All Episodes
Previous Next
July 13, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
55:05
Need to Know News (13 July 2022) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joel Sinn in Houston.
Holly Seliger is on special assignment.
We look forward to her rejoining us soon.
Meanwhile, Jeffrey Sachs and Phil Giraldi's The Ukraine War is yet another neocon war.
This is edited by Kevin MacDonald, whom I know personally, an exceptionally good scholar.
I'll just share some highlights.
Jeffrey Sachs, publishing in Tikkun, a liberal left Jewish publication.
The war in Ukraine is a culmination of a 30-year project of the American neocon movement.
The Biden is packed with the same neocons who championed the wars of choice in Serbia, 1999, Afghanistan, 2001, Iraq, 2003, Syria, 2011, Libya, 2011, and who did so much to provoke Russia's invasion of Ukraine. and who did so much to provoke Russia's invasion of The neocon track record is one of a mitigated disaster.
Yet Biden has staffed his team with neocons.
This outlook is based on an overriding false premise that the U.S.
military, financial, technological, and economic superiority enables it to dictate terms in all regions of the world.
It's a position of both remarkable hubris and remarkable disdain of evidence.
There's no way in which that remains the case today.
The Institute for the Study of War and Neocon Think Tank, backed by Husu and defense contractors like General Dynamics and Raytheon, continues to promise a Ukrainian victory.
There isn't a chance it's going to happen.
Notice that Sachs, writing in a Jewish publication, avoids any mention of advancing Israeli interests as the main motive of the neocons.
However, Jewish motives and Israeli interests were always front and center for the Jewish neocons.
However, to establish, you need to delve into biographical details, associational patterns, history of pro-Israeli activism, and family connections, as Kevin MacDonald has done.
Phil Giraldi, in a piece in the UN's review, How Jewish is the War Against Russia, notes such details in his treatment of the lead-up to the war in Iraq.
Currently, the top three State Department officials, Tony Blinken, Wendy Sherman, and Victoria Nuland, are all Zionist Jews.
The head of DHS, hot on the trail of domestic terrorist dissidents, is also Jewish, as is the Attorney General and the present Chief of Staff.
They and their boss do not seem concerned.
Their client Ukraine is no democracy.
The current government came into power after a 2014 coup engineered by Barack Obama's State Department at an estimated case of $5 billion.
It was driven by State Department Russophobe Victoria Nuland, with a little help from the international globalist George Soros, who's dedicating himself to destroying America before he dies.
Ukraine is reputedly both the poorest and the most corrupt country in Europe.
Witness the Hunter Biden saga.
We have the present president, Zelensky, who's Jewish, replacing another Jewish president, Poroshenko, After being heavily funded and promoted by another fellow Jew and Ukraine's richest oligarch, Ihor Kolomoiskyi, who's also an Israeli citizen.
It sounds like déjà vu all over again, since many of the perps are still around like Newland, priming the pump to go to war yet again for no good reason.
And they're joined by journalists like Brett Stevens at the New York Times, Will Blicker and Jake Trapper at CNN, and Max Mood at the Washington Post, all of whom are Jewish.
And get me counted on to write regular pieces about damning and demonizing Russia and Vladimir Putin, which means this is not only about the Middle East anymore.
It's about weakening and even bringing about regime change and nuclear-armed Russia, while drawing some lines in the sand for likewise nuclear-armed China.
And it ain't gonna happen.
Many of the oligarch millionaires, like Boris Borlewski, self-exiled when Vladimir Putin obtained power and began to crack down on their tax avoidance and other illegal activities.
Some moved to Europe, where they bought up soccer teams.
Others went south and obtained Israeli citizenship.
Their current grievances reflect their tribe's demand for perpetual victimhood and the deference plus forgiveness of all sins it conveys, with self-promoted tales of persecution going back to the days of the Tsars, full of allegations about pogroms and Cossacks arriving in the night.
Stale stories that rival many of the Holocaust's fabrication in terms of their lack of credibility.
Meanwhile, There are others where beyond Ukraine is, to a certain extent, a very Jewish-identified place.
In the Jewish media and the US have elsewhere showered Zelensky with praise referring to him as a genuine Jewish hero.
A modern man could be resisting oppression at David versus Goliath.
T-shirts bearing his image are being sold that read, resisting tyrant since pharaoh, while the largely orthodox Jewish community in New York City has been raising millions for Ukrainian aid.
As U.S.-Russian negotiations clearly designed to fail by the Biden admin, one wonders if the war is really a product of long-enduring ethno-religious hatred, coupled with belief in the necessity for a strong American military, applied as needed, to dominate the world and thereby protect Israel.
The neocons are most visible, but equally toxic are the Jews who would prefer to describe themselves as neoliberals or liberal interventionists, that is, liberals who promote a strong, assertive American leadership to support the basically phony catchword democracy and freedom.
As, alas, Giroldi presents the issue of Jewish motivation as a question, one has to wonder.
Nevertheless, he's quite clear on Jewish motivation for the war in Iraq, with some of the same information presented in my Kevin McDonnellial conservatism as a Jewish movement.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well I have to keep turning the mute on and off, but he forgot something.
In 1992, we succeeded in breaking up Yugoslavia, and that formed Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Kosovo, Bosnia, so that we could split all those up and then force them to fight each other, which is exactly what NATO Ended up doing and that's what a plan that they have for Russia and they're aggravating on as many fronts as possible.
I just saw this morning that the US is planning on sending a large naval fleet into the back Black Sea to confront the Russian Navy there and that.
The Norwegians have started shadowing the Russian fleet in the Barents Sea, and we also know the stuff that they're doing in the Baltics.
So, you know, bottom line is these SOBs have used the same modus operandi for centuries.
It's balkanize everything you can, then get the tribes to war against each other.
Then after both of them are weak, then you come in and take over all of their assets and asset strip them.
This is nothing but international piracy.
And NATO is the largest pirate organization on the planet at this point.
I think that's very well said, Joe.
I think you got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, Biden claims he's determined to renew the assault weapons ban, displaying his vast ignorance.
We're living in a country awash in weapons of war, referring to AR-15-style rifles.
What's the rationale for these weapons outside of war zones?
Assault weapons need to be banned.
Well, number one, they're not actually assault weapons, which are fully automatic.
These are only semi-automatic.
Number two, they're the most popular and versatile all-around rifle, whether it's for home defense, community support, or to protect the national security.
Number three, while there are those who claim the Founding Fathers did not have military weapons in mind when they authored the Second Amendment, It's precisely military weapons they had in mind, because they wanted America to be citizen-soldiers, every American to be able to come to the aid of the nation, to defeat a foreign invader, or to dispel a tyrannic administration such as we have today.
So the major arguments for banning these guns are all bad ones.
Plus, they never talk about the defensive use of guns.
By the way, most of the murders used with guns are done with handguns, not with rifles.
That's a tiny percent, maybe 5%.
The other done with handguns.
Not only that, but Americans use guns for defensive purposes when they're being assaulted by assailants, and frequently they only have to show their arm for the assailant to disappear.
They rarely have to use them, but they're estimated to save 200,000 lives every single year.
The Biden admin and the liberal gun grabbers never acknowledge that role and importance because, in fact, it's only 70,000 a year who die, which is typically blacks killing other blacks in gang wars in cities.
Like Chicago, plus a certain percentage of suicides, plus police and the performance of their duty civilians in self-defense.
The whole thing is out of whack.
The Democrats, as usual, have no idea what they're talking about.
The claim here is suicides account for about 54% of gun-related deaths in the U.S., which sounds extremely high.
43% murdered, according to data from the CDC.
Another 3% were gun-related deaths involving law enforcement, unintentional or undetermined.
In 2020, handguns were involved in 59% of all gun-involved murders.
Only 3% involved rifles, even less than the five, which includes firearms, sometimes called assault weapons, which is incorrect, inaccurate, misleading, and shotguns in 1%.
The other 36% guns that were classified as type not stated.
Biden also said he wants to ban high-capacity magazines.
I'm determined to ban these weapons, and we're not going to stop until we do it, said Biden who backed the 1994 assault weapon ban.
But it's not going to happen.
Last month, 15 Republicans did join all the Democrats to pass the Safer Communities Act, with red flag laws, more stringent background, and making guns-through-straw purchases a federal offense.
The NRA wrote, Make no mistake, behind this facade is a contrived talking point of safety, school security, and mental health.
This is a gun control bill.
Gun Owners of America, another pro-gun group, announced it will challenge these unconstitutional laws in court to defend the rights of all Americans.
Meanwhile, to reinstate the 1994 ban, Democrats will need 10 Republicans to vote to overcome the 60-vote threshold.
No Republican, not even one, has sought to reinstate that ban, which ended in 2004.
And your very own Senator, Joe Cronin, has declared no more gun bills.
Oh yeah, well, Cowboy Cronin is being booed off the stage every time he shows up in Texas at this point.
And the totalitarians would love for us to be limited to nothing but flintlocks so they can just mow us down without having any problem and then say we were an armed insurrection.
You know, sort of like wearing a Buffalo hat and walking around the Capitol building.
But at the same time that they wanting to disarm us, they're rapidly arming federal agencies that have never had arms before.
And that would be the USDA buying 40 caliber submachine guns, the Railroad Retirement Fund, the IRS, the ATF, The Department of Education is arming itself.
Department of Energy?
Oh yeah, that's a big problem we've got to have.
USGS is buying riot shotguns because everybody knows it when you go out to the lake.
There are all kinds of things that need to be taken down.
And US Fish and Game is buying Glocks with suppressors, which you can't even buy without a special permit and a six-month waiting period.
So it's okay for the federal government to arm themselves to the teeth, for I wonder why.
Maybe because the Second Amendment is to protect us from a government that's armed to the teeth and has ulterior motives that are unconstitutional.
Yeah, these are very bad signs, Joe, very bad signs that the administration is expecting a popular uprising and is going to want to suppress it violently, with a heavy hand, with lots of death.
Meanwhile, the biggest reason people aren't buying electric cars has been revealed by a new survey.
Charging logistics is a principal problem.
The amount of time it takes to recharge and the lack of availability of charging stations.
Consumer Reports, which surveyed around 8,000 Americans, found 61% say wouldn't own an electric vehicle because of charging logistics, 55% the number of miles it can go per charge, another 52% the cost of buying and maintaining is cost prohibitive.
Another 46% said they had not heard of any financial incentives available for owners of electric vehicles.
We found 14% would definitely buy or lease if they were to buy a vehicle today, up from 4%.
Who said the same in 2020?
So the propaganda is having an effect on the weak-minded.
Kelly Blue Book reports the average price of a new electric is $56,000.
In contrast, a new compact, only $25,000.
The average price of a new non-electric SUV, $34,000.
But the electric version, $45,000.
A recent report from J.D.
Power, by the way, found electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids have more problems than internal combustion engines, your ordinary gasoline engine.
While internal combustion engines averaged 175 problems per 100 vehicle, it jumped to 239 among plug-in hybrids, 240 among electric.
Tulsa models, which include the industry calculation for the first time, averaged 226 per 100, not much better.
Automakers continue to launch vehicles that are more and more technologically complex in an era when there are many shortages of critical components to support them.
Among elevated gas prices, White House officials continue to suggest Americans buy electric as Republicans have halted Biden for the spike in prices.
In mid-June, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm suggested Americans can deal with $5 per gallon gas by ditching a gasoline engine for an electric.
If you fill up your EV and your gas tank with gas, you would save 60 by going electric rather than using gas, claiming it's a compelling case.
But she's not talking about the hours you have to sit and wait to have your electric battery charged, which only takes five minutes with a gas engine.
And get this, a report from the UK, We've had a few reasons to discuss electric vehicles this week on various platforms and again we're further discovering that EVs are no green nirvana.
How about this?
Electric police cars are failing in the United Kingdom.
They're running out of charge before being able to reach emergencies.
Gloucestershire has the largest fleet of electric police cars in the United Kingdom.
21% of their vehicles are electric.
But the Police and Crime Commissioner in the District is concerned, and he should be, because as he says, I've heard lots of problems with officers driving around in electric vehicles having issues trying to find recharging facilities.
Another problem is when these vehicles run out of puff and then officers have to get another vehicle.
What, taxi?
He said, so although the world is going down that road, it's definitely an important thing, but my first priority is to fight crime.
That would be handy.
And therefore, I have to take the operational effect into account.
In other words, EVs make some people feel morally responsible, especially governments and local governments, but they are not a fit in so many scenarios, including cops chasing crooks.
And you can't put the car before the charger.
If you can't charge electric vehicles, they're totally useless.
It's a concerning example of how unreliable these electric vehicles can be.
But moreover, how green governments jump the gun to look on trend without doing the due diligence.
It's absolutely right, Joe.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, here we go.
I'm unmuted.
Yeah, amazingly enough, there's a whole bunch of things wrong with this, and rather than me explain all of them, I would recommend again that people see the Michael Moore movie, Planet of the Humans, about how environmentally destructive all of these green policies are.
And then we have the case of the Chevy Volt, which caused so many fires and General Motors doesn't want to be sued anymore.
That they've not only recommended, they've pretty much said that they're not responsible if it burns down your garage.
You're supposed to charge your Chevy Bolt outside of your garage, hopefully to limit damage.
And with that kind of a disclaimer on the part of the manufacturer, you can bet the insurance companies are not going to be covering any home losses due to fires.
And it'll expect the same thing to happen with Tesla's, which have a big problem with Spontaneous combustion.
And then in Texas, right now, we're having rolling blackouts because we've got 25% of all of the nation's windmills, thanks to T. Boone Pickens and goofy Ricky Perry, who was our governor after Big Bush got promoted to D.C., and he signed the Energy Act for Texas, where all new generation capacity had to be 25% renewable.
So now we have all this renewable energy that doesn't do a single freaking thing, and then a lot of people are noticing that, hey, these electric vehicles are not paying any gasoline tax to maintain the roads, so they want to put a mileage tax on, which will be great, because these people should enjoy the same amount of taxation that we've got, which will make even less attractive Electric vehicles.
And then in the UK starting in July, this is a new story from about a month ago so I'm sure it's already in effect, all home chargers have to be able to have reverse current.
So if there's a current shortage in the UK and you've got your electric vehicle plugged in and you're 90% charged and you're thinking you're going to drive to work in the morning, Surprise!
They had an outage somewhere and they're taking the energy out of your car because your car is now part of the grid and when there's an energy shortage, they're going to take your energy and then they claim they'll recharge it back whenever the system is back operational again.
Which means you could maybe go out in the morning and you'd have zero percent charge in your stupid little electric vehicle.
All you people that fall for this kind of tokenism instead of actual reality, you deserve the world you're living in.
The problem is the rest of us don't deserve this world and we don't need to be drug into hell with you.
I can't believe how this Green New Deal is driven by scientific ignorance and a sense of moral superiority totally undeserved.
Biden asked to declare a public health emergency over the abortion ruling.
Senators Tina Smith from Minnesota and Elizabeth Warren from Mass, two loons, wrote an op-ed urging Biden to declare a public health emergency to protect Americans from all across the nation.
Almost two dozen states have banned or significantly limited abortion since Roe was overturned.
The Senators wrote that this is the end of a woman's constitutional right and a perilous time threatening millions of Americans.
They have other far-reaching ideas, propose changing the composition of the Supreme Court to allow more liberals to be appointed, reforming the Senate's filibuster to allow Democrats to push through legislation with a simple majority.
Remaking the Electoral College allowed presidents who won the popular vote to be elected.
Thus, Hillary would have won over Trump.
They wrote all three ought to be allowed.
The five conservative justices shouldn't be allowed to undo a woman's federal protection, showing a gross misunderstanding of the nature of the three parts of our government and the role of the Supreme Court.
Polls conducted back in May, after the draft opinion was leaked, found 60% believe abortion should be legal in most or all cases, but only in the first two trimesters, undoubtedly.
Only 37% thought abortion should be illegal in most or all.
The public is overwhelmingly on our side.
The two of us lived in an America without Rowan.
We're not going back.
Not now.
Not ever.
I guess that means we're going to leave the country.
Meanwhile, the majority of Americans say they're worse off today than they were before.
51.3% say they're worse off.
First time in history of the survey that a majority have said they are worse off.
Households have become gloomier.
Inflation expectations have increased.
The median expected change in home prices, moreover, has fallen from 4.4 from 5.8.
The mean probability unemployment will be higher one year from now, increased by 1.8 to 40.4.
The mean perceived probability of losing one's job in the next 10 months inched up to nearly 12% from 11.1.
Meanwhile, 57% believe the U.S.
is in an economic recession.
There's not really a lot of room for doubt about it.
57% said yes when they asked if we're in a recession.
19% said no.
24% were unsure.
Most reported being Republican and Independent said yes.
75 and 57, but only 43% are Democrats.
Just 16% view the economy as excellent or good, while a majority categorize it as poor.
That's a useful indicator for a midterm election, reliably historically.
The poll also gauged the importance of the stock market.
64% viewed as somewhat or very important, 24% not.
Whether they approve the way Biden's handling the economy?
51% said no.
40% strongly disapproving.
Only 38% stuck up for him.
75% of black Americans now say inflation is very important for the midterms.
Nearly two-thirds of Americans say it'll be very important when deciding how to vote.
73% say inflation is very important.
75% of black Americans.
66% of Hispanics.
Among non-college graduate whites, 80% say inflation is very important.
Among their female counterparts, 83%.
60% even of Democrats say inflation is very important.
70% of Democrats, 92% of Republicans.
This is very bad news for Biden and the midterms if they are allowed to take place.
Joe?
Yeah, well, funny thing happens when you print money for nothing.
You end up having money worth nothing.
Yeah, great article at the Conservative Treehouse.
June inflation jumps one 0.3 percent.
So far, the annual rate is 9.1 percent.
Well, let's see.
If you multiply 1.3 times 12, you're going to get something like on the order of 15 percent inflation rate.
And this is based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which we all know they're lions.
You know, it's impossible to deny that we are not in the 20% inflation rate and that it's spiraling completely out of control.
And we're giving more and more money to our friendly little Ukrainian democracy that outlawed any other foreign any other political parties and any other news medias.
They completely nationalize all the news media in Ukraine.
So basically, you want to know what Soviet-style government looks like?
Look at Ukraine and then realize that this is exactly what they planned for us.
It's absolutely insane.
And anybody who can't notice how prices have gone up is just beyond hope.
I hope they get their fourth booster because we don't need them around any longer.
Well, the booster business is Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Check this out.
Totally fake.
We knew Abe wasn't hit by the first round.
He didn't appear to be hit by the second.
He's kneeling as though in prayer.
But look at this, a close-up photograph.
A fake blood packet was hidden in his jacket pocket.
A fake blood packet.
Kabuki theater indeed.
This is all totally fraudulent.
Meanwhile, This is very, very serious.
While you were distracted by Boris resigning, the UK government published a report confirming the vaccinated account for 94% of COVID deaths since April, 90% of whom were triple or quadruple jab.
Very serious.
Look at this percentage of deaths by vaccine status.
It's like 4% were unvaxxed, 96% vaxxed.
On the 7th of July, Boris PM announced he was retiring since they've had 24-7 news about it.
You ought to look then for the bad news being quietly published that they hope you won't notice.
Back in March of 2022, the UK Health Security Agency announced that from April 1st of 2022, they'd no longer publish the vaccine status of COVID cases, hospitalization, and death.
The reason being, of course, it's horrific.
No one, knowing the data, would ever get the shot.
At the time, the UK HSA claimed it was because the government had ended free universal COVID testing and therefore it affected their ability to monitor by vaccine status, which was simply a lie.
The UK Security Health Agency had been looking for an excuse to stop publishing the data forever because it showed that cases, hospitalization, and death per 100,000 were the highest among the fully-vaxxed population.
When Pfizer claimed their vax was 95% effective, I think we thought to promote health.
I think it makes sense, if you now understand the other way around, 95% effective to bring about death.
This is what's going on.
Another UK government agency, the Office for National Statistics, has published data that shows exactly what's going on.
Here's Table 1 showing for a month of April, deaths involving COVID among the unvaccinated, 206.
But, the other deaths from the first dose, one, first dose at least 21 days, 45, second dose 13, second dose at least six, about 246, get this, third dose, 3,057.
So among those who are ever vaccinated, we had 3,365 deaths compared to 206 for those who were unvaccinated.
Ever vaccinated, we had 3,365 deaths compared to 206 for those who were unvaxxed.
Here's more data.
A following chart, from 1 April 2022 to 31 May 2022, 288 who were vaxxed died.
4,647 who were unvaccinated died.
4,647 who were vaxxed died.
And of those, 4,215 were triple vags.
Plus, in accord, there were 4,935 deaths.
You might want to mute, Joe.
You might want to mute.
Will do.
And the vax population accounted for a shocking 4,647 of those deaths.
Even more so, the triple vax were 4,216 of those 4,647.
And the vax population accounted for a shocking 4,647 of those deaths.
Even more so, the triple vax were 4,216 of those 4,647.
Only 288 among the unvaxed.
So here you see another table for the COVID deaths from 2018.
Feb to 27 March, 321 among those unvaxxed, 3,736 among those vaxxed, 89 one dose, 592 doses, but 3,054 among those who had three or more.
This means there were 33 fewer deaths among the unvaxxed over two months, and there were in the whole of March.
The opposite is true for the vaxxed population.
It's just going haywire.
Deaths have fallen drastically among the un-vaxxed but increased significantly among the vaxxed.
Just look at these percentages here for the un-vaxxed versus a single vaxxed versus a triple vaxxed.
Stunning stuff!
The quietly published figures revealed the vaccine as a whole accounted for a shocking 94% of all COVID deaths.
Remember, this is a vaccine that was supposed to keep us safe and preclude our having COVID.
It was to help us.
It turns out the opposite is the case.
It was killing us, and by design.
Many in the UK have been given a fourth dose, and my God, they are dropping like flies.
Stunning stuff!
So from 6 June to 12 June, that's just one week, there were only 36 unvaxxed deaths, 485 vaxxed, broken down as follows.
43 double-vaxxed, 200 triple-vaxxed, and 242 quadruple-vaxxed.
The most recent Government of Canada figure shows a similar pattern.
Hey, the vax population had 485 deaths that same week.
242 among the quadruple vax, accounting for 50%.
These aren't the kind of figures you'd expect to see if the injections were 95% effective at preventing death, but what you'd expect to see, I add, if they were 95% effective at promoting death.
There you have it.
You've been distracted by Boris while news like this was being swept under the rug.
Makes you wonder what else they're trying to hide.
Joe, your thoughts?
No, God, and if you thought Boris was bad, now you see the group of clowns that they're trying to run as a replacement, man.
What a miserable form of government, man.
There's not a single candidate that's running for a position to replace Boris that's any better than FJB, so that's pretty sad news.
And then as far as the information on COVID, They're trying to ramp up the hysteria for Monkeypox.
It doesn't seem to be working, so their fallback is they're going to give us Marburg.
Yeah, that's the one we need to worry about.
So, anybody that's silly enough to trust Big Pharma after their record of fraud and deception for decades deserves what they're getting at this point.
And I'll just put down in the notes some of the people that you can do your own research.
Google them up.
And since most people in this country are illiterate, you can probably find good information on them.
It won't be on YouTube because they're heavily censored.
I think the article you're reading from is a guy named Steve Kirsch, K-I-R-S-C-H, if it's not, he's an excellent source, but I'll also put the names of several other doctors that have got great videos that you can find on BitChute.
Just go to the search in BitChute, put in the doctor's name, and then go most recent, because then you'll get the material that's, and I certainly recommend Karen Kingston, And, you know, I've met a dozen of these doctors that are frontline opposed to this in person.
And it's an absolute 100% staged genocide.
And if you are still doubtful about that, just do your own homework.
There's plenty of medical doctors and highly qualified experts in biology that can explain to you exactly how defective these treatments are.
Excellent comments, Joe.
That article can be found on my blog at jamesfetzer.org, and it's worth reviewing again.
Meanwhile, they don't trust us, we don't trust them.
The short-lived disinformation governance board reminds us that Washington is dangerously out of touch.
A long time ago in a country far, far different, the U.S.
of America in October 1964, for example, as many as 77% of American trusted the federal government to do the right thing almost always or most of the time.
No, don't get nostalgic.
This was a uniquely gullible time for the American public.
The FBI was busy spying on Martin Luther King, Jr.
Congress had just passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized the dumbest war in U.S.
history on false pretenses.
Sorry, millennials, Vietnam was left over 58,000 Americans dead thanks to our much-trusted government.
Was even dumber than Iraq, with only 4,431 killed in action.
Nowadays, Americans have a much better grip on reality.
Only 24% are so foolish as to trust the government to do the right thing, at least most of the time, much of which I believe was generated by Trump calling out the fake news for which we are eternally grateful.
This was not exactly a good environment, therefore, for Biden to try to stand up for a disinformation governance board at DHS.
The backlash was swift, and the project has been paused.
In our polarized country, the least credible entity to try to correct disinformation would be the federal government.
But then, Biden admin lives in an echo chamber.
68% of Democrats have a great deal or fair amount of trust in the media, compared to 11% of Republicans.
That reflects that the media is overwhelmingly on the Democrats' side.
Considering the individual they had in mind to head the disinfo board was Nina Jankowicz, Even the New York Post reported on the damning contents just weeks before the 2020 election of the Hunter Biden laptop.
Other media ignored this story, except to assert without evidence that it was likely Russian disinformation.
Facebook ruthlessly suppressed this story.
Twitter even suspended the Post's account.
But The disinformation expert they were going to put in charge was fully on board with Team Biden.
Dismissing the laptop story in an interview, we should view it as a Trump campaign product.
While live-tweeting a presidential debate, she again derided the laptop story, repeating Biden's evidence-free allegation of Russian disinformation.
Needless to say, it turned out to be genuine, as even the rabidly pro-Biden, anti-Trump Washington Post and New York Times would acknowledge after the election.
In Biden's America, anything that isn't a Democrat talking point is deemed disinformation.
So why not set up a government entity staffed by We Will Be Holden to its worldview and give it authority to denounce claims that run counter?
The Twitter censors equally await Instructions.
The idea of DHS housing the Sorwellian Ministry of Truth was especially rich since Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has himself been a fountain of disinformation about what's going on at our southern border.
When encounters between border agents and would-be illegals is at an all-time high, he blithely assured Congress under oath that we do have operational control of the border.
If by we do, he meant we do not, he was exactly right.
Who better to oversee a government effort to counter disinformation?
Don't worry, Mayorkas, that sure does.
The board was going to be just a small working group.
But here's a quick thought experiment.
Imagine if Trump tried to establish such a board.
From the Times to the halls of Congress, it would have been condemned, and rightly, as an authoritarian crackdown on free speech and dissent.
The fact is, we have excellent reason to fear a disinformation governance board, regardless of who's promoting it.
We do not need governance of speech.
We need government to protect it.
That's a basic responsibility of our American form of government, as the First Amendment attests.
No one's disputing the fact that false information proliferates.
People make all kinds of claims about everything from COVID and election results to moon landing and JFK.
Error mingles with truth in our marketplace of idea.
That's the price of liberty.
But as Sir Karl Palmer has explained, vigorous critical debate is our most reliable instrument to discover the truth.
You cannot have debate if only one side is presented.
Joe, your thoughts?
My thoughts is yes, I should unmute myself.
Yeah, we had the Smith-Mutt Act after the Congress found out that the CIA was doing Operation Mockingbird, where they were manipulating press and lying overseas.
They said, okay, well, you can lie overseas, but you're not allowed to do it domestically.
Oh, okay.
So then, under Obama, he passed the Smith-Mutt Modernization Act, where it is perfectly legal for the government and the media both to lie to you about anything that they're required to do.
And as far as this governance board, yeah, they didn't get disbanded.
They just went underground.
Their new head is Michael Chernoff, who, amazingly enough, was the only We've had all kinds of stuff that they lied to us about.
fired in February 1993 by Willie.
Imagine that.
And then we've had all kinds of stuff that they lied to us about.
One of the things, and it's a pretty strong rumor, is that E. Howard Hunt's wife Dorothy was killed December 8, 1972 in the crash of United Airlines flight 553 in Chicago.
Yeah, she had a briefcase with $200,000 of milk money that was supposed to go to the president's re-election campaign that she was supposedly delivering, and E. Howard Hunt was one of the ones that was later involved in the Watergate system, and then yesterday had an interesting little bit shoot video with Ivory Hecker, H-E-C-K-E-R.
She's a former Fox 26 reporter who was fired after she did a program on over a thousand patients treated by a doctor here in Houston using ivermectin with 100% success, so Fox fired her.
She interviewed one of my fellow TNT hosts, Christina Borgeson, B-O-R-J-E-S-S-O-N, who was working at CBS when the TWA accident happened, and she's got some really good detailed information.
She was doing a documentary on it, and then they shitcanned her at CBS, but she has an enormous amount of information, including Uh, interview that she did yesterday with Hank Hughes, a former NTSB inspector.
What is almost certain is that that, uh, passenger airliner with over 250 passengers on board was shot down during a missile test from the U.S.
Navy that was trying to avoid having a similar mistake that they had in July of, uh, 1988 when they shot down an A300 in Iran.
shot down an A300 in Iran.
That was a Iran flight 655 that killed 290 people.
And we ended up making our payment, I think $20 million to Iran for killing some of their citizens.
But apparently somebody in the defense industry had come up with some magic way that we could fire a Anti-aircraft missile from a submarine and it could tell the difference between a passenger plane and whatever the drone target plane was and this particular one didn't happen.
But when you see the amount of evidence that was suppressed and how the NTSB was removed from any investigation involving this, It will really let you know that our government has been lying about everything.
And somebody, she mentioned that there was nobody on the passenger list that could have been a possible target.
Well, surprise!
There was a Houstonian on there, Pam Lichner, and her two daughters, Shannon and Kate, age 10 and age 8.
And she was trying to push a bill through Congress called the Sex Offender Trafficking and ID Act.
And after she was killed, there was a whole lot more momentum to pass the act, and it was passed.
And guess who supported it?
Our local Phil Graham, dirtbag senator from Texas.
And FJB supported a Sex Offender Tracking and Identification Act in 1996.
So, go figure, man.
Maybe he can track his own son someday.
That's part of their coverage, though.
They act to be the opposite of what they really are.
Meanwhile, ironically, a gay couple reaffirmed the reality of biological sex by suing a fertility clinic for giving them a girl instead of a boy.
A gay couple perhaps unwittingly reaffirmed the gender binary when they decided to sue a fertility clinic for giving them a daughter instead of the son they had ordered.
Albert and Anthony Sainiger of Pasadena, where I myself was born, Filed a lawsuit against HRC Fertility and Fertility Specialist Dr. Bradford Kolb in Los Angeles Superior Court alleging breach of contract, medical malpractice, negligence, fraudulent concealment, and violation of the Unfair Competition Act and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, all because they were assured they would have a boy born via surrogacy, not a girl.
The singer spent about $300,000 to secure donor eggs in a female surrogate, a gestational carrier called, then endured two unsuccessful implementations before the unidentified woman became pregnant.
The lawsuit claims the clinic assured them they would be able to select the exact embryos and that the biologically determined sex had already been known prior to the transfer procedure.
They selected a male embryo But the clinic and doctor called negligently, recklessly, and or intentionally transferred a female embryo to their gestational carrier.
To this day, HRC has offered no explanation for the error.
They claim they decided before they married in 2013 they wanted to have two boys to raise.
They even selected names for them, created email accounts for them using those names.
They say they still intend to have two sons, whom they'll raise alongside their daughter, and that the staggering expense of a third child is another reason they have decided to sue.
HRC, which specializes in family building options for the LGBT community, has issued a statement in response.
Our mission is to provide world-class care.
We've helped thousands, including the couple involved here.
Every child has value and limitless potential regardless of gender.
We hope that Santagers find love and value in their healthy child while so many across the country have struggling with reproductive issues.
According to the lawsuit, the Sanger's healthy child is biologically female and not just AFAB or assigned female at birth.
Joe.
That's absolutely amazing.
Yeah, when they talk about transgender, they always change from one sex to the other sex.
There's not like they're transferring to the third or fourth or fifth or sixth sex.
It's like, sorry kids, there's only two sexes.
But I can't imagine anything more horrible than growing up in a gay couple's house.
You know, just the distortion that you would have from day one.
About your role as a human being on this planet, which is the unbelievable.
And there's a perfect example of sexism that you have two guys that would reject a daughter just because she doesn't have the sex organs that they apparently intend to play with.
And I'm sorry, but almost every guy I know that's or every Monday involved.
I don't know that many, but The people that are involved in the gay male sex thing are also very heavy into the man boy love stuff and the pedophilia is okay and basically it's on both sides of the gay agenda is to roll back the barriers quote the and the stigmatism of pedophilia and that's one of the big diseases of our society at this point.
And I believe Barack Obama and Michelle, who are of course a gay couple, are very much behind all of this, wanting to create an environment in which they themselves feel more normal.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you, send fan mail, pro or con, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Here we have a comment from my blog.
About the article published there, Jewish influence is indeed the 800-pound gorilla in the room.
The lack of honest discussion of Jewish power and influence or any discussion at all among mainstream figures in the media, academia and politics speaks volumes.
And it will continue ad infinitum.
Never will we hear anything approaching a debate or even a discussion in the mainstream.
The Jews have developed victimhood into a fine art, and until the whole of hoax is exposed, little will change.
Congress shakes in their boots when it comes to opposing or even confronting the Jews.
That is the sad reality.
The only way I see that changing is an entirely new and uncorrupted government revolution, both of which are highly infeasible.
And Trump's re-election, if we get that far, will only intensify their power.
Reality?
It's a bitch.
Meanwhile, I've written to my health care provider where I'm having an annual physical this coming week and I'm instructed to wear a mask.
I have republished a study from December 2021 summarizing the results of 150 plus investigations showing that face masks are neither safe nor effective but actually harm those who wear them.
Is SSM aware of these studies?
And if so, then why are you, including Dean Clinic, still requiring them?
Check it out at jamesfetzer.org.
More than 150 comparative studies and articles on mask ineffectiveness and harms Plus, a new study shows the vaccinated population of England accounted for a shocking 94% of all COVID-19 deaths in April and May, and 90% of those deaths were among the triple-quadruple vaccinated population.
Is SSM and Dean Clinic aware of this data, but still recommend the vax?
Expose news Boris distraction UK government revealed triple vax 94% covid deaths what has become of the Hippocratic oath which of course asserts first do no harm.
Meanwhile my petition on the docket of the Supreme Court I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case.
The summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the judge to decide whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them if, in his subjective opinion, they were not.
As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop, the Court of Appeals Fourth District of the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
You can find more at givezengo.com slash funding fat sir.
GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFedServe.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Can't hear you.
You're muted.
Sorry.
Yeah, in September of 1989, I made proposals for the best package of civil engineering projects ever presented to a municipality anywhere in the United States.
And I was on local TV news, Channel 2, which is the NBC affiliate, KPRC, and they gave me three minutes of time.
I proposed one of the projects was a convert Main Street from a noisy, stinky, dirty, abandoned bus quarter, connect Intercontinental, Downtown, 70 versus
Campuses in the medical center for a billion dollars and as a result of that I found out that the reason they were doing a no-bid contract was they intended to hide 200 billion dollars in the I mean 200 million dollars in the billion dollar rail project and so I was instrumental in getting that project stopped but in the process I met an enormous number of quote
Self-declared power elite in the city of Houston and I'll be doing an expose on that but I'm getting right now the film footage Converted to PDF and I will I mean an mp3 and I will put that up at my website and I'll forward it to Jim so we can put it up on his website and next week I'll produce a local cinematographers working with and we're going to produce about a 45-minute special edition on it.
So for all you people that question my benefitus and my pedigree and my gravitas as far as a Truth teller, I've got four decades knowledge of how horrible the self-declared power elite are in Houston, and it's a short extension to go statewide and nationwide and worldwide from there.
So bottom line is, I've been very well aware of how defective our whole entire government is for my entire adult lifetime.
So look forward to sharing that with people in the near future.
Thanks, you guys.
Well, great job, Joe, of course.
We miss Holly, but you made so many excellent points.
I'm floored at the very idea anyone would question your background or your credentials.
You have demonstrated to me an intellectual versatility extremely rare, even among the most highly intellectual individuals I've ever known through a lifetime career.
Princeton, Indiana, even in the Marine Corps, University of Kentucky, Virginia, North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Cincinnati, New College of the University of South Florida, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Joe, you have an exceptional intellect, and it's just ridiculous anyone should challenge.
You have shown here again and again your complete and utter competence, your mastery of issues around a vast range of subject and historical understanding taboo.
I endorse you 100%.
You're my main man here, Joe, and you're doing an exemplary job.
Everyone should listen to what we're reporting here, because you're sure not going to hear it on the mainstream.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love, because we do not know how much time we have left.
And I guarantee it's going to be a whole lot less than you anticipated.
Don't waste a minute.
▲
Export Selection