All Episodes
Previous Next
March 21, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:37
‘Africa, Rise Up’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
And with me, of course, is Paul Kersey with yet another fun-filled week.
There is never a dull moment when you're paying attention to what goes on around the world and in the United States in terms of race, immigration, and the demographic future of the world.
Now, there was an interesting little incident in not-so-far-away Italy.
And I believe, Mr. Kersey, you wanted to mention that to our listeners?
Well, this story was one that could have been a disaster of biblical proportions in Italy, where, well, when it broke as I was watching the news, and it seemed like it was at first, Mr. Taylor, and to our listening audience out there, I thought it was, it didn't seem real that And I know we talked about this before as we were planning out what we're going to discuss, Mr. Taylor, but we should point out that on the heels of what just happened in New Zealand, that something like this would happen.
And, you know, Mr. Taylor wrote a fantastic essay on what happened in New Zealand.
I encourage you to read that on www.amaran.com.
But what nearly happened in Italy is a reminder of the true evil of open borders.
And what happened was a bus driver, a Senegalese, an African bus driver in northern Italy, he abducted 51 Italian children and their chaperones.
Threatening them over a 40-minute ordeal before setting the vehicle on fire now officers were able to break the glass windows in the back of the bus and we're Luckily as the fire is beginning to rage.
They were able to get all the passengers to safety now this African did this because he was upset and he was protesting the migrant deaths in the Mediterranean.
And Mr. Taylor, one of the most important aspects, it hasn't been reported really.
This whole story's kind of gone away.
It was in the news for a cup of coffee.
Matt Drudge, to his discredit, did not highlight this story.
But here's one of the main reasons why this took place.
And if I may read from a Washington Times story, The black African had sent a video to friends in Italy and Senegal indicating plans for a bold action with the accompanying message, quote, Africa, rise up.
Well, yes.
His bold action was going to be to burn to death 51 children, if he could.
That's pretty bold.
And here's a guy who's protesting the fact that these people from Africa and North Africa are trying to come across the Mediterranean to live in Europe, and they're not making it across.
Well, now this will encourage people to let them across, won't it?
We want more of these guys.
Well, this is one of the reasons why we talked about last week Salvini.
The Italian Navy is no longer going to be a taxi service.
They've basically shut down the Mediterranean.
There's no more illegal migrants coming from Africa.
And yet this guy was ready to carry out a terror attack to ensure that that pipeline stay open so that... We already know.
We've seen that most important graph of Steve Salem that shows the projection for the growth rate of the African population.
It's catastrophic.
He wants them to be able to come over unmolested to this land of milk and honey that is Italy.
I mean, this is a guy, again, this black gentleman from Senegal.
Gentleman, now you have to be careful about this.
I do use that word.
You said it was a fun week.
No, you're right, you're right.
No, not a fun week.
This is not a gentleman.
This was an African terrorist ready to kill white Italians.
Let's put it that way.
Much better.
He took all their phones and he ordered the chaperones to bind the students' hands with cable ties.
He had apparently a little supply of cable ties.
Yes.
Threatening to spill gas and set the bus ablaze.
Now luckily one of the chaperones was reported was only loosely bound.
He only loosely bound several students' hands, not everyone's.
That enabled one of the students to escape.
The bus was intercepted on the outskirts of the lawn.
Because what happened is they managed to call the police.
Yes.
And the police intercepted the bus.
Yes.
I mean, the crisis that nearly happened in Italy on Wednesday, March 20th is, again, it's one of those reminders why we're seeing the so-called far-right win election after election in places that five years ago it seemed highly unlikely that a right would ever rise there.
Well, exactly.
This guy became an Italian citizen in 2004.
Now, he hasn't exactly been a model citizen.
He's been convicted in 2007 and 2011 of drunken driving and sexual molestation of a minor.
What's this guy doing driving a bus?
Yet, he's been a bus driver With the company for 15 years.
So that means that he had had both of those convictions for drunk driving while he was employed as a bus driver.
That's right.
That's right.
It makes no sense, does it?
But I think more and more Italians are saying to themselves, we frankly don't need more guys like Useniusi, which is, as far as I can tell, how you pronounce his name.
But, yes, this is something that, you know, these things don't get talked about very much in the United States, and they're probably somewhat downplayed in Italy, but this will remain in people's minds.
Somebody who tried to burn children to death, he told them, no one will survive today.
That was his warning.
That was his intention.
Africa, rise up.
Well, boy, if that's the way Africa rises up, no thanks.
Africa, rise up.
Yes, he's addressing Africa.
Now's your chance.
Do like me.
Well, and of course it wasn't just this Senegalese guy who wanted to barbecue 51 Italian children.
We had another attack in Utrecht in the Netherlands.
This was just on Monday.
We had this crowded tram and a fellow named Gokmen Tannis, born in Turkey but living in the Netherlands.
I don't know whether or not he's a citizen, but he opened fire and he killed three people and he badly injured five more.
Now, this guy, too, he's got a really colorful record.
In 2014, he was acquitted of manslaughter, but he was convicted of possession of an illegal weapon.
And last year, he was convicted of shoplifting and burglary and jailed for four months for the burglary and a week for the shoplifting, but hasn't served any time for the shoplifting.
Now, there's yet more to this guy's colorful record.
He was detained from August to September 2017 after being accused of rape.
But they turned him loose, but then they got him back in the pokey on the 4th of January because he refused to cooperate in the investigation.
This investigation of his own rape.
And he was released on the 1st of March after he pledged to cooperate.
Well, just 17 days after he was released, what form does his cooperation take?
It takes the form of killing Dutch citizens.
And again, we agreed we weren't going to talk about what happened in New Zealand prior to this podcast, ladies and gentlemen, but we should point out this happened, I think, a day after The events, maybe two days after?
I think it might have been three days after.
You're right.
It was three days.
It was Monday.
Three days after, yes.
Now, it was clearly an act of terrorism.
He had messages in his car saying that although the texts of the messages are not something that the Dutch police have decided to vouch safe to us, but it's clear that this was an act of political terrorism on his part.
And even murderous clouds of this kind sometimes can have something of a silver lining because this act of terrorism probably contributed to the success of the party that is being run by Thierry Baudet, known as Forum for Democracy.
Forum for Democracy is a very staunch immigration control party.
There were provincial elections and it resulted in the fact that Forum for Democracy is now the number two party in the Senate and, as it turns out, a fellow named Rutte.
Mark Rutte.
He's the Prime Minister.
He's going to have to form a coalition government because Forum for Democracy came in with a good enough score so that he is going to have to find coalition partners.
Now, he's looking for the Green Left Party, which also gained reasonably well.
It's just another example of the extremes are growing and the center is falling out.
Correct.
In this crazy situation, not only in the United States, but in Europe as well.
But the fact is, Forum for Democracy, they had no seats in the upper house and now they were from 0 to 12.
0 to 12 out of 75.
That's a good chunk.
Now, the Greens also doubled their number of seats.
Now, I want to tell you a little bit about this fellow Thierry Baudet.
He is an intellectual.
He's a young guy, not even 40 years old, and he is a bit of a dandy, a bit of a ladies' man, and he keeps a baby grand piano in his office.
He's very concerned about the civilization of which we are part, and in his speech to supporters, I think this is a remarkable phrase.
He said, we are standing in the rubble of what was once the most beautiful civilization in the world.
I love that line.
I love the fact that he remembers the civilization he was a part of and what they have to become if they're going to be able to keep that civilization alive.
Yes.
And he very frequently uses classical allusions.
He says, the owl of Minerva has alit, has come down.
Wisdom.
Owl of Minerva.
The Owl of Wisdom.
In other words, the people of the Netherlands were influenced by Minerva and now did the wise thing.
He was criticized, of course, because after the tram attack, he continued to campaign.
He said, this is a perfect example of what Mark Rutte, the current Prime Minister, has done wrong.
This guy should never have been in the country and we don't want any more like him.
Everybody else was sort of soberly and piously standing aside, not campaigning.
He says, no, this is all the more reason to campaign.
And he's right.
He's right.
Let them be pious if they want to.
They are atoning for their own bloody sins.
Speaking of atonement, I'd like to bring up something that's just breaking.
The Italian interior minister, Matteo Silvini, has decided that they're going to strip the black terrorist, the African terrorist, who told his friends, Africa, rise up.
Wait a minute.
his Italian citizenship under the recently passed Salvini decree.
If he's convicted of terrorism, I think that's a foregone conclusion that's going to happen.
This is the type of bold leadership the West needs, that type of reaction, and this is
what the people of the West want.
Hey, wait a minute.
Why strip a corpse of citizenship?
Put him to death.
I guess they probably don't have the death penalty.
That's the problem.
I don't think they do.
It's a Catholic country.
So what are they going to do?
So this guy, Usenius C., presumably he's going to go to jail for a long time.
But I don't see what the point of stripping him of citizenship is if he's in jail for the rest of his life.
But I guess if they only give him 20 years, then he can go back to Senegal.
Well, contrast that reaction by the Interior Minister Salvini to what's happening in Sweden and France and England, where they're welcoming ISIS fighters.
Yes.
There's something about Anglos and Islam.
I mean, we're seeing this in New Zealand.
It's so refreshing that there are men of the West who are standing while so many other so-called men of the West submit.
Indeed.
And if I may be so bold to bring something up, Mr. Taylor.
So, if you are a reader of SBPDL, which is now exclusively at Ron Unz's website.
Ronunz.com.
That's where the entire archives and all new material is found.
If you've been a reader of that website you'll know that one of the things that regrettably I do is I document black-on-white murders and so there's a famous scene in Fight Club where the 1999 film by Chuck Palahniuk is the author's name where one of the members of their order is killed and they say his name is Chuck Paulson and death his name is Chuck Paulson.
So what I do Mr. Taylor is whenever a white American is murdered by a black person I say his name is or her name is.
I'm taking that.
In fact, he actually wrote about Paul Kersey in his latest book.
He said, the character of Tyler Durden lives on whenever Paul Kersey remembers a white victim of a black crime.
The fact that he wrote that in the foreword to Fight Club 2, this graphic novel, it made me smile a little bit to think that he knows.
He knows.
He's read this stuff.
He understands why that's being said.
Well, normally I get hate mail from family members.
They say, Oh, that's not who, you know, it doesn't matter what happened, the circumstances surrounding their death.
They had black friends.
They had black neighbors.
I one time got a letter from a lawyer saying, you need to take this down.
He worked with a lot of black contractors in Memphis about this white gentleman who had been murdered in Memphis.
And I wrote back, I said, hey, it doesn't change the fact that he's dead and that he was murdered by blacks.
I didn't take it down.
Well, the other day, I got a really Touching email from someone.
I'm not going to mention their name, but it was the spouse.
It was the wife of someone who had been murdered.
And this was a especially horrific murder.
It involved a number of blacks killing this young white male.
And his spouse actually wrote to me.
I'm not going to mention their names.
I'm not going to redact any information that would give it away, but she wrote, I am the wife of the individual you wrote about.
He was murdered.
And I just happened to see the article you wrote about his death today.
I just wanted to thank you for acknowledging the lack of information on this event.
And your condolences, of course.
Whenever the trials start, I'll be working with his family to bring his name to light and fight for justice for him.
I know that he would have agreed wholeheartedly with your article.
We've had a problem in this city where the murder happened for a long time.
And she finished by writing this.
Apparently it's just okay to murder white people nowadays.
Well, it's not okay.
You still go to jail.
But nobody is particularly sympathetic and nobody is going to come and comfort you.
That's just tough luck.
There are no institutions that will rally to your defense or to point out anything that there's a pattern here.
We, in some respects, as we'll talk about later, we are the underdogs.
We are the underdogs.
We are on our own.
Listeners, no one's coming to save us.
There isn't going to be some event that magically converts the silent majority, whatever you want to call whites across the country, to our side.
It's going to take dramatic examples and unfortunately it's going to take instances like what happened to this Poor woman and her husband?
Well, I hope it doesn't take that.
You're somehow suggesting that it's going to take countless murders for white people to wake up.
I like to think that one heinous crime, like what happened in Italy, is going to wake up tens of thousands of white people.
And let's hope that happens too.
But of course, this news doesn't get the kind of front-page treatment that anything that could be spun in the other direction does.
One little bit of news that came along just today was the fact that all of Charlottesville schools were closed.
Closed for the whole day.
And the reason is that apparently some anonymous person on 4chan posted a notice saying that there was going to be ethnic cleansing in the schools and this showed up yesterday and said school shooting tomorrow.
This is just one anonymous post and so they decided to close the schools down.
Now, this just goes to show you that the extraordinary power that anything resembling some kind of presumably white wickedness has on the imaginations and minds of school administrators, of Americans, the FBI and the state police are looking into this.
This is a huge, huge undertaking apparently.
My guess is that if it was anyone that had anything at all to do with the Charlottesville, Virginia school district where somebody just didn't want to take an exam.
But he probably knew that this was something that was going to put the whole district on its ear.
Now, were you aware that, as you pointed out, we weren't going to talk much about Christchurch, although I will permit myself to note the irony of the two mosques that were attacked in a city called Christchurch.
It doesn't seem to me that anyone has noticed that, but one wonders why they should even be there in Christ's church.
But did you realize that all flights in and out of the city were grounded after that?
This is yet another example of just the extraordinary panic that people go into Now, it's not necessarily because of the nature of that, of the racial aspect of that attack.
It's just the super-duper overreaction that people have when there is some kind of mass shooting or even just a solitary shooting.
Do you know how big, how many flights?
I don't know, and I don't know for how long it took place, but no, no flights in and out.
Extraordinary.
But let's see.
Oh yes, I was going to move on to yet another assault on our freedom of association.
Facebook, by the way, which of course has banned American Renaissance years and years ago, and I can't claim much
familiarity with how it works, is removing certain categories
for advertising purposes.
Now, apparently, if you want to advertise on Facebook, you can really tailor things quite precisely.
It is one of the most amazing platforms for truly targeted advertising.
It's one of the reasons why Facebook and Google, Mr. Taylor, have roughly 90% of online advertising, because you're not just putting a static banner on a web page who you have no idea who's going to click on it.
You're able to send ads to the individuals you want to target.
Yes, yes, and this is something that people find very useful, but Henceforth, they are going to be removing age information, sex, male or female, or zip code targeting if this is an ad having to do with housing, employment, or anything related to credit.
This has to do with a settlement with so-called advocacy groups and other plaintiffs.
ProPublica, that's that non-profit news source that is always up to some hyper-liberal jiggery-pokery.
They said that they'd been able to buy ads for house hunters, excluding certain groups based on ethnicity.
Now, the way Facebook works, you can't target specifically by race, but it does let advertisers seek consumers by what it calls ethnic affinity.
Now, ethnic affinity is available only for blacks, Asian Americans, and Latinos, not for whites.
Now, you can either target those groups or you can exclude those groups.
And so if you want to, and many people want, you know, some sort of hair relaxer, you know, you're not going to send that to white people.
You want to send that information to black people.
And, you know, if you want to sell beer, if you can stay away from Mormons, you know, Exclude the Mormons.
You can actually do that.
Yes, yes.
You've got to find your target market.
That's right.
It makes it very, very effective advertising.
But, as I say, the journalists at ProPublica had put together a target for property, and they said that we want to sell these houses, and they were able to exclude blacks, Asians, and Latino affinities.
And, oh, well, this is a scandal.
This is so much of a scandal that Facebook is not only changing the way it operates, it's going to pay these groups $5 million.
It's a drop in the bucket to Zuckerberg.
Of course.
But it's not a drop in the bucket for ProPublica and more mischief that it's going to do with that kind of money.
So, it's quite interesting.
If something has to do with housing, employment, or credit-related, I don't know why credit-related makes a difference, but housing discrimination or job discrimination, you're not going to be able to do this.
Furthermore, they have a different thing called look-alike audience that has to do with not only people who look like each other, who appear to have similar interests, they're going to make it impossible to To target ads for property or for jobs on the basis of age or religious views.
But you know, on age, what if you want to appeal to the retirement community?
What if you want to appeal to people with young children?
This apparently is no longer possible because age is an illegitimate category.
And also, they can't discriminate on the basis of sex.
Now, I don't know why that makes a difference.
If you have a place that is particularly appealing to men or women, I don't know.
But that apparently is also no good either.
Facebook does have income levels, so you can target people who have certain household income levels.
And that's based on the information that you give to Facebook, where they're able to come up with a profile on you.
In fact, I encourage all of our listeners to try and put as little on your Facebook page to give information to advertisers.
Think about it.
You, the end user of Facebook, are using this platform for free.
So how are they monetizing it?
They're monetizing your information to sell to advertisers.
Well, let me take the opposite position.
You're going to get ads anyway.
Shouldn't you want ads that appeal to you?
That is true.
No, that is a great point.
No, no.
My instinct is exactly the same as yours.
I don't want these people knowing anything about me.
And if I make a mistake and I go shopping on a non-incognito window, and then for the next three weeks I get the same silly thing that I was looking for over and over and over again, I find that profoundly irritating and a little bit spooky.
Well, it's retargeting.
Facebook has a code they can put on... It's not even Facebook.
This is Google.
Google can tell what I looked at, and if I haven't been an incognito window, they will... I mean, everybody's had this experience.
If I'm looking for a, I don't know, a staple gun, I see all the staple gun advertising.
Anyway, but no, I found it quite fascinating that, as I say, a form of freedom of association is being destroyed by ProPublica.
You cannot advertise something that might particularly appeal to white people if it has to do with these categories.
And again, this is what the companies that are investing a lot of money onto Facebook, they want to be able to target like this because they know who their demographic they're going after.
Now, it was interesting.
Apparently, the ProPublica people asked them, how come there is no Caucasian affinity?
And the advertisers said, we're just not interested in that.
We have no need for that.
We usually, if we want to target an affinity, it's not white people.
We want to target blacks or Hispanics because we have these sort of ethnically oriented things.
But for a general audience, we just go for a general audience.
But if they have something that they think is going to be particularly appealing to white people, you know, maybe opera tickets or who knows, advertising a new art museum someplace.
They can exclude the African-American, but I guess they can still do that.
I'm still shocked that in grocery stores across the country there's an ethnic food aisle where they have oriental, Mexican, and sometimes kosher products.
And I'm always flabbergasted that some smart lawyer out there hasn't said this is a form of racial profiling.
Why isn't all the food equally distributed in aisles?
Why is it in this ethnic aisle as if we have to conform our tastes to this This white majority, this oppressive white majority, it's everywhere, even in the grocery aisles.
It's all part of white privilege, my friend.
Even in the grocery store.
That reminds me of a woman who made a huge stink, perhaps even brought suit, against some store where the black hair care products were under lock and key.
And the hair care products for everybody else were not.
It was in Walmart.
It was in Walmart.
Yes.
Well, it's known as pattern recognition.
But pattern recognition is immoral.
And in many cases against the law.
Speaking of pattern recognition, one time I went to New Orleans and we stopped at a Walmart to get some supplies before we got to the city.
And I was walking through the I guess it was the DVD or CD aisle, and then all of the DVDs.
Normally when you go to a suburban Walmart, everything's out.
You can leaf through it.
You can pick them up and buy it.
It was all behind Plexiglas.
I had never seen that before.
And that was a sign.
I said, guys, we got to get out of here.
Put your stuff down.
And my friends, my comrades, we immediately laughed it out.
We put the items we were going to buy down because we realized you don't want to be in a store where everything is behind Plexiglas.
No, that's usually a bad sign.
A very bad sign.
Well, speaking of pattern recognition, Mr. Taylor, let's talk about one of New York City's most selective schools.
I am of course referring to Stuyvesant High School.
Stuyvesant High School. Now out of 895 slots in the freshman class, how many
of those do you think were offered to black students?
Well, I cheated.
I read the article.
But this is one of those remarkable schools where they do not lift a finger to budge the scores.
You've got to score at the cutoff to get in.
And what was the number?
Was it four blacks?
No, you're selling short.
Seven blacks.
Seven blacks out of 895.
And that number of black students is actually shrinking.
There were 10 black students admitted to Stuyvesant last year in 2018 and 13 the prior year.
So that number, of course, is going in the wrong direction.
Of course, this school made 33 offers to Hispanic students, which is up slightly from 27 seats last year.
Asian American students, they received 587 of the offers.
And white students, hey!
They were offered 194 seats.
There's your white privilege in action, ladies and gentlemen.
Well, what we got here is Asian privilege, of course.
Exactly.
Because here, Asians and whites each make up about 15%.
And what's the proportion here?
Well, they make up 15% each of the total public school system.
Yes, yes.
I should have made that clear.
And at this school, Asian Americans represent 74%.
of the students at this highly selective school.
Now, of the nearly 4800 students admitted into specialized schools, 4%, 190 are black.
Though, Black and Hispanic students make up nearly 70% of New York City public school system as a whole.
Yes, that's the extraordinary thing.
Blacks and Hispanics are 70%, but just over 10% of those admitted into specialized schools.
70% as opposed to 10%.
And then when you have Asian Americans who are just 15% having this overwhelming dominance.
This article included a breakout of every single one of these specialized schools.
And the more demanding the entrance examination is, and Stuyvesant is the top, the more overwhelmingly Asian they are.
But, of course, what then happens here is that you've got all these people agonizing.
Why is this?
This can't be.
The New York Times had an article dedicated to this problem and, of course, they buried the lead by pointing out that Hey, it's Asians that make up the bulk of the school.
It was positioned with a picture of white children.
It was positioned as, yet again, another pattern of white privilege, white racism, systemic bias, implicit bias.
I forget all the terms that are out there that sociologists have invented to try and describe why whites thrive in this country and why non-whites don't.
Of course, Asians, there's an asterisk, are excluded.
Well, and of course, Mayor Bill de Blasio.
He's got this plan to get rid of the entrance examinations.
Fortunately, the entrance examination system is protected by state law since 1971.
It's going to be hard to change.
What he wants to do is just admit the top performers from every middle school in the whole city.
Now, a recent report found that If that happened, Asians, who are about 60% of the people in these specialized schools, their numbers would drop in half.
Cut them in half!
And the number of blacks would increase five-fold.
But that's what Mayor de Blasio wants to do.
Incredible!
Well, and not surprising, there was resistance from the alumni organizations, and guess what, from Asian groups.
Now Asian groups say, wait a minute, we worked hard, we studied, we got good scores, and you're going to cut our numbers in half?
Now, to me, one of the fascinating things about this is that even the Democratic leaders in the Senate and the Assembly, the people who would have to change the laws, they don't want to talk about this.
No, they don't.
No, they don't want to talk about it.
That coalition of the fringes, Mr. Taylor, has to stay together.
They have to stay together.
That's the Democrat Party.
You have all of these landmines that they're trying the best.
They're trying the best not to step on, and yet they're there.
And here's a goofy white guy who's pushing this ridiculous idea that very few people, except probably from blacks and Hispanics, and they're apparently not yelling about it all that loudly either.
Nobody really wants it, but here's a white guy beating his breast and saying, this is no good.
And he said, this is prejudice.
This is discrimination.
And not even your favorite Puerto Rican, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, not even she said the test has got to go.
She said something in some respects even goofier.
Yes.
She says, well, all the schools should be just as good as Stuyvesant.
Well, what makes Stuyvesant such a good school, do you reckon?
Well, I think we went over those numbers.
It's a good school because it's got really smart, hard-working people in it.
Correct.
But, oh, no, she wants them all to be just as good, just as good as Stuyvesant.
Well, you're going to have to invent those people, get them from somewhere.
But, you know, to me...
The really fascinating question here is, all of these even Democrats, Republicans and Democrats alike, apparently don't want to talk about this.
They say, oh, you know, there are two ways of looking at this, you know, some people like the test, some people think it's meritorious.
My question is, is there some sort of sneaking recognition that there are racial differences?
Incapacity?
Yes.
Do you think they recognize that?
I think that it's obvious that they do.
Go back and read the great American novel.
called A Bonfire at the Vanities.
Wait, but wait, these Democrats don't read that.
They don't read that, but you are seeped in this culture where race is around you constantly.
Well, I know.
But if, you know, I've had this debate over and over with a friend of mine.
He shall remain nameless for the time being.
He is convinced that anybody with the IQ of maybe a fried egg has got to realize that there are racial differences in ability.
I mean, everybody from everywhere, all the people who run the country, I just can't believe that's true.
If they really did recognize that, we would have different policies.
We wouldn't have things like No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind was based on the utterly absurd idea That blacks, if they're taught right, can perform at the same level as whites and Asians.
And it was passed overwhelmingly.
It depended on that delusion.
Furthermore, if American legislators and Supreme Court justices and journalists and everybody else, everybody with an IQ over, say, let's say 75, recognized the racial differences in IQ, our immigration policy would be different.
It would be.
It would not be different necessarily based on race.
We'd be saying things like, oh, carrying capacity and pollution and global warming and we can't have more people.
I am convinced that most people believe this egalitarian baloney.
But you don't believe it.
We'll give you one anecdote from Chicago Public Schools.
I think it was 2012-2013.
They had decided to tie teacher bonuses, teacher salaries, teacher promotions to the academic performance of the students.
The Chicago Public School System is, I want to say last time I saw the numbers, I think it's 98% black or Hispanic.
There are a handful of white.
There's almost no Asians.
And the teachers rebelled because they realized, hey, unless we do what Atlanta Public School System did and just cheat, We're not going to get any raises.
We're not going to get any bonuses.
But all that recognizes, I mean, that is not necessarily a recognition of the racial facts.
It's simply a recognition that they can't improve scores, period.
Probably black, white, or Asian.
If they are stuck with the raw material that comes in the door.
That is not a recognition of racial differences.
That is a recognition of the fact that teachers can do only so much.
No, egalitarianism is a religion.
We've talked about it.
It is one that you and I are, of course, heretics of.
Again, why would you even think that, oh, Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi, those people really don't believe?
Do they really realize that blacks have an average IQ of 85 for genetic reason?
Do they understand that?
No.
I don't think for a moment they do.
I don't see any evidence, so I would agree with your position.
But anyway, this is a bit of a diversion, because we were on our way, were we not?
We were on our way to Anchorage, Alaska!
So let's see if I can have some fun with a... I guess we're talking Italian heavy here, so...
Bouskaglia.
Yes, probably Bouskaya or Bouskaglia.
Bouskaglia.
Yes.
So he's the executive director of the... No, no, no, no.
No, I'm sorry.
Oh, no, I beg your pardon.
I interrupted you.
I beg your pardon.
You're quite right.
Yes, he's the executive... It's a woman.
It's a woman.
She is the executive director of the Alaska Human Rights Commission.
Now, her official business card, it shows the authority vested in her by the state of Alaska on a truck belonging to Britain... Again.
Probably Linegar.
Linegar, who owns a small plumbing firm that had a contract to do some repairs in the building.
So they took a photo of the back of the truck and the decal and posted it on Facebook with a provocative comment meant to shame the truck owner.
Quote, in what world is this OK?
End quote.
And of course, tell us about the decal.
Well, forgive me for... The decal showed what was clearly an AR, and it said, Black Guns Matter.
That's right.
Black Guns Matter.
Well, she couldn't stand the idea of somebody with a decal saying Black Guns Matter in a government parking lot.
Yes.
And so she put her, she's the head of the Human Rights Commission and also didn't she leave the business card of some official in the police department?
Correct.
And so clearly they're saying, and she just left a note saying, please do not park this truck with that offensive sticker in this parking lot.
Yeah, and of course, her concern was the connotation of the statement to the Black Lives Matter movement.
And we know some of you were offended by the post, so we removed it, of course, because there was such a backlash to this Facebook post.
This is one of the things that these leftists who, again, why would you post anything like this on Facebook to begin with?
They truly believe that they have that authority to shame any individual Well, that's right.
She claimed, and she may very well be right, that she wasn't opposed to gun rights.
What this Marty Buscaia is worried about is the idea of somebody saying black anything matters, so long as it's not black lives, black people, black anything.
Black labs, remember that?
Black labs matter.
Labrador lovers can't do that either.
Here's what she told the Associated Press.
Quote, I think the line between being protected by the First Amendment and hate speech is very fine.
And frankly, I wasn't sure which one this was.
This is hate speech?
Well, of course, the absurd thing is, the line between protected by the First Amendment and hate speech?
She's suggesting whatever hate speech is, is not protected by the First Amendment.
That's dope.
Of course, it is.
It is.
Was it 2017 or 2018 that the Supreme Court, I believe, unanimously said there is no such thing as hate speech?
Well, you got me on that.
I don't remember that happening.
There's no such thing as hate speech?
Well, if... Well, hate speech is protected by the First Amendment.
Of course.
I'm sorry.
Yeah.
Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment.
That was the ruling.
And her note also said, Again, I can almost see this cat lady or wine aunt, whatever you want to call her, doing this, Mr. Taylor, said, quote, please do not park this truck with that offensive sticker in this parking lot.
Yeah, see, the very idea, these people are absorbed in this utterly unreal little world of their own in which they think an AR and black guns matter is some ferocious insult that may be so hateful that's maybe not even protected by the First Amendment.
This is just astonishing.
And this lady is the Executive Director of the Alaska Human Rights Commission.
But, as you point out, there was a huge backlash when the owner of the truck, the owner of the truck didn't take it down, take this lion down.
He took her card, her message mail, saying, get the heck out of my parking lot.
And she had the skyfall on her.
This is a good news story.
It is a good news story.
Because again, the purpose of the First Amendment is to protect the public from people Like Marty Bouskaglia.
Right.
Those who appoint themselves philosopher kings to sit on high and decree which political speech is protected and which must be removed from the public square and from government-owned parking lots.
The governor of Alaska is actually calling for an investigation into Marty.
Yes, let's hope she gets her walking papers.
But I'm not absolutely counting on it.
And you know, this may say something about Alaska.
This may say something about gun owners.
In any case, it's very good to see one of these people being slapped down.
But she's being slapped down for such a good reason.
I guess if the guy was a dog owner and it had said, Black Labs Matter, that would have set her off in exactly the same way.
It's incredible to think, Mr. Taylor, that we have a worldwide audience that we're speaking to, and in so many countries, freedom of speech doesn't exist.
It doesn't exist in this one!
Well, it really doesn't, but in some cases... I mean, we're still able to have this conversation, but again, it's so few people exercise it, and this is, like you said, it is a feel-good story.
Well, moving back down to the lower 40, no, the lower 48, I beg your pardon, and this is a New York Times article that you called to my attention, and rightly so.
It was about a book called, by Eric Kaufman, called White Shift, Populism, Immigration, and the Future of White Majorities.
It's quite a good book.
I've not read it, but I'll certainly take your word for it.
And he's done some very interesting research, and some of the highlights are conveyed in this New York Times article.
And one has to do with what's titled as, Feelings About Race.
And it's broken out between different political groups and blacks and whites, and what blacks think about their race, and what blacks think about whites.
Now, black Clinton voters, and it's on a scale of 0 to 100, and the higher the number, the better you think of your own race.
And when you say black Clinton voters, we're talking about the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton.
Exactly.
Black voters for Hillary Clinton.
And as far as blacks are concerned, they're 85% positive.
They like themselves.
But whites?
Only 59%.
They like black people considerably better, 85 to 59, than white people.
Now, let's take a look at white Clinton voters.
These are the people who voted for that lady.
They are 80% positive on blacks and only 70% positive on themselves.
The blacks who voted for Clinton, they love themselves.
They're very dim on whites.
But for the whites who voted for Clinton, they are very high on blacks and pretty dim on themselves.
Yes, they are.
This is extraordinary.
Self-hating, self-loathing.
This is extraordinary.
Now when it comes to white Trump voters, they are 80% in favor of whites.
I mean, they're not in favor of themselves as black Clinton voters are.
It's 80 to 80 to 85.
Blacks get an 85% score among blacks who voted for Clinton.
But at least whites get 80 and blacks get 69.
The people who vote for Trump and they're white are actually prepared to have a more favorable opinion of their own race than of blacks.
Extraordinary!
Bigots!
White supremacists!
Lock them up!
But here, white Clinton supporters, no.
80% favorable view of blacks, only 70% for whites.
That's very interesting.
Now, something else I thought was very interesting that this guy tracked was Whether or not you disagree with the following statement, Irish, Italians, Jewish, and many other minorities overcame their prejudice and worked their way up.
Blacks should do the same without special favors.
Now, over the years, the number of people who will disagree with that and say, no, no, no, no, no, blacks are different, they deserve special favors, it's moved quite a lot.
Back in the 1990s, even white liberals mostly, you know, said, yeah, they got to work their way up.
Twenty, twenty-five percent said no, no, they need a special hand up.
Over the last few years, that has risen to forty-six percent.
Forty-six percent of white liberals say no, no, blacks need a special leg up.
That's even higher.
higher than the number of blacks who say that. Now compare, now this data is
incredible. This question goes back to 1994 during the presidency of Bill
Clinton when blacks they said no no no no no that's not true at all to the tune
of 40 about looks like about 43 percent. That's right 43 percent of blacks wanted
handouts. Exactly now it's down to 32 percent of blacks who say that no no no
it's special favors we're all...
Only 32% say that, so it's dropped about 11%.
But as you noted, for white liberals, it's gone from 20% disagreeing with that, saying that blacks, you know, Don't need handouts.
Exactly.
Don't need special favors.
So like you said, a whopping 46%, nearly one of every two white liberals queried on that question has the opinion that we're not doing enough for blacks.
Exactly.
And they're the same folks, no doubt, who have a higher opinion of blacks than of whites.
Exactly.
Now, again, this data, it goes from 1994 to 2016 for white conservative moderates.
It was about, it looks like about 8% of white conservatives said, yeah, maybe we
should do some more special favors for blacks back in 1994.
And that number's gone up, probably in the margin of error, to only about 9%.
That's right.
So it hasn't moved at all.
It hasn't moved.
90% or maybe 90% or more of white moderates and conservatives say, no, they can work their way up.
We've done enough for blacks.
No handouts.
No handouts.
But no, this leap of, as you point out, from 20% of white liberals saying they need handouts to now 46% of white liberals saying they need handouts.
This demonstrates how we were once able to have a conversation with white liberals with white leftists in this country on these important issues for the future of our country.
No, for the present And the past of our country, because as whites have become more and more, as white liberals have become more and more dedicated to this idea of improving the lives of blacks, they basically said, well, let's look at every instance in American history that's stopping blacks from achieving.
Think about all of the ink that's been spilt, Mr. Taylor, on this idea that somehow redlining in the 1940s has impacted blacks' ability to secure and grow wealth.
It's a cottage industry now.
I mean, Tiny Easy Coats has basically made himself a MacArthur.
He got a MacArthur grant writing about this.
Well, that's right.
And the more people say that blacks need handouts, that puts the wind into the sails of this reparations movement.
Correct.
And that is back big time.
All of these presidential candidates are saying, yes, we need to look into it.
Line up, black folks.
You know, 40 acres and a mule.
Now's your chance.
We'll see what comes of that.
Now, there are similar moves on the whole question of attitudes towards immigration.
This is quite astonishing, too.
White Democrats.
Back in the Clinton years.
And, you know, Clinton had some sensible things to say about immigration back in 1994.
He was a far better president on immigration than George W. Bush was.
I'll say.
I'll say.
He sounded like Trump, or even more so.
You know, we've got to keep these folks out.
In any case, Back in the Clinton years, not even 10% of white Democrats wanted more immigration.
Now it has shot up to 56% want more immigration.
56%!
Almost six times.
It's shocking.
That's right.
Whereas white Republicans, you know, once again, there's pretty much no change.
We have a little bouncing around, but for some reason in the Bush years it went above 10%, but mostly it's been under 10%.
White Republicans, in other words, 90% of white Republicans don't want any more immigrants.
90% of Republicans say no special handouts for blacks.
White Republicans are really a consistent lot.
Yes, they are.
But these liberals could grief from 10% and at one point during the Clinton years in 1996, not even 5%.
Of white Democrats who wanted more immigration.
Well, Mr. Taylor, white Republican voters are a consistent lot who are consistently sold out by the white individuals they elect.
Exactly.
Who then help create this idea that there is a backlash, which is, I would argue, one of the reasons why we see white Democrats who have abandoned reason and logic and the ability to actually debate without immediately going into this, hey, that's racist.
You are a bigot.
You're prejudiced.
We can't have a conversation if you're going to use that line of logic because I can't agree with a white supremacist.
Well, yes, it has become clearly a religion.
What surprises me, though, is the way the approval of black Democrats for more immigration.
You know, back in the Clinton years, it was under 10%.
Now, 32% of black Democrats say they want more immigration.
What in heaven's name for?
This is why I never understood the appeals that white conservatives have made or anyone on the dissident right has ever made that says, hey, we've got to try and find a way to get blacks on the bandwagon of immigrant restriction.
They don't care.
They don't see it as that.
But you know...
It should not be all that difficult.
I agree.
Why on earth do they need more Mexicans?
Why do they need more Guatemalans?
They're all competing for the same jobs.
I don't disagree.
I don't disagree.
Why blacks have been flimflammed and bamboozled and browbeaten into thinking that we need more immigrants?
This to me, I mean, blacks aren't stupid.
Come on.
They should know what their own interests are.
Ordinarily, they vote their own interests with unerring precision.
But not when it comes to this.
Anyway, the whole question of diversity.
And this is, to me, a somewhat dispiriting chart here.
This was the percentage of 2018 voters who said increasing diversity made the United States better, worse, or made no difference.
Now, white Clinton voters, they say 83% of white Clinton voters think diversity makes the country better.
83%!
That's a pretty spooky number.
Only 5% said they made it worse.
Now, you go all the way down to white Trump voters, and you get Asian voters, black voters, Hispanic voters.
You know, the majorities, except for Hispanics, interestingly enough, When you talk about Asians and blacks, they say diversity makes the country better.
Only 46% of Hispanics say that, intriguingly.
But you're fine to make it down to the white Trump voter here.
And, alas, only 35% of white Trump voters say diversity makes the country worse.
Only 35%?
And 35%, an equal number, say it makes it better.
This is very surprising to me.
And 30% say it makes no difference.
So you've got 35% saying it's better.
30% says diversity?
Yeah, it makes no difference.
I could be the only white man for miles around.
Who cares?
We have the Constitution.
What does it matter?
There you go.
We still got the Constitution.
Boy, yeah.
Keep it up.
Now, here, this is the final chart, and I hope we're not boring our listeners with these numbers, but, you know, you really ought to go to the New York Times if you can, and it's a piece called, Americans are divided by their views on race, not race itself, which sounds like baloney to me.
Their views on race.
This is whistling past the graveyard here, but this Kaufman guy, He says, good news!
They're not divided by race, they're divided by their attitudes on race.
Well, what's the difference?
But, here, now the percentage who agree that it's racist for a white person to want less immigration so as to help maintain the white share of the population.
In other words, if you want to maintain the white share, is that racist?
Oh boy, with white Clinton voters with a postgraduate degree, 91% that's racist.
So you and I, you and I are just stone cold racists, Mr. Kersey.
Now all white Clinton voters, you know, that'd be 73% that you and I are racist.
Minority.
See, then, this is interesting.
Non-white Clinton voters are more understanding of you and me than white voters.
They're far more reasonable.
You can actually have conversations.
Exactly.
Exactly.
These are, what, 58% say that we'd be racist, but 42% no.
42% of all minority voters who voted for Clinton say, well, you know, whites, of course, why should they want to become a minority?
And when it comes to all minority voters, Whether they voted for Clinton or not, a majority say that it's okay for whites to want to maintain their share of the population.
It's okay to be white, is what they're saying.
Exactly.
Very good.
They say it's okay to be white.
Which, of course, as you say, again, these numbers are shocking.
91% of white Clinton voters with a post-grad degree say it's racist.
Exactly. 91%.
They are more down on white racial consciousness than all the minority voters.
And all the white Clinton voters, they are more down on any kind of sense of white legitimacy than minority voters.
Now, interestingly enough, here's white Trump voters, but they say no degree.
I assume they're talking about no college degree.
95% of them say, well, of course it's okay for us to want to remain a majority.
Now, I'd be very interested to know, white Trump voters with a post-grad degree.
That's actually in the book.
I do recall, I've got it actually postmarked to actually get the data.
So, I'll have that answered for you.
I do encourage our listeners to have an open mind and check out this book.
This author, this academic Kaufman, he's, I'm not going to say he's sympathetic, but I think he understands what's happening.
And he understands there is going to be a pushback to these radically shifting demographics in historically white lands.
Well, it's about time somebody noticed the obvious, isn't it?
But anyway, we have two very interesting questions.
We may have time only to get to one.
One has to do with this fellow named Andrew Yang.
Were you going to introduce this question here?
Yeah, I'd love to bring it up.
It was entitled, The Yang Gang.
What do the hosts make of Candidate Yang's tweet, which explicitly calls out the decline of white American birth rates and life expectancy due to substance abuse out of All the no-democratic presidential primary candidates, I do think these two issues, along with the UBI policy, that's universal basic income policy, to offset the existential work crisis looming due to increased automation, make Mr. Andrew Yang an extremely interesting candidate to follow from an American white nationalist perspective.
The question is, do you feel that expressing support for Mr. Yang's 2020 run could serve to benefit our movement?
Well, this guy is Andrew Yang.
He's a Chinese businessman.
He's an absolute newcomer to politics.
And he does favor immigration control.
I think that's just fine.
I would support that.
And he's very much against identity politics.
I think that is the only position that anyone who's a real American civic nationalist can take.
Otherwise, they're saying it's okay for everybody but white people.
That's what it boils down to.
Correct.
Also, he wants to fight tech censorship.
I'm all for that, too.
He's said a lot of great things about tech censorship.
Yes, yes.
He's very angry that all of these self-anointed censors can tell us what to say and therefore tell us what to think.
And he's the only candidate I've ever heard of who is talking about this decline in the life expectancy of whites.
So, I can understand for all those reasons why people find him an attractive candidate.
On the other hand, this universal basic income stuff, I don't believe in handouts.
And I have heard that some people say, well, the country is going to the dogs anyway.
Why don't we at least get a check while the country goes to the dogs?
I think that's a rather negative point of view.
What is interesting to me is that it takes a Chinese guy to worry about Tech censorship and the declining life expectancies of whites.
I mean, if a white person talks about that, of course, then you're a white supremacist, probably.
Exactly.
He has been called out for even bringing that up.
I mean, this is stuff that Donald Trump hasn't even said, where he's talked about what's happening to the white working class, when he's talked about the white death, when he's brought up what automation is going to do to the white working class, these jobs that Could completely demolish industries that right now the people of Midwestern states are relying upon these jobs.
And one of the fascinating things, Mr. Taylor, about Andrew Yang that I believe is what a lot of people are captivated by is the fact that he does have this civic nationalist mindset.
He tweeted out something very interesting.
He simply said, quote, somehow the American people Have become underdogs in our own land.
That is messed up.
Let's fix it.
Yes, let's fix it.
And he's taken all sorts of heat for that.
Yes, he's from blue checkmarks from the leftists because this is something they don't care about and that conforms with the information we just talked about.
White liberals will not take their own side.
And again, they feel that their primary duty is to help aggrieved blacks achieve and overcome this intrinsic racism that is prevalent all throughout society.
And our duty is to wind up.
Now, you're not going to be here for the next two weeks because you're getting ready to head to Sweden, but we'll talk about that when you get back.
So, for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection