All Episodes
Previous Next
May 15, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
58:56
‘WW Continue to Uphold the Patriarchy’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome ladies and gentlemen to another episode of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
And with me is PK.
And we have another action-packed week to go over with you.
So hang on tight and we will start with the world of wrestling.
You're laughing because this is a story that I know you would normally not want to hear about, Mr. Taylor, but the World Wrestling Entertainment is a publicly traded company that has a market cap of $6.3 billion.
Jared, their stock closed at $81 a share.
Last year at this time, it was about $39 a share.
So this is a massive worldwide company.
You're right.
I don't care.
I know you don't care, but this story is one we have to care about because this is a story of a Contracted white performer who wrestles under the name of Lars Sullivan.
He's a really, really big white dude.
And he recently made his debut on World Wrestling Entertainment Television.
Well, get this.
He was just fined $100,000 by World Wrestling Entertainment because of past comments that he made, mostly between the years 2007 and 2013, that were just unearthed.
No, he was not under The employment of the World Wrestling Entertainment when he made these comments.
He made these comments with what are dubbed troublesome controversy.
When he was on bodybuilding.com.
So he was just a private citizen?
He was a private citizen and a number of current wrestlers, a lot of black wrestlers, have on social media, when they were asked questions, did you know about them?
They would say, yes, we did.
And the World Wrestling Entertainment is going to publicly address this soon.
And guess what they did?
To the tune of, once again, a $100,000 fine And he's going to be required to complete sensitivity training for this offensive commentary that, again, this was more than a decade ago in some cases.
Then regale us with some of these comments.
All right, let's talk about some of these comments that Lars made when he was his real name, Dylan Miley.
So the messages were posted.
I'm not even going to say his username because I don't believe in piling on people.
I think that's ridiculous.
But here's a couple of things that he said.
Apparently he made comments that were disparaging to Muslims, Hispanics, and various black world wrestling entertainment wrestlers.
Quote, they should be demonized for their religion, Miley wrote in a thread about Muslims.
They are violent and have a violent agenda against America.
So that is one of the quotes on a social media board.
That's worth at least $20,000 right there.
I was going to say about $5,000.
Not to be racist, but it seems like white people are more willing to take responsibility of their own lives than blacks and Hispanics, who are all for government handouts.
That's easily worth $15,000.
He also attacked a number of his current World Wrestling Entertainment colleagues who were both black, Kofi Kingston and R-Truth.
He said, quote, or he posted this on a message board, quote, look like they could be in a prison black gang, end quote, end comment.
Now again, I'm sorry.
These comments were made.
He was not under the employ of the World Wrestling Entertainment.
Now again, as we stated, as I stated at the beginning of this podcast, This is a fortune.
This is a huge corporation.
Massive market cap.
I know people don't care.
I don't care.
I know you don't care, but... They could be small.
They're still taking $100,000 from it.
They're taking $100,000.
These guys are paying installments.
Now, why I think this is so fascinating, Jared, the World Wrestling Entertainment has signed an exclusive deal with Saudi Arabia to go put on shows exclusively for the royal family.
And they've come under a lot of pressure for this.
I mean, think about what happened when the entire world was upset about the journalist who was killed last year.
They still did the show.
They've still put on this show for this regime that a lot of people believe is illiberal.
But yet, a guy, a white guy who makes comments Twelve years ago.
They're unearthed, and he's fined $100,000.
Well, no wonder they're upset about things you said about Muslims.
I wonder if the Saudis care.
The Saudis probably could not care less.
All they want is a good show.
And here's what's more... This might be the most fascinating aspect of it all.
He has to do sensitivity training, he has to pay a hundred grand fine, but the World Wrestling Entertainment knew about these comments before they signed him.
And he's been under the employ now.
He's been employed by the World Wrestling Entertainment for the past two years.
And it's only because of the social media craze that was promoted.
They found these comments.
Boom.
Here comes the fine.
That is just so disgusting.
Stuff they knew about all along and didn't care about.
Now, when the word gets out and the sky falls, then they punish the guy.
No, this is disgusting.
I wish there was some sort of competing organization he could defect to.
There actually is and we'll see if he does but again the point is this is as silly as it sounds that we're talking about professional wrestling.
A guy who made comments 12 years ago.
Pretty bad.
Well you know it just goes to show you loose lips can sure sink ships and a certain Natasha Tynes discovered that this week.
She is an author and a Jordanian American writer and a World Bank employee living in Washington.
And one morning, just this week, she was going to work on the DC subway and she saw a transit employee in uniform eating on the train.
And she happens to be aware of the fact that metro rules ban eating, drinking, smoking, and littering on buses or trains or in stations.
Well, she took a picture of this employee and she tweeted it right out with this text.
When you're on your morning commute and see Metro employees in UNIFORM, full caps, eating on the train.
I thought we were not allowed to eat on the train.
This is unacceptable.
Hope Metro responds.
Well, I guess she was a bit of a busybody.
Did she tag Metro?
She tagged Metro, yes.
And there was a huge backlash about this because of one thing.
Because she was, quote, shaming a black woman.
It's the fact that she was a black woman.
Apparently, if she'd done this with a white man, that would have been just fine.
Well, how many employees are actually white who work in the metro system?
There are a few.
One of them wrote an article for us, actually, for American Renaissance.
A quite eye-opening article.
But, she was shaming a black woman.
Now, This Natasha Tynes, a Jordanian-American writer, had a contract with a publishing company called Rare Birds Books that was supposed to distribute her upcoming debut novel.
And on the very same day when she tweeted the photo and the sky fell on her, they issued this statement.
They had learned that an author, quote, did something truly horrible today in tweeting a picture of a metro worker eating her breakfast on the train this morning and drawing attention to her employer.
Black women face a constant barrage of this kind of inappropriate behavior directed towards them and a constant policing of their bodies.
We think this is unacceptable and have no desire to be involved with anyone who thinks it's acceptable to jeopardize a person's safety and employment in this way and they are not going to distribute the book.
This is just incredible.
The Black Congressional Caucus officially approved of this.
They tweeted out a thumbs up.
Yes, yes.
She's been treated exactly as she should.
Now, the book already appears on a number of websites and now it has over 1,500 reviews.
How many are negative?
I haven't counted.
But the average comes out to 1.43 stars.
And nobody's even had a chance to read the thing yet.
Well, it's funny.
When we see that kind of targeted harassment of an author or a movie, normally the company where this has happened on their platform will step in and excise those reviews because they know that they're rigged.
We saw that with Hillary Clinton's book.
I think we saw that with some other writers' books who were heavily, heavily targeted for these negative ratings.
In this case, though, it seems as if the platform is saying, hey, just go ahead and pile on.
We're fine with it.
It certainly seems that way.
Nobody cares.
Nobody's read the book, but they are in a position to give it a one-star review, as one person said.
Would you still go ahead and buy a book if you knew it was written by a bigot who went out of her way to get an African-American lady fired for eating on her way to work?
This is just, as I say, the whole thing is incredible for a whole host of reasons, but it clearly is saying that if it had been a white man, or if it had been anybody else, it would have been perfectly fine to draw attention to the fact that this uniformed employee of the metro system is stuffing her face on the train, and this is rush hour, no less.
And violating, as you stated, sir, violating the clear, defined rules.
But then, this is the ultimate irony.
The ultimate irony.
Natasha Tynes, Jordanian-American, describes herself as a She's trading.
She's trading on her own racial status.
She doesn't realize that there are certain races that trump her race.
There is a racial pyramid.
Yes.
And she's below the top.
She's only a Jordanian-American.
She's not an African-American.
So, too bad for Natasha Tynes.
What a story.
What a story.
You know, those two stories we just talked about to start this podcast, they tell us so much about modern America.
I'll let our listeners interpret that.
And again, we thank all of our listeners out there.
I want to encourage everyone, if you haven't, make sure you subscribe to this podcast on YouTube.
Just go to Amren Podcast when you're on YouTube.
Make sure you subscribe.
That way you're notified the moment that these podcasts go up.
That's right.
And they are all fresh with the week's news.
And so you want to get them as soon as possible.
Correct.
And continuing on our Saga, if you will, of what happens when white people do something that the elite don't like.
I want to bring your attention to a Guardian story, ladies and gentlemen, and if you would just type in these words.
I want all of our listeners to see this headline.
Type in, The Guardian Alabama Abortion White Men.
I'll give you a second.
Go ahead and type.
White women?
White men.
Men?
Sorry.
White men.
It's important.
Abortion.
Alabama.
The Guardian.
White men.
When you get to this story, it was published about 17 hours ago, and it is in regards to Alabama just passing to basically vote to ban abortion.
Here's the title.
These 25 Republicans, all white men, just voted to ban abortion in Alabama.
Now scroll down and look at the pictures of what they've done in this piece.
They have taken screenshots of all of the caucus, of every member of the caucus that voted, the 25 white men who voted to pass this bill, and they've got pictures of all of them.
And they make it quite clear throughout this whole story that this is an attempt to racially shame the white men who dared pass this bill 25 to 7.
And they show the pictures.
Well, was every voter in favor of it a white man?
Yes.
I see.
Interesting.
Okay.
And here's what they say.
These 25 Republicans, all white men, just voted to ban abortion in Alabama.
The new law, which mandates an almost blanket ban on abortion, the strictest in the United States, was passed by this group of exclusively white male politicians.
Now, of course, Jared, they make sure this article to point out that this new Alabama law will disproportionately affect black and poor women because they are more likely to seek abortions and less likely to have resources to obtain an abortion out of state.
And once again, we have an article, the clear cut reasoning that this piece was written this way is to point out once again and to create antagonism, Jared.
To whites.
And toward whites.
Quite so.
By their reader.
And it's just astonishing when you look at this, because if this type of targeting had been done in the way that, say, blacks vote in a city, like say there's a law that passes in, I don't know, Baltimore or something, and if somebody had taken the extraordinary lengths to show the pictures of all the people who voted for it, clearly, we know what would have happened.
And obviously, we're not talking about double standards here, because all of our listeners know quite well there's only one standard.
It doesn't go both ways.
We all know this.
But the point is, these type of stories are becoming increasingly The way that journalism operates.
Yes, increasingly blatant.
And this is a British paper, for heaven's sake.
This is a British paper.
And they have pictures of all of the white men, all of the member of the Alabama State Senate.
And they point out that there are only four women in the Alabama Senate who are among the eight-strong Democratic Party minority in the upper chamber of the state.
And, of course, all of those people voted against this bill.
Well, it's a heartbeat bill, right?
You can't have an abortion after the fetal heartbeat is detected?
Isn't that what it is?
It's not really an outright ban, is it?
No, it's an outright ban.
It's not even a heartbeat bill?
No, it's not like Georgia.
There are a number of states that have passed similar type stuff.
Well, shut my mouth!
Arkansas, Kentucky, Ohio, Georgia and Mississippi and North Dakota, they pass heartbeat bills.
This goes a step beyond that.
bill, if it's signed by the governor of the great state of Alabama, it actually
bans abortions for people from like rape and incest. So it goes to kind of
shocking levels that are, in my opinion, are indefensible.
But that's Alabama for you.
Well, the Supreme Court will no doubt strike it down.
I think you are correct.
But isn't there more to this abortion story?
Well, there is more to this abortion story, Jared.
It's funny.
Somebody said, hey, don't say Mr. Taylor.
So I'm going to start calling you Jared.
A little less formal, but thank our listener.
We'll give it a try this week.
Give us your feedback.
Yeah, then you're going to get people writing in saying, no, I liked the formality of it.
A dignified pair of people addressing each other.
But anyway.
Correct.
We move with the times.
We do move with the times and we want to make sure that we give our audience exactly what they want and we appreciate each and every one of you.
Now this story, of course, we're just going to go To the state of Georgia and everyone's favorite white woman playing a Muslim, Linda Sarsour.
Remember when she said that she was just a white woman until she put on the hijab?
So, no one really took her seriously in her SJW crusade.
Well, on Tuesday... I guess she's exercising Muslim privilege.
There you go.
The Woman's March leader, Linda Sarsour, reached into her intersectional playbook and, well, she came up with another way to attack white people.
She blamed white women.
for the Georgia heartbeat bill.
She claimed white women were responsible for the defeat of Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, which actually it was white men and white women in that great state of Georgia who kept Stacey Abrams out of office for at least four years.
Sarsour tweeted, quote, while folks are debating tactics to respond to Georgia's heartbeat bill, let's remember that 76% of the white women electorate in Georgia, more than white men, Voted for Brian Kemp over Stacey Abrams.
That's where the work needs to happen.
WW continue to uphold the patriarchy.
In tweet.
Now, I like that, Jared.
WW continue to uphold the patriarchy.
Now, of course, that's an acronym for white women.
Yes, it is.
And we must remind our listeners that Stacey Abrams was, of course, the great black hope who was going to be the first black female governor of a southern state, or maybe the first state in the union.
First state in the entire union.
That's right, that's right.
She was about to make history, but she was pipped at the post by this miserable white man who was voted into office by all these bigoted white men and white women.
Ah, poor girl.
But as you say, she has high hopes for next time around.
She has high hopes for next time.
I'm actually going to say something here that I think might even shock you, Mr. Taylor or Janet.
I'm not easy to shock.
I think there's still a lot of flux in the Democratic primaries coming up.
Obviously Kamala Harris, who I thought was going to be able to run away with things, is just floundering.
She looks terrible.
She has marbles in her mouth when she speaks.
Joe Biden, who we're going to talk about in a few minutes, he's the frontrunner, the shocking frontrunner.
His lead keeps growing.
I wouldn't be surprised if Stacey Abrams doesn't consider Remember, Joe Biden threw out that idea of going in and announcing as his vice presidential candidate before all this started.
Stacey Abrams.
Oh, I can see that.
But I don't think she's going to swoop in and snatch the prize.
No, no, no.
I wouldn't be surprised if she doesn't consider it.
Because right now, this field is uninspiring, I think, to see these two white men leading the way.
And of course, Beto O'Rourke, he can't stop finding ways to attack whites.
I mean, it's shocking.
That's been the most stunning thing.
As he declines, what does he do?
He ratchets up the anti-white rhetoric.
I think eventually, even for non-whites, they end up despising people who are constantly crawling in the mud.
They're not going to vote for Beto if he constantly tells them how sorry he is to be a white man.
I don't think this goes over well with anybody.
Have we finished with abortion?
We've got one more quote from Sarsour that I think is important to point out, because once again, remember, she said she was just a white woman before she put on the hijab.
She's attacked her fellow Democrats.
She attacked Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer for being white in February 2018 at an anti-Trump rally.
She said, quote, I'm talking to Chuck Schumer.
I'm tired of white men negotiating on the backs of people of color and communities like ours.
Referring to the Democrat negotiating the terms for DACA policy.
We're not bargaining chips.
This is not a poker game.
And even Nancy Pelosi was targeted with the same anti-white wrath from Sarsour, who wrote on Facebook in March of 2019, just a few months ago, she said this, quote, this is why we wanted Congresswoman Barbara Lee to be the Speaker of the House and progressives were like, nah, Pelosi is a leader, and OMG, oh my god, you should see how she claps.
What a clap.
Nancy is a typical white feminist upholding the patriarchy, doing the dirty work of powerful white men.
God forbid the men are upset.
No worries.
Nancy to the rescue to stroke their egos.
So, it's not just WW upholding the patriarchy on the Republican side, but it's white women upholding the patriarchy on the Democrat side, and they need to get out of the way of these aging boomers, these white boomers.
Even Nancy Pelosi, she's upholding the patriarchy.
Oh, poor dear, poor dear.
It's a sad day, isn't it?
Well, of course, speaking of the patriarchy, There was an interesting story about the patriarchy that was written up by a woman I consider to be a national treasure, namely Heather MacDonald, in the latest issue of City Journal.
And it has to do with a story about the big white shoe New York City law firm, Paul Weiss.
Well, in December of 2018, we go all the way back to then, they announced their latest class of partners.
And they accompanied this announcement with a photograph.
Because the trouble was, all 12 were white.
All 12 of them.
The New York Times then published a front page article called, 12 white faces reflect blind spot in big law.
The fact that they're all white is reprehensible.
And in reaction to this, and this is the aspect of it that I find as astonishing as anything else, Nearly 200 corporate general counsels.
These are the top lawyers in these companies that decide which law firm to hire if they got litigation or they need contracts negotiated.
Nearly 200 signed an open letter threatening to pull their business from law firms whose partners are not, to use their words, Diverse in race, color, age, gender, gender orientation, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, and without regard to disabilities.
So, you know, I guess we have to include gender orientation now because, well anyway, this is getting too complicated to me.
But you've got to have, you've got to have an absolute smorgasbord of everything under the sun or they will not do business with you.
The firm's chairman, Paul Weiss' chairman, Brad Karp, he immediately licked boots.
And he said in a statement in response, and this is quoted by Heather MacDonald, there is no more important issue to me and the firm's leadership than diversity.
Can that really be true?
I think it is.
I mean, think about it.
We hear this statement all the time.
Well, he says that, but for heaven's sake, is it more important than providing good legal advice to their clients?
Is it more important than making money?
No.
This is complete baloney.
Now, I'm sure diversity, or the appearance of diversity, is profoundly important to him.
And Heather MacDonald quotes some people who used to be at Paul Weiss, who say that the firm, like every other big law firm in the country, every other institution, is twisting itself into a pretzel, constantly trying to give blacks a leg up.
Hiring them for summer internships when they don't really qualify.
Giving them mentors.
And of course, Paul Weiss's pro bono work is all just excruciatingly lefty from start to finish.
These people are constantly doing the best possible to get themselves a lovely black face on the partner list.
But instead, Brad Karp, chairman of Paul Weiss, licks boots.
It's really a sad and sorry tale, but this is the world in which we live, and I think we have an even sorrier tale in some respects coming up.
Damning stories of corporate America here.
This started the podcast out with the World Wrestling Entertainment, and now that story of what passes for permissible thought and what is punished, of course, in modern America.
Well, I'd like to talk to you real quick.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a story for children, so if you have your kids listening, please go ahead and stop the podcast, ask them to leave the room.
This is a story about sanctuary cities and a rape by an illegal alien of a dog, and we're going to talk about this.
Give you a few more seconds to make sure your kids are out of the room.
So an illegal alien was convicted of raping his fiancee's dog and he's finally set for deportation.
Federal immigration officials lashed out at authorities in Multnomah County, Oregon.
and local sanctuary laws.
This is a sanctuary county.
Last week, after a man residing in the U.S.
illegally, he was set free upon serving 60 days for raping a dog to death.
Now, we actually talked about this story a couple months ago when this happened, when he was sentenced.
But he was, remember, this is a sanctuary city.
He was let free after spending 60 days in jail.
Fidel Lopez, he's 52, was convicted on April 8th of sexually assaulting his fiancée's mix, little dog, so forcefully that it had to be euthanized.
He received a 60-day sentence but was released immediately because he had already served that amount of time awaiting trial on the February offense.
Tanya J. Roman, who is a ICE spokeswoman, said, quote,
On April 8th, Lopez was convicted of sexual assault of an animal
and aggravated animal abuse and sentenced to 60 days in jail,
with credit for time served.
The Multnomah County Jail did not honor the immigration detainer and released him without notice to ICE.
Does it explain how ICE eventually caught up with this guy?
Let's see if we can get to that part.
ICE picked up Lopez at his home Thursday and served him a notice to appear.
And he will be taken to the Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma pending immigration proceedings.
So this has been a year-long fight, ladies and gentlemen, between ICE and Multnomah County Sheriff's Office.
This was reported by The Oregonian.
ICE expects to be notified of any of an impending release so as, quote, to allow ICE to assume custody for removal purposes.
But this county, Multnomah County, ...has said it can't detain someone without an official criminal arrest warrant signed by a federal judge.
Now, I mean, again, this is just an isolated story.
We're going really deep here.
We're not taking a 40,000 foot view of sanctuary county, sanctuary city laws.
This is a story here of just one county of an illegal alien who He raped a dog, and the dog had to be euthanized.
I mean, this is... If we... I mean, think about it, Jared.
This is the type of story that President Trump should be tweeting out.
As to why we need to get a hold of these sanctuary county laws.
I don't know.
I think there are... Disgusting as dog rape is, there are crimes that are worse.
Murder of humans.
And we get that often enough so that this sanctuary city, sanctuary county stuff should have gone by the boards long, long, long ago.
It's interesting you bring that up.
Because in March of 2018, ICE officials put a hold on Martin Gallador, Galador, Gala, Galador, whatever, an also illegal alien who had been charged with felony fourth-degree assault in an alleged attack on his wife.
The Multnomah County Jail did not recognize ICE's civil detainer and He walked free.
Then guess this?
He killed his wife.
Allegedly killed his wife.
No, finished the job.
He finished the job.
So ICE tried to get a hold of this alien, the sheriff's office there in Multnomah County.
They would not recognize this silver detainer and now his wife is dead.
Allegedly killed by this guy.
There's where the story goes.
In this one little county in Oregon, we have these two stories of the fights toward ICE.
Every time we have one of these stories, I say the same thing.
I'm getting tired of hearing myself.
How many killings is it going to take?
You know, you'd think Multnomah County, after even just one death, one guy who, if they had done what they were supposed to do and handed him over to ICE, that woman would still be alive.
And we always talk about all these ideas about, if even only one life can be saved, we must move heaven and earth, etc., etc.
All they need to do is turn over an illegal immigrant, who's got no rights to be in the country, Why don't they do it?
I just don't understand this.
Surely this must have been reported within Multnomah County.
They must know about this.
Do they not care?
I mean, do they so hate President Trump?
Do they so hate the idea of America that they would rather have their citizens killed than hand illegals over to ICE?
I don't know.
I'm increasingly baffled by the things that motivate my fellow U.S.
citizens, but I've been baffled for many years.
Well, they don't want you to be able to be a citizen of their country that they're helping birth by not doing anything but immigration laws.
Remember, let's just go back to that one simple quote from Alex Ocasio-Cortez.
All these illegal aliens They are far more American than those currently residing in the United States.
Well, no, she didn't say that.
She said paraphrasing.
No, no, no.
It wasn't it wasn't quite as broad as that.
She says they are more American than anyone who doesn't want to let them in.
So if you are slavering to let them in, if you are salivating at the idea of letting them all hop the fence, then you might be you might be as American as them.
But somebody like you and me, I mean, it may be that they don't even speak English.
It may be they've never heard of Thomas Jefferson.
It may be that they certainly don't even know the tune of the Star Spangled Banner.
But they are more American than you are, says Alexandria.
So, moving on.
Now we're moving on to University of Iowa.
And this is just another sort of routine little bit of data that spilled out into the public sphere.
This is thanks to Campus Report.
Campus Report is really an excellent website.
I think they have some unpaid stringers all over the country in various campuses, and they feed these choice little tidbits about what's going on in campuses all around the country.
Well, at University of Iowa, Iowa, as you can imagine, being a fairly white state, is in a constant state of desperation and embarrassment over the fact that it is so hideously, excessively white.
Well, this year, they have earmarked $2.7 million for its division, this is not just an office, this is a division of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Now, of this $2.7 million, they're going to spend $1.9 million on salaries.
That is 32 people, no less, who are working for this division, full-time, making sure that there is diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Now, those two things, really, those three things, there's one that's a bit of an outlier.
Diversity and inclusion.
Yes, we know what they mean by that.
Equity?
Anyway, that reminds me of all these employers who used to advertise that we are an Equal Employment Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer.
I always used to think, well, come on, make up your mind.
Do you really do give people equal employment opportunity?
Or do you have certain preferences for certain people?
But in any case, they're claiming that diversity and equity go hand in hand.
Well, wrong.
But in any case, after they've spent their $1.9 million paying their 32 people, That leaves $800,000 for many other fun things.
One, and it's hard to get really to the bottom of the things and find out what this means, but $2,500 has been set aside for a safe zone.
Hard to know what that is.
And then there's money that's set aside for a program called Better Hawkeyes, Better Men.
Hawkeyes, of course, are the people who go to the University of Iowa.
That's the nickname, yes.
Yes.
And this is a quotation from what it does.
This Better Hawkeyes, Better Men is, quote, dedicated to promoting healthy masculinity across campus, specifically engaging groups where students who identify as men, where they identify as men.
They may not be men, but they are identifying as men and they'll make better Hawkeyes and better men.
Oh, boy.
Now, I don't understand, really.
Does that come under diversity, inclusion, or equity?
Turning people who identify as men into better men.
I mean, I would think that's toxic masculinity.
That's beyond toxic masculinity.
That's the Chernobyl of masculinity.
Wow, that's lethal masculinity.
In any case, then there's another $32,920.
In this $2.7 million budget that's designated for institutional membership use.
Now, I didn't really know that there were institutional memberships to things like the National Center for Faculty Development and Diversity.
Well, I don't know.
They didn't break out how much each one costs, but the institution pays a certain amount of money for it to be a member of that group.
And no doubt, They get to send their people off to seminars put on by this outfit.
They go boondoggling all around the country and learn how to develop faculty and diversity.
And then there's another one called Association of Title IX Administrators.
Title IX Administrators, of course, are those who make sure that women are not shortchanged.
That enough money is spent on women to make them happy and they have to get equal treatment with men.
One of the things about the storage area that reminds me, I actually have a spreadsheet of over 58 universities that our audience has sent in over the past year.
It's a long-term project and I have links to all of the diversity centers and the diversity initiatives at a lot of the major schools.
I've actually had the entire SEC and Big Ten conferences broken out.
I need to put the data together And I want to encourage our listeners, if this is the first time you're listening to the podcast and you never heard us ask for this data, go to your alma mater's website and look up and see if you can find out how much they spend, how much they spend on diversity, what the budget is for the diversity center, and how many
Individuals are employed by this diversity center.
And when you get that, please email it over to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, that email is sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
We will get this published at some point.
It's an exhaustive database that we want to put together.
And because it does just show these schools, they will spend An enormous amount of money and resources and time, not just employing people who hate us, but wasting this money to try and indoctrinate as many more individuals as possible in these campuses into this cult.
The fact is, this $2.7 million for the Division of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, that's probably not all the money that goes for this kind of tomfoolery.
There are people who run the Black Student Union.
There are people who run the Hispanic Center.
And probably in every department there's somebody whose job it is to hoop up equity and hoop up diversity and all of this stuff.
So these are the people who at least are part of this specific division.
And I bet probably every school on campus has a Dean of Inclusion or a Dean of Diversity.
But this was just another one of those little tidbits that came up thanks to the investigative work of Campus Report.
Not just campuses, but think about going back to what we're talking about corporate America.
We're seeing a lot of ways that corporate America are sneaking minorities, blacks, into the c-suite is by creating The chief officer of diversity.
Oh yes, chief diversity officer.
Yep, yep, yep.
They get there right up there next to the chairman of the board.
And because as Paul Weiss says, nothing is more important, not even profits, not even his salary, not even giving clients good advice.
Nothing could be more important than diversity.
Well, gosh, it sounds like a new religion, doesn't it?
It is, and that's why we have to look at it.
We are heretics of this religion.
That's why we are persecuted to such levels of near digital, you know, digital excommunication.
But we are happy heretics.
Happy heretics.
We don't have to live under this oppressive, mind-bending, terrible philosophy.
But now, moving on to another story.
You have some facts from the Department of Justice to share with our readers, our listeners.
Before we get started, as we were in pre-production for this podcast, you pointed out, well, this actually is the way it should be if we're talking about federal sentencing.
So, I just want to preface this by saying, Everybody that we're talking about in regards to non-citizens, these people shouldn't be in the country to begin with.
Now, that's the tease.
Let's get to the shot.
Let's get to the chaser.
That was the shot.
Here's the chaser.
According to the U.S.
Sentencing Commission in its recently published 2018 report on federal sentencing statistics, 54.3% of the 69,425 federal offenders last year were
Hispanic and 42.7% of offenders were non-citizens. What percentage were Hispanic? 54.3. 54.3,
wow.
54.3.
Wow.
And 42.7% of offenders were not Americans.
They were non-citizen.
The two biggest offense categories were immigration, 34.4%, and drugs, 28.1%.
The article I'm quoting here from a piece I saw on, I think it was called Conservative Review.
This is why the methamphetamine was actually the most common drug charge according to the U.S.
U.S.
Sentencing Commission.
The biggest increase in drug activity from the cartels was meth, not marijuana or heroin.
So we're talking about drug position charges accounted for 3.9% of federal offenders.
And almost all of those were in border districts because they involved immigration cases.
Smuggling, probably.
And also, probably, possession.
Well, it may be smuggling, but they often plead down to possession when what they're really doing is dealing.
But be that as it may.
Well, let's go a couple more statistics for those of our listeners who enjoy this type of stuff.
63% of all non-citizens charged for drug trafficking in 2018 were illegal aliens.
I lost my stat here.
Hold on.
Moreover, because illegal alien networks are the antecedent for which much of the trafficking from cartels, if we're to enforce our immigration laws in the front end, many Americans who get roped into drug trafficking would never have the opportunity to do so.
I mean, we're talking about 69... I mean, this is...
So, 54.3% of the 69,425 federal offenders were Hispanic, Jared.
And again, 42.7% of offenders were non-citizens.
Now, think about it.
You take away that number.
So, you're talking about what?
33,000 people.
If we just simply enforce immigration laws, you cut that number down from 69,000 to what?
You could send a lot of people home and have them do something productive rather than ride herd on these criminal aliens.
It's an astonishing state of affairs.
I sure didn't realize that Hispanics were a majority of federal prisoners.
Well, look at it this way.
Think about the border states we're talking about where a lot of this stuff is happening.
California is now a majority.
Hispanic.
Arizona.
New Mexico.
Texas.
I've actually started breaking down, Jared, the population of states from 1910 to 2010.
And even I was shocked when I saw that in 1970, California was 80% white.
when I saw that in 1970 California was 80% white. In 1980.
You know you should look at the figures for the city of Miami.
As I recall, the city of Miami in 1960 was 90% white.
Then 20, 30 years later, 10% white.
No, these things are just precipitous.
White people don't like to become a minority.
And when the things begin to change, they clear out.
Well, is that for the DOJ report?
That's it for the DOJ report.
It's just important those two numbers that we talked about.
Again, this should be happening if we actually enforce immigration laws, but because we don't, 54% of those in federal prison are Hispanic.
And yeah, it's that simple.
And 45% of them are aliens, foreigners.
Correct.
Man, I bet you can't get a job in the Federal Bureau of Prisons without speaking Spanish.
No, in fact, I'm sure if you went to their job board right now, they would say, we want Spanish speakers that are encouraged to hire, or encouraged to apply to be hired.
Yeah.
Well, speaking of Spanish speakers, the little town of Deming, New Mexico, It is a population of only 14,000.
And over the weekend, just last weekend, 170 immigrants, all from Central America, were released by ICE into the town, just dumped.
And ICE told them that they could expect as many as 150 people a day for the next few days.
Now, Deming has absolutely no way to deal with these folks.
No way at all.
And what they are doing is they have, there is something called the Southwestern New Mexico State Fairgrounds.
And that's where they're being housed.
But at city expense, they've got as many as 150 people on watch and providing help in the form of food, Personal hygiene, towels, blankets, toys for children.
The Deming Volunteer Fire Department is helping in medical screenings.
And the city is in a state of distress.
They have declared a state of emergency.
They're saying, help, help, help, we can't do this.
Now, a state of emergency really means nothing.
It has to be declared by a governor of a state for it to take into effect at all.
But this is just an example of the insanity of our immigration policies.
Because the ACLU and all of these other organizations have made it impossible for the feds to hold families Together, they just get turned loose.
And Deming is trying to send them on to whoever might be their sponsor.
But in the meantime, they are stuck with all of these people on their hands.
And Deming is not the first city to declare a state of emergency.
We talked about this last April.
When Yuma, Arizona became the first city in the nation to declare a state of emergency over illegal immigration because over a three-week period they had gotten not 170 immigrants like tiny Deming but 1,300.
Of course, they're a city of a population of 100,000, but still, in a proportional basis, these people are overwhelmed.
Yuma had only one shelter, a former Salvation Army thrift shop, that had space for up to 200 people.
That seems like a pretty generous shelter for a city of 100,000 people.
The Deming didn't even have anything like that.
They're not used to having bums on the street.
And all of a sudden they get these people dumped on them.
I'm sure most of them speak no English at all.
It is a horrible strain.
But this is the kind of terrible emergency that our crazy congressional laws and our absolute open borders fanatics are foisting on all American towns all across the country.
We're increasingly strangers in a strange, strange land, to paraphrase Heinlein.
I'll say we are.
But then there was something of a... I could even call it a good news story from the New York Times.
They didn't realize it was a good news story.
But the title of this May 14th article was The Intersection of Race and Blood.
Race!
And they actually managed to choke out the fact that you are likely to get a better blood match from someone of the same race.
Oh gosh, then you're slipping times!
And so they pointed out that, you know, different antigens are found in different bloods, and the closer the match racially, the better off you're going to be.
And they even pointed out that if you have mixed race people, you really better get blood from mixed race people, because people of just one or the other race are chances are ain't going to work.
Now, Did you realize that when it comes to bone marrow transplants, they have to be even more precise?
I am very well aware of that, yes.
And you have to have somebody who's practically a second cousin or closer.
I mean, maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration, but you have to be somebody who's very, very similar to you genetically, but race doesn't exist.
We all know that.
Obviously.
But you know, the intersection of race and blood, you know, that also almost sounds like, I don't know, Blumenbach or some of these ancient guys who talked about the blood of the Englishman.
Correct.
They didn't mean by that.
They didn't mean that.
Now, this is in New York City.
They have, I'm sorry, in New York State, they have got something called the Precise Match campaign, in which they are getting the word out to people of all different ethnic mixes and varieties.
Please come donate blood, because your co-racialists will benefit.
If you care about black people and black people, come donate blood, because black people need your blood.
Well, at first, when they started segregating blood, or labeling it as by race, the staff was all upset.
The staff thought, oh, this is segregation.
And they had to sit them down and explain, well, no, no.
There's a reason for this.
There's a reason for this.
That's right.
He says, well, the director of the blood bank, we didn't educate the staff.
We had to show them that we weren't segregating the blood just to be segregating.
Well, so for five years now, they've had this big campaign called Precise Match.
Well, guess what?
Blacks are 28% of the population, but only 8% Whites are 35% of the population, but 58% of the donors.
There's a huge discrepancy there.
I'm not sure... Despite.
You said that word despite when you talked about the black population.
Well, no, no.
They've been campaigning for five years.
Hard work and outreach, says the New York Times.
Now, you do this math.
There's a simple way to do the math here.
And we determined that white people are 5.7 times, nearly six times more likely than blacks to donate, to donate blood.
Well, you've noted before that whites have a propensity to volunteer far more when it comes to their community.
That's right.
And that's one of the whole reasons why we talk about social capital and why it's so important to have cohesive communities that are united by Dare you say it?
Dare I say it?
Definitely not by this belief, this religion that we've been talking about today that you and I, of course, are heretics of.
Yes, yes.
Though I'm sure I've told this story before, but once when I was living in Louisville, Kentucky, we had this recycling campaign.
We used to sort our garbage and put it out in trays for this color and that color and the other.
And I was talking to the guy who came by and collected the stuff, and he told me they don't even bother to drive through the black neighborhoods.
Nobody puts the stuff out.
Waste of time.
Waste of time.
They're not public spirited.
And even in this precise match campaign where they're telling them, look, black people need your blood.
They are not prepared to be bled.
But let's see.
Oh, and we have more good news, more good news, more good news from across the Atlantic.
And I find it very interesting.
There was a Guardian headline.
British paper, and it said Mette Frederiksen, the anti-immigration left leader, set to win power in Denmark.
I like this.
An anti-immigration left leader.
She's a social democrat.
She's 41 years old, and in the elections just coming up, she is likely to become the youngest prime minister ever in the history of Denmark.
Now, I find it very significant because every time you want to control the borders, you are not just right, but you are far right, or extreme right, or fascist.
And the Guardian has tumbled to the fact that you can be a leftist.
You can be a social democrat.
And what this means is that Mette Frederiksen is going back to the tradition of her party.
This is a significant quotation from her.
She says, the price of unregulated globalization, mass immigration, and the free movement of labor is paid for by the lower classes.
She has tumbled to the obvious fact that if you start bringing in these people, it's going to bring down wages.
It's going to push down wages.
And so instead of considering non-whites to be the proletariat for which we must work, the classes that are oppressed and need to be uplifted, she is going back to the original roots of leftist thinking, namely that the people of our own country, those who are not doing as well as others, are and should be the subjects of social democratic effort.
Now, but you know, I think in a way it seems to me that she's going further than just social class.
Yes.
Because she has fully endorsed the Danish policy with regard to asylum seekers.
She says that our goal is not integration.
Our goal is repatriation.
If a consensus is forming that both the left and the right can agree with to actually put the people of Denmark first, hey, that's something that we can all get behind.
Oh, this is wonderful.
This is absolutely wonderful.
I'm all for, I'm all for Mette Frederiksen.
And somebody asked her about compromise.
What could you compromise on?
She says, anything but immigration.
Again, and this is something I know that our listeners like to read the articles that are on amren.com.
I think there's a great article that talks about how the gosh what is the big environmental organization the Sierra Club was paid off when that donation and what I think it was in the tens of millions was made where in the 1990s that stipulated you can't talk about immigration.
That's right.
You can't talk about immigration if you want to take this donation.
And the Sierra Club used to take the very sensible approach that the environment is degraded by the fact that we're importing people right and left.
But now they never take that position anymore.
They were bought off.
They were bought off for, I think it was, $10 million.
For $10 million, their lips were sealed.
Back to good news.
Back to Estonia.
Now, the Conservative People's Party of Estonia, it was founded only in 2012.
It's only seven years old.
But in the 2019 elections this year, they did so well, they're in a coalition government.
You know, this is a kind of flourishing of democracy in the true sense that we do not see.
We do not see.
We get these two doddering, miserable parties.
They dominate everything, they control everything.
Here, in seven years of campaigning, you can join the government.
In a parliamentary system, at least in Denmark, where the people's voices are actually heard.
Now, the finance minister, another young fellow, 48 years old.
Of course, young by my standards, old by yours.
His name is Martin Helm.
And before he was elected, he was known to have said, our immigration policy should have one simple rule.
If they're black, send them back.
It's as simple as that.
He went on to say, I want Estonia to be a white country.
Now, he perhaps wouldn't have put it as bluntly as that, now that he is in a public position, but when these words were quoted back to him, he says, yes, I stand by that.
I stand by that.
And he is the newest finance minister in all of the European Union.
And in fact, I believe tomorrow he's going to take his place with the other 27 finance ministers.
A big meeting of the EU.
And here he will be, in the halls of power, saying, I want Estonia to be a white country.
Now, something else about the elections.
This is a conservative People's Party.
Anyone who attended the American Renaissance contest in 2016, three years ago, would have heard a talk by a fellow named Ruben Kallup.
Ruben Kallup was the head of the youth movement of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia, and now he's a member of parliament.
So there is life after Amran.
You can swan your way into the parliament of Estonia.
Now, someday you will be swanning your way into the American Congress, but that is a question for a later day.
In any case, we actually have a little bit of time for questions.
We've managed to do it as we should.
Here's a question, and I'd be curious to hear your view, and then I'll express mine.
Someone writes to say, Do you think the white ethnostate, after a racial divorce, wouldn't it be much better off with fewer whites who apologize for their whiteness, and with people like Jesse Lee Peterson or Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell?
Would there not be a place for the small number of blacks, Asians, or Hispanics who share the general sensibilities of the white majority and were willing to assimilate?
That's the question.
Your answer, sir.
My answer is I simply go back to the wisdom of our founding fathers and I look at the Naturalization Act of 1790 as to who could be a citizen who could vote and who could actually hold the franchise.
I've made it quite... I've stated over and over again that one of the books that had the most profound influence on my philosophy is Starship Troopers when it comes to the whole concept of the franchise.
But I think there is a way to reconcile that idea with the wisdom of our Founding Fathers and Naturalization Act of 1790.
And I would say that, yes, those men that you mentioned, they all are admirable characters, but at the end of the day, no, I don't believe that they should be able to be citizens within an ethno-state.
And to be able to cast votes that would have the impact of doing what's happened to so many cities and states across the country.
Despite the fact that our founding fathers were so righteous to understand as to who should have the franchise.
Well, I think that in the process of creating a white ethnostate, there will be a time during which there are non-whites in that state, as there are voluntary population movements.
I think that it would be an inevitable part of bringing about an ethnostate.
And I just hope that those non-whites who do remain, or those who are most likely to stay, would be more like Jesse Lee Peterson, Clarence Thomas, and Thomas Sowell.
But I do not think that no matter how admirable those people are, and I share your admiration for them, they are not people that we would voluntarily welcome into the ethnostate.
That would be my view.
After all, this is an entity that is for us, and exclusively for us.
And as I say, in the process of getting there, we will have to make compromises.
But I don't think we should reverse the flow by bringing such people in.
Another question here.
I would be delighted to attend an AMREN conference, but I understand there are protesters who station themselves outside.
Is that a problem?
Well, no, frankly, because we have very, very solid security laid on by the state of Tennessee.
So it's a little bit late to register now.
I don't think that my assistant Henry Wolfe would be all that happy to get a phone call this time of day, but you know, he's the guy who counts the chairs and makes sure that there's room for those who wish to come.
But no, that is not a problem.
We have a lot of security.
And as I used to say to people who come to the conferences, you didn't realize that when you register to the conference, you're actually getting a ticket to the zoo.
You get to see wild animals.
And they're carefully and safely behind bars.
So, now there is another question, and maybe we'll save this for the next time, because this is quite an interesting question.
I'll read it out, and then maybe we should mull it over.
I would be interested to hear Mr. Taylor's plans for the future.
To trust a movement, and indeed a group of people who want to change the world, women like me need to be confident that our leaders have a strategy.
I'm all in, and ready to move at a moment's notice.
But where do we go and what do we do?
It's an amazing question.
It's one that I think a lot of great people have contemplated and regrettably some people have come to bad conclusions.
Anyways, but we truly love all of our listeners who send in questions and we appreciate, as I've stated many times on this Podcasts in particular.
We appreciate each and every one of you.
That is the $65 question, you know.
Okay, it's all very well.
All very well, PK.
All very well, Jared Taylor.
Here you jabber about all this stuff.
What do we do?
That is the real question.
And we'll think about it and we'll get back to you.
We will.
And if you have a question you'd like us to address, please send it to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, that email addresses sbpdl1 at gmail.com or you can go to the amaran.com website and click on the contact us tab and send us a question.
We are always happy happy happy to listen to hear from listeners.
We will listen to our listeners.
And we'll read from our listeners.
So, for your hosts at Renaissance Radio or Radio Renaissance, depending on which edition of the podcast you hear, our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection