All Episodes
Previous Next
March 14, 2019 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
57:49
‘That’s Part of the Problem, and I’m a White Man’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance, and with me, of course, is Paul Kersey.
I'd like to start today's podcast with an update on Jussie Smollett, as he apparently is known.
I'd assumed that his name was Smollett.
But Smollett kind of strikes me as social climbing.
Sounds a little bit more elegant.
Like the lady I used to know who, whenever she went to Target, she says, I'm going to go shopping at Target.
That's what Smollett sounds like to me.
But not to be too mean-spirited, I suppose.
And we try to be fair in all of our comments.
But Mr. Smollett pleaded not guilty.
To those 16 counts of disorderly conduct in connection with his what I fully expect to be proven in court to have been a hate crime hoax.
This was just today this happened and his pleading was in a packed courtroom and full of his supporters.
One man wore an Empire t-shirt and another woman had a shirt that read Justice for Jesse on it.
Well, you know, I'm all for justice for Jesse.
I sure am, and I hope he gets it good and hard.
But the judge will ultimately decide if the full court proceedings will be video recorded.
Apparently, this pleading in which he pled not guilty was on video, and his lawyer, Tina Galandian, has taken the somewhat odd position that she's all in favor of cameras in the courtroom.
She says the defense wants the public to see what happens in court.
Well, the 36-year-old Jesse Smollett is free on a $100,000 bond, and he vigorously, vigorously denies having given the Chicago police the runaround.
He says it was all true, despite the fact, of course, we have these Nigerian brothers who said, yeah, yeah, he offered us, what was it, $4,000, $3,000?
$3,500 checks.
Yes, and then $500 afterwards, just as a little tip.
But these guys don't face any charges, by the way.
And I guess that's just as well.
Well, you know, it's not just as well.
If they faced charges, then they could probably be more easily compelled to testify in court against him.
Now, I suspect they'll testify in court against him anyway.
They will testify against him because, if you recall, they basically broke at the 17th hour.
Yes.
And they decided to tell the police what actually happened.
Right.
So it would be very difficult for them not to testify.
But the police always have more leverage over a guy who's been charged.
And it would seem to me that if you agree to take money to hokey up a fake hate crime, I'd call that disorderly conduct too.
But to me, all of this is great news.
I want Jussie Smollett to be in the public eye for as long as possible.
And I want every proceedings in the courtroom to be completely known.
You know, all of these black activists have this idea that the system is completely rigged, that everybody that's sitting behind a bench in a black robe is a white supremacist and really a Klansman, etc, etc.
The fact is, I have witnessed a lot of court proceedings for one reason or another.
And I have been a juror on a criminal court proceeding.
And what struck me was the overwhelming fairness of it.
If you're accused of a crime in the United States, really there is a huge burden of proof on the prosecution.
People who watch this Smollett trial, I think, Black, white, or indigo, they're going to be impressed by how utterly fair it is.
So, I think it's great.
I want Jussie to be in the public eye for as long as possible, and this trial to go on as long as possible, and he's going to be found guilty, I'm absolutely 100% convinced, and the longer the left's nose is rubbed in this, the happier I'll be.
Well, what's interesting, I've not seen any polls that show black support for Jussie, that think he's innocent.
There was one very famous black actress, black rapper, Queen Latifah, who's been in a number of family-friendly films, actually.
She's been positioned once, she was a hardcore rapper, and then she transitioned, which is curious, into being cast in family-friendly films.
She came out and she said, She needs to see definitive proof that he lied.
So she's supporting Justin.
Yes, that's what I understand.
Now, Her Majesty actually invited me on her television program years and years ago.
Were you aware of that?
I have seen the video!
Yes, yes, yes.
So I, you know, she treated me quite fairly and in a friendly way.
So I have fond memories of Queen Latifah.
So, we'll keep our eye on Mr. Smollett, and I think the whole country will as well.
Moving on to another piece of breaking news.
This has to do with another old buddy of ours, Morris Dees.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has fired Morris Dees.
He is no longer the chairman of the board, which I believe he was.
He is the co-founder and the former chief litigator He and another guy whose name I've forgotten now founded the place in 1971 and his name has been associated it from absolutely the year dot.
But the SPLC president Richard Cohen issued a statement in which it said, As a civil rights organization, the SPLC is committed to ensuring that the conduct of our staff reflects the mission of the organization and the values we hope to instill in
the world. How is that for a modest position? They're instilling their views in the world. In
any case, then another extra from this is today we announced a number of immediate concrete next
steps we're taking, including bringing in an outside organization to conduct a
comprehensive assessment of our internal climate and workplace practices.
Now, I must admit to a certain amount of speculation in this case.
My guess is that Morris Dees, who is a pretty frisky guy who's been married more than once, He has an eye for ladies.
I suspect that he laid hands on the help.
Are you saying this is a Me Too situation?
Are you implying that?
Well, I'm not implying.
I'm quite specifically saying that I think it's probably that.
Now, who knows?
Because remember there was that 1994 Montgomery Advertiser newspaper series that was very candidly opposed to what was going on at the SPLC and they said Many black staffers at the time said the place was hell for blacks.
That it was all discriminatory.
And so possibly he said something, you know, he's an old southern boy.
Maybe he unleashed certain earthy expressions.
But I suspect it's not that.
I think he laid hands on the hell.
It's amazing to me, Mr. Taylor, he's 82 and he's still going to the office.
Yeah.
Because there have been a number of pieces about Morsties that have been published by the Montgomery Advertiser or publications in Montgomery where they showcase his lavish lifestyle.
Yes.
I think you've seen the spread where it shows all these strange antiques he's purchased.
Yes.
And I mean strange by not odd that he bought them, but it's like who in the world would want that?
Well, he's got a peculiar taste.
This whole spread also had many pictures of his trophy wife wrapped up in furs and prancing around in this swank mansion.
I believe it has a river that runs through it.
He is many times a millionaire, like the organization, of course.
It's got $450 million in the bank.
Half a billion dollars in the bank!
A lot of that's overseas, by the way, in offshore banks.
Oh, they've got it tucked away where it's doing the most good for the most number of people.
But you realize, of course, he is a member of the Direct Marketing Association Hall of Fame.
That's your company, I guess.
Well, he's a pretty slick operator when it comes to raising money.
But anyway, something else to keep an eye on.
And I'm sure that the details will eventually creep out as to just what it was he did, although
The Daily Caller in its report that was up just a few minutes ago said that they had
called up the SPLC and a spokesman refused to elaborate.
They said, see Richard Cohen's statement and we're not going to say any more.
So we'll see about that.
Morse's co-founder, I believe, went on to be one of the founders of Habitat for Humanity
and he said a number of derogatory things about Morse.
Oh, he said Dease was interested in one thing and one thing only, making a bundle.
And it didn't make a bit of difference to him how he made it.
No, he's not spread sweetness and light wherever he's gone, this Morris Dease.
And something else that makes me wonder what was the nature of his transgression has to do with his divorce papers that were scattered around the internet.
It's all very gruesome, foul stuff, but he does have a colorful past.
Which divorce?
Anyway, we should not gloat the downfall of those who hate us, but it is a very strong temptation not to do so.
Well, speaking of gloating and divorce, once again we have a story that leads a lot of people to say that CalExit...
Would make a lot of sense.
I'm referring to California of Governor Gavin Newsom.
Of course, we're not going to talk about him, but we should mention that Kim Kardashian, who was behind the FIRST STEP Act being passed because she met with President... I almost said President Bush because he's acted so bad.
President Trump.
I guess that's a Freudian slip.
Recall she met with President Trump and convinced him to go about with criminal justice reform.
She tweeted out the same about how she met with Governor Newsom and said, The death penalty is racist and disproportionately impacts blacks and brown people.
So Governor Newsom on Monday actually got rid of the death penalty.
That's true.
Now we're talking about California in a different light because the death penalty for Californians He's only 24 years old.
native-born Californians or who are Americans once again has happened
because of the state being a sanctuary state. An illegal immigrant and a
gang member with a long, long criminal history, Carlos Carranza.
He's only 24 years old, he's already got a long criminal history. He's
been arrested for the murder of Bambi Larson, a 59 year old living in San
Jose.
You know, if there's ever a stereotypical California name of the once great state, Bambi would be it.
And God rest your soul, Bambi.
Cops say that Carranza stalked the mother before beating and stabbing her to death.
Now, ICE have actually applied nine times during prior arrests But these requests were ignored by county officials.
They're citing the sanctuary?
I mean, they had to ignore them.
They had to turn ICE down.
They had no choice.
Who was the other woman?
I don't remember her name, but I mean, this is the second story, I think, in 2019, where a woman, a white woman, was murdered in California.
By an illegal immigrant who had been, who'd hopped the border who knows how many times.
ICE was praying, please turn him over.
And was it 24, 48 hours later?
He goes, he goes, runs off and kills a white woman.
Yeah.
And not to mention what happened in Nevada as well where that happened too.
There were four.
Two white couples were murdered.
That's right.
Exactly.
So what happened is this is a known gang member.
He stalked Ms.
Larson, Bambi Larson, through a neighborhood before breaking into her home and attacking her.
San Jose Police Chief Eddie Garcia revealed the lengthy criminal history which began in 2013 when he was arrested for crossing the border illegally in Texas.
He was deported back to Mexico.
This was followed by 10 arrests and at least three convictions for offenses ranging from
drug possession to battery, false imprisonment, and burglary.
Now, when he was arrested for Bambi's murder, he was on probation for possession of methamphetamines,
paraphernalia, false imprisonment, and burglary.
This is a really bad ombra.
This is a bad dude.
And this is the kind of person that's protected by California being a sanctuary state.
Complete democrat-dominated state legislature of California.
Let's see.
Let's put it on the line.
Democrat and Hispanic-dominated.
Increasingly Hispanic, as you know.
That would make a great video, by the way.
You're talking about what's really going on in California.
It'd be ten videos.
Well, again, this is Garcia, San Jose's police chief, Eddie Garcia, revealed that ICE had applied, like we said, nine times for a detainer.
Nine times for this 24-year-old Carranza, who has this lengthy criminal history which allows suspects to be held longer than their prison term so their immigration status could be investigated by federal officials.
Well, nullification exists in California when it comes to federal rules because Well, ICE applied for their 10th detainer on Tuesday following his latest arrest.
We'll see if they ignore it again.
Exactly.
ICE Field Director Eric Bonner said, How many more people have to be killed or injured before California lawmakers will open discussions to revise the state policy prohibiting local law enforcement agencies from working with ICE to apprehend dangerous criminal aliens?
Good question.
It's an amazing question.
We're reading this news story, Mr. Taylor, on a day where The Republican-controlled Congress just voted down 59 to 41
to stop President Trump's emergency declaration.
He vetoed it.
But the point is, there are 30 million plus illegal aliens in the country.
We've seen estimates that range from 22 to 30 million.
I believe it was your alma mater that came out with that study.
Yeah.
Yes.
And then we have this type of situation where ICE is denying cooperation with local jurisdictions
and an entire state now is protecting illegal aliens.
That's right.
How can you call this a country?
Well, you could call it states' rights if you wanted, if you're a southerner.
Now, this is an excellent question.
How many people have to be killed?
How many people?
Of course, I've been wondering that about Middle Eastern immigration to Germany, to Europe.
How many people have to die?
And these people are so fanatical.
It seems that the number is unimaginably high.
What will it take?
But at this point, as you point out, ICE has applied for its tenth detainer after having nine denied.
How can, in fact, the local police even legally hand this guy over?
I don't think they can.
The local laws trump that.
So, I think you're closing with this Eric Bonar, the ICE field director's question is absolutely appropriate.
How many?
And I'd love to see the answer someday.
Well, the question, in my opinion, is one American killed by an illegal immigrant should be justification for deporting all illegal immigrants.
Then again, just one illegal immigrant should be justification for building as big a wall as possible to ensure that there are no illegal immigrants in the country.
And speaking of walls, speaking of walls, let us speak of Beto O'Rourke.
What a beta this guy is.
You know, he apparently has announced and he's going to, he wants to be President of the United States, but he's acutely aware of what may be, at least in the primaries, his biggest vulnerability, the fact that he's a white man in a party that is yearning, yearning for a woman or for a person of color.
And this is what he says.
He recognizes this, of course, and he thinks he's going to talk his way around the problem.
He's going to talk his way out of his sex and out of his race.
He says the government at all levels is overly represented by white men.
That's part of the problem, and I'm a white man.
I think it's just so important that if I were to run, and if I were to win, my administration look like this country.
It's the only way I know to meet that challenge.
It's not the only way I know, Beto brother.
You can step aside.
What kind of nonsense is this?
There are too many white men running.
I'm a white man and I'm running too.
Good.
It's all like these lily-white, liberal white people who say, oh, we need to discriminate against white people to give non-whites a chance.
None of them ever says, and I'm going to step aside right now so that a one-legged lesbian black lady can take my place.
They never do this.
Never, ever, ever.
But then he goes on to say, I totally understand.
People who will make a decision based on the fact that almost every single one of our presidents has been a white man and they want something different.
And I think it's a very legitimate basis upon which to make a decision.
Well, if it's a legitimate basis, he's saying, go ahead, vote against me because I'm a white man.
What a dope.
Then he's saying, especially in the fact that there are some really great candidates out there right now.
Great candidates.
In other words, you can vote for a black woman if you like.
You can vote for a Hispanic.
Boy, you know, this kind of groveling, this kind of hypocrisy, it just turns my stomach.
When has there been such a pathetic figure in American political history?
Really, can you think of anyone?
This is a modern phenomenon.
These utter hypocrites, apologetic, crawling white people who think that the best thing they can do, well, who think that the best thing all other white people do is to get out of the way, but not them.
And just think of how What a vast phenomenon this has been.
Back to 2004, when Howard Dean was running, he had no problem saying he wanted white Democrats from the South with Confederate flags on their truck to vote for him.
He had no problem saying that.
Well, he got a little bit of criticism for that.
He got criticism for it, but... He was prepared to say it.
Yeah, exactly.
This story that Mr. Taylor just quoted from was on the cover of Vanity Fair.
This just gushing piece.
Think about it.
We've gone now, the Rolling Stone Mr. Taylor last week had Omar Alon and I'm sorry, Alon
Omar or whatever, names interchangeable.
Whatever it is.
No, no, no, show some respect.
Show some respect to our Somali overlords.
Yes, to our unpronounceable names.
Yes, you're right.
But then you had this gushing piece on Rolling Stone magazine.
And then for all of those people who have to travel and they walk into airport bookstores, now they see Mr. O'Rourke, who like you said, on the cover, in this picture of him with a truck, he's looking all American as can be and working class attire.
And you open it up and like you said, it's just self-flagellation.
This is a guy who basically says, You know, I don't look like what the Democrats want.
They're better, you know, Kamala Harris.
She's better, but you know what?
I still, if you vote for me, I'll make sure that they find a place in my administration.
Well, and the point is, you know, if, if, if against all the odds and if against the desires of the American people, I somehow miraculously stumble into the White House, I'm going to make sure there are practically no other white men in my administration.
No, this is just so sickening to me.
Isn't he the guy who said that if it were up to him, he'd tear down all the wall that's already built on the southern border?
What a patriot.
What a man.
What's upsetting is that I think he does represent He is the avatar for a lot of white liberals who look up to him.
He doesn't push the boat too hard.
He came out today and said, hey, I'm a capitalist.
I don't think he's endorsed the... Well, no, I take that back.
He did endorse the New Green Deal.
He's of Ms.
Cortez.
So he asked him out.
You're right.
So this is a guy who is going away the dodo bird.
Well, that's the thing.
He has endorsed the new dope deal.
These guys are so dopey thinking that they can ride this anti-white horse into the White House.
It's just not going to work.
No, it's not going to work, but what is going to work, this is a guy who came very close to unseating Ted Cruz.
Now, the current governor of Texas, he won by a landslide in the election.
Ted Cruz, however, who a lot of people in Texas don't like.
He's got a lot of qualities that I think irk people.
I'll admit, I'm not a big Ted Cruz fan, but I don't live in Texas.
However, looking at the exit polls, this is very interesting because, we'll just go over a couple of the numbers.
Ted Cruz got 66% of the white vote when he ran against O'Rourke.
What's important to note, though, is that if you just look at college-educated white vote, Ted Cruz lost that for females.
49% of white college-educated females Voted for Ted Cruz.
That means 51% voted for O'Rourke.
Now, 55% of white college grads, white overall, voted for Cruz.
Now, the numbers that I just brought up there are important because when you think about what's going to happen the next year, Mr. Taylor, the first state that runs their primary is Iowa.
Now, I believe a white male will win Iowa.
but then they're going to hit a black wall when you go down to Florida, South Carolina, and Georgia.
So I think it's going to be fascinating to see how well he can fundraise leading up to that,
because I think he's going to put most of his eggs in the Iowa-New Hampshire basket, where
I think that... remember a couple years ago, was it someone at MSNBC said that Iowa was
too white to have the first caucus? Oh yeah.
It didn't represent Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC.
I think that we're going to see a lot of the same type of conversation started because Well, look, the basic issue is this.
Ted Cruz gets 66% of the white vote and still almost loses the election.
Correct.
That is the point.
All that tells you is that all the non-whites lined up for this other guy.
Oh yeah.
And so I guess he thinks that's gone to his head.
Brother Beto thinks that since all of these non-whites voted for him in Texas, they're going to vote for him all around the country.
We'll see.
We'll see.
As you say, these guys just do not realize that they are whistling past the graveyard.
These people are going to go extinct so fast, I think they're not going to know what hit them.
Well, I think the demographic asteroid has already hit, and that atmospheric dust is already going up, and you know, it's the white males, like you said, white male Democrats.
We'll see.
Anyway, let's talk about something really positive.
Let's get off the demographic decline and what's happening in the United States.
Let's move on to Italy, where a man who rose to power in the shadow of Trump actually has now eclipsed whatever we thought Donald Trump could be.
And I'm talking about our friend, the populist interior minister Salvini in Italy.
What is the number that you think of migrant arrivals in January of 2019?
What's it down to, do you think?
Well, see, I would never have guessed this until I saw it.
It's down to only, it's down 95% from the year before.
Correct.
No, no, I wouldn't have guessed that.
I would have said we'd be lucky to have it down, you know, 50%, 70%, down to 95%.
That's practically nobody.
Was it the year before it was 3,176?
Correct.
That means you can scarcely count the numbers that have come.
Correct.
Wow, what good news!
Well, and the Interior Minister, Salvini, compared the approach of the previous government under the left-wing Democratic Party with his Five Star Movement and League, saying, quote, the data shows that the Democratic Party had not blocked arrivals.
It's really that simple.
If you have the will, It can be done.
Despite the fact that the Democratic Party, as it was called, claimed it was going to bring the numbers down.
Correct.
Yeah, this is typical of so many so-called conservatives and even centrists who say, yeah, we understand, there are too many coming in, and then they do nothing.
Well, much of the credit Silvini has said for the reduction of illegal migrant arrivals rests on his policy, where last year he told migrant transport NGOs that they would not be welcome to dock in Italian ports and drop off migrants in what many referred to as Taxi service.
I think that's so great.
That's so great.
You've got this guy who's an interior minister calling the NGOs.
They're the ones who fish the illegals out of the drink and bring them.
They're running a taxi service.
Our astute listeners might remember that this was the gentleman who got in a lot of trouble before he was elected because he pointed out that he didn't want white Italians to become minorities.
Or he said a number of things about the ethnic composition of Italy and how that was at the risk of being disturbed forever.
That's right.
And he's also the guy who said, you know, if they ever see Italy, it's going to be on a postcard.
He ended this by saying, the first time returns are superior to arrivals.
Following the release of the statistics.
And after closing the ports, they've now focused on something that brings music to my ears.
I love this concept.
Increasing deportations, and as a result have seen more deportations of radical Muslims than any other country in Europe since he took over.
And this comes at a time when the Swedes are welcoming back ISIS fighters.
Well, and let this be a lesson unto the United States.
I think this is wonderful.
Departures, there are more departures than arrivals.
When are we going to achieve that happy day, happy day, Mr. Kersey?
Because here in the United States, the Immigration Reform Law Institute has revealed that there are approximately 1.8 million illegals from Central America and Mexico alone living in the U.S.
despite the fact they've been ordered to be deported.
This just makes you shake your head, as I can sense you are doing just now.
Yeah, there are about 600,000 in Mexico, 450,000 in El Salvador, 400,000 in Guatemala,
350,000 in Honduras.
And so this is, you add all these people up, that's more than twice the population of Boston.
These are folks that have been told, scram!
But we don't have the will that Matteo Salvini does.
We haven't been able to make them scram!
Isn't this double the population of Wyoming and some of the smaller states?
You know, I don't have it off the top of my head, but yes, more than twice the population of Boston.
And, you know, the trouble with it is, People in all of these countries follow this news more avidly than they follow the soccer scores.
They know that once you're across the border, you're allowed to be home free, and even the judge says, scram, you can stay.
And experts now project that this year, there are going to be approximately 840,000 illegal crossings, and that'll be double last year.
And of course, it's because all they need to show up is and say, asylum.
And especially if they've got a child with them, oh boy, oh boy, that's the gravy train.
So, there you have it.
And, of course, most of the U.S.-Mexico border remains open.
Nothing fenced off.
All you gotta do is hike.
I mean, you might have to do some serious hiking, but just hike across.
Whereas, the U.S.
continues to fund border walls and border security programs in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, and Lebanon, and other countries that are really serious about guarding our borders, unlike us.
Yeah, no, it's astonishing when you think about what's going on.
Because, as you said, They're paying attention to those numbers and what the United States is doing as opposed to the football games.
That's right.
And this is one of the primary reasons they're doing it.
63% of non-citizen households currently in the United States who live legally and illegally use some form of welfare versus only 35% of native-born American households that are on welfare.
Now, of course, you break those native-born American numbers up by race, It would even be a more hilarious picture.
If you just compared it to whites, in other words.
Exactly.
Yes, of course.
Likewise, roughly 50% of naturalized citizens, those who legally immigrated to the country and became citizens of the United States, use taxpayer-funded welfare, as well as about 55% of all households headed by legal immigrants.
But, as that meme says, they came here legally.
Right.
What does it matter, right?
That's right.
They're here legally.
They're here legally, so, you know, they can suck off the public teat for as long and hard as they like.
Non-citizen households are more than twice as likely as citizen households to use food welfare programs and Medicaid.
And get this, more than 7 in 10 non-citizen households in California use at least one form of welfare compared to just 35% of native-born American households in the state.
That's right.
70% of non-citizen households in California.
And California keeps complaining about it's going broke.
Well, we wonder why, don't we?
What's going broke?
Electricity, water, resources are stretched thin.
You've got venereal diseases.
What was it, San Francisco, where they say there are medieval diseases showing up?
No, it was Los Angeles.
Yes, what was it, typhus they had?
Yes, we thought we got rid of that.
Skin Road, Los Angeles.
Rats are running around the city, bringing it into City Hall, even.
It's Old Testament type stuff in that state.
Well, get this, it's not just California, though.
Texas, which is going to be a battleground state in 2020, nearly 70% of non-citizen households Use welfare.
Just like California.
That's right.
Only 35%.
Basically the same numbers of native-born American households are on welfare.
And as you say, that includes native-born Hispanics and blacks.
I think the white figure, it's still high enough.
It's nearly 20% or so, but still.
No, as you point out, this is a huge draw.
If you can get a job, fine.
If you don't get a job, fine too.
Just hop on the welfare train.
And, you know, I think this is an extraordinary figure.
According to these researchers, every year we, the American taxpayers, spend $57.4 billion paying for the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of that year's crop of new immigrants.
We have the mass immigration of 1.5 million new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants who
are dragging down wages.
And at the same time, if they do have a job, or if they don't, they're just saying they're
enjoying the tax benefits.
Costs us nearly $60 billion a year.
Yes.
Say bye-bye to your hard-earned wages.
Most Americans, Mr. Taylor, just have no idea.
You get these reports of government waste from Cato, or from the Heritage Foundation,
all these so-called right-of-center non-profits talking about government waste.
But if you actually had those figures in front of you, I think that number would be so hard
to quantify, really how bad it is.
I think ordinary Democratic voters just despise the idea of somebody sashaying into the country
and sticking his snout in the trough that way.
It just goes against everything we think is fair.
But these numbers, as you point out, are not nearly widely enough known.
And I don't think we can count on the New York Times Magazine, which we'll discuss later, to tell us about these numbers, do you?
No, I don't, but I would like to say one thing about what you just said about Democrats.
You might not agree with it, but just think what just happened last week.
The Democrat-controlled House, Mr. Taylor, dear listener, actually voted to let illegal aliens.
It was a symbolic vote, but they voted to say, hey, illegal aliens should have the right to vote.
Non-citizens should have the right to vote.
In local elections.
Correct.
This is something that Stacey Abrams in Georgia was pushing.
And now it's basically become a uniting principle of this Democratic Party.
That is based on the assumption that illegals or non-citizens... I think they're... They didn't make a specific point about illegal aliens, but I suppose they're included.
The point is, non-citizens are presumably paying taxes.
That is the rationale for this sort of thing.
They're sending their children to school so they should have a voice.
You can make some kind of not completely harebrained argument about this.
It just is not the case for saying that you can struggle across the border and instantly go on welfare.
That really sticks in people's craw.
But, as I say, we're going to move on to the New York Times Magazine.
They have a column.
It's called The Ethicist.
So, we get deep ethical questions considered, and we get the Times' point of view on this.
Now, this had to do with a fellow who had written in and said that he goes to a local Chinese restaurant, and there are two menus.
There's one that they give to the Chinese customers, and the one that they give to the round eyes.
And the one that the Chinese get has less expensive prices.
And this guy says, you know, if I know about the cheap menu and I ask for it, they will cheerfully bring it to me.
But if you just wander in and you're not one of the tribe, then they will hand you this expensive menu.
And so tourists wouldn't have an idea.
So, you know, they're being, they're being hosed.
Well, and he says, is this, is this really okay?
Now, the ethicist, the ethicist gets, he says this.
Some people think that giving preferential treatment to members of your own ethnic group is as bad as hostility to outsiders.
Others even deny that such a distinction can be drawn.
I think it's wrong.
African Americans, so we know he's black, especially in small towns, often smile and nod at black passers-by and not at white ones.
And he says, that's fine, because this is group preference, not outgroup hostility.
He's very clear about that.
Then he says, granted, We'd feel very different about white servers favoring white customers, but that's for two reasons.
One is a suspicion that in our society, behavior of that sort would in fact be motivated by negative feelings towards non-whites.
It is by racism.
So white people are not capable of legitimate in-group preference.
Correct.
If they are appearing to behave in that way, that's not really the case.
It's hostility and it's racism.
Then he says, another is that whites are a majority.
Partiality to your own kind, for minorities, is to some degree a response to the sense that you need to stick together against majority prejudices.
That's us.
All non-whites get to stick together against the white man.
Now, there are plenty of parts of the country Where white people are a minority.
A lot of parts.
But too bad, too bad, if we show anything that could be described as in-group preference, that's no good.
Once again, the spectacular double standard against white people.
Chinese, Chinese, no, yes.
I was going to ask you, who is this guy writing?
The guy who writes, the ethicist.
His name is Kwame Appiah.
And I thought that was a familiar name, so I looked into this guy.
And it turns out, according to Wikipedia, he is, quote, a British-born Ghanaian-American philosopher, cultural theorist, and novelist.
So here we have a British-born Ghanaian telling Americans what's right and what's wrong.
Telling white people, no, no, no, no.
You mustn't behave that way because you don't have the right to prefer your own.
Absolutely not.
He is apparently a professor at New York Law School where he teaches philosophy.
And this is what his page says about this fellow.
He lives in Tribeca with his spouse, Henry Fender.
Hmm.
No.
Odd name.
Odd name.
Eh, well.
Editorial director.
Now, Henry Fender is editorial director of The New Yorker.
And they live in an apartment filled with art and artifacts that reflect Mr. Appiah's
many interests and travels.
He and Finder spend weekends in an 18th century farmhouse near Princeton that they share with ducks, geese, and sheep.
Are they going to point out he's taught at Cornell, Duke, and Harvard?
So, this guy is homosexual, married to a man, and so he lives at the intersection of brutal prejudice, brutal oppression, that our society meets out to homosexuals and to blacks.
But, he lives in Tribeca, in a beautiful apartment, and he spends his weekends in an 18th century farmhouse, which he shares with ducks, geese, and sheep.
He sounds like a one-percenter, that type of wife.
He really sounds miserably oppressed, doesn't he?
And of course, he's in a position to tell white people what to do.
He's the ultimate oppressor.
Boy, oh boy.
So there you go.
Apia, you know, you got some nerve.
That's all I got to say.
Now, you're going to tell us a story about the ACLU, are you not?
Actually, I was going to do the next one.
I think you get to tell us about our friends at the Civil Liberties Union.
That's right.
They've come up with a big, important report here.
They say that 14 million students attend schools across the U.S.
that actually have police officers on the beat, but don't have counselors, nurses, psychologists, or social workers.
So you got that?
They're going to school.
There are police officers walking the hall, but no Nurses, psychologists, social workers.
Now, and the schools that do not provide students access, the ones that actually do provide access to mental health professionals, about 90% fail to meet the minimum staff to student ratio, which means that one mental health professional might be responsible for as many as 400 students.
Now, I have a question for you, Mr. Kersey.
Fire.
When you were a student, Was there a psychologist or a social worker or a mental health professional at your school?
No.
No.
There was not.
No.
And look how you turned out.
No wonder.
I always thought that was the problem.
You didn't have a mental health professional at your school, Mr. Kersey.
There were a lot of counselors, but there were no mental health providers or psychiatrists, psychologists.
Well, I come from a terrible generation when we didn't have anything resembling.
We didn't have a school nurse, for heaven's sake.
We had teachers, and we had a principal, and that was about it.
And we had a lady who cleaned up afterwards.
We had a weight room, and that's where you went and got your mental issues out.
Well, exactly right, exactly right.
And coach football coaches, basketball coaches.
Now, what the ACLU says, this increasingly popular decision to fund police officers, combined with a lack of mental health experts, has had a disproportionate effect on, guess who?
Students of color.
And students with disabilities.
Now, I wonder if the fact that they've all these policemen walking around has something to do with the fact that there are students of color in a particular school.
In any case, the students of color and people with disabilities were subject to more discipline and over-criminalization, says the ACLU.
What does that word even mean?
Over-criminalization, then their peers.
Apparently students with disabilities.
Now this is really something, I don't know who they're talking about.
These people learning disabilities, people who are in wheelchairs, people with the ADHD, ADHD, autism, I don't know what qualifies.
In any case, you know, this is really a big deal these days.
Students with disabilities are arrested almost three times more often than those without.
And in certain states, 10 times more likely to be arrested.
I think some of these may be just, I don't know, psychopaths in any case.
But then we get to the racial statistics.
Black students arrested at a rate three times higher than white students, sometimes eight times higher.
Black girls were arrested at least four times more often than white girls.
Latino and Latina students arrested in schools at rates of 1.3 times higher.
We have this consistent pattern.
You know, it's astonishing.
In all 50 states, in every school district in the country, white people have the same prejudices to almost exactly the same degree.
Isn't it astonishing?
Now, the ACLU, as far as I can tell, is silent on the question of Asians.
Of course.
Because my suspicion is Asians get arrested far less frequently than whites.
It doesn't go along with the narrative.
Once again, white people have this pattern of racial prejudice the ACLU just can't stand.
Now, according to the report, and this may be true of all I know, they say there's no evidence that increased police presence in schools improves school safety.
I don't know if that's true or not.
I suspect that in some places, when you've got people walking around, well, let's not imagine who they are, but it probably does help to have an armed policeman on the beat.
But they say six months after the Parkland school shooting, more than $1 billion was added to school security budgets by state legislatures.
And they say that's all wrong.
They should be hiring mental health professionals instead.
So, according to the ACLU, you just can't get it right, can you?
Some guy goes in and shoots up a bunch of people, and if you say, well, we need more police officers... No!
No!
The ACLU is not going to help.
Because, they say, that's not going to make anybody safer.
I know you don't like bringing up films and movies, but the early 90s was such a weird
period in American history because that's when you paved the contentions.
There's this great movie that came out called The Substitute, and it's set in Miami.
It's at this almost all-black, all-brown high school.
Tom Berringer's character, he's like this ex-commando, becomes a substitute teacher.
They think there's a drug deal, drug runners there.
It shows what the students have to go through when they get into the high school.
They have to go through a metal detector.
One of the opening scenes is such an amazing scene.
There's this long line of gangbangers, no white students.
It's all brown and black students.
They're being, just like cows going to slaughter, they're having to go through the metal detector.
And one of the best scenes, though, is there is a statue of the white man that the school is named after, and he is protected.
So people won't be able to spray paint on him.
So there's like a cage around him.
And I've been trying to find a picture of this scene, because it's such a powerful, just an image of all these black and brown students going through security.
Anyways, it's also one of the few movies that has a villain that's a black man.
You rarely see that in movies.
Oh, you sure do rarely see that.
And he's a black man in a position of power.
He's the principal.
And it turns out he's the drug runner.
He's the leader of it.
So it's a movie I highly recommend watching.
What did you say it's called?
It's called The Substitute.
The Substitute.
It's a good film.
Well, you know, it is an interesting question.
I'm assuming that these local school districts, et cetera, are not completely wasting their money.
I would think that, for sure, metal detectors, if it keeps people bringing in guns and knives and hand grenades and bazookas into the school, it would keep it safer, wouldn't you say?
Well, I'll tell you an anecdote.
I'll tell you an anecdote.
When, uh, growing up, we were going to a basketball game and we were playing in inner
city black school and we had to go through a metal detector and as did every parent and
student who attended the game you had to go through metal detectors to even to be in the stands
Even to be in the stands?
That's the most important part, because that's where the violence would happen.
But even when we got to the auditorium, to the basketball arena early, we had to go through metal detectors as well.
And we were told that our bags were going to be safe, because we had been warned that you might have to bring your bag with you and put it under the seats on the bench.
And, well, we didn't.
We left the bags there.
When we got back after the game, our bags had been rummaged through and we had money stolen.
And that was not a fun trip, but it was so eye-opening because you had to travel and you had to see the way this world worked.
And this is how life exists every day.
And for an outsider, it's, wow, this just reinforces every stereotype imaginable.
It's true.
We live in so many different Americas, and there is practically no overlap between them.
No!
And if the press don't write about these things, all of these corn-fed folk living in Iowa have absolutely no idea what their country's like.
Well, I'll tell you what a lot of people are beginning to learn what our country's like, and that is the discrimination that right-of-center groups, that patriotic groups, are beginning to face from corporate America because of these left-wing Troll farms will get on social media and just attack anything and any corporation that dares show benevolence toward people who, you know, they're not on our side, per se, but this is an organization, the We Build the Wall tried, this is an event that We Build the Wall tried to put on.
Steve Bannon was going to be, is going to be one of the main speakers, Purple Heart recipient, he's the Tripoli amputee veteran Brian Colfage, and Sheriff David Clark.
They were going to put on this conference.
We're recommended they stay at the Detroit Foundation Hotel because it's close to the Kobo Center, where the Town Hall is going to be held.
Now, Colfage's staffer told the hotel they needed 23 rooms for two nights, March 13th through the 15th.
They were offered a group rate of about $186 per night, which is a discount.
It's a good deal so far.
About an hour after Colfage sent the hotel salesperson a list of names, He got an email back from the hotel letting him know they decided to withdraw the group offer.
Quote, your guests are more than welcome to book on their own through our website.
But we cannot place a group offer, he was told.
So, Kolfage said he might file a lawsuit against the hotel for discriminating against his group for being Trump supporters.
He had to inform the Angel families, whose sons were both murdered by illegal aliens, that they were not welcome to stay at the Foundation Hotel.
Well, this story does have a happy ending.
The Foundation Hotel issued an apology and they said, quote, The Foundation Hotel does not discriminate against guests
based on race, creed, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, political affiliation,
sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, age, physical or mental ability, veteran
status, and marital status.
You got that out with one breath.
Well, what's significant to me is the inclusion of the words political affiliation.
That is a very rare... Very rare.
And you know, I bet they put that in just for the purposes of this statement.
I mean, I can't prove it, but do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation.
That is very unusual.
In any case, I believe this event is going on right now.
Yeah, it's the second day of the event on March 14th, and think about it.
the Act for America conference that I believe is no longer going to be able to be held in Washington, D.C.
Earlier this year.
That's right.
On one of the podcasts.
So this is an interesting development that you would see a private company, a hotel chain, come out and say,
political affiliation as you noted.
What's fascinating here is apparently the hotel didn't come under any pressure at all.
This was somebody in the hotel itself saying, Uh oh, Steve Bannon?
Uh-oh, the sheriff?
Can't have them.
Somebody without even any kind of pressure at all.
I think that's quite fascinating.
In the case of Act for America, CARE and all these other Islamic groups have been yelling at the hotel for years.
And they finally succumbed and said, we're not going to do this.
It's a pressing thought.
Talking about Steve Bannon for the first time in a long time.
We used to bring him up a lot when he was still with President Trump.
Yes.
Do you remember that famous photo of him in front of the whiteboard where he had all the
promises that Donald Trump had made during the campaign and what they were going to try
and do?
It was in a profile piece when the administration first took over.
Don't remember that.
It's a great photo and it's Bannon and he's like, these are the campaign promises and
there's a lot of great stuff.
There was a lot of great stuff.
Unbelievable stuff.
Yes.
And you, to your everlasting credit, were one of the first people who started to have
a lot of worries about President Trump very early into 2017.
I want to say it was maybe even March or April of 2017.
There were a number of things that were happening.
And you think about that erase board.
Unfortunately, it was a dry erase board because all those campaign promises, they're all erased.
Wiped clean.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Wiped clean.
Wiped clean.
Well, you know, interestingly enough, I think we have a little time for questions here.
And someone has asked a question that I get from time to time.
Am I planning on writing another book?
I don't have any concrete plans, but I'm thinking about a book.
And yet I'm not quite sure even what the title... I have a general vague sense of what it would be.
It would basically be about how to be a white man.
Because that's a real question these days.
It's a great question.
How to be a white man.
But I don't want to make it sound... I'm not talking about how to be a white woman either.
How to be a white person.
But how to be a white person doesn't sound... It doesn't have quite the same poetic ring.
But just because this is something that we really have to think about.
More and more people in the United States and all around the world are having to ask themselves, what does it mean to be a white person?
A white man or white woman in the world today?
How do we go about defending our legitimate rights?
What are the best ways to proceed?
How do we protect ourselves professionally?
I think that's a book that needs to be written.
And I guess I've been knocking around this movement long enough and seen enough mistakes and seen enough good decisions that I might be in a position to write a book like that.
But as I say, it's just an idea.
And so far as it's just an idea, I'm probably making a fool of myself even talking about it.
No, it's a good idea, but unfortunately with that title, I don't see it lasting too long.
Jeff Bezos' storefront.
I think anything that I write.
It could be something on how to be Mary Had a Little Lamb, and it would probably be kicked off Jeff Bezos' storefront.
But, you know, I was on a podcast.
It was actually a video interview with a group of Frenchmen.
And there's this group in France, it's called Radio Athena.
And these are sharp guys, let me tell you.
And their attitude was...
Stop whining.
I mean, it wasn't quite as brutal as this.
You got kicked off Amazon?
Stop whining.
We've got to build our own platforms.
We've got to have our own institutions.
How would you even expect?
Why would you even expect those people to let you purvey ideas that run completely counter to their view of the world?
You can't even expect that.
Stop whining.
That's a jolt!
It was a jolt!
But I thought, in a way, they're right.
It's their platform, their decision, and we've got to have our own platform to compete with them.
So, with that in mind, I should not let the other side dictate my choice of subject or title.
So anyway, that's a book I'm thinking about in a vague sort of way.
And now here's another question we can ask.
This fellow says, the demographics of the U.S.
appear to be a mess.
He says the actual white population is probably a lot higher than the 62% because Spanish descendants from Spain fall into the Latino category.
What do you and Mr. Kersey think are the actual numbers of whites and do you consider Latinos white?
Now I think this is an interesting but in some respects a stupid question.
Spaniards are Europeans and they're white.
It doesn't make any difference what their last name is.
I mean, there are plenty of people in the United States with names like Jackson and Washington who are not white.
Their owners might have been white, but they are not white.
So just because you look at somebody's last name, I think Nick Fuentes, for example, Nick Fuentes He's got a Latino name, but I think he's Spanish as far as I can tell.
And it's the same with many people.
You can have a Spanish last name or you can have an Anglo last name, and that doesn't necessarily tell you what the person's race is.
Now, my guess is the number of actual Spaniards in the United States is pretty small.
Oh yeah.
And so, most people with Spanish names are not white, in my view.
Now, to the extent that there is even a slight inflation of the number of whites because there are some Spaniards, there are some blue-eyed, blonde-haired Castilians who have Spanish surnames, who are Hispanic, that, I think, is overwhelmingly counteracted by the fact that Middle Easterners are also considered white.
Anwar Sadat, for heaven's sake, would be considered a white man by the Senate.
Yasser Arafat.
So, all of these Egyptians, Iranians, Lebanese.
I mean, there are some Lebanese who look pretty white to me, but they're quite the minority.
So, I'm not too worried about the idea.
I mean, this guy's implying That, hey, don't worry, there are all these white people that aren't being considered white.
So, no, no, no, no.
I don't think that's the truth.
No, I don't think that's the truth.
Trying to find a silver lining in the demographic dispossession.
Yes, yes.
So, anyway, I think that is about what we have time for.
Anything else you wanted to bring up?
The only thing I'd like to bring up is we love getting your questions.
We love getting your suggestions of topics.
We love getting your feedback.
So, we encourage you to email sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again, that email address is sbpdl1 at gmail.com or You can write to me, Jared Taylor, at American Renaissance by clicking on the Contact Us tab and send us your questions.
Send us your questions.
We really like them.
Often we have had interesting corrective observations to what we've said.
People have pointed out, well, you kind of got that the wrong way around.
And we really appreciate that too.
Questions, corrections, observations.
We welcome them all.
Well, and Jared is too modest, but I would also like to say that you can't get If we do nothing or white identity at Amazon, but you can head over to amaran.com and pick up a signed copy from the man himself.
That is true.
That is true.
And we are always happy to send them out.
So go ahead.
Well, so for Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey, our time for this podcast is up.
▲
Export Selection