All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 5, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
56:16
Feds Arrest Pro-White “Serial Rioters”
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's edition of Radio Renaissance.
I'm Jared Taylor with American Renaissance.
And with me is our inimitable, indefatigable, except no substitutes, Paul Kersey, our weekly commentator and confidant.
And as usual, we have a full week, a full week to discuss.
And I think one of the most important stories that broke this week was about the federal arrests in the West Strict District of Virginia by an appointee of the Trump administration of a group that I hadn't heard of before called Rise Against Movement.
Now, these people are apparently white nationalists of some stripe or other who have participated in some of the noteworthy actions in which the Antifa come around and try to beat up people who are standing up for the rights of whites.
Well, instead of going after Antifa, United States Attorney Thomas Cullen, who is a Trump administration appointee, and he works directly for Attorney General Jeff Sessions, He held a press conference this week to brag about having arrested several of these rise against people on charges of conspiracy to riot.
They point out a number of such things that apparently some of these guys showed up in Berkeley, California as well as at Huntington Beach where there have been tussles with Antifa and of course the fact that they were at the Unite the Right.
And one of the points that the prosecuting attorney Thomas Cullen makes is that they taped their fists like M.A.A.
fighters, M.M.A.
fighters.
In other words, they were looking to fight.
Now, what is dismaying about this?
Well, there are many dismaying things about this.
That's an understatement.
Yes.
That's an understatement.
One is that there is an outfit called ProPublica.
This is a lefty non-profit that does deep analytical anti-white consciousness pieces.
They're very much a lefty outfit.
They've been involved in doxing people who were at the Unite the Right rally.
They did a huge hit piece on this rise against movement and much of the material that is in the indictment, much of the reasons that this guy Thomas Cullen gave for arresting these guys is pulled straight out of their article.
Straight out.
That was what shocked me the most Mr. Taylor considering the fact that we live in a country where on election, I'm sorry, on inauguration day back in January 20th, 2017.
If you remember, all of the Antifa that were arrested, I can't remember, but I'm quite sure that all the charges were dismissed, right?
Every one of them.
Every one of them.
That's right.
The people who burned the limo, who attacked, of course, it goes without saying that the individual who assaulted Richard Spencer in the infamous video No one's ever tried to find out who that guy was.
Well, there was an attempt to find out who he was, but the police seem uninterested.
Yeah, they seem uninterested.
In pursuing the case.
But it is astonishing that, and it's not only people on our side that look at this indictment and say that it's kind of a cut and paste of what ProPublica did.
One of the pro-Antifa so-called journalists, Christopher Mathias, who writes for BuzzFeed, He gloated about that himself.
He says this is essentially based on ProPublica's work.
And what you have here really is an utterly, utterly and entirely one-sided group collecting information and passing it along apparently to the FBI.
And the FBI is using it to put an indictment together.
This is just so blatantly, blatantly one-sided.
And as you point out, the ones that went wild on our inauguration day, they weren't actually arrested.
I think several dozen of them, maybe as many as a hundred of them were arrested.
Correct.
And they were charged with riot, which is a serious crime.
But they ended up being let off.
And of course, it is undoubtedly the case that you have Antifa who make a fetish of trying to shut people like us down through violent means, if necessary.
And of course, every time there's an American Renaissance conference, you get these Antifa groups that say they are going to shut it down, by fair means or foul.
You know this better than most people.
The Antifa are nothing more than the shock troops of the establishment.
You think about how many times American Renaissance over the years has had public officials who have stepped in and most notably in Charlotte when your conference was denied the ability to be hosted there.
Would you say that was one of the moments when you realized just the tyranny that you were living under?
Before we started this podcast, you and I were chatting about how some of the American Residence conferences in the mid-2000s, most notably the one in 2006, the Washington Post ran a huge story, if memory serves correctly.
I think Nick Griffin was one of the speakers.
I think those conferences were held at a hotel in Northern Virginia without any fanfare, without any problems.
Well, I wouldn't say that.
The Dulles Hyatt, they hosted us for, I forget, four or five years in a row.
But as the years went by, they got more and more threats, more and more demonstrators.
And so we sort of got to the point where we would enter into a contract with one group, and we'd have a nice conference, but there'd be demonstrators, and the hotel would say, well, we love you guys, but we can't afford to have this kind of Hooping and howling outside our hotel.
So it's not as though there'd been no problems.
But now, of course, we have just given up on private venues and that's why we go to government-owned venues.
But the astonishing thing is that here Antifa is a group that has advertised itself as perfectly prepared to resort to violence.
And it's not as though people on our side go to anybody else's group looking for a fight.
Not at all.
If these guys taped up their fists, it's because they knew that violent lefties were on their way.
And essentially what this means is, if we defend ourselves, then we are considered serial rioters in the words of the indictment, and we're the ones who get in trouble.
And it is the Trump No less a person than Jeff Sessions that is doing this.
Didn't he call out Antifa a couple weeks ago in a speech?
Trump continues to talk about Antifa at the rallies he's giving nationwide.
He made some off-the-cuff remark where he said, These people better be careful because our guys will fight back.
And then you have this happen where it's like, well, Mr. Trump, wait a second.
This contradicts what you said at your rally.
What is going on?
The other thing is, remember after the Unite the Right rally, there was a congressional resolution that lambasted racism and this, that, and the other.
And as I recall, Donald Trump put in some sort of personal addendum saying that, well, hey, you have to blame both sides.
So he has, right from the start, taken a position that it takes two to tango, it takes two to rumble.
But the fact that they are going after this group—as I say, I'd never heard of them.
Had you ever heard of— No.
I've never heard of them.
No.
Rise against.
But apparently this ProPublica outfit has gone over photographs, videos.
They've made a huge effort to try to get photographic evidence that these guys were in particular places and they say, okay, these are the bad guys.
It is such a one-sided, utterly partisan approach, which the FBI has accepted.
I find this really shocking and dismaying.
I suppose I should never be shocked and dismayed by anything that happens in this country.
But this to me is blatant.
Well, you know, it's one of those stories where the left... I mean, that is one of Trump's... I don't want to sound like this is just such a pro-Trump podcast today, but remember, the word Antifa now is part of conservative vernacular, which I think is very important.
When they begin to understand that it's not just quote-unquote racists who Antifa are attacking, but Kavanaugh supporters, Brett Kavanaugh supporters.
You see the type of demonstrations that are going on, and when you have Large segments of the conservative population in this country understanding that there's something wrong when this group of people, Antifa, this nebulous group of people, that they're able to just come out and basically be protected by the state, as you noted.
Well, it certainly seems that way.
I'm very disappointed by this, and the fact that you have these groups that make it a point of pride.
Whenever we would have, the last couple of years, and we've met at Montgomery Bell State Park, their position has been, if the state of Tennessee permits this group to meet, we will hold the state accountable.
Now, it seems to me that at some point, this is conspiracy.
This is a conspiracy against us, to deprive us of First Amendment rights, the right to peaceably assemble and state our views.
And if the Trump administration or the state of Tennessee were serious about enforcing the law, this seems to me, to me, a very clear avenue of approach.
But we will see what comes of this, and I certainly hope that there'll be a certain amount of even-handedness, especially given that right at the top of the executive branch you have a guy who has noticed that the violence ain't just on one side.
And as I've said over and over and over, and as is clear to you, and probably everybody listening to this, if there is ever violence at some group that's standing up for white people, it's not because the white people are going around randomly beating people up, it's because they've been attacked.
This is something that has to be emphasized over and over again.
You know, while we're on the subject of hotels, if we could jump to a story that I think dovetails nicely and that we should bring up because I did read that apparently one of the members who attended of the Rise Against Movement actually happened to be a member of the Act for America.
I don't know if you saw that.
Yes.
And Act for America, of course, is an organization Largely focused on the threat of Islamization and Islam.
It's started by Brigitte Gabrielle.
She's a Lebanese-born Christian and again, just like all the Brouhaha that you've had to deal with whenever you try and hold a conference.
This organization just basically, they just had their last conference that was going to be in a public venue.
Well, we'll see.
Certainly in a Hyatt hotel.
As you point out, there have been these various Muslim groups.
There's one called Muslim Advocates that was lobbying against the Crystal City Hyatt ever since the conference was announced.
Gathering signatures with phone call campaigns.
Beaten on these people to cancel Act for America's conference.
Well, the Crystal City Hyatt held firm and they let them hold their conference, but they said this is the last time.
And Hyatt Hotel's CEO, a guy by the name of Mark Hoplamazian, that sounds Armenian or something.
What kind of name is Hoplamazian?
He says, and this is a direct quotation from their statement, If a group is primarily focused on disparaging a group by virtue of their identity, that's really where we need to draw the line.
Now, I don't think Act for America is primarily involved in disparaging Muslims, but in any case, I'd like to point out this is not some pipsqueak organization.
I was very surprised to learn that they claim a million members and nearly 1,000 chapters throughout the country.
Of course, the SPLC says they're a hate group.
But they claim to be the nation's largest national security grassroots organization.
They look at it from a security point of view.
And as they've said over and over and over, we don't care about what they believe.
We care about what they do.
And it is true that Brigitte Gabriel, this Lebanese woman who started the organization, says that a sincerely practicing Muslim can't be a loyal citizen in the United States.
I think there's certainly reason to take that position.
I can't fault anything she said there.
And look at this roster that they were able to attract this year.
This is what's amazing about this organization, because as you're right, a lot of people listening to this probably don't even know about Act for America, but they do have a lot of power.
Bridget Gabrielle, she could probably walk into a number of Republican offices on Capitol Hill right now and have an audience because she was able to have Ted Cruz.
She was able to have the former director of ICE, Thomas Homan.
And two, I'm sorry, three members of the House.
Jeff Duncan from South Carolina, Louie Gohmert from Texas, and Doug Limbourne from Colorado.
And I want to say Steve King is also very close with her as well.
That's right.
Who is, in my opinion, the best elected official right now that we have in the United States.
And these were all speakers at her conference, for heaven's sake.
Which leads me to ask you, Mr. Taylor, how long do you think it is until CPAC, the conference that's held I think every year now in Maryland at the National Harbor.
I think it's a Gaylord property.
Yes, yes it is.
How long until they start getting pressure?
I mean, with what's the acceleration of Trumpism in the Republican Party that we're seeing, how long until you start to see pressure put on corporate interests?
We saw this interestingly when the last Republican National back in July of 2016, when they had their big event and there was a lot of pressure put on corporations that were donating.
You have to start asking yourself this fusion of SJW-ism with capitalism.
It's fascinating to watch.
Well, it is yet again an example of this ferocious divisiveness that we see in this country today.
It used to be when we had our first actual failed conference back in, it was 2009, I guess, 2010.
2010 was when we hoped to have a conference.
We ultimately had to cancel it after it got kicked out of hotels.
Eight years ago.
This is pretty much unheard of.
We were the only people who suffered in this way.
Now you've got a group that can attract a senator, several congressmen, and apparently Bridget Gabrielle is welcome in the White House anytime.
She has these unannounced meetings with Donald Trump.
And this is a group that Hyatt Hotels is going to say, no, no, these are hate mongers, and we're not going to let them meet in our hotel.
This is extraordinary.
My guess is that Act for America, given the kind of support that it's got, is going to find some other private venue to have their meetings.
But this is a very, very ominous first step.
Well, for their national conference, if they're going to have these lawmakers appear, it makes sense to be able to have it in Washington, D.C.
So this is a huge blow to their ability to organize and attract and to have caliber speakers such as Senator Cruz and Louie Gohmer, who also has said some very interesting things about the racial transformation of the country, I should add, and Louie Gohmer.
That's true.
And he was the one who had a long meeting with Philip de Winter.
That's right.
Philip de Winter, I don't know if Louis Gohmert knew this or whether Philip de Winter and he discussed this, but Mr. de Winter has been a speaker at two American Renaissance conferences.
Just for those who don't know, he is a member of the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, which is a very, very staunch group that wants independence for Flanders, and they want Flanders to stay Flemish.
In any case, yes, I think Louie Gohmert is a guy that we should keep our eye on.
But on other not entirely encouraging developments here, as far as the sanctuary law is concerned in the state of California.
You know, California, they recently passed what they called, and this is so hilarious, they called it the California Values Act.
And what this California Values Act does, it forbids any city in the state from cooperating with federal ICE officials or taking any kind of steps to encourage or to permit deportation of criminals.
And what it does is it prohibits state and local police agencies from notifying federal officials about the impending release of immigrants in custody who could then be deported.
I mean, it's astonishing that a state should be doing this.
You would think that a deportable criminal is one that they would want out of state.
You would think that Trump's DOJ would be less interested in prosecuting members of
the Rise Against Movement and instead be focused on elected Democrat, non-whites basically,
who are not only using illegal aliens to colonize California, but are actively passing laws
and of course this California Values Act to protect these people.
I mean this is a moment where that whole anti-federalist, federalist debate needs to go and the federal
government needs to step in and say, hey, this has to stop.
Well to me, I am a staunch federalist by principle, but to me it is astonishing that a state,
even if it is exercising a certain amount of sovereign power, should take the view that
okay, we've got a foreign criminal.
Let him stay.
Let him stay.
Don't send him away.
We love diversity.
We love criminals.
But the point about bringing this up is that in Orange County, There was a ruling in a suit that was brought by a number of cities because they have an interesting system in California of which I was unaware.
There are two different kinds of cities.
There are cities that are called charter cities and there are cities that are general law cities.
Charter cities, and that's 121 of them out of the 478 cities in California, they have a charter that they have established that makes them supreme, the supreme authority over municipal affairs.
And a number of these charter cities in Orange County, Huntington Beach was one of them, They had filed suit in state court, and the state court had said, yeah, these guys, if they want to, they can ignore this so-called California Values Act, and they can notify the feds if they have got some deep-dyed criminal that they want to get rid of once he's out of jail.
But the astonishing thing is, here, Attorney General Xavier Becerra of the state of California.
He said, we don't care what this court has decided.
We're going to enforce this California's Values Act anyway.
What are they going to do?
Arrest an official who turns a criminal over to ICE?
This is absolutely astonishing.
Here, right there in California law, there is this distinction, and a city is sovereign over municipal affairs.
Now, I suppose the state is going to argue this is not a municipal affair, but it seems to me that who a city lets out on its streets is certainly up to it.
I mean, we're at a point now where something that you and I have talked about many times, what could President Trump do that would send shockwaves across not just the United States, but the globe?
That is to go into one of these sanctuary cities and arrest the mayor?
Or to go to California and arrest Attorney General Beccara?
What is stopping you from doing that?
Well, there have been some suits about that.
Remember, at one point, he was going to withhold federal money.
And then there was some running around about how, okay, maybe the only money that could be withheld had to do with police enforcement.
But this is quite outrageous.
On the other hand, I think it is worth noting that the California Values Act That was sponsored and authored by Kevin DeLeon, who was at that time the leader of the Senate.
Now, Kevin DeLeon, we've talked about him before.
He is the guy that the California State Democratic Party has endorsed in his fight against Dianne Feinstein.
Correct.
Here's yet another one of these rising non-whites.
who wants to kick out one of the old-timer white people who have been in the Democratic Party for a long time.
He was in the State Senate, but he got term limited out.
He's been doing this for a long time.
And he says, well, you know, too bad for these old white ladies.
It's time for us true blue, brown, Hispanic, La Raza has got to take over.
The ascension of the people of color.
It's fascinating to watch because, again, this upcoming election cycle, I know we're going to talk more and more about it as we get there, but there are so many important races to watch.
From a national standpoint, from a macro standpoint, I think this is one of the more interesting ones to see what does happen.
Yes, yes.
Apparently, you know, Dianne Feinstein, He has, oh, a war chest that's, what, 10 to 1 his size.
But he's gaining.
He's gaining all the time.
And of course, after all, now isn't that one of the states now in which Hispanics are an actual majority?
Or maybe not yet.
I think, oh, Hispanics are the largest number.
Largest racial group in the plurality.
Yes, they're not yet a majority.
So we know who he's appealing to.
I was just reading about him the other day, and apparently he says now that when he was growing up, he resented the fact that his first name is an Anglo name.
His name is Kevin.
He asked his mom, what's this?
All my friends are Esteban, or Miguel, or Manuel, or Jesus.
I'm Kevin?
What's this?
Just another white guy with a tan, right?
Right, right.
No, no, no, no.
He wants to be la raza all the way.
And, again, we mention him only because he's the guy who wrote this so-called California Values Act, which the state of California is going to enforce even if a judge says that it violates the state constitution to enforce it, that it rugs roughshod over the authority of these charter cities.
So we'll see how that turns out.
And speaking of yet another disappointing judge, no, that was an encouraging judge.
Very encouraging.
Now here's a disappointing one.
That was just on Wednesday of this week, a federal judge By the name of Edward Chen, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, has overruled the Trump administration's decision to end TPR, a temporary protected status, for those people who are here from El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan.
And as our listeners know, temporary protective status is granted to people who happen to be in the country, whether legally or illegally, if there's some sort of horrifying development in their home country.
The idea is, oh, the place is devastated and the poor deers would be in trouble if they went back.
And so even if you're illegally, you can stay.
Or if you're here for a short visa, we'll extend the visa.
Well, some of them have been here an awful long time.
Yes, they have.
El Salvadoran since 2001.
There was an earthquake.
Nicaraguans from Hurricane Mitch back in 1998.
1998!
20 years!
And the Haitians, of course, that earthquake in 2010 that devastated that country far more than the Haitian population is capable of doing on a daily basis, if I might be so bold.
And, of course, the Sudan There's been internal fighting since 2013 and of course anyone can just look at these countries and they can realize that there's going to be indefinite problems that probably are the rationale for bringing every citizen of those countries to the United States.
That's what you have to understand, Mr. Taylor.
That's where this is all headed when you actually look at what Judge Chin in his decision to temporarily halt this plan.
Well, the fact is, yes, if it is unsafe for the ones who are here to go back to their home countries, it's probably unsafe for everyone who's there.
Isn't that the logical conclusion?
That's it.
It's as you say.
But, you know, Judge Chen is saying something quite interesting.
And this is something that the judges seem to be really sinking their teeth into these days.
He says there were certain procedural difficulties in coming up with this, but in this decision to revoke TPS.
But he did say that one of the most important reasons why he overruled the President on this is that this lifting of TPS violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
Based on, to use Judge Chen's words, animus against non-white, non-European immigrants.
Now, of course, there is nothing in the findings about this and there are plenty of other countries that still have TPS.
They've just gone through the list of countries and they said this one's safe, this one's okay, but he has He apparently, Judge Chen has come up with this list of statements by Donald Trump.
Donald Trump, including the one when he announces candidacy and he talks about how some of the Mexican immigrants are rapists, etc, etc.
And the old, well, dung heap countries statement.
Actually, I believe he said it was a shithole country.
Oh, dear, dear.
I shall use the language because that's what he said.
We're just quoting the President of the United... Well, we're quoting someone quoting the President of the United States.
Correct.
And a couple of other... And the fact that he said that he wasn't interested in Muslims coming into the country.
All of this he has trotted out to say that it is against the law and unconstitutional to lift TPS status for these people because of Donald Trump's alleged racial animus and that violates the 14th amendment.
Quite incredible.
Also, of course, he has been talking about, Judge Chen points out that there, this is a complete non-sequitur if you ask me, that thousands of children And, of course, they're U.S.
citizens because they were born here.
Thousands of children have been born to these estimated 240,000 people who should be getting the door.
Now, one thing that is interesting about TPS status, if your TPS status is lifted, you would think that because this is something that has been extended year after year, you would think that the federal government knows who these people are, where they live, you'd think they'd be right at the top of the list to be sent home.
No, no, no.
No.
There's no special effort to make them go home.
They just become regular illegals like everybody else.
They just blend right in.
In fact, there was a time when Liberia had temporary protective status.
But then, after that was lifted, they got what's called Deferred Enforcement of Departure.
What the heck's this?
That means they weren't sent away.
Sent away.
And this went on and on and on.
And even when this was eventually lifted, nobody, nobody made any particular effort to find them and send them home.
So the whole thing is a joke.
They're illegal aliens with an asterisk.
With that DED status.
You know, it's so fascinating to look at this case, Mr. Taylor, because this is one that will be quickly shot to the Supreme Court.
I would think so.
I would think so.
I mean, the Justice Department is not going to take this lying down.
No.
And it's interesting to wonder just where the Constitution would come out.
Well, I'm sure the Equal Protection Clause, the 14th Amendment, those people would have thought it was perfectly fine to keep Muslims out.
Perfectly fine to keep every Guatemalan out.
They wouldn't have cared less about that.
Not at all.
But even if there is some kind of racially related motivation, does that make it illegal?
I don't know.
The point is, this is a clear encroachment by the judiciary on executive power.
And that's fortunately what the Supreme Court determined.
No, did it go to the Supreme Court?
The one about the so-called Muslim ban?
It did.
It went to the Supreme Court, yes.
And that's what they decided.
So we will see.
This will go to the Supreme Court for sure, as you say.
But moving right along to our next story, I thought there was a very amusing little story in the Washington Post.
Diversity for thee, but not for me.
That's right, that's right.
They pointed out, with a smirk, that the New York Times has just hired its seventh reporter to cover the White House, and all seven of them are white.
And the Washington Post also announces that Politico, they will have seven reporters on the beat, including their latest hire coming on this month, and all of them are white.
Reuters, USA Today, no non-white reporters on their teams covering President Trump.
And now, the Washington Post, as it happens, brags about the fact that their six guys to the White House include two blacks.
Two blacks!
So, yes, no fewer than 33 and a third percent of their reporters covering the White House are black, so they're patting themselves on the back.
And of course they're wringing their hands about how awful this is, about how we need black people, we need people of color.
And they do point out, and this is quite interesting, that the number of women in journalism is approaching parity, they say.
That means 50%.
That over the past two decades, the percentage of women in the profession of journalism has nearly doubled.
More than doubled, more than doubled.
I would have thought it would already not only reach parity, but that men were a clear minority.
It seems that way because that's when you read the paper, and if you look at USA Today, They've started to include the picture of the author for most of the stories, and it's like, where are the men?
It's just a parade of females.
That's right, that's right.
But, well they asked the Times, they asked the Times a spokesman, you know, how come all these seven White House reporters are all white?
And the Times spokesman Eileen Murphy, a woman of course, She said that 60% of last year's newsroom hires were either female or a Menard.
No newsroom for white men?
No, no.
Guess not.
Guess not.
But, you know, I always shake my head over these stories.
If it takes a black person to report the news for black people, then why not just make it explicit?
Make it explicit.
Black newspapers for black people.
Black police officers for black communities.
A certain quota set aside in Congress if blacks are 13% of the population, 13% of the legislators for black.
They don't seem to realize where this leads.
Tell me, and I believe it tells you also, is that anything seen as too white is not legitimate.
Right.
That's as far as they go in thinking about this.
They don't see the implications of this.
There should be black television stations for black people.
Well, there are.
It's funny because you're no longer on Twitter.
No, no.
It's fascinating, whenever the GOP or whenever someone like Paul Ryan, they tweet out a picture of their new interns, they have them all gathered together, it's amazing all of the blue checkmark journalists who go crazy and they point out the dearth, the paucity of diversity.
And yet, as you noted, I'm sure the Washington Post, whoever it was, was it an intern, whoever it was that noticed this and decided, Go up the chain of command.
We've got to get this story out because look, we've got two.
Two of the six.
We're way above them in our diversity quota.
Man, we're great.
What ombudsman allowed that story to be published?
That's the funny thing in my eyes.
How is it even a news story?
Oh, well, it's a look at us story.
It's a we're more diverse than you are story.
We're virtuous and you're not story.
I wonder how diverse Jeff Bezos is, who owns the Washington Post.
I wonder how diverse his engineering team is at Blue Origins.
I bet it's very diverse.
I bet there are lots of Asians.
Lots of Asian men.
Because he clearly discriminates against black women and Hispanics.
I bet it's very diverse. I bet there are lots of Asians.
Lots of Asian men.
Because he clearly discriminates against black women and Hispanics. I bet that's the case.
There might be a few hidden figures in there.
There might be a few hidden figures, yes.
These black ladies who are actually running the show, without whom they'd never get off the ground.
But anyway, that does our domestic stories, and we move to the rest of the world, and just across the border, actually, to Quebec.
This is an interesting development.
There were Quebec elections in the province there, and it is a new party, just founded a few years ago, called the Coalition Avenir Quebec, Coalition for the Future of Quebec, and it came in first place.
And the head of it, François Legault, is forming a government.
Now this was historic in the sense that The governments in the province of Quebec have been dominated by the Liberals and the Parti Québécois ever since 1966.
This is a long time.
But this François Legault, he's a businessman.
He's had a lot of political experience, actually.
He was with the PQ, the Parti Québec, for a while, the independence types.
But what is noteworthy about this is That he has been branded as a populist, all this usual stuff.
And according to one news account, this was one of the Canadian papers, and I quote, it says, Quebec will now be led by a man who came to power fixating on immigration and cultural identity.
If only it were true.
Well, apparently he really is resolute on the idea that he's going to ban any public servant or school teacher from wearing any kind of religious regalia.
That can be a headscarf, that can be a Jewish kippah, and perhaps even a cross around your neck, for all I know, to be consistent.
And this is infuriating people.
Not so much banning a cross, but keeping the Muslims from, they can't wear a headscarf if they're teachers.
This is terrible.
And he has the temerity to propose that immigration into the province be cut by 20% next year. 20%!
It's a start.
You see this in Switzerland, you see this in Belgium, all this banning the burka and stuff.
Again, it's too late when that population is problematic enough that you have to do this.
That's when you start having to have people who even broach the subject of repatriation.
Yes, and you know, on the one hand, I entirely understand the impulse.
On the other, I am perfectly happy for these foreigners to be as unassimilated, as obviously alien, and as different as possible.
Which is why I'm not in favor of making English the official language of the United States.
Because as long as these people cling to where they came from and speak another language, we're quite Cognizant of the divisions that are propping up in otherwise once peaceful communities across the country.
That's right.
Let them remain as alien as they wish to be.
As they wish to be.
And many of them certainly wish to be alien.
Now, some of the journalists are wondering, though, how the present Prime Minister Young Trudeau will be welcome.
After all, he has said that Canadians don't have a core identity and that everyone is welcome in Canada.
Whereas this François Legault, new Prime Minister of Quebec, is saying that yes, we Quebecers, we do have an identity and we plan to preserve it.
Not only are they trying to preserve it, but again, I've said this repeatedly and I'll say it one more time, the four most important words of the 21st century and those nations who have sons and daughters who rise to positions of power simply by articulating, because we live here, those countries, those areas have a future.
Those that, as you noted, the current Prime Minister, there's no identity.
Everyone's welcome here.
Those societies will cease to exist as a functional nation, community, whatever you want to talk about.
Because we live here, those are the four most important words of the 21st century.
Well, it depends on what because we live here defines.
If we're saying because we live here, we don't deserve to be here, which is practically what Trudeau is saying.
But the point is, we have the right to stay here.
We have the right to be here because we live here.
And you don't.
You don't.
That's it.
You don't have a right to live here.
It's a powerful assertion.
Yes, but another interesting aspect of this election is that another party came to the fore in these Quebec provincial elections and that is something called Quebec Solidaire, which is Solidarity Quebec.
These are an interesting outfit.
They are an independence party.
They want Quebec to be independent, but they are also super lefty, super, super duper lefty.
They claim outright that they are democratic socialists, they are feminists, they are very much pro-immigration,
and they want native people's rights, Indian rights, and they are advocates of what's called alter globalism.
Do you know about alter globalism?
I've never encountered this term before.
Well, it comes from the French, actually.
There's something called alter-mondialism, and alter-globalism.
And the idea is, okay, we're all for globalism, but not in the capitalist, free-market sense.
Because the current form of globalism is one in which the rich exploit the poor, the North exploits the South, and that if there is immigration, it's only permitted as cheap labor for the capitalists in the North.
This is a kind of super-socialist globalism in which free trade has to be regulated in ways that benefit the exploited South.
And we also have to be very, very cognizant of the fact that it's the rich countries that are polluting, so they're the ones who have to make all the sacrifices.
It's a globalism, alright, but it is a kind of explicitly anti-North, anti-developed, ultimately anti-white, pro-Third World globalism.
Which will only accelerate the environmental cataclysm that is coming largely due to the developments in India and China to create first world economies there and the just horrific consequences to the environment that we're seeing as more and more of the people in those countries rise to a middle class status.
The environmental impact is just gratuitous.
Yes, well, the idea, as you've often pointed out in these podcasts, if Bill Gates really cared about the future of the country, really cared about Africa the way he does, he would be encouraging every possible means of earth control, every possible means of trying to suppress this enormous, enormous population explosion that everybody's predicting for Africa.
But of course, well, he's actually said something vague about that once or twice.
He has, and you know, I think that we are seeing people in power, billionaires, forced with the reality of what's coming.
I think that's one of the reasons why people like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, who I It's obvious that they know why they're putting so much emphasis on these private space ventures.
Jeff Bezos is pumping billions of dollars.
Billions.
Tens of billions of dollars into Blue Origin.
Same thing with Elon Musk with SpaceX.
Well, you think they're preparing a bolt hole?
Well, no, I just I think that they, I think that they, they were, you know, I think Musk is 47.
I know.
Let's see if I remember he serves correct.
Bezos was five or six when we landed on July 20th on 69.
on July 20th, 1969. So he's, you know, they both grew up in a time where there was a lot
of optimism about the future and I think now you're beginning to realize that pessimism
with this overpopulation and this, the rise of the third world and the instability that
that creates as the white world regresses.
I I would love to be a fly on the wall at some of these board meetings, let's just say.
Some of these private conversations these guys are having.
Well, it's always a topic of interesting speculation to imagine who knows what, actually.
What do they really think?
But amusing though it is, it's a little bit fruitless because we don't know.
And what matters is what they do and say, what they do and say.
I mean, well, we've had presidents.
The one that I think of all the time is President Nixon.
He understood perfectly well that there are racial differences.
And he says, this is good for presidents to know about, but we better not ever talk about it.
How many people actually understand what the situation is, but think we better not talk about it?
It may be a dismayingly large number.
It may be a dismayingly small number.
Well, I'll say this.
Elon Musk, if by chance you're listening to this podcast as you're driving one of your great Tesla cars, realize that you have a chance to do something.
And if you remain quiet and you do nothing, then all of the horrors that you have read about will transpire.
Yes.
What happened to South Africa will happen to the entire Western white world.
That's right.
As we get dispossessed.
That's right.
And then your dreams of the heavens will be just that.
Dreams.
Well, as I say, he may be preparing a bolt hole.
But in any case, this takes us to Switzerland, to a proposal that was put forward by the Swiss People's Party.
They've been a pretty good outfit for, oh, several decades now.
But they have decided that the country should strip asylum from anyone who's been granted asylum, but then who actually travels to his home country.
Which makes perfect sense.
I mean, if it's safe enough to go home, go home.
If it's safe enough for 10 days, it's safe enough for a lifetime.
If you're happy going back there, go back.
And this, apparently, there was the National Council, which is made up of all the different parties.
It was accepted by a vote of 129 to 57.
Pretty good vote.
And then it has to pass to what's called the Council of States, which is Switzerland's upper house, for consideration, but it's very likely to be accepted.
Mr. Taylor, there is not a human right to live around white people.
No.
And that's what I think more and more individuals in these Western countries are beginning to learn.
I would take issue with that.
There is a human right to live around white people, if you're white.
That's a nice addendum.
Okay, you got me there.
Yes.
You're right.
But as these guys pointed out, they said it would make it easier to identify false refugees.
And I think it's also important to say, okay, if you've got so-called asylees who are here, who are going home on vacation, that suggests that we don't need to take anybody from these countries.
If the folks who've come here, presumably because they were terrified of something, if they're waltzing home again, then, I mean, isn't the proof in the pudding?
Don't base social policy on individuals.
They should all go back.
It's really simple.
Yes, yes.
So I think good for them and good for Switzerland.
And then another little foreign story that I thought was an interesting one.
This had to do with a poetry contest in the city of Speyer in Germany.
Now, this was put on by the Speyer Youth Council, and it was supposed to be an anti-racism initiative.
I mean, that's the only kind you're allowed to have these days, of course.
And one of the contestants was a 14-year-old named Ida Marie Muller.
And, to quote from a few lines of her poem that she recited for the anti-racism initiative, Don't giggle!
It goes, from far away the man fell into the hands of traffickers with no passport but a mobile phone.
He arrived in our hallowed German land.
Because he can't get a lady, he helped himself to one with a knife.
I laugh because the audacity of this girl to go up there and give this, read, recite this poem.
I can only imagine the looks of horror that the white leftists who applaud everything Merkel's doing and they were anticipating to hear nothing more than one anti-white poem after another extolling the virtues of this non-white refugee wave that has capsized the German nation and then to hear a girl actually
Weave into her poem, our hallowed German land.
Yes.
Wow!
Yes, and he couldn't get a lady so he helped himself to one with a knife.
Well, and to me, there's an even better part of this story.
Now, even at this anti-racism initiative gathering, her poem got the loudest applause.
The loudest applause!
I guess the adults, I mean, everybody sort of goes along with this rubbish.
Exactly.
And then somebody stands up.
It just takes one brave person to stand up and everybody goes, of course!
Well, but her poem was disqualified.
We don't know why.
Her poem was disqualified.
And when another participant was announced the winner, some members of the audience responded with loud jeers and boos.
Courage is contagious, and sometimes it takes a 14-year-old to state what everyone else is too afraid to say.
Yes, yes.
I think this is quite a delightful little story in its own way.
Now, as it turns out, she is the daughter of one of the members of the Alternative for Germany, a politician.
She's maybe number two or three in the party, actually, by the name of Nicole Hext.
Well, after all this happened, their home was spray-painted with anti-Alternative for Deutschland graffiti.
This just goes to show you just how, what the other side is like.
The left is, again, you cannot find one instance that didn't turn out to be a hoax of graffiti being spray-painted on a leftist house or one of these individuals house in any country and yet this is the type of right invective and hate that is thrown and We we are headed to something terrifying Mr. Taylor and it's it's in every Western country because of this disease of egalitarianism has crept into the minds of so many people so many of our own people who would
We're repulsed that someone would have the word, our hallowed German land.
And that actually, that makes me smile to think that this little girl, this 14 year old, would like I said, weave that into her poem.
Because you know what, that's what it's going to take.
Because we live here, it's our hallowed German land.
She gets it.
And a lot of Germans do too.
Yep.
I'd love to know.
I mean, I don't speak German.
It would be interesting to know what the original German was.
But I imagine that this is a pretty good translation.
And it probably rhymed and scanned and all those wonderful things.
But no, I say three cheers for Ida Marie Muller.
I think what she did was absolutely great.
And you know, to go to an anti-racism initiative And then recite a poem like that.
I mean, that takes so much more backbone than 99% of whites have.
99.9%!
You're probably right.
Good for her.
And we're going to end this podcast with a question, and the question sort of answers itself.
But one of our listeners wrote in to say, what do you think about how President Macron, Emmanuel Macron of France, lectured a young white Frenchman and told him to address him as Mr. President.
Whereas this week he embraced a black thug from St.
Martin who was giving the camera the middle finger.
Now, let's explain the first thing that happened.
He was at a patriotic public appearance in June, and it's actually the anniversary of Charles de Gaulle's broadcast after the fall of France.
He made this broadcast from London, which practically no Frenchman heard, but it's considered sort of the beginning, the first heroic movement of the resistance in France against Nazism, and it's part of what led to France being one of the victorious powers.
In any case, it is a rather stirring broadcast, a short broadcast, but Charles de Gaulle made this broadcast and they celebrate this as an annual event.
Well, he was going into the crowd and some high school student It's really pretty snotty when you think about it.
He sang the opening bars of the Internationale.
That's the communist song, and that was at one time considered the national anthem for all communist countries.
The opening bar of the Internationale, and he's saying, how you doing, Manu?
And Manu is Emmanuel.
That's short for Emmanuel.
I mean, that's a pretty flippant way to address the president of the republic.
He says, no, no, no, no.
You better call me Mr. President or Sir.
And on occasion like this, you sing the national anthem, the Marseillaise.
He really dressed him down.
And as a matter of fact, I saw the video of this and the guy says, yes, sir, Mr. President.
I mean, he really was cowed.
Well, just a few weeks later, he visits the French territory of Saint Martin in the Caribbean, and I don't know how many of our listeners saw this photograph, but here are two young blacks that are naked from the waist up.
I don't know why they're running around undressed like this.
And Macron is grinning like a banshee between the two of them.
With his arms around him.
And one of them is just flipping the bird at the camera.
Well then, when this is called to his attention, he said, and I'm translating the French here, he says, we have to stop thinking that we can gain nothing from our young people just because they are a certain color and because they've said they've done something silly.
He says it's the other way around.
My, my role, that is to look for something good that every young person in the public has to offer.
Well, the double standard here is quite obvious.
I do not blame him for dressing down this guy.
He's really making fun of France.
Making fun of him.
And I think he did the right thing.
But if it's a black guy... Acquiesce.
Acquiesce.
And look for the best.
Look for the best.
Now, there were a number of different reactions to this.
One of the ones that I thought was the most hilarious was that Macron is making a fist, sort of a solidarity fist, awareness together kind of a fist, and this black guy is showing the middle finger.
Somebody had photoshopped the thing and gave him another finger
so it looks like he's doing the V sign and said, no, no, you've got it all wrong.
They were doing rock, paper, scissors.
And Macron with his fist, he had just won the rock, paper, and that's why he's smiling.
It's a nice win and it's a nice way to Yes, satirize the whole thing.
Yeah, to poke fun again.
This is just emblematic of what's going on in the Western world when you have
these spineless leaders who, they wanna have one set of standards
for their own people.
And then of course, the people, the ascension of the people of color
that's happening across the Western world.
Acquiesce.
Complete surrender.
That's right.
Anything they do, anything they do, you gotta look on the positive, forgive, and say, my role is to bring out the best in all of our youth, even if occasionally they do something silly.
Well, speaking of silly...
This is not Silly Request.
We had some other questions that some people sent in to us and we really enjoy ending the podcast each week by addressing some of those questions.
So please write any question you have.
There's so much going on in the world.
We love getting feedback from our fantastic listening audience.
So shoot those questions over to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
Once again that's pdl1 at gmail.com or please send your questions to the contact us button at amran.com a m r e n dot com oh just one little detail uh i learned a french expression because of what happened in saint martin in the caribbean and that is what the french how the french refer to the middle finger gesture they call it the finger of honor
Which is a lovely French ironic way.
They know very well what it means.
Yes.
But they call it the finger of honor.
Well, as always, it's an honor to speak with you, Mr. Taylor.
So, for Jared Taylor, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection