I'm just saying that if you're gonna do Uncle Howdy, and you're gonna elevate it into something that's legitimately scary, you give him the child- And cover him in blood.
That's the combination that you gotta go down if it's Uncle Howdy.
The Pelosi's don't want the footage from their surveillance cameras that the Congressional Capitol Police, where they've expanded offices around the country, turns out they've got HD video of all this, but they don't want the footage released, ladies and gentlemen.
They just don't want to talk about two men in their underwear with hammers in a bedroom.
Normally, I think whenever I've lied to my bosses about something that's happened, I've felt bad about it and they might not believe me.
You know, those types of things.
I mean, if you're working for Alex Jones and you got your ass kicked in a law situation, you could just lie to him and he'll be like, that sounds more true than that we got our ass kicked for lying all the time.
We're not releasing why there were two naked men or men in underwear with hammers in a bedroom that Paul Pelosi said he knew and was a friend named David.
He's just making up his conclusions and proclamations as he goes along, so he probably doesn't even realize that what he's saying is that it's become more likely that the Pelosi home invasion was a real event since the last time he put a number on it.
David DePape wasn't part of a hallucinogenic cult any more than Joe Rogan is.
I would bet that he did do some drugs during his time living with some San Francisco nudists, but that's a bit of a distance from a hallucinogen cult, unless you're a member of Alex's audience.
Then you'll actually believe that cities are burning and demons walk the streets of every urban center cackling and threatening any conservative who dares show their face.
That audience might be naive enough to buy that shit, but...
So Alex mentions DePape's girlfriend there, which is a reference to the high-profile nudism activist in San Francisco, Gypsy Taub.
Is that okay?
Probably not.
It should be pointed out that she wasn't a nudist activist in the 70s, which is kind of where your mind goes.
It's closer to the 90s and early 2000s.
She was a local character and actually has a ton in common with Alex.
For instance, she was a huge 9-11 truther.
She even had a public access show about 9-11 called Uncensored 9-11, which eventually became a show called My Naked Truth, where she would host a talk show naked.
I guess Alex didn't do his show naked, but he got his start in public access and he was super into 9-11 conspiracies, so him and Tob would probably have a lot to bond over.
You may notice that Alex says that she's in jail for...
Typically, this would be Alex using suggestive language to implant ideas in his audience's head.
Sure.
In this case, however, he just doesn't actually know any of the details of the case, but he feels like he heard something that was like, ah, maybe it's pedophilic, but he wants to keep it vague just in case he needs to change things up.
Tob is in jail for stalking and harassing a former friend of her son's, who she sent messages expressing her love for, and who she made actions towards attempting to kidnap.
He was in the ninth grade at the time, and her actions are reprehensible.
There's no indication that DePape had any involvement with that stuff, though, because he and Tob split in 2015, and she has said that even at that point, he was less a romantic partner and more of a roommate and someone who took care of the kids, who may be his kids as well.
It's reported that he's the father of her children, but this whole thing is chaotic and I have no idea what's what.
Taub married a 20-year-old named James Smith in 2013, and DePape and her lost contact a little bit after that point.
She told the San Francisco Chronicle that she assumed he'd, quote, completely lost his mind after that point.
Taub does make some interesting points, inasmuch as she felt that DePape wasn't really a Trump guy or a right-winger, which might seem true to her on the surface.
The nature of this conspiracy world that's so prominent now involves a denial about the actual political underpinning of the conspiracy beliefs that you hold.
You may think that you're just opposed to the deep state cabal or something and have no connection at all to the ways that the conspiracy belief is used to invalidate and attack any kind of federal bureaucracy, let's say.
In your mind, you're against demons who drink children's blood, but the real-world implications of your belief serves only explicitly right-wing political goals.
You might notice that no one arrives at left-leaning politics by obsessing about Soros or Klaus Schwab, and there's a reason for that.
It's a dynamic that's built in.
You're not supposed to realize how all this conspiracy is geared towards funneling you towards an extreme right-wing political set that you don't identify as extreme right.
Well, I mean, because people don't talk about it in its totality for the most part, people aren't saying, once these far-right billionaires and such get into power, they slowly or quickly erode all of the safe...
So, Alex makes an announcement, and, like, I mean, we're recording this on Sunday, and I might have a really bad week ahead of me, because he's tempting me to get back on my bullshit a little bit.
We're going to be here next Tuesday, right through to probably two in the morning, but they admit they're going to try to steal the battleground states, so we're going to be here Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday.
All this talk about violence and imminent Republican violence and Republicans are going to pull something big, that signals major false flag or provocateur operations, which is a big staple that governments use all over the place.
They try to demonize me for popularizing the term false flag, but now the State Department has press conferences about Russia, they claim, is staging false flags.
But he talks to a guy, and he's from Australia, and Alex is obsessed with the idea that COVID lockdowns are coming back and what have you, because apparently in Wuhan, they had a small lockdown, and it's because China has a zero COVID policy, and they've done this a couple times periodically over the last year, even.
And Trudeau's doing that in Canada, and Europe's doing it, and the Democrats are planning it here, absolutely.
They're planning to come back with the same assault.
unidentified
Two more points as well.
Go ahead, go ahead.
Two points.
With the corruption, for example, in South Australia, here in Adelaide, the judges are involved in shipping in drugs, and I think it's even deeper than that, and I think it's involved with the spy agencies as well.
And it's also why you see there's a rise in youth crime across Australia.
And these young people also are threatened with violence and some to escape that in their own lives.
And as well, up in APY lands in South Australia, where the British military tested nukes back in the 60s.
I can't remember exactly.
It's primarily just an Indigenous population.
And I've talked to Indigenous people up there, and they tell me about all these things they see and all these experimental things flying in the air, and they believe it's God, but it's clearly technology that is not of this planet, and we have no business touching it.
Alright, so I guess nuclear testing has caused flying things that are alien technology to be about, and we should not deal with any kind of nuclear technology because it's not of this earth.
Long pause.
Very interesting.
Let's get back to that COVID stuff, because I don't even want to address any of this.
It makes me think of that exchange that I had when we were in Hawaii, and I saw a guy who was complaining about Democratic politicians, and normally I would just be like, I don't even want, I just ignore it, but I was like, ha ha ha!
Yeah, but that's, I mean, Alex has to understand that a lot of his callers, if not kept to a very short amount of time, are going to reveal some kind of a position or idea that they have that makes their other positions that he wants to hear about look a little silly.
It would be confusing to imagine that Paul Pelosi could take to Pape in a fight.
really relevant because they weren't fighting.
DePaype wasn't there to attack or kill Paul.
He was perfectly fine waiting around with him until Nancy returned.
Paul didn't have to fight off DePaype, which is why this situation really isn't that confusing.
And he just doesn't...
Get that.
Asking for evidence isn't the new conspiracy theory, but it is really fun that Cernovich is still a name that people like Alex say without feeling intense shame.
What Cernovich is describing is the same old game the conspiracy theorists have always played.
Essentially, it goes like this.
There's an event that you desperately don't want people to accept as real because it's super threatening to your political project or propaganda business model.
You don't really have any direct means of invalidating the event and you can't really claim that it didn't happen, so what you do is you make a ridiculous demand and insist that it's suspicious that your demand isn't being met.
The public has no right to the surveillance video from the Pelosi household and the police have already said that the claim that they've refused to turn it over to the authorities is false.
But through repetition and an insistence that you would totally believe the story if they just made that video public, you can convince your audience that it's a reasonable demand and that it makes no sense that the Pelosi's wouldn't release the footage.
Cernovich and Alex don't actually want any footage to be released because they know damn well that it wouldn't prove anything that they want proven.
All they want is the ability to use the fact that it's not released as some kind of a means to introduce suspicion and doubt in their audience, and you can see clearly that it works.
So one of the things that's really a through line throughout this episode is Biden gave a speech and he talked about how there's going to be, you know, we may not have an answer for all of the midterm elections on election night.
You know, there's going to be some ballot counting that may take a while.
That Biden is telling people, we're about to steal it, naturally.
So that's sort of the game that Alex is playing on here.
And so this caller has some thoughts about that.
unidentified
Yeah, Alex, with Biden's speech last night, why would you tactically follow up the Philadelphia speech, which was so badly received, with this speech last night, and sprinkle in some, hey, it's going to take us some time to count the votes, okay?
He was prepping everybody not to question the steal and saying that he was elected totally fair and square, the cleanest election ever, and then demonizing his opposition and then saying that they're going to try to steal the next election.
That's what he said.
unidentified
Yeah, nothing about how the country's going, nothing about how to change how badly things are going.
Or the other way I guess you could read this is Alex saying that the media coverage of it has a script where DePaype didn't actually say where's Nancy and everybody is just saying that so they could connect it to January 6th.
Which is really, really important to keep this in mind, because if this conspiracy is true, that means that when Alex is asking why were they found in their underwear with hammer...
One of the advantages that Alex has is that callers also don't ask follow-up questions, and so it can just sort of lay there as there was a script, and it doesn't really mean it.
You want to think that you're an individual iconoclast that acts like everybody else wishes they could, and instead you're someone listening to Alex Jones daily.
Hey, so the liberal Democrats, they just, you know, they tell us what they're going to do and they keep, you know, like stealing the elections, all that stuff.
So we go and vote, but they're still telling us they're going to steal it and do all this crap.
They just do it in front of us, but there's nothing we can really do?
You know what I mean?
What happens when we vote and they just steal it again?
Plus, if the whole scheme relies on fraudulent votes and dead people's names, where are the examples of that happening in 2020?
Alex seems to believe it's a rock-solid case that that's what they are doing and what they plan to do, so it seems weird that I don't think I've ever heard him cite one example of it happening.
Did you know that if you cast an absentee ballot but you die before election day that they will invalidate your ballot?
That happened to 3,469 voters in Michigan alone.
Weird.
PolitiFact reviewed news reports of instances where people cast ballots on behalf of dead people and found that, quote, Republicans were more often the perpetrators.
And this isn't always a malicious form of fraud either.
Sometimes it's one of the cases where someone dies after casting an absentee ballot and the system doesn't catch it.
That does happen sometimes.
Or in many cases, it could be a relative or a loved one of the deceased person who fell in the house.
felt like casting the vote in their name would have been in keeping in line with their wishes.
Yeah, I mean, ironically, that might be the only way to save democracy, is if they were to actually take up arms, everybody would be like, maybe this problem is too big to ignore for now.
Instead, we're going to be like, eh, we'll just let them do it for another few years, and then we'll live into fascism.
I have a PhD, so I just don't follow anybody for any reason.
And I believe that we will win the election, but we have to be vigilant.
Because they are going to try to steal it, as we saw today on Infowars News, that a judge in Arizona is stopping the mule watchers, which is ridiculous.
Yeah, I think that if Alex had been doing this kind of stuff, like back in the 9-11 days and all this, his career would not have gone the same way as it would, because a lot of those people who were like, Ostensibly skeptic-leaning and kind of atheist, but also have some leanings towards conspiracy.
They would see him for the religious zealot that he actually is.
And I don't think that he would have had any traction outside of the extreme right militia folks and the Christian identity folks.
And I think that would have been a better reality.
they're going to steal it again based on this joe biden speech of course sure uh very dumb hi alex um cincinnati loves you cincinnati ohio um there's a big red I can't wait to see what they do.
No, you're certainly right that we forced the corruption out in the open, and now we're going to make them steal it in front of us again.
That's just going to cause an even bigger awakening.
So people say, well, they're just going to steal it again.
That'll just make people more mad.
That's what I'm saying.
I think the deep staters are going to let the Republicans win the House, maybe even get a few seats in the Senate, but they're going to mitigate this massive realignment that just happened.
And so, because they know stealing two in a row is too much, then they're going to have a partial sale.
Well, and it's also a little bit like, you know, when we talk about voter fraud, that kind of stuff, it happens more often because Republicans do it than Democrats, that kind of thing.
And that's partially just psychological, you know, like...
I have something I'd like to donate to your legal fund, and I'd like you to put me on hold after a call because I have actually a Picasso and Warhol that I'd like to donate to your legal fund.
The cheapest of Picasso's paintings still sell for over $100,000, and some are valued in the tens of millions.
In order for this guy to have this painting, someone would have had to pay a shitload for it, and if you're in the position to pay for a piece of art like that, you could just donate money to Alex instead of parting with a legitimate piece of history that it's only going to appreciate in value.
The value of Warhol pieces is a bit more variable.
His Maryland painting sold earlier this year for $195 million, but there are a bunch of his works that are substantially cheaper than that.
If this is real, and I have misgivings about that, it represents a deeply fanatical and unhealthy attachment to making sure Alex stays wealthy.
Whatever amount he could possibly get from selling these artworks will absolutely not make an impact on his ability to carry out his legal case, and honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Alex would just keep them.
Like, why not?
It's an investment.
If you have a Picasso, there's not going to be more of them.
Anything folks want to donate, we should create like a donate at Infowars.com where you can send us emails of what you want to donate.
And you've got my pledge.
If you donate a truck or sell it, give us the proceeds.
Or you donate a painting, 100% We'll go to fund this operation.
Now, quite frankly, I agreed to a deal, I'll just be honest with listeners, where I'm currently getting paid $40,000 a month to work here, and I could live off that.
I don't need a bunch of, I got a truck and I got a car and a nice, decent house with a little pool in the back, and I just, I'm a suburban guy.
But the bankruptcy court said, I've got to pay 40% of the legal bills.
Him saying that it's like a modest living is pretty wild, and saying it in the same breath where he's asking people to donate their cars to help him pay his legal fees is just amazing.
Also, why is Alex surprised that he has to pay part of his legal expenses?
He's being sued, and he owns 100% of the company that's being sued with him.
I'd be willing to bet that he would be able to offload all of that onto the company, but I bet he has some language in his corporate policies where he doesn't cover legal expenses for employees.
I didn't even know how insolvent we were a year ago.
The money came in.
God will provide again.
Or it's time in God's plan for me to downsize or not be on air.
And I don't want to quit.
I'll never quit.
But I'll keep fighting as hard as I can.
And then if God decides that I'm not supposed to have the support working through you, if you decide God working through you, that means you, if you decide to take me out of the game...
I appreciate this, because the thought occurred to me that we've had a lot of situations where you could take Alex Jones' clips from his shows and play them in a school setting, and you could learn a lot from them.
For lawyers, if you want to become a better lawyer, you can play some Alex Jones clips.
You know what not to do.
You know how to not be a bad lawyer.
That also...
Accounts for business.
I forgot about that.
You could get an NBA by not doing what Alex tells you to do or says he's doing on his show.
But when Biden occasionally tells the truth, he says, I'm going to go after the oil companies, they're definitely globalists, and they're definitely part of the whole problem.
No, when we say, if you do the numbers, it planes out to, they will not have any new supplies, and it'll be behind schedule and major shortages starting in like 12 days.
And it's been done because Biden shut down one of the biggest diesel refineries.
He curtailed it with regulators and a bunch of others.
They've shut down a bunch of delivery systems.
There are supply problems.
I mean, I talk to oil company folks that work at every level of it.
A lot of my family works at every level, from roughnecks to plant managers to delivery companies, you name it.
And they have been scavenging the last three years under the lockdowns and control.
For oil, well, and gas equipment and parts to plants.
And so a lot of the parts aren't made here, and so they can't get the parts, and the plants are breaking down.
Does that make sense?
unidentified
Yeah, it kind of makes me want to scream like my screaming goat here.
What he's saying is all nonsense, though, but it doesn't matter.
Alex is just trying to find a way for his conspiracy to make sense by making things up as he goes along, and it's a really good way, if you want to do this, a good way to do it is to make up personal stories from random people that you know to defend your points.
So in reality, there have been nine oil refineries that have been shut down or scaled back since the COVID pandemic began, and most of them happened under Trump's presidency.
Another was damaged in Hurricane Ida, and one had an explosion in 2019 that's still limiting its capacity.
There's a confluence of variables that are affecting the situation with Diesel, but it's not going to run out in the middle of December, and as time goes on, the price will stabilize and trend downward.
None of the stuff Alex is saying has any connection to reality, and if it did, he wouldn't spend so much of his time covering this dumb Paul Pelosi story, and he'd have no patience for screaming goats and clown horns.
Although that guy's my favorite caller in a long time.
I'm having a big shotgun with us for the rest of the hour and taking your phone calls.
David and Chris and Carlos and Bart and Summer and Cody and JP and Antonio and Chris is one of my good friends and one of the best talk show hosts out there, not just journalist and political activist, Drew Hernandez.
At an age of censorship, he's still able to break through.
I think he's probably had, I saw, 50 million views of his reports the last...
So we've talked about Drew Hernandez a little bit in the past.
He's one of the people I've collectively referred to as the baby reporters who show up on InfoWars from time to time, along with Savannah Hernandez and Patrick Howley.
There are people who give me a distinct vibe of angry immaturity that's being enabled and boosted by right-wing media outlets like Alex.
And for Drew and Savannah, they use Turning Point USA as well.
Howley probably isn't welcome at TPUSA because of his more overt America First associations and almost comical anti-Semitism.
This facade dropped pretty quick, and it became clear that he was just trying to go out and get footage at protests that he could use to make Antifa bait for the right-wing media.
That's his whole stock and trade.
This culminated in him being a defense witness in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, which is a little bit weird considering he was on the payroll of the right-wing media outlet Real America's Voice at the time, and he didn't actually see the shootings.
Drew is essentially somebody who saw the success and profitability of what Andy Ngo was doing and got into the same lane.
His work is meaningless, and it's just meant to incite based on distorting reality with selective editing and telling half stories.
Further, he's intensely boring, and he's not good at talking.
I heard his name come up.
I almost turned this episode off, but I decided to keep going only because Alex was still allegedly taking calls and some of these weirdos are worth the time.
But there's still, like, even if you can't make yourself into, like, a really high-level person in this game, there's still a lot of money to be made on that con.
Sounds like he's a guy who's out reporting and his suit's just a little too big.
But yeah, the phenomenon that Alex is discussing is really just based on his feelings.
And it's because of the way, I mean, it's at least partially contributed to by social media, the way that everybody's clamoring for information, and the way that the media now covers these elections like sports contests.
You know, those kinds of influences make it feel like we should have things immediately.
And it distorts your memories of how things were in the past.
It's pretty regular for elections to not really be fully counted until the next day or days later.
It has nothing to do with the electronicness of it.
Because if you're going to make that argument, we saw Brazil...
Just do an election overnight, right?
So if you're complaining about that, then just say, let's change it to do what somebody else does, instead of being like, wow, this country's over, I think we should do fascism.
And I mean, literally the only time in my lifetime that I can think, well, the only time I can think of in the past hundred years that an election was actually stolen, it was the same way that the other elections have been stolen, which is the Supreme Court or a bunch of rich white dudes got together and were like, here's what we'll do.
Democracy fucked up this time.
How about you get one and I get one and we call it the day?
Alex, I'll say this is, I mean, in the perspective of propaganda, right?
Number one, the elites, they view themselves as higher, more intellectual gods of the universe.
So these people come out and they say what they're going to do before they do it preemptively because, number one, for the sake of propaganda, because they need to put out this narrative one week ahead of time.
And at the same time, they're literally jailing the true to vote leaders that were behind the 2000 Mules movie that exposed their geo tracking.
What was going on during 2020?
Oh, how convenient.
They're shutting them down.
They're censoring all kinds of people on social media while at the.
simultaneously for people to accept the fact that this upcoming midterm is going to take days, possibly weeks to come to a conclusion.
Because they need to set the propaganda they need to set the stage first There are millions of people in this country, not the viewers, but these moron, woke-tart idiots that believe these elites and whatever they say is gospel.
Number one, that's why they do it.
Number two, they do it, Alex, because they know they can.
Because they view themselves more powerful, more greater, as a god, as if their word is literally gospel and is the end of all things.
When I was at Barack Obama's rally last night in Phoenix before I told him, one thing that I heard continually and consistently throughout all the Democrat candidates, they're making mail-in voting some kind of trendy thing.
It's kind of cringe, but at the same time, because their face is so stupid and low IQ and doesn't think anything through, they just believe whatever they say, They've made mail-in voting like some kind of new technological trendy thing that everyone should just be a part of and doing.
He attended a rally that Obama was speaking at in Arizona, and he wouldn't stop yelling while Obama was speaking, so he got kicked out of the event, while Obama told him he needed to be polite and that if he wanted to speak so bad, he should set up his own rally.
He got some attention for that, but unfortunately he didn't get invited to go on Tucker to talk about how his free speech was stifled, and that proves that Obama's a tyrant, but better luck next time.
Maybe it'll work out, and this is what we call journalism.
Targeted by the FBI, targeted by the three-letter agencies, declared a domestic terrorist.
This is what they'll say, too.
A threat to democracy, right?
Being an individual that cares.
And it doesn't matter whether you're on the right or the left.
This is what the left doesn't understand.
If you care about your voter process and you show up watching a ballot box throughout the night, they'll come after you and accuse you of being a domestic terrorist and a threat to democracy.
This is what the left doesn't get.
It's not about left or right.
It's about the regime at the top that wants to control all of us because these globalists and satanists are real.
And they want to control elections because they want to control the people.
We have no democracy.
They're always talking about democracy, Alex.
Democracy, democracy, democracy.
Okay, well, what about Klaus Schwab?
Who the hell elected that guy?
What about Bill Gates?
Who the hell elected that guy?
What about the World Economic Forum?
Making decisions on behalf of the United States of America in the West on foreign soil.
This is some childish shit, and his analysis of the situation and the relationship between the World Economic Forum and the government is non-existent.
There's no analysis.
He knows he's supposed to be mad about this stuff and at these people because that's what the right-wing media audience eats up, so he does it.
It's performative outrage, and there's nothing really behind it.
He even trips himself up about the whole idea that we have no democracy at the end there because he knows...
It's not that there's no democracy in the country, it's that the Democrats and the Republicans that I don't like are puppets of the World Economic Forum.
This kind of destroys the whole premise that there's no democracy, because if you were able to get the support, you could unseat those Democrats and bad Republicans and only elect people who are hostile to Klaus Schwab.
It doesn't matter that he's basically contradicted himself in the course of a minute because the actual things he's saying don't really mean anything.
It's about eliciting an emotional response and then directing those emotions into negative feelings towards your political enemies.
It's something Alex does a bit better and less transparently than Drew, but Drew's young and also has no discernible convictions past getting attention, so it makes sense that Alex would be better at it.
Also, poll watching is totally fine.
There are tons of poll watchers who operate within acceptable guidelines.
What's not okay is voter intimidation, which is what Drew and Alex are defending.
This has become popular in Alex's crew since at least 2015, but wasn't much of an issue before that because he didn't really have strong convictions about presidential candidates.
Ron Paul never made it out of a primary, so it never really was an issue.
In the lead-up to the 2016 election, Larry Nichols was on the show stressing the need for armed groups to be outside every polling place, and he made an effort to organize around this.
In 2020, these ideas continued to circulate heavily in right-wing media, and Roger Stone made some pushes in that the original Stop the Steal ideas.
And clearly, these were not attempts to defend election integrity.
They were thinly disguised motivations to make people scared to vote.
This is happening again this cycle, because of course it is.
In Mesa, Arizona, armed individuals with their faces covered were seen patrolling, leading to a Trump-backed group called Clean Elections USA being ordered by the court to stay at least 75 feet from drop boxes and ordered not to follow or speak to voters.
This is because they were doing that shit.
Voters reported people watching them from hiding in bushes, people watching them with binoculars, and even taking photos of voters' license plates.
One voter reported to the DOJ, And here's the thing.
I totally understand the vigilantes doing this voter intimidation.
If they truly believe the bullshit that folks like Alex and Drew yell about day after day, why wouldn't they harass people at the polls and ballot boxes?
They have to believe that the election is being stolen and to not do something like what they're doing would be to let that happen.
These people are wrong and what they're doing is horrible, but it's the natural conclusion of the rhetoric that Alex and Tucker use every day.
If you believe the things that these demagogues say, These actions make total sense.
If you believe that, say, somebody is super evil, acting without any consequences, and there's no one who will hold them accountable, maybe you think the only way to do it is to go to their house and smash their fucking kneecaps.
So anyway, we have one last clip here, because I grew bored of this baby, and they didn't get back to Caldas for a while, and by that time, the charm of the guy with the clown horn had kind of worn off.
I think it's a continual controlled demolition from within of our society.
And the number one thing that takes down a society, a democracy or a constitutional Republic or any functioning, uh, Money?
on planet Earth, is a voting process.
When you take that away, that is the voice of the people.
And when you begin to sabotage that, that is taking away the voice of the people.
So these people know that.
They're far, far advanced enough to understand that this is how it works in foreign countries that are communist, that are globalist, that are socialist.
They know that the only way to truly take away power from the people is to take away their vote and also to take away their voice.
That's why censorship and election meddling and fraud and tampering go hand in hand for a totalitarian regime because those two things need to be functioning simultaneously in order to have a healthy society or a healthy group of people here on planet Earth.
These globalists, these people, they know this because they're all energized by Satan and Lucifer.
What I mean by that is Lucifer, Satan, has been around longer than us for a very long time.
unidentified
How long?
Has studied human behavior for thousands of years.
Jordan, you look a little bit frustrated, and I don't understand why, because this guy is spitting hot fire.
You understand that the devil has been around for a long time, and he's been studying people, and what he's come to the conclusion is that in order to destroy society, you have to get rid of elections and kick people off social media.