Today, Dan and Jordan check in on a particularly bizarre stretch of time on the Alex Jones Show. In this installment, Ted Nugent corrects the record about Jan. 6, Alex gets mad about the HuffPost publishing some of his sales numbers, and the "Most Important Person In The World" is named. Citations
And I actually think that something was very noticeable about this episode as well, and that is that Alex starts off the show being honest and upfront about the fact that he has to leave early to go to family court.
It is January 6th, 2022, on this Thursday transmission.
At this time...
A year ago, I was sitting there watching Trump give a speech.
And down the road, the feds were busy attacking the undermanned police and with just a few dozen men breaking through the first barricades and the rest is history.
Then the police standing down waving everybody in so they could get some patsies to put in solitary confinement and set the precedent for Chinese-style torture of political dissidents in America.
And we have Ted Cruz praising it all yesterday.
Obviously, that's just what's wrong with Ted Cruz is he's smart.
I can't get over how fantastic it is, how funny it is, and how complete of a coward you would have to be to be in a building where you could have been murdered and then a year later be browbeaten by...
Tucker Carlson into pretending that you weren't going to be murdered.
Yeah, it's kind of a fun thing in this dystopian world we live in to watch that utter humiliation that Ted Cruz had to go through on the national stage.
So he called the storming of the Capitol a violent terrorist attack, and immediately the extremist pundits that essentially guide the GOP now swarmed.
Showing that he has absolutely no backbone, Cruz went on Tucker's show on Thursday, the evening of this episode, and he tried to beg for forgiveness, almost as if he was worried about being cancelled by a right-wing mob.
It would be a shocking display of cowardice, except I remember the 2016 election when Trump called his wife ugly and said his dad killed JFK, and then Cruz ended up phone banking for him.
Wouldn't you be sad if you would elect, if I had voted for Ted Cruz, even if I believed in everything Ted Cruz believed in, it's just like, oh, you're such a worm.
So watching Tucker not accept Cruz's apology was also really fun, but underneath that, there's a more troubling reality.
Ted Cruz isn't some dumbass media personality.
He's a senator representing one of the most populous states in the country.
He has no ability to express himself if the things he's wanting to express happen to Oh, yeah.
Another thing that's shocking about this is that these people like Alex and Tucker, they're pretending that this is the first time Ted Cruz called storming the Capitol terrorism.
Daniel Dale at CNN was able to find at least 17 other times that Cruz has used that wording in the past.
It's a consistent pattern, but they're sort of pretending that it's a one-off thing because that allows them to humiliate him and make this public display of like, I mean, what's so funny about it to me is that...
The whole new system, the whole new cosmology is that the American people are all terrorists and that they've got to round up everybody.
And shut down any populist movement, any conservative movement, any nationalist movement.
And Ted Cruz knows that purge is coming, and he wants to position himself so when the state's terror attacks happen, he can point his finger at the patriots and say, I'm not with the patriot terrorists.
Instead of saying, the evidence shows it's a false flag, and the globalists have the motive, and we need to stop them staging a false flag sometime in the next 300 days.
We're 300 to 6 days out from the midterms, and if you don't feel the suspense, if you don't feel the danger, if you can't cut it with a knife, you're not dialed in.
So, yes, the globalists are going to pull a false flag, and they're going to blame it on the patriots and the good Americans that are left.
And so in order to signal to the globalists that he's on their side and he will help persecute the good Americans, he's using the language of terrorist to describe January 6th.
And don't talk to your neighbors, even over a fence.
In fact, don't look them in the eyes.
That's on billboards and on signs in the UK and in places like Australia.
And then you've got government health ministers over major provinces in Canada saying, we're keeping the lockdowns going because we don't want That thing about Canada is just a month's old narrative Alex is rehashing and it's nonsense.
There was one comment that a person made that a positive side effect of limiting large gatherings to slow COVID was that people who were spreading misinformation would also not be gathering.
It's kind of a dumb comment, particularly considering the fact that most of this misinformation gets spread digitally, not in in-person meetings.
As for that other stuff, that's all just a load of bullshit.
So that thing about sunsets in Australia is a misrepresentation of comments made by Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews back in August.
He was specifically responding to a question about a bunch of people gathering at Rye Beach on a recent evening.
He said, quote, I'm sure it was a beautiful sunset, but that's not in the spirit or the letter of these rules.
He didn't say that you can't watch the sunset or even that you have to stay indoors all the time, just that the state of things in terms of the pandemic back in August in Victoria, having beach gatherings is a bad idea.
According to Victoria's COVID case tracker, they were having in the neighborhood of like 20 to 50 new cases a day back in August.
In January 2022, they're up to about 20,000 new cases a day.
The thing about looking at people in the eye, that thing, that's a case of even sloppier work on Alex's part.
This was a meme that was making the rounds back in September, which showed a bar in London having posted a list of restrictions that they were putting in place in order to limit COVID spread.
One of their rules was, quote, no handshaking, high-fiving, or extended eye contact with anyone not at your table.
This was a joke.
The bar in question is London Fields Brewery, and their event manager, Paris Capone, told Reuters, quote, The health and safety of our customers and staff is our number one priority, and we're strictly adhering to all latest public health guidance inside the taproom.
The reference to no eye contact was intended to be an engaging way to encourage customers to read and take notice of the broader guidelines, but we've since removed it in case it was distracting from the overall serious message around safely enjoying the taproom.
None of the examples that Alex has here, he's using to illustrate the nightmare tyranny that's coming, none of them are real.
His argument is so weak that one of his examples that he has to use is a satirical list from a bar that he saw in a meme and he never looked into.
They're now saying in Australia that you can't go outside.
And exercise if you don't have your little travel pass.
So there it is.
Now you can't leave your house unless you have the digital ID and then everything it takes to get that ID, the social credit score, you must comply with, including the carbon taxes, the injections, all of it.
Now, Alex is actually fairly right about this one, this headline.
There was a comment made by the chief minister of the Northern Territory, Michael Gunner, and he did say that going to work or exercise, that's not a legitimate reason for an unvaccinated person to leave their home.
This decision was made because their new case numbers jumped about 60% from Tuesday to Wednesday and then over doubled from Wednesday to Thursday.
And so they were putting in this four-day pretty tight lockup.
The comment about not being able to go out to exercise, it kind of seems like it's actually in reference to unvaccinated people not being allowed to go to gyms.
Even with a vaccine pass system in place, there's no way the Northern Territory has the police capability to check people's vaccine status out on the street, like if someone's going for a jog.
And while we're at it, that's not even how this works.
The police aren't enforcing this at all.
Health Minister Natasha Files was talking to ABC Radio Darwin about how this places an added responsibility on service workers, and she said, quote, the onus is on the community to abide by the requirements.
That doesn't sound at all like this tyranny thing, but...
Look, I don't know, maybe I'm not the best expert on this because I don't have a knee-jerk reaction to every meme I see that makes me yell about how the devil is upon us.
Now, I said that Alex was fairly right there because the bar is just so low for him.
So the fact that he isn't just basically making this up entirely, I feel like that deserves some recognition.
That said, there are a couple other important corrections I need to make.
This isn't for all of Australia, and the rules still allow you to leave your house for essential items, and everything he was saying about a social credit score and carbon taxes, those are just from his imagination.
I just see somebody walking outside of their house in Sydney, just like slow, looking both directions, crossing the street, putting their headphones in to go for a jog, and then 30 Scotland Yard people with billy clubs just show up out of nowhere and just start beating them down.
So, I need that document, and that second, I just gotta say, this is a stupid plan, and actually, it's completely in conflict with the other aspects of the conspiracy that Alex has been trying to promote about COVID and the vaccines.
I thought the whole plan was to kill off everyone so the globalists can enjoy the Earth without all of us getting in the way, but now I guess it's a plan to put Alex and his friends into camps that then they have to oversee?
When you go back through Alex's career, it seems like there's an intense preoccupation with him and his friends being put into FEMA camps.
Throughout so many different generations of the show, that's the big fear that he's promoting, but if you actually track the storylines that he uses to sell that fear, they don't match up at all.
In 2009, it was owning a gun that was going to get you thrown into FEMA camps.
There's going to be large-scale gun confiscation efforts, and if you resisted, you'd be sent to the camp.
Then a little bit later, when Obama was in office, he was always just about to pull the trigger on the FEMA provisional government, which would make him the king of America, which he was planning to turn into an Islamic caliphate, and if you resisted his power grab, you'd be sent to a FEMA camp.
Now, if you don't get vaccinated, you're going to get sent to a FEMA camp.
It's honestly a little bit boring for me at this point, but I guess it works to rile up the audience.
That's the only explanation for why he just keeps going back to that detail and all of his fear porn.
Another reason this is super boring for me is that if the government ever did get the idea to start doing this and rounding up unvaccinated people to send them to work camps, the people who are going to be on the forefront of fighting against that are the very people Alex thinks are demons.
Leftists, the ACLU, politicians like AOC, they're going to be opposed to this on principle while Alex's favorite politicians shrivel up like Ted Cruz and go along to get along.
Yeah, you know, it's really easy to drum up fear of being put into a camp if you're trying to scare white people, because historically, it's never been white people who get put into the camps.
Well, and again, you know, I'll often repeat the obvious that I'm just a guitar player, but I'm actually a We the People experimenter and self-government guitar player, which means I'm tuned in to the world around me, especially the only experiment in self-government.
They're sacred, United States of America.
And here's what happened on January 6th.
President Trump did a speech and a presentation and had a rally with good conservative families supporting God, family, country, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, that man in the arena work ethic that has created the greatest quality of life in the history of the world.
Then Ray Epps and a bunch of other saboteurs, a bunch of other provocateurs, federal protected provocateurs.
Organized a rally.
Well, it was supposed to be a peaceful protest.
But those that created violence, those that turned it into a riot, those were Black Lives Matter punks, those were Antifa punks, and those were Federal Bureau of Investigation, James Comey, J. Edgar Hoover punks that perpetrated all the violence, all the violent activity, dressed in Trump regalia.
So it's also got to really suck to be someone like Daniel Rodriguez, who is the guy who tasered Officer Michael Fanone on the 6th.
You know, it's got to suck to hear how easily disavowed and disowned you are by the very people who whipped you into the frenzy where you thought it might be necessary to tase a cop in order to save America.
illusioning to see this kind of thing where because you took action in the way that these people were clearly indicating that you should, you now have to be cast off as a left-wing provocateur just to make the noble patriots look bad.
They have to turn you into that because you did what they wanted you to.
It's honestly pathetic, and it's also disrespectful to the insurgents that people like Alex and Ted have radicalized.
Alex always says that you can tell a tree by its fruit, and I think it's a disgrace for these guys to disown their fruit in order to pretend that their tree isn't as shitty as it clearly is.
Well, you have to know that you were, and you have to see these people trying to cover their asses by pretending it was all false flaggery or whatever, and it's got to be confusing.
Unless you fully understand, actually, why they're trying to cover their ass, and you're like, well, good on them, they're covering their ass.
And that's why my friends, when they went to the government, were very peaceful, fun-loving, enjoyable Americans who never threatened to murder the president before.
America, take a deep breath and be sure you let your mayor, your senator, your congressman, your governor, and the White House know on a regular basis, I would say at this point during these tragic times, on a weekly basis, communicate with your elected employees and let them know that you know January 6th was not an insurrection.
It does seem like bullying them into denying reality has been shown to work, so I wouldn't be too surprised if over time we don't end up seeing an entire political party that fully embraces themselves.
For me, I think you and people like Tucker Carlson are the model of America.
You're just populist.
You believe in our basic rights and freedom, and that should unify people around all that.
And to have Ted Cruz putting out the same talking points...
As Chuckie Schumer and the Democrats, that are also a lie, is super dangerous.
And I think it spotlights, as you like to say, the reason we keep losing this country is we know the Democrats are bad, but if we didn't have Republicans continually stabbing us in the back, we would turn this country around.
What's your view on that?
Ted Nugent.
I may have lost audio to him.
So, Ted, continuing here, how do we create a populism in America and take the country back?
So if you guys can aim that document cam, the overhead camera overhead, I'm going to show people what was going on here.
And it only seems to happen in clusters.
Like, it might not happen for another year.
And then this week, it's been happening, as you saw earlier in the week, where the mic cut out.
It's this system right here.
I was talking to Ted during the break, trying to go to him, and then hitting the button.
And people in other parts of the building heard that you couldn't hear him, but they thought they could hear him.
So I've just learned not to argue.
I know when I'm off air.
I just shut it down, and I go off so I don't get mad.
Because I'm not going to do that amateur thing here on talk radio where there's a problem and they just keep going, hello, hello, hello, for like five minutes, you know, to like prank callers.
Like a prank caller will call in and say, hello.
The person says hello and you go back and forth for an hour.
So first things first, Stephen Kirsch is not a pathologist.
He's a guy whose background is in computer science, who lost his fucking mind during the pandemic, and now he's pretending to be a pathologist, selling dangerous bullshit to the segment of the media that abhors critical thinking, like Alex.
There's one link, but it goes to a previous article that Kirsch wrote on his blog.
This previous blog post also had no evidence or proof of any of his claims, but instead relied on reporting based on something someone told him.
Allegedly, a parent had told him that three children at Monta Vista Christian School had been diagnosed with myocarditis.
that this didn't happen, but I am saying that this is something that you need to do some more legwork on if you're going to report it as a definitive claim.
This is sloppy.
But this shit gets so much worse.
So the ratio and literally every conclusion that Kirsch comes to is just the result of him guessing things from the original post.
Roughly half the school are boys.
There has never been a vaccine mandate at the school, so I'd estimate conservatively that two-thirds of the kids could have been vaccinated by then.
So 855 divided by two times two-thirds is 285 vaccinated boys.
So the rate of myocarditis at the school, by my estimate, is three out of 285, which is one in 95 boys.
That's the original article that has now been updated because he's heard of a fourth.
He can't demonstrate that three children had myocarditis.
He can't demonstrate that vaccination rate.
And I would bet that he's even just guessing with the roughly half the school or boys thing.
This 1 in 95 number means legitimately nothing.
He can't back this up at all.
So then, his new post is about how he's, quote, heard that there's another case of myocarditis at the school, which of course would make it one in about 70, using the same made-up numbers that he used before.
It's hard to believe that someone could write a blog post like this and hit publish without feeling intense embarrassment.
Kirsch doesn't know what the vaccination rate at the school is, but he's decided that all of the alleged four children who he's heard got myocarditis must be recently vaccinated, which he condescendingly responds to.
So the first is that some alleged students at the school told him that the school administered vaccines on April 30th, so the school must be afraid of getting sued.
Apparently, Kirsch went on to bother the dean about this.
Quote, she stated in an email to me on January 5th that, quote, Monta Vista Christian School has never administered COVID-19 vaccines to students or anyone else.
And Monta Vista Christian School has never hosted at its real property or anywhere else, any clinic or other event at which COVID-19 vaccines were administered.
His other theory is that parents don't want to hurt the school and think that God will heal the students.
This is the primary source Alex is using to report out this vaccine conspiracy claim.
It's nothing new, really, but this is particularly shitty work.
Also, about that supposed vaccine clinic that the school allegedly had on April 30th.
If that was when the students supposedly got vaccinated, that flies in the face of Kirsch's other made-up point about how they were all recently vaccinated, which you'll remember he made up earlier.
I mean, it fucks me up the most whenever it is this kind of situation where you go back and you're like, there's really only this one dude who is saying this shit and everybody's just running with it.
What fucks me up about that is just like, that is such a positive reinforcement type reward for just Gaul.
Just having the gall to say something this dumb with a straight face is rewarded beyond your wildest dreams.
Well, I mean, dumb or not, let's put that aside even.
Sure.
Evil.
Making so many assumptions in terms of justifying the claim that you want to make as opposed to getting the actual information that you can verify out.
And it's Kersh reporting on what the pathologist is saying.
On Wednesday, Kirsch reported via Substack that he'd privately received a report from a concerned parent that a fourth student at the Monte Vista Christian School in Watsonville had been diagnosed.
Kirsch had already documented three cases at the school with an enrollment of about 855 students last month.
So you'll notice at the beginning there, Alex is correcting, because he had said that Steve Kirsch was a pathologist, and now he's saying, oh, he's not a pathologist.
But Alex is still a liar.
Nowhere in Kirsch's articles is he covering anything that a pathologist told him.
That is just a load of bullshit.
Also, Alex is reading an article from his own website that was written by Adan Salazar that does say that Steve Kirsch is a pathologist.
It's so weird.
Almost like Adan wanted to try and give these stupid claims more weight by lying about Kirsch's credentials.
Also, another major point here is that Kirsch has in no way documented any of these cases.
He's heard a rumor about them, and he's repeating that rumor, but this isn't documented or proven in the least.
Every element of how Kirsch reports this story is an attempt to create certainty out of insinuation.
And then, when Alex and Adan cover Kirsch's blog post, they do the same thing all over again.
Any point where it kind of becomes clear that Kersh's blog post doesn't prove anything, it gets fudged in order to make it look definitive.
Adan calls him a pathologist.
Alex accidentally does because he's just reading Adan's article, but then he realizes he can't justify saying something like that, so he scales it back to saying it's secondhand from a pathologist.
These cases are documented!
It's all intentional.
Most of this story is made up by Steve Kirsch, or just things he's assumed for no reason.
But it helps push the narrative Infowars profits from pushing, so it's critical to keep the audience from realizing that this is Steve Kirsch fanfic, which is why they dress it up like it's actual reporting.
It's too bad this is actually getting people killed, because otherwise dunking on it could be good, clean fun.
Imagine a situation where a guy was running for a county treasurer position.
He's awesome at the actual work of being a treasurer, but unfortunately he's also pretty public about his belief that white people are superior to other races.
Would voting against him because of that be the social credit score coming into play?
I really don't even understand what Alex means by this stuff anymore.
Like, it's so thin to the point of it's undefinable.
I had the picture in my head of a government system, but now that he's saying that it's just something as meaningless as MVP voting, I'm really lost.
Also, I can make a very strong argument that even if Rodgers is the best football player in the season, him being an open anti-vex weirdo in the middle of a pandemic kind of reduces his value as a player.
And may take him out of the running for most valuable player in my mind.
I would rather have a quarterback who's just slightly less good at football than him, but also isn't a total asshole who's probably going to get a bunch of my team's fans killed.
I think I would have more value in having someone like that on my team than Aaron Rodgers.
It's such a weird move on Alex's part to play a clip of Robert Kennedy Jr. talking about how Fauci wanted to vaccinate kids for money, but then he introduces it by saying that the clip you're about to listen to, actually, it isn't true.
I guess if Alex's goal is to make Kennedy's argument look sane in comparison to his own, I guess he's done a good job of that.
But they don't even know that what they're trying to do is combine...
So if I understand now, the vaccines aren't even also about killing people.
It's about mad scientist behavior, where you're taking the vaccine to get the idea of what genes can connect with immortal cell lines, so you can combine with silicon in order to become gods?
Anyway, the only way to merge a silicon is for everyone to take COVID vaccines.
Now, I believe that Alex thinks that the vaccines contain, like, AI nanotech robots, so this is all a big test to see whose bodies can merge with the vaccines, and then from this, they hope to find an immortal cell line that can merge with the vaccines, because that'll help them.
When I hear things like this, I really wonder if the listeners recognize how Alex keeps adding new wrinkles to his conspiracies and how the plans of the globalists seems to change constantly.
Man, the way he ended that sentence, too, with those last four words were just choppy, not sure where he's going to land, and then finally he was like, no one's going to buy that shit.
The headline about human history ending when people become gods isn't some kind of an evil statement or threat.
It's the headline of an interview from 2017 with an Israeli historian named Yuval Noah Harari.
It's basically an interview to discuss his new book, Homo Deus, which argued that with the advent of technology that we've created, man was beginning to wield powers that we previously ascribed only to deities, like the ability to create life.
He was speaking in a somewhat poetic way to express that when we are able to create inorganic life like a sentient AI, we can, quote, go to the Earth spirit and say, what do you think about that?
We're equal to the spirit we understand, not you.
Harari has some very interesting thoughts, but this is a futurist theory, and he's definitely not saying that humanity is going to end, just that we'll take on an entirely new relationship with the world around us that hasn't been the case since human history has begun.
Like, has Ray Kurzweil not said anything freaky for Alex to get upset about lately, so he's moved on to pretending another futurist is secretly telling everyone what's coming?
When Alex says they admit all this, what he's actually saying is that he has a couple sensational headlines for articles about interviews with a futurist who's making predictions about where technology is going.
This isn't admitting anything, and the things that are being predicted aren't even in line with Alex's bullshit.
Novak Djokovic is not the most important person in the world, but he's right up there at the top, and the spirit of what he's doing is the essence of what we're about to cover.
Because there's a little twist to who this most important person in the world is.
But here's Paul Joseph Watson talking about what's happening in the land of tyranny, formerly known as the land down under.
I mean, I assume that he's labeling that a hero because right now they're keeping Djokovic in a notorious refugee hotel that has been housing people for upwards of eight years.
And what was very funny is that the pro-Djokovic protesters were right next to the anti-refugee protesters, and they were like, Hey, man, guess what else?
These fucking guys are stuck there, and all the pro-Djokovic protesters were like, holy shit, we gotta solve this problem first!
And there's nothing more frustrating than knowing we have the answers and the key to defeating this evil takeover and stopping it dead in its tracks.
But instead, I just can't get people conscious.
I can't get people focused.
I can't get the message punched out enough to actually finally finish these people.
And so that means we're going to go into a very long, hellish nightmare.
And most people listening and watching will be dead in 10 years.
That's Klaus Schwab's promise.
He's sworn to kill you and your family.
He's put his people in over 100 nations.
And they're running their global lockdown shutdowns right now, preparing you for the real bioweapon they're going to release.
Cyber lockdowns, cyber shutdowns.
Collapse of the third world completely, being totally overrun, war on the streets, electricity going off for years, just absolute death and destruction is guaranteed.
Because I have this weight on my shoulders, and I know I'm right, and I know it's going down, and I have all their own admissions and documents, and I can't get people out of their trances.
Everybody's in their comfort zone.
And so the enemy's going to win, because they're going to incrementally collapse society while posing as the saviors the whole time.
I'm going to deliver the most important information ever.
When I'm looking for someone to admire, I can tell you that it's not going to be the person who gives themselves the job of being the one who can wake people up to the globalist plots surrounding them, only to lament that they can't actually wake people up to the globalist plots surrounding them.
When Alex says he can't get people to wake up, that isn't the alleged sleeping person's fault.
It's that there's something wrong with the person yelling at them to wake up.
When Alex says stuff like this, I just hear him saying, I can't do my job, which was imaginary to begin with.
Yeah, I wonder if the fact that Alex constantly builds things up to be the most important information ever, or how Reset Wars was the most important work he's ever done, and then it's always a bust and means nothing.
I wonder if that has to do anything with him not being able to wake people up.
I'm going to deliver the most important information ever that if people actually grasp it and get it and understand it, we're going to be able to turn society around and beat this.
But all this other incredible news I've got in front of me, and it's all very important, is a byproduct of the...
That is the New World Order.
And so, that's where we are, ladies and gentlemen.
I've got to go to rebroadcast for a while.
I may not be able to do the show anymore.
I hate it.
I can't stand it.
And I'm sick of just window dressing, talking about all the stuff that's going on.
And the general public just doesn't even care that we're all falling apart.
I mean, you know, they think it's funny that Klaus Schwab's up there murdering everyone.
Remember when I was doing stand-up, sometimes to keep things interesting or keep things fun, we'd be like, you know what?
I'm just going to do none of my material.
I'm just going to do nothing but crowd work tonight.
And then maybe you'd keep a clock on somebody and be like, ah, you only did 10 out of 20. Has anybody ever put Alex on a clock for how long he can just build something up for?
How many segments can you go just...
Saying nothing but how important the next thing you're going to say is.
So see, I don't want to just say a bunch of nasty stuff, and I'm gonna try my best here, but it's getting hard.
So...
We got a lot of really good reports here, and I'm going to try to relaunch the show later in the hour, but I can't do it right now, so let's just go ahead.
I tried to come back on.
I just can't do it, guys.
Let's air Greg Reese's report from yesterday.
That was a really, really important report about the nanotech they're putting in the shots.
The way he's describing what he needs to do in order to defeat the globalists, it almost sounds like he's like, if I can get the spell right, if I can get the word order and the incantation correct, it will work.
I've got this whole thing basically spring-loaded, I want to say, when we come back.
That I grasp in my mind, and then if I don't just keep that moment of understanding and all those points I want to make, because I'm not writing this down, I'm not reading a teleprompter, it all just dissipates like gas into the ether.
And then I don't say the key thing, that if I say it just right and explain the thought perfectly.
Almost perfectly, then the public will grasp it and also absorb it and understand a blueprint for victory, which we need.
And there's nothing more frustrating than knowing you've got the blueprint for victory, you've proven you can do it, God's given you the directive, and you can't get it done because you are weak.
And I'm talking about myself.
So, my frustration here is not with the audience, the crew.
My frustration is with the globalists killing everybody and running around enjoying it.
They love it.
See, it hurts us.
They like it.
They have fun doing all this.
Oh, they just love it.
They just love it!
And I have to control myself and not go after them with rage because we're not doing this for them.
And they believe once they get rid of you and your ugly hovel and your ugly face and your ugly kids in their view that they'll finally be free because you won't be around.
That's their real view.
And just because you've got the general mass of people dumbed down, not aware of standing up for themselves, doesn't mean you have a right to kill them just because you're some inbred, occultic globalist that knows the basics of the third dimension so that makes you a god because you're willing to crap all over other sentient creatures and keep them in the dark?
Alex has been teasing and rambling this whole episode so far about him revealing who the most important person on Earth is, but now he's moving the goalposts.
Apparently now it's the greatest person on Earth, or the person with the most potential to empower humanity.
If Alex thinks those things are interchangeable, that's fine, but it also speaks to his subjective beliefs.
Someone else could easily believe that the most important person and the person who has the most potential to empower humanity are two different people, like you touched on.
Like, I think a very strong argument could be made that you can make these separate.
The most important person could actually be a force of evil.
Importance is a value-neutral concept, so if you were a terrifying dictator who was working against the cause of empowering humanity and you were a threat to everyone, that person could easily be the most important person in the world.
But it's interesting to see how disorganized Alex's thoughts are, even about this clearly intentional tease session he's doing.
Really, when he said he's going to clarify what it takes to be the most important person, he's just created more questions for me to ask about what it is his new subjective measurements actually mean.
So I guess now the most important person title that Alex is giving out is really better described as person disseminating ideas that Alex likes who is also not a well-known lunatic or bigot, so they fly under most people's radar?
That's why it's not fair, because when you have those thoughts spinning around in your head, I'm not behind you being like, oh, who do you think it is now?
He can become the most potent person in the world.
Just like that.
And he understands that and is now moving towards that.
And as we all move towards that center of pro-human gravity, we then learn the secret that I will tell you when we come back in the final segment of this hour.
Motherfucker.
Who the most important person in the world is.
But I want you to understand something.
This isn't hype.
This isn't exaggeration.
This isn't BS.
This isn't Any of that.
We must recognize from amongst our people who is the best at promoting humanity.
If we could take the country back peacefully without the revolution they're trying to artificially trigger around January 6th, then we could really have a future of peace and justice.
We could have a real shot at that with Russia and with China and with Asia and the Middle East and Africa and Latin America.
And I know the individual that I'm going to say is the most important person in the world has that same idea and has that same thought and wants that.
And when I recognize this individual, it's not to put them up on a pedestal, but it's to recognize who's done the best, clean, professional, level-headed job despite all the attacks and what I know they've gone through behind the scenes that other people don't know about.
In America, and as an example, around the world, who's listened to in Japan?
And in South Africa, and in Mexico, and in Canada, and in the United States, who all over the world, when I talk off record to world leaders in South America, like Brazil, or in Eastern Europe, who do they talk about, and who's unifying them to have a pro-human future against the Great Reset and the New World Order?
The thought that I have is like, Alex has so little to talk about on this episode that he spent an hour building up to saying that Tucker is the most important person in the world.
Somebody like Tucker Carlson knows that Ted Cruz got a talking point from Garland and from the establishment and that they are preparing to claim that the American people are about to stage terror attacks and try to assassinate Biden.
I told you that months ago.
It's in the news today.
And they're going to try to sew us up and bring in martial law.
And the lawyer...
The Bush minion, Ted Cruz, who poses as a patriot all these years, who is a wolf in sheep's clothing, Tucker Carlson believes, and he's got better sources than I, I believe him, has to be cut out and destroyed.
And like a populist general, Tucker Carlson just tore his guts out.
Tucker Carlson knows the terror attacks are coming.
Tucker Carlson knows the state civil war is coming.
Tucker Carlson knows the big event's coming and the end of America, and he's trying to stop it and making an issue in front of all the other conservatives and all the Christians and all the Fox News Republicans and saying, stop putting up with Mitch McConnell and with Ted Cruz, and with Rand Paul, he's come out against the vaccine.
It doesn't work, it's dangerous, it's poison.
And Josh Hawley and all of them, because they all fear the liberal media.
I think Alex kind of lets slip there what actually makes him think that Tucker is the most important person in the world.
It's that in Tucker, Alex sees a person who actually has the ability to humiliate senators and essentially sway power on the right wing.
He sees someone who, if he can piggyback it, Alex can use to reestablish the illusion that he has any effect on the real world.
If Tucker can humiliate Ted Cruz, and Alex pretends to be totally in line with Tucker and secretly his best friend, then it's kind of like Alex inspired Tucker to humiliate Ted Cruz, and thus Alex is really the one with the power to sway politics.
This is a fine game for Alex to play, and though I think it stinks of desperation, it may well work a little bit for a while.
There is an essential problem with this, though, and it's that people should ask themselves, if they're in Alex's audience, if Tucker and Alex are such good friends, And on exactly the same page, why has Tucker never had Alex on any of his shows?
Why doesn't Tucker show up as a guest on Infowars periodically if they're a couple of the very few comrades in this fight against Alex's enemies?
Possibly more bitingly, why wasn't Alex interviewed for Tucker's documentary about January 6th?
He was at the Capitol, and clearly Tucker had no problem interviewing shifty weirdos since he had Ali Alexander interviewed in it.
The fact that Tucker seems to have a staunch resistance to being publicly personally associated with Alex should be something that causes the audience to ask themselves some serious questions.
Like, this is Trump all over again, basically.
Trump came on Alex's show once to sell his book in December 2015, and he never came back.
And he never publicly associated himself with Alex in any way.
The narrative that Trump and Alex were on the same page came almost entirely from Alex's stories.
And in the end, I think it's pretty safe to say that most of them were made up.
now Alex has to jettison that mainstream avatar for him to live vicariously through because Trump likes the vaccine so it seems like maybe Alex is trying to lean hard into glomming on to Tucker in order to preserve some image of relevance in the actual world.
Yep.
unidentified
Also, there's absolutely no chance that Tucker makes almost no money at Fox.
According to CNN, back in 2020, he was making $10 million a year, largely based on the fact that his show drove 16% of the channel's entire ad revenue.
That number probably went up a bit, but maybe it's dipped since, because one of his main sponsors was MyPillow, and Mike Lindell might not be shelling out as much ad money these days as he was in the fun salad days.
There's a difference between somebody who really muscles through for a bit that's worth it, and then there's this, which is just like, yes, you will keep saying, I'll tell you after the break, and then rambling about bullshit.
And I think a big part of it, too, is that Alex was keenly aware that if I do this, maybe people will report on me doing an hour about how Tucker's the most important person in the world, which will publicly associate me with him and get me more attention.
I mean, that's just from five minutes of looking in our clips.
And also, I miscut that, because when he says there's bumper stickers of it's okay to be white, the next thing he says is, I'm gonna make a shirt that says...
He's an American communications strategist, local advisor, and CEO, best known as the chief spokesperson for the Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign and transition of Donald Trump.
He was a senior advisor to the Trump 2020 re-election campaign.
In March of 2021, Miller became a contributor for Newsmax.
Miller left his position as Trump's spokesperson in June of 2021 to become the CEO of the Social Network Getter, G-E-T-T-R.
And we've been on there a while, have hundreds of thousands of followers, but I saw my good friend Joe Rogan last week started really promoting it.
Got millions of people to go over there, and that is very, very exciting.
After that happened, Gitter also banned users from posting the word Groyper because Fuentes' fans were posting too much about how he got kicked off.
Fun.
Also, just after Gitter launched, we should not forget that their API was so weak that hackers were able to scrape personal information off a ton of users.
They got hacked immediately.
Also, there was the Stanford Internet Observatory Cyber Policy Center.
They did a review of Gitter's operations in August 2021, and they found some fun stuff and then also some not fun stuff.
Fun stuff.
Quote, You fundamentally don't understand your audience, sir.
This report also found, quote, very few, if any, mechanisms for detecting spam, violent content, pornography, and child exploitation imagery are present.
Gitter instead appears to be relying on community reporting models, which has not proved successful.
Essentially, there is a program that can just entirely block images that are in a database of child exploitation imagery.
I don't know if they would be saying it's fine, but they didn't do the requisite steps that most people use in order to safeguard against this content.
Really, our value proposition is the fact that we're the free speech platform where nobody is going to get canceled or sent to digital jail or deplatformed or algorithmed for speaking your political opinion.
And you really hit the nail on the head up front where we do not allow pornography.
We do not allow ISIS.
Unlike Twitter, we do not allow the Taliban or the Ayatollah or the political director for Hamas.
But if people want to come on and express their political opinions, then they can.
There has to be a real digital town square, not this nonsense BS where Dorsey and Zuckerberg and those guys say, as long as you don't mention climate change, or as long as you don't mention election fraud, or you don't mention these tyrannical vax mandates, then you can My dude, all those things are widely discussed on Twitter.
We want to create this thing that caters to the people who are kicked off Twitter, but then we're going to have to kick them off if they behave the way that they did when they got kicked off Twitter.
But as long as you're able to essentially control yourself and not threaten illegal activity or go into the racial and religious epithets, you have a welcome place here.
Now, before I get into that, because there's a lot of stuff coming in, a lot of breaking news, a lot of stuff I want to hit coming up at the bottom of the hour, I've got to talk about something.
I've got to talk about our biggest problem at InfoWars and who the main problem is.
So this is Alex's response, essentially, to the news breaking on the Huffington Post.
Sebastian Murdoch on Friday released an article.
That covered the financial documents that Alex and InfoWars turned over in the process of discovery in the phase of the Sandy Hook case they're in.
The headline is, quote, Alex Jones' InfoWars store made $165 million over three years' records show.
Which is fair, but it also leads to a number of inaccurate and possibly just hasty conclusions that I'd like to touch on before Alex even gets into this.
The first thing is that this spreadsheet that was covered in the story, it only reflects sales numbers.
This says nothing about profit or actual money brought in by Infowars above expenses.
It's very unclear from the available information what kind of profit Marge and Alex has on these sales.
So the actual amount this money reflects Infowars bringing in could be a number that's within a range, and it's really hard to determine where we are inside that range.
People don't engage in this kind of shithead grifting that Alex does if it's not massively profitable.
So I'm not sure that any of these sales figures really surprise me that much.
Another thing that really confused me about the discussion surrounding this spreadsheet is the impression that it reflects a sudden and massive jump in sales in November 2015.
The beginning of the spreadsheet is for September 18, 2015, and it shows $15 worth of sales.
The next entry is for October 5, 2015, which shows $81.90 in sales, which kind of implies that there weren't any sales in between.
Then, by late November, you're looking at sales over $30,000 a day, and it just goes up from there, occasionally topping $100,000 until April 2016, where it gets pretty routinely $100,000 per day, that pattern.
Some people have suggested that he started making money on the shop around this time, but that's just not possible.
The Infowars store, be it primarily operated at Infowarsstore.com or Infowarsshop.com, has existed since at least 2010, and an article from 2010 in Texas Monthly discusses a claim from Alex that he made $1.5 million in ad revenue and sales from the store in the past year.
It's inconceivable that he could be getting periodic sales of less than $100 a day, and some days apparently not bringing in any sales at all in this period prior to September 2015.
Then you have to consider the money bombs that he did and has done over the years, which predate the time period this spreadsheet covers, that money isn't reflected anywhere.
I can't prove this, but my best guess is that this set of data reflects the migration of sales to a different account than they were previously counted in.
I can only theorize on this point, but it seems really bizarre to me that this document begins literally at the exact same time that Ted Anderson, the owner of Midas Resources and Genesis Communications, which syndicates Alex's show and was his primary sponsor, was in court dealing with a case that would lead to him losing his license to sell precious metals.
That case began on September 11th, 2015, and Alex's money bomb in 2015 was on September 16th.
It's very difficult for me to believe that this timing isn't a coincidence.
I mean, it could be, but it seems plausible to me that prior to Ted's legal problems coming to a head, their finances might have been more intertwined than you would expect.
And after Ted was no longer able to engage in his primary business, Infowars started keeping their finances much more separate.
Just on a very basic level, they raised about a million dollars in that money bomb, and that money is absolutely not reflected in this spreadsheet, even though in theory it does cover the time period after the bomb.
It should be in there.
Another thing that's important to remember is that this spreadsheet is barely labeled at all, and it's really up to the person looking at it to try and deduce exactly what these numbers show.
For instance, one column says total sales, but nowhere in this document is it explained what this is the total sales of.
It's assumed that this is the total sales from the Infowars store, but that's not concretely shown in the document itself.
It's a pretty good assumption that this is showing Infowars store sales, but it's still a little bit of an assumption.
One point I want to make about the Huffington Post article is that a bit of context is missing.
For instance, the article contains this paragraph, quote, the gamble of backing Trump appeared to pay off.
Of the more than three years of data reviewed by HuffPost, Infowars most profitable days happened around the 2016 presidential election.
The day of the election, November 8th, the Infowars store more than doubled its sales from the previous day, making a total of $660,000.
The next day after Trump won, more than 8,700 orders were placed on the Infowars website, totaling nearly $850,000 in sales.
It's fine to connect this surge in sales to supporting Trump, but it's also important to point out that Infowars did a 52-hour marathon over the course of those days, which probably has an increase in sales a bit.
You know, it has that impact.
That is an important context to why the sales are so high.
It was weird because I couldn't read the, I mean, obviously the conceit of our show, but- I couldn't avoid seeing some of the numbers and then going over, like...
We talked about him during that time period and seeing like little things that don't quite make sense in that context, you know?
Man, nothing screams, I only want to make money to build an anti-New World Order infrastructure, like Alex having to distinguish between which of his multiple houses he allegedly had to sell to stay on air.
The fact that he was able to sell this house is clear evidence that he never actually needed it to begin with, but there was something about having multiple houses that was appealing to him.
Maybe it was the luxury of it, maybe it was the convenience, or like he said, maybe it's just the investing aspect of it.
But whatever the case, this was achievable only because of the money he brings in from the show.
That money could easily have gone towards this infrastructure he's pretending to be building, but Alex prioritized things like having multiple homes or buying a tank or having the ridiculous gun collection that he has.
He can claim that he wants to just build an anti-New World Order infrastructure, and that's great, but honestly, it's just a way to keep the audience pacified about how much money he's actually bringing in and how it's not going to an anti-New World Order infrastructure, unless that's code for his lawyers.
A conservative Christian broadcast has people that run businesses.
And they know if your business brings in a million dollars, you're lucky if you get $10,000.
So my listeners, I know off of this, because no weapon formed against us will prosper, and I haven't even plugged in the last two days, this reminds me.
In the name of this, I'm plugging every segment, and we're going to actually raise the money we need to stay on air and launch all these operations.
It's literally in a movie whenever you finally get to the bad guy and they've stolen all your gold and then they're like, ha, I scattered it to the four winds you have lost, sir.
I would say that based on the temperature around Infowars prior to this, And how Alex was quitting a bit and storming off air, and he started this episode off by saying everyone needed to die and walked around to the parking lot for a while.
A lot of my criticism or the things that I'm responding to are perhaps interpretations of information from this that I've seen on Twitter and on social media.
I really want all the Democrats and globalists and, you know, the pedophiles that run the Democratic Party and all the rest of them to know something right now.
I was sitting there when I got married on January 6th, five years ago, when my new wife was pregnant with our wonderful daughter that's four and a half now.
And I looked at her and I said, I want to be out of Infowars in five years.
And I want to move on because it obsesses me.
It's all I do.
And it's killing me.
And I said, I want to hand the baton on to others.
And God has really touched my heart that there's going to be other leaders and just people that are going to stand up and wake up.
My wife looked at me sitting there in the big island at the Four Seasons, which I wouldn't have gone to when Bill Gates owned it.
And so I told her, I said, I said, within five years, I commit to you that I'm only going to be on air one day a week and I might write a book a year or make one film a year, but that's it.
I say it's the dawn of something new, where we're going into something big, where a metamorphosis is happening, and I'm not quite sure until I go through that psychic wall what it is, but I know it's big.
And I know it's a big test.
And I'm going to follow it.
And I'm going to do it.
But it takes your word of mouth.
And it takes your prayer.
And it takes your financial support.
So, next week, today, a month from now, it'll be the last time you ever get an InfoWars t-shirt.
Literally.
I don't just hype stuff, folks.
I don't say stuff that I don't actually believe.
I mean, there's a very good chance in the next year we're not here.
I'd give it well above 50%.
And I'm not trying to curse us.
I'm telling you, it's in God's hands.
It's in your hands.
When we go off, the lights go off, that means they're coming for you.
And quite frankly, at that level, then I can just worry about my family.
I don't want that to happen.
I want to hold them off as long as I can.
But, folks, I can't hold them off much longer, okay?
And we've been trying as hard as we can.
And don't worry, though.
God's going to judge all the people that serve us.
They're going to beg as their houses burn down, as they starve to death, why did they do this?
And not killing you and your family is because Alex is sitting right in that chair, which he won't be in in a little bit because he's going to get mad and he has to walk around the parking lot.
Because she has no future if I don't beat these people.
And we're going to come in here with a focused, unedited, live analysis of the false flag globalist plan for at least two hours and shove that up the New World Order's ass.