All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 27, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
54:33
‘Your Foremost Love Belongs to the Homeland’
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome ladies and gentlemen to this edition of Radio Renaissance.
This happens to be the day of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings when he faces his accuser and everybody's talking about Brett Kavanaugh and so we won't.
Instead we're going to talk briefly about Bill Cosby who has had woman problems of his own.
As I'm sure you're aware, some 60 women have come forward to accuse him of various kinds of sexual misconduct.
Apparently his favorite activity was to drug people and then rape them while they were unconscious.
And as I recall, just about every one of these 60 were white.
This is something the media have not really said much about.
Maybe there was one black woman who was a victim.
What's your recollection?
Again, this is Paul Cursie.
We normally do a wonderful introduction, but Jared had that great joke about our complete disinterest in the Kavanaugh hearings.
I recall a famous or infamous People magazine cover which had the images of all the women that he had allegedly A sexually assaulted.
And yes, it was quite monochromatic, was it not?
Yes, there's not much diversity there.
Kind of like Tiger Woods' sexual predilections in a maid.
That's right.
Very strange.
Something that we are not supposed to notice and certainly not comment on.
But in any case, he has been found not only guilty, but he finally got sentenced.
And he's been sentenced to three to ten years in a Pennsylvania prison.
He's gonna have to pay $25,000 in fines and some $44,000 in prosecution fees.
That sounds like a pretty cheap prosecution to me.
I suspect the state paid far more than that doing this.
But what he's up for is sexually assaulting, of course, a white woman 15 years ago.
Her name is Andrea Constand.
Now, to me, what is significant about this is not the crime, not the conviction, not the monochromatic list of victims, but what Bill Cosby's spokesman Andrew Wyatt said after the sentencing.
He says, they persecuted Jesus, and look what happened.
I'm not saying Mr. Cosby is Jesus, but we know what this country has done to black men for centuries.
So I guess he's saying that this is, once again, breaking black bodies, the alleged violation of the lily-white southern womanhood, and oh, we've got to find a perpetrator and string him up.
Then he went on to say the child was, quote, the most racist and sexist in the history of the United States.
I mean, that's saying a lot.
But why is it sexist, I wonder?
I guess he might as well have said neocolonialist.
He's just using all the buzzwords you could think of.
There's been a lot of talk on black Twitter and the black websites that, of course, have massive corporate funding, Mr. Taylor.
Black men and black women shouldn't care about Mr. Cosby because of the remarks he made at the NAACP convention more than a decade ago, and how he had abandoned black America, and why should we get involved, and why should we worry about this?
And why this is so interesting, a little before my time, but, you know, this was a guy who was positioned and scripted as America's conscience.
That's why the stories, you know, for a lot of our younger listeners, you know, like myself, it is weird seeing this guy who at one point was on the Mount Rushmore of, you know, morality in the United States with his character of Cliff Huxtable.
Wasn't his nickname America's Father?
Yes!
Father of his country.
This was a guy who probably had the most well-revered and respected show in the 1980s, The Cosby Show.
Well, and for those of our listeners who weren't aware of the comments he made in the NAACP, basically he was saying to black people, look, you've got to shape up.
The way you behave with your pants hanging down your knees, getting drunk, swaggering around, killing each other, this is what is hurting black people.
He actually had the temerity to say that black people have the wherewithal to actually change their own destiny.
And these things that all these young black people are doing, he said, they were disgusting, they got to shape up.
And that created an enormous furor among blacks.
They're never supposed to wash their dirty linen in public.
But apparently now, despite having said that, his spokesman and his wife too, his wife, she says that the prosecutors in the case falsified evidence.
In her view, to convict her husband.
So when Push covers the show, the father of his country has decided that he was the victim of a high-tech lynching, to coin a phrase.
It's one little anecdote that I read about the Cosby show that they started to put free South Africa stickers all in the background of the Of the set.
You'd see it on the refrigerator.
You'd see free South Africa.
Free Nelson Mandela.
All sorts of that type of stuff.
Because again, this was a show that was beloved by white Americans.
And probably the audience was, I'd say, 92% white.
Because they wanted to... They saw on screen the projection of their greatest hopes.
That's right.
That black people were going to be just like us.
That was the theory.
We want these people as our neighbors.
That's right.
That's right.
So long as they behave like Bill Cosby.
But, you know, all of this, you know, blaming it on the white man, you know, it was racist and sexist, and they look what they did to Jesus, you know.
It reminds me of something that happened just last month.
I don't think we talked about it on this program, but there were four little black children in Grand Rapids, Michigan, who were playing.
And they were five, six, and seven years old.
And one of the boys peed on the five-year-old girl.
And they decided this is going to be a little bit difficult to explain when they got home.
And so they said, a white man did it.
And a white man, he used the n-word, this ferociously powerful word.
And sure enough, the whole city goes into conniptions.
They go running around.
And they arrest a guy.
Turns out he's got an absolute 100% alibi.
But even little children, even little children know that if things go wrong, blame the white man.
Blame the white man.
They've been conditioned and you know what?
They normally have a great... That was an international story for a couple days.
That's right.
And then the retraction was on the back page of the newspaper.
It was barely mentioned that, oh yeah, they made this all up.
That's right, that's right.
But you can be five, six, and seven years old and a blackbird, you know what you're out is.
Boy, they learn early.
And so, anyway, back to perhaps more serious news.
I would like to give a brief report on my Europe trip.
I was in Europe for 10 days, had a really wonderful time, and I was invited to speak at the Skanza Forum.
This is an annual, and sometimes more than once a year, group organized by Flody Midyard, a Swedish guy who's doing great work.
At that conference, I spoke, Greg Johnson spoke, Helmuth Nyborg spoke.
He's a wonderful Danish scientist.
He's 81 years old, but still absolutely sharp as a tack.
It's not surprising to learn that he won a bronze medal in the 1960 Olympics.
Wow!
Yeah, he was in canoe racing.
In any case, a very fit, bright guy, Matt Tate, I think one of the brightest guys in the British nationalist movement, and also a fellow named Chris Doney.
He was a Swede.
He was working for the Swedish Democrats for a while.
So he gave us a really interesting talk about the Swedish Democrats.
It was really a great meeting, about 200 people.
And then I piggybacked on that a whole lot of other talks.
I went to Poland and addressed two groups of all Polish youth.
This is a very interesting outfit.
Their roots go back to 1922.
Then they were banned and they were not revived until the communists disappeared in 1989.
They are Catholic, but also very nationalist.
And this is part of their manifesto.
After God, your foremost love belongs to the homeland.
And foremost, after God, you must serve your own country.
Powerful.
Yes.
And they are not just nationalists.
They are fully racially wide awake.
Really, a very impressive bunch of people who are very serious.
They open every meeting with a prayer.
And it is the official military prayer of Poland.
And believe it or not, The military prayer still asks for the blessings on our fallen comrades murdered by the Gestapo and the Cheka.
The Gestapo, of course, the Nazi secret police, the Czech or the Russian secret, the Soviet secret police.
So to this day, they are sticking their thumb in the eye of the Gestapo and the Czech, which don't exist anymore.
But still, I think it's very, very interesting that they really have this sense of their history, their fallen comrades.
No, it was really a great group.
I was interviewed by a couple of other people also.
And then I went to Paris.
I gave two talks there.
One to a new party that is called the National Liberal Party that has been started by a very aristocratic and fascinating guy named Henri de Lesca.
That was a great group of young people.
And then I also spoke again before an organization that probably would prefer not to be identified.
And gave a couple of radio and was on a television interview.
And then I went, I finished off in the Netherlands.
And gave a talk that was sponsored by Erkenbrand.
Erkenbrand is a Dutch movement.
I spoke at an Erkenbrand meeting of about 300 people last October.
But after that meeting, some of the organizers got doxxed.
They went through a rocky period.
But they're all coming back strong.
So that too was very encouraging.
And what strikes me is how all around the world, well at least all around the white world, the wide-awake white world, you have young, attractive, accomplished, well-informed people who see the world almost identically.
The things that you and I discuss, the things that we might read in the American newspaper, they read, they discuss these things, they see the future of their country exactly the way we see ours.
And it is very encouraging to see people waking up really all around the white world.
It was a great trip.
I would have loved to stay another 10 days, go to another four different countries.
So, maybe this will be possible, but it's really a great way to establish ties between right-thinking, similarly thinking, young, wide-away, quaint people.
It was really a great experience.
But I'm back now, and back to reading the news in the United States.
Well, back to the reality, but it should be noted that your trip You're traversing across Europe.
You were doing something that enrages the global elite more than anything, and that is white people gathering together to notice the ramifications of the global elite's machinations and how they only benefit the perpetuation of the global elite.
That's right.
We are becoming the global dissident movement, I would like to think.
It was great.
Some of these people will be coming to American Renaissance conferences.
It's great.
It's great to establish ties like this.
Let me ask you something.
You said before you left on your trip that you never would have thought a lot of what's happening would have happened in your lifetime right now.
What does a trip like that, all that you've been through over the past 28, almost 30 years of AR in your life, what does a trip like that do for your spirit?
Oh, it's hugely invigorating.
And it's touching to see, especially Scandinavians and even Frenchmen, but especially Scandinavians.
They all come up to me as if I'm a movie star.
They see these videos.
The French and the Polish.
The Polish not so much, because they're not as English-oriented.
But certainly in the Netherlands and in Copenhagen, it's as if I'm practically a household word.
Of course, these are a selected group of people who want to come and hear about these things.
But it just goes to show you that our message is getting out all around the world.
All around the world.
You know, it used to be, when we first started having American Renaissance conferences in 1994, everybody there was old.
They were all my age.
Geezers!
But now, in all of these meetings, it's overwhelmingly young.
And I'm not quite sure why.
I think it's partly because it's young people who are organizing them, and they have a network of young people.
But it's young people who really see what's going on, and they have the energy and the motivation to change things.
But no, it's hugely, hugely encouraging and gratifying.
But back to the realities of the United States of America.
And one of the things that happened this week had to do with the September 22 announcement by the Department of Homeland Security that they were going to change the definition of what constitutes a public charge.
Because when you go back to the Immigration Act of 1882, it said that immigrants were going to be banned if they would like to become a public charge.
We don't want people Feeding at the public snob.
It's rough.
Perfect sense.
How difficult, how can any person with a room temperature IQ not see the benefit of that for all Americans regardless of race, color, creed, or sexual orientation?
Well, Mr. Kersey, some can't see it.
Some can't see it.
The fact, the new rules now, Meaning that if you've been on health insurance, or if you've been in low-income housing, and certain kind of nutrition programs, if you have had your handout for that stuff, you can't apply for a green card.
Wow!
Oh boy, there are kind of exceptions really, unfortunately.
You know, apparently, if you have had handouts of up to $3,800 for family of four, and $1,800 for a single person, they're gonna wink at that.
But anything more than that, and you can't apply for a green card, even if you're here legally.
And according to the Department of Homeland Security, this could affect as many as 382,000 people a year.
There's that number of moochers every year who are likely to apply for green cards and eventual citizenship.
And that would save taxpayers $2.7 billion annually.
Now, of course, you look at that number of 382,000, Mr. Taylor, and you think about that Yale study that, of course, just came out.
We had talked about it.
A couple months ago, because the news of it was leaking, which showed that the number of illegal aliens is double, perhaps even triple the number that is reported.
I tend to believe it's well over 30 million, but you have to even wonder if this number is not.
It's a low ball.
Exactly.
Who knows how they're on what basis they're calculating this.
But well of course now these 382,000 they are legal immigrants.
Of course.
But you have to just wonder because again you look at how you noted that the rules will provide exemptions and one of those exemptions is the Women Infant and Children Nutrition Program.
That's WIC.
You see that all the time.
A lot of people confuse WIC and SNAP food stamp benefits.
Right.
You're right there when you kind of put an asterisk on this, because that number could be in the millions for WIC participation, and what the cost is for taxpayers.
And the fact is, half of immigrant-headed households are on welfare of some kind in the United States.
Fully half!
It's an outrage.
And as you say, Who could oppose this?
Well, I have an answer to your question, Mr. Kersey.
A couple of people actually do.
Derek Johnson, president and CEO of the NAACP, he says the latest proposed rule by the Trump administration is racist, petty, and inhumane.
Now, again, I never understand how it is that the NAACP, that's supposed to represent black people, wants more poor people coming into the country.
Why on earth would they want that?
Why do they want more moochers and leeches?
They can expand their recruiting base.
Again, remember, it's all about uniting this disparate non-white coalition in the direction of hating whitey.
But most of these, of course, are Hispanics.
A lot of them are going to be Asians.
And I think once there are enough of them, they're going to have no time for sob stories about lynching and slavery.
I think black people are making a terrible, terrible mistake if they think they're going to hold hands with all these newcoming non-whites and they think they're going to unite against the white man.
Once we are a minority, they're going to fight so much amongst themselves.
I think blacks are really going to regret this.
From what I've read and heard, future time orientation is not one of the trademarks of the African-American community, so... These are the leaders!
These are the ones with IQs of at least a hundred, probably, I'd like to think, but maybe I'm wrong.
And future time orientation comes with that, ordinarily.
So, the NAACP thinks this is racist, petty, and inhumane.
Jackie Vemo, That's not it at all.
policy analyst with the National Immigration Law Center.
Jackie says, this is an attack on immigrant families and an attempt to make our immigration system a pay
to play system where only the wealthy need apply.
That's not it at all.
We just don't want paupers, which is something that Massachusetts, before the country,
while it was a colony, it said no dumping of paupers.
That was in 1645.
As you say, this is the most logical possible thing.
Why on earth would a country want people coming in who are going to go on welfare?
Unfortunately, it's taken the egalitarianism that is the guiding principle of modern America to its logical conclusion.
That not only do we want the world to come here, not only do we want to invade the world to spread our principles, But we want to invite the world to a country that denied that nation those same principles.
And guess what?
Like you said, if you're a public charge, hey, you're more American then!
Then American taxpayers.
That's right.
Invite the world.
Feed the world.
Clothe the world.
Educate the world.
Try to medicate the world.
What an insane thing.
And the New York Times editorial board, which now includes our favorite naturalized Korean, Sarah John, they said, and I quote, the Trump administration has taken another step in its program to use fear and cruelty to drive out legal as well as illegal immigrants.
And to that I say, I wish.
Not really.
I mean, again, they're being quite lenient with a lot of illegal immigrants and a lot of the stuff that's going on.
Unfortunately, you know, it's a shame that we are Having to watch so much of, you know, we get to see the left overreact to a lot of these simple stories, and we've yet to see the Trump administration really unleash to do the things he was elected to do.
And that's one of the depressing things about all that's happened, in my opinion.
Well, but these are little steps.
They are, they are.
And I approve of every one of them and I agree with you.
It really brings the lefties out of their hole.
Correct.
And that might be even more important than some of the more strategic deportations when you actually dredge up what the left really feels about Americans and the acts that the federal government has refused to perform in regards to, hey, you know, why do we have 382,000 people who have come to this country legally and yet They're on the public charge.
They're on the public charge.
Wait a second.
And they would ordinarily have been given the opportunity to apply for a green card, first step towards citizenship.
Now, under the Clinton era, there were things that disqualified you if you actually took cash assistance.
But also, one of the disqualifying behavior was being institutionalized for long-term care.
Boy, I'm glad I at least drew the line somewhere.
I agree.
We've talked about this before about how going to Ellis Island is a really transcendent experience because you get to see that this whole myth of Ellis Island has it wrong.
Ellis Island used to be a fantastic opportunity for the impediment of immigrants coming to the country because you had to be checked medically.
I think they actually have a number of exhibits that Denigrate that aspect of what Ellis Island was.
I haven't been in probably eight or nine years, but again, Ellis Island, in my opinion, is something we should be proud of in H.P.
Lovecraft's fantastic story.
It's not the street.
I can't remember which one it's called.
The Red Hook Horror.
The Horror at Red Hook.
His character in the story, he thanks the gods that Ellis Island has tried to keep out the refuse of humanity.
And it's one of those fascinating things you read about because you always hear, oh, the myth of Ellis Island and how it's so great.
Well, in reality, Ellis Island kept out Tens if not hundreds of thousands of people.
Oh yes.
They would separate you for all sorts of reasons and if you were not fit to immigrate, they'd send you back.
There was no question about it.
And the fact that it was known that they did that, I'm sure that fact alone kept a whole lot of riffraff even from trying to get in.
But I toured Ellis Island probably about 20 years ago with Larry Oster.
God rest his soul.
God rest Larry Oster's soul.
He's one of the most brilliant writers, a very prickly guy, but a brilliant, brilliant writer that probably many of our listeners don't really know about.
He died, must have been about four or five years ago now.
He died of a horrifying battle with cancer.
Yes, yes, but I'm not sure I know anyone who wrote as smoothly and as limpidly about all of these racial immigration related questions.
Really, really a brilliant guy.
And it's too bad that he was carried off well before his time, like so many of our comrades.
but uh oh this this reminds me this stuff about keeping the public charges from becoming uh permanent residents and then moving on to citizenship the federal officials are also likely uh henceforth to read to reject Visas and green cards if someone can't speak English.
This is draft regulation.
Of course, this is going to be racist and sexist and homophobic and who knows what, you know, if you can't speak English.
But it's very clear.
People with the lowest English-speaking ability have the lowest employment rates, the lowest full-time employment rates, and the lowest median earnings.
Why bring them in?
Why?
This is the crazy thing.
This is what I used to ask people back when Trump was running for election.
He'd been talking about how he was going to put a ban on Muslims.
And journalists were saying, well, this is horrible.
I said, well, wait, wait.
What do Muslims bring?
Why do we want more Muslims?
Same question.
Why do we want people who don't speak English?
Who can't read a bus schedule?
Why do we want this?
To even ask the question is to answer it, because it harms white Americans.
I know you don't necessarily believe that there are leftists who think that way, and I know we're not going to talk about the Kavanaugh stuff at all, but we should point out that the reaction by a number of Almost all of the credential media has been to blast the Republicans for having the poor optics of having just a bunch of white men ask the questions.
And again, that shows that all the elite in the United States, when it comes to the media, are trying to do is delegitimize white males at every turn.
That's right.
And that is the unifying morality of our elite, I think globally and in the United States.
Well, certainly, increasingly so.
White male is almost a swear word these days.
You can be alive or dead.
White male, you are the demon.
You are the devil incarnate.
And this is somewhat related to our next story, which is based on some leaked internal documents from Facebook.
That the website Motherboard talked about.
And apparently, at least for a while, Facebook was trying to distinguish between what they called white supremacy and white separatism and white nationalism.
And they said they were going to outright ban only white supremacy because separatism and nationalism are, according to their internal memos, not always associated with racism, at least not explicitly.
Well, I salute them for trying to draw some sort of distinction between these things.
As you know, I think the term white supremacy should be completely retired because I don't know anyone who thinks that white people should rule over people of other races, dominate them in some way.
When this came to light, of course, all of the usual screamers started screaming.
And black history experts and black civil rights leaders said that, no, no, no, no.
They're all the same.
You got to ban every last one of them.
And the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights wrote Facebook a letter explaining that their policy on white nationalism is, quote, misguided, inconsistent and dangerous.
I mean, trying to draw distinctions, I guess, is misguided, inconsistent and dangerous.
Then they went on to say, Facebook ignores centuries of history, legal precedent, and expert scholarship that all establish that white nationalism and white separatism are white supremacy.
You know, this is something that has really struck me.
It's the rise of this term white supremacy.
It used to be it was bad enough to say that people were prejudiced or racist, but now everybody is white supremacist.
I'd say within the last, I haven't done a Google search on this, but I would suspect that over the last, say, five or ten years, the term white supremacy has just rocketed in frequency.
You can do that one fantastic tool that Google has to see how frequently it's been used in books and articles.
You could look at the graph and I think you'd be quite shocked at how that graph rises on the white.
On the Y scale, quite significantly in the past, I'd say 20 years.
That term has been kicked around a lot.
I mean, my gosh, George W. Bush, remember, we talked about this, the worst moment of his presidency when he said that he didn't like black people by Kanye West.
He was dubbed a white supremacist.
You have to remember, the left believes anyone to that is Republican at this point, is a white supremacist.
Look at the fantastic campaign that they did and you called it, you called it, to what's going on down in Florida with the comment that the Republican candidate DeSantis made where he, what would he even say?
Don't monkey around with our budget.
You elect this guy, he's a very eloquent spokesman for a far-left platform, but if you monkey with the state, you know we could end up with huge deficits.
And he's down six or seven points right now, and the Republicans just don't seem to understand how to fight back.
They really don't.
They really don't.
They are such spineless, spineless, pathetic characters.
But back to Facebook here.
Facebook rather recently explained to this website, Motherboard, that if they were consistently to ban separatists and nationalists, then they might have to de-platform black separatists and Zionists and the Basque movement.
And, no doubt, the Kurdish nationalists, they seem to be seriously trying to understand a difference between separatism and supremacy.
And they'd be correct!
As you said, they'd be correct.
And this is one of the reasons why it's such a shame that the American Renaissance Facebook page was removed, what, two, two and a half years ago?
Several years ago, yes.
Yes.
But now, apparently, they have been collapsing under this blast from the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights.
They seem to have had a change of heart, and they apparently are going to make no distinction between white separatists and white nationalists and white supremacists.
We're all just wicked white supremacists.
We've all got to go.
Remember, the simply slope has already happened.
Alex Jones was banned from Facebook for the nebulous term spreading hate, which would Probably be a subset of
Nationalism, separatism, who knows?
Because that is the way that they view any of these ideas whenever it is used to, quote, disparage, end quote, non-whites with statistics.
Right.
But I've never, I don't follow Alex Jones very closely, but there's nothing that he's ever said that I'm aware of that would even suggest some kind of separatism.
Oh gosh, no.
He's actually made comments that are infuriating, that are far worse than stuff that your Rush Limbaugh would say.
He said something along the lines of, This is Alex Jones we're talking about.
He said something along the lines of, hey, I don't care if America is 80% non-white as long as they respect the Constitution.
I was like, dude, what?
Yeah.
No, but still, he was spreading hate.
As I recall, Facebook explained that it hadn't to do with his theories about Sandy Hook and some of these other somewhat eyebrow-raising ideas he had.
It had to do with his attitudes towards immigrants and Muslims.
Correct?
Immigrants and Muslims.
That's exactly right.
So, you say the wrong things about immigrants and Muslims, and we know what happens.
And then we move on to Ji Chaochun, if I'm pronouncing this name correctly.
27 years old, who just this week was arrested as a spy.
Now, Ji worked for the Jiangsu Province Ministry of State Security.
And G had enlisted in the U.S.
Army Reserve under something called the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest, known to its friends as MAVNI.
Now, what MAVNI does is it authorizes the U.S.
Armed Forces to recruit certain aliens, certain non-Americans, who apparently have skills that are vital, vital mind you, to America's national interests.
The other thing MAVNI does, it expedites citizenship for these wonderful immigrants with critical skills that the military needs.
Nearly 11,000 of these non-citizens joined the U.S.
Armed Forces once the MAVNI program began in 2008.
But it was officially suspended in 2016 over security concerns.
If there was still a country that you can be treasonous to, whoever came up with this program should be charged with treason based on the results.
But again, I think it was...
Maybe it was James Kirkpatrick who wrote a really good piece.
Might have been Greg Hood.
I can't remember.
But that author asked the question, treason to what?
One of these leftist comedians was saying that Donald Trump was committing treason.
I think it was Keith Olbermann, actually, was the individual.
And he said, he's committing treason.
And you read the story, it's like, treason to what?
When our elected leaders are implementing programs like this, where this 27-year-old spy is passing on State secrets to the Chinese government.
Well, one of his jobs, apparently, was to dig up biological information, biographical information, on eight people for possible recruitment, along with him.
And these were Chinese nationals who were working in the United States as engineers and scientists, and some of them were with U.S.
defense contractors.
Now, see, this is one of the... I've always been fascinated by the whole Chinese espionage thing.
When the Soviets were back doing it, they would train these people to infiltrate the State Department or even try to get in the CIA, spy and counter-spy.
The Chinese don't bother with that.
They just find ordinary Chinese who are working in a university lab or working for a company.
They don't have to train them.
They just find them.
And they figure that any Chinese is basically loyal to China anyway.
And many of them are.
They can be naturalized U.S.
citizens.
Some of them are second-generation Chinese.
Some of them are Chinese nationals working in the United States.
And they very, very readily will get information and pass it on to the motherland.
I think back to that manifesto you read from the all-Polish youth event you went to.
I don't believe the Chinese actually have a god, so their foremost love belongs to their homeland.
The nation.
The homeland.
That's right.
And you must serve your country, because your country is your god.
Yes, yes.
And they do.
And I don't fault them for it.
Of course, what is absurd is that we let these people winkle their way into sensitive positions in the United States, where they have access to all of this information.
Many of them get security clearances.
And I remember reading a document about Chinese espionage that said, One of the great obstacles in finding Chinese spies is this prohibition against racial profiling.
As soon as you start looking for evidence, then just someone will say, oh no, you can't look at him.
He's Chinese.
But we're looking for Chinese spies!
No, no, can't look at any of these Chinese.
But the other day, just ahead of one security guy just recently said, we have to take a national approach to combating this national effort by the Chinese to surpass us.
And espionage is one of their techniques.
And then, of course, you get a letter from all these Asian groups saying, don't you remember?
During the war, Japanese people were interned in camps.
This sort of national stigmatizing of Asians has got to stop.
It's just one more, one more crazy thing whereby we bind ourselves hand and foot, blindfold ourselves because of this silliness about race not mattering.
Diversity is our strength.
It enables Chinese spies to infiltrate these misguided military programs that would grant
citizenship in exchange for expediting your citizenship because you have some great skill.
Well, guess what?
That skill turns out to be loyalty toward your homeland.
That's right.
And disloyalty toward that country that for some reason wanted to grant you citizenship.
So it's just, again, it's treason to what?
You read these stories, you hear all these people say on the left and the right, this goes back, I know you want to talk about it, but this whole Kavanaugh thing is so strange because the left is screaming, this is treason, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
We can't allow this.
We got to stop Trump.
He's a fascist.
But you're like, what are you talking about?
How did these definitions keep getting watered down to, just like you said, just like we just talked about a few moments ago?
Public charges.
How are we at a point where there's such little sanity in public life that you can look at the stories we've talked about here and not just realize there's something seriously wrong with the country that goes beyond the whole left-right paradigm.
And unless we can get some sensible people together, it doesn't matter if we try and care about what the Chinese are doing.
The Chinese are just sitting back laughing.
They don't need to have really a long-term strategy.
They just have to wait for that great American experiment to end.
That's right.
And then they have complete domination.
And you know, I wonder if it doesn't make it easy for them psychologically to betray the United States when they see how there is no loyalty, no love of nation here.
Isn't it much easier to take advantage of a country that everybody's taking advantage of?
I think if we had any sense of real pride, of pride of belonging, they'd think twice about it.
But no.
Everybody's getting their digs in.
This poor corpse of what used to be a great nation is this dying hulk.
Everybody's going to get theirs.
But as you pointed out, diversity is our strength.
We must never forget that.
And apparently, New York City is discovering just how much of a strength diversity is.
Nice segue.
You're getting really good at these segues.
That just occurred to me.
But apparently, four years ago, there's an interesting precedent for this.
The Fire Department of New York had a screening test that was determined to be discriminatory.
Now, there's only one way you need to demonstrate that something is discriminatory.
That is, blacks and Hispanics don't pass the test at the same rate as whites.
That means it is, by definition, ipso facto discriminatory.
Quad errat demonstrandum.
The demonstration is over.
And the taxpayers had to shell out $98 million.
for these poor blacks and hispanics who were victims of a discriminatory test to become firefighters in New York.
Well, recently we have just discovered that a court-appointed special master in a different suit has recommended the total of 91.6 million dollars in damages be paid to 219 plaintiffs in a long-running class action suit against the former board of education over racially biased certification test.
You see what happened is they decided to certify the serving teachers in the city of New York and lo and behold the test turned out to be biased.
We No, we know it was biased.
We know absolutely that it was biased, because on this 80-question multiple-choice quiz, 90% of the whites passed, but only between 51% and 62% of the blacks, and only about 47% to 55% of the Hispanics passed.
So, we know it was biased.
Obviously discriminatory.
Yes, that's all we need to know.
Now, the punchline here is, If we're going to dish out 91.6 million dollars for this initial batch of 219 platers,
There are, in fact, 4,000 people eligible for payments.
And if they get the same kind of payout, the taxpayers of New York City are looking at a total bill of $1.67 billion.
Which works out to $418,000 per person in this purported payout for this discriminatory test that whites so successfully passed and blacks and Hispanic test takers were Not able to pass the same rate.
Of course, as usual, missing from the data are the pass rates of Asians.
I'd be very curious to know, and I suspect they passed at a rate higher than that of whites.
So, no doubt, this was a test that was cruelly biased against blacks and Hispanics, and unaccountably biased in favor of Asians.
But this is, you know, you just don't know what to do.
Here you have a country that refuses to accept the most basic and obvious facts of racial differences.
And when you refuse to accept those facts, you find yourself in the absurd position of paying damages because you have a test that distinguishes between the competent and the incompetent.
Now, it is possible, and this is one of the things that certain groups in New York City used to do, to make a test that is so easy everyone passes it.
And then you just hire as many blacks and Hispanics as you like, because everybody passed the test.
That was one approach.
But here was a test.
I mean, 90% of white test takers passed it.
That seems pretty high to me.
I mean, if you really want to winnow out the losers.
But because... I mean, it's like, to me, it reminds me of the geocentric solar system.
If your point of departure is that the Sun and all the planets go around the Earth.
Earth is a center.
Apparently, you can come up with certain predictions for eclipses and things like that, but everything is just completely wrong and weird.
And this is a society we've built on the basis that, in effect, everything rotates around the earth when you say that the races are absolutely equal.
Everything else is this jury-rigged, crazy, inexplicable, hodgepodge, Rube Goldberg set of explanations for something that's very, very easy.
And this is a typical example of what you end up with.
You know what's a typical example of what you end up with?
When you do have a morality that blames White supremacy and structural inequality and implicit bias for the failures of non-whites.
Right.
Try and guess what that is.
You end up having to get rid of Prospector Pete as the mascot of California State University.
You know, we talk about all these campuses across the country that had Indian nicknames that had to be removed, of course.
At the end of this baseball season, which ends in three days, Chief Wahoo of the Cleveland Indians is being retired.
Oh, this is his last season.
This is his last season.
He's got a couple games left before the poor Chief Wahoo is retired.
But you know what?
He didn't last as long.
Yes, Prospector Pete.
And I'm laughing because this is the most absurd mascot change and the long-running absurdity that is the war on mascots that's going on.
Yes.
This is Prospector Pete.
He's been the school's mascot for, I want to say, half a century, since the 1950s.
Well, that's all over now because the school's president, Jane Close Connelly, and now it's the end of Prospector Pete's reign because, quote, as our diversity grew and more voices were heard, we came to know that the 1849 California Gold Rush was a time in history when the indigenous peoples of California endured subjugation, violence, and the threats of genocide, end quote.
That's right.
The team that used to be known as the 49ers and Prospector Pete was their mascot.
Apparently you can't even have something that was in a period in the past.
Essentially what this means is if your mascot is a representative of someone from the past, from the era of racism, oppression, genocide, then I've never heard of the 49ers particularly threatening genocide against Indians.
But the fact that you've got someone from that period of time, that's all you need in order to demote him.
Isn't that what she's saying?
She's exactly saying that.
It's a war on... Again, this is where the war on white America's past is really going.
Any white mascot...
It's going to have to go.
Even at some point, the Patriots are going to have to go.
The New England Patriots, or any school with a Patriot nickname, because why would you only have a white person as a Patriot?
And that's the look that the Patriots have.
It's a white colonial.
Well, you know, I've really never understood this, the whole psychology of this.
Apparently, having the Cleveland Indians and Chief Wahoo, That makes fun of and denigrates Indians to have his name, that visage.
I would have thought that is an honor.
And it is an honor if it happens to be Colonel Reb or any kind of Confederate.
If you make a Confederate mascot, you're honoring the Confederacy.
If you make an Indian your mascot, you're denigrating Indians.
Can you explain to me the difference?
I can't.
I don't understand except that it's a, again, these are people's tribes.
You know, you feel some sense of loyalty to your alma mater, Yale.
I'm sure it's not as great as someone who has attended, say, the University of Tennessee and is upset that the Volunteers football program hasn't done that well in the past 10 years.
but that's where a lot of Americans, regrettably, because as the deracination of America has accelerated,
all that white Americans have left is their fledgling loyalty to their alma mater
or the pro sports team that they worship.
And that is something you have to factor in to all that's going on, which is why, again,
I'm still so excited with the persistent national anthem ordeal that's gone on.
You know, there's this great author by the name of Clay Travis,
who just came out with a book on Tuesday that I would review for American Renaissance.
I can't recommend it enough.
It's called Republicans Buy Sneakers Too.
And he quite poignantly pointed out that one of the main reasons why Donald Trump
was able to win was because of his stance on the national anthem and his attack on the NFL.
As ESPN and these pro sports enterprises have drifted so far left and quite frankly, anti-American.
There's going to be a pushback from sports fans, and Trump articulated that.
And now, Clay Travis has articulated it to a New York Times best-selling book by pointing out that there are a lot of sports fans out there who are getting increasingly red-pilled by what's happening.
And I think that you'd be surprised by the number of California State University alumni, Cal State University Long Beach, I should point out, who are going to be questioning if they're going to write a check to the school based on this insanity.
We'll see.
We'll see.
I hate to point this out, but the president of the school is now someone whose first name is Jane.
I think this may have something to do with it, but I wouldn't want to be a victim of the Me Too movement.
But you know, when it comes to these mascots, When you actually ask American Indians if, say, the Washington Redskins is an insult to them, many will say, no, no, of course not.
They named the team because they respected our fighting spirit, our vigor, our militant.
You know, we're tough dudes.
And of course, that is true.
And it's not as though the helicopters in the U.S.
Army, the Apache, the Black Hawk, the Chinook, It's not as though they've been given those names because we're trying to insult the helicopters or the Indians.
No.
The Apache, you know, the Apache were very warlike, successful, light cavalry for heaven's sake.
And so, You know, to me, the idea that naming your team the Rebels, glorifies the Rebels, naming your team the Indians, insults Indians, it's all consistent in one respect.
It's just to keep Hawaii on the back foot.
Keep Hawaii on the hop any way you possibly can.
And, of course, the great tragedy is that we are on the back foot all the time.
All it takes is this kind of foolishness and we apologize and we change.
So, yes, goodbye, goodbye, Prospector Pete.
Apparently, there is a statue of Prospector Pete.
And they're not going to take it down and melt it.
They're going to move it to someplace that is maybe an alumni house, because the alumni really are keen on old Pete, and they don't want him gone.
And so as a sop to the alumni, they're going to put him in someplace to honor the alumni.
But he's relegated to the past now.
And insanity, of course, is not limited merely to the United States.
We have a story about Glasgow University in Scotland.
Now, Glasgow University has its first black professor.
His name is Sir Geoff Palmer.
I don't know what he did to get his knighthood, but he has now called for reparations to be made after he has put together what has been called a groundbreaking report showing how Glasgow University benefited from the proceeds of slavery.
Now, Professor Palmer, Sir Jeff, argues that the institution gained almost 200 million pounds calculated in today's money.
Now, how did Glasgow University benefit from slavery?
How would you imagine?
Well, apparently, some of its benefactors were in the tobacco trade.
The tobacco trade.
And the tobacco trade used slaves.
Just real quick.
Yes.
That number in today's money, 200 million, it has to be far more if you're in the tobacco trade.
You think about what tobacco and what these other commodities were priced at then, what they would be priced at, what that value would be today.
I mean, again, this report is so absurd on the face of it.
Again, you know, one of my favorite movies is Braveheart and you think back, you know, okay, wow, you know, Scotland's black population, I want to say Scotland, It's about 98% white.
It's one of the whiter... It's pretty white still.
Yeah, but you have this guy already.
Loyalty again to his people.
Yep.
It has nothing to do with loyalty to the nation.
It has loyalty to the nation that he's actively trying to create and actively trying to supplant that Scotland as we know it and we care about it so much as a Scots-American, Scots-Irishman.
And he has prompted a wide-ranging and ambitious reparative justice program.
And yes, Sir Jeff, Sir Jeff says that the university has got to ladle out the lolly in order to make up for the fact that it made money on the slave trade.
He also points out that there are streets named after Jamaica.
Tobago and Virginia in Edinburgh.
No, I'm sorry, in Glasgow, where the university is.
And he thinks these names must be changed because slaves were in Jamaica, Tobago and Virginia.
And this also contributed, of course, to the wealth of the university.
Apparently, James Watt, the guy who invented the steam engine, really played a key role in bringing about the Industrial Revolution.
His family apparently had connections to the slave trade.
Links.
Connections.
We're familiar with that.
Oh yeah.
And all of this contributed to the wealth of Glasgow and to the wealth of the university.
All this built on slavery.
So even the Scots are learning how to apologize.
I gotta tell you, that's a frightening term that I'm afraid is going to seep into the lexicon of our Leftist Friends in the United States Reparative Justice Program.
Wow, that's a scary term.
And you know what's even scarier is the fact that This university was actually at the forefront, Mr. Taylor, of the movement of the 19th century to abolish slavery.
That's right.
Even though it supposedly benefited from slavery, which... The thing about it is, I'm sure Glasgow University never owned a single slave.
No.
All this guy is saying is that some of its benefactors were in industries in which slaves were used in some capacity.
That's all he's saying!
And still they got to cough up all sorts of dough.
Yes, the fact that Glasgow University was right at the forefront of the abolitionist movement doesn't matter.
Doesn't matter.
They got to be published.
Punished anyway.
There's no depth that those who have embraced the anti-white mindset like Sir Jeff Palmer will go to shake the last few pennies out of the pockets of the white man and formerly white institutions such as the Glasgow University.
And it, you know, it always seems to me that all of these utterly poisonous and ultimately suicidal ideas are invented in the United States.
I think it must have surely been an American university.
I know Georgetown has done this.
University of Virginia has done this.
Many universities have have scrabbled through their past.
Harvard just did it, of course.
Yes, yes.
To find out just what sort of, how they might have profited I don't know.
Georgetown.
Georgetown is somehow out looking for the descendants of slaves that were somehow involved in the university so that they can be given free education at Georgetown.
Good grief.
Why not just give them all doctorates without even attending?
Yes.
Well, you know, I think one of my favorite proposals is that all black people be granted a B.A.
at birth.
At birth.
Then we can dispense with all of this fooling around.
Every one of them's got a B.A.
and they got it at birth.
But these ideas are invented here.
They make their way across the Atlantic and they seem to poison every available white mind.
You would think that a country with a history so different from that of the United States in terms of race relations, like Scotland, surely would be immune to this.
But I think it's simply the fact of being white, just being white, makes you susceptible to this kind of exploitation.
But we are not susceptible to exploitation, nor are we susceptible to going over our time.
Well, we had a fantastic show.
We're glad that you're back, and we look forward to talking to you all and engaging with you all next week.
If you have any questions you'd like to send us, please send them over to me at sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
We look forward to getting any questions from our fantastic listening audience, or you can send it to to the contact page at amren.com, which is, we hope, a website that you visit frequently anyway.
And yes, we've had a bit of a lull in interesting questions from readers.
We've had some very, very good ones that we've answered, and we'd like to keep them coming because they really give us food for thought, and we would love to hear from you.
Hey, so for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection