All Episodes
Previous Next
July 5, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:12:01
Exposing the Real Story Behind the 9/11 Attacks with Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. PART 1 of 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
...
Hey there, guys.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Great Awakenings.
I am your host, Scott Bennett.
And tonight we are going to be joined by a very special guest, Dr. Jim Fetzer, who is going to be giving us one of the best lectures and outlines of evidence and facts revolving around 9-11 that you will ever hear.
So we are very much looking forward to it.
And we are thankful to God for bringing us the Great Awakenings program.
Our mission is to Educate and inspire people about the great awakenings that are happening all over the country in the world and 9-11 is one of the most important ones.
So this is one of the programs that will open your eyes to some of the greatest events that have happened since 2001.
But first, let us start with our Sovereign Advisors donor and supporter.
Sovereign Advisors is an investment firm that we encourage all people to contact just to get an assessment of their financial future and the best way to invest their resources.
So let us go to Sovereign Advisors.
Hello, everyone.
John Michael Chambers here.
I am the creator and founder of American Media Periscope.
Now, the world is changing.
On June 28th, 2021, the Basel III rules changed.
For the first time, the European Central Bank is pushing the price of gold up because they need to maximize the value of their 10,000 tons of gold they control.
What is this about?
It's about global monetary dominance, and instead of suppressing the price of gold, they are pushing the price up, because they need it to go up.
You can take advantage of this paradigm-shifting rule change.
The team at Sovereign Advisors, with decades of experience in analyzing political, economic, and social trends, can help you take advantage of what may be the most monumental change in gold in the history of the world.
Call my good friend, Dr. Kirk Elliott, over at Sovereign Advisors, 720-605-4000.
$3,900.
Tell them John Michael Chambers at American Media Periscope sent you and request a free consultation.
Thank you, Sovereign Advisors, and also we wanted to bring your attention and remind you that tomorrow in Livermore, California at Stockman's Park, we're going to be having a We the People Patriot Rally.
I'll be one of the speakers as well as a variety of other people, Jackie Cota and others.
So let's play that video for tomorrow's Patreon event in Stockman Park, Livermore.
I'm Dana. I'm Silhouette. And I'm Samantha.
And we're the future.
And we're the UTP Girls.
I'm Jackie Cota.
I'm running for Congress in California District 15.
Come down Saturday, June 26 to Stockman's Park in Livermore.
We're going to be having a nice We the People rally with fun vendors and speakers from 11 to 5.
Join us on Saturday.
We'd love to see you there.
there.
So that is our event that we're going to be having tomorrow.
It's going to be a lot of fun, a lot of food, a lot of families, a lot of patriotic speakers, a lot of new material and intelligence over regarding the audits and what's to come in the presidential election.
Finality is the treason of Joe Biden and some of the others.
But that will be tomorrow, so hopefully you can make it out with us and you can join us for that great event.
Well, let's jump right into our guest because we want to get as much as we can in there.
Dr. James Fetzer, I consider him a very good friend and a colleague.
I've worked with him for four or five years now, Jim.
And there is no one that I trust and that I admire more when it comes to excellence of scholarship and faithfulness of character.
He is a Marine officer to the core and I am honored to be with him every time we work together.
And I thought there is no one more important that I want to bring on to this program to help awaken Americans to the most important event that has ever occurred in the history of humanity and that is the great false flag event of 9-11 in which various parties contributed to this This incredible crime against humanity that has been used as a justification for endless juggernaut wars.
And I know some people may not know much about it.
They may be brainwashed by the media.
They may have misconceptions.
So this program is going to be part one.
of a two-part program in which Dr. Fetzer will join us again next Wednesday to provide the concluding part.
There is just so much evidence, so many photographs and such, that we couldn't do it in one show.
But Dr. Fetzer, I'm going to hand it over to you because I want you to take command of the video and the visual and the slides that we have.
So, Dr. Fetzer, it's an honor.
Well, Scott, it's just terrific to join you today.
And, of course, I enjoyed that little interlude about your meeting in Lafayette Park, having been born in Pasadena, growing up in Southern California, enjoying the beach, boys.
I thought that was all terrific.
I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth in December of 2005, and the society took off like a rocket.
By the end of 2006, we had something on the order of 800 members in four different categories.
I was bringing together experts from all around the world.
So that put me in a position to really field a lot of issues.
I've been flown around the world to talk about all these.
And because there are three most crucial questions about 9-11.
One, what about the planes and the crash sites?
Number two, what happened in New York City?
How was the World Trade Center destroyed?
And third, who is responsible and why?
We're going to begin tonight with the evidence about the four 9-11 crash sites, and Scott, it turns out that all four of those crash sites were fabricated or faked, albeit in different ways, which may come as quite an astonishing result, because that includes that no plane hit the Pentagon, and given that the Pentagon is a command and control center of the U.S.
military, that means very high officials, Donald Rumsfeld in particular, And the then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were both involved.
I also would mention regarding what I'm reporting here about the crash site.
So I did an interview years ago with Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S.
Army, retired.
The reason that's significant, Scott, is he was in charge of all U.S.
military intelligence, in particular signals and photographic intelligence.
General Stubblebine not only agreed with the evidence I'm going to present here this evening about the crash site, but added additional reasons why I was right.
So this is not merely my opinion, this is a distillation of collaborative research of many experts, and I'd point out, by the way, from the point of view of reasoning things through, There are two kinds of impossibilities that matter in situations like this.
One has to do with physical impossibilities.
We cannot violate the laws of physics, engineering, aerodynamics, and so forth.
If you witness or are presented with an event that violates those laws, or any of the other laws of science or of nature, you know you're witnessing an impossible event.
Something is wrong.
And in the second place, there's a question of technical possibility.
You have to have the resources, the capability to perform certain events, if and when we talk about the moon landing, for example.
It turns out we didn't have the propulsion capacity To escape low Earth orbit.
We didn't have the navigational capacity.
The computer shown in diagrams for the Apollo missions isn't even a functional computer.
We didn't have a communication ability of 250,000 miles.
I mean, it's absurd.
One expert in the area at the time said in that period, 69, 70 and so forth, to communicate you would have required a van the size of a bread truck.
None of us saw any fans the size of a bread truck on the moon.
That's for another day.
Here and now, I want to introduce, bring us back to the events of 9-11.
Mae Russell has a wonderful short video that'll get you back in the mood.
This is what the American people saw if they were watching MASH.
You'll see how you were transformed into a whole other world, a universe of calamitous events taking place.
Here, let's watch this video now.
No second flyer.
It was a bomb.
Bombing another building.
Not second plane.
It was a bomb.
We say the second plane.
That's what we're told.
The second plane.
We saw it on television.
No.
We saw everything.
Alright.
Thanks a lot.
This is...
...idea of how much of the plane actually impacted the building.
You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left...
That you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
Now, even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon, you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately.
It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
Jeff, it's a United Airlines plane.
It's believed to be at that site outside Pittsburgh, isn't it?
That's exactly right John with 45 people total on board and one of the more profound things today the imprint of terrorism seared not only on Wall Street but also on Main Street.
Here you have an area 80 miles to the southeast of Pittsburgh and this plane which went down at about 10 o'clock this morning.
We have rescue vehicles that came in earlier in the day and they have turned up nothing.
No one believed to be alive from this crash.
Some of the media just getting back to the scene which is about A quarter of a mile up on a hill back behind me, and so some of the first pictures just starting to come in within the last hour.
I want to get quickly to Chris Konicki.
He's a photographer with the Pittsburgh affiliate of Fox Affiliate.
He was back there just a couple of minutes ago, and Chris, I've seen the pictures.
It looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground.
Basically, that's right.
The only thing you could see from where we were was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees.
We could see some people working, walking around in the area, but from where we could see, there wasn't much left.
Any large pieces of debris at all?
No, there was nothing.
Nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.
Smoke, fire?
Nothing.
It was absolutely quiet.
It was actually very quiet.
Nothing going on down there.
No smoke, no fire.
Just a couple of people walking around.
They look like part of the NTSB crew walking around looking at the pieces.
How big would you say that hole was?
From my estimates, I would guess it was probably about 20 to 15 feet long and probably about 10 feet long or 10 feet wide.
What could you see on the ground if anything other than dirt and ash?
You couldn't see anything.
You could just see dirt, ash and people walking around, broken trees.
says that City Hall in Oakland will remain open.
It will be business as usual.
He is urging people to remain calm with given what is going on.
Remain calm.
Oakland City Hall will remain open.
But in San Francisco, City Hall has been closed.
We're also Just getting word here now that a second United Airlines jet, Flight 175, from Boston to Los Angeles is now missing.
Again, if you're just joining us, there have been four separate plane crashes.
Three of those planes were en route to California.
Two were heading to LAX.
The third was heading to San Francisco International Airport.
That was specifically the one heading to SFO United flight number 93 from Newark to SFO.
It apparently crashed in Pennsylvania, fairly close to the border of Maryland and not too far from Camp David.
Why is that significant?
Because one of the groups possibly claiming responsibility for all these terrorist attacks is the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
And it was this week in 1978 that the Camp David Accords were reached.
Is there a connection?
At this point we don't know, but it is important to be aware of that situation.
In Washington, D.C., many congressional leaders have been transferred to a secret location.
Some senators have described this as a second Pearl Harbor.
And President Bush was in Florida this morning, but he made a brief announcement when the first attacks were clear on the World Trade Center, and he was heading back to Washington, D.C.
At this point, we don't know exactly where he is.
They're trying, they're not really broadcasting that information, but we are told that the president is safe right now.
We're waiting for a press conference to start in San Francisco from the Office of Emergency Services to discuss what the situation, what the city's reaction to all of this is going to be.
be but again right now in San Francisco we can take a look
There is an additional clip available where Dan Rather is talking about Building 7 and saying this looks just like the resorts and casinos in Las Vegas we've seen taken down by controlled demolition.
And Dan Rather there on the scene got it exactly right.
Now, Scott, let's begin with Shanksville.
You notice there was no signs of any plane having crashed there.
Then we'll turn to the Pentagon.
And last but not least, we'll turn to what happened in New York City, which is more complicated.
Meanwhile, here's a diagram showing the flights that were allegedly taken on 9-11.
Two of them originating out of Boston, one out of Dulles, heading toward Pennsylvania, and then allegedly turning around.
That's Flight 77 they're showing there, but actually what they mean is, yeah, that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon, but the dotted line is an area where it wasn't visible on the radar, so that's all conjecture.
We'll get to that.
Meanwhile, look just above it, United Flight 93, somehow heading west and then coming back and crashing in Shanksville.
Now if you look, the next slide shows how bereft of any debris was the site.
You heard the description that it was about 10 by 15 or 20.
Well, bear in mind, this was a Boeing 757.
It has a 125-foot wingspan.
It weighs 100 tons.
It has a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground.
But there's nothing there!
Compare that, as the next slide shows, with actual crashes of real planes elsewhere in Missouri, Amsterdam, Russia.
Massive piles of fuselage.
So, we know right off the bat, things are not adding up.
And indeed, that's the first stage of scientific reasoning.
Something is puzzling.
It doesn't fit into your background knowledge.
How can a plane have crashed there when there's no sign that any plane crashed there?
In the next, we see one of the witnesses that was actually featured there, Chris Knickey.
He and the other reporter first on the scene both said the eerie aspect of the crash site was there was no sign that any plane had actually crashed there.
And, of course, the most reasonable inference one might make to the absence of any evidence that a plane had crashed there would be that no plane had crashed there.
We're told you cannot prove a negative, but if you went to your living room right now and looked for the presence of signs of elephant, seeing none, you're entitled to infer that's because there's no elephant there.
Similarly with the aircraft.
Apologists have sought to explain this was a soft earth area, as the next slide shows, and that the plane had disappeared into the ground, some accounts even into an abandoned mine shaft.
Well, Scott, we know what to do with miners trapped in abandoned mine shafts.
We did bring out the bright lights and the heavy equipment and dig 24-7 in the hope that by some miracle, one or another of the miners might have survived.
Well, that did not happen in Shanksville.
They didn't bring out the bright lights, they didn't bring out the heavy equipment, even to recover the alleged 45 souls that were supposed to be aboard the plane.
Now, among the evidence that was cited is a photograph taken by a woman named Val McCletchey, which we can see on the next slide.
The photograph on the left.
But notice the smoke there doesn't appear to be that from an airplane crash.
It tends to be dark black.
Look at the far right.
But looks more like something from a demolition explosive in the middle.
Not only that, but if you track the geography as to where that photograph shows the crash having been taken, it turns out to have been in a pond.
Not at the crash site where we had the hole that was 10 by 15 or 20.
The next show is yet another crash site and you see the enormity of the dense black smoke that originates.
Now, pilots for 9-11 Truth have done simply sensational work, Scott, and in the next slide you see one of their reports, namely that Flight 93 was still airborne after it had allegedly crashed in Shanksville.
In fact, pilots reported that the plane was over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois after it had crashed in Shanksville.
And I would eventually obtain FAA registration records to show that the airplane used on that flight was not even deregistered or formally taken out of service until 2005.
Pilots, as we're going to discover, has done some extremely good work.
Scott, I would pause here to invite any comments you have about Shanksville, because this is easily the simplest to dispose of as a totally fabricated fake website.
Your thoughts?
Disintegrating into soil without the tires, without the engine, without the fiberglass, without the tail section, without the luggage, without the bodies, leather lug and debris field.
Yes.
The way saying there's no This was a pre-determined and pre-targeted point consistent with a lot of laws of physics.
We have a far grama, a human body part recovery from the Columbia shuttle.
So you're right, absent the laws of physical common sense.
Yeah, it's just ridiculous and obviously it couldn't be in two places at the same time,
so it can't be buried in the dirt in Shanksville and also over Champaign-Urbana.
Urbana.
If we turn to the Pentagon, we eventually got five frames from the Pentagon, here you see four.
Notice the very first is conveniently labeled plain, and there does look like there's something up there in the corner.
We'll take a closer look.
The rest are all indications of a growing fireball, but the growing fireball is very odd because it has the wrong date and time on it.
I asked Jack White, who did brilliant work on JFK, if he could size the image of a Boeing 757 to the tail here, and he did, and as you can see, the 757 is more than twice as large as whatever we have here.
Moreover, I asked experts and they explained that white plume could not be exhaust from a jet, which would be black, but could be from a missile.
It appears that what actually happened at the Pentagon was an unmanned aerial vehicle, a Global Hawk, fired a missile into the Pentagon to take out an area in the West Wing, which was the only part of the Pentagon that had been reinforced.
The next slide shows the hit point.
It's only about 10 feet high, 15 feet wide, there's a chain link fence, there are two automobiles, two enormous spools of cable, but unbroken windows surrounding the hit point, and guess what?
No signs of any aircraft having crashed there either.
No massive pile of aluminum debris, no bodies, no seats, no luggage, no wings, no tail.
Not even the engines were recovered, even though they're virtually indestructible.
Eventually, the Pentagon would claim the engines had been recovered, but it's obvious that was simply trying to recover from a massive faux pas, a huge gap in their story.
If you look at the next, we see where a section of the building As Jamie McIntyre was explaining, collapse.
My opinion, Scott, is that they looked at the facade of the Pentagon and it didn't appear to be serious enough for anyone to believe that a plane had actually crashed there, so they set off additional explosives to produce an effect that might look more convincing.
Now, the next slide reveals that when they did a renovation, there were no signs of a massive fire having occurred there.
I mean, this is startling!
You saw the fireballs in those early frames.
Well, their existence is not substantiated here.
Look on this floor here, for example.
You have what appears to be the wooden stand for an Oxford Unabridged Dictionary.
It appears to be completely intact, undamaged, no way in which that appears to have been consumed or involved in an intense fire.
Now, the next slide shows the approach, according to the official government, that a Boeing 757, traveling at over 400 miles an hour, barely skimming the ground, hit the Pentagon on the ground floor.
Now, I would observe that had a Boeing 757 barely skimming the ground hit the ground floor, it would have done tremendous damage to the Pentagon lawn.
But as you see from the very next slide, we have these two lime green civilian fire trucks in the vicinity.
They're extinguishing the very modest fires that remain.
Notice, no signs of any plane having crashed there.
The Pentagon lawn is perfectly clear from debris.
Again, no signs any plane had crashed there.
Take a look at more of these images.
This is from a BBC special.
They actually came here to near Madison, Wisconsin, where I reside, and interviewed me for eight hours.
For the first of their Conspiracy Files programs about 9-11.
What's important to hear from my point of view is, you see, from this perspective, there's no debris on the lawn.
Here's another frame from the BBC special.
Again, no debris on the lawn.
This is even after that section of the floor had collapsed.
By the way, when they did the program, They had me and Alex Jones and Avery on, where Avery was a snot-nosed kid who made loose change.
Alex Jones was a messianic preacher and I was, of course, a kooky professor, but they had us on for 15 minutes combined.
Avery got two and a half.
I think Alex got three.
I got seven.
Seven and a half for a total of 15.
The other 45 minutes were devoted to analyzing why anyone would be so mistaken or misconceived or mentally confused as to think no plane had hit the Pentagon.
The fact that I'd for eight hours laid out proof after proof didn't make a dent because that was not their objective.
It was to tell a story, a tale, A very tall one.
Now, debris did eventually begin to show up.
And here you see, by far, the most interesting piece of debris.
It actually is a piece of fuselage from a Boeing 757.
But notice several points.
It's not all crumpled up and compact as you would expect, had it been hit in contacting a building in a violent collision.
There are no signs that it's been exposed to any intense fire. Another disproof of the fireballs
that we saw in those few images.
More strikingly yet, James Hansen, yes, an attorney from Columbus, Ohio, noticed that
there was a piece of vine, not indigenous to the Arlington, Virginia area, that was
wrapped into the debris.
Now, it turns out that 757s are very safe aircraft.
There have been very few crashes as 757.
James tracked this one down to a crash near Cali, Colombia in 1995.
Here's a scene from the crash site where you can see the pilots actually got lost on their approach and passed through a jungle where these fines are endemic in hitting the side of a mountain.
Notice how much debris you have there from the actual crash of a Boeing 757.
And the very next slide shows again another take.
So the salvage was done by an Israeli firm.
A point I forgot to mention with our very first slide is that the very same security firm was at the airports for all four of the flights, a security firm run by Israelis.
We're beginning to see a pattern here.
The next is of the pilot where I believe I conjectured and told the BBC that since it would have been impractical to have officers and men carry that debris out onto the Pentagon lawn, I believed it had been dropped by a C-30 that was circling the building.
Well, here's the pilot of the C-30 saying, no, no, that was absurd.
He didn't actually say it was false.
He said it was absurd.
But what's absurd is the official trajectory, as we see in the next slide, of this plane traveling over 400 miles an hour, barely skimming the ground, taking out a series of lampposts.
Now, The laws of physics require that a plane hitting stationary lampposts at over 400 miles an hour has the same effect as if the plane were stationary hit by the lamppost traveling over 400 miles an hour.
It would have shattered the wings where the fuel is stored.
They would have mixed with the air caught fire.
The plane would have exploded and catapulted across the lawn.
Which of course did not happen because there would have been debris scattered all across the lawn and it was we saw it was not there until debris was actually planted.
If you take a look at the next slide you just a group calling themselves the 9-11 investigative team Discovered that at a CITGO station here, roughly in the middle of the photograph, there were witnesses who saw an actual plane approach toward the building on the yellow trajectories.
They saw a plane fly toward the building.
The official trajectory, however, is the green line.
So they saw the plane fly toward the building on the north of the CITGO when it ought to have been on the south.
Moreover, even though many of them believe that a plane had hit the Pentagon, a friend of mine from JFK Research, Roy Schaefer, had a friend by the name of Hall, who was a trucker in front of the Pentagon.
He watched the plane approach the Pentagon and then fly over the building.
This, by the way, appears to have been the aircraft that was testified to by the Secretary of Transportation, Norman Mineta, who was in an underground bunker with Dick Cheney when an aide came up and said to the Vice President, Sir, it's 40 miles out.
Sir, it's 30 miles out.
Sir, it's 20 miles out.
Do the orders still stand?
Cheney whipped around and said, of course the orders still stand.
Have you heard anything to the contrary?
The order had to be to not shoot the plane down.
Now, think about it.
The Pentagon has to be, like, the most heavily defended building in the world.
The order to not shoot the plane down was an odd one, contradicting common sense, because if you shoot the plane down, you lose the plane and the passengers, but you protect the personnel and the property at the Pentagon.
So it was the right thing to do to shoot it down, but it was not done.
Moreover, Scott, aeronautical engineers have explained to me that a Boeing 757 at over 400 miles an hour, because of what's known as ground effect or wake effect, could not have got closer to the ground than 60 or 80 feet, which is taller than the Pentagon at 71 feet is.
It's a fantasy scenario that violates the laws of aerodynamics.
If we look at the next slide, we see the claim is made that a hole was made in the C-ring.
Remember, of course, the Pentagon has five rings, E, D, C, B, A. But notice how perfectly symmetrical it is.
This was supposed to have been from A landing gear that hit the hole at an angle, but if it had been hit at an angle it would have been asymmetrical.
You can barely see under the red circle it says, punch out.
This appears to have been done by means of explosives to create a fake evidence to substantiate the idea a plane had hit the Pentagon.
The next slide shows Jamie McIntyre as he was explaining to the anchor that from his close-up inspection there was no sign of a plane having hit anywhere near the Pentagon.
Now, Jamie was their best correspondent for CNN.
He was subsequently forced to retract it, which he did in the following way.
He said, only a fool Would deny that a plane had hit the Pentagon, thereby implying he'd been foolish to believe that CNN wanted him to report the facts of the matter, the truth.
And I think, not wary of carrying this heavy water, he retired from the news business, even though he was their best correspondent.
We also have another witness, April Gallup, who was a civilian employee at the Pentagon, where April said when she punched her computer there was a massive explosion, a big hole in the wall there.
She stepped out through the hole and saw no signs of any plane having hit there, but she did see massive evidence of, she smelled what she believed to be military explosives.
Now, the very next slide shows General Stubblebine, who was interviewed in Germany, and who explained how he could tell that no plane had hit the Pentagon, and when he was asked why, he said, because the Pentagon has a facade of limestone, a relatively soft stone, and it would have had the impression of the plane, which was not there, as I mentioned in the beginning.
I did an interview with General Stubblebine and showed him all the evidence I'm presenting here, and Stubblebine not only agreed with me, but added further reasons why I was right.
Now, it was very odd that as the next slide shows, that when members of Congress came out, Having been told the Capitol was next, they saw billowing black smoke from across the Potomac.
But Scott, those lime green fire trucks had extinguished the very modest fires.
This led me to investigate what in the world could be causing that billowing black smoke.
It turned out it was coming from a series of enormous dumpsters in front of the Pentagon.
In fact, another student of 9-11, a member of Scholars, came to Duluth, where I was residing.
We had lunch together, and he showed me 44 more frames where, from a different perspective, you could see space between the dumpsters and the Pentagon.
This was a Hollywood-style special effect, but it made an indelible If we turn to New York City... Go ahead.
so Donald Rumsfeld could waltz into their holes the following day and ask for hundreds of millions,
billions more in defense spending, which they gladly doled out. Scott, this was outrageous.
If we turn to New York City...
Well, what is it in particular?
Go ahead. Go, Scott.
That's really outrageous. Go ahead.
Yeah, if we turn to New York City...
No, go ahead.
Practically no one saw the hit on the North Tower.
It was very strange.
If you look at the next slide, you'll see there just happened to be Well, go down.
Yeah, these are not the slides I meant.
This was from the first set rather than the second.
But we can do it in that order nevertheless, Scott.
I mean, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, of course, in 1991, The West needed a new enemy, and neocons created a website called Project for a New American Century.
If you go to the next slide, you'll see that they were Talking about and publishing about the need for a new Pearl Harbor.
Now, if we have the next slide, Sean, the need for a new Pearl Harbor.
Notice, they thought there was a unique opportunity to create a new American empire that would endure for the next 100 years.
It was actually just a cover.
What they really wanted was to draw the United States into the Middle East to serve as a military force to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region.
In one of their publications they published, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.
In other words, they were worried the American people wouldn't catch on fast enough.
Go to the next slide and you'll see Here we have General Wesley Clark on October 3rd, 2007 at the Commonwealth Club in California explaining how he had come back to the Pentagon after serving as Supreme Commander, Allied Forces Europe, meaning Commander-in-General of NATO.
He'd run into a general of his acquaintance who informed him of a plan to invade Iraq.
They were both astonished because Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
So, Clark said, well, please keep me informed.
He returned a month or more later and ran into the General and said, are we still planning to invade Iraq?
And the General said, oh no, sir, it's much worse.
Step into my office.
He said, we've just received a memorandum from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld explaining that we're going to take out the governments of seven countries in the next five years.
Beginning with Iraq, Libya, Syria, eventually confronting the Persian nation of Iran.
So Wesley Clark was explaining the actual master plan that was behind and motivating this entire attack.
We know, of course, it fell short in Syria because of the intervention of Russian and Iranian troops at the request of the democratically elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad.
Which Scott, sad to say, many Americans still do not know to this day.
We cannot be bringing democracy to Syria because Syria is already a democracy.
Next slide.
We'll see here where we have Richard Perl and Paul Wolfowitz, who were two of the key players, these were dual U.S.-Israeli citizens, as were virtually all the members of the Project for a New American Century, who were brought into the Pentagon virtually intact, all these dual citizens.
Well, during the very first political speech I ever gave on 15 April 2008 at a Ron Paul Freedom Rally on the grass outside the Capitol, I explained why there ought to be a law precluding any dual citizen from a decision-making or policy-shaping position in the government, because you cannot know that their loyalty to the other state does not exceed their loyalty to the United States.
And I believe indeed it was these neocons together with the CIA and the Mossad that brought us 9-11.
If we take out the next slide...
Well, see here, the Twin Towers in New York.
These were masterpieces of engineering, Scott.
The building began in 1966.
They first opened in 1970.
They had a unique tube-within-a-tube design, which we see in the next slide.
There were 47 massive core columns in the center, then surrounded by external support columns, 230 that were very imposing in and of themselves.
This was to create all the open office space, as you see there, which was a unique, award-winning design, extremely robust.
Check out the next slide, and we see that, in fact, the steel was very thick at the base.
Six inches in the sub-basements, for example, then five inches, four, three, two, one, All the way up to a quarter inch at the very top.
This, by the way, is one of the reasons why the collapse theory advocated by the government, that the top floors fell down on the lower floors, is completely indefensible.
The way the buildings were designed, it was impossible for them to collapse.
Check out the next slide.
We'll see that there were actually seven buildings in the World Trade Center, not merely the North and the South Tower, all of which would be destroyed, as the next slide shows, all of which would be destroyed.
Meanwhile, there was an action taking place to remove asbestos from the buildings.
This was a serious problem.
It was estimated that the removal of the asbestos would run about a That was obviously prohibitive.
They could not destroy the towers using conventional demolition, because it would have released all the asbestos and other heavy metals into the atmosphere.
It was therefore exceedingly convenient, when there just happened to be a terrorist attack, to take out the World Trade Center and the Twin Towers, solving the asbestos problem.
Next slide, you'll see.
This is what it looked like when it was over.
All and only buildings with a WTC designation were destroyed.
It was remarkable, a real phenomenon, that it could be done with such precision, which is indicative of how carefully the entire event had been planned.
The next slide shows Other players.
These were members of the Port Authority who are prominent Zionists who are responsible for transferring the World Trade Center into the private hands of Silverstone Properties, where Larry was a friend of Bibi Netanyahu.
They spoke every Sunday.
So here you had the Port Authority transferring this precious real estate into private hands of Larry Silverstein for the very first time just six weeks before 9-11 would occur.
Next slide.
What he did immediately, by the way, and this is the guy, they call him Lucky Larry, not for nothing, He immediately fired the security firm that was providing support for the World Trade Center since it first opened in 1970 and replaced it with an Israeli firm.
He also negotiated a new insurance policy for the World Trade Center that included an anti-terrorist clause, such that because there were reportedly two planes, he claimed two attacks and therefore double indemnity And pocketed over $4.5 billion on a $114 million investment.
Not a bad deal.
I think you would agree, Scott.
The next slide shows Others who were involved.
This was Kroll, the new security firm that was put in place here to look after the World Trade Center.
Once again, we find all the key activities were controlled by Israeli firms, Israeli companies.
The next slide shows that there was a doggo messenger service that Mayor Willie Brown reported that he had received a warning From Condoleezza Rice that he should not fly on 9-11.
Well, he wasn't the only one who was warned.
In fact, I had a little old lady in Brooklyn call me up and tell me that the rabbi had told the members of her synagogue not to go into New York on On that day, which would be 9-11, and indeed of all the thousands of employees at the World Trade Center, there's only one reported death of a person who happened to be Jewish.
It appears that their advanced warning system was very successful.
Next slide shows.
This is at the Boston airport where we're supposed to be seeing Mohammed Awda and his colleagues entering the plane.
Now it's very bizarre that the FBI claims that they found a suitcase, baggage, left behind on the flight from Boston that included a list of the 19 members of the conspiracy.
Even though David Ray Griffin makes it the first point of his magisterial work, the 9-11 Commission Report, Omissions and Distortions, that a half a dozen of these guys turned up alive and well the following day and made contact with the British media, The FBI has never revised its list.
Even Mohammed Ather's father said that his son contacted him and told him he was scared out of his wits, afraid for his life, because he was now being identified as a participant In an event that he had nothing to do with.
Next slide.
We see here that the passports were actually issued by the U.S.
Consulate, according to a whistleblower.
In other words, the United States was setting this all up, giving the passports to the alleged Islamic terrorists, 15 of whom, by the way, from Saudi Arabia, The number from Iraq was zero, and where there was nothing here to implicate Osama bin Laden, who, by the way, Scott, as you well know, was our man in Afghanistan.
Osama was instrumental in getting Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen that they used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes.
He was actually an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman.
Where an official of the agency visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death from his medical maladies on 15 December 2001.
It's tough to get dialysis machines in and out of those caves in Afghanistan.
Where there were local obituaries, and both Fox News and CNN reported his death on the 26th of December 2001, some of which you may still find available on the Internet, though they're doing their best to clean up any evidence that contradicts the official account on a regular, systematic basis.
The next slide shows Donald Rumsfeld, who declared the day before, on a Monday, that there was $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon budget.
Now this is fascinating because Rumsfeld was an old hand in Washington.
He knew if you let out a big story early in the week, say on a Monday, that it's going to get legs, as they say, grow as a story over the week.
It appears he understood something would happen to wipe from consciousness the missing $2.3 trillion so that he'd be able to waltz into the halls of Congress and ask for hundreds of billions more in defense spending.
The Comptroller, the Chief Financial Officer at the Pentagon at the time, I believe is featured in our next photograph, Dov Zokheim, who was not only a dual US-Israeli citizen, but also a rabbi, and where Dov Zokheim had his own remote control of aircraft company.
They performed these devices, developed these devices that would enable you to take control remotely of an aircraft, I believe that the original plan was to fly remotely controlled drones into the North and the South Tower.
It was only when they discovered that wasn't physically possible for the plane to enter the buildings that they had to abandon that approach and devise an ingenious alternative to give the impression of planes hitting the Pentagon, when no planes hit the Twin Towers, when no planes actually hit them.
A matter that we shall address momentarily.
The next slide, however, shows, here in New York City now, this is the attack on the North Tower.
Virtually no one had any reason to believe anything like this would happen.
It's very curious, therefore, that there was a French television crew on Duane Street, ostensibly doing a study about firemen dealing with gas leaks, and nevertheless, when the sound of the plane was heard, the cameraman swung his camera up and was able to capture the hit on the North Tower, which is quite remarkable considering the sound lag behind the trajectory of the aircraft.
And he would not have naturally assumed the plane was going to hit there.
Leslie Raphael, a Scotsman, has done a brilliant job of analysis and discern that it had to satisfy a hundred improbable circumstances for the Noday Brothers to be there, and where it turns out that the very name they used, Noday Brothers, is an anagram of Dwayne Street, indicating just how fraudulent this whole operation is.
We have been playing from beginning to end.
Now here is the image of a 767, and although at Shanksville and the Pentagon we were dealing with 757s, here in New York where we're dealing with two 767s, this allegedly Flight 11.
Now that's what a real 767 would have looked like approaching the North Tower.
But take a look at the next slide, and you'll see what we actually have.
It's very, very strange.
One student has described it as looking like a flying pig.
It does not even remotely resemble a Boeing 767.
If you turn to the next slide moreover, You will see the first hit in a flash frame.
You see, this is supposed to be when the plane hits the building.
Take a look at the very next slide and you'll see a very curious phenomenon.
The initial impression on the left was kind of an elongated Z.
But after the smoke cleared, it was instead an elongated V. How is that possible?
Well, something was going on behind all the smoke when the alleged impression or impact of the plane occurred.
Take a look at the next slide, and we'll see they even extended, they even extended the wing here in subsequent frames.
This is a Nadei frame of impact in a later photograph.
So they were doing a little touch-up.
I would observe that the design of these buildings, which I will review in great detail, was so thorough, so massive, it would have been impossible for a real aircraft to have entered either of those buildings.
They would instead have crumpled external to the buildings, body seats and luggage fallen to the ground.
We have photographs of the ground, which I shall share.
There's nothing there.
It did not happen.
Next slide, we see what happened behind all this smoke and mirrors.
There was a twinkling Here, I thought maybe this is what George H.W.
Bush meant by a thousand points a line, because while there was all this smoke and debris, which by the way did not show any of the signs of wind turbulence that occurs, you get a mini-like a tornado effect passing through smoke or clouds, didn't occur there, which is further proof that no plane actually hit the North Tower We appear to have had the cutting out of the cookie cutter like shaped objects in the building behind the smoke.
So the next slide shows us The design here of the buildings, okay?
Each floor consisted of a steel truss connecting the 47 massive core columns to the external steel support columns filled with four to eight inches of concrete.
The variance because the grooves in the trusses were four inches deep.
So in some areas it would be four, in others eight inches deep of concrete.
Because the buildings were 208 feet on a side, that meant each floor represented an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
The plane at the North Tower was intersecting seven of those acres of concrete on steel trusses, and of course had to
deal with the facade, the external steel support columns, which were quite massive and
formidable in and of themselves.
Next slide shows us where something seems to have happened to create those images.
Now, a fellow named Steven Dack believes that a missile was fired to hit the building at the side to create the gashes.
I have an alternative interpretation as to what happened.
But this illustrates how flimsy, how flimsy was the alleged interaction between the plane and the building.
I mean, this is ridiculous beyond belief.
Take a look at the next slide.
And we'll see these gashes.
I mean, there's no parts of any aircraft that we can find inside these alleged areas where the plane entered.
Notice, where would the plane even go?
Where would the plane even go?
Remember, this is a plane that's even larger than a Boeing 757.
Next slide.
What we had was, and this is my alternative hypothesis, a group of Israeli art students, as many as 200, were entered into the United States.
I mean, the visa were given on the ground.
They were art students.
They had access to the North and the South Tower.
They were doing what they call performance art.
They were actually putting up platforms external to the building.
There were box after box of fuse holders here that you actually could see, if you could see more clearly, the identification of those boxes.
I believe these Israeli art students, whom I take to have been most sawed, were responsible for planting the explosives to create the cutouts that were allegedly caused by the aircraft.
I mean, this is a typical Hollywood special effect.
Think of the movies where Sylvester Stallone is going into a North Vietnamese prison camp to save American prisoners of war.
Machine guns firing, blood splattering, explosives going off.
Do you think any of that was real?
Actually, they use these little blood packets that are timed to explode.
I mean, after all, If they were doing this for real, they'd have a very hard time recruiting actors for future films.
So what we have is a combination of special effects that's designed to bring about an effect that looks as though it was caused by a completely different origin, in this case, by an airplane hitting the building.
Next slide.
So I believe that's in fact how they created the images.
Now this will be a really suitable way to tie things together tonight, Scott, given we have the set of images that go into what actually happened that day.
This was a very elaborate attack.
We have a summary in the very next slide where you'll see that the student groups, these art student groups, had a variety of tasks.
Among them, planting jammers on buildings to block the Port Authority dispatchers and first responder radios, planting explosives on the New Jersey side of the George Washington Bridge where the cables are anchored, In order to collapse a bridge, exploding a truck in the Lincoln Tunnel, exploding a truck in the Holland Tunnel, park trucks with demolition devices in specific parking areas of the Twin Towers, and, this is the only false part of this report, coordinate with Mohammed Adda and his group, because Mohammed Adda and his group were merely the Patsy's, just as Lee Oswald was a Patsy, just as Sirhan Sirhan was a Patsy,
Just as Chapman was a patsy in the shooting of John Lennon, it was all fabricated and fake.
But notice the elaborate plan here, which was intended to isolate the island of Manhattan by interdicting every access or exit route.
One more slide may do it.
Here we have, yes, there was even a van.
This is from Urban Moving Systems.
One of these vans was stopped by the police, and the driver, when the officer approached him, said, we are not the problem.
Your problem is our problem.
The Palestinians are the problem.
Notice the mural with a plane seemingly hitting the Twin Towers.
They found multiple passports, residue of explosives, and box cutters in the van.
This is one of multiple vans that were stopped that evening by the New York Police Department, which de Blasio is defunding, was at the time the best police force in the world.
And now, of course, it's being obliterated by the Democratic policies of defunding the police.
Let's take a look at one more and see what we have.
Oh, yes!
There's a group known as the Dancing Israelis at Liberty State Park across the Hudson River who are observed filming and celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers.
High fives, selfies, the whole bit.
A nearby resident observed their actions and reported it to the police, which was what led to their apprehension in one of the urban moving system vans.
Now they were apprehended and held for some 77 days until an assistant attorney general directed their release.
They went back to Israeli and appeared on Israeli television Explaining they were there to document the destruction of the World Trade Center, which obviously implied foreign knowledge.
The individual who directed their release, I believe we have in the next slide, Michael Chertoff.
I mean, he just looks like a Nazi prison guard.
This is a very bad guy.
But it was he who's another U.S.-Israeli dual citizen directed their release.
He would also play a key role in Las Vegas with the development of scanners We're after that event, which we'll discuss on another occasion.
He thought they would be installed in every casino and hotel in Las Vegas, and he'd make a bundle.
One more slide, perhaps, to tie together.
No, this is Flight 175.
We'll pick up with that at our return engagement, Scott, on Wednesday.
We're in a perfect place to call it a night.
It is.
It is remarkable, and it is important for people to be emotionally and spiritually prepared for these revelations.
This is something that can traumatize and shock and shake and really have a Matrix-like awakening experience for people who have never pondered this, who have never looked at the photographs, never looked at the evidence, never heard this sort of analysis as Dr. Fetzer is presenting.
But it's very, very essential to understand Who we are, what our country is, what's been done to us, why this has unfolded over 20 years.
We have to go back to the science and the physicality and the documentation and the original evidence to begin to form and clearly see what the truth is.
So, in summary, Jim, let me just say what we've seen so far is the physical evidence of the Pennsylvania crash proves that there was no plane at Pennsylvania, there was no plane in the field, there was no debris, no tail, no wheels.
The smoke billowing was different than what should have been from a plane, so Pennsylvania was false.
It also had the heroic narrative that they tried to put forth, such as Flight 93, let's roll, like a bunch of Custer's Last Stand heroes thrusting boiling water in the face of terrorists that somehow had paper-thin box cutters It was all nonsense, but it was meant to psychologically and emotionally trigger Americans into this sort of bravado, America, we're the cowboys of the world and we're going to go after them and they're going to hear from all of us soon.
Bush's propaganda slogan is he sat atop the smoldering ruins of the bodies and the steel from the Twin Towers.
And then we have the Pentagon strike and I was at the Pentagon the next day because I was driving to Catholic doing my PhD and I drove along George Washington Parkway and I can confirm with my own eyes That there was no scrape of the grass, it was a pristine lawn, there was a big tarp cover I remember, but there were no wheels, no tail section, no luggage, no engines, nothing that a plane would have been 24 hours later.
You would have had yellow tape, you would have had the place completely covered.
But yet the photographs within the hour after the event shows nothing but some smoke billowing out of garbage dumpsters and the building that had not even collapsed but just had fire and holes.
And let's remember some of the discussion is that section of the Pentagon was being audited and Dov Zakheim had been the comptroller of the money that was being audited.
I might add Dov Zakheim was my boss at Booz Allen Hamilton.
Dov Zakheim was in charge of the terrorist financing at U.S.
Central Command.
I had been tasked to go down and expose Dov Zakheim as well as the shenanigans of the terrorist financing that Obama and Biden and Hillary Clinton were doing with Swiss banks such as Union Bank of Switzerland and the Clinton Foundation and the law firm Covington & Burling who I might add Dov Zakheim's son And Michael Chertoff later joined, and Eric Holder and Lanny Brewer later joined, Covington and Burling.
So the conspiracy is very, very vast and easily documented, as well as some of the other shady characters, Booz Allen Hamilton and people in the Bush administration.
But the Pentagon attack was obviously not a plane that hit there.
My father was a pilot.
My uncle was a pilot.
My uncle was a 747 pilot.
And he said exactly the same thing.
A plane cannot perform on that level in which they are trying to depict it.
And when it runs into street lamps, the plane is torn apart.
A plane is made of aluminum.
And again, you've climaxed into the 9-11 attacks, Jim, the 9-11 Twin Towers.
And a plane, if it had crashed into the Twin Towers, would have been like a fly crashing into a spider web.
Because that building was designed to catch things, to bend and to sway, but not to be crumpled and to be destroyed.
The plane would have fallen all over the place, and it didn't.
And there's other physical evidence about that, of course.
The molten steel, we'll get into the nuclear possibilities.
The Israelis that were traveling around as students selling art, they did that when I was at the Mason Enterprise Center, and I had done some CIA papers at the Mason Enterprise Center.
So when I heard that Israelis were traveling around with students putting up art, I knew exactly that this was a surveillance operation.
They had done it to us.
So, the Twin Towers, the dancing Israelis, the Israelis that we're documenting in the truck, the event, and all sorts of other things that we'll explore on Part 2 of the impossibility of the Twin Towers is very, very revealing.
And of course, the Building 7, the Solomon Building that apparently just crumpled into its own footprints because of the fire and the debris fell on the roof.
Never in the history of humanity is a building fallen into its own footprint because of little things like that.
And other things.
The engine that was found on the bottom that didn't belong to the plane.
So many different things.
The firefighters.
But we'll have that next time.
We may even have to have a third part on this 9-11 show, Jim.
But I thank you so much for having this.
And I want to promise people we will not Bow down or retreat or compromise or hide any aspect of this false flag attack because it was a damning attack upon the American people and every single person that participated in this and knew about it including military figures who call this an intelligence failure or somehow some other explanation other than a planned operation of treason
Which is Susan Lindauer, a CIA asset.
She had told us, Jim, her handler had said this was a Mossad operation.
Everyone has to understand this was the greatest crime in the history of the United States, the greatest crime in humanity, and we will expose it, every single element of it, because there will never be a whole America, there will never be justice, until these traitors and all of these people who participated at the highest ranks in other countries, Israel, Netanyahu, Silverstein, Dov Zakhaim, Faith, Wolfowitz, Pearl, Vice President Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, General Dick Myers, Rumsfeld, Bush, all of them will be exposed and they will eventually face their judgment in this life or the next.
But Jim, I want to hand it to you to give us your closing thoughts before we come to the end.
Go ahead.
Well, you made a wonderful point, Scott, about the fact that having announced there was a $2.3 trillion missing, Rumsfeld directed the Section Chief to bring all the budget experts, financial analysts, and accountants into the West Wing, which because of the renovation was virtually bereft of property and personnel, with all their documents and records.
So that by firing a missile into the West Wing, he took them out and destroyed the very records necessary to attract what happened at the $2.3 trillion, truly outrageous event, clearly planned in advance in meticulous detail to steal that amount of power and control through a fabricated event to justify taking American forces into the Middle East to wreak havoc on behalf of Israel.
So you're making key points, Scott.
I couldn't agree more, and I'm so appreciative to have the chance to share all of these findings with you and your audience here today.
Well, thank you, Jim.
We will be back next week for part two.
We apologize for running a little bit over, but I don't think there's any more important subject than 9-11, and I don't think there's any man better at articulating the truth than Dr. James Fetzer.
So again, we will never bow down, back down, retreat, or deviate from the absolute truth of every element of 9-11.
Because as a military officer, and as Jim is a military officer as well,
we swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against domestic enemies,
as well as foreign enemies.
So we are honoring our oath by exposing one of the greatest crimes that have ever occurred,
and we will not stop.
So please join us next week and we will return for part two.
▲
Export Selection