#1106: December 4, 2025 dissects Alex Jones’ baseless claims—from misrepresenting Ireland’s Enoch Burke case as "totalitarianism" to justifying false flags in Venezuela via Ender’s Game metaphors. He falsely frames January 6th arrests as political cover-ups and promotes deceptive supplement sales, while hyping Patrick Byrne’s unverified "defector" claims about Hugo Carvajal’s election fraud tapes, blocked by the DOJ. Jones’ shifting stances and conspiracy-driven rhetoric expose a pattern of exploitation, profit, and reckless disregard for accountability, undermining both truth and his own credibility. [Automatically generated summary]
So, today, though, we're going over December 4th, 2025.
We are plugging along in this dumb stretch of time that I think is breaking, a little bit of a breaking point to understand the slippery slope that Alex falls down.
And if you want to know where we're going to be living under the globalists, if we don't turn this around, they're giving people life in prison for not using the correct pronouns in Ireland.
It's mainstream news.
A school teacher refuses to do it.
And so life in prison.
Canada.
Same law is going into effect.
It's a global operation.
So you want to know where we'll be if it wasn't for Trump in there, as imperfect as he is.
In September 2022, the school went to court to get an order barring him from doing this because he didn't work there anymore and he had no business being around the kids who were just trying to go to school.
So Burke was arrested for violating this order by trespassing on school property.
That was three years ago.
He did a short stint in jail, and then when he was released, the court ordered him to pay a fine of 700 euros a day every time he defied the trespassing order.
According to the BBC, as of this November, he owes the Irish courts about 225,000 euros, which would make it clear that he does not care about fines and that doesn't work.
So he keeps showing up to the school and insisting that he has a right to teach there, and he's been arrested a couple times for contempt of court and trespassing.
In September 2025, the school again petitioned the high court to address the issue because he wouldn't stop showing up pretending to still be a teacher.
They discussed hiring guards, which the school could not afford to do just to stop Burke from trespassing, which the court affirmed was, quote, wholly and exclusively to prevent Mr. Burke from trespassing on school premises.
On October 14th, Burke was supposed to show up for a hearing with the high court, but he instead chose to trespass on school grounds and not show up for court.
All too often, the crazy people we see on this show aren't ambitious crazy, but this Burke guy is in that category.
Instead of going to court, he sent his brother Isaac to show up for him and to argue that Burke couldn't show up because he had to work at the school he was busy trespassing at.
Quote, I indicated to Dr. Isaac Burke that he had no right of audience before the court.
Mr. Isaac Burke replied, quote, I'm aware of the rules of the court, Judge.
Dr. Isaac Burke, despite my clear direction that he had no right of audience before the court, made several other statements to the court, and I had to remind him again and again that he had no right to audience.
In the second hearing, the judge was again harassed by Dr. Isaac Burke, whose brother couldn't be there because he was too busy trespassing at the school.
And this time, Burke showed up, which the judge speculated might have been because school wasn't in session that day, so he didn't have to pretend to be a teacher.
Not only did he show up, but his whole family showed up, ready to cause trouble.
So Burke's mom stood up to accuse the opposing counsel of being a liar, which led to this scene.
Quote, moments later, Dr. Isaac Burke jumped up and shouted, Judge, you're lying.
You're lying.
So what happened was last week.
And then Dr. Burke said, quote, I am Dr. Isaac Burke, and I've been listening to lies.
Again, having been given a number of warnings to Dr. Isaac Burke, I asked the guardi to remove Dr. Isaac Burke from the court, whereupon Mrs. Martina Burke shouted, Disgrace, lies, lies.
And Dr. Isaac Burke said, quote, shame on you.
God will judge your wickedness, Mr. Craigen.
God will judge your wickedness.
I rose whilst the guards removed Dr. Isaac Burke.
Even outside the court, I could hear the continual noise of shouting and roaring from members of the Burke family.
So there's a new family member at this hearing, a sister named Ami, but she gets thrown out for yelling at the judge, which then causes Isaac to yell at the judge, and he gets thrown out again.
In the course of these hearings, the school had brought up some important issues, like the fact that Burke had driven onto school grounds, which could introduce an added danger of him hurting students.
More frighteningly, he posted videos of himself trespassing on school grounds to Twitter, which ran the risk of violating the privacy of students of the school, leading harassment to the school.
It's a huge mess.
So the judge was becoming more and more inclined to think that maybe Burke posed a threat and should be committed to jail.
Yeah.
So that's what he did.
The fines weren't working.
The security guards at the school weren't working.
And Burke's constant trespassing stopped the school from being a school.
The judge ordered him to jail until they could hold another hearing.
And his judgment says, quote, Mr. Burke has the keys to his own prison.
And if he wishes to purge his contempt, he can be released.
Even now, after all of this bullshit that I've been describing to you, the court is bending over backwards to accommodate this lunatic.
He was fired for refusing to allow the school to work through his suspension that arose from him disrupting a school church service where he verbally attacked the principal, the administration of the school, and the bishop.
He commitTedros misconduct, and maybe he was angry about people having different views about trans people than he did, but none of the consequences that came were because of his beliefs.
You may be surprised to hear that instead of making an argument, he yelled at the judge until they had to remove him for contempt and then refused to return after being given multiple explicit opportunities to come back and participate in court.
Quote, his demeanor and unorthodox behavior were very much evident in the course of the presentation of his appeal before this court.
He granted himself free reign to speak disparagingly about and deploy language calculated to traduce and demean those with whose conduct and decisions he did not agree.
The conduct of Mr. Burke at the religious service in the chapel was wholly disrespectful towards the school's principal and entirely inappropriate.
By the standards of civilized behavior, his conduct was simply outrageous.
By any objective measure, his conduct was highly confrontational and calculated to cause maximum embarrassment and stress to the school principal and to undermine her publicly and openly in front of key stakeholders, parents, some students, clergy, members of the church hierarchy, and other persons connected with the school as well as teachers.
By any measure, the disruption of the chapel service on June 2022, at which the bishop was officiating, was wholly unorthodox, and Mr. Burke's lack of insight into the inappropriateness of his behavior speaks to either his inability or unwillingness to engage in dialogue or discussion as one might conventionally expect to find in a school setting where through the mechanism of dialogue,
a means would be arrived at which would be mutually respectful of the teacher's concerns on the one hand and the spiritual and moral values of a student and their family on the other.
The appellant appears to lack all insight into the extent to which his conduct was inappropriate, undermining, intimidating, contemptuous towards and demeaning of the school principal.
Even on his own version of events, his behavior was confrontational and wholly out of place having regard to the nature of the event as a ceremony of religious worship.
The wide variety of attendees and the solemn occasion.
His approach in all matters appears to be directed towards getting his own way at all costs whilst being incapable and/or unwilling to engage in respectful dialogue in an effort to achieve a mutually acceptable compromise, which might adequately address his concerns.
One is driven to the conclusion that he quite enjoys conflict and confrontation and the passing notoriety his willful and contemptuous contempt of court has brought upon him.
You can't really sum up his actions around the Sandy Hook trial better than saying that he appeared to lack all insight into the extent which his conduct was inappropriate and that he quite enjoys conflict and the confrontation that the case brought him.
This guy is just a baby who can't accept the consequences of his actions and eventually decided that consequences didn't actually exist because no one was holding him responsible for the severe harm that he's causing people.
A parent should have beat the shit out of him for coming to that school and putting all the students there in danger and profoundly disrupting their education, but instead he showed up from multiple school years and pretended that he still taught there.
He flagrantly ignored the court's attempts to get him to stop trespassing at a school, but instead of being adult about it, he decided to pretend that it was all him being persecuted for not accepting trans people.
Through playing that game of pretend, he's made himself very useful to demagogues and pieces of shit like Alex, who are desperate to pretend that people are getting arrested for not using people's preferred pronouns.
It's a whole cottage industry that he's being able to make himself a part of.
There are cases where police and courts are legitimately encroaching on people's rights or where people are being unfairly treated, but it's pathetic for Alex to treat the story like this is one of them.
In order to accept that he's reporting on this story as a guy who's going to jail for life for using the wrong pronouns, you have to accept that either one, he's such an anti-trans zealot that he's willing to lie about every aspect of this story, or two, he's so lazy that he hasn't looked into it at all.
The reason I spent as much time on this as I have is because this is a mirror.
Both Enoch, Burke, and Alex were given every opportunity to prove their underlying claims.
Alex had his cases that ended up in default where he could have argued that his actions were protected under the First Amendment, and Burke had this 2023 case where he could have argued that he was fired unjustly for being against trans people.
Both men made conscious decisions not to engage with those cases, most likely because they knew damn well they couldn't succeed with the dumb arguments they were trying to make, and they didn't want to be embarrassed by the finality of losing the case.
Instead, they both tried to sabotage the proceedings until the court had enough, which allowed them to play the victim and pretend at later hearings that they never got the chance to make their case, and they've been silenced.
I don't think that the court system is equipped to deal with people who act like this and who are financially incentivized to act like this.
Yeah, I mean, it has become more and more apparent that there should be like, and I think, I think the problem with it is it's like that one asshole with the Secretary of Retribution shit.
There needs to be a separate thing where it's like, oh, guys, this is one of ours.
You're not capable of handling this.
You're great at so many things.
The court system can do a lot of stuff well, but you can't handle this guy.
Like, if this guy was actually being oppressed, like, for his beliefs about trans people, then that might be inappropriate.
You know, there might be some argument to be made, but that's not the case that's going on at all.
And his actions, if left unchecked, because clearly the fines don't work, mitigation measures don't work, no one's kicking his ass, like because those things aren't happening, like he's fucking up people's lives.
Like everyone who goes to school there has to deal with him just showing up and trying to sneak through the doors whenever they're when they can.
He disrupts education.
The school has to pay for a guard, which they conceivably don't have the budget for.
This is another one where it's like, for I understand all of those solutions that those people came up with, but they didn't think about things the way that I think of things, which is if anybody shows up to work more than two months in a row without getting paid for it, they're insane.
Whatever else you think is like what's really crazy about them, they showed up to work for 60 days and no one paid them.
So the Inspector General report about Pete Hegseth's use of Signal as it relates to the bombings in Yemen came out on December 2nd, and Alex is flagrantly lying about it.
Quote, we concluded that the Secretary sent sensitive, non-public, operational information that he determined did not require classification over the signal chat on his personal cell phone.
The secretary is the head original classification authority in the DOD based on Executive Order 13526 and DOD manual 5200.45 and holds the authority to determine the required classification level of all DOD information he communicates.
However, because the Secretary indicated that he used the Signal application on his personal cell phone to send non-public DOD information, we concluded that the Secretary's actions did not comply with DOD instruction 8170.01, which prohibits using a personal device for official business and using non-approved commercially available messaging applications to send non-public DOD information.
They recommended that the Department of Defense explain to the senior staff why they have rules about these kinds of things.
And if they could do that, then it would be appropriate to handle this as an internal kind of thing.
Like how if you get in trouble at your office job, HR might make you go to a training session.
It's disconcerting, though, to see that Alex has now just decided to start calling all the Jewish people he's mad at Mossad agents.
Jeffrey Goldberg is an interesting case because he's a Jewish man who was born in the United States, who later moved to Israel, became a citizen, and then joined the IDF, who then gave up his Israeli citizenship in 2013.
He's definitely a Zionist in his ideology, but he also doesn't line up with most of the goals of the Netanyahu government as we understand them in the present.
So it seems like a pretty big leap to assume that he's employed by Mossad.
But the only reason you would do that is because he's Jewish.
Yeah, there's the twin of like, oh, these are cockroaches.
They're less than human.
And then there's that version of it where it's like, they're unrecognizable from you wouldn't do that because you're not fucking crazy, but all of them are.
So let's tell everybody else because this is how we raise the alarm.
It's about preparing some big event, some false flag to be blamed on Trump and the National Guard and the Border Patrol and all the rest of it.
And it is about when this big event comes trying to sell the public and the blue states and everybody on turning against America.
And of course, the blue states will do it because they're globalist.
And then using that illusion and using that supposed grab attach or strength of, oh, look, see all these blue states seceded because Trump's a dictator.
Believing that that will start put enough pressure on the body politic of the military to stage a coup against Trump.
While we're on the subject, it seems pretty likely that if a couple states secede from the Union and while we're trying to sort that out, Russia and China will definitely see that as an opportunity to gain some ground.
So who knows what they'll do?
The international order kind of falls apart without the U.S. investment and weapons.
So it could be a make hay while the sun shines kind of moment that we find ourselves in.
I get that the fantasy Alex has is that there's going to be another 1860s style civil war, but that shit is never going to happen in the modern world.
Even if Trump is a dictator, it is not in New York or California's best interest to secede from the Union.
Like it just, it's dumb.
Well, it's it overcomplicates things, creates more problems than it solves.
Geography, yes, somewhat arbitrary in the way that like counties and cities and states are drawn.
But the state itself as like a financial organizing thing can have some sort of like, okay, we're not going to allow businesses that don't recognize us as the central authority of the state.
So before we even get to negotiating our exit from the United States, we have to negotiate our exit from ourself, the New York state, which would then hopefully provide an armistice time where the people of New York State who don't want to become new citizens are allowed to return back to the United States.
And if Trump is a dictator, then you just kind of like, I think that the states would recognize that, like, all right, best thing to do is resist as we can and roll the bones.
They go, sir, they've shipped most of the fentanyl because the Mexican drug cartels in your first administration, you threatened to kill a bunch of them, and you did.
So actually, sir, they followed your orders eight years ago and it all moved to Canada.
It's the Canadians now doing it with the Chinese.
So he's like, okay, well, we'll just cocaine then.
Yeah.
And people go, oh, well, for cocaine and heroin, you're going to kill everybody?
But they are backstopping the Mexican drug cartels.
No, no, we don't like to do fentanyl, but that's what we were told to sell.
It kills our own people down here.
And now they've been, Sinaloa, that's what runs down there, has been killing anyone that sells it.
And I was looking at the news where they were killing anybody selling it because Trump was already having special forces kill Sinaloa leadership and they didn't stop.
So yeah, it's not true.
We're really going there to do this.
But he has to set the precedent that we can blow their boats up and make it about drugs, which is still reasonable.
It's still going to kill a bunch of people and still wait through banks.
So you can't come up with a worse spin to be delivered by someone who's pretended to be the character Alex has for the last 30 years.
Apparently, the sinking of these boats is retaliation for Venezuela engaging in election fraud in the U.S., but Trump knows that he couldn't get away with saying that as the public reason, so he's lying.
He's lying to everybody.
If Alex is fine with a president lying about their use of the military and he has no problem with them killing people from another country because of unfounded conspiracies about election fraud, then he can't have any of the complaints that he's had over his career.
He could have all the same political positions, but it's important to understand that he couldn't have made his arguments the way that he has if this is what he believes.
Trump thinks that Venezuela is doing election fraud in the U.S., so he's blowing up their boats and lying to the public about them being narco-terrorists because that works better for him politically.
Alex has accepted and justified that he's doing this because it's in service of solving a larger problem, which is that Venezuela is working with the globalists to do all that election fraud.
If Trump has to lie in order to sell the public on accepting the military actions he's doing, then that's just the cost of doing business.
If you believe this, then every false flag Alex has ever accused the government of pulling is pretty much justifiable.
It's a little harder to justify, but I thought through and I could argue that 9-11 being an inside job can be an acceptable act if you use this framework that Alex was putting forth.
But behind that, Alex's real position was tricking the public into accepting a war is okay if I like the person doing it and support why they're doing it.
It's all conditional, and that's not what he sold the audience.
I hate to say this 1,100 episodes into our podcast, but it's kind of simple in one sense.
Alex likes when his guys do things and doesn't like it when the guys he doesn't like do things, but he desperately wants to be seen as deeper than that.
Sure.
Another thing that Alex needs to address here is that if what he's saying in that clip is true, then he has been lying to his audience for years.
He's claiming that he's known that fentanyl coming from the southern border isn't a big problem since like 2018, but he's continued to use fears around that issue to demonize immigrants and justify police state action.
He's either lying in that clip directly or he's been lying about this for years to the audience in order to help Trump accrue power through fear, which is kind of what his career has been about.
So then he is saying, Alex must be saying that Trump is lying to you, the people who like Trump, because you are not smart enough to recognize that Trump is actually making the right move.
Whereas Alex is smart enough to recognize that, thus saying that all of the MAGA people are kind of dumb.
I think what we've reached is a spot where I think we, and none of us were really fully ready to be here now, but Trump can just say, like, oh, I'm going after him for election fraud.
So in this next clip, Alex, I can't really describe this in any other way as like he descends into a stretch of doing self-affirmations online or on air about how great his stock is.
Just, I mean, how do you not, if you say that, you cannot use the ring of doom, how do you not go, oh, Trump winning and now having the ring of doom is why we're here.
You know, if the Martians had a mothership out by the moon launching attacks on the Earth, we're not just going to fight the ships they're sending at us.
The first thing the Pentagon would do in five minutes saying, where are those ships coming from?
Blow up the origin.
Blow up the mothership.
Blow up the flagship.
Well, look at Venezuela as a Martian mothership that is politically, with money laundering and election fraud and all of it, the secret piggy bank where the Democrats and the CIA elements can commit their crimes.
So obviously, you know, I never read the Endergame books, but my sister didn't like them.
And then I went and watched the movie, and it was okay.
And like, about 20 minutes to the end, there's this girl that's a genius, and she knows how to beat her little boy or whatever it is.
And it's a little boy.
And then they get to the home planet of the ant-like creatures that are attacking Earth.
And instead of with the fleet blowing up all the ships, which he didn't have enough ships and missiles to do, he blows up the whole planet.
And I said 20 minutes before he got to the scene, I said, let me guess.
I'm sitting there watching it with my sister and Rex when he was still little.
I go, let me guess he blows up the ant planet.
And my sister's like, well, how do you know that?
You have read the book.
And I said, no, I can already see they're losing these battles.
And it's all.
And then they apologize.
Oh, we're sorry we genocided you.
And he saves a queen and its eggs and moves it to go build a new planet.
It's like, do you even need to read 10 books or whatever it is to know this?
The real world version of what he's talking about is so serious and so devastating that this trivial shit and this idiotic way of talking about it, it's just offensive.
Yeah, I mean, it would be good for him to maybe explore the books, specifically the theme of it is a, so like the main central conflict of the book, the theme, is how do you end conflict for good?
Right?
So it is a child's way of thinking, right, to kill them all.
That's the way you end conflict for good if there's none left.
And that's why they exploit a child to do it.
Because the sign of maturity is when he realized the way you end conflict is by becoming friends.
Do you beat a nest of bees with a ping-pong paddle?
Or if you actually see how exterminators do that when it's on the outside of the house, they just come up with a big giant bag, satchel around the top, tie a big knot, and then cut the top off.
And now you got the whole mess of these.
And some people are liberal.
They want them relocated somewhere and they'll take them to some ranch.
Or other people just say, I don't care.
So they just go throw it in the trash.
But see, we just have to go down to Venezuela and just take a bag and put it around the beehive and tie the top and cut it off and just take the whole big thing and put it in the trash.
And the fact that this is okay is no, if anybody within a hall of power or anywhere near a powerful person said things like this, they should be removed instantly.
And it's just funny because for years, we're told they have no idea who it is.
And then as soon as people zero in on a lady who calls Seraphin just so happened to be staking out the house next door that had another Capitol cop working at it, the lady people zeroed in on and got into an agency software system that could track the gate, the walk, the biometrics had a very high probability it was her.
Now that there's all this pressure, we have Brian Cole.
Everything we need to know about January 6th riot pipe bomb suspect arrested by FBI.
It's interesting that the right-wing media got caught up in hysteria based on fake information pointing at one person being the January 6th pipe bomber.
And then the FBI made an arrest of a different person shortly after.
But that doesn't mean anything.
Alex is presenting this as if it illustrates that the FBI is setting up this second guy because the conspiracists were getting too close with the first person.
And how they'll do it is they'll have somebody already on other charges and they'll tell him, you're going to take the dive for this and we'll drop it.
They did that with a guy that committed a bunch of crimes and a bunch of stuff.
And for more detail, they basically told him, just go into this pizza place, shoot a gun in the ceiling, say that if we're Alex Jones, we'll drop your charges.
And that's what happened.
Still simple.
Remember Pizza Gate?
Oh, you're indicted for all this stuff in the state?
Well, you just go shoot a gun in the ceiling, say Alex Jones made you do it.
And they'll remember six months later when everything gets dropped.
It should be understood that what you're hearing in that clip is Alex doing preemptive damage control because he has a pretty good reason to believe that he and the alleged pipe bomber probably have some stuff in common.
That guy's like, once you reach the totality of somebody's life like that, once there's all possibility of like, maybe he'll turn around shows up, right?
Then it just really comes into focus.
Like something happened inside that guy's brain 20 years ago, and then it just set in motion a series of events that whenever they come in contact with an Alex Jones with just that fucking little catalyst, all of a sudden the entire life is ablaze.
I mean, now that he has passed, you can look at the trajectory.
And yeah, I don't know everything about his case or anything, but it is just, it is really sad.
And the fact that he was killed by the police last year, you know, I'm not saying that I know enough about the case to even say like the cops were out of line.
You know, like now that it's over, you know, because if he was still going, even if he was in jail now, you're like, there's a chance he could turn around, he could have some perspective on this, and then he could contribute something really, really interesting, having that point of view and that life.
And then to have it go before any chance of anything is possible is a tragedy.
Like, I understand hating that guy while he's alive and thinking he's a piece of shit, but it's a tragedy to see that life exist.
And then to see Alex treat the story this way after he was such a big part of promoting and disseminating the conspiracies that led to this guy showing up at Comic Ping Pong and the life going off the rails in whatever way that it did.
The reason is that it reveals the inherent markup your store is putting on the things that you sell.
If you can afford to sell all of the expensive items at the price of the cheapest items, then all of the difference in price is artificial.
If these prices reflected real expenses Alex needed to balance, then a sale like this could easily put him out of business.
If product A sells for $10 but costs Alex three, and product B sells for $40 and costs Alex 10, all it takes is a couple of people buying product A and getting product B for free for the scales to tip.
Each time that happens, Alex is paying out $13 for the two products and making $10 on the sale.
He's losing $3 every time he makes a sale.
Obviously, I've just made up random prices to illustrate the point, but this is why you never give a more expensive product away as a bonus for someone buying a cheaper product.
As long as you make people buy the more expensive one, then you're paying out $13, but you're still bringing in $40.
So you make less profit than without the sale, but you're still ahead.
That's why these deals are structured this way.
If you're willing to do a sale like what Alex is doing here, then you're revealing that your markups are so high that it doesn't matter what anyone buys.
If you can afford to do a sale like this, then you are fucking people over.
You can't do this if your business is legitimate.
Nope.
Because even if you're doing it for a few days, you run the risk of people buying enough product that you are thousands and thousands of dollars in the red.
It is that it's the sale version of somebody walking by a $20 bill on the ground and being like, is somebody watching to see if I'm going to fuck with this in some way?
In a matter of seconds, Alex has read two headlines that have gotten him spun into a contradiction.
In his version of the story, the IG report gave Heg Seth a total vindication.
But in reality, they concluded that he didn't follow the rules and should learn more about the rules.
As far as anyone in Alex's branch of the media cares, this is a total vindication because there's no impending consequences.
So that's the way it's been treated inside their bubble.
Because Alex doesn't do any work at all, he doesn't know what the report says.
So when he reads a headline that runs counter to the spin that his media is putting on the story, he has to make up that this watchdog group in the headlines a leftist group or else the narrative starts to not make sense anymore.
I mean, creating two people out of one person to rebut the other person who's not the same person, yet somehow is also the same person, seems to exist only in lies.
So I think that decency expectations have dropped so low that if he were just talking about Ilon Omar, no one would even take notice of Trump's flagrant racism and hate.
But this was the sitting president openly saying that people in the United States of a particular nation of origin work garbage.
I was thinking as I listened to that, though, like, what do you think it would take for Alex to finally not feel like everyone wanted him to feel bad because he's white?
It seems like an unachievable goal.
And I was trying to imagine the world as it would have to exist for him to be like, ah, finally.
I mean, I think it is theoretically possible for the rational part of the world to get together, pool our resources, and build a segregation fun park and then let these people live there.
You know, wall it off.
If you want to visit, that's fine.
You have to live the way we live in our world.
And if we go visit yours, we'll live the way you live.
And in the saying of this hatred of Somalians who have come to America, he's also making very clear that there's other countries that he would like to cleanse the United States of.
Like, let the bureaucratic people just fucking do their thing.
Like, what is Darth Vader doing?
I want to rule the galaxy as father and son.
Why?
What's your agenda for the galaxy?
There's no agenda here.
He's just an old racist moron that people keep asking questions to and then listening to the answers to when you could just not ask him a question and put him in a fucking corner.
Yeah, I think that if we're in a situation where there's like a dark villain, and they can shoot lightning, I'm taking it more seriously than this rambling dipshit.
So if Alex thinks that Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and Pam Bondi are lying in order to blame a Patsy for the pipe bombings, then he needs to accept that that's what Trump wants.
No one in the opposition party could do anything if he fired any of them and replaced them with whoever he wants.
So it's just silly to pretend that there's any pressure coming from anywhere other than Trump.
I'm always interested in bombers because I feel like there's a very small number of people who are capable of building a bomb and then capable of using it without blowing themselves up.
Right.
So shouldn't it?
I feel like it's a lot easier to find bombers.
If I'm law enforcement, there's way fewer than people who can use a gun.
I mean, maybe, maybe there, I'm sure that there are ways to build a bomb, right, with stuff, but I feel like most bombs wind up being built by somebody who went to a hardware store at one point.
When you attack American citizens, when you attack our institutions of legislation, when you attack our nation's capital, you attack the very being of our way of life.
And this FBI and this Department of Justice stand here to tell you that we will always refute it and combat it.
Yeah, I mean, I wonder how much they could get away with it.
So it's like, Alex, could they get away with just being more mysterious, but because they're all shit talkers, they have no choice but to like blast it on fucking Twitter, right?
Like they could get away with so much if they were like, we're not doing it, and then just winked.
If they all acted like professionals and weren't all more or less performing for a social media audience, then yes, it would be all manageable because most of the time they would be shutting up or speaking in professional language that has like plausible deniability baked into it and all this, like neither confirm nor deny.
So Alex has another guest on who's a lady who I think makes TikToks that Alex likes.
She's fine, but the interview is derailed because it turns out that Alex knows her stepdad, who is a janitor who was in World Trade Center, one of the buildings during 9-11.
Yeah, and he became a figure in the 9-11 conspiracy world.
And the interview just deteriorates into Alex begging her to get him back on the show.
It's really funny because I think she comes off pretty well and like a competent media figure, but Alex can't stop talking about her stepdad and like, oh, me and him go way back.
So Alex is saying this shit to try to make it sound like he has some secret information and he's an insider, but it really just comes off like he's a stooge.
And none of this is true, but if you take him at his word, then you have to believe that he's taking programming and guest booking instructions from the government.
That's a pretty cool thing for a guy who loves the free press to do.
Oh, yeah, Trump tweeted about this because we're telling you messages that he can't tell.
This is illustrative of why people generally play short clips of Alex because when it gets a little bit longer, he starts talking about hitting bees with a ping-pong paddle and everything just fucking stops making sense.
So an important correction here is that Alex has admitted on his show that he tried to take over and steer the QAnon stuff, but it didn't work.
True.
Q folks hated Alex and thought he was a shill, in no small part because they resented Alex's then employee, Jerome Corsi, trying to write a book and brand himself as the Q expert.
Alex created his own Q in the character of Zach, who was a secretive, high-level whistleblower, made up fun stories for the Infowars audience.
The truth is that Alex tried a bunch of different things to profit off QAnon, but he couldn't because it was something that was truly decentralized.
You could make a lot of money off Q and the audience by fleecing them and just giving them what they wanted, but it wasn't something that was co-optable by a figurehead.
Alex's version of conspiracism is incompatible with how QAnon unfolded because it relies on Alex being the only source of truth.
Other people can have some good points, and some folks are more heroic than others, but at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is what Alex says.
It might be different than what he said yesterday, and that's part of the mystery of the InfoWar.
If you listen to Alex and you like him, then whether you know it or not, you have accepted that premise that he dictates reality.
Meanwhile, QAnon led to the rise of a bunch of interpreters who tried to figure out what Q's posts meant, but they were all subservient to Q, who is in turn subservient to Trump.
The chain of command was clear, and as big and full of themselves as any one of these interpreters could get, they couldn't be Q.
We said in the interview, we said we're saying things Trump can't say.
He's saying it's about fentanyl, it's about cocaine.
That's the side issue that gives him the legal reason to do it, which is authorized under Thomas Jefferson's precedent and the war powers and all of it.
And the emergency clear and present danger.
But the real issue is Venezuela, one of the richest countries in the world, piggybacking the globalist election fraud, all of it, as General Flynn and others have said.
And before Trump got in, we said he's moving on Venezuela or he's not serious.
Just like we got it in Ukraine where they're laundering the money back to the Democrats.
But Trump can't come out and say we're about to hit Venezuela because it's a Democrats piggyback.
What does Trump do?
He posts a link, and then they later posted more links to the full interview to what Patrick Byrne said.
I tried to get Patrick on three days ago because I had a call from the White House and he said, hey, they really liked that interview.
You should get Patrick Byrne on more and talk about this, this, and that.
Trump has a message that he wants to get out, but he can't tell the public the whole story.
So he has to send cryptic messages through tweets and about how somebody has decoded his moves successfully.
If you follow all the breadcrumbs, you'll get there.
He would tell the whole world what he's doing, but the world isn't ready for the storm that's coming.
So this message is really only for the really smart elect among the base, like Alex and Alex's fans who recognize that Alex is a genius.
Leaving all that aside for a second, I think Alex should have a bigger problem with the president lying to the public about why he's using the military for partisan political goals.
The way Alex is describing this, it's all to attack the Democrats because they're laundering money through Venezuela, which is not what the military is for.
That seems like a really bad precedent to set, especially considering how many countries you could justify bombing based on Trump using the presidency to make personal business deals with them.
So like, is it like, could you bomb Trump's golf courses in other countries in the next presidency?
The thing that I hate that Trump is or that Alex is allowed to do, and all of them are allowed to do, and everybody in the media is allowed to do, is to say Trump hit Venezuela or Hegseth hit Venezuela.
They don't go, here are the names of the 10 people that Trump and Hegseth murdered.
Because it's a lot easier if you go, like, oh, he attacked Venezuela.
But I mean, it's not, they're not being held accountable for an act against the state or an act against people who have every bit of the right to life that they do.
But now he's saying that Trump is just lying to everybody and it's really about the Venezuelan being involved in stealing elections and money laundering with the demands.
Yeah, I think, well, I think they're dreaming if they think the military is going to support them.
Some weenies may.
I think if some weenies try to follow this stuff about stand and like officers try to stand against and go with this normizing color revolution that they started, their own enlisted people will liquidate them.
Remember in Vietnam, you know, fragging the lieutenant was quite a popular thing to do.
And I think that from what I hear, the enlisted are so fed up.
And if their officers start leading in this direction, they're going to frag some generals.
They're not the military, and they should.
They swore an oath to defend the Constitution, and that includes any corrupt generals or colonels who are trying to get you to break with the constitutional structure.
So that's what you're supposed to do for people to know history like Patrick Byrne, who is a historian.
If you're given a commander-in-chief order and you believe it's legal and you're having commanders saying don't follow it, I mean, it's like Meli Masker killed the whole village.
That's obviously don't follow it.
But if the president's like, arrest illegal aliens or, you know, stop a drug boat.
If you're given an order not to do that, you're 100% need to disregard who gave that order and follow the presidents were.
Yes, the former head of military intelligence of Venezuela, his name, Hugo Carvajal, he's been sitting for two years.
He's defected in 2017 from the regime and stayed in Spain.
We arrested him two years ago.
And he's been sitting in prison in New York.
He reached out to me, to me and the people I've worked with with you, the Gary and the guy I call Zorro, the three of us who've been on this, and offered to flip and turn everything up.
Now, just, you know, everything we've been fighting is actually, this election system is categorized as a weapon, and it reports to the Venezuelan military intelligence.
So this is the guy who was over the weapon.
He was Nicholas Maduro's and Hugo Chavez's director of intelligence.
So he knows it all.
He got in touch and let us know that he would flip sides.
So it is true that military intelligence guy for the Venezuelan government, Hugo Carvajal, has come out and offered to give a bunch of information about various illegal things that Maduro and Hugo Chavez did.
So Byrne is over-promising here, and this is not what you want to do as a conspiracy theorist.
If you introduce tapes of this guy negotiating elections and tell the audience that they're safe, you're going to have to come up with a damn good reason why you aren't producing those tapes.
Unless you have those tapes, don't mention them.
Even if you've seen them, you should shut up until you have copies because now the absolute proof of the thing you desperately want to prove is real exists.
And we're just waiting for you to show it.
There's no more convincing for you to do.
We don't care what other side conspiracies you have.
Carvajal was not snatched up by Biden to try and cover his tracks.
He was ultimately arrested and extradited to the United States in 2023, but that was the end of a long process that began with his arrest in 2019 when Trump was in office.
The U.S. got Spain to arrest him, but the request for extradition was denied.
He was a wanted criminal before 2019, and he'd been arrested prior.
He left the military in Venezuela in 2017, and he was in good standing with Maduro until he backed Juan Guaido when he named himself interim president and tried to oust Maduro.
I'm not saying that we need to have the running man, like literally.
But what I am saying is if something like this happens, where like a military, a high-ranking military guy like flees the country, we should get to watch.
You know, like there should be cameras.
We should be watching him try and escape.
Man, he should have a camera in Spain in his villa where he's living, hiding out.
Is the fugitive, is the life of a fugitive really just a matter of how long you can live the life of a fugitive as opposed to how hard it is to escape stuff?
You just can't call people handlers when you're on shows like this.
It's loaded.
You can't do that here.
No good.
So in his letter, Carvajal says, quote, I was present when Russian intelligence came to Caracas to propose to Hugo Chavez the tapping of submarine internet cables that connect most of South America and the Caribbean islands with the United States for the purpose of penetrating United States government communications.
In 2015, I warned Maduro that allowing Russian intelligence to build and run a secret listening post on La or Chila Island would one day invite American bombs.
He ignored me.
This isn't a revelation, and it wouldn't take someone with an intelligence background to understand what the guy is saying.
You can find conversations online going back to at least 2018 about Russia setting up on that island.
Alex's humor seems like it only exists whenever he is with like three other dudes, specifically dudes, who are already comfortable with where they know he's going to go.
Because every time he starts thinking that something's funny, he catches himself, remembers that other people are watching him and he's actually a weird pervert.
So that makes him feel uncomfortable.
And then he's like, I need to prove that I'm not a weird pervert.
So I'll act like a weird pervert and go, he could have saved the entire thing too by just like whenever Patrick Byrne starts saying like, oh, she's really glammed up over the last few days.
All Alex would have had to do, recognizing that this riff train is off the tracks.
Man, Rikers, being a guy who's like, I'm in, I'm doing 20 years for marijuana possession in 1990, and my cellmate is the former defense intelligence guy for Nicholas Maduro.
Why did Hugo try to kill that paralegal five times?
So earlier in the interview, Patrick says that Hugo is being held at Rikers Island, which is presumably where these conversations would have taken place.
I don't know if they were ever cellmates, but in December, which is when this episode was happening, Diddy couldn't have been bunking with Hugo because he was transferred to a prison in Texas in October.
Right.
Patrick is one of these interesting types of characters in Infowars world because I sincerely can't tell if he's completely crazy or not.
And like, you know, because it's based on lines on the map, like there's parts of Africa that are in the Western hemisphere and like parts of Europe even.