arranged in a swastika because it created anxiety in someone.
And we have so many other examples of this.
So I can give you an example of what just happened.
Just to be clear on that, all of the hate speech laws in this country are predicated on a person's subjective perception.
So for example, all of the hate speech laws, you don't even yourself have to report being the victim of a hate crime.
It can be if a third party perceives that what was said from one person to another perceives that to be racist or whatever it is, they can report you to the police and suddenly, and even if you don't end up with a criminal record, even if what you said doesn't meet the sufficient bar to be regarded as criminal, you can still get what they call non-crime hate incidents.
So someone somewhere has said something naughty.
It's not a crime yet, but it's still going on some kind of record that the police keep on citizens who have not committed crimes.
Honestly, people don't realize just how genuinely dystopian Britain is at this point.
Oh, yeah.
And here's the thing.
This basically, this is communism because it de facto gives the government complete control over your business.
In other words, any business at any point, any restaurant, it just takes one person saying, I overheard this and it made me anxious and now the government is in your business.
It's like the IRS only instead of auditing your personal finances.
It's every interaction in your business.
I'll give you one where I would claim this.
I was at Great Wolf Lodge with the kids.
It's a lot of fun, but by the way, they upcharge you.
Hot tip, if you ever go to Great Wolf Lodge and you use the indoor water park and you take their towels and you don't return them to the kiosk, but you take them to your room like a normal non-savage, they charge you $15 per towel.
So on the third day, I went down with 12 soaking wet towels and fucking take them.
Now, there was a black lady there.
It's a little mining thing where kids, they do like old prospectors and they have sand and they get to mine.
It's just the kids have a great time.
I'm more happy seeing my kids have fun than I think I've ever been.
So anyways, this black lady there, very nice, older, portly.
I do well with them.
Sorry, Gun.
I do very well with the old black lady.
I don't doubt.
My hair was all over the place.
It was before I got a haircut.
She goes, you look like that.
I don't want to tell you, you look like that actor.
And I'm like, please don't say Dan Aykroyd because I get that a lot.
I go, oh, is it the – Look at that Wolverine.
I was like, oh, well, yeah, I guess I'm a mess.
She's like, nah, it's kind of burly.
It's sexy.
I like it.
And she had a wedding ring in her finger.
So it wasn't really flirting.
But that alone, if I was a woman, I was like, hey, you look like Oddjob or whatever the hell it is.
You know what I mean?
Like, that could be hate.
That was just an interaction.
You don't even have to be a woman.
You could take that to whoever owns the resort and say, look, that's something that's happened to me.
I'm offended if you're a worker there.
And again, with all of these things, it is ridiculous and it is terrible that it gives the government all of this power.
But it's not the worst part about it because people probably won't use this that much, right?
There are areas of the country that are like San Francisco, such as Brighton or Bristol, where this probably will get used a lot.
But most of the country is pretty damn right wing, actually.
And so this will just be considered nonsense and most people will ignore this.
The problem that this creates is the legal liabilities and the business load, which is the real issue.
Because what this is, is the state once again attacking business owners and primarily small business owners.
Because of course, large businesses will probably end up hiring some, I mean, it's not, and the government has literally said it's not mandatory to hire some sort of diversity officer for this or, you know, some whatever they want to call them, woke officer to deal with this.
But large businesses will, because what it will do is give them some kind of legal protection and make sure that they can stay within the law.
And it's a much smaller price for them to pay.
But if you're a small business owner with like a dozen employees, you can't do this.
In fact, I know I'm a small business owner with like a dozen employees.
I can't do this.
And so what this is, is once again, attempting to centralize all business, all commerce, all things under not just the state, but a very narrow band of very large corporations.
It's actually the same effect that we saw during the COVID lockdown, where the government locked everyone's small business down.
But for some reason, the giant supermarkets were allowed open.
The Walmarts were still loud open.
It's like, okay, but that's no more dangerous for spreading COVID than going down to my local grocery shop.
Why can't I just go there?
It's like, well, no, they've just been banned by the government because it's all about instantiating a gargantuan managerial regime that polices every aspect of your life.
This is why it's truly communism.
Absolutely.
And honestly, there's just no getting away from it.
Well, because communism, right, is you have no right to your own business, right?
It's about the proletariat seizing the means of production and distribution.
Now, they know they're already halfway there with banks and with giant businesses that are too big to fail, right?
They can't really do that with all the small businesses because then it would look like they're going after the proletariat, to use a term, meaning the common working man.
So to put a finer point on it, this is how you know it's the case.
During COVID in California, you could shop at Costco but couldn't go surfing.
In Michigan, you could go to Walmart, but you couldn't go to an outside open-air farmer's market.
They have lost the ability to claim that they are fighting for the little man.
But yes, it is, because communism is all about the subversion of power.
Communism is about helping people.
Oh, great.
What about the inventor of Tetris?
Oh, he got run out on a rail.
Most successful game of all time.
If you guys ever watched, there's a documentary and a movie on it.
He's not entitled to any of his own profits, but the government is.
And it really is something that I think Americans don't fully appreciate because they completely take it for granted here in the United States.
And I think, Jill, you had a question?
Yeah, so I mean, just going on that broader point, it seems like it's turning citizens against one another.
It seems like a lot of these courses are kind of built for that.
Do you think that's just part of the strategy?
Like lay the groundwork of turning the citizens against one another?
It doesn't even have to be directed at you.
You could just hear a conversation that could be offensive and you can take it there.
Do you think that's part of the bigger play?
There's this massive communist uprising, essentially.
So I think that it's important to remember that all of the people in our government, every single one of them, is a fucking retard.
And I'm not saying that for a fact.
They're genuinely thick.
I trust you.
You can hear them talk on a daily basis.
You can watch any of their statements.
You can hear them speaking off the cuff.
And you realize, oh, this person's an idiot.
And so I wouldn't ascribe to them grand plans or any future conception of what might happen.
I don't think they're smart enough to plan for the future and plan ahead.
I think what they are are people, I think it really comes down to what the nature of ideology is, right?
Ideology, if you think about where ideologies come from, they often come from people who themselves have no experience doing a particular thing.
For example, in the case of communism, Karl Marx had never run economy.
He'd never been in any kind of office.
He'd never done anything with his life.
He was a couch surfing loser.
And yet he comes.
Exactly.
And yet he comes out with this grand master plan because he doesn't know what he's doing.
And so what ideology is, is a way of programming people who have no particular knowledge or experience of the subject at hand.
And so what Keir Starmer is doing, the rest of the Labour Party's front bench, the government, what they're doing is they're following a pre-programmed set of instructions.
For example, they've just reduced the, or they're going to, for the next election, reduce the voting age to 16.
Now, nobody's asking for this.
Nobody thinks it's a good idea.
In fact, when polled, half of 16-year-olds just flat out say this is a bad idea, that they don't think that actually 16-year-olds are capable of voting for an elected government.
And yet they're doing it anyway because it's part of this programming.
They've got, what it is, is kind of, we say communist, but that's not entirely fair because what it is is a kind of liberal extremism.
And so it's more tied to the French Revolution than it is to sort of 1930 Soviet communism.
But it ends up looking very, very similar because communism is really the kind of most extreme form of liberalism.
And so they've got this set of priorities.
They're like, well, we need to make it so that if there's someone in the workplace who's offended by what a customer says, that person's needs take priority over the business sense of persecuting your own customers or whatever the next thing is.
And so it does end up looking a lot like communism, but they're not smart enough to understand that's what they're doing, even though they've come out of the communist tradition.
Like I said, these people are just not that smart.
But they are inherently, right?
They do inherently know that, like you said, an uneducated or ignorant populace is easier to control and get into the fold.
So for example, like to bring in tens of thousands of Afghan migrants, which I'm sure will do wonders for your country, while looking at lowering the voting age to 16 so they'll be able to vote sooner.
We saw that stateside, right?
Where it's import tens of millions of people.
Hand, hand.
So this again, what you're thinking is what a villain thinks, right?
Because villains are smart people, right?
villains have a plan.
And so they I'm not joking.
I'm not joking, right?
Villains join up various data points and say, right, if I do this, this, and this, I'll get these consequences to this end.
No, our government are stupid, right?
And so they have separate layers of thought, right?
So on one layer, for example, on the business level, that's like, well, we need to protect workers.
This is for workers' rights.
And that's compartmentalized.
And in the next view, they go, right, oh, look at all these poor Afghan children who are all 16 years old with receding hairlines and grey beards.
Like, we need to bring them in and save the poor Afghan children.
And that means we need to put them in hotels at people's expense and just hope they don't molest that many children, actually.
And so they don't tie these things together.
They're not thinking, oh, these people are here to be an army to overthrow the state or something or to overthrow the society.
They don't think that way.
They think very much in like what's directly in front of their face.
And so that's a question of, and really, it all comes down to the kind of dogmatic reign of human rights, because human rights in Europe, more broadly, has been extended to all of humanity, in all places and all times, but for everything conceivable.
So you get them saying things like broadband is a human right.
You know, this is an extension of housing being a human right.
And it's anything you would like becomes a human right.
And that means that any person who arrives on your shores, well, they're entitled to this too.
So this is why the British taxpayer is currently paying a billion pounds a month.
So probably something like 1.3, 1.4 million, a billion dollars a month, just housing and giving benefits to foreigners, to people who are born overseas.
And so we're pissing away loads and loads of money.
And I mean, I don't want to get into the scope of it because it's actually kind of embarrassing.
Like, for example, we don't hold you accountable for your retarded politicians.
That's fine.
Oh, trust us.
Everyone in Britain hates our government.
Everyone.
One of the famous stats that came out the other day is 48% of the government-funded housing in London is owned by people who are born overseas.
So we are literally, through our taxes, battery farming foreigners in London for nothing, for absolutely no profit.
They don't work.
They're on benefits.
And we are just paying for them to live here for some reason.
And then when you combine it with the sort of assault on businesses, we wonder why Britain's economy is just dying on its ass.
We just throw so much money away.
And the only thing that the government, and this is another brilliant thing, when they came in, of course, when a new government comes in, they do a budget.
And everyone knew the budget was going to be painful.
And they were like, oh yeah, we're 22 billion pounds in the hole.
So we're going to have to raise taxes.
And everyone's like, right, okay, yeah.
I kind of knew that you weren't going to cut spending.
And then they raised taxes by 44 billion.
And it was, okay, well, hang on a second.
What's that for?
And then they started announcing things like, oh, we're putting 22 billion aside for carbon capture in the soil or something.
So a black hole's worth of money is being used for some climate boondoggle when we just can't afford anything anyway.
It's like this, this whole thing, this whole paradigm is going to start falling down itself.
And man, do you think it will?
Do you think it will, though?
Because here's the thing, because I will tell you, that's not going to happen with Canada.
It's not going to happen with Canada.
Maybe Canada.
Maybe Saskatchewan.
And it's the closest thing that I've experienced to living for 15 years with a European mindset.
And I'm at the point where, like, I'm at the point where I've changed, people say, have you changed your mind?
I'm like, yeah, I've changed my mind a bunch of things.
For example, I think Trinity should be allowed to women's sports because women voted for it.
Women supported it.
You deal with it.
I think it's wrong, but this is the bed that you've made.
Same thing with Canada.
I go, you know what?
You get the country you deserve.
And at some point, maybe we'll take you over.
That's where I am at this point.
I just don't know if the people in these European nations, I mean, I hear what you're saying.
They don't feel represented, but they do have other choices.
Britain isn't really a European nation.
Britain is an Anglo-nation.
And so it's these rules are being imposed upon us despite there being no public mandate for this.
The only reason we had a Labour government is because we were on track to get a Conservative government, not that they're any better, just FYI.
But Nigel Farage kind of kneecapped them going in and took about a third of their voters, which split the votes, us being a first-past-the-post country, and allowed Keir Starmer to get this kind of royal flush in the election.
But that also meant that he got hardly any votes.
Out of all of the people who could have voted, only one in five voted for the current government.
So everything they're doing, and they're doing really radical things, it has no popular mandate.
And so at the moment, the country is a tinderbox.
There was the stabbing in Southport last year that you could see the very first sparks of genuine civil unrest in this country.
And the Afghan thing is just incredible, right?
So under the Conservative government, because the Conservatives are just the Labour Party with blue stripes, they decided what they needed to do is sneak in about 25,000 Afghans who had apparently, quote unquote, helped us in Afghanistan.
Now, it's unlikely that that's the case, and the Taliban weren't out to persecute them anyway, because what good would it do the Taliban?
They've already won.
They allow us in college now.
No, that's right.
Sorry, they promised, but no, matter of days.
well, they don't, I'm not, I'm not endorsing the Taliban or anything, but like, Their bitches aren't so licky.
Go ahead.
You know, they had a point on the heroin, actually.
They just took the drug addicts off the streets and put them straight into rehab.
They were just like, no, we don't care.
We don't believe in human rights.
You haven't got a human right to be a drug addict.
Right.
Plus, unlike fenny milk, it's natural.
It's a plant, man.
Continue.
But anyway, yeah.
So the point is they've snuck them in.
But the thing is, they're entitled to bring their relatives with them, their dependents with them.
So it's probably going to be something like 200,000 Afghans that our government has people trafficked into Britain against the wishes of the population.
And they took out a court injunction to make sure no one was allowed to know about it.
And it's only recently that this was overturned and we got to know.
And so everyone's just like, my God, the levels of betrayal of the British state against the population of Britain itself is just unimaginable.
And so, like, we've got so many things piling on top of each other.
We had an incident in Epping a couple of days ago where you'll be shocked to hear one of the people who broke into our country, an illegal immigrant, there are lots of them getting on boats, sailing across the English Channel, breaking into the country.
And when they get about halfway through, for some reason, I mean, we're an island, so you think actually defending our borders would be really easy.
Like the Germans never made it across.
You know, the French never made...
The French haven't made it across those waters in a thousand years.
And yet, every day...
Sure, but that's not the way they're getting across.
Every day, 700 or so men arrive on our shores.
And our government just, oh, great.
Would you like to come in and sit in a nice hotel?
Would you like some spending money?
And would you like to just be left free to roam around the country?
And they're like, yeah, okay, great.
And so one of these men in a place called Epping in Essex molested three children.
The residents weren't happy.
They went out.
They started rioting.
The police got involved, obviously, because it got a bit hairy.
And this has been an instant of incredibly high tension.
And so what they've done is they've moved these people out of this hotel to a different hotel.
And people have followed them there to protest at that hotel.
Because the point is, we shouldn't be allowing foreign rapists into the country and paying for the privilege.
Like, it just doesn't.
I don't need to make an argument for that, do I?
You know, this is just something that should be assumed.
And yet this is what's happening to the British people all day, every day.
And it has been for years.
It didn't help but they moved the pedophiles to Great Wolf.
That's the worst place for pedophiles, putting them in Great Wolf Lodge.
And it's a lot of fun for the families.
You know what?
This hotel that they were putting them in was literally down the street from a school.
Like it was literally, you could see the school from the hotel.
And it's like, what are you doing?
How nice for you to have kids to see a school.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And to give an idea, it's not just this is a surprise.
We play a game here sometimes where we just look at stories and we cover, we just have the headline.
And we had one the other day where Lane the Branny goes, hey, eight men gang raped a water monitor lizard.
Guess the race.
It's okay.
No one needs to say it.
Whatever you're, yes.
Yeah, yeah.
So that's the hence.
It's the news version of Ethnoguesser.
Pretty much.
And I will say, I guess the primary difference with Canada and the UK is a parliamentary system.
And that's why I always tell people, actually, the two-party system, of course it's flawed, but it's closest to getting a view of the majority of people represented.
Because in Canada, unlike the UK, you're saying they only have one in five votes.
In Canada, you have the Conservative Party, and the Liberal vote is kind of split between Liberals and the NDP and the Green Party.
There really isn't like a Nigel Farage type person who takes votes away from Conservatives, at least not to a significant degree.
So Canada's gone.
The UK, I don't know how you get it back with the parliamentary system.
You know what would change public opinion more and it'll never happen?
And I've talked about this for a very long time.
I said we did the gift a gun campaign here.
Gun rights.
And the reason that changes everyone's opinion is if someone goes out and just buys a revolver, if that just happens and they go, oh, wait a second, I have now experienced that everything I was taught was a lie.
I am now safer having a basic firearm in my house.
It's not going to go off on its own, right?
I'm not out to harm anybody.
I am safer.
I am protected.
And that turns more people at least open to the idea of, okay, maybe the government is not looking out for me.
I wish there could be a groundswell in the UK on that.
I mean, I know you guys are allowed hunting rifles and things like that, but the culture.
Yeah, yeah, we do actually have millions of guns here.
It's just that they're in the hands of farmers because they use them to farm.
They use them to kill pests and whatnot.
But Britain is different.
In particular, England is different.
In that since World War II, there's been a remarkable amount of moral unity between the people and the government.
We saw fighting the Nazis as a unifying moral agenda, and it was assumed, and probably with a fair reason, that the government was basically on your side and was going to do the right thing.
It's only since sort of the turn of the 21st century that the government has decided, actually, maybe communism is a good idea, and I'm going to give that another go.
And has been imposing that on us slowly but surely ever since, proper Fabian fashion.
And it's got to the point now where the problems that they have created are so stark, but there's nowhere for them to go because they can't blame anyone else because we've been under the same kind of regime for the last 25, nearly 30 years.
So there's just no one else to point the blame at.
And the parliamentary system actually is not as bad as you think.
A lot of people are very sour on it.
But we have some advantages, actually, on this.
Because, for example, when you have winner-takes-all, all people have to do is actually change their mind.
The parliament is also the sovereign of the country de facto.
And so the parliament can do anything, but we don't actually have a constitution that they can appeal against.
So if we get a parliament that says, right, okay, this is all changing.
We're just kicking all of these people out.
We're going to repeal all of the European Court of Human Rights nonsense that's making us through the courts, that's forcing us to keep all of these foreign illegal men in this country.
We can just repeal all of that and then just deport them.
There's actually nothing that they can do.
And all it takes is for about a third of the population in any one constituency to say, right, I'm voting right-wing.
I've had enough.
And the country can flip overnight.
So really all it takes is for people to get sick of it.
And I tell you what, man, the average Englishman at this point is a lot more radical than their government.
They have no idea how pissed off people are.
What about the bitches?
Oh, yeah.
All of the women I know are, I'm not even going to repeat some of the things they say.
They're quite angry that there are foreign men threatening the children of this country.
They're pretty angry about it.
So they don't want it.
Is it going to translate to change, though?
That's the thing.
Are you optimistic that it'll translate to change?
Yeah, I am, actually.
I don't think it's going to come through Nigel Farage.
Nigel Farage has shown himself to be essentially a safety valve for the Conservative Party.
He kind of, I mean, look, if you think about the name of his own party, Reform, it kind of implies that he's going to tinker with the current paradigm and try and make sure that that keeps working.
But that's not the issue.
What we need is basically a revolution that is going to sweep away everything that was done in the last 30 or so years and return us to a much more sort of traditional and frankly conservative form of country.
The only person I see on the horizon doing something like that is Rupert Lowe, who Nigel Frost kicked out of the party for being too right-wing.
But he's the person who is actually saying the things and doing the things that we want to see said and done.
So I would keep my eye on him if I were you.
Okay.
I will keep my eye on him.
And the show is, I want to make sure it's the Lotus Eaters podcast.
And people can follow you on X at Sargon underscore of underscore Akkad, lotuseaters.com.
And you can get this up on any of your channels.
You're always free to grab it.
We'll send you the file.
And since you're a business owner, and Gerald, you're a business owner, and I'm a business owner, we need to do faggot blood brothers.
Faggot, faggot, faggot.
Wait, I'm not a business owner.
Everyone say the word so that that way it's mutually assured destruction.
Yeah, yeah.
I already said it.
Well, for him, it's a bunch of situations.
I live in England.
I'm not saying that.
Oh, no.
Why isn't that a...
We'll allow PUFTA.
Can you say that?
I don't know if I can to be honest.
I didn't mean to put you in the hot seat.
All right, you can text it to me later.
I'm checking.
It's one of those things that you genuinely have to think about.
Right.
Yeah?
You genuinely have to think about it.
You just made the point.
Yeah, I'm not, I will never do stand-up in Canada, probably Europe ever again.
Like, I have a bunch of people that do a big venue there.
I'm like, nah, I can't go back because I might not come back to the States.
They'll arrest me.
They'll put me in a, I mean, their prisons are, you know, they're a little bit less rough.
They'd hate Carlos Witch joke in Poland.
Yeah, they're not big fans.
Ed hate it.
And I love that.
Carl, by the way, if you guys need any notes on revolution, just let us know.
Yeah, we can help you out with that.
Sorry.
Appreciate that.
I know it still stings.
All right.
Thank you so much.
We'll talk with you soon.
Sargon of a God, Carl Benjamin, everybody.
Cheers.
I feel bad.
I didn't realize he could be hauled off either.
I was just like, woo, that's true.
But that made the point.
That really did make the point.
He's like, that's it.
You got to, you actually have to think about it.
Think about that law that really struck me.
And I think you made a really good point.
Like, it's just basically, these are these rules that we talk about all the time, these giant media corporations or giant companies, they can afford to implement these kinds of rules.
It just puts out all their competition.
You can't.
So they don't mind the red tape.
They don't mind all that stuff because they can just pay for it and it'll actually give them more market share, essentially.
So I thought that was a good point.
But the thing that just really struck me in the middle of that is that it's not me saying this to someone.
This is me having a conversation with my friends and maybe seeing, you know, they watch a lot of football matches over there and say friends.
Right.
Yeah, exactly.
People that I pay to sit next to me at bars.
Also, because it's at the perception of the person who makes the complaint.
You could literally say something and they misunderstand it.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, that's comedy.
You could make a joke and someone doesn't understand the joke.
Right.
And they go, oh, this guy's pro-Nazi.
He was making fun of Auschwitz.
You're like Colbert can be sitting next to you.
The next thing you know, you lose your diner.
And I'm getting 17 vaccines.
Yes.
I mean, think about it this way, too.
Like, you could go in and maybe potentially try to get one of your competitors ousted.
Of course.
You just go in there and it's against them.
Oh, yeah.
Because you're not going to be the one punished for going in there and going, I hate you.
There's another beer.
I want you to go.
You're going to go into Harry's diner and you're going to say, I found a pufta in my soup.
What is that?
A cereal?
Pufta?
What is that?
Pefin spaghetti.
Sounds like a recent spaghetti.
Cereal pufta.
It's just like, it's not even offensive.
Do you think.
Do they call it, because they call a cigarette a fag?
Yeah.
They do.
Do they call it a, if somebody smokes, are they a fagger?
I don't know.
That's a good point.
Because a pufta sounds like somebody who smokes.
Yeah.
It does.
That's true, yeah.
Well, it's technically.
He's puffing on his fag.
That's right.
Well, he was blowing him.
Right.
Puffing and blowing him.
He was puffing and blowing.
He sucks, he blows, he puffs.
But you don't want to call him a blofter.
It doesn't sound quite as because then he's saying, woe's a penny blooters.
I'm talking about fallatio or cigarettes.
I'm surprised that he thinks that there's so much resistance to this and yet they don't vote that way.
No, he ran for it.
I didn't want to source button, but he ran for office and he didn't win.
None of that happens.
No, I know.
That's a good point though.
He said there's five parties, is what he's saying?
Or is it one out of five?
He said one out of five voters for like 12.
Yeah, they've got to have quite a few parties then.
In Canada, they have the main one is liberal, then they have conservative, then they have the NDP, which is like a big liberal party, then they have the Quebecois, which is really only big in Quebec.
I don't know if they have the Green Party, but I know they have a couple of others, but those are the main ones.
That's got to be their problem then, because you would see that here, too, in the United States.
When we had the election last year, people were complaining, on the right, people complaining about like, oh, well, I don't like Donald Trump's view on abortion.
Right.
So if there was another party that had a lot of the same views as the Republican Party, but then were like absolutely no exceptions for abortions, you'd see a ton of people go like, well, I'm going to vote for that because it fits with my morality.
Right.
And then obviously Republicans lose.
And that's why liberals push for ranked choice voting, which makes no sense.
It's a scale slightly, like no one can actually fully explain it, and you don't end up with anyone even close to what your balance is like.
Yeah.
That's what you end up with.
Yeah, that's what you end up with.
So in New York.
I'm glad, though, he's still around and kicking.
He's one of the OGs.
There aren't many around left.
And I actually want to talk to him at some point because he was a really staunch atheist back in the day.
And I don't think he's a Christian now, but I know he's a Christian sympathizer where he's like, we got to have some moral.
I remember the atheism conversation was one of the conversations we had.
Yeah.
We interviewed him.
So, yeah, but the Tinderbox thing, look, I hope, I really hope.
And I hope it manifests not in violence, but in change in who the leaders are there in that country and that it does turn overnight.
But I just don't see that from the outside looking in.
And I know that there's a huge problem from the outside looking in.
You don't have all the information.
You're not there.
But man, I really hope because at what point do you like you look at Britain right now, you look at England, you go, what's there to defend?
Yeah.
Like you, you at some point have to go, all right, we have to throw these bastards out.
And I'm not just talking politically.
Like we've got to, we've got to make some really hard choices here.
And it's just time.
Yeah.
And I don't know what else has to happen.
If that kind of stuff was happening here, we probably would have been fighting a long time ago.
Call St. Patrick.
Well, that was snakes in Ireland, I think.
Remember.
And then Pied Piper.
I think we're going to go to some chat here from you guys.
And I guess there might be something.
Is there something breaking there, Gerald?
It was kind of a comment on the atheism.
Carl admitted he now brings his kids to church despite his atheism.
So there's, you know, a little.
Giving his kids an education, even though it might not believe it.
That's good.
That's nice to know.
Let your kids see it all, I guess.
A lot of times kids can lead you to go, okay, I'm going to expose them to these things because it seemed like that's a good thing.
There's a lot of good values and morals being taught here.
And then you get exposed to it yourself a little bit more and it starts to tear down some walls.
Yeah, and you talk about kids and use the word expose.
There's some Punjabi going, did I hear expose?
Wrong word, boys.
Where's the Komodo dragon?
I'm horny.
Oh, Jesus.
Yeah, him and his priest buddy.
Oh, all right.
Let's grab some chats.
First time in the new, I guess, second half of the year.
All right.
Second half of the year.
It's the new season.
That's fair.
All right.
First chat from Doso Klakos.
Question for all.
Oh, I hate your name.
Oh, great.
Which story from the break were you upset that you couldn't cover immediately?
I honestly wasn't upset.
I wasn't upset.
I will tell you this.
Not I was upset that I couldn't cover it.
The stories like the Epstein story, it's the kind of thing where sometimes I go like, oh, I don't know if I want to do this anymore.
In the sense I look at it, I'm like, yeah, okay, we covered this.
We recreated the entire cell and walked through this with you, right, hand in hand.
Yeah, it's obvious that he was running a blackmail operation.
It's obvious that he couldn't have killed himself in the way that we were told.
And we need more information.
And then to have people who you voted for say, oh, it's just people on the left.
No one actually cares about this.
That's the kind of thing where it's a no-win situation if you cover it honestly.
Same kind of thing when I saw the story of the FBI and Bongino and Patel.
I really, because I would check in every now and then just try and check out and spend time with my kids because they're only going to be this age one more time in my life.
And we don't really get breaks here.
Like, you know, we get a week in the summer and a week in the winter.
And it really is.
You kind of have to keep doing it.
So I try to check in.
We're no late show.
No, exactly.
Where they take a month off three times a year.
And I really, I was like, oh, well, good.
It looks like Dan's going to quit.
And Cash is going to quit.
They're having a crisis of conscience.
And then I find out he came in to work like nothing happened and said he was working on something big.
I'm just like, I get why you're upset.
I really do.
I get why you're upset.
I mean, I've heard so many people who aren't plugged in just going, I feel kind of like I'm being gaslit about the Epstein thing.
They're saying that only the left cared about it, but I do care about it.
No, no, that's exactly how you should feel.
So when I see that and it feels like for a lot of people out there, you're completely helpless where you go, oh, wow, I really don't have control.
I think that's the feeling a lot of people have.
Like I voted for this and then I was told that I'm not an ally and I didn't vote for this.
It really pissed me off.
And that's the kind of thing where I've never, I've sworn to myself and all of us here, we're never going to, we'll get things wrong.
We're never going to lie to you just because we've got to keep those ratings up there because someone calls and goes, hey, let this go, which happens too.
No, you should.
You should have the Epstein files, the ones that were promised to you.
And if there's nothing there because it's been scrubbed, then tell us.
But the people who told you that they were sitting on their desk and they were going to do something about it and they were running.
And we didn't even run with the conspiracy theories as aggressively.
I never told you I knew what happened with Epstein.
I said, I know what didn't happen.
I said, I know that A, B, and C didn't happen.
I know that you couldn't kill yourself this way.
The people who were the most passionate about it, and they're going to get to the bottom of it all of a sudden going like, no, there's nothing there, but we're not going to show you how there's nothing there.
It just upset me because I can imagine being someone who doesn't work in media and feeling really helpless.
And, you know, you lose a lot of friends.
You lose a lot of, here's the thing.
I will tell you this.
You think if I went into the FBI and I was being stolen and I realized that there was nothing I could do, you think I'd still be there?
I'd go, there's no working with these people.
Okay, guys, just so I went in.
There's nothing I can do.
I can do better work if I leave because these guys are assholes.
I didn't trust them before, and now I really don't trust them.
But you do that, you develop a reputation for being difficult, right?
They reach out to you, go, hey, we want to give you a binder.
And if you ask the question, go, well, what's in the binder that we don't already have?
Ah, we can't tell you that.
Can you do a photo op on your social?
No.
They go, well, we're going to remove you from the press list.
That's the kind of thing that I understand.
What's most defeating, I think, for people out there is not, well, you know what the left is.
I was a scorpion when you met me.
But when you see people on your side, when you see people on your side, to draw a parallel, like impeach Donald Trump because he launched the single most effective covert zero violence military strike on Iranian nuclear ever, which he always said he would do.
Let's impeach him.
Why?
Because clicks, clicks, clicks, clicks, clicks.
Like, I'm just sitting there going, what is this?
I get it.
Everyone has to be relevant.
I get it that everyone has to feed their family, but at the cost of the very purpose you serve.
So it kind of broke my heart a little bit when I read like, ah, these are only former fans.
And stop talking about Epstein.
Just that.
I was like, oh my God, this just looks bad.
I don't think that Donald Trump did anything with Epsom.
I don't believe that because he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago.
And we know that he was the one person who actually cooperated with the FBI.
I think there might be some embarrassing things in there for colleagues, contacts, friends.
Guarantee he's in the report because there were interactions.
It just seems like there are too many powers that be that won't allow it to happen.
And I get why you could feel helpless.
And so all we can do is call balls and strikes and use our investigative power when we have the ability to.
So let's grab the next chat.
All right.
Next chat from that guy, 245.
Question for Stephen.
Do you think the Colbert issue illustrates perfectly why capitalism works?
Like how if you're selling bad product, then there is consequences.
No, it doesn't perfectly illustrate it because like I've said this in the past, a lot of these companies, they will operate at a loss if they think that it can be effective enough in the messaging.
I mean, you see it with Disney.
It takes bleeding money, hemorrhaging money for a very long time for them to straighten up and fly, right?
And a big reason for that is because the DEI initiatives, right, those come from the government.
So there are some kind of, there are incentives and there are forms of forgiveness.
If you've played ball, okay, well, we'll absolve you of some of these debts or you can have some safe harbor here.
So no, he should have been fired a very long time ago.
He should have never gotten the job.
He got the job because he would play ball in a way that they deemed permissible.
He maintained it because he was towing the line and because he never stepped out of line.
And it just got to the point where the hemorrhaging of finances was so severe that they had to make a decision.
And by the way, they wouldn't have had to make this decision if he wasn't a greedy socialist fuck.
If he just said, I'll take 5 million and 100 employees.
Right?
I mean, if you just cut 10 million off your salary, gosh, how many employees can that pay there at CBS?
But he's not willing to do that.
He's not willing to do that.
So, no, I think it partially does, but I think there are more clear examples because there's a component here where they kept him on the air specifically because they wanted a propaganda mouthpiece.
We didn't have much time.
We had to get to our guest, Carl Benjamin, and we had a lot of stuff to talk about on our first day back.
But I had questions about that, that story.
I want to know more.
Like, I want to know, is there still a late, late show with Seth Meyers and even less watchable show?
Is that still on?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, he comes cheap, so they might.
Yeah.
I think all that stuff's going to kind of go away.
And by cheap, I mean, I think he gets $5 million.
He gets $2.5 or, I think he gets $5 million for ratings in the low hundreds of thousands.
Also, I want to know when Colbert's contract was up.
Is that something that people are overlooking?
Was his contract already going to be up in May of next year?
And it was just a, hey, we're not going to, you know, we're not going to re-up this contract.
We're not going to renegotiate.
We're just going to cut the show.
Because that could be a very reasonable thing there.
Where it's like, oh, yeah, your contract's up in May.
Do you want to renegotiate?
And he says, no, I want more or I can't take any less.
And he's not going to say that.
And maybe they're like, well, it's bad press to talk about this as the parent company.
We're not going to mess with it.
I think that's probably a more likely.
I want to find out.
The only thing I want to find out.
You're right.
We don't have all the answers.
Here's one thing.
We do know that he has not been removed because Donald Trump or this administration leveraged the network in any way.
And even if they had attempted to, it wouldn't make a difference.
So that's what we do know.
It has nothing to do with freedom of.
It's absolutely crazy.
Six months into this presidency, and we've got people in America actually thinking that the media works for the Republican Party or Donald Trump somehow.
It's like insane to me.
Insane to me.
Well, they tie it all to the $8 billion merger that they were talking about and saying, oh, it must be because of that.
And it's like, well, listen, they just asked a franchise.
They just asked a show that could have somebody else come and sit in the chair because they've done it.
Yeah, exactly.
If it was because of Colbert, they could easily get someone else to do it.
Yes.
It would have been much more suspicious, though, still, you probably have a hard time making the case.
They're like, oh, we just don't want Colbert anymore and we're going to bring in this pro-Trump guy.
We're going to bring a late show with Steven Crowder.
No, they can't bring in anyone that inexpensive because here's why.
It's a house of cards and you pay what you pay for advertising because it's what you pay.
And so if they go, okay, you know what?
The host can take a very good salary, but much less than $50 million.
And we can have a very robust staff size, but not 200, then advertisers go, oh, you could do less with more, like they know in the podcast space, right?
Where they can actually see how effective their advertising is.
They don't want that.
They really, it's like magazines before they basically, I don't know that they even exist anymore, but they were sort of in their last stages.
They were buying up subscriptions en masse for all magazines so they could sell advertising space because there weren't enough people subscribed to the magazines.
Like, let's just, let's all keep this afloat.
And it was a sham.
And then advertisers found out like, oh, this doesn't really work.
So I think that's the thing is the advertising model is changing.
It's going away.
And honestly, just late night, this was a late night show.
It's the worst format for new media because first off, if you're watching something at night, if it's aired at any point during the day when things are on demand, well, then you just watch it at aired in the morning or it aired at 4 o'clock.
The only thing that happens if you run it at late night is a lower viewership because it's late night.
And the people who might want to watch or listen to it at 9 or at 10 can't.
And by the next day, it's no longer fresh if it's a topical show.
So it really, that's why we moved to the morning during COVID with the lockdowns.
We did the Tua Days.
We realized that just as many of you and more of you were not only tuning in in the morning, but more of you were watching the previous night's late night show in the morning.
So, you're like, oh, well, let's just do that because more people are watching it later on anyway, and we still have the live component.
They're just not capable of adapting, and they don't want to tip their hand.
They don't want people to see, oh, you really don't need this kind of budget, and we really shouldn't be paying this much for advertising.
It's fraudulent.
Yeah, well, the advertisers did figure it out.
That was one of the key pieces in the New York Post article, was that they were having a really hard time finding advertisers that wanted to come on the show.
And that's a really big problem.
If you're spending $100 million a year to make a show, you better have a bunch of very committed advertisers and people actually jockeying for position to get on that card so that they could be one of the advertisers.
Otherwise, people start looking around going, yeah, you got a lot of empty space here.
You sure you want to charge me that rate?
Yeah.
Let's see how his podcast does because he's a man of this.
He's going to have a podcast.
Yeah, it'll go about as well as Jason Bateman's or, you know, all the other things.
It'll go about a fourth as good as it did when they had all four of them get together and do one podcast during COVID.
Right.
I don't like to remember those.
Sim, Seth, Myers, Fallon, and Kimmel.
Was it Kimmel?
I think.
I think it was all four of them.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They got together.
Yeah, you know why?
It's so hard to forget or so hard to remember.
Yeah.
It's so forgettable that.
No, you're absolutely right.
Yeah.
Next month shows off.
He'll have a podcast.
Yeah, they'll have a podcast.
It'll suck.
Shit like because he doesn't want to put on the work.
It is your fault.
I've just come to this conclusion.
You've been knocking on the late night guys for a long time now.
You're ahead of your time.
Yeah.
It is your fault.
You put him out.
Yeah.
I mean, I'll take credit for him.
Good.
Colbert's the worst.
Yes.
Colbert was good in character, and he's just not a good host.
Yeah.
He's just not a funny guy.
And I mean that.
It kind of upsets me if people call him a comedian, too, because he doesn't written shit.
Right.
He's a member of the Writers Guild, but I mean, he has 24 writers on staff.
He's an improv guy.
He's never been a stand-up guy.
Right.
There's not a single late-night host that was a stand-up.
Yeah, I mean, Fallon was for a minute.
Yeah.
I mean, I would still say Steve Corell is a comedian or even Will Ferrell.
They're sketch actors.
They write and stuff like that.
But Colbert never did anything outside of a character that was kind of assigned to him.
So, yeah, that's a tough.
I remember that was a big controversy when he was getting the job, when they were considering him and a few other people.
A lot of people were like, I don't know, this guy from the Colbert rapport, he's just a goofy, you know, he's just a goofy character guy who just makes fun of right-wingers all day.
And, you know, I liked that.
They were like signed.
Yeah, it was funny.
I thought it was a funny show because it was over the top and it was very parody and satire.
I loved it.
Yeah.
But yeah, that was a big problem when he was coming in.
And I was like, I'm sure he'll be fun.
Total difference of what I thought was going to be.
No, he's just the worst.
Maybe not as bad as Samantha B, but we forgot about her.
Grab another chat.
We did until now.
No, Seth Meyers is definitely worse.
And you were right on the 5 million figure for Seth Meyers.
And they're keeping his show?
I haven't heard otherwise.
$5 million, and I think his demo viewership is under six figures.
It's going to be weird to call it the late, late show and there's no late show.
Yeah.
True.
The late er show?
Yeah, probably just rerun something like Waterfront Housing Hunters or whatever the hell it is.
Oh, great.
Love that show.
Love that show.
You're only 11 blocks from a pond.
What's the waterfront?
Well, there's a sewage spill.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, it's still worse.
It's so much fun.
Like, ah, look at these countertops.
Fermica.
We've got three options for you.
One's on a river, one's on the beach, and one is next to the dump.
Guess which one you can afford.
Let's grab a...
Next chat.
All right, next chat.
Chat from Nicole.
Do you think the conservatives in Britain could turn their law against them by claiming offense for all the craziness of liberal thinking?
Of course not.
No.
No, because there is a purview, right?
There are things that are considered offensive.
They have designated certain words, certain phrases, certain opinions as the bad ones.
Yep.
So I think that, yeah, it is defined by the left that wrote it.
And I disagree with Carl.
I mean, they might be idiots there, but you can't argue in the States that, oh, it was ignorance when they changed the census rules so they can count them to get more seats, right?
And they try and buy votes.
There's no other purpose for you to fight for the census rules to be changed.
Like, no one's cared about that for any other reason than to create more representation.
Right, exactly.
Or voter ID.
And then to open and get 15 to 20 million people in and try and get them on a fast track to voting.
In the UK, sorry, can you bring up the question?
Oh, liberal thinking.
No, because here's the thing I have to understand.
Communism, leftism, progressivism, and it's all the same thing.
And people try and separate like, oh, communism, socialism, anarcho-syndicalism.
No, no, just call it leftists.
Leftism, it's all the same thing.
They can only destroy.
That is the viewpoint of Karl Marx, because Karl Marx created nothing.
If you look back, he really didn't.
That is important.
He created nothing because he didn't believe that creating something was a value.
He didn't believe that you could actually create anything.
And so it's because you can't do it, it can't be done.
Except for his writing that no one wanted to read.
So it's all about destroying.
And conservatism, is about conserving here in what it is that we've built, our constitutional rights that are predicated on human rights, on natural rights, to be clear.
So we want to conserve that.
All of their laws and all of their changes against, right, rebelling against conservatism are designed to destroy it.
And so if you say, well, that offends me as a conservative, they go, yeah, but that's why this was created was to destroy what you want to conserve.
Freedom, right, in the United States, the right to bear arms.
So it doesn't apply because the entire purpose of these new laws, these bait and switches, is to destroy that which it is that you want to conserve.
So it doesn't apply to you.
That's why you go, well, it doesn't make sense.
Why would they bring in people who execute gays and stuff?
Well, because as long as it serves the purpose of destroying, tearing down, right, you can tear down a business or you can take over a business and say that's not yours anymore.
We're seizing the means of production and distribution.
Or you can tear down the basis of a country.
Yeah, no, we're going to get rid of the Constitution.
We're going to get rid of your fundamental rights.
We're going to get rid of Judeo-Christian principles because we want to take it away from you.
It's all about taking power away from you, taking away from you what it is that you've created.
If you want to know what communism, socialism, anarcho-syndicalism, progressivism, Democrat Party, Labor Party, all of them are doing the exact same thing.
Kicking down the sandcastle that you built.
That's it.
That's all they can do.
And they never rebuild one.
Yours is too high.
Right.
And they never rebuild it.
It never happens.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat.
Sticking with the English theme, DX9S.
Like an unstoppable force meeting an unmovable object, with this law in the UK, if a migrant is caught making illegal offensive talk, what will happen?
The story will disappear.
Yeah.
It's kind of like stop Asian hate.
Well, it's okay as long as it's in one of those no-go zones.
He's going to rape the cop.
Probably say.
They have to be.
My blocky was a monitor lizard.
Well, did he rape you?
It's not a crime.
Which, by the way, the raping of, I will say this, it's horrible.
You shouldn't rape animals.
Okay, everyone knows.
I take the unpopular opinions.
But I think it was eight guys who raped the water monitor lizard.
Hold on, time out.
That was real?
What is a water monitor lizard?
It's kind of like a Tomoto Dragon, but smaller.
Okay.
That means that one guy had to be the last guy off.
And that guy has a brass pair.
Or do you think they were all just pranking one guy?
Where they're all like, okay, we're all going to rape him, right?
Like, okay, all of it.
And then seven of them are like, we're going to have lunch.
Bye.
He's like, hey, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
And he's like, no, we all did it.
I mean, no, they got theirs.
But hey, that pork's unclean.
Yeah.
Well, it's a lizard.
Yeah, it's.
Yeah, but they don't eat pork because it's unclean.
Do they eat the lizard?
No, they're not.
I don't know.
They bang part of it.
They bang it.
No, but I'm pretty sure it would have died from, you know, you don't miss the point.
The point is eating bacon is not as offensive as penetrating a Komodo dragon.
You're missing the old point.
Don't eat where you fuck.
Wow.
That's the old adage.
Do you think he sees a pair of gator boots and gets hard as a scratching post?
The Godzilla's a porno.
Whoa.
But it's the best part.
Here comes Mothra.
She reveals herself.
Yes.
I heard the monitor lizard didn't even notice.
Yeah.
laughter laughter laughter Jokes on them because he took his conductor courses and ran them over with a train.
Let's grab one final.
Okay.
Research sent in.
We do have a slight admonishment on the story.
First off, it was four men, not eight.
Oh, geez.
Well, they all did it twice.
And they did, in fact, eat the monitor.
Wait, they ate it after they ate it?
Oh, my God.
That's familiar.
Good gross, dude.
Get me off the.
Do anything wrong there?
That was right.
You said it was a turtuckin, Gary.
That's the worst thing I've ever heard in my life.
Yeah, it's not Thanksgiving.
Yet.
No, I mean, a new tradition is born.
All right, let's all go around this lizard and say what we're grateful for.
I am grateful for you, Habib.
I'm grateful.
I get to go first.
I am grateful I have such handsome and pretty children to have sex with.
Oh, come on, what?
You never went to college?
You never played the old limp lizard?
Help me!
Oh, man.
All cultures are equal or some shit.
Next chat.
Somebody call the Geico, Gecko, make sure he's okay.
How do they insure people in Grace?
He's just huddled in a corner.
They sent me to Britain.
Dude, that's worse than what my cat does to these lizards out here.
Yeah.
Yeah.
She doesn't even have sex with them.
No.
She just eats them.
I thought she was a monster.
She's not even having sex with them.
She's a saint.
Oh, man.
That's true.
Hopper was an assassin with lizards.
I caught him eat at least like 10 of them.
My cat plays with him for a while and then was like, why aren't you moving anymore?
Let's keep playing.
What's for dinner?
What's for dinner?
Lizard, what's for dessert?
Green pie.
You have that?
I'm sorry, guys.
You brought it up.
All right.
Next gen. All right, next gen. You know who I am?
From Darth Arlena.
Question for y'all.
With the new evidence around RussiaGate, can the House impeachment from Trump's first term be overturned?
So glad you're all here.
No, it won't happen.
All right.
Next gen. All right.
And thank you for welcoming us back.
I wish, but it's just not going to.
So it's like, I don't want to waste time on it.
All right.
Let's see.
Following up from Garner Steve, can you explain how sedition versus treason treason?
Yeah, I can't speak.
Maybe the appropriate charges.
No.
And the reason I can't is because I don't want to, again, I don't want neither one is going to happen anyway.
Treason is more so about subverting where sedition is kind of pictured as warring versus subverting effectively.
That's the simplified, ultra, ultra reductive version.
But neither one is going to happen.
So I just don't, just, I would rather us spend, look, people being aware of it is more important and more effective going into the next election than what charges come of it.
And I understand that charges can be a way of validating it, but it is, or sorry, maybe charges, but a conviction.
It's not going to happen.
And there's also a risk.
The risk is, if you spend time on this and you get a petition with 5 million people who sign it, and then let's say that this actually did go to trial and there's no conviction, then they'll use it and say, see, this was a witch hunt.
It never happened.
And I'm guaranteeing you he will not be convicted.
So please don't even give them the win.
Just do what they did, which is go out and run with the story.
The only difference is yours is true.
Final chat.
All right.
Final chat from B Goldhammer.
Right now, not talking about AOC being attacked by her own party and her office getting vandalized.
Do we know anything about that?
No, I didn't even know.
I don't know about that.
This just happened right now.
The same as happened right now while we're live?
That's the chat I got in, but her office got vandalized?
All right.
Well, next chat.
Set us up there, guys.
Somebody.
Which podcast can we confirm from?
Yeah.
All right.
Well, in the meantime, next final chat from Leslie 13077.
Should the Senate take a full recess so President Trump can make recess appointments?
We need U.S. attorneys appointed as we currently have zero.
I guess that's an interesting idea.
I'm pretty sure you could still get it done.
I mean, I don't really think the legislature.
they just hold up the appointments.
Yeah, true.
I'm not, listen, it's a double-edged sword.
I'm never a huge fan of just kind of going around the system for everything that you need.
So I want to make sure that we don't do that.
But with this guy, I kind of think the answer is yes.
Yeah.
Like, we do need these people in place.
They're never going to get through because there's always a procedural this or a procedural that.
As long as these are qualified candidates and everybody knows it.
I'm kind of saying yes.
Yeah.
I don't know.
Well, let's grab one other final chat.
That's not so procedural, guys, because the recess appointment.
Oh, you know, Ken Paxton, that's the thing.
What an awful woman where he's going through that divorce and he's running for a very important seat.
And the wife just, he makes a very, whether he's wrong or he's right or she's wrong, I have no idea.
Makes a very diplomatic statement regarding his divorce.
And then she decides to go out on social media, tar and feather him while he's in the middle of a race.
And it shows you that people weren't really happy about it.
They're like, yeah, this probably isn't the right time for this.
Right.
So.
Okay.
Following up on the previous.
Following up on the previous chat, apparently AOC's campaign office in the Bronx was vandalized two days ago with anti-Israel messaging because she voted against an amendment from Marjorie Taylor Greene over stripping defense aid.
That's not her party attacking her.
That's constituents.
When I hear party, that's the actual DNC.
It's people in positions of influence inside the party.
I don't think that's what that is.
I think it's just a Palestinian, you know.
Yeah.
It's not like Chuck Schumer, like, the problem is your brain was put to your tits.
Yeah.
You know, something like that.
I will say this, and we'll see you tomorrow.
I do find it funny that her, is it her headquarters in the Bronx?
Her campaign offices?
I do find it funny that her campaign offices are in a place where she did not live or spend time.
Right?
She was in, was it Yorktown?
Was it Yorktown up there in Connecticut?
So.
I can't remember if it was Bronxville or Yorktown, but she lived in an area where the average median income was $150 something thousand, whereas the Bronx, I believe at that point in time, was 30 something thousand.
She went to very nice schools.
She lived a very privileged life.
I mean, it's Mayberry.
You have your local coffee shop and everybody knows everybody's name and whether or not you have AIDS.
And that's where she was.
And she just has to.
And to me, it's because the left vilifies success.
Then feel entitled to it.
They vilify if you worked your whole life and you created a business.
Look, I think Bezos is probably an evil prick.
The guy started selling books, right?
So at least before he got to the first couple of billion, right?
Before he became to the point where it's too big to fail and he's using the leverage that he has now to try and suppress small businesses.
You do have to hand it to the guy.
You have to hand it to people who run local businesses where they start a franchise.
And hey, now there's one, two, three, whether it's Kentucky Fried Chicken or Jack in the Box or whatever it is, a local ACE hardware, right?
Some guy who's a multi-millionaire because he owns five Buffalo Wild Wings or Bennigan.
So he's broke now.
But the point is, you see that in like the left village, hey, hey, yet you didn't, you didn't earn that.
You didn't make that, right?
Remember that was a famous Barack Obama quote.
And then all of a sudden you didn't build that.
That's right.
You didn't build that.
And then E.F. Colbert, like, what?
They're taking this away.
They don't, when I say the left has no accountability, they truly don't conceptualize, understand, and process the idea of getting to reap the fruits of your labor, of gaining what is earned.
That doesn't enter into the equation because it's a fundamental worldview that says you can't really earn anything.
It's everybody's.
And so their own candidates, like AOC, who was raised very likely far wealthier and more privileged than you in the safest, one of the wealthiest per capita areas, a very small area in the United States, she knows that because her own party and she herself have vilified hard work and success, where they've actually separated the two, they really do an effective job of trying to make you believe that actually success in no way is tied to hard work.
It's usually ill-gotten gain.
And when they've bombarded you with that for so long, someone goes, yeah, but isn't it a problem that you were raised wealthy and that you have a Tesla and you have a really expensive like, oh crap, that's right.
The only way out of this is to lie and to act like I'm Jenny from the block, like I'm from the Bronx.
It's just all, I was just talking about this.
It was on TV in the hotel.
I think it's called New Jack City.
It's with Wesley Snipes.
Yeah, New Jack City.
Yeah, Wesley Snipes, Iced Tea Before Your Worst Nightmare.
Right.
And I'll tell you this, I was watching this with the, it's an all-black movie.
And, you know, Wesley Snipes is the coolest guy with his black beret and his black turtleneck and gold chain and Adidas track pants.
Yeah.
And you watch it and you just go, man, this is so corny, right?
If any black guy showed up in a predominantly black area of town right now, acting like that, talking like that, looking like that, they would call him a cornball and they would laugh him out of the neighborhood, right?
But it's the whole community.
It's like, be real, man.
Keep it real.
There's nothing real about it because that was cool back then, which means it was entirely fabricated.
It was entirely disentangled.
You weren't raised to talk that way and use that lingo then that is out of fashion now or dress that way.
It was an entire language in the 80s and 90s as far as Ebonics that is totally different from now.
And black people 20 years from now will look back in this era and go, you guys look like absolute idiots.
What a cornball say, okay, so then which one is genuine?
And I get that certain things change, but not an entirely tectonic shift of the foundation that exists beneath you because none of it is genuine.
And they've tried to convince you that none of us are genuine, whereas our values, our ideals haven't really changed since 1775.
Technology's just gotten better.
The way we dress, if you go watch a video of my dad raising me, it's pretty much the same language and similar dress.
Maybe some sideburns are not as his dad raising him.
How are we so consistent generation Through generation in the way we look, present ourselves, behave, what we believe, and people tell you that we're fake when they change everything about themselves more often than their wardrobe.
None of it is real.
It's why Bernie Sanders has three houses.
It's why AOC was raised in a wealthy area, but they know that because they bombarded people who are easily controlled, right?
Hey, it's not your fault that you're a screw-up.
It's not your fault that you've been on snap and unemployed for 10 years.
It's the disingenuous rich guy who talks, walks, believes, and acts like his father and his father before him.
I'm going to fix it for you.
By the way, tell this person that I come where they come from.
Tell them that I come from the Bronx.
Don't tell them about my penthouse.
None of it is real, if nothing else.
If you take 100 representatives who are conservative, Republican, whatever, and 100 who are Democrats, and you just line up what the conservatives say and how they live, they will be far more consistent.
And I mean to the tune of probably 90% more consistent, than the rhetoric you hear from the left and how they live.
Let me walk you through examples.
AOC, not from Bronx.
Okay?
Not from Bronx, from, I believe, Yorktown.
Okay?
Yorktown.
Yorktown.
There you go.
Very, very wealthy area.
Bernie Sanders, worst tipper ever, three houses.
Chuck Schumer, has clearly professional private chefs because he doesn't even know how to grill a hamburger.
Barack Obama, raised by predominantly white, I believe grandmother, identifying with the black father who he never spent any time with.
Who else do we want to go through?
Kamala Harris.
Kamala Harris wasn't raised in the black ghetto culture of the United States whatsoever, but tries to identify that way and also tries to identify as Asian.
Tim Walls, man of the people.
I was a coach when you look at this guy's.
Joe Biden, career politician, multi-millionaire.
Crockett.
Crockett.
Go through that.
Doesn't talk that way.
Public schools.
Went to private schools.
Went to private schools.
Now, look, you can say that anyone's a hypocrite, but it's not hypocritical for Marco Rubio, who comes from Cuban immigrants, if they work hard and send him to a private school because he's not vilifying it.
So my point is this, the left is required.
Plenty of Republicans lie.
All politicians lie.
But it is only a requirement of the left.
For them to get your vote, it is a requirement that they lie, that they lie about who they are, that they lie about what they believe, that they lie about what they'll do for you, and that they lie about what they want for you.
If it's the party of the poor, if it's the party of the downtrodden, it's the party of EBT and SNAP.
Well, guess what?
That's what they want for you.
That's why they lie and say they identify with it because that's their voting base.
You know how you take away their voting base?
Be moderately successful.
Have a family.
You'll never have a Democrat again.
▲
Export Selection