All Episodes
Previous Next
June 23, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
33:39
🔴 America Bombed Iran... Is a Regime Change War Next? 2025-06-23 18:14
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's funny.
But then they're also socialists.
All right, next chat.
All right, next chat from 69. Question: Trump's got a lot of votes.
Trump got a lot of votes by promising to quickly end Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, and not get the U.S. into any new wars.
So far, over three.
What would you say to those voters?
Hey, man, I appreciate the question, even if that's a little, you know, retardé there.
What new war is you talking about?
Yeah.
I don't see a new war.
I see people who get fucked up, very bad.
That's all I see.
And they didn't even know about it until they see about it for real.
So that's almost kind of a brilliant, as you guys say, in the Inglafen.
Look, yeah, I think he overpromised on Russia-Ukraine.
Yeah.
I think that's something that he made during the campaign.
As far as Israel-Gaza, I think he more so, if I'm not mistaken, made promises to get American hostages back.
He was somewhat successful, but not fully.
And I think this is one that he could control.
In other words, he can't control Russia-Ukraine because we're not directly involved.
He can't control Israel-Gaza because that's not our war.
In this instance, we had terms and an agreement with Iran, and he has been saying for 20 years that they cannot be allowed to have a nuke.
This is one that he could deliver on effectively unilaterally.
So if he was in charge of Russia-Ukraine, where by the way, the purse strings had already been set because that did go through congressional approval, right?
Went through that whole process.
If he was in charge with Israel-Gaza, but he's not.
He is in charge of the agreement that he made with Iran.
And when it came time to make a decision, he delivered on his promise and ensured that they did not get a nuke.
I think that's a big difference.
And I don't see a third war.
There could be, but we're not there yet.
Yeah, but people are playing a word game with that right now.
They're like, what do you call it when you bomb a country?
Of course you're at war with them.
And it's like, well, that's not what you meant.
What you meant was boots on the ground, nation-building, regime change led by the American forces.
That's what you've been decrying this whole time.
Otherwise, you'd have to say that every single surgical strike in the history of this country has been a war when it has not been a war.
This is about as much of a war as SEAL Team 6 taking out bin Laden was a shootout.
Exactly.
Which was in what country?
Does that mean that?
Pakistan.
Yeah.
Did we go to war with Pakistan?
No, nope.
Peace prize is the latest I heard.
By the way, in the other ones, I feel like it's fair to call him out and say, look, you shouldn't have been promising the way that you promised on Russia-Ukraine.
I said that with Russia.
I said he's talked too tough, and he's not, you know, people now heard him.
I agree.
You're going to get shit-tested as a president.
He got shit.
Here's the thing.
You can't control the shit testing when it involves Ukraine and Lindsey Graham and it involves decisions that happened before you came in that you can't change.
He was shit tested by Iran, counted to three.
Do not mistake that for his lack of ability to deliver on promises that largely were empty on Russia-Ukraine.
Also, make no mistake here, the rest of the world, the people who were thinking about maybe acting up a little bit, leaping, they went, oh, shit.
We forgot about this.
Yeah.
So there's good and there's bad.
But let's not call it World War III if you didn't call SEAL Team 6 taking out bin Laden a shootout.
If you didn't call it a shootout or war with Pakistan, then don't call this World War III.
Really quickly before we move to the next chat, I forgot.
So the Mug Club, we have all of the Mug Clubbers who signed up before election night.
You can actually go to the website right now.
Link in description.
You can only go through the link, though, because it's a hidden product because not everybody can get it.
You have to enter in the email address that you used when you signed up for Mug Club originally, and you can purchase some extras of the OG mug as long as they last.
And then we're moving on.
That's right.
That's for you if you want to purchase extras.
Mug.
Yes.
Yep.
There you go.
The OG mugs.
You can buy some extras.
And once they're gone, they gone.
They're gone.
Like stealth bombers.
Oh, big own.
Wouldn't it be, if it was World War III, wouldn't it have to be a significant world leader?
Also, wouldn't it have to be other countries jumping in?
Oh, the Dutch country.
Yeah, they'd have to be the world, first of all.
The world would have to care about Iran.
Right.
And then Iran would have to be somebody of significance.
Yeah.
They aren't.
And for it to be a war, wouldn't there have to be a back and forth?
Wouldn't any civilians have to be killed?
Any people have to be killed?
Technically, there is a back being sent to Israel, but that's because they, you know, they.
It's a separate war.
Yeah.
Israel and Iran.
It's a separate war.
We're just like, hey, while you guys are playing, we're going to just.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
We're just going to take this out.
Thanks for making this extra easy for us.
Hey, Rand.
Surprise, cockfags.
All right, next chapter.
Next chapter from Carville.
Question for Stephen and Tim.
Given your experience, well, given your experience, do you think the MSM takes it personally when something like this happens and they weren't personally informed about it?
Oh, yes.
Yes, they do.
Oh, yes, they do.
And I will tell you, that's one of the beauties of Mud Club Undercover that we have is I've told them, because some of the people out there who do investigative journalism, it's all they do, right?
And so everything has to be like the biggest landscape-changing bombshell.
And I've been like, hey, if you think something's interesting, you know, you can take a flyer and try it just because it's part of what we do.
They operate as a satellite sort of unit.
And then ironically, because of that, we've had the biggest breaking investigative journalism pieces in the last few years.
We've had the Nashville Manifesto.
We've had the DOJ story, Donald Trump about them stacking charges.
We had Jay Varma, who was then ousted, right?
The COVID architect.
That's because they're free to roam a little bit more.
But I will tell you this.
I know, I've been in the room with these people and they get really, really mad.
They get really competitive over scoops and they really don't like it if they didn't know something.
And I'll tell you this, because that extends to me where if I go, well, hold on a second.
There was this information by the time I went on air and you guys didn't let me know if it's key information.
Because sometimes when we're in here, I will tell you this, when we're in here, we are actually unable to be informed as to what is going on in the world unless it's on CNN right in front of us.
We're sort of in a silo, right?
It's before this that we do all of our preparation and then after this that we brush up.
But when we're in here, we already have all of the information that we could take in with us.
And then we try and deliver that in a way that is as accurate and hopefully entertaining as possible.
But yeah, journalists Get really mad and competitive over that.
They hate not getting a scoop.
And by the way, they have no ethical obligations to revealing strategic military info.
They would love to.
They would love to.
I just thought of this.
They are not praising this at all.
A lot of them said that it was ineffective as a strike.
But remember that drone attack that Ukraine did to Russia?
Where they struck their bombers and there were no casualties and they basically called them the greatest military.
Yeah.
Greatest military strike of all time.
Yeah.
Remember the phantom of Kyiv?
Remember that?
The ghost of Kyiv?
That was a fake thing.
It didn't exist?
Yeah.
This is possibly the most awe-inspiring modern strategic military strike.
I don't want to take anything away.
That Ukraine drone thing was great.
They did a great job.
Cool.
Yeah, but this is way cooler.
This is way cooler.
Way cooler.
Come on.
You're going to tell me that you don't think we can't just even, wherever we line up, can you just acknowledge that this is pretty badass and pretty cool?
And I'm not saying that war is a game, but we're not at war.
I mean, if you can't go, ah, it's pretty cool that they took out these enrichment sites without killing anybody and no one knew until you were basically over the ocean.
If you can't say that that's pretty cool, then nothing's cool.
You would tell Fonzi that he's a dork.
Let's grab the name.
All right, next chat from Pilot Bailey.
Question for Stephen.
What would you say in response to those who say Iran has the right to a nuclear weapon?
No.
That's silly.
No one has a right to anything.
That's right.
Force.
People have a right to what it is that they can protect.
And the good news is people don't have to protect themselves from the United States if they're not a hell-bent regime on the destruction of the Western world.
Iran is not a, and actually Van Jones said this, funny enough, and it was a good point.
He said, Iran is not a normal country.
He said, Iran chants death to America.
Iran chants death to Jews.
Iran chants death to Israel.
Iran chants, I think, said death to gays.
He said, and as a liberal, at least one of those should be of grave concern to you.
He said, it's not a normal country.
Any country that says death to America, I mean, I'm sure there are some Somalians saying death to America.
I don't really care.
I'm sure there are people in some country that I can't even name who say death to America.
I don't really care.
The problem is the combination of death to America, if we can, we'll take out your way of life.
And we're getting to the point of nukes.
That's the problem.
Iran is not a country that should have.
Don't take my word for it.
Take Saudi Arabia's word for it.
Take the rest of the Middle Eastern world.
They don't want Iran to have nukes.
It is a very unstable, evil, oppressive regime.
Let's call it Taliban, see what they think.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Although I will say this, and I'm not approving of it.
I keep forgetting the name of the new guy in Syria after Assad.
It's Al Sharpton.
Al Franken, Al Abeb.
Oh my gosh, that would have been great.
Just knock out Assad and install Al Sharpton.
Please.
That's not what Syria needs.
Now, what I think you all will understand is the burqa in the heat has humidity.
It's Ahmed Al-Shara.
Ahmed Al-Shara.
Here's the thing.
I don't like him.
Bad.
But is anyone else kind of surprised that for an actual member of Al-Qaeda, he's been surprisingly moderate?
So far, I mean, like, I mean, I'm just, I'm not saying I don't like him at all.
And I don't think that the whole thing of topping him aside, he's bad.
Bad, bad, bad.
But he's not as bad as we thought an al-Qaeda guy would be.
So far, he's al-Qaeda-ing like he used to al-Qaeda.
Yeah, he's not al-Qaeda-ing.
It's like it was a phase for him in college, like torn Levi's.
It's not a phase.
I'm not a young man anymore.
I was like, what is that guy?
I'm like, you know what?
Because we were all told, and it just as easily could have gone horribly, and it just as easily could go horribly tomorrow.
But he hasn't been nearly as insane as you would think with al-Qaeda.
Like, if Osama bin Laden was the head of any government, you'd have expectations as to what it would look like.
And if he, like, came in and just put in a Bennigans, you'd be like, no shit.
Wow.
So I'm not.
You've been welcome.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Exactly.
Two for 20. Okay.
We could have solved this problem a long time ago, bud.
Oh, top Iranian commander, we will never back down.
Well, I mean, you just got promoted to that position because the other guy didn't back down and died.
You know what?
He wouldn't even be able to finish the song.
No, I won't back down.
No, I won't back down.
Well, that's him in hell.
Yeah.
You can stand me up.
Oh, I am here now.
It's the gates of hell.
Shit.
All right.
My virgins are all men.
No, I'm still standing.
No, I'm not.
No, no, no, I'm not.
No, I'm not.
Stronger than I ever was?
No.
No.
No, not at all.
All right.
Next chat.
All right.
Next.
Never mind.
No, go for it.
But after the, go for it in the middle of the chat.
No, it's a rickroll.
Next chat from White Juggernaut.
Is it a Rick Roll?
Are you going to do it with the nukes?
The nukes.
Never going to give it up.
Never going to let it down.
Going to enrich your enemy and then hurt you.
You just have to monitor their karaoke and know exactly what they're going to do.
Go ahead.
I'm going to ask a question to piss everyone off, so this will be fun.
White Juggernaut bitch asks, question, why when Iran actually cooperated more than Israel, who actually have nukes stolen from us, are we bombing them?
Okay.
That's just unique.
So, and by the way, I understand there's a little bit of truth to the idea that Israel stole some materials that they may have used to make nukes.
I completely agree with you that we should have the right to inspect and know what Israel is doing.
Okay.
That being said, the reason for needing to know why Iran has nuclear capabilities is because they've said they would kill us with them.
Yes.
And they've also lied about where they are.
Yeah.
And they've also not Even revealed some that the IAEA was like, hey, what about over here?
Yes, yes, over there.
And for people who get really upset about the USS Liberty, which, by the way, we can have that discussion and we've talked about it another time.
If you believe that the Israelis in the 60s said we're going to kill a bunch of these Americans and then never do it again, okay.
As opposed to friendly fire, my read on that is there were some people who maybe knew better, made a judgment call that was really, really bad.
I do think there were probably some Israelis who knew that it was potentially an American vessel and made a bad judgment call and immediately let us know afterward.
I don't think it was something that was completely blind in the fog, but it just seems like there was awful, horrible decisions made and the way that it was communicated as far, even worse.
Okay.
But if you're mad about that, you've got to be more upset about targeting, killing American troops and American citizens at embassies, bragging about it and saying there's more to come.
This is when people say anti- You can't go USS Liberty and then go, and actually Iran was more cooperative since the USS Liberty.
Maybe we can tell this up.
How many Americans have been killed by Iran?
Not even including all the proxy warring and the funding of terror groups.
It's a lot.
It's a lot.
There's no doubt as to whether they were guessing.
They said, can we kill these Americans?
Yes, we can.
And then boasted about it.
Okay?
So let's just apply this equally.
Do you mean they were cooperating more because at some point in time we were able to invest?
Okay, sure.
And we've never been able to do that with Israel.
I understand that.
And I think that we should be able to inspect Israel.
And I hope that someone pushes for that.
I really do.
If I could wave my want to be president, it would be Israel.
You're just like everyone else.
We've got to be able to know.
Yeah.
100%.
That being said, they have not killed American servicemen and women multiple times, bragged about it, and said, we are going to nuke America.
And we will never back down.
Yeah.
Exactly.
How many...
I just would like to hear from white juggernaut, bitch.
Let's see if they respond.
Is that fair?
Does that answer whether you agree with it or not, my perspective?
Does it matter?
You say Iran is more cooperative.
Do you agree with the fact that Iran, their government, have targeted, killed more Americans, and by the way, on more occasions and boasted about it than Israel ever has?
Do you agree with that fact?
And do you understand that the people who have done it and said, we will do it on a larger scale the minute we're able?
That that's different from Israel saying, whether you believe it or not, you're a greatest ally.
We would never actually, we would never actively try and harm the United States.
Why would we do that?
One says, we'll kill you.
We've killed some.
We'll kill more.
The other says, we're friends.
You may not like that they're not good friends, but they're not saying, isn't it great that we've killed you, and we're going to kill some more?
I would like to hear what that person says, because I do think it's important to note.
They did reply.
Yeah, let me see.
Oh, 9-11, JFK, USS Liberty.
Oh, I see.
Okay, the Jews were behind 9-11.
Come on.
Don't go down that rabbit hole.
Okay.
So even, let's take this for a second.
Now, you can't obviously prove any of that.
You can claim that you can, but you can't.
I don't need to prove that Iran targeted and killed Americas.
They did it, and then they said, yeah, that was us.
So in every example that you point to, it's one that Israel is vehemently denied.
And you can't directly say so.
Maybe there's some truth to it.
Let's even give you that.
Somebody else bragged about 9-11, by the way.
Yes.
They didn't brag about it.
They bragged about 9-11 for the entirety of a war.
We fought them because of it.
Right.
Bragged about it.
That's what I was in, by the way.
Sorry, I don't know if you were there or not.
No, no, no.
You were fighting a war against the Jews.
You continued to brag about it.
Yeah, you were fighting a war against the Jews.
You just didn't know.
I'm sorry that they misinformed you.
so many more examples of Iran doing it and taking credit and gleefully doing it.
Does that nation...
You believe that Iran would go that amount of time without nuking the United States or Israel or threatening anyone after being under attack for decades?
By the way, just.
JFK, by the way, was also, that was one casualty.
Yeah.
That was not a mass casualty event.
Yeah.
No, but I don't want to even lend any credibility to this.
Look, just for the sake of argument.
For the sake of argument, you're 100% right.
But 9-11, there's virtually no indication at all.
And I say virtually no individuals.
They'll show some videos of dancing Jews.
I don't care if Jews were dancing.
It doesn't mean they planned the freaking attack.
Hey, Jews danced.
Fine.
You don't.
Poor list.
Okay, so that means the Jews were behind it.
Like two people told the FBI on some app.
You know, people said like, what, five or seven Jews died during it?
It was well over 100 people.
There's just so much misinformation out there on that that it's just staggering.
The USS Liberty thing is the same thing.
You can have a different opinion about it, but look at the facts of what actually happened.
Go look at how long it took the Israelis to notify us after the attacks.
If you're looking at about an hour, that's not exactly a good false flag event.
And I understand that you're going to vehemently argue your position.
I'm surprised you didn't bring up the Levon affair because I brushed up on that too a long time ago.
Again, even, let's assume it for the sake of argument, at least one's posture is we are allies and they provide us with not nearly as much value as we provide them.
The other one is openly calling for the extermination not only of Israel, but the United States.
And it said, the minute we get to the point that we are able, we will.
The only point of contention is them saying, no, no, no, no, we're not able.
Yeah, but it looks like you're enriching uranium.
Yeah, for other reasons.
Yeah, but you don't need it.
You're the only country that has uranium enriched to that degree that doesn't have a nuclear bomb.
Yeah, so we think you're making a nuke.
No, where are the materials?
We hid them.
Can we see them?
No.
You got to sit down and talk with us about this.
No, we're going to send someone else.
All right, 60 days are up.
Next chat.
By the way, thanks for engaging on this.
We disagree.
No, I do appreciate you engaging.
But the issue is when you apply two different standards.
I don't think I am when I'm saying, hey, we need to be able to know what Israel has as far as nuclear capabilities.
We need to be able to.
That's important.
And I think that's the right thing to do.
Just like we need to know it from Iran.
I don't think you're applying the same standard if you argue to the point I'm willing to bet that you post this everywhere that you can about things that you cannot, no matter how much you cannot verify.
You cannot with 100% certainty say JFK was assassinated by the Jews, 9-11 was committed by the Jews.
You may have a case that you can present, but I can with 100% certainty say that Iran has killed Americans, has taken credit for it, and has said that they will do more whenever they are able.
Why?
Because we saw it, they admitted it, and they made the declaration.
Apply both standards.
And then assess which one is a threat.
Next chat.
All right, next chat from Agrathos.
Question for LWC.
How does the demonstration of military power in Iran and Trump's willingness to use it affect current geopolitical turmoil around the globe?
Does this give other countries pause?
I'll bet.
I think a lot of people already knew our capabilities, but I think it doesn't hurt.
It doesn't hurt anyone.
Man, it's a flex.
Using them is different than having them.
You know what I mean?
A lot of people have capabilities.
Yeah, the flex is more of like, we will do it.
Yeah.
Don't push too far.
I think the next time Donald Trump gives a timeline, again, where it's a conversation that he has started and he can make a decision unilaterally.
He can't really use Russia or Ukraine as an example because that started before him and there's just too much red tape.
I think the next time he gives people a red line, I think they are going to take it, if nothing else, much, much more seriously than if this had not taken place.
It's also a different flex with military power in the sense that there were virtually no casualties that we know of casualties.
And when somebody knows that you can do that to them, you know that you're not going to get any sympathy.
No one's, I mean, there's very little sympathy going out to Iran right now.
Well, here's something else, too.
It's a very good point.
And the casualty thing does matter because the fact that that can be done, look, when the people of Iran, many of whom don't like their own government, the regime, right?
When they see their regime firing rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas, and they see the people who, out of their own national security interests, target with such precision the military sites or the uranium sites in question, while going to such great efforts to avoid killing civilians, their tolerance for their own regime shrinks.
In other words, the likelihood of a civil uprising from a nation's own people goes up every single time there is a targeted military strike that shows the regime's weakness and shows compassion from the American government in not killing them.
They go, oh, wow.
At a certain point, they go, wait a second, we're firing rockets into women and children and they just took out, like, we didn't even miss lunch.
Maybe we're the bad guys.
Yeah, at a certain point, they're like, death to America.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Why?
So that is important.
That is where doing it as righteously as you can.
As righteously.
Yeah, as righteously as you can.
Look, I don't believe, you've never heard me say this.
When people say political violence is never the answer, that's silly.
Of course it's sometimes the answer.
We're a country because of it.
Yeah, exactly.
Now, it's never the answer to go shoot up a congressman or woman's house because you don't like a bill that they didn't write.
But to say that there's violence is never the answer, whether politically or internationally, is silly.
It's absolutely silly.
Sometimes it is required.
And if you can do it as righteously as possible to remind the world of not only the might that we wield, but the compassion that we have for people, it just, you know, it just reiterates that it's not an empire.
It's not an empire.
It really is about looking out for our own national security and taking into account the value of life.
Period.
I think that's a good thing.
Next chat.
All right.
Next chat from MP Tiger T. Question for the crew.
How come no one is talking about the 5.1 earthquake the day before the bombings?
Could that be why Trump sent the bombers?
We have satellite system that detects nukes.
I kind of think if there had been a detection that they would have blasted that out publicly because it would have galvanized the world, I think, in some ways.
So I don't know.
And that's a good question.
That's my first thought.
I don't necessarily...
5.1 earthquake.
Is a 5.1 earthquake a huge earthquake?
I don't know.
I don't think it is.
I could be wrong, obviously.
That's why I'm uncomfortable.
I've lived through earthquakes.
I'm not an expert on this at all.
And I don't know what the measurement, but as a kid living in California, I think I remember people being on the news like, yeah, we suffered a 5.54 earthquake.
And me being like, well, we had one today.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So I don't know.
I guess it's something that I don't know.
I fell asleep during San Andreas.
Yes.
Did you really?
Just sent him away.
In the theater.
And I left.
I left just because I woke up.
I wasn't offended or anything.
It was just so boring.
I was like, it is a bit.
It's still going on or I'm going home.
The fault is still breaking.
Yeah, I know.
I saw that come and go in the media.
Like, I would really like to understand what happened there if it was just kind of a natural geological event.
I don't know.
Maybe.
But otherwise, it does sound kind of fishy.
Yeah.
See?
But don't you think Iran would have said something too?
So Iran's whole goal, again, get in your mind.
You're like, you're a RAN and let's just give Iran the most benign purposes possible.
They're just trying to counter it.
They want to get in their head.
It's like the selling.
I know, but you have to get out of their head.
Just stay away from goats.
So basically, you're trying to make sure that the rest of the world knows that you have a capability so that you're now protected.
They're not going to invade you.
They're going to leave you alone to do your thing.
And eventually, maybe you can even take out your enemies.
If you had accomplished that feat, not building up to it, not almost there, but like accomplished it, you would have told everybody.
Everybody would know so that you can go, see, see, we've got it.
Stay away.
Don't mess with us.
Just look at North Korea for years when they didn't have the ability to launch them.
They're like, hey, I present to you then the West.
Ah, shit.
Hey, so just so you know, the last test for North Korea registered 6.3 on the Richter scale.
Okay, so it's in the range.
Okay.
Okay, it's in the range.
I don't fully know.
Was that in the water or is that on land?
I don't know if it's like decibels where it's like you go up two and it's now you have permanent hearing data.
Orders of magnitude.
It's orders of magnitude.
So every 0.1 is orders of magnitude higher.
Okay.
That's what I mean.
Okay.
So I don't know.
All right.
Final chat.
And I got to saunter out a little early, so we'll be done here by 45 today.
Big 7355 asks: question for the crew: Do you think these lefties will start supporting Iran over America soon?
Just next big Orange Man Bad bit.
I've already seen it.
Yeah.
I've seen it on Apple.
Sure, but I don't think it'll be.
Mainstream, no.
Mainstream.
And here's the big thing.
No civilian casualties.
No military casualties we know of.
Yeah.
The no casualty, you said as righteously as possible, which I was hoping you'd hit the guitar riff on.
Right.
He didn't.
But yeah, I think that's a big part of it.
It's like, it's hard to be like, yeah, well, I mean, we didn't kill anybody.
Yeah.
It's easy to be like, oh, God, our country sucks.
We keep killing people.
Right.
But when you have...
So righteously.
Yeah.
Yeah, it is hard to play the victim when no one's dead.
But it's also indicative of the heart of those on the left who have no interest whatsoever in the United States when you see the L.A. Sheriff's Office.
In other words, that guy couldn't help himself or whoever was in charge of their ex from virtue signaling.
They had it at the ready because they probably were anticipating.
No one thought you could have a military strike and actually take out all of the relevant facilities without killing anybody.
They're probably Iranian.
Maybe.
Maybe.
And they couldn't help themselves from going, our hearts go out to the families and victims of those.
Meaning they're always looking for an opportunity to side with the enemies of the United States.
And in this case, very clearly, the enemies of freedom, the enemies of basic fundamental human rights.
No one can argue that Iran is not against basic fundamental human rights that we take for granted here.
Of course they are.
It just comes down to, are they powerful enough to inflict that worldview upon the rest of the world?
That's the only remaining question.
And so for people in Los Angeles to say, oh my gosh, this is horrible.
And we can't believe when no one was actually killed, that tells you where their heart is.
These people don't want America to succeed.
They don't see the United States as a shining city on a hill.
And they don't believe that this is the greatest country on earth.
And you know what?
I can extend that.
There'll be, I believe next week, there'll be a talking with people on ICE deportations and immigration.
And we just recorded it on Friday.
We just filmed it on Friday.
And I was speaking with a man named Chico.
Guess his origin.
Chico.
And basically admitted to being an illegal alien on camera.
You'll see that.
And he was talking about the problem with the deportations.
And finally, he was going back and forth and talking about it.
And I said, hey, so you're here.
You want to stay here?
He said, yeah, I said, tell me, is the United States the greatest country on earth?
He goes, it's pretty good, but no, it's not the best.
I said, which country is better?
I don't know.
I don't think there's any country better, but you know, I said, okay.
We don't want you here.
I said it to him.
I said, we don't want you here.
We don't want people here who are coming to take.
And then he went on to say, yeah, you know, but you have people here.
They work for four years and they go back home.
You know, they come in, they do the work.
And then I said, right.
We don't want them here.
And it's not because you're brown.
It's because we can't build a nation on that.
We cannot build a nation on people who don't view this as a greatest country and who are willing to take the resources and take it back to the country that they were fleeing that never provided them with those resources in the first place.
That is a succubus.
And here's the big difference, too, between people talk about the left.
I mean, for example, use JFK.
JFK, he was a philanderer, jaundice, likely drug addict, sure.
He also understood the deep sea.
He also understood the problem with our intelligence agencies.
And his qualms were largely with enemies of America.
That is a big difference between not all the left, but JFK and modern Democrats.
JFK would be viewed as quite moderate today.
Quite left on some issues, but quite moderate on other issues.
I will say this.
I think he was wrong on a lot, but I do think that he hated the enemies of America.
I don't believe that that's true of the left today.
As a matter of fact, I believe their inclination is to embrace any enemies of America before they champion America's cause.
And here's the big difference to tie it to immigration.
They say, we're a nation of immigrants.
And I interviewed quite a few people.
And by the way, at the end of the day, there was a fan named Armando, who was Cuban, who came up and we're going to do a good immigrant, bad immigrant thing because he was like, I can't believe these people.
But here's the big difference.
People say we're a nation of immigrants.
Take the Irish, take the Italians, the Polish, the German, the Jewish, whatever.
People who came here on boats with no promise of anything other than opportunity.
Those people who then raised generations here, right, those Polish Americans, those Irish, those Italian Americans, guarantee you, in the 1920s and 1930s, if you ask them, is the United States the greatest country on earth?
Unequivocally yes.
Unequivocally yes, and they stayed here.
If the answer was no, they would have left.
Some did, by the way.
Not many, but some returned to the security along with their subservience to the governments they left because they weren't willing to make it on their own here.
It's a very small percentage.
Everyone who stayed here said, yes, this is the greatest country on earth.
That's why I came here.
And they planted that American flag in their yard and they were proud of it.
And I go as far as not only does the left disdain America today, and I mean that, I think that a huge portion of the left, certainly the DNC, disdains America.
I view a lot of immigrants coming into this country right now as people who simply take advantage of America.
They do not come with the same mindset.
I also interviewed, you'll see a lady who was Chinese, came here on a student visa, went through the lottery system.
She married an American.
And it dawned on her as I continued to interview her, where she said, yeah, no, the immigration policies are definitely stricter in China.
I said, okay, why do you think that is?
And she kind of, I said, are you allowed to protest the government?
She said, no.
I walked her through the deportation process and the app and how people can self-deport and get a $1,000 check and a flight.
She said, okay, that's reasonable.
I said, so you're married to an American?
I said, 4th of 1, I said, What flag do you fly out in front of your house?
Mayor, United States or China.
She said, Oh, well, we don't fly any flag.
I said, Change that.
Change it.
Are you saying it has to be the law?
No.
Not saying it has to be the law for everyone to fly an American flag.
Saying if you're coming here, consider it your trial period.
Show us that you really want to be American.
Show us that you, not only that, show us that you are so afraid of being anything other than American to the point that you are willing to risk it all and fight for it.
Or we don't want you here.
Because just like with current Democrats, you can't build a nation on those people.
We talk about nation building.
I don't want a nation build abroad.
It's time to start nation building right here.
And that means anyone who comes in, litmus test, it's the greatest country on earth.
What are you going to do for it?
What's your duty?
If not, we don't want you here.
You're not welcome.
▲
Export Selection