Today, Dan and Jordan dip into the past to look at the ways that Alex's response to the beginning of the 2009 H1N1 outbreak closely mirrored his response to the beginning of Covid. Also, Alex goes on Coast to Coast, and tries to call the White House. Citations
We're going to go back into the past, not to 2003, but we're going to take a separate journey today, because I was thinking about it, and I'm like, I don't want to fucking talk more about these same stupid, like the COVID conspiracies, and I don't want to talk about, like, James O 'Keefe, Project Veritas put out a video.
So, I was going back through some of the archives and such of Alex's shows and other things on InfoWars, and one of the things I noticed was...
There's a bit of a pattern as it relates to how public health crises are covered.
And so I noticed a number of things surrounding, in particular, the end of April in 2009, which is when the H1N1 swine flu pandemic was really getting going and the first cases were identified.
I started to recognize there are some things that would be well worth our time to look at as it relates to Alex's behavior in the present day and draw some connections.
So I want to start off with a little bit of a comment, and that is that I mean in no way to minimize the impact of the 2009 H1N1 outbreak in this episode.
I'm not minimizing or belittling it.
It was a serious public health event and a lot of people got sick and died.
But I think it's very clear from history that it wasn't as severe an event as what we're living through in the present.
The point of this episode that I put together today is to look at some of Alex's coverage from the early days of H1N1 or the swine flu outbreak to highlight the ways that his rhetoric was almost identical to the ways he behaved in the early days of the COVID pandemic at the beginning of 2020.
Alex's tone has changed a bit since that point, but it's my contention that he's only had to change his rhetoric because he fucked up.
Over the course of this, I'm going to argue that Alex has a method of responding to things like novel outbreaks that has absolutely nothing to do with the reality of the situation, but is actually motivated by the utility that this method has in terms of building and pushing predetermined narratives.
These central narratives are the virus is man-made, It's a bioweapon.
It was deployed in order to put in martial law.
It was deployed in order to make people get vaccines and that the vaccines will be mandated and they're secretly meant to hurt you.
In addition to these narratives, I contend that Alex also uses some hallmark techniques in order to reinforce his narratives and uses set strategies in order to get his message out.
Through examining a few broadcasts from 2009, I believe that all this is pretty clearly borne out, and I hope that looking at this will be helpful in terms of understanding how meaningless Alex's stories about the present pandemic really are.
Earlier I said Alex's narratives about COVID are so convoluted and all over the map right now because he fucked up, and what I mean by that is this.
In the past, Alex was able to maximize his outcomes by following basically the same script that he used at the beginning of the COVID outbreak.
In these instances, whether it was the avian flu in 2005, Ebola in 2014, or H1N1 in 2009, the public health response was competent, and we got lucky.
So the diseases didn't end up causing the sort of social disruption that we've seen in the last few years.
That's the sweet spot for someone like Alex to work in.
There's a legitimate public health concern that he can spread bullshit about, but the adults working on the actual problems are still able to get their work done to avert any real long-running troubles.
Alex gets to fearmonger, make a ton of unfounded claims, and then when things die down, he can move on to another subject altogether.
In fact, because things are being competently handled, he doesn't even really have to make a story like H1N1 the number one story in his rotation every day over and over again.
Alex would have had every expectation, based on every single time he's done this in the past, that COVID would go the same way.
But it didn't.
I believe that had things gone poorly in the past, in other instances, you would see a similar deterioration of Alex trying to...
Keep his grip on the narrative as things just spiral out of control.
I mean, obviously the most important, not most important, but definitely not coincidental thing, is that the president that he wanted was in the White House at the time that he did not get what he wanted.
I honestly think if you look back at some of the earlier times in InfoWars history, like around these, you know, 2008, 2009, this stretch of time, Alex owes a lot to Jason Bermas in terms of, first of all, loose change.
So I would ask the Genesis Network folks up there, if you get on the line and somebody's not from Mexico or doesn't have family in Mexico or not from San Antonio or other areas where there are outbreaks, We would ask folks to call in later, just in the next hour, after we get some of these calls from Mexico or areas affected by this new...
Well, experts, scientists and researchers who weighed in, even at the time, they talk about recombining that happens when, let's say, one pig is infected with multiple viruses.
They will trade genetic information, and you can end up with the genetic information of various different flus combining into one.
And so that's basically...
As much as he has for this was designed.
Right.
It's because there's these hallmarks of three different types of flu.
It's a weak argument, but that's stamped in the narrative immediately.
So it's probably not surprising, but this headline that Alex is reading, suggesting that swine flu could be a biological weapon, was written by Paul Joseph Watson.
Paul is hip by this point in 2009 and seems to be aware that he should probably cover his ass.
So this article starts like this.
Quote, there are some factors that suggest the swine flu killing people in Mexico may be a biological weapon, but obviously no such conclusion can be drawn at this time.
The lead of Paul's story is that there's no conclusive answer, but wouldn't it be fun to spend the next 12 or so paragraphs heavily insinuating that you don't have a conclusive answer, but you think that the swine flu probably is a biological weapon?
So the article that Paul has written largely relies on an alleged source who spoke to former regular InfoWars guest Wayne Madsen.
Wayne is one of Alex's old best buddies, and he was the guy who broke that story about Hillary Clinton's personal chef being found dead with a note attached to him that said, Call Larry Nichols.
He stopped talking to Alex a little bit after Alex went all in for Trump, since Wayne was a conspiracy lunatic, but probably sensed that that was bad for his brand.
Wayne's source apparently told him that he was, quote, convinced that the current outbreak of a new strain of swine fluid in Mexico in some parts of the United States is the result of an introduction of a human-engineered pathogen that could result in a widespread global pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences for domestic and international travel and commerce.
Paul plays with the knife's edge, stressing that it's too early to say anything with certainty, but also ends the article with this paragraph.
Quote, fears that a mass pandemic was being readied as a biological attack have rumbled on in the conspiracy community ever since 9-11.
Investigators point to the highly unusual number of deaths of top microbiologists to suggest that people with knowledge of the program are being eliminated.
It's being used to freak readers out and make them have fears about this mass pandemic being launched as a biological attack, just like Infowars does all the time.
It seems like this end that's justifying whatever insinuations you're making throughout the article is just like, well, we do this a lot.
It's important to understand that a large part of what Alex has been doing over the course of the current pandemic is part of a larger pattern.
And seeing the same stuff play out in other periods in his career can be really helpful in illustrating the exact ways he's full of shit.
The reality is he's doing these exact same things that we saw at the beginning of the pandemic here in the past.
And he would have been doing exactly the same thing that he's doing now then if it weren't for some good luck and better public health response that led to these outbreaks not getting as bad as things have gotten today.
It may be difficult to remember this now, but when COVID was just emerging, Alex wasn't a huge denialist about it.
He was a sensationalist, and one of his main narratives in the beginning was that China was suppressing the numbers of dead by gigantic magnitudes.
I think it's probably fair to say that there wasn't total transparency with China's reporting, but that has no bearing on how irresponsible and dishonest the kind of reporting Alex did was.
This coronavirus situation and all these top biological weapons experts and top scientists scanning the virus and saying it's man-made, we've got to get ahead of this.
And if you notice the virus numbers, maybe we can punch those back up for a moment while we're waiting for the president.
The official World Health Organization says 28,000 confirmed.
When I walked in here a few minutes ago, it was 24,000.
But the internal Chinese numbers that leaked and were actually published in China by the People's Daily, Said 24,000 dead yesterday.
So what we think they're doing is they're just putting the number of dead as the number of infected.
And the only difference, the only thing that's different is that the person he wanted to be running the country was running the country at cross purposes with the organization that was supposed to be the adults trying to stop all of this stuff from happening.
It's crazy how that works.
It's almost like there's a very simple direct lesson to be learned.
And so he has a CNN interview that he's going to bring up, and it's an interview with this retired general, Honoré, which is, I know this name because Alex will reference him a lot.
But it's fun because at this point in 2009, Alex has no idea who he is.
It's really fun to watch him try and pronounce the name.
The reason he does this is pretty simple, but there's actually two prongs to it.
The first is that if it came from nature, there's no real bad guy.
We're all just trying to deal with this wild-born disease that threatens us all, and it's not really all that exciting.
If it came from a lab, then there's intrigue and the ability to paint these meddling scientists as either outright villains or people who probably meant well but were tampering with forces outside of what God wants man to tamper with, which led to a smiting.
The second reason is because reporting all of these potential outbreak stories as having their roots in a lab, it helps bolster anti-vax narratives in as much as they undermine general trust in science.
There's an added element to this, too, which is that it's always reported as vaccine research gone wrong that led to this lab accident or the release of this alleged bioweapon, which has the effect of associating vaccine development with disaster in the audience's mind.
This interview that retired General Honore did with CNN was between him and Don Lemon.
Here's the exchange that Alex is basing this insinuation on.
Lemon has pointed out that informing people is an important part of a national strategy to a public health response, and Honore says, Informing people, so people can make informed decisions.
That will help us, that will help stop the spread of the disease.
But you know, the key question we've got to ask is, we think it came from Mexico.
That's the conventional wisdom of most folks.
The next question is, how did it start in Mexico?
Where did it emanate from?
We've been able to find out that in all previous pandemics.
The question is to get at the heart of how did this start?
Did it start from the occasion of viruses coming together, or was it, did it come out of a lab?
I mean, all these questions have to be answered.
I know it seems like I'm possibly splitting hairs, but I sincerely believe there's a relevant difference between someone saying that it's important to understand where the virus came from and the way Alex was reporting on these comments.
The difference is that interviews like these with General Honoré are open-ended in terms of laying out questions that are on the table, whereas Alex's coverage is designed to lead the listener to a predetermined conclusion.
The goal is to cover this as a lab-related outbreak, and Alex uses Honoré's comment to further that goal.
You can see that, by the way, that Alex has tailored the headline as to only include the part where it's suggesting that the virus came from lab, and, of course, the part at the end where he's saying that all experts are saying it's weaponized.
Yeah, well, this is just a clip of the retired general on CNN pointing out that this could be made in a lab.
And when you get all these different viruses mixed together, where you get the pig flu, the swine flu, this bird flu, and human flu, all mixed together classically, historically, that is engineered in a lab.
And then you always have it coming from the east.
And there's two different flu seasons, and it always comes from the east, the new strains always.
This originated in Mexico City, and they've known about it since March 18th at least, and we're busy covering it up.
And the reason they're so scared is because it's killing healthy, virile 18- to 30-year-old men and women mainly, and the death toll is now upwards of 149.
I have the latest there, and that's probably a whitewash number.
So this is a really dishonest way to leap off of Honoré's CNN interview.
There's no reason to believe that just because the 2009 H1N1 virus had elements of swine, avian, and human flus in it, that means that it had to be made in a lab.
Scientists who have studied the virus widely reject this conclusion for a number of reasons.
The first is that it's entirely possible for this kind of recombination to happen in nature.
Pigs or people can be infected with multiple flus simultaneously and then they can recombine in ways where they trade genetic information.
According to the CDC, quote, I think?
once naturally in the five years prior to the identification of the 2009 h1n1 flu So there's precedent.
So there's no need for a lab to be involved to explain the complex nature of the virus, but Alex is obscuring that to further push his predetermined conclusion that the virus had to have come from a lab, just as he's done consistently since the beginning of COVID.
He's jumped all over the place trying to find these weird explanations for why it had to be made in a lab that have all been fallen flat and he's kind of forgotten about.
As for the idea that flus come from the East, that's actually...
Actually, kind of been borne out by research, but it's not a universal thing.
A study by the University of Chicago noted that between 2000 and 2010, 87% of the, quote, most successful globally spreading strains of H3N2 originated in East, South, and Southeast Asia.
N3N2, of course, being the most common disease-causing strain.
tell us another little fact, and that is that it's not unheard of for flus to pop up in other locations.
So Alex is fairly right that 2009 H1N1 did affect younger people more severely.
With people over 65 being less vulnerable.
However, what he's saying about there being a cover-up of anything is just not founded in any way.
And here we see another common feature of how Alex reports on public health matters in the immediate.
It's important to cast suspicion on all other sources of information, so no matter what the reality of the situation is, you lead with accusing them of a cover-up.
By this point, the CDC was already posting updates about what information had been learned up until that point.
The Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy were sounding the alarm.
State governments were posting guidance for people to avert panic and help them guide themselves through any possible health problems.
CNN had even reported on cases that had been confirmed in California I don't know what cover-up Alex is.
Because there wasn't one.
But the suggestion that there was is crucial to undermining trust in public health experts, which then helps Alex present himself as the actual expert to his audience.
Around every corner in the present pandemic, there have been accusations of cover-ups because it's an easy thing to do and you never have to back it up.
And the thing about it that makes it so good is, no matter what they're telling you, because yes, you see all this stuff, you can always claim they're covering up something.
Even though I said they were covering up 10 million different other things, the one that I didn't say that did happen to be the case is the one that I meant.
I have the latest there, and that's probably a whitewash number.
But still, this is a bunch of hype, because the regular flu strains every year kill millions of people worldwide, conservatively hundreds of thousands, and over 15,000 a year in the U.S., even more in Mexico.
But when we see all this massive media hype, we have to question...
Alex doesn't want his audience to actually be super afraid of the H1N1 flu, in the same way he doesn't actually want the audience to be afraid of COVID now, nor did he at the beginning.
He wants to build up a sense of fear, foster distrust in mainline sources, and then transmute that fear that he's established into being fear of something else that he wants them to be afraid of, possibly something that profits him or pushes his extremist agenda.
The first part of this would lead you to think that you should be very afraid of the fact that the villains are creating a bioweapon and for some reason they're covering up how many people have died from it, which heavily implies that the virus is something to be deeply concerned about.
But then the second part deflates that and sends the message that this is no more scary than any flu every year.
This is confusing if you don't pay attention, because it's inherently nonsensical.
If it's all hype and no different than every flu, why does this coverage exist?
If the numbers are no different than they are every year, why would the globalists put out decreased death numbers?
What sense does that make?
If it's the same as every year, why would the globalists need to cover up the flu's existence for a few months, as Alex is implying?
Alex wouldn't have gone through all the effort of laying that track if it weren't for the purposes of shifting the fears.
We do, but Alex wants to deal with it in the way that he wants to deal with it.
And I think you can already kind of get a sense based on...
I don't know everything we've gone through the way that this is going to go.
This is going to be shifted into fears of lockdowns, fears of vaccinations being forced on you.
Right, exactly.
You build up the fear the way he has so far, and then deflate the fear of the actual condition, and use that fear that you've built to build your own gingerbread house of fear that looks like a FEMA camp.
Well, I mean, if you don't know who Baxter is, only two months ago, in mid-February, actually, it was late February that Bloomberg reported on it, they sent out...
To 14 separate countries, this batch of anti-bird flu vaccine that contained two different strains of bird flu and then a third strain of flu.
And this is just incredible to me that we would allow Baxter to be the people in charge of inoculating and quote-unquote immunizing the populace.
According to a write-up from WebMD in 2009, 46% of the vaccines manufactured for the United States were made by Novartis, 26% were from Sanofi Pasteur, 19% from CSL, 6% from MedImmune, and 3% from GlaxoSmithKline.
And none of these are Baxter's secret name.
Baxter talked a big game, but they ended up getting beaten out by other suppliers that came to the market.
That being said, in October 2009, after Baxter had won part of a contract to supply H1N1 vaccines to the United Kingdom, it came out that they had been forced to pay back millions to state governments for overcharging them for products in the past and committing Medicare fraud.
Additionally, Baxter did have a mix-up at a lab that they run in Austria, being a little exaggerated by Burmus, but that did actually happen, where live avian flu had contaminated some experimental samples that they'd sent to a couple other labs.
It was a bad mix-up and could have had some seriously bad consequences, but ultimately it just ended up killing a few ferrets, which is still sad.
There's a specific goal that's being pursued by coverage like this that Burmes is doing as well.
The point of this is to establish the groundwork that there's something suspicious about the plans to develop a vaccine for this new flu virus.
There must be a reason that the globalists are having all of our vaccines made by this one specific company that recently bungled a shipment of experimental samples.
They must want to have these vaccines that they put into us contaminated too.
Introducing these sorts of narratives is the first step of the essential pivot that needs to happen, where the fear that's being built about the virus is transformed into fear about the vaccines.
It's pretty remarkable how this is almost just muscle memory for them.
It's second nature to be able to build up and move.
So you can see here this almost identical language to the president.
Masks are just fear, hysteria, and it's all in service of trying to force vaccines on you.
For what it's worth, Alex never got to the second option after Burmese interrupted him, so I have no idea what it was going to be when he's brought up Tamiflu.
I have no idea.
So that said, Tamiflu is not a publicly traded entity.
It's a product that's produced by Gilead Sciences.
The reality, too, is that Alex is wrong.
Gilead was not seeing record stock prices in April 2009.
Their peak was on August 4th, 2008, coming in at about $28.50 a share.
The day this episode is recorded, their shares hit a high of $24.11.
Their numbers would start going up eventually, but it wouldn't be until late 2011, and a large part of that was likely due to enthusiasm surrounding some acquisitions that they'd made, buying up a ton of pharma companies like CV Therapeutics, Sure.
Sure.
That fund has holdings in a bunch of other companies, and Gilead is number 10 on their list of most held things.
So, in a very indirect way, you can claim that Obama profits from Gilead, but what Alex is claiming is a bit of a stretch.
If Alex just wants to go all the way and say that public officials can't own stock, I'll join him in that.
But otherwise, this is all just blustery nonsense.
I think in an ideal world, everybody should be able to...
We don't live even close to there.
But what you see here is another standard feature of Alex's public health coverage.
There needs to be an insistence that Alex's political enemies are painted as corrupt with their motives chalked up to their financial stake in these pharmaceutical companies.
We saw this exact same song and dance play out in the COVID pandemic and there are a few slight differences though.
Trump was in office so it wasn't going to fly to start tossing around ideas about his finances.
So Alex went the safer route and just insisted Bill Gates had the patent on not only the vaccine, but also the virus itself.
While he might have had some interest in pharmaceutical companies, or he does through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates doesn't himself have a patent on the vaccine.
In fact, last May, he came out as in favor of dropping the patent protection on the vaccines in order to allow greater access for them in developing countries, although probably too late on that.
Come to that conclusion a little earlier.
Alex would later add Fauci to the list of owners of the patent who were making money off the vaccine, but to be fair to him, he didn't know who Fauci was at the beginning for a while, so he couldn't accuse him of that.
Anyway, the point here is that all leaders who advise caution or public health measures, they're only doing so because they want to create fear hysteria in order to corral you.
into getting this vaccine because then they profit from it.
This story plays out over and over again because it's a myth cycle.
It's not actually analysis of the news.
This is basically Alex's version of Joseph Campbell.
It doesn't make any sense because what you would do is you would want to get the population to all have some sort of version of diabetes.
So if you wanted to invest in a pharmaceutical company and then create a conspiracy that would make you a ton of money, then you would do that and then you would try and flood the market of the United States with some sort of high sugar content.
And then what you really want to do is get kids.
To really be into it.
So you'd have cartoon characters and all of these people.
They would advertise it for you.
And then they would push that out there.
And then so many people would get it.
And it would just become part of their daily lives.
So that clip is amazing because in it you see two of the major elements that Alex needs to make this whole pageant a success.
The first is to have a platform that's larger than his and presumably more mainstream that'll allow him to come on and present himself as an expert to the suggestible audience.
In the present day, that's Joe Rogan's job.
But in 2009, Rogan wasn't a gigantically popular podcaster, so he wasn't useful for Alex in that way.
George Norrie will do in a pinch.
We'll get to that in a minute.
But first, I want to get into that second aspect.
The almost-too-perfect document that Alex has found.
In order for this whole charade to go off right, and for Alex to be able to control where the audience directs their fear, there needs to be some kind of document that can be used to illustrate that the globalists have been planning this all along, which means that Alex is right, and that means you gotta listen to him.
In our current performance of this play, there have been actually a ton of documents that have fit this role, with Alex and his menagerie of weirdos cherry-picking things to suit their purposes and prove definitely that this pandemic is a false flag.
I would say that, based on my experience, the lockstep document is the one that Alex seems to present as the most concrete and most persuasive, so I'm going to give it that title for the present-day pandemic.
And here in 2009, we happen to have a...
I'll tell you that tracking this one down was really hard, because Alex gives almost no details on it other than it was on his website, possibly in March, and apparently written by Kurt Nimmo.
If you try to search keywords like 30 million dead, prediction, 2009, 1996, something, you don't come up with anything.
But thanks to the Wayback Machine, I was able to go through all of the headlines published on Infowars in March 2009, and I hit pay dirt.
This Curt Nemo article is headlined, quote, U.S. Air Force study proposed 2009 influenza pandemic in 1996.
The underlying document is a thought experiment from the Air University titled Air Force 2025 that's described as, quote, a study to identify the concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the first quarter of the 21st century.
This document is literally the exact same thing as the lockstep document, and Alex is using the exact same intentional misunderstanding in order to present it as some kind of a nefarious plan.
This was an exercise to brainstorm what the Air Force would need to do to continue effectively into the future, and in order to carry out that exercise, the research participants created six different alternative future scenarios to explore possible challenges in.
They use three variables, American worldview, tech, and the world power grid.
Each of these had two values possible.
American worldview could either be global or domestic, tech could either be constrained or exponential, and the power grid could be concentrated or dispersed.
So, for instance, if you want to explore a world where the American worldview is global, tech is constrained, and the power grid is dispersed, you'd be looking at their scenario titled Gulliver's Travails.
There are five other scenarios, but for our purposes, we don't need to go through all of them in minute detail.
Each of the scenarios includes a section titled Plausible History, which is an inexercise description of how the world got to the point it is in their imagined version of 2025.
These are imagined, made-up things.
And if you want to go, you can cherry-pick whatever you want out of it.
For instance, in this Gulliver's Travail scenario, China broke up into 15 new territories in 2006.
And apparently, this year, 2022, it's just titled Africa Wars.
So, look, the scenario Kurt Nimmo has decided to focus on is one called Digital Cacophony.
This is one where it has a global American worldview, exponential tech, and a dispersed power grid.
In this scenario's plausible history, there's an influenza that kills 30 million people in 2009, but there's other things in here that should be red flags for anybody thinking this is reflective of planning.
For instance, in this plausible history, we're supposed to have reached a state of abundant food due to genetics in 2002.
Yeah, the flu part is part and parcel of all this.
If you read the report, the flu outbreak is included in this scenario as a reminder that, though this is a possible future that's dominated by technological advancement, quote, technology could not solve some old problems.
So Nimmo's article is really interesting, too, because he's trying to use this document to build a conspiracy about the Baxter flu lab mix-up that had happened previously.
Quote, is it merely a coincidence the Pentagon would propose in 1996 a deadly flu pandemic for 2009 when live H5N1 avian flu viruses are discovered in vaccines produced by Baxter International plants in Austria?
He goes on to cite Paul Joseph Watson, quote, the fact that Baxter mixed its deadly H5N1 virus with a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses is a smoking gun, writes Paul Joseph Watson.
The H5N1 virus on its own has killed hundreds of people, but it's less airborne and more restricted in the ease with which it can spread.
However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which, as everyone knows, are super airborne and easily spread, the effect is a potent super airborne, super deadly biological weapon of the sort proposed in Air Force 2025.
In the scenario, they say that no one ever figured out if it was a naturally occurring flu or it was bioengineered, but that makes sense in the scenario's parameters.
It's a world with boundless dispersed technology and power where one of the main hallmarks of the challenges that they have is that there's an increasing number of states and non-state actors that have weapons of mass destruction.
Leaving the genesis of this flu outbreak ambiguous creates flavor in the picture that they're painting for the scenario exercise.
Anyway, Kurt Nimmo sucks, and even he had no clue that this would be able to be repurposed when that whole Baxter narrative didn't really go anywhere.
And so now Alex is digging back, taking this, and saying that, oh no, it proves this one.
As is the exact same situation with the present-day use of the Rockefeller lockstep document, this is a useful tool for people in the Air Force educational program to explore what challenges the military may face if certain variables of social organization go different ways.
Mm-hmm.
as predictive of this 2009 flu as it is of the UN dissolving in 2010.
It's not an accident that Alex's coverage of both the H1N1 flu outbreak and the present pandemic include a completely misrepresented document that he uses to prove foreknowledge on the part of his enemies.
It's because he's a liar with a pattern and he needs props.
While in our continuing special report on the swine flu, To scare up next, Stephen Quayle joins us along with Alex Jones right here on Coast to Coast AM.
Well, my problem is I'm sitting here with about 150-plus documents and reports, including the one we broke just a month and a half ago at Infowars.com, about that Air Force perspective saying that they thought there would be a massive flu outbreak.
back in 1996, in 2009, so I just have information overload here, but I want people to listen to me very, very carefully because this is so important.
Even CNN had a retired top general on today involved in researching bioweapons, saying we need to look at this being made in a laboratory.
A month ago, and just like I predicted 9-11, because I just understand these people, and I don't just throw predictions out here, predictions out there.
I'm not bragging.
I can't sleep.
All I do is study this.
I said, they've got a bunch of cards in their hands, the globalists above our government, the Illuminati, the New World Order, the social engineers, and they need a crisis or they won't get their world government through, which they're openly announcing, new bank of the world we pay our carbon taxes to.
They've got to make us love them as their saviors.
And I said out of a stage nuke, out of attacking Iran, out of attacking Pakistan, out of all these things they can do, I believe...
I believe the next card they're going to play is at least a massive bird flu scare.
And I talked to Steve last Monday, and he on record said that too.
A lot of people are thinking along the same lines.
Can everybody that's listening to this broadcast worldwide even imagine the fact of the fury that's going to be exhibited throughout the nations of the world?
When they find out that this was a genetically altered biological weapon that was intentionally released.
They either know this is super bad and are covering it up.
They either released it and know it's super bad and are covering it up and are using this as a martial law takeover smokescreen, or they know it's not really bad and they're just hyping it because governments everywhere, including Mexico on the verge of collapse, need this as a unifier.
And most sociologists looking at this, and many Mexicans I'm speaking to in Mexico, believe the government is hyping it and using it and may have even released it to stop revolution and get people's minds off of all the government.
I mean, wasn't there an episode in 24 where the president shook the hands of somebody and got gook all over him and then, you know, he came down with a disease?
I mean, all of this is just too bizarre.
Well, I said this was made in a lab, but something very serious went wrong.
I said on this program that SARS would not be a pandemic, that the avian flu would not be a pandemic, qualifying it every time, every time by saying, unless they concoct it in a laboratory.
You know, it's interesting, George, because no one who speaks a prophetic word at the time it's given is ever received at the time it's given, and only people look back at it and say, gee, that guy knew what was going on.
If the deaths are mainly centered in Mexico City, there are studies showing that the toxic waste And the heavy metals can weaken people, and that may be why we're seeing so many deaths there.
But if the evidence continues to confirm that they're dying in these nice little clean towns on the Pacific and on the Gulf of Mexico and on the Caribbean, and we're getting these reports, if that is happening, then this is race-specific, tailored for...
For those that don't know, over the Bering Strait about 20,000 years ago, Asians came across the bloodline.
You know, they have the Mongolian spots on their backs when they're babies.
The people who are, quote, Mexican are really predominantly Asian with a mixture of Spanish bloodlines.
unidentified
And so this is a very specific bioweapon for Asians.
I was wondering if that had anything to do with possibly the disclosure of extraterrestrials and possibly a connection with how they would, I guess, throw them out there without creating panic that maybe they have a cure.
But, like, you see a couple things, like, the nonsense aside, a couple of other added elements are the knee-jerk insinuation this is a race-specific bioevent.
But, like, we should all be so lucky, as Alex, to have friends throughout all these points in our careers with wide audiences that are willing to engage with our bullshit.
And, like, you see the narratives that he's pushing on the show with Jason, and he's just shined them up a tiny bit, made them a little bit harder to track down exactly what he's talking about, and he's disseminating them to George's audience.
And George is a very willing, active participant in it, in the same way that Rogan is.
Yep.
unidentified
Through negligence or actually being interested in...
It's the dum-dum who's willing to say, oh, that's interesting, say more about that, or, huh, you know, that's all you have to do, that's what they need.
Janet Napolitano said last Sunday, now six, seven days ago, that, oh, this flu will probably fade out, but another big pandemic will come, will happen.
It's a foregone conclusion.
So let's not forget about that.
And they're saying that this flu will probably mutate right around the fall when flu season begins.
We better all go roll up our sleeves and get the shot they're going to have right on time.
They're talking about...
The federal government paying for 600 million doses for the 300 million Americans.
Do you know how much profit that is when they're talking about the drug company that's chosen to make the vaccine get as much as $20 per shot?
So you can see here a direct mirror of much of Alex's rhetoric from COVID times.
In the current day, it was Bill Gates saying that there would be future diseases that Alex deemed to be suspicious.
But in the past, it was Janet Napolitano.
And of course, it's a fear-based exercise in order to get everyone to take vaccines, possibly just motivated by getting $20 per shot for large batches.
This is serious because they may move on us right now with martial law.
And these globalists are eugenicists who've done all this chemical, biological, radiological testing on us in the past.
We need to take what they're saying serious.
But we believe it's a hoax.
Well, it's now becoming more and more clear.
Thank God it is a hoax.
But that's just...
The lesser of two evils, because we know that it's a hoax for them beta testing their federalization and their takeover and coming martial law, what could be in the fall of the winter of this year into early next year, and they even admit they're beta testing that.
With 2020, 2021, and now into 2022, the presentation and the performance that he's done surrounding COVID has gone so far off the rails that it's going to be impossible.
They said last Sunday in Napolitano Homeland Security head's briefing, she said to everybody out there, she said, there is no need to shut down the border or shut down the flights or anything because it's already spread everywhere and there's no way to stop it anyways.
Speaking of efforts at the border, she said, All persons entering the United States from a location of human infection of swine flu will be processed through all appropriate CBP protocols.
Right now, these are passive.
That means they're looking for people who, and asking about, are you sick, have you been sick, and the like, and if so, then they can be referred over for further examination.
The part from that press conference that touches on the possibility of new strains popping up is not Napolitano, but it's a comment made by the acting director of the CDC, Dr. Richard Besser.
Besser says, "We analyzed that strain and are continuing to do further analysis of that strain and we expect to see the emergence of new flu strains.
That's something that we are continually watching for to ensure that we're ready should a strain emerge that there's not immunity and protection in the community for it.
This strain is not unlike other new strains that have emerged.
It's an assortment.
It's got genetic components from a number of sources, including human, swine, and avian sources.
I mean, it's so crazy, because I feel like this is a fundamental thing that hasn't really been communicated to people to the level that I think a lot of people just assume other people understand it.
None of the comments that Alex ascribes to Napolitano are accurate in the least, but that doesn't really matter.
This isn't about reporting news or depicting reality.
This is about characterizing Alex's enemy in a particular way.
They want the virus to spread, because doing so allows them to force vaccines on people and put in martial law.
So naturally, Napolitano isn't closing the border intentionally to make the virus spread more.
The enemy wants the public to be in horrible fear, so of course Napolitano ominously predicted new and worse strains of the flu, which Alex interprets essentially as a threat, just as he did with early Bill Gates interviews in the present day.
Now, one thing I should note, looking at this content, there's a tremendous overlap in terms of tactics and narrative elements that Alex is using.
There's a glaring difference in terms of the stuff that I reviewed for this episode.
I'm not saying he doesn't mention him anywhere, but...
All the stuff I looked at, he doesn't bring up Bill Gates at all.
Right, and it makes more sense, the idea that Obama would be able to put in martial law enforcement to have vaccines, whereas the leap from Bill Gates being able to do that is a little bit tough.
We had a massive mythology around Trump divorcing him from the reality of who the person is to the point where you can say both he's the most powerful man on the earth and he can't do anything about anything.
Because the public isn't buying the phony boogeyman, you know, terrorists in a cave anymore is the reason to lock down the cities.
This is something where we're all guilty, and the government gets to get involved in our lives and tell us what to do and tell us what to put in our bodies, that they're going to come forcibly inoculate us, inoculate us and put us in prison if we don't go along with what they say, quarantine us, lock our cities down.
They're already beta testing with hotels and airports and some people's homes in Texas and California.
People are on quarantine with police out front, keeping them on house arrest.
Yeah, don't tell CNN, because they got this one article.
This article is from Fox News that Alex says isn't fear-mongering, but if you actually look at the article, the quotes that are in it are from the very people Alex is claiming are hyping this up and fear-mongering.
For instance, Dr. Nancy Cox, a flu chief at the CDC, said, quote, we do not see the markers for virulence that were seen in the 1918 virus.
Obama is cited in that article as suggesting that the flu may have run its course like ordinary flus.
Alex wants to have his cake and eat it too, and he achieves this by crafting intricate stories based solely on headlines.
This Fox article is saying that the signs are pointing to a milder flu than once feared, which is counter to what the establishment is saying, but because he ignores the body of the article, Alex doesn't have to then explain the fact that the article is based on comments from the people within the very establishment that Alex is insisting are trying to fearmonger and bring in martial law.
Also, if you look at the coverage of comments made by Dr. Cox around this time, you find articles in NPR.
It was titled, Flu Genes Suggest Virus Not As Deadly As 1918.
And guess what?
You can even find an article from CNN using the exact same quote.
There is a story that Alex wants to tell, and it has no relationship to the reality in front of him, which is why headlines are his most important tool.
They're often flashy and vaguely written, either due to length constraints or a desire to drive clicks to websites, and thus, they're really easy to misconstrue, which is about 75% of Alex's journalistic toolkit.
I've made about a lot of the points that I wanted to make, or I hope to demonstrate with this.
You see these exact same tricks, a formula more or less play out that Alex used at the beginning of the coverage of the COVID pandemic that you see here with the 2009 H1N1.
And now there's a little bit more to talk about, but also this...
Special that he did ends up going off the rails a little bit.
And so there's something nice to enjoy here at the end, almost like dessert.
Let me go over the martial law, what they're selling, what they're pushing, why this is so important.
And, folks, if you're watching this in a month on YouTube when it's got, you know, 200,000 views or whatever, you call the White House, too, because they're planning to run this in the fall or the winter.
They're even saying it.
This is a great training for us to have NORTHCOM and the military take over and lock the cities down and have forced inoculations for your safety when the next deadly flu hits this winter.
So you need to call Obama and go, look, Jack, we know what you're doing.
We know you're using this as the economy implodes as an excuse to put troops on the streets and bring in martial law.
This was a document that the WHO put together in 2005 because of the avian flu outbreak.
This is not a list of demands the World Health Organization is making of everybody.
It's just a helpful guide to establishing best practices to be able to be ready to respond in the possible event of a new flu strain emerging, where health officials need to respond quickly to uncertain circumstances.
It doesn't list any treaties or whatever Alex is saying, that's all just made up, but we see here another direct parallel to the present day.
It's important for Alex to present the takeover plan that's being facilitated by the outbreak as being run by the international globalist bodies that he imagines he's fighting against.
In this framework, the folks like Obama and Napolitano are bad, but they're really just under the sway of these folks like the WHO who are actually running things.
We've seen that time and time again in terms of COVID where any form of international cooperation or collaboration is presented as the World Health Organization ruling over American sovereignty.
That's a meaningless argument for Alex to make, but it's a very good way for him to fearmonger to his audience that's been trained for years to be super afraid of the inevitable day when the UN and the international bodies would take over the United States.
He was doing that in 2009.
He was doing that prior, and he's still doing it.
Maybe he needs another visit from the predictions board.
I told you, they're constantly, they've got like five or six numbers and they're changing them day to day and they're like, they're constantly changing the number.
To the higher-level speechwriters and people actually writing the scripts and plays for the actors, that the American people are aware that Obama and George Bush and all of them are just puppets, total New World Order puppets.
And that the folks at Infowars.com are not closed on Saturday night like you are, because this is the real world.
This is not a Shakespearean, a thespian troop of actors.
We are Infowarriors in the Infowar exposing the New World Order.
You're hired guns to get up there and read off teleprompters.
We understand that.
But we're just saying to you as the puppets, since you actually talked to the bosses, Bernanke and Paulson and Kashkari and Geithner and others, who are just mid-level minions themselves to the Rockefellers and Rothschilds and others, that we're not your slaves.
We're not your property.
This is our Declaration of Independence.
My John Hancock, I'm Alex Jones.
Bring me a pen.
I want to sign my name big.
Bring me a Sharpie here as we simulcast on the radio and TV.
That I want the White House to know we are not putting up with this tyranny anymore.
I'm not your slave.
You don't own me.
And you can stage all the bird flu, swine flu crap you want so you can get involved in our lives and pose as our saviors and our bosses and shut down public assembly.
We know Mexico's collapsing from your new world order narco-terrorism that you guys bring the drugs in together.
We know that they've staged this flu situation as a way to unify the people and get folks more worried about surviving than being slaves.
But just know this.
We're not cowards.
We're standing up to you.
We're speaking out against you.
We're aware of your activities.
So you want our comments?
It's this.
We know you as actors are aware that real human beings, real people who aren't buying into the puppets of the left-right...
are beginning to wake up to what you're doing.
And we're not looking at the puppet Obama or the puppet McCain or the puppet Bush or the puppet Barbara Boxer.
We're looking past the puppets right now to the elite that actually control things.
And Ron Paul's got bills to audit the criminal Fed, private Federal Reserve, that claims it's above all laws on Lear NewsHour and no police, no judge, no branch of government can even look at it.
That's asinine.
We're exposing that.
And we're going to audit the Fed.
We're going to abolish the Fed.
And just like Madoff, Founder of the NASDAQs, a criminal, one of your bosses, all of you are going to end up going to prison after you've been tried by a jury of your peers unless you turn state's evidence against the new world order today.
So again, from Infowars.com, from the front lines of the Infowar, from the front lines of true liberty, this is my emancipation proclamation against you.
I am not a sucker.
I am not a slave.
Your neuro-linguistic programming and brainwashing doesn't work on me.
And I'll say it again, like they say in V for Vendetta, ladies and gentlemen, ideas are eternal.
Ideas go on forever, and you can't stop the signal.
You can't stop the truth.
So you should join humanity.
You should stop selling out to these degenerate, old, pot-bellied European Rothschilds and Rockefellers.
So this is really dumb, but if you think about it, this is also an analog to the present day.
These days, Alex pretends that every important person in the world listens to his show, so he can just do full-on wrestling promos, calling out people like Bill Gates, and the audience gets to feel that vicarious excitement of pretending that Alex is talking directly to and telling truth to power.
He's standing up to the tyrants, and you're part of it.
In 2009, Alex couldn't really pretend that anyone in power cared all that much about what he was doing, so this is how that same kind of vicarious thrill for the audience was conveyed.
Alex is pretending to leave a message on the White House comment line where he just drones on and on and declares his independence, which is supposed to be like a thrill for the listeners.
It's pretending to take a risk, which is clearly illustrated by Alex pretending to sign something with his John Hancock.
This is meant to evoke the idea that the signers of the Declaration of Independence were taking a serious risk by putting their names on paper, since if their cause was unsuccessful, they would be immediately killed for treason.
This is the same kind of risk Alex wants to pretend he's taking by faking leaving a voicemail for the White House.
I will say that it's kind of hard to tell which version of this sketch that he's doing is sadder, like...
So, I understand that maybe this is retreading some territory a little bit, inasmuch as I think that we've hinted at and talked a little bit about how some of this dynamic works, but I felt that it was worthwhile to look a little more closely at some of this formulaic nature of the way that Alex presents his coverage, especially in the early stages of...
Now, one of the things that I think is a limitation of this is obviously later on down the road, Alex will transition this into...
The swine flu vaccine is dangerous.
There are horrible side effects that are coming from the swine flu vaccine.
But it's almost impossible to create a parallel to how he ended up having to weave things with COVID to any other period in his career because he'd never been stuck that far out on a limb before.
He never was forced to do whatever he's doing now as it relates to swine flu or to Ebola.
And, I mean, I guess I'm thankful for that because that means less pandemics got out of hand.
I mean, the awful part about Alex is that his type of...
Bullshit, I guess, can only flower in a stable environment.
One that doesn't fluctuate so far off course that it gives in to any of his extreme bullshit.
And if he's allowed to flourish in a stable environment, his presence will be an unstabilizing aspect of it, which will then lead to where we are now.
A stable environment allows Alex to exist, allows him to grow to the point where the unstable environment takes over.
And then the cycle begins again, and 20 years from now, there's going to be another fucking asshole Alex Jones who's going to do the same shit for 30 years!
I've been reflecting on this since that news broke a little bit earlier.
You know, of the people who are most instrumental in the rise of the Oath Keepers, I don't think you can name somebody more intimately entwined than Alex.
He's been around since before they were an actual organization.
Him and Stuart Rhodes.
Stuart's been a guest on Alex's show since the founding of the Oath Keepers.