All Episodes
Previous Next
May 23, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:41
The Wicked Cauliflower
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen it's time once again for Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance and with me of course is the indispensable PK.
May I jump in and just say that was a tremendous entrance and introduction to what is quickly becoming what I understand a lot of people's favorite podcast and I did get a lot of feedback and people have said to use sparingly Mr. Taylor when I talk to you.
Sparingly?
Sparingly.
People gave feedback.
They said they like the formality.
They like the idea that there is a sense of Decorum.
Yeah, deference, if you will, to the senior, to the enormity of the breadth of what you've brought to our people.
And speaking of that... It's just a matter of age, you know?
It's not a matter of age.
It's a matter of understanding that we're in the shadow of greatness.
And speaking of that, I believe that the 2019 American Renaissance Conference Just happened, and it went swimmingly.
Yes, yes.
It was a great success, a great success.
And we were very adequately guarded by the Tennessee authorities.
As several people noted, the Montgomery Bell State Park was probably the safest place in the entire state of Tennessee.
We had heavily armed men all around, and on some occasions there was some need for them, too.
I saw some video of the demonstrators milling around, and they were being looked after by men on horseback, but there were still several arrests, quite a few of them, and they were all screaming insults at the officers.
I think it's just great.
For the officers, certainly, at any rate, and for the television crews that came and filmed them and then came and talked to us, it is very, very clear who the civilized people are and who the savages are.
So, yes, it was a great success.
We actually had something remotely resembling fair-minded coverage from local TV.
Interviewed me very sanely.
Also interviewed Patrick Casey very sanely.
And you could just tell.
They interviewed the demonstrators outside who were complaining about, we are promoting genocide.
And then they walk in and, hmm, not much sign of that.
So yes, it was very good.
And those of you who missed it, next year, next year, it will be bigger and better than ever.
But it always is.
So yes, thank you for bringing that up.
But I believe you were going to lead off this program with a story of money leaving the country.
Yeah, let's talk about a new report that was just released today.
May 22, 2019, from the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
We'll call them FAIR from now on.
That's the acronym, FAIR.
Guys, ladies and gentlemen, get this.
Legal and illegal immigrants in 2017 sent $150 billion in untaxed funds back to their homelands.
And this is each year.
The number that we're talking about, this is just for 2017.
So, this FAIR report just came out.
Now, think about that.
Think about that, guys.
Think about that girls.
All that money that's not going into the infrastructure of the United States, that's untaxed.
All of that that could be going to local communities, local governments, state governments.
That's going back to places like Mexico where in 2017, 30 billion dollars Of that $150 billion went back to Mexico.
Well, see, it's not a question just that it's untaxed.
The fact that it leaves the country.
Correct.
It's like sending money overseas and expecting to get something from it, and we get nothing.
It's not even like importing.
No.
It's terrible for our balance of payments.
It's money that is just sucked out of our economy and given to other countries.
It's an outrage.
And, you know, this question of taxing it.
Remember when Donald Trump was talking about getting the Mexicans to pay for the wall?
All you need is to put, I don't know, 3%, 5%, some small percentage of taxation on these remittances.
You'd have that wall paid for in no time.
Well, I mean, it's like you said, 30 billion, 10% of 30 billion is 3 billion.
So there you go right there.
Get it down to half that if it's just that.
I don't mind making China pay for the wallet either.
They're getting $15 billion out of us every year.
India is getting about $12 billion.
The Philippines are getting over $10 billion.
Vietnam is getting about $7 billion.
Guatemala and Nigeria, they're over $5 billion.
El Salvador is about $4.5 billion.
The Dominican Republic and Honduras, respectively.
Roughly four billion dollars going to those countries from the United States.
Now also think about these individuals who are able to come from these countries and pull those type of salaries from businesses in the United States.
You understand why E-Verify is so important, because that immediately cuts the legs out
from this ability for these illegal migrants.
Now, there are some legal, but again, these illegal migrants, these illegal aliens
would not be able to even get hired by these businesses, because again, who really, who really is at fault here?
It's the businesses that hire these illegal aliens, that undercut wages for Americans.
And I'm not one of these people who whine and cry, Oh, look what it's doing to black Americans because.
because black Americans, blacks in our country, guess what, they still vote for Democrats.
You would think they would be like, yeah, we do want to stop illegal immigration,
but statistics show they don't, guys.
So what I care about are the white working class throughout the country that is being impacted.
And you know, Charles Murray's book, Coming Apart, showcased this quite succinctly,
even though he didn't really mention immigration in that book.
That's true.
And you know, the other thing that I always think of when I see figures like this is the fact that Mexico is right at the top with $30 billion being shipped out of the country.
And of course, Mexicans are among the people who are the least likely to have any kind of health insurance, the most likely to be on some kind of Hispanics are the most likely to be on some kind of welfare, and here they've got $30 billion to spare that they are not spending on medical insurance, that they're not spending on room and board.
It just outrages me to think that they have got $30 billion to send outside the country, whereas they got their hands out constantly to the U.S.
taxpayer here in the U.S.
What, are there nine zeros in a billion?
Yes.
I mean that even that it just there's that great joke from a movie I know you've never seen the whole Austin Powers where dr. Evil says 1 million dollars that's what they have but these numbers are so extraordinary that it's hard to even fathom a hundred fifty billion dollars leaving the United States economy but then you just like you extrapolate that data for those countries and you think wow There's $4.5 billion going to Honduras.
What is the GDP of these countries?
I believe in the case of Mexico, after oil exports, remittances from the United States are the number one source of foreign exchange.
And of course, that's why their governments are perfectly happy to see these people go.
It means they don't have to worry about them, and it produces a steady flow of money into them from Uncle Sugar.
Now, of course, speaking of steady flows of money, we have another equally, in some respects, outrageous figure, and that is that last year, The German government spent a record 23 billion euros, that's over 25 billion dollars, last year helping to integrate the 1 million refugees that marched in the country.
That was an 11% increase over last year.
So this is, you know, maybe on the order of 20 billion dollars a year.
Now, if you're talking about a million refugees, if you're talking about 25 billion dollars per year, you know how much that works out per refugee?
How much does that work out per refugee?
$25,000.
$25,000 per refugee.
That the German taxpayers are expending.
That's exactly right.
This is a staggering figure.
Just one year.
It continues to go up every year.
I don't know why it should continue to go up.
You'd think that the more they integrated, the less they would cost.
Integration was never the whole plan.
Here, it was the Germans assimilating to the invaders.
It sure seems that way.
Now, Angela Merkel has repeatedly said that her decision in 2015 to let these people swarm in was absolutely necessary because it was a humanitarian requirement.
The moral white man needed to do this.
But, since then, she has started talking about, well, we really might not want to do this every year.
And you know what she's trying to do instead?
She wants instead to tackle the causes for these people wanting to come.
And so, on top of the 23 billion euros they're spending trying to integrate the ones who are already here, she is spending 8 billion euros last year on measures at keeping migrants outside the European Union by improving living conditions for them.
Another absolute fool's errand.
They're going to continue to come so long as there's any differential at all in the terms of earning capacity or standard of living in these third world countries and Germany.
But for the idea that she's going to spend all this money making them wealthy so they won't want to come, What a doubly impoverishing effect on the German taxpayer.
It is, but you know what?
If there weren't that expenditure, the $23 billion, if you were to try and keep them out, if you actually had... Obviously, Merkel doesn't care about the German people.
We know that.
Everyone knows that.
But if you actually had a politician who said, all right, we're going to pay them not to come here and create fortress Europa, create fortress Germania, I'd be okay with that.
Because you know what?
It is a Eight billion is a lot less than 23 billion, and you know what?
At this point, you have to put in places, structures to protect the people.
But PK, my young friend, this eight billion dollars they're spending, that is not to keep them out.
That's not Fortress Europa.
That is spending money in their local economy.
I know, I know.
To try to make it better for them, make them happier to stay.
For a billion euros, for one-eighth of this money that they're shipping overseas, they could toughen up the borders.
They could just pitch them out.
In fact, all it takes, frankly, is a couple of salvos shot across the bow, and they're going to turn around.
It doesn't even take that.
We've seen with Salvini, all it takes is, you're not going to bring your ship to our ports.
It's that simple.
You don't even have to fire.
You don't even have to use military.
You know, the Air Force flyover.
It just takes one word.
Exactly.
No.
Exactly.
And you know what?
You know who said that word, Mr. Taylor?
What?
Ben Carson.
Oh, yes.
Dear Benji.
Yes, tell me about Ben.
Ben Carson is a guy a lot of people thought, wow, why did Donald Trump appoint sleepy Ben Carson to head HUD?
And I think it's been actually one of the few things Donald Trump has done right.
Yes, I agree.
Seriously, I'm not joking when I say this.
Because we have had, in the past week, an instance where the Democrats now are pushing for illegal aliens to have access to public housing, and Ben Carson, and very sensible Very incredibly articulate, simply says, what?
Why should illegal aliens be in public housing when we have massive lines of people lining up for vouchers?
Think back a couple years.
Think back a couple years to, I think it was 2012, down in Atlanta, Georgia, in College Park, 30,000 to 40,000 blacks Rioted!
They rioted because they wanted to have access to a lottery to have the right to then get public housing.
It wasn't that they were going to get public housing, they wanted to be part of the lottery.
And this type of thing has been replicated all across the country.
There was one in Dallas, There was an instance in St.
Louis about a decade ago where there was a riot over getting part of the lottery, and as Ben Carson has sensibly stated, There are Americans.
Our people are not getting in public housing.
You have the gall to want illegal aliens to be in public housing.
Well, as I recall, doesn't the controversy have to do with the fact that if you have a whole family of illegal aliens, they can't get into public housing.
But these are cases in which one member of the family is illegal.
is legal, maybe even a citizen, one of these anchor babies.
And so if you have mom and dad and their brothers and everybody else,
they're all illegals.
But so long as a baby has got a U.S. passport, then the whole crowd can say it.
That's the whole idea of birthright citizenship.
Right.
You're exactly right.
But I believe the question is, I don't know if anybody is actually proposing that illegal aliens in general have the right to live in public housing.
He's saying, look, we've got these mixed families, and if there's even one illegal in the family, we want to pitch them out because we've got Americans, actual citizens, people who have the right to be here who want to live there.
Well, no, the White House proposal would exclude all illegal immigrants from public housing.
And so what's at stake here?
The Democrats are saying, no, no, no, this can't happen.
Carson testified before the House Financial Services Committee.
They discussed a wide range of topics, mainly because Democrats have attacked this proposal
by the Republicans that, according to a recent HUD study, would potentially kick out as many
as 55,000 legal children who gain that legal citizenship because they were born in the
United States.
And again, this goes back about seven months when Donald Trump, right before the election,
decided to try and rally the rubes by saying, hey, I'll do an executive order on birthright
Hey dude, you had the chance to do that back on January 21st, 2017.
That could have been the easiest thing that you could have done.
You could have said, hey, No more.
But my point is, I don't think any Democrats at this point are saying, oh, just every last one of these illegals, put them on the list for housing.
What they're saying is, if an illegal is related to a legal, then you can let them stay in public housing.
You'd be correct there, but I'm I think based on what we're seeing in California, where we are seeing the state push for rules to give health care, that's actually going to be voted in the California legislature in the next couple days.
You've seen what Joe Biden has said, where he says illegal aliens deserve to be covered by health care.
I'm sure the sentiment is there to let anybody who manages to stagger into the country live in public housing.
But at least the controversy here in the hearings had to do with the fact that Ben Carson, God bless him, wants to pitch out a family if even one of them.
Correct.
You're right.
This is the most important quote, I think, of the entire Trump administration, uttered by Ben Carson.
May I quote the neurosurgeon?
It seems only logical.
That tax-paying American citizens should be taken care of first.
It's not that we're cruel, mean-hearted.
It's that we are logical.
This is common sense.
You take care of your own first.
End quote.
Wow!
I mean, again, that is even considered controversial.
Shows how deeply the rot is in.
I agree.
But that, to me, is better than anything Donald Trump has said as president.
It's startling good sense.
Yes, it's logical!
It's astonishing that somebody in a high position could say something as sensible as that.
But moving on to the anti-sensible, if there is such a word, I have a longish little item here about Houston, which will then merge into a question about George Soros.
But just last Sunday, two Houston police officers, one person only, stopped a car.
Well, they tried to stop a car.
And when they were trying to stop a car, they saw somebody in the car pitch a pistol out the window.
And by the time they stopped the car, they discovered that inside there was a 17-year-old driver and 18-year-old female passenger.
And they have it all on body cam.
The driver, who was 17 years old, he instructed his 18-year-old passenger to throw the pistol out the window.
Well, as it turns out, and I was unaware of this, it's illegal under Texas law for anyone under the age of 18 to possess a handgun.
So, these people had already clearly committed a crime.
So, you think they got arrested?
Well, think again.
Think again.
Law enforcement officers in Harris County have to contact the DA's office for permission to charge someone before they actually arrest anyone.
Can you imagine that?
What a bloody time-consuming thing that is.
I suppose that means 24 hours a day there's got to be somebody in the DA's office prepared to answer the phone.
In any case, The current Harris County District Attorney, her name is Kim Ogg.
She is clearly a white woman and a Democrat.
She's been in since 2016.
She has quickly earned a reputation as a friend of Houston criminals because she and her office refused to allow charges on anything but the most violent crimes.
And so these particular officers, they called up Assistant DA Twionette Wallace.
Now, Twionette Just to be sure, I looked her up, and she's not a white woman.
In any case, Twionet said, Nix, no, no, can't do that.
Can't arrest us.
Can't arrest these guys.
We don't give you permission.
Well, they went up the chain of command, and they found Assistant DA Eric Biley.
Now, I couldn't find out just what sort of extraction he was.
There are no photographs of Eric Biley anywhere on the internet.
But he said, this is not a crime.
Because the perps were just trying to abandon the gun.
They're abandoning the gun.
They're not holding it.
They're not possessing it.
And so, not to charge them.
And he said the crime couldn't even be tampering with evidence because they were not committing a felony at the time they threw the gun out the window.
So, do you know what they finally charge him with?
What do they charge him with?
Littering.
Littering?
Yes, you can't put your gun out the window.
No, I think that would be littering.
You see signs all across the highway that says littering a fine up to $500.
But what a crazy state of affairs.
Now, astonishingly enough, This is in Harris County, which contains Houston.
The Harris County DA's office has stopped prosecuting charges of resisting arrest or assault on police officers that are committed while the suspect is resisting.
This, to me, is an astonishing, astonishing, complete capitulation.
A narco-tyranny at its best.
Well, we've covered the amount of DAs all across the country.
Kim Foxx is no longer prosecuting crimes of theft under $1,000 because they disproportionately impact people of color.
The Dallas DA is doing the same thing under $750 because they disproportionately impact people of color.
That our precious people of color are being impacted.
Our greatest asset.
Well, I looked into this Kim Ogg person, and you know, just on a hunch, I put into my search engine, Kim Ogg George Soros.
And I got a hit.
I got a pretty spectacular hit.
Kim Ogg, in the Democratic primary, she actually ran against someone who had gotten George Soros money.
This was a black former judge by the name of Morris Overstreet.
He got $100,000 in Soros money.
And at the time, Kim Ogg, who is now the DA, condemned the whole business.
She said it was a last-minute money dump to try to buy the nomination.
Horrible, horrible, horrible.
Well, Once she won the primary, George Soros and his pals gave her campaign $878,000 to run against the Republican.
Now this time, she changed her tune.
I'd say so.
This had nothing to do with buying an election, she says.
Well, this is a direct quote.
Supporting Overstreet, her black opponent, was a last-minute dump of money.
In my instance, his people came to talk to me after I won the primary, so it wasn't a last-minute dump.
She says my agenda and my platform was already set before he spent money in my race.
But I am appreciative of the money.
As I was with every other donor.
Good grief.
Do you know how much her overall budget for her campaign was?
About $1.5 million.
So this was more than 50% of her budget.
70% roughly.
70% of her money comes right out of the blue by George Soros.
It's hard to imagine this did not tilt the campaign.
Now, I found another interesting article about Soros having spent nearly 11 million dollars on 12 DA races in 2012.
Every single one of these people, of course, was a super progressive, and he concentrates on non-white super progressives.
And he's got a pretty good instinct for winning.
His candidates won 10 out of the 12 races.
And this was in what year?
2012?
2012, yes.
And then he's done the same stuff in 2016.
He says most of the time when he finances, because he doesn't want to be limited in the amount of money he can spend, he just starts a pack.
And the pack can spend unlimited amounts of money and make all of these independent kind of expenditures.
They buy TV ads.
In the name of the candidate.
In the name of the candidate.
And for example, Let's see.
Soros Money helped a woman by the name of Aramis Ayala upset an incumbent in Florida, in Orange and Osceola counties.
She became the first black person ever to be elected a state attorney in Florida.
And there's a woman by the name of Whitney Thymus, who is an advisor to the Soros Project, explaining why he gives money on these DA elections.
He says, quote, Because of the enormous discretion vested in those who enforce the laws, including prosecutors, it is important to elect officials who are committed to public safety and equal justice.
Now, of course, there's Kim Ogg, who refuses to charge these people by possessing guns illegally and assaulting police officers.
Resisting arrest!
I didn't know that!
I like to pay attention because I think these are the type of stories that Your average American relates to.
It's like the one out of Grand Rapids, Michigan, where they're talking about making it potentially a crime for calling the police on people of color excessively.
I think people react to that viscerally.
They say, wait a second.
Like you said, they might not understand the concept of anarcho-tyranny that Sam Francis Created and coined, but when they hear it, they instinctively understand that, wait, there's something wrong here.
It's absolutely outrageous.
And the point is, Soros money in these elections can be extremely effective because DA elections are not very high profile, and people running for DA hesitate to try to get big money donations.
Correct.
They do not want to appear beholden to anybody.
They want to be impartial.
That's what the law is supposed to be.
That's exactly right.
That's exactly right.
And of course, part of the problem is that he can spend this money without even having any kind of coordination with what's going on.
For example, there was this election.
One guy who benefited from his money was a fellow by the name of Scott Coleman.
He's a black, of course, and a Democrat, and he got $400,000 spent on his Mississippi DA election from a PAC.
And there's this white guy that he was defeated on account of this.
Well, this fellow, Scott Colum, said he first learned about the Soros contributions only after he started seeing and hearing television and radio ads supporting his election.
He didn't even fight.
All of a sudden, right out of the blue, here are these very effective TV ads blasting his opponent.
$400,000 that George Soros spent, and this guy Colin, this black fellow, he raised only $150,000 of his own.
Oh my goodness.
Yes!
And he gets an extra gift from Bolt from the Blue, $400,000 from George Soros, our favorite Hungarian-American.
Now, I was quoting this Whitney Timas person, and somebody asked her, well, you know, how come you're supporting all of these non-whites?
And she said, Race does not explicitly play a role, but in seeking candidates who understand the injustices of the current system, many of them just turn out to be African American or Latino because it is people of color who have been disproportionately affected by those injustices.
Wow.
The implicit bias and structural inequalities of a white supremacist?
That's right.
We've got to fight it on every front.
Dismantle it brick by brick.
Now the last example here is perhaps even more remarkable.
This was one of the unusual cases in which George Soros made a bad bet.
He dropped 1.2 million dollars trying to defeat a fellow named Peter Weir, who is the district attorney in Jefferson and Gilpin counties in suburban Colorado.
Well, this fellow Peter Weir, do you know how much money he had of his own to spend on his re-election campaign?
$80,000.
$80,000!
And yet, he went on to defeat the 1.2 million, and I don't even know how much the opponent raised on his own.
George Soros spent $1.2 million on this.
Now, to me, 14 times?
Yes, it's extraordinary.
You'd think the way money buys elections in this country, that would have been a crushing defeat for this poor Peter Weir guy.
But imagine how DAs all across the country must think.
They never know.
They have absolutely no idea.
There could be some sort of massive TV campaign against them that they never even saw coming because their opponent only raised 25 cents.
But, and we are all supposed to be upset about Russian meddling in our elections.
I'm at a loss for words.
I think back to that great...
Well, no need to make that reference.
I'm at a loss for words because, again, we all think that Texas is this wonderful law and order state, and yet you have the two biggest cities, the two biggest counties, Harris County where Houston is, and of course the Dallas-Fort Worth area, completely under the control of these district attorneys that do not care about law and order, but instead they care about, let's protect people of color from Law and order.
And speaking of protecting people of color... And you did mention Kim Fox, right?
Oh, of course, Kim Fox!
She got a bunch of Soros money, too?
She did.
There's one other one that I think is important to bring up.
I do not remember his name, but he's the DA in Philadelphia, and he's taking credit because they're basically no longer Arresting everyone.
And they're like, hey, look, we're not arresting everyone.
Murder might be going up, but look at arrest for all these other crimes are going down.
It's like, well, wait a second.
It would cause an effect here, dude.
What are we talking about?
We can talk about that later, but we need to talk about, speaking of covering crime up, the junior minister, the junior justice minister in the Netherlands, Mark Harbers, he resigned about three days ago.
Taking personal responsibility for an error of judgment by his ministry.
And what do you think that error of judgment might have been, Mr. Taylor?
Well, since we're talking about crime, I suspect it had something to do with that.
He came under fire because he minimized statistics regarding criminality among asylum seekers.
The exact same thing that we've seen happen in places like Sweden, in Finland, in France.
In England.
Germany.
In Germany where they're still not even arresting a lot of the people who did the sexual assaults.
What city was that?
The Cologne Railroad Station.
Yeah, the Cologne Railroad Station in front of that beautiful cathedral.
So they've minimized the statistics about crime among the asylum seekers.
The ministry was criticized because they categorized hundreds of cases reporting serious offenses including attempted murder and sexual assaults under the heading others.
Right.
The revelations and accusations of a massive cover-up to protect these migrants, these illegal aliens, these asylum seekers, led to a swift internal justice investigation at this justice ministry, which of course led to him resigning.
And Gerd Wilders, who is, again, always called an anti-immigration lawmaker by the corporate media, regardless of the country, He accused the ministry of sweeping under the carpet these allegations among the thousands, and again, these are thousands of asylum seekers who are responsible for these gruesome crimes that are categorized simply as others.
So that way it looks less, it looks like the impact of this crime is much less serious, insignificant.
You know, again, It's difficult for me to inhabit the mind of someone who is going to deliberately falsify the facts to make these criminals look less criminal.
I remember when all of this came out.
Oh, in Sweden there had been a bunch of sexual assaults at a music festival.
Oh yeah.
And this was all downplayed.
And as I recall, the Swedish official involved in this said, we simply couldn't afford to give ammunition to anti-immigration activists.
They are prepared essentially to lie, to conceal reality, because reality is something that favors immigration control.
I mean, this essentially says the facts don't matter.
Reality doesn't matter.
They're prepared not only to conceal it, but make sure that nobody else knows about the facts so that they can go on with this agenda.
I just do not understand that.
You and I, when we talk about a particular point of view we have, we're certainly not in the business of concealing the truth.
We want to get at the facts.
And if there are facts that go against our position, we'll try to deal with them.
But the idea of actually concealing and lying because the truth is so uncomfortable that you can't afford to deal with it.
And I live by the motto, you don't base social policy on individuals.
So, by saying that, you don't base social policy on those who might be asylum seekers that try and assimilate and abide by the law.
You look at, wait a second, these crimes wouldn't be happening if these people weren't in our country.
The remittances that we're seeing, again, there are plenty of Americans who would gladly do this job that equates to Individual Mexicans collectively being able to send 30 billion dollars in 2017 back to Mexico.
It's mind-blowing and you think back to that, what was that movie, Network?
I'm mad as hell I'm not going to take it.
I think there are a lot of Americans who, that was the reason why Donald Trump was elected and I think that we're going to increasingly see more and more people start to say, hey Donald, hey Mr. President, What's going on here?
Let's get something going because there's not much of America left to defend anymore.
And we're running out of time.
We sure are running out of time.
I'm not sure Donald Trump realizes that.
No, he doesn't.
I think that's obvious.
He floats from Trump Tower to the White House to, what is it, Bella Largo?
What is it?
Milargo.
Milargo.
Mary Largo.
Mary Largo.
Florida.
He never sees it.
He never sees it.
He never knows.
He claims sometimes to have the common touch, but that guy, that guy doesn't really see the sand slipping through the hourglass.
But moving on to a yet a different crime story.
It's the saga of Mark Domingo.
And just on Wednesday, a federal grand jury indicted him in a plot to plant a bomb at what was billed as a white supremacist rally in Long Beach.
This was supposed to take place on April 26th in a place called Bluff Park in Long Beach.
Now, sometimes the rally is described as Nazi, sometimes as white supremacist.
I wonder if it was really just patriot prayer.
Who knows?
You never can tell who the press are going to describe as Nazis and white supremacists.
In any case, they didn't show up, but a bunch of counter-protesters did.
And he apparently, well he did not set off a bomb at that time, but his plan was to kill as many of these so-called Nazis as possible.
And he received what he thought was a genuine bomb from an undercover officer.
Whom he thought was going to be his co-conspirator.
And this fellow, Mark Domingo, had bought several hundred nails he was going to add to the bomb to use as shrapnel and kill as many people as possible.
Also, it was his intention to kill Jews and to attack churches and also to attack the police.
He was pretty indiscriminate.
Now, before we explain a little bit more about just what sort of lad he was, he had posted a message online on March 3rd saying, America needs another Vegas event.
And of course he was talking about the shooting in which 59 people were killed in Las Vegas because he thought that this would spark civil war and weaken America.
And his idea was this would give them a taste of the terror they gladly spread all over the world.
What sort of fellow is Mark Domingo?
It's hard to get to the bottom of this guy.
From his photograph, he looks like, I don't know, a Malaysian or a Filipino or something.
It's very hard to make out.
Maybe he's some sort of Hispanic, but he looks more Asiatic to me.
He was apparently a combat veteran who served four months in Afghanistan before being kicked out of the army, and the army refuses to say why.
But, recently he converted to Islam.
He's obviously some kind of oddball and misfit, but he was planning on launching attacks all across Southern California to kill Jews, Christians, white people.
But we don't know anything about whether he's an immigrant, what country he's from, And it's all rather mysterious and I'm sure that we'll probably never find out much of this stuff.
No, no, no.
This will just glimmer away.
It'll be sealed.
There's going to be no investigators who are interested.
We don't have this on the...
on our notes to talk about, but I think we'd be remiss if we didn't bring it up real quick.
There's another story that broke this week about, we do know, is an immigrant from Sudan.
Back in 2017, about a month after Charlottesville, there was a shooting at a church outside of Nashville, a predominantly white church, and this immigrant from Sudan, Emmanuel Kedega Samson, he went and targeted this church.
We didn't know what happened, but it was obvious there was something underneath, underlying the The decision for him to target this church.
And that was the one where the armed citizens stopped him with an AR-15?
That's correct.
It was at the Burnett Chapel Church of Christ, right outside of Nashville.
Well, it turns out that the trial has started now.
He has 43 counts against him and indictments, including a first-degree murder charge, because he did kill one person.
Wounded seven people in this attack.
Well, we find out now that a judge had actually sealed All of the information surrounding this until the trial started and we learned that he wanted to go and kill as many as 10 white people.
It was a purely racially motivated decision for him to target this church.
He based it on the 2015 shooting in Charleston, the Dylan Roof incident.
He wanted to get racial revenge.
targeting white people. What's curious though is it's a month after Charlottesville and I'd love to know if
what happened in Charlottesville if that played if that motivated him to
speed up his attack again
Most people aren't paying attention to this it it made National news earlier this week one of my favorite people
who I've mentioned before Clay Travis. He's a sports reporter
He lives in Nashville.
He actually tweeted out something.
He said, we need people who are unafraid of being called racist to bring this story up.
This is a shocking story, and it really is.
Well, to me, it's quite particularly shocking.
The judge sealed all this information.
It's at least good it's coming out now.
You know, the same thing happened with the Washington area shooters, John Lee, Malvo, and Mohammed, whoever he was, who terrorized the D.C.
In 2002.
It was, yes, 2002.
That guy's intention was to kill all white people.
Kill as many people as possible.
But that was very, very carefully cupped under wraps.
A lot of people, I was living here in the area at the time, and if you bring that up to people now, most people have no idea that that was his motive.
They just think of it as sort of random killing, some sort of weird goofball.
Well, he was an absolutely white-hating goofball.
And it's very annoying that when you have these explicit racial attacks, the media and the judges want to put the kibosh on it.
Keep that quiet.
But it'll be very interesting to see if more of this comes out in trial.
But I agree, this has basically caused a ripple, as far as I can tell, as far as the media are concerned.
Well, Nashville is one of these progressive cities.
It's still 65% white.
And I think that these are white people who are afraid of their own white shadow.
Whenever they see a sign, it's okay to be white.
They recoil in horror like a vampire.
Who's been shown a cross or sunlight or garlic because they're so terrified of taking their own side.
And speaking of taking their own side, we have to bring up what's going on in Sweden right now.
This is a story which harkens back to that old Orwell adage, people of no past have no future.
If you destroy people's past, guess what?
Their future is gone because they have nothing to fight for.
And what we're seeing is the Swedish government has decided to make certain runes from the runic alphabet as well as some old Norse Scandinavian symbols illegal.
Now, why would you think that they'd want to do?
Why would they go to this extraordinary step?
This is a country that, up until 1985, was all Swede.
Right, right.
Well, as I understand it, their thinking is that the Nazis used some of these runes, and also, today's wicked white supremacists and odinists, they have become associated with white racial consciousness, and that just can't be allowed to persist.
The Swedish government wants to ban ancient Viking symbols, claiming they, quote, constitute incitement to hatred.
We're seeing, for example, the rune that means O and the tear, the rune that means T. Those have to go because, as you noted, the Nazis used some of them during the Second World War.
Reportedly, the Social Democrat Minister of Justice, Morgan Johansson, is behind the initiative.
According to the proposal, Old Norse symbols and jewelry may also be banned.
Thor's hammer is one of them.
Yeah.
It may be banned as incitement to hatred.
This includes the hammer of the Norse god Thor and the Odin's knot.
Again, I'm not really up to some of these terms.
I'm not going to try and pronounce them.
The runes are over 12,000 years old and have absolutely nothing to do with World War II, the Nazis, or... They were Nazi precursors.
Early Nazis.
Very early Nazis.
They predated the Nazis.
And again, for many Swedes, the runes are a large part of their religion.
They have great historical meaning.
And now, of course, the definition of racism in Sweden.
...has been to include anyone that is oppressing the migrants who are colonizing Sweden.
As somebody who has a lot of Swedish blood in him, this is so hard to fathom what's happening.
See, I will make a prediction.
I think even among the goofy Swedes, this is not going to pass.
I just don't think this is going to happen.
This is so far, it's a proposal.
It's a proposal!
How are you going to illegalize a complete alphabet?
An alphabet that is part of your history for, what is it, how many thousands of years did you say?
Over 1,200.
1,200 years?
At least, yeah.
And is it going to be against the law to draw one of these things?
Is it going to be against the law?
Look, they've got these runes on standing stones all over the place.
Are they going to blast them?
Are they going to cover them up?
Are they going to paint them over?
I think we know how far liberals in this country are willing to go.
the mayor of New Orleans was willing to do, Mayor Landrieu, when he decided basically
on his own to go to war with the Confederate monuments, the Robert E. Lee statue.
They will do anything possible to...
I mean, I still have a shred of hope for our Scandinavian friends.
I don't think this is going to go through.
Surely there's going to be a huge backlash against me.
Well, you know, you talk about a backlash, but I have to say, we look at what happened in New Zealand, and the speed at which the elected officials were willing to excise any rights when it comes to semi-automatic weapons, firearms.
That was very quick.
It was very quick after the Bratton shooting at the mosque in Christchurch.
Well, now the New Zealand Human Rights Commission says that the message, it's okay to be white, has no place in the country.
No place.
So the controversy began when It's Okay To Be White t-shirts and stickers were sold on a New Zealand auction site called Trade Me.
Wear this shirt as a white person to troll your local communist, or wear this shirt as a brown person to troll stuck-up middle-class urbanites.
I like that word, urbanites, by the way.
Either way, it's funny.
Read the description for the product on this Trade Me site.
Well, the Human Rights Commission decided that they didn't see the funny side, and that the message, it's okay to be white, has no place in New Zealand, conveying a, quote, A message of intolerance, racism, and division, end quote.
So, to its credit, the Trade Me website has refused to pull the item, saying the slogan doesn't break any rules.
While we know that there is some debate about the slogan, we don't think these items cross that line, stated the gentleman who heads up Trade Me.
The point is, we go back to when you and I were talking a number of podcasts ago about, you said, I wonder how many Republicans would stand by in our country, the United States, Is it okay to be white?
And I said, I don't think any of them would even agree to such a statement.
And you thought there would be a few who... I stand by it.
I don't think any Republican in our country... We've already seen how quickly they did it after a certain episode earlier in the year when everyone voted to condemn white nationalism, white supremacy.
And then think about what happened when the Ilhan Omar stuff happened and what should have been a condemnation of her anti-Semitism became Yet another opportunity to condemn evil whitey.
So, I think that's the unifying theme of our ruling elite all across the world.
Whether it's Sweden where they're trying to get rid of the runes and Nordic symbols.
Or whether it's New Zealand where an innocuous says it's okay to be white.
Or whether it's... well...
We could even talk about cauliflower, but we're not going to talk about that because that story is so goofy, it's hard to take Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez seriously.
Oh, talk to us about cauliflower.
Well, I'll bring this up shortly because this story is...
It's one that, again, we have to go back to to laugh about how this new diversity is bringing us such wonderful fruit in the terms of elected officials like Ilhan Omar, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who declared this past Sunday that the Green New Deal will reverse purported colonial attitudes associated with growing vegetables in community gardens.
Here's what she said.
Why don't you repeat that phrase?
Colonial attitudes.
I mean, that is such a remarkable combination of words.
I want to hear it again.
Okay.
She says the Green New Deal will reverse colonial attitudes associated with growing vegetables in community gardens.
And here is... I refuse to call her AOC.
I just like to call her Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Quote, what I love is growing plants that are culturally familiar to the community.
It's so important.
That's really how you do it right.
She wants to grow yucca, right?
Yeah, basically she stated that she then talked about growing cauliflower and these community gardens represents a colonial approach which turns off people of color from Embracing environmentalism.
Now I decided to look up the origin of cauliflower because I was so shocked by the fact that how dare this delicious vegetable be called a tool of colonialism.
Turns out that cauliflower was domesticated in the Mediterranean region and it originated on the island of Cyprus from where it moved to other areas like Syria, Turkey, Egypt, Italy, Spain, and northwestern Europe.
So it is a indigenous vegetable To the Indo-European people.
Yes, but it's not indigenous to North America.
Which is why she calls it a colonial vegetable.
But you know, I don't get it.
I don't get it.
When you do these urban gardens, don't the gardeners get to choose what they're going to plant?
If they want to plant yucca, God bless them.
Let them plant all the yucca they like.
It seems to me that she's talking about people eating stuff that somebody else has grown.
Well, here's what she said.
Here's what she said.
But when you really think about it, when someone says it's too hard to do a green space that grows yucca instead of, oh, I don't know, cauliflower or something, what you're doing is that you're taking a colonial approach to environmentalism.
And that is why a lot of communities of color get resistant to certain environmentalist movements because they come with the colonial lens on them now when you when you actually see her talking she's she's flighty she's she's strange she's all over the place in this
In this attack on the delicious cauliflower.
I just don't understand this at all.
If they want to raise chickens in their backyard, that's their business.
If they want to grow mango trees, for heaven's sake, if they want to put bones through their noses.
But the idea of somehow someone proposing cauliflower, that's colonial?
Well, here's what I propose.
A couple years ago, right after Trump won, Milk somehow became synonymous with so-called white supremacy or whatever the ADL, SPLC, these alphabet soup groups have decided to castigate any white person who dares
voice a concern for what's happening in the present and will happen to the future for white people.
I believe it's time that cauliflower becomes the official vegetable of the renaissance of Americans.
Well, of course you know the reason why milk was at least construed by the people who don't care for us as a symbol of white supremacy.
Lack of intolerance, right?
Yes, yes.
Because Europeans are lactose-tolerant, we can drink milk.
The fact is most of the world is lactose-tolerant.
That's right.
But there are a few non-white groups who are not, and so this theory was that we were beating our chests and saying, look at me, I can drink milk and you can't.
All very silly stuff.
But continuing on with mighty silly stuff.
You'll remember last February, when the governor of Virginia caught a lot of heat, Ralph Northam,
because it was discovered that back in 1984, in the yearbook of his Eastern Virginia medical
school, there was a photograph of him.
And you'll remember that there was a photograph of somebody wearing blackface and somebody
wearing a Klan hood.
Now, when this first came out, Ralph Northam immediately crawled and said, oh, I'm so sorry.
But then now he's saying, wait a minute, I'm not either of those, the guy in either of these pictures.
I can't explain how it's in the yearbook.
But of course, there was a tremendous, tremendous pressure on him to resign.
All these national Democrats, and of course, all the Republicans are piling on, too.
When they see a chance to accuse a Democrat of being racist, they just love it and can't get enough of it.
Well, but he toughed it out.
He toughed it out.
But somebody tried to get to the bottom of this.
And what happened is that the medical school, they hired this expensive, high-priced law firm, McGuire Woods, And they got Richard Cullen, who's a senior partner there, who has had a very distinguished career in investigations.
He was investigating Watergate, Iran-Contra.
He was U.S.
Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, and then he became Attorney General for Virginia.
He's a very high-powered guy.
He spent months with his staff trying to figure out how that photograph got there, who put it there, and who's in it.
And he came up dry.
This to me is just astonishing.
He had months and months and months to do this.
He interviewed all sorts of people, including Northam, twice.
And Northam apparently remembers some of the photographs, but he says he has absolutely no recollection of this photograph, no idea how he got there.
And to me, one of the funniest things about this is that on February 2nd, immediately after this happened, Ralph Northam himself claimed that he would hire a private detective to investigate the thing.
There's no evidence that that actually happened.
Of course not.
But after all of this huffing and puffing, The report that has been drafted up, I cannot claim to have read the whole report, but one of the statements in it is that Mr. Northam, quote, believes he is not in the photograph, based on the size of the individuals in the photograph.
Mr. Northam claims that, quote, the person in blackface had much larger legs than he did in medical school.
That makes sense.
Well, maybe his legs are larger now, but at least in medical school his legs were not so large.
Got to do your deadlifts.
Right?
And that quote, the person in the KKK robes is much shorter than he is.
I mean, how can you tell just looking at the photographs?
I don't know.
But in any case, he's now decided he is neither of these people.
Now, the question to me is, How much did all this cost?
What kind of incredible waste of resources is something like this?
The Virginia taxpayers on the hook for trying to prove or disprove the racism of their, of their, the Dems, the Dems of their real racist governor, Northam.
I guess, I guess crazy stuff.
Well, I don't think we expect it to, but I think we have time.
To at least answer one of these questions.
Let's do one question because I can tell you're a little under the weather and you're trying to get through this one.
No, no.
I'm soldiering on.
This was a question from a lady listener.
She said, I'd be interested to hear Mr. Taylor's plans for the future.
Now, I'm sure she'd be interested in hearing PK's plans for the future as well.
She says, to trust a movement, and indeed a group of people who want to change the world, women like me need to be confident that our leaders have a strategy as well as a vision.
I'm all in and ready to move, but we need to organize.
Now, you know, my view on this is a somewhat modest one, and at this point My strategy, at least it has been for the last 30 years, has been primarily education, changing people's minds.
More people have to agree with us before something is going to happen.
But I think now enough people agree with us so that, yes, definitely we continue with education.
We continue trying to explain to white people why it is okay to be white.
But I think we're at the point now where people could run for election.
An attractive, racially conscious white person could run for election at the local level.
I think you could get a slate for city council or school board.
And all this could be effective.
It's a huge propaganda opportunity.
And once you're actually in office, people have to deal with you.
They cannot completely shun you and ignore you the way they try to do today.
Politics is a great opportunity to spread the word and eventually it's the only way you can have your hands on the levers of power.
That's certainly what they're doing in Europe.
Now, Europe is a much more democratic continent in the sense of people actually having alternatives to vote for in the United States.
We have these two doddering old clapped-out parties that run the whole show.
We certainly don't have anybody who's in elective office now, except for an occasional, almost erratic comment by Stephen King that reflects our genuine interests, whereas the Europeans They've got all of these brand new parties that have been running candidates for maybe two or three years.
You've got parties, you have people talking about the Great Replacement in a lot of these countries.
You've got Silvini who's basically going on there and who's saying that Macron and these other leaders are...
They're in the pockets of global finance, big business, who have absolutely nothing to do with the cares
of the common people.
And in our country, I think Mr. Taylor's right.
I think that it will take an extraordinary amount of courage
from someone who will run for office on this platform.
I think you could do as a Democrat.
And I think you could do as a Democrat in a state or a community that is largely white.
And you could just say, look, I don't really identify with either party, but I look at what the Republicans and I look at what the Democrats stand for and Nationally, yes, the Democrats are off the reservation, but they are far more sincere when it comes to what's happening to the working class, the Republicans.
President Trump has lied the whole time, and you could do this in 2020.
There is such an opportunity now, and you just have to understand that one of the things I would argue that people need to do is try and surround yourself with positive people.
That's the most important thing in this life, is that if you are going to embrace dissident politics, you cannot allow yourself to believe that things are going to change overnight.
Oh, no.
We have to be in this for the long haul.
And in addition to running for office.
And the fact is, many local offices are non-partisan.
You don't run as a Republican.
Run for sheriff!
Yes, you can run for sheriff.
You can run for, as I say, school board.
All of these positions, if you are articulating an attractive, pro-white message, I think they're places where you can get elected.
And you can attract a huge amount of attention.
The other thing we need to do, and we're running out of time here, is to establish communities.
I think the greatest challenge for being a racially aware white person in the United States today is how to rear children.
Not everybody is temperamentally suited to homeschooling.
There are people who prefer to send their children to school.
Once they're in school, who knows the sort of stuff they're being taught.
But if we had a community in which we actually had some sort of control over the school board, some control over the city council, I think we could have a genuine community.
Maybe not an ethno-state, which is what many people hope for, as well as myself, but we could start with an ethno-community.
That would be a huge and encouraging start.
From the micro to the macro.
Exactly, exactly.
And the micro, yes, the micro, bit by bit, can become the macro.
And in any case, I think it would be an inspiring model for communities all around the country.
Well, speaking of inspiring, thank you once again for a tremendous conference.
I heard nothing but great things from those who attended.
Look forward to hear more about the 2020 conference as we move forward in the future.
We can only move forward into the future with this podcast thanks to you, the listeners.
So, be sure to like or subscribe to the American Renaissance YouTube page by subscribing to the channel.
Tell your friends.
Tell your family.
More importantly, if you have any questions you'd like us to address on a future podcast, send them to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, that email address is sbpdl1, the numeral one, at gmail.com.
So, for Jared Taylor, this has been PK.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection