Enormous Danger – UN Agenda 2030 - Dr. Mike Yeadon on CHD's "Tea Time" - Oct. 31, 2022
|
Time
Text
- Hello everybody.
Welcome to Tea Time.
It's October the 31st, 2022.
I'm not a fan of Halloween, so I'm not even going to mention that.
But that's just my personal thing.
I'm sorry, but I make no apologies for that.
We do have Dr. Mike Eden on with us.
He's just changing locations.
He'll be on any second now.
We just had him on, and he's really I think he might even be in the green room.
If he is, do bring him on.
There he is.
Hello.
Hello.
Thank you so much for coming back on Tea Time.
I have to say, you must be the most popular, what we call, new person on the block in our movement.
So I want to thank you, start by thanking you for all that you're doing.
So lots of people writing to us asking for you to come back.
Now, I want to get straight into it, if it's all right with you.
Yeah, just give me, uh, how long are we planning to talk?
Because that, you know, I can talk on a high level.
We're live right now, and you can have as long as you like, or as short as you like, but we are a one-hour show, so if you have to go, you have to go.
We're just grateful for any time.
But I want to get straight stuck into it, and, um, we've called this, like, basically, uh, Massive Danger Ahead.
Do not get complacent with the UN Agenda 2030.
We are in danger, You said on an email, Covid is act one in a multi-act drama is what you're feeling, and I think we'll all agree with you, set to conclude in 2030 where we will own nothing apparently and be happy.
Can you talk us through what you think of the immediate dangers and the complacency of so many?
Yes, okay.
So thanks, you know, thank you for thanking me, but I always say it's platforms, programmes and people like you that allow me to reach other people, so it's mutual.
What can I say?
I spent a long time early in 2020 as a recently or semi-retired research scientist looking at what was going on, things like PCR tests, the absurdity of lockdown, great worries about the so-called vaccines barreling towards us.
I'm going to have to ask the audience to tolerate me more or less skimming over the evidence for all of that being a fraud.
I'll give a couple of examples, but I don't want to recap what I've spoken about about 80 times.
But rest assured, the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, I think the evidence is very strong from independent researchers, so this is not me saying this, I'm looking at their work, that there never was viral pandemic of a novel pathogen and that the deaths that we saw, I'm afraid, were medical malpractice at best and murder at worst.
So that basically we were lied to from the beginning.
I don't believe there's been a novel cause of illness and death, significant illness and death, other than our government's responses to the fake pandemic.
Now I know that's quite shocking.
It's quite Uncommon for kind of full-on research scientists like me to say things like that because they sound like conspiracy theory, but I'm telling you I have been nothing all my career except saying things as I see them.
So I don't sugarcoat things because they're unpopular and I won't bore you with it, but people can go and look up a researcher called Dennis Rancourt.
R-A-N-C-O-U-R-T-E.
He had a recent interview with On Germ Warfare, a very popular podcast.
And at the end of it, if you've listened carefully, you will be in no doubt that you'll be where I am now.
And why shouldn't it be a lie?
They lied to us about absolutely everything.
They lied to us about the magnitude of the public health emergency, which never existed.
They lied to us about the necessity of having measures like lockdowns, mass testing, social distancing, masks, and it goes on and on.
Every single one of those was known to be ineffective in interrupting transmission of some respiratory illness.
It's been tested and they don't work.
So now I've told you they've lied about the public health emergency.
They've lied about the necessity and usefulness of the measures.
And I'm afraid back to my absolute wheelhouse, they lied to you about the design, research and development and use, approval and use of the so-called vaccines.
So that's the backdrop.
And I didn't get there in one leap.
But I started my journey, I think, by when Boris Johnson said, I must, I have to tell you, you must stay at home.
That was the moment I knew we'd lost the country.
And then noticing lots of other countries were doing the same.
I thought, my God, we're in danger of losing the free world.
And so that's what I've got to say.
And the funny thing is, if you look to who might be influencing this stuff, I'm personally not that interested in who the perpetrators are.
I just call them the perpetrators.
Other people call them Mr. Global or Globalist or WEF or whatever it is.
I mean, I don't want to do anything different if I'm told that it's one group of individuals or another.
So I don't really care.
But I will say some people have made themselves very visible.
on the scene like Bill Gates and some that have been highly involved but are quite invisible like Sir Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust and numerous scientific advisors to various governments.
These people are clever people and as I've said in the past they know what I know.
I'm pretty much their contemporaries and so I knew they were lying to us and they've done nothing but lie to us.
Now the effect of what they have done has been multi-factorial.
One, it's terrified the hell out of everybody.
I think I'm beyond terror now, but I have to say, I've asked my wife to not be in the room when I do these interviews, because I think she's suffering from the equivalent of PTSD, except it's not post.
She's literally unconsolable for hours afterwards.
It is absolutely terrifying.
And I resigned myself to, this is what we must face.
And the outcome doesn't matter for me.
I'm absolutely serious.
If I perish attempting to Avert this, it will be fine.
It's about my children and grandchildren.
I've received no payment or any other reward or compensation from the beginning.
So those who say I'm a grifter are liars.
OK?
Along with the other liars.
I'm not stupid.
I had a long career and a successful one in commercial research.
So all that I have said, I'm going to have to ask today's listeners to take on trust.
But a couple of things.
One, you can go and find, if you can find recent interviews, don't use Google.
Use other browsers, otherwise you won't find me on things like Rumble and BitShoot and so on.
But if you want to know the details, go and listen to earlier interviews.
And the other people I would highly commend to you that I bumped into this year, Mr. Hedley Rees, a Welsh guy with over 30 years experience in pharmaceutical production, the actual manufacture and filling of vials, labelling, shipping, all that sort of stuff.
He's spent as long in that field complex field as I have in research.
And the other person is Dr. I think it's Dr. Sasha Latipova.
And she's a serial biotech person, understands the industry and regulations, runs a company, medical device company right now.
These people have risked their entire reputations and careers to tell us in their field of specialty, you know, regulatory affairs, manufacturing, me and research.
And those people have given Fantastic interviews to Dr Elizabeth Liette of the Truth for Health Foundation.
And I think today the latest whistleblower recording will play, so pick up from them.
So this is, it's all been a fake.
The effects of it, as I said, terrified people.
I think they have severely damaged the economies of every country in which sort of massive lockdowns, repeated ones, were put in place.
The international confidence in the sovereign currencies of those countries, like UK, Europe, North America, have been so badly weakened that the movements of the values of assets priced in those currencies are so dramatic.
I mean, I'm an amateur when it comes to money, but I needed to watch money markets for 10 years or so.
And even I, as an amateur, can tell that weird things are going on.
So in addition to the damage to the economy and the finance, including currencies of various countries, lots of people have been killed, actually been killed by the medical profession and the actions of our governments all around the world through inappropriate administration of treatments that you would never, ever use in someone with a flu-like illness.
You don't sedate and ventilate them and give them Midazolam morphine.
I'm afraid that was done for certainly scores of thousands of people and possibly hundreds of thousands according to Stuart Wilkie, recently interviewed by Marjid Nawaz on his show Radical.
And the guy, Dr Wilkie, has receipts as they call them.
He can show you the actual orders and the amounts of Midazolam flowing into the NHS stockpiles, by the way, when Jeremy Hunt was Health Secretary Hello, Mr Hunt, you are a war criminal.
Certainly crimes against humanity.
So the NHS accumulated large amounts of material that, used appropriately, helps people who are suffering, you know, die with less discomfort.
But the quantities used and the patients in whom they were used, and the doses in which they were used, as a pharmacologist, I'm telling you, They knew that that would kill people.
So, you know, Hancock, Hunt, medical doctors, following protocols, and not learning from what was going on, or even thinking about, because this makes sense, have killed lots of people.
And I would put it to the audience, what kind of organization sets about frightening the developed world pretty much to death, smashing their economy, And then putting in place various measures that meant that people would die in excess from the hands of their own medical authorities.
So I often say to people, if I'm wrong about one thing, I ask you to think of this.
I think I need to be wrong about everything I've said for it not to be true.
How many times is the right number for public health people in your country to lie to you about something that could affect your life or that of your family.
I put it to you, the answer's zero.
And I've proven at least like six or eight lies, really major ones.
So that as a backdrop, who is involved?
The people who, as I say, who are visible, like Gates.
All the major figures that I can spot unfortunately are descended from people who've been involved in eugenics activities in the past and certainly I think Bill Gates' grandfather was important in so-called Planned Parenthood and you can find time without number these people have got connections to groups that believe they have more or less have the right to push the whole of humanity around and shape it The way they want it.
I think they're acting like gods.
But unfortunately, the other end of the scale, I think they're acting like diabolical people, really, really evil.
So the connection between those individuals like Gates have been telling us that things won't be over until everybody's vaccinated.
Which of course is absurd, because you would never vaccinate people who were not at risk, and that's most people.
Even if the virus narrative was true, and it is not.
So even if it's true, you wouldn't vaccinate the people who've had it and recovered.
Children, because none of them die of it.
Pregnant women, because we never give experimental novel medicines to pregnant women.
And you can see all three of those things have been trampled on.
I could give you an hour's worth of examples.
So those people who have been involved have long track records or descended from people whose concern seems to be about genetic purity, racial purity, numbers of warm bodies on the planet.
And then it is a matter of record that the United Nations agreed the UN 2030 goals, also called Sustainable Development Goals.
And if you go through them one by one, they're absolutely horrifying because, for example, they imply the end of personal transportation, certainly internationally, permanently.
They intend to remove the opportunity for plebs like me to move from country to country.
They phase out Commercial aviation completely by 2030 if not earlier.
We will not be eating meat, or very little of it, while they'll have Philly Mignon, no doubt.
But we'll be eating grains, pulses, bugs, and things like that.
And we'll be burning far less fossil fuel.
We want to get to net zero.
There's no question that the consumption of fossil fuels is the strongest possible surrogate for indicator for the standard of living of a society, I'm afraid.
You simply can't not consume or produce CO2 and have an even acceptable life of staying warm and being able to be fed and sheltered.
And so these people want to drive us towards these UN 2030 goals, which are they're inhuman and unlivable, actually unlivable.
And so one possible conclusion matching their connections to genesis of the past is they don't expect you to survive it.
You won't be there.
There are lots of lines of evidence to suggest that depopulation is a very important objective of this.
And I would say, even if I am wrong about that, I'm not wrong about the control agenda.
The relentless digitization of the world is not necessary.
Could be argued to be a benefit in some ways, but there are a couple of things that are not benefits.
You do not need A mandatory digital ID in order to transact your life, you know, to meet people, to travel, buy some food, whatever.
You don't need to have a common format global mandatory digital ID.
Someone else wants you to have that.
And they want you to have it, I believe, so that they know where you are at every breathing moment of your life thereafter.
And why would they want to have that power?
So they can make you do things or stop you doing things.
Once you've got a mandatory digital ID, powers that can be can shrug and say well it's not us it's this next viral pandemic and you have to take the vaccine otherwise your digital ID will become invalid and you'll effectively fall into house arrest.
So that's what they've been rehearsing.
But then I think almost the last brick in the wall of control are central bank digital currencies, basically electronic money, but issued from the Bank of England or the Federal Reserve, not high street banks.
Now, the difference between CBDCs and ordinary money where you use a plastic card or PayPal or whatever it is, is that the moment when you're in front of a merchant selling you goods or services, what they want to know is, is your account good for the money?
Which is fair enough.
And that's the question that is pinged to your bank.
Generally, details of the transaction are not sent ahead of time, just the amount and the merchant and the would-be customer.
I'm And then usually you'll get an approval.
So it's not a real-time examination of what you are doing or where you are doing it.
And then every day, apparently, I read this recently, all those high street banks do a reconciliation overnight, and it often turns out very little cash is needed to be moved from one to the other.
Central bank digital currency is their do away with high street banks for the purpose of running accounts.
So now when you present your mandatory digital ID at the vendor or for whatever it is, a piece of meat six miles from your home, the database that's connecting your electronic money and your ID knows exactly where you are to the grid reference point.
It knows who you're interacting with and what it is that's proposed to be purchased.
And all you need now is a simple algorithm that could decide that people from further than five miles from their home may not buy anything, for example.
They could set that rule.
I could write it.
At least I could define what I want to happen.
And we've all heard these things, like if you've had one piece of meat in a unit time, if you're not allowed to have more than one other, then you simply will find you can't buy a piece of pork, but you could buy some baked beans.
And like I said earlier, all it now takes is for malign individuals to have control of the database and the algorithms, and I assure you they are malign, and they won't be a tech company in your country either.
They won't be alterable by democratic processes because it'll be in the cloud run by probably a military computer.
So whoever has control of that database and its algorithm can prevent you from doing anything they choose.
And don't assume they'll be benign.
Their plans, as you can see from the Sustainable Development Goals, is that you will have as little mobility as possible, that you'll be probably cold unless you live in a warm country, and that you'll be hungry unless you like bugs.
And I personally believe it will definitely... That situation is one that's unlivable as far as I'm concerned.
Complete loss of freedom means not a world I want to be in.
But I would say that for most people that's already as bad as it gets and if they happen to do things that will bring about your death, you know, you've already suffered the greatest indignity of loss of freedom.
It's lost my train of thinking.
Yes, another thing that comes right from my area of expertise.
So there was never a necessity for these so-called vaccines to be Forms developed at great speed and then jabbed into enormous numbers of people.
And that's because there was not a novel public health emergency of international concern involving some recently discovered pathogen.
So there was nothing to oppose with these so-called vaccines.
But even if there was, even if there had been, so my argument doesn't turn at all on whether it really existed, we know that people given intramuscular injections Vaccines against respiratory illnesses like flu do not work.
I was shocked because I didn't know that I'd taken it on trust like everybody else but in recent years I've gone back through all the meta-analyses and flu vaccinations do not reduce the number of people being admitted to hospital with influenza-like illnesses or deaths.
This has been proven in multiple countries so with that you realize as I did with horror that we've been lied to By regulators, pharmaceutical industry, presumably in big money, for decades.
I've just pointed out logically how the vaccines could never have been an appropriate response, even if the narrative of this viral pandemic was true, and it wasn't.
But even if it was, a vaccine of any kind simply wouldn't work.
And that's because old people's immune systems are tired and unresponsive to new threats, and so why would you expect them to do well with a vaccine?
And they don't.
So what was in the minds of the people manufacturing, deciding to make vaccines, you know, to lie to us and pretend that that was necessary?
If it was just about making money, they could jab us with saline.
If it was just about forcing mandatory ID on people, you could jab them with saline.
You know, you don't need to, or they could give you something they already have in the locker.
It's not like you're going to go measure your own immune status either.
So they were manufacturing gene-based materials for a purpose, and since demonstrably that purpose was not to protect you from a non-existent threat, and is associated with mass illness and quite a few deaths, I'm afraid the logical assumption is they intend to use this technology now it's well understood and notionally well accepted, to I think that will be the method they will use to depopulate
So all that needs to happen is for the powers that be to say there's another pandemic, you know, you need to get vaccinated or there's a shortage of food and fuel and we'll let you have some but you have to have a ration card and the best way of having a ration card is a digital ID.
So plausible isn't it?
And if I'm not a criminal I have not thought all my life about how I could repress people and so on.
But if I can think of that and it would work, I'm afraid the perpetrators have got probably many more suggestions.
So they could use the shortages of fuel, fertilizer and food that are either true or they might as well be because that's what we all believe, including I do.
um they've manufactured those shortages they've literally manufactured them so the the loss of fertilizer and maniacal fertilizer mostly made in Russia and Ukraine has of course been one of the victims of this of this conflict.
I don't know enough about military matters to say anything at all about them other than those who are experts tell me it's not what it seems so that's as far as I can go because I don't know anything about Something I knew a little bit about because I'm a scientist, the climate change fiasco.
It's simply not true, and it's never been true, that humans' activity on the planet through release of CO2 has driven a greater temperature at the surface, nor is it going to.
The whole thing is a closely funded fraud, where if you make the right kind of findings scientifically and say the right kind of things, you'll get new grants.
But if you're an awkward cuss like me, so I would be out if I was a climate scientist, or say, Dr. Judith Curry, who I followed for years, long before COVID.
If you're a good, well-published person, but you start putting out output that challenges the narrative, you find that all your grants disappear.
And that's happened to hundreds and hundreds of people.
So you don't hear of them.
So anyway, that's perhaps a not very crisp way of saying, The thing we're just coming out of now, I think, towards the end of COVID, it's hard to believe that we'll all fall for the next variants as hard as we did the first ones.
And the vaccines, all of this stuff is fraudulent.
And then 10 years down the road from the start point of 2020, we have, by sheer coincidence, the Sustainable Development Goals that do effectively involve us traveling little, being cold, Having no meat or very little meat.
And I think having an energy consumption profile which would probably be probably inferior to medieval period.
Something like that.
If they're serious about going to zero.
And that combination is not consistent, A, with anything reasonable, any honest
um response to things happening in the natural environment uh and two they are strongly associated with people who've had this long track record of a belief in their right to have control over you and your lives and along the way along in the last two and a half years things that have happened that are quite deliberate completely avoidable not accidental um have resulted in probably around the world um estimates vary but who knows five to ten million
Lethal reactions worldwide to these injected so-called vaccines and they continue.
They're not, no one is really coming out with the truth on main media.
What I would warn people, this is actually really why I got very excited, I was pleased that the New York City's, I think it was Supreme Court, struck down the public sector workers vaccine mandates.
Great!
And certain individuals have been given their jobs back, also important.
But if we pass ourselves on the back and keep staring at that, and we've got rid of that, what else is going on that you're not looking at right now?
And impending power intermittency, you know, we're told to prepare, I think, in Britain for intermittent power outages.
There is no need for any of that.
Someone is planning So get to the third week in January or whatever it is and literally just turn the power off for a period of time, maybe regionally, maybe nationally.
There is no need for any of this.
We're in somewhat of a recession.
That means power consumption, fuel consumption will all be off their highs.
um and so there's there's no need for uh you know we haven't suddenly run out of the ability to generate electrical energy energy nor has the demand spiked quite the contrary so why is it that we've been warned a month ahead of time that's never happened before in the past when there have been dire warnings It's where people who run what we call the National Grid folks, the people who work with the electricity generators and the distributors, and they always like to have a margin.
I think it was like 8% over peak expected consumption.
And I remember one year, a few years ago, it got down to 3%.
And so one of the gentlemen said, I'm not joking, if we have a colder than anticipated winter this year over the next three or four months, we will not be able to keep the lights on in a first world country.
And I think it's much worse than that now.
Or if it isn't, it might as well be because the people controlling power grid are literally going to turn it off.
That will also in addition to making life very uncomfortable it will further damage industry and I think it's on the edge of Basically, I think countries is on the edge of a worse Economic and financial crisis than the IMF in the 1970s because it is deliberate it's not going to recover because it is deliberate and if people think that Well, they wouldn't do that because they're our government, right?
And they surely wouldn't break the country they live in.
Forget about that.
Whether they're a nice person or not, Rishi Sunak would probably regard America, for which he has, I think, a green card, according to his publicity, or India, as places he'd be equally as comfortable as in Britain.
So I'm not implying anything personal about him, only to say The person in charge does not have your interests at heart.
And if things went really badly wrong, you know what?
They'd jump on their Gulfstream jet and go somewhere else, nice and warm.
So don't trust the people in positions of power, because they can leave at any moment, and often will.
I think the MPs don't mean to be too disrespectful to them, but come on, folks, ladies and gentlemen.
You must be pretty stupid if you haven't worked out by now that you are also being lied to.
And that if you're going along with whatever it is, the whip, discipline, and so on, to keep your own nest feathered, do you imagine when what I've told you begins to come to fruition, that they're going to give you a golden ticket, that they're going to honour the promises that they've probably impliedly made to you?
You idiot!
They will crush you on the foot like everybody else.
You're the last hope, really, of the people, politicians.
And I tried to brief very badly, I suppose, in writing in October 2020.
I said the people running the country are not the people that you see in front of the TV camera.
And I could tell that already because the evidence of international coordination of lockdowns, masking and an expectation of vaccination told us that this was not being run at national level.
They were occurring in almost all countries Within days apart, they would change the laws in the same way.
So I said to these MPs, I pointed that out and said, if you renew the Coronavirus Act 2020, I don't believe they will ever give the country back.
And of course, I got replies from, I think, three people.
Thank you.
And I did speak to them.
And I've spoken to about a dozen before.
So I think there's probably at least 10 MPs that know what I've said is true.
Because everything I warned about has continued to happen.
But I don't see any sign of them.
They're not even using parliamentary privilege to make a two-minute statement, like Malcolm Roberts does in the Senate in the Australian Parliament.
So gird up your loins, folks, all of you who know that this is wrong.
I'll help if you want me to, on or off the record.
Write a two-minute speech, something where you have parliamentary privilege, and they literally can't stop you unless they body tackle you live on camera.
And all of you need to say things like, you know, the response to the alleged viral pandemic were wholly inappropriate, They were deliberate and done for various purposes, some of which we think will be to do with fraud and making lots of money.
There are other reasons too, but this has to stop right now.
If you don't do these kind of things, people like me, I can't do a thing.
As I've said before, I can't even save myself.
But I'm convinced that the West, so most European countries, Britain, North America, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, have been completely taken over.
They have experienced a coup d'etat, not like the ones we're used to in the 1970s where banana republics would change their military leader from one week to the next by raiding the TV station and holding the former president at gunpoint, but a coup d'etat nonetheless.
So what important piece of legislation that's not to do with COVID have you heard discussed on your TVs in the last almost three years?
The answer is no.
None.
No one in Westminster is paying the slightest attention to anything that could matter to you.
They've only executed a Coronavirus Act 2020 and various other acts.
I'm not pretending I'm an expert on the legislature.
Those materials are so long and complicated.
They're about the size of a PhD thesis.
Don't tell me that was written in a couple of weeks in early March 2020.
Absolutely no chance.
It was written beforehand.
So that meant there were parliamentarians or civil servants that were drafting legislation to be used in the future, and they were writing this legislation before there was a need to do it.
And I presume Sir Humphrey, Sir Arnold, took their money and just carried on doing it.
But that's the position.
We've got a nation, along with scores of others, that have been taken over partly from within, I'm afraid, tracers, Absolute tracers.
So people you would think of as, you know, parliamentarians and experts and so on.
They have grabbed the country and more or less held it underwater and they're not planning on letting go.
They're not planning on letting go.
So I'll pause at this point and say again, just in summary, that the pandemic was all a fraud.
The vaccines were dangerous and unnecessary.
Please don't take them.
And there's plenty of evidence out there to support that.
And if you don't like what I'm saying, listen to Hedley Rees, Satya Latipova and many other people.
So fresh voices, see if they're credible.
And we're heading towards the sustainable development goals where you'll be cold, hungry and immobile.
And I believe those are conditions that are not only very unattractive for humans to live in, I don't think we could actually live in them.
And then if you think about who's going to arrange the international supply chains of planting crops, harvesting them, moving them around the world, and then delivering to you if you're economically almost inactive?
And the answer is they're not going to do that.
They're not going to do that.
What they will do instead is probably what the lord and lady of a very big farm with a manor house at the top would do if, having looked out the window and seeing far too many sheep in the lower meadow,
and having a word with the groundsman saying we've got a thousand extra sheep sort them out and that's what they would that that is what i think they're going to do and it's so easy to do if we have mandatory digital id um we have electronic money in the form of central bank digital currencies which which will be followed by i think the withdrawal of cash completely now at this point you cannot transact with anyone about anything without basically the computer saying yes and it's very easy now for
Half a dozen reasons I could invent a scenario where you are required to turn up at your local vaccination centre for your jab.
And because they've had now 5.3 billion people's worth of injection experience, and they know what the data is even though we don't, if their goal was to depopulate, the easiest thing in the world now to just slightly increase the lethality of whatever it is they put in those vaccine vials, And you'll have delayed, well-designed, or when I say well-designed, it'll be designed toxicity.
So you'll either die of liver cancer or a heart attack or a stroke between three months and a year's time.
Now, all I've got to do is invent a new virus, tell us there's a new virus or some threat, and you'll be expecting to be all these excess deaths, and lo and behold, there will be.
But, you know, you can see the first part's a lie, and the second part is injected death sentence.
That's pretty much where I am.
And so, yeah, today is a good day not to take any more of these COVID-19 shots, but today is not a good day to celebrate more than briefly the appropriate lifting of these ridiculous vaccine mandates in the US and other countries, but to be looking at what's going on in terms of the electrical energy market, food, petrol, What's going on in Ukraine?
There are lots of voices.
I don't know the truth, but I bet if you started looking, you would find out financial state of the financial system.
Likewise, lots of people writing lots of worried things about that.
But I think at this point, I wouldn't know how to stop the perpetrators, but I think the best thing to do is to prepare everyone in your circle to say, even if you disagree with what that guy, Dr. Mike Eden has said, There are a number of things that are happening that are deeply concerning, and I'm not the only person.
And I believe that they will, at some point over the next few months or couple of years, engineer circumstances where the logical response is that every one of us will have a digital ID.
And we know already, Rishi Sunak, I think as Chancellor, announced that he plans to be working with his G7 partners, the other six large economies, to bring about Central Bank Digital Currencies.
There is no need for CBDCs.
The only real user of a CBDC are the criminals that have basically stolen the money from the system.
According to Catherine Austin Fitz, they've run out of roads to be able to cover it up anymore and so they've decided either they could put the money back or they could just take us out and they've decided to take us out.
So, you know, as I say, even if you don't believe me about the virus stuff, it's very, very important that you Acquaint yourself with these sustainable development goals.
I think one of the advantages of looking at those, and especially the central bank digital currencies, is you can talk about them without having the reflex response, conspiracy theorists, whereas you can't with the vaccine and the virus story.
You can't.
And you can't with climate change either, not that that stops me talking about it, but there are certain aspects like, you know, CBDCs and food and fertilizer and so on.
Which no one will call you a conspiracy theorist yet, because that has not been forced into the public consciousness through the mass media.
At least I haven't noticed it.
Not that I watch it very much these days.
So, very, very frightening.
But yeah, I guess one last thing.
There's always a last thing, isn't there?
I'm afraid to tell you, and you probably know this already, we no longer live in a democracy.
So what that means is if you resort to democratic methods and you're expecting if enough of you resorted to them that your elected leaders will have to give way, because that's traditional for the last 100, 150 years, I don't think that's going to happen.
They don't need your votes because it's not those 650 people in the House of Commons that are actually running this.
So I don't know what you should do instead but the warning is if you just write petitions and hoof them under the wall they will do diddly-squat because the people you're sending them to have no power whatsoever to do anything about this.
So I would say if you know some people in the police, if you know some people who are in the forces like Army, Navy, Air Force or were in the past, I think they would be like gold dust because if you can persuade them, if they don't already know, they will know lots of other people.
And I have this hope that eventually enough, you know, courageous men and women with resourcefulness who know lots of other people and can plug into a wider group can more or less release a few Films, could be anonymously or whatever, that says, you know, you globalists, you know, the perpetrators, enough already, you know, because me, I don't frighten anybody.
But I think if you had like a former, you know, senior army officer, senior, you know, Joint Chiefs of Staff or whatever, and some retired and current politicians and some senior medics and retired regulators, come on you guys, you know, Don't be a coward all your life.
If you haven't spoken up and you know, for example, that the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority is a sham with nowhere near enough staff and not enough expertise to evaluate, let alone approve, the products that have been across their desk recently, you must speak up because no one else, no one is coming to save us.
As I've said repeatedly, there's no one out there that's coming to save us from these nutcases.
The thing is, there are not very many of them.
And I also think they are individually quite vulnerable to being scared.
So in a recent interview I accused my former colleagues Sir Patrick Vallance and my former colleagues Sir Manny Pangloss of AstraZeneca, James Merson I once of Pfizer and Dr Matai Mammon of J&J.
I accused them of crimes against humanity.
You are responsible for the R&D of the vaccines.
It's on your watch.
Even if you don't know it, you're responsible.
And I said, you need to come and debate with me publicly, or you need to resign.
And soon after I did that, first Patrick Ballantyne announced his intention to leave, I think, next month, no, December.
And to my great surprise, Dr. Mattai Maman of J&J left I would say in a hurried fashion, saying he'd enjoyed his time there, but he wasn't saying anything about what he was going to do.
So I'll say it again, James, Dr. James Merson, you know, you have actively or passively allowed to come into being and to be distributed after terrible, inconsistent manufacturing, a product that's been injected into probably billions of people on the planet, killing perhaps one in a thousand and injuring perhaps one in a hundred.
And it's on your conscience.
So you probably didn't start out with that intention but you've been a pawn of these people.
So come and debate with me and have it recorded or resign because if you stay in your spot everyone knows that I am accusing you personally because I had jobs similar to that for the whole of worldwide allergy and respiratory advisor.
So if there was a product in clinical trials of God help me on the market and I'd okayed it Amongst other people, I would have been responsible.
So you are, James Merson.
And the same with Manny Pangloss.
Sir Manny Pangloss, Senior Vice President of AstraZeneca.
Same charges to you.
You have sat astride the vaccine development program.
You've allowed it to go out with terrible... Did you know how awful your contract manufacturing organizations are?
Absolutely dreadful.
I had no idea.
And, you know, you are responsible for that and it's injured and killed people.
Lots and lots of people.
I don't care what it is you've been offered or with what you have been threatened.
You need to come and debate with me publicly and we'll record it and you must resign.
Otherwise you're siding with evil people.
Anyway, I'll pause at that point.
It's about 14 minutes in.
Brilliant.
A couple of things while I can here.
I've just come back from a conference and normally people come up to me and tell me their vaccine injury stories, but no, not really.
I got so many hospital deaths.
Remdesivir killed my father.
They went in with just a tiny breathing problem and they were dead.
It was unbelievable and shocking to me.
So therefore, going to hospital is becoming forever a very dangerous place to be.
I agree with you.
I mean, it's an absolutely dreadful thing to say.
But yes, I agree with you.
It is my ambition, if I can avoid it, never to be admitted to another British hospital.
Never.
I don't trust the people in it anymore.
And the reason I don't trust them is because there's evidence, as Polly has just outlined, lots of people have had the experience that basically a do not attempt resuscitation order has been put on people or, or and or, they've been given drugs that are known to be seriously toxic.
So remdesivir, an antiviral In a clinical trial I saw it caused kidney failure I think in 23% of the patients who received it just over a few days.
So imagine giving what is not a very good antiviral to people who probably don't have a viral illness at all and then when they start to fail they would sedate them And put them on a mechanical ventilator.
I just need to reorientate people.
I'm shocked that doctors don't seem to know this, but I spent 32 years, whatever, in respiratory science.
I do know this, what I'm going to say.
With people who arrive in hospital with an open airway, And an ability to breathe.
They don't have pneumothorax.
They don't have a hole in the chest, for example.
They can still breathe.
Their airway is open.
Unless they're badly burned and absolutely in agony, where they may put them in a therapeutic coma under every other circumstance, you would not sedate, intubate, and ventilate that person, especially if they're elderly and frail.
So mechanical ventilation in an appropriate time is unbelievably wonderful, clever, and life-saving but you don't just give it to people who turn up who are unwell but that's what they were doing following the Wuhan protocol I learned this from friends in Northern Italy, that's where it started in Europe.
They were told that, the Wuhan colleagues said, the sooner you get your patients sedated and ventilated, the better your chance of saving their life.
So people would turn up having a panic attack, you know, they felt they had respiratory symptoms, and rather than take a proper history, they were sedating them and ventilating them, and over 90% of them would be dead within 10 days.
Ventilation, especially if a frail person, is a very aggressive procedure and when it's life-saving it's worth those risks, but if you arrive and you're free breathing, the airway is open, you never do what they did, unless perhaps 60% burns and in agony, then you probably would do it.
But none of the others and yet I know here where I am in Florida literally within a couple of kilometers from here Sarasota General Memorial General Hospital whatever is anyway local hospital big hospital I know a person who was very senior in the emergency room or A&E and He was busy trying to save lives at the front end But people who had missed it weren't coming out again and after a while he explored it
ended up in an absolute shouting match with his clinical colleagues and he more or less said what i've said to you what the hell are you doing ventilating people with an open airway unconscious and it's like oh we've got to do it this is what we've been told they were given money to put people on ventilators they were given money if they got remdesivir got given money if they happen to die after a diagnosis of covid so So they followed the money and gave up.
So yeah, I'm afraid those honest people in the NHS, maybe the majority, maybe not, you have not covered yourself in glory.
And even now, if you don't partner up with other people who know this has been a dangerous fraud, Your lives will be lost, your children, your grandchildren.
This is the time.
And if you don't do it this side of winter, if it turns out that the perpetrators are going to do something over the winter that triggers a necessity for rationing, which could be an introduction of a managed digital ID, and then they push the currency over at CBDCs, that's good night Vienna.
I think there's no way of coming you cannot extract yourself from this system unless the people running it choose to turn it off but I swear once that system is in place and you've got used to showing your ID to access say food shops and showing your central bank digital currency card before transaction if the people in charge of the database and the algorithm are not your friends And if they choose to say you can't have steak, but you can only have locusts, that's the position you'll be in.
You won't be able to buy anything from someone on the market because they will only be able to use CBDCs themselves.
So, you know, and then, like I've said, if they say, oh, there's another pandemic, you must be vaccinated or bring your children.
And if you don't, your digital ID will become invalid.
If I can think of these things, they can think of these things.
So the time to stop them is before it happens.
And I think the best way of stopping them is by making sure that as many people as possible know, even if you are not able to persuade them of the details, that some things are badly wrong and that we are at threat.
I think if you can do that, it will get very hard.
Oh, yeah.
Final bit of advice.
Stop watching mainstream media of all kinds.
We turned our TV off, I think, in May or June 2020.
And apart from electively watching usually a drama or something, we just don't, we don't watch it at all.
And you will be calmer and less frightened straight away.
You'll also find it easier to see clearly what's going on if you're not, if you haven't got propaganda coming in.
So anyway, I'll pause again there if there are questions.
Absolutely.
Thank you so much, Dr. Jadon.
I couldn't agree more and I appreciate your candidness.
My question to you, and you actually tackled part of it with what you just said, but in regards to right now, we just had obviously the shots were recommended for children.
So what is your professional opinion about this whole thing and your personal opinion when it comes to that?
And what what would be your advice for individuals?
So it's completely again, I have to put these in caveats.
Oh, in parentheses.
If the virus narrative was as described, it would still be completely inappropriate to subject Minor children, people under 18, to these so-called shots.
One, no healthy child has died as a consequence of this alleged virus.
I actually don't think it's circulating.
Or if it is, it's circulating as a marker.
It's not the cause of pathology.
It's not.
It's just not.
I know it's really unpopular.
Even people on our side, I'm afraid, you know, it feels like an absolute majority, attack me because I've said that thing.
They said, I'm gaslighting the people who've suffered.
No, I'm not.
The people who were ill were ill.
I'm only challenging the establishment narrative of what was causing it.
So I think whatever was causing the respiratory symptoms before, that's what they suffered from now.
That's what they suffered from when they thought they had COVID.
And remember, the populations were stressed to the nines for weeks and months on end as a deliberate policy, a deliberate policy of fear.
Look at the nudge unit, so-called, and I think it's called behavioral insights team, BIT.
They exist.
These are...
These are people who work psychological operations, generally in the covert services, and they would turn it on you.
And that was true of every country that had this main theme.
So these people frighten you to death.
Fear, chronic fear, is one of the most potent things that damages people's health.
We know this with livestock.
If animals are kept in bad conditions, There was never a reason for them to do this other than to get you to comply.
Same is true of human beings, babies, children and adults.
And that's what our governments did to us on purpose for no reason.
There was never a reason for them to do this other than to get you to comply.
So in the light of that, I personally would recommend no one get injected with these so-called COVID-19 vaccines.
And we've had eight deaths, Dr Ewan.
We've had eight deaths reported to VAERS already for six months to five years here in America.
I believe you.
And we've done this way more.
I believe you.
And I remember making a rough prediction
Probably over a year ago, I said if you vaccinate all children, and at that time I thought there was a virus, and I thought the chance of dying from basically a severe flu-like illness, which was how it's been passed, was so low, and yet the chance of injury and death higher, that I said I thought between 50 and 100 times more children would die as a consequence of mass vaccination than would have died if you'd done nothing.
Of course, it's now an infinite number because nobody's dying of a non-existent disease.
But the point is this, that there was never any utility in these vaccines.
So even if the virus story was correct, and even if they were attempting to make vaccines with good heart, The preparation of an injected material that would get your body to become a virus protein factory briefly would not have saved the elderly that were allegedly dying.
So that's fact, what I've just said.
There are no scenarios, whether the virus narrative is true or, as I say, fake.
No scenarios in which an injected vaccine would have saved the people who are vulnerable, who were the elderly, fragile people.
And we know that already, the recent track record of And so they knew that too.
The pharmaceutical companies that manufacture and distribute and sell those flu vaccines know perfectly well they don't do any good.
And they knew perfectly well that a so-called vaccine against this alleged virus wouldn't be useful, even if the narrative was true and if they'd done a good job.
And by the way, they didn't do a good job.
They did a great job if the goal was to injure you, as I've gone through at length in the past.
The so-called spike protein of this virus is the only component of it which, when injected acutely, causes illness and deaths in animals and people.
So why would you?
Why would you do that?
You definitely wouldn't do that, would you, James, if you were designing it?
Or Matai.
Or many.
You wouldn't do it.
And then they rushed the development.
and a completely inadequate amount of time after dosing and followed it out, I think, for two and a half months.
I think I would rather know that a medicine I'm about to take that I can't get rid of isn't going to be injuring me in six months or a year's time.
You need, you can't shorten long-term safety data, but they did.
And then they lied to you, and they told you it's perfectly safe.
They told you, we didn't miss out any steps.
We just massively did things in parallel.
Lies, lies, lies.
The dossiers, that is the file, was almost empty of information.
In the case of Moderna they did almost no toxicology with the actual product, just something similar.
It's so appalling that with complete confidence I can say not only were the drug companies behaving extremely badly, and they knew they were, but the regulators in rubber stamping these things were also committing regulatory fraud themselves.
They're meant to be standing between you and a company that might accidentally or on purpose put a put a dangerous product on the market.
And they didn't do that.
They didn't do their job in Amsterdam in the EMA or in London with the MHRA.
An FDA recently approved 15 to 1 to recommend these these jabs to children when what I've just told you is true and it's easy to find out.
So they're either threatened or bribed and have done it.
But so no one should be injected now with these so-called COVID-19 vaccines.
Absolutely nobody.
Wow.
Thanks, Dr. Yadin.
I mean, I'm still an optimist at heart here.
I'm in Canada.
I'm in crazy town, just like you guys.
And, you know, I realized as this goes on and on, we have chosen, the people have chosen convenience over connection and community.
And that is all done by design.
I still think there's more of us waking up daily than they have anticipated through this entire thing.
And I know our CHD viewers are very well aware of the globalist steps, I believe.
But some of them don't understand how to get out of it.
And it's to walk backwards.
It's to simplify your life.
And I don't know if anybody has seen or heard of the Global Walkout.
Yeah, we're reaching out to the people that don't understand how we got to this point and Trying to remove that indoctrination of convenience and bring it back to community.
Yes, I agree with you.
I agree that I don't pretend to have a solution.
And when people say, oh, all you've done is made us frightened.
I said, I'm sorry about that.
Would you like me not to tell you what I think the truth is?
But I'm not a politician.
I'm not a street organizer.
I'm not even a strategist.
I'm a mere biologist doing, I would say I'm doing an ordinary thing.
I love you.
In an extraordinary context.
That's the end of it.
Catherine Austin Fitts definitely has a lot of solutions, so everybody should be tuning into her weekly show.
I'm sorry, Amanda, I didn't mean to... No, that's OK.
I don't have solutions, and so I'm all ears.
I'm all ears.
OK, well, look, one of the solutions is definitely cash, as Catherine is banging on.
We've got to get out of this idea, all this QR code, all this Alexa, all this crap that everybody has in their house.
But I have to tell you, it's hard to make people understand.
My mother actually said to me the other day, she lives in England, That cash is dirty.
Because you listen to the BBC all the time.
I mean you can't...
How you get these people out, I do not know.
I want to ask you, just to end on this, could you clarify that we still, scientists, doctors, still do not know the full ingredients of these shots?
My first question.
And secondly, they're pushing on the media right now, the triple-demic, or triple-pandemic, or whatever it's called, which is COVID, flu, and RSV.
We all know the RSV shots are nearly here, the new ones from Moderna, Pfizer, they're all making them.
Where are they going with this?
You did say that, let me quote you here, it won't be about COVID in a year's time.
I don't need you to come up with solutions.
Catherine and people can do that.
I want a warning to our people.
Yeah, I am at a point.
So, before 2020, I would not only be one of the more pro-vax people that you could imagine.
I had all my shops, so did my wife, so did our young adult children who are now in their 20s and early 30s.
So I'm not an anti-vaxxer.
I'm pro-safety.
I worked in the industry in Big Pharma and then Biotech for 32 years until they fired me because they didn't like what I was saying.
So it would be a trivial, just a stupid puerile criticism to say, hey, he's an anti-vaxxer.
Basically, I'm anti-unsafe practices.
And I've reached a conclusion, and I've shared some of that reasoning, that the COVID-19 vaccines are horrible, malign products.
There's no justification for their design, their lackadaisical development, and their slapdash manufacturing.
It speaks of an arrogance that knows it's not going to be inspected by anyone who's going to pull them up short.
Really?
They might as well scoop something out of the nearest lake and dispense 0.3 of an ml in it and put a rubber bung and an aluminium foil seal on it.
Is that appalling?
Why would you subject yourself to products made by an industry and companies like that?
So don't.
Don't.
They're not at the moment.
At best they need root and branch reform.
I personally think the best outcome years down the line is that all these large companies get dismantled in the same way that Standard Oil was dismantled, I think, several hundred years ago, and for the same reason.
They end up with an inappropriate amount of influence over people who live in a notional democracy, and they have to be defamed.
Even if that makes them less efficient and more expensive, well, that's worth it for removing the hideous amount of power a small number of sectors have Of course augmented by the World Economic Forum and our friendly Klaus Schwab I think is a convenient sort of pivot point, but I doubt what's going on is his plan.
I don't think we'll ever see the people whose plan it is.
But yeah, so I would encourage you not to take the products of an industry that has proven itself to be completely untrustworthy in recent years seriously.
Step back, you know, don't be persuaded or well be thought of as an anti-vax, just be pro-sensible.
That the companies that have injected you and maybe lots of other people have behaved in an appalling criminal way, certainly careless, reckless.
Why would you think that the production line in the next building is somehow going to be, you know, Perfect and tickety-boo.
I would assume it's not.
And do we know?
No, we don't know what's in the vaccines.
We definitely don't know what's in the vaccines.
There's been some analytical work done, and it's not consistently what was said on the tin.
Definitely, I've seen some results that do suggest it was exactly the sequence that we expected it to be, but I've certainly seen other Analyses that show there was literally no RNA in some of them.
So whether that was just bad manufacturing or deliberate, I don't know.
But so why would you take products of an industry that is that reckless with your health?
I would say don't do it.
Don't do it.
Just treat them as alongside the products that we've already recently seen as unnecessary, ineffective and dangerous.
And we have wonderful people like John O'Looney, Funeral Director from the UK, talking about what he, I mean, did a fantastic interview with him recently.
But okay, we are running out of time and we've got about two pages of questions for you, so we're going to have to get you back on.
All right.
Well, seriously, I don't mind doing that.
This is, this is what's worth doing.
This is what's worth doing and nothing else really.
So I'll come back in a few weeks.
Can you thank your wife and your family for us?
Because I know what it's like being an outspoken person, what it's like, the effect on the family.
Please thank them.
It is absolutely awful.
It's worse on my family because they can't get away from it.
And yet it's not them kind of trying to help.
Whereas I suppose my only salvation is that I am doing my best to try and help.
But yeah, they can't get away from me, and yet they hear this horrible stuff all the time.
So yeah, I'll pass the thanks on.
Please do, because we have grandchildren.
We have to fight on for them, because otherwise it just doesn't bear thinking about.
Now, there's that, and also, I have to say, I don't know where you follow you.
I'm trying to follow you on Telegram.
And I can't find you on Telegram.
I'm just so inefficient.
I share a channel with a guy called Robin Manotti, who's a London-based Italian-English architect.
And we bumped into each other because he was all over the mask stuff.
He knew about engineering and so on.
But so I don't have a particularly good social media presence.
But yeah, Robin Manotti and Dr. Mike Eden exist on Telegram.
And that's the only thing I post to regularly.
Can you just spell Robin Manotti?
Okay.
M-O-N-O-T-T-I.
M-O-N-O-T-T-I.
And there's also people listening, there's a CHG UK discussion group and they share Mike's work and that's how I'm able to click in from there.
Okay, good.
So you'll go to CHG and find me I have seen several other people actually very helpfully set up channels that are not mine, but they bear my name and image, and I'm happy that they've done it, even though it's a bit peculiar, because the only posts in it are my own posts.
So they must have copied and pasted it.
Well, I don't know how well intended that is.
I have someone who might be able to help you, so I'll get in contact.
Look, we will get you back.
We'll get Dr Mike Eden back on again.
I know I've seen that the chat is blowing up for love for you, and thanks and gratitude for fighting for the future.
So thank you, Dr Mike Eden.
OK, I'll be back.
We will get you back.
And to everyone listening, thank you, and to my lovely co-hosts as well.
We'll see you next week.
Thanks a lot.
Okay.
Bye-bye.
Bye-bye.
When the media tells me something over and over and over again, I get suspicious.
We now know that the Biden administration held weekly censorship meetings with social media giants like Facebook, now Meta, and HHS to censor us and suppress COVID and vaccine-free speech.
Here's Senator Josh Hawley reading part of the emails that were released.
On July 23rd, 2021, a Facebook employee thanked HHS, quote, for taking the time to meet earlier today and wanted to make sure you saw the steps we just took this past week to adjust policies and what we are removing with respect to misinformation.
Misinformation is any information which is different in this context from the information We do not have a medical system.
We don't have a health care system.
or your national health authority at that point in time.
The CDC and FDA that continue to tell the world that this product is safe, they are clearly not adhering to the scientific method.
We do not have a medical system.
We don't have a health care system.
What we're all suffering under right now is a sick care system, a kind of a medical industrial complex.
What are they really concerned about?
Their stock price and their profit that benefits their stakeholders and shareholders.
Those companies are making $50 billion a year selling vaccines.
When I was a kid it was $270 million.
Today it's $50 billion.
Today it's 50 billion and they're making 500 billion a year selling the drugs that treat those diseases.
Whatever it is they're selling, they have their spin doctors that they know they can go to, so that they always have essentially someone to spin the story the way they do today.
Doctors drank the Kool-Aid, but 96% of doctors took these vaccines right away.
Why are we forcing vaccinations going against doctor's orders for people that have pre-existing conditions and saying, hey, you have to take this vaccine or starve?
I said right in the very beginning, this COVID-19 is about the track and trace.
It's not about the vaccine.
It's not about a very bad flu.
It's about full and total surveillance.
Freedom of choice in medical decisions is everything.
Without that, you have no control over your body or what goes in it, and how did this become our reality?
It's the scariest part.
We are one nation under God, with liberty and justice for all.