All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 20, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
01:00:41
Bleeding Hearts but Too Many Mouths
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to another edition of Radio Renaissance.
I am your host, Henry Wolfe, standing in for Jared Taylor, who is on a speaking tour in Europe right now.
And I am joined, as always, by the indefatigable Paul Kersey, who joins us from the road today.
He is the road warrior himself.
Mr. Kersey, how are you?
That's high praise to be compared to the great Mel Gibson, although I would say you and I both probably feel that we were part of Jared's speaking tour in a reawakening Europe.
We're not going to get to talk about what's going on over there, of course, in Hungary, but there's so much positive news going on.
If our listeners remember what Jared said last week, it kind of shocked me, Henry.
He said he never could have envisioned what's happening in Europe happening in his lifetime.
And I've been thinking about that all week, about what he said.
And you think about all Jared's done, all the sacrifices he's made to try and bring about an American renaissance.
Well, guess what?
he let slip this reality that he never thought a European renaissance was actually possible
in the way that it's happening.
And that was a profound pronouncement, I thought.
No, I was just reading an article about the Hungary situation and there's a Dutch politician
who's, you know, some bureaucrat, and he was saying he was referring to the alt-right in
He said this alt-right government.
So they're already declaring that, you know, this nebulous movement that we have in America has somehow taken hold in Hungary and that Orbán is an exemplar of that.
And I would say with Salvini in Italy, you see another similar Similar case where he was saying stuff last week about how Italians need to have more children and they need to not bring in Africans to replace the children they aren't having.
I mean, these are very solid arguments.
The lesson of the 20th century was that the elite tried to stamp out identity worldwide and bring about a homogenous globalization.
And the reality of what we're seeing in the early stages of the 21st century is identity
is going to come back with a vengeance.
Well, yeah.
And our first major topic today is actually a rift off of that because the globalist project,
I mean, we should realize that it doesn't just affect Europeans and whites.
I mean, we had a Mexican speaker at our conference two years ago who refers to himself as an identitarian, and he understands that the forces of globalism are at work to unmake the identity in Mexico as well.
But the same is even true in Africa.
Where you have this attempt at homogenization, where they want to create neoliberal societies everywhere.
They want everyone to be shopping at Walmart.
They want everyone to be eating at McDonald's.
And they're going to do their best to bring this about.
And don't forget drinking coffee from Starbucks.
That's right.
Everyone needs their Starbucks coffee.
Yeah, our first topic is Bill Gates, and he made headlines for something that a lot of our readers will be, and listeners, will be excited about.
I mean, he was saying that one of the biggest problems facing the world over the next century is going to be the African population explosion.
And that's something that will be very familiar to our readers.
They may recall our several part series that we did on the world's most important graph, where we had contributors and thinkers Right, what they thought it meant.
Steve Saylor coined this term for this graph that just shows every other continent's population basically stagnating over the next century, but Africa exploding over the course of this century from roughly 600 million to 4 billion.
If present trends continue.
And that year that population will reach 4 billion, I believe, is 2100.
That's right.
So we're talking about in 82 years.
Yeah.
And that's not that long of a time because, think about it, that graph shows the population of Africa in 1950.
I think the population was just over 500 million?
No, no.
Under 50 million or 100 million.
Wow.
Because in 1990 it hit 500 million.
Wow.
Yeah, and then today it's 1.1 billion.
See, these numbers are so absurd.
I know.
You're not able to put them into context until you see what Mr. Wolf noted quite succinctly, as Steve Saylor has coined.
This is the world's most important graph.
And what we're about to talk about with Bill Gates, who spent billions of dollars, billions of his own dollars, trying to find And trying to show that, hey, you know, race isn't real.
We can bring these Africans up to a standard of living to where they can create not only Wakandas, but they can surpass Wakanda.
They can surpass what Western man has created.
And lo and behold, I'll let you quote what he said.
Well, he's running into some very... he's running into some problems.
Racial impediments.
Some racial impediments to his vision of global wealth and global neoliberalism.
But he says that one of the biggest challenges is, of course, the population growth.
So he says, to put it bluntly, decades of stunning progress in the fight against poverty and disease may be on the verge of stalling.
This is because the poorest parts of the world are growing faster than everywhere else.
More babies are being born in the places where it's hardest to lead a healthy and productive life.
If current trends continue, the number of poor people in the world will stop falling and could even start to rise.
And so he is acknowledging this problem.
Now, he doesn't acknowledge what's led to this problem.
No, he doesn't.
You know, why is the population of Africa able to explode?
And it's in good measure because of a lot of the things that he's done to improve agriculture there, to improve the economies, GDP per capita is up, so people are able to afford more.
Healthcare and sanitation.
It's really simple things like that that are going to increase fertility.
And we already know you're dealing with a, probably the most fecund people on the planet
due to the just, like we talked about that world was supported graph, 500 million in 1952.
To a projected 4 billion.
Four billion.
Yep.
Four billion.
But he talks about how since 2000, there have been these dramatic gains in reducing global
poverty and they've primarily been out of China and India, where if you look at from
1990 to 2017, China and East Asia have gone from 59% impoverished, like deep poverty.
We're talking the metric is $1.90 per day.
They've gone from 59% to...
And that trend is continuing, it's not flatlining.
And in India and South Asia, the figure is from 45% To only 8%.
Those are extraordinary numbers.
Extraordinary numbers in terms of escaping that $1.90 per day line.
And apparently beyond that point is when you can start thinking about the future.
You're just, you're getting beyond subsistence.
You're creating a middle class.
you're creating an actual, from an economic standpoint, which you and I don't really want to measure
a health of a community based on, just on economic indicators alone.
But the point is you're able to create a middle class where you have to start thinking
about future time orientation, where just having children nonstop
to be able to sustain your economies, to sustain your, whatever you want to call your,
quote, standard of living, what you're subsisting on under $1.90 a day,
that goes away.
Right.
But, as you noted, it's not happening in Africa because in Sub-Saharan Africa, during that same time period, it's gone from 59% to 38%.
So a little bit of an impact, but it's not compared to what's going on in China.
Only a 21% drop over that time period in Sub-Saharan Africa versus a 55% drop in China and East Asia.
And a 37% drop in India and South Asia.
So, Africa, we're running into some racial impediments, possibly.
Of course, Mr. Gates would probably disagree with us on that.
But we'll talk more about that.
Strenuously!
He would strenuously.
The report notes that by 2015, if current trends continue, extreme poverty at this $1.90 per day will basically be non-existent in all of Asia.
And it will be concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa.
86% of the world's extreme poverty is projected to be in Sub-Saharan Africa.
And that's by 2050.
Mr. Wolf, that number is... When you look at that number and you think about the strides and the positive results that have been made in these other portions of the world versus Africa, and you look at that world's most important graph, you start to realize that The daunting nature of how bad it's going to get in sub-Saharan Africa, I think they're underplaying.
Right.
Significantly.
Yeah.
I think there are a lot of factors that they don't consider.
And the biggest one is race.
So all this data comes from this goalkeepers report that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation put out this week.
And the report makes no mention of race.
It just talks about region.
It just talks about populations and countries.
It doesn't point out the fact that China's average IQ, according to 2002-2006 works by Richard Lin, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, is 105.
India's is 82.
Sub-Saharan Africa, if you average all the different measures of it, the most reliable indication is it's about 68.
You know, you started this podcast, Mr. Wolf, by saying, hey, leading a Mad Max lifestyle.
I want to read to you the writings of Paul Thoreau, who is regarded as the greatest living travel journalist on the planet.
He wrote in The Last Train to Zone Verde, My Ultimate African Safari, these words about the Malthusian Nightmare brewing in Africa.
He wrote, quote, My horror interest in the futureless dystopian world gone wrong, Mad Max Africa of child soldiers, street gangs, wreaking slums, refuse heaps, utter despair, misplaced belief, new age cargo colts, and bungled rescue attempts.
This horror interest is rooted in detachment.
It is unworthy, no more than idle, slightly sickening curiosity over modernity in its most odious form, the sort that technology worsens by making people lazier and greedier, tantalizing them with visions of the unattainable, driving many Well, of course Gates thinks we can get beyond that.
in Europe and Africa.
We have bestowed on Africa just enough of the disposable junk of the modern world
to create in African cities a junkyard replica of the West, a mirror image of our own failures,
but no better than that."
End quote.
Well, of course, Gates thinks we can get beyond that.
He thinks that if you invest in human capital enough that you can change everything.
But of course, he doesn't consider genetic capital.
When Bill Gates goes to Africa to see the results of his investment, to see the return on investment, he goes to areas where there are photo ops and opportunities that are screened.
He probably has security doing everything possible to make the images for the journalists of the world, to take these positive images of these formerly impoverished Africans who are now on the verge of being the next hidden figures that we can write about and helping Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin or SpaceX with Elon Musk.
They'll do the trajectory just as we're supposedly told that three African-Americans did all this for the Apollo space program.
Whereas Paul Thoreau, he actually has traveled through Africa and he's seen the results of all of this money that's being poured in and these investments and his analysis of the future is terrifying, because as Mr. Gates comes to understand, it's the migration worries versus economic potential, Mr. Wolf, that really keeps him up at night.
Well, that's the thing.
He does, to his credit, at least focus on the question of demographics.
He's not looking at it from a racial perspective, but he does look at it from a general demographic perspective.
He does point out that 60% of Africans today are under age 25.
And for comparison, the figure for people living in Europe I won't say Europeans because that includes a significant immigrant population at this point, but that figure is 27%.
So you're talking about a 33 point spread.
And he says in the report, he says people focus too much on what will happen when a disenfranchised, unemployed, unruly, youthful population comes about in Africa, which is already, it's already here.
And we're already seeing it.
And he says that people worry too much about this threat of global migration.
People are worried too much about Camp of the Saints, and they refuse to... He doesn't mention Camp of the Saints, but that's what he's referencing.
He says people need to look instead at the economic potential of all these people if we get them educated, if we get them plugged into jobs, and things like that.
So that's what this report is a call for.
It's a call to invest in healthcare, in education, while at the same time, he goes on to say
that we have to do things to make sure that the population is a size such that it can
actually benefit from those things and those things don't just get washed out.
Because what you've seen actually, if you look at the numbers, and this report doesn't
contain all the numbers that you would need, is that if you look from 1990 to today at
how much the population has grown in Africa, it's about 600 billion and more than doubled.
If you look at the poverty numbers, they've gone up almost at the same pace.
And so what you're doing is creating just more and more poverty.
And really GDP per capita flatlined for about the first 20 years of that period, and has only started creeping up slightly since.
So you're not really improving people's standard of living.
You're instead just creating more and more gross numbers of impoverished people.
Let's put into perspective what happened in the United States of America in the early 20th century.
The mechanical cotton picker made sharecropper labor, largely black labor in the South, obsolete.
So what happened?
Six million African Americans moved to the North.
They moved to places like Detroit.
They moved to places like Camden.
They moved to places like Harlem.
They moved to Chicago.
They moved to all these cities in the North to seek work, to seek a life.
And in 2018, it doesn't take a genius to notice pattern recognition in all of these cities and the quality of life that exists there.
As these projections show, and as Paul Thoreau noted, you're going to have this virtual army of You're going to have this virtually army of under 27, under 25 Africans who are looking around and they see the quality of life that exists where they live versus these images of what it looks like in Europe.
And what's going to happen when 600 million Africans decide, hey, we're not going to take it anymore.
Or more.
Exactly.
And we've seen, luckily, We're just getting the first hints.
We're getting the first hints, but we're seeing a resurgence.
You know, the racial situation in Europe had seemingly atrophied from, you know, an Arnold
Schwarzenegger physique to the physique of a prepubescent, you know...
Arnold Schwarzenegger today.
Okay, we can go that.
Sure.
But my point is, we've seen something happening though with Salvini.
Think about the comments you alluded to that started this.
Europeans, Italians need to have children.
We don't need to be replaced by Africans.
Because if you replace Italians with Africans, you no longer have Italy.
You have Africa.
And for that type of dialogue to now seep into the discourse in Italy, I'd say that the European Renaissance isn't A myth.
It isn't something that we're trying to attain.
A European renaissance is happening, but we will need an African renaissance as well, because current projections, you know, I actually don't think, and I think you agree with me on this, that the population would hit 4 billion.
No, it can't.
That assumes that those projections are made by people who don't understand race, basically.
They assume that there are going to be all these gains in African agriculture productivity.
How do you think agriculture is going to proceed in South Africa?
Okay, after all the white farms are confiscated.
They don't know race like we do.
Supply and demand.
They think that Africa will improve at basically the same rates as China or India once you put certain investments into human capital, once you get certain benchmarks.
Reach, but those benchmarks probably will never be reached.
And one of the things we're not going to talk about too long, but we have to factor in what the Chinese are doing in Africa as they begin to continue to colonize.
And I think I was reading, don't remember what country it was, but they defaulted on a loan to China.
So basically China, which has gone in and built all this infrastructure.
I think it was like power, a power company.
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
And they basically said, Hey, you defaulted.
We're taking it back.
Yeah.
Sorry.
So now China owns a lot of the power infrastructure?
I think it was in Kenya.
Yeah, but the point being, Mr. Wolf, is that the Chinese don't have any of these human rights illusions that have created myopia and Western man when it comes to our future.
We're incapable of even envisioning a future where we put our interests first.
Whereas the Chinese, they see Africa as an area For which goes against almost all of Chinese history when it comes to colonization and embracing the world as opposed to, you know, being insular.
Correct, correct.
What's going on there?
Again, there are going to be so many fascinating things that happen in Africa over the next decade, I believe, that are going to greatly impact that world's most important graph.
Nature always finds a way.
Well, yeah, China is definitely a factor, but the Gates Foundation is also a big factor too.
He's spent $15 billion in Africa so far.
He plans on spending much more than that in the future.
And as I say, he's doing all these healthcare and Economic initiatives there that are enabling this population growth, but he is he has also historically and he's he makes a big emphasis in this report focused on the need to empower women as he puts it to control when and whether they have children.
And so there's a guy who writes a subsection of the report, he's an African named Alex Eze, and he says that if through global initiatives we can provide women in Africa with the kind of birth control that they want, Women in Africa, on average, have 0.7 more children than they would prefer to have.
So if they had complete control over that, then over time, from now until 2100, you would have a 30% lower overall population in Africa.
you would have 30% fewer, a 30% lower overall population in Africa.
So you'd be down to 2.8 billion by 2100 instead of 4.1 roughly.
Substantial drop, but again, these numbers just aren't sustainable.
No, it's still more than doubling, nearly tripling from its present levels by 2100.
He talks about another factor you can do if you can Educate women then on average while they use a conservative estimate that says that would kick back their age that they had their first child about two years, but it could do as much as five years.
That would reduce the population by 2100 by as much as 9%.
That's their conservative estimate, so it could go higher.
But so they are thinking in terms of, okay, I mean, of course, they frame it, yeah, in terms of empowering women to have the children they want with whom they want, and so on.
And they frame it in terms of, okay, we're not just trying to hit population goals here.
We're not trying to do that at all.
We're just trying to be sure that people's quality of life can be high, that they can take advantage of these Let me ask you a question before we move on to the next portion of our production notes.
So, they frame it in terms of human rights and stuff like that, but the end goal is one
that I think everyone can agree is admirable, that you're not having a billion more destitute
and impoverished people on this globe.
Let me ask you a question before we move on to the next portion of our production notes.
If you had the opportunity to speak to Bill Gates, what would you tell him about this
investment in Africa?
Well, the birth control investment, I would say he needs to ramp up.
But the fact is he's just blinded by his...
His neoliberal, end-of-history ideas about how society needs to progress.
They're progressive ideas, we could say.
Basically, if you look at these, he's got 17 goals at the start of this report.
They're set out by the UN.
They're called the Sustainable Development Goals, and it's all the mush you've come to expect from the UN crowd.
But basically, there's nothing in there about cultural continuity.
There's nothing in there about the texture of life, nothing about preserving heritage.
It's all about, you know, creating equality, empowering women, vague things about taking action on the climate, and so on.
There's just no, there's nothing in there that really affects people's quality of life, and that's really my biggest complaint with With this report, with the Gates Project in general, is that, you know, what happens when Nairobi is transformed from a city where you have largely subsistence farming, African tribal way of life, African culture, all this stuff, to a city that has a couple skyscrapers and just
Hundreds of miles of shanty towns surrounding the outskirts.
I mean, what is gained there may be some amount of GDP per capita.
And that's all that they see.
But what's lost?
What's lost is the African way of life, which is, by the way, much more economically sustainable or environmentally sustainable, rather.
So they're directly working against some of their goals in terms of taking action on the climate, and taking action to preserve land and sea life, the more
you create these shanty towns and things, the more you undermine those goals. But importantly, I mean,
as someone who genuinely does care about preserving the diversity among human
populations and so on, in terms of cultures, you're eliminating that. I mean, they were...
I mean, they do want Walmarts there, because that means that people can get their goods for cheaper, people will have, according to them, a higher standard of living, but they'll never ask what was lost.
You know, it's funny that you talk about these 17 points because you do all these efforts to try and, as you noted, this Francis Fukuyama end of history nonsense.
And that Bill Gates is obviously thinking that he can, just as George Bush thought they could, and the neocons thought they could bring democracy to the Middle East.
You spend trillions and trillions of dollars and you can't admit it's a failure.
Because if you do, it's like, well, what was the point?
And how can we castigate those who are responsible for this devastation?
Conversely, Bill Gates, he spent all this money believing that, oh, we just gotta get the GDP up, we just gotta get these people up to a Western standard of living.
Mr. Wolf, talk to me about the Vietnam situation.
A nation that, you know, you can say defeated the United States in a war back in the 1960s and 70s.
It was a war of attrition, for sure.
Correct, correct.
But yeah, Vietnam, it's interesting.
Within this report that the Gates Foundation put out, they talk about the case of Vietnam.
And they talk about them as a case of education done right, where if you look at the GDP per capita of Vietnam, it's actually 27 times lower than the United States.
But they outperformed the United States on PISA testing, which is like international standardized testing.
They outperform us on math and science, and they're only slightly lower than us in reading.
Again, with a GDP per capita 27 times lower than ours.
And so, Gates' idea is to try and say, look, you don't need to have a ton of money to get educated.
But what he's not looking at is the fact that if you have a people, the Vietnamese people, whose average IQ is about 94, Then it doesn't take large amounts of economic activity to create an educated people.
You don't have to have all these massive investments and from the outside because they're capable of lifting themselves up.
They have cultural practices that are geared towards that.
The report talks about how teaching is a very highly respected profession.
All these teachers go way out of their way to educate their students on weekends during breaks.
It's just a different, there is a culture of learning there.
The teacher is considered, you know, the third most honored person in your life behind both of your parents.
And Vietnam is... it's culturally different, but it's biologically different.
Vietnamese people are a different people than sub-Saharan Africans.
So he thinks you can take the case... You can't say that!
Mr. Gates would say that's not true.
Well, he thinks you can take the case of Vietnam and apply it... map it directly onto Africa.
And the fact is you simply can't.
You know, the conclusion of all of this, and I think this is what separates you from so many thinkers in our cause, Mr. Wolf, is that you look at things from a very different level than just being about race.
You look at the consequences of what is lost by all of this forced belief in egalitarian utopianism, whatever you want to call it.
A long time ago, I read a lot of the Ensturation I've read a lot of the installation pieces and there was a writer by the name of Charlie Bilderberger who wrote brilliant, just unbelievable stories, prose and columns for that fantastic magazine.
I think you can find them all online.
I think someone uploaded all the PDFs.
And he wrote about how this Walmartization, these big box stores,
and this is the late 1970s, early 1980s.
He wrote about, do you think that Americans will fight to stop this?
They love this.
This is what they want.
No one's gonna, this is what, look at these people going to these stores.
They've already become deracinated.
They don't care.
Well, I would say that the things basically coincide, that as people become deracinated
and they start caring less and less about their heritage, about their history, culture,
about their music, their dance, these things that are native to their people,
as diversity comes in and you start having this kind of reduction
to the lowest common denominator between everyone who lives in a society,
Yeah, people begin to hunker down.
They start to really focus on their homes and their personal lives instead of their communal lives and their communal buildings.
What is their community investing in?
Is it investing in the arts?
If it is the arts, is it arts that reflects their heritage?
So instead, people look to consumerism.
They look to making their own personal lives more comfortable.
And yeah, having cheap goods helps them do that.
And so they do favor it, but I think that there are conflicting factors going into this.
That it's partly one of the reasons they do favor it is because of the effects that Robert Putnam described in his work.
They are essentially consequences of diversity.
But to move on to our next topic, we have more discussion about the changing texture of our communities.
And the Center for Immigration Studies has put out a report which analyzes the 2017 data from the American Community Survey, massive survey, really
good data.
And it found that there are 44.5 million immigrants living in the US, according to that 2017 data.
And this number doesn't include illegal immigrants.
It does?
It does actually.
Okay.
It includes illegal and the figure actually may be as much as 2 million higher since the Department of Homeland Security has reported that the American Community Survey misses about that many immigrants.
And the Center for Immigration Studies report also notes that the number is up 800,000 from
2016 to 2017, up 13.4 million since 2000 when the great George W. Bush was inaugurated.
He was inaugurated in 2001, but when the election happened, we've seen 13.4 million.
13.4 million.
And that means that today, immigrants, counting both legal and illegal immigrants, comprise one in seven U.S.
residents.
And that's if you believe the figures on illegal immigration.
Which I don't.
And Coulter and others have argued that that figure for illegal immigrants is likely much higher, and we just don't have a great way of measuring it.
And so it could be even higher than 1 in 7.
And to put that in perspective, Mr. Wolfe, and to our wonderful listening audience, in 1980, the figure was 1 in 16.
The share was last this high in 1910.
1910, and as you know, and as many of our listeners know, shortly after that is when the United States issued its Immigration Restriction Act in 1924.
Largely due to the great work of Madison Grant and Lothar Stoddard, who correctly noted that this was an environmental issue at the heart.
It wasn't just about maintaining the racial composition, because at that time, Mr. Wolf, the immigration was largely Well, let's say 90%, 95% European.
Right.
If not greater than that number.
Right.
Now, of course, we can't even speak where, you know, white people are handcuffed and defending their interests.
So we can't even notice unless you want to be, you know, tarred and feathered like a Buchanan or a Coulter or Laura Ingraham.
Think about what Laura Ingraham said.
Laura Ingraham knows what this means.
Right.
We were not asked about the racial composition changing as significantly as it has.
That's right.
And as she and we have pointed out many times, not only were we not asked, we were promised that it wouldn't change.
Correct.
Correct.
And so this was a move by Fiat, and it's undeniably changed the texture of our societies.
In fact, the CIS report notes that if you count the children of these immigrants, legal and illegal, there are 17.1 million who were born to them.
And, of course, they're citizens, because we have birthright citizenship, which I just saw National Reviews arguing in favor of.
There's a nice dialogue between them and the American greatness side.
Michael Anton continues to show that he wasted a lot of his time in the Trump White House, regrettably, because he is a visionary.
He, of course, is the gentleman who wrote the Flight 93 election, I still think highly of.
That piece, I think he's dead right, and I think what he's doing in showcasing that National Review, as you just noted, is now writing the conservative case for birthright citizenship.
Once again, conservatism is an impediment to identity becoming the preeminent issue of the 21st century America.
We've noted it's already happening in Europe.
European Renaissance is happening.
Conservatism is what keeps the American Renaissance from occurring.
Wow, did I just say that?
Wow, that's harsh.
Well, National Review has certainly played a strong role in that.
But yeah, so when you take those 17.1 million children and you combine it with the figures for their parents, those are children born to at least one immigrant.
But when you combine it with the figures for their immigrant parents, the figure comes to 61.6 million total.
20%!
That means one in five U.S.
residents is either a Immigrant, legal or illegal, or born to at least one immigrant.
Mr. Wolf, you see those memes all the time where it shows Sweden, and it shows a classroom, a kindergarten, or a first grade classroom, and say 1980, and it's just a bunch of blonde-haired blue-eyed kids, and then it shows 2017, you know, first grade, same class, same school, and it shows one little white kid, and A bunch of Muslim Africans, you name it.
Yeah.
And you think, oh, how is this happening?
The Swedes, can you believe this is happening in Sweden?
Look what they've done.
You come to America and you go to any state, you go to any city in those states, it could be anywhere from Maine, to Minnesota, to Georgia, obviously to Texas, Arizona, you name the state.
It could be in Iowa.
Right.
It doesn't matter because all of America is a border state.
The same situation's happening.
Except New Hampshire, but we need to change that.
Well, yeah, New Hampshire is, at 94%, is hideously white.
Hideously white.
You know, at some point someone could do an amazing, an amazing piece on just all the things that are hideously or too white.
You know, you and I were joking off, off, um... There.
Off-air about how the Air Force fighter squadrons are too white, according to the gentleman who is in charge of air command for the Air Force.
The general said it needs to reflect the demographics of the country.
We can't have the greatest Air Force if it's all white.
That somehow disqualifies our Air Force.
No, and in that same report, it paradoxically pointed out that they're having problems with retention.
And so they said, what we need to do is create more community.
So he's saying on the one hand, you know, we need more diversity, we need the Air Force to look like the community in the United States, but then he also says we need more community.
And of course, we know that diversity and community are inversely correlated.
The more diversity goes up, the more community values, the more community trust, community involvement, and all that stuff, feelings of belonging, the more that all goes down, plummets.
And that's really what we're talking about when we talk about one in five residents of America are either legal or illegal immigrants or born to at least one of those.
And It does.
We talk about the texture of life.
It changes everything.
I had someone write to me yesterday, and we have people write in all the time, who get maybe one bit of race realism, or they understand that there are racial differences, or they understand that diversity causes conflict, but they don't see the big vision.
They say, well, maybe it's someone who only sees racial conflict.
He says, well, why don't we just all mix and become beige?
And then racial conflict goes away.
It's like, okay, well, yeah, you do solve that problem, but what do you lose?
And as the late and great Sam Francis pointed out, you know, there's no reason to believe that a beige population is going to carry the standard of Western civilization.
The civilization that we as whites created in Europe and North America is a direct product of us as a people.
If those people go away, so does their creation.
Well, here's the point.
America is running out of white kids to pass around.
This is something that a lot of individuals are starting to recognize.
At the same time that the elite, like we talked about this Air Force General, who's one of the top generals in the Air Force, is lambasting the whiteness of the fighter squadrons.
At some point there has to be, obviously you have to keep, if you want to maintain your position, you basically have to be the most vociferous and boisterous when it comes to placating the anti-white narrative, the anti-white mindset.
But at what point are you going to look around and be like, wow, there's really no more white people.
Well, the thing is there are almost as many white people alive today in the world and in America as there ever have been.
It's not that there are fewer white people, although when the boomers go and the millennials have had their, you know, 1.2 children, Things might change, but there are a lot of white people.
It's the proportion, the share of the U.S.
population is going down.
Per capita, correct.
And what that means is it's not that white people are necessarily going extinct or something.
It's not like our population is plummeting in gross numbers, but we will stop, our communities and our institutions will stop reflecting our values and our vision and our hopes.
And if you look at those electoral maps of what it would be like if only whites voted, it's, you know, the map is a sea of red.
And because those are the political preferences of whites, which arguably created the country.
I mean, it's inarguable, really.
But the fact that we have large, one in five now, people in the United States have a different view.
And, you know, obviously some of them still vote Republican, whatever that even means anymore.
But even the meaning of Republican has been watered down dramatically.
And the meaning of conservatism has been watered down dramatically because of this influx of people.
Institutions, including parties, begin to reflect the population.
And then governments reflect the population.
Cultural institutions reflect the population.
Every factor of our life is impacted, not just the Every factor, every facet of our life is impacted by this racial change.
And even if you just want to talk about elections, you know, a place like Florida and Georgia are now on the verge of electing their first black governors, Mr. Wolf, because of this impact.
And Florida and Georgia have been greatly impacted by this racial change on a micro level versus the macro country where things are still in some states, you know, like you pointed out, the New York Times can say that New Hampshire is too white, but you have a place like Florida and Georgia where this demographic change is so pronounced that you now have a candidate who is, you know, who was very, very bad in Tallahassee as the mayor.
In fact, I believe he was up.
He was charged with a number of Fraud, he was in a lot of trouble, but he's on the verge of becoming the governor of Florida because of these racial changes.
Well, and the CIS report actually has some data on that.
It points out that since 2010, okay, so just over the last eight years, but really seven years since the data came out or was collected, you have an increase of immigrants in Florida of 721,000.
That is a 20% increase over just eight years.
And in Georgia, this other state is one of the ones that's mentioned.
120 and 3,000.
A state that you wouldn't even think about that would have a massive increase is a state like Washington.
You're talking about Washington which borders Canada.
Yep.
173,891.
The ramifications of this change, as you've noted, in the institutions and just going down to your neighbors when you no longer even feel any connection to your neighbors anymore, to invite them over for a backyard grill.
Hey, you guys want to come over?
They don't even speak English.
Yeah.
There's no connection.
The CIS had another report that I'll draw our listeners' attention to, which is about how many households speak a foreign language now.
Was it 70 million?
I don't know what the total numbers were.
I know that 41 million speak Spanish.
So pretty dramatic numbers.
But on the immigration question, there are a couple White pills, a couple good things possibly on the horizon.
I mean, we know that they're qualified white pills because in the long run, it's not going to make much of a difference.
But Trump is at least hinting that he may do executive action on immigration before the midterms.
In an interview with The Hill yesterday, he was saying, yeah, we may do something in the next two weeks that people are going to be very excited about.
He had a tweet this morning, actually, where he said this.
I want to know, where is the money for border security and the wall in this ridiculous spending bill, and where will it come from after the midterms?
Dems are obstructing law enforcement and border security.
Republicans must finally get tough.
All caps on that last bit.
So, he's at least saying the right things, and his administration is doing some of the right things.
There was a story also yesterday that the ceiling for refugees is being capped at 30,000 for next year.
And to put that in perspective, when Trump took office, it was 110,000.
And that's just the ceiling.
Did you watch the Jack Ryan show on Amazon?
No.
The whole show is predicated around human trafficking of the third world, largely Muslim countries, and their resettlement into Europe or America.
And it ends triumphantly with a Muslim family, the mother and her three children being resettled as refugees in what appears to be Leesburg, Virginia.
And you think about, I actually sent, I said, Hood, Gregory Hood, you need to watch this because I know you love the Jack Ryan and the Tom Clancy nonsense.
And it's fascinating because when you start to see these types of storylines seep into pop culture, I think that's good that people are forced to encounter what's happening and that they talk about how all these people want to get to Europe.
That's one of the underlying points and how much it costs to have these human traffickers try and smuggle you in.
And then, of course, the show ends.
This family is just as American as you or I.
Well, yeah, I mean, that's that's the subversive element of it.
But yeah, you know, this refugee racket is largely that.
I mean, all these all these Catholic agencies and other agencies, quasi-religious, quasi-governmental in terms of how they get their funding.
They're the ones who are pushing all this stuff.
And Trump has unilaterally put put a cap on that with his administration.
There's another story about Jeff Sessions, our hero.
Going after H-2B.
Jeff Beauregard Sessions.
Jeff Beauregard Sessions going after H-2B visa violators.
There were some house cleaning companies in Florida who made the headlines because they were directly... Americans had applied for these jobs as housekeepers, house cleaners, and the company threw away their applications, applied for H-2Bs, and then, you know, is claiming that Americans won't do these jobs.
So there is enforcement going on at the executive level, but as Trump indicated in his tweet, we need action.
We need a wall.
We need something in the spending bill.
And without that, the immigration numbers are just going to continue to be astronomical and we need to look at legal immigration.
You know, a lot of boomers and a lot of people out there on social media, they care so much about this, this Russia nonsense and these documents with the FBI being declassified and shown that there's this massive collusion.
All I want, all I want is Construction on the wall to start and for the wall to start to be built.
I did a tweet the other day that it got well over 5,000 retweets because the great Ann Coulter retweeted it.
And I pointed out, hey look, all you got to do is go and arrest one of these sanctuary city mayors.
That's all you need to do.
Again, reinstitute federalism.
Step up and do something that forces the mainstream media to continue to cover for illegality.
If you can send the National Guard in to integrate schools, why can't you send it in to enforce immigration?
It's like I've always said, there's a great quote from the late Sonny Bono.
He was a Republican, obviously Sonny Bono, Cher's husband, musician, but he became a Republican congressman in California and he famously was asked, what do you think about illegal immigration?
And he said, hey, what's to talk about?
It's illegal.
That's the only way you have to look at it.
Right.
There shouldn't be one illegal alien in the country and all President Trump has to do is just arrest one of these sanctuary city mayors.
I would arrest the one in Atlanta, Keisha Bottoms, who was basically thumbing their nose at ICE,
and it's something like that.
And Jeff Sessions, you know what?
He's done a lot to ensure behind the scenes that the machinations for a lot of great things
in the near future can happen.
But we see Trump continuously attack him, maliciously in a lot of ways,
as opposed to being magnanimous and trying to say, hey, you're doing a great job.
Trump is blinded by this nonsense with the Russia collusion.
What I wanna see is Americans in office collude to actually do what we elected them to do.
How hard is that?
I kind of wonder if some of Trump's attacks on Sessions are just to make him look as though he didn't do it.
He didn't obstruct justice in the past.
I think that's a good point.
I think that's a very fair point.
There is conflict, but he's keeping him around.
But I don't know.
He could genuinely be mad.
I mean, it wouldn't be unlike him to do something like that.
But think about the Attorney General we had under Obama for the first six years and Eric Holder, the things he said about white people and what he did to create a DOJ that was, let's face it, anti-white.
Jeff Sessions on the other hand, he just said a fascinating quote and I'd love it if you would read it.
Oh yeah, I was in a speech actually before law enforcement personnel and he said he was talking about how Basically, the agenda of de-policing and all these consent decrees that have been done in Chicago have led to an increase in crime, really a dramatic increase in crime, such that if you look at the, there's been overall national homicide level increases since Black Lives Matter.
The Ferguson effect.
And Trayvon Martin and all this stuff began, but a lot of it is concentrated in Chicago.
And so he gave a speech where he pointed out, yeah, all the direct results of these actions and these policies being taken by the government.
He said, quote, there's a clear lesson here.
If you want more shootings and more death, then listen to the ACLU, Black Lives Matter, or Antifa.
If you want public safety, then listen to the police professionals who have been studying this for 35 years.
I mean, who else, what other guy is Trump going to appoint who's going to talk, who's going to call out BLM, Antifa, and the ACLU?
Well, Chris Kobosh, but that's a story for another day.
That is a story for another day.
No, Jeff Sessions is someone that deserves our support.
If our listeners out there get the chance, find an email for the DOJ, find the number you can call, and just call.
It's little things like this that might shock you, their impact.
Just say, Jeff Sessions, you're doing a great job.
Or hey, call the White House and just say, I want President Trump to know that we really appreciate what Jeff Sessions is doing.
Yeah, lay off Mr. Beauregard.
Unleash Jeff Beauregard Sessions.
Unleash the dogs of war to actually do what This pusillanimous GOP Congress has failed to do, as you noted with that great quote, that great tweet that he did this morning, this ridiculous spending bill.
Republicans must finally get tough.
And that's definitely the case.
So, with that, I think we can go on to reader questions.
The first question is, given current trends, every white Western country is going to become majority non-white sometime within the next century or less.
I believe this is largely inevitable.
Assuming this, how would you suggest someone prepare?
How does someone prepare for a world where America and other Western countries are majority non-white?
I have four young children and this scares the hell out of me.
What would you do or where would you go?
Well, I just want to say one thing before you get to answer it.
Nothing is inevitable.
No, you can't assume this.
No, and that's the most important point to go at and say immediately is nothing is inevitable.
I was just reading this fascinating I was watching this fascinating interview with Paul Krugman, where he's talking about how whites basically have no place in the future of America.
He basically lets this slip.
And it was fascinating.
And what I took from that, it's something I'm going to start using now.
Fight their future.
That's what they actually want.
They want us to think that we're already, it's already set in stone that we are going to be disenfranchised, dispossessed, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Well, that's the funny thing.
You go back to 1965 when they passed the Immigration Act, and they were saying at the time, it'll never happen.
Correct.
And then now the justification goes from, because it's already happening, they'll say it's inevitable.
So it went from it'll never happen to it's inevitable, and you can't buy that lie.
So I will question the premise.
I don't even want to grant the premise.
We won't grant it.
But what I'll say is that people on our side of things, people who think the way that we do, will sometimes get into this mentality where they're thinking of society collapsing, Uh, mass conflict.
They're thinking about their bug out plan.
They've got their bug out bag.
They've got their, you know, place where they're going to go to their property in the woods.
They got a bunker, not probably not too many people have that, but they're thinking in those terms.
And as it's, if, if you think that something like that is really going to happen, then.
Sure.
Like spend some amount of time and effort.
Like thinking about that, but you need to spend the vast majority of your resources, your time, your effort, trying to prevent that from happening.
Because guess what?
If everyone thought the first way and everyone was just focused on themselves and how they're going to survive some sort of collapse or something like that, then it would happen.
It would be inevitable.
People who know, people who see, have to speak.
And if they're not willing to speak, then they have to give resources to people who are.
And we've got to fight this thing.
You say you have four young children?
Hey, make it six young children.
That's another great one.
We are going to win, and that is the reason why so much is being done to try and demonize us today to prevent tomorrow from occurring.
This is what you have to wake up every day knowing.
We have the opportunity to fight their future.
Look at what's happened in South Africa.
That is what they want for us.
In our country and not just the United States, but in England and Germany and in France.
I mean, I don't remember what the politician in Germany who said, hey, we need to embrace this.
It's inevitable that Germans are going to become a minority in their country.
No, it's not.
No, it's not.
It is not an inevitability that The Western world is going to fall.
You don't know how history is going to proceed.
Just look at one small thing of Trump.
Who could have predicted Trump?
Nobody.
And even as it was happening, as people could see with their own eyes that he'd won the Republican primary, that he was clearly capable of this, how many people honestly thought that Trump had a shot at winning?
And everyone predicted against it.
Look, you can't rely on predictions, projections, all that stuff.
People with strong enough vision, strong enough will, and the dedication to apply themselves can change the world.
And you have to believe that.
Heroes are rising and we have to fight their future.
And it's happening and courage is contagious.
No need to go into anything else because nothing is inevitable.
Don't assume anything.
Look at your four children and realize, you know what?
With your wife, you guys have time to have more because there's a future for them.
And that's what you have to believe every day.
A hundred percent.
Next question.
Do you think that this awakening of consciousness will extend beyond no more immigration and stop the demonization of whites in the media and in affirmative action and reach the sufficient level of seriousness and determination that is required to preserve ourselves and our civilization?
I mean something along the lines of the large-scale re-migration of the past decades of immigrants and their descendants, or the confident assertion in the media and law that this is our land, this is for us, this is for our people.
That's a heck of a mantra right there.
This is our land, this is for us, this is for our people.
And you know what?
That mindset, once captivated, Americans.
And when I say Americans, I'm talking in the sense of the Naturalization Act of 1790.
White people.
To engage and manifest destiny.
And if we want to go to Europe, just look at what Salvini's talking about.
Look at what Orban is talking about in all the speeches.
It's already happening.
It just takes It just takes finding that one politician and they become a statesman.
You graduate from just being a politician thinking about petty interests and the next two election cycles.
You have now statesmen in Europe who are realizing a score from now, two scores from now, three scores from now, four scores from now.
They're looking toward the long-term future and the ramifications of this egalitarian thinking that has so stunted the growth and progression of Western man.
That really is the folly.
Mr. Wolfe, you and I were born into a world where we had already made this This pact, if you so will, with the devil.
And believing that race didn't matter.
And that egalitarian thinking was the way to this neoliberal future.
That has already failed.
Catastrophically.
But the elite cannot admit it.
They can't.
Because if they do, their oligarchy is gone.
It's gone.
Their hold.
That vice that they have that our first questioner said.
It's inevitable.
It's going to happen.
No, it's not.
When things start to change, Mr. Wolfe, and to our listeners, it's going to happen so quickly, then that's why it is so important that people continue to promote and help organizations like American Renaissance and VDARE and those that have a actual footprint in We have these people all the time.
and the conversation by helping if it comes to monetary donations, which are tax-deductible,
I might add, or just sharing the articles because you never know what person is going
to encounter an argument they've never thought about before and then engage in an intellectual
odyssey and quest for a truth.
We have these people all the time.
I mean, I spend a good portion of my work hours every day interacting with people who
are just coming around.
They've just discovered our videos typically, and they'll say, well, okay, well, I'm with
you on this, but how do I get there?
I alluded to one of them earlier.
But to respond to the question, I would say that you've got to remember that this white
ethnomassacism, this people not taking their own side, white people not taking their own
side is an aberration in history.
And that not just white people, but all peoples through all time have always taken their own side.
They've always said, this is for us, this is our land, this is our people.
Americans, as we said, have done it historically.
It's not as though we're some unique, unique people.
I mean, we kind of are unique in that we abandoned that.
But we abandoned it through deception, as we said.
We were promised that it wasn't going to happen.
And really, it's only in the last 50 years that you've got this aberration from the course of all of human history being tribalistic, people pursuing their own interests.
Whites have been bamboozled into abandoning that.
And already you see a rekindling of that.
And it's happening.
And what I would say is that Of people who do adopt a white racial consciousness, it is inevitable that they come to the conclusions that this guy is hinting at.
That, you know, we need to do what's necessary to actually preserve the future of our people and not just end affirmative action or something.
I know very few people who understand the full reality of race, of projections of the
future, of the way things are going.
Once you understand that, it's axiomatic that you're going to come to realize, okay, we
need to do something real about this and we need a real solution to the problem and not
just these halfway measures or not even halfway, just these things that are going to basically
increase our opportunities and incomes or something in the short run.
We need genuine places to call our own.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
That's why you said it.
Yeah.
Hey, I want to thank everyone out there for listening.
If you have any questions, we'd love to answer them on a later podcast.
Shoot those questions over to sbpdl1 at gmail.com.
That email address once again is sbpdl1 at gmail.com or you can send them to Wolf at amren.com.
That's w-o-l-f-f at a-m-r-e-n dot com.
So for Henry Wolf, this has been Paul Kersey.
Our time is up.
▲
Export Selection