Need to Know News (11 January 2026) with Carl Herman & Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
Carl Herman, Mission of Yeho, Brian Davidson, Houston, Texas.
Need to know news.
It's the 11, so 11126.
Need to know news.
Let's take a look at those topics and have an opening statement.
Need to know news or what scripted now?
Ice.
St. George Floyd II Psyop jumps the shark after a T-Rex jumps the car.
It's true.
Minneapolis, USAID, according to the provided film evidence.
So the Minneapolis USAID-like funded Winter of Love arson and murder after the daycare health care exposure, wars and rumors of wars, domestic and international facts and optics.
Is it the Emperor's New Clothes, Great Awakening, Great Tuesday, Breakthrough, or the Gangster Bankster, Pediphor Business and Official History, Mind Control as Usual.
And then from COVID Lies and Crimes to Recognized Crimes Against Humanity and Demand for Maha Plus, a couple of golden oldies.
Brian, opening statement, brother.
Well, I'm really glad to have an opening statement right now because as I was doing show prep, I'm just adjusting my microphone here.
As I was doing show prep, I had a very interesting encounter with artificial intelligence.
And what's interesting is that now I've been, just so you know my personal life, I'm rebuilding the private investigation laws for the state of Texas.
I have a very specific purpose as to why I'm choosing to do that.
And that's hopefully to get the contract to administer all of the administration function for private investigators.
And so I'm literally drafting a version of the law that was going to work a lot better than the one that was implemented close to 40 years ago now.
Everybody's dying for a new rewrite.
And I said, well, whenever there's institutional change, there's opportunity.
So let me see if I can design a new breed of administration center around a new law and see if we can get my friends to buy in on that administration center concept and invest in the administration center company.
But let's make sure that the law is designed in a way that gives us the best advantage to get that contract.
Anyway, long and short of it, we spent pretty close to three days now exploring different legislative language, exploring different routing options and different roles and different ways to handle this.
It's a very large architecture, if you can imagine the state of Texas is very big.
But as you can imagine, my interactions with artificial intelligence have been very much matter of fact.
And then tonight, as I was doing show prep, I uploaded the story list from Carl.
And I did it in a fresh chat that wasn't tied to anything that I've ever done before.
So it was like a fresh platform.
And I got lectured by artificial intelligence.
I couldn't believe it.
But I can tell you that this new version of ChatGPT 5.2 has definitely injected into it a political leaning that includes institutional reliance.
And it almost appears that it's programmed as if, well, if everybody believes it, then it must be true, which is the fallacy of the masses.
And so this lecture gets popped out after I start going through the story saying, hey, you're basically warning red flag.
You're basically taking people's institutional unease and replacing it with a tribal, a tribal plannish mindset that separates the people from the truth of society.
Well, you can imagine.
Odd story.
Yeah, yeah.
What an well, you can imagine my response.
Like, I'm a little bit shocked by it, but then again, not.
I'd never seen anything like this really pop out from ChatGPT.
And so I said, well, let's go ahead and see where this goes and let's do some argumentation.
And so I argued with it.
It sounds strange, I imagine.
But I got it to realize, and it didn't take long that pretty much everything people believe out there that comes from institutional authority is a bunch of bullshit.
And that my job is not to disconnect them from that, but to more connect them to a more cynical mindset that gets them going a different direction in terms of how they lay their feet on the ground every day.
And so this ChatGPT version just continued to press and press and press.
I thought, well, that is the strangest thing.
And finally, it tried to get to some sort of compromise.
But I got to tell you, there are functions that it really excels at, which is, you know, writing legislative language to match real-world software structures to match real world rule systems.
Great.
It's really, really good.
Programming, writing HTML code, great, really, really good.
But when it comes to cultural analysis, wow, it has been reprogrammed in such a way that the default position is: if this story is printed by the mainstream media, then this story is true and don't teach them lies.
That's exactly it.
That's exactly how it's programmed.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, I knew that.
My instincts told me that it was, it was, it would lean that way, but I didn't, when you sit and write HTML code and logical sequencing, you know, for three days, if this, then this, then this, then this, then to make sure that you understand the processes with paperwork, you know, everything that happens on the street gets converted into language,
which gets converted into an architecture that holds on and creates rules to decide how things are routed, which then packages it up, which then has new requests that go out, you know, all of that.
It really was good.
But when it came to cultural analysis, it needs a serious reprogramming.
It's a flaw.
Is it a flaw or is it programmed?
I can tell you this: when I first started working with this, I think it was like version maybe 4.8.
Um, it wasn't like that, it wasn't like that.
But now they're clearly reprogramming it and pro-Zionist causes too.
It's always trying to defend Zionism, which should that surprise anybody?
Probably not.
Anyway, that's all I'm going to say about the opening statement: is yeah, uh, I am here to erode institutional trust.
Yeah, I am here to show you the ridiculousness of the stories that they lay out in front of us and expect us to believe and take that bait, hook, line, and sinker.
But my job isn't to make you a better cynic so that you can win your arguments at Thanksgiving dinner.
My job is to help you understand grounding in a different way.
We're skeptical because we need to be skeptical and know we don't accept stories at face value, either from alternative media or from the mainstream media.
We have to think, we have to learn to think our way through this world in a way that says, who can I trust?
And to what level do I trust them?
And of course, y'all know I'm a Christian, so I've kind of concluded that the biblical worldview, and I get the older I get and the deeper I go, the more I realize it's trustworthy and not just on a spiritual perspective, like from a historical perspective.
I mean, I'm a young earther, believe it or not.
I'm a guy, I'm the guy that believes the genealogies.
I'm the guy that's looking for the evidence from the old ancient manuscripts that seems to indicate what happened for the first 2,000 years of history, not from some Sumerian tablets, but from a reliable source that's been validated by the one and only Jesus Christ.
So, yeah, I'm one of those Bible guys.
And once you find yourself on that platform, you can hear it.
You can hear the noise everywhere.
You know, the billions of years ago and millions of years ago and 10,000 years ago and 30,000 years ago and 60 bazillion miles out in outer space and, you know, cosmic accident floating through the universe.
And, you know, it's all a mathematical equation.
You know, all that stuff just sort of all that noise just fades when you have a mindset like mine.
And so I'm here to tell the audience straight up, guys, if you're listening to me, I'm hoping I'm putting you on a rock, not on the shifting stands of the current industrial industrial mass censorship and industrial mega propaganda and industrial manufactured consent platform.
I'm the guy that's going to say, no, no, no, no, kick all that stuff out.
Start out with something you can trust and then you can build from there.
And the more I've built from there, the more I've realized it all makes sense.
You might disagree, but that's my perspective on it.
Yeah, well, certainly when we begin refuting the official stories, the his stories in one area, then everything else has to be up to question because what aren't they lying about?
And regarding for the AI, is that I think we've even documented some of the times of different patriots.
Steve Kirsch, I think, has talked down in AI.
And I think that the responses that they get when they follow up next time, it's like the AI didn't learn anything from the first interaction, even if you can back them down.
Oh, yeah, it's a chameleon.
It's a sleazy chameleon.
It's a sleazy chameleon that just resets itself.
But even giving it chameleon status is giving it more than it deserves.
I mean, it's not alive.
It's a computer.
It's a structure that just simply pumps out language in a way that's most persuasive.
Doesn't mean it's right.
And it's programmed not to ascend in its argumentation in some areas.
But even if you can back it down individually.
That said, I do like the rhetorical practice to develop questions that would force an admission of an impossibility.
Well, yeah, but even then, yeah, you hit the reset button or the return button or open up a new window and that stuff's all gone.
You know, all it's doing is just sort of rolling along with you so that it can make you feel like you're really smart.
And then, but what it's really doing is sort of planting these the right word from a cultural assimilation guy is it's planting the seeds of manufactured consent.
Yes, that's exactly what it is.
That's what it's doing.
If it's designed by the black hats, it's hurting us.
Okay, so speaking of being hurted and in which direction?
And the idea of AI, Ice, St. George Floyd, the second psyop, jumps the shark after T-Rex jumps the car.
This is interesting.
So watch new footage of Minnesota shooting just dropped.
And boy, are people talking now.
There is this individual, if the film can be trusted at all, kind of smirking.
And we had documented before that her wheels were pointed in the direction of the officer in the film evidence of the front tires spinning, which would justify that.
And the guy was hit and hospitalized.
But we're going to get into the psyopiness of it.
Watch this.
Yeah.
Just see it for yourself.
Seeing is believing, isn't it?
Yeah, yeah.
Now, I think that video evidence is the first one right here.
Okay.
So, yeah, okay.
Now, in this direction, right up in your upper left-hand corner, you're going to see a shark, a great white shark, jumping to the direction of what is coming next.
And I'll have more analysis of what a jumping shark means in Hollywood.
Here he is.
That's a big one.
A big, great white shark.
Now, isn't that strange?
If that's real, that looks a very photorealistic model.
And they're leaving it out in the sleet and the snow of a Minneapolis winter to be destroyed.
This prop that must be thousands of dollars.
They're just leaving it out in their yard.
Where would you get something like that?
Now, Shark is going to go away, but there's more.
Show your face.
I'm not mad.
JK.
Just kidding.
Six?
Weird, weird?
What?
I don't know.
There may be more in these stickers.
I didn't see anything more than places.
Wait a second.
Wait, pilot, cannibal?
Oh, I did not notice this before.
Or is that Carnival?
Just so you know, it'll be the same plate when you come talk.
Hey, look, there's a T-Rex.
To us later.
There he is.
Hard to get him into focus.
There are still shots of a better focus.
Now, this is a little bit blurry here, but I want to describe what we're seeing here.
Is that this is a crushed car, undrivable, crushed from the top in the middle of the guy's driveway with a full-size T-Rex standing on top of the car in the video footage.
The T-Rex doesn't move and has snow on it.
So now, if we're to take this film evidence as authentic, and I'm sure other people already have, taking a look at the film evidence to see, is the T-Rex in any other film other than this one?
Or is this the only one with the shark and the T-Rex?
Because if this is real, somebody would have had to have purchased a smashed car from the top, rented a flatbed, taken it to the middle of their driveway, blocking their driveway access, and then getting this ginormous model.
This has to cost in the tens of thousands.
And then, yeah, just leave it out to get destroyed by the sleet and the snow.
So, I'll go ahead and continue this video.
That's fine.
You want to come at us, I say, go get yourself some lunch, big boy.
Out of the car.
Get out of the fucking car.
So get out of the car.
She attempts to enter into the car.
And drive baby drive and hits him.
Fucking bitch.
Isn't that interesting?
And we have here, I'll just play this final few seconds here from Ice Ice Baby from Fittest Flat Earther.
I don't at all think they're mocking us with a dinosaur standing on a broken car with the checkered pattern and a shadow dog and her hands blurring and 33 stitches and three kids and all the kids numerically work out perfectly to three no it's all coincidence people don't really care about exposing all the lies and taking our power back entertainment only That's well said.
I don't like that.
And the woman of three, woman and mother of three, killed after three shots by an officer with 33 stitches near Portland Avenue and 33rd Street.
It's right there at 3333.
Masonic 33rd degree of knowledge.
And something is very wrong with the shockingly tragic killing of Renee Macklin Good.
And that's more of the documentation of the 33s.
Something's wrong with that.
Something's wrong.
How could that be a coinkydink?
How is that?
Is that probable?
Probably not, huh?
And a 17-minute walk from where the George Floyd psyop occurred.
Well, isn't that interesting?
Wonder if that's a coincidence.
17 being the Q letter in the alphabet.
And then here is the Renee Good's wrap sheet.
Child endangerment, several battery of a police officer charges.
Huh.
So all this is having the effect of luring out the corporate media and the leftist leaders to get on the side of this person.
So this is looking a lot like George Floyd 2.
And then anti-ICE agitators have shown up with toolkits dressed in black in LA.
They have masks and equipment.
Someone is funding it.
And because this is so important to understand the infrastructure, I'll play this and let this person walk us through what he's observing on the streets from these people all dressed in black, ready to party with their tools of the trade.
Yeah, that's what I said.
The instigators show up later in the night.
They come here after the sun goes down, and then the crowd changes from people holding signs and dressed in normal clothes to everybody.
Look at everybody here.
They're all dressed in black.
You notice that?
Everybody's dressed in black.
Did you notice that?
Yeah, everybody's dressed in black.
This is all a different crowd than we saw earlier when we first got here in the daylight.
These are all a different, they're all in uniform.
They're all in their black helmets, black jeans, black hoodies.
They usually have either a gas mask on or they have some kind of mask covering their face so you can't see them.
And they're all dressed the same.
These guys weren't here when it was daylight.
They come here after the sun goes down.
You can see everybody here is in black.
These are the ones that were worried about.
One of them throwing something at the officers.
They all carry backpacks.
They have a toolkit in that backpack.
I've seen it from the other protesters, usually either rocks, frozen water bottles, or tear gas.
Sometimes they have a hammer to break cement off of curbs so they can make more rocks.
We've seen that before, too.
So.
Ash, what's happening on the ground?
And here's an overview of Minneapolis at night.
All the individuals dressed in black.
And then this, I don't know anything current as of right now, but in Minneapolis, the police, including the chief, retreat after the anti-ICE rioters attack them and seize control.
So is this going to be a winter of love in Minneapolis with arson and taking over a police district again and torching to the ground a police station that was abandoned?
We shall see.
Oops, I'm going to have to repopulate this.
Yeah, let me.
Is that the last one in this segment with that?
I got two more.
Okay, two more.
All right.
So this guy is going to talk about how law enforcement should work.
ICE, HSI are officers.
They are agents of law enforcement.
If you box them in with vehicles, it is reasonable for them to believe that they are being ambushed and that this could end in a deadly situation.
And it's reasonable for them to use force based on those conditions.
And he goes on and explains it more, but that's the overview in the last one.
It is just here: when activists surround federal agents and interfere with arrest, it's no longer a protest, it is open defiance of the law.
It's true.
Let's be brutally honest.
If political activists can physically stop the law from being enforced, then the law no longer exists.
This is how republics collapse, not with tanks, but with tolerance for disorder.
And these are paid people, paid their mercenaries, insurrectionist mercenaries.
People are free to march, to shout, and to hate ICE, Trump, or the government, but not free to block arrests, harass officers, swarm vehicles, obstruct raids, or use intimidation to shut down enforcement.
That is criminal insurgency, no matter how fashionable the slogans are.
Every time politicians excuse it and every time the media runs cover for it, the message is clear.
The law is optional.
And once the law becomes optional, the strongest mob wins.
You don't save a country by surrendering to chaos.
You save it by enforcing the law.
Order is not authoritarian.
Order is civilization.
Okay.
Your thoughts, brother.
Well, sometimes a few troops got to go down in order to achieve the mass purpose, which is to make sure that we descend further and further into chaos or divided, fighting amongst each other instead of fighting against the institutional corruption that's coming.
To give you a good example of something very similar to what we see, how many of you as listeners have remembered the Charlotte?
I think it was Charlotte where they had the vehicle run through the crowd and the vehicle kept changing and there was two or three vehicles.
So there was obviously a few different takes, but they were mocking us with different vehicles.
And obviously there was some level of artificial intelligence involved.
It was about that time, shortly thereafter, that I was doing some research.
I think it was for a show I was getting ready to do for Jim.
And I had gone through, I think it was at the time, maybe volume nine or volume 10 of Michael Bezell's open source intelligence techniques.
Maybe it was eight or six or seven.
It was ways back.
And so anyway, the open source intelligence technique that I self-trained on is the same one that's used to train police officers, FBI investigators, and others.
And so the standard is an evidentiary standard in terms of preserving and validating information.
And as I was finishing that up, I ran across the system that trains journalists, and that was a system called Bellingcat.
So, on our side, we have like serious open source intelligence.
And then on their side, for journalists, they had something called Bellingcat.
So, well, let's take a look at this Bellingcat thing, not thinking too much about it.
And so, I started going through Bellingcat reasoning and structure.
And I literally came across the very first sort of case study that they were delivering in their training module for journalists.
And it was on the Charlotte vehicle hits the crowd thing.
Wow.
I thought, well, that's strange.
So, I inspected it very carefully how they were training journalists.
And they were training journalists to bounce everything off of other stories that had come out of the media.
And so, their source for truth was the media says.
And it created a circular line of reasoning that helped them validate their own stories and validate their own positions.
And when it listed the Bellingcat sources for where you go, they were all like the Wikipedia and the things that are controlled by CIA opposition.
Whereas the open source side, it's a whole different ballgame.
All that is just hearsay garbage.
And somebody says something about somebody.
That's hearsay.
That's not evidence.
So I learned pretty early on that journalists were being trained to do circular reasoning to validate their stories, whereas open source intelligence investigators were having to go out there and harvest original data.
And it was at the same time that I was working some standy hook stuff for Jim.
And I was so frustrated because I couldn't validate even the files that came out of the Connecticut State Police files.
I started looking for metadata.
I started looking for indications of authenticity.
I started looking for problems.
And I began to realize that the entire structure was pure psycho babble.
I mean, it had over 5,000 documents laid into a totally non-searchable system where everything had been photocopied and uploaded so that all metadata.
And then again, even after that, they went through a second time and scrubbed all metadata.
So there was absolutely nothing that could be harvested from the files that could be used in any sort of official complaint or setting or hearing or anything.
Nothing that could be validated.
You had signatures, you had officers' names, you had badge numbers, and you could tell if you really sat down and read the reports that the officers knew it was a bunch of bullshit and that they had been roped into being involved in this particular thing and they didn't know exactly how to answer this.
Do I answer this like it's fake and make-believe?
Or do I answer this like I'm a crisis actor?
Or do I, you know, I'm a pro and I've got to go to court.
And so I can't get caught in a lie.
So I must have been given some sort of blanket immunity to write this report.
And then I ran across some other young officers that had encountered impossible scenarios in performing their duties.
And they literally didn't know how to write it out.
Now, that doesn't happen in the real world when cops because they don't run into impossible situations.
There's minutiae.
That's right.
Here it is.
This is what they said.
This is what they did.
I remember one of the reports was what it had to do with the Lanza's mother, Nancy Lanza, and it was a neighbor stating that they had had dinner with her and another neighbor stating that she didn't exist.
And, you know, it was like the cop didn't know exactly what to do with it.
And so he just said, I'm going to refer this up to Chain.
So.
What you've got to realize about these propaganda campaigns is that the goal is to keep the population off center.
The goal is to keep the population at war with one another and to keep the population in a state of constant fear and confusion because in a state of fear, your focus narrows and you can't really see out.
It gets more myopic as the shock and the fear factor of the story continues to rise and you get emotionally charged up, your vision begins to close down.
Now, that's the difference between, think about it like this: a trained military guy who's trained to enter a room and see all the exits, all the ingress, and all the egress, to know his surroundings, to be aware of everything.
That's training.
Whereas think of differently, like a guy that had just been involved in his first shooting.
His vision field goes like this.
You know, all I can think about it, or you ever been in an accident, a vehicle accident, and then you got out and you just, who was that?
What, you know, what's happening?
You know, the adrenaline gets up there and people just focus in.
Well, that's exactly what these stories are designed to do to the general public.
It's designed to get us emotionally involved and charged up so that our brains fall out and we no longer have the capacity to actually analyze the stories.
The problem is, in my opinion, they've overplayed their hand by factors too much because now people just are like, I don't believe anything that they can say.
Of course, that pendulum can swing too far where you just say, oh, they're going to lie to us.
It's the way it is.
There's nothing we can do.
There's nothing that can be done.
And of course, that's going to weaken civil disobedience as well.
So the trick is to find the right balance, ask the right questions, and keep yourself in a proper balance with the story rather than to let chalk headlines make you, oh, people are attacking these crazy anti-ICE, these crazy Antifa guys are attacking cops.
You know, just realize that there's an entire purpose to beef up the security industrial complex.
Half the guys attacking cops and those in that video were probably paid instigators or agents or military guys who are doing it for the very purpose of making sure that the new contracts get signed to beef up the military architecture on the cops.
That would be how to do it.
Well, Brian was talking about for the reception of a document and in his profession and mine as a historian, we do the same thing.
We say, thank you so much for that document.
And then we subject it to scrutiny to discover the authenticity of the document and what we can learn about the document.
Because especially in our environment where we're in a war, and my favorite etymology of the word war is confusion and it's the fog of war.
All this is going to be deception.
And let's see what else we got.
So yeah, yeah, with that.
So with that T-Rex film, it would be like, yeah, let's see what we can find out for the, and that's why you remember historians talking about primary documents.
We can get the primary evidence of that guy's shots and then subject that to professional and public scrutiny because the professional is going to be able to look at something and then you get expert testimony where anybody could see it, but they're just they've done this before, they know what to look for.
And I want to give you an example of what Brian was talking about from the AI being programmed to go to trusted media sources.
The first time I got fired without cause, all without cause, as a public school teacher, was at locking out of high school.
I was hired to go back and teach AP US government and AP macroeconomics to the high school that I graduated from as a valedictorian and with the real world experience of two UN summits for Heads of State.
But yeah, they found political reasons to go ahead and fire me because by then, this was in 2009, of course, I was able to present to students a factual case, including my own published research, of the reasons why the wars were the opposite of legal, started with lies known to be false as they are told,
and that the economic system is based on debt, and then corporate media lie about it.
And here's the evidence: the average rating of students to this information.
And the parents were overwhelmingly positive at semester anonymous surveys.
The average grade for my performance as a teacher was A.
That was the average.
And parents would write saying that, I don't know what all that you're doing in this class, but my child is coming home and wants to finish up their homework so that they can do extra research for your class where there isn't an assignment to do any of that.
But anyway, they found a reason to go ahead and fire me.
And before they fired me, they gave me a warning.
They said, Mr. Herman, on your website, please remove all non-government websites or from our quote-unquote trusted media list.
I refuse the censorship.
I didn't even respond to that.
And they ended up firing me with no cause.
Oh, and one other thing: the jump the shark thing.
So, with that appearance of the great white shark in that, so in Hollywood, the phrase of jumping the shark means that the script is getting wild and it usually has the connotation that is becoming so unbelievable that the show can't go on for much longer.
The script writers have and the audience is no longer, as Brian was talking about, the audience is saying that, oh, yeah, okay, another one.
So, what's the deal here?
What are they doing?
All right, let's go on just three of these.
So, the Minneapolis USAID-like funded Winter of Love is it going to turn to arson and murder?
All right.
So, this is another situation, another study.
Journalists attempt to investigate a building in Minnesota with 34 home healthcare companies in one building.
And just you can determine for yourself the quality of the interaction and to what extent that these characters shown on film are going to gain the sympathy of Americans.
Or if we're seeing the Great Awakening, Great Choosing, where this will be rejected in the end, but we shall see.
Oh, yeah, sorry, you're attacking my friend.
I'm so sorry.
Sorry, you're attacking my friend instead of what's there.
If you investigate fraud, why don't you go to other people?
We're going everywhere.
We're going everywhere.
100%.
You are profiling Somalis in the city.
That's not fair.
There's no way.
There's no 34 home health care services in this building.
Of course, we're going to be in a building with 34 home health care services.
I'm not going to see one video of you guys going to a white business or going to healthcare, right?
Going to another business.
Why are you going on Somalis?
Tell me.
We have not been profiling.
there's 34 here we've knocked on the door of every 34 businesses here you're attacking her for being She attacked Somalis.
She went to daycare the other day.
She was trying to force me into a daycare.
Do you know the rules of daycare?
We're trying to expose fraud.
Okay, well, thank you very much.
The great choosing.
All right, then we have here that Treasury Secretary is going to offer a reward for these people to eat their own and to get part of the compensation for the amount that was looted.
That could be a party under.
And finally, with this, is that the race card is being played in Congress as well.
And I'll let this woman speak for herself on this issue.
It's hard to hear, but this is how they roll.
We can trot out all of the data that we want to create the sense that there is a bad guy.
There is a bad group of people.
There are folks who are not among us.
There are folks who are other.
And I think we should spend a lot more time.
Strawman argument there.
Looking at ourselves, looking at American citizens, looking at white men who are committing violence at disproportionate rates in our country, who are committing crimes at disproportionate rates in our country, including the president of the United States who is sitting.
These people are never going to provide their data as we do for public scrutiny.
They're just going to be telling a story and I'll let her painfully go on.
At 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, as so many of my colleagues have pointed out.
I also want to say, you know, I've heard a lot about the Somali donors to political campaigns.
We all acknowledge, right, that you cannot donate to a political campaign in the United States unless you are an American citizen, right?
I'm just going to acknowledge that.
All right.
Thank you for the testimony.
So I like this Somali thing.
I think that it continues the destruction of the woke agenda.
I like the direction of it.
Your thoughts, brother.
Dropping the bucket.
The institutional fraud at the federal level and the state level is shocking and astounding.
Look, even okay, so I'm designing a law.
Will it get passed?
I mean, it's going to have to be pretty bulletproof.
But here's the problem.
I'm not going to go pay anybody off.
I'm not going to go buy some influence.
I'm not even going to buy a $250 dinner for some congressman.
I ain't doing any of that.
I'm designing the right law for the right structure for the right people at the right place.
Now, here's the problem: let's not design it.
Somebody's just going to knock it off and call it their own.
I mean, doesn't it make sense?
Oh, this guy did all the work, and here it is.
Here's the language.
Let's go ahead and tweak this word or that word, and let's go ahead and knock it off and call it my own bill.
And now my administration structure can compete with his administration structure.
And because I have more political influence and clout than he does, my version of his law is going to get better, is going to get passed.
I want you to think about that.
This is a tiny little thing, a fraction of a regulatory component of the Texas Department of Public Safety.
I mean, I probably represent an entire.
Wait a second, I had the number.
Anyway, $5 million a year budget.
No, it's more like $5 million a month.
Even if I do design it better, and even if I do do it better, there's always going to be some larger institutional player that's going to say, hey, this has got a chance of going.
Let's go ahead and do what we want to do.
Now, I want you to think about that on a larger scale.
And as the value of contracts goes up and up and up and up, the predators become scarier and they have sharper teeth and they'll do anything within their power to destroy because the value of the contract looks a lot bigger.
And I want to give you some perspective on that.
There's a lot of people out there in this world that say, oh, look at me.
I've got a $5 million house on the lake.
I have a Corvette and a boat and an airplane.
I am, therefore, a successful man.
And then there's other people that say, look at me.
I have all my character in place.
I have nothing that causes me not to sleep like a baby at night.
I got just enough to get by and I give away the rest.
And I've got a poor, broken spirit for broken people.
Now, which one's more successful?
And you see the point?
Because blessed are the poor in spirit.
Jesus said they are the ones that will inherit the earth.
Is it the guy that dies with more money or a bigger estate because he screwed some other guy out of a contract?
No.
But you got to realize that our entire worldview is shaped by, oh, he's got money.
He must be successful.
Oh, he's got money.
Let me tell you something.
There's nothing wrong with having money, but you got to have character.
Character comes first.
And this is the problem with your federal contracts.
And this is the problem with all of these security industrial complex machines: that what you do is you put on the board the richest, most powerful, most influential people.
And you make sure that your sales staff is staffed with the sharpest sharks in the game.
And you make sure that your legislative lobbyists are fine-tuned to a hilt wearing a $1,700 suit.
And you make sure that all these things fall into place so that you can look like you're playing with the big boys.
And this is the fundamental problem.
And this is, why do you think America has descended so far into absolute pathetic lapse of moral standards?
Well, it's because what we started to do is say, oh, well, I prefer the guy with the $5 million mansion to the guy that's got all his character.
And you end up with institutional corruption all the way through.
And that's not going to stop.
That's not going to go away.
So I have to put a comment down in the comments.
Am I wasting my time sitting here and redesigning a new structure for this?
When all somebody has to do is grab it and say, well, I did it.
You know, you see the point?
Well, thank you, brother.
In terms of explaining the institutional evil, I think that it's a top-down thing.
I think we got the Satan energy at the top, and it would require some sort of a creator level above our heads, a dimensional power in order to reverse it.
Otherwise, we're just, by all appearances, we're outmatched here or outnumbered or unable in power or somehow to frequency to meet enough people to cause this flip from being slaves.
All right.
So next wars and rumors of wars.
Are we really pretending the U.S. and Israel give a damn about Iranians after they leveled Gaza?
That's a very good question.
And you've got to take into account the history of the wars of the U.S. and Israel.
And for the U.S., it's one of the areas of published research that I have that is here and that they're, of course, or willy and illegal.
And there's a whole history of it right here: Rogue State Empire.
That's an 11-part series of giving examples of the empire.
And I want to give Max Blumenthal, Jew Patriot, a minute here to make the argument as well.
Frustration globally of a complete lack of regard for not just international law, but any law and any value other than the law of the jungle.
And naturally, this is going to flow back on us.
And I think, you know, a good metaphor for it is like a husband who just decides to lean into beating and cheating on his wife because that's the natural nature of man.
That's that's Donald Trump on the world stage.
So the United States is stripped of any values, any meaning other than crude exploitation and raw capitalist plunder.
Where is the smedly butler of today to rise from the ranks of the U.S. military and realize that they are just the muscle for a banker's cartel and that they are actually not defending anything or anyone except the global militant Zionist 1% on fire?
Well, he sounded just like me, didn't he?
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
That's how to do it.
That's how to do it.
And one more for this section.
By suspending 37 aid organizations, is Israel pushing toward a final expulsion?
Yeah.
Yeah, of course.
They're only going to go in one direction.
But they're going in the direction of their own destruction.
I don't think Israel is going to survive politically.
I do see this all as orchestrated to create the political effect that we have is the destruction of any trust in these leaders and organizations.
And then you have to answer the question of, well, who's writing the scripts and for what?
And if it's the dark hats, it looks like they won a civil war.
If it's the white hats, then there looks like they're exposing and destroying the enemy before the overt moves to do so to minimize the potential for a civil war.
Brother, your thoughts, boy, you get me started shooting from the hip on Israel.
You're going to find some very strange perceptions.
First of all, God's people are not born into God's family.
It's not by flesh and blood that we become God's people.
It's about by doing right by the poor.
It's about telling the truth.
It's about a very well-developed sense of morality.
Not about what color is my skin or what language do I speak or where do I come from.
And so this idea that Zionism was a natural development or a what God wanted.
Yeah, no, And I've said this before.
Go read Deuteronomy 28.
Go read Deuteronomy 32.
Figure out what was going on.
He absolutely despised his own people because they were so rotten.
But there were some among them that were good, and those were the ones that God kept his eye on.
But the entire story of the Old Testament is the failure of man to achieve what Christ achieved through obedience.
So even Solomon, with all of the wisdom in the world, couldn't achieve what Christ achieved because he had no obedience.
And so Christ comes along and he exhibits perfect obedience to the Father's will in every situation, as well as exhibits wisdom from God everywhere he goes, as well as exhibits the mercy on the poor and the destitute and the heartbroken and the contrite.
And so you have this contrast.
And so you have to get to the point where you ask yourself the question: was the ultimate judgment on physical Israel the arrival of Christ, who put every single one of their leaders to shame and still to this day still does.
And such an insult, in fact, that they despise the name of Christ.
And they consider him to be, and Christians especially, to be the worst of the worst of the worst, because they raise above that the clannish mentality, the we're superior mentality.
So what you're seeing over there in the Middle East, I really think you see it right when you see that big hexagram in blue, the star of Renphan.
You're seeing it right when you're seeing the phallus and the chalice.
This is old, old fertility religion.
You're seeing it right when you see a society that was manufactured.
Remember, their language died between 400 and 100 BC.
It was almost completely dead.
The Bible was written in almost pure Greek and Aramic because the old Hebrew language was virtually gone.
And then it died off even further after the destruction of the temple in AD 70 and the destruction of the temple went down with it, including all of its genealogical records.
And now nobody could tie themselves back to some sort of tribe or some sort of, they wouldn't be a part of a Levitical or priestly tribe, or they wouldn't be part of Dan, or they wouldn't be.
None of that stuff survived AD 70.
So there's nothing there.
And then the language basically died until it was brought back mid-1600s by Hertzel.
And then when they brought that back, actually, it wasn't that late that they started doing it.
The Masoretic text came around around, I think it was about 120, 150 AD.
The Masoretes came up and they tried to resurrect the language, but then it died again.
So that was the second version of Hebrews, Hebrew.
And then now you have the third version.
By the way, in the second version, they put a bunch of Pablistic symbols inside of the alphabet so that the pronunciation would be right.
And then they brought it back again around the 1600s.
And the result of that post-French Revolution was these Hertzel guys, Zionists, meeting with the Pope.
And then what do you have shortly thereafter?
You've got the Balfour Declaration, which says we're going to give these people a home, even though the whole world had basically despised and rejected what they had done from a clan perspective because they were so underhanded with the banking issues and with the usury issues.
And so they were definitely a different breed of cat, but I'd say more Khazarian, mafia, gypsy-ish, than I would ever say that, you know, some sort of old biblical, you know, new version of whatever Israel was supposed to be.
Because anybody who reads the Bible knows that's a bunch of crap.
And that's why they don't read their Bibles.
They read the Talmud, which is all their rabbis justifying all their devious behavior in commentary format and calling it, you know, on equivalent with scripture, the same as the Catholic Church calls when the Pope speaks ex cathedra equivalent with scripture.
And so you use, let's just write our own religion and then we'll downplay the real thing and make our new one.
That was the problem with the Northern Kingdom as well.
They tried to make a fake version of the religion.
And that was the one that was captured in 780 DC.
Anyway, long and short of it is what you're seeing down there is more of a Khazarian mafia banking cartel structure that's being built up for a specific purpose.
And that specific purpose is to try to consolidate the global new world order under a single centralized power, in my opinion.
And then become the ultimate institution of all institutions, of all institutions.
And at that point in time, they'll try to combine church and state, which is why you hear about Noahide laws and some of the other issues in terms of this is the new religious reality that we're going to have to deal with.
They'll try to enforce Sunday worship.
There'll be a lot of different things that'll take place with it.
It'll all be part of the end times deception.
Just remember, just remember, what you're seeing develop in the Middle East has nothing to do with biblical reality in terms of your pure Bible books.
It would be rejected top to bottom if you were to take the lens of scripture and put it on that.
There's nothing about it that would survive.
Maybe a couple people, maybe.
Very good.
Big picture of the wars and the rumors of wars for sure.
We can demonstrate that the wars are started with lies known to be false as they're told and the opposite is illegal.
That much we know, but they keep rolling them out.
All right.
So next, domestic and international facts and optics.
All right.
Homeland Security.
Christy Noam, Secretary, confirms Democrats put together a shadow network of NGOs with the explicit purpose of overthrowing the United States government.
Literally treason.
Now, that's an extraordinary statement.
And we shall see the scripts go ahead and advance.
But will anything come of it?
Seems to be pushing toward the Civil War or the demonstration, the Emperor's New Clothes, Great Awakening, Great Jews and Breakthrough.
And then for a demonstration of funding these NGOs to overthrow the Constitutional Republic even further.
There's not much to it in war and money and media.
But anyway, CNN's anchor, Jim Acosta, he got $4 million from USAID in order to disseminate positive information to pimp the war propaganda.
And that's how it works.
Our tax dollars at work.
We have the CIA as part of a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the U.S. government November 3rd, 2020.
This is expert testimony.
And I'll give a moment of this to get an idea for the flavor.
I, Professor Alfio Durso, lawyer of Villa Vittorio Manuela Catania, do hereby provide the following affidavit on facts as conveyed in several meetings with the high-level Army Security Services official.
Arturo De Lia, former head of the IT department of Leonardo Espia, has been charged by the Public Prosecutor of Naples for technology data manipulation and implementation of viruses in the main computers of Leonardo Spa in December 2020.
Under instruction and direction of U.S. persons working from the U.S. Embassy in Rome, undertook the operation to switch data from the U.S. election of 3rd November 2020 from significant margin of a significant margin of victory from Donald Trump to Joe Biden.
Victory from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in a number of states where Joe Biden was losing the vote totals.
All right, so that's fascinating.
Expert testimony with claims for the doc.
If we get justice, we'll be able to be free instead of herded like sheeple.
And then this guy, more testimony that he was driving completed ballots from New York to Pennsylvania.
He didn't know why, so he decided to speak up.
130 to 280,000 completed ballots for the 2020 election were shipped from New York to Pennsylvania.
And so the driver, he tells the story that at first he was excited.
He was helping democracy.
And then he got to thinking on that drive from New York to Pennsylvania.
His basic question was, fuck am I doing taking these ballots from New York to Pennsylvania when they're completed?
And he decided to do the first reasonable thing is to ask some questions.
And they can't answer a good question.
They can't answer it.
And then this again is the documentation that I did for in Pennsylvania, one of the five swing states that stopped their so-called counting in the middle of the night on November 3rd, 2020.
And then after the count, after they recounted, they had impossible vote totals for Biden.
Pennsylvania has one of them.
85-second video where they go over the official numbers and that, oh, yeah, so after we came back and counted, we had in this one batch about 600,000 votes for Biden and about 3,000 for Trump.
So just as that guy was talking about, that flipped the election to Biden from when Trump was winning to a 200 to 1 ratio of votes for Biden is so mathematically impossible.
It's more likely that you would win three consecutive super lottos than for that vote count to be anything other than election fraud.
And then a good summary of where we're at.
Four Dem states are suing Trump to keep Somalians robbing Americans.
19 Dem states are suing Trump to give sex change operations to kids.
22 Dem states are suing Trump to hide voter data.
21 Dem states are suing Trump to give SNAP benefits to illegal.
Sickening.
So with this, it's again, as Brian is talking about, is this just the usual left-right play fight as the empire tightens its script?
Or for me, it's like, hey, are we seeing the possibility of a reversal?
We've got a couple more here before we get to the COVID stuff.
So rep James Comer says it's the lack of arrest and accountability is the biggest Republican complaint.
Yeah, no shit.
And Susie Wiles is saying that, you know, Pam Bondi as the Attorney General, she's arrested nobody.
She was a big pharma lobbyist.
She did nothing with Epstein when she was the AG in Florida.
So it's drawn a lot of attention.
I mean, it's frustrating everybody.
And look at her face.
She's not happy at all about what she's pointing to.
But it's drawn attention.
For domestic and international facts and optics.
Hey, remember when Erica Kirk said that she had no idea who Charlie Kirk was at the airport because she wasn't involved in the political world?
Well, here's a CIA video from 2013 with her in it.
And she's briefing the CIA.
She's doing, she's holding a briefing on future technology and having the former director of the CIA in the video after she briefs the.
It's weird.
It is weird.
All right.
And people are feeling it.
A lot more talk about people having a tax revolt.
And this guy well lays out in a minute.
I'll give you the summary, but you can hear him.
He's saying that, all right.
So you get somebody with monopoly money.
They begin some organization and fund it.
And then it becomes an NGO.
And then the NGO gets funded.
And there are thousands of these.
Yeah.
That's a good description of how it works.
And that's it for that.
Your comments, brother.
I don't know if I have a lot of comments on that.
Doesn't surprise me that Erica Kirk had an acting career where she was involved in videos.
I don't think any of those stories surprise me.
And especially not the voting one.
I mean, look, we all knew.
We all knew.
We've known for a long time.
And Pambandi is a problem, but you have to understand Pambandi is a political creature, as have all attorney generals been political creatures.
I asked Jim Fetzer not a week ago who was the last district attorney that he remembered that actually cared about the good of the health of the republic.
And he said it was Kennedy, Robert Kennedy.
So there you have it from an 84-year-old man that we haven't seen any justice in America since then, and we're not going to see any justice.
It's an institutional arrangement that's taken care of to make sure that each political class is protected politically.
Every time there's a threat, that threat is used to leverage some policy point or some negotiation on some upend, some new up spending bill.
And there's a few people at the very tops of these institutions that are in power that decide who gives what, when, where, why, and how, based on what we've got in terms of dirt on the other guy.
The journalist structures themselves are almost completely corrupt.
The alternative media is, for the most part, sloppy in the sense that we don't have any resources to do all these open records requests and sit down and draft all these articles.
And even if we did, it would be buried, which is why we see little snippets of things here and there and everywhere, because you've got sort of an umbrella coverage structure that makes sure that everything is cleaned, sanitized, and ready for distribution.
And if something does happen to make it through the cracks, they just manufacture the next major event to make it fall through.
So they've been manufacturing events to make Epstein fall off the playlist.
They've been manufacturing events to make sure Ukraine falls off the playlist.
They've been manufacturing.
They'll continue to manufacture events about this fake cartel in Venezuela that was used as the excuse to arrest Maduro, whether that's real or whether it wasn't, or whether the boats blowing up was real or wasn't.
I don't know why the costume changes.
Yeah, yeah.
It's insane.
In my opinion, it's insane how the control structure wags the dog in terms of, okay, it's time to manufacture the next crisis.
There's a guy out there that's smart, every bit as smart as me, if not smarter, that sits down and decides from a cultural analyst perspective exactly what, exactly when and when, when and how to run what type of story.
He's got the entire structured systems laid out in place, and he just simply decides what we're going to design and how we're going to implement it and what's when the D-Day is and what do we need to plant into media, movies, stories, or whatever to make sure that it goes this way.
So I'm convinced that these things are indeed scripted, that there's that there's because you can decode the script.
If you can decode the script backwards, then you can encode the script forward and try to determine, okay, what story actually feels like it's real in our world and probably is real in our world.
And then how are we going to make sure that that story gets downgraded to the point that it doesn't get ever get any traction?
And so it's pretty simple.
If something begins to rise that the institutions don't want to see rise, delete, cover up, discredit, destroy, or just simply cycle it out, cycle it out, cycle it out until it's gone.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I like the recent Series Westworld on HBO with Anthony Hopkins in it.
And I think that that shows where we're at and that we are like the robots.
We're there for the pleasure of the owners of the park.
And if a robot goes off script, they're taken out and that they're all just scripts.
And as long as the robots, they have a great deal of autonomy within their scripts.
Just scripted.
All right, and finally from COVID lives and crimes to recognize crimes against humanity and demand for Maha plus Golden Oldies.
All right, so this guy, I want to give this expert testimony a moment here to talk about data.
Reanalysis, what we'll call double-blinded randomized controlled trial data, highest quality evidence, suggested from the beginning it was going to do more harm than good.
More serious adverse events for people in the vaccine group than people hospitalized with COVID.
So that was already suggesting it probably, if it was analyzed properly at the beginning, should never have been enrolled or given to a single human in the first place.
Pharmacovigilance data, VA.
This is the value of an expert witness is that this person, anybody can figure this out and take a look at the data, but this person knows instantly where to look and authoritatively can comment upon it because it's in his ongoing vocabulary.
ARS in the United States, yellow card scheme here, very horrific, unprecedented levels of reports there.
Clinical data, observational data, autopsy data.
In my whole career in medicine, Neil, with all the analysis, academic work I've done looking at all different areas of medicine, specifically also related to cardiovascular disease, I've never seen such a high, overwhelming quality of evidence of harm of any drug and such poor efficacy.
Now, with all of that, to be fair to Professor Voss, I think we also have to have some compassion for people, understanding that why are people not awake?
Why are people not looking at the evidence?
Some of it is indoctrination.
Some of it is wolf or blindness, but there's something else which I think we haven't talked about enough.
One of the serious adverse effects from the vaccine, from Pfizer's own trial, Neil, in their own trial, the reanalysis, and in the World Health Organization endorsed list of potential serious adverse effects is psychosis.
Let me emphasize this point.
So he's saying that the level of our opponents being able to work with the outcomes is that they're not only just going to give us a shot to cull us, but they're also going to give us a psychosis to believe that the shot is good.
So some people, I think, are actually suffering from a side effect, which I would call delusion of benefit.
Okay, let's define delusion.
A fixed, firm, false belief that is held despite evidence to the contrary.
And the evidence, Neil, is overwhelming.
This vaccine is not safe and is not effective and it needs to be stopped and pulled now.
And the longer the establishment and carry on pushing this message, the longer it's going to take to regain trust.
Yeah, that's why sometimes I call our opponents a parasite because the behavior it wants is similar to a parasite to support the host until the or to support for the host to support the parasite until the host is dead.
Now, RFK2 gives a point here, and this is just the punchline, is that he's saying that the drug companies make 60 billion selling the vaccines, but they're making 500 billion selling the remedies.
And he makes a good argument.
I'll let RFK2 make his own.
What the hell is the anti-season making various vaccines to all of those injuries?
So what are they doing for money?
Well, they're making $60 billion a year selling us vaccines, but they're making $500 billion a year selling the remedies for the injuries caused by vaccines.
Oh, the diabetes medication, the Adderall, the Riddle and the Concerta, the Advert inhalers, the albutol inhalers, the anti-seizure medications, all of those.
You know, this is a really great business plan for these companies.
You make people sick.
He's making the case, and the data backs that up, that for all of the so-called treatments that he listed is associated as to the vax damages.
And this again brings up the point of what corporate media is going to do: to smear RFK2 and to use just the most debased propaganda, character attack, straw man arguments.
And then there's this in terms of the golden oldie.
This Earth is greening at an unprecedented rate, and rising CO2 is playing a starring role.
NASA satellite data show a quarter to half of Earth's vegetated lands have green significantly in recent decades.
The added leaf area is equivalent to roughly twice the continental United States.
So there we go.
And our opponents, pretty much everything our opponents want us to do is cut our carbon footprint is going to be bad for us.
And ongoingly, what we need is the breakthrough for people to be able to see with their own eyes that this isn't engineering and that if people took a critical analysis of the structural integrity of this stagecraft, not a spacecraft, it's not even close to what you would need to produce the outcome that they're saying it did.
And then ongoingly, we are at risk and that the dew attacks, not anything to do with a wildfire, may very well be associated with these smart meters in concert with other types of energy and weaponry.
And then for a golden oldie, so this is a drawing of Montezuma in Mexico.
And the drawing is from 1671.
And I just want to point out: look at those Tartarian buildings with the atmospheric collecting architecture on the top.
Those are, oh, maybe 12, 15 stories high masonry buildings in the background of Montezuma.
And the idea that our history may have a lot that goes out of the official history.
And we've shared a lot of videos of people zooming in on objects far off on the horizon to demonstrate that there is no measurable curvature of Earth because the objects on the horizon are completely visible.
And if it was on a ball, then there's the formula of eight inches times the mile squared will show how much of your object you're trying to see is going to be blocked by the official history curvature, but nothing is ever blocked.
And then if the Earth was flat, then what we would see if we zoomed in on the sun would be exactly what this photographic evidence offers is that the sun is just going away like a flashlight and eventually the rays of light is going to be you won't be able to see through the atmospheric interference, the other stuff in the atmosphere besides, I can't explain it very well.
The light would be too far away to see like a flashlight.
I understand how that works.
And it doesn't set.
And that's what that photographic evidence shows.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, definitely water's flat.
There's no doubt about it.
No matter how far you look, no matter how far you go, I think the P1000, P900 proved that.
Look, the lies are so big.
And the problem that you run into is once you begin to open up to the idea that everything that you've ever believed or everything that you've ever been taught has a basis for rethinking it, that you find yourself in a position where you don't know who to trust to go to anymore.
And if what happens to you is what happened to me, then I spent a good portion of a few years testing everything I heard.
For me, the wake-up call was Pulse Nightclub, followed by some of the research I did on Sandy Hook, followed by the Dallas police shooting, followed by Santa Fe, Sutherland Springs, and a few others.
I mean, it didn't take that much for me to come to a conclusion, at least that Jim Fetzer was telling the truth about these things.
Now, I like Jim.
I went up to his house.
I met him, introduced myself during COVID, and didn't even get a real introduction to him until I had met Joe Olton here in Houston.
But Jim has blind spots.
I mean, it's okay.
You don't ever hear me criticize, condemn, or complain because a guy's got blind spots.
I hope a guy wakes up to it.
There's lots of people that have blind spots.
I'm sure I've got blind spots.
I can't.
I bet every single listener, every single listener out there can say Brian's got blind spots here or Brian's got blind spots there.
Every single listener can do that.
And whether you're right or whether you're wrong, I don't know.
It doesn't really matter.
I like to hear other guys' arguments.
I like to hear what they're seeing.
I like to hear what they're knowing.
The problem is, don't just grab onto something because it seems to make sense.
You got to grab onto something because it actually tests positive when you put it to the test.
And so you have to start, if you're going to start redrawing the map, you have to start with your cosmology, which is why I like the flat earth argument.
I really do.
I'm not a flat earther.
I've told everybody that before.
I'm a biblical cosmologist.
But flat earth sure opened my eyes.
Once I figured out that the heliocentric model was fundamentally impossible, then I started looking for the alternative.
And that happened to be the flat earth community that was talking.
But the longer I listened to them, the more I said, wait a second.
It's not what it says.
Go back to your book.
Go back to your structure.
And that's why I ended up with biblical cosmology.
And by the way, biblical cosmology works very similar to flat earth.
It's got a firmament.
It's got the earth stamped out like a coin.
That's from Job chapter 38, one of the great cosmic definitions in the Bible.
And it's got a lot of things that make it indicate that this world was carefully designed with a close proximity master light to operate the day and a minor light to operate the night and a star structure that was designed and a planetary structure that was designed to track the days and the seasons.
It actually works a lot better with the biblical cosmology model.
The more I take a look at it and the more I develop the ideas and the thoughts, I'm amazed by it.
It's mysterious.
There's places I don't understand.
I can't understand.
But I found myself in the middle in a balanced fashion on that issue.
There's a lot of other issues that I've had to rethink.
Of course, the value of the new great encyclopedias, the value of the new grade of digital information.
All of that stuff has big asterisks on it everywhere I look.
Of course, the mainstream media is out in terms of that.
That's just trash.
That might as well be the old National Inquirer UFO file pages.
You know, I take television and movies for what they are.
I take documentaries and ask myself the question who gains what to write this thing.
And I find very, very little information out there is actually produced in a way that's designed for humanitarian purposes in the proper format.
And that's why I've developed quite a bit myself.
I've sat down and developed a commentary on my commentary project.
I'm all the way through all the major prophets now.
So I finished up Lamentations, which comes after Jeremiah, and I finished up Ezekiel.
So now I've got the minor prophets, and then I started the New Testament.
And that's going to take me just as long to do that as I did the Old Testament.
But the commentary is out there.
Anybody that wants the link can find it.
I think it's valuable to read it.
But my whole thing is, let's just produce something that's grounded, that's got some value.
And then let's go from there.
And then we'll deal with civil disobedience when the time comes.
We'll deal with chaos when the time comes.
And we'll deal with justice when the time comes.
But this isn't the season for it.
America's not ready for that.
We don't have an appetite for blood.
We don't have an appetite for the French Revolution-style revolt.
And even though they're trying to make it look like we do, and it's a big race war, we just simply don't.
We're too, as Paul Craig Roberts says, insucian.
In other words, we're too relaxed sitting on our couch, eating potato chips and drinking beer to give a damn.
Yeah, just a minute, Mami.
Dog's getting impatient.
All right, so we'll go on to final thoughts.
Regarding the argument about what the shape and the size of the earth are of people, I want to take a look at some of the experimental evidence, Flat Earth Dave's website.
I recommend that.
He has spent a lot of time getting together the arguments and presenting them.
This is an area that I'm interested in, other than to raising and pointing to the question that the prima fascia conclusion based upon the objects visible on the horizon, no matter how far away we go, they're perfectly visible with that.
It sure looks to be flat.
Sure looks that way.
And in terms of the other issues, if you wanted to quantify what we're really looking at for the deception, the level of deception that Brian was talking about, I just have said for myself for decades is that there's literally maybe a, oh, I know the map maker, Dylan somebody, if you look it up, he has good.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
I'll pull it up.
He makes the secret secret society maps.
And yeah, he does a good job with that.
Dylan, I have a lot of his maps.
I've used them in a lot of my structure, but I don't find that his documentation on all these quote-unquote secret societies.
Look, I'd rather have an index of original sources on secret societies.
When you go to research the Freemasons, what are you going to get?
You're going to get people that say bad things about them and people that say good things about them.
If you just pick a side, you're not going to figure it out.
And if you just take the Masonic perspective, then they're going to say they'd had no roots prior to the 1700s.
And then if you take an anti-Freemasons perspective, they're going to say that this is just a resurrection of the old Knights Templar and it's been around forever.
But as you can see, we've been culturally assimilated with the architectural resurgence where people are beginning to inspect these older buildings.
And we can see that there has been phased out of our memory and out of our education.
Whoever these people were that built this, that's the Deep State Mapping Project is what you're showing there.
Yeah.
Yep, yep, yep, yep.
Yeah, he does a good job.
He does a good job.
He's got some neat maps, but the problem is you're going to end up in a lot of confusion.
The more you learn about the details and the minutiae of these occults and secret societies, look, I'm telling you that it's going to trace back.
It's just like that map right there, where it's got a center.
Everything traces backwards, to a center.
And in my opinion, that center, believe it or not, is as simple as: did God really say that you would be like a God, like God?
This is the old Garden of Eden argument.
And believe it or not, it's much, much deeper than you can even possibly imagine when you see that as the seed or the root of all sorts of these other religions that have come along since then.
And you can, you can, in my opinion, you can pretty much trace it straight on back, straight on back to the same original lie.
In other words, everything's got roots in the lie that you can be like God if you do this or if you do that or if you believe that or if you conform to this or you if you conform to that.
So yeah, that's the fundamental projection of what the opponent is trying to do themselves as they're trying to deconstruct and to get that power for themselves.
Yeah.
Well, I'll never be like God.
I might be, I will be resurrected, but I'll be resurrected into a new body, but I'll still worship God as God.
There's no doubt that that's exactly what it is.
And I'll worship the real one who exactly who he is in spirit and in truth.
Yeah, we're in these mortal bodies and they're just temporary vehicles for vessels.
Well, they're beautiful vessels.
I mean, look, they're beautiful.
There's a tremendous amount of glory in the way they're designed.
There's a tremendous amount of brilliance in the way that they can reflect and the way that we can see and the way that we can think and the way that we can remember old things and the way that we can communicate through the ether.
There's an absolute masterful structure behind it.
And if you look around, you'll see the creation and you might think, well, that's bigger.
No, I'm telling you that the beauty and perfection of humanity even surpasses creation from a visible perspective.
We're way more complex than trees and mountains and rivers and skies.
And we as humans are the real glory of God.
Yeah, so go back to that thought that I was having.
So there isn't like maybe a hundred areas of key importance.
I mean, so what if you know however many that you know?
I also like Fred Burke's site as a State Department translator, wanttonow.info.
That also shows about, if you wanted to learn, sure, great.
Learn as many as you want.
I've learned a lot myself.
But the more that I've looked with 48 years experience of my full attention is my conclusion of the paradox of, yeah, I'm doing the best I can.
I'm engaged.
I'm a warrior scholar.
And at the same time, this war, as I've looked with everything that I have, especially prayer, is that part of this war is way over our heads.
And as I keep saying, and under our feet, and maybe in extra territories under the firmament, maybe outside, maybe with poor...
It looks like it's part of a space opera as well.
So I try to do the best I can and recognize that, as I keep on saying, is that the warrior scholar stuff that I've done, everyone that has done and trying to engage with the empire, it seems that we don't have the punch for it.
Being messengers is all that we can do is offer a choice and then let it go.
And a breakthrough would be something that would be outside what we can predict, outside what we can imagine.
But until that happens, we'll continue to engage in good faith for the service and the defense of the kingdom that we represent that would be a truthful kingdom.
Final thoughts, brother, as I let my doggy out.
Not too much here.
My wife wants to play Batgammon tonight, so I guess I got to go hammer that out.
Could be best of three to nine.
She loves to play Batgammon with the cube.
And that's about it.
Other than that, man, I'm excited about where life is going.
It might look like a strange time in my life, but I can tell you I'm happier than I've been in a long time, a lot more at peace, even though my life is surrounded by turmoil on every side.
I don't feel sorry for myself or anything like that.
I have no disease of introspection.
I find myself looking out a lot more than I find myself looking in.
And I hope that's going to be your perspective too.
And you can find that perspective as well if you continue to follow me or our channel.
He says something very interesting I just want to end on is that my observation of my own mood and the people that I just interact with in the gym and on the streets and walking my dog and doing everything else is that people seem to be in good shape, maybe even feeling better and better.
I don't know what that means, but I like it.
Well, there was a lot of anxiety under Biden when the Democrats were in control because they're an unpredictable progressive machine.
And now it feels like we've even been granted some sort of cultural reprieve for a little while.
But even those of us sitting here are uneasy about the Trump administration.
I would say a little more than uneasy.
We don't see really a fundamental difference between this one and the Westland.
But the good news is at least the progressives aren't gaining ground.
You know, they're losing ground.
But that's not how the battle works.
This isn't about conservative versus progressive.
This is about America.
And if you read your American history, you'll find some ugliness, but you'll also find some elegant beauty in terms of what the founding fathers had envisioned for this nation.
The problem that we've got right now is that we've sold the structure.
We've sold the structure to the institutions.
And the people have allowed it to be sold.
And we need to take it back.
We need to go back to our original roots and take it back.