Ladies and gentlemen, you're just in time for the latest edition of Radio Renaissance.
It's been a busy week here in the multicultural, multiracial paradise of the United States.
Stories of harmony and happiness and kindness and friendship just fill the headlines, not just here, but all the way around the world.
Yes, it's been a remarkable time.
And I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
And with me, of course, is PK, without which this podcast would be hardly worth listening to.
Now, there has been big news, at least not in the United States, I should say.
I beg your pardon.
It has to do with our secular saint, Martin Luther King.
And I always point out, whenever I have an opportunity, that he and Jesus Christ are the only two people whose birthdays are celebrated.
In the United States, at least one birthday per holiday.
We used to celebrate President's Day, but they got all lumped together.
So now it's only Jesus' birthday and Martin Luther King's birthday who have a holiday devoted to each of them.
And, of course, it's appropriate, given the respect with which we hold Martin Luther King.
Well, there are still some states that celebrate Robert E. Lee's birthday, I believe.
And they do, actually.
I think Alabama has state offices closed for Robert E. Lee's birthday.
But nationwide, it's only the Saint and the Christ.
I'm not sure which order you're actually referring to when you say the Saint and the Christ.
One would wonder, wouldn't one?
The fact is, back in the 1960s, when Martin Luther King was at his height, The FBI became increasingly worried that he posed a national security risk not only because they thought he was a communist, but because his well-known adulteries might make him vulnerable to blackmail.
Now, just what he might do if you're blackmailed, I'm not sure.
It was for this reason that Robert F. Kennedy, who was then Attorney General working for his brother John Kennedy, agreed to let the FBI bug his phone calls in his hotel rooms as well as a love nest that he had in Atlanta where he would take his girlfriend.
Now, all of these tapes were made, and in 1977, the Justice Department, publicly attested, had reviewed all the tapes and transcripts and found them to be genuine and accurate.
Now, there was a former assistant of Lee's by the name of Bernard, I'm sorry, of King's, by the name of Bernard Lee.
He filed suit on privacy grounds, and when you find out what's in these tapes, you can well understand why he would do that.
And in the same year, 1977, a judge by the name of James Lewis Smith ordered that these tapes be sealed from public view and public listening for 50 years.
Until people could forget about it.
Although they can't forget about Martin Luther King, we've made sure of that.
Can we put this into a timeline for our younger audience that might not realize that it was six years later in 1983 that the King holiday became a national holiday?
Yes, that sounds about right.
There were some holdouts.
Arizona was a holdout for quite some time.
And there were others.
I believe South Carolina was a holdout for a while.
That's true.
But everyone finally came through and agreed that there must be a national holiday.
Just recently, some of these documents became declassified as part of 19,000 documents that had to do with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Now, the tapes themselves are not to be available to anyone until, as I said, 2027.
But some of the written summaries of the tapes are now available, particularly to Martin Luther King's biographer David Garrow, and he has looked through quite a vast trove of these.
And, as it turns out, what we find about Martin Luther King is consistent with everything some of us skeptics have known all along, but there are a few piquant details that have not yet come to light.
Garrow, I might point out, he is no anti-black person.
He's no conservative.
He's, in fact, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
He also won a Pulitzer Prize for his biography of Martin Luther King.
And on the basis of what he discovered, he tried to peddle an article to all sorts of American publications, including The Washington Post, The Atlantic, The Atlantic Constitution Journal.
They all turned him down.
Eventually, in despair, he sent his findings to a British magazine that I'd never heard of called Standpoint, which was willing to publish.
And, as I say, there's lots in it, and I won't go into too much detail, but what he did find is that not only was Martin Luther King a serious binge drinker, Having gone through these documents with some care, he figures that David Garrow figures that Martin Luther King had affairs with some 40 to 45 women.
And it's on one occasion in 1964 in the Willard Hotel.
This is the one that's attracted a certain amount of attention, at least in Britain, and in a very hushed and reluctant way here in the United States.
And I will read what the accounts of this say.
The Willard, by the way, is a first-class hotel.
It's one of the prettiest hotels, I think, in Washington, D.C.
And Martin Luther King was clearly traveling first class.
Who was paying for it, do you think?
Ah, that is a good question.
Probably one way or another, white people were.
The Southern Conference Leadership... What is it called?
Southern Christian Leadership Conference?
Southern Christian Leadership Conference.
The SCLC was probably paying for it with a lot of help from white people.
But, according to accounts, when King arrived at the hotel, his close friend, Logan Kearse, who was a pastor of a Baltimore Baptist church, invited King and some of his pals to meet some women whom he described as parishioners.
He'd brought them along with him to Washington.
Now, I'm quoting here, the group met in his room and discussed which women among the parishioners would be suitable for natural or unnatural sex acts.
This is the FBI summary.
They were listening from an adjoining room and, continuing reading from the summary, when one of the women protested, the Baptist minister, Logan Kearse, immediately and forcibly raped her.
It adds that King looked on, laughed, and offered advice.
That's hard to even listen to you talk about these details.
Extraordinary.
It's absolutely extraordinary.
And apparently the following evening, according to the files, King and his friends participated in a sex orgy involving 12 people at the hotel.
Now, as I say, there are many other details here.
This is the one that is most striking under the circumstances.
And to me, it is astonishing that the American media have been extremely tight-lipped about this.
I looked through all of the general reports on this.
They are almost exclusively from British sources now.
Standpoint has since been referred to by a number of British publications.
And a few minor, tending to be very conservative, undeceived publications of the United States.
But the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is the only one that I could find that has done a summary of some of these findings.
And of course they admitted that they initially turned the story down.
That's exactly right.
It's funny, what is accepted as the conventional wisdom around Martin Luther King is a revisionist history.
What's striking to me is that Were there no FBI agents who wanted to leak this to sympathetic southern politicians or newspapers in the 1960s?
They could have published this and devastated King.
Or were they the ones who were using blackmail?
Well, as I understand it, one of the things that the Justice Department did, they then, the FBI, wrote a letter to King.
You may be aware of this famous letter.
They wrote him a letter saying, look, we know all about your animalian, bestial activities, and we are going to let the whole world know, and you're going to be in trouble, so you might as well kill yourself.
It's an invitation to suicide.
It's a pretty spooky thing to get a letter like that.
I assume that King must have known that it came from the FBI, but that didn't stop him.
He became even more defiant, even more flagrant.
And of course, Ralph Abernathy, who was his number two, he published an autobiography, or he basically divulged a lot of this.
That's exactly right.
He didn't go into the great details that Garrow went into when it came to actually having this declassified data, but Abernathy, I want to say this was written in the Late 80s, early 90s perhaps?
No, no, it wasn't.
I think it was earlier than that, but I could be mistaken.
I thought it was the late 70s.
In any case, Abernathy is now dead, but he wrote this memoir of his own life, and he wrote a lot about Martin Luther King, and he says the night before he died, he had extramarital trysts with two different women.
Correct.
And a third came along expecting to get some of the good stuff and was very disappointed to find him gone.
And the next morning they got into a fight.
No, I'm sorry, that very evening they got into a fist fight.
Abernathy says that Martin Luther King threw the woman across the bed and they were in a full fisticuff punch-up.
In any case, one brings this up with a certain amount of hesitation, but only to point out just how reluctant, even in this age of Me Too, that the conventional media are to speak truthfully about Martin Luther King.
Well, again, as we started, Is he the saint or is he the Christ of this era?
Good grief.
I guess he must be the Christ with this kind of treatment he's getting.
Now, of course, this reminds me of how long it took for the facts of his plagiarism to trickle out.
This had been known among King scholars for quite some time.
Those who were editing his papers had been shocked by this.
But nobody in the U.S.
would write about it.
Nobody.
It was first reported in December of 1989 in Britain by the Sunday Telegraph.
Not reported in the U.S.
until nearly a year later, November 1990.
And then there were all sorts of explanations and justifications.
Well, this is voice merging.
Remember that expression?
I do.
There was a Chronicles writer, Theodore Papadopoulos?
Papas.
Ted Papas.
Yes.
He wrote a first-rate book about this, in which he has these selections side-by-side, in particular of Martin Luther King's PhD thesis, and then a thesis by a fellow named Jack Boozer.
And when you see the passages side by side, clearly they're just lifted.
Even, of course, his, uh, I Have a Dream speech.
Yes.
That too, that too is lifted from this guy Archibald Carey, who had given a speech or I think it was a speech at the Republican National Convention in 1952.
Extraordinary stuff, but we close our eyes very, very firmly and deliberately in the face of anything that might besmirch Martin Luther King.
And you have to ask, how many printings did old Ted's book get?
Oh, Ted Pappas, boy, Sherwood did not become a bestseller.
Although, as I say, it's extremely convincing, very well written.
We're probably two of the maybe 20 people in all of America who even remember this book besides Ted Pappas himself.
Anyway, now, of course, all of this, walking on eggs, in the case of Martin Luther King, of course, we can imagine something salacious that comes up about, say, oh, I don't know, Eisenhower, or Thomas Jefferson, or Teddy Roosevelt, any white person.
Now, maybe Abraham Lincoln, there might be something different there.
I don't know.
Well, they've tried.
There's that story that he would sleep with men that's come out, that he would share beds with men.
But of course, that doesn't really matter because in our new enlightened moral age, that actually makes him more of a hero.
That's a good thing, yes.
He was before his time.
In any case, I just thought we had to mention this because the American media has been so tight-lipped on this story.
Now, actually, we had an article about this at the MRAN website, and one of our authors, Gregory Hood, speculated that this might be enough to bring down the saint.
I think he is completely wrong.
Yes.
He's completely wrong.
The saint is untouchable.
I refuse to call him the Christ.
This is blasphemy.
It is blasphemy.
The saint is untouchable.
Because he is the... You don't want to say it, but it's true.
In the eyes of the left and the egalitarian who are in complete control of our society.
I guess in that respect he is the messiah.
Yes.
But another important story, I thought, was one that appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology.
This had to do with a study of white privilege and what informing people about the concept does to their way of thinking.
Their research involved two groups of people who had been queried as to their political beliefs, and they divided them into conservatives and liberals.
Now, these two groups were told about the whole concept of white privilege.
Then, they were told a story about an unfortunate man, a down-and-outer.
Some of the participants were told that he was black, some that he was white.
Now, after having been told about the whole concept of white privilege, Liberals, white liberals, did not have any different view as to what they thought about this guy.
They were not any more sympathetic towards the black down and outer, or the white down and outer, or less sympathetic.
What is significant here is that compared to people who hadn't been told about this whole concept of white privilege, because there was yet another group that was not told about white privilege, What they found out was that white liberals who had been told about the concept of white privilege, white people have all this unearned privilege, now, when they then learned about a story about a down-and-outer white person, they were less sympathetic to him, to a down-and-out white, than liberals who had not heard about white privilege.
Conservatives were unaffected in their opinions, both of a black person and of a white person.
And as it turns out, White liberals' sympathies for a black down-and-outer were utterly unchanged by being told about white privilege.
The whole idea of white privilege, I suppose, is that it's supposed to make you particularly sorry for black people who haven't succeeded because they don't have white privilege.
Instead, according to this finding, The effect, at least in this study, was that learning about white privilege, in the case of white liberals, all that does is make them contemptuous of whites who can't make it.
Yeah, and as you stated, more unsympathetic to the poor white man.
I mean, this data completely aligns with what Eric Hoffman wrote about in White Shift.
What we're seeing, this massive split between white liberals and their racial attitude toward Unwashed whites.
Those white people who don't share their same views.
And what's fascinating about this is that, hey, a poor white guy, they're in that same boat as conservative whites in their eyes when it comes to white privilege.
I mean, this is the type of stuff that I think, and we're going to talk about this a little bit later when we talk about the European elections, but guys, there is no middle ground anymore.
There's no middle ground.
No.
I mean, What to me is fascinating about this is that it brings white people to think to themselves, okay, if there is such a thing as white privilege, and these guys are losers anyway, then they must really deserve to be losers.
It doesn't change their views about blacks, it changes their views about whites.
And that may be perfectly fine for all the people who are promoting white privilege.
Why not?
Why not?
The idea, theoretically, was it's supposed to make them sympathetic to blacks.
But if it makes them contemptuous of whites, so much the better in the views of the view of the view of the left, wouldn't you say?
I would say so.
And what's also interesting to point out is, besides what you stated, we're coming up on the eighth anniversary of What I believe is still the only white privilege murder.
There was a shooting in Atlanta in 2011.
Three white women were shot.
One of them died, Brittany Watts, and she was a University of Georgia graduate.
The individual who shot those three white girls was a guy named Nikoshi Thwande, I believe is how you pronounce his name.
And in court, when they were going for the murder trial, he said he learned about white privilege and he decided to take action to his own hands.
That's right.
And that was the reason why.
And it's one of the forgotten stories.
Completely forgotten.
Of what happened in Midtown Atlanta to Brittany Watts.
So, we're still thinking about you, Brittany.
I made a video about that at the time.
The title of the video was, You Swine Happy Now?
And it was addressed to the lefties.
I mean, after all of this time you've spent talking about how wicked white people are, are you happy now?
One of your pets, one of your non-white pets has gone out and killed a white woman because he was so furious about white privilege.
Yes!
Is this what you wanted?
This ideology that has only accelerated since 2011.
Think about that, how now it is so ingrained in academia.
To me, now that is the one, in fact, bonafide and documented case of murder because of white privilege.
Well, he admitted it in court.
Yes.
I suspect that there are probably many more.
There have been a number of cases in which a black criminal said, well, I raped her to get back 400 years of slavery.
That was a Vanderbilt football player.
Yes, and another guy who explained to his girlfriend why he'd shot a couple of white women, he said, well, they were probably just racist anyways.
I do remember that, yeah.
But so there is this common theme of white people being expendable because of slavery, white people being expendable because of racism, but the idea that you're going to go out and kill them because they have privilege.
That's the only, as I say, documented case of that, but I suspect there have been more.
But this is not the kind of thing that the American media would pursue with any diligence at all.
Do you know what else is something that the American media will not pursue with any diligence at all?
Well, there are many things that it refuses to pursue with any diligence at all.
We've talked about MLK already, so we have to disqualify Martin Luther King from that query.
I'm referring to a piece that just appeared at the American Renaissance site by Robert Hampton.
And this is a story about serial killers.
And I actually had a conversation with Robert where I said, hey, the story of this 46-year-old illegal alien, illegal immigrant from Kenya, Billy Shmirmir.
Is that how you pronounce his last name?
I think it's Shmirmir is how I would pronounce it.
Billy Shmirmir.
So this came out a couple weeks ago.
I don't recall if we actually talked about this.
But he murdered women, primarily white women, who were between the ages of 76 and 96, for their valuables.
He would suffocate them with pillows.
Now authorities claim Mr. Shmirmir poses this health care worker repairman to get in these women's homes.
And he had worked as a homemaid prior to that.
Well, as it turns out, he'd worked as a homemaid for many of the women he's charged with killing.
This is just so utterly disgusting.
So how this ties into the serial killers.
Well, he came to the United States on a tourist visa in 2002.
He overstayed, but was able to get a green card in 2007 after he married an American citizen.
Mr. Chamiramir had a long criminal record before his arrest, but was never deported.
Well, guess what?
Police have now opened in the Dallas-Fort Worth area They've reopened 750 other cases of elderly people who also died alone that might be tied to this black illegal immigrant from Kenya who has suffocated, who has been charged with killing 11 elderly women in Texas.
Mr. Hampton used this anecdote as a tremendous introduction to a 2016 Radford University study, which is you and I in the pre-production meeting, we both said, why was this even published?
Why did they sit on this like the guy who wrote Bowling Alone sat on his diversity study?
For a number of years.
Well, Radford University, I don't think of it as a particularly top-notch university, certainly not a conservative university, but they've done a very serious study of all the serial killers in the United States going back to the 1920s.
And guess what they found?
White people have never been overrepresented among serial killers.
The decade with the highest percentage of white serial killers was in the 1920s.
Whites were 78% of mass murderers even when they were 90% of the population.
The 1920s blacks were about 10% of the population.
Now for some of our younger listeners you might forget that prior to the 1965 Immigration Act, America is basically a white-black nation, so we're talking about a 90-10 split.
Well, non-white killers usually get attention only when their crimes have been so terrifying and widely reported that the arrest, too, must be widely reported.
One example is Richard Ramirez, a Hispanic who terrorized California in the 1980s.
His crimes were widely covered, and he was dubbed by the national media the Night Stalker.
Yeah, going all the way back to the 1990s, blacks are more likely than whites to be serial killers.
Correct.
I've never seen any reason to doubt these data.
They're very, very carefully compiled.
And then, of course, we can finish with Samuel Little.
And this is another story that popped up for a blip earlier this year in 2019.
Mr. Little, he's a 78-year-old black man.
Who has been in jail and he confessed.
He's killed 90 victims.
Confessed to over 90 murders.
And he beat and raped his victims before killing them.
And a lot of the pictures showed up.
There was the drawings of the women.
A lot of them were white.
Yes.
An overwhelming number of them were white.
Overwhelmingly white.
No one's ever talking about this.
And if you look at the names, they sound very much like white names.
You don't find many Tanishas or Laquishas.
No, I think.
No one has talked about this.
This is my own surmise, judging from the photographs and from the names.
I suspect he deliberately targeted white women.
And yeah, not a nice guy.
He would beat them, he would rape them before he killed them.
And if this guy really did have 90 victims, that would make him America's deadliest serial killer.
Well, it would, unless it turns out that Mr. Shamirmir actually killed Even a fourth of the people that are currently having their deaths reopened.
And again, the FBI and local police and all these jurisdictions where Mr. Little claimed these murders happened, they've cross-referenced and they're saying, yeah, there's significant evidence to showcase that there is a connection between the gentleman in jail, the black killer in jail who's confessed and the death so it's this guy is not just out there trying to
claim something that he didn't do. This is a terrifying reminder that the national media,
outside of one fantastic journalist who is associated with AR, and that would be Robert
Hampton, who put all of this together in a cohesive narrative for the first time. I mean,
you will not see a better piece about black serial killers than this article that was just published,
I believe, on May 30th, 2019. It went up yesterday.
Oh, May 29th.
Yes.
No, quite an excellent piece.
And yes, as you say, this Samuel Little guy, he seems to be getting a huge kick out of telling the police, oh yeah, there was this one, and then there was that one, and then there was the other one.
And he tells them where the bodies are buried, and they go digging, and lo, a body appears.
The details are all there.
So it's not someone who has some, you know, telekinesis or you know this this is a guy who was there who did it and again Shamir Mir and little you're gonna it's gonna be wondering which one is gonna end up being uh the stereotype breaker well because you think you think when you think about serial killers you're you're
You were taught to think of, what, Ted Bundy's, your... Son of Sam, Ted Kaczynski.
Yeah.
Of course, he's a funny sort of serial killer, but yeah, Silence of the Lambs, all the fictional representations, invariably white people.
Just, yeah, just these white sexual deviant, sexual perverts, like the guy who dressed up as a clown, John Wayne Gacy.
Was it John Wayne Gacy?
Gacy, yes.
You have that in your mind when you think of serial killers, these whites who are anti-social, when in reality, It's completely the opposite.
As is so often the case.
I confess, years ago, I was just as ignorant of the truth as the rest of the U.S.
population.
I was on a television program talking about racial profiling and why racial profiling of young blacks makes sense because they're most likely to be violent criminals.
And I went on to say, and of course you're talking about serial killers, it makes sense to assume that they're white because they almost always are.
I didn't know.
I didn't know.
But this ignorance about the nature of the race of serial killers is overwhelmingly widespread.
But, oh, by the way, I understand that there could be some sort of documentary on Samuel Little in the works.
This guy who claims to have beaten and raped 90 people.
I mean, I find this very difficult to believe, but news reports say that they're doing something about this.
Hmm.
Yeah, hmm is right.
Well, seeing is believing.
We'll see if it actually happens.
But now a different sort of killing here.
Not a serial killer, but the kind of killing that crops up from time to time.
This had to do with a 19-year-old woman by the name of Marlon Ochoa Lopez who lived in the Chicago area.
She was last seen when she was on her way to pick up a stroller and other baby items from a 46-year-old woman that she'd met through a Facebook group called Help a Sister Out.
You see, 19-year-old Marlon, who already had a 3-year-old child, was very, very close to delivery and needed a stroller and other baby items, and this woman had offered to give them to her for free.
So off she goes.
Well...
She shows up and, as it turns out, Clarissa Figueroa and her daughter Daisy Ray Figueroa strangled her and then cut the baby out of her womb in the hope of claiming that it was Daisy Ray's.
There was another similar case to this.
Blacks were involved in doing this.
People who really badly want to be a baby mama And who are prepared to carve a baby out of somebody else's stomach in order to get it.
So we have two Hispanics murder another Hispanic in the hope of rearing this child, claiming it as their own.
I guess Daisy really, really badly wanted a baby and I wonder why she couldn't get one in the conventional way.
But this is the way they went about it.
Now, on an anonymous tip, the baby got a DNA test and it turned out that she was for sure Marlon Ochoa Lopez's baby.
Now, this is a gruesome enough story to begin with.
However, I bring it up only for one reason.
And that is the fact that after the three weeks that it took to track down the body of poor Marlon, his father gave a press conference.
And he said during the press conference, it was just last Thursday, he claimed that it was, quote, these anti-immigrant laws, which accounted for the fact that the police didn't, quote, take action sooner and save a life.
Now this is, to me, astonishing.
Absolutely astonishing.
Here is a Hispanic lady who goes to meet two other Hispanic ladies who kill her.
A Facebook group, Help a Sister Out.
That might be the title of this podcast, by the way.
Help a Sister Out.
And now her father says, Anti-immigrant laws.
Name one anti-immigrant law.
What's he talking about?
I guess he's just saying that the idea that you can't just let anybody waltz in who wants to.
That is why the police didn't take action sooner and save a life.
You're trying to blame white people, Jared.
Well, you know, to me, from what I can understand, Mr. Arnulfo Ochoa, the girl's father, is just an ordinary Mexican laborer.
But he's already spouting.
I mean, this is the sort of thing that is so prevalent in America today.
We're becoming, as one guy put in an article that we're going to put up very soon, the United States is becoming one big college campus.
That's all completely woke.
All of these idiotic ideas that start in college campuses are percolating all the way down to our new folk Ochoa.
Well, and he brought his daughter who died, of course, to the US as a child to give her a better life as a legal immigrant.
He's admitting that.
And you think, This story has some similarities to the fake hate crime hoax, or the hate crime hoax that Jussie Smollett, who said, hey, I was attacked by these two white guys with MAGA hats who use racial slurs, homophobic slurs.
And now this guy axiomatically knows, hey, I'm just going to blame immigration laws.
By extension, white people.
That's right.
It's such an automatic reaction.
It's trickled down from these goofy, lunatic white people in universities all the way down to an ordinary Mexican laborer.
But anyway, so that's just one of the costs of people coming into our country who shouldn't be here.
But you were going to tell us about other costs, as I recall.
Well, that's one of the costs.
The Federation of American Immigration Reform, FAIR, they just put out a Well, a sobering report that talks about, at the end of 2016, the United Nations estimates that 65.3 million people had been forcibly displaced from their homes due to conflict or persecution.
Why that number is important?
Because between 1980 and 2016, the United States admitted 3.5 million refugees.
96,900 refugees just in the last year, 2016, that the report analyzed.
million refugees. 96,900 refugees just in the last year 2016 that the report
analyzed and the annual cost to the US taxpayer that's you dear listener is 1.8
That includes federal and state public assistance programs, costs per refugee to American taxpayers, which is just under $79,600 in the first five years after a refugee is resettled in the United States.
five years after a refugee is resettled in the United States. Now nearly 90% of
all refugees and asylees who entered the United States in fiscal year 2011
were not fluent in English.
Not fluent in English.
They're going to make a great contribution to our society.
They're more American than you are, as Alexandria Cortez stated.
They're more American than you or I. So refugees, average earnings increasing from $10.22 an hour to $10.86 an hour, which is only a 6.3% increase over those five years, from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2016.
So that's the type of contribution that these individuals are making.
This means they are unlikely to pay any federal income taxes, because they're making under $22,000 and could end up receiving a net credit state.
And local income tax contribution will all Be negligible.
That's right.
The interesting thing about asylees and refugees is that they are immediately eligible for every single welfare program.
Theoretically, those who just come in illegally and those who come in on other grounds, at least the first five years, are not supposed to get cash welfare.
They're not supposed to get free housing.
Refugees, these darlings, they applaud her for absolutely everything, right from the start.
And let's repeat that figure.
First five years, nearly $80,000.
And it doesn't mean that they get their snout out of the public trough on year six, either.
No, it doesn't.
This just continues.
So thank you, Federation for American Immigration Reform, for coming out with this extremely interesting report.
You know, it's these organizations.
The other one, of course, is CIS.
They put out tremendous reports.
Unfortunately, they just don't make any impact.
You would hope that there'd be some congressmen who would run with this and just shout to the heavens.
Exactly.
That's just it.
That's just it.
CIS and FAIR often put out excellent reports, and it's only people like us that pay attention.
Only the marginal press.
This is going to get exactly the same treatment as the allegation that Martin Luther King stood by and shouted encouragement while this guy raped a woman.
No, this stuff does not get anything like the attention it deserves.
Well, you know what will get the attention that it doesn't deserve?
A country that has been deemed Cuck Island.
I believe you're banned from that island.
You're not allowed to go to England.
No, I'm not.
Well, I'm not quite sure you want to go to England.
So this story is from Paul Joseph Watson's must-read Summit.News.
That's Summit.News.
I encourage our listeners to check it out.
He does some tremendous journalism, talks about some of the topics and ideas that are near and dear to the heart of both AR readers and Renaissance Radio podcast listeners.
The British Army says people who describe themselves as patriots are extremist right-wingers.
So if you criticize political correctness, that's also demonstrating an extremist trait.
So the British Army has released an information sheet encouraging members of the military 2.
Stasi-esque.
Report others as right-wing extremists if they express a myriad of beliefs including, like I said, describing themselves as patriots.
Here's some of the other indicators that one might be a right-wing extremist in the British Army and worthy of snitching upon.
So not only is the United States one big college campus, So is Cuck Island, which might be even not just a college campus but a preschool.
People who describe multicultural towns as lost.
You might be a right-wing extremist.
People who use the term Islamofascism, which I must confess is probably my most hated term I've ever encountered.
That, and when people say libtard, I think anyone who says Islamofascism, libtard, don't listen to them.
That's like calling a criminal a gentleman.
Well, or calling refugees darlings.
No, my point is, listener, scratch those terms from your vocabulary.
Islamofascism or libtard.
Those are just silly, silly phrases from a vernacular we should lose quickly.
Alright, some other Well, other indicators are right-wing.
Oh, go ahead.
Well, no, no, I was just going to remark for an army to say that its soldiers, if they happen to express British patriotism, that's a sign that they should be put under the magnifying glass.
It's like that end scene in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, the remake in the 1970s when the girl, the heroine, thinks that her friend has made it successfully without being replaced and then he points and does this terrifying scream.
I saw that, believe it or not.
Donald Southerland.
I actually saw that movie.
I regret to have to confess.
But I agree, it is horrifying.
These people, once they turn into snatched bodies and they detect someone who is not, it's like a pointer dog, but in the most horrifying, awful way.
They point and they scream.
They omit this loud, piercing sound.
And I think that's the best example I could think of.
Just a couple others.
People who refer to political correctness as a left-wing plot.
Might be a right-wing extremist in the eyes of the British Army.
People who are angry about the loss of national identity.
Well, that's John Cleese, who we'll talk about shortly.
He's also going to be labeled a right-wing extremist.
Well, he's not fit for the army.
And then, lastly, but not least, people who make inaccurate generalizations about the left.
Inaccurate?
Inaccurate generalizations about the left or government.
You might be a right-wing extremist if you're an SAS officer or enlisted guy and you say anything about patriotism or about what's happening to the loss and erosion of national identity.
Did they include any examples of inaccurate generalizations about the left or the government?
They did not.
I'd love to think what they were.
Yes, yes.
Now of course, as Joseph Watson notes, he does brilliantly, last year there was a commercial that was put out by the British Army which depicted a Muslim soldier taking off his helmet and praying as colleagues watched nearby.
Colonel Richard Kemp, who's doing his best to put on his political correct bonafides, just as so many of the American generals do when it comes to saying diversity is our greatest strength, he said that the new campaign showed an army I should rephrase that.
He actually is one of the good guys.
There's another general who I'm not even going to mention.
Colonel Richard Kemp, who led British troops in Afghanistan, said this campaign showed an army being forced down a route of political correctness and neglecting the main group of people who are interested in joining.
Mainly the British White Britons.
Right.
I remember seeing that ad.
Isn't it sad that we automatically think that any officer who is above maybe a major or a captain is so indoctrinated in political correctness you instantly believe anything they say is going to be Praising of diversity and multiculturalism as our greatest strength.
You can't get any sense out of them until they've retired.
Then, yeah.
As you say, even then, not necessarily.
Tell us about Cleese.
For our listeners who might not be familiar with John Cleese, he's one of the brilliant British comedians who was part of the Monty Python troupe.
I would encourage people to check some of those movies out.
They depict a far healthier and saner Britain that, unsadly, is now gone.
Well, he's under a lot of pressure and he's actually been slammed by critics for political correctness over a tweet that he put out in which he said, London is not really an English city anymore.
Now, of course, white Britons are about 44% of London, so I think we know exactly what he meant when he said this.
I don't know.
What are some of the observations you might have about John Cleese?
And here's a guy who's in his late 70s.
Oh, well, Monty Python, of course, had a huge, huge cult following among Americans.
I'd say particularly in the late 60s, early 70s, that time, that's when they were really going strong.
And I suspect you're right.
Probably a lot of our younger listeners don't even know about Monty Python.
Yeah, Mighty Python and the Holy Grail is a movie well worth going out of your way to watch.
Well, London's Mayor Sadiq Khan wrote that Cleese's comments made him sound like, quote, he's in character as Basil Fawlty, a right-wing hotel owner Cleese played in the 1970s.
You know that series?
It's called Fawlty Towers.
It's really quite funny.
Okay.
I don't, but I... Fawlty is spelled F-O-W-L-T-Y, and Fawlty is a hotel owner.
And he makes sort of all-in-the-family type conservative jokes about people that he can't understand.
He refers to non-whites as foreign-looking.
You can't call them foreign-looking.
But anyway, it's meant to be a huge insult, of course.
Well, Mr. Kahn made sure to point out in his tweet that Londoners know that our diversity is our greatest strength.
I mean, okay.
I guess everyone knows we have to think that Martin Luther King is both a saint and a Christ, a Messiah figure.
We have to always revert back to diversity is our greatest strength.
Now this isn't the first time that a Monty Python alum has said something that has upset the establishment.
Terry Gilliam, he lamented back in April that the change in comedy culture has He basically made it so that because he's a white man, he's blamed for everything.
And he made sure to say that.
As a white man, I'm blamed for everything.
It's nice to hear prominent people pointing that out.
It's great.
It's this point where these guys are in their late 70s now.
And if someone doesn't say it... I think back to the British actor who was in Lord of the Rings who talked about Islam.
I cannot think of his name right now.
He played Gimli the Elf.
He was also in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.
He was punished in some fashion, wasn't he?
I can't remember how exactly.
He was punished and then people tried to say, oh the British National Party is going to ape this language.
You can't talk in such divisive tones.
People in these positions need to speak up because it causes your normal, your average white person in England or around the world to say, hey, wait a second.
I also think he might be right.
I think London is lost.
Yes.
It is very important for people who have credibility in other fields to say these things.
If John Cleese, the famous and beloved John Cleese, says that London is no longer an English city, then that will cause people to think.
I'm delighted that he's standing up and saying the obvious.
Well, not just think, but the left go into hysteria because everybody knows What he's saying.
Not an English city means not a white city.
Well, maybe he's saying it's become cosmopolitan.
It's become a world city.
Maybe he's complimenting London.
It's no longer a parochial English city.
It's a United Kingdom, Great Britain city.
No, of course not.
He's saying it's no longer white.
And the gentleman who played Gimli, Mr. Taylor, was John Rhys-Davies.
Yes.
Who made those comments about Islam and what was coming to England.
Well, let's move 5,000 miles to the west from London to New York City.
And we have to talk about Richard Carranza.
He has been the new New York City Schools Chancellor since April of 2018.
He's the son of Mexican immigrants, and despite the vicious white supremacist system that he's had to struggle against ever since he got here, of course, he has made it to the top, the number one school district, the largest school district in the whole country.
Now, he was head of the San Francisco Unified School District where he was accused of creating a hostile environment for women.
Well, now it may be that he's creating a hostile environment for whites.
The city has contracted with a number of so-called diversity experts.
They've splashed out almost $1 million to teach supervisors on how to, quote, disrupt the power structure and dismantle institutional racism.
Now, they learn, for example, that white supremacy is characterized by perfectionism, a belief in meritocracy, and the Protestant work ethic.
All of those things are white supremacy, so you better kick them out.
And, of course, that the foundations of Western civilization are yet again examples of white supremacy. Now when they gather the teachers and the
administrators together to tell them that merit that thinking that merit matters is
white supremacy these conversations these sessions are called courageous
conversations. Of course.
Well a middle school teacher says that some of her friends don't go to them
because what they do what they are what these sessions are is quote a catalyst
for hate and division.
And in fact, a member of Bill de Blasio, Mayor Bill de Blasio School Diversity Advisory Group, has explained that anyone who doesn't like these race trainings Quote, they are the ones who must look inward harder.
I mean, this is the typical thing now.
As soon as a white person says, I don't want to hear this guff.
No, I don't accept the idea that all white people are racist.
You are fragile.
And resisting it only proves that you're racist.
White fragility.
How dare you not participate in this one-way monologue.
That's right.
Dubbed a courageous conversation.
Yes, yes.
These re-education sessions straight out of Mao Zedong's China at one of the monthly superintendents' meetings the spring of 2018, just shortly after Richard Carranza took the helm.
People at the meeting were asked to share answers to the question, what lived experience inspires you as a leader to fight for equity?
Okay.
Well, one of the Jewish superintendents said that her grandmother, Malka by name, Had told her about bombs falling on Poland and running away from the Nazis.
Well, she was verbally attacked by a black superintendent in front of everybody else the whole meeting.
And she said that she was told, this is not about being Jewish.
It's about being black and brown, people of color.
You better check yourself.
The coalition of fringes always frays.
Wow.
Wow.
That's pretty, that's pretty ferocious stuff.
Yes, it is.
Yeah.
Sit down and shut up, you Jews.
You know, we don't care about you.
You're white people along with all the rest of them.
I think a lot of Jewish people for many years have thought that they were going to be protected from this anti-white stuff.
Well, I'm sure this lady got a full dose of whiteness from this set of non-whites.
In any case, then there's another person who's on the million dollar gravy train.
Her name is Darnisa Amante.
She's the founder of DEEP.
D-E-E-P.
That stands for Disruptive Equity Education Project.
Disruptive.
Good acronym.
Yeah, they're gonna really shake things up.
She explained, if I had a poor white male student and I had a middle-class black boy, I would actually put my equitable strategies and interventions into that middle class black boy.
Because over the course of his lifetime, he will have less access and less opportunities than that poor white boy.
In other words, she's going to favor the middle class black.
In other words, she wants to create actual structural inequalities.
Exactly.
anti-whiteness. That's exactly, but her justification of course is all that's
doing is leveling the playing field. Yes. Because this poor white boy just because
he's white. Yeah. Is gonna have everything handed to him on a silver platter of
Of course, as we just learned, white liberals, if this guy is poor, and they are steeped in the thinking of white privilege, they're going to think, well, he's poor because he deserves to be poor.
He's a loser.
Absolutely dismissive.
Yes.
But in any case, now, this is recent news.
Just a day or two ago, it was announced that A number of Department of Education employees have filed a $90 million lawsuit against Mr. Carranza and the Department of Education.
David S. Perry, the group's lawyer, has said this.
Under Carranza's leadership, the Department of Education has swiftly and irrevocably silenced, sidelined, and punished plaintiffs and other Caucasian females on the basis of their race, gender, and unwillingness to accept their other colleagues' hateful stereotypes about them.
That's a pretty strong statement.
Hateful stereotypes.
That's what this is all about.
Correct.
White people are the only people about whom hateful stereotypes are not only permitted, they're encouraged.
Or they're mandated.
That's right.
I think mandated.
Well, as a matter of fact, one of the people that Carranza has brought on board, her name is LaShawn Robinson.
She explained in one of these trainings that the white people there were going to have to take a step back and yield to colleagues of color.
Also, she explained that you have to recognize that values of white culture are supremacist.
She went on to say, if you've been with the Department of Education for more than 20 years, You are responsible for the problem, and finally, if you draw a paycheck from the Department of Education, get on board with my equity platform or leave.
You know what comes to my mind when I read that?
There's that meme of the rather corpulent black woman who's giving that PowerPoint presentation, and then it's, you know, railing against white privilege and white people, and then it's got her PayPal.
Address and it's pay me and she's wearing what looks like this ones this green onesie that's plastered on and when I see this quote from from LaShawn Robinson, that's what comes that's what springs to my mind immediately Well, yes.
Pay me.
That's the only way that you can get out from under this horrible burden of white guilt, is to fund my PayPal account.
Very nice.
Well, in any case, since Carranza got on board, more than a dozen high-ranking superintendents and deputies have been demoted, some with large pay cuts, or pushed into retirement, and every time they complain that they are not racist, they are called fragile and offensive.
So, we will see how far this suit goes.
And I would just add something about New York City again.
You know, it has these very, very well-regarded selective schools, Bronx School of Science, Stuyvesant High School, that have turned out a number of Nobel Prize winners.
And there's a 48-year-old state law called the Hecht-Calandra Law that requires competitive exams as the sole criterion for getting into these selective schools.
It's strict meritocracy.
And in fact, they've been doing that way since the 1920s.
Well, Bill de Blasio and Richard Carranza, they're pushing for an alternative scheme.
And guess why?
Because there aren't enough the right people of color.
There are lots of Asians in these schools.
Yes, there are.
But there aren't enough blacks and Hispanics.
Oh my gosh.
Oh my gosh.
So they would phase out the test and replace it with guaranteed admission for students in the top five to seven percent of their eighth grade classes.
But, they have to be at least in the top quarter of 8th grade students because they're recognizing that you could be in the top 5% of some of these schools and probably be way, way, way close to the bottom in the whole school district.
Now, what this would do...
It would increase black and Hispanic enrollment in these specialized schools from 10% to 46%, more than quadruple.
Almost 5%, yeah.
It would cut Asian enrollment virtually in half from 61% to 31%.
61% to 31%.
White enrollment would drop from 24% to 20%, but who cares about white people anyway?
And this same study found that 10% of the people who got in would not even meet basic proficiency standards in math
if they do it this way.
Wow.
But who cares?
Get rid of whites.
That's great.
That's right.
Cut the Asians.
They're not part of the true coalition of people of color because that's only brown and black people apparently.
Exactly.
And this Carranza guy, Richard Carranza, who is now being sued, and we'll see what the outcome of that is, He says that this testing requirement is racist.
Of course.
Now, interestingly enough, the Democrats have a large enough majority in the statehouse so that they could overturn this law that has fed these top-notch schools strictly by maritimes.
And of course they will.
We'll see, but... We'll see.
You know, the one thing that might keep them from doing it is the fact that Asians are shrieking about this.
Yeah.
And, you know, there are some... Oh, the New York Times is likely to pay a little bit of attention to Asians, but we'll see.
Now, white people, you know the fact that they're only 24% of the people in there now, nobody cares about that.
Nobody cares about that.
Well, gosh, we are running out of time.
We're running out of time, but I want to throw a phrase out for you real quick.
There's a term, diversity expert, that was thrown around there, that the city's contracting so-called diversity experts.
Yes.
You know what you are?
You're a homogeneity expert.
I actually wrote that down right here, and I think that that's something we should start to You know, kind of tongue-in-cheek, refer to ourselves as.
Because, again, diversity is not our greatest strength.
No.
Homogeneity always will be the greatest strength of a nation-state, of an actual people, if they want to have a future.
Well, you know, sometimes when I'm sitting on an airplane, get into conversation with the person next to me, and start talking about, well, what do you do?
I tell them, I'm active in the white community.
No, you're a homogeneity expert.
And then people have to ask, you know, we are running out of time and I do want to let our listeners know we love the questions we get.
I'll tell you what, Mr. Taylor, why don't we go ahead and start next week's podcast with some of those questions?
Well, you know, one thing we do have time enough to do is to point out one of the people who wrote in This is quite interesting.
It was a question that was not seeking really so much of an answer as it's kind of an advertisement in a good way.
Have either of you ever read Evelyn Waugh's book, Black Mischief?
He goes on to say it's an excellent racially realistic and very pessimistic book about the modernization of black Africa written in the 1930s.
I have not read it.
You have not read it.
I have not.
But Samuel Francis had read it.
And he spoke highly of it.
He thought it was a very gripping story, and it was also race-realist.
What was the title of the book again?
Black Mischief.
And it's about what was going on in black Africa, written in the 1930s.
Now, that reminds me, of course, of Heart of Darkness.
Heart of Darkness is a race-realistic novel, too.
Written in the 1890s.
Is it that old?
I don't know.
It's not that old.
It was Joseph Conrad.
He's a 20th century writer.
You can look it up while we are jabbering about other things.
Now, this listener also says another very good novel is The Missionaries.
Now, I've never heard of the Missionaries, but it is set on a Papua New Guinea-like island in the Pacific.
Now, people send us from time to time novels that are supposed to be race realist and supposed to wake people up.
I think they're almost always Miserable.
What we need, of course, are great novelists who are race realists, not race realists who are trying to become novels.
But Evelyn Wong, I have read one of his books, and it was The Loved One, really quite an interesting account of the burial industry.
But I'm sure Black Mischief is first rate, and it's on the strength of that recommendation that I go on to mention the other recommendation by this listener, The Missionaries.
Now, I'm afraid we are getting to the end of our time.
This fellow had another.
We will proceed with this same questioner next time because he raises a number of very interesting points.
And as our listeners know, we are delighted to hear from you.
We're delighted to hear comments.
We're delighted to have questions.
And I will start by pointing out that you can send them to American Renaissance at the contact us tab at the amren.com page and you can also send them to PK.
Or you can email me sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again that's sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
We'll start next week's podcast with your questions.
Your concerns, your praise, anything that you would like to send us, we will address.
I'd also like to point out that Heart of Darkness was published in 1899.
Oh, you were right.
Well, gosh.
Well, shut my mouth.
All right.
Heart of Darkness published in 1899.
Well, I didn't realize Joseph Conrad was writing as far back as that.
Well, for Jared Taylor... I stand corrected.
For Jared Taylor, this is PK, and you've been listening to Radio Renaissance.