All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2026 - Jim Fetzer
01:08:03
Truth vs. NEW$ Inc, Part 2 (18 January 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Chris Weinert
|

Time Text
Israeli Analyst's Insights 00:04:25
And welcome back to the Truth versus News Incorporated here on January 18th, 2026, right before Martin Luther King's birthday and all kinds of things that are happening in this crazy world this year so far.
And so, Jim, what do you got next?
Well, Don, it's fascinating.
We're going to continue with Colonel McGregor, whom I regard as the most brilliant geopolitical analyst in the world today, talking about how Israeli American billionaire Miriam Adelson pretty much confirms her buying influence from U.S. politicians.
Can you allow me not to answer?
I want to be truthful.
And there's so many things I don't want to talk about.
I think that's Miriam responding to questions, perhaps.
Probably not from the Colonel, but from another source.
In any case, it's unavailable.
We've sought for it.
I cannot find it.
Brian cannot find it.
It ain't there.
So, is Trump the Chabad's non-Jewish Messiah?
Sounds absurd initially until you realize it just might be true.
Here we have State of the Nation reporting.
As best I can tell, there should be no confusion as to exactly what President Trump meant when he told the New York Times reporter he would rely on his own morality to decide what's right and wrong when it comes to question of international domestic law.
Yeah, we all know how keen is Donald Trump's sense of morality, law, and propriety.
Having apparently been anointed by the Chabad Religious Sect in recent years, as confirmed by that suspicious bullet piercing his right earlobe, which has biblical roots, by the way.
I mean, that wasn't staged just accidentally, but very purposefully as a sign that he is the anointed one.
Trump's ascension to the highest office in America affords him the opportunity to institute their version of universal propriety to be applied across the whole earth as determined by the Schneerson-inspired United States Commander-in-Chief.
As preposterous as this assertion may seem at first blush, a brief dive into the following short video should make it crystal clear to all with an open mind that Trump is indeed acting as the agent,
not so much of the Jewish state of Israel, but for the adoption of unique religious perspective advocated by Chabad's former leader, Rabbi Schneerson.
Here we have the video.
Or so we thought.
Probably not.
What a challenge.
Meanwhile, Scott Briter is being punished.
His reparte has been debanked.
Here he is on.
Undeclared wars are commonplace.
Tragically, our government engages in preemptive war, otherwise known as aggression, with no complaints from the American people.
Sadly, we have become accustomed to living with the illegitimate use of force by government.
To develop a truly free society, the issue of initiating force must be understood and rejected.
What if sometimes to love your country, you had to alter or abolish the government?
FBI's War on Suspicious Activity 00:15:22
What if Jefferson was right?
What if that government is best which governs least?
What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong?
What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom than to live as a slave?
Now, Scott, I want to talk to you at some length about what has been happening in the streets of Iran and what may very well be a coming new relationship between the United States and Russia.
But before we get there, you were subjected to what Maurice Stanz, Secretary of Commerce in the Nixon administration, once called the terrors of justice, the government doing whatever the hell it wants to do to somebody without any justice whatsoever.
What happened to you the other day when you tried to use your regular bank card to put gas in your car?
Look, I think, gosh, I've lost track of time.
But I took my wife out to dinner the night before the incident in question, and the card worked fine.
Paid dinner, gave a nice tip.
On the way home, the yellow light in my car dinged off.
You know, the one that says, you got to put low fuel, you got to put gas in it.
Don't worry about it, honey.
I'll take care of it in the morning.
Why not?
I have a debit card that works.
I mean, we have money in the bank.
This is the digital economy that we've grown accustomed to.
No cash in the wallet, no cash at home, all the money in the bank.
So the next morning, I drove my wife to work, and I went to the gas station to fill up the tank and tried to use the card and it got declined.
And so I called my wife and I said, hey, did we make a mistake?
Did we run out of money in checking?
Do we need to transfer money from savings?
She said, no, we've got plenty of money in checking.
I said, well, could you just double check?
And she went on the online banking app, Citizens Bank, 26-year relationship.
And all of our accounts were zeroed out.
We had no money, not just in our checking our savings, but in our joint accounts with our daughters, because as good parents, we kept joint accounts there in case our kids ever called us up and said, hey, mommy, daddy, we need help.
And we wanted to be in a position to say, instantly, here's the help.
So they zeroed those out too.
In total, around $2,500.
For all the people that think Scott Ritter's rich, there's the evidence.
$2,500 is what I had in my life.
What did you learn made this happen?
Well, I immediately called the local, our bank managers, who we have good relationships, and they said, we have no idea what happened.
And I said, well, we need to find out.
So we started bumping up the chain of command.
The first thing we found out is corporate would not talk to us.
Corporate said, we have no legal obligation to talk to you.
And I said, you most certainly do.
And they said, we most certainly don't.
And I pushed the issue and the manager backed me up.
And what we found out, they said, look, we sent a letter to you.
And so I went back through the mail.
And sure enough, the day before in a stack of mail that we hadn't quite gone through yet was a letter from Citizens Bank that said, we have decided to end our banking relationship with you.
And we have taken all your money and we will issue you a cashier's check in 10 to 14 days time.
And then, I mean, literally at the thing, it says, citizens is under no obligation to disclose to you its reasons for closing the accounts.
And at this time, citizens' policy prevents disclosure of any information concerning the decision to close the account.
And again, I didn't accept that, so I pushed and made another series of phone calls.
It finally got citizens to tell us who did this.
And it was a priority investigations unit within their fraud department that only responds to input from the federal government.
And the input that they respond to are called suspicious activity reports.
And I asked the local bank manager, did you submit any suspicious activity reports?
And she said, no, there's nothing you do that's suspicious.
You coordinate with us on everything.
I said, that's right.
And so it turns out that somebody in the U.S. government triggered Citizens Bank at least three times with suspicious activity reports.
And then what happens is you automatically get designated as a high-risk client.
And then under the, you know, every time when you open up your bank account, you know, that thick pad of paper that they print out and they open up the last page, say, sign here, well, in there in the small print says that citizens or any bank can terminate your account at any time if you're deemed to be a bad investment risk.
And if you get designated as a high-risk client because of suspicious activities report, they automatically debank you.
And this is by design.
The House Judiciary Report, when going through the January 6th, how the U.S. government targeted them, said this is used all the time by the FBI, all the time.
When they don't like you, they simply go in and go ding, ding, ding, ding, algorithm click.
You are debanked.
It's a tactic that has been used.
I think the U.S. government had, the Biden administration had a code name for choke point.
And it's just a standard tactic that's been used forever by the United States government to harass anybody who dares do things that the U.S. government's not happy about.
You see, it's not about me breaking the law.
If I broke the law, FBI guys would be coming through my door.
They'd seize my accounts.
They'd freeze them, seize them.
I wouldn't get the money back because it's bad money.
That's not what they did.
What they did is simply abuse a loophole in a law written by Congress.
And Congress has acknowledged there's nothing they can do about it.
Literally nothing.
They call the FBI and the FBI says, we didn't do anything.
And the banks say, we can't talk to you because you wrote the law and said when a suspicious activity report is filed, we don't tell anybody.
Who filed these well suspicious activity report can be filed for no reason at all.
It can be absolute BS.
Do we know who filed this?
Federal government.
That's the truth.
We don't know who in the federal government did it.
I have reason to believe that it's the FBI because the National Security Division of the FBI has declared war against me since 1995 and has gone on record saying they are going to destroy me and my family.
And so I have every reason to believe that they're continuing to live up to this threat.
Are the FBI agents who threatened you 10 or 12 years ago and threatened your wife still in the FBI?
No, Michael Templeton, I just want to say his name there for everybody.
Michael Templeton, the man who physically assaulted my wife and verbally assaulted my wife, threatening her with physical violence, threatening me with physical violence.
He has retired.
But, you know, the FBI is a, it's, it's an organized crime syndicate.
And they, the, the criminal activity that was done 12 years ago carries forth today.
I am convinced somewhere in the FBI is a file that says, you know, haunt Ritter today.
And when I say haunt, that's not the word that I mean to use.
Because you're going to be able to do that.
The word that they used was said to me in person.
We will haunt you for the rest of your life.
I was told.
They didn't say haunt.
They used a common word, which we don't see on here that starts with F.
We all know what you're talking about.
Why do they haunt you?
Because of your exercise of the freedom of speech, because you're intellectually honest, because you're not afraid to call something as you see it.
It's more than that, though.
Again, I'm not bragging or anything, but I used to be inside the system.
And I was considered a superstar.
I mean, as a captain in the Marine Corps, junior captain, I had two classified commendations from the director of CIA for doing strategically, nationally important work.
The president of the United States knew my name.
The Comrade of the Marine Corps loved me, and I was being groomed for bigger and better things.
I made the decision in 1991 that I didn't want to go down that path.
I had experienced, you know, disarmament and realized that maybe stopping nuclear war is better than planning nuclear war.
And I'd gone to war in Iraq.
And I realized that there had to be better ways of resolving problems between nations than simply killing people.
And I said, no, thank you.
The CIA at that point, time, John Byrd, he's dead, so we can't hold him accountable.
He declared me to be an enemy of the state.
And he wrote letters that were put in files everywhere that followed me forever.
That anytime somebody said, hey, what about Ritter?
They go, oh, no, no, no, he's an enemy of the state.
You know, and then I was brought back into the system as a weapons inspector.
It was a difficult process, but the CIA found John Byrd's letters and said, no, Ritter's clean.
So they brought me back in.
I'm at the White House.
I'm at the Pentagon.
I'm at the State Department on the seventh floor.
I'm everywhere.
And I'm at the heart of this.
And I decided that I was going to walk away because it was corrupt, because they were telling lies, because it wasn't the right thing.
And I was told, you can't walk away.
You're on the inside.
You've seen it.
You know it.
You know too much.
And we can't let you walk away and speak out.
Oh, it's well, but they said if they let me walk away and speak out, a precedent would be set for other people of integrity to say, oh, you guys are lying, cheating, stealing.
I'm going to call you out.
You know why there aren't, you know why we need whistleblower protections?
Because people who tell the truth are destroyed by the government.
And I said, I'm going to walk away and tell the truth.
And that's when the CIA station chief in New York City, Larry Sanchez, I'm giving you guys names here, told me straight up: the FBI has told me that if you walk away, they will haunt you for the rest of your life.
And it will be immediately and it will be designed to destroy you.
You are not allowed to walk away and talk.
And if you choose to do that, the United States government will destroy you.
And Larry Sanchez was a friend of mine.
And he put out his hand and he said, I liked you, but this is the last time we're ever going to be able to talk.
Just appalling.
Honest to God, I had no idea this was coming.
I didn't know what had happened to Scott Ritter.
Ryan, this is completely outrageous.
How disgusting can you get?
Give us your thought.
Well, a free people simply cannot tolerate either undeclared war abroad or undeclared punishment at home.
They both bypass consent, due process, and accountability.
What Ritter claimed in the rest of the transcript was that the United States has basically normalized the process of declaring preemptive undeclared force or war without declaration and aggression without consent from the people.
But he's also making the domestic claim that you just heard, the domestic control claim, that the same governance style appears at home through financial exclusion.
And if you think this is the last time that a patriot is going to be debanked, you're probably wrong because people need to stand up.
And the problem with Ritter is that Ritter's voice just isn't big enough anymore.
So they can trigger a debanking through some dark, opaque process.
In this case, it was a suspicious activity report with absolutely no explanation and no remedy.
Now, that's the same problem as due process being removed from somebody without the ability to defend yourself in court.
Obviously, it ought to be legal to abuse the system that way.
Whoever did it ought to be fired.
There ought to be checks and balances in place, and there ought to be punishment handed out all over the place.
But as a pattern, these undeclared wars on citizens and foreign governments are very commonplace.
It's an administrative punishment without a court process, just like we learned on January 6th.
It didn't matter if you got the process or not.
You were going to be punished anyway.
And these days, people generally shrug because they just say, well, this is how it works now.
But the real mechanism is ambiguity.
No formal declaration, no formal charges, no clear accuser.
And then, of course, you've got the plausible deniability level.
Oh, the FBI didn't do anything.
The bank can't explain it.
Policy prevents disclosure.
This is a decision being made systematically that we're not allowed to cross-examine on any level whatsoever.
And so citizens are going to come to believe that they can be punished without breaking any sort of law, and that our speech itself is a risk management, self-censoring program where we either self-center or self-manage and self-censor, or we lose access to our money to be able to function within society.
So it turns the American people into a position where we have to basically say, well, we're just going to survive quietly and go ahead and replace our rights with permissions because the government is so big and so powerful.
This ought to be incredibly alarming to every patriot out there.
And if banking access can be removed without any sort of formal accusation or hearing or appeal, then it's not a freedom whatsoever.
It's revocable access for saying something that doesn't align itself with the narrative.
So it's a type of new handcuff where they're disabling your ability to transact life and freezing us out of normal functioning because they don't like what we say.
Digital Choke Chain Testing 00:00:51
And therefore, they're going to try to use the digital economy As a choke chain to control us and prevent themselves from being criticized.
It is appalling.
It's horrible.
And I don't really know what else to say about it, except somebody ought to get to the bottom of it.
And it probably ought to be his congressman.
So we need to get to the bottom of it fast because I'm telling you, it's coming.
They're going to go ahead and do this.
This is part of the social media.
They've tested it in Australia.
They've tested it in New Zealand.
They've obviously tested it to death in China.
Extradited Witnesses Against Maduro 00:03:37
And it's certainly going to be coming this direction if they're going to implement their new global new world order with all their shiny bullshit on it.
Well, you get reports about crackdowns on critics of Israel.
And Scott Ritter, obviously, by speaking the truth about Iran and the situation in the Middle East is interpreted as a critic of Israel because the truth is very damaging to Israel.
And even on our show tonight, the screen has intermittently gone completely black, which happens when their outside is recording the show in progress.
So what's happening to Scott may happen to others we know even better.
This is truth versus news.
Yeah, truth versus news.
Meanwhile, we have a report that King Went has again.
You didn't hear the word cartel of the Sons between that 60-minute special and probably 2014.
And that's when the U.S. government started putting the squeeze on the former head of military intelligence under Hugo Chavez as Nicolas Maduro came into power.
His name was Hugo El Pollo Carvajal.
And at the same time, Marco Rubio announces Pollo Carvajal is coming to the U.S.
We have extradited him and he will supply us with all the dirt we need to convict Nicolas Maduro.
A bad day for the Maduro crime family.
That's a public tweet by Senator Marco Rubio in 2019.
Carvajal was extradited from Spain in 2023.
The U.S. did everything to block him from getting asylum in Europe, to bring him to the Southern District Court in New York, and before the same judge who will preside over Maduro's trial this June, Carvajal was convicted of a narco-terror drug conspiracy, and he signed a secret plea deal with the Trump administration to provide dirt on Maduro.
And in exchange, he gets his possibly 50-year sentence reduced to, it could be just a few years.
All he has to do is be the star witness in the trial against Maduro, where he has pledged to Trump in a letter authored to Trump that he will provide evidence that Venezuela's SmartMatic voting machine company actually helped rig the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden indulging one of Donald Trump's favorite pet conspiracy theories.
So that's the witness against Maduro.
And this is how the United States Department of Justice finessed its case against Maduro as the U.S. military developed an operation to steal Maduro from Caracas.
We didn't hear.
Just awful, just god-awful.
All this stuff.
Manufacturing, kidnapping, extortion, all this grotesque.
Brian, I mean, the United States has no moral compass left whatsoever.
Reframing Anti-SemitismNarratives 00:15:30
The corruption is so thorough from top to bottom.
Your thoughts.
Well, I agree with you.
I've always believed that the institutions that we've placed above us have become corrupt.
I started believing that back in 2016 when I realized the Pulse nightclub shooting was fake and that nobody would talk about it, and that you were frozen out of the conversation and kicked around if you brought up the anomalies that are tied to that particular event.
As it ties to anti-Semitism, I tend to believe that that's a huge push for the ADL and the other Israeli-aligned NGO influences to make sure that these people don't continue to take the brunt of the burden of the blame.
I think that they probably know and recognize that their leadership is indeed morally corrupt to the point where they don't even like the idea that they have to live underneath the power structures that drive Netanyahu, the hardliners, and the rest of them.
These people believe that we're goi.
They believe that we are lower than them, that they have some sort of special, unique relationship with God, but they don't act that way.
And it's going to continue to go that way.
I think the next story is on what Pompeo.
Let's go ahead and take a look at that one and talk about the ramifications of that one in the same context with this.
Oh, I do agree.
You're absolutely right.
This is another extraordinarily revealing story from Information Liberation.
Mike Pompeo declares: we need to make sure the history books don't write about the victims of Gaza.
Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the Zionist Muram Institute Tuesday, we need to make sure the history books don't write about the victims of Gaza.
We need to make sure that the story of October 7th is told properly.
And that when the history books write this, they don't write about the victims of Gaza.
The Zionist crowd erupted in applause.
Let's hear him say it.
This guy is disappointed.
The next generation of young people won't remember October 7th in the same way.
That's true in Israel and in America and broadly in the world.
And we need to make sure two things.
One, it's not that we don't forget.
We need to make sure that the story is told properly so that when the history books write this, they don't write about the victims of Gaza, right?
They can't the history.
And it's, I should be a little more precise.
There were victims in Gaza, right?
It's true.
There are civilian casualties in every war that's ever been fought, but the victims were the people of the nation state of Israel.
Yes, of course.
And only they actually count.
Brian, your thoughts.
What could be more obvious?
Well, the non-Jews don't count.
The Palestinians don't count.
Let them be killed.
They're no more than cattle.
They're inferior to the chosen people.
Look, Pompeo says, okay, make sure when the history books write it, they don't write about the victims of Gaza.
And of course, that's going to get an applause from the Mir Yam Institute, who wrote up a video, do a write-up in a video on the event that happened on January 13th.
So, what Pompeo is signaling there is that on behalf of Israel and the rest of the Zionists, we're going to go ahead and treat history as a battlefield.
We're not going to talk about what happened, but we're going to talk about what needs to be remembered and more importantly, what must not.
And so, they're already planning, just like in George Orwell's 1984, a memory management program where they're going to preload the textbook with the verdict before the record is settled and make sure that the story of history is sold properly.
So, this is just simply a reframing of who counts as the victim versus what is collateral that changes how future generations are going to interpret justice and proportionality.
So, it's a sad, sad situation that's putting us into even more of a position where we need to discipline our speech and watch out for dissenting frameworks that might be anti-narrative and dangerous enough to censor.
It's stamping out criticism related to Israel's state actions should not be an American political concern whatsoever.
It should be an issue of conscience and it should be an issue of fact.
But if we're just simply going to rewrite the textbooks to become, oh, now the narrative is the moral standard, then you're, of course, going to stamp out the next generation's ability to evaluate facts and start performing their obligation of allegiance to the American people.
And so, permissioned history is just a way to tell us what we're allowed to say and what we're allowed to think.
And Pompeo's injecting that he's going to go ahead and do this on behalf of the Zionists.
And it has absolutely nothing to do with American patriotism whatsoever.
History is not owned by the state.
It's owned by the people, and it's not owned by private power or citizenry related to Zionists or anybody else.
There shouldn't be any faction that can dictate what the history books are allowed to emphasize.
Otherwise, democracy will be pure theater.
And history is really an illusion.
Meanwhile, Vance can't be silent on anti-Semitism, according to Algeminor.
An opinion essay by eternity and commentator Micah Danzig this week in the online Jewish news magazine The Alga Minor argues that D.P. Vance's failure to confront anti-critic Semitism, meaning criticism of Israel, within the populist right, represents a serious moral and practical failure, not a peripheral issue.
In other words, Vance is being criticized because he's not opposing every single criticism of Israel, many of which he may, in fact, actually endorse.
He sits Megan Kelly's favorable remarks about Nick Fuantes, an openly anti-Semitic extremist, really.
He's simply an outspoken critic of Israel who has praised Adolf Hitler alongside Dutch Carlson's apparent agreement.
Well, if you study the history of Hitler in Germany after the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler brought the country back to economic life.
He secured the borders.
He took Jews out of finance and he rebuilt Germany into an economic powerhouse.
Danzig points to a series of recent incidents involving high-profile conservative figures.
Within a day, Kennisso and reboasted Kanye West, DEF CON 3 on Jewish people tweet, calling it a vibe, according to Danzig.
These moments like not cringe radicalism, but anti-Semitic ideas moving into the political mainstream.
Well, why do you think that is?
Do you think the massacre going on in Gaza, do you think the genocide being perpetrated for year upon year upon year has anything to do with it?
Then we have James Forrestal's reported anti-Semitism.
This is D.C. Martin, Dave Martin's commentaries.
He's an expert on Forrestal.
This article adapted from chapter three of the 2021 second edition of the assassination of James Forrestal, which he wrote in terms of opprobrium.
Anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist through an isolationist too.
We don't need laws to limit our thoughts when labeling language will do.
He's got so much to say about Forrestal, who was thrown out of a high window at Bethesda Naval Hospital in what was claimed to be a suicide, but was a blatant act of murder on multiple grounds, principally because he did not support the Jewish state of Israel.
Here we have the year was around 2004, and I was attending an in-house lunchtime lecture by a professor from Georgetown, the Bureau of Labor Statistics on the subject of Harry Truman's racial integration of the U.S. military.
I beg the indulgence of the readers, but I've completely forgotten a professor's name.
I do recall, though, he was quite obviously Jewish.
During the question and answer period after his lecture, I suggest he might have fleshed his story out a bit more by noting that the real pioneer in the desegregation of the armed services was James Forrestal.
What ordered the integration of the Navy when he was Navy Secretary?
The man's very emotional response surprised me.
Forrestal was an anti-Semite, he said, in what was really a complete non-sequitur, meaning it had absolutely nothing to do with the issue of integrating the Navy as he brushed away my observation.
He seemed almost like Diracula with a cross being waved in his face at the favorable mention of Forrestal.
The impression this scholar imparted was that there is a continuing strong dislike, if not pure hatred, of Forrestahl within an important element of the U.S. Jewish community.
Yeah, I think Forrestal is a very principled guy.
Meanwhile, to try to refurbish their Charlie Kirk credentials, Israel's going to honor him posthumously, though I believe he's in fact alive and well, with an award for fighting anti-Semitism.
This to counter out all the reports we have from Candice, from Ducker, from Redacted, that he confided in them.
He no longer believed in Israel or the genocide and could not abide Bibi Netanyahu.
They want to cover it up.
Jabru Salam.
Israel will honor the late Charlie Kirk for his work combating anti-Semitism at a conference in late January, four months after the conservative activist was assassinated while speaking at American University.
P.M. Netanyahu's office said Wednesday.
Kirk will be given an award at the International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism in Jerusalem.
Several pro-Israel leaders are expected to attend the event, among them Albanian Prime Minister Edie Rama and former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurtz, whom I imagine are both Jewish and strong supporters of Israel.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, we've had a lot of people in American history that have been labeled anti-Semites.
I can think of Charles Lindbergh, a lot of international Ezra Pound was another one who was labeled an anti-Semite.
Henry Ford was another one, Martin Heidegger, and many, many others that were given that label as a badge of shame, but I can tell you that they were intellectual people who understood the signs of the times.
And in a sense, so were a lot of the Germans who were involved in World War II.
These people were not insane.
And I understand post-Treaty Versailles why they would support Hitler.
Hitler was offering a new version of society where the people would become great again.
Does that sound familiar?
And right now, we tolerate dual citizenship issues as if it's okay.
Anybody who's an American citizen ought to be an American patriot first and foremost and ought to be, if they're a patriot, opposed to a centralized banking system that controls the structures because it's generally unsafe.
Anybody who is culturally conservative ought to oppose the murder of the people in the Gaza area.
And I can, in that article on Forrestal, it talked about how Caterpillar, the heavy equipment supplier, came out and said, Israel's using Caterpillar heavy equipment to tear down buildings in Gaza to get themselves situated.
And we're not happy about it.
So we're going to take away their ability to continue to use caterpillar equipment.
And that was something that Forrestall supported.
It was a way to exercise their influence as a corporation to try to separate themselves from anti-Semitism.
Fucking Gun Laws 00:15:34
And a lot of people believe that that was one of the straws that broke the camel's back when Forrest all came out about that.
So, you know, there's been a lot of victims of this.
And again, this comes back to a system and a structure that's more interested in opposing and destroying free speech and continuing to incite, in a sense, more racial hatred.
Whenever you separate yourselves out and you're no longer an American, you identify with another nation or another force as your primary directive in life and your primary patriotic duty.
You've stopped from being an American citizen patriot who wants to resolve and rebuild and improve America and started leaning toward abandoning us if we ever need you and if we ever choose to put ourselves in a position where we draft or call you into service for American citizenship.
It's something that ought to be frowned upon by every American citizen.
Indeed.
Indeed.
Meanwhile, did Candace dream of EMB shenanigans?
I'm so fond of Candace.
Opening theory: the MP game and the rare earth payoff.
Do we have here an actual at Fort Huchuca?
Was she there?
What was going on?
Meanwhile, shocking videos of ICE repeatedly violating citizens' rights.
He has his gun on him.
Look at that.
A fully registered firearm.
Fully registered.
What's up?
Wow.
Whoa.
Wow.
Wow.
He's carrying a gun legally.
Wow.
This is just run-of-the-mill stuff happening to regular Americans in their neighborhoods right now because of ICE.
And again, I have to remind people: we're all against illegal immigration.
It turns out that they could close the border at the flip of a switch.
Turned out they didn't need to build a wall.
So that was all propaganda to get people riled up.
You didn't need to build a wall because Trump stopped the illegal immigration at the border like that.
But now they're terrorizing American cities and regular Americans.
And this is all performative.
It's all a show, as Tim Dylan said and pointed out, because they're not really going after the businesses that hire illegal immigrants to suppress wages of Americans.
They're just doing this as a show, as chum in the water to keep their base happy.
And it's not worth it.
They've lost their base.
Well, I don't know about their base base, but they've lost all the people they needed.
They have Israel still.
They still have Israel.
Yeah.
And Zionists.
So let me show you this.
Here is, I'm going to show you this video coming up in a second.
ICE agents in Minneapolis violently detained, threatened, and arrested a U.S. citizen for one reason only.
He refused to prove his citizenship.
You don't have to, if a cop comes up to you and says, I need to see your ID, you don't need to, they don't get, they're not Joe, the boss of you.
And this isn't Nazi Germany.
You don't have to show your papers.
They can only ask for your ID if they think that you've committed a crime and they have a reasonable, articulable, I know that's that's ironic because it's hard to say, suspicion of a crime.
If a cop asks you for your ID, you get to say, what is your reasonable, articulable suspicion of the crime that I've committed?
And while he tries to say articulatable, that's when you run.
That's when you run what he tries to say articulable.
So, this happened in this video.
Agents immediately escalate to physical force immediately.
A man stands with his hands.
By the way, the guy's carrying a gun because it's legal in the United States for you to carry a gun.
So, a man stands with his hands up, repeatedly saying, I'm not doing anything, while agents shove him, force him on his car, and begin an illegal search.
No crime, no warrant, no probable cause.
An agent falsely claims that's assault while they are actively assaulting a U.S. citizen who's complying and not resisting.
Moments later, the agent admits the truth, saying, All we needed was your ID, openly acknowledging this was an unlawful detention based solely on a refusal to produce identification.
That's not legal.
Okay, the people recording this, because we had a great one that Chris ran when you were going where the guy that they were trying to say he's impeding their investigation.
No, he wasn't.
He's just recording, and you're allowed to do that legally.
So, let's watch.
Here it is.
Let's watch.
Get the fuck on the car.
Get the fuck on the car before you get it.
That's fucking assault.
Oh, you're going to get fucking tased.
Don't fucking move, and you're going to get tased.
Because you want to be an E. Move because you want to be a fucking fucking pussy.
You're a fucking bitch.
And you're going to learn the fucking hard way.
I didn't know Joe Pesci was in ICE, but apparently.
So they find a gun.
He's got a gun.
I don't give a fuck what you asked me for, bitch.
Shut up.
You shut up, bitch.
How the fuck is wrong with you?
What's wrong with you?
He has a gun on him.
Look at that.
A fully registered firearm.
Fully registered.
What's wrong with you?
Wow.
Whoa.
Wow.
Wow.
He's carrying a gun legally.
Wow.
Where is this?
This is in Minneapolis.
Let's go.
Get him in the fucking car.
Go ahead and ask him.
That's a Vax fake gun.
What the fuck?
Is it working?
Fucking war.
You don't give a fucking ID.
Think about that.
I don't know where to go.
Is that right?
Thank you, Ryan.
I got to say, I find this very disturbing.
I've been inclined to think that ICE was acting properly, but this is a clear illustration of illegal search and seizure.
I'm pretty damn distressed by that.
Brian, your thought.
Well, I told you this was going to happen when they started after Trump got elected and started sending out ICE to check these societies.
I told you exactly that this was going to happen, that Americans were going to start exercising their right not to identify themselves.
And what you've got to remember is that in America, rights are presumed, not conditional, based on papers.
Okay.
And at the moment, citizens have to prove their status in order to exercise a right, then the right is already gone.
That's been legally proven so many different times in so many different courts.
But I wouldn't expect these cops to understand that.
Cops are a bought and paid for enforcement mechanism.
They're wearing masks.
They're trained and conditioned to violate people's rights all the time.
There's very few of them who have enough self-control and enough mental power to control themselves in a way where they meet resistance from something that they don't like and they're able to walk away without getting emotional.
They're charged up.
They're militarized in the sense that they've been equipped with not only tasers and guns and SWAT vehicles and many others.
And this is all a result of a very carefully planned takeover program that started post-9-11, where the security industrial complexes were beefed up at the threat of some sort of outside force.
And now they're running around off the chain and trying to compel people to prove their citizenship to avoid exclusion.
So the pattern here is really developing that your rights have to make it through the documentation gate before enforcement's able to adjudicate them.
And so it has quietly and successfully made our rights only provisionally legitimate.
And it shifts the burden from the state to the citizen to run around proving it.
And so the government no longer has to justify their interference.
They just do it.
But the individual must instead justify their existence, eligibility, or identity.
And that's not a right anymore.
That's a privilege.
And that's just not how it's supposed to be.
So you've got this stop and identify normalization process that's being pushed through as a result of ICE and as a result of, oh, we've got the cover of we're getting rid of all the illegal immigrants that came in.
It's going to wreak havoc and it's going to get a lot of people killed in time.
But more importantly, right now, the public is getting the message that our rights are privileges, not licenses.
And so your best bet to avoid friction is to just basically shut up and comply.
And any resistance is now going to result in suspicion.
So people are not going to continue to ask, do they have the authority?
They're going to ask, do I have the permission of the cops?
And that's caused a psychological shift among the populace, where as a result of all the false flags and as a result of all the media and magnification of these issues, people have shifted psychologically to, I'm already red-flagged, and therefore I need to be prepared to answer to the police if they come around.
So if it's rights as a gate right now, tomorrow it's going to be residency or background status or anything else that's considered to be an ideological risk to society, such as being a cultural commentator on an alternate media channel.
So it's chilling and it's designed to be that way.
And it's being effective in its ability to condition us to do it.
So no, I don't support ICE's ability to do this at all.
I don't think that these cops were acting legally at all.
I think they need to be either re-educated or removed from their responsibilities.
And I feel absolutely no empathy for guys that go to work for the government to do enforcement work.
What a pathetic, pathetic life.
Learn to live for yourself.
Don't work for the government.
Well, I was shocked by how unprofessional they were, insulting him and all this stuff, not respecting his rights.
He was making legitimate claims.
It's par for the course for a militarized police operation.
It's par for the course.
They're just taught to throw the weight around and throw the badge on without validating any of their actual responsibilities in the course of what they call duty.
Brian, I think part of it too is they're being trained in Israel to treat American citizens the way the Israelis treat the Palestinians.
It's a travesty.
Meanwhile, I love that Jimmy Doer.
What a brilliant guy.
Meanwhile, Minneapolis mayor just admitted a scary detail back in front of Nice that has cops fuming.
Frey admits ICE agents outnumber Minneapolis police with bigger guns.
Jacob Pry, this is the mayor, happens to be Jewish, found himself in an impossible position of his own making.
The Minneapolis mayor watched ICE agent plot into a city after years of refusing to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.
Now he's caught between his sanctuary city promises and the reality that his police force can't match federal firepower.
Frey admitted the truth during an interview on the Woolworth podcast with Tim Miller.
When Miller asked whether Minneapolis police could arrest ICE agents acting illegally, Frey acknowledged what every cop already knew.
Can our cops arrest them from a legal perspective?
Yes.
Frey said, from a practical perspective, to state the reality, it does get kind of hard when they drastically outnumber us and they have bigger guns than we do.
That's retreat mode.
The mayor who told ICE to get the F out of Minneapolis after the Renee Good shooting now admits his police force is powerless to stop them.
And here is another Minneapolis mayor caught lying about ICE Agent Jonathan Ross's internal bleeding injuries.
It was a bare, it was a glancing blow.
This is a guy where Rene's Renee Good's car brushed against him, and yet it was reported that he had internal injuries.
Turns out to be false.
Jacob spent Friday morning telling everyone with a camera, ICE agent Jonathan Ross walked away from the Renee Good shooting, basically uninjured.
The ICE agent walked away with a hip injury.
Might as well have gotten from closing a refrigerator door with his hips.
He said he was just getting warmed up.
Give me a break.
No, he was not run over.
Engineered Jurisdictional Conflict 00:13:17
I guess I got this story opposite.
He walked out of there with a big hop in his step.
That's a Minneapolis mayor openly mocking a federal law enforcement officer who just survived being struck by a VHICAL.
The same mayor who screamed Ice, get the F out of Minneapolis was now declaring the agent's injuries were no big deal.
Here's what Pride did not know when he was running his mouth.
Wednesday, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin dropped a bombshell.
Ross suffered internal bleeding to his torso after Good's vehicle hit him.
I suppose that could be a bruise.
A bruise is internal bleeding.
Not a bruised hip from bumping a fridge, but his internal bleeding required hospital treatment after the Minneapolis shooting.
How are we going to be able to confirm that claim?
I mean, listen, we began the show where I was explaining how I just brushed up against a wall, and because I'm 85, you know, I got a bruising to my arm, right?
Well, that's a form of internal bleeding.
Honest to Pete, I mean, from what I see in those videos, he wasn't hit that hard.
I'd be astonished.
Brian, your thoughts.
I think that the engineered jurisdictional conflict that's developing as a pattern, where federal authorities come in and they're going to go ahead and assert their presence, and then you're going to get some resistance from local authority, but neither side's going to back down.
And the terrain becomes the citizenry.
It's a managed friction that's designed to assert federal power inside state jurisdictions.
And it's basically going to start blocking jail transfers.
It's going to result in a very quiet federal enforcement over locals.
And you're going to see the same thing that you saw in Israel, which is where the IDF is able to justify going into neighborhoods saying bad guys are here or Hamas is here or going into workplaces or into any place in public view.
And local leaders, in order to reduce the friction, are basically just going to continue to disavow any responsibility and inflame all the rhetoric that they possibly can.
But they're going to fundamentally admit that they can't stop it because of the government, the federal government has grown completely out of control.
And I think that the effect is what the federal government wants us to hear is that local governments can't protect us and that the federal government's going to act regardless.
And we're going to go ahead and maintain a presence by force, not consent.
And so if the people just continue to accept this sort of armed presence and normalize it as sort of a near conflict condition, then we're going to be psychologically militarized without even seeing a single shot fired.
So, you know, the bigger guns comment really matters in Minneapolis.
And it's an important thing to look out for because the federal government has conducted all of these false flags in order to beef up and extend the security industrial complex on a federal level so that local police presence doesn't have the effect of chilling them any longer.
Brian, as a final point of discussion, Governor Walls is talking about marshaling the National Guard of Minnesota to prevent ICE from its operation, the Pentagon.
Trump admin is suggesting they're putting together 1,500 American soldiers to enforce the law, almost certainly under the Insurrection Act.
How do you see this playing out?
Well, I mean, if you're just going to analyze it politically, I'm going to say I'm for resisting federal intervention.
Now, I don't like walls.
Obviously, he's a clown.
But in this particular situation, he's right.
However, we have a problem.
All the blue areas, the Democrat-controlled urban zones, have been so underpoliced, under-regulated, and under authorized against these dark skin proposal sorts of concepts that they've become almost completely ineffective, leaving the citizenry caught in the fire between local and federal power.
So I think it's all part of continuing the engineered conflict.
And I think that generally conservatives lean towards, oh, we got to get rid of these MS-13 agents.
But what they don't realize is that you're in the process of cleansing ourselves from this less than maybe immediate risk.
We're finding ourselves in a position where we're beginning to lean towards federal militarization and control over local jurisdictional boundaries.
I'll tell you, that dog wouldn't hunt in Texas, but in the urban areas, that's not exactly Texas culture.
So it's a strange situation, but I think that you're going to start to see the battle lines get drawn more and more and more.
And you're going to start to see more inflamed conflict that goes along this direction to try to hand over power to the feds when local ought to be maintained by consent.
Personally, I think that the Democrats are fighting this so strongly because the immigrant, the mass migration has made such a difference to the demographics that this was to save the Democrat Party from extinction after Trump's populist reform of the Republican Party drew so many away from the Democrat Party, including me myself, where I found him a breath of fresh air.
I think they have been desperate to maintain their voting roles and they're willing to use any technique, any bribe, any carrot to make it happen.
They've had Biden with the auto pen supporting the massive influx.
I think this is to preserve their political power and it's become colossally corrupt.
And frankly, I've not seen a situation I thought had the real potential to simplifate a civil war in the United States.
But I think this business with the sanctuary states and the sanctuary cities just might do it.
It's not race relations.
It's not black versus white, which I never believed was going to fly, especially after we elected a black president twice.
But I do think this immigration issue could actually be a fuse that ignites a very massive explosion.
Your final thoughts?
Well, look, the American people need to coalesce around the idea of being Americans first, and they need to understand their cultural rights.
We have academic systems that have phased out any semblance of civics courses.
We have schools that have defaulted to a security industrial complex mentality that are beginning to train and program that into the next generation.
And so you're going to see a more complacent society because nobody wants to get arrested.
There's tremendous amounts of paperwork and bureaucratic punishment associated with just the process.
And so you're going to see citizens walking away.
And by the way, if you thought that because the pendulum swung from the left to the right, that power wouldn't be, power would all of a sudden be set down instead of seized, then you're crazy.
It's always the guy with more power that's going to enforce his more powerful rights.
And so as the pendulum swung to the right, now you have a problem in that you've got a federal government that doesn't necessarily operate at all by the consent of the governed, that has stepped well over its constitutional boundaries.
And by the way, we fought the Civil War on this very issue.
Everybody thinks it was about slavery, but it wasn't.
It was about the federal government's ability to step their way in and make decisions on behalf of the states about what they can and cannot do.
And at this point in time, the legal structure has become so overburdened and overbuilt with laws, rules, and regulations, both on the federal and state side.
Remember, we left Europe because of that very issue.
The pilgrims left, the churches left.
They were starting to institute church-state mechanisms such as which church you would worship at and what you would do.
And it was for freedom of conscience and freedom from government overreach as a result of generations and generations and generations of passing laws, to the point where a government had such overreaching power over someone that our founding fathers and their partners got on the Nina Pinta and Santa Maria and came over and the Mayflower.
and came over to the United States to establish church-based colonies where a new form of government would be established.
And as that new form of government began to be established, they took on debt and that debt produced obligations.
And then those obligations started leaking down to taxation without representation and then leaking down even further to full-on red coat overreach within society.
And that forced the parring and feathering incident with the Boston Tea Party, which then drove us into a revolutionary war against the oppressors.
And I can tell you that at some point, patriotic churches that don't take money from these structures are going to start to stand up and begin to realize what Jonathan Whitehead, Jonathan Whitfield, was preaching about, which is that a government that overreaches too far, too often, and too much should be declared a tyrant and must be resisted.
And that is the obligation of the citizens to do so.
It was Jonathan Edwards.
I'm sorry, Jonathan Edwards said that.
And that's the time.
That's going to be the spark that unites the war.
But by the time the war gets united because of an uneducated, complacent citizenry, it's going to be far too late.
The government's going to be far too militarized.
And unless that war involves the local sheriff and all the local officers against the federal presence that's going to be completely militarized with tanks and everything, then there's not going to be a hope for us to redeem this country or bring it back whatsoever.
At this point in time, it's my opinion that you should go out and go out peacefully, separate yourself from society, re-educate your children properly.
try to begin to assert your rights with proper modes of civil disobedience.
And once they begin to cross that threshold, then Second Amendment, there'll be a time and a place for that.
Brian, I thank you.
As I thank Chris for the first hour, you for the first and the second.
Dawn, take us out.
Yeah, I suppose you notice that I changed my shirt from this here because this hour looks like freedom and all the stars and things that I'm so proud to be are really just fixing.
Critical Time Ahead 00:00:53
And that's not the way America really is working.
So we got to, like Brian says, we got to get back to basics and do things.
So I'm saying that this is a critical time.
This is a critical show.
And we got to take what we have back and make sure that we have a country worth living in.
So, okay, this is the 18th of January, 2025, 26.
And truth is news.
And I'm Donald Rod, and I'm trying to keep up with everything.
So we'll see you next week, God willing.
It's been a heck of a great show today.
So think and plan ahead.
Export Selection