All Episodes
Previous Next
March 28, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
59:38
A Blackwash of Justice
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I am your host, Henry Wolfe, standing in for Jared Taylor, who is off on another European escapade, this time to Scandinavia.
And I am here, as always, with our trusty co-host, the perspicacious Paul Kersey.
Paul, how are you?
Calling in from Denver, having a great time, having a great spring.
I hope all of our listeners around the world are also enjoying This beautiful spring weather.
Well, in Virginia here it is 66 degrees and sunny outside.
It's really quite glorious.
We have a really difficult show.
today because it's going to be tough to find words to describe some of this stuff.
There are some things that just can't be captured in words.
I think it was Martin Heidegger who said, you know, words are the essence of being.
But it's just not true.
I mean, there's some things that words cannot capture.
And really, the events of this week, I think, are beyond words, but we will do our best to approximate.
What you just said, Mr. Wolf, we're trying to articulate the absurdity because all of these stories, they'll seem as if they have nothing in common, but they're all coalescing into what is going to be the most profoundly entertaining and though the Republicans don't want it to be
racial election in the history of the United States in 2020.
And the first story we're gonna talk about is of course the decision by the prosecutors in Chicago
to drop all charges when it comes to our friend Yeah, Cook County prosecutors, or Crook County prosecutors, as I've heard them referred to, decided this week that they were going to hold on to the $10,000 bond that Smollett had posted, and they were going to let his community service time served be adequate recompense for the massive hoax that he perpetrated.
Where did he do that?
Community service, by the way?
What, non-profit?
This is just one of the things.
I mean, he did it for Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Push Coalition on Saturday and Monday.
He showed up and worked in their little store for a little bit and gave some people some advice on film business.
This was considered a great service to the community such that it made up for the fact that he sent the entire world on an international frenzy looking for white Trump haters who had, you know, quasi lynched him and screamed, this is MAGA country.
At 2 a.m.
In not just freezing cold Chicago.
Sub-zero Chicago.
Sub-zero Chicago with another 20 degree wind chill.
This has been one of the amazing racial hoax stories of 2019.
There's been a number of them.
There's a gentleman on Twitter, Andy Neo.
Andy Neo.
Andy, you know, who's done an admirable job of trying to bring back all these stories.
I mean, just today, it was announced that the Hispanic illegal immigrant, and somewhere in Northern Virginia, he kidnapped a Muslim girl and raped her and murdered her, and he just got jailed for life.
And initially, that story was presented as if it were MAGA people, a white person, a Trump supporter.
And it was positioned that way.
And I had forgotten about that, but he brought that back up.
And a number of other people did on Twitter.
These type of stories, they happen so frequently.
And what makes the story that Henry and I are talking about, and again, we don't need to go into the details.
All of our wonderful listeners know what Smollett tried to do to smear all, not just Trump supporters, but this was an anti-white hate hoax.
It definitely was an anti-white hate hoax.
And it'll go down, I think, I mean it's always hard to tell when you're in media rest, but I think it'll go down next to Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, as one of those moments that woke a lot of people up.
I was just at the AIM conference a couple weeks ago, two weeks ago I think, and several people there were saying how it was Trayvon Martin that case that was responsible for getting them to realize
the predicament of our people.
And I think that the Smollett case, and especially this result of it, I mean, from the perspective
of waking white people up to the system that we face, to the anti-white nature of our system
and how crimes, effective crimes, which should be crimes against white people, because this
was a smear, this was defamation against white America, against Trump supporters.
And that is allowed to slide.
These should be positioned as a hate crime, a hate crime hoax.
A number of very intelligent people have started to state we need to start treating these what end up being hate crime hoaxes as legitimate hate crimes because what are they doing?
How did the media take this?
How have You know, you have to wonder.
Black-on-white crime is so frequent in this country, and of course, we try and find the man-bites-dog story of the few white-on-black crimes.
But you have to wonder, were there any attacks on whites that were motivated by this Jussie Smollett story, which broke at the end of January, right?
I believe it was the end of January.
at best make local news.
Yes.
And then, you know, hopefully someone sends them to us at Ameren and we can post them and get them circulated around.
But apart from that, you know, we're not going to hear about those kinds of attacks.
What you just said about people being motivated to learn the truth about what's really going on, what happened in 2012 with Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman down in Florida, obviously Michael Brown, Darren Wilson, and Ferguson back in 2014, August of 2014.
You know, those of us, our listeners and those who read American Renaissance, Henry and myself, we're immersed in this world.
We read all the stories, all the sad, morose stories that are out there that are published daily on Amran, the fantastic pieces by Hood.
We read all this stuff.
We swim in this stuff.
Most people have lives out there.
They only see bits and pieces of information.
They don't have time to really sit back and think about what this all means.
But when a story of the magnitude of the ones you've mentioned, Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and now Jussie Smollett, this is so in your face and it's so obvious that, I mean, even someone like Rahm Emanuel, the mayor of Chicago, came out and said it was a whitewash of justice.
Well, we should, I guess we should go into some of the details for, I'm sure most of our listeners are familiar, but basically the prosecutors this week decided to drop the charges against him, against Smollett.
Smollett comes out of this emergency proceeding, which was under the auspices of a black circuit judge by the name of Stephen Watkins.
He comes out and does a press conference because his side alerted the press that this emergency thing was going to take place.
They wouldn't have even known otherwise, so his side obviously knew what was going to go on.
And he comes out and acts like they totally exonerated him, when in fact they just dropped the charges.
Correct.
And the prosecutor who had the case Um, had to come out and say, I want to make it very clear that, you know, the case was strong.
The evidence was strong.
There was nothing wrong with the, uh, police work.
There was nothing wrong with the evidence.
It was strong.
We just decided to drop it.
And the excuse he came up with, the guy's name is, uh, uh, he's the first assistant state's attorney.
His name is Joseph Maggots.
He came out and said that the reason they dropped it was because they have to focus on violent crime.
That they don't care about these victimless crimes, which is the most absurd thing I've ever heard because, of course, Chicago police devoted an incredible amount of detective resources, investigative resources, to this case because it was such an international scandal.
Oh yeah.
What, a dozen, two dozen, I think, detectives on the case who spent untold amount of man hours getting to the bottom of this hoax.
And they could have been used to solve, I mean, Chicago has a notoriously low clearance rate for their homicides.
In 2017, homicides in Chicago had a clearance rate of 12%.
It's one of the lowest in the country.
Yeah, and so can Chicago afford to have two dozen people off the job?
And now by establishing this as a precedent, they've said, look, if you commit this kind of a hoax, you will become a celebrity.
I mean, I'd never heard of Smollett before.
Most white people hadn't heard of Smollett, but now everyone knows him.
I barely knew about the show he was on, Empire, because Matt Drudge is always talking about how much ratings are great, and it's supposed to be this wonderful show on Fox that glamorizes the life of rap executives.
And I believe he plays the son of one of the characters, and they've basically written him off.
And we'll get into more of this, but think about his position as a black homosexual.
I believe he's actually Jewish as well.
Yeah.
So his position as a black homosexual who was attacked by purportedly two Trump supporters and this hate crime hoax, a noose placed around his neck, we forget that this was utilized by Cory Booker and Kamala Harris as justification for passing the lynching.
Some lynching legislation that they were pushing.
The federal lynching law that they pushed.
They tweeted out about this and it's amazing how many photos we've seen now that they knew this guy.
I mean this guy was in the White House with Michelle Obama.
There's these photos of them laughing together.
We'll get into more of these details but this is one of those moments where you have to look at all of the facets and all the players.
One of the individuals who is the the state's attorney of Chicago, Kim Fox.
She is an adherent of George Soros.
Remember back in- She got, I believe, $400,000 in donations
during her campaign from a Soros-funded nonprofit.
Soros was pushing to bring a lot of, to take over a lot of the DA's offices in the major cities.
They've taken over the Boston DA.
They've got their hands all over the Baltimore.
Of course, no one really cares about Baltimore anymore, but we all love Marilyn Mosby, who was the DA, the state's attorney during the riots.
And of course, now we have this Kim Foxx, who initially, we thought that she had recused herself.
Well, that's right.
And that's a very interesting thing.
The reason why that Joseph Magitsky, the first assistant to the state's attorney, was on the case was because the state's attorney, Kim Foxx, this black lady who was put into office by Soros effectively, she recused herself from the case.
And she recused herself because none other than Michelle Obama's Chief of Staff or former Chief of Staff had reached out to her on behalf of Smollett's family.
Correct.
And had said the family has some concerns about this case.
I guess they were upset that there were some leaks happening from within the police department once things started turning against Smollett and people started figuring out what was actually going on.
They wanted the case transferred to the FBI.
Correct.
I guess because the FBI would have better kept a lid on things.
And so, because there was this, you know, backroom dealing, there were text messages that are now public, and I think phone calls...
Kim Fox claimed, and it was reported, that she had recused herself from the case because of conflicts in the case.
What came out, I believe, today, that she did not.
She never formally recused.
She did not formally recuse herself.
She said that that was just a colloquial expression, but in the legal sense, she did not recuse herself because people were wondering why there wasn't a special prosecutor assigned to the case.
But instead, it was her first assistant who was on the case.
And so it was still under the auspices of her office, her direction, and they colloquially recused themselves.
I wonder if Jeff Sessions had colloquially recused himself from the Mueller investigation if he would still have a job.
Well, some of the stories we're going to talk about later, we sure do miss Jeff Sessions as part of the Trump administration.
You know, it's fascinating.
Kim Foxx is one of these people of color, district attorneys, state attorneys, who Look at Michelle Alexander's book The New Jim Crow as their Bible.
She's basically come into office and she said we've got to find a way to get a lot of these non-violent offenders, these people of color.
There's too many non-whites in jail.
We've got to be softer on them.
And it's been fascinating to watch this because If memory serves correct, Smollett was facing a number of years in jail on a very large fine.
He had 16... In Chicago, filing a police report falsely is classified as disorderly conduct.
It was felony level disorderly conduct.
He was facing, yeah, over a decade.
He had 16 indictments.
Because I remember this story... The grand jury indictment.
That's right.
The way that all this happened, you have to go back and think about... Smollett was out of the news for a while.
And then it just broke Tuesday, was it Tuesday afternoon?
Yeah.
I believe Tuesday of this week, all of a sudden, what the heck?
Yeah.
What the heck?
And I was thinking about the moment when I was, I think I might have been in middle school when the OJ Simpson verdict came down and the reactions people had.
Now I went, the middle school that I went to where I grew up, it was basically all white, so there weren't that many Blacks cheering as we found out in video evidence that was happening all across the country.
You know, CNN, back in the 1990s, CNN was still doing news and there are these historical images of blacks just cheering when OJ Simpson was exonerated.
We're seeing the same thing with what's going with Jussie.
Well, what's very interesting is that there was a press conference held by, or it was at a press
conference held by Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson and Mayor Rahm Emanuel were there.
And they were mad.
Oh yes.
To put it lightly.
I mean, they were fuming is how the Chicago Tribune described it.
Rahm Emanuel said this was a whitewash of justice, which of course it was actually a
blackwash of justice.
Yes, it was drenched in blackness.
Yes, but he said there shouldn't be one standard for him and one for other people.
And he tried to blame it, of course, on power and wealth, that that's why Smollett got off.
And a lot of people, that was a lot of people's take.
But Ann Coulter and others pointed out correctly that, no, it was strictly because of race.
And, you know, you look at someone like Martha Stewart, who got a stock tip and lied about it and did hard time.
Okay, so... How many days?
She's a lot wealthier.
I think she did six months.
She's a lot bigger name.
Everyone of all races knew who Martha Stewart was.
And she had a lot more money than Smollett.
But guess what?
She did hard time.
She had no white privilege at that point.
What happened to the white privilege?
Yeah, you think she wasn't... didn't have political connections?
Give me a break.
Okay?
The fact is this was a... this was race.
And it's not just Smollett's race, it's race really across the board.
People talked about how there should be colorblind justice and this is the death of colorblind justice.
This is!
Not colorblind justice, this is black justice.
This is African justice, as you said as we were planning this podcast.
This is African justice.
You've got a black judge, you've got a black state's attorney, you've got Michelle Obama's, I believe it's her black chief of staff, who is reaching out and doing the corrupt Backroom dealings.
You've got the two Nigerian-American supposed brothers who did the attack are black.
Everyone is black, up and down.
Black, black, blackity black.
That's right.
And so this is just the way that justice is going to be conducted in any parts of America where they are running the justice system.
Well, look at it this way.
Think about something as simple as jury nullification.
When you have a black defendant in a city like Baltimore, where jury nullification happens, and you have an all-black jury, even though the evidence shows, hey, this guy is being charged with committing homicide, but you know what?
Jury nullification.
They're not going to say that, hey, he's guilty, and it's just because of that racial That racial cohesion.
There was a story in the New York Times the other day about how black women don't want to throw black men under the bus when it comes to sexual assaults.
Right.
And it's out of that racial loyalty to not make the race look bad.
Right.
And we're seeing, you know, as more and more of America is ceded over these wonderful cities, these beautiful cities, Chicago, Baltimore, Memphis, New Orleans, as they fall under the control of black elected officials in both the executive, the judicial, and God, as the state, as the states fall under legislative control of blacks.
This is what we're going to start seeing as America becomes more openly a banana republic.
And there are a few stories I can think of that are more demonstrative of where we're headed.
Well, there was a great article that we posted on Amarin.
I think it was in the Baltimore Sun.
It was a long, long article about how Baltimore got to where it is.
And they went through just the revolving door at the top of the police department there because there was just so much corruption.
Exactly.
Left, right, center, everywhere.
They just couldn't get a black person in charge who wasn't corrupt.
Well, the guy they had, they had a white guy who was there that ended up being fired.
Right.
Exactly.
But he actually brought law and order to the city.
Correct.
And then now they want to bring him back.
But that's very typical.
But to his credit, back in Chicago, the black police superintendent, Eddie Johnson, he at least said, you know, justice was not served in the Smollett case.
But he said very weakly, he said, you know, he still owes the city an apology.
Like, what is that?
What does that do for you?
To his credit, Rahm Emanuel wants Smollett to repay everything.
Yes.
He says that the city is still tabulating its bills, but once it has a total number, they're going to send Smollett and his lawyer a bill.
Well, they'll appeal it, of course.
Now, I don't know what grounds they have to actually compel them to pay it, but they are at least going to submit this invoice.
And in response to the news that Rahm Emanuel had said this, Smollett's attorneys fired back and said that it is in fact the mayor and police chief who owe Jussie an apology for dragging an innocent man's character through the mud.
Jussie has paid enough.
I mean, it is just so brazen.
Just in case our listeners aren't familiar, the evidence against Jussie was overwhelming, and apparently there's a lot of evidence that the police didn't even present in the media.
They were planning on presenting it at trial, but we'll never know about it because the black judge in the case has ordered the record sealed, Nope.
And the black prosecution in the case has not contested that.
Nope. Not at all.
So we won't know.
But one of the few documents that we do have is the bond proffer that the prosecution wrote,
which is just a narrative account that describes their version of events.
Correct.
And gives you an indication of what kind of evidence they have against Jussie.
It reads like a story Tom Wolfe would have written posthumously.
Well, Tom Wolfe couldn't even imagine this because you read this four page document and it is just so stupid.
Jussie is such a stupid man for having I mean, it's an embarrassment.
It's an embarrassment to the general public that he went about this in such a sloppy way.
We still don't even know what his motivation was either.
And that's what's so strange.
His motivation allegedly is that he wanted more.
He wanted a bigger paycheck.
He was making what?
Six figures per episode?
Yeah, he was making over a million a year.
But yeah, some of the evidence that they presented is they have a text message from Jesse to these Nigerian brothers who ended up attacking him.
You know, saying, might need your help on the low.
You around to meet up and talk face to face?
They have, you know, of course, the $3,500 check that Jesse wrote to the brothers, which the brothers cashed the day of the attack.
Smart move on their part.
It was backdated, by the way.
They have phone calls of Jesse to the brothers in the hours leading up to the attack.
They have the brothers hanging out at the exact place of the attack, and they lurked there for like four minutes at something like 2 a.m.
in Chicago, as we said, in extremely cold temperatures.
They have, on apparently before the attack, a couple days before the attack, they have Jussie picking up the brothers from their neighborhood and driving them to the place of the attack so they can case it.
And Jussie pointing out, you know, which cameras they were hoping to get the attack caught on and so on.
I mean, the evidence was just overwhelming.
And so it's insulting that he planned the case so sloppily.
And then now the fact that his lawyers are coming out and saying, no, Rahm Emanuel, Eddie Johnson, the police, everyone owes Jussie an apology because he's innocent.
And even the first assistant state prosecutor, the maggots guy, he had to come back out and say, I want to make it very clear.
I know what Jesse's people have been saying.
I want to make it very clear that this does not mean we exonerated him.
And they had to say that.
Yes.
But they also claimed that this is very typical for how a non-violent first offender is treated.
They said it's a typical thing.
As though he's just like someone who, you know, what, like, wrote a bad check.
I mean, is that what we're calling what he did here?
This international scandal that wasted millions of police resources in all likelihood?
Give me a break.
You forgot to scan the milk at the self-checkout at the grocery store.
Yeah.
That's all you did.
That's right.
I mean, here we have a story, and if any of our listeners live in Chicago, again, you need to get the heck out of Illinois to begin with, because that state is in a lot of fiscal trouble, the way things are headed.
It's one of those states that has more people are leaving than are actually coming in.
So, you have to start thinking in terms of where things are headed and where you want to live, and I just got to tell you guys, Chicago is not a place that would be reciting.
No, it's not.
But just to round off this story, we did have a Trump tweet this morning.
There's a Trump tweet for everything.
Yeah.
He said, the FBI and DOJ to review the outrageous Jussie Smollett case in Chicago.
It is an embarrassment to our nation.
I'm still waiting on that executive order on birthright citizenship.
I know.
As we're going to say later, you know, Trump tweeted out at Mexico, you know, you're all talking no action on the border.
It's like, give me a break.
Here's more all talk and no action from Trump.
He should do what we talked about.
He should push for what we talked about, I should say, a couple of weeks ago on this show, which is he should push for fake hate crimes to be a federal offense.
Yep.
Equivalent to committing an actual hate crime.
I think that makes too much sense.
It would be, if it actually succeeded, if they actually got it passed, it would be a tremendous victory.
It would be a tremendous, it would People never see when it actually winds up to be a hoax.
They're celebrating.
that are meant to smear Trump supporters so it would benefit him politically
because these attacks are reported in the media and people never see the
retractions people never see when it actually winds up to be a hoax.
They're celebrating. They actually think that Trump supporters are going around ripping
hijabs off of women and screaming about Trump and stuff.
And writing racial epithets on black churches. It's just in purely self-interest
for his re-election campaign.
He should be passing this legislation because that would stop these types of reports from happening.
But even if it didn't get passed, it would start an excellent conversation about fake hate crimes in the era of Trump.
Which, you know, we have a map on our website, if you go on our right sidebar, that documents over a hundred of these.
And it's just incredible the amount of anti-Trump animus that has been whipped up on account of these fake attacks.
And I don't think that Trump is going to do anything.
And it's not just anti-Trump, it is what the left perceives Trump being.
An avatar of white supremacy, white nationalism, the white backlash.
One last thing to say about Jesse before we leave.
He was nominated for an NAACP Image Award, Mr. Wolf, and the host is an actor, Anthony Anderson, who plays one of the main characters on ABC's Black-ish, another show that I avoid, like Empire, and he said, quote, about Jussie, Hey, I hope he wins. I'm happy for him that the system
worked for him in his favor because the system isn't always fair
especially for people of color."
End quote.
So the host of the NAACP Image Awards, which is their equivalent of the Oscars or whatever,
thinks that justice was served here.
Exactly.
I mean, despite this overwhelming evidence, I mean, I don't know.
It would be interesting to see polling data on who believes Jesse, among blacks, because I'm sure no whites believe he did it anymore.
It would be very interesting to see, because all these blacks, of course, still believe that, uh, that Michael Brown had his hands up.
Yes they do.
When he was shot.
And they still believe that Trayvon Martin was busy chugging iced tea and Skittles when he was gunned down.
And so they believe all these myths.
I bet they believe that Jussie was actually attacked by white guys.
I think it would be close to 80%.
Even though Jussie's attorneys at this point admit that it was the Nigerians.
I would say close to 80% of blacks, if not higher, would agree with the words that Anthony Anderson said, that a black man finally got a fair day in court, even though this was done in secrecy, not in a courtroom, with everything sealed.
Because you know what?
He is a person of color.
That's the whole reason.
Ladies and gentlemen, with Jussie Smollett, we've seen the future for how blacks will be treated by the legal system when blacks are in charge.
I hope that they do come out with some sort of polling data or something like that that can indicate to white America just the total disconnect between how they see the world and how blacks see the world.
And there's just no, when it comes to cases like this, when it comes to OJ, Trayvon, Michael Brown, just The clear facts established by forensics, established by science, established by Obama's Justice Department, in the case of Michael Brown, are irrelevant compared to what the initial story is that they want to believe.
Whatever the spin is of white racism.
Tribalism.
That's what they're going to go with.
I mean, that's what it really comes down to.
The identity wars are upon us.
That's right.
Well, on the question of tribalism, we have a big story out this week about how certain types of tribalism will not be allowed expression anymore on the globe's largest social media platform, Facebook, and its subsidiary, Instagram.
Correct.
For our listeners who haven't heard yet, it's now a new policy announced Tuesday and going into effect, I believe, next week.
That both white nationalism and white separatism will be banned from the platform.
Not just white nationalists and white separatist groups, but any expressions of these ideologies.
For instance, they say you're not allowed to say, I am a proud white nationalist.
You're not allowed to say, immigration is tearing this country apart.
White separatism is the only answer.
Those things will be banned.
I've got to say, when this story broke, I was thinking, I wonder what's going to happen.
I wonder what pages are going to take down.
Because there are some pretty big pages out there that you would think would be targeted.
Remember back during the campaign when Breitbart was labeled white nationalist.
Donald Trump was labeled white nationalist.
At this point, anything to the right of Ben Shapiro is white nationalist.
Actually, Ben Shapiro today was called alt-right by The Economist.
I did see this story, but they did retract it.
They retracted it, but the fact is that Ben Shapiro didn't have a massive platform from which to yell, and he wasn't such a vociferous opponent of the alt-right.
The label would have stuck and that's what the media has the power to do now.
I mean the media effectively what Facebook is granting is Huffington Post the right to get people, smear people off of Facebook.
All they have to do is say Breitbart is a white nationalist publication.
Boom.
Or they've had someone who has been sympathetic to what is, quote, white.
By the way, I hate these terms.
I despise the term white nationalism, white separatists.
I mean, what the?
Come on.
Is there someone out there who actually said that on Facebook?
Yeah.
Quote, I am a proud white nationalist.
Well, they might say that, but the real Just to give our listeners a little bit of background, Facebook has always had a policy against so-called white supremacy.
Correct.
Okay, and they actually had an explicit policy allowing expressions of white nationalism and white separatism because they said that those were not necessarily associated or motivated by And that was, of course, what they said.
you know, if you thought that white people should just go their own way, that could actually be
motivated by who knows, something other than hatred and bigotry.
And that was of course what they said, quote, content relating to black separatist
movements and the Basque separatist movement, for example, will still be allowed. But prior, it
was still compared to that type of separatist movement. Right.
Right.
White separatism was considered, yes, similar to say Basque separatism in Spain.
This is just another reminder, Mr. Wolf, that the ideas that are being promoted by those who write for American Renaissance, those who write and read and digest the information that is published by VDARE, all of these sites that have been plugging along and just doing great work and, you know, consistency confirms commitment.
These great organizations that continue to Day in and day out, show up and just present the facts logically.
This is all that's happening.
They're being targeted because they've been effective.
Again, Twitter, Facebook, Google.
There's a reason now why it's almost impossible to find on the first page of Google when you type in certain search subjects a link back to amren.com.
Well, I think that that's definitely the angle of some of these so-called civil rights groups who have been lobbying Facebook to change their policy.
And so when it came out that Facebook was distinguishing between white supremacy and white nationalism and all this, All these groups mobilized and went after Facebook and they were just raked over the coals in the media for suggesting that there was such thing as a non-hate motivated white separatism.
Yeah, why try and present those arguments as moral and just?
You can't do that.
Yeah, well or just as not bigoted.
Just as like not purely like frothing at the mouth.
And so what they managed to convince Facebook of According to Facebook's release about this is that there is no meaningful difference between white supremacy and white nationalism and white separatism.
And I'm sure most of our listeners do understand that there's a meaningful difference between them.
But for, you know, maybe some lefties who are listening to this or the uninitiated, There's a very clear difference.
I mean, white supremacy, the definitions are very clear, whether you go on Wikipedia, Webster, wherever you want to look, that white supremacy is the belief that whites are a superior race.
That's the first part.
And that whites should dominate or rule over other people.
That is almost by definition separate from white separatism?
How can you rule or dominate over a people if you're advocating separatism?
If you say whites should be here, blacks should be there, how is it possible that you're talking about supremacy?
And the fact is that nobody, I mean, the science is so clear on this now that there is no superior race That it depends with respect to what you want to talk about.
Like, if you want to say, okay, which race is the most intelligent?
Which race has the highest average IQ?
You'd have to say East Asians.
Okay, so whites don't win there.
If you want to say which race is the tallest, whites would win.
Like, Dutch people specifically would win.
If you want to say, and these are of course averages, if you want to say which race has the highest prevalence of fast-twitch muscle fiber in their legs, you're probably going to get West Africans.
Yes, all you have to do is look at who is winning the 100 meter sprint in the Olympics for that.
Right, so anyone who is a race realist, which is what we call ourselves, understands that there is no superior race according to any objective criteria.
And so all of us are excluded from this, but Facebook is trying to claim that there's no meaningful difference between anyone who advocates for whites and white supremacy.
But if you advocate for blacks, if you're a black nationalist, that is considered somehow different because it has a different history according to them.
Correct.
Or, of course, if you're anti-white, you get promoted to the New York Times.
Editorial board.
Editorial board.
That's right.
I mean, this is the tech totalitarians, the power that they have right now to sway the conversation, to dictate what people can and can't see.
Apparently, what's going to happen when you search for terms on Facebook?
This is the funniest part, is that if someone tries, and it'll be very illustrative to see if this happens when someone tries to post an Ameren article to their Facebook.
Some of our listeners will probably have fun with this.
But, if you try to post an article from a supposedly white nationalist or white separatist website, or if you try to search for some of those terms, so if you say, you know, white people rock or something, in the Facebook search bar, what's going to pop up is a recommendation that you go to a website called Life After Hate, which is a non-profit run by six supposed ex-white supremacists or something who try to guide people away from their naughty views.
And so these six guys are apparently going to be awfully busy.
Because they're going to be getting recommendations from Facebook's presumably 2 billion users who want to find out what all this Whitey stuff is all about.
It's really, you couldn't have asked for anything better.
I mean if they had just, if people searched for white nationalism and they were just sent to like some page about like white rhinos in Africa going extinct or something.
I mean, that would be very boring and they would probably stop there.
But if they get this Orwellian pop-up that says, oh, you're a hater or something, and it's some, like, high school kid who's just kind of seeing what things are about, seeing what some term they read about on the news is about...
or is doing research for a project or something and they see this, do you know how pissed they're going to be?
It's going to be shocking and it's going to happen to people like Michelle Malkin, her pieces that she writes for Town Hall or pieces that are syndicated elsewhere and Coulter is going to have a lot of her pieces.
It is going to be fascinating to see what happens.
Seeing what qualifies as it.
Now, interestingly, they said that stuff which is implicit or coded expressions of white nationalism or white separatism will not be banned.
So I wonder what that means.
I wonder if you can make a post that says, for instance, I can't believe that people believe the following.
People who believe the following are idiots, colon, white people have a right to their own homelands, you know?
I wonder if that sort of thing... White people have a right to exist, to breathe.
I mean, this is just... It's okay to be white.
Like, I wonder if that kind of thing will be allowed if you couch it appropriately.
Like, I do not believe the following, colon, you know?
This is part of that continual drip.
That anti-white drip program, that corporate America, and that the so-called things, in a lot of ways, your Facebook, your Apple, your Amazon, your Google, and your Netflix.
It's astonishing, ladies and gentlemen, listening to this wonderful podcast with Henry Wolfe and PK, how anti-white some of the shows are on Netflix.
I mean this.
It's astonishing.
It actually goes beyond the anti-white nature of commercials.
I've cut the cord so I don't see network TV anymore, so I have the luxury of not having to immerse myself in the world of commercials when you're trying to watch television.
But Netflix!
So you think about some of the biggest corporations out there now with the largest market cap, those so-called things, and they're all 100% against What?
That is the proliferation of what so many people are searching for.
An identity in a world that is increasingly and in a country that is increasingly non-white and not just non-white but aggressively anti-white.
That's definitely the case, and it's very interesting.
I mean, of course, this came on the heels of the New Zealand attack.
They always seem to capitalize on these atrocities and use them as excuses to censor us.
The affair in Charlottesville, the disaster there, was their real causus belli to go after
American Renaissance for sure.
People who had nothing to do with the rally, but they used it as an excuse to try to get us off the internet, to cut off payment processors, to cut off various web services that we depend on and
Gosh you guys can't even find an email provider at this point. Can you it's been tough
But yeah Basically, they used the New Zealand attack and the guy who
announced one of the guys who is announcing the policy this Brian Fishman at Facebook
He's their policy director of counterterrorism Who's the one who's talking about this policy?
So it's clear what they're trying to associate things with.
What's very interesting that they seem so dedicated to censoring even innocuous and peaceful expressions of white advocacy because The shooter, I mean, you could say that one of the reasons that he took the drastic measures he did is because he didn't feel he could be politically efficacious elsewhere.
That maybe he was censored off of social media.
It'll be interesting to see if he was.
If people don't feel like they can get their message out in one way, then certain lunatics are going to think that, hey, if I write some big manifesto and go and do something disastrous, then millions of people are going to see it.
And probably millions of people have seen this guy's manifesto on account of him doing this.
So if that's the only avenue you're going to leave open to people to express themselves, then what do you think is going to happen?
Do you think you're going to get fewer of these attacks?
Or do you think you're going to get more?
I mean, their policy, it's almost as though they want more of these things to happen.
And when you look at Some of the censorship that they do, Amazon's for instance, when they've just this month took down four of Jared Taylor's books, and they took down a lot of other sensible, reasoned approaches to white advocacy, all of which are non-violent, explicitly non-violent, explicitly advocate peaceful and political solutions to the problems that we face.
Well, they also advocate dialogue and not a monologue, and that is what I believe you are really nailing here, is that this anti-white monologue can only go one way.
Well, they take those down, but then they leave up, if you want to go and buy the Turner Diaries on Amazon, you can still do it.
So this, you know, genocidal revenge fantasy is that you're allowed to buy that, but you're not allowed to buy Jared Taylor's scholarly assessment of race relations.
In the United States.
So what does that tell you?
It almost tells you that what they want are these extremists.
Or certainly they want the public to perceive any of our views as nothing but these extremists.
And that's why Facebook totes out their Director of Counterterrorism to talk about, you know, people getting censored for saying like, wow, immigration is a disaster for this country and whites should go their own way.
I was actually banned for three days for posting on a page that I have.
Something along the lines of, build the wall, deport them all.
Right.
And I used a period between each word.
Right.
Because I was trying to test the algorithms, the sensors that Facebook employs.
Because if you've read about all the people that they have, they have an army of individuals that are moderating comments.
And so I was trying to test this.
This was about two months ago.
and that this happened and it's going to be interesting to try and test some of these phrases because again Mr. Wolf I believe that they're going to start coming fast and furious with 2020 elections coming and as we see the Democrat party basically running as the anti-white party They don't want to allow that conversation to start taking place.
It's true.
Things have really reached a fever pitch, and we won't go into that today, but there is a whole discussion to be had about that, about Joe Biden's comments this week, going after white... White male culture.
White male culture.
White jurisprudence.
He's just self-flagellating up there.
Doing everything he can to boost his anti-white bona fides.
Yeah!
Pretend he's one of them, you know.
He's able to go after whitey and you got Beto up there talking about how his biggest flaw is that he's a white guy.
Yeah!
Something that he was born as.
And that he would totally understand if people just looked him over because of that.
Yeah, because he has to constantly explore his unearned white privilege and what that means The tenor of this election is going to be very racialized, and they want to clamp down any dissent that would possibly point this out or lead people to take a different perspective on it rather than just swallowing it wholesale.
Likewise, they're trying to cover up the massive invasion of our country.
They want it to happen, as it were, by stealth.
They want the fact that millions of immigrants are coming into the country legally and are remaking the culture and the shape of communities, are remaking the politics in states like Florida, Texas, states that are going to go blue.
Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, your home state.
Go blue, certainly within the decade.
They don't want us to talk about this.
They don't want us to have this discussion.
And right now, the border, the news came out today that the border is at a, quote, breaking point.
This guy, Kevin McCallion, Who's the commission of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection Agency.
He said, you know, two weeks ago, I briefed the media and testified in Congress that our immigration system was at the breaking point.
That breaking point has arrived this week at our border.
We are on pace for over 100,000 apprehensions and encounters with migrants in March, with 90% of those, 90,000 people, being unable to be repatriated expeditiously and instead are almost guaranteed to be released and to remain in the U.S.
indefinitely, regardless of their merits.
The insanity of what's happening at the border.
On Twitter there are a number of really good people who are trying to bring the president to anyone in the White House.
What is going on, Mr. President?
Again, you ran on one issue and for the first couple months of your presidency We saw the torrent become a trickle, and unfortunately every month since, as the appearance of resolve faded, we now have what Brandon Judd, who is the president of the National Border Patrol Council, says is, quote, the absolute worst, end quote, he's seen in the 21 years of his work on the border.
He said this, Quote, we have never seen what we are dealing with today.
It's unprecedented and we're in uncharted waters, end quote.
And what's happening is a massive increase in the number of so-called family units
that are arriving at the border.
And who could have predicted this?
I mean, everyone to the right of Nancy Pelosi was saying that this omnibus bill that Trump signed was going to open the floodgates.
Yes.
Because provisions of it said, basically amnestied people from deportation who were potential family members, potential sponsors of these children, or relatives of the children, unaccompanied minors arriving at the border.
It also increased catch and release because it reduced the numbers of detention beds.
So these people have to be released directly into the interior of the United States because they have no place to house.
And sometimes they're driven by ICE on buses and then just released into the general public.
It is terrifying beyond belief that we thought in 2016 we were electing a man who was actually
going to deal with this.
That's the whole reason why this guy's president.
It's the only reason.
People understood that fundamentally the United States was changing and that finally, finally
someone emerged on the Republican side who wanted to address this.
And there was a YouGov poll out this week that showed that fully 30% of Americans believe
that or Republicans, I forget, believe that the immigration issue is the top issue and
that was a plurality.
I mean, what's happened at the border?
Think about what happened.
Was Bush president when the Minutemen, that nonsense, got started?
Yeah, the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps.
Yeah.
What happened to that, that espirit de corps?
Was that just all a scam to try and raise money from gullible people who thought?
Well, I mean, if you look during the Bush presidency, there actually were successful operations where he did militarize the border.
He sent the National Guard to the border and effectively stopped immigration.
And Trump, the tweet we alluded to earlier that he sent out, said that he's talking about
how Mexico is supposedly all talk and no action at the border, how they're not doing anything
to stop this flow.
And he threw in Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.
And he says that in response, he, quote, may close the southern border.
I mean, this is, you know, in the same tweet, the same breath, That he talks about Mexico being all talk, no action.
He's going to say, oh, I may close the southern border.
Let's see it.
Let's see it.
These are record numbers of arrivals, and these people are just pouring into the interior of the country.
Breitbart had a story that estimated that 1.5 million illegal immigrants were going to get into the interior of the country this year.
And as you said, as we were mentioning about the Border Patrol, there are 55,000 family members in the month of March were arrested, which is a more than 500% increase over 2018 arrest levels.
Now as you stated, so succinctly, what happened between March of 2018 and March of 2019?
The caravans.
They kept coming.
The caravans.
Just taunting him.
And you would think, like Trump just being the kind of guy he is, that these people who are saying, there's nothing you can do to stop us.
Yeah!
You'd think that he would do everything in his power to get it done.
That he would use every bit of leverage that he has to get it done.
But he didn't.
And the fact is the best he's done, the best he's pushed for is the wall.
And we did get a story this week that they're going to devote one billion dollars to 57 miles of new fencing and border infrastructure and things like that.
But the fact is that will not stop this surge because these people are not they're not hiding when they come across the border.
They're going to open places at the border.
They're surrendering themselves to authorities and claiming asylum.
And then they know that they're going to be released.
They're going to show up in Seattle, Washington.
We just saw a police officer murdered in the state of Washington by an illegal alien.
Every city in the country now, whether you're in Maine, you could be in North Dakota, you could be in Montana, You're a border city.
You're just El Paso at this point.
And this is so depressing because the mother of all caravans is now forming in Honduras.
20,000 people are getting ready to march.
The camp of the saints is upon us.
It's been happening now since the first caravan started arriving.
Or the military.
We thought that he was going to effectively repel these waves of invaders.
government shut down to do something, anything, and nothing happened.
Or the military, we thought that he was going to effectively repel these waves of invaders.
What's the point of the military, Mr. Wolf?
$700 billion a year is the budget for the Pentagon.
One billion of that was diverted for 57 miles of the wall.
Again, there's not much of a country... It's not even a wall.
We're talking about fencing, which is probably pretty inferior stuff.
There's not much of a country left to defend at this point.
These caravans that are forming, now you've even got Cubans.
coming in and joining this because they've realized that taking rafts and boats is not the most efficient way to get there.
Joining one of these caravans.
It's a big party.
It's a big parade.
It's a fiesta.
It's a fiesta to head up to the border and then they get pampered once they're there.
The ICE officers, you know, they treat them real nice.
It's a fiesta on the way to the border and then it's a siesta on taxpayers like you and me in these facilities where they get health care.
Yep.
They get food?
Right.
Room and board?
Right.
So, fiesta to siesta to reconquista.
That's right.
That's right.
And it's just another miscarriage of justice in this country where these people are being released.
They're being told to come back for their immigration proceedings.
Which, again, will never happen.
They'll never return for those proceedings.
We'll never hear from them again.
Nope.
And, yeah, justice is just not served against people who actually willfully break the law to enter this country.
Justice is not served against people who willfully commit hate crime hoaxes and slander vast segments of the population, the majority population of this country.
There is no justice for that.
But Martha Stewart?
Jail time.
Put her in prison.
Six months.
Gotta serve.
Yeah, that's right.
It's anarcho-tyranny.
They are going after law-abiding citizens, or overwhelmingly law-abiding citizens, and they are letting slide these people who just brazenly break into the country, brazenly flout our hate crime laws, And use them, weaponize them against the majority population for the purpose of trying to get a raise.
And you know what?
Just going back to Smollett briefly, I bet he's actually going to get that raise.
Because the Empire writers, they have a blue check account on Twitter.
And they tweeted out, we can't wait to get back to work on Tuesday, winky face, as soon as the charges were dropped.
That's right.
I'll actually say I think Empire is going to be canceled.
The ratings are down.
It's been in for, I think, six or seven seasons.
There's not much else they can do.
I have a feeling that they're just going to cut the show.
But I will say this, going back to the little Facebook conversation and what is or what isn't a white nationalist.
Basically, when a white person starts to look at what's happening in the present and he begins to understand the powers that be really don't want myself or my people to have a future in this country.
That is what a white nationalist is in the eyes of the digital elite.
The tech totalitarians and the elected and unelected officials in Washington and these citadels of power like Chicago.
Anarcho-tyranny is the only word that comes to mind, Mr. Wolf.
That's it.
Well, we'll close it off with a reader question.
We've got a question, or a listener, I should say.
We've got a question from John in Ohio.
Who asks, in the presence of this overwhelming censorship and deplatforming campaign against us, what should we be doing to help push back and further the cause?
Mr. Kersey, what do you think?
Well, I think that the most important thing is if you have made any connections, you need to cherish those relationships that are reciprocated.
If that makes sense.
You need to understand that this is a...
time period where you are, if you are reading AR, if you are reading a site like VDare even, I mean, at this point, if you're, if you're reading or sharing stories from Breitbart on Facebook, I'm sure you've lost a lot of friends who have said, wow, that, that site, that helped elect this evil bigot, Donald Trump as president.
And that's part of the alt-right, isn't it?
You probably lost a lot of friends.
And I think at the end of the day, you need to realize, surround yourself with good people and If you lose your ability to post on social media, hey, oh well, you know, why are you posting what you're eating?
You know, re-evaluate what you're doing on social media.
Well, yeah, from a political perspective, in terms of getting the message out there of white advocacy, of race realism and things like that, I would add to your sentiments that, you know, the real world connections you have are going to become increasingly important.
If you can, try to meet people who are in your area who share your views.
The only organization at this point I can recommend and highly recommend for that purpose is the American Identity Movement.
I recommend all of our listeners check them out and see if that might be a group that you could be interested in.
Their website, I think, is AmericanIdentityMovement.com or .org, I'm not sure.
But go and check them out.
They've got local groups around the country, and you can apply and try and join.
Because those real-world groups, if we get... No one knows how far this stuff is gonna go.
No one knows how far this censorship is gonna go.
This Facebook stuff is almost laughably silly and far-fetched.
But they may eventually try to erase people from Google search results altogether.
You could search for American Renaissance Jared Taylor and not have any of our results come up.
Well, that's the kind of social capital situation we see in China.
And I think that is where ultimately the goal is to take things in this country.
They're just kind of seeing what they can push for.
And they use these things like New Zealand.
The shooting there, they use those as cover to advance their position.
It's very clear that they want us completely silenced and de-platformed.
And so these real world networks are going to become increasingly important because you're going to have to fall back on old forms of giving the word out.
You know, if we still have a web presence 20 years from now, I'd say two years from now.
Two years from now, but we're not listed on Google.
One thing you can do is pass out nice business cards that have the web address on it.
And that's, you're opening people to a whole world of information just by passing these out.
But if you have a real world group, you could, you know, I'm close to DC, you could go on the National Mall and just pass these things out.
And people could go to the website and check it out for themselves.
Like real world actions to garner attention are going to be increasingly significant.
So I think a group like the American Identity Movement will be increasingly important.
Well, I enjoyed having the conversation with you this afternoon, Mr. Wolf, and if you have any questions you'd like for us to address next week, because Mr. Wolf will also be sitting in for Jared next Thursday, shoot them over to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, that email address is sbpdl1 at gmail.com, and we'll try and address your question next week, or you can send the question to Wolf That's w-o-l-f-f at a-m-r-e-n dot com.
So, for Henry Wolff, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our podcast time is up.
▲
Export Selection