All Episodes
Previous Next
May 3, 2022 - Louder with Crowder
01:21:08
IT'S HAPPENING! LEAKED Decision Says SCOTUS Will OVERTURN Roe v. Wade | Louder with Crowder
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
🎵 Music 🎵 🎵 Music 🎵
Hey Steven, it's Dave, Lando, third chair.
I'm really sorry that I ate your last Bill Bar.
I have self-control issues with food and everything else.
I wrote you a song.
I hope you like it.
I'm just a little bit plump in the middle.
Ate the last Bilt Bar hot off the griddle.
Sweet and yummy cocoa.
Junk food a methadone.
Deep fried banana cream pie.
Mouthful of delicious chocolate mint.
Ooey gooey candy coated fingerprints.
Low net carbs so technically still keto.
Sweet sweet marshmallow.
Got em from Biltmore Shop.
So full my tummy's gonna pop.
Ate too much.
It's a lot.
In your mouth something it's not.
Protein.
I'm so buff.
And I just can't get enough.
Dum dee dum.
Dum dee dum, sweet marshmallow.
Don't leave me alone with Bilbao or Steven.
Don't leave me alone with desserts.
Don't leave me alone with desserts.
Shouldn't have done that.
It's on you.
Hi.
Subtitling made easy by Secondlyegg A strange animal That's what i know
A strange animal, playing on the ball physics
That's an I can't contain my excitement sip Because today's a good day.
Well, okay.
It's a bad day because the guy who leaked it, or girl, or Z, is a dick.
But what was leaked is big news.
Of course I'm talking about Roe v. Wade and the alleged, but it seems like Supreme Court ruling on that that's going to be coming down the pike.
Look, this is something where a lot of people are talking about it.
A lot of people are missing some key points that this is... Roe v. Wade has been bad law.
So I want to make sure that... I know we have some of you right now if you're watching or you're listening on audio on Apple.
It used to be iTunes.
When I was your age, or on Android, or on Spotify, that you may be pro-abortion, pro-choice, to whatever capacity you believe that you are.
That's not necessarily what we're talking about today.
Of course I am pro-life.
Look, I make my biases known as apparently as I can.
But my question to you is this.
Before we get to the law of it, we are going to show some clips here today from the meltdown.
And there's some exclusive updates here.
We may know who the leaker is.
As this comes in, it's 921 Central, God's Time, so 1021 Eastern.
We may be finding out more and more about who leaked this.
Spoiler alert, definitely a liberal.
This is an intimidation tactic.
But before we get to that, uh, my question to you is, why do you think that the left,
why do you think when you see all these feminists, why do you think they're so,
they're so vehemently pro-kill, these people killing babies?
And I mean actually wanting to abort babies up until and including birth.
These people.
Those are the people I'm talking about.
That's not most of the country.
I understand that.
And most of the country is not pro-life to the extent of, you know, not allowing for exceptions of incest and rape.
That's not what I'm talking about.
I am talking about, if you look at the reaction today from the mainstream left, what other reason can you have other than people shouting their abortion and talking about Colorado, for example, Virginia, these laws, and praising them outside of, honestly, evil.
Evil.
Because we're at a point where, look, people know it's a baby if it's 32 weeks, if it's 34 weeks.
There's no denying that.
There's no scientific argument at that point.
And they say, well, it should be taxpayer-funded abortion on demand, period.
That's why we're here.
What's happening today, leftists who happen to be watching Media Matters, hello, is Your fault.
This is the pendulum swinging.
You've reached too far.
And I just, my question is, I want to know why.
It's hard for me to get into your mind.
I mean, this isn't the cell.
So, that being said, since we are discussing something that has been leaked and YouTube is selective on what kind of investigative journalism is allowed, if this is not on YouTube, you don't see us on YouTube, you can go to Rumble or Mug Club, Monday through Thursday, 10 a.m.
Eastern.
We're available there.
Nothing would make me more happy, nothing would make, nothing would thrill me more greatly than for you to go to Rumble or Mug Club.
And to shoot you.
So, we'll get to that in a second.
A lot of info today.
It's mainly going to be on the Supreme Court and also the history of Roe v. Wade and why RBG was against the ruling of Roe v. Wade.
But first, let's introduce, of course, Gerald A. is with Child.
Gerald B., how are you, sir?
Oh, he's surprised in the leak.
He is dumbfounded.
He is stunned to find out.
That Alito is not amongst his blow-up brethren.
Stunning.
And you know him, you love him.
At Landau, Dave, the quickest man on his feet.
And he's doing some dates here this weekend in Springfield, Missouri, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Go to loudmouthcotta.com to buy tickets.
Dave Landau, how are you?
Ahoy, good.
How about you, sir?
I'm doing well.
I did my own makeup.
We secretly wear that on this show, and boy can you tell.
All right, go on.
Actually, no, you look rosy.
Do I?
Yeah.
Then I don't wear makeup.
No, he doesn't wear makeup.
What about one of them?
He just wakes up like this.
He doesn't need to put on his face.
I look like a cop.
Or in the Taking Back Sunday parody that's coming down the pike, someone said you looked like emo Hitler.
Yeah, the full mustache one.
He's like, not the handlebar.
Well, because it was just coming in.
Yeah, handlebar Hitler would be good instead of the toothbrush mustache.
It's a bold choice, the mustache.
Check your mug, by the way, because it does smell a little bit in the studio, so just check it.
We had an incident here yesterday.
No feces yet.
Amber Heard.
She's been creating copycat poopers.
I'd like to say, too, I think it's not a man's place to talk about abortion until Apple decided to make the pregnant man emoji.
So that's what I enjoy, is that the woke left is like, you can't talk about it, but also men can get pregnant.
It's like, you really ruined yourself there, didn't you?
Yeah, exactly.
Kind of like Title IX, sure.
With dicks.
Yes.
All right.
The rules have changed!
Also, I would recommend, if you have kids watching with you today, it's not a trigger warning, this is a strong PG-13, because we will be discussing the dismemberment and tube-sucking of babies, just to be clear.
So it's, you know, not necessarily age-appropriate.
I'm not a Florida public school teacher.
No.
So, before we get to that, of course, we know the big news, Supreme Court.
It has some... and when I... before I... so, let me give you... it has the worst among us.
Middle-aged liberal women upset.
Yeah, she's lecturing me.
We're on the same side.
Are you guys angry?
I'm not angry.
Don't be like that with me.
I'm not a church mouse.
Shut the f*** up!
I'm a f***ing woman.
And I'm not a god damn church mouse.
At least a church mouse would be quiet.
I'm making a wrong decision.
Coat and seize, ma'am.
Coat and seize.
F***ing cheese.
EEEE! F***!
You lost, baby killer!
Woo!
You weren't sleeping, you little shit!
You had all this going on in your life?
Well, not a creature was stirring, not even a church bitch.
I love you.
She really thought that church mouse, and then she's like, I know, I'm gonna say I'm not a church mouse.
And then when someone came back with something she wasn't ready for, she's like, I AM NOT A CHURCH MOUSE!
It's also just an outdated, stupid thing to say, where everybody's like, you just lost touch years ago.
This is why you're angry and no one's touched you in years.
You're not a church mouse, you're a satanic temple shrew.
There's just the guy in the salmon shirt who's like, I'm a straight white guy who's here to settle this.
It's like, stay home.
Are you angry yet?
What a waste of a night.
Are you upset?
Yeah, they're upset.
That's all they do.
I would like to express being upset, but that might exhibit toxic masculinity.
So I will let the raging Karen who says she's not a church mouse do my speaking for me.
But do you have anything else other than she's going with church mouse?
Okay, great.
I can't believe she pulled that one out.
Yeah.
I don't know what it means either.
Yeah, I don't know exactly.
Is there an epidemic of mice in church?
I'm just not... I think she was fighting with somebody else that was on her side.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's... well, because they don't really have a side.
They're just psychotic and mad at everyone and everything.
We're on the same side.
And by the way, speaking of mice, looking at that, you know, she was wearing those white pants.
Seems like someone cut off her tail with a carving knife.
So, Hank, Philip Parr, We just had the intro there.
By the way, name that film reference for people who don't know.
They're delicious.
It's the end of Moneyball.
You just ruined it!
It was a game!
That's right.
Alright.
Built.com.
And you enter in the promo code Crowder15.
You're like my mom.
My mom, when she tells jokes, she tells the punchline first because she's concerned people will stop listening.
It wasn't Moneyball.
No.
Is that better?
That's fine.
Did I fix the problem?
Threw him off the set.
Built.com, Crowder15, look, I've said this, no one needs, like, protein bars, but they are delicious, it really has, it's like, you've hit it really well, it's like junk food methadone, it really does, sort of, it's a tiered process.
Yeah, because you're trying to wean yourself off of the bad stuff.
Yeah, it's like chocolate suboxone.
Yes.
Yeah.
Very well put.
Yes, but then, you know, but don't become an addict, you don't want to, you replace a bad habit with a good habit.
That's what I've used Built Bar for, and I'm down, uh, since the surgery, about, uh, 35 pounds.
That's what you have to do, rewire the brain to do something positive to replace the negative.
Right!
And my brain just, it's more like a piston engine where it's like, oh problem, this one goes down and another one's pop.
It's like whack-a-mole, none of them go away all the time.
Mine's more like a turbine, in that it's not quite a jet.
But you know, I can fly a little lower, so there's some versatility.
There's one person there with an F-8 pilot.
I like this, I like the pilot-themed humor.
I have a small plane, I enjoy it.
All right, so look, the Supreme Court, this is what's in the news today, but I think that some people are missing some important, some key details here.
And when people say find common ground, I don't believe you can find common ground in a lie.
I've talked about this before.
But you can find common ground on agreeing to the terms.
I mean, people have done that in war, for crying out loud.
So agreeing to the terms as far as What constitutes good law?
This is where you had someone like Ruth Bader Ginsburg who was able to agree with people like Alito on at least the legal premise of Roe v. Wade.
This is why we are where we are.
Now there's been a leak this morning.
We have a hunch as to who the leaker is.
But according to a draft majority opinion, this was obtained by Politico, they are now voting to strike down Roe v. Wade.
Now is there, I have a question, is there punishment for the leaker?
Because it seems between the FBI, CIA, this, there's a lot going on in the government that should not be out and available to the public the way that it's been.
They would, but they're too busy prosecuting the QAnon shaman.
Oh, good.
Yes, I forgot.
That son of a gun.
Also downloading hardcore pedophile pornography, the CIA.
It's research.
Yes.
It's simply research.
The Pete Townsend defense.
Yes.
The Daniel Day-Lewis method pornographing.
So, the draft decision, just for people who don't know, it comes from Dobbs vs. Jackson's Women's Health Organization.
Now, this was a case in Mississippi.
It was a 15-week ban.
extremists. 15-week ban and so there was an organization that lobbied for it and so obviously
they were sued and they said, hey you lobbied for this and now you're infringing my rights. This got
then, you know, it went up to the Supreme Court. Now the majority opinion, this is according to
the leak, which we have every reason to believe, not because it comes from Politico, of course not,
but because it's been confirmed also by other sources, the majority opinion written by Justice
Alito wrote, we hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.
It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives.
Now what does that mean?
We'll talk about this more.
This means that it just goes to the states.
So by the way, the states that have these crazy radical abortion laws.
No, I'm not talking about, you know, viability bans like in places like Texas.
I'm talking about places that allow abortions up until eight, nine months.
Right now, that's not going to be effective.
This is going to kick it to the states.
So guess what?
You might have to cross state lines on your Datsun.
Well yeah, they sort of reacted immediately as if it had all been taken away and that's not the case.
It's kind of like the Twitter thing.
Immediately you think you know the outcome and before researching any of it you just freak out.
Yes, you freak out because you're not a church mouse.
Right, and you'll still be able to get abortions except Tom Selleck will be the spokesperson and they'll be called reverse carriage.
Yes.
Listen, this isn't my first rodeo.
I've used stirrups before.
Yes.
I wouldn't lie to you about taking your baby.
This is not an attempt to steal your baby.
Yes it is!
Yes it is, Tom Selleck!
He's just taking it out of the crib.
He's fine.
Reverse.
Magnum primary physician.
What primary physician?
Anyway.
Alito also noted that, look, the right to an abortion.
This is the thing.
We'll talk about Roe v. Wade.
It's nowhere in the Constitution.
This is one of those issues, too, I've talked about in the past where people go, separation of church and state, separation of church and state.
Look, I understand the principle, and so it's sort of become a soundbite.
You know, one that Oprah would like.
But, it's not in the Constitution.
And then people take a sound bite that isn't in the Constitution and they misinterpret it.
You're talking about the First Amendment.
Just the phrase, separation of church and state, doesn't appear.
Now, what the idea of the First Amendment expresses is, of course, they left the Church of England, that the government would be out of the church running business.
It never was intended to prevent, for example, elected representatives from expressing their faith.
It prevents them from enforcing their faith, and particularly a state denomination.
We've talked about this.
You can look at a letter I believe it was written from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists.
So there's historical precedent.
Not only do you have the Constitution, but you have supporting documents, and there are a lot of them.
The same with the Second Amendment.
When the left says that there's a constitutional right to abortion, not only is it not in the Constitution, there's nothing even supporting that, and that's not why Roe v. Wade exists.
So, let me read again.
Alito, he said, we hold that Roe v. Wade, in case it must be overruled, the Constitution makes no reference to abortion and no such right, meaning the right to abortion itself, is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision.
and it should be noted that even though he is pro-life, Justice Alito is ironically a
PYROOOOM!
Justice Alito gets his!
When you stopped the music at me.
Yeah, it was really awkward.
Now I'm just shaking.
No song.
It's like in Dirty Work when he takes him out to moon the movie line and then just stops the car, puts in the parking brake.
Thought he was gonna keep driving.
Sorry.
So, let me give you some other news here before we get to the wonderful reactions from the left, because that is fun.
Thomas Gorsuch-Kavanaugh and, of course, Coney Barrett are going to join Alito.
This is all from the leak.
We don't know with 100% certainty the majority decision.
Now, of course, Kagan, Breyer, Sotomayor have dissented.
Sotomayor is an idiot.
Now, Roberts, we don't know.
Coney sounds delicious.
Weird name, but delightful.
She's also foing.
Yes.
She's quite foing.
And she's pro-life, so you know she's fertile.
I took Coney to Coney, and I had some more Coney.
Just lost a pro-life card.
Did he do the grease motion under the dock?
Yes, but this is a woman.
No, that's a really weird woman.
That's a bunch of roles.
I like my women.
Do you like your women curvy?
I like them foldy.
They wash up on the beach.
They're mermaids.
They're seacows.
They're manatees.
Half man, half manatee.
But they're mine.
It's like a, it's like a, uh, an ocean...
tar.
**laughter** Well, I give it PG-13, but...
I should really have one of those.
Yes!
So, now let's get to, before we get to some more of the ins and outs here, of course, as expected, and by this what I mean when I say as expected, I don't just mean that it's coming from the left, I don't just mean the type of reaction, but that the people who are delivering these reactions also look exactly how you would expect them to.
Enjoy!
Oh It could also become a criminal offense, it's black or pink
Davidson ...or manslaughter to have a miscarriage or carry out an abortion in a different state.
This would be arguably the single largest slide into fascism for this country in living memory, and that is saying something.
Do what you gotta do, but be ready.
The reason they're keeping this focused on abortion rights is that, look, there's lots of people who are religious... Ever sleep with a woman with a goatee?
I like to wake up next to clown smash mouths.
Demolition Man!
I wish the doctor would suck some of this fat out of my neck.
So these are not tears of like sadness, these are tears of rage.
You break the most, you become the hero.
I do it and I become the enemy.
Your diet is the abortion.
I love it, like y'all.
Yeah.
Well, okay, here's the thing.
Sorry, that might have been too far, but it's true.
No, it's not too far.
It's not too far at all.
It's ad hominem.
It's entirely appropriate, because all of them are scary.
Now... Well, especially the first one.
It's like, what, you worry about guys?
You don't have to worry about that.
No.
Well, that's what I have.
I have a theory.
It's always really, really unattractive women who, for example, they bitch about catcalling.
They bitch about abortion.
And here's the thing.
I know there are plenty of attractive women who believe in the right to abortion.
That being said, women who are attract—this is just a theory.
Just to be clear, this is just—this is just conjecture, okay?
I'm not a doctor on ugly chicks.
They look like, because attractive women who support abortion, they still, you know, they're often because they can sleep with whoever they want.
Well, yeah, they're interested in the choice.
But they're predominantly concerned with usually attractive women like, hey, I'm not a slut.
You know what I mean?
That's like, hey, I'm not a slut.
So they typically don't want to go out and shout their abortion.
These often women want to be like, look, everybody wants to catcall me and I'm having so much sex that I have to have all these abortion, you guys!
And everyone's like, right.
Sure.
Somebody, uh, yeah, you walking down the street in a construction worker yelling, move, so they can see a hotter woman is not catcalled.
Exactly.
This just starts, he just starts aiming his pneumatic drill.
Yeah, it's, that's, I mean, look, like, it's like Elena Dunham's like, oh my gosh, I'm at this party, I'm super drunk, I took muscle relaxers, I hope nobody rapes me!
Like, you're good.
Yeah, you're fine.
Nobody, nobody wants consent or anything.
Have you noticed the playpen?
Go in there.
Enjoy.
Everyone hates you.
Yes.
You're an awful person.
You're a terrible, terrible person.
She is awful.
By the way, they even started supporting outside.
We showed you this, but we have some more.
The Supreme Court already.
We will not go back!
Abortion is healthcare!
Abortion is healthcare!
Hey, hey!
Ho, ho!
Justice has just had to go!
No justice!
No peace!
No justice!
No peace!
Hey, I've heard that before.
My vote, my choice!
My vote, my choice!
Crowd9 is a lie! We don't care what they say!
Okay. Uh.
First off, let's break down sexual fascism.
This is what they're using nowadays.
I mean, we could probably bring up the definition a little bit later.
I'm going by rote, but primarily the concern with fascism is them forcing you to conform, right?
By the threat of force, having to conform with a political persuasion, a point of view, a lifestyle as dictated by a tyrannical government.
Can someone please, can someone make an argument?
And if you make a good argument here, we'll pin the comment on YouTube.
How Kicking this back to- giving the rights back to the states to determine their own abortion laws.
How, uh, that is sexual fascism.
Who is forcing you to conform to their view of sexuality here?
Is anyone for- are they forbidding you from having sex?
No.
Are they forbidding you from having sex with as many partners as you want?
No.
Are they forbidding you from having sex a specific way or purchasing a Vietnamese sex hammock?
I can testify to that.
No.
How is there sexual fascism?
Oh, wait.
It is a nice hammock.
Yes, it is.
I took a nap on it.
I didn't know it was a sex hammock.
Well, it's also because it's supportive.
It's good.
It's nice.
It came with a wonderful milking table.
It's like sleeping on a cloud.
Yes.
It's great.
Also has stirrups.
It's right in there.
So, I don't understand, where's the sexual fascism coming from?
Oh wait, hold on a second, and this is something whether you agree with my point of view or not, even as it relates to what happens after you've had sex irresponsibly and couldn't be bothered to purchase a 25 cent rubber at a truck stop or use birth control or if you work at Hobby Lobby, take advantage of the 16 forms of birth control available which you complained about as a violation of human rights on par with the Holocaust.
Even after all of that, we still believe in many, many options if you are with child.
Four, we just don't want the fifth.
What's that?
We believe in chastity, abstinence, contraception, parenthood or adoption.
Just not the fifth.
Butterface.
You might not agree with me, but guess what?
That's not fascism.
Just like 16 forms of birth control at Hobby Lobby, which is actually, there are very few businesses that actually subsidize birth control to the degree of Hobby Lobby.
I don't get the 20!
It doesn't matter.
That's not fascism.
Everyone remembers Pol Pot.
Yeah, you have 16 choices.
No, of course not.
That's not how it works.
This is the term that they use, sexual fascism, and it doesn't even take into account that there's a legal argument here.
They're hero.
They're heroine.
RBG said it was bad law.
So, one of them may have all of this figured out, where, and this is one of my favorites, without Roe v. Wade, this is a brilliant idea.
Maybe people should just stop having sex.
Hear me out.
If they overturn Roe v. Wade, humans that possess uteruses should collectively get together and never have sex with men again.
Some of you guys were on the fence already about it.
This will be the best way to protest this.
Deal.
Transies it is!
You made me this way!
She has to go to great lengths, too.
She's like, humans without a uterus, because there's one NCAA swim champ.
Like, hey!
What about me?
What about me?
Can I have an abortion?
Sure.
Yeah, whatever you call it.
Whatever.
Whatever that is.
They can't stop tripping over their own prosthetic dicks.
Sorry, we can't do the heart transplant.
We're doing a fake abortion.
Two rooms down.
Oh, well, legs in the strips, okay.
We are going to, of course, go into the birth canal.
Let me just move these testicles out of the way.
You don't have a appendix anymore.
It's like the final scene in Man on the Moon with Andy Kaufman.
Just pull out a baby, like a clown, with one of those ropes.
But this is where they are!
There's no way, how can you say that abortion is about supporting women when you're allowing men to beat the crap out of women in sports?
When you're allowing men in women's only spaces?
Let's be honest about this.
This isn't about women's rights.
Women, I hope you are seeing this.
And I say this because, look, the only demographic left that has not made a wild swing toward the right, this includes Latinos, this includes blacks, I'm not saying that they're all a majority Republican, but a significantly higher portion.
And yes, a majority of Latinos here.
The only group that hasn't swung is suburban women.
And then when you talk with most of these women about these issues, they invariably find out that they're far more conservative than they realize.
Because women are often more agreeable.
That's what we love about you.
And so often women want to avoid topics that will create conflict.
Things like abortion.
And so they go along with, not all women to be clear, But statistically, if you look at the polling data, a lot of women seem to sort of be led by the nose on abortion.
They believe, oh, sexual fascism.
Oh, my body, my choice.
This is something, this is an opportunity to educate people.
People have said, where's the hope?
Where's the silver lining?
There's a lot of it.
Not only with Twitter last week.
Not only with the giant polling shifts.
But what you're seeing now with this, this is going to give you an opportunity to educate people.
Go down to these protests in your city.
Go down and talk with them.
And if they keep yelling that they're not a church mouse, find someone, you know, reasonable and, you know, like a six.
So, some lawmakers... That's not what you want to take home.
If you look at this, lawmakers, they've already taken to Twitter calling for codifying Roe into law.
So you have Bernie Sanders, where he said, uh, Congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe v. Wade as the law of the land in this country now!
Son of a bitch!
If there aren't 60 votes in the Senate to do it, We must get the filibuster and pass it with 50!
Then you have... I find... I'm trying to find a way to always bring you...
Actually, that was ridiculous, so it made perfect sense to do it in the late, great Gilbert's voice.
We have Elizabeth Warren.
I don't know if you know this.
Noted not Native American, Elizabeth Warren.
But my Kung Pao Chow.
Yes, my Kung Pao Chow.
I realize that's Asian.
Good point.
No, you are the Panda Express of Native Americans.
You really are.
Your teepee peepee whatever cookbook canoeing lessons.
She wrote this.
She tweeted this.
An extremist Supreme Court is poised to overturn Roe v. Wade and impose its far-right unpopular views on the entire country.
It's time for the million who support the Constitution and abortion rights to stand up and make their voices heard.
We are not going back.
Not ever.
And of course, noted favorite representative who is googly, I repeat, googly, AOC said, people elected Democrats precisely so we could lead in perilous moments like these to codify.
By the way, she knows perilous moments because she was four miles away when there was a bomb threat once.
I know, terrifying.
She almost died.
Yeah.
I'm told.
Exactly.
It's like, it's like someone like, I was there, the Boston Marathon bombing.
Really?
Where were you?
Well, I was in, I was in, I was in Nantucket.
Yeah.
Queens, Jamaica.
Yeah.
I mean, I was alive.
I mean, I guess at some point I was facing the general direction of the Boston Marathon bombing, so I, too.
Yeah, 9-11, rough day for me.
Oh, were you there?
Ah, no.
Yeah.
So, how were... Hey, I bet I almost died.
I couldn't pick up my dry cleaning.
Yeah, I mean, are you kidding?
There were places that were closed.
It affects us all.
So she wrote People AOC, elected Democrats, precisely so we could leave in perilous moments like these to codify Roe, hold corruption accountable, and have a president who uses his legal authority to break through congressional gridlock on items from student debt to climate.
Okay.
So look, this is perilous.
Student debt.
I just love the comparison.
It's an issue-to-issue thing.
Why do they always drag in the dumbest shit?
It's perilous.
You know why it's perilous?
Because these people don't have an actual fight.
Well, Greg Abbott's in a wheelchair.
They don't have an actual fight.
That's what happened on the beaches of Normandy, that first scene of Saving Private Yeah, they're seeing their friend carrying around his arm, going like, oh God, I hope I don't have a $20,000 loan with unreasonable interest on my basket weaving degree.
You have nothing.
Student debt?
Don't go into debt!
How about that?
How about don't go to... Oh, climate?
Well, I don't know.
Look, if you want to talk about climate being more... Look, here's the thing.
I get that you care about climate more, and I think that you think that people shouldn't have to pay off their own loans more.
That's more important to you.
But can you at least acknowledge?
Can you at least acknowledge?
Because I understand why people on the left, women who don't really know what abortion is, who don't know when viability actually takes place, who don't understand that there's new DNA, that you do not have 20 fingers, 20 toes, that if you have a boy that you don't have a vagina and a penis.
I understand that many women don't know this, and so they believe that they are pro-choice.
I get where they're coming from.
I think they're wrong.
Can you acknowledge that if someone, particularly scientists, particularly every biology textbook that's ever existed, right, the definition of where life begins, can you acknowledge that to someone who believes, let's say, a 32-week-old baby that's being aborted in Colorado, can you acknowledge that to them that's more pressing?
Then a 1.6 degree increase in the next 100 years?
Can you at least understand why, to these people, it's pressing?
It's not about finding common ground.
It's about just trying to understand the other perspective.
Which, by the way, is why we use liberal sources.
You can check all references available at ladderwithcutter.com.
So here's the thing that they're trying to claim.
They believe that overturning will set a precedent.
That's completely unheard of.
By the way, no problem with packing the Supreme Court.
And they'll try and point to, but they don't really understand exactly what happened when the Supreme Court was expanded because of the country and population.
But here they try and act as though this is something, if we overturn Roe v. Wade, everything else is going to be overturned because this hasn't happened before.
The Supreme Court has overturned over 230 rulings in its history.
230!
It's not a mundane detail, Michael!
That's quite a bit.
Yeah, and by the way, you're saying, well these are just... Two of them were guilty.
These are just, these are just small decisions, is what you might want to, these are just, you know, these aren't pivotal wedge issues like this.
No, no, you're wrong, and by the way, many of those overturnings, you supported because they reflected your position.
Liberals, so you have Brown versus the Board of Education, that ruled, well this is one that I think is actually a good thing, that racially segregated schools were unconstitutional.
Great, that's one that we can all agree with.
But then you have Lawrence vs. Texas, and you have Obergefell vs. Hodges, which ruled that bans on same-sex marriages were unconstitutional.
Where were you guys on the overturning there?
My point is this.
We understand the rules to the game here.
You have to play by them.
You can't just throw a hissy fit when it doesn't go your way.
That's the worst kind of player.
Soccer.
So.
What is actually being overturned?
And by the way, Dave and I have had conversations on this.
Dave isn't on the same side of the political spectrum entirely that I am as far as pro-life.
I think you hold a reasonable position.
I think some of them, I disagree with them.
We'll probably have a conversation today on Mug Club about it.
Yeah, it's not a... I come from a different place and it's not the...
But I mean, this is a different animal that we're talking about right now.
It's not what they're making it into.
No, that's exactly the point.
Which is exactly what they do the second, like we said, they hear a word or they hear something's going to happen,
they jump on it immediately, pretend it's something that it's not, and they gaslight the other side.
It's all they do. It's their tactic.
Like Church Mouse.
A bit like Church Mouse.
It's kind of like when you watch WorldStarHipHop, you ever see when, when, when... What are you saying?
Black people?
When they get into a fight, and then it's like, you know how it's about to come to blows?
Yes.
Is when they repeat the same thing over and over.
Like, they're talking trash before that, and a lot of zingers, and then all of a sudden they're just like, yeah, yeah, yeah, you a bitch!
And then now it's no longer like, you a bitch, yeah, your mama's a bitch!
It's just like, yeah, you a bitch!
And they get up close, like, you a bitch.
You a bitch.
You know by the sixth, you a bitch, there's something coming.
Now, when he starts repeating himself, that's when it gets dangerous, you're in the danger zone!
Well, it's cause fight and flight, all of a sudden it's not flight, it's fight.
Everything else in your world is gone.
Yeah.
Including the ability to, like, rip on someone.
Yep.
And it's just an attack.
There was one, I think it was on Ultimate Fighter, it was Brampage Jackson versus a guy named Rashad Evans.
So, oh, guess the ethnicity.
And he's going, you a bitch.
You a bitch, Rashad.
You a bitch.
He's like, yeah, go ahead and treat me like a bitch.
You a bitch.
Go ahead and treat me like a bitch.
You a bitch.
Go ahead and treat me like... And then you see the coach is getting like, all right, separate!
We know where this is going!
Stand back, Marcel Wallace.
All right, so Roe v. Wade federally enshrined abortion.
Okay?
And it was predicated on the idea of viability.
And here's also the problem with that.
Viability changes as technology advances.
You can go back and watch the Change My Minds that we've done.
Oh, viability is the argument.
So is a baby more valuable at Lenox Hill in Manhattan than they are in the hills of Tennessee?
Because they have better technology?
Well, it's viable there.
So does geography determine whether it's a life or not?
I certainly think nine months does.
That would be, I think it's a good jumping off point.
I think it's fair to say that that's just disgusting to me and what I don't understand is how you think that this is compassion for people while you don't have compassion for a person as well.
Right.
It's insane to me.
So Roe v. Wade enshrined viability into law and so basically what it means is the first trimester a state can't regulate abortion.
Okay, that's it.
Now, the court determined, here's the thing, it's not based on a constitutional right to abortion, despite what not-Churchmouse would have you believe.
The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment protects the right to privacy against state action.
It's basically a technicality about the right of privacy and a patient and their doctor.
It does not, Roe v. Wade, does not say that abortion is a constitutional right.
Okay?
And unfortunately what happens, as you see with laws a lot of the time, something gets ruled on the Supreme Court, and then you see smaller courts that interpret it some way, and it's a bastardization of the law, and then it ends up bouncing.
So this is the problem that we've run into.
This is why Roe v. Wade is something that even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said is a problem.
We should probably take another run at it and do it properly.
So, it's about a woman's right to privacy.
And this is how Alito referred to the case in his majority opinion.
He said, Roe expressed the feeling that the 14th Amendment was a provision that did the work, but its message seemed to be that the abortion right could be found somewhere in the Constitution, and that specifying its location was not of paramount importance.
So it was... Let me read that again.
That the right to abortion, the abortion right, could be found somewhere in the Constitution and that specifying its exact location was not of paramount importance.
I will say that's a little bit passive-aggressive.
Yeah, it really is.
But I like that.
He did it right.
That's passive-aggressive, Justice Alito, and I dig that about you!
So, you know who else understood?
How flawed it was again.
I, sort of, like you, I already spoiled it, Mr. Moneyball.
I'm sorry about the moneyball.
But I did the same thing with RBG, I already said it.
So this is what she wrote.
She wrote, Doctrinal Limbs!
Yeah, she was not for this.
People don't realize that.
She said, So she wanted to approach abortion under the Equal Protection Clause.
And she knew that framing it around privacy wouldn't hold up in the long run.
So, hey, she got one right!
said the unelected judges decided this question for the country and never mind
that the issue was in flux in the state legislature. So she wanted to approach
abortion under the Equal Protection Clause and she knew that framing it
around privacy wouldn't hold up in the long run. So hey, she got one right.
That is true.
Sorry.
Sorry, liberals.
Your hero's robbing you from the grave.
You need to get the snaggly whip.
Do you think you can grow it that much?
I'm like, sorry, feminists!
Sorry, feminists.
RBG took your ability to get an abortion.
She's haunting you.
She's haunting you.
She's the ghost of Christmas future.
She's a specter!
So, now we get to the leak.
Yeah, they really made her into it.
Yeah, I know.
It was ridiculous.
Or they were like, look how fit she is at Netflix documentary.
Oh yeah, when she's like barely holding up a one pound weight and throwing up bra.
You're like, yeah, she's doing great.
Exactly.
She's probably going to be around for at least another 10 minutes.
She's like lifting a rubber band.
You hear snap.
We'll get you another rubber band.
No, that was my ligament.
Just another toe.
Ironically, she did look like a church mouse.
She did?
She was half, half demon, half church mouse.
And fairly quiet.
Yeah.
Especially on a plane sitting next to a minority.
She'd be like, oh, I'm scared.
Yeah.
I shouldn't have flown Spirit.
I just thought I'd save a buck or two.
Yes.
I'm so scared.
Not worth it.
They make me pay for my carry-on anyways.
This is a stampede to get off this plane.
So Ruth Bader Ginsburg agrees with Alito.
This is something that a lot of people may not necessarily realize.
Now let's get to the leak.
Okay.
Let me explain this.
Not a big fan of the leak.
I'm glad to hear what we've heard.
But let me give you a guess.
I'm pretty sure the leak is from a leftist.
Why?
This is an intimidation tactic.
Now when you talk about unprecedented, that nothing has been overturned, that's what we call in the biz, wrong.
230 examples of you being wrong.
In this case, we actually have something that is unprecedented as far as a security breach.
A leak of a ruling of the Supreme Court.
That's a really big deal, and of course you see it, and just like clockwork, you see the protests, and you know it's going to get violent because it's never not.
That's why I'm guessing that it's a liberal, so let's read from Politico.
It says, no draft decision in modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending.
You don't say!
But didn't you leak it?
They totally did.
I was like, yeah, this has never happened.
This is really dangerous.
So it's because of you.
It would be dangerous.
No, you did it.
You're kind of solely responsible for all the danger that's brewing up right now before it comes out.
Well, the leak came to us!
I didn't leak it.
It's just, we leaked it.
Yeah, that's all.
We leaked it after it was leaked.
What's the trouble?
So the going theory right now, and this is sort of breaking, we'll keep you updated, it's almost 11 o'clock Eastern.
The only people who would have had access to it You know, unlike Hunter Biden's nine hard drives.
We found this out.
Swalwell, unfortunately, him and the Chinese spy had an OnlyFans.
Did they?
Didn't require a lot of digging.
Oh.
Just an $11 a month subscription, which seems high.
Yeah, it does seem high.
I wouldn't want to watch, especially because he farts during it.
Yes, I know.
Well, you know, everyone has their thing.
Anytime there's a mic around.
Don't want to be a sexual fascist, but that's gross.
So, the going theory right now is that it was a clerk for Justice Sonia Sotomayor that, before we go to the quote, the stupidest of the judges.
That's how I refer to her.
Yes.
A quote here on Twitter says, a person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor as a Yale student.
Is it Jain or Yain?
Well, hopefully they'll be going to Yale.
Yeah.
Blasted Yale.
We're supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination.
Jane or Jane, I don't know, as I'm reading this as it's breaking, was quoted in a 2017 political piece by Josh Gerstein.
Today, Gerstein published the draft opinion on Roe.
So, assholes of a feather?
You know, that's why it's the best guess at this point?
Let me give to you why the leak matters, okay?
And I understand that sometimes, you know, there's a difference between a whistleblower and a leaker.
The Supreme Court has actually been referred to, and I think we have this from the Chicago Tribune, as the last leak-proof institution.
And again, because it's very, very small.
It's closed circuit.
Yes.
And that needs to be by design, you know, as opposed to city legislatures, like in Seattle or Portland, who get pressured due to the violence to defunding the police, and then they go, oh, we really shouldn't have done that.
This is now a hellscape.
Yeah.
You don't want that happening at the Supreme Court.
At all.
You don't want these people- it's supposed to be separate, that's why.
Can you guys- hey, we'll read this in the chat later, but pause it if you're watching this on the archive.
By the way, smash that like button.
That does help with the algorithm.
Best thing you can do is smash the like button, you can comment, you can share, all that stuff.
Anyway, doesn't matter.
Last Leak Proof Institution.
I forgot what I was going to say because I'm still thinking about... Well, they are the Last Leak Proof Institution.
Yein.
Yeah, Yein is not a name.
Yein!
Neither is Kony.
Yein is off the Yein.
Yein.
Coke Yein.
So, here's the thing.
Leaks are incredibly... Oh, that's what I was going to ask you.
Three branches of government.
Can you name it?
Don't use a cheat sheet with Schoolhouse Rock.
Again, leaks are a real problem to the process of deliberation.
This is something that people... It's just, look, there's inconsistent... There's inconsistency on both sides.
Let me be clear about this, okay?
It's not really... You're not breaking new ground by accusing someone of being a hypocrite, because everyone is a hypocrite.
And you do have people who praise whistleblowers and then condemn whistleblowers, depending on who it is.
Okay, got it.
However, this has never happened.
Ever.
And there's a reason for it.
Let me read you from Politico deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been a fluid process
Um, and I mean that in the actual sense of fluid not you can be whatever gender you want depending on when the clock
strikes 12
It says justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject
to multiple drafts and vote Trading sometimes until just days before decision is
unveiled. The court's holding will not be final until it is published
Likely in the next two months. Look, this is one of those things where secrecy is it's of paramount
There are things that of course we have the right to know.
For example, if American citizens are being throttled or silenced on social media.
I know, private company, but if they're being throttled or silenced on social media as per the directions of the United States government, these are things you have a right to know.
If you voted more than once.
This is something?
Good point.
Yes.
Yeah.
Just throwing it out there.
Yeah.
Not that that would ever happen.
Right.
Hey, guys in the control room, can we write down for next election, anyone here who wants to vote more than once?
I don't want to.
I vote three times.
Well, yeah.
I mean, you do the absentee and then you do the other absentee.
Yeah, well, they send me three.
It's kind of like when I used to go and get the price match guarantee.
Yeah.
And they'd say, we price match.
And I would go to one place and say, hey, they beat your price.
And they're like, well, then we have to beat their price.
And I would go back and say, they beat your price.
I know.
You can stop at four different churches in my area that have voting.
Yep.
Wonderful.
Yep.
Also, trash bins.
Yeah.
Where they tell you to put, uh, if you don't like who you're... Yeah.
All the pamphlets you get for the other team.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, and that's where you find a bunch of votes.
So, there are things you... Sorry, I'm just learning as this goes along.
There are things you have the right... I feel a little off.
It's okay.
But I'm just watching.
Like, I didn't know all about this until yesterday, to be honest.
There are things you have the right to know.
For example, when people say, we have a right to know everything as it relates to national security.
No, Geraldo Rivera shouldn't give away coordinates.
So, my point here is there are things that need to be kept private.
And certainly deliberation between judges, which is supposed to be a separate branch of government.
They are supposed to be siloed by design.
They are supposed to be completely devoid of outside influence.
And this is why conservatives tend to support originalists.
They are supposed to be beholden to the text of So there's inconsistency on all sides as it relates to whistleblowers.
However, in this case, it's unprecedented and it is very clearly meant to be an intimidation tactic because they want to try and pressure the Supreme Court.
They want them to be afraid.
They want them to make a decision.
Now, where am I getting this from?
Where am I getting this from that, ooh, the left seeks to try and intimidate through the bully pulpit, through the power of the mob?
I don't know, Black Lives Matter riots.
I don't know, Antifa.
I mean, is an opinion the only reason you would leak the document?
Yeah.
What's the other purpose?
I mean, you're gonna find out in two months.
I mean, that's really what it is.
Exactly.
It's not like you're saving somebody's life by leaking something as far as, I don't know, a hostage situation, or if there are war crimes being committed.
That's not what's happening here.
You're leaking something that there's an opinion coming down the pike that you don't like and you have made very clear, leftists, in the past.
You will be violent.
To oppose.
And you're also ignorant about.
So it's very easy for you to go out and just start protesting and, you know, eventually that leads to death, destruction, everything else that we've seen.
Well, I think too, you know, this is one thing where if you look at the recent polls where you see, you know what, let me go to CNN really quickly, but I want to go remind me to go back to the polls of national security and Biden doing very poorly on it.
Right now we'll go to the polls of Tubin.
Yes.
Legal expert.
I'm sure he appreciated that.
Yeah.
Am I the only one who at the very least, I don't know if that's journalistically ethical, but ass-holish?
or released at any point before decision day. We're still waiting to hear if and
when the Supreme Court might comment on this. We were outside the Chief Justice's
home, John Roberts, earlier this morning. He was asked if he had any comment about the leak.
If there would be any investigation.
Am I the only one who at the very least, I don't know if that's journalistically ethical, but assholish?
It's just, yeah, I just hate that.
We were outside of his home.
I was hiding in the hot tub and he didn't want to talk to me.
I was on his swing in the yard.
It's a nice place, Gabe.
Yes, exactly.
I was holding a blow dryer with a scope and he didn't seem to like that very much.
So back to you, Tubin.
Stelter was on all fours on his front lawn eating a pizza like a dog.
With a woman!
With a woman, yeah.
Going, yeah, straight.
Stelter's great.
Let's see what CNN has to say about this, because we just gave you some context to this exact quote on Alito.
Reference is available at lotto.com.
Let's see if they give context, or if they just go into hysterics.
Releasing is the term they use.
Releasing!
releasing this draft opinion, 98 pages, from Justice Alito, joined crucially by four...
Releasing is the term they use. Releasing! Releasing means it's a plan. This isn't a PR release, it's a leak!
It would, uh...
It's a crime.
Somebody should be held responsible.
Practically eliminate the right to abortion now.
Crime. Somebody should be held responsible.
...that would go back and completely eliminate the right to abortion.
Practically eliminate the right to abortion.
So we just had, well we just told you, it's a leak.
And they said a release, and of course this sends it back to the states,
and they just said we'll practically eliminate the right to an abortion.
That's how they just framed it on the most trusted name in news.
Are you paying attention yet?
Let's hear their experts.
Let's see, uh, resting... Oh look, it's Turbin!
Hey, great, yeah.
I thought I heard flapping.
I guess it's, if you don't have a, if you have a penis, no right to an opinion unless you are chafing it on a webcam.
Yes, of course, unless you're using it in every conference call.
Then it's fine.
How do you still have a job?
You were masturbating on camera.
Disclosed!
Released!
Disclosed!
in the first place but how shocking is this draft?
Who do you still have a job?
You were masturbating on camera.
Good morning. It's shocking in just about every way.
How it would roll back a half century of reproductive rights for women.
How it was disclosed to the American public late last night.
And in terms of the substance that you ask about being on our...
Disclosed!
Release! Disclosed! Availed!
Carrier pigeoned!
Joan, you couldn't get pregnant with a time machine.
And a turkey baster.
been so strong that I have to tell you the truth that I can't imagine that what ultimately
comes out from the court is as harshly worded.
The sentiment will probably be there, but to have five justices join what is such a
strong statement against precedent, referring to abuse of judicial authority by prior Supreme
Courts in allowing abortion rights, and also how By the way, everything we've already addressed, they're using.
They're using right now.
It'll go against precedent?
No it doesn't.
It'll roll back all abortion rights?
No it doesn't.
No, it doesn't.
We've already addressed it.
So you're seeing in real time, and this is why, look, I'm not going to toot my own horn or the horn of researchers, producers here.
We almost exclusively read liberal sources to try and prepare you for what it is they're going to say.
Right now, in real time, they're saying it.
By the way, the most trusted masturbatory experts.
Let's hear what else they say.
I really want to listen to this for a little bit.
I don't know how long Roe v. Wade had been entrenched that the Supreme Court would not reverse it.
That was obviously before Donald Trump put his three appointees on the court.
Oh, it's Trump's fault.
But now there's nothing that I think of as off limits.
You know, I used to say, oh, they'd never reverse Obergefell, which was the 2015 case that made same-sex marriage a fundamental constitutional right.
But now I have to say I'm never going to say never again.
It's happening under Biden's watch.
Regardless of who he put in.
So Jeffrey, you remember me.
Regardless of who you put in.
So Jeffrey, you remember me.
And you say that this would be a seismic shift.
It was.
And again, if this is the opinion or something close to it is the opinion, it's worth remembering
what the basis of Roe v. Wade is.
The Casey decisions were, which is the right to privacy, which the justices found implicit in various constitutional provisions.
He's thinking clear-headedly because he cleaned out the pipes.
And the right to privacy, according to the court, for decades has protected a right to purchase contraception.
It is the right to have consensual sex with a person of the same sex or of a different sex.
Let's look at that.
Here's the thing.
keyboard while on a live TV show. Same sex or a different sex. He has to have a silicone
keyboard cover. If there is no more right to privacy in the Constitution as this opinion seems to suggest
all this opinion doesn't... Let's look at that. He was on...
Here's the thing. He just went a little bit further and this is something you need to be
prepared for.
That's why I say there's the tree trunk and then there are the branches.
You have the basic bitches going, ah, abortion, constitutional right.
And then he just acknowledged, OK, the right to privacy.
Understood.
But then he said that overturning Roe v. Wade, it's a tantamount to saying that the Constitution doesn't guarantee a right to privacy.
No, no, no, no, no.
No, it's not.
So you used the right premise and then you veered.
No, it's saying that abortion isn't a constitutionally protected right under the right to privacy.
Does this, let me walk you through this right now, Socratic Method, your right to privacy.
You have the right to do whatever you want in your own house provided you're not breaking the law or harming anybody.
Does that change?
No.
You have the right to watch what you want to watch.
Does that change?
No.
You have the right to have sex with whoever you want to have sex with and nobody else
has to interrogate you.
Does that change?
No.
You have the right to purchase contraception and that's your private right.
Does that change?
No.
You have the right to privacy between you and your primary physician.
Does that change?
No.
You have the right to discuss with your primary physician, for example, if they are a primary
physician, not for example, like Planned Parenthood who've never performed a mammogram in their
life.
You have the right to have a mammogram.
Does that change?
No.
You have the right to not be spied upon by the government.
Does that change?
Well, that kind of has gone away with the Patriot Act and of course what we see from the left, but in theory, no.
The only thing that goes away is this idea that abortion is a constitutionally enshrined right under the false premise of privacy.
That serial masturbator slash sex offender just implied that this decision would overturn the constitutional right to privacy.
No one's talking about doing away with the 14th Amendment.
So it seems like I'm angry It's not that I'm angry because of church mouses.
Out in front of the Supreme Court.
It's because they are so fundamentally dishonest, and this is the silver lining.
The House of Cards is coming down.
Look, right now there's no one on there to challenge them.
They have four people.
Say what you want about Fox News, and I've said it a lot, at the very least they're going to have a token Democrat in that quadrant view.
CNN doesn't even try.
It's just lie, lie, and then a little bit more of a manicured lie.
Let's see if anyone here actually... It starts as a truth and then it spins at the end.
Every time.
It's constantly strong.
Define woman!
I know that the Democrats are going to be out there saying, this is going to affect everything, as Jeffrey was just saying before.
It's not just the question of abortion, it's the question of where else the court will go.
Will the court backtrack on gay marriage, for example, as Joan was questioning.
So I think the Democrats are going to raise these issues.
Oh, that's a shock that they're bringing up all these other things that upset people and rile up the public.
Well, they go back against it, but isn't it funny too that they just implied that constitutionally protected rights include abortion and banging a dude with a ring on?
Like, they say those are constitutionally protected rights, and they also believe that a constitutional right should be the right to student loans being forgiven.
They believe that the right to not health care, not the right to maintain your own health care, hey, that falls under the right of privacy right now.
That's a perfect example.
We believe in your right to privacy.
You can purchase any health care you want.
You can take care of your health however you want.
You can have an HSA.
You can have some kind of an emergency account.
You can have a health sharing program.
No, they believe in what?
They believe in socialized health care.
I mean, this is the mainstream platform of the left we just quoted.
AOC and of course Bernie Sanders has supported that as well.
They believe those things are rights.
What about the Second Amendment?
So we have these absolute rights for abortion and we'll get to what happens with that in states like Colorado and states like Virginia where...
Virginia, where if a baby survives, it can still technically be aborted, thrown in a waste paper basket.
By the way, that's not extremist.
Your champion, your star player, Barack Obama, voted against the Infants Born Alive Act in Illinois, where babies who were surviving abortions were not being given the health care that other babies were being given.
He voted against, just requiring doctors to give babies who managed to evade the forceps the same kind of health care as any other baby.
He voted against it.
So I'm saying this is not a fringe view.
This is the mainstream view of the Democratic platform.
All of these things, same-sex marriage, and I'm not even talking about where you line up on the same sex.
That's another thing he didn't care about.
Right, that's another thing.
Well, he was against.
Yes.
Then he was for it.
Same-sex marriage is a right.
Student loan forgiveness is a right.
Healthcare is a right.
Abortion is a right.
What about the Second Amendment?
That one's pretty clear.
In other words, find me.
Grab your Constitution right now.
I'll make it publicly available in the references.
I shouldn't have to, but many of you, of course, haven't read it.
Find me the right to an abortion.
Find it.
Find me the right to same-sex marriage.
Find it.
Find me the right to forcing a company to provide you with healthcare free of charge at the taxpayer's expense.
Find it for me.
Find me the right Remember how I talked about supporting documents?
That's important, too.
You don't just look at the Constitution.
That's important.
fight for every day, the second amendment. Where is it?
Number two, shall not be infringed. Remember how I talked about supporting documents?
That's important too. You don't just look at the Constitution. That's
important. It's pretty clear there. Shall not be infringed. The rights of a free
people, right?
People try to make a big deal out of the comment about the militia.
Yeah, but then they'll say, that was old and it's different now.
Right.
Isn't that the exact same case with this?
Well, it would be the same First Amendment.
I don't see them saying that, well, it doesn't apply to the printing press.
It doesn't apply to, you know, Politico.
They don't care much about that either.
No.
This is the point is when we say First Amendment, they say, well, private companies can do whatever they want.
OK, I get it.
But your press, your White House press secretary called upon Spotify and YouTube and Twitter and Facebook.
You created Under the Department of Homeland Security, meaning you can arrest people, a department to determine what is misinformation.
Here's also something, by the way.
Someone's right, the First Amendment, right to free speech, also protects their right to be wrong.
So you can't silence them, even if it's misinformation, unless it's deliberate slander, deliberate libel, and we have laws for that.
The Second Amendment is pretty clear.
Again, we just said, you said, right, abortion, right, same-sex marriage, right, education, right, healthcare.
Second Amendment, the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
You go to the supporting documents.
Oh, wait a second.
That's just back then.
It was just for muskets.
Wait!
You look, I think it was Madison, who wrote a letter of mark, saying to a private ship, well of course, yeah, you guys can have cannons, what is the second amendment?
It protected cannons!
That's at least in AR-15, you've heard me talk about this before, I feel like I'm repeating myself, but it needs repeating!
By the way, they also knew about the Puckle Gun, the Pepperbox Revolver, the Girandoni Airgun, there were plenty!
of higher capacity or rapid-fire weapons that existed at that point.
The only reason that they weren't... they were too expensive to produce for the same reason that not all of you today have an Elon Musk flamethrower.
It doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
So, they make up rights where they don't exist, lie to you about them, and then when we say, hold on a second, let's just start with the two that are enshrined.
Number one and the number two that protects number one.
Oh!
What are you?
An absolutist?
Yeah.
Now, let's look at where the left is mad.
The left is mad That allegedly in two months, the Supreme Court may not recognize your right to force a state to give you the right to abortion up until and including birth period.
We're just talking about the restrictions here in the first trimester.
Everything else gets kicked to the states.
Let's be clear about that.
They're mad about that.
What are conservatives mad about?
And I will tell you, I am mad about this.
I'm mad that they lied about this.
This is not a release.
This is not something that was disclosed to the public.
Leftists are mad about the fact that abortion isn't found as a right in the Constitution.
They're mad at the Constitution, really.
Conservatives, myself, are mad about the leak!
We're mad about something actually unprecedented.
I'm mad about the torch mob trying to now exact justice themselves.
We have a process.
This is why, if you look at the polls that recently came out, Joe Biden is, I think, the worst polling that's come out, not only of Joe Biden, but a Democratic ticket.
A generic Democratic ticket versus Republican ticket is the issue of rule of law.
Hey, hold on a second.
Rule of law.
What did we... Black Lives Matter riots.
You can't riot.
They said, well, the riot is the language of the unheard.
Okay.
We talk about, hey, hold on a second.
This is breaking the law.
Former Vice President Joe Biden.
Hunter Biden.
I just get the Bidens confused because there's so many pieces of shit.
So we say, hey, hold on a second.
The problem is you're breaking the law.
And so the left believes that the right believes in the rule of law.
Right now, you look at the left, they're mad with what will be the rule of law.
Better legal reasoning at the Supreme Court.
So they're mad with rule of law.
And Republicans are mad at the breaking of rule of law.
That a crime has been committed in leaking this!
And there have been plenty, not just, again, we want to use the mainstream left, their platform, use Republicans that, most of whom, I don't even like!
You have people like Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, Rick Scott, and I believe that Senator Small Hands Mark Rubio probably said it best, he said, the next time you hear the far left preaching about how they are fighting to preserve a republic's institutions and norms, remember how they leaked a Supreme Court opinion in an attempt to intimidate The justices on abortion.
That's really well said.
And I don't even like Mark Rubio that much.
Dave, you were asking earlier about there being some kind of punishment for this, and Josh Hawley just tweeted this.
It should go without saying that if a justice leaked this, he or she should face impeachment.
Oh, 100%.
I appreciate you looking that up.
I would assume that, yeah, anybody who leaked this kind of information would have to... I mean, anybody who does.
I personally appreciated the Snowden thing, and I'm sure a lot of people disagree on that, but it's like, I really do think that If we don't start getting our government in check, because it's just showing that not only is the government, it's always people, it's always been people, that's why it's a flawed system, but it's becoming more and more flawed as we just give in to these mobs.
And while this other side pushes in, constantly saying, oh you're flipping this, you're flipping this, you're just gonna create a rule.
If you got everything you wanted, you would eventually have three laws that basically took away every one of your human rights, and we would just be sitting under communism.
Yeah.
That's all that they want, and I don't understand why they don't grasp what a free country is, a free society.
They don't look into the laws.
Like, I enjoy learning about stuff like this.
They don't want to.
Well, of course they don't want to.
Here's the thing, you're earnest.
You and I disagree on things because, I mean, you say you're more of a centrist, but the truth is today, like Elon Musk, you're definitely more conservative.
That's even by, and I think a lot of people are by default.
But you approach it honestly.
Which I appreciate about you, and I know that even though our audience, the people watching, are likely more to the right than you, they appreciate that you go, okay, what's going on here?
The thing is, people like the AOCs, and not just AOCs and Elizabeth Warrens, but people at CNN, they're not approaching it honestly.
They're approaching it from, how can we misrepresent this?
They don't want a free country.
Well, they just, I mean, you just watched it again on Real Time on CNN, how they just changed simple words.
Yeah.
And say, they want to take away your right for abortion.
Right.
This wasn't illegal, this is to take away your right for abortion.
This is all the things that are meant to piss you off so that you start a fire.
That's it.
Yeah, well, they're gonna start a fire because they're not a church mouse, Dave!
No!
Come on, I'm not quiet!
Yeah, well, church mouse, I mean, they just haven't really, they don't have Bic lighters.
She should put on her cap and go for a long winter's nap, that's what I say.
And by winter's nap, I mean one from which you never wake up.
No!
Rip Van Winkle, only without the third act.
Yeah, it just means she should be in a play.
But you just gave some examples that I do think are important.
You talked about Snowden, okay?
And a lot of people, they bleed together.
Snowden, Assange, and I think there is a difference, but okay.
Yeah, I don't think it was legal what he did.
No, no.
I'm just saying I appreciate it.
But here's the point is, there is an argument to be made.
Yeah.
Certainly.
For both of them.
I think Assange and Snowden are different.
Let's just say for the sake of argument right now, there is certainly an argument to be made that there is validity, for example, to whistleblowing when you are exposing corruption.
When something is illegal, absolutely.
Or not even when something is illegal, but something that harms the American populace, right?
Let's say a backroom deal, something that is pulling the wool over their eyes, something that is deliberately pernicious.
Watergate.
Right now, leaking.
What corruption are you exposing?
What illegality are you exposing?
What are you blowing the whistle on?
That judges are doing their job?
That's how you differentiate.
You go, oh, this is designed to intimidate.
Oh, okay, got it.
Hey, wait, hold on a second.
Does it help?
CNN, does it help illuminate the issue for the audience to stake outside of Justice Roberts' house in a rapist van?
What's the added value there?
What's the valid value?
Intimidation.
Taylor Lorenz, in posting the information of the parents of the libs of TikTok.
What corruption are you exposing?
Are the parents involved in some sort of illegal TikTok ring where they somehow managed to go out and find publicly posted videos of public teachers saying share this to indoctrinate as many kids?
What's the corruption that's being exposed?
None!
That's how you At first pass!
At first pass!
Again, does it pass the sniff test?
Okay.
Is this- Is it collateral damage, though, when it's even- when it's the point?
Right.
Because, like, her exposing them, yeah, it's- by her exposing them, you're endangering them and all their family that's innocent, and all of your family that's innocent who doesn't want to be exposed, because now people are pissed off at you, they're going to go after them.
Right.
Everything that she went about in that way was wrong.
Yes.
So, yeah, I don't even- that's what I mean.
I don't even look at it as, like, a collateral damage thing.
It's a deliberate thing to create all damage to be that.
Right.
No, that's exactly what it is.
That's the difference between whistleblowing, there's a purpose to it, the context of it is different, versus just leaking private information in an unprecedented way, in a criminal way, in order to try and silence and intimidate to get your way.
So, what does this mean though?
This really means, right, with Roe v. Wade, Chief Justice launches investigation on leak of Roe draft opinion.
Let's see Elizabeth Warren, who looks like a kindergarten boy, And that's the reason for it.
some woman who can't support the children she has and is desperately trying to keep
her family together.
Let's get them on the record voting on that.
And if we don't have enough votes to pass it now, we get everybody on the record and
then we take that to the public in November.
We've got less than 200 days until Election Day, Roe vs.
Wade.
And that's the reason for it.
It's intimidation.
It's trying to scare people.
They're trying to gin up riots and protests right now so that people stay home and don't vote.
Or they're trying to convince enough people out there that the right is as extreme as they are, believing that, you know, kids should be put on puberty blockers.
This is what your former vice president said, that affirming your child's gender, meaning not their gender, is one of the most important things you can do.
They're trying to say, look at how extremist the right is.
They're trying to remove your right to abortion.
Let's make sure that message is heard up until and including elections.
This isn't any different than the playbook where Kamala Harris Said they should keep rioting!
That's what they did back then!
What did she just say?
If we don't have the votes, if we can't go through the legislative process, if we can't go through rule of law, you know, sort of like the process that we also understand with the filibuster and, you know, not packing the Supreme Court, we're just going to abandon it and try and intimidate people with the power of the audience.
And then they try and frame that as democracy.
That's not democracy.
That's mob rule.
Let me see if she's still on there.
Isn't that coercion?
I don't know law, but isn't it?
In a matter of speaking.
I mean, yeah, I guess it's a roundabout term, but it seems that way.
I don't think it's a roundabout term.
I think it's a way-of-the-bird term.
As the crow travels.
As the crow's feet, Elizabeth Warren, travel.
Let's go back to her.
I bet she's wearing moccasins.
The problem is that we're going to, after 50 years, decide a woman does not have a right to choose.
The mental limits of the import decision are basic. Number one.
But even more He just went number one.
He also paid six Russian prostitutes for abortions last night.
I realize this goes back a long way, but one of the debates I had with Robert Bork was whether Griswold v. Connecticut
should stand as law.
The state of Connecticut said that the privacy of your bedroom, you, a husband and wife, or a couple, could not
use contraception.
To use the contraception was a violation of the law.
If the rationale of the decision as released were to be sustained, A whole range of rights are in question.
Like what?
A whole range of rights.
Like what?
The idea of letting states make those decisions, localities make those decisions.
I just gave you a list of, you can rewind this probably about 15 minutes.
They forced people to wear condoms?
Is that what he's talking about?
I don't know.
I don't believe that's accurate.
No, that's not what he said.
He was trying to say that one state said you couldn't use contraception, which is again, it's a red herring.
It's not something anyone's talking about right now.
But what rights?
I just gave you an example.
of rights that are not in the constitution that are also not at risk like the right to privacy all these pretty much every other example of right to privacy doesn't include abortion he just said other rights are at risk name one Alright, Tocanowan here was telling me that there's something coming in.
Yes, we have breaking news.
So, Chief Justice John Roberts confirms that the draft of returning Roe v. Wade is genuine and they will launch an investigation.
So, I just saw on CNN that he was going to launch an investigation, but they confirmed that it is authentic.
Alright, good.
Well, I didn't waste a whole show.
Well, that's good.
As long as the FBI and CIA are on it, we'll never know.
Yes, yes!
That's, uh, well, they're now, they're now, uh, they're referred to as memory hole.
Yes.
This is a guy with the boy's life in the bathroom.
Oh, I got to do something today?
No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
By do something, we mean nothing.
Oh, good.
Oh, great.
Great.
I'm going to go continue leaking my information.
If you wouldn't mind, I'm on a Zoom call.
So let's look at what this actually does as far as it kicks abortion. By kick I mean it gives the
rights back to the states. We're just talking about the idea that states can't legislate
abortion within the first trimester, right? That's what people are complaining about when they're
filing these petitions that go up to the Supreme Court if there's a ban on abortion or if there are
any limitations on abortion within the first trimester.
This is why people get really confused if they don't states really already have the right? Yeah,
okay. Now if this is overturned, the only thing that really changes is that first trimester
idea, this idea of viability. It's It's really not something as severe as they're making it
out to be.
It just allows states to be more free to make their own decisions with abortion.
Okay, so the left, what they are arguing, and you're seeing this with with Joe Biden, and we just quoted earlier AOC and Bernie Sanders said it needed to be codified into law.
So they want the federal government to control abortion regulations.
So if they had their way, What does that mean?
The federal government would set it.
Basically, you wouldn't have states like Colorado, or like California, or like Connecticut, as he just mentioned, with extreme abortion laws, and then states like Texas or Mississippi.
All states would look like Colorado.
All states would look like Virginia if the federal government were in charge of abortion as they see fit, because you can see it on a state level.
So let's look at the extreme right.
Versus the extreme left.
The most extreme anti-abortion laws would be those like Oklahoma's right, the fetal heartbeat protection bill.
Now, you may not agree with it, but the idea is, there's a heartbeat, can't abort it.
Once there's a heartbeat, can't abort it, right?
These are the kinds of extreme laws that they vehemently oppose, said the church mouse.
They're like, whoa, hold on a second, you can't, whoa, hold on a second, whose heartbeat is it?
You still have to answer that question.
They don't want to answer the question.
They just say it's about a woman's choice.
Okay, so the woman has two hearts.
What is she, a rainbow trout?
Now, don't fact check me, I'm not exactly entirely sure which fish it is that has two hearts.
Someone can comment below and let me know.
I know there is a fish that has two hearts, though, so I'm half right.
So, the most extreme- Rainbow trouts are pretty nice, either way.
Too fishy.
It's like the, no, not to eat, just to be friends with.
Oh, okay, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, they're fluid.
They're very.
They're fluid in fluid.
They swim in fluid.
It is a trout, by the way.
It is a trout?
With two hearts?
I didn't even know that.
The rainbow trout?
Might not be a rainbow trout.
It just says trout.
Okay.
All right.
Well, I like trout.
I don't like trout.
I like to look at them.
Yeah, they're fun to look at.
I particularly like it when there's a trout on a plaque, and you're like, oh my gosh, that's so nice, and then it goes, smoke on the water!
And you go, ugh!
What a wonderful gift.
This is great that this took over the 90s.
Thank you, Uncle Scott.
I still have it.
I didn't have enough doorstops.
Yes, I guess you didn't know me at all.
I thought I'd like this.
Let's look at the most extreme right versus the extreme left.
Let's just, the right is not arguing for the federal government to control access to abortion.
They're arguing that states have these rights at this point, at least as far as it relates to Roe v. Wade.
And so, even though at the most extreme example, you'd have a heartbeat law.
You may not agree with it, but I don't think that's crazy extremist.
On the left, you have Democrats like former, thank God, Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, advocating for, and I don't want, I'm putting in quotes, but hold on a second, I was going to say infanticide, but hold on, let me just Infanticide!
The infant would be delivered.
The infant would be kept comfortable.
The infant would be resuscitated, if that's what the mother and the family desired.
And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mothers.
And this is something, and all references are available at lotterworthcredit.com.
We'll also have a link to this undercover abortion video that we did a while back, which you can't find on YouTube.
This was absolutely shadowbanned, so not as many people saw it.
It's like 90% of the videos like this that we had done.
This is undercover work in Colorado.
Here's what abortion looks like there.
Meet, we'll call her patient X. She was at this Colorado abortion clinic to kill her 29 week old potential baby Rose.
How far along are you?
28.
And as we later found out, it was actually worse.
hours.
So let's do the math for people who don't—let's—'cause this is something they often just say, and I'm going to do this if it sounds like, uh, if it sounds like I'm being, uh, pedantic, I am.
Certainly pedestrian.
A lot of ped.
Yes.
Um, let's go through it, so hopefully you'll remember it, because I often throw around terms like 28, 32.
Well, there's 52 weeks in a year.
Yes, so 4 weeks is a month.
Let's go by 4 weeks.
So 4 weeks, 1.
8 weeks, 2.
12 weeks, 3.
16 weeks, 4.
20 weeks, 5.
24 weeks, 6.
28 weeks, 7.
weeks three 16 weeks for 20 weeks 5 24 weeks 6 28 weeks 7 she thought she was
at seven months but was instead was at eight Bye.
I had twins who were delivered at eight and a half weeks.
There's no argument that even before we get to 32... Months.
Months.
Oh, sorry.
Weeks.
Months, yeah.
That would have been weird.
Yeah, that would have been weird.
They'd just be finger puppets.
Yeah, exactly.
So, there is no argument there at viability.
And by the way, the viability argument keeps moving up because we have better technology.
No one's arguing at this point that that's not a baby.
At 28 weeks, 7 months.
At 32 weeks, 8 months.
No one's arguing that.
You just saw the former governor of Virginia.
He's not arguing it.
He's saying, well, if the baby is born, then we'll... Because it doesn't matter.
Look, it matters!
To me.
It matters to people who are pro-life.
Here's the big difference.
To people who are pro-life, and how aggressive are they going to be?
Well, they're going to be out there on the sidewalk protesting abortion.
It matters to us because seven months, eight months is a life.
That should matter if you're pro-choice.
It should, but it doesn't.
It doesn't.
On the mainstream leftist platform, it doesn't, and it can't.
The Democrat Party cannot say that matters.
So, it matters to us, which is why we focus on what a life is.
It doesn't matter to the left, because they're fine with abortion up to 7 months, 8 months, 9 months, anyway, and so they say, my body, my choice.
But, is it a life?
The question is never answered.
And that's what it comes down to.
If you can't answer the question, what is a life?
If you cannot answer that question, I'm sorry, your opinion on abortion is not as valid as somebody who is willing to have some skin in the game and answer that question.
You have to be able to answer that question to actually be able to tell me where you stand.
Certainly to argue it in the courts.
I've never heard Elizabeth Warren, I've never heard Bernie Sanders, I've never heard former Vice President Biden, I've never heard President Kamala Harris define what a life is.
Because you won't find it.
It doesn't matter.
And that's why they have to lie.
And by the way, speaking of leaks, because we're going to be talking about this more on Mug Club, it is just, it still smells... It really does, and this is the second day in a row.
It smells terrible.
It's why I grew a mustache.
And my mug is fine, but... Just to smell something else.
Oh, God.
Oh, no.
I tip it in the finest colognes.
Look!
What?
Oh, dude, come on.
It is...
Amber Heard, it's a copycat pooping and this has been going on all week.
You know what?
You know what, let's get to the bottom of this.
Two...
I don't mean to laugh.
It stinks in here, man.
It's disgusting.
I know.
That's a crime.
That's a crime, Dave.
I just thought the Amber Heard comparison was humorous.
Yeah, but it's a crime, Dave.
It is a crime.
It's not a laughing matter.
No, somebody's been leaking it all over the office.
Someone's been pooping angrily, which is what's most disturbing.
There's Roe v. Wade in it everywhere.
Who is doing this?
I'm not doing it.
I don't... I think... Okay, look.
I think I saw Brendan's staying a little late last night.
What?
I've had my suspicions.
All right, guys.
Maximus, send Brendan in.
Can we send Brendan in here?
We'll get to the bottom of this today.
Yeah, we're gonna need to get to the bottom of this.
All right.
Okay, here's Even Brendan, obviously works here, wonderful editor.
Yes.
Even Brendan.
Good man.
I'm gonna ask you, and I'm gonna ask you once.
Okay.
Why are you pooping in our mugs and placing them on our furniture?
That's two steps.
Hold on a second.
Let me make sure I can't hear you.
Why are you pooping on our furniture and or mugs?
Where's that happening?
It's right next- Brendan, it's right next- There's crap in the chair right next to you, okay?
Where you put it?
Yeah, right there, right next to you.
Let's be honest.
I couldn't have done that.
And why is that?
Because...
I have a peanut allergy.
My God.
My God.
It's true.
He's ruined every field trip we've ever had.
And there is a peanut... ...in that piece of shit.
Actually, come to think of it, I think I might have some video evidence of who might be the perpetrator.
Tim, could you roll that clip?
Alright Austin, make sure you get this.
Remember the pole?
Well now, I'm going to use this trash can to wall jump to here and then climb up this pole.
I've done it in Mario, it'll work.
Sorry, I'm getting a phone call right now.
Let me just pick that up.
Well, way to provide non-evidence, Brendan.
It was Luna!
No, look, he was walking.
You can slow it down.
You can, yeah.
Tim, can you go back and reverse and enhance?
Um, yeah, hold on.
What am I looking at?
Luna's walking on the back with a mug.
Uh, rewinding.
Oh, wait a minute.
You're talking about this.
Yeah, look.
Back to the right.
Dude.
Or to our left.
That's him walking out the bathroom with mugs.
Well, that's circumstantial at best.
Is that triple fisted?
That's circumstantial at best.
You know, okay, we don't have any more time for this.
Brendan, okay, fine.
You're off the hook for right now.
For right now.
We're gonna have to test it later and feed him a payday bar.
We'll see what happens.
There was more than one gunner on the grass, you know.
But you are still in, you're still in, you're still fired.
All right, you know what, let's just, let's, you can take us out.
Sorry, we've gone late because I've been transfixed by CNN's not.
By CNN's non-experts lying to you about the Supreme Court.
So we're going to go right now, we're going to go to Mug Club and actually we're going to talk about how Generation Z is a bunch of racists.
And also, you know what?
Let's just have more of a discussion.
I'm very humorless as well.
Can I toss that in there?
Oh yeah, I have a story because I went to Starbucks because I ran out of coffee beans this morning and there was a woman, there was a lady who made a comment about Dave Chappelle where if she were a man I would have hit her.
We'll talk about this and more about the Supreme Court in a way that we can't talk on YouTube.
▲
Export Selection