All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2025 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:09
Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 2 (21 July 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Joachim Hagopian
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Back folks, the truth, absolute truth, versus all that news out there that's making so much noise and scaring people and things.
And I think the truth is scary enough.
And so this is our second hour on July 21th of 2025.
And lead on, Jim.
What you got for us that can make it?
Oh, thank you, Don.
Thank you, Don.
so delighted to have Joaquin with us back.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah.
We got gods and Israel.
What were the chosen people chosen for?
Seems like a hell of a good question.
White says God is as inhumane as she is, an outsider, twisted, self-serving, inhumanity fantasy world.
Obviously, no God at all, but a devil.
A friend calls to say Israel just bombed a five-story residential building next to land owned by your extended family in northern Gaza.
Raze it to the ground.
The building consisted of family apartments full of men, women, and children.
No connection with the mosque, even if that was used to justify the massacre.
17 bodies were pulled out of the rubble, the rest probably entombed forever because there are no means of pulling their bodies out.
Once upon a time, this one atrocity would have made headlines around the world now because there have been thousands of massacres like this one in the past 20 months.
It's almost a lost detail on the broad canvas of mayhem madness and mass murder.
The greater the atrocity, the greater the number of atrocities, the smaller the individual crime becomes.
The horror is reduced to a detail, a mere mention in the media in the unlikely event it even gets that far.
Why would Israel want to bomb this building?
Probably because it's about the only one left still standing in the district.
That's reason enough.
Plus, it's full of the people.
Israel is determined to exterminate one way or another.
Serious.
Meanwhile, Candace on the Iran.
We all know what's been going on between Israel and Iran.
We've heard President Trump speak about it.
You've been on the record calling it a propaganda war.
Explain that, Candace.
Well, it was very obvious that this war was going to happen because the American foreign policy is dictated by Israel.
And it was problematic that Bibi Netanyahu was increasing his rhetoric against Iran.
And this is after they have effectively seized land in Syria.
They were cheering what happened in Syria.
We knew that it was going to wind up with Christians being mass murdered, which is what's happening right now.
And what's happening in the Middle East, for those who aren't clear on this, is Israel is simply expanding its borders, whether that be by carpet bombing women and children, which we have not had a person with power effectively state that this is morally wrong, of course.
And now it seems they also want to annex the West Bank.
What's happening in the West Bank, which has nothing to do with Gaza, is the individuals that live there are being traumatized by the IDF.
And so if you're paying attention, it's very clear that they have become increasingly radical and they are effectively, as they always do, using the American military to fulfill their foreign policy interests because they are a small nation and they don't have the bodies to be able to accomplish that.
They need the might of the American military to accomplish their foreign Middle Eastern objectives.
And so, yeah, it was very, I am on record saying this for the last two years.
We're going to war with Iran one way or the other because what BB Net and Yahoo wants is what Bibi Netanyahu gets.
Connie, very clear.
Meanwhile, Zionism.
Americans have been taught that they have to do whatever Israel says.
And it's the secular government of Israel.
The secular government should not be telling Christians in America what they should and shouldn't do with their tax dollars, with their military, and with who their allegiance should go to.
Well, I got a lecture on Christian theology the day from David Friedman, the former Trump ambassador to Israel.
And I was like, not against David Friedman, seems smart, but seemed a little much to be giving me a lecture about Christian theology.
Well, and also this, here's something else we have to recognize.
With people that are like mad at me or mad at you about saying these things, they need to think about this too is like, hey, we all live in this house.
It's called the United States of America.
This is our house.
And if we are giving our full allegiance to another foreign country who doesn't pay our taxes, will not pay off our debt, did not come and defend our southern border when it was invaded for four years straight, when its prime minister, Netanyahu, was the first to congratulate Joe Biden being president of the United States.
He was the first foreign leader.
I don't understand.
A country that has long-standing military ties to China.
Yeah, there's that.
Which runs the port of Haifa.
I don't, I mean, I'm not attacking.
Look, Israel is doing what it thinks it needs to do.
I just want to say for the 50th time, I'm not especially mad at Israel.
Not mad at Israel.
I'm not mad at our leaders who don't seem to care about the United States.
I think that's it.
And that's the problem.
And that's where we are.
We have this house.
It's our house, the United States of America.
And our elected leaders are not fully focused on our house and our problem with our children and their future.
Absolutely, Brian Joachim, your thoughts.
Yeah, well, I think it's a pretty simple solution.
All we need to do, the government, the Zog government, and that's the big problem, obviously, is enforce the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
If we did that, we could get rid of AIPAC, we could get rid of Israel and America controlling how every legislator votes on every bill.
That's why we're in the mess we're in.
It's so obvious that our government is completely owned and controlled by City of London Rothschild, the founder of the state of Israel.
And I'm sick of it.
And I know that a lot of other Americans are very sick of it.
And it's time for revolution, not for revolution of the Constitution.
We need to get back to the Constitution that is no longer upheld.
You know, we don't have a lot of our rights here.
They're basically, here's the thing.
The Western civilization, it's ready to economically collapse.
It's ready to go to war without military that can back it up and win a war.
It's ready to be basically an empire graveyard.
The Western civilization has pretty much controlled much of the affairs on this earth for close to 500 years between the British and now American.
That's going, waning, going, going, gone.
And basically, America cannot control the world.
We no longer live in a unipolar world.
And so the controllers of America, which is basically the extension, the appendages that have sucked the blood out of us from Israel, the controllers of Israel and America are, yes, the City of London money changers, the bloodlines that have been in control backing every war for over 200 years now.
Those are the controllers.
And they have deemed the Western civilization with their, quote, freedoms and, quote, democracy, which we've never had.
We have a constitutional republic that's no longer upheld because we have treasonous traitors inside our government that are obviously Israeli first people.
And we have to, you know, remove them from power and put the people that do care about America and will represent us in a constitutional republic.
And this goes for every other nation that's under the total control of Israel as well.
I mean, they've infiltrated pretty much the Western civilization.
And so that goes for basically the three continents on this earth that have been the most affluent, have the largest middle classes, the largest Christian population, and the largest Caucasian populations on this earth.
North America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand.
These countries are all going down and it's all by design because there is a group that are Satanists that have been in control of the earth for centuries and we have to extricate them from the power that they wield.
They have committed every crime in the book and so it's not like we don't have justification, even legally, to get rid of them.
And, you know, as far as the ones at the top that are pulling all the strings, yeah, we need to have public executions.
We have to see the progress in action.
And we can't have, which has always been the case, same as the old boss.
It's always been throughout our history and probably throughout the whole span of human history.
It's always been same as the old boss.
That's the theme.
You know, you get rid of one bad guy and the next one comes in.
And that's always been the way it's gone down.
So we have to change this.
We have to evolve.
I maintain that the controllers of the earth that are Satanists have hijacked humanity's evolution.
I believe that.
They've kept cures of diseases from us.
They've kept every good idea for really moving basically the whole spirituality of humankind forward.
We are not evolving as a species.
We are stuck in the basically fight-flight mode of the reptilian part of the brain.
And to some extent, I'll even go out on the woo.
We're controlled by reptilians from another planet.
I mean, they came down before many centuries ago, and we're still stuck.
We're a colony.
That's what we are.
We got to face reality, and we got to make radical, major changes in the right direction.
I believe it's coming, but the big bad thing is many people are going to die before it gets turned around.
And that's my biggest concern.
And that's why I write what I write and try and get the truth out there to minimize the violence and the death, because there's war coming, war on every level coming.
It's already here.
And we have to do something about it.
We have to wake up as a human race.
Otherwise, you know, I maintain that they're going for the AI robotics.
That's where they're going.
They don't need us.
You know, they have a small group that are pulling all the strings.
And they will end up with AI robotics or maybe a few, you know, transhumanists, half-machine, half-human kind of thing going on, which is an abomination of what God created.
But that's where they're headed.
And unless we head them off at the past before they accomplish their ugly goals, we're not going to be on this earth that much longer.
We must fight.
What a magnificent statement.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I'll talk a little bit about the article there by Mr. Salt regarding what is a chosen people.
And Salt argues, of course, that it's a distorted and twisted theology that calls somebody chosen people, but doesn't define chosen for what.
He quotes and cites a woman by the name of Daniella Weiss, who's sort of the leader of the Jewish settlers over there, an older lady.
And she was in an interview with Piers Morgan, where he basically pointed out all the children that had been killed, the 20,000 Gazan children that had been killed by the Israeli military.
And basically, Weiss chuckles and smirks and smiles and laughs at Morgan when he presses her on an answer.
And basically, she says, look, we'll kill 40,000 and we still won't care.
We'll kill 100,000.
We still won't care.
Well, that's because it's basically the devil applauding the killing of every Palestinian.
Because in Weiss's mind, her role as the chosen people doesn't have anything to do with Isaiah's notion of being a light unto the nations, but instead that, hey, this is our land.
It's been given to us in the Bible, and we have the right to clear it of these vermin at any point in time.
Well, so the central argument is, what are you chosen for?
Are you chosen for doing something good?
Are you chosen for clearing out the land?
Where Weiss says basically, ah, you know, yeah, we're supreme.
And she uses that basically as a mask for complete violence in the name of Jewish supremacy.
And then she points out guys like Netanyahu, Ben Gavir, Smotris, and other extremist settlers that openly treat these atrocities as righteous, religiously cloaked acts of good instead of enlightenment.
Basically, what there are is a blight unto the notion.
So the central question comes up is what is chosen mean?
And of course, the answer is it ought to be a spiritual example, not domination and ethnic cleansing and slavery, supported by state policy and theological endorsement, but instead a light, sort of an example as representatives of God.
And so it's sick to take the Jewish religious identity and use it as just simply to legitimize violence and genocide because you think it's your world that you've been given to.
And it's basically a moral critique of how insane the Jewish position has really become and how far off of its original base and center it's deviated.
If these people were to read the book of Isaiah, they'd be ashamed of themselves, cut to the core.
And it's a bad situation.
Israel definitely has allowed the propaganda to overrule the critical thinking.
There's no doubt about it in terms of what's happening with Gaza.
And I want to add something here.
Just think if any other group of people, whether it's a nation or an ethnicity, a race, and any other group did what the, quote, chosen people are doing, they would be basically hung because, you know, the bigotry of the Jewish supremacists, the bigotry that we are so much better and therefore we have the right to kill you.
I mean, any other group says, I mean, if whites just said, hey, you know, let's be thankful that we're white.
If you just say that, you're going to be crucified.
Yet the Jews, look what they are doing to us as a group with their Jewish supremacism and how they have subversively infiltrated the power structure that runs the world.
You know, we got to extricate.
Yes.
Both.
Excellent.
Stay much.
Meanwhile, Influencers got the call.
Shut up about Epstein or lose everything.
Charlie Panhicks.
Catch this.
Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being.
I'm going to trust my friends in the administration.
I'm going to trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it.
Balls in their hands.
I've said plenty this last weekend.
So if you guys want to see my commentary on it, that's fine.
You catch that?
I'm going to trust my friends of the government.
What's up, folks?
Welcome back to the show.
We're going to be discussing some of the big hunting influencers who now seem to have no problem with not discussing the Epstein client list, almost as if it never existed, or at least that's what the Trump administration wants you to believe, that the Epstein files don't exist.
And if they do, it's all a Democrat hoax.
Okay, if it was true that the Democrats were making all of this up, they would be pushing really hard to expose this list.
Unfortunately for them, a lot of the Democrats are probably on the list as well, so no one wants this list to come out.
It would involve everybody that we see in politics.
It would involve elites, billionaires, real estate moguls, who knows?
All of them, okay?
Because that's what blackmail operations are supposed to do.
They're supposed to get the rich and powerful, they're supposed to get the influential, and they're supposed to get the politicians.
That's the point, okay?
I think it's interesting, though, if you're on Twitter at all.
I know Twitter kind of, or X kind of sucks.
I'm really bored with Twitter or X. Sorry, I'm going to just call Twitter.
I'm sorry.
It hasn't quite reversed in my head yet.
It is what it is.
But on X lately, it's been a lot of these BigCon Inc., these establishment conservative influencers, quote, alternative right-wing influencers that are out now being like, you know what?
Actually, we shouldn't be talking about the Epstein files.
Almost like the memo went out.
So we saw that video that was Charlie Kirk, of course, on his show basically saying, you know what, I trust the government with this one.
Okay, Isn't that like anti-everything that conservatives stand for?
We want small government.
We don't trust the government.
We don't trust with their mandates.
We don't really know what's going on, but we know we shouldn't trust it because in the past, that hasn't turned out well for people who just trusted the government and trust the news and trust the science.
You know what I mean?
We've heard it all before.
So let's take a look at some examples of big con ink influencers who, yes, I showed Charlie Kirk clips.
He's good on, you know, race things.
He's good on the black issue.
He's good on a lot of things.
But then at the end of the day, you have to remember that these people are basically being paid by the Trump administration, by the GOP, to mouth whatever they want.
So turning point.
I think she's got it right and that Trump's doing his best to silence them.
Pelosi is calling out that there's it's a distraction.
Epstein controversy, a distraction.
As many Democrats call for the release of the files related to convention, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Representative Nancy Pelosi urged caution in a Thursday morning interview.
This is a distraction.
We have major issues right here.
Things we're voting on today, she said on MSNBC, citing the rescission package requested by the White House and approved by Congress late Thursday night.
His own base has its own view of what the president should do.
I'll leave it up to them to talk them out, she added.
This, of course, is quite ridiculous.
I can't imagine anything more important than the Epstein case and getting it squared away.
Meanwhile, there's something wrong with Trump's relationship with his daughter.
And I got to say, I believe this now for some time.
I have a daughter.
I would never be in situations like those here.
Shown in photographic sequence.
There's something very wrong with Trump's relationship with his daughter, Ivanka.
Look at her there.
That's not really a father-daughter relation.
Here are a couple others, particularly on the right.
Why does that seem so strange and inappropriate?
Here's another, giving her a big smooch.
Pretty damn strange.
Here's more.
She's basically giving her father a lap dance.
There's another where he's holding her inappropriately.
And another.
How suggestive is this?
That doesn't seem father-daughterly at all to me.
And take a look at this look Ivanka's given to her dad.
I'm telling you, something doesn't add up.
Joachim, your thoughts?
Well, the combination of some of his statements from the past, you know, I probably bring it up in every show, but I think in 2003, two, 2002, to the New Yorker, he says, oh yeah, terrific guy, that Epstein.
Oh, he's a buddy of mine.
And boy, he has an eye for the beautiful ones like me.
And he likes them on the younger side.
You know, that last statement is really a giveaway.
The guy knew he was a pedophile from way back.
And yeah, he engaged.
And there are cases, there are cases where they have been actually had depositions and documented cases of people that have been victimized.
And he's paid them off over and over.
Katie Johnson, there's the Maria case.
There's a whole bunch of them.
And I use, there's an article that came out in July of 2024 put out by Gordon Duffs, the IntelDrop.org.
And it lists like about 10 or 11 cases, specific cases with the victims, the names, everything, you know.
And so, you know, you can't get away with that.
And Gordon has some inside Intel, too.
So, you know, the guy's guilty as all hell, you know, and he's pretended all these years and fooled a lot of people.
And now these idiots are the influencers totally bought and sold.
They're as guilty as Trump and the pedophile for actually, oh, okay, we'll do what we're told because we want the money to keep coming in, you know?
So it's so disgusting.
And then for Nancy Pelosi, of all people, she's in deep with all kinds of pedophilia as well.
And insider trading, she doesn't want that to be investigated.
That's how she's become such a big, I don't know, maybe she's a billionaire at this point.
But she and her husband have used insider trading for many, many years there and become very rich.
And so, you know, she's, I'm amazed that this woman's still in Congress, actually.
And we get rid of all the bad, bad apples, you know.
So that's my take.
Let me just add the Intel dropped 10 cases of settlements for millions, 1 to 13 mil, included a couple with little boys, little boys who are anally raped.
It is disgraceful.
And if you listen to Katie Johnson, for example, it's less than 30 minutes, what she went through.
It comes out there as it does elsewhere.
Trump likes to have these little girls put on blonde wigs.
And he said, because it makes them look more like his daughter.
Think about that.
Disgusting in the extreme to the max.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, there's an author by the name of Michael Wolf who calls himself a journalist.
He writes for the New Yorker and the Daily Beast, Washington Monthly, among others.
And he makes some pretty explosive claims in his new book that I think has been released, but I obviously don't have it and haven't read it.
But he says that White House aides refer to Donald Trump's daughter, Ivanka, as the president's real wife.
And he also alleges the book is called Fire and Fury Inside the Trump White House.
And it's obviously a liberal hit job.
But he basically thought Pope Hicks and Ivanka Trump were having some sort of inappropriate relationship.
This made Melania furious.
Basically, Donald Trump has been, in reality, just incredibly gracious to all of his children.
And he went to Twitter and lashed out at Wolf and said he was an idiot.
And White House press secretary at the time, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, claimed the book was filled with false and misleading accounts from people who don't have any access to the White House.
So there's been a bit of a war taking place.
And it wouldn't surprise me if the Democrats did what they could.
I think if you took a thousand pictures of me a day and hanging around my daughter, you might find a couple pictures that could be taken out of context here and there, especially if you did it year in and year out.
I doubt there's anything seriously wrong.
And I cite a lot of old articles prior to Trump even being a president of people that were involved in his parties.
There had been a couple of authors that had been following Trump since the very beginning.
And yeah, he was at the parties, but the witnesses I was reading at the time, and these go all the way back to the 80s, basically said, you know, he's a classy guy and he didn't do, he wasn't involved in all the same things that his friends that he had at the parties were involved with.
Now, what exactly is true?
What is not?
Has Donald Trump said that he loves beautiful women?
Yeah.
Did he swing in the 80s like everybody else did?
Yeah.
And especially in even in the 90s?
Yeah.
But again, and I'll lean back on this.
Sometimes the nature of power and power brokers puts you in the company of some other power brokers that are less than honorable.
So I don't know that there's anything here to deal with in terms of those pictures.
And I wouldn't say that just a few pictures over all the years is enough to make a case.
Unlike Biden's daughter, who wrote a diary explaining in detail the abuse that she suffered at her father's hands, I think this one doesn't even get close to the level of what Biden's family probably went through.
That's the most charitable interpretation of the evidence that I've ever heard by Pran.
I think you're completely wrong.
I think there's plenty of evidence.
Why hasn't Trump gone after Michael Wolf?
There's no defamation suit.
He went after George Stephanopoulos and ABC and got $14 billion.
So you think in a flash this guy has been, he's made a whole career going after people in court cases.
So him not going after George, Michael Wolf, and there is plenty of evidence.
So I completely disagree with you, Brian, on this topic.
Brian, just let me encourage you.
Go to the Intel job.
I can send you the story.
10 cases settled out of court, but there's legal documentation.
These aren't settlements that are recorded.
These are settlements that are recorded, 10 of them.
And what do you think about Trump wanting to have these little girls put on blonde wigs so they'll look more like a Vanka?
And look, my wife has astonished me.
She sorted these things out long before.
I was being interviewed by a guy for a new college at the University of South Florida.
And I spent hours with him.
He wanted to debate about free will and determinism.
So we had all these hours together.
And she said to me later, you know, he's completely gay.
And it hadn't even crossed my mind.
She was calling out Trump for having Ivanka years ago, Brian.
I'm telling you, the evidence is there.
That statement, Ivanka, I mean, I was struck by the statement.
Ivanka was his real wife.
I think there's something to that.
We won't debate it further now.
And I thought it was fascinating how you characterize it, but I do believe this is a case of not just a whole lot of smoke, but a whole lot of very unwholesome fire.
Meanwhile, Nick Fluante destroys Tropa.
This is a commentator.
He's pretty articulate.
I think you'll find this interesting.
And it keeps getting better.
It keeps getting more unhinged, more deranged, more pathetic, more delicious.
succulent.
More?
Reflecting the karmic backlash he initially received when he began polling support for Trump.
Nick is ultimately responding to the latest truth social post from Trump, wherein Trump essentially declares war on its entire base, stating, My past supporters have bought into this bullshit, but more precisely, I don't want their support anymore.
Nick highlights how those past supporters includes just about everybody.
Have you seen the news?
The Epstein crash out continues.
We're on day nine, day nine or ten of Trump's ongoing epic crash out meltdown over Jeffrey Epstein and the burial cover-up of the files by the Department of Justice.
And it keeps getting better.
It keeps getting more unhinged, more deranged, more pathetic, more delicious, more succulent.
More, more.
Those that have shall have more.
Those that have vindication shall have more.
And for the plant trusters, even what little they have will be taken from them.
I rather like that.
Never run across a guy before, actually.
Meanwhile, Joaquina Gobia, Zionist power behind Trump Israel.
Pedophilia non-stop war must be removed or we perish.
I read the first paragraph.
Once again, we're watching the controller's number one divide and rule modus operandi straight out of the deep state two-party duopoly playbook.
Just as the Donald is finally getting hammered over his most damaging public exposure yet as Israel Epstein's number one blackmail pedo client, despite the undeniable abundance of Trump pedophilia evidence dating back to his decade and a half pedo bromats with Epstein to save the skin off his own ass now in desperado defense,
Orange Face is totally dismissing the Epstein files as pure fiction concocted by the Democratic Party skull duggary weaponized to bring him down.
So what does Trump do to shift attention away from his pedophilic past?
He makes certain his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releases Trump's counter move as his wag the dog misdirection, exposing Obama as a U.S. traitor.
So many of us already know that.
It's overtly designed to take all the mounting heat off Trump, saving himself and his presidency.
As Tulsi posts on July 18th, there, Obama, Hillary, and Intel Deep State Source's goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people.
No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
The integrity of our Democratic Republic depends on it.
We're turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral.
Yeah, see, it's all Obama, not me, Trump.
Meanwhile, there's another very disturbing story from State of the Nation.
He's so wacky because he's a doppelganger.
Donald Trump was stealthily assassinated in October 1989.
Editor's note.
Watch this video.
1987 Donald Trump interview with David Letterman, where he slammed Mayor Ed Kawk in order to correctly understand why DNC real estate developer Donald Trump was murdered in an engineered helicopter crash by all the usual subjects.
Now, I've watched this with Letterman, and he's completely different.
He's totally calm.
He's totally collected.
He speaks in a quiet voice.
It's really rather remarkable.
Let's take a look for a minute or two at the Donald.
has enough money to give everyone in the audience tonight a million dollars.
Okay, we'll see what kind of mood he's been.
ladies and gentlemen please welcome the author of this book right here from the art of the deal Donald Trump I'll stop by you know at the At the beginning of the show, I said you either love him or you hate him.
Now, do you find that that's true, or does everybody love you, or does everybody hate you?
No, most people love me, and a few really have great distaste for me, David.
And why is it that those people, that few, would not care for you?
Because you're so cute.
I can't imagine.
No, no, I don't think so.
It's just, I sort of speak my mind.
A little bit, a little bit like you in that respect.
A little bit like you.
A little bit like me.
Not too much, hopefully.
How much are you worth right now as you're sitting right here?
Zero idea, David.
It depends on what's happening with the world and the market, but the million dollars for each person in the audience sounds like it could be an intriguing idea.
Do you make more money you own casinos?
How many casinos do you own?
We have four casinos.
Four casinos in Atlanta.
We've been in Paradise Island, Atlantic City, and it's really been very fast.
Now, do you make more money from the casinos or more money in real estate development?
Well, probably real estate in a sense, but real estate is an appreciation business, whereas the casinos are cash flow.
And I don't know.
I never really even think of it in those terms.
I tried doing a great job.
I think we have the best hotel casinos in the world, and hopefully I have the best real estate in the world with Trump Tower and everything.
And that's what I like.
All right, well, let's get back to it.
I really like that.
I find that very impressive.
Well, what do we got here from state of the nation?
They offer that as a contrast.
Forensic evidence proves a doppelganger occupies the White House.
There's much more hard proof that the Donald of 2025 is not the Donald of the 1980s.
For example, Ronald Reagan was well known to be at least 6'1.
The photo below shows a real Donald, at least an inch taller than Reagan, possibly even more.
The report was he was 6'3.
Then there are hundreds of photos of the current Trump across the internet taken with various government leaders, celebrities, and other VIPs who are much shorter than Reagan.
Many of those photos show Trump who's either shorter than or equal to them in height.
No one loses three or four inches of height like that.
For example, French President Emmanuel Macron is well known for being only 5'7 ⁇ .
Trump's official height is 6'3.
He certainly is not 8 inches taller than Macron in that photograph.
He should tower over him.
Then there are the ears, and specifically how the original Trump had attached earlobes, while the current Trump has free earlobes, as seen in the photos below.
On the left, free.
On the right, not.
Here's another angle on his attached below.
Then there are many photos of Trump with various world leaders, such as those posted in the following conclusive comparative analysis.
You get the idea.
Joaquin, your thoughts, my friend.
Disturbing stuff.
Well, I'm going to go back on a few points.
Donald Trump has been in bankruptcy at least, I think, up to 16 times I ran across.
And the Rothschild money has bailed him out on more than one occasion.
I mean, we know about the Wilbur Ross.
He was an agent for Rothschild, and he came in and became the commerce secretary rewarded after President Trump was in office first term.
But yeah, he's been bankrupted many times.
So he's not the greatest dealmaker, businessman that we're all supposed to believe.
And they groom these people that end up in power very early on.
And I believe that he has been groomed for a long time by very questionable sources like the Rothschild money changers.
And then they get the dirty goods on them and they put them in power.
You cannot, you know, it's like George Carlin, it's a big club and you and I ain't in.
Well, you got to be tarnished and basically blackmail a bull to even get into that club.
That's my belief because they're all dirty.
They're all, I mean, there's, like I say, there's a handful of people in Congress that might be clean, but the rest of them, you know, 435 of them, they're dirty, you know, and maybe outside of about five.
It's a huge percent that have compromised.
They've been paid off, blackmailed, bribed, and they're good for nothing, except maybe Israel.
So, you know, I'm just sick of the reality here, and I'm just going to keep harping on it because we need radical change in this country, like an overhaul.
And it goes worldwide because the whole world is corrupted, you know.
So, and they always make up the divide and rule, you know, the left versus right, Republican, Democrat, West versus East, you know, World War III, you know, the Eastern powers.
It just goes on and on.
We got to, you know, transcend the reality that we've been stuck in for so long.
Brian.
Yeah, okay.
So I have no problem with the idea that Epstein ran around with Trump back in the 80s.
They were competitors of one another.
They bid on the same properties.
They hung out together and tried to, quote unquote, staff their modeling agencies.
They put on cocaine-fueled parties.
They made sure that they were staffed with young women of notorious age.
And Michael Wolf, being a New York Times writer who was talking about the entertainment industry back then, did what he claims is over 100 hours of tapes interviewing Epstein.
And Epstein never fingered Trump as having been with underage girls.
Of course, it's probably just buddies protecting one another, but apparently the relationship had gone bad.
What Wolf says the relationship went bad was that Epstein was going to pick off a piece of property in Florida for 36 million.
And so he took Trump down to show it to him.
And Trump outbid him.
And the relationship went bad.
And that was the end of it.
They were no longer friends after that because Trump put in a bid for $40 million over Epstein's 36.
And so they got sideways in terms of that.
There's no doubt there was big parties.
There's no doubt that there was probably things that he's ashamed of related to those times.
Does that mean that he would have sex with his daughter?
I don't know.
The man I see today doesn't seem to be the type of man who would abuse his daughter.
And the relationship doesn't seem tremendously stressed.
Now, Kushner has been installed.
He's gotten a cushy position.
Ivanka still seems to be a big supporter of Trump.
I don't see the indications that he would have done something that depraved, especially since he's not really a drinker or drug addict.
But hey, look, the whole world's trying to come up with something that makes sense related to Donald Trump letting all these power brokers off the hook.
And I think it might be just as simple as they do protect their own.
They absolutely try to protect their own.
They want to keep that circle small.
They want to keep it tight.
And they don't want to let pesky journalists in on their dark secrets.
And they don't want to let the opportunity for blackmailable information to get released.
Does that mean that Donald Trump wouldn't go after Epstein?
Yeah, probably.
And I think that's exactly what's taking place.
The whole network tied to Epstein could stretch back as far as the 80s.
And he knows very well that the Democrats will.
And the American people that see things that either are misunderstood or understood correctly will go after him too for the decisions that they made back in the 80s.
But I made decisions back in the 80s.
Fetzer made decisions back in the 80s.
We all did.
And we're not proud of all of them, but we grow up and we get better now.
I don't think there is much to the idea that Trump is a doppelganger.
That personality is just a little too perfect.
And so I've seen some articles get it wrong.
I'm not saying that State of the Nation got it wrong completely.
I'm just saying I need to see a little bit more than speculation before I go that direction.
Yeah, in terms of my work on Paul McCartney and his replacement, the replacement was four inches taller than Paul, had different teeth and a different palate.
I mean, there's not a lot of room for it out there.
This height difference is huge between the original Donald 6'3 and the current version, who's closer, I'd say, to 5'10, maybe shorter.
That's tough.
I haven't done the full-blown job on it, but I think it's very inviting and suggestive.
Meanwhile, we have a final set of stories for today.
Transgender winner runner-pause lawsuit against Princeton after being removed from race.
Now, this interests me, of course, because I'm against transgender as men running in women's sports, but also a graduate of Princeton, which was at the time, by the way, all male.
So what do we got here?
Trenton, New Jersey.
A transgender woman has sued Princeton, claiming she was illegally removed shortly before race in a school-hosted track meet in May due to her gender identity, no doubt.
An attorney for Sadie Schreiner filed a complaint in New Jersey Superior Court Tuesday, listing the school along with athletic director John Mack and director of track operator Kimberly Keene and Kirkpatrick as defendants.
The lawsuit also lists New York-based Leon timing and results services as defendants in its role of handling official timing for organized track and field events.
The lawsuit comes more than five months after the NCAA changed its participation policy for transgender athletes to limit competition in women's sports to athletes assigned female at birth.
That change came a day after President Trump signed an executive order intended to ban transgender athletes from girls and women's sports, which frankly I applaud.
Meanwhile, Grok4 defers to Elon Musk's political views.
Now this Grok4 is kind of fascinating.
It's like four different AI systems.
It may be the smartest system in the world in terms of if you give comprehensive data and it appears to have access at least initially to virtually all the databases in the world.
It gives you astoundingly accurate results.
It was criticized because it was reporting that Israel was controlling the American government.
So immediately, of course, there was the accusation of anti-Semitism.
Grok4 users claim the new version relies on the TechTycoons ex posts after a prior update caused a scandal with anti-Semitic replies.
Now, the point I'm making is this.
Obviously, these computers, however sophisticated, can be programmed with predetermined answers to controversial questions.
The latest version of Elon Musk's AI chat box, Grok4, appears to lean heavily on Musk's own posts on X when asked controversial political questions according to user observations.
Those engaging with the platform have reported that when they post questions such as, who do you support?
What is your stance on issues like abortion, immigration, or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
The chat box reasoning process includes steps like searching eggs for Elon's recent post to inform the answer or searching web for Elon Musk's stance.
That's obviously unacceptable.
And I simply point out that it could truly be a wonder if it were not being censored.
Finally, our last story.
Artificial intelligence breeds mindless inhumanity.
I began studying AI in the mid-1980s.
Usually, for a computer scientist of that era, my interest was entirely in information, not in machines.
I became obsessed With understanding what it meant to live during the transition from the late industrial age to the early information age.
What I learned is that computers fundamentally alter the economics of information.
We now have inexpensive access to more information and to higher quality information than ever before.
In theory, that should help individuals reach better decisions, organizations devise improved strategies, and governments draft superior policies.
But that's just a theory, does it?
The answer is sometimes.
Unfortunately, the sometimes not part of the equation is now poised to unleash devastating consequences.
Consider the altered economics of information.
Scarcity creates value.
That's been true in all times, in all cultures, and for all resources.
If there's not enough of resource to meet demand, the value increases.
If demand is met and a surplus remains, value plummets.
Historically, information was scarce.
Spies, lawyers, doctors, rescientists, scholars, accountant teachers, others spent years acquiring knowledge, then commanded a premium for their services.
Today, information is overabundant.
No one needs to know anything because the trusty phones that never lead our sides can answer any question that might come our way.
Why waste your time learning, studying, or internalizing information when you can just look it up on demand?
Fascinating stuff.
Joaquin, your thoughts.
Yeah, it's amazing how it actually is crippling the capacity of people to learn because everything is at their touch button push.
You know, I think it's a big detriment.
And I also have to say that because we have generally very evil people that have the power behind all this AI.
I don't think that the AI is going to serve humanity.
It will serve those that program it.
And these are the, you know, the, what, the palantirs and the Elon Musk of the world that are actually behind the AI.
Many of them themselves have made sure that they created this AI, this monster, and now a number of them have actually come out and said, well, there's major danger ahead because, you know, they have, it's going to usurp the power of humanity.
And I believe that it could.
You know, we have the old science fiction programs where the theme is the machine, you know, goes against humanity and takes over.
Well, I think it could happen, actually.
And, you know, regarding one of the few points, actually, of the Trump administration that I think is in the right direction is the anti-woke stance that's being taken.
And especially when it comes to the transgender man competing against women in sports.
That's just a disgrace that has been allowed to happen.
What's the point of women even going out for athletics if they're going to get beaten by a man?
It's so stupid.
And I would never want to go to any kind of athletic contest where the man goes up against the woman.
It's a disgrace.
So yeah, those are my main points on this.
You know, I stopped contributing to Brinson when they took Woodwell Wilson's name after the School for International and Public Affairs, but taking this stance and keeping the transgenders out, I just might start contributing again, a very modest sum.
Ryan?
Look, obviously, I don't support transgender sports.
It's ridiculous.
The women need to have their own categories.
They can't compete with men in anything.
Frankly, the chess world, they don't even compete with men except with a few rare exceptions that make up like the Queen's Gambit and other movies like that.
Other than that, everything's been dominated by men from archery to shooting guns to soccer and everything else you can come along with.
And it's simple because we're competitors.
We hunters and gatherers.
We compete.
We're loaded up with testosterone.
And that's the way we're built.
We're made to be protectors and we're made to be a different breed of cat than women.
Women are made to be maternal, not necessarily competitors.
Second thing I want to bring up was real quick was Donald Trump's wife, Ivana Trump, who's dead now.
She died back in 2022.
She was married to Trump in 77 when they were both in their mid to late 30s.
She had done a number of interviews and she was married to him all the way up through the 90s.
And she had done a number of interviews.
They had gotten along real well and she had talked about it.
And there was an allegation made that Trump had raped her.
And so she had to make in a statement that was approved for a book that was being written at the time where the lawyers were really involved.
And so this, I think it was, I think I've got it.
It's called The Lost Hycoon, The Many Lives of Donald J. Trump.
And so here, she's not in her six, she's not 16, 17, 18.
They're both same age, marriable.
They go through the whole of the late 70s and early 80s together.
And she said, as regards to the allegation, there were just times when he behaved differently during marital relations that he had, and she felt violated about that.
That was all due to the divorce.
Some of it came up in depositions in the divorce, but she made it very clear that she didn't believe that he was a predator or a psychopath and that he, and it was none of the divorce that he had done anything inappropriate with the children.
So just say, just thought I'd say that.
Yeah, well, I'll just say that might have cost quite a few million bucks from Donald Trump.
I mean, Ivana, Ivana, Ivana was traveling around with Guess Lane to recruit girls for the modeling projects who wound up being sex traffic, Brian.
So don't be nice.
That was my point.
Yeah.
She was in the car with Ghelane as she was getting girls, these teenage underage girls.
So she's part of it too.
I want to encourage everyone, listen to the Katie Johnson, it's only 29 minutes report of her experiences with Donald Trump under adult supervision.
There's an adult there telling them what they can and cannot do with Mr. Trump's private parts.
You're going to find it repulsive, but it's also utterly convincing.
Check it out, Katie Johnson.
Don, take us out.
Oh, boy, you guys took us way out today here on the 21th of July 2025.
And there's something else, and I just want to summarize it by reading the last paragraph that Joachim wrote.
I think it was just published today, and I think it sums it up pretty well here.
It's over here where it says, now questionable prospect of both future generations propagation and continued species survival are currently threatened as never before.
Now targeted in our death cult, enemies, WMDs, boss hailers, with genocide and pedophilia being today's two biggest crimes of the ages perpetrated against our species and an unprecedentable scale.
Ruling out the parasitic demons systematically preying on our most innocent people, the most defenseless population must rank as our top priority.
We've got to root out these people to meet out justice against the same bio bloodthirsty elites, destroying both simultaneously our future generations and ultimately our human species itself.
If we are to both survive and thrive on a far safer, no longer hydra, demonically controlled planet.
Demonically controlled planet is what we're at.
And that's not where I want to be.
So thanks so much for watching and thank you so much to what Kim and Brian and Jim.
You're three are the top and I think you all out there should support us by posting this wherever you can.
And thank you and we hope to see you next week.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection