Miriam Adelson buys America for $250 million, Greenland & Cuba are next, Monroe Doctrine & Much more!
|
Time
Text
Welcome to episode 160.
That's 160 of Gary King's Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents stories.
Video clips I don't know are coming for my spontaneous and unrehearsed response.
We've got quite a positive reaction to our last show.
Let's see what we do today.
Gary, what do you got for me?
All right, we're going to start off on a clip that I titled Trump Costs $250 Million Dollars.
That's what it costs.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is Steve Iser on the Oz Watching channel.
And what a great start to a new year right here.
President Donald Trump ringing in the new year's with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago.
That's right.
What a great start to 2026 right here.
A lot of craziness, people, and we got a lot to talk about.
First of all, standing ovation for President Donald Trump.
First Jewish president to also receive the first Israeli prize ever, okay, ever awarded to a non-Israeli.
Historic moment right here.
Netanyahu himself said, and I quote, we decided to break a convention or create a new one.
And that is to award the Israel Prize, which in almost our 80 years, we've never awarded it to a non-Israeli.
And we are going to award it this year to President Donald Trump.
First ever, people.
Unprecedented.
Maybe this is why Mark Levin was manhandling Trump while calling him the first Jewish president.
Okay, look at him over here ragdolling Trump.
That doesn't look like your friend right there.
That looks like a mafia boss manhandling his little worker like he's on a dummy mission.
None of this is surprising though.
This is the same Trump who once said, my father would tell me the most powerful lobby in this country is the Jewish lobby.
My father would tell me the most powerful lobby that there is in this country is the Jewish lobby.
It's the Israeli lobby.
It's the Israeli lobby.
He said that word for word.
And this is why Trump seems to be bending over backwards for them, which is crazy to think that if we said those exact words, we might be charged with some kind of anti-Semitic hate crime.
Why is Trump doing all this, you ask?
Well, guess how much money Trump received from that lobby?
Miriam gave my campaign indirectly and directly $250 million.
She was number one.
When somebody can give you $250 million, I think that we should give her the opportunity to say hello.
Well, he gave her more than an opportunity to say hello.
We know who runs Donald, people.
$250 million from Miriam Adelson.
Her late husband, Sheldon, made it very clear who they are loyal to.
Somebody said that the Adelson family has nothing to gain except that which was in our heart.
I am not Israeli.
The uniform that I wore in the military, unfortunately, was not an Israeli uniform.
It was an American uniform.
Although my wife was in the IDF, and one of my daughters was in the IDF, and my two little boys, our two little boys, one of whom will be Bermudzva tomorrow.
Hopefully he'll come back.
Thank you.
Hopefully he'll come back.
His hobby is shooting and he'll come back and be a sniper for the IDF.
Wow.
All we care about is being good Zionists, being good citizens of Israel, because even though I'm not Israeli born, Israel is in my heart.
Well, there you have it, people.
Miriam Adelson bought the United States for $250 million.
Wow.
Yeah, that's a wonderful clip, Gary.
I'm just ecstatic because it's so revealing.
Yes.
You got Mark Levin saying this.
Donald Trump is our first Jewish president.
He's telling us a lot.
And then you have Trump going on basically to confirm it, getting the Israel Prize.
He has a whole shelf full, multiple shelves full of awards that historically have only been given to Jews, Gary.
And I'm convinced that he actually converted in 2017.
There was an elaborate ceremony at the Wailing Wall.
He was there with Melania, with Amanka, with Bibi, of course.
And listen to Adelson explain, Miriam was actually in the IDF.
He wants his sons to be in the idea.
He's got a son who's a good shot.
He wants it to be a sniper in the IDF so he can pick off little Palestinian kids, kill them dead right there in Gaza.
He probably wants them to rush over and help participate in the slaughter before it's too late and they're already all dead.
This is a very important clip, Gary, a great start, but also horrifying for what it reveals about this guy who campaigned to put America first and who has done anything.
But he is clear, 100% Israel first, and his foreign policy in particular just reeks of Zionism at every pore.
Thank you for this, Gary.
Yeah, I don't know anyone that I've ever heard say they want their grandkid or children to grow up to be snipers.
That's a first for me.
Yes.
The Monroe Doctrine is an early cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy.
It is steeped in ideas of dismantling colonialism and shifting global power dynamics in the 19th century.
Its origins are simultaneously simple and complex.
Let's start by meeting James Monroe.
Before he became the fifth president of the United States, he fought and was wounded in the American Revolution, served in state and federal government, and held several diplomatic posts.
Through it all, he believed firmly in the American experiment.
And a doctrine is a principle or idea that influences a government's actions.
Doctrines can become part of a country's foreign policy.
The Monroe Doctrine began as part of an elaborate speech Monroe gave in 1823.
So how did he get there?
In 1812, the United States fought and won the Second War against the British.
This win showed powerful European nations that America could defend and maintain its independence.
But American independence was also tied to addressing the political volatility in its neighborhood.
South of the United States, colonies in Latin America were fighting and winning their own independence from the Spanish Empire.
Between 1821 and 1822 alone, 10 former colonies forged new nations.
The United States couldn't afford to take a wait-and-see attitude.
Could these new Latin American countries keep Europeans from recolonizing them?
Somebody had to say something.
But would anything the U.S. president had to say really make a difference?
It's tricky.
Monroe recognized the need to support Latin American independence, but at this point, the United States was not a global superpower.
Its economy and military were no match for the Europeans.
Enter the greatest naval power in the world, Great Britain.
Great Britain wanted to trade with the new Latin American nations and was also keeping an eye on the competition from mainland Europe.
They knew firsthand that empires are expensive to maintain.
The British were not interested in any recolonization schemes, but they worried about others and even offered to make a joint statement with the Americans, warning Europeans to stay away from the Western Hemisphere.
Monroe and his advisors knew that Great Britain would provide the naval might to back up a statement.
The offer to issue a joint statement was very tempting.
But would a joint statement make the United States look weak?
Some of Monroe's advisors did not think so.
They argued that teaming up with the British was how the United States could be taken seriously by the other European powers.
But Secretary of State John Quincy Adams disagreed.
Like Monroe, he remembered America's hard-fought victories against the British.
Adams told the president that riding on the coattails of the British was no way to establish dominance in its own neighborhood.
Adams also saw this as an opportunity to reaffirm America's strong independent foreign policy.
Wise leaders consider all points of view before making a decision.
Ultimately, Monroe agreed with his Secretary of State.
In a speech to Congress on December 2nd, 1823, he made the United States' position clear.
Monroe declared the Western Hemisphere closed to future colonization.
He also reminded the Europeans that any interference in the Americas would be considered a hostile act against the United States.
In effect, this bound the security and economic interests of the United States with that of the new Latin American nations.
But what Monroe did not say in his speech was just as important.
He did not lay out a plan of action should the Europeans ignore the warning, because when in reality, there wouldn't be much the United States could do.
However, the presence of American diplomats throughout Latin America did help forge new alliances.
Diplomats built relationships with Latin Americans and provided valuable intelligence back to Washington regarding European ambitions in the region.
As it turns out, while both the United States and European nations did eventually interfere in the affairs of independent Latin American nations, it would be America that cast its imperial arm over the Western Hemisphere at the dawn of the 20th century.
Though there was one significant difference from Monroe's time, there would be no question the United States could now back up its words with military and commercial might.
Okay, I've heard the Monroe Doctrine come up many times in the last week or so.
Yeah, basically, it means that the United States has hegemony over the Western Hemisphere, North, Central, and South America.
But what's most interesting about that summation, which appears to me to be historically accurate in every respect, is that the U.S. basically had no way to enforce it.
Now, what's going on now with Trump is that given the greater independence has been exercised by foreign nations, our intervention in Venezuela, for example,
which might be interpreted as a manifestation of the Monroe Doctrine, is viewed as anachronistic, as a vestige of a distant past when the United States was able to impose its will on other nations.
Instead, the world has been aghast at our action.
They have lost confidence in the United States, fearing that if they cross America politically, they may suffer the indignity of an invasion or a kidnapping or an assassination of their leaders.
It's leading to a further stampede toward BRICS as an alternative, economic, politically, vastly influential block of nations, which I believe is going to be predominant for the rest of this century.
And, of course, fleeing the dollar.
The dollar is going to drop.
It's going to be less used as a reserve currency.
People resent the United States and its bullying, thuggish tactics.
None of this good is for the United States, Gary.
So we have here what can be called a pyrick victory.
Short-term game by capturing Maduro, bringing him to the U.S., but massive long-term losses.
This is going to prove historically to have been a catastrophe for the United States, Gary.
All right.
Okay, next up, we have Greenland.
Policy question.
How much money are you thinking of giving people in Greenland to get them on board with a possible U.S. I'm not talking about money for Greenland yet?
I might talk about that.
But right now, we are going to do something on Greenland, whether they like it or not, because if we don't do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we're not going to have Russia or China as a neighbor.
Okay, I would I would like to make a deal you know the easy way, but if we don't do it the easy way We're gonna do it the hard way And I'm a man, and by the way, I'm a fan of Denmark, too, I have to tell you.
And, you know, they've been very nice to me.
I'm a big fan, but the fact that they had a boat land there 500 years ago doesn't mean that they own the land.
I'm sure we had lots of boats go there also.
But we need that because if you take a look outside of Greenland right now, there are Russian destroyers.
There are Chinese destroyers and bigger.
There are Russian submarines all over the place.
We're not going to have Russia or China occupy Greenland, and that's what they're going to do if we don't.
So we're going to be doing something with Greenland either the nice way or the more difficult way.
Please go ahead, ma'am.
Mr. President, why is it so important to you to own it when you have a military presence there, which you could expand to affect the security?
Because when we own it, we defend it.
You don't defend leases the same way.
You have to own it.
And, you know, with a nation, look at what happened with Obama, with that horrible deal they made with Iran.
It was a short-term deal.
It was like a nine-year deal.
Countries can't make nine-year deals or even hundred-year deals.
Countries have to have ownership.
And you defend ownership, you don't defend leases.
And we'll have to defend Greenland.
If we don't do it, China or Russia will.
It's not going to happen.
We are not going to have, and I like China, I like Russia, I love the people of China, I love the people of Russia.
I get along very well with President Putin, but I'm very disappointed in him.
I got along very well with President Xi.
I'm going to go over to China in April, but I don't want them as a neighbor in Greenland.
Not going to happen.
And by the way, and NATO's got to understand that I'm all for NATO.
I saved NATO.
If it weren't for me, you wouldn't have a NATO right now.
But we're not going to allow Russia or China to occupy Greenland.
And that's what's going to happen if we don't.
All right.
That, in my opinion, is very, very disturbing.
I mean, I suppose it could be tied into the Monroe Doctrine, but I have yet to see any indications of Russia or China seeing to take control of Greenland.
It's owned by Denmark on historic grounds that have been recognized for hundreds of years.
And yeah, it sure did have to do with her having a boat landing there, just as the United States, you know, came about under similar circumstances, having the original colonists and then the nation growing and developing.
Honestly, this looks like a form of theft, stealing a whole, you know, a major property of a sovereign nation, Norway, which is a member of NATO.
So because the U.S. is a founding member of NATO as well, you have a conflict between two NATO nations.
If Trump moves forward here, and it looks as though he's planning to do it peaceably or non-peaceably, the easy way or the hard way, that we're going to have a conflict among NATO nations that may, in fact, precipitate cracking NATO apart.
It may lead to the dissolution of NATO.
Now, personally, NATO is an anachronism.
It's a relic of the distant past when the European nations had something to fear from the Soviet Union, or at least thought they did.
The United States, in particular, betrayed Mikhail Gorbachev by promising there'd be no encroachment by Western nations one inch to the east.
And now we've taken some 14 different former Soviet bloc republics and incorporated them into NATO.
This is perhaps the greatest diplomatic travesty of world history right there.
The U.S. promising the Soviet Union to bring about its dissolution that there'd be no encroachment to the east, which has now been massively violated again and again and again.
And yet the Western nations seem to have no appreciation of the alarm this causes in Russia by now having American military bases all along the border of Russia, which, as it happens, has led the Russians to be very, very resourceful in the development of their military equipment, very, very dedicated to protecting the motherland.
And I believe today Russia is fully capable of defeating NATO, the United States, any other force on earth in a military engagement, which I hope will not come to pass.
The problem being that, as Henry Kissinger observed, facts don't matter, only perceptions.
And when you have a Donald Trump believing, perceiving that the United States is militarily more powerful than Russia, that can lead to a fateful decision with consequences that are going to be horrendous for the world, Gary.
I have no optimism about the situation we're in now.
And Greenland is a perfect illustration of the prospect for another world war, one from which there will emerge no winners and where the living will envy the dead.
Ouch.
All right, this clip here says it.
People don't really matter.
If I talk to my number two adversary in the region, Russia, I mean, I've got, of course, the countries Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua with Russia relationships.
But why this region matters?
With all of its rich resources and rare earth elements.
You've got the lithium triangle, which is needed for technology today.
60% of the world's lithium is in the lithium triangle, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile.
You just have the largest oil reserves, Light Sweet Crude, discovered off of Guyana over a year ago.
You have Venezuela's resources as well with oil, copper, gold.
We have the Amazon, lungs of the world.
We have 31% of the world's fresh water in this region, too.
I mean, it's just off the charts.
We have a lot to do.
This region matters.
It has a lot to do with national security, and we need to step up our game.
Well, there she's admitting the United States wants a rape loot and pillage South America.
I mean, could it be stated more bluntly?
That's what it's all about, natural resources.
And the United States is grotesque for its history of abusing other nations.
A typical scenario was outlined by John Perkins in his brilliant book, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, who explains how the U.S. uses the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank to hook undeveloped nations on major projects like hydroelectric dams and the like.
They really don't need and can't afford to get them into massive debt.
And they propose paying off that debt by giving access, cheap access to their natural resources.
And if they balk at that, we send in the Marines.
I mean, here you get Smedley Butler, most decorated Marine Corps general in history with not one but two Congressional Medals of Honor writing a booklet called War is a Racket, where he explains that he spent his entire military career defending the profit margins of major corporations because that was what a Marine Corps was being used to do in Latin and South America.
Smedley got it right, sad to say.
And all this ties together with where the U.S. stands in the world today as a beast, a threat, an abuser, violator of international law, disrespector of the UN Charter, abuser of the Geneva Conventions.
And this goes into Gaza, supporting mass murder, genocide, giving the weapons, the money to Ukraine by supporting the Ukrainians against Russia when Russia was totally justified to protect the people of the Donbass,
who've been undergoing artillery assaults from Kiev since the revolution of 2014 deposed the Russian-friendly president and replacing with a Western puppet of whom Zelensky is the successor, and of course Iran, the most peace-loving, dedicated nation in the world, which hasn't launched a war of aggression against another nation since 1775.
Where remember, the Declaration of Independence was made in 1776.
We ought to be emulating Iran for its commitment to peace and stability.
Instead, we're doing our best to undermine it right now.
We have what appears to be a CIA conspired, no doubt, with collusion from the most odd kind of color revolution taking place so that Trump can claim the Iranian government is abusing the Iranian people to justify hitting Iran.
You see, they need a pretext, Gary, to sell another attack on Iran to the American people because 70% of the American people don't want anything to do with another hit on Iran.
So they're trying to build up some kind of popular support.
It actually doesn't even matter if the public believes it.
They create a false predicate, the claim of all this abuse by the Iranian government.
They're even claiming there's massacres of the Iranian people.
So to protect the Iranian people, I mean, it's this absurd, when it's really to promote the interests of Israel, contradicting the interests of the Iranian people, the United States is going to participate in another attack on Iran, for which I'm at least glad to say Iran appears to be fully prepared.
And if we send B-52s, I think we're going to see a number of those estimable flying machines shot out of the air.
I believe they're able now to defend themselves against Israeli missiles.
They've only used 5% of their own missile supply.
They now have a lot of Russian and Chinese fighter jets they didn't have before.
The situation is very, very different from the Iranian defensive point of view.
And offensively, they were already beating the hell out of Israel, which sued for the ceasefire after the 12-day war.
Well, this time, there will be no let-up until Israel has been destroyed militarily and politically and economically.
Mark my words.
Okay.
All right.
Now, Trump has also said that Cuba and Mexico had better watch out.
Colombia is very sick, too, run by a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States.
And he's not going to be doing it very long, let me tell you.
What does that mean?
He's not going to be doing it very long.
He's not doing it very long.
He has cocaine mills and cocaine factories.
He's not going to be doing it very well.
So there will be an operation by the U.S.
It sounds good to me.
And Cuba is ready to fall.
Yes.
Cuba looks like it's ready to fall.
I don't know if they can hold up.
But Cuba now has no income.
They got all of their income from Venezuela, from the Venezuelan oil.
They're not getting any of it.
And Cuba literally is ready to fall.
And you have a lot of great Cuban Americans who are going to be very happy about this.
Are you considering U.S. action in Cuba?
I think it's just going to fall.
I don't think we need any action.
It looks like it's going down.
It's going down for the count.
You ever watch a fight?
They go down for the count.
And Cuba looks like it's going down.
By the way, you have to do something with Mexico.
Mexico has to get their act together because they're pouring through Mexico.
And we're going to have to do something.
We'd love Mexico to do it.
They're capable of doing it.
But unfortunately, the cartels are very strong in Mexico.
We need Greenland from a national security situation.
It's so strategic.
Right now, Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place.
We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security.
And Denmark is not going to be able to do it, I can tell you.
All right, excuse me, it's the biggest bully on the block, beating up South American Asian.
Today Venezuela, tomorrow Colombia, then Mexico, Cuba.
It's a disgrace.
United State should be saying an example for the nations of the world in terms of respect for international law, the sovereignty of nations.
The Geneva Conventions, the Un Charter were none of the above.
We have fallen to a very low point in our history Gary, from which I cannot see a rapid recovery, sad to say.
All right, next one up.
I'm not even sure what this clip is about, but I had it on queued up.
Based on what we have found so far, we believe that the Somali fraud operation in Minnesota is the single greatest theft of taxpayer dollars through welfare fraud in American history.
We believe that we have only scratched the very top of the surface of how deep this goes, and you're familiar with all the scams, with pretending that children have autism who are not in fact autistic, with pretending to enroll people in food programs when in fact nobody was ever enrolled, and engaging in massive fraud, lying and theft and grift on a scale we've never seen before in American history.
The total bill, the total tab for this is going to be far beyond the numbers you've already seen, reported.
We believe the state government is fully complicit in this scheme and we believe that what we are going to uncover is going to shock the American people.
Look, based on the records that we already have and this is a significant undercount by the way, 75 percent of the Somali population in Minnesota is on welfare but that's likely a significant undercount of just how much of a financial burden the Somali refugee population is imposing.
Well, let me all right.
Uh look, what you have to understand about this Somali thing is the following, the scandal was exposed in 2020, way back when.
So why is it on the map now?
Because Israel wants to divide Somalia into two parts, creating a new nation of Somaliland, which Israeli government has already recognized as a relocation site for the Palestinians.
They want to export, they want to deport, they want to expel from Israel.
You know they want every Palestinian dead or outside of the boundaries of Israel.
That's what's going on.
It's a massive ethnic cleansing.
So once again, we have a pr stunt taking place here.
Just like that Color revolution in Iran, we got a pr stunt going on here to demonize Somalis Bollies.
And there's no doubt they were running a massive prod.
They had daycare centers with no children.
They had learning centers where they couldn't even spell the word learning.
This fellow Nick surely has done a great job of exposing what was going on there, but it's old news.
The question, therefore, that's important to contemplate is: why now is it being treated as new news?
And it's to benefit the Israeli agenda, just as so much else that Donald Trump does is to benefit Israel, not the United States.
Israel, Israel, Israel, once again, illustrated here in Minneapolis today.
All right.
Even my grandkids who are like 11, 12-year-olds, they don't even like Israel anymore, and they're not even sure why.
Speaking news here in Batship Bonkers, Britain, where Emily Thornbury of the Labour government has said that what Trumpy Trump has done by nicking Maduro from Venezuela in the middle of the night might not be compliant with international law and that there might need to be a need to condemn it.
Oh my goodness, what will Trumpy Trump Trump do to be condemned by Emily Thornbury, last seen slagging off British people for owning a white van and flying their union flag, and also clearly allergic to We Govi?
Emily Thornbury's greatest achievement was playing lacrosse at her private boarding school.
So I'm sure Trump's going to be really concerned about what the Labour government thinks about what he does.
In other news, fat kids in schools, the government is going to ban fast food ads from social media and the TV.
This will do piss all for fat kids in schools who spend too much time on screens and not enough time running around and don't do triple games on a Friday afternoon anymore.
Former Army 800 meter runner here, just mentioning.
But in fact, it will make the government look like they're doing something, which is all that snake-ass politicians really give a single shit about.
And then, can we take a moment, please, for Trumpy Trump Trump and the way that he deals with other global leaders?
Maduro, he went in and nicked him in the middle of the night.
When you think about Abdul al-Baghdadi, he went in and killed him like a dog.
He died like a coward, Trump said.
Suleimani, Trump went and got him by drone strike and evaporated him, a bit like milk.
When Starmer tried to speak in Trump's presence, Trump backchecked him away from the microphone.
And President Macron, he grabbed him by the hand, crushed Macron's hand so hard that Macron could no longer whank off his wife.
And when you think about the way he dealt with Zelensky, which was a teen bullying session, followed by advice not to keep dressing from Ross dress for less.
Well done to Trumpy Trump Trump.
What would the world's news media do without you, my darling?
I don't know.
That's it for today here in Batship Bonkers, Britain.
Also, much love to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.
I'll just be hanging here if you want me naked with pegs on my nipples.
Thanks.
All right.
Charming.
Hello about Macron being unable to whack off his wife.
Who appears to be a man?
I mean, you know, you see photographs of her in a bathing suit.
It's very clear, like Michelle Obama.
She has a package most women do not have, Gary.
Ouch.
Run was very rather delightful in the way she was lampooning Trump and his activities and taking any number of other swipes.
I like it.
It was engaging.
And it follows up on Venezuela and Trump's other atrocities of the day.
All right.
We're going to do something completely different.
All right, is it a coincidence or is it not a coincidence that our sports stadium seemed to have the all-seeing eye, just like CBS?
What do you think about that?
Coincidence?
Yeah, well, I mean, how else are you going to design a stadium?
It's going to, from an aerial perspective, resemble an eye.
It's inevitable.
So I don't attach any, there's certainly nothing sinister to be found here.
It's just kind of amusing to juxtapose all with the appearance of stadia from above.
So, nah, this isn't consequential, but it is amusing.
Yeah.
That's what we try to do is be amusing and informative here.
Okay.
I see something I've never seen before.
Ever.
This sirloin steak.
The ingredients are beef and natural flavoring.
What is this?
It says nothing about that on the label.
Nowhere here does it say anything about natural flavoring.
I also noticed their producer is Tyson Meats.
Since when does a meat product leave an ingredients list?
So I was thinking maybe it's just on this sirloin tender steak.
Then I grabbed just a regular old top sirloin.
What do I find?
It's there too.
The non-Ingus beef variety, still made with Tyson, still has natural flavorings.
I have brown.
Natural flavorings.
How about a chuck roast?
Natural flavorings.
What the heck?
That's crazy.
These New York strips don't have it.
I mean, seriously, like, is the beef not beefy enough on its own?
You got to add natural flavorings.
And if you followed my content, then you know, natural flavorings could be one of hundreds of things.
It could be fish guts.
It could be mold.
Anyhow, thanks for watching.
Embire, beware.
Bye.
All right.
So you think we need beef natural flavorings?
She's a cutie.
I've been watching this series called Scandal.
Gary Washington, and it's unbelievably good.
They're like seven seasons.
It's all about politics in Washington, D.C.
And Gary, it's absolutely sensational.
And Gary Washington, like this gal is a young, attractive black woman.
And it's the series is just sensational.
The natural flavoring, I just wonder, they're talking about an additional artificial ingredient to give it flavor, or is it just when they say natural flavoring, it's got whatever flavoring comes with the meat.
I'm not overly disturbed by any of this.
I certainly don't mind it.
I like the way she did it.
I got to regard this one as not, again, not overly consequential, Gary, unlike many of our other reports.
Yeah.
All right.
Yeah, she's just wondering if beef needs to have more beefy taste.
Okay, would you like fries with that?
Should you eat McDonald's french fries even once in a while after you hear this?
I think you'll say no.
Okay, first of all, you can see how perfectly white they are because they allow no blemish in their potatoes.
Oh yeah, not one blemish.
And how they accomplish that?
They get rid of this little aphid that is the guy that causes this, and they spray it with one of the most toxic pesticides on the planet.
After the farmer sprays it, he can't be in the field for five days.
Oh, after they harvest them, it has to go in a special atmosphere-controlled environment for six weeks.
That's how toxic it is.
It's not safe to eat.
Guess how many chemicals, or guess how many ingredients I found in this?
Oh, not one.
Potatoes.
Potatoes are one of the 11 that I found, but I had to write them down.
Vegetable oil, which consists of soybean oil, canola oil, corn oil, and which are horrible for you, by the way.
Natural beef flavors, not so natural.
It's hydrolyzed wheat and hydrolyzed milk, horrible for you.
Wheat, milk derivatives, dextrose, sodium, acid, and pyrophosphate and salt.
11 plus ingredients and a load of chemicals.
I don't suggest it.
All right.
I regard McDonald's fries as the best fries in the world.
You know why?
Yeah, a lot of, yeah, we gotta get all these ingredients in practically everything we eat.
So I appreciate the warnings.
I doubt it's going to have much effect on behavior.
I still like McDonald's fries.
I do think the Whopper is a superior burger to the Big Mac by far.
Okay.
All right.
We're coming close to the end.
All right.
This is the truth about men, according to this lady here.
I agree with her.
A man's life is way harder than a woman's life.
And ladies, do you even have the first clue of what a true alpha masculine man has to deal with day in and day out?
Do you have an inkling of an idea?
Because I guarantee you don't.
Men wake up every day knowing nobody's going to hand them anything.
Nobody cares how they feel.
Nobody's validating them for existing.
Everything they have, they have to earn respect, money, status, reputation, even his physique.
All of it comes with sweat, sacrifice, and relentless pressure.
Women are born with value.
You're young, you're beautiful, you have femininity, and automatically you get attention, protection, options, and men willing to provide.
But a man, he's invisible until he proves himself, invisible until he brings something to the table.
That's the brutal truth.
Ladies don't know what it's like to carry the weight of protecting and providing, not just for yourself, but for your family, for the woman you love, for the people counting on you, while nobody's coming to save you, even if you fall.
Men don't get safety nets.
Men don't get sympathy.
They grind or they die unnoticed.
And yet, despite carrying that pressure, most men still get nothing but criticism.
Women demanding more, complaining, disrespecting, instead of appreciating the fact that their man is out there fighting battles that they can't even see.
So before you roll your eyes at the men, ladies, ask yourself this: Do you even have the first clue what a real masculine man faces every single day?
Because if you did, you would stop nagging and start appreciating.
Men's lives are harder, and the fact that they still show up to protect you anyway, that's strength women will never understand.
All right.
That's kind of dear.
I mean, you know, as a man, of course, I appreciate every word, but probably a bit of an exaggeration.
You know, I think relations are quite so clear-cut or different for men as opposed to women.
But it was interesting to get a point of view there that we don't normally encounter, Gary.
So I welcome hearing it out.
I'm not particularly affected one way or another, but I enjoyed hearing her say all those things.
You know, you're a man, former Marine.
Okay.
Looks like YouTube has quietly deleted more than 700 videos that document Israeli human rights violations, war crimes, and other abuses as part of an effort by our government here in the United States to essentially bury evidence of Israel's war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank.
Now, according to reporting from the intercept, YouTube surreptitiously deleted all these videos in early October by wiping the accounts that posted them from its website, along with their channel's archives.
The accounts belong to three prominent Palestinian human rights groups, Al-Haq, Al-Mezan, Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights.
These three YouTube channels hosted hours of footage documenting and highlighting alleged Israeli government violations of international law in both Gaza and the West Bank.
And it's really important to have that record because as we know, the Hasburgh coming from Israel is strong.
Our politicians are bought and oftentimes bought on behalf of Israel, on behalf of doing favors for Israel.
And I don't want what has happened over the last two years to be misrepresented in history books in the future.
I want documentation of the war crimes that have been committed.
But there is a very real effort and a successful effort at that to essentially wipe the internet of these videos.
So the deleted videos range in scope from investigations, such as an analysis of the Israeli killing of American journalist Shireen Abu Akle, to testimonies of Palestinians tortured by Israeli forces and documentaries like The Beach about children playing on a beach who were killed by an Israeli strike.
So according to The Intercept, the deletion only affected the groups basically their official channels and any of the alternate channels they might have or if the videos had been reposted by other channels.
Luckily, those channels are still active.
Those videos are still viewable.
But okay.
Well, she's part of a group called the Young Turks.
And what she's reporting is common practice for YouTube.
I mean, here you're talking about deleting 700 videos of genocide in Gaza in the past.
Fellow calling himself Lenny Bosner on behalf of concealing the Sandy Hook hoax got 1,500, 1,500, more than twice that number, exposing the shenanigans, the fakery, the fraud of what was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to remote gun control deleted from YouTube.
So this is all rather scurrilous.
It's all contrary to responsible reporting, but then the media, the mainstream, is in the Zionist pocket.
So she's telling us something that we have learned to expect.
It's outrageous.
It's a betrayal of the role of the media in America.
But that's what they're about now.
They're an extension of the Zionist probably and the machine, Gary, sad to say.
Yeah, the new JFK show was one of the first shows to go when they started deleting channels.
And they actually let us have it back.
Okay, this is a little scientific for you.
And I wanted to get this.
We have this clip and one more minute clip and we'll be out of here.
The UV scale used to cap at 10.
Today, Texas has pushed that to an 11, which is great for the sun.
Super happy.
But science is now saying that that sun may actually be conscious, agreeing with these guys.
Let's break down this theory first.
The heliosphere is created by the sun and protects everything in the solar system, but it also connects everything using photons like a nervous system.
Photons are not just light.
They're bits of information carrying frequency, phase, polarization, and direction.
It means they can hold way more information than typical binary bits like we use in computers, which is why they're used in quantum computers.
Those are qubits.
It is complex information encoding that we are getting trillions of times per second, especially in Texas.
Our perspective into it flooding us with data instead of just Mr. Fritz Albert Pop discovered that cells also emit photons called biophotons.
These are literally the transmission mechanism for your cells that can also control gene expression and they manipulate conscious states.
A light flickering at 40 hertz can increase memory and attention.
So what's the Aten connection?
In ancient Egypt, Ra was the solar deity, the sun god.
He represented our local celestial body within the giant universal mind that the universe uses to observe.
Consciousness rides along these solar boats, solar barks, which are wormholes to us.
It rides along the vibrations of the universe.
That concept encapsulated by the snake.
Those two are connected to a human vehicle where Horace is the higher aspect of that solar awareness.
Surya is the Hindu equivalent.
So clever here.
You'll always see him pulled by seven horses, the seven colors that make up the visible light spectrum.
This whole picture comes together as a universal mind creating these celestial nodes like neurons that further distribute consciousness into life forms like us that can experience the physical reality.
You have Cryptex, go to page 215 and I go way deeper on this, but I really love this theory.
It creates a link between consciousness in a universal sense and the human mind in a way that's sort of like the as above so below concepts that were very popular in ancient times.
It links biology and cosmology and it uses the sun as that medium.
I love it when science and spiritual conscious concepts agree with each other.
Because let's be real, we're all just trying to figure out why we're here in the first place.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer, we opt on.
Here we go.
Well, count me unimpressed.
I have quite a background in this field.
I have a big book called Artificial Intelligence at Scope and Limits.
I have a smaller book, Philosophy and Cognitive Science, second edition.
I found it and solely edited for a decade, the International Journal Minds and Machines for artificial intelligence, philosophy, and cognitive science.
And I can guarantee you this is pseudoscience.
This is nonsense.
There's no justification whatsoever.
The nature of mind is properly understood as a semiotic or sign-using system, where minds use signs as things that stand for other things in some respect or other for themselves.
A perfect illustration is that of a red light at an intersection.
Now, if you know the rules of the road, you understand that's a sign for applying the brakes and coming to a complete halt and only proceeding when it turns green.
So you got a sign, which for those who know the rules of the road, know how to use those signs, stands for a behavioral process of applying the brakes and coming to a complete halt.
Now, consciousness involves having the ability to use signs and not being incapacitated from the exercise of that ability.
So if a mother is driving along a highway, but her toddler in the back seat somehow gets out and puts his hands over her eyes, she may be unable to see the red light at the intersection and not act appropriately, possibly causing an accident.
Absent that incapacity, however, a sign user is then conscious when they have that ability that is not incapacitated, where interacting in suitable causal proximity with a sign brings about the appropriate response.
And of course, it doesn't have to be uniform, depending on context, the motives and beliefs and ethics of the party exercising their sign using ability.
For example, if you got a couple of bank robbers who are fleeing the police, they may see the red light, but run it anyway, because they know if they apply the brakes and come to a complete halt, they will be apprehended.
So it's a complex matter.
I've discussed it many places, another being my book, The Evolution of Intelligence, where I trace the development of human mentality from its precursors in the animal kingdom and before.
We have a distribution of simpler kinds of minds at lower levels of evolution leading to the highest, the human, with the most complex forms of mentality.
Let me just offer a criterion, a litmus test, as it were, to determine whether something has a mind.
Is it capable of making a mistake?
Because exercise of mind, signs, means taking something to stand for something else in some respect or other.
And if you're mistaking, you're taking, but taking wrongly.
This is like a spider in front of a cafe Ray Tube, a TV screen, sees the image of another spider, jumps on because it takes it to be a real spider.
Well, it's made a mistake.
But it's proof that the spider has a mind.
Now, just ask of the sun, is the sun or sticks or stones or tables or chairs capable of making a mistake?
And you begin to appreciate the extent to which we're being gaslit.
We're given a song and dance about consciousness and suns and the like, Gary.
I mean, I hate to disillusion anyone out there who thinks there's a spirituality here and the universe is conscious.
I just say, just ask of the various contents of the universe whether or not they are capable of making a mistake.
And if they are, they are minded.
They have minds.
And if they are not, they do not.
And that'll clarify the situation for you in a big way.