All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 31, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:18
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (30 October 2022) with Don Grahn and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Three, two, one.
And welcome, folks.
This is Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'm Donald Rodner, producer, JD.Consultants at Live.com.
And this is right before Halloween, October 30th.
This is some kind of, it'll be some kind of show today.
Hopefully it's not going to be a big bomb, but it's going to be one heck of a show.
And we've got the best people here to share things with us here.
We've got James Spencer, most dangerous mind in America.
We're going to be having a big conference on false flags coming in December.
And also other things are happening too with Jim.
He's really the Energizer Bunny, who's really sparking a lot of good things in this world.
We also have David Kenney, who is this outstanding attorney out of Los Angeles, Wilshire, and doing fantastic there with the school board and things.
So Jim, let's see here.
Are we having any big bomb Well, Don, it's more serious than you could possibly imagine.
Scott's on a special assignment.
We're hoping Holly will be able to join us during the show.
But there are reasons I think this might even be our last show, as I shall explain as we proceed.
Fairly stunning stuff.
The U.S.
wants to replace its nuclear bombs in Europe with an updated version.
The question becomes, why the hell?
This is accelerating plans, replacing older weapons with upgraded bombs at U.S.
storage facilities in Europe.
The U.S.
keeps about 100 warheads at bases in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, and Turkey.
The upgraded B61-12 replaces non-nuclear components to make it more accurate, also designed to be carried by all U.S.
and Allied bombers and fighter jets, unlike the older versions.
Accelerating the deployment amidst the current tension would do little but stoke tension with Moscow.
Hans Christensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, described the plan as odd.
They have been saying we don't respond to the situation with nuclear weapons.
I don't think they want to go down that one, he told Politico.
The revelation comes that both Russia and NATO are conducting nuclear exercises.
Biden recently said the risk of a nuclear Armageddon is at its highest since the end of the Cold War.
Meanwhile, we have to ask, why is the U.S.
show known interest in pursuing diplomacy to end the war in Ukraine or to ease tension with Moscow.
Meanwhile we have to ask why is the US Army 101st Airborne in Romania?
commanders have repeatedly told CBS they're always ready to fight, that they're there to defend NATO territory, fully prepared to cross into the border into Ukraine, which of course is not itself a NATO nation indeed.
It was a desire of NATO to have Ukraine join NATO that led to the special military operation.
Meanwhile, In October, The Intercept reported the U.S.
was significantly increasing intel and special forces in Ukraine, despite freedom promises American troops would not get involved.
The report states the U.S.
initially withdrew its intel and special ops days before Russia's counteroffensive.
However, the belligerent Thalocracy decided to send its operative back into Ukraine, though the move can certainly be seen as another escalation.
Washington seems determined to further up the ante by sending regular military forces close to the conflict area.
The U.S.
Initiative Operation Atlantic Resolve, saying the 101st Airborne and the 2nd Brigade Combat Team to the Army's V Corps deployed in Europe, entails 4,700 soldiers from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, sent to locations across NATO-occupied Europe, especially Romania, close to the border.
On 30 July 2022, they conducted an air assault demonstration at the 57th Air Base.
Mikhail Galitsin, together with the 9th Mechanized Brigade of the Romanian Air Force, U.S.
forces are ready to enter Ukraine in place of further tensions, said CBS News on October 21st, citing the 101st Airborne Command Staff.
We are ready to defend every inch of NATO soils, said the Deputy Commander Brigadier General of Group John Lubas.
Commander of the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, Colonel Edward Mehaedras, in turn noted, troops deployed to Urania have been closely watching the Russian forces, building objectives to practice against and conducting drills that replicate exactly what's going on in the war.
CBS reporter Charlie Didaga was embedded with the forces as they conducted military exercise just six kilometers from Romania's border with Ukraine.
The 101st Airborne is conducting joint drills with the Romanian forces.
U.S.
troops are simulating combat operation against Russian troops.
How is it going to pacify Russia by this or make Putin confident the U.S.
isn't going to intervene?
It's completely absurd.
It's a gross provocation.
Needless to say, such action would not be taken kindly in Moscow, especially true when you get statements from the General that U.S.
forces are ready to defend every inch of NATO soil.
Russia has never threatened any NATO member state.
Such rhetoric thus only causes needless escalation to make matters worse.
The threat U.S.
troops are ready to enter Ukraine is even more dangerous, since Kyiv is officially not a member of NATO.
Moreover, neo-Nazi membership ambitions have repeatedly been rejected at the highest level, including by U.S.
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg.
As Lubas observes, the 101st is a light infantry division primarily suited for aerosol.
Its missions include planning, coordinating, and executing battalion-sized aerosols to take control of hostile ground.
Nicknamed the Screaming Eagles, the division is trained to conduct operation by inserting highly mobile teams capable of covering large distances, fighting behind enemy lines, working in austere environments with limited or degraded infrastructure.
Given the nature of the previous mentioned U.S.
intel and special force presence, as well as statements by the military commanders, it's clear the 101st Airborne falls perfectly in line with such clandestine operations, bound to further escalate tension between NATO and Russia.
Meanwhile, Sweden is going to further investigate the Nord Stream pipeline damage They already have one of the drones that was sent to destroy it, and it appears to be the case that this was a U.S.
op, but where it may also have involved MI6.
David, your thoughts?
Well, first off, you know, I want to address the diplomacy issue because there's been no representation whatsoever from Biden, nor Blinken, nor Jake Sullivan, To engage in diplomacy and that I think is of the highest importance right now the being on the brink of Armageddon you want to get people That's somewhat troublesome.
You want to be de-escalating.
And you see the lunacy of President Biden and Anthony Blinken by continuing to escalate the affairs.
With regard to putting the 101st Airborne in Romania, that's somewhat troublesome.
It is NATO soil there.
So I think that's that's a sufficient justification for the presence.
But I don't like it as a staging area for intrusions or invasions into the Ukraine.
And when I go back to hearing that Jake Sullivan and Jen Stoltenberg have been planning clandestine missions in or around Kiev, it doesn't surprise me.
But I think the main thing now is that there's got to be dialogue, there's got to be diplomacy, there's got to be de-escalation.
And I wouldn't be surprised if some of these Very good.
Biden's last hurrah or even Obama's last hurrah with an upcoming red sweep of the United States Congress.
Very good.
Yeah, Don.
Yeah, Jim, we opened up by saying that this might be our last show.
Please reassure me that you were just kidding because things are not going to be as bad as you're saying they are.
Well, you got to hear the other stories, Don, aren't you?
I'm telling you, I met that literally just now.
Oh no, that is scary.
Well, you'll see what I'm talking about.
Meanwhile, Joaquin Hagopian has deconstructed Putin's Valdai speech.
A rational mind amidst an insane irrational world, this guy has really got a grip on it.
Here you see how reasonable is Putin compared with the U.S.
and how irrational we are being.
On October 27, Putin addressed the annual Valdai discussion group with a headline, RT proposed no one can sit out the coming storm.
Putin's milestone Valdai speech.
Listing important takeaways, followed by the key Putin quotes in italics.
This presentation offers my commentary after each of the seven takeaway points.
During these harrowing moments when nuclear Armageddon appears closer today than any previous time in history, Including the October Missile Crisis of 1962, when then-Premier Nikita Khrushchev was confronted by American President John F. Kennedy.
Given the ultimatum to either remove the Soviet-installed nuclear missiles or face nuclear confrontation, he opted to send the missiles back to the USSR.
By the way, part of the agreement that was not made public was removing American missiles from Turkey as an agreement that was very appropriate, but which was not publicized at the time.
From that, historical development evolved a mutually assured destruction policy, the effective mutual deterrent shaping subsequent restrained behavior on both sides, meaning knowing that the attack by one on the other would guarantee the destruction of both sides and therefore it was inadvisable to initiate.
That ethical principle applied throughout the remainder of the Cold War, but alas, no longer applies today.
Putin has stated that to protect his nation, he'd be willing to use nukes, as it led to unprecedented war-mongering rhetoric on both sides over this last month near daily allegation by both Ukraine and Russia of a tactical nuclear duty bomb to be used as a false flag.
Several of my previous articles have shown the threat is actually real, that Ukraine or the West may release a nuke to blame Russia and instigate World War III.
The Thursday speech by Putin was as much addressed to his fellow Russians as to the people of the West.
Here are the RT takeaways in my response.
The West stokes conflict to preserve hegemony.
Ruling the world is what the so-called West has staked in this game, which is certainly dangerous, bloody, and I would say dirty.
It denies the sovereignty of countries and peoples, their identity and uniqueness, and disregards any interests of other states.
That is Vladimir Putin's declaration.
Joaquin's Commentary The Western Empire of lies led by the U.S.
but controlled by the Khazarian Mafia has enjoyed sole superpower status for over three decades and, like a drug, can't give it up.
The 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union marked the beginning of this brief unipolar hegemonic reign of exclusive U.S.
power and self-entitled exceptionalism.
Ever since U.S.
foreign policy toward Russia has been one of constant provocation, obsessively attempting in vain to weaken Moscow by any and all means necessary.
And for over two decades now, the U.S.
and Western media have demonized Russia's leaders, all while attempting to win over nations along Russia's border to recruit them to join NATO and install U.S.
nuclear missiles aimed at Russia.
In more recent years, the U.S.
agenda has grown overtly aggressive to outright regime change, removing Putin from power to select a weak puppet to control and thereby steal Russia's vast natural resources.
But now, with national economies in North America and Europe cratering, those days of unipolar hegemony are over.
Wake up and join the rest of the now-multipolar world or be the pariah that all other nations avoid while quietly celebrating the fall of Western civilization, because all it meant for the rest of the world is centuries of imperialistic racism, indentured servitude, and genocidal enslavement.
Humble yourself and move on as the dethroned power that hobbles along just to stay alive now.
Either respect all nation's sovereignty and right to national security or perish.
Second, rules for thee but not for me.
Vladimir Putin.
As soon as something becomes profitable for themselves, they change the rules immediately on the go in the course of the game.
Commentary Joaquin.
While the U.S.
is constantly denigrating and punishing any and all nations attempting to remain independent of America's hegemonic sphere of influence as a global bully, the U.S.
habitually threatens military invasion, regime change, Engaging in overt coercion customarily resulting in piling on economic sanctions that ultimately and humanely hurt the target nation's poorest populations.
While Washington, D.C., as a globalist enforcer, arbitrarily accusing targeted nations of various violations of international law or worse, It arbitrarily changes the rule of law to suit its own exploitative advantage, evoking its privilege, exceptionalism, greatness of impunity to violate any law it chooses.
It rigs a game so the controllers of the D.C.
puppets always stand to profit the most, while browbeating and bullying other nations into submission.
A recent example is committing a terrorist act of war and betraying against its supposed German ally.
Bullying up the North Stream Pipeline, depriving heat for the winter and energy to run its industry, forcing widespread bankruptcy and deadly famine.
Yet a vassal that is the European Union's kingpin, Germany, is driven to its subservient knees, too afraid to even confront the backstabbing American aggressor.
The domino effect is the death of Europe, but the same fate soon befalling North America as well.
Politicians who will not act in the interest of their citizens, but only the dirty bidding of their criminal master, have been on destroying the West for depopulation purposes.
Third, Vladimir Putin on canceled culture.
Liberal democracy has transformed into something unrecognizable, declaring any alternative viewpoint as propaganda or a threat.
The so-called cancel culture destroys anything that is alive and creative, preventing any freedom of thought in culture, economics, or politics alike.
Putin is taking aim at the liberal left that's hijacked Western culture into a highly destructive, overreaching, fascist, authoritarian tyranny that rejects any and all viewpoints differing from its intolerant dogma.
It woefully violates constitutional human rights and liberty, particularly First Amendment rights of free expression as well as freedom of the press.
The oppression engaging in rampant censorship today has turned the U.S.
constitutional republic into a dictatorship.
Where those bold enough to voice an alternative viewpoint are deemed criminal and enemy of the state, no different from the Soviet gulag enslavement.
Pace Pal just reinstated its earlier proposed policy of fining dissidents deemed anything to set the misinformation $2,500.
And the self-appointed tech gatekeepers construe anything that deviates from their dogmatic false narrative as misinformation.
Increasingly, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, among the tech giants, notoriously utilize algorithms To systematically deplatform, dissent, and to this day are criminally aiding and abetting genocidal murder by censoring life-saving information and truth that would otherwise prevent many from taking dangerous poisons, deceitfully sold as safe and effective.
Life-saving vaccines intended to deliberate injury and murder innocent victims.
Cancel culture is just another Kazarian mafia crime against humanity and children.
Putin criticizes cancel culture for preventing freedom of thought in culture, economics, and politics.
His own strict domestic policy severely punishing dissenters strikes me as hypocritical.
4.
Russia does not seek domination.
Russia is an independent, original civilization that has never considered itself an enemy of the West since antiquity.
It has had ties with the West of traditional Christian and Muslim values, freedom, patriotism, and a rich culture.
There is another West, however, an aggressive, cosmopolitan neocolonialist acting as a tool of neoliberal elites whose dictates Russia will never accept.
Russia simply defends its right to exist and develop freely at the same time.
We ourselves are not seeking to become some kind of new hegemon.
Joaquin.
This Putin criticism is a mark as he's repeatedly made offers, overtures, and gestures intending to normalize and improve Russo-American relations, but consistently his efforts have been rebuffed and rejected.
The latest case in point is as recently as last May, Putin was ready to negotiate a peace deal with Ukraine as long as Ukraine stopped its ethnic purge of residents living in the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics.
And accepting Crimea's Russian territory in addition to Ukraine's neutrality to Russia.
Thousands and thousands of lives, especially on the Ukraine side, would have been saved.
But the Popatzolensky taking orders from US and NATO that in turn followers of their bloodline masters absolutely refused.
And of course, he's talking about the Rothschild banking empire.
U.N.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III truthfully said the objective was to stretch the war out to weaken Russia, and neocon policymaker John Bolton truthfully stated the ultimate objective is to remove Putin from power.
These scumbags, with blood on their hands, would rather see widespread carnage and mass human suffering using the people of Ukraine as cannon fodder than bring peace to the region by respecting Russia's right to national security.
The Russian people have sacrificed so much historically and after the Cold War ended in 1991.
The Kremlin leadership has been open to peaceful relations with the West, but the overloads that control the Western governments, especially in the U.S.
and the U.K., have consistently chosen provocation and unwarranted aggression against Russia.
Meanwhile, Russia never went to war killing millions of Muslims.
Putin has embraced a Christian Orthodox Church, respecting religious freedom.
The West, historically rooted in Christianity in recent decades with its leftist focus bent, has seemingly embraced decadence and hedonism.
Moreover, During the post-Soviet era, Russia has never demonstrated an ambition to become a hegemon or resurrect the imperialistic Soviet empire.
Yet the U.S., for three decades, was the sole global superpower committed to non-stop wars of imperialistic brute aggression against the elites, including the Zionist bludgeoning killing machine for the Greater Israel Project.
Deceptively selling its bloodthirsty aggression and brutality as promoting democracy around the world is both an insult to our intelligence and an abomination of the worst sort.
Putin's assessment is both fair and true.
Fifth, Putin.
Western hegemony is envy.
We're standing at an historic milestone ahead of what is probably the most dangerous, unpredictable, and at the same time important decade since the end of World War II.
The West is not able to single-handedly manage humanity, but is desperately trying to do so.
Most of the people of the world no longer want to put up with it.
No one can sit out the coming storm, which has acquired a global character.
Humanity has two choices, either to continue to accumulate a burden of problems that will inevitably crush us all, or try together to find solutions, albeit imperfect, but working, capable of making our world safer and more stable.
Thus, Vladimir Putin.
Joaquin, this point is also extremely valid.
An historic milestone has clearly been reached where America's unipolar hegemony is over, a kaput history, a bygone era.
The entire world knows this, except for the primadonna papas pretending they are still the righteous, freedom-loving rulers of this world, when it's the biggest lie of them all.
We're now living in a multipolar world led by Russia and China.
With Economic Bricks Alliance and Shanghai Cooperative being flooded currently with application for new membership by Turkey, ditching NATO, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Argentina, Egypt, nations are lining up in droves, ditching the U.S.
petrodollar as international reserve, with new currencies developed backed by the gold standard.
The West is now in its death throes while the rest of the world is leaving it behind.
Looking for global leadership from Russia and China.
Bottom line?
Tragically, in the race to drastically reduce the human population, the elite has chosen the three wealthiest continents to throw out of their bus and brutally destroy, and their treasonous puppets are more than obliging their masters and demolishing the West as soon as possible.
Drawn from elite think tanks and CIA data, military industrial complex trade website, deagle.com predicted enormous population loss by 2025 in all the wealthiest nations on earth, 80% in the US going from 330 million in 2020 to only 65 million in 2025.
Of course, the most from all Western countries.
The skyrocketing unaffordable prices survive amidst secondary record inflation, the history's biggest economic collapse, acute shortages of all kinds, especially food staples.
Putin.
What a multipolar world should look like.
Above all, We believe that the new world order should be based on law and justice, be free, authentic, and fair.
A future world order is being formed before our eyes.
And in this world order, we must listen to everyone, take into account every point of view, every nation, society, culture, every system of worldviews, ideas, and religious beliefs.
Without imposing a single truth on anyone and only on this basis understand our responsibility for the fate of our people and the planet to build a symphony of human civilization.
Thus spoke Putin.
Joaquin!
Who could argue against a multipolar world that values law and justice with the attributes of being free, authentic, and fair?
Likewise, live in a kumbaya world where everyone has a voice and every nation, culture, and religion is respected, and no one truth or single power dictates the rest.
By the way, the fundamental principle of morality is respect, treating other persons with respect.
It all sounds idealistic and utopian, never in history achieved on this planet.
And Putin's frequent use of the term New World Order and previous positive references and benevolent deference he apparently holds toward the U.N.
poll both give me serious pause that he is a globalist in disguise.
With a lousy track record for human rights and Putin's controlled opposition roots groomed by the Rothschild-Kissinger-Schwab-Davos crowd, his kumbaya world Where these words come cheap, espousing all the high-falutin' values of yet-to-realistically-ever-be practice on this fallible earth throughout history makes me very suspicious.
He may not be who he says.
That said, Putin is obviously an extremely intelligent individual capable of expressing sorely needed truth in our truth-starved world.
Especially rare among today's world leaders, and in his capacity to show remarkable constraint while for decades aggressively provoked and demonized by the West, as seemingly a genuine nationalist who appears to care about his people, his leadership stands head and shoulders above the rest, and his anti-globalist, anti-wokeism, anti-pedophilia positions repeatedly articulated over the years also make him a rare standout among world leaders.
And as much as I want him to turn out to be a good guy, I lean toward him being a controlled opposition despot merely playing his role on the geopolitics chessboards.
Time will tell who he really is.
Here I depart from Joaquin and credit Putin as a good guy.
Seventh, finally, Putin.
Thoughts on the West woke-ism and gender theory.
If Western elites believe that they can incorporate into the minds of their people, their societies, things that I personally find somewhat weird, and which are apparently in fashion like dozens of genders, gay pied parade, so be it.
Let them do whatever they want.
Their difference from the so-called neoliberal values is that in every case they are unique because they stem from the traditions of a particular society, its cultural and historical experience.
That is why you cannot force them on somebody.
You should simply respect them, cherish what each nation picked for itself over centuries.
Joaquin.
Again, Putin articulately applies tact and diplomacy here, stating how all the wokeism bullshit and transgender perversions and decadence of the West that constantly attempts to normalize pedophilia in the mass media is not perimerous culture.
But he attempts to accept that each culture and nation is free to accept whatever its historic traditions and values it embraces as their own.
He expresses more tolerance than I, maybe because it's not bringing down his culture like it is America.
Having the degenerates cramming their sick agenda down our throats as they cluelessly brainwash left and engages in criminal election fraud, I just simply had, in my opinion, Putin is denouncing the West, standing up against globalism, and is a hero to us all.
destroying America.
This clown show is hard to even stomach, Joaquin.
I just simply add, in my opinion, Putin is denouncing the West, standing up against globalism and is a hero to us all.
That is my take.
David, yours.
David I second that.
I had the similar take, but you know, Joaquin Hagopian has raised an interesting proposition, which is that Putin is just part of this whole deal, controlled opposition, and stoking or playing the part of the, you know, the other side of the dialectical thinking.
I think what The conflict is absolutely true.
The comments are accurate.
Rules for thee and not for me.
It was very, I think, articulate the way that he cited out that the West's goal is imposing in some instances widespread bankruptcy and causing famine.
And so that seems to be me to be a correct assessment in Putin's logic.
As he addresses cancel culture, I agree with him.
There's rampant oppression taking place by the West.
And when we we look at our ideals, constitutional and First Amendment, Second, Third, Fourth Amendment, you know, you see that the amplification of governments all over the world has taken place.
And so that's COVID, in effect, in my opinion, was...
I think historically when he says Russia does not sink domination, I think that's correct.
of government and at the same time operate to diminish personal liberties and individual opinion.
So I think historically when he says Russia does not sink domination, I think that's correct.
If there's anything I've noticed in my entire life over Russia, the only external adventure that I can think of right off hand is Afghanistan when Russia, of course, got a little further than it wanted to toward the Indian continent. got a little further than it wanted to toward the
But I think that the fact that the West has continually provoked Russia, has done so despite agreements not to do so, gives him every right to question the integrity and the moral authority of the gives him every right to question the integrity and the moral authority of the what I believe he's correct.
Western hegemony is failing.
It's eroding.
We see U.S., Russia, and China, and now you've seen an alliance take place between Russia and China that is similar in its historical origin, but has to define its role in an upcoming world.
You have Russia now eyeing the Ukraine.
You have China eyeing Taiwan.
You're just going to see more and more escalation, I think, on those fronts.
When Putin raises the concept of a multipolar world, it's, you know, he's talking about every culture having an opportunity to flower.
It's, you know, all glory is like the grass and the glory of man is the flower of the grass that is there for a while and passes away.
Okay.
And what Putin is saying is that all of these cultures are going, some are going to succeed and others are going to fail and you have to kind of accept that as a matter of national policy.
And, and you should implement that in diplomacy.
So when he's talking about the, the multipolar world, I certainly understand it.
The one part I liked is that You know, you look at what's going on in Finland and Sweden right now, considering membership in NATO, and advancing membership in NATO, which is just more poking of the bear.
So there's a lot of things that justify Putin's ideology, his concrete narrative, and quite frankly, it's very well put together.
I was impressed for the first time in Joaquin Hagopian's articulate discussions, especially from his use of the term highfalutin, which I've never seen written before, you know, but, and nor spelled correctly.
So I was, I was delighted to see him read that.
But at the end of the day, the wokeism or the gender theory that is being pushed down our throats here in America, It's offensive.
I don't think over the long term it will survive.
I think, like all things, if you give it an opportunity to try to gain an argument, that's okay.
but in the long run, it doesn't hold out.
But what's interesting is all of those seven points by Putin have merit.
All of the comments by Hagopian are accurate and articulate.
He expressed himself very, very well.
The one thing that concerns me, like I said, is that he notes that Putin may be controlled opposition, and that concerns me to no end.
Well, let me rebut that point.
Jacob Rothschild himself has declared that Putin is an enemy of the New World Order and that the New World Order cannot proceed without Ukraine.
That, in my opinion, makes Vladimir Putin certifiably a good guy and a champion of all of humanity, not only of Russia, where he's shown himself to be a dedicated nationalist, just as, in my opinion, Donald Trump has shown himself to be a dedicated nationalist with regard to America.
But a champion of all humanity in a situation that is becoming increasingly dire.
And when Don asked if I meant literally what I said, I do, for the reason shown in the following story, which I revised ours for today.
Get this.
Evidence that U.S.
intends blitz nuclear strike on the Kremlin coming from South Front.
Alexander Berkouris headlined in October 29th.
That would be yesterday.
Biden quietly moves the world closer toward Armageddon, Finland ready to host nukes.
Discussing a U.S.
plan to trap Russia by positioning its nuclear missiles about 500 miles or 7 minutes flight time from the Kremlin, a checkmate ...beheading of Russia's Central Command, so Russia won't have enough time to launch retaliatory missiles, and demand Russia's surrender, since there's no way Russia's Central Command would be able to assess the situation within only seven minutes and launch its missiles.
There's a history to the plan.
The U.S.
government decision to do this seems to have been made around 2006, when America's two most prestigious national security academic journals, Foreign Affairs and National Security, both recommended Though ever so tactfully, replacing the idea—actually, the meta-strategy—of mutually assured destruction or MAD, that nuclear weapons exist only in order to prevent a World War III, by the new U.S.
meta-strategy of nuclear primacy, that America will use them to win a nuclear war against Russia.
Positioning those missiles in Ukraine was supposed to be the way to do that, but since it's looking increasingly unlikely now, it is to be Finland, the second nearest nation to Kremlin, taking on this function, if Turkey's President Erdogan will allow it into NATO, which will be his most fateful decision ever.
Then, on March 1, 2017, two leading American experts on nuclear arms control published in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists declaring a new type of nuclear fuse was being installed on U.S.
missiles Creating exactly what one would expect to see if a nuclear-armed state were planning to have the capacity to fight and win a nuclear war by disarming enemies with a surprise first strike.
That strike now is expected to be coming from Finland instead of from Ukraine.
On October 28, Russia's RT News bannered.
Biden backtracks on nuclear pledge.
The Pentagon has failed to impose a limit on use of the atomic option despite President's promise, and reported that Biden has switched his policy because of advice from the Pentagon, which says America needs to have an option to start a nuclear war with Russia, not merely to respond to one from Russia.
Russia's policy on nuclear first strike is very clear, and it is no Russian version of America's nuclear primacy policy.
Here it is.
There are four scenarios in which Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons, that is, to go beyond nuclear deterrence.
One, obtaining reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking Russia.
Two, the use of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction against Russia.
Three, some impact on objects, a failure which will lead to the disruption of the response of nuclear forces.
Aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened.
Of course, there's also a possibility the situation in Ukraine could develop one in which that fourth condition might be the one that would spark a Russian first strike against America and its allies.
But that now seems less likely than U.S.
first strike from Finland.
Also, Finland was part of Hitler's Operation Barbarossa invasion of the Soviet Union.
It allied with Hitler.
This time, it would be allied with Biden.
More?
NATO wants to blaze nuclear missiles on Finland's Russian border, and Finland has said yes.
According to Newsweek, on October 26, Finland will allow NATO to place nuclear weapons on border with Russia, they cite Finnish media reports.
Allegedly, a condition NATO had placed on Finland to join NATO was to allow America's nuclear missile to be positioned on Finland's Russian border, which is closer to Moscow than any other except Ukraine's.
Whereas Ukraine's would be five minutes from blitznuking Moscow so as to preemptively decapitate Russia's retaliatory command, Finland's would be seven minutes Only around 120 seconds longer for Russia to be able to launch retaliatory strikes.
Finland is now to vote on the bill joining NATO on that basis to become America's spearhead to defeat Russia in World War III.
Obviously, assuming NATO had indeed given Finland's leaders the belief that saying yes would increase NATO's likelihood of expediting Finland's application to join, NATO is set upon checkmating Russia into capitulation if Finland does join.
Newsweek reports, also, the U.S.
already has around 100 nuclear weapons in Europe, Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey, according to the Federation of American Scientists.
Britain and France, both NATO members, also maintain their own independent nuclear arsenals.
None of those countries, however, borders Russia.
They're all much farther away.
David, your thoughts?
Yes, proximity is everything.
Irrational behavior is nothing.
The problem that we have is that, you know, as Russia has sought to take out activity in the Ukraine, which is indisputable that this activity being was supported and pushed by which is indisputable that this activity being was supported and pushed by the It has a
It has an idea, or it has a notion, that these are planned events to threaten the existence of the nation.
So, I understand that.
When Finland argues for being involved in NATO, it is operating off a fundamental presupposition that NATO will then protect it.
But there are two problems with that.
Finland is seven minutes away from the Kremlin.
And the other side of that is the Kremlin is seven minutes away from Finland.
I'll tell you right now, I've always admired the Scandinavian nations, Norway, Sweden, and Finland, because they stayed neutral, because they didn't become part of NATO.
Now they're reversing themselves, they're committing suicide, I guarantee you 100%.
As soon as nuclear weapons are positioned in Finland, Russia will take them out.
Now, under international law, it is permissible to launch a preemptive strike If you know you're about to be hit with one yourself, this therefore would, in my judgment, be in accordance with international law.
Putin has shown such restraint in the face of overwhelming provocation, he would not succumb to stupidity and allow those missiles to become activated to threaten Russia.
He would not allow that to happen.
Therefore, as I see it, The United States and NATO have embarked on a policy that is going to lead to the destruction of the West.
I frankly don't believe we're going to have a chance to launch our missiles.
The Russians are so much better.
They're better equipped.
They have more accurate missiles with greater devastation.
This is a suicide compact into which Finland has now entered.
I do not foresee a happy ending.
David, further thoughts?
Yeah, I'm concerned about that, of course.
You know, the world is such a big place.
We've got a number of continents.
We've got South America.
We've got Africa.
We've got Australia.
We've got Asia.
I mean, the whole world is such a huge place, and to have this This theatrical presentation of nuclear war focused on Europe and the United States and Russia just tells me how base the thinking has gotten.
You know, I don't mean to chant democracy, diplomacy, Yes, yes, yes.
Don, go ahead.
But those are the things that should be leading us now.
They are aspirational in character.
They're inspirational in following.
And we need to embrace diplomacy and efforts to create a sense of peace immediately.
As a nation.
Yes, yes, yes.
Don, go ahead.
Add your thoughts here as we're about to close up.
Yeah.
Actually, I've heard rumors that there's supposed to be a dirty bomb going off there.
And also I've heard that there might be a neutron bomb being implemented in the future here.
So, I don't know what all is happening, but it sounds pretty ominous all right.
It looks like you might be right, brother.
Well, Joaquin already said about how ready the suspicion the U.S.
and the Ukraine are going to set off a dirty bomb and blame it on Russia.
Russia's already made up an issue of this before the United Nations and elsewhere.
They're not going to play the SAP.
They're not going to be suckers.
The United States and NATO are, in my opinion, Consigning themselves to nuclear annihilation.
They're doing it deliberately, but it's a massive, an act of massive stupidity.
Self-destruction.
Don, take us out.
Oh, no, we got 10 more minutes.
Oh, I thought I saw, we already, I thought you had a half a minute, 30 minutes, 30 seconds.
That was 12 minutes.
Okay, okay, way to go, my friend.
Here we go now.
Politics in the U.S.
is playing out in a devastating way for the Democrats.
GOP candidates are dominating with Catholics in six states.
What did they think they were going to do when they kept promoting abortion, abortion, abortion?
Catholics are pro-life.
You got overwhelming Catholic opposition to this Democrat fixation on abortion, and they want it not within the constraints of Roe, which I consider to be perfectly reasonable, where you had unrestricted abortion in the first ...trimester, that it could be regulated by the state in the second, but that after the second trimester when viability occurs, when the fetus has the ability to survive independent of the interuterine environment, then only
To preserve the life or the—save the life or to preserve the health of the mother.
Otherwise, it was murder.
You have Democrats in states like Virginia with the governor advocating infanticide, murder of a baby after born live, when it's legitimately described as a baby.
This is so outrageous.
So get this, a new poll shows Catholic voters overwhelmingly support Republican gubernatorial and Senate candidates in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, Ohio, and Pennsylvania just two weeks prior to the coming midterm.
What did they expect was going to be the outcome?
Wow.
Here's a review.
Arizona.
Catholic voters favor Kerry Lake, 52.5 over Katie Hobbs, 46.9.
Katie Hobbs, by the way, is a moron.
We saw a premature vote outcome that flipped those exactly.
They just gave the vote reverse so that Kerry Lake had 47 and Katie Hobbs had 53.
It's absurd.
For the Senate, they support Blake Mastard by 52 over Mark Kelly at 46.3.
In Florida, DeSantis has a favorability of 61.5 in Catholics.
Only 34.5 for Democrat Chris, who used to be a Republican.
Meanwhile, Marco Rubio has 59.1 over Val Demings of 36.9 in Georgia.
Brian Kepp has the largest lead to 36.67.1 of Catholic votes in Georgia.
Stacey Adrams running once again.
And she, by the way, has never acknowledged having lost her race in the past.
Only 31% of the Catholic vote.
Herschel Walker, again, running away with the Catholic vote.
64.7 over incumbent Raphael Warnock.
32.7, who's abused his wife, sought to run her over with his car, for God's sake.
That's the best that Democrats can do?
Nevada.
Gubernatorial candidate Joe Lombardo, 55.6 over Steve Sisolak, who's the incumbent governor at 34.
Meanwhile, Adam Laxat is doing well, eclipsing Senator Catherine Cortez at 36 with 56.7.
Catherine Cortez claimed today that she's running even with Adam Laxat.
I do not believe that for a second.
Ohio, incumbent Governor DeWine, faring extremely well with Catholic voters, 61.3.
Nathan Whaley tailing with 34.4.
Republican challenger J.D.
Vance saw an advantage in the Senate race, 55.5 over Tim Ryan, with 41, where Tim Ryan appears to be a miscreant, just a disgusting guy.
Pennsylvania.
Oz, of course, leading here, but after the debate, Fetterman's gone into the toilet where he belongs.
Oz is going to win, even if he's a flawed candidate, because Fetterman is clearly incompetent to hold the office.
If he won, he couldn't carry out his obligations.
It's ridiculous.
Meanwhile, also in Pennsylvania, Attorney General Josh Shapiro is the only Democrat to be ahead among Catholic voters, where Senator Doug Dastiani yielded a favorability rating of only 44.5, the lowest of any Republican in the six states.
As we approach our final weeks, a few Catholics in these pivotal states are coming into focus.
Not only do they show general dissatisfaction with Biden, which appears to be influencing each state's respective Senate and gubernatorial race, but that the main issue driving Catholic voters are related to the economy.
It's also clear measures to protect the unborn are very popular among Catholic voters, especially compared to those who say abortion should be legal throughout all nine months of pregnancy.
From a national perspective, here we get some overall results.
For all six states, at least 59% of Catholic respondents viewed the economy, jobs, inflation, rising interest rates as the most pressing issues.
Among Catholic voters, Biden didn't clear 40% in any job approval ratings.
His highest came in Arizona at 39.5.
Lowest in Georgia, 29.9.
In Georgia, Regarding abortion, at least 69% of Catholics favor a nationwide abortion ban after 15 weeks.
The highest score in Georgia, 78%.
Nevada, the lowest at 69.
Meanwhile, Michael Moore, I am deadly serious.
He's confident of a Democrat midterm win.
If anyone wondered whether this guy is off his nut, here's further proof.
Positive.
Michael Moore is a loon.
David, your thoughts.
Yeah, well, you know, I see, well, I'm not going to make the comment.
It was about Michael Moore, but I'm not going to make it because I don't want to be foul and base over the FCC.
You know, it's very interesting.
I've been watching Catholic, I'm going to call them movements, over the last 10 years.
I've seen, you know, there's a real, there's a real historical basis for Catholicism and its impact on the United States.
A lot of that emanates, of course, from Mexico.
We've seen the Archbishop of Los Angeles, Jorge Horacio Gomez, write a book about immigration and the next America.
And he talks about how all these people are going to come into America and how we should be prepared for that.
And then you see a little while after that you see Pope Francis come to the border and and give a have a host of a sermon on the border and And he talked about how the Trump regime, which hadn't come into existence yet, and it should be building bridges, not walls, in a hundred words or less.
You've also seen the encyclical that was written by the Pope regarding a more symbiotic relationship with the world.
And so you've seen the interests of Catholicism, I think, really in things over the last 10 to 15 years, and doctrinally as well.
I think I agree with the analysis on the influence of abortion.
I'm surprised that the leading factor would be economics with respect to Catholic voters.
I think it's just shocking to me that there are people out there actually condoning infanticide.
You know, I mean, it's just abhorrent to me that that could actually be a position.
I, like you, Jim, thought that Roe v. I didn't agree with Roe v. Wade, But I thought it was a well-reasoned and constructed opinion that tried to satisfy the multiple interests that were at stake in the abortion debate.
We've now seen abortion getting returned to the states.
We're now going to see some states, like Arizona, I can't wait to see Carrie Lake take The governor's seat in Arizona.
I think DeSantis has got it locked up in Florida.
Kemp's got it locked up in Georgia.
I hope to God Herschel Walker gets elected.
I think he will.
And then we see, you know, the comedy and the campaign of Fetterman.
And I just cannot, for the life of me, believe could put forward.
It's amusing.
It's almost hilarious.
And I'm just glad to see that Mehmet Oz has some promise as United States Senator.
Other than that, I wish Mastriano well in Pennsylvania, and we'll see what the future holds.
Well, Fetterman, at best, was an oaf.
He was a Neanderthal.
The idea that this guy was a Democrat candidate was insulting.
He looks like a homeless guy.
He never even wore a coat and tie until he got on the debate stage, and then it was a catastrophe.
A catastrophe for the Democrats.
And of course, Ron Johnson, my own senator, is faring well here in Wisconsin.
He may be the single best and most important senator in the entirety of the United States Senate.
I'm very proud of him.
Along with Chuck Grassley.
Yeah, Chuck Grassley, of course, but he's a long-timer.
Chuck Grassley's been around forever.
He's like a granite for integrity and, you know, serious governance.
I'm all for Chuck Grassley.
Don, I think we're out there.
We got some big, big stories, but I want to save them for the start of our second hour.
Your thoughts?
Oh boy, yeah.
What an hour this is.
I will say everybody should review this show.
Probably should watch it at least twice to get the full impact.
What Joaquin Hagopian has to say there.
That was outstanding and he's just a fantastic person who's living in Bali right now and that is just world-renowned.
And I will say thank you so much for watching your Truth Vs. News here on October 30th or before Halloween in nine days of this important election.
And so I just want to say
▲
Export Selection