All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 18, 2026 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:36
Troops arrive in Greenland, Iran, Trump & Insurrection, Mercury in Baby Formula, Megyn Kelly & Israe
|

Time Text
Oregon Rebellion Concerns 00:14:01
Welcome presents stories.
Video clips I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
Gary tells me we get more views than the White House.
We actually do.
Love it.
Yeah, there's some other quality shows that has like Paul Craig Roberts called Dialogue Worked.
We get more views than them.
So we're very happy that everyone who watches the show, we read all the comments, good or bad.
And like I said, we can't thank you enough.
All right.
And we really try to make the show entertaining as well as informative.
All right, so we're going to start off.
To the ongoing controversy over Greenland, several European countries now have troops on the ground there.
They say they're there to beef up security.
Yesterday's talks involving Greenland, Denmark, and the U.S. failing to reach any consensus.
President Trump making it clear he wants Greenland.
He says he needs it for national security, saying that China and Russia have their eyes set on the country, which is rich in what are called critical rare earth minerals.
The French president Emmanuel Macron saying French and German troops are there for reconnaissance.
In the meantime, there are 50,000 people who live in Greenland, and they too have a say in what happens next.
Scripps international correspondent Ross Cullen is on the island and talked to some of them.
This is the U.S. Consulate in Nuuk.
It's a small building, but one at the center of a big international issue.
The United States is not budging on its ambition to control not just this consulate, but the entire island of Greenland.
President Trump says it's a matter of national security, but the people of this remote, far northern capital are worried.
They say they feel let down by the U.S., a country considered to be their closest ally.
Are you so disappointed?
Oh, Trump.
I was a he will never get our iron.
And we had hoped that maybe the Trump administration had forgotten us a little, but that's not.
We can see that's not happening.
And right now, everything is really at stake.
Greenland is a place of stunning beauty.
The island is three times the size of Texas, covered with a vast ice sheet, remote mountains, and deposits of rare earth elements and untapped oil fields.
The prime minister here in the self-governing territory of Denmark says a geopolitical crisis has broken out and there is a defiance here.
A majority of the population of 57,000 overwhelmingly say they do not want to become part of the U.S. Denmark and other European nations are now beefing up their military presence here to show they are serious about the island's security.
Here in Greenland, there is a feeling of uncertainty and real concern for what will happen next if the US does not give up its ambition to control this island.
Ross Cullen, Scripps News Group, Nuke, Greenland.
That was a terrible idea to begin with, Gary, and it only reinforces the image of the United States as a thug and a bully and a thief, a thief on a grand scale.
I mean, violating Zenevaland's sovereignty to kidnap its chief, its head of state, Nicholas Maduro, was outrageous.
Violation of international law, the UN Charter, the Geneva Accords.
This would stand in the similar in the eyes of the world, just outrageous.
Just because they have things we might covet.
Don't we remember the commandment not to covet thy neighbor's wife or property?
I mean, this is just outrageous.
It's disgusting on every ground.
I'd like that Europe is sending forces there to Greenland to make it an international incident if Trump tries anything.
Frankly, I think he's losing it.
He's having a lot of cognitive tests.
A reason to believe that he may be suffering from a form of dementia that affects judgment because he's displaying incredibly bad judgment.
I'm not happy about any of this.
And I frankly don't think he can get away with it.
But it won't be for lack of trying.
Yeah, it's amazing that a country twice the size of Texas wouldn't even fill up the superdome as far as the people that live there.
Three times the size of Texas.
Three times.
Wow, even more.
Just amazing.
All right, next up, we've got Trump still at it.
Welcome back.
Our 90s legal expert Whitney Trailer is back with us now to talk about the developing situation in Minneapolis.
So just to bring viewers up to speed here this morning, another shooting last night involving ICE agents in Minneapolis.
And now this morning, President Trump says he's threatening to use the Insurrection Act.
I think for starters, we should explain what that act means exactly.
Sure.
So the Insurrection Act is from the 17, it's the Insurrection Act of 1794, which actually allows the president to call in federal troops on domestic property.
And so when in the situations that it is usually invoked is when there is an actual rebellion, and that means a rebellion against the country and if the laws of the cannot be executed with the forces that we have in place.
And so it's really a very high bar.
It's a very high standard in which when the Insurrection Act is necessary.
We have seen something just like this play out recently in California, Oregon.
What happened there?
Yeah, the same thing happened where he tried to federalize troops.
The National Guard brought them into both Oregon and California.
And there were lawsuits, there were injunctions, and the courts ruled in favor of the state, saying, no, this wasn't a rebellion.
It didn't rise to the level that would justify the use of national forces in these domestic settings.
I mean, that is really frowned upon.
They said it was a 10th Amendment violation, which was overriding the states' rights to do it.
The governors didn't want this to happen.
So he tried to do it without the governor's consent, and the court said no.
And in the Oregon case, it was actually a Trump appointee who issued that decision, that federal district judge.
So it didn't work in Oregon.
It didn't work in California.
Let's just say that President Trump moves forward with this threat in Minneapolis.
What could it mean for that state?
Well, I think you're going to see the same result.
And because the question is, is this a rebellion against the country?
And one of the shootings that the federal officer, the ICE agent shot, somebody had attacked him with a shovel and a broom handle.
And for the most part, these are peaceful protests.
But to the extent it's not, folks are throwing rocks and shooting fireworks in the air.
So does this constitute a rebellion?
I don't think so.
And so I think the result is going to be the same that a judge, and I suspect there will be litigation, and a judge is going to rule against the Trump administration.
Because again, this is a last resort to use federal troops in a domestic setting against your own citizens.
I mean, that is very unconstitutional and in a very rare circumstance that that would be justified.
Have other presidents tried this before?
Yes, other presidents have tried it before.
Generally, though, it is with the consent.
And as I said in the 740 hour, it was in 1794 with the Whiskey Rebellion, the rise of the KKK after the Civil War.
They needed to use these federal troops.
Bush used it in 1992 after the Rodney King protests.
But of course, that was with the California governor's request.
And then the last time it was used without a governor's request was in Montgomery in 1965 to support the civil rights protesters.
So this is rarely used without the governor's consent.
So again, the new news this morning is that President Trump is threatening to use the Insurrection Act in the state of Minneapolis.
We don't have a lot of time left here, Whitney, but what do you think the next steps are in the legal process here?
So I think there will be a lawsuit.
I think they'll seek immediate injunctive relief, basically asking the court to say, hey, this is unlawful and get the troops out.
I suspect that will happen any day, and there will be a ruling quickly because it's an injunctive relief.
And I suspect that the courts will rule against the Trump administration, and those federal agents will have to go out.
For the California and the Oregon situation, that took a little while to play out because wasn't there like a lot of back and forth of that?
Yes, that took a while to, it was months while those troops were there, and it took a while for that to resolve.
It then went to the Court of Appeals, two different Court of Appeals, and they affirmed those decisions.
So they ruled against the Trump administration.
So every court that's looked at it has really ruled against the Trump administration.
Yeah, I was reporting in Oregon at the time of all that, and it went back and forth.
And even some of the appeals judges were ruling against each other.
I mean, they couldn't even come to agreement in some cases there in Oregon.
Yeah.
All right, Whitney.
Well, we really appreciate you coming in again here.
Well, I don't think it's quite so clear-cut in Minneapolis.
The 10th Amendment, of course, reserves to the states the rights that are not specifically allocated to the federal government.
Now, what makes it different is that the anti-ICE activists are performing a lot of illegal acts, and the state government and the local police are not enforcing the law against them.
They're blocking the roads.
They're using vehicles to threaten or actually assault, even hit ICE agents, throwing rocks, bottles, alike.
It's a very lawless situation.
And right now, Walls, the governor, is calling out the National Guard of Minnesota to basically protect the protesters, the illegals, from the intrusion of the federal government.
What that means is that Trump may actually have a far stronger case for invoking the Insurrection Act in Minnesota than he had or other presidents have had in other instances, such as in Oregon and California.
I have a report today, the Pentagon is preparing 1,500 troops to enter Minneapolis to enforce the law.
Now, what everyone needs to understand is that the states don't have the right to oppose the enforcement of federal law.
That is not a right they have.
So I think legally, and you notice at the end they were even talking about disputes among the appellate court judges.
I think Trump actually is on stronger grounds here than in any previous case.
And I do not rule it out.
I think he is on the verge of declaring the Insurrection Act.
And frankly, I think he has good grounds for doing so, Gary.
We'll see how it plays out.
But I don't count the administration out over this matter of enforcing federal law.
That's what it's all about.
All right.
Okay.
Killy, I was on the ground for five days.
And one thing I did start to notice, they do do this in shifts.
And I kept hearing this.
The first morning that I was there, a woman said, Hey guys, we're moving out to the neighborhoods.
We hit our goal time.
What do you mean, goal time?
And then another time I heard someone say, Oh, I did my shift.
When I hear the word shift, my employment alarm bells go off.
Do you think that these people are being paid?
I mean, you kind of start to think so because when it's 2 p.m. on a Friday, how are you guys out here?
I was seeing like working-age people out there, and I'm like, What are you guys doing?
And then I've talked to protesters who talk about how expensive it is.
And then you see the free snacks and then all the effort that goes into it.
And you just start asking questions.
Are you guys taking PTO to get out there and do this for five days?
It's tons of people, and somehow the bulk of them seem to be on the same page.
How are they all coalescing and figuring out where to show up when?
So there's Facebook groups, and then you can go on the Facebook group.
You can sign up for text messages.
Hey, sign making on Tuesday.
And then on Thursday, it was like meeting crafts on Tuesday.
Yes.
And so what do you see?
But it's the same thing.
It's this community.
Like, if you want to, you can make this thing your whole week.
Because it's like there's always an activity.
There's always something you've got.
Nothing going on.
They're free.
So.
All right.
Are these protesters paid, Dr. Pescher?
I'd say they are being paid.
Yeah, this looks like a George Soros op.
It was that was going on in Minneapolis over the George Floyd.
They even had pallets of bricks that were being delivered by trucks so protesters could use them to smash windows of businesses.
It was catastrophic.
The so-called summer of love.
Soros has wanted to destroy America in his lifetime.
New Concerns About Baby Formula Testing 00:03:51
And I guess, even though he may be teetering on death, that he's still active.
His son Alex, of course, was instrumental in getting Kamala onto the ticket with, you know, Biden.
I mean, it was all ridiculous from the beginning, but I think this is very suggestive that a lot of this protest is being paid for.
George Soros is a tyrant.
He's a traitor to the United States.
He ought to have been arrested and prosecuted long ago.
And frankly, he deserved to be executed for treason.
That's what's going on here, Gary.
So there's another reason why the Insurrection Act may actually be appropriate in this case.
All right.
I didn't know what to think about the Insurrection Act being used.
All right, baby formula.
New concerns about what's inside some of the most common baby formulas.
A warning for Florida families.
The state's been testing baby formula, and some of the results are scathing.
According to the Florida Department of Health, the state tested 24 infant formulas, and 16 of them contained at least one heavy metal above federal safety standards.
Mercury was found in all 16 of the samples that tested positive, with three formulas showing three or more undesirable results.
Casey DeSantis, backed by husband Governor Ron DeSantis, alongside Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Latipo, announcing test results Friday.
Neurodevelopmental injury.
We're talking about injury to your kidneys, to your lungs, to your livers, to elder, pretty much every organ in your body.
The governor says this is just the beginning.
That is part of their exposing food toxins initiative, that they will be independently testing even more products in the near future.
We want people to be able to make the best decision for them, not necessarily what would be in the best decision of some manufacturer or something like that.
You know, when I watch this, Jeffrey, I think about like, what is it?
What was it, like six surgeon generals or something wrote a letter against Robert Kennedy Jr., you know, and I'm like, oh, the same six that allowed poison toxic chemicals in our baby food, never thought to test it for the United States of America like that.
Like the same six that allowed arsenic in the baby food, which is one of the things they're finding, mercury, petroleum dyes in our, you know, in our fruit loops.
Those same six surgeon generals.
I mean, it's amazing to see, it's so exciting to live in a nation that is starting to act like the nation you believed you lived in.
Unfortunately, this is just Florida, hopefully other states.
But honestly, you know, our own federal government shouldn't be testing all of these things.
Shouldn't this be a part of what it takes to get on the shelves?
Was that not what the Food and Drug Administration was supposed to be doing all this time?
Doe Victory is a good guy, and Ron DeSantis magnificent on this issue, his wife being involved, testing the baby formula Gary.
Mercury not only affects all those other organs like the lungs and the kidney, it affects the brain.
So that it's well known there's a correlation, direct correlation between mercury and aluminum-based vaccines and autism.
The more vaccines, the more autism.
The less vaccine, the less autism.
This is very commendable.
Florida is leading the way.
He's not a charismatic guy, but he's adopting the right policies and pursuing them with vigor.
Reevaluating News Narratives 00:04:18
So I have to compliment Florida and Ron DeSantis over this issue.
He really, truly is leading the way.
We'll take who we can get.
All right.
Megan Kelly making a revelation.
And only now, Tucker, have I begun to say, like, wait a minute.
How much of the narrative that is in our news today has been spoon-fed to me by people who are super pro-Israel at all costs, who won't tell the truth about Israel, no matter what it is, and will cancel you if you don't befriend or defriend people who do.
And so this whole thing has made me reevaluate.
Like I'm just starting from square one, basically on Israel right now.
And I'm actually day by day taking a much harder look at who are they?
What do they do?
How do I find real information on what happened in this war in Gaza that I will trust?
Because I do know I'm being propagandized by both sides.
And how will I make up my own mind?
Even some of the narratives that we hear, like I'm not a fan of certainly radical Muslims.
And I'm not a big fan of Islam.
I'm going to be honest.
The tenets of it are political and I don't agree with them.
But I have dear friends who are Muslims.
And I do start to wonder how much of the very negative messaging about all Muslims, and I've been a part of some of that negative messaging.
Don't get me wrong.
I'm not wavering from my position that it's not great to have an Islamist running New York City.
But how much of the narrative has come from people who are just ardently pro-Israel and need me to hate them?
Do you know what I mean?
All of it.
So I think it's a fair question.
And I'm sort of in my own search mode.
Well, it's good.
I think Megan is coming into her own.
She in the past was just a beauty who didn't make much contribution to journalism, but I think that's changing.
And certainly an interview with Tucker is a Hayakolaid.
And on the issue, she's 100% correct.
As I would observe to students in my courses in Greggle thinking, in Islam, there's an absolute prohibition on the consumption of alcohol and no sex outside of marriage, which, once in form, brought about a considerable diminution in enthusiasm among students for converting.
But it's an interesting aspect.
I thought about, ma'am, Danny, given the prohibition against alcohol, I mean, you know, New York lives on alcohol.
How many businesses would be affected?
He's not making any move in that direction.
It's just an interesting observation.
I do understand.
There's a strong Jewish, really Zionist-led movement against him.
Right now, they have a commissioner of police who's an avid Zionist who ought not to have been carried over.
Well, I think Megan's got him right.
Yeah, everyone out there has been pressured to come up with pro-Israel propaganda, and that's the bottom line.
They're paying a lot of influencers, a lot of money.
They're even bribing pastors of evangelical churches, again, with a lot of money.
Remember that saying, the love of money is a source of all evil?
Well, there's a lot of it going on here to promote what is truly an evil cause, namely the Zionist agenda for Israel and the continued ongoing slaughter of the Palestinian people to steal their land.
So I give Megan high marks here.
I think she's turning into a significant journalist, contributor to getting the truth out there, which I had frankly not anticipated.
Shell Shock Definition 00:09:11
It's a good sign, and I commend her for it.
Yeah.
Better late than never.
All right.
Now we're going to have George Carlin talking about euphemisms and how language changes.
Americans can't really handle the truth, so they invent soft language to protect themselves.
And it gets worse with every generation.
Give you an example of what I mean.
There's a condition in combat when a soldier or a sailor can't take it anymore, when he's ready to snap, all stressed out.
During the First World War, they called that shell shock.
Good, simple, honest, direct language, two syllables, shell shock.
Almost sounds like the guns themselves.
That was 70 years ago.
Then a generation later, we had the Second World War.
Same combat condition was called battle fatigue.
Four syllables now, takes a little longer to say, doesn't hurt as much.
Fatigue is a nicer word than shock.
Shell shock, battle fatigue.
Then, in 1951, we had the Korean War, and Madison Avenue was riding high by then.
The very same combat condition was called operational exhaustion.
We're up to eight syllables now, and the phrase is completely sterile.
There's no humanity left in it.
Operational exhaustion sounds like something that might happen to your car.
Then came the Vietnam War, and that only ended 15 years ago.
And with all the lies and deceit surrounding Vietnam, it's not surprising that the same condition was called post-traumatic stress disorder.
Still eight syllables.
We still have eight syllables.
But we've added a hyphen.
And the pain is completely covered by jargon now.
Post-traumatic stress disorder.
Maybe if we still called it shell shock at that time, those veterans might have gotten the attention they needed.
The CIA doesn't kill people anymore.
They neutralize someone.
Or they depopulate the area.
The government doesn't lie.
It engages in disinformation.
The Pentagon actually refers to and measures nuclear radiation in something they call sunshine units.
Israeli murderers are called commandos.
Arab commandos are called terrorists.
Conservatives refer to the country killers as freedom fighters.
Well, if crime fighters fight crime and firefighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight?
Just ask you, you know?
All right.
Historically, in terms of television figures, there have been some great comedian commentators like Johnny Carson and Jay Leno and David Letterman, but frankly,
the best of all, superlative, completely brilliant George Carlin had a way of cutting through the smoke and getting to the bottom in a way that just resonated for his intelligent intellectual audience.
This was a classic example.
Shell shock, battle fatigue, you know, up to post-traumatic stress.
This already's got it exactly right.
And to this day, our veterans are not receiving the assistance they need.
The Veterans Administration has been corrupted, Gary.
And as a former Marine Corps officer, I regard this as a great betrayal by the American people to those who actually are fighting for the nation's freedom.
Although as Smedley Butler observed all too often, it's actually just to enhance the profit margins of big international companies, sad to say.
Carlin's completely brilliant.
Love it.
I can't get enough of the guy.
Frankly, very good choice.
Great clip.
All right.
That was a very long time ago talking about Israel.
Okay.
So I'm going to talk about some upsetting and I suppose graphic detail in this video.
So if that's not your cup of tea, turn off.
What's the video about?
The video is about our justice system in the UK and specifically about some of our judges in the UK who I would argue are absolutely not fit for purpose and that when cases like this come up should be outed, named, shamed, embarrassed publicly.
So all over X at the moment are details on a case of a man called Husnain Ahmed who has been convicted of sexual assault and rape against a minor.
She was 13 years of age.
He was convicted of four counts of sexual assault through inappropriate touching, one count of sexual assault through penetration, and another four or five counts, I think it was, of inciting a 13-year-old to engage in sexual activity.
Have a guess what his sentence was.
Two and a half years.
Let me just repeat that.
Sexual assault through penetration.
He had sex with a 13-year-old girl, and he got two and a half years in prison.
Now, given the current situation in prisons, normally you get 50% off your sentence.
We're letting people out currently to free up space in prisons between 30 and 40% of their sentence.
So he's likely to do around about a year in prison.
Is that acceptable?
Well, Gary, the situation is actually much, much worse.
Talking about an individual instance in terms of context around this.
There may well be.
Sorry about that.
Okay, go ahead.
Turns out, Gary, this is just one instance of which are a vast number.
In fact, latest reports have it over 300,000 young British girls have been subjected to gang rape and has been suppressed by the government because they didn't want to be accused of sexism or racism because the gangs who are raping them are Pakistani immigrant.
300,000 young British girls have been violated by gang rape, gang rape, multiple penetrations by multiple persons at the same time.
And the British government has suppressed it.
This is grotesque.
Anyone who had any lingering respect for the UK, I'm telling you, this point being made here about the 13-year-old girl being assaulted is trivial compared to the mass rapes that are taking place in the UK affecting young English girls.
And think about it, it affects their entire lives.
They'll never be able to engage in normal sexual activity after having been gang raped.
They'll never be able to have sex.
It's a pleasurable experience.
It will always be mixed with pain and fear and agony.
This is grotesque.
So what you're seeing here is just the tiniest tip of an enormous iceberg.
Gary, I'm glad you included it.
The problem by comparison, however, to this individual story is simply horrific, horrific.
And I damn the UK for allowing it to take place, covering it up, and not acting appropriately to protect its own young girls who represent the future of the nation.
All right.
We're at the halfway point and we're going to move on.
Okay.
This is a Rothschild family member.
This is an extraordinary story.
So he was born in a place called the Judengasse, which was a Jewish ghetto, basically.
And it was the house that he lived in when he eventually had 13 children was only 14 feet wide.
And he lived there with his very, very overpowering and dominant and an incredibly brilliant wife who was called Guttel.
Breaking The Ghettos 00:03:55
He was determined to get out of this ghetto.
At night time, the ghetto was closed.
You weren't allowed to leave.
The street was so narrow that no sunlight could penetrate.
There was no plumbing.
There was no sewage.
There was nothing.
So everything you can imagine happened in this street.
And unsurprisingly, he wanted to get out of there.
And he started a small coin business and that did reasonably well.
But actually, and this is where it ties into legacy, his great strength was to send his five sons to the capitals of Europe at that time.
And what they did is they set up, in effect, the first international banking system.
So whereas everyone used to be in separate different countries or separate cities until then, these five boys communicated with each other, sometimes by pidgin, and they wrote to each other in Judendeutsche, which was a kind of Yiddish German vernacular.
And that is why they were so successful.
And this absolute belief in togetherness, you've got to stand together, you've got to work together, you've got to work across borders, you've got to work with rules.
And by 1789, when the last one went to 1815, so very, very short period of time, it was said that no government or king would consider going to war without the Rothschilds supporting them, because that was how incredibly influential and powerful they had become.
Well, she's certainly right about how incredibly powerful and influential they have become.
That's absolutely correct.
Origins, five kids in a 14-foot-wide facility.
That sounds like happy horseshit to me, Gary.
Yeah.
But she wants to introduce a bit of mythology, to emphasize the humble origins to the rise of the greatest financial empire the world has ever known.
Other Rothschilds have observed that there would be no wars unless their sons wanted them to occur, that there would be no wars.
Well, I say, if we got to choose between the Rothschild family and no wars, I make no wars.
Let's get rid of the Rothschilds.
I only wish it could happen.
They are so powerful.
They are so entrenched.
They have made an enormous impact on history and frankly warped, warped the world in ways that have benefited them financially to the detriment of humanity.
It's grotesque.
It's interesting to have an actual member of the family talk about the family and its history, because the whole world really needs to understand how all this came about.
And the Rothschild century, in terms of the 20th, 21st century, were right at the core of bad things, evil things happening to the world,
and it must be understood and at some point dealt with in a forceful and forthright fashion to set humanity back on a path that represents the best interests of the world community rather than that of a single entrenched,
fabulously wealthy and influential group of individuals who have exercised a degree of influence far beyond what justice or truth or humanity would require.
Why Berlin Burned 00:02:51
All right, we had book burning in Germany.
So what was that really all about?
Why did the Bavarian brown shirts of 1930s Germany march to their capital of Berlin to shut down brothers and burn books about sexology?
Well, the Weimar Republic of the 1920s Germany had turned Berlin into the world's largest substance-infused house of hedonism, offering up to 13 different kinds of prostitution, including with children.
You see, after losing World War I, Germany's overseas colonies in Africa and Oceania and so on were signed over to Britain, Belgium, France, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia.
And this made Germans economically dependent all of a sudden on these other Western powers.
With the loss of their living standards, these other powers began extorting the German population for its labor.
In response to their sudden poverty, many German women, men, and children were forced to start selling their bodies.
Even upper-class women.
German chemical companies began producing synthetic substances to subdue the German mind.
And many of the brothels and early pornography, since Germans invented the first motion picture projectors, were being commercially exploited by a certain group of immigrants.
Around that time, intellectuals of the Frankfurt School, such as Hirschfeld, founded the Institute of Sexology, and they began experimenting on the poor Germans who were forced to sell their bodies with transgenderism and androgyny.
The Bavarian brown shirts finally could no longer bear watching this humiliating condition forced onto them by the Treaty of Versailles.
And they demanded that Germany once again become a proud and independent and economically strong nation, as well as ushering in a morally sound and healthy future for their children.
Okay, Dr. Fesser.
Of course, what they're not mentioning here is Adolf Hitler was a driving force for a lot of these reforms to establish and secure the borders of Germany, to get the Jews out of the financial institutions of Germany where they'd been operating to benefit other Jews and the Jewish community at large.
Where Kevin McDonnell, who's been a student of group selection in terms of evolutionary theory, has done absolutely brilliant exposés of how Jews operate to benefit other Jews.
Venezuela's Diesel Dilemma 00:06:44
And of course, you dig into the theology and you discover in Judaism there's a distinction between the Jews and the Goyam, the non-Jews.
And the Jews are viewed as superior, a superior race, superior people, the non-Jews as inferior, inferior race, inferior people.
Whereas some, like Menachem Began, who is an extreme Zionist supremacist, likened the other races to the cattle of the field and that the Jews were so superior.
You know, they could abuse, lie, rape, pillage non-Jews with impunity, even murder them.
So there's a real problem here that the world has yet to confront, where I'm now disposed to say that the merger of the Old Testament with the new in the Bible was a calamitous mistake.
That the Christian Zionism is an incoherent philosophy because the Zionists want to kill all the Jews.
This Rabbi Schneerson, who was thought to be the Meshiach, the Jewish God returned to earth, said no, he couldn't be the Mesiach because there are still Christians alive on earth.
You've got to understand and fathom this.
The God of the Old Testament has got up vengeance, revenge, genocide abounds in the Old Testament.
Check it out.
Versus the God of compassion, love, and forgiveness.
There's new research being done by a fellow named David Skirgina, suggesting that Christianity was really intended to be a way of controlling a population from becoming anti-Semitic and continuing to allow itself to be exploited by a minority group.
Because if you believe in forgiveness, no matter what transgression you're going to forgive, they can go on raping and pillaging and not be confronted or opposed by those whose God is of love and compassion and forgiveness.
Gary, we're in a really awkward situation theologically and otherwise with the ongoing slaughter in Gaza.
I don't see any immediate cessation.
And sad to say, the president of the United States has been supportive.
He's even talked about developing Gaza as a real estate project.
His son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has said what a valuable piece of real estate it is.
They're talking about turning it into the Riviera, the Mediterranean.
This is all grotesque.
This is grand theft of some of the most historically important property in the history of the world, the lands of Palestine, which belong to the indigenous Palestinian people, to whom the present occupant of Israel are not even genetically related.
It's just outrageous and an atrocity, Gary.
And until we come to grips with it, we really aren't going to understand why events are unfolding in the world as they are in such bizarre and morally, profoundly corrupt ways.
Sad to say.
Okay.
We've got a Zionist preacher here saying that God wanted us to take Venezuela.
They say you have ceased Venezuela for the oil.
Yes, this is true.
That there is that which has been brought to the forefront of this earthly battle.
But the enemy has sought and was seeking to bring war and to bring conflict through Venezuela and to control the oil of the earth.
But the spiritual oil and the natural oil does not belong to the forces of darkness or to those who thought that they could bring a one-world order.
This is my reset.
And the oil of the natural and the oil of the spirit is mine, says the Lord.
Okay.
The oil of the spirit.
What ridiculous horseshit, Gary.
I cannot believe you got a minister up there with a pseudophony product about U.S. entitlement to take Venezuelan oil.
Interestingly, Gary, the big oil companies aren't interested for multiple reasons.
One, of course, is Venezuelan oil is very thick.
It's not the sweet, light oil that, you know, fuels machinery, lubricates machinery, or is convertible into gasoline.
This is very thick.
It's suitable for diesel.
And of course, there is a big demand for diesel.
On the other hand, the Venezuelan refineries, because of the years of sanctions imposed by the United States, are in a state of disrepair.
It would take a vast amount of money to bring them up to part Iran.
There's a security threat.
The people of Venezuela aren't happy about this, however much disinformation we may be flooded with, that they like having Maduro out.
The opposite is the case.
The woman who's now replaced him as vice president actually in Venezuela, the vice president basically runs the country.
So she's very well qualified to carry on.
We had the absurdity of this opposition leader who was given a Nobel Peace Prize she didn't deserve, has now given her medal to Donald Trump, and he's smiling widely about it.
But frankly, it would cost so much money and the risks are so bad and there'd be no profits for a decade, for about 10 years.
The oil countries don't want to do it.
Common Sense Gun Laws 00:14:15
It makes you wonder what it was all about.
That Trump hadn't bothered to consult with the oil people about whether they would have a bona fide benefit from gaining access to Venezuelan oil, the whole thing.
In my opinion, over and beyond the violations of international law, the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions has turned out to be a fiasco.
And Trump may congratulate himself for it, but it's all undeserved.
Frankly, it's embarrassing.
And to see him with this Nobel medal he didn't earn and most surely does not deserve is frankly embarrassing and makes him look very, very silly, even like a fool, or some would say a buffoon.
I couldn't agree more than that.
All right.
What about lead paint?
Was there a reason for taking it out?
Did they really ban lead paint because it was toxic or because it blocked their signals?
Think about it.
For decades, every home was coated in lead paint.
Thick, durable, insulating.
Then suddenly, governments worldwide decided it was dangerous.
But here's what they don't tell you.
Lead is a natural shield against radiation and electromagnetic frequencies.
In other words, radio waves can't penetrate it.
Before the ban, your walls literally acted like armor.
No TV signals, no radio frequencies, no wireless, anything could pass through.
And then, right as wireless communication exploded, radio, television, early radar, the health panic began.
Convenient timing, right?
They told us it was about safety, but the studies linking lead paint to poisoning, most came from industrial smelting, not house paint.
The numbers never added up.
But what did add up was control.
Because once the lead came off the walls, the signals went in.
Every home became a receiver.
Every person became a node in a connected network.
Was lead paint banned to protect you or to make sure they could finally reach inside your home?
It's kind of like the lead paint thing.
You know, everybody goes, oh, lead paint's harmful.
Well, that's a yes and a no.
Yes, lead is harmful to the human body, but that's not why they took it away from us.
They claimed the baby's shoe and all baby crib corners going to get lead.
That was the hoax that they used to get this agenda over because they involved children in it.
The truth of the matter is when you have lead paint on walls, certain frequencies can't penetrate those walls to see inside because lead is a barrier.
When you go for x-ray, they put a lead shield on the person who's doing the x-rays.
And if you've got specific places in your body, they want to do a radiation therapy, they put lead shields over the rest of your body.
And we know that lead blocks frequencies.
So that's the real truth behind the lead paint knife, is there's a lot of stuff that's being hidden from us, the actual truth behind this stuff.
All right.
What do you think about that one?
It's just astonishing.
It had never occurred to me.
Betty's got it right.
I'll bet that's exactly why they made a to-do over lead paint.
Messy propaganda.
Yes, yes, yes, lead can affect your health adversely, but I think what he's reporting is right.
That wasn't coming from lead paint.
And all this was a propaganda campaign to abandon it, so our homes would no longer be protected by the shield it provides.
This is unbelievably insightful, in my opinion.
Gary, honestly, a thought that had never crossed my mind before.
I think he nailed it.
I think this is exactly right.
And it is a matter of control.
It had nothing to do with health.
That was a cover story.
Just as we get cover stories again and again to justify actions by the government that are inappropriate and harmful to the people, but they need a pretext.
This was a pretext to make the public vulnerable to radiation and thereby additional forms of control by the government.
Fascinating.
That's a brilliant revelation, Gary.
I can't thank you enough for that clip.
All right.
Onward to California and open carry ban.
Tonight, a federal appeals court says the state law banning the open carry of firearms is unconstitutional.
So a federal appeals court just told California that banning open carry is unconstitutional.
I know that sentence sounds fake, kind of like a unicorn writing a bald ego while reciting the Bill of Rights, but apparently miracles do still happen in federal court because California has been treating the Second Amendment like it's a free trial that expired in 2007.
Let's keep going.
The law would have banned open carry in counties with more than 200,000 people here in California.
The judge, a Donald Trump appointee, said the law didn't stand under a ruling from the Supreme Court.
It requires firearm restrictions to be consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulations.
Okay, that part right there is the whole ballgame because what the court is saying is this.
You don't get to make up gun laws based on vibes.
You don't get to legislate your feelings.
You don't get to ban rights because a holster makes you uncomfortable at Trader Joe's.
If you're going to restrict a constitutional right, it has to be consistent with the nation's historical traditions of firearm regulation.
Not modern tradition, not California tradition.
This scares me tradition.
Historical tradition.
Now, before the internet starts malfunctioning, let me say this clearly.
I don't open carry.
I don't plan to open carry.
It's not my thing.
But I am a huge proponent of your right to open carry because rights aren't rights only when they match your personal aesthetic.
That's not how this works.
State Attorney General Rob Bunta's office said in a statement that options were being considered and quote, we are committed to defending California's common sense gun laws.
And here's where anti-gunners short circuit.
If you are truly afraid of guns everywhere, you should logically be more afraid of concealed carry than open carry because concealed carry means you don't see it.
Open carry means you can literally see it, avoid it, leave, and remove yourself from the situation.
But people who oppose open carry don't actually want to be safe.
They want to feel safe.
And those two things are not the same.
They'll say, we don't want to see guns.
Meanwhile, you're surrounded by people carrying guns right now and you don't even know it.
So what you're really saying is the presence of guns scare you.
That's hoplophobia.
And sorry, we don't make laws based on your internal irrational fear of an inanimate object.
This ruling is a win, not because everyone needs to open carry tomorrow, but because it reinforces a principle California keeps trying to ignore.
Rights aren't granted by state preference.
Rights aren't optional.
And rights don't disappear because the political class gets uncomfortable.
Okay.
Well, that's simply excellent clip, Gary.
Let me say a few things about it.
What is common sense?
They talk about common sense gun laws.
They're really appealing to popular beliefs, widespread beliefs that may be false.
In fact, I think most Democrats believe the more guns, the more homicides.
The facts, however, are the opposite.
The more guns, the lower the homicide rate.
Gun ownership is inversely related to homicide rates worldwide.
So that what's common sense turns out to be a false belief.
And if you really want to reduce the homicide rate, you ought to support concealed carry firearm laws that allow citizens to defend themselves.
See, here's a situation that Democrats seem to be incapable of thinking through.
If you have strict gun laws, like places like Chicago, the Burbs, who are criminals because they don't follow the law, they haven't been disarmed by the gun laws.
It's a law-abiding citizens.
The people who do follow the law who are disarmed by gun control laws.
But they're the very ones who would, had they been armed, might enforce the law and prevent crimes from being committed.
Because when you take guns away from law-abiding citizens, you allow the Burbs to go about, use their guns without fear of interference from nosy civilians.
Now, I do think it's appropriate that guns not be allowed in places where arguments might break out.
Bars, for example, maybe nightclubs.
I think it's probably a bad idea to have guns in facilities like that.
But in general, concealed carry and gun ownership reduces the homicide rate.
It's true in the United States.
It's true worldwide.
We had a nice illustration in Brazil of late, where a strong gun control opponent lost his position and he was succeeded by someone who loosened the gun laws.
Well, the homicide rate went down.
And he was replaced by another gun control guy and the homicide rate went back up.
So when they appeal to common sense, you know, gun control laws are really playing you for a sucker and a sap because you may not know better.
You may not realize that the more guns doesn't mean more homicides, but the opposite.
So I like this guy.
He's very sincere.
He's on top of his game.
And I have a concealed carry permit myself.
I'm not into open carry, but I reaffirm it may not be what many call common sense because it's not widely understood, but the more guns in the community, the safer we all are and the lower the homicide rate.
And look at what Trump sent troops into these communities where they're armed.
The violence, the homicide rate drops to practically zero.
It happened in Washington, D.C.
It would happen in Chicago.
Now you got politicians who want to play a game and claim it's an infringement of the rights of the public to be safe and secure, but that's based on the false premise that the more guns mean the more homicides when the opposite, the opposite is the case.
By the way, John Lott, L-O-T-T, is our nation leading expert on these issues.
So I highly recommend his work, his articles, his research if you want to get the facts straight.
Okay, we've got two one-minute clips, and that will be the conclusion of our show.
And to people that are at home, I implore you to wake up to these people who believe that they are contract lords.
I challenge black Americans to wake up to your true history because your quarrel is not with white men.
Okay?
Wake up to who publishes these books and keeps us war with one another.
Christians versus Christians, right?
Christians versus Muslims.
Wake up and learn the true history of slavery because that wasn't exactly a white men sport.
Okay.
Jewish people were the ones that were trading us.
Jewish people were in control of the slave trade.
They've buried a lot of it, but it's there, and you can find it.
I think all of us need to wake up to this because it's making me absolutely sick that he is so bold that he dare sit near Charlie Kirk's chair, that he dare grace that stage when Charlie Kirk knew exactly what Ben Shapiro was and will always be.
So again, on your belly, Ben Shapiro.
Okay.
Well, I'm a huge fan of Candace, and of course she's making some key points.
It is a case that the slave trade was largely a Jewish enterprise.
The slave traders were, for the most part, Jews.
And remember, it's permitted by the Talmud to lie, to cheat, to steal to the non-Jews, to the Goyam.
So Miss Rabbi Sane history is just par for the course for the Zionist cadres.
And I just adore Candace.
I think she's absolutely wonderful.
She's not always got everything exactly right.
I think she still believes Charlie was actually taken out at Utah Valley, whereas I'm convinced it was a stage event.
The blood was CGI added.
You got the wound move around on his neck.
Not possible if it were real.
The blood doesn't sink into his shirt.
And at one point, it actually reverses flow because it was CGI added.
Check out my Charlie Kirk assassination hoax exposed with Christopher Key, and you'll understand what I'm talking about.
But on the whole, Candace is a major force for good.
And of course, is now the number one podcaster in the world today, Gary.
Attendant Checks & Sales 00:03:08
I admire her beyond words.
Yeah, Alex Jones and Nick Fuentez have been really attacking her a lot lately, so maybe they feel threatened.
All right.
Okay, this is our last one.
This is a lightweight.
Just casting your mind back to a different time.
The attendant finds out what kind and how much gasoline you want.
He then gets the pump ready for a new sale.
The attendant watches the numbers on the pump.
If you want five gallons, he'll stop the pump when five gallons are delivered.
The attendant also checks under the hood of your car.
He looks to see if there is enough water in your radiator.
If more is needed, he pulls out a special water hose to fill the radiator.
All cars need oil.
The attendant checks to see if there is enough oil in your car.
Oil is often sold at a service station in quart bottles or cans.
Today's service station attendant knows exactly where and how to put oil in everybody's car.
The attendant also checks your tires.
He uses the air hose to do this.
The service station attendant washes your windshield so that it's bright and clear.
Then you pay him for the gasoline and oil.
His other services are free.
Okay, so those days are gone.
Ancient history, it's hard to believe.
Actually, even during my lifetime, there were services like that provided by filling stations, but they were even giving away glassware.
You would get benefits from filling up at various stations, and then big oil realized it was crazy and they reversed course.
And, you know, I think it was oil shortage OPAC somewhere in the mid-70s, maybe.
Everything changed.
And now today, it's all self-service.
None of those benefits apply.
None.
You don't have any attendant.
You don't have any checking the oil, much less pressure in your tires.
Talk about nostalgia.
Yeah.
It's hard to believe, but there actually was a time when you actually got full service at a filling station across this once great nation.
Ain't that way today, sad to say.
All right.
All right, Dr. Fezer, it's been fun.
Once again, this has been Inconvenient Truths, and we'll see you next week.
Export Selection