Today, Dan and Jordan check in to experience Alex's triumphant return to the studio after an extended "work-cation." In this installment, Alex whiffs every detail while covering the Pelosi home invasion story, obsesses about imaginary hammer fetishists, and warns of the impending disappearance of diesel fuel. Citations
And honestly, it was sort of my intention to do that on Monday's show and then the rest of the deposition stuff on Friday, which would be this episode.
But the reason we recorded a day early was because I was very kindly invited to give a lecture at the University of Kansas in Lawrence by Professor Colin.
I texted you about this, too, and it's like, it's in your...
bones as somebody who does stand-up or as that time doing stand-up that you're expecting the response of laughter even when you know that that's not the right not the right avenue yeah so viscerally when i'd say things and get almost no response some just dead-eyed i'm really I'm just overwhelming at this lecture I'm giving.
Yeah, you couldn't help but feel kind of weird in that same way that you did.
Although a high point probably was when...
They have these high-tech desks, and so there's a TV built into the desk that comes up out of the desk, and one of them got triggered somehow, and it just started coming up, and I acted like I was very scared of the robot desk.
Yeah, I was just thinking, when we, probably about, what, six or so years ago, when we were drunk at like 3 a.m. arguing about the finer points of Andy Daly's career, I was like, you know what?
Yeah, so a lot of people had wanted a recording of the lecture itself, and unfortunately, we were trying to do that, but the tech, I think, was a little bit out of pocket.
The issue is, we recorded on Saturday with this expectation that Alex has been out of studio forever, so the idea was we'd do the deposition on Monday, come back Friday, boom.
We have Nancy Pelosi's husband being attacked with a hammer and them trying to say that he's a Trump supporter or a QAnon person, but now we have the audio we'll play in just a moment.
The 911 call.
Police dispatch.
Paul Pelosi said he doesn't know who the male is, but he advised that his name is David and he is a friend.
He was in his underwear.
They were naked.
The stuff was broken inside, not broken into.
And so something very interesting going on there with Mr. or Hair, Monsieur.
So it's not too surprising to see Alex being pretty on top of the Pelosi conspiracy theories, and also not surprising to see him lying about the situation.
He doesn't have the audio of the 911 call, that's just entirely made up, and he's basing his reporting on faulty assumptions that he just saw in memes or on dumb blogs.
In reality, Pelosi was the victim of a home invasion, and the person was holding him hostage with a hammer, but he was, that guy who came in, David DePape, was really more interested in his wife.
Yeah.
unidentified
Mr. Pelosi was able to convince the guy to let him use the bathroom.
where his phone was charging, and he made a call to police, being careful to speak in language that wouldn't set off alarms for the guy with a hammer.
Pelosi did convey to 911 that the guy's name was David, specifically that the guy had said that his name was David.
He also was clear that he didn't know who he was and that he planned to wait there for his wife to arrive.
Just after police arrived, David hit Pelosi with the hammer and was arrested.
In the ambulance, Pelosi told Officer Arianne Starks that he, quote, had never seen DePay before.
The glass was not broken outward.
A witness who was working security at the neighboring address, a nearby house, saw, quote, an individual in all black carrying a large black bag on his back walking near the Pelosi residence.
He, quote, then heard what sounded like banging on either a door or car.
Also, in a post-arrest interview, De Pape admitted that he, quote, broke into the house through a glass door, which was a difficult task that required the use of a hammer.
DePape's interview is consistent with Pelosi's version of events in that they didn't know each other and that DePape had arrived, broken in, and demanded to know where Nancy was.
DePape made it clearer to police that he wanted to hold her hostage and that if she lied to him, he would break her kneecaps so she would have to be, quote, wheeled into Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were consequences to actions.
It's clear from his admissions to police, from his actions, and from his writing prior to the attack that David DePape is a far-right extremist who was at best attempting to hold the Speaker of the House hostage and maim her.
It's very obvious why people across the right-wing media ecosystem, from Alex to Matt Walsh to Glenn Greenwald, have tried to run interference on this story and craft a different narrative out of it, and that's because it's a direct result of their ideology and rhetoric.
It's a good thing that nobody has ever put out, say, a list of people for whom this type of action would be valuable.
You know, it's a good thing nobody's ever been like, hey, here's, let's say, hit list of some sort, you know, of the people that need to be taken care of.
This is a dispatcher relaying the information from a 911 call.
Also, there's a very clear pronoun reference issue here that is at the heart of this.
What this dispatcher is saying is that Pelosi doesn't know who the person is, but the person had said that his name is David and that he is a friend.
He wasn't saying that Pelosi considers this guy a friend.
He's saying that Pelosi is saying that David told him he was a friend.
It's about as simple an explanation as that.
But Alex has to grasp at whatever straws are there to pretend that this is some kind of fake thing as opposed to the exact logical conclusion of his worldview.
But the whole point is they're trying to saddle, they're trying to frame the American people with this right now as some type of attempted false flag.
I'm not saying it didn't happen.
I'm saying they're trying to blame conservative voters.
They're calling it a new January 6th, but it gets worse.
Senator Rand Paul, who had six ribs broken and a lung punctured and is still in serious health problems because of it, the left celebrated when he got physically attacked.
He put out a tweet wishing him a speedy recovery and saying political violence should not happen, and it's wrong.
So if this constitutes a false flag, then the term has entirely lost its meaning.
It's just a meaningless catchphrase for Alex to throw out to pop the crowd.
It's like his getter done at this point.
It just means...
It's so empty.
As for Rand Paul, that wasn't a politically motivated attack at all.
He got into a fight with his neighbor, Rene Boucher, about yard waste.
From an NBC News article about Boucher's trial, quote, The prosecutors said Boucher had enough after he witnessed Paul stack brush into a pile on his own lawn, but near Boucher's property.
Boucher then ran onto Paul's property and tackled him.
These aren't comparable situations at all, and all Alex is doing is playing a distraction game.
It was just that when Alex was starting to get really going with his COVID death conspiracy theories, that was right when flu season was ending.
So he made a really big deal out of how the CDC was going to stop monitoring flu deaths.
He settled on that as a fake explanation for things back then, and he hasn't thought about it since.
And he just hasn't updated talking points.
Even so, in the 2021 flu season, it was estimated that the flu resulted in between 8 and 13 million cases and between 5,000 and 14,000 deaths.
It was relatively mild, as was the 2020 season, most likely because of the broad adoption of COVID mitigation strategies like social distancing and wearing masks.
People have seemed to decide that...
Shit is all done with, so whatever benefit that was bringing about is gone.
One variable that's likely unrelated to human behavior patterns is that the flu is coming early this year, and it looks like this year the H3N2 strain that's spreading is fairly severe.
That's unlucky, partially because about 26 million less people have gotten the flu vaccine than did in 2020, which conceivably could be at least...
Vax rhetoric and belief in the intervening years pushed by folks like Alex.
Yeah.
unidentified
Much of the influence that Alex and his ilk have put into the world have contributed to the pretty bleak situation we see in front of us in terms of fluency.
Yeah, I really do appreciate everyone's staunch refusal to learn the most obvious and enduring lesson of all time, which is that there will be unintended consequences of all of this bullshit.
And the COVID, while whatever it is level of, quote, we're done with it, as there may be.
The reverberations of the behaviors during that time period are going to be echoing for decades.
And the crazy thing was, you'd have a little tree next to a big one, but it would have twice as many plums on it, or twice as many pears on it, or apples.
And sometimes you'd have one of the bigger trees that grew really big and strong and looked great, but it would have almost nothing on it.
And that's what the Bible's talking about.
What?
You look at this little tree and it's loaded with apples where it's almost weighed down to the ground.
In fact, we had one tree went down to the ground.
It had so many apples on it, like just like a hundred apples.
We were making apple pies constantly and everything, just God's bounty.
And my Savior, but let's just say this, Christ is never wrong.
But when I compare my thinking to Christ, that isn't from an arrogant perspective, just be very clear.
But Christ said, you judge a tree by its fruits.
And so when I look at Elon Musk and the things he's done, promoting Neuralink and Starlink and all of it.
That kind of weighs down him being a good guy on the side of bad.
But then you look at coming out against the vaccine two years ago and saying don't take it at the start and coming out against world government and now coming out against the Ukraine war and now coming out against censorship and now saying we shouldn't get rid of fossil fuels.
They're a good thing.
We need them alongside electric while we develop better systems and that we will collapse if we don't have it.
And just on and on and on, I look at the tree that is Elon Musk, and I say, this guy's getting better and better.
There are two verses that he's referencing here with the fruit and the trees.
One of them is Luke 6.43-45, which says, For a good tree does not bear bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit.
For every tree is known by its own fruit.
For men do not gather figs from thorns, nor do they gather grapes from a bramble bush.
A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good, and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart brings forth evil.
A similar passage is found in Matthew 7, 15 through 20. Quote, Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.
You will know them by their fruits.
Do men gather grapes from thorn bushes or figs from thistles?
Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
Therefore, by their fruits you will know them.
This appears in both Luke and Matthew because both those Gospels are largely believed to have been derived from a common source.
That's a really complicated matter, so to stick to the simple stuff, Alex has no idea what these verses mean, apparently.
Even in this long, meandering plum and apple story that he's telling, Alex offers two different interpretations of how you can tell a tree by its fruit, and they're both wrong in terms of what the Bible says.
Yep.
unidentified
The first he presents is that you can tell how good a tree is, not by how big it is, but by the amount of fruit it produces.
In this actual context, the verse is really unhelpful to Alex because it would require him to put definite labels on people which are rigid and cannot be changed.
Alex can't work in that environment because he needs to be able to shift the allegiances of his imaginary allies and enemies depending on what headlines he needs to respond to, and if they're determined to be unwaveringly good or bad, it hurts his ability to make shit up as he goes along.
This is all very stupid, and it illustrates how Alex's understanding of his holy text is really just surface level, and mostly based on catchphrases he doesn't really grasp.
And naturally, this is all really just a ramp-up for Alex to explain that he'll determine whether or not Elon Musk is a good tree based on whether or not he lets Alex back on Twitter.
All right, I was already planning today, last night and this morning, to come in here on this special Sunday broadcast.
And every broadcast is special.
This is a particularly special one.
Just talk about...
Why there's a war on children and why the real currency of this satanic global elite and their minions is hurting and killing children.
And then this afternoon, when I was going through clips and doing research here about three hours ago at the office, I saw a clip of Laura Logan, the famous investigative journalist, who they're really demonizing and attacking now for coming out against the poison shots and the globalists.
And she was talking about...
Why they target children as an affront to God.
And that's really what it's all about.
And then they're given basically evil rewards by the God of this world for what they do.
I'm not sure if the problem people had with Laura Logan was that she said there's a war on children and it's done as an affront to God.
That kind of commentary probably would preclude her from being on a network that's trying to do serious work.
But she was on Newsmax, so that's not a big deal there.
Her comments were so inappropriate that Newsmax had to put out a statement saying they wouldn't interview her again.
She was a guest on Eric Bolling's show, and she said, quote, They may think that they're going to become gods.
That's what they tell us.
You know, the ones who want us eating insects, cockroaches, and that while they dine on the blood of our children?
Those are the people, right?
They're not gonna win.
So Logan's blood-libel-laden QAnon rant was just another step on her path to full-on public conspiracy lunatic, and a lot of people have this notion that she's fallen so far.
She was formerly the chief foreign affairs correspondent at CBS News, which is a lofty position compared to someone no longer welcome on Newsmax, but the reality is she'd already fallen from grace.
She was put on leave of absence by CBS in 2013 after an internal investigation found that her reporting on Benghazi was fraudulent and that, quote, key elements of the story were untrue.
Her reporting relied heavily on a story told by a contractor named Dylan Davies who was lying to her.
Davies spawned a story about how he'd gotten into combat during the attack and he'd seen Ambassador Stevens' body, but unfortunately he'd already told the FBI that he never left the villa that evening and that he hadn't been on the scene at all.
Logan did not follow up on details of Davey's story that would have indicated credibility problems.
She also failed to disclose that he had a book deal selling his fraudulent story about what he did during the attack.
No, it's kind of like what, just off the top of my head, somebody like Alex might do is interview somebody who's completely lying about their credentials and then inflating it and then putting it out on TV.
So in the past few years, she's become just another raving nut that's allowed to spread nonsense on conservative platforms.
She had a show on Fox Nation but was fired earlier this year and now she's rambling about Q shit and blood libel with Eric Bolling and getting the boot from Newsmax.
What I'm saying is that she's a prime candidate for Alex to hire, and I think it makes total sense for him to come to her defense.
She's unwelcome anywhere else, and Alex could really use anybody with a little clout.
It's just like, I wish it would be so much, it's so simple, too, because it's just like, hey, do you know why their number one thing is attacking children?
Because if I tell you that, then maybe it'll override your emotional center long.
That you won't think for two seconds and realize that I'm full of shit.
So this is stupid, and we're not gonna run out of diesel fuel.
Alex just saw Tucker tweet something that was incorrect, and now he's reporting on that tweet as if he's looked into the story at all.
The comments that were made is that there's a 25-day supply of diesel fuel in the country, which was to say that if all production were to stop immediately, it would run out in 25 days.
The thing is that production didn't stop, and it isn't stopping, so there's no date where the fuel is just going to be magically gone.
An economics professor explained to CBS News that we generally have a supply that would last about 35 to 40 days out, but there's a tightening of supply and an increase of demand that's slightly lowering that window.
But it'll adjust back eventually.
The point is that diesel isn't running out.
This is just a dumb lie Alex is using to scare his listeners.
Also, let's be clear.
If we had an impending date that was less than a month out where we'd be entirely out of diesel fuel and we had no plan in place to adapt to that, that would be a catastrophe.
Most of our trucking delivery folks rely on it to bring food around the country among countless other goods that need to be transported.
If these trucks all simultaneously became immobile, it's difficult to estimate the amount of death that could result in.
He knows this is meaningless, but the audience doesn't stick around unless you give them ample reason to be scared, so he just tosses this bullshit on the pile knowing it means nothing.
They released a 911 call on Friday, but it got no attention.
But today, the San Francisco police released the fact that Mr. Pelosi and the man half his age, who was a hippie from a nudist colony, not a right-winger, were in his bedroom, both in their underwear, with hammers.
When someone else let...
The police in, and they have the 911 call where Pelosi said, I'm here with and named the man my friend, and he's attacking me.
So Pelosi is circling the toilet bowl very, very quickly, 80-something years old, and you got two dudes in their underwear in a bedroom with hammers.
So there's no evidence that Pelosi and DePape were in their underwear when the police arrived.
Pelosi was asleep when DePape broke into the house, so he was in a pajama shirt and boxer shorts, so you could say that's his underwear.
Initial reporting from KTVU Fox 2 had incorrectly said that DePape was...
of him being in his shorts.
Right.
unidentified
Paul Pelosi answered the door, but the phrasing of the initial police report, it didn't specify who had answered the door, leading right-wing media figures to just assume that it must have meant that there was a third person there.
The websites and writings that were found created by DePape were not fake.
He did have a bit of a hippie phase back in, like, 2013, but had since descended deeply into extreme right-wing bullshit, much of which matches up pretty well with the stuff Alex yells about every day.
He had a blog where he explained that he was radicalized by Gamergate, as is the case for so many Ding Dongs, and after that point, he went off the conspiracy deep end.
He has posts including climate change denial, transphobia, nonsense about the Great Reset, Second Amendment fears, 2020 election conspiracies, and of course Holocaust denial.
It's fair enough to say that he had a phase where he was into a presumably left-wing hippie nudist lifestyle, but that ended a long time ago.
I'm not sure if anyone really wants to call this the new January 6th.
It's an act that's on a completely different scale from a mob invading the Capitol, but it would also be dishonest to not recognize some important similarities.
Both events involved someone targeting Nancy Pelosi.
At least in some capacity, they were motivated by conspiracy bullshit about the election being stolen.
Both events involved people bringing zip ties, which gives some indication of an intent to take hostages.
...
The same knee-jerk denial is being employed because this attack threatens him in a way that's the same as January 6th did.
It can't be allowed to be seen as the natural conclusion to his ideology and rhetoric because then as a society we might wake the fuck up and start taking this stuff seriously.
The extreme right-wing community learned their lesson from how huge a setback the Oklahoma City bombing was to the ability for militia groups and extremist cells to organize, and they don't want to have to do that work again of re-normalizing themselves.
So they don't want something to be very well understood to be like, oh yeah, this is kind of what you're going to end up having.
I want to thank the listeners and viewers and the crew for being so steadfast in this fight because we're being vindicated and we have a good chance of stopping the globalists together.
And by the day, more and more people shift their perspective from being a nice, good person, which you still are, but to thinking like a globalist and reading their own documents and understanding just how evil they are.
And it's hard to get your mind around, but once you see things through their eyes...
This is how Alex gets away with the fact that his primary sources don't say what he claims they do.
You can't read a document and just think it means what it says.
No, no, no.
Before you read it, you need to run that document through the globalist filter.
A Homeland Security paper might suggest extending refugee status to a larger number of people, and you could accept that means that the author is suggesting that the U.S. should extend refugee status to a larger number of people.
But if you're able to think like a globalist, then you can clearly see that what they're really suggesting is that hundreds of millions of unvetted immigrants are going to be a Right.
The game is really transparent, but honestly, I haven't heard Alex express it quite like this very often.
You can't just read things.
You have to read them using code.
And for an added bonus, Alex has just made up these globalists and imagined what their plans are, so guess who gets to be the sole arbiter of how the code is translated?
Once an audience accepts this kind of bullshit, they're essentially allowing one demagogue to be their sole contact point with reality.
Alex has appointed himself as the person Right.
It's really pretty abusive, but on the other hand, it's just dumb.
Context is important, and understanding the jargon that's used in various fields is critical to understanding how to read documents, but pretending that they're written in some kind of a sneaky code that only Alex's dumb ideology can unlock, that's a kid's game.
He might as well tell the audience that he has a signed confession from Klaus Schwab, but it's written in invisible ink.
Another critical issue is that Alex is basically the worst person you can trust about whether or not something is real.
90% of what you just said also applies to the Pope.
Second, I think one of the other things in there that he accidentally revealed is just that, listen, once you get this, you'll go from being a nice person...
I mean, you'll still be nice, which is a good way of saying you're going to become more violent if you start behaving and thinking the way that I have described over time.
Like, he's literally saying, if you do this right, eventually you will break into Paul Pelosi's house.
But yeah, Saturday shows, they actually do get a bigger crowd because they're not on the radios.
It's a bottleneck.
Right, right, right.
Still, generally, those are often under a million.
From there, we see a big drop-off.
Harrison Smith's American Journal is typically between 10,000 and 15,000 views, which is a disaster.
Owen's War Room usually hovers around a little over 30,000, which is similarly awful for what they're doing.
Greg Reese's special reports often get between 500,000 and a million views, which I believe is the highest consistent viewership of the Infowars in-house team.
Paul Joseph Watson has a minuscule amount of viewers because he's still on other platforms, and why would you go to Alex's site when you can get that shit somewhere else?
None of the three episodes of the Stone Zone that he's posted in the past month have over 600 views, which is because he's primarily on Frank's speech now.
People just go there.
And most of the other shit on this website is a ghost town.
If you really stop and think about it, maybe if the overhead wasn't so high, they wouldn't have chased after so many of these false flag stories so hard to get money, and then where would we be now?
So I'm going to say this right now and then hit all the other huge...
Economy news, Russia war news, Pelosi, what really happened at the attack at the House that wasn't an attack, that was some type of bondage, trust gone bad, it looks like, another drug-fueled type operation.
All the evidence is leaning towards.
We're going to hit all of that coming up and more.
I want to just tell the listeners something, the viewers something.
You want somebody to take on the Democratic Party?
You want somebody to take on the Deep State?
You want somebody to take on the ADL, Southern Poverty Law Center?
And take on the big media?
Big tech, all of it?
We're doing it.
So, we are recognized by the globalists as the biggest threat to their criminal enterprise.
And so I know most of the listeners get this, but I want to really sink in to the masses of people that tune in here and never spread the word or never go buy a book or a supplement or a film or a t-shirt.
We don't have George Soros and the New World Order funding us.
And this is looking more and more like some type of homosexual interlude or rendezvous.
And I'll give it to Paul Pelosi.
At least it wasn't the kid that was in there.
The 40-year-old man.
My issue here is how they've spun the whole thing, put up fake websites that he was a right-winger when he was a leftist, nudist, big Democrat supporter on record.
That's all been confirmed.
And the websites put up Friday saying he was a right-wing QAnon person are not true.
It is like, I don't know how to be angrier that you can just say, like, ah, see, it looks like it was gay.
Guess what?
Now we can still be terrorists.
That's so fucking...
And it doesn't even make sense.
If you're telling me there's a hostage situation and both men are in their underwear with hammers, I'm thinking that the guy who took hostages is a weird guy who made him get in his underwear and then got in his own underwear and gave him a hammer.
And so they waited until Sunday to release today that Pelosi is refusing to release surveillance footage to them, and Paul Pelosi was in his underwear in a bedroom with him, and that he'd gone in the bathroom and called the police, but then come back out and join the man.
Then they began to hit each other with hammers again.
And the police aimed guns at him and said, put your hammer down.
And the younger man did not put his hammer down and continued to try to attack Pelosi, but they didn't shoot him because they could obviously tell this was some kind of weirdo stuff going on.
If I break into a room and there's two men naked, like, wearing their underwear with...
Both of them having hammers brandishing them towards each other.
My thought is not like, oh, they're probably having some sort of sex game.
My thought is like, this is like hour five of some sort of fight, like a Family Guy cartoon fight that lasted over six settings and over time their clothes ripped off as time went on until they wound up here like with hammers.
Like that's the only thing that makes sense to me.
So Alex continues his streak of being completely wrong about things he gives a 99% chance of being right about.
David DePaype has actually already, he's been arrested, he confessed to a crime, and he's going to jail for a long time.
Yeah.
unidentified
He's charged with, quote, one count of assault on an immediate family member of a U.S. official with the intent to retaliate against the official on account of the performance of official duties, which could land him three.
Alex is reporting based on some dumb shit he saw on social media, but Politico reached out to police, and PolitiFact spoke to Pelosi's spokesperson, and they both said that claim is false.
So you might think that Alex is being homophobic by saying studying the lifestyles of these people leads you to believe that they're on meth or on coke.
But what you don't understand is he's talking about the lifestyles of Hammer people.
So Alex says he's questioning, but this isn't questioning anything.
This is Alex lying about misreported details and bullshit memes he's seen on right-wing social media, which he's then laundering into being stuff that's been concretely reported by the police.
It's fine to question things and retain an open mind until you hear more details about situations, but that is not what Alex is doing.
He's constructing an alternative reality based on nothing for his audience to live in so they don't have to realize how much they have in common with the guy who tried to kidnap the Speaker of the House.
It isn't good for business for Alex to let his audience realize how far down the extremist road he's taken them.
Because you might wake up and be like, oh, shit.
You know, you might look around and look to your left or look to Yeah.
He posted a link to an article from a fake news outlet called the Santa Monica Observer, which is a publication that has reported in the past that Hillary Clinton was dead back in 2016, and that Trump had appointed Kanye West to a high-level post in the Department of the Interior, and also that Bill Gates caused polio.
Musk was understandably embarrassed when this stuff was pointed out about the thing he linked to, so he deleted the tweet, and he didn't learn a single lesson.
We have the Russians officially saying they have evidence that British military working with NATO blew up the Nord Stream 2. And there's a big viral video.
One version of it has like 10 million views.
Whether it's about pushing against vaccinations, promoting Alex Jones, Kyrie Irving doesn't care about the impact of his words.
He's just a wealthy, entitled individual who wants the benefits of existing in a society without responsibilities.
And so they're demonizing him.
He's responded to tweeting this video that I can't even count up how many views it's got.
I mean, some versions have 15 million views.
There's dozens of versions with millions of views.
It's safe to say this has got 100 million views.
And it's 20 years ago, a minute and a half clip, where I just lay out the future that would be unfolding.
Yeah, so Russia has proof that the UK did that shit with the pipelines, but more importantly...
We could be like other more professional shows that would be like teasing it out in advance, you know, like making it an event as opposed to just being like, hey, that thing that everybody loves, we're just going to throw that out on our Wednesday episode for fun.