Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 13, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:57:10

The Raw Deal (13 July 2022)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Not just anybody.
	You know I need someone now When I was younger, so much younger than today I never needed anybody's help in any way But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured But now I find the genuine, I open up the doors Help me if you can, I'm feeling down
	And I do appreciate you being around Help me get my feet back on the ground Won't you please, please help me Well, This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, and we could all use a little help these days, I have no doubt about it.
	I've been republishing a series of rather brilliant articles on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
	Several of them have to do with Ukraine, which is my point of departure for today's discussion conversation, where Jeffrey Sachs and Phil Giraldi
	The Ukraine War is yet another neocon war, where Kevin Macdonald, whom I know from this evolution in human behavior society, edited Sacks Writes in Kikoun, which is a liberal left Jewish publication.
	The war in Ukraine is a culmination of a 30-year project of the neoconservative movement in America.
	The Biden administration is packed with the same neocons who championed the wars of choice, meaning we weren't obligated to undertake them in Serbia, 1999.
	Afghanistan, 2001, which of course had to be the longest war in American history and came to naught, though I believe we were looting their vast supply of lithium, one of the greatest in the world, next to one in Bolivia.
	Lithium is using computer components, triggers for nuclear bombs and electric car batteries.
	Iraq, 2003.
	You may or may not recall that Rumsfeld, Even though Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11, Herbsfeld rejected the idea of going after Afghanistan, which of course was falsely implicated in the idea that we had these 19 Islamic hijackers commentating four planes and committing these atrocities under the control of a guy off in Afghanistan.
	Now he dismissed Afghanistan because it wasn't target rich, unlike Iraq with all the castles and exotic structures, Iraq having one of the oldest civilizations in human history.
	Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were eager to destroy it.
	Syria, 2011.
	Libya, 2011.
	And it did so much to provoke Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
	The neocon track record is one of unmitigated disaster, yet Biden has staffed his team with neocons.
	As a result, Biden is steering Ukraine, the U.S., and the European Union toward yet another geopolitical debacle.
	If Europe has any insight, it will separate itself from these U.S.
	foreign policy debacles.
	Remember now, Biden is just a puppet.
	Literally.
	He has no brain, no cognitive function.
	He even has trouble reading cue cards and teleprompters.
	That's it.
	When he's reading a teleprompter, he reads the instruction and says, stop here, sit down.
	He'll read it all.
	Just disgusting that we're saddled with this nebbish, mental midget as a president of the United States, of course, all based on a stolen election.
	He continues.
	The neocon outlook is based on an overriding false premise that the U.S.
	military, financial, technological, and economic superiority enables it to dictate terms in all regions of the world.
	It's a position of both remarkable hubris and remarkable disdain of evidence.
	Since the 1950s, the U.S.
	has been stymied or defeated in nearly every regional conflict in which it has participated.
	Think of Vietnam!
	Yet in the battle for Ukraine, the neocons are ready to provoke a military confrontation with Russia by expanding NATO over Russia's vehement objection because they fervently believe Russia would be defeated by U.S.
	financial sanctions and NATO weaponry.
	Well, it hasn't played out that way.
	The financial sanctions are actually redounding against the West, Europe is desperate for gas and oil, which it was getting at cheap rates from Russia.
	Russia is now cutting them off, demanding if they wanted any, they'd have to pay in rubles.
	The ruble is now the strongest currency, the strongest performing currency in the world.
	The BRICS system now is coalescing into a major alternative to the Western World Bank, World Monetary Fund, Rothschild banking system.
	Thank God getting out from under the Rothschilds is a great accomplishment.
	So it's just backfiring on so badly that the European Parliament has now declared that natural gas Is green energy a form of green energy?
	You gotta understand, gas and oil aren't fossil fuels, actually.
	The Earth's inner core produces endless amounts of oil.
	It's a virtually infinite supply.
	No end to it.
	If you began drawing upon it, it would never end, because Earth produces it naturally, as long as Earth continues to exist.
	Well, the continued existence of the Earth, of course, is a different proposition than the continued existence of life on Earth.
	That's a whole other matter.
	Sachs continues.
	The Institute for the Study of War and Neocon Think Tank, led by Kimberly Allen Kagan and backed by a who's who of defense contractors such as General Dynamics and Raytheon, continues to promise a Ukrainian victory.
	Regarding Russia's advances, the ISW offers a typical comment.
	Regardless of which side holds the city of Severodonets, for example, the Russian offensive at the operational and strategic levels will probably have culminated, giving Ukraine the chance to restart its operational-level counteroffensive to push Russian forces back.
	Give me a break!
	That's incredibly stupid!
	That doesn't reflect any of the realities on the ground, as Putin observed recently in a speech.
	They've only begun, they've only dedicated a tiny portion of their military and they're not using any of their heavier stuff.
	There's no possible way Ukraine could defeat, there's no possible way NATO could defeat Russia.
	There's no possible way NATO and the United States can defeat Russia, though we can do massive damage to one another without any doubt.
	Notice that Sachs, writing in a Jewish publication, avoids any mention of advancing Israeli interests as the main motive of the neocons.
	However, Jewish motives and Israeli interests are always front and center for Jewish neocons.
	But to establish that, One needs to delve into biographical details, for example, associational patterns, history of pro-Israeli activism, family connections.
	Here, for example, he cites a 2014 article that Victoria Nuland, a central figure in both a 2014 coup sponsored with $5 billion of American taxpayer dollars in the current war, is enmeshed in a family dedicated to pro-Israeli activism.
	These sorts of details are essentially missing on the Ukraine war, both in the Sachs article as well as Phil Giraldi's in Un's review.
	How Jewish is the war against Russia?
	However, as indicated here, Giraldi notes such details in his treatment of the lead-up to the war in Iraq.
	Giraldi.
	Currently, the top three State Department officials, Tony Blinken, Wendy Sherman, and Victoria Nuland, are all Zionist Jews.
	The head of the Department of Homeland Security, which is hot on the trail of domestic terrorist incidents, is also Jewish, as is the Attorney General and the President's Chief of Staff.
	They and their boss, Joe Biden, do not seem concerned that their client, Ukraine, is no democracy.
	The nation's current government came into power after the 2014 coup engineered by Barack Obama's State Department at an estimated cost of $5 billion.
	The regime change carried out under Barack Obama was driven by State Department Russophobe, Victoria Nuland, with a little help from the international globalist George Soros.
	He's the guy, of course, who's Paying for financing all these district attorneys who believe in revolving George Ossoff, don't believe in bail, don't believe criminals should even be punished, but put back on the street as properly as possible.
	George Soros.
	He's an international criminal.
	There are warrants for his arrest in Hungary.
	They ought to be here.
	This man deserves to be tried and prosecuted for his crime, and if convicted, given the penalty, deserves which is to be hung until death.
	This is a monster.
	If you want to understand what's going on in the United States and the decision being made by the Biden administration, just envision the acting president is actually not Joe Biden.
	It's George Soros.
	Giraldi continues.
	It removed the democratically elected President Viktor Yankovych, who was unfortunately for him a friend of Russia.
	Ukraine is reputedly both the poorest and most corrupt country in Europe.
	Witness the Hunter Biden saga.
	The current president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who is Jewish and claims to have Holocaust victims in his family tree, is a former comedian who won election in 2019.
	He replaced another Jewish president, Petro Poroshenko, after being heavily Funded and promoted by yet another fellow Jew and Ukraine's richest oligarch, Ihor Kolomoisky, who is also an Israeli citizen and now lives in, guess where, Israel.
	It all sounds like deja vu all over again, particularly as many of the perpetrators are still around like Newland priming the pub to go to war yet again for no reason.
	And they are joined by journalists like Brett Stevens at the New York Times, with Blitzer, Jake Tapper at CNN, Max Boot at the Washington Post, all of whom are Jewish and can be counted on to write regular pieces both damning and demonizing Russia and its head of state, Vladimir Putin, which means it's not only about the Middle East anymore.
	It's also about weakening and even bringing about regime change and nuclear-armed Russia Also drawing some lines in the sand for likewise nuclear-armed China.
	And I might add that playing power games with Russia is a hell of a lot more dangerous than kicking Iraq around, to put it bluntly.
	Many U.S.
	government and media Jews hate Russia, and even though they benefited substantially as a group by virtue of their preeminent role in the looting of the former Soviet Union under Boris Yeltsin, And continue to be among the most prominent Russian oligarchs.
	Many of the oligarch billionaires like Boris Zhevovsky self-exiled when Vladimir Putin obtained power and began to crack down on their tax avoidance and other illegal activities.
	Many moved to Western Europe.
	Where some bought up football teams, meaning soccer teams, while others went south and obtained Israeli citizenship.
	Their current grievances somewhat reflect their tribe's demand for perpetual victimhood and the deference plus forgiveness of all sins that it conveys, with the self-promoted tales of persecution going back to the days of the czars, Full of allegations about pogroms and Cossacks arriving in the night stories that rival many of the Holocaust fabrications in terms of their lack of credibility.
	It has long been recognized by many that a particular antipathy directed against Russia permeates the so-called neoconservative worldview.
	The neocons are hugely overrepresented at the top levels of government and, as noted above, A number are running the State Department while also holding high-level positions elsewhere in the Biden administration, as well as in the foreign policy think tanks, including Richard Haass at the Influential Council on Foreign Relations.
	Likewise, the intensely Russophobic U.S.
	and Western media foundations and social networking sites are disproportionately Jewish in their ownership and staffing.
	And beyond that, Ukraine is, to a certain extent, a very Jewish-identified place.
	The Jewish media in the U.S.
	and elsewhere has been showering Zelensky with praise, referring to him as a genuine Jewish hero, a modern Maccabee resisting oppression, a David versus Goliath.
	T-shirts bearing his image are being sold that read, resisting tyrants since Pharaoh.
	While the largely Orthodox Jewish community in New York City has already been raising millions of dollars for Ukrainian aid, as U.S.-Russian negotiation leading up to the current fighting were clearly designed to fail by the Biden administration, one therefore has to wonder if this war against Russia is largely a product of a long-enduring ethno-religious hatred coupled with a belief in the necessity
	A strong American military applied as needed to dominate the world and thereby protect Israel.
	The neocons are most visible, but equally toxic are the Jews who would prefer to describe themselves as neoliberals or liberal interventionists.
	That is, liberals who promote a strong, assertive American leadership role to support the basically phony catchwords democracy and freedom.
	Remember, Cynthia McKinney revealed the pledge on Iranian TV during an interview in 2011.
	New members of Congress or candidates, therefore, are asked to sign a pledge to put the interests of Israel ahead of that even of the United States, where those who oppose, who are very few, find themselves With no more financial support, their districts may be redrawn, they may confront a well-financed alternative candidate next time around.
	Cynthia was strong enough and popular enough to surmount those obstacles to serve six or eight terms in the House, but even as worthy and estimable a human being as Dennis Kucinich, whom I regarded as the smartest member of Congress at the time, Now his district was redrawn and he no longer had a seat.
	This is how it's done.
	This is part of why I said at my very first political speech in 2008 on Tax Day, April 15th, at a Ron Paul Freedom Rally on the grass outside the capital of the United States in Washington, D.C., that no dual citizen
	Should ever be permitted to occupy a policy shaping or decision making position in the United States government because you cannot know that their loyalty to the other state does not outweigh their loyalty to the United States.
	It shouldn't happen, but it happens all the time.
	Both neocons and neoliberals inevitably support the same policies, so they have both ends of the political spectrum covered, particularly considering concerning the Middle East and against Russia.
	They currently dominate the foreign policy thinking of both major political parties, as well as exercising control over media and entertainment industry coverage of the issues that concern them.
	Largely leaving the American public with only their viewpoint to consider.
	Very, very significant to appreciate.
	Only presented a neocon political point of view.
	Very rarely something broader and more humane and more beneficial to the American people and actually to the well-being, peace and happiness of the world's population.
	Alas!
	Geraldi presents the issue of Jewish motivation as a question one has to wonder.
	Nevertheless, he's quite clear on Jewish motivations for the war in Iraq with some of the same information presented in my Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement, meaning my Kevin Macdonald, good man, good man, brilliant guy.
	I'm a huge fan.
	Meanwhile, to return to the numbskull in the White House, Biden says he's determined to renew the assault weapons ban.
	President Biden said Monday, just this, he wants to implement a new ban on assault weapons as he touted the Safer Communities Act at the White House.
	We're living in a country awash in weapons of war, Biden said, apparently referring to AR-15 style rifles.
	What's the rationale for these weapons outside of war zones?
	Assault weapons need to be banned.
	Biden added as he signed the measure into law, they were banned.
	I led the fight in 1994 and then under pressure from the NRA and the gun manufacturers and others, the ban was lifted in 2004.
	in 2004.
	Well, number one, the vast majority murders are committed with handguns.
	In fact, I believe more people are killed by bare hands than are killed by handguns, and overwhelmingly more.
	I mean, 95% of the murders committed by gun violence are committed with handguns, not with rifles, number one.
	Number two, the AR-15 is not an assault weapon or a weapon of war.
	Assault weapons, weapons of war, go full automatic.
	The AR-15 is semi-automatic.
	I've fired an AR-15.
	It's a very versatile, deservedly popular, all-round defense weapon.
	Good for your home, to protect your community, and especially to have an armed populace capable of rising up against a tyrannical government, which is why they want to ban them.
	Number three.
	When they talk about military-style weapons, you know, that no one should have a military-style weapon, and that the Founding Fathers weren't thinking of military-style weapons when they fashioned the Second Amendment, that is absurd!
	The Founding Fathers were thinking of exactly military weapons.
	They wanted to have a nation of citizen-soldiers that could come to the defense of the nation from a foreign invasion or another threat.
	To democracy, to the integrity of the American government.
	They were talking about the muskets of their time.
	They were talking about the military weapons of their time.
	It's embarrassing, the ignorance of these half-witted liberals, these gun grabbers who don't understand anything about weapons of war.
	And why the military, why the Founding Fathers had a Second Amendment to make sure Americans were citizen soldiers who had the very weapons they'd need to fight a war, which would include, God knows, the AR-15.
	That was just stupid!
	It's embarrassing how much moronic drivel passes for intelligent discussion of gun control.
	Moreover, the liberal, the neocon press, Never talks about the defensive use of guns.
	Mind you.
	There are millions of occasions every single year in which Americans protect themselves from assault and assailants by showing their arm frequently.
	Most often, they don't even have to fire their weapon.
	As soon as it's evident their arm, the assailants back off.
	Which are estimated to save 200,000 lives every single year.
	Claire McCaskill, who's just a disgusting person, full of half-truths and hatred for democracy and the Constitution, was saying how 70,000 people are killed every year.
	Well, she's not distinguishing between all the murders that occur in Chicago, black on black.
	Murder, by the way, is overwhelmingly predominant in the United States.
	Overwhelmingly.
	Roughly 50 times more blacks kill blacks than do blacks kill whites or whites kill black, which is relatively rare.
	And then you've got to take into account suicides.
	You've got to take into account police and their performance of their duties, civilians and self-defense.
	You never hear about that.
	Indeed, This piece continues.
	Suicides accounted for about 54% of all gun-related deaths in the United States in 2020, while 43% were murdered, according to data from the CDC.
	The other 3% were classified as gun-related deaths involving law enforcement, unintentional or had undetermined circumstances.
	Something's wrong about that.
	Something's wrong about that.
	Because you don't see the data for all the handgun murders of blacks on blacks.
	In 2020, handguns were involved in 59% of all gun-involved murders, according to the FBI.
	Only 3% involved arisals.
	That's even less than my suggested 5%.
	Which includes firearms that are sometimes called assault weapons, and shotguns were involved in 1%.
	The other 36 involve other guns that were classified as types not stated.
	Why were types not stated?
	They're handguns.
	On Monday, that's probably because once you understand handguns, you realize they can't ban handguns.
	Well, they're going after handguns even in Canada.
	Mark my words, Canada!
	On Monday, Biden also said he wants to ban high-capacity magazines, referring to a magazine carrying more than 10 rounds.
	I'm determined to ban these weapons again and high-capacity magazines.
	I'm not going to stop until we do it!
	Last month, Fifteen Republican senators joined all the Democrats to pay the Safer Communities Act, which includes federal funding to enforce red flag laws, implements more stringent background checks for gun buyers between the ages of 18 and 21, and makes obtaining guns through straw purchases a federal offense.
	The law also bars individuals from obtaining a firearm for at least five years if they've been convicted of a misdemeanor crime involving a domestic partner.
	The NRA wrote, make no mistake, behind the facade and the contrived talking points of safety, school security, mental health, this is a gun control bill.
	It does little to address violent crime while opening the door to unnecessary burdens on the exercise of Second Amendment freedom by law-abiding gun owners.
	And gun owners of America, another program group, announced it will challenge these unconstitutional laws in court to defend the rights of all Americans.
	Good, good, good.
	Meanwhile, In order to reinstate the 1994 ban, they'll need 10 Republicans to vote with them to overcome the 60th row threshold, and no senator has sought to reinstate that bond.
	No Republican when ended in 2004.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support as it has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio, Freedom Subs.com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio.
	Hey, everyone.
	It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
	If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
	It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	Then they sued to shut me up.
	And the Wisconsin courts played along.
	I have the proof and the law on my side.
	What I don't have is the money.
	They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
	Take guns, impose tyranny.
	It's on the way with Remington's help.
	First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
	I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
	GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
	Check it out.
	This is for all the marbles.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	Oh, oh. oh.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSix.com, the people station.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Having spent 35 years in higher education offering courses to students in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, I have an antipathy to ignorance and stupidity.
	That seems to be the area of specialization of today's progressive Democrats.
	They are the dumbest, most ignorant, illiterate, scientifically ignoramuses that the world has ever seen.
	And gradually the stupidity of the Green New Deal, of the ridiculous claim that CO2 contributes to global warming, when the facts are the opposite, when there's no correlation between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of Earth, and therefore there can be no causal relation where CO2 actually contributes to cooling the Earth in four different ways, and where CO2 is indispensable to life on Earth,
	These morons continue to try to shut down gas and oil, which, as I've already observed, are fossil fuels naturally produced by Earth, and coal, which are indispensable to a functioning viable economy for the sake of moronic ideas like electric cars.
	Well, Joe Olson and I are doing what we can to Reduce the ignorance about these matters with a series on anti-global warming you can find on my Bitchute channel.
	There are nine episodes as of now, but the very first, Joe debunks the very idea that CO2 is a contributor to global warming.
	I mean, it's just completely, frankly, absurd.
	Those who buy into this are dumber than a post.
	And the idea of electric cars?
	Here's one of many reasons why it's a bad idea.
	Biggest reason why people aren't buying electric cars revealed a new survey.
	This is from the Epoch Times, which I highly recommend.
	Really a wonderful publication.
	Articles are very thoughtful on important subject, well-written, incisive.
	A survey discovered that charging logistics is a primary reason why Americans aren't buying electric vehicles.
	Consumer Reports, which said it surveyed around 8,000 Americans, found 61% said they wouldn't own an electric vehicle because of charging logistics.
	That means the amount of time you have to spend charging your battery, which can take hours versus five minutes to fill your tank with gas.
	While 55% said the number of miles a vehicle can go per charge.
	Another 52% said the cost of buying and maintaining an electric vehicle are cost prohibitive, and obviously you can offer more than one reason, since we're talking about percentages that add up to well over 100%, but these are good reasons.
	Charging, low distance, how far you can go.
	The cost of buying and maintaining these run like 50, 60 grand to have an electric car.
	And if something goes wrong with it, it's virtually impossible to fix.
	So there's 50, 60 grand down the drain.
	Who the hell can afford 50 or 60 grand for a car anyway?
	Another 46% said they'd not heard of any financial incentives available for owners of electric vehicles.
	We found 14% of Americans would definitely buy or lease an electric-only vehicle if they were to buy a vehicle today.
	That's up markedly from the 4% who said the same in a 2020 national survey of 3,392 licensed drivers.
	That's the power of propaganda.
	According to recent figures from Kelly Blue Book, The average price of a new electric vehicle hovered at roughly $56,000.
	In contrast, the average price of a new compact is about $25,000 at or about the same time.
	The average price of a new non-electric SUV was $34,000, while the electric version was $10,000 greater at $45,000.
	Meanwhile, recent report from Data Analysis and advisory firm J.D.
	Power found that electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids may have more problems than internal combustion engines.
	Oh, really?
	Surprise, surprise!
	While internal combustion engines, that's ordinary gas guzzlers like you have in your car, Average 175 problems for 100 vehicles.
	It jumped to 239 among plug-in hybrids and 240 among electric vehicles.
	A June 28 press release of J.D.
	Power's 2022 U.S.
	initial quality study stated lower scores represented higher quality vehicles.
	Tesla models Included in the industry calculation for the first time, average 226 problems for 100 vehicles.
	Well, that's not a whole lot better than the 240.
	Not much better.
	Automakers continue to launch vehicles that are more and more technologically complex.
	In an era in which there have been many shortages of critical components to support them, said David M.
	Emmodio, Director of Global Automotive at J.D.
	Power.
	Amid elevated gas prices, White House officials have continued to suggest Americans buy electric cars as Republicans have faulted the Biden admin policies for the spike in gas.
	I mean, remember, this is no secret.
	His first act as president was to cancel the XL pipeline and to rescind permits to drill on federal lands.
	One of the great accomplishments of the Trump presidency has been to make us energy independent.
	Just as he shut down our border, he nearly completed the wall.
	But of course, Biden, in the infinite wisdom of these stupendously stupid Democrats, Has made us energy-dependent again.
	We're helpless at the mercy of the rest of the world.
	Going for green energy, going against coal, gas, and oil.
	Just, I mean, incredible.
	This is moronism run amok.
	In mid-June, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm Suggests Americans can deal with $5 per gallon of gas by ditching an internal combustion engine in favor of an electric.
	If you filled up your EV and you filled up your gas tank with gas, you'd say $60 per fill up by going electric than using gas.
	It's a very compelling case.
	But again, we want to bring down the price at the point of purchase, which is not talking about the hours you have to spend sitting around on your thumb waiting for your damn vehicle to charge.
	There are very few charging stations.
	So a trip that ought to have taken you, say, five hours if your electric runs out after four means you're going to have to sit around, spend more money, waste more time.
	Incredibly stupid.
	This is a case of special bleeding where the only site the evidence Favorable to their case and ignore the rest, also known as a method of selection and elimination.
	And in the UK, they're having a problem because the electric vehicles just don't have enough power when the Brits are chasing criminals.
	The electric vehicles don't let them catch up.
	Listen to this.
	We've had a few reasons to discuss electric vehicles this week on various platforms.
	And again, we're further discovering that EVs are no green Nirvana.
	How about this?
	Electric police cars are failing in the United Kingdom.
	They're running out of charge before being able to reach emergencies.
	Gloucestershire has the largest fleet of electric police cars in the United Kingdom.
	21% of their vehicles are electric.
	But the Police and Crime Commissioner in the District is concerned, and he should be, because as he says, I've heard lots of problems with officers driving around in electric vehicles having issues trying to find recharging facilities.
	Another problem is when these vehicles run out of puff, and then officers have to get another vehicle.
	What, taxi?
	He said, so although the world is going down that road, it's definitely an important thing, but my first priority is to fight crime.
	That would be handy, and therefore I have to take the operational effect into account.
	In other words, EVs make some people feel morally responsible, especially governments and local governments, but they are not a fit in so many scenarios, including cops chasing crooks.
	And you can't put the car before the charger.
	If you can't charge electric vehicles, they're totally useless.
	It's a concerning example of how unreliable these electric vehicles can be, but moreover, how green governments jump the gun to look on trend without doing the due diligence.
	Very, very nice report.
	Very, very telling.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Now I have a friend of longstanding from the University of Minnesota Duluth who bought a Prius, which is a hybrid gas-electric, and the Prius seemed to work pretty well.
	But I think this idea of electric cars is just fine for driving around town, but it's terrible, a total disaster for trips, and it's also highly unreliable.
	What happens when the electric grid goes down?
	Wind and solar are no way to compensate it requires energy to produce the electricity necessary for the electric car.
	In fact it requires more energy than it saves so the whole thing is a net loser.
	And yet you have airheads like AOC rushing around insisting what a great idea.
	You have other congressmen saying how they they just drove past all those gas stations in their electric vehicles because they got the 60 grand to buy one.
	But who the hell would want to have one?
	I mean, it's just.
	Calamitously stupid.
	But that's all we're getting from this administration.
	Nothing but one dumb idea after another.
	One waste of taxpayer money.
	One misconceived project after another.
	None of which.
	Not a single action taken by the Biden administration has been beneficial to the American people since he came into office after the Democrats went out of their way to steal the election.
	Just grotesque.
	Meanwhile, Biden's being asked to declare a public health emergency over abortion.
	Two Democrat senators who often lead the fight for abortion rights are urging President Biden to take definitive action to protect abortion rights after the Supreme Court overturned Roe.
	On Saturday, Senators Tina Smith from Minnesota and Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts, and if it's a harebrained idea, you can count on Elizabeth Warren to subscribe to it, wrote an op-ed in the New York Times, which was once a great newspaper.
	I had friends when I was growing up who lived and died by the New York Times.
	If they didn't have it, they were addicted.
	And they had good reason because at the time it was a highly responsible newspaper.
	It's now turned into nothing but a propaganda rag.
	It's useless.
	Urging Joe Biden to declare a public health emergency.
	They said doing so would protect abortion access for all Americans while unlocking critical resources and authority that states and the federal government can use to meet the surge in demand for reproductive health services.
	That means more abortions.
	Almost two dozen states worked either ban or significantly limit following the Roe reversal.
	Some states had old abortion bans before the Roe decision, which would take effect again.
	Others have so-called trigger bans, which would go into effect within 30 days.
	And I think slightly more than half, 26, I believe, of the 50 states are going to have More abortion restrictions than were represented by Roe.
	In response, the senators wrote, the end of a woman's constitutional right to get an abortion has brought the U.S.
	to a perilous time, threatening millions of women.
	They continued, now the government, not the person who is pregnant, will make the critical decision about whether to continue the pregnancy.
	They also had some far-reaching ideas for how the government and elections are structured.
	They have proposed changing the composition of the Supreme Court, which would allow more liberals to be appointed, reforming the Senate's filibuster rules, which would allow Democrats to push through legislation with a simple majority, remaking the Electoral College, which would allow presidents who win the popular vote to be elected, If the latter had been in place in the 2016, Hillary would have won over Trump.
	But you see, the framers recognize that if it just made a popular vote in a small number of states with very large population, California, New York, Florida, would decide the outcome of every election.
	All the smaller states would have no say whatsoever.
	So with the idea that all the states ought to have a say, they created the Electoral College.
	Actually, it was a brilliant idea.
	And those who want to abolish the Electoral College are being dismissive of the rights of all of the states to have some say in who is elected president, where your Electoral College vote is equal to your number of senators, which of course is two per state for every state.
	That's the 100 senators.
	And then, The number of representatives you have, which is periodically revised according to the census, so that roughly, very roughly, each representative represents about the same size of a constituency.
	My best guess, 20,000 to 30,000, sometimes more, sometimes less, but that's the idea.
	To make sure the smaller states are not neglected by an administration.
	After all, they might then just devote all the resources to the government.
	They're collecting taxes from taxpayers in all 50 states and devote them to California, New York, and Florida to harvest votes for the next election.
	Just think of that.
	That's another incredibly stupid idea the Democrats are peddling.
	The Senators wrote that all three of these things would allow the five conservative justices to ultimately undo a woman's federal protection in regard to getting an abortion, as they wrote.
	Simply put, we must restore our democracy so that a radical minority can no longer drown out the will of the people.
	Roe may be gone, but the protections and what's guaranteed are on the balance.
	Now remember what Roe did, their decision was simply to re-delegate the responsibility for determining restrictions or not on abortion to the various states.
	And that is pretty clearly in the Constitution.
	If you don't believe that there's a right to privacy that extends so far as the reproductive and the freedom of choice.
	And you have to acknowledge that the Constitution is very clear that all of the authority not delegated to the federal government remains with the states.
	So I'm inclined to think that even though I believe Roe was a wise decision, that the Supreme Court highly probably ruled properly on terms of a stricter construction of the Constitution than we had in the past.
	That's the deal.
	And now it's left to the states, and the states are in closer proximity to the public than the federal government, and therefore it's really leaving it up to the people, which I think is a fundamental blunder of Tina Smith and Elizabeth Warren, though Elizabeth Warren is so far out there.
	She makes so many harebrained statements.
	I can't believe anyone would continue to take her seriously in this day and age.
	Polls conducted back in May, after the draft majority opinion was leaked, found 60% of Americans believe that abortion should be legal in most or all cases.
	That's not unrestricted.
	That's not up to the, you know, in the third trimester.
	So you got to realize the way the outcome of these polls works is very much dependent on the phrasing, the way the questions are formulated.
	That makes a huge difference.
	Only 30%, 37% thought abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, usually leaving exception only to save the life of the mother, sometimes in cases of rape and incest.
	The public is overwhelmingly on our side.
	The two of us lived in an America without Roe, and we're not going back.
	Not now, not ever.
	But the two Senators or Democrats all can do about it on a federal level, however, isn't very clear at the moment.
	Moreover, the majority of Americans say they're worse off today than they were a year ago.
	Surprise, surprise!
	The New York Fed's survey of consumer expectation found 36.1% of respondents said they were financially somewhat worse off Up from 32.8 in May to 19.9 a year ago, another 15% said they were much worse off, up from 13 and 3.9.
	So add 15.2 to 36.1 and you get 51.3.
	In total, 51.3 say they're worse off.
	up from 13 and 3.9.
	So I had 15.2 to 36.1 and you get 51.3.
	In total, 51.3 say they're worse off.
	First time in the history of the survey, which goes back to 2014, that a majority have said they are worse off.
	Households have also become gloomier about the future.
	The share who say they expect to be much worse off financially a year from now has risen to 13.6 up from 10.8 in May and only 4.6 a year ago.
	The share who expect to be somewhat worse off rose to 31.1 from 28.6 in 16.3.
	The survey also found that year-ahead inflation expectations increased while expectations for the longer term decreased.
	Median one-year-ahead inflation expectations had consumers forecasting 6.8 price rise, up from 6.6 in May, which is also a new series high.
	And I guarantee it's going to be much worse than that.
	Inflation is just growing.
	The median expected change in home prices, by the way, a year from now fell sharply to 4.4% from 5.8, the lowest reading.
	The New York Times said the decline was baud-based across age, education, and income groups.
	The mean probability the U.S.
	unemployment rate will be higher a year from now increased by 1.8%.
	The mean perceived probability of losing one's job in the next 12 months Inched up to about 12%, but remains well below its pre-pandemic of 13.8.
	The mean probability of leaving, quitting in the next month declined to 18.6 from 20.3.
	Wow.
	Meanwhile, 57% believe the U.S.
	is in an economic recession, no doubt about it.
	Just over half of Americans said the price of goods and services they buy is the best indicator of a recession.
	The unemployment rate and job report was the second most popular answer, garnering 21%.
	That's 30% less.
	11% believe the stock market is the best sign.
	5% are personal finances.
	Only 16% view the economy as either excellent or good.
	Excellent, 3%.
	Good, 13%.
	A majority, 51%.
	Poor, another 29%.
	Fair.
	Most participants, 58%, said inflation has affected them a lot, and 38%, a little.
	The poll also gauged the importance of the stock market to adults.
	64% view it as either somewhat or very important.
	When asked if they approve or dissuade that Biden is handling the economy, 51% say they were dissatisfied, of a plurality of 40% strongly disapproving.
	And we all know that's the single most significant indicator of how a midterm election is going to go.
	Meanwhile, 75% of black Americans say inflation is very important for the 2022 midterms.
	Bad news.
	Bad news.
	For Joe Biden.
	Let me throw in, by the way, quickly before the break, we have new photographic evidence from the Abiy shooting in Japan that when he lay on the ground, you could actually see a fake blood packet hidden in his jacket pocket.
	You can see it right there underneath his jacket pocket.
	This is a staged shooting, as I explained before.
	The man was clearly not hit by the first round.
	I don't believe he was hit by the second either.
	He kneels down, but he's not in agony.
	When he's lying on the ground, there's only a minimal amount of blood, not sufficient from two neck wounds, as the BBC was reporting, or a severed artery, which would have blood gushing everywhere, and there's a fake blood packet hidden in his jacket pocket.
	I'm telling you, this is god-awful.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslifts.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	Was it a conspiracy?
	Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting This is a Drill, This is a Drill on bullhorns during the marathon?
	That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
	And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
	Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
	But there was no blood.
	The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
	They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself.
	Oh!
	Because we know who they are and what they do.
	This is what they do!
	and we must fight back.
	You can torture us and bomb us.
	Fire is catching.
	And if we burn, You burn with us!
	Good evening.
	Are you awake yet?
	I hope.
	We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
	But time is over.
	Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
	The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
	Denial is not a choice anymore.
	Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Not giving up.
	Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio.
	Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
	It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
	I have the proof and the law on my side.
	What I don't have is the money.
	They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
	Take guns, impose tyranny.
	It's on the way with Remington's help.
	First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
	I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
	GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
	Check it out.
	This is for all the marbles.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Well, you want to brace yourself for this one.
	While you were distracted by Boris Johnson's resignation, the UK government quietly published a report confirming the vaccinated account for 94% of all COVID deaths since April, 90% of whom were triple or quadruple jabbed.
	In other words, If you want to guarantee abbreviating your lifespan, don't just get the jab.
	Get it repeatedly.
	That's going to do it.
	A report quietly published by the UK government just hours before PM Johnson announced his reservation reveals COVID deaths have risen dramatically among the triple vaccinated population in England over the past couple of months.
	While declining drastically among the unvaccinated population.
	With the most recent figures showing the vaccine in England accounted for a shocking 94% of all COVID deaths in April and May.
	90% of those were among the triple quadruple vaccinated population who no doubt thought they were making themselves extra safe.
	When they're actually consigning themselves to an early death.
	There are lots of graphs here to show what's going on.
	This is among the articles on my blog you really, really want to go to and read because it's so stunning.
	JamesFetzer.org.
	On July 7th, Boris Johnson, PM of the UK, announced he was resigning.
	Since then, the mainstream in the UK have distracted the public with 24-7 about the announcement and speculation of who might be his successor.
	In times like these, you need to watch the bad news that may be quietly published in the background in the hope it won't receive much attention.
	Hours before Boris announced his resignation, The government published new data proving things have been terrible for the VAX population in England over the past several months.
	Back in March of 2022, the UK Health Security Agency announced that from April 1st of 2021, they would no longer publish the VAX status of COVID cases, hospitalization and deaths in England.
	Think about it!
	Back in March, They declared that as of April 1st, and this is not an April Fool's Day joke, they'll no longer publish the fact status of COVID cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in England, so you won't know how bad it really is.
	At the time, the UK Health Security agents claimed it was because the UK government had ended pre-universal COVID testing and therefore affected their ability to robustly monitor cases by vaccinating status.
	That, however, was a lie.
	The UK Health Security Agency had been looking for an excuse for months To stop publishing the data because it clearly showed the VAX population were suffering immense immune system damage with case hospitalization and death rates per 100,000 highest among the fully VAX population.
	And the charts just absolutely stunning.
	You know, it's ironic when you have 95% dead.
	Pfizer claimed that the vaccine is 95% effective.
	Well, have you got 94%?
	That's almost 95%.
	But the efficacy is not to preserve health.
	It's to bring about death.
	To bring about death.
	So I think Pfizer got it right.
	We just misunderstood what they meant.
	But now we have more evidence to prove the UK Health Service Agency was lying.
	And the mainstream storm surrounding the resignation of Boris is merely a distraction.
	This is because another UK government agency known as the Office for National Statistics, ONS, has just published data on death by vaccine status.
	The latest data set from ONS is titled Deaths by vaccination status England 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022 and can be accessed here.
	All data relating to age standardized mortality rate for death by vaccine status England between 1 Jan 2021 and 31 May 2022 has been published as of 6 July 2022.
	31 May 2022 has been published as of 6 July 2022.
	Table 1 of the latest data set contains figures on mortality raised by vaccination status for all caused deaths.
	questions.
	Deaths involving COVID and deaths not involving COVID.
	And it's here we're able to ascertain the vaccination status of everyone who's died of COVID since the beginning of April 2022, when the UK HSA claimed they could no longer reliably report the figures.
	Here's how the ONS presents the figures.
	In April, unvaxxed, 208 deaths.
	Actually, it says minus 206.
	But then the deaths involving COVID, first dose, 1, 21 days, 45.
	Second dose, 6 months, at least 6 months, 246.
	Third dose, 3.
	Six months, at least six months, 246, third dose or booster, 3,551.
	So of the 3,365 deaths, 3,057 were from having the third dose or the booster.
	Unbelievable!
	They took the figures and produced the following chart.
	Here you got, during this period, one April to 31 May of 2022, unvaccinated deaths, 288. Vaccinated deaths, 288.
	And of that 4,647, 4,215 were triple vax, triple vax, triple vax.
	My God!
	And of that 4,647, 4,215 were triple vaxed, triple vaxed, triple vaxed.
	My God, in all, according to O&S, there were 4,930 COVID deaths over the two months, but the vax population accounted for a shocking Even more shocking, the triple vax accounted for 4,216, with only 288 recorded among the unvaxed.
	This is just grotesque.
	the triple vax account for 4,216, with only 288 recorded among the unvaxxed.
	This is just grotesque.
	Anyone with this kind of knowledge who goes for the vax is, has a death wish, this is death wish.
	This is to commit medical suicide by vax.
	Suicide by needle.
	We know suicide by cop.
	Individuals who want to commit suicide and provoke the police into shooting them because they can't bring themselves to kill themselves, so they provoke a situation where the cop will do it for them.
	Well, here's a guarantee of suicide by vax.
	Just get yourself triple vaxxed and you can relax.
	You're done for.
	This means there were 33 less deaths among the unvaccinated over two months than there were in the whole of March.
	Unfortunately, the opposite is true for the vaxxed, especially the triple vaxxed.
	There are 911 more deaths among the vax and 1161 more deaths among the triple vax.
	This means deaths have fallen drastically among the unvaccinated, but increased significantly among the vax since the UKHSR claimed they could no longer reliably publish the data.
	Of course, they're not going to publish the data because it's so damning.
	The following chart shows a percentage of COVID-19 death by vax status in England.
	And what you have here is death, green among the unvaccinated, looks like 4%.
	And you have deaths among the single or double-vaxed, that looks like another 10%.
	And then you have all the rest, what, 86%?
	All the rest, the triple-vaxed, ban.
	They're dead!
	They're triple vaxxed and they're dead!
	The quietly published figures reveal the vaxxed population accounted for a shocking 94% of the deaths, with the unvaxxed only 6%.
	But the most horrific statistic is that 90% of the deaths among the vaxxed were among the people who had been given at least three doses of a COVID injection.
	However, many in the UK have been given a fourth!
	Since the spring.
	And judging by the latest data, it's likely many of those deaths could actually be among the quadrupled vaccinated.
	So here's some numbers.
	This is from 6 June to 12 June.
	My God, that's just six days.
	Among the unvaxxed, 36.
	Among the vaxxed, 485.
	Among the vaxxed, 485.
	How did it break down?
	Double vaxxed, 43.
	Triple vaxxed, 200.
	Quadruple vaxxed, 242.
	The most recent government of Canada figures show there were 521 COVID deaths between 6 and 12 June, that same period.
	And the vaxxed population accounted for 485.
	485 of the 521.
	485, 485 with the 521, the vaxxed.
	Those are the people who are supposed to be safe and secure.
	Remember when Fauci, Tony the Rav, was telling us, you get the vaccine, you'll be safe and you won't have to get it again, you won't get COVID?
	What a, what a monstrous liar.
	With a shocking 242 deaths among the quadruple vax, meaning they account for 50% of COVID deaths, among the vaccinated in the second week of June.
	These aren't the kind of figures you'd expect to see If the injections really are up to 95% effective at preventing death, are they?
	No.
	And I say it's the other way around.
	They're 95% effective at bringing about death.
	So we've been misreading the numbers.
	So there you have it.
	While you've been distracted by Boris Johnson's resignation as PM of the UK, the UK government quietly published a report just hours before containing data They previously claimed they didn't have, which confirmed the Vax now account for 95, 94% of COVID deaths in England and 90% of those deaths are among the triple or quadruple Vax.
	With news like this being swept under the rug by the mainstream media, makes you wonder what else I'll attempt to hide in the coming weeks.
	Fantastic.
	Here's a thoughtful piece.
	They don't trust us, we don't trust them.
	And then I'll open the lines for callers.
	The short-lived disinformation governance board reminds us that Washington is dangerously out of touch.
	A long time ago in a country far, far different, the United States of America in October 1964, to be exact, As many as 77% of Americans trusted the federal government to do the right thing, almost always or most of the time.
	No, don't get nostalgic.
	That was a uniquely gullible time for the American public.
	The FBI was busy spying on Martin Luther King, Jr.
	Congress had just passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which effectively authorized the dumbest war in U.S.
	history on false pretenses.
	Sorry, millennials.
	Vietnam, which left over 58,000 Americans dead thanks to our much-trusted government, was even dumber than Iraq, with only 4,431 killed in action.
	Nowadays, Americans have a much better grip on reality.
	Only 24% are so foolish as to trust the government to do the right thing, at least most of the time.
	So this was not exactly a good environment for the Biden administration to try to set up a disinformation governance board at the Department of Homeland Security.
	Indeed, the backlash was swift.
	The project is now paused.
	Nevertheless, it's a cautionary note on how dangerously out of touch Washington can be.
	In our polarized country, the least credible entity to try to correct disinformation would probably be the federal government.
	Then again, the Biden admin lives in a partisan echo chamber.
	68% of Democrats have a great deal or a fair amount of trust in the media to report news fairly and accurately, compared to only 11% of Republicans.
	These figures nicely capture the fact the media is overwhelmingly on the Democrats' side.
	Consider the individual a Biden admin had in mind to head the short-lived disinformation board, one Nina Jankowicz.
	In the weeks before the 2020 election, the New York Post reported on the damning comments, including evidence that corruption and worse on a laptop abandoned by Hunter Biden.
	Other media ignored the story except to assert without evidence that was likely Russian disinformation.
	Facebook ruthlessly suppressed the story.
	Twitter even suspended the post's account.
	Disinformation expert Jankiewicz was fully on board with Team Biden, dismissing the laptop story in an interview with the Associated Press.
	We should view it as a Trump campaign product.
	While I'm tweeting a presidential debate, Jankiewicz again derided the laptop's story of repeating Biden's evidence-free allegation of Russian disinformation.
	Needless to say, the laptop and its contents turned out to be genuine, as even the rabidly pro-Biden, anti-Trump Washington Post and New York Times safely acknowledged after the election.
	The only disinformation being spread was the Biden campaign's accusation of disinformation.
	In Joe Biden's America, anything that isn't a Democrat talking point is deemed disinformation.
	So why not set up a government entity, stabbed by people beholden to its worldview, and give it the authority to denounce claims that run counter?
	The Twitter censors eagerly await instruction.
	The idea of the DHS housing this Orwellian Ministry of Truth was especially rich since DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has himself been a fountain of disinformation about what's going on at our southern border.
	At a time when encounters between border patrol agents and would-be illegal entrants is at an all-time high, Mayorkas blithely assured Congress under oath that we do have Operational control of the border.
	If by we do he meant we do not, he was exactly right.
	Who then better to oversee a government effort to counter disinformation?
	But don't worry, Mayorkas assured us the board was going to be just a small working group that wouldn't monitor U.S.
	citizens.
	But here's a quick thought experiment.
	Imagine if the Trump administration tried to establish such a board.
	From the New York Times to the halls of Congress, it would have been condemned rightly as an authoritarian crackdown on free speech and dissent.
	The fact is, we have excellent reasons to appear a disinformation government's board, regardless of who's promoting it.
	We do not need governance of speech.
	We need government to protect it.
	That's a basic responsibility of our American form of government as the First Amendment attests.
	No one's disputing the fact that false information proliferates online.
	People make all kinds of claims about a wide variety of topics, from COVID vaccine election results, a boon landing, and the JFK assassination.
	Yes, error mingles with truth in our marketplace of ideas.
	That's one of the prices of liberty.
	And may I add that, as Sir Karl Popper emphasized, It's only by free exchange, open debate, and critical thinking that we can sort out, ferret out the truth.
	We need free exchange of ideas, but that means all ideas must have the opportunity to compete.
	We can't have just one-sided debates using the method of selection and elimination.
	Selecting the evidence that supports a predetermined point of view and eliminating the rest.
	Meanwhile, I'll add one more story, but you're welcome to call in 540-352-4452.
	540-352-4452.
	Mitchell will field your call and get you on the air.
	Here's the additional story.
	4452-540-352-4452.
	Mitchell will field your call and get you on the air.
	Here's the additional story.
	Gay couple reaffirm reality of biological sex by suing a fertility clinic for giving them a girl instead of a boy.
	Wow!
	I thought that for the Democrats there is no difference between girls and boys.
	They should be happy just to have a child to adopt.
	A gay couple in California perhaps unwittingly reaffirmed the gender binary, meaning there are only two sexes, leaving hermaphrodites who have both to the side.
	When they decided to sue a fertility clinic for giving them a daughter instead of the son they ordered.
	Last Friday, Albert and Anthony Sainiger of Pasadena, California, which just happens to be my birthplace, by the way, filed a lawsuit against HRC Fertility and Fertility Specialist Dr. Bradford A. Kolb at Los Angeles Superior Court alleging breach of contract
	Medical malpractice, negligence, fraudulent concealment, violation of unfair competition law and consumer legal remedies, all because they were assured they would have a boy born via surrogacy, not a girl.
	We're joined already by Bruce in Texas.
	Bruce, have your say.
	How you doing, Jim?
	You sound good.
	You're good.
	Yeah, there's carbon stuff.
	Yeah, it's stupid, but it's actually just a mind-screen.
	You know, the people that are running this thing are just ingenious in their usage of psychology and pressure and manipulation of the political process.
	And then they get the corporations on board too, you know.
	I'm sure they do that by leveraging them through You know, these big hedge funds that you either play ball with us or you don't.
	And there is like a controlled demolition of our entire society.
	You know?
	Oh, I think you got it exactly right, Bruce.
	I do.
	I don't disagree with any of that.
	More.
	Yeah.
	Go ahead.
	I'll go on.
	OK.
	And did you see Trump's rally there in Anchorage, Alaska?
	No, tell me, tell me, tell me.
	Oh man, he is on fire.
	I mean, he's even better than for the 2020 election.
	He's got his game going on, you know?
	And yeah, he's dying, he's dying, I'm dying, whatever.
	But, you know, you have to play with the cards that you're dealt at this point.
	Unless you want to have a revolution, you know, maybe in the future or something.
	But we have midterms coming up.
	This year and in two years of general election, it was just apparent to me that the whole January 6th thing, they're doing anything they can to disqualify Trump from running in 2024.
	If they lose the House or even the House of the Senate this year, then they're not going to be able to block Trump's agenda when he gets elected back into office.
	So, uh, That's the only thing I can see to roll back this insanity coming out of Washington, D.C.
	It's just unbelievable.
	It's just unbelievable.
	Now he's got this anti-gun zealot as the head of the ATF.
	It's absolutely unbelievable.
	They get these numbskulls, absolute morons.
	They're completely unqualified for these key positions.
	Boudicca get a transportation, he knows nothing about anything.
	The guy's just a totally fraudulent, a phony, a fake who's in love with himself.
	He's a, he's a Democrat narcissist who's really into the progressive agenda and he doesn't have any comprehension of the consequences of any of those acts.
	Everyone promoting the Green New Deal is really Promoting the destruction of life on Earth, of quality of life initially, and then a reversion to a feudal era, which if we have the massive depopulation, is literally going to return to the rich in their castles and the rest who remain toiling as serfs and slaves in the field.
	It's just stunning.
	Bruce, we got it.
	Exactly right.
	Go ahead.
	I don't know.
	You got someone else here.
	No, we got it.
	Just a minute before the break, Bruce.
	So go ahead and say more.
	Thank you.
	Yes, have you ever seen the show Crosstalk on RT?
	It's on Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
	No, I'll bet it's very good.
	It is awesome.
	You need to go after the show.
	Please remember, just go to RT.com and then look for shows and Crosstalk should be the first one.
	It's only half an hour long.
	They don't waste time.
	They hit every topic that's worth it.
	You know, the Ukraine and the Global South versus the West.
	Today's show was awesome, so I just highly suggest it.
	I think you'll really enjoy watching it.
	Hello.
	Thanks for calling in, Bruce.
	Pleasure.
	We'll be right back after this break.
	We'll be right back.
	Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
	We'll be right back after this message.
	We'll be right back.
	Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support that has made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
	Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
	We need the support of the people.
	It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
	Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
	With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
	Revolution Radio.
	FreedomSubs.com.
	The number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
	Revolution Radio, Radio, Radio, Radio.
	Thank you.
	Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern.
	Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomSedge.com, the people station.
	Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
	But did you know that it was an inside job?
	That Osama had nothing to do with it?
	That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
	That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
	Barry Jennings was there.
	He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
	The U.S.
	Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
	Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
	9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
	Don't let yourself be played.
	Read American Newt on 9-11.
	Available at moonrockbooks.com.
	That's moonrockbooks.com.
	The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
	They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
	You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
	Well, I'll tell you, there are lots of ironies out there.
	One of them has to do with Twitter, where Twitter resisted the very idea of Musk buying it.
	Then Musk discovered there were lots of phony accounts.
	Many were bots.
	Biden's, I think, was at least 50% fake.
	He withdrew his motion, his offer.
	Now, Twitter is suing him to follow through.
	Here is the great irony.
	By Twitter suing Musk to follow through, they're going to have to allow Discovery, meaning Musk, who was being denied information about what percentage of the Twitter accounts were phony or fake.
	We'll now be legally entitled to all of that information Twitter wanted to withhold, as I see it.
	There's no way Twitter can prevail in this.
	This guy didn't get to be one of the richest, and I don't know, they keep referring to him as the richest man in the world.
	I think that Jeff Bezos has that distinction, but above him, the Rothschild family obviously is overwhelmingly more.
	Has more assets.
	Queen England has more assets.
	You know, they're in both cases into the trillions.
	Musk is just into the hundreds of billions.
	Here's about this.
	Elon Musk responds after Twitter files a lawsuit against him.
	Tesla CEO Elon Musk responded to Twitter's lawsuit.
	After the billionaire say he was terminating his $44 billion deal to purchase the company.
	Just an hour after Twitter filed its suit in a Delaware court that specializes in corporate disputes, he responded on Twitter.
	Oh, the irony!
	LOL.
	Laughing out loud.
	He did not elaborate on the statement his team has not filed any court documents in connection with Twitter's suit.
	Late last week, Musk said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission he no longer seeks to purchase a company, citing what he described as Twitter's alleged unwillingness to provide data on automated accounts and spam bots.
	Twitter then said it would file a lawsuit against Musk to complete the deal.
	Over the past weekend, Musk issued a more Elaborate response by posting several memes.
	Busk posted a meme of himself laughing in a series of four photos with the captions.
	They said I couldn't buy Twitter.
	Then they wouldn't disclose bot info.
	Now they want to force me to buy Twitter in court.
	Now they have to disclose bot info in court.
	The lawsuit filed Tuesday.
	Signals the start of what may turn into a lengthy legal battle as Twitter attempts to hold Musk to an April 25th agreement in which he would pay $54.20 per share.
	As of Wednesday morning, Twitter shares jumped about 5% to $36.07.
	But look, Musk was paying a huge premium.
	He is paying $54.20 per share, which are now even with a 5% jump at $36.07?
	Having mounted a public spectacle to put Twitter in play, having proposed and then signed a seller-friendly merger agreement, Musk apparently believes that he Unlike every other party, subject to Delaware contract law, is free to change his mind, trash a company, disrupt its operation, destroy stockholder value, and walk away, Twitter said in its complaint.
	This reputation follows a long list of material contractual breaches by Musk that have cast a pall over Twitter and its businesses.
	Twitter's lawyers added in the suit, which also cited several Twitter posts made by the tech billionaire.
	This is a loser for Twitter.
	Musk was challenging them to reveal how many of their accounts were real.
	Obviously, the value of the company was a function of how many Twitter users they actually had.
	And it's clear they were faking it.
	They were puffing it up.
	It was fraudulent.
	Holds all the cards here.
	I think Twitter has committed a real blunder, but they did from the beginning.
	They should have been very amenable to his desire to buy Twitter and turn it into a modified, uncensored free speech platform.
	The company said a recent decline in the company's shares had been partially triggered by Musk's actions.
	However, other social media big tech firms like Meta, Alphabet and Apple I've seen their stock prices slide in recent months as well.
	Since signing the merger agreement, Musk has repeatedly disparaged Twitter and the deal, creating business risk for Twitter and downward pressure on its share price, Twitter added.
	The company also concurrently fired a motion expediting the lawsuit as it seeks to have the dispute completed in September.
	As I say now, Twitter is going to be forced to reveal all the information it wanted to deny must because it would be so embarrassing and show the sham that the company only had like on the order of half as many followers or participants as they claim to have.
	Just unbelievable.
	Unbelievable.
	Bruce, if you're still there, you're welcome to add more comments.
	Are you still with me?
	Yes, Twitter, I imagine Twitter They must be pretty confident that they're not going to have full discovery.
	I believe that they're a CIA outfit from the beginning.
	Look how they're instrumental in the Arab Spring and in the Maydian coup there in the Ukraine.
	But we'll see.
	They cannot avoid discovery.
	There's no way they can avoid discovery.
	They did with you, didn't they?
	With me?
	That was a totally different situation.
	I'm, alas, not among the richer patrons of the art, shall we say.
	And I was in a box where, I mean, I was making discovery requests, but none of them were being accepted.
	They were all being rejected.
	This is very interesting.
	An additional story.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Go ahead, Bruce.
	Go ahead, go ahead.
	Then I'm going to have to jump and I'll listen again.
	Did you hear John Bolton on CNN?
	He actually admitted to performing coups.
	He let that slip out and he said, well, we've done coups before.
	I've done coups before.
	This was yesterday on CNN.
	So he's actually admitting to interfere in the affairs of a sovereign nation.
	And so they do this, yet they claim that a demonstration of protest, exactly what January 6th was, was a coup.
	Oh, and that was supposed to be the idea that this guy's an expert on coups and he could tell you January 6th was a coup because he's participated in coups before?
	Coup, yes, yes.
	The coup was the election.
	The January 6th was just to try to polish it off by tarnishing the guy from whom they stole the election to make it out as though he were the bad guy and they were the good.
	I mean, it's just.
	The Democrat operatives here are just horrific here.
	John Bolton is, of course, a neocon, a neocon's neocon.
	So if it's not right in the category I was addressing with the opening story about You know, the war in Ukraine and our foreign policy being dominated by Zionist interests.
	There's no doubt about it.
	This guy is there pitching for those same interests that are contrary to the best interests of the United States.
	We have another caller joining from the 231.
	Bruce, Bruce, thank you for joining us.
	I know you gotta go, we're good.
	We have another caller, Ken from Michigan.
	Ken, yes.
	Join the conversation.
	Hello, Dr. Jim.
	Yeah, Twitter's a loser anyway, because they, you know, shadow banned the President of the United States.
	It's outrageous.
	Ever since they did that, they're on a losing team.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I agree.
	But what we have going on with Musk was an opportunity to make it an asset to the nation, to turn Twitter into something worthwhile, responsible, by fostering free speech.
	I'm, you know, I really like what Musk had in mind if he indeed was going to follow through.
	And Twitter has now put itself in an impossible situation by trying to sue him to follow through, because during discovery, it's going to be revealed that everything he was concerned about was modified, that they've only got half the number of followers they claim they have.
	It's really stunning, the stupidity with which Twitter has handled all of this.
	Right.
	It's just like Facebook, too, where they wouldn't allow comments for the right wing or Donald Trump accolades or anything that had to do with the president winning the election.
	They would just shadow ban that.
	It's the same Zuckerberg conglomerate.
	They're the radical left.
	I call them the lunatic left.
	They're just completely out of touch with proper reality.
	The way they treated the president is terrible, you know.
	President Trump had the rally in Anchorage, Alaska.
	It was really tremendous.
	Tell me about it.
	This was very recent, right?
	This was just, what, this past weekend?
	Yeah, Saturday.
	Tell me about it.
	He spoke to the pilot that was flying him out there.
	Talking about, I guess it was when he was on the Air Force, when he was President, and how he would take out ISIS, and the General, you called him General Raising Cane, and he was the pilot.
	And he said, how would you do it, you know, pilot?
	And then he said, I would take him out on the left, take him out on the right, and right down the effing middle.
	And I would take out ISIS, and it would take me three weeks.
	His generals were saying that it would take three years.
	And he said, we got to get it done faster than that.
	And how would you do it, Captain?
	You know, that was a highlight of the rally because he dropped the F-bomb.
	Yeah, they're quoting the pilot.
	No, I get it.
	I get it.
	I get it.
	I want you to stand by.
	Sarah Palin came out.
	Go ahead.
	Sarah Palin came out.
	Yes, she came out.
	Another real looker, too, at the conservative girls that were out there, and guys with the Trump T-shirt.
	I think Palin has an excellent prospect of winning the Senate there in Alaska.
	Right, because she was stymied by that loser McCain, so Trump will bring her back into the glory.
	Will you stand by, Ken?
	We've got another caller, Brian.
	Brian, join the conversation.
	Yeah, you talk about those neocons, and it always drives me nuts, because, you know, there's Shabbati and Frankus, and I've talked about it before, Winter Watch, Russ Winter had that excellent article on them that June 6th of 1666, a lot of sixes there that give you clues, Rabbi Shabbat and Zevi said he was the coming of the Christ,
	And so in 1666 we had something called Cestuqve, C-S-T-U-Q-U-E-V-U-E, that showed up for it.
	You had the London Fire, you had a plague, you had all these things for the million followers of the Shabbat and Zivi to herald his coming.
	And so, let's just label them what they are.
	They're antichrists.
	And Jacob Frank, you know, he said, oh, I'm the reincarnation of Shabbat and Zevi.
	Well, they know how to handle dark energy, so they know how to use the egregore, the hive mind, so that means everybody reincarnates.
	You know, Christ has had to reincarnate.
	All these people have had to reincarnate.
	I understand where the 666 thing comes from, but no one knows.
	No one has an understanding of this stuff.
	So, anyway, that's what I wanted to say was, you know, we're basically dealing with people that worship the Antichrist.
	Rough childhood was one.
	Melinda Gates wears an upside-down cross.
	That means she's Shabbat and Francus.
	All of your neocons are Shabbat and Francus.
	So basically, if you read what Jacob Frank was doing, they were into pedophilia.
	Uh, child rape, you know, I can assure you Biden is one when he's taking a shower with his daughter.
	If you read what Shabbat and ZD was doing politically, it's just like what's going on now.
	So that's what we're dealing with.
	The people, they all have cell phone brains.
	It just doesn't seem to register.
	So that's what I had to say.
	Well, Brian, I'm sure I would agree with parts of that, but as you know, as an agnostic, you know, I don't have a theological point of view.
	I certainly believe in good versus evil, however.
	Ken, your thoughts about what Brian has said, or others of your own?
	Yeah, the great website from Henry Macau, he points out the Satanic Jews, the Illuminati, and he has a pretty good handle on that.
	Infiltrate governments with the root of all evil and the financiers of the world, you know, and they want the control of the world.
	And, uh, you know, communism is Satanism and Antichrist, uh, Jewish banking, cabal, you know, they reject, uh, the Messiah.
	So, uh, they go about their business through the dark gospels and, uh, you know, people, uh, you know, have to go on long after that in the secular world with, uh, We have Paul joining us.
	Paul, join the conversation.
	The United States is a Christian nation.
	Stand by.
	Stand by.
	We have Paul joining us.
	Paul, join the conversation.
	You know what I think we should do all across the country is we should hold kind of a fake gay adoption event, similar to that old bait car thing they used to run on the spinoff of Cops, where they park a car in the hood and they wait similar to that old bait car thing they used to run on the spinoff of Cops, where they park a And when the, when the faggots show up to adopt a kid, quote unquote, we should take them somewhere and throw them off the roof like these Arab countries do.
	Then we can start to have a nation again.
	I am so sick of talk about faggots everywhere and that's all they're doing.
	And I'm sorry to use such a pejorative term.
	But if you've ever seen The Boy with the Henna Tattoo, which I mentioned years ago, and I've actually sent it around and watched, nobody could watch that and ever think that gays, especially gay men, should ever be allowed to adopt a child, especially a little boy.
	Now, I know there's a lot of faggy liberals out there.
	Oh, they're not all like that.
	I don't give a damn.
	You watch that thing and you see what they did.
	It's disgusting.
	They bought a child.
	The lawsuit against the fertility clinic makes me throw up.
	So what do we have now?
	We have factories that make human beings.
	We have stores, and you can just go buy a kid.
	You don't have to be a normal, natural, heterosexual couple anymore.
	What's the boy with the henna tattoo?
	You can find it on YouTube and other places, where these two fags, they bought a little boy from Russia.
	They went to Russia, and they basically paid in adoption.
	They bought this boy.
	And then they did all this thing that these sickening fags do, they butt-rammed them and every else, they put it on film, and then they pimped them out to other pedophile fags all around the world, okay?
	This is what homosexual fags are, and there should be no way ever fags should be allowed to adopt a kid.
	That's my take for the moment, thanks for hearing it.
	I'm a free speech guy, Paul.
	I think a lot of people are sympathetic or agree with you even a hundred percent.
	It's very troubling, very troubling.
	I was always told, you know, years and years ago that gays were nurturing of children, but I suspect you may be closer to the mark than those stories of the past.
	I thought it was a story, of course, intended to reflect on the reality of sex, but you're turning it in a very different direction, namely that there's a potential for abuse there, and I have no doubt that you're right about that.
	Go ahead.
	I know the reason for the story, and your comments on it were appropriate.
	I just used it, as I do so many things, as a trigger to vent my rage.
	No, I get it.
	I get it.
	I get it.
	And if you want, I can send you the link again, and you should watch it, Tim.
	When you watch this, you will be so infuriated and so enraged and so nauseated by what these two gays did to this little boy that they bought.
	I think it's completely weird and unnatural.
	We're living in a completely, totally Jewish culture.
	That they allow and promote this kind of thing, such as gay adoption or gay marriage.
	It's disgusting and nauseating.
	And I would love to never hear of it again.
	Before I go, thanks for taking my call once again.
	I like your show and I do listen when I can.
	I'm actually taking a break at work now.
	But I sent you that PDF on Elon Musk before and I know you didn't read it, but if you did, I don't think you would speak of him in the way that you do.
	He's a frontman.
	You're suggesting that Musk is also a very compromised individual, right, Paul?
	Well, he's a frontman.
	In other words, you know, this whole thing, Twitter, Facebook, all these places were started by Intel, okay?
	These are Intel operations.
	Their finances and their money claims don't make any sense.
	They don't add up, and this is being revealed by the very things you talk about, right?
	All the phone accounts and so forth.
	In other words, the ad revenue and everything else, it just doesn't make a working business model because they're essentially a vacuum cleaner.
	They're intelligence operations designed to get all kinds of data, do whatever they're going to do with it.
	It's not the kind of real business model that would work in the real world.
	And so this whole thing, in my opinion, with Musk buying it, not buying it back, it's just a phony stage show designed to whip sauce back and forth.
	You look at what they're doing now, what they've been doing for a long time, and especially ramping it up these days, is they're whip sawing the American mind back and forth.
	Yeah, you may be 100% correct about that, Paul.
	I mean, I agree.
	Of course, Facebook was known as LifeLog when the CIA was nurturing it.
	Then the following day, they sprang it on us with Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook.
	And it gets the public sharing all their private details of their life, saving the CIA the necessity of having to learn all those details independently.
	Everyone's voluntarily giving it up, and there is a giant information vacuum cleaner.
	You're absolutely right about that.
	I have no doubt whatsoever.
	I'm even given to understand NASA is a branch of the agency, Paul, by the way, which would also make sense, in my opinion.
	So, I think you've made any number of good points.
	Brian, did you want to add?
	Okay, thanks, Paul.
	Thanks for calling in.
	Yeah, Brian, go ahead.
	Yeah, Paul was right on a lot of that stuff.
	I think it goes back even further if you look at people like Warren Buffett, Les Wexner, even Bill Gates.
	Rothschild is worth $800 trillion, $500 to $800 trillion.
	I think the way it works is he'll say, look, I will contribute billions of dollars to you if you use it to destroy America, and we're going to do it in certain ways or whatever, and that's how these people get their money.
	On their own, they wouldn't be able to do it.
	That's just my feeling.
	And as far as the gay movement, that LGBT flag you see, this is more of their dark stuff, like the 6666.
	What you notice when you look at it, when you look at a rainbow, it starts red at the bottom, goes orange, yellow, green, blue, and what you're actually looking at is Gaia, the divine energy for this planet.
	You're looking at her chakras.
	Okay?
	When I do my meditation, the first one's red, they go red, orange, yellow, it's exactly the same.
	Well, what you'll notice there is theirs is upside down.
	The red's on top.
	They take everything and they invert it and screw it up.
	It's the same with the swastika.
	You know, if you look in ancient India, the swastika's there.
	It means higher consciousness.
	But the base of the swastika is parallel to the ground.
	Well, the dark pink over the Nazi movement when it started out, it was something good, and then they cockeyed it.
	The swastika becomes a little off, and that's them taking things over.
	The same with Red Shield for Rothschild.
	That's from when he took over the Knight-Templar banking.
	If you look at the Knight-Templar shield, it's...
	It's white with a red cross.
	Rothschild takes it over and suddenly it's a red shield with a white cross.
	And then they do all of their, you know, crap they do and take it over and screw it up.
	So that's what I have to say.
	Ryan, I want to give Ken a sec here just before we have to close our conversation.
	Ken, your further thoughts?
	Yeah, that's hate speech now to call out fags and gays.
	That song by Dire Straits, Money for Nothin', they had to take out the lyric, that little faggot with the yearning in the makeup.
	Yeah, buddy, that's his own plane.
	You know that song, Jim?
	I don't think I do, Ken.
	What's the name of it again?
	Money for Nothin' by Dire Straits.
	I don't think I do, Ken.
	The second verse, it was a big hit back in 84.
	Well, anyway, yeah, the homosexuals all part of the secret society, like Alistair Crowley was a notorious homosexual.
	And, you know, you got George W. was prancing around and what, you know, all kinds of rumors.
	Well, thank you guys.
	Thank you guys for calling in and thanks everyone for being here.
	Spend as much time as you can with your family, your loved ones.
	We don't know how much time we have left.
	Thanks for being here.

▲