All Episodes
Previous Next
March 9, 2018 - Radio Renaissance - Jared Taylor
54:17
Lefties Discover States’ Rights
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to this edition of Radio Renaissance.
As usual in the studio, we have Paul Kersey, our indispensable commentator and analyst.
And once again, we have had a fascinating week.
It is always a fascinating week, and that's why we always have so much to say and wish we could be on for hours.
But we know that our listeners have limited patience and limited time.
So we restrict ourselves to really the most urgent and compelling news of the week.
And this week I think a very important, a very important story's come up is this looming war
between the federal government and the state of California.
If I could say something to tout our archives and encourage people to go back and listen to some of them,
this is something that we've been talking about both before the election of President Trump
and a lot after.
Now, what we're about to start talking about, this took a lot of time to prepare for.
You know, everybody wanted Jeff Sessions to do this.
Everybody wanted Jeff Sessions to do that.
Well, you know what?
He's doing a pretty great job.
And yesterday, I will go on record and say this was the finest moment yet of the Trump administration.
Because Jeff Sessions' speech, if you haven't seen it, what we're about to talk about, you need to see Jeff Sessions articulate and give this very impressive speech.
Let me go back and say it again.
Beauregard Sessions.
It's important that we throw that in there because he's an Alabama senator who's never shied away from his heritage and it's so powerful when you juxtapose what's happening with America's history and why this question of nullification has already been answered.
Yes, and of course the speech that Mr. Kersey is referring to is when he got up behind the Department of Justice podium and he said that he is going to seek an immediate injunction to stop the enforcement of several California laws.
These are the laws, of course, that are attempting to preempt federal authority over immigration.
In fact, one of these employers are ordered to make ICE agents present a warrant or a subpoena before entering certain areas of their premises when they're looking for illegal immigrants or when they're wanting to look through employee records.
And another state law It forbids state and municipal cooperation with ICE, including what information can be shared.
And finally, the state has legislated to itself the power to inspect immigrant detention facilities either run by or contracted through the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security.
And Jeff Sessions, harking back to many, many precedents on this matter, is saying, well, hold on.
There's something called the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution.
And he's going to launch, as I say, he's going to demand a federal injunction to block enforcement of this.
Now, on this occasion, state officials who probably have never, ever heard of the 10th Amendment have.
Somebody has slipped into their ear this notion that, wait a minute, the power's not expressly granted to the federal government to reserve the states.
This is not the kind of talk they usually have, because the federal government has, so far, been right up their sleeve, right down their alley.
They've never heard of the 10th Amendment, but now, all of a sudden, they're starting to sound like John C. Calhoun.
We're all Federalists now.
That's right.
That's right.
Ah, the lack of consistency, the lack of integrity.
Oh dear.
Well, we shouldn't be surprised by that.
And of course, the other Jeff Sessions initiative, I think, is this review.
We talked about this on the last podcast when Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf decided to let the cat out of the bag.
She said to her town, Oakland, hey, ice is coming your way.
Head for the high grass.
Now's your chance to elude these wicked federales.
And of course, as a consequence, ICE was saying maybe 800 people, most of them absolute hardcore criminals.
Sex criminals.
Today's International Women's Day, mind you, and this Me Too movement has taken over pop culture and infested all walks of American life, except for when it comes to illegal aliens.
Because once again, we learned that illegal aliens' rights are greater than Women's ability to maintain safety and not be sexually harassed or the victims of sex crimes in the United States.
And this sickness is not just limited to the United States, of course.
In Europe, it's the same thing.
When these Muslims come, so long as they are illegal immigrants, so long as they're Muslim, so long as they're not white, that's vastly more important than the kinds of outrages that they seem determined to commit against the women of Europe.
But anyway, once Jeff Sessions announced this initiative, I thought it was quite fascinating the way the Californian authorities reacted.
Jerry Brown, he says that this effort to get a federal injunction is an act of war.
You know, he was asked by reporters about this.
An act of war?
And he backtracked a little bit, but that's his feelings.
The federal government is waging war against, apparently, a secessionist California.
And then, of course, there's Kamala Harris, your favorite Democrat.
She will be the candidate in 2020, I'm telling you.
There's a couple reasons why we won't get into, but she's done some things in the past couple days, and her reaction is, Mr. Taylor, if I could go ahead and say what she said, California's going to fight Because, quote, the state represents the future, unquote.
We know that that future is only possible because the courts in the 1990s decided to throw out the will of the people of California who voted for Prop 187 to deny illegal aliens benefits.
I was just watching Falling Down, the great 1993 movie with Michael Douglas.
Directed by Joel Schumacher the other day.
And that movie, boy, does that movie make more sense today than it did in 1993.
You know, 25 years.
It's actually, I guess, the 25th anniversary of that movie being released.
And maybe the great Gregory Hood is listening and he'll know to go back and do a review for America Renaissance.
I suspect a lot of our listeners are not familiar with that movie.
If you came out 25 years ago, I'm sure you're right.
Just summarize it briefly for us.
Yeah, falling down, Michael Douglas plays a displaced white male who used to work in the defense industry, and one day he's driving to work, movie opens up, he's stuck on a freeway, he's looking around and just sees, he's realizing, what am I doing?
You know, his air conditioner isn't working, it's hot, he sees all these third world people, and he just gets out of his car and leaves it, and then he goes to procure some change at a Korean grocery.
The guy won't give him change, he gets mad, he goes to buy a Coke, The Coke is 85 cents, so he won't even get a quarter to be able to call, make the call, and he goes crazy!
And he ends up paying for the Coke and getting the change, and then the rest of the movie is about his attempt to go home, and it's about the third world conditions of Los Angeles that he confronts Robert Duvall, plays a fantastic role as a emasculated cop.
And it's so worth watching now.
It's one of Michael Douglas' best performances.
And of course, that's what Kamala Harris says represents the future.
It's in store for all of us.
Now, perhaps in your view, the fact that she's half Tamil and half Jamaican, is that one of her qualifications to be the Democratic candidate?
Well, that or she launched her career basically underneath Willie Brown.
I'll let anybody who's listening to this This is a family-friendly podcast.
No, no, I'm saying, you research it.
They dated.
They dated.
Yes, she dated Willie Brown.
I mean, that's all we need to know.
Willie Brown, I believe, was married at the time, so we can be quite certain that nothing untoward happened.
Well, and she went on, of course, Nancy Pelosi went on to say, The people of California will not be bowed by the Trump administration's brazen aggression and intimidation tactics.
Californians will continue to proudly keep open doors to the immigrants who make America more American.
We will fight this sham lawsuit and we'll fight all cowardly attacks on our immigrant communities.
And she's talking about illegal immigrants.
The immigrants who make America more American.
I mean, think about that.
Even if they were legal immigrants, this idea, I tell you, for people like you and me, who've been in this country for many generations.
The first tailor showed up back in the 1600s.
And for us to be told constantly that it's immigrants who make America more American.
God, the bloody cheek of this.
One of the Pelosi's show up, by the way, I'd like to know.
In any case, she's a lady who's happy that her grandchild wishes he were Honduran.
Actually, it might have been Guatemalan.
I don't remember which one it was.
Some Central American.
Oh, yes, at a birthday party, he makes a wish.
He says, I wish I were just like my best friend with brown skin and brown eyes.
Oh, that thrilled Nancy Pelosi.
Oh, dear.
So, no, I find this fascinating.
And, again, this just shows up the importance of real politics.
We have a Justice Department that takes its responsibilities seriously.
We can be absolutely certain that Eric Holder would not have done, not have made such an attempt.
Eric Holder would have applauded this sanctuary state, sanctuary city stuff.
Anyway, apparently, 35 communities in the state.
I thought there were more.
One of which is San Francisco.
But 35 communities have officially declared themselves sanctuary cities.
But, of course, the entire state, thanks to the state legislature, which is increasingly, overwhelmingly non-white, it has decided that the entire state is a sanctuary state.
Guys, I really believe that 2020 is going to be such a fantastic year where we really see the beginnings of the breakup of this racial experiment.
California, of course, there's the push now to have Dianne Feinstein's seat replaced with an actual Reconquista-type Mexican candidate.
The left is going absolutely insane in implementing the anti-white policies by wanting anti-white
advocates now elected in positions of power.
This situation in California with what Jeff Sessions and what Donald Trump did today by
doing, he was asked by reporters on his thoughts and he went off on the Oakland mayor.
This is the stuff that he's really passionate about and this is why it was so important
that he won.
This is why it's so important that Jeff Sessions isn't being bogged down with nonsensical grand
juries or investigations of the Clintons.
Who cares about that?
That's the past.
We shouldn't care about that aspect.
What we care about as advocates for our race and for our country for an American Renaissance to happen Yes, yes.
Every time the left overplays its hand, it makes the lines clearer and clearer and clearer.
I applaud it every time they overstep because they are going to throw more and more ordinary white people into our arms.
And even though the Republicans don't get yet what's happening.
They don't understand it.
They don't want to understand it because it's so clear now.
We're in the post-America mindset.
It is so clear.
It is so clear, Mr. Kersey.
They're going to not help but understand it eventually.
It's just a question of time.
Well this is, again, this is one of your great colleagues, someone I met once, it corresponded with a lot, was Dr. Sam Francis.
And this is, it's so fascinating to think that it was 13 years ago, and I want to say February, that he passed away in 2005.
2005.
Yes, it was in the winter.
I remember that.
Yeah, and so it's roughly 13 years ago and here we are.
Here we are now in a moment that almost seemed unthinkable in our lifetime for this type of situation to happen where, like you said, the inconsistent nature of the left, they are now the anti-federalists in a situation where we, the answer of federalism has already been, you know, the Federalist Papers, all that debate was settled in 1865.
Well, it was still settled over Arizona SB 1070, too.
Yes, it was.
It's just so hilarious.
All of a sudden, as I say, they become disciples of John C. Calhoun when it suits them.
But just briefly, Arizona SB 1070.
That was passed in 2010, and it was a law that made it a state misdemeanor for an alien To be in Arizona without carrying documents, carrying proof of legal presence in the United States.
And it also required that state law enforcement officers attempt to determine an individual's immigration status if there was a lawful detention or arrest.
Ah, that's great!
And the law said state and local officials And see, this was the aspect of it that I particularly liked.
There were penalties on anyone sheltering, hiring, or transporting unregistered aliens.
I mean, there were penalties for knowingly carrying an illegal alien someplace.
I mean, I just had this vision of all of these do-gooder priests and uplift artists just ferrying illegal immigrants to their church sanctuaries and things.
They were theoretically going to be penalized under this law, unfortunately.
All of the people who are now ardent federalists, I mean, I'm sorry, ardent states' rights advocates, who were ardent federalists then, and the DOJ.
The DOJ sued the state.
I think today's DOJ would not sue the state, but the DOJ sued, and it went up to the Supreme Court in 2012, and almost all of this good stuff was ripped out of the law.
So, at least they did uphold the part of the law that allowed Arizona State Police Now, all of this, of course, gave rise to all of this idiotic talk about racial profiling.
This just makes me tired.
If you suspect that somebody who can't speak English, who looks like he is from way, way, way south of the border, is that racial profiling?
If you ask yourself, well, perhaps, is this guy an illegal immigrant?
Apparently, apparently, who knows?
This is just such a tangled issue in terms of what any sensible police officer is going to think given the circumstances.
And this is also one of the main reasons why it was so sad that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arrapaio lost because this would have been such a great reintroduction with Trump and the DOJ doing stuff to launch a lot of the, you know, Operation Wetback 2.0, as Eisenhower had, I mean, back in the 1950s.
You know, but these ice raids almost are Wetback 2.0, because what they're doing is making it clear that we have a government that is at least beginning to take seriously the idea that if you're illegally, we're going to send you home.
And again, this is why such a high-profile arrest.
Think about how many cities across the country, Denver, Chicago, other municipalities, are going to write an amicus brief on the side of California during this battle.
They're going to side with them and they're going to say, oh no, we have the right, blah, blah, blah.
This is really setting the stage for a mass exodus of Right-thinking people who probably... You know, you and I, the left and right debate doesn't really matter.
We don't really care.
Conservative, Republican, Democrat... These ideas don't... They're ancillary.
They're secondary.
We don't care.
What we care about is putting in policies that are going to impact our people to actually be able to survive the consequences of this great experiment that we tried and it failed.
And now we're seeing Beginning stages of what is going to be an undeniably incredible conflict.
And this is why I want to encourage every listener to start going to your Republican meetings in your cities where you live, in your communities, and to voice an opinion that this is the only issue that matters right now, is getting control of our country from a law and order standpoint.
It doesn't have to be a racially motivated, just Attorney General Jeff Sessions and President Trump are right.
This is what has to happen.
Use the language of, oh yeah, everyone has a right to come here, blah blah blah, but not illegal aliens.
They don't have rights.
Well, I would hope that our listeners would take a somewhat bolder stance, but that is certainly a good beginning.
I think we have to be able to talk about who is coming and who we need, whether they come legally or illegally.
Oh, I don't disagree with that at all.
However, what I want to see is people begin to step up and become ingratiated with the system as it is.
You're not going to be able to start a new party.
You're not going to be able to start a new movement.
You're not going to be able to win people over with arguments that you think are worthy of an automatic PhD assigned to you from the most prestigious university.
Go use the language that most people are comfortable with.
And then the moment is going to come when, as Mr. Taylor pointed out, the left is going to overplay their hand.
And it's happening.
It's happening right now.
But the first step in any political journey is take that first step and get your feet wet.
You know, even in the Los Angeles Times, I was pleasantly surprised to see an essay by someone who was saying, well, hold on.
Do we really want to protect illegal immigrants who are known criminals?
I mean, even the lefties, even the most blinkered lefties have got to wonder, wait a minute, the rapists, the child molesters, the armed robbers, the people who have been already deported, do we really want to protect them from ICE?
So, yeah, as the left gets increasingly insane, More and more people, I think, will realize that the direction we're going in, what the left is doing now, is the logical consequence, the logical projection of everything we've been doing for the last 50, 60 years.
And they will realize, hold on, we jumped the tracks.
How far back did we jump the tracks?
And the farther back they see, the better they are going to understand.
That's why when Ms.
Harris, who's going to be the candidate in 2020, when she says that they represent the future, you need to understand that she's trying to say that illegal aliens are the heroes.
Americans who voted for Trump, you're the real criminals.
Right, right.
Well, and the future.
As you pointed out in a brilliant article for a website none other than amran.com, the future is likely to be one without Individual right to bear arms.
Yeah, I just want to say a few things about this because I have great reverence and respect for the NRA.
They've done a tremendous job.
When you actually look at the history of the organization the past 20, 30 years, they were at a point where they almost became irrelevant.
And it was only due to a couple of individuals, John Milius and Charlton Heston, who brought back a clear vision and a pragmatic vision of where things should go.
And there's a great story there that hopefully at one point I'll try and tell because it is so important to understand As white advocates, how do we start to get a voice where we have lobbying power?
We can unite people across the country who live in various states, various geographic regions, to care about one and only one issue.
And that's why the NRA is so powerful.
They don't bring in a lot of money.
compared to other lobbying groups.
They bring in a modest amount, they spend a modest amount, but the people who care about the Second Amendment,
when they tell them who to vote for, they show up at the polls to vote for them.
And unfortunately, Mr. Taylor, due to the demographic changes that are so vast in so many
states, talking about Colorado, where 20% of the electorate is now
Hispanic, I'm talking about California.
I'm talking about Maryland, which has one of the largest black populations per capita in the country.
I'm talking about New York.
I'm talking about Connecticut.
A lot of people think Connecticut is this great state with white picket fences because you see Mr. Brimlow's compound and whatnot, but really Connecticut has some of the more horrifying cities.
I think Hartford, Connecticut is less than 15% white.
Hartford, Connecticut is less than 15% white.
Bridgeport is awful.
Yeah.
So because the left is in complete demographic control of the legislature, the state legislature.
They're able to enact these onerous, these anti-second amendment gun bills.
Which, you know, Mr. Taylor, you've bought a couple guns.
You know that some... Oh, I wouldn't admit to that publicly.
You wouldn't admit to that publicly.
No, no, no.
If you've ever tried to buy, say, a gun legally online, You will see certain places where you have to go to the FFL, they won't ship certain capacities, certain guns to various states.
Now, if we were to actually sit down and graph it out, we would realize, wow, this all correlates to race and the control of the Democrat, the control of the legislatures there, which have enacted these policies.
Now, let's extrapolate that data out to the entire country.
You don't even have to extrapolate it.
It's all there.
I thought the really key point that you made in that article was just how overwhelmingly white the idea of private right to bear arms is in this country.
Hispanics don't care.
Blacks certainly don't care.
Asians don't care.
It's only white people who believe in this.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the NRA is based in Virginia, and Virginia is only probably an election cycle away, 2020, from having a Democrat-controlled legislature.
less and less white there will be less and less support for our right to bear
our correct if I'm wrong but I believe the NRA is based in Virginia and
Virginia is only probably an election cycle away 2020 from having a Democrat
controlled legislature it was only because I think of a of a they pulled a
name out of a hat to see if a Republican was gonna win That's why they have a Republican majority, a slim majority by one.
No, I mean, race, everything that we love ties to race.
And everything, every issue, name the issue, it all comes down to, at its heart, race.
And the gun issue is one.
It's the most heated debate right now in the country, but guess what?
There's a racial component.
And that is what we wish the NRA would tumble to.
And yet, I wonder if they would ever, even if they woke up to it, now it's perhaps the case that people within the NRA understand this.
I mean, they see the statistics.
They must know how opposed Hispanics and Blacks and Asians are to gun ownership.
What are they doing?
I mean, you propose that, well, they're trying to do this outreach, trying to get more Asian gun toters Good luck with that!
No, they have to realize that in order to protect their values, they have to protect the country.
They have to protect the majority of whites.
But anyway, typical of blacks, I thought, was the NAACP statement on arming teachers.
Now, their proposals to give them special training, this, that, and the other, I just don't see why anybody who's got a concealed carry permit in the state of Florida, or whatever state it is, why can't they just bring their arms to school?
The idea of making schools gun-free zones, that's just like painting a target on them.
I've never understood this.
Churches in the state of Virginia, churches, as long as they're conducting some sort of regular worship service, all the schools, you can't walk in if you're packing legally.
And that means if you do walk in packing illegally and want to blaze away, there's going to be no return fire.
I've never ever understood the thinking behind this.
But here's the NAACP.
The NAACP finds the variety of arming teachers as a solution to gun violence utterly absurd.
We know that children of color are portrayed and seen as more dangerous, more culpable, and less human than children viewed as white.
Now, this is a wonderful sentence here, that they're portrayed as more violent, but less human than children viewed as white.
You and I are viewed as white, I suppose.
We're not really.
We're viewed as white.
Given this background, how can parents of black children feel comfortable sending their children to school where guns abound?
Where the perception of threat could have deadly consequences.
Can one imagine telling a parent that their child has been shot in school not by an intruder but by a teacher or staff person who felt threatened?
Now this is so stupid at so many levels.
I mean there are many, many schools in the United States, overwhelmingly black schools, where there are armed police officers for heaven's sake.
I mean, are they going to somehow... But the idea that somehow, if it's a teacher, and presumably we're talking about white teachers, they're going to see some black guy walking down the street, or walking down the hall of a school, just like Zimmerman saw Trayvon Martin walking, and they'll whip out a gun and blaze away!
Just because he's black.
It's just absolutely astonishing here.
But that is the NAACP statement.
A lot of these majority non-white schools across the country have multiple resource officers with firearms.
And as we know back with the Obama administration wanted to do, they didn't want to perpetuate this myth of black criminality, brown criminality.
So they put in place the Promise Program.
We talked about this last week.
And as Ann Coulter noted, it's this political correctness and these quotas that are now being instituted nationwide.
As we run out of white kids, it's only going to impact everyone that is not the criminal.
But somehow, the idea that we're going to keep students unprotected because of this utterly fantastic and delusional fear that if you arm white people, they're just going to start opening fire on blacks.
But this is, once again, an example of the extent to which they see the same things we see, and they just live in a different world.
They draw all the opposite conclusions.
They live in a world where, as you noted on that great video you did.
It's still up on YouTube, by the way, where you talked about Wakanda.
They actually believe Wakanda is real.
Oh, I don't know how many really believe that.
I think they dream about it.
They'd love to think it was real, but don't push them that far.
But this brings us to another story, I think.
It just turned out today, we got some interesting news.
Was it yesterday?
Very interesting news about that old Air Force Preparatory Academy race hoax.
That was reported, of course, back in September, September 25.
Some black cadet discovered that four or five of the rooms occupied by blacks ...had Go Home N-Word written on them.
And this was a big scandal.
Some cadets complained all of a sudden they didn't feel safe at the prep school.
It was a huge, huge investigation.
Lieutenant General Jay Silveria, who was the commandant, he gave this wild, just forceful speech about how if you just don't think the way we do, if you think racial distinctions matter and this and that, you've got to get out.
You've got to get out.
And this was widely applauded, and he was seen as a potential presidential candidate for his wonderful statement on race.
Well, it turned out, of course, this was a hoax.
And it's interesting.
I only bring this up now because it has the Air Force Times.
They had to file a Freedom of Information Act to get to the bottom of what went on in the investigation here.
They were not going to release this stuff voluntarily.
But they spent an enormous number of resources doing handwriting analysis, polygraph tests.
They really worked hard to find out who this wretched, miserable, creep racist was who'd done this.
And it turned out, on the basis of handwriting samples and polygraph tests, lie detector tests, that it was this black guy.
Now, what's the black guy saying cards at all?
Concussion.
It was a concussion.
An untreated concussion.
Yes, the Air Force Times, due to this Freedom of Information Act, they got a hold of a handwritten statement, largely redacted, by the way.
There are parts in it that you and I are not allowed to see, but he said, on the night in question, I was struggling with a concussion.
Therefore, I wasn't myself.
I'm sorry I didn't say anything before.
I should have just gotten treatment for my head.
Oh, boy.
I suppose this really requires no commentary, but this guy is now claiming that... Oh, just something else.
The Air Force Academy refuses to say whether or not this guy even had a concussion, if he'd had any injuries, whether or not he's appealed to the medical staff, because that would be revealing private information.
But I just thought it was quite fascinating.
This fellow who created this huge stink is now claiming that I didn't really do it.
I didn't really do it.
Well, what's so fascinating is that they say he's no longer with the university.
Now, the Air Force has a, for cadets, there's a, I guess it's also for enlisted and officers as well, there's a, there's a mantra they live by.
I will not lie, steal, nor cheat, nor tolerate those among us who do.
So, obviously this guy lied and he tried to pin an international story, came about from it, and even seen it as a concussion.
That doesn't matter.
He's gone.
He's lied to his, as an officer, a candidate.
He has to go.
But like you said, we'll just never know.
As America has sacrificed standards and our future and the present state to this egalitarian Nightmare that, again, we tried it.
That's what the history books are going to say, by the way.
I'm very bullish on where things are headed.
The history books are going to say, Mr. Taylor, we tried.
We gave up 60 years of what could have been.
Who knows where the country would be?
I dream.
I dream.
Listen, you're not going to be a Wakandan citizen.
Don't dream.
But this is one that we need to also point out because, as you noted, this preparatory school is basically a dumping ground for Diverse candidates who don't have the grades to get in right away.
So they do that fifth year where they do this preparatory school to see if they actually can cut it and be assimilated into military life.
Yeah, they spend 10 months, room and board, all things taken care of, to see if they can make it.
And most of them are diversity students.
I'm sure that this guy was a diversity student.
This is now near universal, that you take these people who do not have what it takes to make the grade, and you give them all this remedial training to try to boost them up barely to the level to make it in, and they don't seem to realize that probably even if they manage to boost them up to that level, they're going to spend their career basically in a remedial state.
This is one of the consequences, but I'm sure no one will reflect on what this says about this attempt to take these diversity students and turn them into real Air Force officers.
Anyway, let's move overseas and talk about the Italian elections.
Now, the Italian elections are so complicated.
The system here is so... I mean, from our Northern European standard, there is a certain Latin Rococo quality to Italian politics.
But one thing I find fascinating is how practically a brand new party can come right in first.
I think the Five Star Movement, they came in first in elections, 33%.
I mean, that's a very substantial number in these multi-party elections.
That party is only about five years old.
Can you imagine a five-year-old party in the United States swooping in number one?
Now, they are a very slippery sort of party.
They are mildly anti-immigrant, but they have all these kind of weird ideas.
They want all politics to be online, and they have their primaries online.
And their membership is all online.
They have this idea of sort of graceful non-growth.
They're not particularly interested in growing the economy.
They're very ecology-oriented.
But they do have a mildly sensible view of both immigration and the European Union.
They're real Euro-skeptics.
Yes, they are.
The party that came in number two is the lefty Democrat Party with 19%.
Then the Lega.
Used to be the Lega Nord.
With 18%.
Those guys are staunch.
Yes, they are.
They want Italy for the Italians.
And then there's this Forza Italia business that's run by Berlusconi.
What a character he is.
Bunga bunga Berlusconi.
He was caught scampering about with underage ladies and he's officially barred from serving in politics because of some kind of, I think it was a tax scandal or something, but in any case.
And then the Fratelli d'Italia, the Italian Brotherhood, 4.4%.
They're a pretty hard right.
They're solid folks, too.
But the trick is, it's going to be very tricky.
It's going to be very hard to come up with a ruling coalition.
And they're probably going to bicker and negotiate and go back and forth for a long time.
But this has really thrown politics in Italy into a cocked hat.
But the former Lega Nord, they have made a real advance over previous elections, understandably so.
And I thought it was fascinating that if you look back over some of the history of these Lega Nord types, one guy, a candidate for the league, he was candidate for the governor of Lombardy.
That's really an important province that contains Milan.
And back in January, he said something very significant on television.
He says, we can't take in everyone because if we did, he's talking about immigrants of course, we would no longer be ourselves as a social reality, as an ethnic reality.
We have to decide if our ethnicity, if our white race, if our society should continue to exist or if it should just be wiped out.
He hit the nail on the head.
That's what we have to decide.
Of course, then, you know, the sky fell and he says, oh, when you're talking about the white race, that was a slip of the tongue.
But I am delighted to be able to report to our listeners that he was voted in in a landslide.
He was?
As governor of Lombardy.
Identity is the question of the 21st century and we're seeing when people get to vote, identity is a resounding winner.
Yes, yes.
They got to vote and I wish this guy had not said it was a slip of the tongue.
But anyway, maybe he had to do that.
The voters seem to have forgiven him.
I'm happy to say.
Then there's this other guy in 2013, Roberto Calderoli, who was the vice president of Italy's Senate, he was a senator, he's an important guy, and also a Northern League fellow, he said that whenever he looked at Italy's first black minister, there's this Italian Congolese woman who's a minister, he said she looks like an orangutan.
Well, later he said, that wasn't racist, that was an aesthetic judgment.
It wasn't meant to be the least bit derogatory.
And in 2006, Mr. Calderoli said that Italy had defeated France in the Soccer World Cup because the French team was made up of, quote, Negroes, Muslims, and Communists.
So he's a colorful guy.
But, again, this guy, too, was re-elected in the latest elections.
He is still a senator from Lombardy.
You know, real quick anecdote.
There was a book written about the French World Cup win, I want to say in 2002 or something.
They had a team that was maybe one or two actual French.
The rest of the team.
I remember.
And there was this book and everyone said, this is the future.
Yes.
We have soccer.
This is what unites us.
Forget about fraternity, liberty, equality.
We have soccer.
That's how we'll create this colorblind, wonderful French society.
Now, of course, they've lost a lot.
A lot of people have said that because of the failures, that's one of the reasons why a lot of people are turning away from the society.
And I want to point out the reason why that's so interesting is because you did a great podcast yesterday about South Africa.
With Dan Root.
Now, the South Africans, one of the main reasons they gave up their country, and this is not a lie, one of the main reasons they gave up their country was because they wanted to play international rugby again.
They had been barred from participating in the International Rugby World Cup, so guess what?
Lo and behold, they decided to give over their country so they could have the right to play in the International Rugby World Cup again.
They made a movie out of that, I think called Invictus, with Morgan Freeman playing Nelson Mandela.
One of the great stories After all that is now of course South Africa has quotas in place to try and get more blacks on a team that is traditionally all Afrikaner.
And of course now we're seeing, as your podcast went about yesterday, the threat of confiscating of land without compensation.
So it's just so fascinating to think about how these idiotic children's games play such a large part on social policy in our nations.
These life and death decisions for a nation get made on the basis of something as absurd as being able to play international rugby.
But white people throughout history make these terrible decisions based on what really should be seen as obvious mistakes.
Cheap labor.
Cheap labor.
The standard joke about South Africans is that they would rather be murdered in their beds than make their beds themselves.
And if they are unable to clean their own swimming pools, if they surround themselves by black people whom they think of as loyal Loyal retainers and people who love them, if they make that mistake, if they cannot clean their own swimming pools and make their own beds, then this is what's going to happen to them.
Fortunately, there are us South Africans who are beginning to understand that.
But we make mistakes, we sell our birthright for what seem to be just the most trivial and inexcusable reasons.
But briefly back to Italy.
I think the Northern League, which was called originally, it's been around for 30 years, it has gone through a very important evolution because it started off as a party that wanted to take the prosperous north of Italy, that's why the Northern League, and secede from the poorer south.
but this year this year for the first time they dropped the word northern now they are just the league and they have stopped describing southern italians as uh an unwanted baggage around their on their backs and they are Taking a we-are-all-Italians point of view and they want to keep Italy Italian.
I think that that is a very significant evolution.
They gained a great deal of popularity on this idea in the north of separating from the poorer south.
Now they see Italy as a unit that's under threat.
I think that is an admirable, admirable transition and I hope they really go far with that idea.
Well, that's the beginning of an actual European union.
Yes.
And a fraternity.
And a brotherhood.
And this is the type of evolution that has to occur in our thinking and putting aside any of the racial taxonomy that you want to do.
Nordics, Mediterranean.
Let it all rest.
That's right, that's right.
We're in this together, fellas.
We need all the allies.
Even if Southern Italians might be oediphorous.
No, I'm joking.
Which is one of the things.
That's what they used to call the Southern Italians.
We're smelly.
No, no, no.
Come on, boys.
Come on, boys.
No, we're in this together.
We're all Italians.
We're all, you know, we're all white men.
And moving to a different country of white men, I thought it was very significant that we had the convictions for hate speech crimes of the leaders of Britain First.
This is of course the organization that produced a few tweets that Donald Trump had retweeted.
Yes.
Now, Paul Golding, age 36, and Jada Franson, age 32.
They were arrested because they distributed leaflets and posted online videos about a gang rape trial.
What happened was, the usual wily oriental gentlemen who were on trial for gang raping young and grooming and gang raping young whites, They went around to the homes of these people and they beat on the windows and they shouted at them and In some cases they went the wrong place, you know, and we're yelling at Pakistanis who were not involved with any of this in any case the judge the judge said
It was a campaign to draw attention to the race, religion, and immigrant background of the defendants.
That in itself was essentially against the law.
But this other aspect they had of going to the premises, I think they went to some pizza shop and they banged them and they yelled at them and called them pedophiles and foreigners.
In any case, Franson, Jada Franson, got a 36-week sentence in jail.
And this is no suspended stuff.
They're going to do time.
And Paul Golding got 18 weeks.
Now, I'm of two minds about this.
I think even in the United States, if you, I mean, we at least have the right to call someone a pedophile and a foreigner, and we have the right to distribute literature saying in the neighborhood, look, the people who are doing this were foreigners and they attacked our white children.
We have the right to do that.
That in itself was already across, that crossed the line in Britain.
But to go on somebody's property and bang on their windows and yell at them, well, that would be trespassing in the United States too.
So I certainly don't condone what these people did.
But, to me, the fact that they have gotten real-time is a fascinating contrast with another case that has just come up.
Yeah, you know, this is something that I saw on Twitter.
I don't remember who put this tweet out.
It might have been Base Monitor, one of the better Twitter accounts out there, noticed the juxtaposition of a story of a gentleman by the name of Rezis Abdullah.
Goodness gracious.
Basically, this is a guy in England who... Give me one second to... Yeah, what he did... Rebecca Telford, a 25-year-old woman, was out with her child.
Yeah.
Pushing in a baby carriage.
Yeah, so they're in South Shields.
This is last January.
And this gentleman, he's obviously a foreigner.
Basically he walks up and as she's walking without warning, without provocation, spit on the baby and said that as he did, white people shouldn't breed.
Right.
He walked up and spat.
It's not like this is someone's house.
This person's in public walking with their child.
And this dude, this guy walks up and just spits on the child.
Apparently just covered the child's face.
Just really sprayed spit all over this poor baby.
In a baby carrier, he stuck his head right next to her, spat on her, and said white people shouldn't breathe.
Yeah, and then, apparently, Rebecca Telford, the baby's mother, was absolutely stunned, and when she remonstrated with him, he said, shut the F up!
And off he goes.
Well, interestingly enough, this guy has two previous convictions for hate crimes against white women.
Now, the news item did not specify exactly what he's done, but these are convictions for hate crimes.
Well, this guy gets a suspended sentence.
Not only does he get a suspended sentence, he gets rehabilitation and mental health treatments.
And you know, there's a real significance here.
If a white person were to behave in that way, there would be no question of mental health treatments, I would suspect.
No.
No, no.
He's just a stone-cold racist.
But when you have one of these darling non-whites who's behaving in this savage way, well, he obviously needs mental health treatments.
And he's going to get a suspended sentence.
You know, on Twitter, a lot of people refer to the United Kingdom as Cuck Island, and I think this is one of those stories that really showcases just the true horror of the legal system.
you know regardless of what you might think about the actions of these two obvious working
class individuals that are part of Britain First, they're standing up and they are trying
to showcase that England is not dead, that England is not a cuck island.
When unfortunately the law is firmly on the side of the dispossession of white Britons
and it's so sad to watch, especially someone like you and I who are part of Albion Seed
and we look at that island and we look at the history and we watch what's happening
and there's no words to describe how England is just in quicksand.
And there's no way to get out.
Anytime you try and get out, you go further and further in.
I know.
They just seem to have given up.
It's a tragic, horrifying thing.
As you say, ultimately Great Britain is your and my homeland.
It's our ancient homeland.
I feel as though I have as much of a proprietary interest in Shakespeare or Dryden as anybody.
But no, it's tragic to see one's own people throttling itself.
But anyway, we have one other foreign story to talk about here, and I think some of our listeners will remember that about the time President Trump took office.
He was roundly criticized in the U.S.
media and in Europe for talking about the rise in crime in Sweden and saying that this had to do with Muslim refugees.
At the time, the Swedish officials were saying, oh, we don't know what this Trump fellow is talking about.
He's responding to erroneous news reports.
And it is true that Donald Trump said something about, you know, the news from last night.
And there wasn't exactly anything we could necessarily put our fingers on.
But he was certainly right in the larger sense.
And at that time the Prime Minister Stefan Löfven said we must all take responsibility for using facts correctly and for verifying anything we spread.
Well, interesting.
Just on Tuesday, at the White House, the Prime Minister changed his tune and he noted that, you know, we have received 163,000 refugees since 2015.
There are not that many Swedes.
And he said that that was most arriving in just a span of a few months.
And now, even the New York Times has reported that Sweden has experienced a rise in clan-like violence.
Gangs using hand grenades.
And that this, oddly enough, was coincidental with the influx of immigrants from certain parts of Europe, but mostly from the Middle East.
And there have been more than a hundred incidents involving military-grade explosives in the Stockholm metro area alone.
And the police are talking about an arms race among immigrant gangs.
You know, it just makes you wonder, what does it take for white people to wake up?
How many more incidents of military-grade explosives in the Stockholm metro area is it going to take for them to realize that there's sort of a cause and effect relationship here?
Well, on this International Women's Day, you would think about that little girl who was run over and cut in two.
I can't remember her name.
This happened last year in Sweden.
I believe her dad is actually going to sue the government because of their policies,
it was a Muslim terror attack, I think he ran over a number of Swedes killing them,
but there's the horrific image of the little 11 year old girl.
She was cut in two by the car, by the vehicle and the terror attack.
What's happening in Sweden, you know, they're unfortunately running neck and neck for Kuk
Island and for you know what happened to the Vikings I guess.
I guess the best Vikings colonized Russia and the best Brits colonized Australia, America and South Africa and New Zealand, I mean, and Canada.
Of course, Canada is not no glowing example of resistance, nor is Australia.
The Australians and New Zealanders, I think that it is simply astonishing to see the extent to which we have degenerated.
And yet, you know, It is not a question, I think, of genuine physical courage.
I think if white people today were motivated, it's a question of moral courage.
I think that people all across the white world, if there were an armed invasion I think they would sign up.
They would take weapons training.
They would fight perhaps almost as bravely as people of generations ago.
It's this moral gelding that we suffer from.
That is really our problem.
It's overcoming this kind of denaturing, this inability to think in terms of our own interests.
I think there's that great comment by Robert Frost.
He says, a liberal is someone who can't take his own side in an argument.
That, I think, is a Perfect description of white people.
White people can't take their own side in an argument.
And once we have achieved this, it's a psychological problem.
It's not one of physical bravery.
In fact, I'm going to be speaking at a few events in Europe later on in April.
And that's one of the themes I plan to develop.
It's what it takes for us to rekindle the moral basis for us to act in our own interests.
Well, I think that is the profound question of our time.
We know that identity is ultimately going to be what drives the 21st century.
But will white people, when they understand this worldwide, will they blink and think it's amoral to act?
That is the issue.
And I think whites are perhaps unique At least in the present era, in the requirement that they believe that what they're doing is moral.
We have to be convinced that this is morally unimpeachable.
Otherwise, we're paralyzed by this notion of the rights of others.
We have to respect these people and those people and the other people.
There's something a little cuckoo about whites in that respect.
But once we have reestablished that, yes, it is moral to wish to survive.
It is moral to take action in order for our people and our culture to continue.
Most people don't require any kind of moral justification for that.
They just do it instinctively.
Whites are the only people who have to have arguments for this.
It's as if you had to have arguments to explain why it's better to be healthy than sick, or better to be alive than dead.
We don't have arguments to explain that.
And nobody else seems to require an argument to explain why their people should prosper.
There's a large percentage of the white population in not just the United States, but in Europe, in Australia, in South Africa, and in South America that will willfully go to the guillotine to atone for their whiteness, their past sins, and they'll apologize all the way through.
That's right.
The entire time until that guillotine drops and President Harris's New America is truly implemented.
They'll willfully do that.
But luckily there are also a lot of white people And not just the United States, but around the world who don't think that way.
That's right.
And I believe that there's going to be a gathering in late April of the next American Renaissance Conference.
Tell me about how things are going.
That is true.
Yes, there are still places available.
There are still places available.
And of course, it is people like the listeners to our podcast, people who follow Paul Kersey, And people who read at amaran.com, they are our prime audience, and we hope that you will register before the seats run out, because that is almost absolutely bound to happen, as it did last year.
We had to turn away about a hundred people, and we don't want to start turning away people when it turns out that what they really are, are fans of Paul Kersey.
We don't want to turn away a single fan of Paul Kersey.
Well, I'll tell you what.
I hope you guys all heed that message and sign up to attend the 2018 American Resonance Conference.
It'll be held in what city in Tennessee?
It's just outside of Nashville.
It's in Burns, Tennessee, in Montgomery Bell State Park.
A beautiful, beautiful place.
And we're having it the last weekend of April, which should be perhaps the most beautiful time of year.
In any case, well, Mr. Kersey, thanks so much for joining us, and we'll see you next week.
Our time's up.
▲
Export Selection