Jim Fetzer - The Raw Deal (15 August 2025) with Co-host Paul from CA

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 15, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:56:45

The Raw Deal (15 August 2025) with Co-host Paul from CA

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Not just anybody.
	You know, I need someone.
	I was younger, so much younger than you say.
	I never need anybody's help in any way.
	Now these days, the garden of yourself is yours.
	I never love you, my heart.
	The dream of mine, I'm the one of the doors.
	Help me if you can, I'm feeling down.
	And I do appreciate your feet around.
	Help me get my feet back on the ground.
	Won't you fail to help me?
	Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
	Very happy to be here with my co-host, Paul, from California.
	We have lots to cover today, but the first story is one with a personal dimension.
	I have filed lawsuits against Boeing Chip and Rumble for their violating their own terms of service, where the punitive damages could run as much as $30 million each.
	Let me share parts of what I have published on my blog and now being released as a press release, Madison, Wisconsin, August 14th, 2025.
	Rumble and Bitchu were sued today for violating their own terms of service.
	Many have found themselves the targets of abuse in the past, but the case that prompted these lawsuits may be most egregious in the history of the internet.
	Am latif alleges he's been subjected to egregious forms of harassment, cyber stalking, defamation, and even elder abuse over 700 times by videos created by one Victor Hugo Vaca II, which they have published since January of 2025.
	The suits were filed by James Fetzer, PhD, on behalf of himself and his colleagues who have been attacked for speaking up on his behalf.
	And every Rumble or Bitshoot user who has flagged a video, only to have the moderator imply that it conforms to BitChute or Rumble's terms of service, which declared that those platforms would not allow personal information promoting harm or injury to any group or individual, including libel, slander, doxing, defamation, or violation of privacy rights.
	Fetzer says it's all a sham and that they are legally liable for violating their own user contract.
	We submitted dozens and dozens of complaints of specific videos, which were loaded with defamation and violation of privacy rights, Fetzer explained.
	Yet they came back promptly with claims to have been reviewed and found to be consistent with our terms of service.
	Those reviews appear to have been done by AI bots, not human beings.
	So we sent them both cease and desist demands, identifying the terms of service that were being violated, not just once, but hundreds of times.
	No response, just crickets.
	They appear to believe they are immune from liability for their platform users' content.
	The suits were filed separately against Mitchut and Rumble at the federal court in the Western District of Wisconsin.
	While Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act provides broad immunity from litigation stemming from user content, social media platforms lose that immunity when they materially contribute to the creation or development of the unlawful content.
	Fetzer became a target of a relentless defamation campaign across both social media platforms after terminating a contributor from his show on Revolution Radio, The Raw Deal, in January 2025.
	After Vaca was terminated, he launched a seven-month defamation campaign that is still ongoing, in which he sought to discredit, defame, and deplatform Fetzer over his reporting on Sandy Hook.
	Vaca posted hundreds of videos defaming Fetzer to the point of overwhelming search engines with his defamatory content, which Fetzer describes as political pornography.
	Vaca has defamed colleagues who supported, defended, or hosted Fetzer on their shows through a relentless smear campaign that included obscene thumbnails and grossly false allegations of crimes, sexual misconduct, and more.
	The contributor, who bills himself as a maverick artist, retaliated by posting defamatory videos against Fetzer and his co-host.
	Vaca began attacking Fetzer by claiming he had thrown his Sandy Hook lawsuit, which was absurd since Fetzer had even carried it to the U.S. Supreme Court and has four appeals currently pending before the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Division IV.
	When Kevin Barrett, who had been present at the trial for damages, told him he was wrong, it made no difference.
	He proceeded in reckless disregard of facts.
	Vaca has also targeted Alex Jones and Wolfgang Halbig.
	The AJ reference may be a distraction.
	Vaca has characterized Fetzer as a gnat in the way of what we are trying to do for Jones.
	He keeps Fetzer in the foreground and includes his name even when he's not part of the video content.
	A mild example of his work displays his preoccupation with penis art.
	Already in 2008, the New Times of Miami was reporting that Vaca was, quote, hanging four-foot penis paintings across a VIP section of Art Basis as one of Miami's strangest.
	Today, Victor markets a line of men's underwear for men who love men with Fetzer's name to promote his product, which features the image of a penis, implying that Fetzer must be gay.
	Fetzer is straight with a son from his first marriage and a second by his second and a daughter by his second.
	Vaca's smears are unrelenting and very often cruel and sadistic.
	Vaca has now expanded his list of targets to include virtually everyone who has featured Fetzer or spoken out on his behalf, including Mike Adams, X22 Report, Stew Peters,
	SGT Report, Russ Winter, Joachina Gopian, Brian Davidson, Susan Bradford, Dave Geherry, FTJ Network, John Coleman, Real Deal Media, Sophia Smallstorm, Giuseppe Vavan Gulo, Carl Herman, and more.
	Indeed, he appears to be attacking half the alt-truth community.
	Vaca has been called the angel of death for his ability to smear and libel using claims to artistry and reporting as his cover.
	His attacks have run as many as five or six in a single day, suggesting that he is being paid by the peace.
	Fauca has acknowledged being in communication with BitChute CEO Ray Vahey, thereby revealing in the process a network of operatives working within and through the platform to weaponize free speech on behalf of political interests.
	Fetzer seeks $10 million from each platform for profound personal, professional, and reputational damage and emotional distress, and treble penalty damages for willful negligent and material support that enabled and further the damage and injury.
	Fetzer maintains that monetary damages are secondary and intended as punishment for inflicting other than financial damages, and that removing the videos and preventing the ongoing offenses is a primary concern.
	Many individuals have been targeted through VACA's defamatory campaign, a few of whom are named in court documents and, of course, above, although the number of injured parties is now quite substantial.
	Both platforms subscribe to a free speech absolutist ethos, in which harmful or hateful speech is largely unregulated and appears to be encouraged and weaponized for political purposes.
	Legal documents concerning the case against Rumble can be accessed and read here in Justia and PACER and downloaded directly from my website.
	Legal documents concerning the case against BitChute, Deep State Protocol LLC, can be seen at Justia PACER and again, downloaded from my website.
	Summary: Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer and McKnight professor emeritus from the University of Minnesota Duluth liked the content, served the platform with cease and desist notices, and filed affidavits with the court, sign examples of the abuse and specific violations of both the user agreements and the law.
	The platforms have refused to moderate the content or respond to the complaints, prompting Fetzer to file suit this month to force BitChute and Rumble to comply with their own user agreements with regard to unlawful and harmful speech.
	Contact for more in for or interview requests, contact Jim Fetzer directly via phone at 608-354-4280 or via email at jfetzer at d.umn.edu.
	Now, Paul, my co-host, has been involved in these matters.
	Paul, give us your thoughts.
	Well, you're in the big water now, and you're going to have the high-paid lawyers generating paperwork.
	And I just have one question, Dad.
	When your $10 million comes in, can I be on some kind of an allowance?
	Well, listen, Paul, this is so shameful by BitChute and Rumble.
	And in fact, they have even been called out in the past for non-enforcement of their terms of service that I believe they're going to want to settle rather than allow this to go to a jury trial, which I have requested.
	The big bucks aren't going to come from my side because I'm representing myself pro se as I have been for the last seven years in relation to my Sandy Hook lawsuit, with the exception of my initial appeal when I had the benefit of two attorneys, one local, one out of state, but we're unsuccessful, unrelenting.
	I've even carried that case to the Supreme Court on my own as a pro se litigate.
	I have reinitiated, reignited a motion to have the whole Sandy Hook case in Dane County reversed on the basis of new evidence and blatant violations of my rights by the judge who is handling the course,
	Frank Remington by name, who, when I submitted these appeals for all together, including calling for his recusal that are before the Court of Appeals,
	after the Posner legal team filed a motion to dismiss, which was denied, Judge Remington retired from the court five and a half years early on 3 May 2025, even though his term does not expire until 1 August, 2030.
	I take that as writing on the wall that the judge could foresee that he might either be recused from the case, which would be bad enough, or removed from the bench, which he clearly would want to avoid.
	So I believe the fact that the judge has already retired prematurely is an indication that I'm on the right path.
	And I frankly believe it's a Sandy Hook entity, Sandy Hook promise, which I have been informed is still raking in a million bucks a month over the scam, which I had demonstrated to be a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control in my submissions to the court, but which the court, Remington,
	had not allowed to be admitted as evidence so it could claim there were no disputed facts and rule using summary judgment, even though the blatantness of what he was doing was extraordinary,
	because that included discounting the reports of two forensic document experts who sided with me over the authenticity of a death certificate over which I was being sued for claiming it was false, fabricated, and fake, that it was false, fabricated, and fake.
	But the judge just set their findings aside as not helpful.
	And indeed, when you consider he had what appears to have been a predetermined conclusion for this case, they would not have been helpful at all.
	Paul well, it would indeed be quite a feather in your cap if you ran that judge out of the courtroom.
	It would be, I would love to know exactly the reasons why.
	I would imagine that they are, you're probably fairly accurate.
	He probably didn't want any more of the whole situation.
	And, you know, who knows, maybe he had some personal reasons too.
	But yeah, it'd be great to think that you ran him out of office, so to speak.
	On the topic at hand, though, with these videos that this vile character, Victor Hugo Vaca, has been posting for months.
	I mean, obviously, initially I was not aware of too much.
	And then I started looking at the channel and just watching the titles and the pictures that he puts up.
	And there's hardly words to describe what he's done, the campaign.
	And it's, you know, scandalous.
	It's absolutely salacious.
	It's just so many different adjectives that you could use to describe the extremely, you know, demeaning and insulting nature of so much of it.
	And it just briefly reminds me, since you kind of went on a little bit of a run there, I'll just briefly take a little license here.
	It reminds me of a discussion I once had with a co-host over on FTJ, Davis Luhrmann, quite a while ago about what can be called an honor culture.
	Essentially, America came out of Europe and England, and long established in Europe and England was an honor culture where dueling was just part of society.
	And that it kind of reminds me of the old saying about an armed society is a polite society.
	And also back in those times, you know, you did not do such things.
	You did not say such things.
	You did not impugn the honor of another, or you might indeed be challenged to a duel.
	And before the pistols, there was swords, for example.
	In fact, some of our own presidents, including Andrew Jackson, were famous for having more than one duel in their career.
	And of course, you know, also Andrew Jackson was also well known for fist fighting and hitting people with his cane.
	And, you know, he single-handedly beat down and disarmed an assassin when his gun was fired.
	So, you know, all these things are made possible by this sort of a remote culture that we live in where people and men do not suffer the consequences of their actions.
	And I think that BitChute and Rumble and these other platforms are certainly guilty, but the more appropriate word would be liable for allowing this to go on.
	And what Victor Hugo and his little team, I believe that he's part of a group, have done is to take advantage of a situation they discovered, I guess you could call it a technical or algorithmic situation where they just post video, post video, post video.
	And as you said, overwhelming the search engines essentially can lead them away from more valuable content into the ridiculous nature of what he's doing, which is just taking clips of what you say and I say and other people say, just taking clips, some of them, you know, you could say out of context, but others just part of a longer show.
	And then putting the most ridiculous, outlandish title with very, what I would call just sort of unflattering pictures and images on the video thumbnail.
	And what is that supposed to be?
	Gonzo journalism?
	Is that modern art, Victor?
	This individual, and of course, again, I firmly believe he's part of a group, has just revealed himself to be a little worm, a weasel, just trying to make trouble.
	Well, for everyone who's interested in what's going on, if you go to BitChute or to Romble and do a search on VictorHugo, Jim Fatzer, you'll find a staggering number of videos which are the subject of this complaint.
	Indeed, Paul, when you began speaking, I went to BitShoot Victor Hugo Jim Petzer, and there were at the time 740 videos.
	Just as I've been scrolling through for the video version of our show to illustrate what's going on here, eight of them have been removed, and now there are 732.
	Now, during discovery, we'll discover, we'll find out which of those videos were taken down, which may I say, they're going to claim illustrates they actually were enforcing their terms of service, but obviously the historical record shows they have not been, but which I believe must have been especially egregious.
	And for them to have taken them down reflects consciousness of guilt.
	They are aware they have committed the offenses alleged, and they're attempting to minimize their damage, at which they will be utterly unsuccessful.
	Paul, let me mention, we have previously complained about many of these videos in the past and got virtual automatic responses, which I believe have stated are from an AI bot, that they comply with their terms of service when they blatantly do not.
	As a consequence, and this may have been six months ago, I sent them a cease and desist demand to both Bitchute and Rumble, which they simply ignored.
	I have subsequently filed affidavits in the Western District federal court here in Wisconsin that outline a summary of all these offenses and shared them with Bitchute and Rumble, where once again, they've made no response whatsoever.
	But it turns out that under the law, when you have an affidavit, if you disagree, you have to speak up and respond.
	Otherwise, as we understand the law, it becomes fact.
	So I believe they have actually committed several blunders along the way here, Paul, that are going to work to their legal disadvantage.
	Well, I'm glad you mentioned that, actually.
	That just validates a little piece of my knowledge and my limited knowledge into an explorations into the law.
	But yes, in common law, an unrebutted affidavit stands as truth.
	And there's actually techniques that are, you know, shall we say, advised online, such as to file such an affidavit and give them notice telling them that they have 30 days to rebut or deny.
	And when they do not, you can go ahead and file that down at the county recorder's office.
	And essentially, they later on, if you were to bring suit on the basis of the issues raised or the allegations raised in the affidavit, they would not be able to address them having previously had the opportunity to address them or to deny them earlier.
	So it really can act like a trap if it's done correctly.
	And if we had honest and honorable courts, but we don't really seem anymore to have honest or honorable courts, as you have found out, as many other people have found out.
	So we shall see.
	But again, my respect and admiration for taking a swing at these people.
	You can't get on base if you don't take a swing.
	Absolutely, Bon.
	I so appreciate your being here today with me.
	What has been your assessment?
	You have had encounters with Victor Hugo.
	You sought to set him straight, but of course, he sought to turn that against you as he does with everyone else.
	He's able to lure on his shows.
	And it's rather amazing the series of guests he's been able to feature only to pervert their conversations, take clips out of contacts, and distort what transpired.
	Your personal experience, Paul?
	Well, so prior to the more recent show, and he particularly wanted me to come on and talk about this issue with you and the others and Russ, right?
	Because I was just coming on what I would call the cusp of awareness.
	You know, Russ had made some comments in our email thread.
	And again, I never went to Victor's channel.
	I had done, I think, two prior podcasts with him.
	And they went well.
	And he told me that I was, quote, popular with a lot of his listeners, whoever they are.
	And I remember going to the BitChute channel later after I had done a couple of shows with him and I read the comments and, you know, more or less they were favorable.
	So we did what I would call normal show or normal podcast.
	But then when he summoned me on for the one about you, you probably heard some clips of that.
	So he wanted me to just sort of get involved and make comments about his feud with you.
	And I wasn't that interested in doing that.
	And then he kept playing clips of you and wanted to make his own comments and then wanted me to comment.
	And I was tired of that.
	And I just told him, I don't want to hear any more clips of you.
	Okay.
	And then I was quite familiar with your work.
	I'd been on your show.
	You know, I had a high opinion of you.
	And so, you know, just like just stop and knock it off.
	Well, anyway, and so during that show, I said some, I don't know, some unsavory things as I can have an occasion to do.
	And he clipped those things and a couple others out of like a two-hour show.
	He put up two or three minutes of me and trying to make me look bad.
	And during the entire two-hour podcast I did with him, we mostly got along.
	And it was mostly what I would call sort of a normal occurrences, you know.
	But again, I found out, just like all you guys had already found out, that once he decides to turn on you or this group sets their sights on you, then it doesn't matter.
	They're going to go ahead and put unflattering pictures and/or unflattering quotes maybe taken out of context or not.
	I don't know if anything I've ever said has been taken out of context because I mostly just speak pretty squarely on any issue I might be addressing.
	But yeah, I mean, if there's a way to make somebody look bad, that's what he tries to do.
	And of course, should this move forward and then not attempt to settle?
	I'd be delighted to have an affidavit from you about your experience as we proceed.
	We'll be right back with Paul from California.com, We'll be right back.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and posts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	revolution
	join revolution radio every wednesday 8 p.m eastern time on studio b for momentary zen with host zen garcia at freedomslips.com
	the people station the opinions expressed on this radio station its programs and its website by the hosts guests and calling listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listeners supported radio.
	And now we return you to your host.
	Well, there's been a rather stunning development in relation to Russia and NATO.
	A massive military cargo ship belonging to NATO, member state sunk by Russian submarine, billions of dollars in armaments lost.
	This is published by State of the Nation, a highly reliable source.
	According to Russian military sources, confirmed by the Russian Ministry of Defense, a submarine of the Russian Black Sea Fleet torpedoed a merchant ship from a NATO country loaded with a large cargo of weapons, tanks, anti-aircraft missiles, more, that was heading for Odessa.
	The Russian submarine was a class 6363 Varyshayanka improved Kilo submarine, which in NATO bears the peculiar name Black Hole due to its silent sailing attack capabilities during missions.
	The ship was sailing along the coast between Bulgaria and Romania toward the mouth of the Danube more than 10 days ago on the night of July 25-26 along the grain trade route between Ukraine and the Bosphorus in an attempt to conceal its course.
	The ship flew the flag of a NATO member state, although it was registered as a civilian ship.
	It was actually carrying weapons sent from Australia, NATO countries to Ukraine.
	This naval attack is one of the most significant against NATO logistics since the start of the special military operation in Ukraine and demonstrate the ability of Russian intelligence services to obtain information about military missions disguised as civilian cargo.
	The attack, in which the explosion was described by Romanian fishermen as sunshine at night in the middle of the sea, deprives Ukrainian armed forces of strategic reserves, especially tanks.
	The following sank with a ship.
	60 M1A1 Abram tanks, 300 javelin anti-tank missiles, 150 Stinger anti-aircraft missiles, 150 Block 1 anti-tank missiles for javelins, 200 tons of small arms, M4 Rivals AK-426, machine guns, grenade launchers,
	155 military artillery munitions.
	According to Russian military sources, confirmed by the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Russian submarine, nicknamed Black Hole for its effective ability to silence transmit, committed the deed.
	Paul, this is a major event.
	And of course, the ship was totally legitimate as a target by virtue of the war between Ukraine and Russia.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, yeah, very interesting.
	This took place in the Black Sea.
	Is that correct?
	Yes.
	So I would imagine Russia regards the Black Sea as their own, shall we say, backyard pond.
	It's quite a large body of water, but it's an inland sea, right?
	So what's of interest to me, I've always, I guess the term logistics would describe the kind of things that I find interesting, such as, you know, how all this equipment got to some port on the Black Sea to be loaded onto a ship, right?
	So Abram tanks coming from the U.S., where did they come from?
	Were they already on soil at some European base that we have?
	Or, you know, in other words, how did this stuff get, first of all, on the ground?
	And then how did it travel to a, quote, port on the Black Sea to be loaded on a ship to be sent?
	I mean, all that stuff is of interest to me, but yeah, Russia has every right to do what they did if this is indeed a warship bringing war supplies to their enemy.
	It does say about the tanks.
	Australia's entire older tank stockpile.
	They came from Australia, Paul.
	Well, they must have had to land somewhere and then go by rail.
	Yeah.
	I believe that, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Like I said, that's just a little, it's a little side note, but it's of interest to me because, like I said, the Black Sea is an inland sea.
	So it's fascinating.
	Yeah, I heard that it's quite large and actually a lot of parts around there are beautiful and lots of fishing and other such.
	If I'm not mistaken, that's where that big, what's the name of that fish that gives the caviar?
	I forget the name of it, but that supposedly is in the Black Sea as well.
	Here's a very negative situation in Ukraine, mired in Soviet decision-making.
	Robert pinned immense losses on Zelensky's firing of General Lazuni.
	The Western mainstream media contributes, continues the trend of turning on Ukraine now that it's clear Ukraine cannot win the war against Russia.
	Recall that during the opening couple years of war, the mainstream treated any criticism of Zelensky or the Ukrainian army as totally off limits.
	But now, a fresh Wall Street Journal report published Tuesday calls out Ukraine's military for having increasingly adopted a rigid Soviet-style command structure that stifles battlefield initiative.
	Soldiers interviewed by the outlet described large-scale meat grinder-type tactics of blindly being sent on suicidal frontal assaults while being denied permission to withdraw from dangerous positions.
	The consistent commentary on the war has long been that while Russia might have the manpower to do these old war of attrition tactics, Ukraine certainly does not.
	Ukraine forces in the initial stages of the war were praised for their effective use of maneuver warfare and were more nimble and able to more quickly seize initiative or strategically retreat as necessary.
	Ukrainian officers and infantrymen complain of a centralized command culture that often punishes initiative and wastes men's lives.
	Generals order repetitive frontal assaults that have little hope of success and deny requests from beleaguered units to carry out tactical retreats and save their men.
	Casualties accumulate on operations with little strategic value, the Wall Street Journal reports.
	They also view the firing of the general as being critical to the losses they're currently sustaining.
	Indeed, here's another report about it, to wit that Zelensky fears his own former general.
	This is from the American Conservative.
	The former commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces penned an article posted for Vogue Ukraine in late July.
	Though the article appeared in the magazine 2025 Leaders Edition, Valerie Sahuzi nowhere declared an intention to run for Ukraine's leadership, nor has he declared an intention to run at any other time, but perhaps he did not need to.
	The article was an apparent rebranding effort.
	Appearing in a tailored suit, instead of battle fatigues, Ukrainians are used to seeing Zelunzi humanized himself.
	He discussed his childhood, never mentioned his rise to the ranks, nor his battlefield strategy in the war with Russia.
	Rather than citing military strategists or military historians, Suzuni cited Vasily Alexandrovich Sukhomlinsky, a Ukrainian intellectual and educator who stressed beauty and nature, the preciousness of human life, and the sanctity of bringing joy to others.
	Zalunzi set his happy childhood against the backdrop of Zukosinsky's teaching that the years of childhood are first of all an education of the heart.
	Sukhozomi, he explained, taught that childhood is when moral qualities, emotional intelligence, and the ability to empathize devaluate.
	These are very different words and a very different tone than Ukrainians are used to hearing from their heroic military commander.
	Zelunzi carefully casts himself as a man of the people.
	I was born in 1973 in an ordinary Ukrainian city, in an ordinary Ukrainian family, he wrote.
	He grew up at a home where everyone in our family is both Ukrainian and in a village where many Ukrainian songs were sung.
	He grew up in his grandfather's modest house where there was not a single Russian book.
	In his childhood, Russian was the language of bullies in the city.
	In his adulthood, Russia is the most brutal enemy since fascism.
	Paul, I think, rebranding is indeed what's taking place here.
	Rather obvious, he would be a natural choice to succeed Zelensky, whose term as president actually expired back in March or perhaps May, but where it's long since been the case that he was not legally still the president of Ukraine.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, there's a whole lot of new information there, so I haven't really had a chance to look at it or see a picture of this guy.
	Is he also Jewish like Zelensky or no?
	Do you know?
	I don't know, but there is a photograph of him here.
	Can you see it, Paul, there?
	Yeah, okay.
	So that was on screen earlier.
	And yeah, so he looks classically Slavic there.
	So yeah, who knows?
	I mean, it all sounds good, but as we know, all the politicians that we've ever been sold as, you know, coming from the people, right?
	In other words, down home, folksy, you know, I mean, even, you know, Jimmy Carter was sold to us as an all-shucks, you know, kind of guy, just a peanut farmer.
	When in reality, of course, nothing was further from the truth that he had been part of the elite, you know, came out of the Naval Academy, had belonged to many of these so-called clubs or organizations, you know, the circles that these people run in.
	So, yeah, I just, I wonder the veracity of his humble background.
	But it is interesting that some people say that Ukrainians and Russians are completely different, completely separate people, so on and so forth.
	But then also people will say that Ukrainians and Russians are essentially the same people, separated mostly by a language and a little bit by a culture.
	I don't know if there's going to be that much living memory of what the Russians or so-called the Bolsheviks did to Ukraine during the famine, but I'm sure there's plenty of, you know, independent and patriotic sort of Ukrainians.
	How many more there's going to be left to continue to fight a war?
	I think that's another question that's problematic.
	And I often wonder what goes through people's heads.
	In other words, wouldn't you love to know what goes through the average Russian soldier's head or what goes through the average Ukrainian soldier's head when they're going out and doing whatever it is that they're being required to do?
	A lot of them probably has to be along the lines of what the hell am I doing here and what the hell is this really all about?
	Of course, Ukraine is only artificially created as a separate state by Nikita Khrushchev, who was himself a Ukrainian.
	But historically, it served as a breadbasket of Russia.
	Kiev was the first capital of Russia.
	I believe because there's so many ethnic Russians, Russian-friendly, genetic Russians, etc., in Ukraine, that Putin has been so kind and gentle in his conduct of the war.
	Hypothetically, they could have ended it in a matter of days.
	Many analysts, including Colonel McGregor, Scott Ritter, Colonel Wilkerson, and others, I submit, have agreed.
	So what's going on here is an artificially contrived war.
	The Minsk agreements were the real tell, because even Angela Merkel would admit later that it was merely a cover story to beef up Ukraine with weapons, that they believed Ukraine might have the ability to defeat Russia.
	Little did they know, but that the overarching motive remains the same.
	They want to defeat the Russian Federation and carve up Russia for its vast natural resources, which Vladimir Putin himself admitted perhaps inadvisedly represented 88 trillion in wealth.
	So that coveting of all those resources remains.
	And of course, there is the additional motive, as Zelensky himself has affirmed, of turning Ukraine into the new Israel.
	Pretty much, things are washed up in the Mediterranean area.
	The Iranians have reduced a whole lot of Israel to rubble, looking very like Gaza.
	And while they want to protest, we had Netanyahu even recently saving the 12-day war had been a disaster for Iran.
	The fact of the matter is it's actually been a disaster for Israel.
	And there are many, I think, who would like to find a new location because so much of the population is Khazarian.
	These Ashkenazi Jews who have no genetic or historical connection to the peoples of Palestine of ancient times or the tribe of Judah, much of it is a total fraud because the Palestinians are bona fide Semites.
	The Israelis are not, which means that irony of ironies, Israel is the greatest practitioner of anti-Semitism in the world today.
	But I believe this motive, this desire to turn Ukraine into the new Israel is also very powerful here.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I would imagine that all of those things are in play.
	And I just couldn't help but thinking, you know, the notion of these, all these wheels are in motion, you know, large political wheels and ideological wheels and logistics.
	And, you know, the people that are making this happen, the movers and the shakers, we can imagine who they are without having to name a lot of names.
	And with regards to coveting the natural resources of Russia and all the various other effects of that agenda would entail, it's no surprise that these people have been known as vultures and vampires throughout history.
	And the fact that the working class or the average run-of-the-mill everyday civilian in these countries might have their blood shed bothers these people not because they just look at their moving things around on the grand chessboard.
	That's what Brzezinski described it as.
	So, you know, yeah, it's disgusting.
	And, you know, people in, you know, my circles, what we would call this alternative, you know, truth movement and the alternative, you know, and so-called white nationalism is part of part of that, I would imagine.
	We're just, we're tired of it.
	People in general are tired overall of what's occurring in the world, what they can see and hear and experience and take in from the news, from the internet, and from, you know, social media now, and there's cell phone cameras everywhere.
	So I think people are becoming increasingly outraged at what's going on.
	What can be done about it by the average person?
	That's another matter.
	It's kind of frustrating at this point.
	Paul, let me just add, it was Ziebig in that very book who offered the provocative analysis that if Ukraine, historically the breadbasket of Russia, as I've observed, could be pried away from Russia, then it would greatly weaken the bear.
	So in many ways, what's going on here is a sequel to Brzezinski's geopolitical strategy for dismembering Russia.
	I think it's outrageous.
	In my judgment, today, Russia may be the most moral society on earth.
	It may be the one that exemplifies to the highest degree traditional Christian values, family values, a wholesome lifestyle.
	I, frankly, am enormously impressed with Russia today, and I believe there's a tremendous natural affinity between the Russian people and the American people, where the politicians under Zionist influence especially don't want it to happen that there should be improved relations between Russia and America.
	Even though Trump campaigned, that was one of his themes from the beginning, that he wanted to improve relations with Russia.
	Now we have a report at the summit conference today in Alaska.
	Trump is going to offer Putin minerals for peace.
	This is from the Truth Seeker, a very good, reliable source.
	Donald Trump is preparing to offer Vladimir Putin access to rare earth minerals to incentivize him to end the war in Ukraine.
	Frankly, it won't work.
	The U.S. president will arrive at the much anticipated meeting with his Russian counterpart Friday today, armed with a number of money-making opportunities for Putin.
	It will include opening up Alaska's natural resources to Moscow and lifting some of the American sanctions on Russia's aviation industry that the UK Telegraph has reported.
	Scott Bassant, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, is understood to be among administration figures briefing Trump ahead of the meeting with Putin in Anchorage, exploring the economic trade-offs the U.S. can make with Russia to expedite a ceasefire agreement.
	Trump, however, has made absurd remarks threatening Russia and Putin if they don't agree to his ceasefire.
	Paul, I mean, his capacity for tact and diplomacy appears to be nil, non-existent.
	Your thoughts.
	Well, it's sort of interesting.
	I mean, in other words, Ukraine has been an aggressor as well, right?
	And so what is it that we expect, or what is it that Trump expects of Russia if they were to, you know, have a ceasefire?
	In other words, I believe that in many instances, Ukraine was an instigator of a lot of these hostilities.
	And you've covered that quite a bit over the last few years on your show.
	So, you know, to me, again, I probably would agree with the idea that it probably won't work.
	You know, it's interesting how at the highest level, everything comes down to a form of like coercion and bribery, you know, giving away or offering various forms of wealth.
	I know by himself, Putin is extremely wealthy.
	Of course, now, so is Trump.
	Trump has actually become much more wealthy since he's been running for president.
	So since he's occupied the office, yes.
	Yeah.
	So we shall see.
	It's interesting that they're going to meet in Alaska.
	I would love to be privy to what is being said.
	But yeah, like you say, the geopolitical scene and the grand chessboard.
	Speaking about Brzezinski's book, that's a book I did not read, but I was familiar with various summaries of it.
	And these people in general like to write ahead of time or forecast their long-range strategies.
	I think that's a common theme among them.
	One of the points I've been making is that since Trump and Putin have had all these extensive phone conversations, the idea of Putin blind to Alaska to further debate doesn't make, in my judgment, a lot of sense.
	I believe, therefore, what would justify traveling is to announce to the public, to the world, the agreement they've already reached, where we know Russia is not willing to surrender the territories it has seized, including Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhans.
	Though there may be some room for question about Zaberzaya and Kursh that he wants no NATO for Ukraine, that he wants demilitarization, denazification, whereas Zelensky, of course, insists there must be a complete Russian withdrawal, no territorial concessions, not even Crimea, and that Ukraine should still become a part of NATO, which, of course,
	may be the very reason why he's not going to be present in Alaska.
	Paul, your further thoughts.
	Yeah, well, that's a much sharper assessment there.
	That makes a lot of sense that they would be announcing something rather than just going to some remote location to meet.
	And yeah, this is an interesting development if indeed Trump and his so-called administration are essentially able to toss Zelensky's agenda to the side and bypass it.
	I think that would make a lot of sense if they're able to do it because I think we both know that Zelensky was placed to play a role and to carry out an agenda.
	So we'll see if that agenda has now been modified.
	And I've been actually concerned about Putin's safety.
	Though Trump put himself in jeopardy by offering this $50 million bounty on the head of Maduro, the president of Venezuela, who could put $100 million bounty on the head of Trump.
	I mean, three president Reagan, Carter, Ford all signed executive orders against the assassination of foreign leaders, but Trump appears to be oblivious, ignorant.
	Even Jeffrey Epstein, who was his closest friend for 10 or even 15 years, described Donald Trump as functionally illiterate, that he could read the society page in the New York Post, but that was pretty much it.
	And when Robert David Steele and I were collaborating on memorandum for Trump as then president, Robert emphasized that Trump can't read more than a couple of pages and there's got to be a photograph.
	So when we prepared these memoranda, one on Sandy Hook and one on 9-11, all the contributors had very strict length restrictions and had to include a photograph.
	Paul, I was rather floored at the time, but it's been further confirmed since.
	Oh, I just thought I thought it was funny there that you couldn't go more than a couple of pages without a picture.
	Yeah.
	Who's to say?
	You know, I don't know.
	I would find that hard to believe given his upbringing and his schooling, but okay.
	You know, it's entertainment for thinking.
	Yeah.
	Well, we've come to another break.
	Very glad to have you here today, Paul.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back after this lesson.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities, and that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs, but there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tomb.
	They used amputee actors and a studio quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston Either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
	Don't.
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	That is what they do.
	You can torture us And Barbara, fire is catching.
	And if we burn, you burn with us.
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	The time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence.
	The hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming, and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	RevolutionRadioFreedomSlips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	REVOLUTION RADIO
	It is no secret that the so-called mainstream media is best described as controlled propaganda.
	Countless news stories are either totally ignored or spun with half-truths.
	And because of this, essential facts and vital information are often compromised.
	Join Dr. Ott every Friday night on Studio B at 10 p.m. Eastern and learn why the story behind the story was nominated for a Peabody Award in its second year of producing unparalleled broadcasting excellence in 1997.
	That is, if you really care about learning the truth.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, its staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
	Now, we return you to your host.
	Well, before we turn to Israel and other atrocities, I'd like to mention a report to Congress about hypersonic weapons.
	The Russians have shown such superiority in military equipment.
	They have the best anti-missile missile systems in the world.
	They have the best anti-submarine torpedoes in the world.
	They have the best anti-ship missiles in the world.
	They have the best missiles, including launching multiple warheads that are hypersonic and unstoppable.
	That the U.S. is playing catch-up.
	Let me just share a bit of this from a report from August 12, 2025.
	That's just a few days ago from the report.
	The United States has actively pursued the development of hypersonic weapons as a part of its conventional prompt global strike program since the early 2000s.
	In recent years, it focused such efforts on hypersonic glide vehicles and hypersonic cruise missiles with shorter and intermediate ranges for use in regional conflicts.
	Although funding for these programs has been relatively restrained in the past, both the Pentagon and Congress have shown a growing interest in pursuing the development and near-term deployment of hypersonic systems.
	This is due in part to advances in these technologies in Russia and China, leading to a heightened focus in the United States on the strategic threat posed by hypersonic flight.
	Open source reporting indicates that both China and Russia have conducted numerous successful tests of hypersonic glide vehicles and fielded an operational capability.
	I add several exclamation points.
	Experts disagree on the potential impact of competitor hypersonic weapons on both strategic stability and the U.S. military's competitive advantage.
	Nevertheless, former Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, Michael Griffin, has testified to Congress that the United States does not have system that can hold China and Russia at risk in a corresponding manner, and we don't have defenses against their systems.
	Paul, that tells me if we actually engage in a conflict with Russia or China, we are going to lose and lose fast, and it will be decisive.
	Your thoughts.
	Well, you know, I don't know anything about, I mean, I have heard such things and I've heard you read such things, and it's all, I mean, it's kind of like reading a newspaper article.
	You don't really know how true something is.
	It's fascinating to me.
	I think it's a little bit hard for me to believe.
	I mean, we're just all speculating on what it is they have, what it is we have, because it's not all going to be disclosed.
	But I would find it difficult to believe that the amount of money that our own government, Pentagon, military, and defense contractors essentially, you know, steal, but I mean, that's not the word anybody would use, but the amount of money that's allocated is staggering.
	And I would be quite surprised if we haven't kept up or we don't have the equal of theirs or perhaps the better, because historically we've been ahead.
	I mean, going all the way back to the famous turned out to be non-existent missile gap, if you recall.
	Paul, let me just say, in this case, you're behind the curve, I guarantee 100%.
	Russia is so far ahead, it's almost laughable if it were not so serious.
	American contractors deliberately produce substandard equipment that have known defects so they can get maintenance contracts at double or triple their profits, which are astronomical to begin with.
	Russia has known from the beginning its survival as a nation could depend on the reliability of its weapon systems, and its manufacturers have produced superb weapons, which have already been illustrated.
	The Orestnik, for example.
	They have hypersonic missiles that have six different platforms that emerge, each of which launches six different independent warheads.
	Knows, they have a single missile that launches 36 warheads.
	Paul, we have nothing, nothing remotely comparable.
	Now i'm i'm not asking you to comment because of your acknowledged ignorance about this matter, and I don't fault you for that i'm telling you, it's cut and dry.
	Russia is so far ahead, it isn't even debatable, but so is China.
	So those, the lunkheads in Europe and in America who may want to go to war with Russia, are simply sacrificing the nation for no legitimate purpose, because it's.
	It's going to be no contest.
	Let's turn to the Middle East.
	Netanyahu has bragged about defying the?
	U.s with impunity.
	With or without U.s approval, it doesn't matter, says Netanyahu is lately, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in an interview in Hebrew with I-24 news on tuesday, bragged about how he has defied America with impunity and dragged us into war after war.
	Chris Manahan, with or without U.s approval, it doesn't matter.
	Israeli bm, Benjamin Netyahu, in an interview in Hebrew, brags about how he's defied America with impunity and dragged us into war after war.
	I'll play a bit, but given if there's no translation, i'll discontinue and return to English.
	Yeah, it's an English subtext titles but it would be tedious to read.
	Thus, commanders and security forces in Israel don't want to go into Rafa Ba.
	I said we were going in in the face of an American embargo by the U.s.
	President of the Israeli news outlet.
	They said we shouldn't do the major operation, or at least we should tell the Biden Admin beforehand.
	And I said no, we're going in and doing it.
	Netanyahu said the same thing happened with the elimination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.
	They said we had to tell the Americans and that meant it wouldn't happen.
	It could be leaked.
	I said no.
	He added, on launching a war with Iran, Netyah said it had to be done regardless of what Us wanted, to stop Iran from getting nukes.
	And here we know this is just a total bullshit.
	Iran doesn't want nukes, hasn't been pursuing nukes, was in agreement with the earlier joint comprehensive plan of action.
	There's just more bullshit from Netanyahu.
	And of course Paul, I respect your skepticism about nukes, but the rest of the world disagrees.
	Here we say on launching the war to stop them from getting nukes, it was mandatory to do it and there were High-ranking officials in our security establishment said that's fine.
	We should of course act, but we need Approval from the Americans.
	I said, no, with or without approval, it doesn't matter.
	With or without approval, we are doing it.
	He also said Israel is making plans to finish the job in Iran with the Americans or without the Americans.
	Paul, your thoughts?
	Net Yu's arrogance is boundless, but he does seem to be running American foreign policy.
	Well, is it really our policy?
	I mean, in other words, the whole idea of American foreign policy, I think, is it's, you know, global capital is what's really, you know, at play here.
	You know, sure.
	Do nations have what you would call a national interest?
	Yes, but it's increasingly clear for the last, you know, many, many decades now, and maybe even before, that the international interests are the ones that are going to be given the prominence.
	Now, Israel, of course, and Netanyahu, they've always done what it is they wanted to do anyway.
	They just get us to go along and get us to pay.
	Isn't Netanyahu the one that said, forget about U.S. Congress.
	We own the Congress.
	Is that what he did?
	Ario Sharon said, don't worry about America.
	We own America and America knows it.
	Okay, so in other words, one, you know, one Israeli Jew or one Israeli rabbi versus another, it doesn't really matter.
	They're speaking the truth, okay?
	That they're like Netanyahu.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, they not only own us with the money, but of course now, as we found out, with blackmail, you know, they have multiple ways of getting what they want and persuading people.
	I mean, you know, heck, when you listen to, you know, some fool like Lindsey Graham get up there and talk about Israel, it just, you know, it's just so obvious.
	These people, they're not sincere.
	You know, they don't really, I mean, I could just tell by listening to some of these people, they just, they don't really believe what it is they're saying.
	They just want you to believe what it is they're saying.
	So, yeah, Israel is going to do whatever it wants as a rule, and we could maybe even object to it a little bit.
	And as we know, even when we strongly object, such as Trump has in the past said some things, and now, well, now he's basically gone back.
	Similar to what he talked about with the war in Ukraine, right?
	So which is the lie, what he said before or what he's saying now?
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Meanwhile, the IDF chief says he's approved plans for the conquest of Gaza, finishing the job just as Netanyahu declared they were going to do with or without the Americans.
	IDF chief of staff, Lieutenant General E. Al-Zamher, said Wednesday that the Israeli military has approved plans for the conquest of Gaza as Israel is playing a significant escalation of its genocidal war.
	This morning, we approved plans for the conquest of Gaza, and now we are in Lebanon at the same time.
	We are operating in Syria, Yemen, Judea, and Samaria, West Bank, and monitoring events in Iran.
	We are in a multi-front war.
	Zamir said during a visit to an Israeli occupation outpost in southern Lebanon, according to the Times of Israel.
	Zamir has been at odds with Israeli PM Benjamin Nett, however, the plan to escalate in Gaza as the IDF has been worrying that it'll take heavy casualties and that the remaining Israeli captives in Gaza could be killed during the offensive.
	According to Israeli media, the message Net Yahoo and his allies have sent to Zamur is that he'd better approve plans to take over Gaza or resign.
	And Netanyahu favors a total takeover, even if it means the Israeli captives could be harmed or killed, Paul.
	That's absolutely correct.
	That's what Netanyahu wants.
	And he doesn't give a damn about world opinion or U.S. Your thoughts.
	Well, again, I mean, I don't want to sound like a broken record, but it's unfortunate.
	I think one of the things that frustrates the American people, and we can hear it and see it in their postings on social media, is that we don't seem to have any benevolent influence or benevolent presence over there in the Middle East.
	That essentially all we do is either aid and abet Israel or turned a blind eye to their malevolence.
	So, you know, just more of the same.
	Yeah, here's more.
	This is from UN review, Jonathan Cook.
	The West is in panic as Israel planned for full control of Gaza heralds a new NAPCA, which, of course, is slaughter of Palestinians.
	Netanyahu's math ethnic lensing strategy pulls the rug out from under the West's cherished pretext for supporting Israeli criminality, the fabled two-state solution.
	If you thought Western capitals were finally losing patience with Israel's engineering of a famine in Gaza, nearly two years into the genocide, you may be disappointed.
	As ever, events have moved on, even if the extreme hunger and malnourishment of the two million people of Gaza have not abated.
	Western leaders are now expressing outrage, as the media calls it, at Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's plan to take full control of Gaza and occupy it at some point in the future.
	Israel is apparently ready to hand the enclave over to outside forces unconnected to the Palestinian people.
	Yeah, Israeli can't, well, is that going to be UN?
	Is that going to be this American takeover?
	You know, Trump talking about the Riviera, the Mediterranean, and other absurdities.
	The Israeli cabinet agreed last Friday on the first step, the takeover of Gaza City, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are huddled in the ruhans, being starved to death.
	The city will be encircled, systematically depopulated and destroyed with survivors, presumably herded southward to a humanitarian city, Israel's new term for concentration camps, where they will be pinned up awaiting death or expulsion at the weekend.
	Foreign ministers from UK, Germany, Italy, Australia, and other Western nations issued a joint statement decrying the move, warning it could aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians, all of which, of course, it's designed to do.
	I mean, yeah, so you see what they're doing at last?
	Germany, Israel's most fervent backer in Europe, its second largest arms supplier, is apparently so dismayed, it has vowed to suspend, that is delay, weapon shipments that have helped Israel murder and maim hundreds of thousands of Palestinians over the past 22 months.
	But nobody thinks it's going to bother BB one bit.
	Your thoughts, Paul.
	Well, again, just a lot of lengthy reading.
	And many times, you know, I hear certain things and I want to respond, but I know you're intent on finishing some of these lengthy stories.
	But I have to laugh at the idea, endanger the lives of the hostages.
	There's no play in that game, right?
	Like the hostages is the reason this whole thing is taking place, reducing an entire area to rubble because of some hostages, right?
	You know, not only that, but, you know, when you said the fabled two-state solution, yeah, well, that's pretty much what it's always been is a fable.
	Okay.
	So, I mean, you know, and plus the notion that Germany is a staunch supporter of Israel.
	Is there anything more?
	Oh, I don't know.
	Just what's the word that comes to mind?
	Just ghastly that I can think of.
	I don't know why that just came to my mind.
	You know.
	Go ahead.
	No, no, I just, I was, I was done with my little reaction there.
	Just to explain, I'm quoting a lot of very good sources, and I don't want to misrepresent their views.
	So I tell you what they actually have said themselves.
	So we have the benefit as though they were here, rather than my casual paraphrase, which might be more efficient temporally speaking, but in my opinion, less authoritative in terms of the sources.
	So here we are in a bizarre situation.
	Meanwhile, we have a Gaza doctor describing daily patterns in Israel, maiming it these GHF.
	Those are the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation sites.
	Ahmed Yusuf says Israeli forces appear to be targeting specific body parts of Palestinians and seekers on specific days.
	This may be for organ harvesting, Paul, that they want to do damage to internal organs, so they're shooting them in the head.
	An American pediatrician who volunteered in the Gaza Strip says the injuries inflicted on Palestinian aid seekers at sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation suggests that Israeli forces there shot the men and boys deliberately by targeting specific body parts on specific days.
	Yaman Yousaf made the comments to Al Jazeera from the Jordanian capital of Amman Tuesday, hours after returning from Gaza, where he had spent two and a half weeks working at the Al-Aska Hospital in Central Deir de Alma and the Al-Sharif Hospital in Gaza City.
	The doctor said he witnessed mass casualty incidents from Israeli shootings at the distribution points run by the U.S.-backed GHF on an almost daily basis.
	The boys and young men came in with very specific injuries, almost like a daily pattern, because it was a daily pattern.
	Meaning, on a given day, say Monday, you get 40 to 60 patients coming in at a given time and they all be shot in the legs or in the pelvic region or in the groin.
	Just kind of a similar pattern.
	The next day, we'd see upper body, chest, thoraxic pattern.
	These were days, there are other days we saw only head wounds, upper neck, bullet wounds.
	And what it felt like was that somebody behind the gun that day was going to choose the way they were going to maim or decide to kill people.
	It was age indiscriminate.
	Paul, this may just be a way they amuse themselves from boredom by shooting their targets in different parts of the body, all grotesque and inhumane.
	Your thoughts.
	Yeah, just lovely, right?
	Lovely, lovely people.
	And yeah, I've heard this before.
	And there can be no doubt about the fact that they are entertaining themselves and, you know, switching it up, right?
	Hey, let's do something different today.
	I mean, you know, that's what's going on.
	Yes.
	It's disgusting.
	Yes, here's the truth seeker.
	UNRWA chief, Israel has killed or wounded over 40,000 children in Gaza.
	The head of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees says more than 40,000 children have either been killed or injured following Israel's genocidal war and an all-out blockade on Gaza.
	Children are children.
	No one should stay silent when children die or are brutally deprived of a future, whether these children are, wherever these children are, including in Gaza.
	Felipe Lazzarini, the commissioner general for the UN agency, said in a statement on Wednesday.
	The NRWHG further highlighted that at least 17,000 were left unaccompanied and separated from their families, and a million minors have been deeply traumatized and out of education due to Israeli aggression.
	At least 100 children died of malnutrition and hunger.
	And the number is going to dramatically increase.
	Paul, your thoughts?
	Well, again, you know, we're just reacting to what's being reported, and we have to assume there's some or more than quite a bit of accuracy to what's being said.
	And it's just horrific.
	It's something the average person does not want to think about.
	And if you want to know what it feels like, just deprive yourself of food for one or two days and tell me what's overwhelming your mind when that takes place.
	Even when I do a voluntary fast and I'm deliberately not eating for fasting purposes, it's still very, very difficult.
	So imagine what these are people being forced to go through, you know, all electrician.
	It can replace virtual tools like I hate to say this, but I'm somewhat relieved that Israel has gone mass down because now we're over this very long period of what about October 7th?
	where they were gaslighting us and pretending that they were just responding to October 7th.
	And those of us who were early being like, this is clearly they're just going to take over the land.
	They're imperializing and they're going to mass murder a bunch of women and children.
	We've been ghastly for so long.
	And finally, Israel is like, yeah, no, actually, F it.
	Yeah, we're killing journalists, um, and we're just saying there's a Hamas tunnel under all of them.
	Yep, this is a headline actually.
	Uh, and the I would show you the footage, but it's too violent, it wouldn't be okay for YouTube, it would get stricken on YouTube.
	Israel killed five Al Jazeera journalists in an airstrike, claiming that one of them worked for Hamas.
	Like, that's all they have to do.
	By the way, if you're watching this and you're a serial killer, if you get caught, you should just say that one of them, somebody was in Hamas.
	Like, one of your, and then I guess nobody should care.
	No matter what you do in life, by the way, if you are somehow breaking the law, I highly suggest if you're watching this program that you just weave it into Hamas.
	Like, right, folks, welcome back to the channel.
	Now, before we get into this hot topic, I want to make it clear: this is all about exploring public figures' opinions, the conversations they're sparking, and how they fit into bigger coming up on a break here.
	Keeping things factual, respectful, and focused on ideas, not promoting any kind of we're about to hit the break, but Candace has had her clip banned for being so direct and outspoken.
	And get this: Israel's biggest U.S. donor now owns CPS.
	We'll be right back with Baltimore, California, after this break.
	Revolution Radio,
	freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and posts for all their support which has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light.
	Dark world, Revolution Radio, freedomslopesome.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia.
	At freedomslips.com.
	the people station even the government admits that 9 11 was a conspiracy But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it.
	That the twin towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S. Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read America Nuked on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and FreedomSlips.com, his staff or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, FreedomSlips.com.
	100% listeners supported radio.
	Now we return you to your host, our host, who has yet to return to his chair, but we'll be back momentarily.
	Anyway, he was about to cover a story that now Israel's largest donor is the owner of CBS.
	What a shocker.
	I wonder if he's Jewish.
	I would bet that he is.
	So nothing to see here.
	Move along that there's Jewish ownership and control of all the major networks, television, you know, producing the movies, so on and so on, as it's always been.
	So nothing to see here, nothing to be alarmed about.
	Never mind Jeffrey Epstein and his sex trial trafficking network.
	You know, that was all just an anomaly.
	Much more important things to think about, you goyam, you human cattle.
	Jim breaks up.
	Time to get back in your chair and start speaking again.
	Well, I haven't read.
	I haven't read the latest at Israel's biggest donor now on CBS.
	Can you believe?
	After reaching an agreement with President Trump, Donald Ellison, the son of the second richest man in the world, Larry Ellison, has acquired Paramount Global, the media giant who owns CBS.
	Larry Ellison, the largest public funder of the Israeli defense force, is deeply tied to the Israeli national security state.
	In counts Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, among his closest friends, David has already announced significant changes at CBS, promising unbiased news coverage and varied ideological perspectives, which are widely understood to signal a shift toward right-wing pro-Trump coverage.
	Were still very wise, a journalist with a long history of zealous pro-Israel advocacy is being considered as the network's new ombudsman, shaping its political direction precisely because of her pro-Israel stance.
	Paul, nothing new here, right?
	Nothing to see.
	Just move along.
	You read my mind.
	The journalistic integrity of CBS and all the other major networks remains intact and will proceed as normal.
	Get this 400% increase report by company.
	It provides paid protesters to object to President Trump.
	Dump Trump, Trump must go.
	They hold signs.
	They're paid.
	What if I told you there are almost certainly paid protesters showing up at anti-Trump events in Washington, D.C. lately?
	I'm sure most of my readers wouldn't be too shocked by that after all.
	They've covered the likelihood.
	Democrats in particular have been paying for warm bodies at public events for years, particularly during the 2024 election.
	Even the Black Lives Matter rioters with a parrot behind the scene logistic team providing everything from food and water, participants, and bricks.
	Some of the stories we filed about all those bust-in supporters caught showing up to multiple Kamala Harris events in 2024.
	Anti-Trump protesters have indeed been springing up in the Capitol since President Trump D.C. crackdown on crime began.
	Again, Paul, I don't think you're going to find a lot surprising there.
	Well, I mean, I'll take that job.
	It's only for like a day or two at a time, right?
	I wonder what the wages are.
	It's not, you know, not bad work, I would imagine.
	Just carrying a sign, being part of a crowd.
	Here's Colonel McGrave.
	Garon with Judge Napolitano.
	All over Ukraine.
	It was devastating.
	And now what we've seen over the last couple of days are major breakthroughs.
	And these breakthroughs are occurring largely because there's not much in front of the Russians anymore.
	So they're smashing their way through defensive lines that are largely unoccupied, not completely, but in many cases, unoccupied.
	And the interesting thing is to watch the Russians because they are nothing if not very, very deliberate and methodical.
	They move on an axis that is large enough to accommodate thousands of troops.
	It has good transportation, medical support, evacuation support, logistical supplies.
	But most important, on either side of the axis where they're moving, they have what I would call ISR dominance, that is intelligence surveillance reconnaissance from basically the smallest drone up to satellites.
	So they're controlling the area as they move forward.
	They don't have to be concerned about their flanks or the possibility that somebody may attack through them because all of these ISR systems are linked to artillery systems, rockets, missiles, and so forth.
	What I'm trying to say is that you have this picture on the one side of Ukrainian forces that are literally bled white, that are falling apart, not for lack of courage or any of that sort of thing.
	That's nonsense.
	It's simply impossible for them to mount an effective resistance against the on-rushing Russians.
	And then on the Russian side, you have this 21st century force, extraordinarily well-equipped, technologically savvy, essentially knocking drones out of the air with either electronic warfare or other means and moving not at high speed, but fast enough that the opposing force has no chance of recovery.
	And right now, they keep talking about the so-called Azov formations.
	I guess there's something like four or five, six, seven, eight brigades left.
	I don't know what their strength is.
	It's probably not much.
	But these are the sort of die-hard Nazis.
	They seem to be nowhere in the path of the Russians.
	I think they've beat a path elsewhere.
	So I'm not sure there's really much in front of the advancing Russian forces.
	So from a purely military standpoint, I would say this is the end of the war.
	Is it fair to say that Russia is close to achieving its military objectives in the war, if those objectives are the acquisition of the four oblasts?
	Oh, well, that's being achieved.
	But remember, the key thing for them has always been not so much capturing territory, but annihilating the Ukrainian forces on the ground.
	That's the problem.
	So they're very force-oriented in what they do.
	Now, we may see finally a buildup of forces in various places of 100,000 or more that are large enough and well-supplied enough that they can move deeper.
	I think you're going to see that in the direction of Zaborisha.
	The bridges over the Dnieper are intact.
	Zaborishia has real strategic value.
	If they decide to cross the river, they can go north or south from there, attacking north to Kiev or south to Odessa.
	I think those are the decisions that they're going to make now in the next couple of weeks.
	And we're going to see more and more movement.
	But the point is, the Ukrainian force is almost annihilated.
	There are still some people left.
	And they're not going to stop as long as there's anyone from these Azov units around.
	I would expect the Russians to plow forward.
	But securing the Russian areas, the Russian-speaking areas, yes.
	But then the next question is, what are you going to do to secure the outcome of the war?
	They're going to be victorious militarily.
	That's not enough.
	In other words, how do you come to an arrangement with somebody who is confident in the West that brings you the measure of security that you want?
	All of this has been about protecting Russia.
	This was never about conquering territory and marching west into Poland or Lithuania.
	Let's land Estonia.
	That's all nonsense.
	And I think that's on the back of people's minds right now in Moscow.
	Well, that brings us to my next series of questions, which brings us to Friday.
	I mean, how would you advise, in light of what you've just told us, how I wish you were there, but how would you advise President Trump?
	What cards does he have to play when he meets with Vladimir Putin on Friday?
	Well, I think first we need to keep in mind, Judge, and we've talked about this before, there is no strategy per se.
	Whereas when the decision was made back in the 90s, we're going to expand NATO.
	and keep pushing it.
	And ultimately, we will encircle Russia and Russia will be compelled to join on our terms.
	This was the talk in the 90s.
	That was the talk, by the way, behind closed doors during the Kosovo air campaign.
	We're going to go all the way to Moscow.
	This is going to change everything.
	But there was no strategy for it.
	It was kind of a wish list where people sit down and say, well, we really wish that Russia would fall apart.
	We really wish that Iran could be destroyed.
	We really wish, you know, this kind of thing.
	But no strategy, no coherent way to get there.
	So now what you have is something that we've had for a while.
	If you brought in the people that were there under Biden, I would go further all the way back to the original Trump administration.
	The people involved in foreign and defense policy are a lot like monkeys at the opera.
	You know, you can take a group of monkeys to the opera and the monkeys will sit in the chair and they're fascinated by all the explosions and the sound and the fury on the stage, but the monkeys have no idea what the hell is going on on the stage.
	Well, that's kind of what's in charge right now.
	And in the center of this mess sits Donald Trump.
	And Donald Trump is a brilliant marketer.
	He's a very successful advertising genius, I would say.
	He was a big success as a reality TV show host, but he knows nothing about Russia.
	He doesn't understand Europe.
	He doesn't understand where we fit in the world and where we don't.
	And so I can't imagine under those circumstances anything happening.
	What I do imagine is that the monkeys in the audience will yell and scream and holler and there'll be excitement, but the Russians are just going to sit there and sort of shake their heads in disbelief that people like this represent the United States of America because they're not going to see any evidence that anything we do or say can be trusted.
	And I think that's the final problem.
	There's no reason for them to trust us.
	And if you have no trust, no understanding, how do you get an agreement that's meaningful?
	I could not agree more.
	I think he's got it exactly right.
	After the Minsk agreement was used as a camouflage to beef up Ukraine in order to attack Russia, how could Putin or the Russians have any confidence whatsoever in the United States?
	Paul, your thoughts.
	Well, I think any political leader in any nation would be justified to have distrust as a default position, given, you know, so, I mean, what, a century or more?
	Multiple decades.
	So, of course, this is what occurs when war and politics are involved.
	I mean, essentially, deception, excuse me, politics and war are about deception or vice versa, however you want to phrase it.
	So, yeah, exactly correct.
	Very, very good.
	Meanwhile, it's astonishing, but the story with which we began about my bit shoot lawsuit has somehow been taken off, deleted off my blog.
	So I'm going to have to restore it.
	Everyone just know that I am going to be restoring it promptly after the show today.
	But I think that indicates a certain degree of anxiety on those who are now being targeted by a lawsuit to be responsible for and liable for their irresponsibility in the past.
	Bad, bad, bad.
	The story, the story that you were reading when I came on this morning, I didn't catch where that was from.
	Were you reading from your blog?
	Yes.
	Oh, yes.
	Posted on my blog.
	It's a press release sent out and it's been deleted, Paul.
	Not voluntarily.
	I'll be restoring it as soon as the show ends.
	But I want everyone to know why if they go there now, they're saying, oops, this page doesn't exist.
	I'll get it back up.
	A press release by who?
	Me?
	I mean, I'm the one who filed the suits, Paul.
	No, but I'm saying that when you read the article, you were reading in third person saying, you know, well, that's how it's, that's how it's, that's how they're written, Paul.
	No, I understand.
	So, but you didn't write it.
	You did not write it.
	Well, I several of us who were involved in this collaborated on the press release.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	I got it.
	Absolutely right.
	Got it.
	Here we have Kevin Barrett, who's a brilliant satirist asking who will be the next mega leader.
	Vote here.
	Candidates, MTG, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massey, J.V. Duncy calls him.
	Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens, and Walter Sobchak.
	I do not know Walter.
	This week's false flag featured Wyatt Peterson discussing recent outrage.
	Oh, he's got a survey here.
	How about Congress Traitors versus Money, Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene theme?
	Here are some of the Congress traitors, the genocide tourists.
	Dave Von Kleis has put together a post about them featuring them and the money they paid.
	Kevin, that's from Dave Von Kleis, my own buddy.
	I was in his 9-11 truth film in plain sight back around 2007.
	Now he's boasting on the genocide tourists.
	They're congressional representatives who are going to the occupied Palestinian territories to be feted by the genocide Berber traitors.
	And who's pushing back?
	Well, Matt Gates is now starting to push back a little.
	He's been talking with Glenn Greenwald.
	About the fact that he had these Israeli APAC guys sneaking into his hotel room.
	He found them in his locked hotel room.
	He had to talk about it to try to prevent.
	I hope he didn't get poisoned or something.
	Here he is confirming that, yes, it actually happened.
	So, yeah, these Israel lobby gangsters really seem to almost own the entire country.
	Yeah, well, Paul Craig Roberts and recent U.S. Representative representing Israel, two on-outliners being Gates and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massey.
	But if you recall, they got Gates wrapped up in some Israeli honeypot trap a little while back.
	Two, I remember looking into that.
	This was one big Israeli operation.
	It backfired.
	Yeah, I like Gates.
	This is going back and forth with Dave von Kleis.
	And now that he's out of office, he seemed to be more inclined to speak out about the Israeli issue and Jewish control in general.
	But in this particular instance, the APAC guy breaking into his room, he said he reported the incident to his committee leadership, and he was told it was regular.
	And the guy just said not to leave anything meaningful in his hotel room abroad as a Congress member.
	Right.
	So we're just okay with this.
	We're okay with APEC guys infiltrating hotel rooms of our Congress people.
	And you just have to deal with it and just be advised.
	Don't leave anything you don't want used against you around or anything that could be harmful to national security.
	Give me a break.
	Paul, that's horrifying.
	So you're telling me that Matt Gates, who's no longer in office, is now revealing that someone broke into his hotel room and they were with APAC.
	Is that correct?
	They were with APAC and he reported to the head of the Judiciary Committee, of which he was a member.
	I would have a couple of what I call logistical questions, such as, did he walk in on them?
	I mean, he couldn't have been in the room when they broke in.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	He returned to the market.
	He returned to his whole room, hotel room, and discovered them in the locked hotel room.
	Wow.
	Okay.
	And so how did they identify themselves?
	Like, don't worry.
	Hey, we're with APAC.
	We're like, we're your friend.
	I mean, what the hell would the dialogue be between?
	I don't know how he identified them.
	See, these are the kind of things I wanted.
	It's like, okay, first of all, how did he know they were with APAC?
	Did they just tell him?
	And it's like, this is, of course, this is not surprising.
	Many of these people, probably the scuttlebutt amongst these congressmen, senators is, hey, this is the way the club works.
	This is the way the game is played.
	So, you know, just go ahead and go along with it.
	I would imagine a lot of that talk has taken place over many decades between more than one politician.
	But that to me, you know, the brazenness of it.
	And what are they doing?
	Are they planting a bug?
	Are they trying to steal something?
	Why are they breaking into a hotel room when he's not there?
	What are they going to get?
	Oh, who, Paul?
	They're fishing.
	They're fishing.
	They could be planting bugs.
	They could be fishing.
	They could be playing video devices.
	I mean, that's the Epstein game, right?
	Now, it turns out this is a conversation between Kevin Barrett and Wyatt Peterson, discussing recent outrages, starting with Net's plan to accelerate the Janata genocide with his blessings of his blackmail pedophiles, pedophile slave Donald Trump.
	And Trump has so grotesquely betrayed the mega movement, whose core issue is to stop wasting American blood, treasure, and soft power in Israel's war in the Middle East and is behaving erratically in capricious ways that recall Stalin and Caligula.
	Maybe it's a good time to look for a successor.
	That's where he wants you to vote on those various successors.
	So this is part of his interview with Wyatt Peterson that I was recounting where Wyatt was talking about what had happened to Matt Gates.
	Go ahead, Paul.
	Yeah, I was going to say that's probably the first time that Stalin and Caligula have been used in the sentence together that I've ever heard.
	Yeah, seems a bit.
	Seems a bit.
	He says, I saw a lot of promise of Marjorie Taylor Greene when she was first elected.
	The media tried harping all over her for that Jewish space laser post.
	But if you look at the work of Alyssa Ragel in Culture Wars magazine, she's pretty much proven a lot of that weather modification, weather warfare stuff to be true, of course.
	Or certainly it's very credible.
	So Marjorie Taylor Green is one of the only people speaking out.
	I was glad to see she didn't get completely compromised.
	When she first came in, she seemed a little too pro-Trump.
	Even when Trump was elected this time, she had the mega hat on, presenting herself like a Yahoo.
	And I was a little disappointed because I thought she was better than that.
	So I'm really encouraged to see her turning away from the institutionalized mega base and connecting more with the actual base.
	That's pretty close to where I feel, Paul.
	I think the mega people had the right idea.
	Trump's agenda during his campaign was the right agenda, but he's betrayed it now that he's in office.
	Like every other politician, right?
	Yeah.
	Unfortunately.
	And of course, if you recall, this is what I predicted back in the day.
	And I was not the only one you went head to head with, but many other people did as well.
	But you and I famously were butting heads many occasions.
	And I just, you know, was cautioning at the minimum not to trust Trump.
	And of course, no, no surprise.
	You don't have to be an ostradamus to figure this stuff out.
	Very good, Paul.
	Well, I'm glad of Florence to discover the article has been wiped so promptly, Paul.
	Here is if you click on the link.
	And I should be able to restore the link.
	Oops.
	That page can't be found.
	How about that?
	Yeah.
	And I was going seeking to go there just to capitalize internet as a minor typo that I wanted to fix, but I couldn't do it because it's not there at all.
	But fortunately, I had shared it with multiple sources.
	I've already sent it out in its entirety.
	So it's going to be very easy to restore.
	But somehow, I'm not going to be surprised if they try to take it down again.
	I think I may be getting some nails very, very hard, Paul.
	Very hard.
	Well, I certainly salute you for wanting to correct typos.
	That's one of the things that drives me crazy when I read articles.
	And even in so-called mainstream publications, you know, the ones that you used to see in print, and then now you see them all online, right?
	Major newspapers and magazines all online.
	And you'll read an article and it's like, does anybody proofread anymore?
	You know?
	Yeah.
	Good for you.
	Yeah.
	Well, I had two parties proof it before I publish it.
	And they actually, one mentioned the internet, and I just, it had slipped by me.
	So it's the one remaining typo affix.
	But everyone knows that it's going to be restored.
	Meanwhile, there are multiple versions out.
	But of course, if they're only giving links, they're not going to find anything except that page does not appear to exist until I restore it, which is going to happen now, meaning as soon as we conclude today's program, which is about to happen.
	Paul, I want to thank you for joining me today.
	I thought your comments were excellent.
	And yes, even when we butt heads, I think it's informative and instructive that if you and I have a disagreement on an issue, it's probably an important issue and one that's complex enough that two sincere truth seekers could nevertheless have differences of opinion.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	Meanwhile, for everyone out there on Revolution Radio, let me encourage you to spend as much time as you can with your friends, your family, the people you love and care about.
	This is Friday, so you're going to have a weekend.
	And as I'm now inclined to say, even though you all know I'm an agnostic, your God willing, we'll be back on Monday and we can do it all over again.
	Support Revolution Radio, but don't miss a moment you can spend with the people you love and care about.
	Have a great weekend.

▲