Today, Dan and Jordan check in to see how Alex is doing with the news that his old buddy Stewart Rhodes got arrested for being part of a seditious conspiracy. Also, Alex gets really weird about the concept of a "prison planet." Citations
So, hey, my bright spot, Jordan, is that I feel reinvigorated a little bit.
And this is something that I can sense, I can feel.
I had a bunch of little irons in the fire that are coming to fruition down the road, and I feel alive in the work, which I've been getting a little bit frustrated for a little bit.
I feel a second wind upon me.
Also, there's something for today, and that is that I have a new technocrat drop.
If I told you they were going to create part animal, part human clones in pigs, sheep, cows, and apes to grow human organs inside of them for transplant, you'd say I was crazy, though it was already happening before I was ever on the air 28 years ago.
And it's in the news today.
In a first, man receives a heart from a genetically altered pig that was part human.
If you're just listening to this show, you might think that the New York Times is reporting that that pig was the source of the heart that was transplanted.
The pig itself was part human, because that's how Alex read the headline.
Alex is lying and adding things to the headline, because that's the only way he can make himself sound interesting and pass off the impression that he's always been right about everything.
The actual headline is, quote, In a first, man receives heart from genetically altered pig.
Alex has just decided that he's going to report that the genetically altered part of this headline, it means that this pig was part human, but that's just him making stuff up.
In reality, the genetic alteration that the pig had undergone was a gene editing process, quote, to remove a sugar in its cells that's responsible for hyperfast organ rejection.
This is one of the greatest challenges with organ transplanting, the risk of rejections, even though in theory, pig hearts are compatible with our bodies, generally speaking.
This genetic alteration that removes the particular sugar could have a huge impact in terms of salt the gigantic problem of organ shortages that people have when they need transplants.
Wow.
unidentified
Another important thing to keep in mind is that we don't actually know how well this Just yet.
The article in the AP about this notes that back in 1984, a child named Baby Faye was the recipient of a transplanted baboon heart, and they actually survived for 21 days, but then died.
So we're not far enough out from this to know exactly how well this is going to work.
I'm not gonna say that I don't get where Alex is coming from, because when I hear genetically modified pig heart put into a man, I see the week before...
Whenever they went Temple of Doom on a giant pig man.
And I've tried my best and I've prayed about it to not get angry.
And, you know, the biggest thing is the attacks personally on us are so over the top and so crazy that as a man, it's almost like I don't even want to address it or talk about it.
What a set of brass balls this dude has to complain about personal attacks, being that his career has essentially been made on and characterized by intense personal attacks on people based on lies and misrepresentations.
I don't care about whatever personal attacks Alex thinks he's dealing with, particularly because I listen to his show enough that I know when he says personal attacks, he means things like Sandy Hook families suing him because of his personal attacks on them.
He's a weak baby who can't resist making himself a victim of every story because he thinks that somehow proves that he's under attack because he's so right all the time and he's dangerous to the system.
This is just the performance of narcissism and consequences being misinterpreted as integrity or something.
I feel like the Bible, at least from my memory of it from growing up in the church, I feel like Jesus also isn't particularly thrilled with people who use religion as a performance.
One of the verses that this brings to mind is Matthew 6, verse 1. Later in that very same chapter, quote, And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites, for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and in the street corners that they may be seen by others.
Truly I say to you, they have received their reward.
This is the declaration of war by a criminal group that has hijacked our nation and the world of exactly what they're going to do to you and me and everybody else.
How they've got the camps built, everything.
And again, it's been the training wheels we've witnessed.
With COVID, that's the smoke screen for lockdowns and checkpoints and doing what you're told, the military at the hospitals, and all of this is just to behaviorally get you ready.
With the ambient background for what's about to go down.
So, like, what you have to do is understand that this is convoluted and impossible to follow because there is no center to what Alex is preaching.
Forget about the fact that there isn't a real-world nefarious plan he's covering.
There isn't even a concrete plan that Alex has made up that explains everything that's going on.
He has to jump around from framework to framework depending on what seems useful to him that day because he's just making up this story as he goes along.
His heart and the weight of his career really drive him towards wanting to cover things as a plot to get us into FEMA camps, especially him and his buddies.
But the real good money right now in the conspiracy world...
But if they're not going to kill us all or replace us all with cyborgs or, like, move into armored redoubts and let everybody else die, we're doing just fine on the road to martial law without a globalist cabal.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, the regular old folks, they're marching us towards martial law.
Also, I think that Alex, I think he read the word son there, and that's what made him think it was the Screwtape Letters, because he's forgotten that the demons in that are uncle and nephew, not father and son.
The quote that Alex is reading is actually from another of Lewis's novels titled The Great Divorce.
Also, I have absolutely no idea what this has to do with him demonstrating that Alex has been right about anything because it's under the hashtag Alex Jones was right.
Yeah, I had absolutely no idea that this is what he meant, and now that I do, I'm struggling to grasp what it means and how it impacts his ideas and his worldview.
If what he's saying here is to be believed, then part of the prison planet actually involves us having been sentenced to being here on this prison planet.
There's something that precedes our birth that we did that was bad and required God to give us this cosmic probation on Earth.
That's pretty fucked up, and I would like Alex to explain more about this.
I think one way to look at this is that he could be talking about original sin, but I wouldn't think that that's the case, because Alex wouldn't go along with the belief that all humans are inherently born guilty.
That would fly in the face of his steadfast belief in individualism, free will, and the rejection of guilt by association.
Like, I legitimately have no idea what he's talking about, and it's fascinating.
Like, if you die young, does that mean that you got out early for good behavior, which is why only the good die young?
So point your fingers, like Tony Montana says, and says, say goodnight to the bad man.
But I'm not the bad man.
I'm the guy here trying to get you to join me to get out of this together.
But alas, you're not going to listen.
And I know some of you aren't.
So you will pay.
And not by my hand.
I just want away from you.
And God has promised that if we go through this, He will separate us from you.
And so, just as everybody exits California and New York to flee the left, imagine that spiritual, energetic release of being away from them forever, and you pass the point of no return, and they're gone.
Alex is a demon who escaped from hell only to wind up on this planet, live in his demonly ways, and all he wants is to get off this rock, but he doesn't want to go back to hell.
Alex got in over his head talking about this and bragging about how he knows cosmic secrets and realized, like, I better stop this because if I say anything concrete, I can't walk it back.
Yeah, I'm a little bit frustrated that we can go directly from a hashtag Alex Jones was right clip to Alex Jones claiming that he has seen hell and is escaping the...
Purgatory of manhood by asking God to remove him with trusty powers.
Look, most of what I'm going to say is already all over the news.
It's known, but it really hit me in the last few weeks for a lot of reasons that are just so fantastical to actually be living this.
Like, again, I remember reading Globalist Plans about social credit scores 20 years ago and how they would...
Say, oh, we're going to not let racists have health care, or we're not going to let smokers have health care, or drinkers, or people that eat too much fat, and we'll have smartphones that track what everybody does, and this will build this utopia, and of course you know it's a total nightmare, it's going to build a hell on earth, because the globalists never follow even their own rules, much less who set them up as God.
Gosh, there's so many angles to this.
There's so many angles to this.
You know, I thought about how I'm going to cover this and how I'm going to get into this a lot, because this is so important.
And then when I just get here to the point of talking about it, it's like such a big deal that talking about it almost lessens it.
Because this isn't just talk.
This isn't just something we're talking about that's about to happen like, Oh, we're about to have a hurricane hit.
Or, oh, it's about to be wintertime.
Or, oh, it's about to be summertime.
This is an end-of-civilization attack and event, and they're running around saying it openly to sell people that are going to buy into it.
And then when you say, I don't want it, they go, it doesn't exist in the same moment.
Now, you notice that Alex, whenever he's talking about his weirdo esoteric ideas, doesn't do that, like, it cheapens it to even talk about it nonsense.
Yeah, it's interesting, really, when you think about it, how many behaviors Alex demonstrates on air that are very analogous to things that children do.
It gives such context to, three weeks ago, letters through foyer requests, they have similar systems in Europe, came out in the Netherlands, where their leader of their parliament is getting orders from Klaus Schwab.
And it turns out he wrote the foreword to the Dutch version of it and promotes it.
So a member of parliament, just a few days ago, confronts him.
And tells the leader of the government, hey, have you heard of the Great Reset and Klaus Schwab?
He's doing this intentionally because that's the only way to get this story to fit into his predetermined narrative of Klaus Schwab secretly controlling all of the world's politicians.
is that this wasn't something that leaked, like the beginning, what he's talking about there.
Yeah.
unidentified
It wasn't some kind of a Dutch equivalent of the FOIA system.
An MP requested some documents, and they were provided.
These were not secret documents.
They are just invitations that were sent to various Dutch politicians to attend the 51st World Economic Forum, which is the organization that was started by Klaus Schwab, so that's how he factors into that part of the story.
Alex has reported this as the leader of the parliament getting orders from Schwab, which is a lie, and the invitations that were released didn't even include one for the head of the parliament.
That body of government in the Netherlands is called the House of Representatives, and they don't really have so much of a parliamentary leader as they have leaders for each of the parties that are represented within the House, and there are a bunch of them.
The House does have a group in it with it called the Presidium, which includes the speaker and nine deputy speakers.
So I guess this may be what you'd call a House leader.
The speaker is currently Vera Bergkamp of the Democrat 66 party, and she wasn't one of the recipients of the invitation.
So this is a little bit murky.
The invitations went to Finance Minister Wapke Hoekstra and the former Minister of Foreign Trade and Development Sigrid Kog.
This is not weird at all.
Not in the least.
Also, along with these damning invitations, the government released some correspondences between the W, uh, Okay, so it's a deadly secret.
This new thing that came out gives context to this.
And it doesn't.
So the video that Alex is covering and he's talking about was posted by a Twitter account called Ringo Lennon last July.
It was actually posted by a number of other accounts, but I chose that one because their profile image is the InfoWars logo, so I thought it was bonus funny.
It is true that this video shows a young Dutch politician named Gideon Van...
Asking Prime Minister Mark Rutte what he thought of Klaus Schwab's book, The Great Reset.
Rutte says he didn't know the book, and then Gideon produces a letter that Rutte had sent Klaus Schwab, thanking him for sending him the book.
Gideon accuses him of lying, and then the Prime Minister explains that he doesn't have time to read every book that he gets sent, and it was a polite response to Schwab.
This interaction was super popular in the dumb-dumb conspiracy world back in July, and I guess Alex just saw it and thinks it's current, or that it has something to do with these misrepresented World Economic Forum invitations that came out recently.
Now, I have stacks of incredible news, each article more insane than the next.
Like the announcement, the Biden administration has been illegally keeping a list of un-quote vaccinated people and putting in a database that they're now announcing they may come door-to-door and forcibly inject you.
That's mainstream news.
Just like denying white people monoclonal antibodies is mainstream news.
So this is yet another story Alex is completely misreporting based on misreporting done by other sloppy blogs.
This is a story that traces back to the Daily Signal, which you can judge as a media outlet by the fact that one of their featured news categories listed on the homepage of their site is Critical Race Theory.
So this article was published on January 11th and appears to have been written by two fellows at the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, which means they're cool.
They're reporting on an announcement that was made by the pre-trial services agency in the District of Columbia, who are going to maintain records on employees that have religious exemptions to taking vaccines.
If you go and you read the posting in the federal registry, it's very clear that this is an administrative decision and it only applies to the employees of this agency.
They have the ability and the authority to do this, and there's nothing weird about this at all.
However, the Daily Signal reports this very suspiciously, saying, quote, From there, the article is pretty dumb and boring.
But using this article, other outlets start to play a little game of telephone.
On the 12th, the Citizen Free Press published an article with the headline quote, Biden is quietly creating a database of the unvaccinated, which is a mischaracterization of their already dicey source.
After that, Alex gets his hand on it and, you know, becomes mainstream news, admitting that Biden's creating lists of unvaccinated people so he can come to your house and force you to take a shot.
This is the pathway that bullshit Alex reports typically goes down.
There's something that's not really that controversial that's the primary source, which gets covered by a group of shitheads who sensationalize it.
And then that sensationalized article is covered by even more disreputable outlets who slap a dishonest headline on it, at which point Alex reads the headline.
This is the quality of information you get with someone like Alex.
So, as for the white people can't get monoclonal antibodies thing, that's actually way messier on Alex's part.
This traces back to a video of a person going to a COVID treatment tent and trying to get monoclonal antibodies but being told that he apparently can't get them, but he could if he were black or Hispanic.
The video is shoddy, and it's not very clear, and it's definitely missing context, but that's what it appears to show.
I left out one important detail.
The person in that video trying to get the antibodies is Infowars employee Harrison Smith.
When Alex says that the mainstream media admits that white people can't get monoclonal antibodies, he means that Tucker played the video on his show the night before and intentionally edited out the part at the end where the healthcare workers tell Harrison that he can't get the treatment, quote, because of a lack of underlying health conditions.
Tucker did a painfully racist segment based on this manipulated video that was produced by an InfoWars reporter without disclosing that he's an InfoWars reporter.
So some of the other stuff I've covered in this episode is really bad work, like the Dutch Parliament thing.
This isn't bad work.
This is actively malicious.
There's no way that Tucker doesn't know that Harrison Smith works at InfoWars.
There's no way whoever put the piece together didn't know that the nurse explains why he can't get the treatment and decided to cut that part out so they can push their racist narrative.
And Alex knows that Tucker...
Tucker is reporting this story based on his employees' bullshit, but still re-reports it as the mainstream media admitting you can't get antibodies if you're white.
These are all intentional acts, and they're designed to elicit a certain reaction in the audience, and that reaction drifts pretty much all the way into white nationalism.
These people don't actually think that white people can't get monoclonal antibodies, but pretending that they do think that is the most effective way for them to pass off spreading their racist messages, and they can still hide behind being offended if someone suggests that they're racist.
And I don't need to even tell you what's personally happened to us because I have it all reverse engineered right here and these stacks I'm about to cover, but this is really bad news.
This is like 50 mile an hour winds in Northern California and a big fire coming and in an hour your town's going to burn down.
Get what you got, get what you care about, get out, get on the highway and drive south.
This is not, I'm not happy up here telling you this, okay?
And believe me, I'm in this with you up to my eyeballs.
I'm in this deeper than probably anybody out there, other than like Trump, who they hate, but who doesn't understand his real power.
So, Alex beats around the bush and is really bad at...
Getting to the point, but his point is he has done a parallel construction and figured out that the FBI has a counterterrorism investigation open into him and that the army is involved or something.
It's a wide-ranging conspiracy that he's got.
And I think a lot of his support for this, the evidence, is that some of his vendors have told him that the FBI has asked them questions about their relationship with him.
I don't know if that's true or not.
Alex has extrapolated that out into, I have an anti-terrorism investigation, there's FBI agents following me everywhere, they've tapped all my phones, all this.
And I think some of this is, like I said, because he knows that Stewart's going to get arrested.
What was it, eight months ago, the FBI came, and Sam Montoya was not here at the office.
And then they later SWAT teamed him with like 20-something officers at his house, a guy with no criminal record, because he was there as a journalist videotaping what happened inside the Capitol.
And then you all know, I guess it was four months ago, Owen Troyer got arrested and indicted for attacking the Capitol.
So yeah, you got this sort of preamble of, yes, Sam Montoya got in trouble because he videotaped himself doing plugs for Infowars while breaching the Capitol.
And in the cards they brought to Owen, in the cards they brought to Sam, it says FBI counterterrorism.
And you know, they said it was a counterterrorism investigation, and you know the FBI director said the main terror threat is the American people and white people.
Imagine, black people are the number one terror threat.
That'd be wrong and not true and terrible, but white people are?
So Alex's lawyers have been talking with the January 6th committee, apparently, and this might be some of the stuff that Alex's lawyers didn't want him to talk about.
So imagine in my life, I'm sitting here now with my lawyers and people talking to the congressional committees that are just the sideshow of what the Justice Department's doing, telling them that I'm a domestic terrorist,
and they want to charge me with material support of terrorists, the Patriot Act, for organizing all those rallies around the country and the peaceful ones in D.C. that led up to January 6th, where they hijacked our event.
I mean, we're as innocent as the driven snow when it comes to wanting to attack the Capitol.
Why the hell would I want to screw up us trying to investigate an election peacefully and go to prison?
The January 6th committee can't charge Alex with any crime like that.
That would be the responsibility of the Department of Justice, which the committee is not just the public face of, regardless of what Alex might think.
I suspect that he thinks that it is because in his ideal version of politics and the government, it would be.
While Trump was in office, Alex would have loved committees investigating Hillary's emails or Benghazi to just summarily arrest her.
He wants that kind of abuse of power to be directed towards his enemies, so he imagines that everyone else is behaving the same way when they're not.
That said, like I said earlier, this is probably what Alex's lawyers don't want him talking about.
And I doubt that it's because it's actually what the committee is saying, but because he might be in hotter water than it seemed before.
So this is the day, like I said, this is the day that Stuart Rhodes' news of his arrest broke.
And I want to make a bit of a retraction on some of the things that I've said before on the show.
I've been of the opinion that Alex is kind of grandstanding about his concern about the January 6th committee, and I don't think he's in actually any trouble.
But after reading Stuart's indictment, I want to walk that back.
I think Alex should be super scared right now, but I still haven't seen any evidence that he could be arrested for active participation in the very clear conspiracy that Stewart and the other Oath Keepers are charged with.
It's a very clear conspiracy, though, and we know how close Alex and Stewart are and how the two of them promoted the January 6th rallies together and they did damage control together afterwards.
I don't believe that the two of them weren't in contact with each other on the 6th.
I don't believe that at all.
But I just don't know the nature of that contact or any of how it went.
I thought Stewart himself was in the clear because I assumed that he would have maintained a safe distance from incriminating conversations that are maintained in writing.
But now that I've seen the evidence in the indictment...
Not knowing what evidence exists of contacts between Alex and Stuart makes it difficult to gauge how worried Alex should be right now, but on the scale, I think it goes from super worried to skipping the border level worried.
Also, it's hard to tell, but I think that there's a part of me that wonders, like I said, if Alex knew ahead of time that Stuart was going to get arrested.
It felt like...
I don't know how to describe this exactly.
It didn't feel like Alex learning something on the fly.
No, and far beyond, you know, we're in different stratosphere of awareness of a man's mood when it comes to having listened to thousands upon thousands of hours.
You've got me beat.
And if somebody can say...
Honestly, I know that he's acting out of character for him.
Criminal corporate interests engage in a criminal, illegal, hijacking, hostile takeover of the government and our systems.
And they've stolen all the money, and instead of going to jail for the Ponzi schemes, they just plan on poisoning and sterilizing us and getting rid of us.
Okay, this just broke 20 minutes ago from phone calls we got.
Now it's in the New York Times.
So we're going to go ahead and go with it.
It doesn't mean it's happened for sure, but 99% chance it has.
And we have the lawyer that was on the phone with Stuart Rose when he got raided by the FBI, reportedly, joining us next hour.
And Ali Alexander as well, and Attorney Norm Pattis, was also here on the same subject of the takeover of America via the National Security State Patriot Act, which we always knew would be used against the American people.
It is the Patriot Act.
Domestic terrorism is to attack Donald Trump's base.
Owen got arrested because he, you know, he was, by being there, he was in violation of deferred judgment from a previous case because Owen failed to complete his community service.
He violated an agreement that he entered into willingly to avoid consequences for his past actions, and that's why he's in trouble.
So this Ray Epps conspiracy is the new preoccupation.
The FBI released an image of him as somebody that they were looking for information on.
Then, he didn't get arrested, and so the crack sleuths in Alex's community have put two and two together to prove that he's a fed, and he was the one secretly running the operation.
This is stupid, and if this logic holds, then I guess Jay Johnston was also there under FBI deep cover.
So, this narrative around this keeps shifting because people like Alex are just throwing out whatever thin bullshit they can, hoping to buy some time and create distraction from the reality that his friends and close associates planned to and followed through on, bringing caches of weapons to the Capitol that day in an explicitly premeditated plan to stop the certification of the election results.
First, it was a nebulous, unnamed Antifa and BLM folks who were dressed like Trump supporters who must have done it.
Then it was clearly John Sullivan who was the ringleader.
And now we've gone through a couple more iterations of this cycle, and Ray Epps is the new sacrificial lamb for the right-wing media.
They're hoping it'll stick, and it'll just be, we'll figure out another guy down the road.
So without any actual evidence, this guy Ray Epps has been blamed for running a false flag coup on the Capitol by people like Charlie Kirk, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Matt Gaetz, and Ted Cruz even got into the act after he was roundly humiliated by Tucker Carlson for not being in line enough with the extremist wing of the party.
As it turns out, this is really simple, and the explanation for the removal of Epps' picture from the persons of interest list is that they just no longer had any questions they needed answers about from him, since the investigation had progressed and they'd got the information they needed.
There are a bunch of other examples of people whose images have been removed, and not all of them are because they were arrested.
This isn't a unique case.
Epps is absolutely not a Fed, and he wasn't running any false flag.
He was, however, previously the head of the Arizona branch of the Oath Keepers.
He was interviewed by the January 6th committee, and this baby should be put to bed, but it probably won't be anytime soon.
Because their high-profile media figures are really closely connected with people who are charged with a seditious conspiracy, There will be targeted campaigns against anyone, even former leaders of Stewart's own organization, if it can help build a narrative where folks like Stewart and Alex are really the victims in this whole thing.
It's sad and honestly really dangerous.
I can imagine that Ray isn't feeling very safe right now, seeing as a not insignificant number of heavily armed lunatics think he's responsible for setting a trap that took down the Patriot leadership and thus the country.
Now look, I think that Ray Epps is probably not a great dude.
I would assume not.
But this is bullshit.
And the way that he's being put up and people in the Congress are trying to use this as a smokescreen to excuse the behavior of people who are right-wing extremists on the 6th.
So yeah, this is essentially the narrative that Alex is going to run with, and that is that Ted Cruz got out and he started questioning about Ray Epps, what's going on with this guy, and then the heat got too hot so they had to take Stuart Rhodes.
I can't stop loving how innocent it looks for you to say, also, I have a tape where he answered questions that makes him look very guilty, that I didn't show you.
And I'm not going to show you now, because I don't want you to think he's guilty, which he definitely isn't, and that's why I can't show you this information.
Think about the level of conspiracy he would make if somebody else was like, oh, we've got a tape of Hillary Clinton looking real guilty describing how she wasn't on Epstein's island.
At this point, Alex should be putting the pieces together about this obvious puzzle.
He hasn't read the indictment, so he hasn't seen the concrete evidence of Stewart's direct involvement with these allegedly delusional Oath Keepers who thought they were under the orders of Trump, so I'll accept that he's still trying to spin this as best as he can.
But that part about how Stewart wasn't denouncing the Oath Keepers who went in, that makes a whole lot more sense now in hindsight.
He was hanging strong with them because he knew that they had concrete dirt on him.
He would get arrested for a seditious conspiracy if they put this dirt out, so he wasn't about to hang them out to dry and risk them talking.
The stuff that Alex is saying fits incredibly perfectly with the set effects where Stewart was running a group of people who were planning to disrupt the certification of the election results by storming the Capitol if it came to that.
That's why he blew up at Alex when he was questioned about things on that show.
That's why he didn't turn on the arrested Oath Keepers.
Alex is making a compelling circumstantial case that Stewart is guilty as hell.
I think he's a true believer that's been set up this whole time.
If I had to go with my gut, and that's why he's been arrested, not Ray Epps.
So we should support Stewart and worry about Stewart and really be concerned here because Stewart's a very smart guy, but he's also extremely romantic.
He's a romantic.
And for folks that don't know, they're new listeners maybe, or public school educated like myself, a romantic doesn't just mean like men and women kissing each other.
Romantics are into romantic stories and fighting and sacrificing yourself.
I'm a romantic.
But I'm also a realist romantic in that I'm not going to let my romance with humanity and my romance with being a hero not let me get my full potential.
I'm not going to be played.
And I warned Stuart over and over again that he was infiltrated years ago.
Also, I get the sense that Alex is maybe making some of the same calculations that Stewart did when Stewart didn't abandon the arrested Oath Keepers.
Stewart's been coming on Infowars since 2009, and it's about 13 years of the two of them being associates.
And I wouldn't be too surprised if Alex didn't want to run the risk of Stewart telling some tales about him.
Maybe about Alex's finances, or the way the show runs, or how little he cares about the audience and the things that he says.
It kind of feels like there's something, because if you're in the clear, now is exactly the right time to pretend you've never met Stuart Rhodes, and anybody who says that you are friends with him, they're floating a raft of dirty lies around.
It's the easiest thing to do right now.
Stuart is fucked.
Half of all of Alex's audience already thinks he's a Fed.
And this Ray Epps nonsense might be playing on the social media right now, but it's not going to work for the long term.
You know, the thing is, when he says his lawyers say, they're looking into me for material support for terrorism, it's hard not to think, maybe he gave Stuart some money.
And then we're in real trouble there.
You know?
Even if he didn't know what it was for, if Stewart took money from him and then went and bought guns and put him in that cash, that's hard to...
Yeah, but you know, thinking back to that time, there was quite a bit of chatter from him, and it's the same stuff that it always was, but like, you know, eh, whatever.
Because God is my witness, and I've done this a few times, people have seen it on air, but this time I didn't do it.
I intended to come on this show today and say, I don't think Stuart Rhodes is fed.
I think he's been misguided.
I'm just really worried about Stuart Rhodes.
I woke up at like 3 in the morning last night.
I had a dream about Stuart Rhodes last night.
God is my witness before God on my children.
And I had a dream about Stuart.
You know, these dreams were all foggy, but he was key, and I wanted to love him, and he wasn't bad, and I'd been wrong, even though I hadn't said it on air.
I need to reach out to Stuart and get him on air, but Stuart's a jerk and arrogant, and he'll think you're just manipulating him, and he's paranoid, but that I need to reach out to Stuart.
So, Ali Alexander comes on, and we do learn over the course of their conversation that he is the one who got in touch with Alex and told him about this.
And my question for the FBI is, is this raid from pressure from congressional Democrats to elaborate on conspiracy charges, to paint the entire Republican Party as a conspiratorial, seditious, you know, paramilitary, which we're absolutely not.
I know it sucks for these guys that the facts that are coming out and the basis for the investigations actually being revealed, it has the effect of completely deflating the fan fiction they've been selling their audience this whole time about the 6th.
I know that sucks.
That's tough, and it's probably even more so for Ali, considering that he's deeply involved in planning the rally at the Capitol, and the fact that most of the real hardcore right-wing folk probably think he's a fed or a snitch because he agreed to testify before the January 6th committee, it's gotta suck for him.
But the reality here is that Stuart's arrest and the information that was made public because of it completely demolishes any of the nonsense arguments Alex and Ali have made about the storming of the Capitol being an orchestrated false flag by Antifa and the Deep State.
Continuing to pursue the conspiratorial narrative is going to force people like Alex to come up with ever more complicated explanations for the new information that comes out, demonstrating that right-wing extremists planned, organized, and carried out the events of January 6th for the purposes of disrupting the transfer of power.
Of course, they can't really do the opposite either because that would require them admitting that they were either knowingly or unknowingly part of that plan, which would tend to look bad and put them in a corner.
I would guess that Alex is going to soon do the move where he transitions into a new narrative, where he says something like, we know who staged the Sixth, but we need to move on from that because the midterms are coming up and the globalists are going to steal them.
Something like that.
We're going to focus on something else.
We're going to be like, hey, let's not re-litigate the Sixth.
So, you know, while there's a temptation on some of the right to just throw Stuart Rhodes, you know, down the barrel, and then there's a temptation to act as a reactionary.
Yeah, I mean, and that's another good question, is why is the J6 committee so hell-bent on clearing Ray Epps' name when he's the only one on camera caught violating the law?
The reason that the January 6th committee is tweeting out that they interviewed Ray Epps and that he isn't a Fed is because you and all your shithead friends are insisting that he is and that he caused January 6th.
They're investigating the events of that day, and Epps is someone who was there and is someone who was on tape saying inciting things the night before, so he was a person that they thought they might want to talk to.
Maybe he had some information.
That'd be helpful.
They interviewed him and it turns out he didn't, so they put out a statement that they interviewed him and that the allegations about him aren't true.
This is a great example of a right-wing media rhetorical trap.
The January 6th committee did this and they're being criticized for it.
Why are they so eager to clear this guy's name?
It's suspicious.
However, if they didn't interview Epps, Ali would just be saying, why did they refuse to interview Epps?
If they interviewed him and then they didn't put out a statement, Ali would say, why won't Mm-hmm.
There isn't any actual interest in the things that are happening in reality.
There's a predetermined narrative, and facts and events have to be presented to the audience through the filter of that narrative.
Instances like this question Ali is asking are telltale signs of people who aren't operating from a sincere position who you should never engage with.
You're never going to convince them of anything because they don't care about reality.
Also, what Ali is saying about Epps being the only person on camera doing anything illegal is absolutely a lie.
There are a ton of people who are on camera assaulting police officers, breaking Capitol windows, and other property.
What he's saying is just absurd.
Ray Epps also didn't do anything illegal on camera.
There's a 45-second video that has made the rounds all over social media where he's talking to another guy the night before and he says, quote, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested.
I'll say it.
We need to go into the Capitol.
If Ali thinks it's illegal to say that, he has a poor grasp on free speech.
And if that standard is universally applied, everyone he knows would be in Oh, yeah.
It's dumb, and it's an indication that he's probably a shithead, but if Ali thinks it's proof of a crime, he needs to go take a high school-level civics class.
I wonder how Alex is going to feel about his gut prediction after he reads the indictment.
That gut prediction that Stuart's innocent and all that?
Actually, I don't really care, because I know he's never going to read it, and he's just going to keep pretending that there's no evidence against Stuart, and he got jammed up to cover up for reps.
It's all bullshit.
So, Ali has been on, and now Alex gets Jonathan Mosley, Stewart's lawyer, and apparently Ali's lawyer as well, on.
And it turns out, like, I don't know if he understands free speech either.
I watched last night for the first time Merrick Garland's speech about January 5th or 6th.
I thought he was unhinged.
Shut the fuck up!
I thought he was giving a raw deal when he wasn't set for the United States Supreme Court and thought they at least ought to have voted up or down on him.
But when I watched him quaking in his loafers in rage, I thought there's something wrong with the man and there's something wrong with the country.
Yeah, man, when Stuart Rhodes and his militia decide that they're going to get weapons caches and then try and storm the Capitol in order to stop the counting of the votes in the Electoral College, you know what Congress should really Yep, yep.
Look, I'm not saying the Congress doesn't need to make some changes, but that's a ridiculous thing to say.
Interestingly, if you pull up the indictment, Stuart Rhodes, one of the things, one of the messages he sent on the 6th, as things were grown down, he said, quote, Hey, the founding generation stormed the governor's mansion in Massachusetts and tarred and feathered his tax collectors, and they seized and dumped tea in the water.
Well, you know, I mean, basically, it's an attempt to criminalize ordinary behavior, and it waters down the conspiracy requirement to almost meaningless dimensions.
If, in fact, agreeing to go to a protest and agreeing to stand outside to try to delay Congress from doing something or a federal agency from doing something or trying to hinder them from doing something, that expression of protest is now considered, under this precedent, sedition.
You notice how the people who were just standing outside and protesting, like all those hundreds and thousands of people, they weren't arrested for a seditious conspiracy.
It's also weird how Norm is completely ignoring all the parts in the indictment where Stewart and his buddies make weapons caches and start up quick response teams to bring guns to the Capitol.
So weird that they're pretending that Stuart didn't discuss how he and others might have to, quote, take to arms in defense of our God-given liberty.
So weird that it doesn't come up that a person with Rhodes messaged their group chat during the storming of the Capitol and said, quote, we are acting like the founding fathers, can't stand down, per Stuart and I agree.
This is just such bullshit of a move for Norm to get on this show and pretend that all Stuart did to get in trouble was to go to a protest with some friends that ended getting up a little out of hand.
This is such cowardly and a deceitful way to present this information, and he knows what he's doing.
Well, they're building this constellation of FEMA camps and arrests and solitary confinement and disappearing and how to block lawyers and how to block judges.
They're just building the beginning of their martial law takeover.
I would even go so far as to say, if you were just a misanthrope who wasn't a racist, you would have said, I'm a misanthrope, instead of, I'm a white misanthrope.
The leaves fall off in autumn, and sometimes stuff shuts down.
I love this crew.
I love we've been in the same building 15 years.
I've been on there 28 years.
If you guys decide not to support us, and you've already done so much, that's what God wants.
They'll be happy to go away, but they're going to blow up a bunch of federal buildings and declare martial law and turn your power off and send forced inoculators to your house and rape your wife and children.
I was thinking about some of the aspects of that, and I do think that, I mean, I think he was bad consistently, but he was better five years ago than he is now.
I mean, just by virtue of going from a D to an F. It's still worse, sure.
I don't know how much awareness he had of the specific of him getting arrested that day or anything, but the way he reacted is not how he normally reacts to stuff.
I wouldn't say that he knew it was going to happen that day, but if he didn't get a text in the past two or three days that's like, it could happen any week now or something like that.
Shit's getting hot.
Exactly.
I would definitely, absolutely see Stewart himself knowing like, hey.