In Knowledge Fight #635, Alex Jones falsely ties January 6, 2022 to a "globalist false flag" while peddling COVID vaccine conspiracies—sterilization, social credit scores, and a California school’s undocumented myocarditis claims—despite debunking by Dan Friesen. He later pivots to Tucker Carlson as the "greatest populist," ignoring their lack of collaboration despite shared rhetoric, before revealing InfoWars’ $165M sales (not profits) and his refusal to take a vacation due to $3M debt, framing it as a fight against the "New World Order." The hosts mock Jones’ shifting narratives, financial hypocrisy, and reliance on fringe theories over facts. [Automatically generated summary]
And American reality shows or contest shows that they're like, they are challenging for $250,000.
There's no obsession with the outcome.
There is obsession with the process.
And the other thing that I noticed too, watching, I think I was watching season five, is that the people sincerely seem to think that each other are funny.
Yeah, you know, I'm a fan of the event because it's all about charity and a bunch of weirdos getting together and having a grand old time doing fun stuff.
It is January 6th, 2022, on this Thursday transmission.
At this time, a year ago, I was sitting there watching Trump give a speech.
And down the road, the feds were busy attacking the undermanned police and with just a few dozen men breaking through the first barricades and the rest is history.
Then the police standing down, waving everybody in so they can get some patsies to put in solitary confinement and set the precedent for Chinese-style torture of political dissidents in America.
And we have Ted Cruz praising it all yesterday.
Obviously, that's just what's wrong with Ted Cruz is he's smart.
I can't get over how fantastic it is, how funny it is, and how complete of a coward you would have to be to be in a building where you could have been murdered and then a year later be browbeaten by Tucker Carlson into pretending that you weren't going to be murdered.
Yeah, it's kind of a fun thing in this dystopian world we live in to watch that utter humiliation that Ted Cruz had to go through.
Brutal on the national stage.
So he called the storming of the Capitol a violent terrorist attack, and immediately the extremist pundits that essentially guide the GOP now swarmed, showing that he has absolutely no backbone.
Cruz went on Tucker's show on Thursday, the evening of this episode, and he tried to beg for forgiveness, almost as if he was worried about being canceled by a right-wing mob.
It would be a shocking display of cowardice, except I remember the 2016 election when Trump called his wife ugly and said his dad killed JFK, and then Cruz ended up phone banking for it.
Wouldn't you be sad if you had elected, if I had voted for Ted Cruz, even if I believed in everything Ted Cruz believed in, it's just like, oh, you're such a worm.
So watching Tucker not accept Cruz's apology was also really fun, but underneath that, there's a more troubling reality.
Ted Cruz isn't some dumbass media personality.
He's a senator representing one of the most populous states in the country.
He has no ability to express himself if the things he's wanting to express happen to run counter to the narratives that underpin the business models of this group of white nationalist pundits.
It really doesn't bode well for the GOP and their politics moving forward.
And I mean, they weren't good before, but the idea that the people who are elected officials need to pass an asshole like Tucker's purity test, that's a sign that things are going to get worse.
Oh, yeah.
Another thing that's shocking about this is that these people like Alex and Tucker, they're pretending that this is the first time Ted Cruz called Storming the Capitol terrorism.
Daniel Dale at CNN was able to find at least 17 other times that Cruz has used that wording in the past.
It's a consistent pattern, but they're sort of pretending that it's a one-off thing because that allows them to humiliate him and make this public display of like what happens if you go against the narrative.
The whole new system, the whole new cosmology is that the American people are all terrorist and that they've got to round up everybody and shut down any populist movement, any conservative movement, any nationalist movement.
And Ted Cruz knows that purge is coming and he wants to position himself so when the stage terror attacks happen, he can point his finger at the Patriots and say, I'm not with the Patriot terrorist.
Instead of saying the evidence shows it's a false flag and the globalists have the motive and we need to stop them staging a false flag sometime the next 300 days.
We're 300 to 6 days out from the midterms.
And if you don't feel the suspense, if you don't feel the danger, if you can't cut it with a knife, you're not dialed in.
And they're going to blame it on the Patriots and the good Americans that are left.
And so in order to signal to the globalists that he's on their side and he will help persecute the good Americans, he's using the language of terrorist to describe January 6th.
And don't talk to your neighbors, even over a fence.
In fact, don't look them in the eyes.
That's on billboards and on signs in the UK and in places like Australia.
And then you've got government health ministers over major provinces in Canada saying, we're keeping the lockdowns going because we don't want people to talk to each other out in public and stop what we're doing.
That thing about the Canada is just a months-old narrative Alex is rehashing and it's nonsense.
There was one comment that a person made that a positive side effect of limiting large gatherings to slow COVID was that people who were spreading misinformation would also not be gathering.
It's kind of a dumb comment, particularly considering the fact that most of this misinformation gets spread digitally, not in in-person meetings.
As for that other stuff, that's all just a load of bullshit.
So that thing about sunsets in Australia is a misrepresentation of comments made by Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews back in August.
He was specifically responding to a question about a bunch of people gathering at Rye Beach on a recent evening.
He said, quote, I'm sure it was a beautiful sunset, but that's not in the spirit or the letter of these rules.
He didn't say that you can't watch the sunset or even that you have to stay indoors all the time, just that the state of things in terms of the pandemic back in August in Victoria, having beach gatherings is a bad idea.
According to Victoria's COVID case tracker, they were having in the neighborhood of like 20 to 50 new cases a day back in August.
In January 2022, they're up to about 20,000 new cases a day.
The thing about looking at people in the eye, that thing, that's a case of even sloppier work on Alex's part.
This was a meme that was making the rounds back in September, which showed a bar in London having posted a list of restrictions they were putting in place in order to limit COVID spread.
One of their rules was, quote, no handshaking, high-fiving, or extended eye contact with anyone not at your table.
This was a joke.
The bar in question is London Fields Brewery, and their event manager, Paris Capone, told Reuters, quote, the health and safety of our customers and staff is our number one priority, and we're strictly adhering to all latest public health guidance inside the tap room.
The reference to no eye contact was intended to be an engaging way to encourage customers to read and take notice of the broader guidelines, but we've since removed it in case it was distracting from the overall serious message around safely enjoying the tap room.
None of the examples that Alex has here he's using to illustrate the nightmare tyranny that's coming, none of them are real.
His argument is so weak that one of his examples that he has to use is a satirical list from a bar that he saw in a meme and he never looked into.
They're now saying in Australia that you can't go outside and exercise if you don't have your little travel pass.
So there it is.
Now you can't leave your house unless you have the digital ID and then everything it takes to get that ID, the social credit score you must comply with, including the carbon taxes, the injections, all of it.
There was a comment made by the chief minister of the Northern Territory, Michael Gunner, and he did say that going to work or exercise, that's not a legitimate reason for an unvaccinated person to leave their home.
This decision was made because their new case numbers jumped about 60% from Tuesday to Wednesday and then over doubled from Wednesday to Thursday.
And so they were putting in this like four-day pretty tight lockup.
The comment about not being able to go out to exercise, it kind of seems like it's actually in reference to unvaccinated people not being allowed to go to gyms.
Even with a vaccine pass system in place, there's no way the Northern Territory has the police capability to check people's vaccine status out on the street, like if someone's going for a jog.
And while we're at it, that's not even how this works.
The police aren't enforcing this at all.
Health Minister Natasha Files was talking to ABC Radio Darwin about how this places an added responsibility on service workers.
And she said, quote, the onus is on the community to abide by the requirements.
That doesn't sound at all like this tyranny thing.
I just see somebody walking outside of their house in Sydney, just like slow looking both directions, crossing the street, putting their headphones in to go for a jug, and then 30 Scotland Yard people with billy clubs just show up out of nowhere and just start beating them down.
Well, I read the globalist documents, and what they were building was a prison planet.
And then once everybody's in the prison planet and getting sicker and dying and had 10, 15 shots, the government says it's the uninjected.
They're the reason you're sick.
We've got to finally put them in camps.
And we can't let them be lazy.
They're going to have to work in the camps.
Now, how do I know that?
Well, it's historically happened before with authoritarians demonizing a group and doing that to them for some reason.
They make up different reasons.
But it's also in the CDC documents from a year and a half ago that they want that here where, oh, we're going to put people that don't take the shots in camps and we're going to make you work.
Like when you go back through Alex's career, it seems like there's an intense preoccupation with him and his friends being put into FEMA camps.
Throughout so many different generations of the show, that's the big fear that he's promoting.
But if you actually track the storylines that he uses to sell that fear, they don't match up at all.
In 2009, it was owning a gun that was going to get you thrown into FEMA camps.
There's going to be large-scale gun confiscation efforts.
And if you resisted, you'd be sent to the camp.
Then a little bit later when Obama was in office, he was always just about to pull the trigger on the FEMA provisional government, which would make him the king of America, which he was planning to turn into an Islamic caliphate.
And if you resisted his power grab, you'd be sent to a FEMA camp.
Yeah, I remember that.
Now, if you don't get vaccinated, you're going to get sent to a FEMA camp.
It's honestly a little bit boring for me at this point, but I guess it works to rile up the audience.
That's the only explanation for why he just keeps going back to that detail and all of his fear porn.
Another reason this is super boring for me is that if the government ever did get the idea to start doing this and rounding up unvaccinated people to send them to work camps, the people who are going to be on the forefront of fighting against that are the very people Alex thinks are demons.
Leftists, the ACLU, politicians like AOC, they're going to be opposed to this on principle.
While Alex's favorite politicians shrivel up like Ted Cruz and go along to get along.
Yeah, you know, it's really easy to drum up fear of being put into a camp if you're trying to scare white people because historically, it's never been white people who get put into the camps.
Well, and again, you know, I often repeat the obvious that I'm just a guitar player, but I'm actually a we the people experimenter and self-government guitar player, which means I'm tuned into the world around me, especially the old experiment and self-government.
They're sacred, United States of America.
And here's what happened on January 6th.
President Trump did a speech and a presentation and had a rally with good conservative families supporting God, family, country, constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, that men in the arena work ethic that has created the greatest quality of life in the history of the world.
Then Ray Epps and a bunch of other saboteurs, a bunch of other provocateurs, federal protected provocateurs, organized a rally.
Well, it was supposed to be a peaceful protest.
But those that created violence, those that turned it into a riot, those were Black Lives Matter punks.
Those were Antifa punks.
And those were Federal Bureau of Investigation, James Comey, J. Edgar Hoover punks that perpetrated all the violence, all the violent activity, dressed in Trump regalia.
So it's also got to really suck to be someone like Daniel Rodriguez, who is the guy who tasered Officer Michael Fanon on the 6th.
You know, it's got to suck to hear how easily disavowed and disowned you are by the very people who whipped you into the frenzy where you thought it might be necessary to tase a cop in order to save America.
I have to assume it would be really disillusioning to see this kind of thing where because you took action in the way that these people were clearly indicating that you should, you now have to be cast off as a left-wing provocateur just to make the noble patriots look bad.
They have to turn you into that because you did what they wanted you to.
It's honestly pathetic, and it's also disrespectful to the insurgents that people like Alex and Ted have radicalized.
Alex always says that you can tell a tree by its fruit, and I think it's a disgrace for these guys to disown their fruit in order to pretend that their tree isn't as shitty as it clearly is.
It's nonsense.
Yeah.
I mean, I hate to, you know, I hate to appeal to, like, hey, have sympathy for this dude who says a cop.
I kept thinking, like, God, if I was one of these, if I was one of those dudes, I'd be like, I'm going to sue Tucker Carlson for libel because I was fucking there and I did that shit, and I'm proud of it.
And that's why my friends, when they went to the government, were very peaceful, fun-loving, enjoyable Americans who never threatened to murder the president before.
America, take a deep breath and be sure you let your mayor, your senator, your congressman, your governor, and the White House know on a regular basis.
I would say at this point during these tragic times, on a weekly basis, communicate with your elected employees and let them know that you know January 6th was not an insurrection.
It was not Pearl Harbor and it was not 9-11.
It had nothing to do with any of those horrific events.
Nugent's a fucking asshole, but this strategy is probably an effective one to put pressure on the GOP politicians.
It does seem like bullying them into denying reality has been shown to work.
So I wouldn't be too surprised if over time we don't end up seeing an entire political party that fully embraces that conspiracy version of January 6th.
What you need to do to prove to our elected politicians that this was a peaceful demonstration is to violently intimidate them until they agree with you.
For me, I think you and people like Tucker Carlson are the model of America.
You're just populist.
You believe in our basic rights and freedom.
And that should unify people around all that.
And to have Ted Cruz putting out the same talking points as Chucky Schumer and the Democrats that are also a lie is super dangerous.
And I think it spotlights, as you like to say.
The reason we keep losing this country is we know the Democrats are bad, but if we didn't have Republicans continually stabbing us in the back, we would turn this country around.
So, first things first, Stephen Kirsch is not a pathologist.
He's a guy whose background is in computer science, who lost his fucking mind during the pandemic, and now he's pretending to be a pathologist, selling dangerous bullshit to the segment of the media that abhors critical thinking, like Alex.
There is one link, but it goes to a previous article that Kirsch wrote on his blog.
This previous blog post also had no evidence or proof of any of his claims, but instead relied on reporting based on something someone told him.
Allegedly, a parent had told him that three children at Monta Vista Christian School had been diagnosed with myocarditis.
I'm not saying that this didn't happen, but I am saying that this is something that you need to do some more legwork on if you're going to report it as a definitive claim.
This is sloppy.
But this shit gets so much worse.
So, the ratio and literally every conclusion that Kirsch comes to is just the result of him guessing things from the original post.
He can't demonstrate that three children had myocarditis.
He can't demonstrate that vaccination rate.
And I would bet that he's even just guessing with the roughly half the school or boys thing.
This one in 95 number means legitimately nothing.
He can't back this up at all.
So then, his new post is about how he's, quote, heard that there's another case of myocarditis at the school, which of course would make it one in about 70 using the same made-up numbers that he used before.
It's hard to believe that someone could write a blog post like this and hit publish without feeling intense embarrassment.
Kirsch doesn't know what the vaccination rate at the school is, but he's decided that all of the alleged four children who he's heard got myocarditis must be recently vaccinated, which he condescendingly responds to.
So Kirsch apparently contacted the dean of the school who said that they don't just give out medical information about students to random people, which of course proves that this is a conspiracy and a cover-up.
So the first is that some alleged students at the school told him that the school administered vaccines on April 30th, so the school must be afraid of getting sued.
Apparently, Kirsch went on to bother the dean about this.
Quote, she stated in an email to me on January 5th that, quote, Monte Vista Christian School has never administered COVID-19 vaccines to students or anyone else.
And Monta Vista Christian School has never hosted at its real property or anywhere else any clinic or other event at which COVID-19 vaccines were administered.
His other theory is the parents don't want to hurt the school and think that God will heal the students.
This is the primary source Alex is using to report out this vaccine conspiracy claim.
It's nothing new, really, but this is particularly shitty work.
Also, about that supposed vaccine clinic that the school allegedly had on April 30th.
Like, if that was when the students supposedly got vaccinated, that flies in the face of Kirsch's other made-up point about how they were all recently vaccinated, which you'll remember he made up earlier.
The claim is going all over right-wing media and social media, and the only support I can find for it in all of the articles is this stupid blog post written by a grown man who sounds like a tween.
These people are re-reporting this story based on this.
They should be deeply ashamed of themselves.
They have done no checking in on the source, or they're willing to stand behind this stupid blog post.
I mean, it fucks me up the most whenever it is this kind of situation where you go back and you're like, there's really only this one dude who is saying this shit and everybody's just running with it.
What fucks me up about that is just like, that is such a positive reinforcement type reward for just gall.
Just having the gall to say something this dumb with the straight face is rewarded beyond your wildest dreams.
Well, I mean, dumb or not, like, let's put that aside even.
Just like evil.
Making so many assumptions in terms of justifying the claim that you want to make as opposed to getting the actual information that you can verify out.
Right.
I think that, yeah, the rewarding of that is got to, I mean, it's got to give you all kinds of endorphin rushes if you're that guy.
And it's Kirsch reporting on what pathologists are saying.
On Wednesday, Kirsch reported via Substack that he'd privately received a report from a concerned parent that a fourth student at the Monte Vista Christian School in Watsonville had been diagnosed.
Kirsch had already documented three cases at the school with an enrollment of about 855 students last month.
So you'll notice at the beginning there, Alex is correcting because he had said that Steve Kirsch was a pathologist, and now he's saying, oh, he's not a pathologist.
Imagine a situation where a guy was running for a county treasurer position.
He's awesome at the actual work of being a treasurer, but unfortunately, he's also pretty public about his belief that white people are superior to other races.
Would voting against him because of that be the social credit score coming into play?
I really don't even understand what Alex means by this stuff anymore.
Like, it's so thin to the point of it's undefinable.
I had the picture in my head of a government system, but now that he's saying that it's just something as meaningless as MVP voting, I'm really lost.
Also, I could make a very strong argument that even if Rodgers is the best football player in the season, him being an open anti-vex weirdo in the middle of a pandemic kind of reduces his value as a player and may take him out of the running for most valuable player in my mind.
I would rather have a quarterback who's just slightly less good at football than him, but who also isn't a total asshole who's probably going to get a bunch of my team's fans killed.
I think I would have more value in having someone like that on my team than Aaron Rodgers.
Man, I wonder if NFL stat people have tried to put that together.
Like, if Aaron Rodgers infected like eight of his teammates, what's his wins above replacement value subtracted by them being gone for a few games because of him?
I want to play a very important clip coming up here in a few minutes of Robert Kennedy Jr. explains why Fauci is going after children.
And what he says is on record and totally true and is a huge evil war crime and scandal in and of itself.
But that's only one level.
This is not about money.
Yeah, the drug reps and the company heads, the people following the directives, it's all about money.
But for the groups above it, it's about sterilization, depopulation, playing God, and engaging in mad scientist behavior where they say they want to merge with silicon and become gods.
Well, the only way to do that is to give enough people these shots and then test what's happening and see what genetic lines are able to merge with this.
What immortal cell lines can be merged with this?
They want to merge biological immortal cell lines with a human synthesis that is able to merge with these nanotech synthetic matrixes.
It's such a weird move on Alex's part to play a clip of Robert Kennedy Jr. talking about how Fauci wanted to vaccinate kids for money, but then he introduces it by saying that the clip you're about to listen to, actually, it isn't true.
I guess if Alex's goal is to make Kennedy's argument look sane in comparison to his own, I guess he's done a good job of that.
But they don't even know that what they're trying to do is combine.
So if I understand now, the vaccines aren't even also about killing people.
It's about mad scientist behavior where you're taking the vaccine to get the idea of what genes can connect with immortal cell lines so you can combine with silicon in order to become gods.
It's fascinating how you can feel the gears moving in his head, knowing that what he's saying is bullshit word salad, but he's still trying to figure out a way to not sound like he's making it all up for sure.
When I hear things like this, I really wonder if the listeners recognize how Alex keeps adding new wrinkles to his conspiracies and how the plans of the globalists seem to change constantly.
The headline about human history ending when people become gods isn't some kind of an evil statement or threat.
It's the headline of an interview from 2017 with an Israeli historian named Yuval Noah Harari.
It's basically trying to discuss his new book, Homo Deos, which argued that with the advent of technology that we've created, man was beginning to wield powers that we previously ascribed only to deities, like the ability to create life.
He was speaking in a somewhat poetic way to express that when we are able to create inorganic life, like a sentient AI, we can, quote, go to the earth spirit and say, what do you think about that?
We're equal to the spirit we understand, not you.
Harari has some very interesting thoughts, but this is a futurist theory.
And he's definitely not saying that humanity is going to end, just that we'll take on an entirely new relationship with the world around us.
That hasn't been the case since human history has begun.
It's a meaningless citation for the argument Alex is making.
Interestingly, the other headline from 60 Minutes is another interview with Yuval Noah Harari.
When Alex says they admit all this, what he's actually saying is that he has a couple sensational headlines for articles about interviews with a futurist who's making predictions about where technology is going.
This isn't admitting anything, and the things that are being predicted aren't even in line with Alex's bullshit.
I mean, I assume that he's labeling that a hero because right now they're keeping Jokovich in a notorious refugee hotel that has been housing people for upwards of eight years.
And what was very funny is that the pro-Jokovich protesters were right next to the anti-refugee protesters, and they were like, hey, man, guess what else?
These fucking guys are stuck there.
And all the pro-Jokovich protesters were like, holy shit, we got to solve this problem first.
It was amazing.
Wow.
They bailed out Jokovich.
No, they were like, fuck Djokovic.
unidentified
These people have been trapped in there for eight years.
There's nothing more frustrating than knowing we have the answers and the key to defeating this evil takeover and stopping it dead in its tracks.
But instead, I just can't get people conscious.
I can't get people focused.
I can't get the message punched out enough to actually finally finish these people.
And so that means we're going to go into a very long, hellish nightmare.
And most people listening and watching will be dead in 10 years.
That's Klaus Schwab's promise.
He's sworn to kill you and your family.
He's put his people in over 100 nations.
And they're running their global lockdown shutdowns right now, preparing you for the real bioweapon they're going to release.
Cyber lockdowns, cyber shutdowns, collapse of the third world completely, being totally overrun, war on the streets, electricity going off for years, just absolute death and destruction is guaranteed.
And so I'm very frustrated and I'm very angry because I have this weight on my shoulders and I know I'm right and I know it's going down and I have all their own admissions and documents and I can't get people out of their trances.
Everybody's in their comfort zone.
And so the enemy's going to win because they're going to incrementally collapse society while posing as the saviors the whole time.
So I'm going to deliver the most important information ever.
When I'm looking for someone to admire, I can tell you that it's not going to be the person who gives themselves the job of being the one who can wake people up to the globalist plots surrounding them, only to lament that they can't actually wake people up to the globalist plots surrounding them.
When Alex says he can't get people to wake up, that isn't the alleged sleeping person's fault.
It's that there's something wrong with the person yelling at them to wake up.
When Alex says stuff like this, I just hear him saying, I can't do my job, which was imaginary to begin with.
Yeah, I wonder if the fact that Alex constantly builds things up to be the most important information ever or how reset wars was the most important work he's ever done and then it's always a bust and means nothing.
I wonder if that has to do anything with him not being able to wake people up.
I'm going to deliver the most important information ever that if people actually grasp it and get it and understand it, we're going to be able to turn society around and beat this.
But all this other incredible news I've got in front of me, and it's all very important, is a byproduct of the disease that is the new world order.
And so that's where we are, ladies and gentlemen.
I've got to go to rebroadcast for a while because this is just not full of signs.
I may not be able to do the show anymore because I just can't come in here and do it anymore.
I hate it.
I can't stand it.
And I'm sick of just window dressing, talking about all the stuff that's going on.
And just the general public just doesn't even care that we're all falling apart.
I mean, you know, they think it's funny that Klaus Rob's up there murdering everyone.
There's got, you know, you remember when I was doing stand-up, you know, sometimes to keep things interesting or keep things fun, they'd be like, we'd be like, you know what?
I'm just going to do none of my material.
I'm just going to do nothing but crowd work tonight.
The way he's describing what he needs to do in order to defeat the globalists, it almost sounds like he's like, if I can get the spell right, if I can get the word order in the incantation correct, it will work.
I've got this whole thing basically spring-loaded.
I want to say when we come back, that I grasp in my mind, and then if I don't just keep that moment of understanding and all those points I want to make, because I'm not writing this down, I'm not reading a teleprompter.
It all just dissipates like gas into the ether.
And then I don't say the key thing that if I say it just right and explain the thought perfectly or almost perfectly, then the public will grasp it and also absorb it and understand a blueprint for victory, which we need.
And there's nothing more frustrating than knowing you've got the blueprint for victory.
You've proven you can do it.
God's given you the directive and you can't get it done because you are weak.
I'm talking about myself.
So my frustration here is not with the audience, the crew.
My frustration is with the globalists killing everybody and running around enjoying it.
They love it.
See, it hurts us.
They like it.
They have fun doing all this.
Oh, they just love it.
They just love it.
And I have to control myself and not go after them with rage because we're not doing this for them.
The level of this, like the transparentness of the putting this off is so the methinks you death protests too much does not even come close to covering it.
It couldn't even, it doesn't even state conclusive things about being a causal relationship between being interested in celebrities and if you read Us Weekly, you're dead inside.
And they believe once they get rid of you and your ugly hovel and your ugly face and your ugly kids in their view that they'll finally be free because you won't be around.
That's their real view.
And just because you got the general mass of people dumbed down, not aware of standing up for themselves, doesn't mean you have a right to kill them just because you're some inbred, occultic globalist that knows the basics of the third dimension.
So that makes you a god because you're willing to crap all over other sentient creatures and keep them in the dark.
Alex has been teasing and rambling this whole episode so far about him revealing who the most important person on earth is, but now he's moving the goalposts.
Apparently, now it's the greatest person on earth or the person with the most potential to empower humanity.
If Alex thinks those things are interchangeable, that's fine, but it also speaks to his subjective beliefs.
Someone else could easily believe that the most important person and the person who has the most potential to empower humanity are two different people, like you touched on.
Like, I think a very strong argument could be made that you can make these separate.
The most important person could actually be a force of evil.
Importance is a value-neutral concept.
So if you were a terrifying dictator who was working against the cause of empowering humanity and you were a threat to everyone, that person could easily be the most important person in the world.
But it's interesting to see how disorganized Alex's thoughts are, even about this clearly intentional tease session he's doing.
I don't care if you, what you did in the corrupt system.
I care how much you care about humanity, how much you want to empower people, how much you're a populist, how much you believe in the species made in the image of God.
Yeah, I mean, really, when he said he's going to clarify what it takes to be the most important person, he's just created more questions for me to ask about what it is his new subjective measurements actually mean.
So I guess now the most important person title that Alex is giving out is really better described as person disseminating ideas that Alex likes who is also not a well-known lunatic or bigot, so they fly under most people's radar.
He can become the most potent person in the world.
Just like that.
And he understands that and is now moving towards that.
And as we all move towards that, that center of pro-human gravity, we then learn the secret that I will tell you when we come back in the final segment of this.
Who the most important person in the world is.
But I want you to understand something.
This isn't hype.
This isn't exaggeration.
This isn't BS.
This isn't any of that.
We must recognize from amongst our people who is the best at promoting humanity.
It's certainly not the poor little reanimated corpse, Joe Biden, or his fake Vice President Kamala Harris.
It's not Vladimir Putin.
Because Vladimir Putin has Russia, the largest landmass in the world, and he has a lot of good people, and he's trying to build a Christian future and going against the globalists, but he's not in America.
If we could take the country back peacefully without the revolution they're trying to artificially trigger around January 6th, then we could really have a future of peace and justice.
We could have a real shot at that with Russia and with China and with Asia and the Middle East and Africa and Latin America.
And I know the individual that I'm going to say is the most important person in the world has that same idea and has that same thought and wants that.
And when I recognize this individual, it's not to put him up on a pedestal, but it's to recognize who's done the best, clean, professional, level-headed job despite all the attacks and what I know they've gone through behind the scenes that people don't know about.
In America and as an example around the world, who's listened to in Japan and in South Africa and in Mexico and in Canada and in the United States?
Who all over the world, when I talk off record to world leaders in South America, like Brazil or in Eastern Europe, who do they talk about and who's unifying them to have a pro-human future against the great reset in the new world order?
Second thought that I have is like, Alex has so little to talk about on this episode that he spent an hour building up to saying that Tucker is the most important person in the world.
Somebody like Tucker Carlson knows that Ted Cruz got a talking point from Garland and from the establishment, and that they are preparing to claim that the American people are about to stage terror attacks and try to assassinate Biden.
I told you that months ago, it's in the news today.
And they're going to try to sew us up and bring in martial law.
And the lawyer, the Bush minion, Ted Cruz, who poses as a patriot all these years, who is a wolf in sheep's clothing, Tucker Carlson believes, and he's got better sources than I, I believe him, has to be cut out and destroyed.
And like a populist general, Tucker Carlson just tore his guts up.
Man, I mean, that is, it is such a huge, that really is like a huge interview, though.
Like the idea to me of being alive in the building for the first time in my life, in my entire political career, really being afraid that a mob would tear the walls down and kill me.
And then a year later to have to sit across from that whiny, sniveling piece of shit, Tucker Carlson, and lick his feet.
That is, if me, like in the body of me right now, I'm ready to kill Tucker Carlson.
If that was me and Tucker Carlson was like, if I was Ted Cruz, I would have leaped across the table and started strangling him.
Tucker Carlson knows the terror attacks are coming.
Tucker Carlson knows the stage civil war is coming.
Tucker Carlson knows the big event's coming and the end of America.
And he's trying to stop it and making an issue in front of all the other conservatives and all the Christians and all the Fox News Republicans and saying, stop putting up with Mitch McConnell.
And with Ted Cruz and with Rand Paul.
He's come out against the vaccine.
It doesn't work.
It's dangerous to poison.
And Josh Hawley and all of them because they all fear the liberal media.
They all fear the George Soros system.
When they better start fearing us.
And that's the instinct Tucker Carlson's got at the top of his game.
I know off record, not from others, almost paid nothing to get actual free will and have his own voice on Fox.
I think Alex kind of let slip there what actually makes him think that Tucker is the most important person in the world.
It's that in Tucker, Alex sees a person who actually has the ability to humiliate senators and essentially sway power on the right wing.
He sees someone who, if he can piggyback it, Alex can use to reestablish the illusion that he has any effect on the real world.
If Tucker can humiliate Ted Cruz and Alex pretends to be totally in line with Tucker and secretly his best friend, then it's kind of like Alex inspired Tucker to humiliate Ted Cruz and thus Alex is really the one with the power to sway politics.
This is a fine game for Alex to play and though I think it stinks of desperation, it may well work a little bit for a while.
There is an essential problem with this though, and it's that people should ask themselves if they're in Alex's audience, if Tucker and Alex are such good friends and on exactly the same page, why has Tucker never had Alex on any of his shows lately on any of these?
He has multiple shows.
He has a radio show.
He has two TV shows.
Why doesn't Tucker show up as a guest on Infowars periodically if they're a couple of the very few comrades in this fight against Alex's enemies?
Possibly more bitingly, why wasn't Alex interviewed for Tucker's documentary about January 6th?
He was at the Capitol, and clearly Tucker had no problem interviewing shifty weirdos since he had Ali Alexander interviewed in it.
The fact that Tucker seems to have a staunch resistance to being publicly personally associated with Alex should be something that causes the audience to ask themselves some serious questions.
Like, this is Trump all over again, basically.
Trump came on Alex's show once to sell his book in December 2015, and he never came back.
And he never publicly associated himself with Alex in any way.
The narrative that Trump and Alex were on the same page came almost entirely from Alex's stories.
And in the end, I think it's pretty safe to say that most of them were made up.
Now Alex has to jettison that mainstream avatar for him to live vicariously through because Trump likes the vaccine.
So it seems like maybe Alex is trying to lean hard into glomming onto Tucker in order to preserve some image of relevance in the actual world.
Also, there's absolutely no chance that Tucker makes almost no money at Fox.
According to CNN, back in 2020, he was making $10 million a year, largely based on the fact that his show drove 16% of the channel's entire ad revenue.
That number probably went up a bit, but maybe has dipped since because one of his main sponsors was My Pillow, and Mike Lindell might not be shelling out as much ad money these days as he was in the fun salad days.
And I think a big part of it, too, is that Alex was keenly aware that, like, if I do this, maybe people will report on me doing an hour about how Tucker's the most important person in the world, which will publicly associate me with him and get me more attention.
But boy, there have been plenty of hate crimes against white people.
And it doesn't matter, ladies and gentlemen, because the leftist judges and the leftist media and the leftist system time and time again say you go free.
Before election, Putin offers 8.6 billion to Russians to have more babies.
Here, the left is saying, if you're white especially, don't have more babies.
I've seen this new movement have bumper stickers or signs put up around town that say it's okay to be white.
They have social workers that ask them questions under this.
Are mommy and daddy spanking you?
Are they yelling at you?
Because we've got a nice foster home, especially if you're blonde-haired and blue-eyed like this little girl.
She better be careful because they can get half a mill for them.
Whites have the highest IQ.
On average.
Who's really being targeted racially is white people.
I mean, that's just from five minutes of looking in our clips.
And also, I miscut that because when he says there's bumper stickers of it's okay to be white, the next thing he says is, I'm going to make a shirt that says, Yeah, I mean, like, he doesn't care.
It's a red herring when it's sort of non-whites.
Well, when it's when it's groups that he is not a part of, discussing issues that are important to them and advocating for their own rights.
When it's white people, it's not really even a group.
He's an American communications strategist, political advisor, and CEO, best known as the chief spokesperson for the Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign and transition of Donald Trump.
He was a senior advisor to the Trump 2020 re-election campaign.
In March of 2021, Miller became a contributor for Newsmax.
Miller left his position as Trump spokesperson in June of 2021 to become the CEO of the social network Getter, G-E-T-T-R.
And we've been on there a while, have hundreds of thousands of followers, but I saw my good friend Joe Rogan last week started really promoting it, got millions of people to go over there, and that is very, very exciting.
So we want to promote independent groups out there.
After that happened, Gitter also banned users from posting the word Groyper because Fuentes' fans were posting too much about how he got kicked off.
Fun.
Also, just after Gitter launched, we should not forget that their API was so weak that hackers were able to scrape personal information off a ton of users.
They got hacked immediately.
So also, there was this Stanford Internet Observatory Cyber Policy Center.
They did a review of Getter's operations in August 2021, and they found some kind of some fun stuff and then also some not fun stuff.
Fun stuff, quote, Gitter markets itself as a non-biased social network where users are able to post content more freely than Twitter.
In some ways, however, Gitter is more restrictive with content policy than the platform it contrasts itself with.
For example, in the app, but not on the website, users were initially prevented from posting expletives, presented with an error message of, sorry, we don't allow abusive words.
Now, more troubling, less funny, this report also found, quote, very few, if any, mechanisms for detecting spam, violent content, pornography, and child exploitation imagery are present.
Gitter instead appears to be relying on community reporting models, which has not proved successful.
Essentially, there is a program that can just entirely block images that are in a database of child exploitation imagery.
And there are trial images that aren't child exploitation images that are in that data set that are used by researchers like people at the cyber policy center in order to test if people are using that software.
I don't know if they would be saying it's fine, but they didn't do the requisite steps that most people use in order to safeguard against this concept.
Really, our kind of value proposition is the fact that we're the free speech platform where nobody is going to get canceled or sent to digital jail or deplatformed or algorithmed for speaking your political opinion.
And you really hit the nail on the head up front where we do not allow pornography.
We do not allow ISIS.
Unlike Twitter, we do not allow the Taliban or the Ayatollah or the political director for Hamas.
But if people want to come on and express their political opinions, then they can.
There has to be a real digital town score, not this nonsense BS where Dorsey and Zuckerberg and those guys say you don't mention climate change or as long as you don't mention election fraud or you don't mention these tyrannical vax mandates, then you can have free speech.
We want to create this thing that caters to the people who are kicked off Twitter, but then we're going to have to kick them off if they behave the way that they did when they got kicked off Twitter.
But as long as you're able to essentially control yourself and not threaten illegal activity or go into the racial and religious epithets, you have a welcome place here.
Well, I think to him, it's that they want to be able to be in charge of the social media platform and be able to restrict things that they want to restrict as opposed to the things that Twitter sees fit to restrict.
Now, before I get into that, because there's a lot of stuff coming in, a lot of breaking news, a lot of stuff I want to hit coming up at the bottom of the hour.
I got to talk about something.
I got to talk about our biggest problem in InfoWars and who the main problem is.
So this is Alex, his response essentially to the news breaking on the Huffington Post.
Sebastian Murdoch on Friday released an article that covered the financial documents that Alex and Infowars turned over in the process of discovery in the phase of the Sandy Hook case they're in.
The headline is, quote, Alex Jones' Infowars store made $165 million over three years records show, which is fair, but it also leads to a number of inaccurate and possibly just hasty conclusions that I'd like to touch on before Alex even gets into this.
The first thing is that this spreadsheet that was covered in the story, it only reflects sales numbers.
This says nothing about profit or actual money brought in by InfoWars above expenses.
It's very unclear from the available information what kind of profit margin Alex has on these sales, so the actual amount this money reflects InfoWars bringing in could be a number that's within a range, and it's really hard to determine where we are inside that range.
That being said, Alex, the amount of money that he's making after expenses is still a very high amount of money.
But this number, this 165 million, is also split up over the course of three years, and Alex probably has massive overhead from payroll to lawyers to business-related tank expenses.
He also constantly runs free shipping specials, and there's a column in this spreadsheet that is sales shipping.
You know, if that reflects some expense that he has to cover from free shipping, they could be looking at a decrease of over $7.5 million in this time period.
The impression that I get from these numbers is that I actually would have expected them to be higher.
$165 million actually seems low to me based on what I kind of thought was going on.
People don't engage in this kind of shithead grifting that Alex does if it's not massively profitable.
So I'm not sure that any of these sales figures really surprise me that much.
Another thing that really confused me about the discussion surrounding this spreadsheet is the impression that it reflects a sudden and massive jump in sales in November 2015.
The beginning of the spreadsheet is for September 18th, 2015, and it shows $15 worth of sales.
The next entry is for October 5th, 2015, which shows $81.90 in sales, which kind of implies that there weren't any sales in between.
Then, by late November, you're looking at sales over $30,000 a day, and it just goes up from there, occasionally topping $100,000 until April 2016, where it gets pretty routinely 100,000 per day, that pattern.
Some people have suggested that he started making money on the shop around this time, but that's just not possible.
The Infowars store, be it primarily operated at InfoWarsStore.com or InfowarsShop.com, has existed since at least 2010.
And an article from 2010 in Texas Monthly discusses a claim from Alex that he made $1.5 million in ad revenue and sales from the store in the past year.
It's inconceivable that he could be getting periodic sales of less than $100 a day and some days apparently not bringing in any sales at all in this period prior to September 2015.
Then you have to consider the money bombs that he did and has done over the years, which predate the time period this spreadsheet covers.
Money isn't reflected anywhere.
I can't prove this, but my best guess is that this set of data reflects the migration of sales to a different account than they were previously counted in.
I can only theorize on this point, but it seems really bizarre to me that this document begins literally at the exact same time that Ted Anderson, the owner of Midas Resources and Genesis Communications, which syndicates Alex's show and was his primary sponsor, was in court dealing with a case that would lead to him losing his license to sell precious metals.
That case began on September 11th, 2015, and Alex's money bomb in 2015 was on September 16th.
It's very difficult for me to believe that this timing isn't a coincidence.
I mean, it could be, but it seems plausible to me that prior to Ted's legal problems coming to a head, their finances might have been more intertwined than you would expect.
And after Ted was no longer able to engage in his primary business, Infowars started keeping their finances much more separate.
Just on a very basic level, they raised about a million dollars in that money bomb, and that money is absolutely not reflected in this spreadsheet, even though in theory it does cover the time period after the bomb.
It should be in there.
Another thing that's important to remember is that this spreadsheet is barely labeled at all, and it's really up to the person looking at it to try and deduce exactly what these numbers show.
For instance, one column says total sales, but nowhere in this document is explained what this is the total sales of.
It's assumed that this is the total sales from the Infowars store, but that's not concretely shown in the document itself.
It's a pretty good assumption that this is showing Infowars store sales, but it's still a little bit of an assumption.
One point I want to make about the Huffington Post article is that a bit of context is missing.
For instance, the article contains this paragraph: quote, the gamble of backing Trump appeared to pay off.
Of the more than three years of data reviewed by HuffPost, Infowars' most profitable days happened around the 2016 presidential election.
The day of the election, November 8th, the InfoWars store more than doubled its sales from the previous day, making a total of $660,000.
The next day, after Trump won, more than 8,700 orders were placed on the InfoWars website, totaling nearly $850,000 in sales.
It's fine to connect this surge in sales to supporting Trump, but it's also important to point out that InfoWars did a 52-hour marathon over the course of those days, which probably has an increase in sales a bit.
You know, it have that impact.
That is an important context to why the sales are so high.
It is, it is, it was weird because I couldn't read the, I mean, obviously the conceit of our show, but I couldn't avoid seeing some of the numbers and then going over like we talked about him during that time period and seeing like little things that don't quite make sense in that context, you know?
I think that there is a broader picture that is not available from the information that we have.
And I would be interested in more information as it comes out.
But I do think that the timing of this document starting right when Ted Anderson lost his license and Alex did that money bomb, if it's a coincidence, it's an amazing coincidence.
Man, nothing screams, I only want to make money to build an anti-new world order infrastructure like Alex having to distinguish between which of his multiple houses he allegedly had to sell to stay on air.
The fact that he was able to sell this house is clear evidence that he never actually needed it to begin with.
But there was something about having multiple houses that was appealing to him.
Maybe it was the luxury of it.
Maybe it was the convenience, or like he said, maybe it's just the investing aspect of it.
But whatever the case, this was achievable only because of the money he brings in from the show.
That money could easily have gone towards this infrastructure he's pretending to be building, but Alex prioritized things like having multiple homes or buying a tank or having the ridiculous gun collection that he has.
He can claim that he wants to just build an anti-New World Order infrastructure, and that's great.
But honestly, it's just a way to keep the audience pacified about how much money he's actually bringing in and how it's not going to an anti-New World Order infrastructure, unless that's code for his lawyers.
A conservative Christian broadcast has people that run businesses, and they know if your business brings in a million dollars, you're lucky if you get 10,000.
So my listeners, I know off of this, because no weapon formed against us will prosper, and I haven't even plugged in the last two days.
This reminds me, in the name of this, I'm plugging every segment.
And we're going to actually raise the money we need to stay on air and launch all these operations.
I got to see my house.
I should have just gone and raised money from you, but I want it all in here.
But the idea that, oh, Jones, look, he's got gold.
Look at him.
He's like a rapper.
He's got gold like Scrooge McDuck and DuckTales diving into gold.
It's literally in a movie whenever you finally get to the bad guy and they've stolen all your gold and then they're like, ha, I scattered it to the four winds.
I would say that based on the temperature around Infowars prior to this and how Alex was quitting a bit and storming off air, and he started this episode off by saying everyone needed to die and walked around to the parking lot.
I mean, he's kind of a little bit like while you're listening to this, you have to be like, I better give Alex some money, otherwise he's going to keep telling me I deserve to die.
A lot of my criticism or the things that I'm responding to are perhaps interpretations of information from this that I've seen on Twitter and on social media.
As much begging as I do, we can barely pay the bills, Jones told a caller on Thursday during a segment that was rating a show prompting, promoting the InfoWars store.
That's an ad from years ago.
I'm not going to stop growth and let them push us backwards.
I got $400 and something thousand dollars in my bank account, which for somebody running an operation this big is nothing.
And the business account's got a few million in it to pay for stuff out in the future and operate.
And I wish we had a billion dollars.
Like Trump raised $2 billion now or whatever his social network that's built on BS.
I wish it was real.
Do you imagine what I do with $2 billion?
I'm not ashamed of money.
I'm not ashamed to have the money, but I don't have money because I spent all the money I had fighting for this country and fighting for freedom and taking these people on.
And then I get to sit there and have them give them everything and then go, he gave us nothing.
unidentified
That's why we have all his documents and put them in the newspaper illegally.
I really want all the Democrats and globalists and, you know, the pedophiles that run the Democratic Party and all the rest of them to know something right now.
I was sitting there when I got married on January 6th, five years ago, when my new wife was pregnant with our wonderful daughter that's four and a half now.
And I looked at her and I said, I want to be out of InfoWars in five years and I want to move on because it obsesses me.
It's all I do and it's killing me.
And I said, I want to hand the baton on to others.
And God has really touched my heart that there's going to be other leaders and just people that are going to stand up and wake up.
My wife looked at me sitting there in the big island at the Four Seasons, which I wouldn't have gone to when Bill Gates owned it.
And so I told her, I said, within five years, I commit to you that I'm only going to be on air one day a week and I might write a book a year or make one film a year, but that's it because I really want to transition out of this.
The only reason that the globalists are at bay and not killing you and your family is because Alex is sitting right in that chair, which he won't be in for a little bit because he's going to get mad and he has to walk around the parking lot.