All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2026 - Jim Fetzer
57:40
Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 1 (18 January 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Chris Weinert
|

Time Text
Putin's Double Message 00:15:09
And welcome, folks, to truth versus all that news.
Truth versus news incorporated zero in America here on January the 18th, 2025, 6.
That's 26, the day before Martin Luther King's birthday so that I look a little patriotic here and things.
And we have a very special show today and special guests.
And of course, we have Killing the first, we have Jim Petcher, who's just a man of the hour.
He's just, well, he's a man of the year, a man of the decade.
He wrote these books, Merit News on 9-11, and JFK, and Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, and all these outstanding historical references that you can't get nowhere else that you've got to have in your library.
And we also have Brian Davison.
He's just here from Texas, a private investigator who knows how to check things out and report them.
And Jimmy, you want to introduce your special guest today?
Yeah, Chris Weinhart, super smart guy.
He amazes me time after time.
So perfect with Joaquin on temporary leave.
I thought Chris would be perfect to join us today.
Let's go for it.
You got it.
Yeah, thanks for the invitation.
We begin with Putin having a message for the West.
Yeah.
Good message.
Oh, yeah.
There we go.
Public Star.
Nice message.
Welcome to Issues of Contemporary Politics with Dr. Brofkin.
My dear friends and subscribers, I had a question in my video before last, which was concerning President Putin.
And he was away, and there was no sign of him in the public arena for two weeks.
And the question was why?
And I think I know the answer why.
And this is what today's video is about.
Putin is back with a message to the West.
And this is the topic of today's presentation.
Now, during this time, there were a lot of important events happened.
As we all know, they were extraordinary to some extent.
And it was very strange that President Putin wasn't there to answer those.
And it seems to me that the reason why, which is now clear, is that there must have been a debate going on among Russian leaders as to do next and how to respond to these new challenges.
And the challenges you all know, which was the kidnapping of President Maduro, the confiscation of an arrest or whatever you want to call it of two Russian tankers, and even more important at the end of December was a drone attack on Putin's residence, which the CIA claimed didn't happen.
And the Russians believe and know and provided evidence that it did happen.
These are all very, very serious events.
On top of it, is now threats against Denmark and Greenland, threats to Iran.
In other words, these are all extraordinary, we can say historic events on the world stage, and Putin wasn't there.
And one had to explain why.
So, the question that I answer is that there was a debate, but what did they discuss and what decisions were made?
And this is what Putin announced to the ambassadors.
The occasion was the reception of ambassadors' credentials to the Russian Federation.
And Putin gave a small speech using this occasion on the 15th of January to explain his position on many of those issues.
Now, before I get to those, I'd like to focus on the very serious voices in Russia and in the West, as a matter of fact, about these events and Putin's inaction.
So, during the last two weeks, there were debates going on, among other places, in Russian media, as to why Russia is not taking any action when its vessels were taken.
There was implicit criticism of President Putin from the generals, and you see this debate on your screen now.
And the criticism was that during Soviet times, the Americans wouldn't have dared to arrest a Russian tanker.
Why are we not doing anything?
And the generals were discussing what could have been done, among other things, not only to seek confrontation by sending a military escort, which could easily run into another missile crisis as in 1963.
No, but they were suggesting things like ramming American Coast Guard ship that tried to board a Russian vessel and show in many other ways that Russia is not going to abandon its vessels and its ally, such as Maduro.
So, there was a lot of criticism among also known supporters of President Putin, such as philosopher Dugin, who, as I mentioned before, insisted that Russia should continue the offensive.
And it's enough to play games with Trump and enough of the attempts to please Trump under any circumstances and to play up to him.
So, these were the domestic critics.
Now, in the West, Putin's silence was understood mostly as that Putin is scared or that Putin doesn't have anything to answer with and that the United States is strong and Putin is in Trump's pocket and the interpretations like this.
Now, Putin's performance on the 15th basically answered all of those.
And when I try now to discuss his response, I'm going to deal with three parts to it.
One is Putin's response to his domestic critics.
That's number one.
His response to Europe and specifically to the coalition of the willing in Europe, that's number two.
Putin's response to Trump, that's number three.
And Putin's response to Cuba, Brazil, BRICS countries, and the rest of the world.
That's part number four.
So this is Putin's response to domestic critics.
Now, obviously, he didn't say this is my response to my domestic critics.
There was nothing like that at all.
This is my interpretation of what the message is.
And I think what the message is to those critics is that there are more important things than picking up a fight over a vessel.
And as far as Maduro is concerned, he didn't say anything like that at all.
It was all implicit.
This is all interpretation.
But the implication was that Russia is loyal to its friends and allies, especially Cuba was mentioned and all Latin American countries,
and that Russia does not accept a language of dictates and demands and violations of United States Security Council and United Nations rules of international behavior.
So it was a mild reproach to Trump, but I'll get back to it later.
But to the domestic audience, to the generals, the message was the special military operation will continue and we are not going to pick a fight over relatively minor things and we will concentrate on the big thing.
And the big thing is that the special military operation will continue until all its aims are achieved.
That is what he said to his domestic critics.
Now, to European Union, I think the most important one in his speech is actually addressing the Europeans.
Now, what he said is one thing, but there was another component to Putin's response to the Europeans, and that is a strike by Oreznik hypersonic missile on the drone factory in Lvov,
which is a few kilometers to the Polish border, which really created a big sensation in Europe and the European press because the Europeans, nor the Americans, have no way to counteract this missile.
There's no way to stop it.
In other words, the message to the Europeans is double.
On the one hand, we can reach any target in Europe if we want to.
As a matter of fact, Russian generals were saying that it's enough to tolerate that Poland is sending over all this military equipment that they buy in the United States.
They're all participants in the war.
It's not acceptable that they pretend that they're not involved whereas they are.
They produce all kinds of weaponry, they send it to Ukraine, and we shouldn't take it any longer, the Russians general say.
We should strike at them.
Now, what Areshnik has shown to the Europeans is that Russia if it wanted to destroy its military facilities and especially those that are destined for Ukraine.
Now that's one side of it, but not in his speech.
In his speech, Putin gave the other side of his response to Europe, which is probably the core of his message and the most important one, which is that he talked back, he recalled back his 2021 December address to the Europeans just before the special military operations began,
where he offered to have a new collective security for all, new architecture of security for Europe.
Now, at that time, the West just ignored it and ridiculed it and didn't take it seriously.
Maybe they'll do the same thing now.
But what I think today is different from the point of view of Mr. Putin is that Russia has shown that it is winning in Ukraine.
Russia has shown that it is willing for a compromise if there is a rollback to NATO.
This is the core of his proposal.
NATO is no longer relevant.
NATO is no longer up to the task of providing security to its members, especially in the context when Trump is undermining NATO, doesn't care about NATO, and wants to annex a territory that belongs to a NATO country.
Wouldn't that be better in these circumstances to rethink architecture of international relations and security for all?
His message to the Europeans, to Macron and to Starmer and to Mertz and others, is that, look, the collective security is not only.
Security guarantees cannot be only to Ukraine, as what you've been talking about over the last two weeks.
The security guarantees should be for all countries, including Russia.
And Russia is willing to sign and to promise in a treaty security guarantees to all, including Ukraine.
So in other words, Putin is leaving a door open for a treaty, but it has to be a treaty, not some kind of a ceasefire, which the Europeans want to use to bring troops into Russia.
Lavrov keeps answering.
It's fairly astonishing that he would even propose such a thing after the Minsk Accord was used as a fig to cover.
Meanwhile, there was, of course, a build-up for an attack on Iran.
I was predicting it would happen within 72 hours.
My prediction would have come true.
Other than it appears, Putin laid down the law to Trump that if in fact the United States and Israel to attack Iran, that Russia would be standing fast with Iran and America would not be secure.
Here we have from the 15th, and you'll see how things transform in two days.
The U.S. military is planning to surge military asset to Middle East to prepare for a potential war with Iran after President Trump backed down from bombing the country, according to a report from the Times.
U.S. officials on the paper, the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln and some warships from its strike group were on the way from the South China Sea, roughly a week away.
The U.S. is also planning to send an array of warplanes to the Middle East.
U.S.-Iran Tensions Escalate 00:15:30
In fact, they have already sent B-52 bombers.
Meanwhile, here's the report we now get on the 17th.
Trump opted against Iran strikes on advice it wouldn't change the regime.
Donald Trump reportedly came close this week to authorizing U.S. airstrikes against Iran, but ultimately backed down after advisors, allies, and intel assessments underscore the risks of escalation, noting it would not lead to regime change.
Trump weighed military options as Iran violently suppressed nationwide protests, which in my judgment have been grossly exaggerated, prompting the Pentagon to reposition naval and air assets and warn regional bases of possible retaliation.
Expectation of imminent strike grew after Trump publicly urged Iranian protesters and signaled U.S. support, even as he stopped short of issuing a formal order.
Meanwhile, have we got here Trump's big back down?
Speculation over U.S. military asset movement and planes against Iran continues to swirl mulling over.
Trade aparsi scenarios for a U.S. attack on Iran.
My own speculation has been the goal of the Anglo-Zionists this time really was to affect regime change.
My speculation in the Anglo-Zionist fifth column in America persuaded Trump.
Sanctions against Iran had brought the country to the point that a combined propaganda campaign and internal insurrection fueled by Mossad and CIA could bring on a crisis that would bring the religious and Republican Guard establishment to its knees, to be finished off by a major demonstration of U.S. Air Power.
It was not to be.
Chris, your thoughts about these recent developments.
Chris.
Yeah, thanks.
You know, as I've stated before on this show many times and throughout history, I've often said that BRICS is a Goldman Sachs initiative that was developed by the same guys that were playing both sides of the Cold War against each other, the banking class that has put up the construction of UN nation states and has used the nation to divide the family tribe, the religious communities, the political communities, and just about everything they can.
This is also done by controlling the value of currency and the value of labor, mostly through supply-side economics and those type of growth business models based on Keynesian economics, where they can create money from nothing and issue it to people at interest.
If you give any group this type of exclusive privilege or power over a civilization, let alone the entire civilized world, you're going to see a breakaway civilization develop like we're seeing now.
And I think that the oligarchy has been conditioning many of these BRICS countries with many of the Masonic formulas.
And even the United States, in its turn, is now starting to see a humiliation ritual and demoralization and debasement, all of these things.
Chris, I think all that's fascinating and important and true, but we're talking about why the United States did not go for an attack on Iran, what Putin has had to say to Europe and to his critics at home.
Have you comments about those issues?
Yeah, I can get into that a little bit.
I was kind of leading into it around the block to get next door here.
But yeah, Iran is very much a crucial part of the BRICS initiative and the One Belt One Road, much of the land bridge, not only for energy development, enrichment, and many other things.
Iran is also one of the leaders in zero-point technology, which would absolutely destroy the energy companies from their cash cows.
So there's a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes with Iran that is certainly not going to be talked about in the mainstream media.
And the motives are certainly a steater at best.
And I think that Putin is trying to not overplay any sort of hand of force in this, but also uphold a line and hold basically the line in the sand.
As I say, this is kind of like these countries on both sides are being played against one another to develop technocracy and surveillance control capital with full controls.
So I think this is all kind of part of the script in the transitioning from the United States to the BRICS.
And Iran is a very crucial state in this.
And it's also one of the final Wesley Clark nation memo countries that does not have a Rothschild bank.
So that's, I think, a crucial factor that's often getting overlooked by the media as well.
Thank you, Chris.
Brian.
Well, I guess I think Chris is exactly right that it's all part of conditioning.
And so the question I would come back with is: if this isn't a shooting war, why does it feel like a shooting war?
If you've got two simultaneous messaging going on, that number one, we're putting our strategic assets over there ready for a big fight, but we're not going to war, then what is the purpose?
What are we trying to do?
Just show them that we're big and strong and we can flex our muscles.
We've been trying to do this with Putin for years.
It hasn't worked.
Putin's not going to back down as a result of it.
I think this is more about getting the American people to understand that the simultaneous posturing that we take on, which is where backing down on one hand versus imminent strike on the other hand, gets people to generally accept that contradiction as normal.
And so they don't expect any consistency.
And that's one of the problems with American messaging on international issues lately: consistency is no longer expected from America.
It's just a matter of who's pulling the strings to get what done.
And so it sort of creates a permanent brinkmanship as normal life mindset that gets the public to adapt psychologically to living on the edge.
It's conditioning.
It's conditioning us.
And war, I guess, it's no longer an event.
It's more of a signal system.
In the old days, it was declaration and mobilization results in sacrifice, which turns into a resolution.
Those were how old wars were fight.
But in this, it's just let's replace action with signals and let's let our posturing replace outcomes.
And then now war is just communication instead of combat.
So I think basically we're trying to signal to Iran that we can hit you.
We're trying to signal to our allies that we're engaged.
And we're trying to signal to the domestic audience that we're in control.
But it's totally detached, totally detached from the cost.
War at this point in time has no visible cost.
Therefore, consent to war happens automatically.
And this seems to be the new model to keep endless wars surviving public fatigue and just replacing wars with war language.
It's meaningless, it's worthless, and it's not going to do anything to adjust the national state, international stage, while the institutions have all become so weak that they can't actually engage on any particular level at any particular time.
So, to me, it just seems like all this contradictory messaging is a new narrative war rather than an old-fashioned guns and missiles war.
I guess I'm glad to see it go that way.
Yeah, fascinating.
I loved your phrase communication instead of combat.
Really remarkable.
Meanwhile, we have Trump's block.
Why U.S. strike on Iran remains a real threat?
Now, this is Al Jazeera commenting on the situation.
After threatening to attack Iran for days in support of protesters challenging the government in Tehran, U.S. President Trump appeared to dial back the rhetoric Wednesday morning.
The killings in Iran, Trump said, had stopped.
Tehran had told his administration arrested protesters would not be executed.
Trump did not rule out an attack on Iran, but in effect, negated the rationale for such an attack.
Still, as Trump closes in on the completion of the first year of his second term, his track record suggests a possibility of U.S. military strikes against Iran in the coming days remains a real threat.
Plus, massive military deployments.
Now, the dates here are very important.
This is Hal Turner talking about how many U.S. troops and equipment, including B-52 bombers, had been sent to the Middle East.
By order of the U.S. Navy, the aircraft carrier strike group of the George H.W. Bush, the second such group, has already departed Norfolk, heading toward the Mediterranean.
Meanwhile, dozens of Eurofighter typhoon aircraft began flying from Europe to the British base at Kritan on Cyprus.
NATO is moving aircraft to the region.
German, French, and British troops have been spotted deploying Eurofighter aircraft toward the Akhatan base in Cyprus and the Metraq al-Saftan air base in Jordan.
Despite America denying its intention to bomb Iran, NATO's aerial movements suggest otherwise.
Plus, Trump tells Iran now that he's not going to attack the country back and forth.
This is anti-war.com, but this is already back on the 15th.
An Iranian official said Thursday, President Trump had informed Iran he doesn't plan to attack the country and ask Tehran to exercise constraint.
The comment about Trump message was made by Rez Amir Mogadam, Iran's envoy to Pakistan, according to Pakistani newspaper Don, as the anti-government protests in Iran appear to have largely stopped.
And in addition, Iranian rioters use ISIS-like tactics.
Diplomatic source reports to RT Russia today, which would be unsurprising.
ISIS is a U.S.-Israeli creation after all, founded by Hillary Critton, John Brennan, and Barack Obama in 2012 over the adamant opposition of Mike Clinton, which led to his being sacked.
The terrorist elements infiltrating the protests in Iran, and this is now dated the 16th, have been using extremely violent tactics, reminiscing the axis of ISIS.
RT has learned from an Iranian diplomatic source.
Iran has been hit by a wave of violent unrest kicked off in late December.
The turmoil began at a peaceful protest over economic woes, including soaring inflation and a sharp devaluation of the national currency, yet promptly grew political and violent.
We have more stories on the same theme, so let me proceed to those as well.
Female ringleader confesses to contacting Netanyahu to fuel unrest in Iran.
This is back on the 15th now.
A female ringleader involved in recent U.S. and Israel-backed riots in Iran has confessed to personally reaching out to Israeli PM Netanyahu, seeking the support of the Tel Aviv regime for the destabilizing operation where they were already running them.
The unnamed suspect, reportedly blew it in seven languages, made the admission Wednesday during a visit by Iran's judiciary trive to a Tehran detention center holding individuals involved in rioting and sabotage.
Meanwhile, we have Mossad declaring, we are with you.
Mossad spurs Iranian protests, says agents with the demonstrators.
This is now back on the 14th.
What's happening in Iran right now being married to Americans through a familiar script, the people versus the regime, with the West cast as a concerned observer.
This is all a lie.
Israeli sources and even a public-facing Mossad account from their own intel agencies are saying something radically different.
They're describing foreign involvement, information war, even Israeli agents in the field.
And that's exactly why this is so dangerous.
When people in the U.S. raise a possibility of Israeli involvement in destabilizing Iran, they are often smeared as bigots, conspiracy theorists, or anti-Semites.
Meanwhile, in Israel, the Israeli press, versions of this are being laid out loud and clear, openly admitting these things we are called bigots for saying.
Meanwhile, the U.S. has now imposed more sanctions on Iranian officials.
Back to the 15th again.
U.S. Treasury announced Thursday sanctions on Iranian officials accused of being responsible for the response to protests inside Iran, a largely symbolic move, since it's unlikely senior Iranian officials have assets in the U.S. or plan on traveling to the country.
Purely symbolic.
And finally, even Russia is shocked.
Movement Matters 00:11:57
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has asked U.S. President Donald Trump to delay any potential American strike on Iran.
Over the past week, the world came dangerously close to another war in the Middle East.
However, the escalation appears to have been stopped, at least for now.
While people were busy watching speeches and counting threats, the quiet signal that lit up everyone's radar was movement, a very particular kind of movement.
Israel's official state aircraft, the Wing of Zion, the one tied to the prime minister and the presidency, took off, headed out, and for a while, nobody in the public was given a clean, confident explanation that matched the timing.
Reports said Netanyahu wasn't even on the plane when it departed, which is exactly the kind of detail that makes people lean in and go, wait, so what is this really about?
And then comes the part that, if you're watching power, not theater, feels almost comedic in how fast it flips.
I know YouTube would refuse to promote this video as they have been doing lately, but you can force them to hit the like button.
It is free and subscribe if you haven't already.
That would help me out.
Thank you.
Let's get back to the video.
This is because in the same window of rising U.S.-Iran tension and all this loud Israeli bravado that's always packaged as toughness, we get reporting that Netanyahu privately urged Donald Trump to delay or hold off on striking Iran.
Not we're ready, not we'll stand firm, but postpone it.
Slow it down.
Pump the brakes.
That's the New York Times reporting as relayed by outlets in Israel.
And it landed like a splash of cold water on the whole unyielding posture image.
You know what I mean?
This is why people don't just watch statements.
They watch logistics.
They watch who quietly moves the crown jewels first and who suddenly starts pleading for restraint right after posturing.
Does you said recently, maybe it was you.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
I think I follow you and I follow the story enough that I know who's quoted when, but somebody, someone in Iran recently said something to the effect that we're not Venezuela.
Did you say that?
I don't recall.
I may have.
But it's obviously true.
Iran is not Venezuela.
Iran is not Vietnam.
Iran is not Venezuela and Vietnam and Iraq and Afghanistan combined.
It is more than that.
It is a very powerful country with very powerful friends across the region.
In Iraq, the parliamentary elections that took place just a few weeks ago, Iran's allies won those elections.
Their majority in parliament is much greater than it was before.
So the United States is not in a strong position, especially now that it's at war with Russia by proxy.
The CIA is still deeply involved.
It's doing a trade war with China.
Its troops, part of its navy, is in the Caribbean.
You have crises at home.
And I don't see the United States being able to get into a conflict in Iran in any way or form with success.
Now, before.
Chris, help us make sense of all of this.
What's your take?
Chris, further expansion on.
Yeah, you're muted.
Sorry about that.
Yeah, as we've seen, the ADL has often had a strong relationship with the FBI and many other charitable organizations, tax-exempt societies, to influence domestic policy and more importantly, social engineering here in America.
Think of the National Endowment of Democracy in foreign countries.
The ADL has been doing that and it's under the guys to invert the rhetoric to protect democracy, as they say.
And it's an age-old deception that goes back to ancient Greece and Rome.
And it's the same guys that have been doing these type of tactics back then as well as now.
As I said, the ADL, and if you think about the COINTEL program, PATCON, JTTF, BLM, Antifa, the FBI and ADL have had a very incestuous relationship, even with the Epstein list and what's going on with that.
So, I really think that much more attention needs to be looked into as far as what the FBI's nature is and what their true charter stands for and how they originated.
And I feel that they are like the bankers Gestapo that are given unlimited funds to really destabilize America and even foreign countries.
So, yeah, what's going on here with that, and especially what's going on with the next level with Palatir and the promised software going next level and this whole surveillance capital and the social credit scores.
This is very alarming behavior.
And I think this is also an effort to really manage expectations to lower the expectation into this as a normal.
It reminds me of similar thug tactics that they used back in infiltrating the labor movements and using ethnic mafias and the Italian mafia to infiltrate the labor movements and to control the guilds.
Those are the skilled craftsmen, the producer of goods, and they have been the basis of every single economic model up until recently since the AI and automation formulas and the new economic models are being put on.
So, you know, you hear about talking about them protecting democracy, but the people in labor aren't even a discussion in terms of economic models for the future.
So, you know, I really think that needs to be pointed out.
I know it's kind of unrelated to what's going on with Iran, but I think Israel is behind this using the central banks to basically strong arm and use coercion tactics, not only here in America, but also in Iran and many other countries in the Middle East and the Wesley-Clark regions.
Much appreciated, Brian.
Well, I think one of the best narratives that you can observe in this is the core question here is about unrest breaking out.
Who gets to decide whether it's organic dissent or foreign manipulation?
So we have a problem here in that the protests are rapidly deployed.
They're described using terror-adjacent language.
And external intelligence services are introduced very early in the story.
So that is training the audience to believe that unrest is inauthentic.
Well, it may be inauthentic, but it's not always foreign-driven.
And it may be foreign-driven.
But regardless, they're getting the American people to believe that the state is never wrong.
And so they are taking the normal boogeyman approach of its Mossad, its CIA, its ISIS.
And they're shifting the responsibility away from any internal conditions that might be present.
So it makes the people believe that suffering is always infiltrated and never systematic at all.
And it puts us into a position where all intelligence services are permanent fog.
They claim to do something out there in the field, and none of their claims can be disproven or proven.
And that justifies the secret that makes us all blind.
So it's sort of a mental fog that they're keeping us into to get us to accept whatever their conclusions are as they drive them out through the media.
It's totally fake.
It's totally fraud.
And the sanctions, again, are just a they're signaling some sort of moral judgment, but for what?
And they're there to reinforce the official narrative and shift the focus away from any facts to it's just punishment.
And so once the punishment begins, what we now are disloyal if we begin to question the motives that they're doing it.
So everything is being framed now not as a political signal, but as a security incident that needs to be dealt with.
And so I guess the question I would ask about these stories is, you know, at what point do we label this dissent as foreign driven?
And how does that eliminate the possibility of a legitimate protest?
And, you know, it's a little bit difficult to see through the fog when we're not given any realistic facts to work with to understand what is really going on.
And this is a technique that they've been putting on the American people for a long time to get them to just bow down and consent to all these ongoing wars.
I thought Trump was going to get us out of wars.
Well, I guess we don't have a choice because foreign unrest is breaking out and we need to stabilize the rest of the world.
This is that old Kissinger mentality that's coming back, but it's so weak this time around that it's got almost zero teeth.
Oh, I think you're exactly right, Brian.
Exactly right.
Meanwhile, was the Iran war averted or just postponed?
Leo Hoffman asks, January 16th.
President Donald Trump reportedly called off the planned invasion of Iran Wednesday when, during a meeting with his National Security Council, his advisors could not guarantee a quick and decisive victory over Iran's Islamic regime.
But we see no evidence that the U.S. had pulled back assets from the region, and an attack would still take place at some point.
You would have thought Trump would have met with his advisor and got their military assessment before he publicly told the Iranian protester to keep protesting because help is on the way.
But that's just Donald Trump.
He can't control his mouth.
And in this case, it likely got people killed.
They thought help was going to arrive in their hour of need when they were most vulnerable and it didn't.
Trump changed his mind, I believe, because of Putin's intervention.
Meanwhile, Israel is continuing to carry out raids and demolitions and arresting dozens in the West Bank.
The Israeli military has launched raids and interrogations, ensuring more than 80 people across the occupied West Bank, wounding at least one, demolishing the home of another as Israel escalates its attack on the Palestinian territory in tandem with its ongoing genocide in Gaza.
CIA Experiments and Child Abuse 00:03:01
In one instant, Thursday, Israeli forces surrounded a home in Dura, south of the city of Hebron, before shooting and wounding the brother of Mahmoud Al Faustus.
The Alphazas brothers have long been haunted by Israeli forces and have faced frequent raids of the family home with soldier assaults.
Moreover, the elite bloodline of the Kabbalist, satanic Kabbalist, Cabal, let's talk about the bloodlines of the satanic globalist Cabal who run our world, traveling children, and the dark, deep state operation projects and experiments that were run on our society that no one to this day has ever been accountable for.
CIA staff sex crimes involving children.
Just recently, 10 documented cases of CI employees, contractors, committees, sexual crimes against children.
Between 2004 and 2018, violation of child abuse and exploitation laws.
Only one prosecuted.
No broader accountability.
Then the CIA's finders call.
PLED CI-linked group investigate for child abuse and potential trafficking.
Way back in 1987, declassified docs mentioned CI internal matter halting the probe.
Child abuse allegation, including neglect, possible ritual elements, no charges or accountability.
Project MK-Ultra, CI behavior modification program with 149 sub-projects across 80 institutions involving 185 researchers.
Experiments including LSD dosing, sensory deprivation, psychological torture on unwitting American citizens, violation of informed consent assault, human rights laws, no one held accountable, records destroyed.
Project Artichoke, CI program focused on interrogation methods, including drugs and hypnosis.
An unwitting U.S. citizens evolved into MK-Ultra.
No accountability.
Project Bloomberg, CI mind control program, including interrogation and hypnosis experiments on unwitting subjects, including Americans, predecessor to MK-Ultra, no one held accountable.
Operation Midnight Climax, MK-Ultra, sub-project involving LSD experiments on unwitting U.S. citizens, lured by prostitute, no accountability.
Justice Eluding Structure 00:12:41
Project Machine Bird.
CI program to influence U.S. media and public opinion involving recruiting journalists.
No individuals held accountable.
There is more.
And a public indictment has been issued for Donald Trump against Donald Trump for treason and crimes against humanity.
Hello, this is Kevin Annett, Eagle Strong Voice.
It is Friday, January the 16th, 2026.
This is a very important time.
The resistance movement to the Trump tyranny is breaking out all over America, all over the world, as a matter of fact.
On January 20th, the first anniversary of the inauguration of Trump, there's going to be a national general strike Across America, work stoppages, walkouts at every level.
Also, on that same day, there's going to be an announcement of a new Declaration of Independence being issued by American citizens breaking from the Trump oligarchy.
Very exciting news.
What's even more exciting is the fact that other countries are drawing that support.
Here in Canada, within the Sovereign Republic of Kannada, and in England, with the newly formed Sovereign Republic of Albion, we're pledging joint actions to help overthrow the Trump tyranny.
But an even greater bit of news came today from the International Commonwealth Court of Justice, which has ruled the Trump regime as invalid under international law and has authorized the removal of Trump by international peacekeepers and by Mandamus orders to the government officials in the military to remove him from office as a rogue criminal.
There's a lot of questions whether any of that is going to come to pass.
Chris, your thoughts.
Help us make sense of all of this.
Well, I'll say that the legal system is absolutely compromised and very much there to cover up much of this.
I think that many of the stuff that we're seeing is just coming to surface because there are too many people and too much of a prominence of whistleblowers and multitudes that are coming out and talking about some of these programs.
But I think there are other programs that are really not being discussed that are even far more sinister, things like organ harvesting and things like that.
Much of the experiment with the technocracy type stuff, the AI, the Neuraleak, the Neuralace, I think they're just kind of hanging out their obsolete operations to kind of lend the optic of disclosure and certainly the optic of diligence and justice.
But in reality, I think the really dark, deeper stuff, the stuff that's the crown jewels, is certainly not being revealed and it's being run at full speed by third-party private sector organizations now that are not necessarily part of the government, but they have contracts with them and are protected under the pretenses of national security.
So really, we have to probably revisit what has been done under the name of national security.
And we have to determine if national security is a matter of keeping the people safe or if it's a matter of allowing billionaires to just take people off the streets, steal their organs, and have seven, 10 heart transplants and live to be 150.
Because ultimately, that's kind of what we're dealing with.
I think you got that right.
Brian, your thoughts.
Yeah, I don't look when the Pizzagate scandal broke as a result of the WikiLeaks files related to Podesta back in 2016,
I believe, or even before that, it really did create a lot of anger in people that were following and watching what was there because it was clearly a part of a larger structure of powerful society members who are involved in illicit, horrible activities.
And those activities are sort of gatekeepers for the club.
And that concept leaked into Epstein, who obviously was connected to it at a distance, but it made everybody believe that power was no longer institutional whatsoever, but instead it was some sort of larger scale, structured institution above institutions where there was this mythic blackmail structure.
And I'm not going to call it mythical.
I mean, just it seemed mythic blackmail structure, occultic that was the gatekeeper for whether or not you're going to be a part of it.
And I think a lot of that is true on some level, but there's also some level of it that's going to be a lot of urban legend.
Power comes in a lot of different forms, and it comes with a lot of different types of corruption traps associated with it.
And to simply use it as a label that this dreadachrome factory/slash child molestation slash, you know, these take the worst level of it.
Look, power doesn't have to go that deep into depravity in order to become power.
And power is something that is corrupted as a natural state because it never gets corrected in its ability to help people avoid justice.
So I think right now, what we've got is a problem, not just in America, but internationally, where we just simply don't believe them.
And until we see some justice and we see some actual DA with an actual appetite to prosecute these things, we're never going to be able to separate mythical from reality.
And therefore, the label is going to get thrown around a lot more than it probably ought to get thrown around.
Now, I don't think that everybody on those levels is involved in the same set.
No actual thinking person is going to do this.
But I can tell you that it feels to me like it's more concentrated around the high-level banking institutional structures where great money and great power is collected in sort of a eyes wide shut structure above all structures.
And then the people that are part of those programs are installed at top levels of institutional control.
And therefore, you find a system of power brokers that are capable of modifying justice in the land.
And the problem is until we start cleaning up that mess, the American people are going to continue to just use labels to try to throw it out there.
And when you use labels to try to throw it out there, the voice is able to be minimized as off out on the fringe, you know, not tied to reality.
You're a bunch of conspiracy theorists and it's not going to stick.
And so the issue is going to need to be settled before this train gets completely out of control because the American people just simply don't believe anymore that these strange events like COVID and others aren't being controlled by the same power brokers that are controlling all the other events.
And if it's this bad here in America, how bad is it internationally?
And if the institutions can't resist it on any level, then I would suspect that it's a full-on institutional problem.
And I got to be honest, I don't see many institutions that I don't feel like are completely corrupted.
I mean, give me a break.
Pam Bondi has been worse than Bill Barr, been worse than Merrick Garland, been worse than Loretta Lynch, and worse than all the rest of them that Eric Holder and the rest that came along.
Until we get some prosecutions and some transparency with some actual prosecutors and some courtrooms that are wide open the way it's supposed to be, we're not going to be able to solve this issue.
And the label is going to get thrown at everybody, causing a massive fog everywhere in the American mentality.
Chris, before you have to ask, yeah, I was going to say, can I jump in real quick?
I got something I want to say on that.
I almost think that the effect is to condition helplessness, and that really creates an underworld full of purchasers of illicit vices and narcotics and addictions and serious sexual deviances and many of these other things that lead to the debasement of culture.
So I think that that is really, you know, more about breaking souls and really trying to destroy people so that they feel they have no legal recourse or justice in this world and really start to take a lot of stuff out on themselves.
I will say this: that Nelson Rockefeller was found with an underage girl.
Warren Harding found with a 12-year-old girl when he died.
You know, Dick Army's in a scandal with similar things with boys.
Think about Heidi Fleis or Palfrey.
I mean, those are supposedly consenting adults, older people, but think of Iran Contra, think of the Vatican, what they had going on in Nicaragua.
There's a long history of this.
In the 70s, there's a bunch of stuff about this too.
So, I mean, like every decade they have like the Dynacorp cover-ups, and it seems to really fall on deaf ears and just people just sweep it down the memory hole.
But it's very real.
It happens every decade.
And it's almost like it's injustice is trying to normalize this behavior.
And I think that is really the millstone that is going to destroy our human qualities if we allow this to become normalized.
Chris, before you have to depart for family reasons, tell us about how all this is related to suppressing the Epstein vials.
I mean, there's a mountain, there are millions of docs there.
Think about this.
JP Morgan settled for over 300 million out of court, just flash settled to relieve any liability from the Epstein cases.
So that's just one bank, one time, one bam, you know?
So, I mean, that's a significant amount of money if you think about it.
And I would assume there's other institutions that have been involved with this that are probably doing very similar things to take advantage of double jeopardy laws and civil claims.
So, yeah, I mean, I think that's how it ties together.
If you can print money out of nothing and lend it at interest or control who gets the lending, you can pretty much turn a whole generation of laborers out.
You can render them homeless, you know, renters from BlackRock.
And people understand that renters are not going to defend their property like homeowners will.
And it's almost like people that don't have kids are not going to defend children as well as people that do.
So I think they're really exploiting certain demographics in certain ways in much of this, too.
Fascinating, Chris.
Would you like to add thoughts about what's going to happen at the midterms, for example?
Is there any way the Republicans martial law?
Martial law.
That's the answer.
I know I'm a fucking, I'm not an optimist sometimes, Fettz.
I'm a meat hook reality.
But no, I hope that we find a way to get through this and that these people that are trying to run the world and do this to everybody are finally going to be held to justice.
And I think it's just going to only come from everybody marching in the same direction and not falling for the traps and the a lot of the propaganda that they're trying to throw at us.
I sure appreciate you joining us for this first day.
Take care of your kids and appreciate you tremendously.
I appreciate you too, Fettz.
I'm glad you're out there, bud.
Thanks, guys.
Thank you.
Have a good night.
Thank you.
Take us out.
Yeah, well, you took us out on a ride here.
Truth Is Heavy 00:00:34
I'll tell you, it's been a heck of a trip tripping out here on Sunday, the 18th of January, 2026.
Truth versus news.
Oh boy, the truth is heavy and hard and I guess you gotta face it and deal with it and share it too.
So do that as you can and we're coming back for a second hour.
I promise it'll be as exciting and heavy as this one.
So thank you for watching.
Come on back.
Export Selection