Jim Fetzer - Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (21 July 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Joachim Hagopian

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 22, 2025 - Jim Fetzer

01:02:25

Truth vs. NEW$, Inc Part 1 (21 July 2025) with Don Grahn, Brian Davidson and Joachim Hagopian

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	321.
	And welcome, folks, to Truth vs.
	News Incorporated.
	Truth, real truth, heavy, hard truth, the harshest, the most reality show we can get is right here on Truth vs.
	News.
	And this is July, the 21st of the month, 21st of July, hot to the moon in the summer, and the hot news.
	And we have the best people to share the news with.
	Of course, we have Jim Fletcher, who's got all kinds of good books, including America Died, America 9-11, and Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, and other books about not going to the moon and other things.
	These books, I have a neighbor who's gone into these books.
	He's got his fourth book right now.
	He said, they're real page tours.
	You've got to have them.
	And he gives Jim Petcher the highest praise of anything.
	He said, this is the best splitting he's done in years.
	That's just tremendous.
	We also have Ryan Davidson with us in Texas, the private investigator, Parr XLOS, who gets to the bottom of things.
	And then we're going to be joined by Joaquima Gokian, who is just an outstanding author.
	And we're going to start off the day with a story about the Trumpgate and talking about it.
	But Joachim just put forth a paper today saying that the Epstein and Trumpgate scandal is far more egregious and pressing than whatever Tulsi Bomagate ever has to offer.
	And it's a heavy, heavy hit.
	So the news is getting really severe.
	So let's get on with it, young man.
	You all out there passing your lap straps and get a chiff drink.
	You got it, Don.
	And we're going to miss Joaquin because so many of these stories deal with pedophilia, where he's an expert on pedophilia and politics.
	Deep state crumbles as DNA tells the Gabbard reveals ironclad evidence of Democrat elites orchestrating coup against Trump, subverting the will of the American people.
	This is coming from...
	...
	Wrong story there.
	Oddly.
	Here's the one.
	Indeed, this will do just fine.
	Breaking exclusive.
	DOJ sources.
	Tell Alex Jones indictments of Obama deep state coup blotters are coming.
	We can't wait.
	And frankly, it's happening because Donald Trump is in such dire straits, he wants to change the subject.
	Now, here's Daniel Davidson giving us a nice globe.
	Never buy magnesium for just a little bit longer.
	Tulsi Gabbard said that there was a treasonous conspiracy has been launched that she uncovered.
	In the months leading up to the 2016 election, the intelligence community assessed, and this is what the documents detail, the intelligence community assessed essentially Russia doesn't have the tools, the capability, or the intent to try to change the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.
	Donald Trump pulls off a historic victory against Hillary Clinton in November of 2016.
	Even in the days after that election, the intelligence community continued their consistent assessment that reflected the same thing in the months leading up to the election.
	All of a sudden, in the early days of December, there was a president's daily brief that was drafted.
	This is put together by the different elements of the intelligence community that reflected that same assessment.
	Russia did not try to hack the election, in essence.
	That PDB, that document, was polled hours before it was supposed to be published for the president to see that following morning.
	That document was never published until we released it yesterday.
	One day later, President Obama calls a meeting of his National Security Council, his top officials, to be held on what they called a sensitive topic.
	And the results of that meeting, which we released yesterday and these over 100 documents that talk about in detail how President Obama and his team, he directed a manufactured piece of intelligence that detailed not if, but how Russia tried to influence the outcome of the United States election that President Trump won in November of 2016.
	This document was then used as the foundation for everything that came next.
	What these documents detail, to me, in my view, cannot be explained as anything but a treasonous conspiracy.
	This is not so different from what we saw under George W. Bush when we saw that manufactured intelligence claiming there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that kicked off a war that changed our country, that changed the lives of so many people like myself who went and served in those wars.
	The implications of manufactured intelligence are real.
	Okay, that's a very, very serious charge.
	Manufactured intelligence.
	And the gist of what she's talking about here, and we'll detail this in just a minute, where she's saying that in 2016, the Obama administration, before President Trump assumed office on January 20th of 2017, that they had intelligence that Russia had been trying to manipulate the American election, but she's going to claim that they failed.
	And then that the Obama team said, you know what, let's change this.
	One of the big arguments that she's making here is that there is this, not creeping coup, how did she fled?
	A years-long coup.
	That's why she says a treasonous conspiracy because she's arguing that Obama and a number of other people, very high-ranking in the Obama organization, said that they were actually trying to unseat President Trump.
	And so she says that there needs to be accountability.
	These actions that were taken demand accountability.
	The American people not only deserve the truth and accountability, When we look at the future of our country as a democratic republic and the American people's ability to have faith that when they go and cast a vote at the ballot box, that the will of the people will be respected by those in government, whether they be Democrats or Republicans.
	This is literally what is at stake here.
	So we are referring all of our documents to the Department of Justice for the purpose of accountability and action.
	That is truly a bombshell.
	If the Trump administration, if she refers this to the DOJ and they bring charges, and you're talking about, and I think it was actually named in some of her documents, is Obama himself, James Clapper.
	I think he was the DNI at the time, the head of the CIA.
	I mean, some very, very high-ranking people are named in her documents, which you can find online.
	They're all out there.
	She released like more than 100, I think, last night.
	But I want to show you the gist of what she's arguing here.
	This is according to a press release issued by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
	And the key things that she says here is in the month leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia is, quote, probably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means.
	Now, I'm going to highlight a few words here because those are going to be really key to what is actually going on here.
	So more on that as we go.
	Next, on December 7th, 2016, after the election, talking points were prepared for the DNI James Clapper stating, quote, foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential outcome, end quote.
	After December 9th meeting, DNI Clapper's executive assistant sent an email to IC, that's intelligence community, that's what they call it, the IC leaders, tasking them with creating a new IC assessment, quote, per the president's request, she says.
	That details the, quote, tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election, end quote.
	It went on to say that, quote, ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.
	Obama officials leaked false statements, she claims, to media outlets, including the Washington Post, claiming that, quote, Russia has attempted, let's say, claiming that Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, and I should have highlighted that word there, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.
	Now, that's all very telling, but bear in mind what I believe to be the case.
	Trump is scrambling to attack Obama in a panic bid to end the Epstein fallout.
	It isn't going to work, but that's what he's trying to do.
	Donald Trump has become so desperate in trying to change the subject from Jeffrey Epstein that he's now started ranting about imprisoning former President Barack Obama.
	He wants something that's going to override the Epstein issue.
	During a posting spree on Truth Social Sunday night, Trump posted a series of lame memes attacking Obama after DNI Gabbard suggested last week the former president should be prosecuted for participating in a treasonous conspiracy.
	Gabbard released a declassified report alleging members of the Obama admin had manufactured and politicized Intel to create the narrative that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election.
	It's worth noting that shortly after the 2016 election, the Obama admin insisted that hackers had not affected vote tallies.
	Well, let's see what we got here.
	Brian, your thoughts about these opening stories.
	Well, in regard to Tulsi Gabbard, I would say I think that this is the tip of the iceberg in terms of what she's capable of releasing.
	It feels to me like it's a bit of a litmus test to see if the Department of Justice will do anything with it.
	She's got documents, 100 pages of them, that seem to be a smoking gun naming Comey and Brennan and others and basically an attempted coup of Trump's first term.
	And the question is, will the Department of Justice pick up and run with it?
	It appears to me that the network is stable, that the network has no fear.
	And when I say the network, I'm talking about the network of criminals that control the bureaucracies that make up our institutions here in the United States.
	The network includes Epstein and his buddies.
	What do you think intelligence is?
	Intelligence is information about transactions that are taking place or are going to take place.
	And of course, those transactions are shared with friends of the state.
	And anybody who's a part of that game gets a chip at the game and gets protection from the chip in the game.
	We still have yet to see a perpetrator walk.
	We still have yet to see a serious charging instrument on anybody.
	And by the way, charging instruments are simple.
	Here's Tulsi.
	She's got all this information and she can't say on this day, at this time, this person did this, which is a violation of this law.
	I mean, last time I was on the federal law website, there was like 7,000 laws and you can't pick one that they have all the elements for.
	You can't pick a single one and make up a charging instrument.
	Then refer it to the prosecutor.
	That's how it works.
	Okay, so what are you doing?
	I mean, you're just going to release some documents to the public to give lip service like, oh, this is going to gloss over or frost over the Epstein issue?
	You're the director of national intelligence.
	You want to pull up a charge.
	I can write a charging instrument.
	I'm a private investigator.
	It Doesn't mean the prosecutor's got to accept it, but at least I can write a charging instrument and put together the evidence.
	I can do that.
	The FBI can do that.
	Anybody can do that.
	But they're not willing to go that far because the network is protected from on high by the Prince of Darkness himself.
	And it seems like the Prince of Darkness has made himself a deal with Donald Trump and with the Department of Justice and with the entire network, telling them they have nothing to fear from the American people.
	The network is more powerful than the will of the American people.
	The network is more powerful than MAGA.
	The network is more powerful than our democracy.
	That's just the way it is.
	Folks, get used to it.
	They've been telling us lies since JFK, all the wars, Iraq, Syria, 9-11.
	Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.
	No accountability.
	Turn off Fox News.
	Go enjoy yourself.
	Play around to golf.
	Do whatever, because we'll never see them prosecute a crime.
	Never.
	Excellent.
	Excellent.
	Points.
	Just simply excellent.
	Meanwhile, we have Joaquina Gopian.
	Epstein Trumpgate scandal is far more egregious and pressing than Tulsi Gabbard's ObamaGate.
	This is a brand new piece just published today.
	Here's how it begins.
	In late 2016, President Barack Obama led a conspiracy to falsely frame both Russia and then President-elect Donald Trump, charging a fake RussiaGate collusion, resulting in the year-long Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's investigation costing U.S. taxpayer nearly 40 mil and ultimately determined it to be a hoax.
	On Friday, July 18, President Trump's Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, released over 100 declassified documents promising more to come that have now turned the tables with the Democrats' RussiaGate hoax, the now GOP, and Trump's ObamaGate scandal.
	Right after DNI Gabbard released the docs, she appeared on Fox with Sean Hannity reporting the following.
	This is such an important issue.
	And I just want to start by saying that this is an issue that is important to every single one of us as Americans.
	This is not a partisan issue.
	It has to do with the integrity and the strength of our Democratic Republic.
	And it lays out over 100 documents that I declassified and released, spells out in great detail exactly what happens when you have some of the most powerful people in our country directly leading at the helm.
	President Obama and his senior most national security cabinet, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, Susan Rice, and others, essentially making a very intentional decision to create this manufactured political piece of intelligence with the objective of subverting the will of the American people, who in November 2016 delivered an historic victory to President Trump defeating Hillary Clinton.
	And President Obama and his team, their goal was to essentially not accept the decision of the American people and use this manufactured, politicized intelligence as a mean to enact what would become essentially a year-long coup against President Trump.
	Now, I agree that that was all the case.
	Meanwhile, we have Tom Dylan talking about the Keystone cops who are running the Department of Justice.
	No more nonsense.
	You can't bring in just TV people.
	You got to bring in good TV people.
	These people are like people who failed at having podcasts.
	They would have been mean if they had talent.
	They're running the FBI because they're shot.
	These are people that were like hyping up Q-drops on 4chan and leading retards in every direction, thinking that Hillary was going to gimme.
	And now they're running the FBI.
	And whether they're in on it or the deep state is clothelining them, they got to get the out of there and start a podcast.
	Half of that administration needs to start a podcast.
	Pambondi, I will email you the mics to buy.
	You're out.
	It's time to go.
	It's time to go.
	you you you Now, here's Tim Dylan, who's coming to town soon.
	He's going to be in the studio in a couple of days.
	Look forward to that.
	Probably my favorite comedian.
	Here he is pointing out that Bondi and Patel are over their heads.
	I'm not blaming them for Trump being pissed off learning that they put poison pills in the Epstein files they held onto and then turned over when they got raided by the Democrats.
	But it is true that they are in over their heads.
	And it is true that I don't think, I mean, I've watched Patel a lot.
	He's really smart.
	So is Mongino at certain levels, but they have not been totally immersed in this like I have.
	Mongino's a New York cop in the Secret Service.
	And then Patel is a lawyer and then in some counterterrorism stuff.
	I mean, they're not.
	What they became is like podcasters that lobbied to get an administration job.
	And Ed Martin should be the Attorney General.
	Ken Paxton, you know, they only tried to put him in jail nine times, the Democrats.
	He's the one that really has sued the feds and done more, sued the globalists to stop carbon taxes, you name it.
	I mean, Ken Paxton is, the Texas Attorney General is got elephant testicles.
	Now, maybe he's not super charismatic, but as it works in the universe, sometimes the most uncharismatic people are the most deadly when it comes to action.
	I mean, you want a knife to destroy the globalists.
	Ken Paxton, baby, he's proven he will attack.
	A lot of good stuff there.
	Meanwhile, Trump Tucker, scary Epstein, Copernicus.
	You're saying that Pam Bondi said on camera we have a client list.
	On the White House lawn.
	I've seen the client list.
	Yes.
	And then yesterday she's saying there's no client list.
	There's no client list.
	And there was no systematic blackmail.
	That actually might be the most preposterous line in the document.
	The whole thing that this tape shows he didn't kill himself is like a joke.
	But worse than that, it's a joke that we all get.
	Like, they're not fooling anybody.
	So I feel like we're at a dangerous point now.
	Yeah, I agree because the lie is more indicative.
	The lie at this point is not even part of trying to convince anyone of this is true.
	The lie is a signal to everybody else involved in the scheme that to the ultimate ends, the United States government will go to protect all of you.
	And that's the question for what's that smart purpose.
	Can you say that again?
	Okay.
	I'm sorry.
	It's a signal.
	The lie is not for you and me.
	The lie is for those implicated to say, no matter what, we will protect you.
	And then we have to start asking the question, why?
	You're saying that Pam Bon Yeah, the lie is a signal that we will protect you.
	I think he's got it exactly right.
	Brian, your thoughts.
	I'm going to go back to the basics of law enforcement here for all of you.
	Pan Bongino, ex-FBI, ex-Secret Service, he knows the basics of law enforcement.
	Cash Patel, a lawyer, knows the basics of law enforcement.
	Pam Bondi understands the basics of law enforcement.
	A crime has an element.
	On a certain day, at a certain time, a certain person did this in this jurisdiction, which is a violation of this statute.
	Those are the elements.
	You could literally take these documents that they have, stick them into an artificial intelligence engine and say, cross-reference that with all the criminal laws in the Department of Justice and pump out 700 sample charging instruments.
	And let's take a look at it.
	And, you know, let's pick the strongest ones and let's pile them up.
	You could literally have artificial intelligence do that job if you had a will to do it.
	It takes a witness.
	It takes evidence.
	A complaining witness would be a victim.
	It takes something inside the file.
	Who's going to be doing the prosecution?
	Is it the state?
	Anybody can do it.
	I could literally sue these people for violating the law and act as what's called a relator to sue them for violating this if the prosecutor does not take the file.
	So these guys know this.
	Why won't they go there?
	They won't go to a charging instrument.
	Oh, let's let's Tulsi Gabbard's going to go release.
	Oh, we're doing all this.
	Oh, we're investigating.
	Oh, we're investigating.
	We're putting our toes in the water to see what the temperature is.
	It's foolishness.
	They have no will to prosecute these crimes.
	Without the will to prosecute the crimes, they're worthless puppets.
	And folks, I've been telling you this for a long time.
	They are worthless puppets.
	A real crime fighter is going to draw up the charging instrument, present it to the prosecutor, to put in front of a grand jury for an indictment.
	Then there's going to be an arrest warrant put out.
	People are going to be handcuffed, brought off to jail, where they get an arraignment hearing.
	This is a simple justice system.
	It's not tremendously complex.
	This is how it works for the basic day-to-day people.
	Oh, but it doesn't work like this for anybody inside the beltway.
	Give me a break, folks.
	This is a non-functioning republic that we have.
	And this is non-functioning because our institutions have sold their very purpose.
	They've sold it to the network of criminals that they're vowed to protect.
	I'll tell you what, they didn't take an oath to protect the people of the United States of America.
	They took an oath to protect the network.
	And screw us.
	That's what's going on.
	We have to deal with real justice when we get pulled over for a traffic ticket.
	These people don't have to deal with real justice even if they murder a 14-year-old girl on Epstein Island.
	They don't have to mess with it because they're part of the network.
	This is what we ought to be livid about as Americans.
	Livid.
	I agree, and that's why Joaquin is emphasizing that the Epstein case is overwhelmingly more important than the ObamaGate issue, even though I agree they should be held to account.
	Meanwhile, we have Moscow defeating a massive drone attack.
	Absolutely fascinating, would you believe?
	After defeating the Ukrainian drone attack, the Russians launched an attack of their own.
	Get this.
	NATO scrambles fighter jets amid massive Russian attack.
	For the second time in a week, NATO member Poland has scrambled its aircraft in response to a widespread Russian attack on Ukraine.
	The Polish Ministry of Defense announced the operational overnight on Friday, which coincided with drones and missile strikes Russia launched against Ukraine.
	On Saturday, the Polish ministry told Newsweek that Polish airspace was no Polish airspace was violated, and that Swedish aircraft were also involved.
	NATO has been among NATO's Poland has been among NATO's Eastern Blank members who have warned about the security risk posed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
	The second deployment of Polish aircraft within a matter of days shows Warsaw's concern about the risk of Russian drone and missile strikes on Ukraine spilling over into alliance territory.
	And we have more seriously yet, Medive advising Putin to start World War III before Trump's 50-day ultimatum.
	Russia's former president tells Putin to strike the U.S. now while he still can.
	Now, this is a website where he can be asked questions and answers.
	So here was the question.
	After reading you for more than 10 years, I understand that you are the best at geopolitics because you honestly know history.
	Mendive has called on Putin to consider preemptive strikes against the U.S. and its allies in response to Donald Trump's theatrical 50-day deadline.
	What would your advice be to Putin, since no leader can do what Trump has demanded and remain in power?
	His response.
	I would give the West 31 days to one, remove Zelensky and hold an election in Ukraine, and two, honor the Minsk Agreement as a West guaranteed, and let the Donbass vote on separation as took place in Czechoslovakia and the breakup of Yugoslavia.
	If that is not carried out, the Ukrainian people have two weeks to vacate Kiev and it will be nuped.
	NATO will claim that they will target Moscow and I would then lock in every capital of Europe if Trump intervenes.
	I would target Washington, New York City, Chicago, and L.A. without dropping leaflets.
	Maybe then the people get off their ass and remove the leaders of Europe and the American neocons should be hauled out and imprisoned for usurpation of power.
	And that would be using the West tactics of regime change in reverse.
	Brian, your thoughts?
	Well, I just wish I could correct the headline to correction from Ukraine attacks Moscow to the United States attacks Moscow using its proxy Ukraine, because that's exactly what's taking place.
	I thought Trump gave them 50 days to figure out what they were going to do and how they're going to do it.
	And then all of a sudden the deep state runs their puppet government in Ukraine to drive a bunch of drones into Moscow.
	What is the situation completely under control or not?
	Putin's doing what he can, but he's in a tough spot.
	The Russian people are getting fed up with all of this, and he keeps demanding more negotiations and more diplomacy.
	And the Russian people have just about had it with all of this.
	I don't know how much farther they're going to be able to go with Putin at the helm if he doesn't end this thing and write fast using some heavier artillery than he's currently using.
	Now, diplomacy is very difficult with Donald Trump appearing not to be the leader that he's signed up to be.
	And it seems that Lindsey Graham is still in charge of the war machine in D.C. So, Mr. Trump, what are you going to do?
	Are you going to take the bull by the horns here and go and end this thing?
	Or are you going to let it turn into World War III?
	I don't know.
	And I got to tell you, I really think that this is a failure in leadership, that Trump isn't taking this thing more seriously.
	And he's Decided to let the war machine do what they've been set out to do from the very beginning, which is prop up Ukraine.
	Look, they're still talking about Ukraine joining the EU and Ukraine joining NATO.
	I can't believe that's not off the table yet.
	The Europeans are still doing everything they can to equip Ukrainians to fight this war against Russia.
	I mean, it's like somebody just won't give up, even in the face of overwhelming military force.
	200,000 of Ukraine's young men are either dead or have left the country for good, and they're not defected.
	So what's left?
	And oh, we're going to send them a bunch of military arms, but they're not going to have anybody to deploy it?
	Please.
	Who's paying for the mercenaries to run all these arms up into Russia and to continue with these attacks?
	This is something that we need to get to the bottom of.
	I'd suggest watching Aleister Crook on the July 14th version of Judge Napolitano, judging freedom.
	He has a very well-educated viewpoint on all of this, and that's a half hour that you really should focus on if you really want to understand how this thing is developing and where it's going.
	Excellent.
	Excellent.
	Meanwhile, Russia will target multinational forces in Ukraine.
	Check this out.
	The Russian Foreign Ministry said any troops from third countries employed in Ukraine will become targets.
	European nations have discussed plans to send their soldiers to Ukraine if a ceasefire with Russia were reached.
	Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Maria Zakharova explained that any country that joins a coalition of the willing and deploys troops to Ukraine will become targets.
	We have repeatedly stated that a deployment of armed forces of other countries in Ukraine under any pretense would be absolutely unacceptable, she said.
	We regard this as preparation for foreign military intervention.
	We will consider these as so-called multinational forces as legitimate military targets.
	Several European countries have said they'd be willing to join a coalition of the willing to deploy soldiers to Ukraine after a ceasefire with Russia were reached.
	Earlier this month, UK Defense Minister John Habley said, the prime minister has always been clear that he's ready to put troops into Ukraine to help reinforce a ceasefire.
	The Coalition of the Willing is an infamous phrase used by George W. Bush to try to sell the Iraq war.
	And I don't think it's going to be any more successful in relation to Ukraine.
	Meanwhile, Colonel Wilkerson.
	Control and domination.
	That's the goal of all power systems.
	I don't know if this is really new news, but the Houthis seem indomitable.
	They won't give up.
	Larry, where does it come from, in your opinion, when it comes to Yemenis?
	And the case of, because when it comes to the military power, they're not that much dominant, but the way that they're behaving is somehow, it's so difficult to deal with them.
	Well, as Chaos Freeman, probably, Ambassador Freeman would say, we've been watching them for a long time.
	And I've been watching them in particular for a long time because we actually conducted one of our fast rope down exercises, the one that I know was successful, the only one I know that was successful on a ship bound for Sana'a.
	And we intercepted 500 or 5,000, I forget what it was, but it was a large number of M16s, U.S. M16s, modified, but basic M16s.
	And we were trying to find out to whom they were going and what we should do with them because we had not, for the first time, and the reason we were successful, notified the flagging country of the ship before we fast roped down on the ship.
	And we found out that they were on consignment to the military of Yemen and that we had put them on consignment to the military.
	The brouwah, I mean, state and defense was quite ripe for a few days.
	But all to say that these were not going to the military because when we tabbed it up at state, that would have been about 12 rifles for every soldier in the Yemeni military at that time.
	And so we knew where they were going.
	They were selling for about 750, 800 US dollars on the black market in Yemen.
	That's Yemen.
	But the thing that impressed me the most over all this time that I've been monitoring it is how resilient these people are.
	They keep coming back.
	They keep coming back no matter what their own government does to them, no matter what the other sects do to them who don't like their particular form of religion.
	They keep coming back and they keep more or less irritating and even winning some of the struggles they have, both internally and externally, like this one.
	And I've been stunned at their ability to differentiate between commercial ships in the Red Sea that are headed for Israel or were headed for Israel and others, because those are the ones they concentrated on.
	And they did some remarkable damage to those ships.
	And so that's one of the reasons why the Port of Elot, as the master said, it's been bankrupt for about a year, maybe a little longer than that.
	And the military facilities that Israel has just above it, both an airfield and training grounds, only place really in that portion of the Israel domain, if you will, that they have this sort of thing, is shut down too, because they can't get supply because the supplies were coming through the port.
	So it's a real sore point with Israel right now, I'm sure, because its economic impact is quite significant.
	Every Yemeni man has a rifle.
	And a knife.
	But they're very decent people.
	I remember a story told to me by the Chinese military attaché in Riyadh, and he had been the attaché in Sana'a.
	This is a long time ago.
	He drove a jeep out of the capital up in the mountains, and he was stopped by a bunch of Yemenis who demanded to get out of the car and turn it over to them.
	And he said, well, how do I get back to Sana'a?
	And they said, we'll call a taxi for you.
	And he said, but I don't have any money.
	And they said, well, here's some money for the taxi driver.
	And they drove off in his Jeep.
	So there's a long history of banditry, but also courtesy from the bandits.
	And they're pretty tough people.
	Neiman, I was training foreign service members as well as U.S. service members in 1979 at Fort Benning, Georgia, officers.
	And we had two Yemeni there, one sergeant and one, what would have been the equivalent of a private.
	And we had a major who was our liaison officer at Building 4 for the Yemeni participation.
	And he was a Yemeni major.
	And one day, one of the guys came into my office, Yemeni, and he says to me and my first sergeant, he says, I want out of here.
	I said, why do you want out of here?
	He says, I want to go back to my sheep.
	Now, he's saying this with a heavy accent, and Top and I are looking at each other like, what's going on here?
	He said, I want to go back to my sheep.
	Well, what do you mean you want to go back to your sheep?
	You're in the military.
	No, no, I was just pressed into the military.
	I was just made to become the military.
	I've always thought of that because this guy was pretty resilient.
	I mean, he's a pretty tough guy.
	He probably went back and joined the other side.
	He was no longer comfortable being with the government.
	Now, I did tell him, and my first sergeant echoed this with him, when you get back over to building four of that major, he's going to beat the hell out of you.
	He's going to just excoriate you right in front of everybody and God, which we knew happened.
	He said, I don't care.
	I don't care.
	I'm going back to my sheep.
	Well, he may have gone back to his sheep, but the Houthis are doing a lot of damage.
	Meanwhile, Hal Turner, madness.
	U.S. military commander reveals NATO plan to conquer Russia's Kaliningrad.
	The commander of U.S. Army, Europe, and Africa, General Christopher Donahue, said recently that NATO has developed a plan to capture Russia's heavily fortified enclave at Kaliningrad in a timeframe that's unheard of in case of a full-scale conflict with Russia.
	Planning for such an operation follows the implementation of a new Allied strategy known as the Eastern Flank Deterrence Line, which focuses on bolstering land forces, integrating defense production, and deploying standardized digital systems and launch platforms for rapid battlefield coordination with NATO.
	Further, speaking about the new strategy, General Donahue stated, the land domain is not becoming less important, but rather more.
	You can now take down anti-access area denial bobbles from the ground.
	You can now take over sea from the ground.
	All these things we are watching happen in Ukraine.
	According to Donahue, U.S. Armed Forces and NATO ally possess a capability to rapidly seize Kaliningrad.
	The American general pointed out that Kaliningrad is approximately 75 kilometers wide and entirely surrounded by NATO member states.
	There's absolutely no reason why we cannot dismantle Russia's A2AD anti-access area denial zone from the ground faster than ever before.
	We've already planned for this and developed the necessary capabilities.
	Hal Turner's analysis, this is madness, utter fantasy, complete futility.
	Why?
	Because Gerald Donnelly's perception of NATO does not seem to match the actual reality.
	In my estimation, NATO's actual reality is more like this.
	And he's got like a cartoon tank that's charging because it's electric.
	Face the facts.
	Europe is broke.
	It's just, it's a fight just to get them to spend 5% of GDP on their own defense.
	Europe doesn't have the actual manpower.
	Europe has given most of its weapons and ammunition to Ukraine already, and all of it would fall upon American troops.
	Given that reality, one wonders if he's planning on taking Kaliningrad as fast as he lost Kabul airport.
	The Russian state Duma just threatened the Russian general with Russia's nuclear doctrine.
	An attack on the Kaliningrad region would mean an attack on the Russian Federation with all the envisioned retaliatory measures, including new versions of the military and nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation, said Leonard Slutsky, head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs.
	Yes, yes, that's what would happen.
	Brian, your thoughts.
	So, if I understand that last story correctly, there is a tentacle of the deep state that's working with NATO to convince NATO that it's going to be the one that attacks Hollingrad, which is a primary important Russian base.
	And Russia is not going to consider that to be an attack on their own native soil and sovereignty.
	And they're just going to ignore it.
	No, Russia's already said that would be the type of move that causes a nuclear war.
	Remember, the fundamental issue that is at place in Ukraine is NATO expanding its territory into Ukraine, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization continuing to expand and push its borders right up next to Russia so they can put in military installations.
	Fundamentally, what's taken place on this is that the Western forces have conducted a coup in Ukraine, and then now they're installing military forces that are threatening Russia on the border.
	Just like if Russia were to conduct a coup in Mexico and install a bunch of military installations on the United States border, we'd be pretty upset about it.
	So here we've got the North American, North Atlantic Treaty Organization that's making claims that they've uncovered plans of their own attack on Russia.
	Make no mistake about it.
	It is the tentacle of the American deep state that has plans to do this if the war in Ukraine fails.
	They've got to finish what they started, which is war, war, war at any cost.
	As for the story about Yemen, Yemen has been attacked by Israel just the same as Iran has been attacked by Israel, just the same as Damascus and Lebanon have been attacked by Israel.
	I think their biggest problem with Yemen, which is south of Saudi Arabia, but it would border, it would be on the new border of the new Greater Israel project.
	Their biggest problem is that Yemen would continue to control the Red Sea, or at least the entrance, the Gulf of Sua.
	I forget the name of the entrance to the Red Sea, but Yemen currently has control of it.
	And they're currently attacking ships that are bringing military supplies to Israel through that port.
	So Israel seems to be fighting battles on every front now.
	They seem to have the will to do it.
	They have nothing holding them back whatsoever.
	And I suspect that they'll continue to expand their operations as long as they think they're in total control of their United States puppet.
	Again, this comes down to Trump stepping in as a leader and ending it in order to end the war, but he won't do it.
	Why not?
	Why not?
	These are the questions that we have to ask of our benevolence leadership.
	He said he would end the wars.
	He's done nothing to slow Israel down.
	He's done nothing to prevent them from continuing to attack everywhere they go.
	And same thing with NATO.
	He's done nothing to slow them down and nothing to pull out of Ukraine.
	It's a failure in leadership.
	Simple as that.
	I could not agree more.
	And we've just been joined by Joachim Agulpian.
	And I want to have an opportunity for him to review the bidding about the Epstein scandal.
	We're very relieved to see you, Joachim.
	We're very relieved.
	Yeah, I'm really sorry.
	My cell phone alarm did not go off this morning.
	Look, of all the events dualities, that's the least most innocuous.
	I'm very pleased.
	Listen, we've already talked about your article.
	Let me go back.
	Your article about...
	Epstein Trumpgate scandal is far more egregious and pressing than Tulsi Gabbard's Obama gate.
	And I read the first couple paragraphs, Joaquin.
	I'd love for you to take the opportunity to elaborate.
	If I think you're 100% correct, and as other stories suggest, this appears to be a desperate effort by Donald Trump to change the subject, to get off of Epstein gate and onto Obama gate if he can possibly manage.
	Your thoughts?
	Yeah, that's exactly what it is.
	It's really clear from the very beginning because he was headed for a lot of trouble and he knew he had to take the heat off himself.
	So of course, he gets Tulsi to come through for him to suddenly change the program.
	You know, they've been doing this misdirection, wag the dog little machination for, I mean, a long, long time now.
	I'm talking about the powers that probably should never be that get The media attention.
	They've been doing this for a long time.
	Every time they have something that's very embarrassing or that could lead to such major scandal as to bring somebody's down their whole career, which is really the situation.
	If America learns that and believes that Trump is a pedophile and engaged in that with his buddy Epstein for many years, obviously this guy's not going to stay president.
	He's probably going to end up dying at his age and feeble mind.
	So yeah, they knew they had to do an emergency here.
	And so it comes in very handy for them.
	But my point is, oh, you may run with another story, you know, but that story, yes, okay.
	You know, there's nothing really minor, minor about Obama pulling a coup or trying to.
	It's a treasonous offense and he's for it.
	And that's just one among many of Obama's crimes, you know.
	I mean, that guy's a pedophile, too.
	In fact, all the major presidents in the modern era have been pedophiles.
	They don't get to be president unless they're pedophiles, unless they're compromised in a major pedophilic way.
	So he's in trouble, too.
	They're all in trouble.
	That's why I'm for, you know, shall I even say, overthrowing the current government of all the people just about.
	There's very few even in Congress that have a clean record.
	They're all complete, as APAC proves, everybody in the government, in the Zionist occupied government, are owned and controlled by Israel.
	You know, we got to get rid of this government that's foreign.
	And that includes every member that's a major APAC member.
	They got to get out.
	So we have to clean house, starting from the very top with Trump all the way down.
	We got to clean house and put some people in there that will represent the people of America.
	We haven't had that forever.
	It's been a long, not in our lifetime, I believe, because the internationalists, which are the globalists, which are the, some say the Jews, I'll say, I don't say that, but I will say that the power structure must change because they're the ones doing it to our kids on a massive grand scale on this earth with,
	you know, 800,000 supposedly missing every year and, you know, an ungodly number, over 100,000 being trafficked every year.
	And then, you know, worldwide, it's 8 million supposedly missing.
	And I don't know exactly, but it's got to be a million or something like that traffic.
	So with those kind of dimensions of enormous evil on this earth, we have no choice.
	We have to clean house.
	And that goes for every government on the earth.
	Joaquin, I believe there's a growing consensus that Trump represents a national security threat because he's under blackmail, because of his pedophilic and ballot indulgences.
	And there's so much evidence out there.
	It's really disgusting beyond belief.
	The question becomes, how could it happen?
	It seems to me there are three possibilities.
	Article 25, that if the vice president would determine that he's no longer competent to fill his position, if the cabinet voted, we could have a replacement and the vice president would accede to the office.
	Number two, articles of impeachment, which would take longer, but I'd sure prefer to see articles of impeachment based on real bona fide impeachable acts than we have had in the past with a fake impeachment.
	But I also haven't seen any indication that even the Democrats are eager to do it.
	Or third, given this oddity about his veins, his health, if he were now to wisely step down, resign on the basis of health considerations, I think that would be the best solution.
	But perhaps you or Brian have alternatives.
	I'm not considering you first, Joaquim.
	Well, I think probably the safest for him.
	He gets to save a little bit of face.
	I mean, everybody would know it's perpedophilia, but at least he could pretend and, quote, more gracefully bow out.
	That would probably be the best thing, but he's such a pig-headed bastard that I don't think he's going to go down easy.
	He's going to go down fighting.
	He's probably going to be so disruptive.
	And other countries are going to take more advantage.
	So there'll probably be much more, even as much as there is war right now, I think other countries are going to take advantage.
	And we're going to see more aggressive military action by some of the adversarial countries that America has built up.
	And there's quite a few.
	So, you know, it's bad all the way around.
	But yeah, the guy's got to go.
	And if we have to do it by force, then that has to be done.
	Within the law, of course, I'm not going to say, let's go kill him.
	And the first alternative, Article 25, I think they were even thinking about doing that on Biden because he obviously was not of the right faculties.
	And that would be a good way to go too, I think.
	You know, the cleanest and quickest, really, but that ain't going to happen with Trump.
	He's going to go down fighting.
	I don't see it Unless somebody, and you know, I don't want this to happen, but unless somebody did something to him very quickly, which would be against the law, of course.
	But, you know, I don't see it.
	It's going to be a knockdown, drag out, ugly scene for America.
	I think you're right.
	I mean, if you had the leaders of the party who have strongly supported him in the past telling him, Donald, it's time to go.
	I'm not at all sure he'd be responsive.
	His ego is so massive.
	Brian, your thoughts about the alternatives.
	He shouldn't go yet.
	We haven't given him enough time.
	Remember, in his first four years, he was able to accomplish virtually nothing against a very well-entrenched, deep state that was led by guys like Comey and Brennan and others.
	He's part of the network, and that's a feather in his cap in terms of his usefulness to help negotiate bigger, better deals for the world.
	And I appreciate that very much about him.
	And I appreciate the fact that he really does think that he controls the system.
	The problem is he's out of balance in terms of his understanding, just like all the rest of the network is out of balance in terms of their understanding of what it is the American people want.
	We've had prosperity.
	We like prosperity.
	Yes, thank you.
	Hopefully it'll continue with Donald Trump, although I don't see it necessarily continuing.
	And in my opinion, things haven't gotten all that much better.
	But prosperity economics is just a simple component.
	I think that right now with the awakening of the new breed of American people as a result of alternative media, people are beginning to see very, very clearly that there's two tiers of justice in America and it pisses everybody off.
	Now, is Donald Trump going to address the issue?
	No, he's not going to go after his old buddies that he used to hang out with at the Plaza Hotel and all the guys that he gave intelligence to about this real estate deal or that real estate deal.
	He's not going to go after those guys.
	That's part of the structure that made him what he is.
	You think he wants to go after those guys?
	No way.
	He realizes where his bread is butter.
	Adelson's and others that are Elon Musk and others, the rich people.
	It's the poor people of America that get nothing out of the transaction.
	Thank you for the show, Donald.
	It's been very fun.
	It's very, been very interesting.
	But until we see somebody in handcuffs walking a perp walk of shame that's been arrested for an actual crime against the people of America that's more important than drunk driving or something, we're not going to believe in what you're doing, Donald.
	So drop the act.
	You can keep it up with your big boy, big wig friends, but the people of America have seen enough.
	We want indictments and we want people in cuffs and we want to see some justice so we don't continue the next 10 years thinking, oh, the elites get their own way and we get nothing.
	Let me say he's so desperate.
	He might actually do some of that to try to quell the uprising against him.
	Don, take us out.
	Boy, you guys took us out.
	Wow, what an hour here on July the 21st of the month of 2025.
	It can't get much hotter in the news than it is right now, except we're going to have another hour coming up that you want to come back for and share this widely to everybody, because this is news you ain't going to see anywhere else, I'm sure.

▲