Today, Dan and Jordan keep track of two ongoing storylines on The Alex Jones Show that probably shouldn't be ongoing storylines. The first is the conspicuous absence of Roger Stone on Alex's show since he got saved from prison. The second is Alex weirdly trying to talk himself into promoting the Wayfair Conspiracy. No reason for any of this to be happening.
So, you know, today I've had to spend a good bit of time trying to figure out ways to seal up these windows in order to keep the coldness and not have the bugs.
You remember at the end of the episode, after Alex spent a long time saying it's a honey trap and don't get in there, he's like, but also maybe it's real.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy the show, I'd like to support these gents too, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it, or you can take that generosity that you feel and grind it in a little machine that sits on your countertop, put it inside a little paper cup thing, run a bunch of hot water over it, and then hand it to your Local charity, because they need to pick me up in coffee form.
Now, with that broke Friday, a huge Wayfair story, the big online merchant company, with people supposedly in the names of kidnapped children selling $15,000, $10,000 cabinets.
I said, is this a cover for money laundering, a cover to deliver kids?
I said, I don't think so, but it could be.
But when you see something like this the media is focusing on, instead of all the confirmed massive roll-up of huge globalist pedophile rings, it could be a setup.
I've witnessed it before to distract us.
But then everybody sent me the Amazon and the rest of them sites going back years.
And then I got reminded on Backpage and on Craigslist and a bunch of other places that busted people selling items when it was really prostitution a few years ago with code words.
You know, every morning I wake up and I just remind myself, like every morning I'm just looking at the news going like, so we're really doing this, huh?
So this is a story that Alex is completely misrepresenting.
Before I get into any of this, I want to be clear that I'm not minimizing the tragedy of unnecessary death, nor am I saying that any party's behavior in this story justifies shooting.
My only point is that the available information completely contradicts what Alex is reporting because he doesn't actually care about the reality of this story.
He's interested in creating a fear in white people of non-white people.
That's all he's doing.
This is about a woman from Indianapolis named Jessica Whittaker who was shot and killed in the very early morning of hours of July 5th.
She was walking with her fiancé and two other friends near the canal in Indianapolis around 3 a.m.
As the group passed a group of strangers, one of the people in Whittaker's group was overheard saying the N-word.
The group of strangers responded by yelling Black Lives Matter at them, to which Whitaker replied, All lives matter.
I'm going to read what happened next from the article about this in the Daily Mail.
Her fiancé, quote, said both groups brandished guns at each other, but eventually talked through the issues, fist bumped, and walked away from each other.
So it appeared that everything was alright, but apparently it wasn't, and they ended up getting into a shootout.
This group of strangers initially shot at them, and fire was returned, and sadly, Ms. Whitaker died.
Incidentally, this is the second homicide that's taken place in this stretch of the Indianapolis Canal in just that week.
Previously, a 14-year-old was shot, allegedly the result of an adult shooting him in self-defense after the youth attempted to pull off an armed robbery.
So, this is maybe an area where there's a little bit of crime going on right now.
This is an awful story, but you can easily and pretty immediately see the factual misrepresentations that Alex has added to his version of it so that his story more easily fits his narratives of white victimhood and fear.
For one, he completely ignores the setting and the inciting incident of the event.
He doesn't mention that it was at three in the morning and the altercation began because someone used the N-word.
Again, that's not to say that I'm saying that that justifies a shooting, but it's relevant if you're reporting this story.
Alex's version of the story has cast these people as Black Lives Matter protesters who randomly accosted this white person on the street and insisted that they pledge allegiance to BLM, and when they dare say all lives matter, they're executed.
This is obviously not at all accurate from the available reporting on the story.
Alex has found a story with a white victim and suspect who yelled Black Lives Matter, and everything else past that is the creation of his imagination.
Yeah, and all the rest of it is just his made-up shit.
This is something that only a very deeply racist person would do.
The complete misreporting of stories like this, specifically for the reason of creating racially charged feeling, is an act of profound bigotry.
And I think, honestly, doing something like this, and with the regularity that we see Alex doing this, that's way more damning than if he just said slurs on air.
I think that this is worse.
I mean, it's not for me to decide.
I'm not the target of this, you know, to say, like, relative scale of it.
Yeah, I mean, a slur is awful and offensive, but it's not necessarily always inciting a bunch of passionate gun weirdos into believing that every black person is coming to fucking execute them if they don't swear fealty to Black Lives Matter.
You can find plenty of stories about this in outlets like the New York Post or the Daily Mail.
It's not something that's being ignored by the media as much as it is more of a local issue.
From everything I can tell, this is a story about a mentally unwell person attacking two people on a train, which sucks, but it's not national news.
For one thing, the suspect was arrested and is facing charges of attempted murder, attempted assault, among other counts.
Both of the victims who were in their 70s survived and are in stable condition, so that's a bright side to this whole thing, and makes it far less severe of a story than it would be had it have gone the other way.
Certainly it's not nothing, and if I lived in New York or, you know...
Hey, you know what?
Even not living in New York, it's relevant.
There was a stabbing.
I'm not playing that down, but the idea that everybody needs to be talking about this and pointing out that it was a black guy who did it is absurd.
There's an important distinction here that Alex fails to grasp at all.
And that is just because the person who happens to commit this crime is black and the victim happens to be white, that doesn't mean that race is really involved at all.
In this case, I can see no evidence that race was a factor in the crime, and in fact, the better case could be made that this was an ageist crime, since the suspect said, quote, why aren't you at home with your kids before commencing the attack?
And they were two dudes in their 70s.
For Alex, he sees a black guy attack a white person, and he believes, or at least reports, that the black guy did it because the guy was white.
That's a really stupid way to look at things, but when you begin to glimpse the racism, the point that you do is when you start to recognize that Alex doesn't operate this way when the races are reversed.
When a white person commits a crime and the victim is black, Alex will go out of his way to justify why racism isn't involved at all.
All you have to do is look back to his coverage of Ahmaud Arbery's killing as a perfect example of how this doesn't play out the same way in those circumstances.
I don't know if it's emblematic of a complete inability to understand why...
Or if it's a pure ability to understand why.
Do you know what I'm saying?
This is a rebuttal to people pointing out the horrific police violence and the racist attacks and the fucking modern-day lynchings that are still fucking going on.
And they are emblematic of a long, long history of doing this shit.
pulling up any kind of like, well, see, a black person hurt a white person as a defense against that is either misunderstanding that each individual act is part of a larger whole that needs to be corrected, or it's understanding
And honestly, like me, bringing up the case of Ahmaud Arbery is almost a bad example in this case because you could make a very strong argument that the reason that they did target him was because he was black.
So there is a pretty compelling racial component of that, whereas at this point, I don't know what information will eventually come out because the guy did get arrested, but that guy on the train did not seem to be, from all the reporting I can find, have any racial...
There's an investigation open into them because they were straight up pointing guns at people, and Patricia McCloskey had her finger on the trigger of her pistol.
Under normal circumstances, that is illegal to brandish a weapon at somebody, but it becomes really complicated when you start to factor in ideas of self-defense and stand-your-ground laws and the castle doctrine.
It's an open question about whether or not the McCloskey's argument of feeling threatened and thus being justified in brandishing weapons and self-defense is valid.
And the fact that Patricia was pointing a gun at people and had no firearms training, that doesn't look great.
Legally, they're probably going to end up fine, though.
Anyway, the DA of Missouri is not involved in this case at all.
The office that opened the investigation is that of St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner.
Though Alex has her position wrong and is just talking shit, I do want to say that what he's saying isn't totally based on nothing.
Gardner won her election to the circuit attorney's office in 2017, and she did accept funding from a super PAC called the Safety and Justice Committee, which Soros did donate to.
So at least there's a little kernel of truth in that she got some Soros funding.
But Alex is all like, he's installing everybody else.
And so, what's going on is it's some kind of a demonstration that's going on on the streets.
It's tough to say exactly what's going on, and then some loud music starts playing.
The camera cuts over to two people holding up a banner that says, quote, all you fascists bound to lose, standing next to a setup of what looks like at least like five amps.
The crowd then descends on them, tears up the banner, and kicks over the amps, and it's hard to keep track of where people are in the crowd, but I would not be surprised if they got roughed up a bit.
This was challenging, but I was able to find some context for this.
This is an event that is called an anti-pedophilia rally in the same way that Milo Yiannopoulos speaking events on college campuses are pro-free speech.
It's essentially an extreme right-wing group using the cover of something that you probably can't possibly be against in order to give them cover to operate their stealthier agenda.
You see this a lot with people like Tommy Robinson.
This rally was being run by a guy named Justin Barrett, the leader of the National Party.
According to The Beacon, in 1998, Barrett wrote a book called The National Way Forward in which he, quote, calls for a constitution configured according to Catholic doctrine and the creation of a Catholic dictatorship.
He's staunchly opposed to immigration, entirely against reproductive rights to the point of advocating the death penalty for abortion doctors, and seems to support the criminalization of homosexuality and divorce.
On at least three occasions, he's spoken at events held by the German neo-Nazi party NPD, including one event in 2000 where he was the guest of honor.
In 2002, in the Irish Times, they include what is described as a quote stinging rebuke of Barrett from John Smythe.
Who's the spokesperson of the anti-abortion pro-life campaign.
No amount of evasion or spin on Mr. Barrett's part can explain away the seriousness of attending such conferences.
It's nonsense to contend that speaking at a neo-fascist rally somehow serves the interests of building a more caring pro-life culture or the broader human rights agenda which he claims to espouse.
The groups with which Mr. Barrett and Youth Defense are reported to be associated have an agenda of social exclusion and political extremism, far removed from the ethos of respect and moderation that should animate the pro-life movement.
This is the guy who was running this rally in Ireland, so it kind of makes sense that there were some counter-demonstrators who would show up and protest.
It's very easy to pretend that their protest was somehow anti-pedophilia in nature, but when you have a better understanding of who's holding the rally, you should get the picture that this rally was not anti-pedophile to begin with.
That's a fascist rally wearing an anti-pedophile hat.
And if you'd like to stand up to the globalists and stand up to the main Paul Revere operation, battering, ramming the New World Order, other than Tucker Carlson, they're trying to take off the air right now.
Please support him.
Please get products at InfoWarsStore.com or by calling 888-253-3139.
So, on Friday, it was revealed that Tucker Carlson's top writer, Blake Neff, had been using an alias to post a bunch of racist and sexist stuff on a web forum.
According to an examination by CNN, quote, there has at times also been overlap between some material he posted or saw in the forum and Carlson's show.
This is a guy who worked for Tucker and Tucker-adjacent entities for years, which makes it a little hard to shrug off as just like, eh, it's a random employee.
This wasn't something he'd been doing years ago, either.
This is a revelation that the head writer for an increasingly racist talk show host is, in fact, a guy who posts racist shit online under an alias, and now people get to make up their minds what they want to think about it.
Obviously, Fox News thought it wasn't cool because the dude resigned since he almost certainly would have been fired to try and put out the story.
Some more advertisers might bail, but...
Tucker's hoping he can just wait this out on another vacation and come back in a few weeks with a new racist head writer who's much better at anonymity.
So that voice that Alex was doing that was super weird was, well, he was talking about Tucker and how you need to support him and you need to support Alex, too.
And, of course, it's part of a sales pitch.
Alex says something really weird about his iodine.
I mean, we've heard stuff like this before, but I just wanted to keep this in just to keep a little marker on this.
I don't care about this dumb fuck political posture.
Uh-uh.
And I'm mostly only keeping this and the next clip in, kind of to be like, well, I certainly hope this doesn't look really, really terrible in a couple months.
Now, I told you back in May that I challenged the president on air and off air to sideline Fauci and to use that term as a code word that he understood what was happening and was going to build a case to actually destroy Gates and Fauci.
Now, I don't know if Trump's going to go that way.
He'll get somebody close before he destroys them, but he has got Gates in there right now and this whole vaccine commission, I think, to keep his enemies close.
So, Alex is taking responsibility for feeding the information to Trump to get Fauci on the outs, and he's insisting that Trump is communicating with him in secret code using the word sideline.
So Alex gets into discussing virus stuff being a hoax.
Sure.
And one of the big headlines on this is that there was a guy who is a correspondent for NBC and MSNBC, and he had had coronavirus, or he believed that he had COVID-19, and it turns out, what do you know?
He ends up getting an antibody test.
It comes back negative.
So Alex believes that this is proof that this is all a hoax.
Now, Alex is going on and on about how this doctor who was interviewed on NBC, you know, he claimed to have COVID-19 and it's now a hoax.
It's really confusing because the clip Alex plays is just that guy, Dr. Joseph Fair, explaining that he was really sick and it's no joke, even if you don't have underlying conditions.
In reality, Alex is kind of just fudging this story.
In May, Fair got really sick, and according to his telling of it, he had basically all of the symptoms that are associated with COVID-19.
He got some nasal swab tests, some of them at home, and they came back negative.
But because he was presenting as a very likely COVID case, and there's the possibility of false negatives, his case was presumed to be COVID.
Now, a couple months later, after he's made a recovery, Fair got an antibody test, which came back negative.
And this presents a number of possible scenarios that could be going on here.
The first is that he had an unknown condition that was very similar in progression of symptoms to COVID-19, and he recovered from it, leaving this a medical mystery that remains to be solved.
It's also possible that the nasal swabs he took were false negatives, but the antibody test could be accurate.
This would mean that he did have COVID-19, but he doesn't have antibodies that would show up in a test for them.
That is conceivably possible.
As of this point, it's unclear exactly what's up here, but Fair has said he's consulting more doctors to try and get to the bottom of what happened.
He's seeing additional experts, and he's taking a follow-up antibody test, so hopefully he'll be able to get to the bottom of what happened.
The scenario that I think is most unlikely in all this is what Alex is suggesting, namely that Dr. Fair faked his illness or something to hype COVID-19 fears.
That seems a little ridiculous, and if he really had faked everything...
Why would he then reveal that he tested negative for the antibody test?
It's not like his doctor could even legally release that information.
He put that out himself.
If this was all a staged hoax, why would you do that?
Well, I mean, the most terrifying possibility is one that is becoming more and more researched and there's more and more evidence for it is that the antibodies go away.
If you're in the ICU for a while and you presume that you have COVID-19, and then you end up having some sort of an indication that maybe you didn't, that's kind of even scarier.
Because now you're like, well, what I had could come back, could be a chronic condition of some kind.
It's pretty scary.
So I would assume that he's going to continue trying to figure out what's going on, if only for his own...
I mean, how many times have you heard, or I've even felt it, of the moment I got my diagnosis of bipolar, I was like, oh, thank God there's a reason and I understand it.
If it was then ripped away from me and it's like, we have no fucking clue what's wrong with you, that would be terrifying in its own manner.
It turns out all these other big shopping carts, Amazon, you name it, going back years have the exact same code words, and it turns out that Backpage and Craigslist got caught with prostitution and similar things and sex trafficking of kidnapped women and children years ago.
There aren't pictures of emaciated kids on Amazon.
What Alex is talking about is something that QAnon weirdos found online by searching for the SKU numbers for these products in a very specific place.
The SKU for a product is the stock-keeping unit number, and it's what retailers use to track inventory.
As it turns out, if you take these SKU numbers for these suspicious items, then add SRC USA to them, and then you search for that in the Russian search engine Yandex, you come up with some questionable image results.
This was not something I cared to research myself, but thankfully there are others who already got to the bottom of it.
The account DapperGander on Twitter has a great thread fully explaining what's going on, which I'll sum up here as best I can.
There is a Russian image-sharing site called IMGSRC, where people should definitely not go.
It was essentially formally like PhotoBucket, but since as early as 2014, it's been taken over by pedophiles who post some awful shit there.
American search engines filter out results that come from this Russian image-sharing site because of the high incidence of illegal images that would come up in the results.
But that filter does not exist for the Russian search engine Yandex, which is why QAnon weirdos insist on using that search engine in order to prove their conspiracy.
Basically, if you search for SRC along with just about anything on Yandex, you'll have a very high likelihood of finding some at least questionable pictures.
So what this boils down to is basically a scam.
It's a trap, and it appears to have worked in terms of swinging Alex Jones.
He's fallen for this bait.
The master of research in reality got fooled by a Pizzagate Yeah, I don't like that bad faith actors can use monsters to portray Good faith actors as monsters, while bad faith actors continue the entire cycle over and over and over again without doing anything positive in the world.
And then I'm going to show you the footage and the newscast about the white woman being shot to death.
And the point is, there's now 12 to 1 black-on-white crime.
And the media is encouraging it.
And so some deranged, criminal, mentally ill black people, not even a large minority, but a very active, vicious, small minority, black folks are going out.
Mainly black males, about 13 to 25, and targeting white people with knockout games and shooting them in the head and stabbing them.
And this is all going on, and the media is all busy covering it up.
Now, you would think that if you didn't know all the facts.
Right.
There's one fact that's kind of important, and that is something we've heard Alex say before, in that no black person who is alive has been the subject of more racism than Alex himself.
I grew up in Dallas, Texas, and I had a lot of black friends as I played sports, and they thought I was crazy when my parents would drop me off in, you know, their neighborhood.
Because that area, Rockwall, Texas, had an area that was the older part of town from the older part of the city, and it was mainly the black part of town.
And there were some racist black people there.
And I got attacked a few times, but my parents were like, well, that's how you make your child tough, kind of old-fashioned.
I guarantee you there aren't any black people out there probably walking around that have been, let's not exaggerate.
I mean, I probably had, I got in over 100 fights with black people.
And almost every time they initiated it.
And, you know, I'd beat up some guy my age when I was like 15, and then his brother who was out of prison would catch me at McDonald's, and, you know, it would get into a really bad situation.
And that'll teach you how to fight when somebody's trying to kill you.
So, I guarantee you, there's no black people out there that have ever had 100 white people start fights with.
And the specifics that he seems to be operating off of are various places where there's a lot of stabbings and shootings, and they're almost all racially based.
So these places, it's not so much that they're not safe.
They're not safe for white people.
That's the image that he's trying to just reinforce over and over again.
Businesses have the absolute right to set their own hours, and there are countless businesses that are closed on Sundays or even on weekends, and no one cares.
The problem people had with Chick-fil-A was that their owners were pretty anti-LGBTQ and were pretty public about it.
Their then-CEO Dan Cathy said in 2012 that allowing same-sex marriage was, quote, inviting God's judgment on our nation.
These comments naturally got some folks unhappy, and in response, a bunch of anti-LGBTQ forces on the right wing turned Chick-fil-A into a pillar of their identity.
That was the chicken company that fought for their interests.
Mike Huckabee tried to get a Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day going, and it sort of became a way of engaging in homophobic trolling.
People wanted to publicly express a disdain for LGBTQ people, but instead of doing it directly, they'd just make a big deal out of supporting Chick-fil-A.
In the process of this whole conversation, it came out that the Cathy's had given millions to anti-gay organizations, including ones that promoted conversion therapy.
This was what people had a problem with as it related to Chick-fil-A and that's what Alex is upset that they're not doing anymore because they announced in 2020 that they'll no longer give money to groups that have explicitly anti-gay positions.
So for Hobby Lobby, the reason people didn't like them is that they believed that they shouldn't have to provide insurance plans for their employees that included birth control, which was a requirement and a part of the Affordable Care Act.
People objected to a business essentially deciding...
Oh, and then there was that whole thing in 2017 when it came out that Hobby Lobby's owner, Mr. Green, he'd paid a $3 million settlement after being found to have bought, quote, smuggled Iraqi antiquities to put in his collection of Bible memorabilia.
According to MSNBC, quote, Hobby Lobby hired an expert who warned that the artifacts might have been looted and counseled them to make sure the country of origin was properly labeled on customs forms.
Instead, according to the Justice Department, the 5,500 artifacts were shipped without proper documentation.
And then, back in March, there was that whole thing where Hobby Lobby told their employees that they were going to stay open, despite the rise in concerns about COVID-19, because Green's wife, Barbara, had received a message from God saying that everything was cool.
And then they ended up closing all their stores in April.
No one cares about these businesses being closed on Sunday.
That's totally fine.
The problem is that they have other societally destructive behaviors that they carry out in the name of their religion, which people just shouldn't be allowed to engage in.
So, turns out, a lot of people have been sort of curious about where Alex stands on the 5G stuff and coronavirus.
Because there's a lot of people who, in the sort of weirder fringe, Communities who believe that it plays a much larger role than Alex necessarily says.
However, it turns out the water might be muddier than we think.
Did people point out to me three months ago that, hey, you know you had Dr. Groupon two and a half, three years ago, and he showed documents where 5G in China was causing an autoimmune response in the lungs and people think they were dying because there was no liquid.
And I called Groupon up and he goes, yeah, that's why I won't talk to you.
That's why I won't come on.
I love you, brother.
They threatened him really bad.
He said he didn't understand why it was that at the time, but he hit the key.
This electromagnetic radiation system is getting so powerful that it's definitely exacerbating autoimmune responses in the lungs.
If you just take a second to think about it, you'll quickly run into a wall where nothing makes sense anymore.
All of the narratives about Fauci and Bill Gates creating a virus as a bioweapon either becomes completely superfluous, or it has to be readjusted to now actually be about them researching a specific virus that works well with 5G, which hasn't been demonstrated up to this point.
Everything needs to change to accommodate this, and Alex hasn't done that.
So here's where things get a little messy for Alex and Roger.
It looks like Trump put out a press release and announcement that Roger's sentence was commuted and he was being granted clemency.
But it looks like he didn't actually provide the appropriate information to the judge in Roger's case, which is causing a little bit of an issue.
According to an article in Time about this, quote...
Although presidents have brought authority to commute prison sentences and issue pardons, the brief order from Jackson, who presided over Stone's trial last year, made clear that the judge still is seeking information and clarity about the clemency, including the actual executive order from the White House, which has not been provided for her.
Maybe it's because he knows better, or maybe it's just a thing where he agreed not to appear anywhere before Hannity in return for that booking.
It's hard to know exactly what's up, but no matter how you slice it, it's abundantly clear that Alex is not a high priority for Roger anymore.
Alex threw him a clemency celebration party on Alex's day off, and Roger didn't show up.
Alex said Roger was going to be on the show on Sunday, and he didn't show up.
Now on Monday, Alex claims that he has some kind of inside baseball stuff that's keeping Roger from coming on, but he's totally fine being on Hannity the same day.
This is pathetic.
Just grow up and recognize this dude doesn't give a fuck.
If Stone goes, because they gave a bunch of, like, Matt Gaetz and all of that stuff, and if he had thanked Alex Jones, that would have been, Stone thanks Alex Jones right off the bat.
This is a fun story and all, but a cat didn't get a ballot in the mail.
According to this guy in Atlanta, he received a voter registration application in the mail in the name of his cat that's been dead for 12 years.
There's a number of possibilities for what could be going on here.
One is that his cat's name may have been used in some kind of a registration list at some point in the past, and someone scraping lists for voter registration drives might have sent an application in error, thinking that the cat was a person.
This is plausible, considering that the cat's name was Cody, which could easily be mistaken for a human name if you saw it on a list.
There's a hundred possibilities for how this could happen.
But whatever happened here doesn't really matter.
The cat would never have been able to register to vote.
If the guy wanted to commit voter fraud, he wouldn't have been able to successfully send in the voter registration form since the cat wouldn't have any human ID or records.
There's no way that this could have resulted in an illegal vote.
Also, if the globalist's evil plan is to send out ballots in the names of dead cats, why are they sending them to the owners of these pets who aren't in on the plan?
That seems like a really stupid way to go about things.
Almost like you'd be guaranteed to have people like this dude in Atlanta come out and talk about it.
If you were gonna do voter fraud, particularly on a large scale, this is the last way you would ever do it.
It's so weird to me, but I think it's interesting the way that this caller is bringing up concrete things that Alex was wrong about, and he's just like, I don't care.
We're skipping over a lot of his calls because I'm just toning out.
Some of it's vaguely racist.
Some of it's just boring.
But Alex gets towards the end of the show now and he's getting really introspective and defensive about Some people have an idea in their mind that his calls are fake.
I used to think that there was a good chance that Alex's callers could be fake, and I still think there's a possibility that some of them are plants.
But the more I listen, the more I think that's less likely.
The reason is because there's so many of the same callers who call in over and over, and they appear to be in business for themselves.
There's a guy named Carlos who calls in pretty much every show when Alex is taking calls, and he just lectures Alex.
It's just like, I don't know what's going on, but this dude, Alex just lets him talk for like 10 minutes.
There's also a guy named Chase the Patriot who calls in pretty much every day, and he's at least partially doing it to promote his own YouTube channel.
So there are some real people, but I think some of them might have their own agendas mixed in with trying to become regular callers on Alex's show.
That said, the reason I pulled that clip is because Alex is saying that he's trying to tell the truth and trying to figure out what's going on.
I'm super offended by that because he doesn't even do the least he could do to figure out what's going on.
Day after day, I tune into his show and I hear him read a headline then tell a story about the article that that headline is from that in no way matches what the actual article says, which strongly implies that Alex hasn't even taken the time to read the articles he covers.
He's said as much many times in the past, when he'll have a stack of paper on his desk and he'll say, I've read some of these articles.
We recently found a clip of him talking about how he hasn't even read all of Carol Quigley's book Tragedy and Hope, which is supposed to be the foundation of his worldview and the blueprint of the globalist's plan.
Alex is not trying to figure out what's going on because he doesn't even do the easiest thing he could do, which is read the stories he's covering on air.
Because I know that's the case, it becomes clear that the other thing that he said...
I do believe he doesn't have the time or energy to fake stuff, because that sounds like it would be effort, and that is not something he's very interested in.
To the point where Alex was getting pissed off that some of the money was being funneled to Roger's defense funds and stuff like that.
And it's like, on Monday, It has been days that Roger has had every opportunity to call in or, failing that, record something in advance to send to Alex.
But I'm sure he would have had to be there on Tuesday.
I can see a very easy explanation for this that Alex would never want to talk about, and that is that Roger gave the exclusive to Hannity, which still means that Alex is lower on the totem pole than places that are really actually media.
The guy who he changed his entire show for, more or less, he gets the vindication and he celebrates it with an exclusive on Hannity instead of with his bro?