All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 31, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:07:17
Highwire CDC, Election Deniers, Flat Earth, JFK & Pawn Stars? 7.65 Mausser, TSA, Israel's Back Door
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer inviting you to join us for episode 14 of the Gary King-inspired series, Inconvenient Truths, where Gary presents clips of various events The content of which I am completely unaware in advance and then provokes my spontaneous unrehearsed reaction to them and commentary thereupon.
We welcome, by the way, viewers adding their comments.
Any questions you like when we post them on Mitchu Channel, Jim Fetzer, And, you know, any suggestions, whatever you like, we want to hear from you, Gary.
Yeah.
Yeah.
We're inviting you to react to the videos as well.
And I'd like to thank the hundred and thirty seven thumbs up that we got.
And one day before we had one hundred and thirty seven thumbs up to zero.
And, you know, there's one in every crowd and you know what happened.
So thanks a lot, buddy.
All right.
Let's get the ball rolling here.
We're going to come out the gate with this one.
Good morning.
Good afternoon.
Good evening.
Wherever you are out there in the world, it's time to step out onto the high wire.
Welcome ladies and gentlemen, mothers, fathers, grandparents, children, all of those that are watching.
I'm going to announce that today, October 20, 2022, is a day that will live in infamy.
Just moments ago, before this broadcast, our own CDC and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, representing the United States of America and our health departments, voted unanimously, 15-0, to approve the COVID-19 vaccine to be added to the childhood schedule.
This means that a product that was never properly approved for safety, never went through a long-term safety trial, is still only under an emergency use authorization, meaning they rushed it out because they didn't have time to do the science, now without official approval has been put under the childhood schedule.
This will lead to mandates across the United States of America for children to be able to enter school and preschools, high schools and colleges.
They will follow suit.
And so now an untested vaccine that has shown to cause harm all around the world, especially to children, for a virus that does not affect children has been forced upon our population by a regulatory agency that is supposed to be working for us.
All right, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, Dalton, Big Tree nails it.
It's 100% correct.
It's outrageous.
It appears that the whole health safety network that Americans have expected to look out for and protect Their health, they're actually nothing but an extension of Big Pharma.
They're a PR and marketing operation.
They're not doing anything whatsoever to protect the public.
There are so many adverse effects and deaths in stunning numbers, millions upon millions.
We're going to have more than a billion deaths, minimally, from the use of the MRA vaccine.
Well, in the past, the CDC and the FDA would have pulled a product had it had a handful, not even of deaths, but of serious adverse effects.
And the fact that in this case they're treating these mRNA vaccines in complete indifference to their adverse effects tells us something is terribly, terribly wrong.
And there's an additional aspect no doubt they'll address subsequently, which is this.
Once Big Pharma gets these mRNA vaccines on the recommended child vaccine schedule, they become immune from liability.
Even if it kills every single child who takes a vax, I can guarantee you it's going to kill a very large number, or disable them permanently.
They are immune from liability.
This is an indication that America has become unbelievably corrupt by big business, in this case Big Pharma.
And when you look at the massive percentage of commercials on television promoting pharmaceutical products, vaccine, pills, you name it, you begin to appreciate Big Pharma has a grip.
On the American government and even on advertising, unlike any alternative we have considered.
I mean, I have regarded the Zionist influence as profound because new members of Congress even have to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel ahead of those of the United States.
And as you well recall, Gary, Years back, you asked me, was I aware of how many members of the then-current Congress had refused to sign the pledge?
And when I admitted I did not know, you held up one finger of one hand because there was only one.
Well, no one's saying I'm a big pharma with scattered exceptions.
Rand Paul's been pretty good.
There are some outspoken medical experts like Joseph Ricola.
There's a group, including now Peter McCullough, who is the most cited physician in America, has just been denied his medical license by the AMA.
This guy's a good guy, but he's wandered off the reservation.
He's not endorsing the phony vax, the killer vax, the deadly vax, and the AMA is censoring him.
This totally discredits the AMA.
It shows the whole medical establishment in America is corrupt, bought and sold, and they're not operating even to respect a Hippocratic oath.
They're all sworn, which is first, do no harm.
Absolutely.
Dr. Fetzer.
Okay, we're gonna switch gears on this one.
So let's go ahead and... Fresh off a Republican primary victory for Arizona's governor, Carrie Lake arrives to a hero's welcome at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Dallas.
In her home state, she is leading in every single county, centering her campaign on Donald Trump's lie about the 2020 election, a position she pledges she will not pivot away from.
We outvoted the fraud.
We didn't listen to what the fake news had to say.
The MAGA movement rose up and voted like their lives depended on it.
Trump endorsed election-denying candidates won up and down Arizona's ballot Tuesday.
U.S.
Senate candidate Blake Masters and Secretary of State candidate Mark Fincham, who says he wants to eliminate all voting machines.
Paper ballots, hand counting on one day.
We can do that.
We used to do it.
Election experts say that would mean months-long counts.
2020 deniers, despite no evidence of widespread fraud, won.
And not just in Arizona.
Ah, thank you, Michigan!
But in Michigan this week, Republican gubernatorial nominee, Tudor Dixon.
Yes or no, do you believe Donald Trump legitimately won the 2020 election in Michigan?
Yes.
Now, Dixon is dodging that question.
There were some things that happened in Michigan that didn't happen in other states, which are very concerning.
These wins are just the latest in the steady advance by those sowing distrust in U.S.
elections being put on the November ballot.
In Nevada, Jim Marchand is a Republican nominee for Secretary of State, running to oversee his state's elections.
He told us this earlier this year.
I believe it was stolen.
Yeah.
I mean, I believe that, um, There are enough irregularities that we need to do an audit.
And then there's Michigan's Christina Karamo, another Secretary of State candidate who doesn't believe the 2020 results.
Election liars on state ballots show Trump's grip on the GOP, celebrated by far-right propagandist Mike Lindell at CPAC.
Everybody's going to go vote these great candidates like Carrie Lake and override the machines.
On the CPAC agenda, they stole the 2020 election.
It is re-litigating 2020 and also looking ahead to November and beyond.
They want to rig elections, institutionalize voter fraud.
We're not going to allow it.
I see your hat there.
How important is it for you to talk about 2020 as we look at 2022?
He won.
He won in 2020, hands down, across the nation.
What does this say about where the Republican Party is in this country?
MAGA.
They're with MAGA.
They're with Trump.
They're Trump followers.
Okay, Dr. Fesser, I think I'm going to kick back and let you respond to this one.
Well, I think it's fair to say CNN is CIA on propaganda.
They're trying to diminish those who are standing up for election integrity as though they were undermining democracy.
Precisely the opposite is the case.
If we're allowed, the Democrats are allowed to steal election after election.
There is no democracy.
There's only machine controlled and literally by machines.
So when you've got that attorney general out in Arizona saying, We're going to get rid of all these machines that return to hand counts and paper ballots.
He's got it exactly right.
And there's no reason to believe what the commentator was implying.
That means months and months of delay in voting.
Even if it did take months and months of delay, it's better to have an accurate vote than to have a quick result that's fraudulent.
And that's what they've been pushing.
It's easier by machine because they can more readily manipulate the outcome.
All of us who are following the vote noticed that interruption, that taking a delay for a break when they came back and adjusted the outcome by adding 600,000 more to the Biden list, and then left the algorithm to guarantee he would win by narrow margins in the key states, recognize something was wrong from the start.
Mike Lindell, whom they're trashing there, has actually proven to be a great patriot and American.
He sponsored a three-day marathon Presenting proof after proof after proof of the election was stolen and exactly how it was done.
And now we have Dinesh D'Souza's 2,000 mules showing how they were stuffing these drop boxes in the middle of the night.
We already have in some state, Pennsylvania, 250 illegal ballots being mailed out without verifying a driver's license or a social security number.
We have other examples of what's going on.
They're going to try to steal it again, Gary.
And I say, damn CNN, damn all these operators.
Individuals like Carrie Lake are absolutely sensational, and get this.
We already have captured a broadcast showing that Katie Hobbs, who's an utter idiot, a complete moron, an ideological disciple of the left, who is so embarrassing that even CNN, which is so grossly biased for the left, would not replay the interview because she was so terribly awful, is shown to be beating Carrie Lake by 53 to 47.
Oh, absurd!
Kerry Lincoln is sensational.
She's articulate.
She's spot on the issues.
She's a great candidate.
Really, absolutely unbelievable what's going on, but there is nothing the Democrats will not do to steal this election because they know they're about to be wiped out.
Yeah, I wouldn't have played that clip if it wouldn't be so close to the big day.
Now, like we said before, the host doesn't know what the clips are.
No one knows what the clips are except myself.
It's sealed, hermetically sealed in a mayonnaise jar.
And this one here is from the comment section.
A guy wanted me to do it.
He's been, you know, continually asking.
So I said, OK, so here we go.
In an age of social media censorship, questioning whether or not the Earth is a globe has been deemed harmful thought.
But why is this?
We seem to be conditioned to think that the issue has been scientifically settled.
But this is not the case.
Our most popular scientists recognize the geocentric model where the Earth is at the center of the universe is observably accurate.
And Hubble and Stephen Hawking went as far as to say that they reject the geocentric model not based on scientific reasoning, but rather because they find the thought of being at the center of the universe to be emotionally disturbing. - Okay.
Geophysicist George Ellis stated that you cannot disprove the geocentric model, you can only exclude it on philosophical grounds.
The Michelson-Morley experiment in the 1880s proved the Earth was stationary, and Albert Einstein claimed this was a serious embarrassment and intended to disprove it with his relativity theory, but later admitted that he had failed to do so.
We're conditioned to think that the heliocentric model is scientifically superior to the geocentric model.
When we apply scientific reasoning, we discover that this is not true.
Contrary to popular thought, the scientific community has disputed the heliocentric model for centuries, such as the Earth's curvature.
According to the heliocentric Earth model, The Earth is 24,000 miles in circumference, and if one were standing at sea level, they should only be able to see less than three miles before the surface of the Earth curves out of view.
But this has been proven to be false for centuries, from the Bedford level experiments of 1838 to modern photography.
This photograph of Chicago was taken almost 60 miles away from Grand Muir State Park in Michigan, on a spherical Earth This would be impossible.
Using the Pythagorean Theorem and the current dimensions of the Earth, the top of the tallest skyscraper should be 900 feet below the observable horizon.
Local news explained this anomaly by claiming the image was a mirage.
And what you're seeing here is a mirage.
We typically would not be able to see this from the Lake Michigan Shore.
We talked about this last night.
Conditions are right on the lake and we're actually seeing a mirage.
They claim that somehow light refraction and perfect weather conditions are responsible for creating a photorealistic mirage of the Chicago skyline appearing to sit on the flat horizon from almost 60 miles away.
Anomalies in the Earth's curvature can also be found in old lighthouses, able to be seen for several miles past what is possible on the heliocentric model, and weapons guidance systems that are capable of sighting targets that would only be possible on a flat plane.
We are accustomed to observing ships disappearing over the curve, but with modern consumer cameras, we can observe that this seems to be an optical illusion based on light reflection.
and the laws of perspective.
Many of us tend to think the planet is too big to observe curvature, but the empirical evidence tells us that either the surface of the earth is a flat plane, or the planet is at least 100 times bigger than we are told.
Another very intriguing argument for flat earthers is Antarctica, the mysterious massive continent at our southern pole That nobody is allowed to explore.
After sailing over 60,000 miles along the Antarctic coastline, Captain Cook was never able to complete the journey around the ice continent, which is supposed to be just under 12,000 miles around.
Whether it was James Clark Ross or the British ship Challenger, nobody has ever successfully circumnavigated Antarctica.
A so-called flat earthers claim Okay, that one's for the audience.
Antarctica is actually a massive ice barrier that surrounds the flat surface of the earth.
It has a neutral equidescent projection map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey has been used for centuries for the fact that all directions or azimuts are correct and all distances are at true scale.
Okay, that one's for the audience.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer.
I see info work.
Gary, I understand a lot of people seem to believe something that was widely believed centuries before the birth of Christ.
It was a very, very good thing.
It was actually already refuted by Aristarchus of Samoas, who was the librarian for the great library in Alexandria, about a fourth century before Christ.
The phenomena are such that just to begin with Einstein, the point Einstein was making is that motion is relative to frames of reference.
Think of it this way.
If you're watching a train pass by and you assume Earth is stationary, you've got the train moving.
But if you're inside the train, assume the train is stationary, not moving, then everything's going on, racing past the train at breakneck speeds.
Einstein showed, and this has got to do with the Michelson-Morley experiment, That Newtonian physics, which has every event occurring at the same time or before or after every other event throughout the universe, is a special case for space-time regions that are relatively modest in relation to the size and speeds of processes that are relatively slow compared to the speed of light.
But that in general is dependent on frames of reference.
So this is simply a misunderstanding about Einstein.
It's not even physically possible that Earth can be a flat surface.
I ask those who want to make that proposition, where can they go to find the edge of Earth?
What are the dimensions?
They're talking about two-dimensional representations of three-dimensional spherical objects.
Do they also think the moon is a flat surface?
Look at the... Galileo invented a telescope.
When he heard that one had been invented by a Dutch lensmaker by the name of Van Leeuwenhoek, Galileo invented a telescope of his own and he turned it to the moon.
And he discovered the moon was all pockmarked and irregular in its surface.
Now, this contradicted the Aristotelian Dogma that it prevailed up to that time that there was a difference between celestial and terrestrial objects.
In other words, everything on Earth had certain properties, but those in space were different, that every object in space was a perfectly round, smooth object, a sphere.
So Galileo discovered That that was untrue based upon empirical evidence rather than theoretical deductions such as Aristotle had used to draw his conclusions.
This was a turning point in the development of empirical science to rely upon evidence.
That was so important and controversial at the time because the Catholic Church had absorbed Aristotelian cosmology as part of the beliefs that all Catholics were expected to adhere to.
Therefore, Galileo was tried as a heretic.
He was denying the dogma of the Church.
And since the Church is supposed to be infallible, representing, you know, the Word of God, absolute truth, this was a huge issue.
This is the biggest controversy in the history of science, the Trial of Galileo.
He also turned his telescope to the heavens and observed Jupiter, the moons of Jupiter, that are moon-circling Jupiter.
That's a perfect model for what we have for Earth.
We have only one moon, Jupiter has several, but it gave us a perfect illustration of what's going on.
Now I'm convinced, by the way, yeah, I know the phenomena with the alleged, you know, views across the lake and all that, but the fact is I've had an expert surveyor on with me who's done several shows and explained how there are faulty premises entailed in those, The bottom line becomes Earth cannot be flat for the following elementary principle of physics.
All mass attracts all other mass.
With a force that's directly proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distances between them.
What this means is you cannot have a flat Earth.
It has to be round.
It's actually technically what's known as an oblate spheroid because it's slightly thicker at the equator than it is from north to south.
So, you know, Listen, I earned my PhD in the history and the philosophy of science.
The history of science is dominated by the history of astronomy and physics.
Those who want to gain a background here ought to read a couple of classic books.
One's by I.B.
Cohen entitled The Birth of a New Physics.
The other is by T.S.
Kuhn entitled The Copernican Revolution, where Kuhn begins by talking about how ships at sea, the mass simply disappear as they go over the horizon.
That's not an illusion.
That's modified.
Anyone can observe it.
My God, go down to the beach and watch the ships go out to sea.
It is absolutely the case.
However, that for regions that are relatively small in terms of the circumference of the earth, that the properties are virtually indistinguishable from those of a flat surface, and I believe that's where most of the mischief lies.
Even William Shatner, by the way, who's been up in one of Elon Musk's, talked about observing the curvature of the earth, and I guarantee you, You know, Captain Kirk, not gonna lie about something like that.
There's so much proof.
But again, I say, give me the dimensions.
Let's test this proposition of a platter.
Can we go anywhere and find where the edge of the earth?
No, of course you can't.
Because you're actually going on a round surface.
You're going onto a globe.
So, you know, look, I appreciate you're hitting me with this.
I find it is one of the most emotionally evocative issues that come up again and again.
It's on a par with the fact that Paul McCartney died on 9-11-1966 and was replaced by an even better musician.
People just can't handle it.
Even if there's differences, clear physical differences between Paul and Fall or fake Paul, F-A-U-L.
He's four inches taller.
He has a narrower face.
Paul had a rounder face and was more boyish looking.
Fall is a more oval face and is not so boyish looking.
Paul had bad teeth and a narrow palate.
Paul has good teeth and a normal palate.
These are not changes one can make to the same person.
These are clear proofs that we're talking about one and the same individual.
And it was an Italian forensic scientist who set off to disprove the claim that Paul had been replaced, who wound up confirming it.
And I just say, for all those who want to maintain a flat Earth, If that's your desire, who am I to inhibit you from holding a belief, even though it is scientifically Provably false.
You're entitled to believe what you want.
And frankly, I don't think it's going to make a lot of difference in the practice of your life.
But there are proofs after proofs after proof that Earth is a sphere.
And why, by the way, if you look at every other heavenly body, since every other heavenly body is spherical, why should Earth be an exception?
This is a very primitive state of belief.
That many today still persist in wanting to believe in it, and it's rather on a par with global warming.
Global warming is based on the belief, which is also provably false, that the temperature of the Earth is determined by the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, Well, we can go through the history, 600 million years of Earth's history, and find there's no correlation whatsoever between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the Earth.
And if there's no correlation, there cannot be a causal relation, because you're having the effect without the cause.
You're having the cause without the effect.
That means they are not causally related.
Indeed, it turns out that CO2 actually cools the Earth in four different ways.
CO2 also is indispensable to live, because through photosynthesis, plants convert CO2 into oxygen.
And the whole idea, the green agenda, wanting to move toward electric vehicles, for example, do away with so-called fossil fuels, which aren't actually fossil-derived.
Their oil is produced naturally by the earth in endless quantity, Pollution has gradually been reduced, by the way, over the last several decades.
The whole idea is really to destroy the American economy for political purposes, to promote the Great Reset.
And there's so many reasons why this is catastrophic.
I won't now on this occasion begin to enumerate, but it's not tough to find.
And if you go to my BitChute channel, check out a series I've done with Joe Olson, quite a brilliant guy.
About anti-global warming and how we're being misled.
I'm sorry to say, flat earth and global warming are in the same pot.
They are tempting to believe, they sound plausible as though they might be true.
There was one point, for example, after seeing Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, I actually thought there was something to it, but believe me, it turns out it's a fraud and it's intended to destroy the energy structure of America and reduce us to rubble.
And just note, just one consequence, How many man hours are going to be lost by having to sit for hours to wait to have your electric vehicle charge up when it could take five minutes to fill your tank with gas?
How many...
Lives are going to be damaged or squandered by taking trips, such as one recently taking from Casper to Cheyenne, Wyoming that should have taken three hours, but driving an electric vehicle took 15, if that's what you want.
And what happens when the electricity, when our electrical grid goes out?
We're all going to be stuck at home.
We're going to be immobile.
Having gas-powered engines emancipates us.
It gives us freedom and liberty, and it's far more effective on a cost-benefit scale.
There is no choice.
It's clear-cut.
It's a no-brainer.
But Gary, I encourage those who want to, if they want to get serious about their belief in the flat earth, those two books I cited, IBCO and The Birth of a New Physics, T.S.
Kuhn, The Copernican Revolution are great places to start.
And if they want to go further, there's a wonderful book on space-time in motion by Wesley Salmon, for whom I did my PhD.
Wesley Salmon, Space-Time in Motion.
That explains Relativity Theory and Einstein in such lucid language, I believe a high school student could benefit.
So check that out too, Space Time and Motion, and you'll be emancipated from false beliefs.
I thank you for bringing this up.
I think that was an excellent attempt to defend, you know, Flat Earth Theory.
But already Aaron Stark has conducted observations about the angle from a well versus other location and even made a calculation of the approximate circumference of Earth on that basis and he was very close to correct where the circumference is roughly 24,000 miles at the equator.
Thank you, thank you for this and for the opportunity to address it, Gary.
Well, what I want to say is the comment sections are littered with Flat Earth talk and also JFK participated in his own fake assassination.
I mean, it's just really, you have to almost put on an armor suit sometime before you look at some of the comments, but not so much on ours.
So, all right, here's the next one.
Now, everyone in the comment section, you wanted your Flat Earth with Jim Fetzer?
You want it, you got it.
Get your Intel chip in your computer.
What is the Intel Management System and why should you care?
What is the Arc Processor, jointly developed by Goldman Sachs and others for the Internet of Things?
The combination of these technologies results in the crown jewel of the hardware facet of the worldwide Talmudic Telpiot Takeover Program, or TOP for short.
This Talmudic technological takeover is part hardware and software, but also people, placing them in key positions around the world.
It's a fully integrated combination, flesh-and-blood backdoor, or FAB, into the world's high-tech infrastructure, which includes the emerging Smart Cities program combined with the Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence.
But the crown jewel of the Telpiot program is the ARC processor that sits within the Intel management system.
A CPU sitting physically within the Intel CPU with its own fully functioning Linux based operating system.
Completely transparent to the Windows, Apple or Linux based operating system functioning at the user level.
This is the ultimate backdoor of backdoors and it was designed and fabricated in Israel as the basis of the new core series of Intel CPUs.
...integrated between 2006 and 2008.
These are the same CPUs that all server farms all over the world use.
Every Google server farm, Facebook, corporate, public and private.
The NSA insisted on a patch that could switch off the Intel management system for sensitive systems.
No such luck for us mere mortal.
The Intel management engine cannot be switched off and is a wide open hardware backdoor for Israel to get into any and all computer systems around the world.
If you think the AMD line of CPUs are a safe option, think again.
They have the platform security processor and it has the exact same problems.
Besides, AMD, once a joint operation between Texas Instruments and the Chinese government, is now virtually wholly owned and controlled by China.
The ARC processor is tiny.
And it's multiple formats, it is filling the internet of things from light bulbs to self-driving cars to robots, you name it.
Think about it.
Think about the power this gives the Israeli state and this Talmudic technological takeover.
All right.
That's an extremely important report.
I have no doubt it's spot on too.
We're talking about Israel having access to virtually all the intelligence in the world.
Israel has aspiration not only to extend to greater Israel, a massive expansion that takes a good chunk of Egypt, more than half of Syria, all of Jordan, A whole lot of Iraq to expand to greater Israel.
They have far more august aspirations.
They really want to dominate the world politically and even are, in my judgment, Provoking the war between the U.S.
and Russia.
They want this to happen.
Sad to say our government is so infiltrated by Israeli operatives, dual citizens.
They may very well get their wish, and the Democrats seem to be all in because they know they're facing a potential wipeout on the 8th of November.
They want to circumvent that at all costs, which is going to be massive to us, because if there is a nuclear war, calculations have shown even what are thought of as limited nuclear wars Are going to contaminate the atmosphere, reduce the heat from the sun, and bring about a death of a third of the world's population.
Now the world's population is approximately 8 billion.
A third of 8 billion is 2.5 billion plus.
So just think what's going to happen even from a limited war.
Let me also explain.
Russia is well prepared to fight a war.
They have, for example, the largest submarine ever produced, over 600 feet long, that releases mini-sobs, underwater drones that are nuclear-equipped that can create explosions in the water that set up tsunami waves that are radioactive.
So if you set off one of these off the Atlantic coast, You could wipe out from Boston to Washington, D.C., including all of New York with a radioactive tidal wave that would make the area uninhabitable for 250 years.
Think about it.
And if they did this simultaneous on the West Coast, Seattle, Portland, just off the coast of California, San Francisco to San Diego, including L.A., one of our major ports, radioactive for 250 years.
Think about it.
America will collapse, or simpler yet, just set off an EMP above the United States and take out the electrical grid.
Everything that runs on electricity will be gone, including God forbid, if you have an electric vehicle, you'll be unable to charge it.
It'll be useless.
So you just shelled out 66 grand for a vehicle that you won't even be able to drive.
Believe me, this is a swindle.
Absolutely unbelievable.
And the Democrats are all in on it with the whole green energy.
We're being devastated on the right and the left by traitors in our midst.
And remember, Thomas Jefferson observed that if the United States ever collapsed, it won't be from a threat from without, but from enemies within, and they are here among us today.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer, it just dawned on me this morning.
You know what?
We haven't had two of the top-notch JFK researchers in the world on the show, or at least one of them.
So I thought, you know, I have one of my favorite clips I've used before, and I want to go ahead and play it.
Let's do a little JFK, and we'll lighten up, and then I have some more.
I have a lot of different clips today.
Looks like a Mauser, and he walked over to Fritz, and Captain Fritz was holding the rifle up in the air, and I was standing next to Weitzman, who was standing next to Fritz, and we weren't any more than six or eight inches from the rifle, And stamp right on the barrel of the rifle was 7.65 Mauser.
Mauser German made rifle with the sniper scope sights that was found on the German built Mauser with the sniper scope that was used to kill President Kennedy.
7.65 Mauser German rifle familiar to It's a 7.65 Mauser, German made army rifle.
Telescopic sight and one shell left in the chamber.
Three French shells have been found nearby and apparently they're hooking this as the murder weapon.
The Dallas Sheriff's Department said the rifle had been found in a staircase on the fifth floor of a building near the scene of the assassination.
It was a 7.65 Mauser.
A German Mauser, I believe.
There is another word that a Mauser has been found.
Mauser.
Oswald worked in the building where the murder weapon, the German-made Mauser rifle, was still found in the Mauser with which the assassin was apparently armed.
From Dallas, we have heard that the death and identification has been made of the type of rifle used in the assassination of President Kennedy.
It was not a Mauser as has been reported through most of yesterday and today, but an Italian Manalicier Carcanto, manufactured in the Italian town of Carcanto.
All right.
But you think-- Well, it's of course very revealing.
Actually, the Mauser would be an appropriate weapon to use for an assassination.
It's a highly reliable, very accurate weapon, unlike the Mannlicher Carcano, which was known in World War II as a humanitarian rifle for never actually harming anyone on purpose.
The particular weapon that was attributed to Oswald had a very difficult bolt-action to work.
Oswald wasn't trained to fire with a bolt-action rifle.
It had a telescopic sight.
Oswald was never trained to use a telescopic sight.
And, of course, it was used to fire at a moving target.
Again, Oswald was never trained to fire at a moving target.
But a weapon is ridiculous.
It appears that in the Daltex, an anti-Castro Cuban by the name of Nestor Tony Escadro was using a
High-quality Mannlicher Carcano to fire three shots under the supervision of George Herbert Walker Bush to create the acoustical impression of only three shots having been fired, which of course was immediately being reported by Merriman Smith, who grabbed a mic in the press car and wouldn't give it up, reporting three shots had been fired.
This is all in accordance with a script, Gary, because we know Ten or twelve shots were actually fired.
We've identified eight different shooters, none of whom were named Lee Oswald, who, of course, as you well know, Ralph Sincade and Larry Rivera have established that Lee was actually standing in the doorway of the schoolbook depository when the JFK motorcade passed by, which means not only that it cannot have been A lone gunman, but he cannot have been one of the multiple shooters.
And what we're seeing here retrospectively is just a way in which a government, you know, will change the narrative to fit a version that it thinks is going to be the final cut and paste, and then it's going to stick with it permanently.
As I have mentioned before, I Have dinner with James Files and his wife here in Madison.
I took them out to my favorite steakhouse.
They drove up from Chicago.
And during our extremely interesting conversation, twice he mentioned how once the government takes a position, it's locked in and will never change.
And we find that regarding 9-11, for example, even though we know a half a dozen or more of the alleged suicide hijackers turned up alive and well the following day made contact with the British media, the FBI still insists on its original list of 19, even though David Ray Griffin, the Dean of 9-11 Studies, in his magisterial work, the 9-11 Commission Report of Omissions and Distortion, make that his very first point.
And in relation to JFK, Lee Oswald was the lone gunman up until the point that the House Select Committee reinvestigated and based upon an acoustical record that was recorded inadvertently by a motorcycle patrolman concluded there had been a second shooter on the grassy knoll
According to them, just by coincidence, being in the same place at the same time, firing at the same target, which of course is absurd on his face, but where James Files appears to be the party cast in that role.
So I like James Files tremendously.
We had a great conversation.
But as I've subsequently explained to him and his wife, I've concluded that he was cast in that role and did not actually fire the shot that entered JFK's right temple, as Malcolm Kilduff announced at the time.
By the way, go back and look!
He got the acting press secretary, Michael Kilduff, saying that the president was called by a shot right through the head and attributing that finding to Admiral George Berkeley, the president's personal physician.
Well, that sounds like a pretty authoritative source on the scene at the time.
At the time.
But it was an inconvenient truth, Gary, because the shot to the right temple was fired from the front, and the government insists there were only three shots fired from above and behind, such that if you were to go back and look at, see it now where you were there, the recounting, for example, on NBC of their continuous coverage, you'll find two shots are reported there.
One, a small, clean puncture wound to the throat, which Malcolm Perry, who is a physician, Who performed a simple tracheostomy incision through that small clean wound prescribed three times as a wound of entry that the bullet was coming at him during the Parkland Press Conference that occurred at 1.30 after Malcolm Kildiff had announced his death at one o'clock.
And then that shot to the right temple, which blew a fist-sized chunk of skull and brains out the back of his head, which was fired from in front, So on radio and television that day, there were two shots widely broadcast, both of which were fired from in front.
Such that Frank McGee was a pretty smart guy in the evening when the stories start coming in that according to the government, the shooter was above and behind.
He says, this is incongruous.
How can the man have shot from in front from behind?
Yeah.
And of course he nailed it, Gary, already right there at the day.
And I encourage anyone who wants to know why there was profound skepticism of the Warren report when it was finally released about a year later.
Because Americans have been glued to their television.
They knew there had been two shots, a small clean puncture wound to the throat and to the right temple that blew his brains out the back of his head, both of which were fired from in front.
And yet you got a report from an official government commission that there were only three shots and they were fired from above and behind.
Gary, this I believe was a turning point historically in the descent, the decline and fall of the United States as a great nation.
We have never recovered from the blow that was struck when our own government participated in and then covered up the assassination of the 35th President of the United States.
What's the chances of all the policemen and all the people in Dallas, Texas, FBI misrepresenting the type of, and when they said it was stamped on the barrel, misrepresenting?
No, no, Roger Craig, there was that weapon.
They did find the Mauser there.
They did find the Mauser there.
Right, but then it switched.
Yeah, everyone was reporting a Mauser because it was one, but then all of a sudden it all switched to... Well, that was a point I was making.
The government will alter the evidence to accommodate its revered narrative, but it took away an appropriate weapon for an assassination and replaced it with an absurd inferior weapon that Could not possibly have conducted.
Let me go back to me again, Gary.
Okay.
Jesse Ventura flew me out to Ventura County.
He actually picked that county for his name when he renamed himself to re-reenact the shooting.
He had a superior quality manly carcano.
I held it.
It was in great shape.
I was there to make sure he had the right elevation and angles to the targets, which were represented not by moving target, but by bales of hay.
He did three replications of the shooting using a Mannlicher Carcano.
Now, he not only had a superior weapon, but he's a much better shot than Oswald, and the targets were stationary rather than moving.
In three replications, none of which could be accomplished in the six and a half seconds or so with which this is supposed to have taken place, he managed to hit one target one time.
In other words, the nine shots fired, eight of them were complete misses, and yet we got this inferior marksman using an inferior weapon who's supposed to have Hit three times on the targets when they were moving.
Yeah.
Gary, I'm just telling you the whole story is such unmitigated bullshit.
They would have been better off to stick with a Mannlicher Carcano, but in fact, the assassination had already taken place and the shooter in the Daltex had used a Mannlicher Carcano.
Another shooter on the top of the county records building used a .30-06 to implant a Mannlicher Carcano bullet in Jack's back.
It only went in about as far as the second knuckle on your little finger because he was firing it using a plastic collar known as a sabot.
It even went through the upholstery.
Jack was wearing the back brace.
It had shallow penetration, and it turns out, Gary, and most Americans have no idea, Sam Kenny, who is driving the Secret Service vehicle and cleaning up the limousine, which is an absurd thing to do because you're obfuscating evidence, found a complete bullet that appeared to have come out of JFK's back and took it inside and put it on a stretcher in Parkland, which would then become the magic bullet of Of JFK mythology.
And when Oliver Stone did his sequel to JFK, which was a masterpiece, and he had any number of experts there, they focused on the magic bullet, and this fact never even emerged.
Nor even though he had David Mannock, who was a leading expert in the world on the medical evidence and the assassination of JFK, who'd taken a patient with similar chest and X dimensions to JFK and The official trajectory it had to have taken from the location specified by the government to the exit at the throat, because they wanted to convert this entrance wound into an exit, and found it was not even anatomically possible because cervical vertebrae intervene.
Oliver Stone did not even include that in his documentary.
Which is just absurd and bewildering.
I attribute that to the fact that he adopted as his screenwriter someone who is miscast, whom I regard as a fraud, Jim DiEugenio, whom, as you know, undertook a massive attack on me over all aspects of my research, where we took, what, seven hours to go through, and I refuted.
I mean, I didn't just refute, but I refuted virtually every single one of his claims against me.
And I even sent it to DiEugenio, and he spent five minutes and said he couldn't watch any more than that five minutes.
I never got an apology.
I never got a retraction.
And I now, in retrospect, believe that was a deliberate hit to convince Oliver Stone that in doing his sequel, he ought to go with Jim DiEugenio rather than with Jim Fetzer.
Well, he picked the wrong Jim.
And frankly, it's tarnished his reputation forever.
Hey, if you want to find out the real truth about JFK, it's on Jim Fester's BitChute channel because I'm part of the show, and it really is where the truth is, and if you can handle it.
Alright, we're gonna...
This I'm gonna play.
It's sort of light-hearted, but it demonstrates how, even today, subtly, they still continue to push.
As James Fowle said, they cannot change from the official story, but see if you catch something like that.
This is one of my favorite shows.
So I have a guy in the shop with what he claims is the original microfilm from the Dallas Police Department's report on the assassination of JFK.
I know a lot about that day, but not nearly as much as The Walking Encyclopedia, Mark Halpat.
He's coming by to take a look at this, and hopefully, it's not just another conspiracy.
So these are the microfilm of the police report from Dallas on the JFK assassination.
I mean, everyone remembers where they were when JFK had been shot.
It was a monumental moment in history.
I was in grammar school when this happened.
You know, this was a huge thing.
You know, after the Kennedy assassination, the Dallas PD started investigating it, but the FBI had already investigated Lee Harvey Oswald because he was kind of on their radar, but they had missed the fact that he was also enough of a lunatic that he was going to kill the president.
And so they didn't want that to come out.
So the government was trying to cover stuff up?
Of course.
So these are the master negative copies.
Back in the mid-70s, microfilm was a great way of making copies of a large mass of paper and making it available.
The master negative was the one that you did not let anybody put through the machine.
But everybody wanted copies.
And the one problem with microfilm is as you were using it, as you put it through the machines to be able to see what was on this, they would get scraped.
After a while, it was impossible to read some of what was on it.
Now, if this is, in fact, the documents from the Dallas PD on the Kennedy assassination, like you're saying, this is a collectible piece to have.
Oh, this is cool.
Wow.
I want to see conspiracy stuff right here.
Oh, here we go.
Look at this, guys.
Files of the evidence connected with the investigation of the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
I'm just trying to find out who actually shot him.
These are statements of people that were there.
About four months ago, I received a call from an FBI agent who wanted to know about a slip of paper with a phone number on it.
Conspiracy stuff right there.
Now this is the sort of thing where you can go through and actually just sit there and read every piece of information.
Oh, this is pretty cool.
I guess this is like what they took from... Lee Harvey Oswald.
Italian 6.5 rifle, released.
Live round 6.5 shell.
Yeah, this is the actual evidence.
I mean, I could look at this stuff for days.
Master negative.
There it is, right there.
Yeah, it's master copy.
And having worked with microfilm, this is a very, very nice copy.
But a lot of this stuff, and probably all of this, is publicly available online.
Okay, Dr. Fetzer.
Well, he said he just wanted to know who shot JFK.
On the basis of my collaborative research, I've concluded the following.
JFK was shot in the back.
This was the first hit by a deputy sheriff by the name of Harry Weatherford, as I explained, using a .30-06 to implant a Mannlicher Carcano bullet from the top of the county records building.
The second shot to the throat was fired by an Air Force expert By the name of Jack Lawrence, who was inside the Triple Underpass using a new experimental weapon that had only been released in limited quantity.
I believe he used the copy that was owned by Curtis LeMay, so Jack Lawrence would know he was acting in accordance with the government, because a chief of staff of the Air Force had directed him.
This shot passed through the windshield.
And hit Jack in the throat.
Bob Livingston, MD, a world authority on the human brain and an expert on wound ballistics, believed that bullet fragmented and part went downward into his right lung, part upward to sever this very tough membrane that covers a cerebellum, which is a compact part of the brain at the base.
Because we have multiple reports after another, I mean, 6, 8, 10 physician at Parkland reporting cerebellum extruding as well as cerebral tissue from the blood at the back of the wound.
And Bob explained to me directly, personally, that even multiple impact shots to the head would not have ruptured the tentorium and allowed cerebellum to extrude.
So it had to be from an independent source.
Which he inferred this was the cause, and I believe all the reactions you see of Jack thereafter after having been hit in the throat is because he had a bullet go through his brain and sever the tentorium, so he's not acting normally.
There are others, such as Ralph Zinke who insists that Jack had been hit by some kind of toxin, that he was paralyzed.
My personal belief is Ralph just got it wrong.
I'm a huge fan.
I think Ralph has done some brilliant work.
He's truly an iconoclast, but he has never actually studied all the major books on the assassination that deal with the medical evidence.
So far as I can tell, he's never read David Lifton's best evidence.
He's never read assassination science, murder, and Dealey Plaza, the great Zapruder film hoax.
He's never read Douglas Horne's five volumes inside the ARRB.
He's never read David Mannix's book on JFK head wounds.
In other words, Ralph is, in this instance, reinventing the wheel.
I think it was absolutely right when he noted, based upon his background as a chiropractor, that Given the height, the weight, the build, the shirt, and the t-shirt he was wearing at the time, the man in the doorway was indeed Lee Oswald, which Larry Rivera has so brilliantly confirmed, and not Billy Lovelady, who is indeed standing nearly, as Larry has also confirmed.
But where additional shots were then fired from after the limousine was brought to a halt to make sure JFK would be killed, and it was an abrupt halt.
William Gerber brought the vehicle to an abrupt halt so that all the passengers were thrown forward.
Jack would then be hit in the back of the head by one of the three shots fired from the Dow taxi.
He'd slumped forward, Jackie eased him back up, was looking him right in the face when he was hit in the right temple by that shot fired from, and I've already identified the Daltex shooters, the anti-Castro-Cuban Nestor Tony Escadro, supervised by George Herbert Walker Bush.
He was hit in the right temple by Frank Sturgis, representing the CIA.
And notice these different groups.
You got the Dallas Sheriff's Department, you got the American military, Sturgis CIA, you got Escadro Anicastro Cuban.
Roscoe White was also there in police uniform and with a pistol fired a shot, but because it would have hit Jackie, he pulled it, so the bullet wound up in the grass.
That was a miss.
There were two other misses by the Manley Carcano and the Dal Tex, one of which hit a distant curbing and injured the bystander, James Tagg.
Another hit the chrome strip over the windshield and created an indentation that perfectly fit a Manley Carcano bullet.
You also then had Malcolm McWallace, who was Lyndon Johnson's personal hitman, firing from the book depository, but the opposite side, the West Side, firing multiple shots at John Connolly, in the mistaken belief it was Ralph Yarbrough,
LBJ and Jack had a huge argument that day where Lyndon was trying to get Connolly, who had been his campaign manager, and was his crony out of the limousine, and Yarborough, a liberal Texas senator whom Lyndon despised, in.
But Jack overrode him on the ground that the chief of the state, chief executive of the state, should ride with the chief executive of the United States.
So Lyndon failed in that effort.
I've identified those six, and then Ole Damogard has identified a seventh by the name of Clyde Foreshaw, who was in the Pergola area, representing the Brafman, the Israeli influence.
And we have, therefore, seven of the eight actually identified who they represented.
And then on the opposite side of the grass, you know, there's a single tree where I've seen photographs from two JFK experts.
You can see a rifleman standing with his weapon.
These are two different photographs.
My suspicion, therefore, is that may represent the Fed, because it sponsors the assassination included.
The CIA, Jack was threatening to shatter it into a thousand pieces.
The military, they were disillusioned because Jack hadn't invaded Cuba.
Contrary to the unanimous recommendation, he signed an above-ground test ban treaty with the Soviet Union, which they'd unanimously opposed, and now he's pulling our forces out of Vietnam.
By the end of 1964, where they felt that stand had to be taken against the expansion of international godless communism.
It was nonsense based on the domino theory.
The Vietnamese were fiercely independent.
They weren't going to have anything to do with China, but that was a myth we were sold.
You got the Dallas Police in Roscoe White, who by the way, also posed for the Backyard Photographs as a body double stand-in for Lee.
Only as Larry has shown, Roscoe is far more muscular than Lee.
So if you superimpose Lee's body image against the Backyard Photographs, he's diminutive.
He can't fill out the silhouette.
Whereas Roscoe fits it to a T. And where Roscoe appears to have been responsible for assassinating as many as 50 witnesses in the aftermath.
Then you had, of course, Escadro, the anti-Castro Cuban in the Dow Tax.
You had Lyndon Johnson, personal hitman.
And by the way, this was all the way with LBJ.
So Derry, if you want a thumbnail sketch of what was going on in Dealey Plaza that day, there it is.
And if you want to watch it in detail, go to my Bitchute channel, Jim Fetzer, and just search for JFK Special, 18 November 2021, and you'll have it.
All right.
This is a 15-second clip, and we're going to close it out.
All right, Jim, this seemed to be this is at the TSA and someone's bag with a phone actually exploded and it seemed like this would be the time that they trained for.
Oh, wow.
But they just go back to work.
Seemed like that had been their big moment that they'd been working.
Well, it's these lithium batteries have an explosive tendency as part of the idiocy, because the electric car batteries are made of lithium.
It's extremely expensive, very rare.
I believe we were in Afghanistan to loot one of the world's greatest lithium deposits, as well as cover for the poppy crowd, because the CIA is addicted to the drug trade, which it began in Southeast Asia.
And it has become the biggest drug dealer in the world.
But the fact is, this whole idea of mining for lithium and other rare metals necessary to make these batteries, they will catch fire if they're contaminated with salt water.
This happened down in Florida during this Hurricane Ian.
They have this limited range.
If you have to replace your battery, it's not like going to Sears and shelling out a hundred bucks.
$22,000 to replace your battery!
I mean, this whole thing is so absurd!
Let me add one final point, by the way, because it came back to mind about Flat Earth.
If you understand Earth as a spinning globe that rotates 24 hours on its axis, that the Moon rotates around the Earth in approximately every 30 days, that Earth orbits around the Sun 365 with a slight edge so that we have to have a leaf here to make it more in sync, Then you can explain the difference between day and night.
You can explain the passage of time that we turn into months with the moon circumventing Earth.
And you can explain the seasons, because as Earth approaches the sun and the spring gets closer to the sun, we have summer.
As it trails away, we get autumn.
And then what is the greatest distance from the sun?
We have the winter.
I don't see how Flat Earth can explain any of that, but I have no doubt of the intent on doing so.
I just say, if you want to believe what has been scientifically refuted, but bear in mind the relativity of motion, as Einstein emphasized, in spite of consulting classic sources such as those I've mentioned here, I. B. Cohen, The Birth of a New Physics, All right, Dr. Fetzer.
Okay.
You wanted the best.
You got the best.
Leslie Salmon, Space Time and Motion, be my guest.
Just don't claim.
This is supported by science because I guarantee 100% it is not.
All right, Dr. Fetzer.
Okay.
You wanted the best.
You got the best.
Yeah, I guess in closing, I'm just going to say that being called a flat earther goes back hundreds of years, and I just feel like it's being used in a way, like they say, JFK was fake.
Everything was fake.
And it's really taken on a life of its own, and it's got its own legs.
And it's really bothering me to have researched JFK like we have and have commenters who say that it's all fake and lots of thumbs up.
It's really, I don't know exactly what to say about it.
It's getting legs.
Well, Gary, we are just to the best of our ability sharing.
What, based on collaborative research?
And remember, in all these cases, I bring together groups of experts, the best experts in the case of JFK, the best experts in the world to ever study the case.
And I'm giving you a distillation of our conclusions and what additional findings I've had access to, especially by collaborating with Gary King and with Larry Revere in our ongoing new JFK Show.
Which I invite you to also join.
We've got a good one coming up this Wednesday, but Gary is posting them on my BitChute channel, Jim Petzer.
So check it out.
Pay attention.
If you want the latest on JFK, you will find it there.
Yeah.
Let me tell you, there is more people out there trying to confuse you about JFK than there are people that are trying to really honestly tell you the truth.
But guess what?
You found the ones that are really trying to do it.
All right.
This has been Inconvenient Truth, number 14.
We'll see you next week.
Thanks again, Jim.
My pleasure, Gary.
▲
Export Selection