All Episodes
Previous Next
July 5, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:07:42
Exposing the Real Story Behind the 9/11 Attacks with Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. - Part 2 of 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
...
conteúdo He shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
My name is Scott Bennett, host of Great Awakenings and tonight we're going to be rejoined by Dr. James Fetzer, one of my favorite colleagues and friends that I've had the great honor of working with over the past five years.
Dr. Fetzer is going to be completing his Part 1, this is Part 2, of his Great Awakenings of the 9-11 event.
All aspects of the 9-11 event.
The science, the technology, the evidence, the planes, the absence of planes, the nuclear material, the Building 7, as well as Shanksville and the Pentagon and so many other things.
And who was responsible and why?
So, we're going to be joined with Dr. Fetzer.
First of all, we want to encourage people to log on and check out SovereignAdvisors.net, one of the great investment firms that is helping people diversify their financial resources to give them stability, so that they are not caught unaware in some of these precarious times that are approaching.
So, let us go to Sovereign Advisors, our sponsor, and introduce people to some of their services.
Hello, everyone.
John Michael Chambers here.
I am the creator and founder of American Media Periscope.
Now, the world is changing.
On June 28th, 2021, the Basel III rules changed.
For the first time, the European Central Bank is pushing the price of gold up because they need to maximize the value of their 10,000 tons of gold they control.
What is this about?
It's about global monetary dominance, and instead of suppressing the price of gold, they are pushing the price up, because they need it to go up.
You can take advantage of this paradigm-shifting rule change.
The team at Sovereign Advisors, with decades of experience in analyzing political, economic and social trends, can help you take advantage of what may be the most monumental change in gold in the history of the world.
Call my good friend Dr. Kirk Elliott over at Sovereign Advisors 720-605-3900.
Tell him John Michael Chambers at American Media Periscope sent you and request a free consultation.
So we're very grateful for Sovereign Advisors to be leading people into their financial investments and we are here to lead people into their intellectual analysis of some of the events that have occurred in this country that have been changing and changing this globe and this world in so many different ways.
And 9-11 was one of the greatest fundamental changes that has ever occurred.
So, Dr. James Fetzer is with us.
Dr. Fetzer, I'm going to hand it over to you.
I know that you have part two and are going to jump right into your continuation of the slides.
And also, I might add that again today, Don Rumsfeld, the architect or one of the architects of 9-11 and the Secretary of Defense during the Bush administration, has passed away at the age of 88 years of age.
So, that is a significant factor and on this day, As we present our second part of the 9-11 revelations.
So, Dr. Fetzer, I hand it over to you.
Well, Scott, it's a delight to be back, and I think you're exactly right that Donald Rumsfeld was one of the two key American players, the other being Vice President Dick Cheney, who appears to have been the Executive Director of 9-11 from a bunker underneath the White House, where the Israelis who dreamed it up were Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Olmert, who would both serve as Prime Ministers of Israel, who back in the 1980s were trying to envision a justification to get American military forces into the Middle East so they could take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region, and eventually
Confront the Persian nation of Iran.
As you know so well, they were unsuccessful because of the intervention of Russia and Iran at the behest of the Syrian government led by democratically elected President Bashar al-Assad.
But that was the plan.
And if it failed or did not come to a complete success, it was not for lack of trying.
And I dare say now the Israelis threw in with Biden and against Trump in order to move forward against Iran.
And now, even now, Abeeratabi is seeking to manipulate the situation behind the scene where these bombings by Biden on alleged militias backed by Iran at two sites in Syria and one in Iraq were outrageous.
Many Democrats even believe this exceeded Biden's War Powers Act.
But we must remember, he is merely a puppet.
And they are doing everything they can to manipulate the situation where they, those behind the scene, can even gain access to the launch codes and wipe out whoever they want.
We even have a rabbi, by the way, saying that with the demise of the United States as a superpower, Israel is going to rise to take its place.
The audacity is stunning, Scott, but there it is.
Now, we have been discussing, really, three different components to analyze 9-11.
One is all the official crash sites, which, as I'm explaining, have been fabricated or faked, albeit in different ways, where during an interview with Major General Albert Stubblebine, Army retired, formerly in charge of U.S.
American intelligence, including photographing, General Stubblebine not only agreed with all of my arguments about the faking of the crash sites, but added additional reasons why I was correct.
So everyone should understand that I, as the founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, in December of 2005, brought together hundreds of experts from around the world So what I'm presenting here is not only the results of my own study, but their expertise, some being pilots, physicists, engineers, mechanical, structural, aeronautical,
Whereas I have been emphasizing a key to understanding that we're being faked or fooled is the absence of effects from purported causes, violations of the laws of physics, aerodynamics, engineering, For example, in Shanksville, the eerie aspect of the crash site was there was no sign that any plane had crashed there, which leads to the inference that that is because no plane had crashed there.
Similarly, at the Pentagon, we have no massive pile of aluminum debris at the alleged hit site on the first floor, no bodies, no seats, no luggage, no wings, no tail, not even the engines were recovered.
Not only that, but it turns out that the approach the plane allegedly took barely skimming the ground at over 400 miles an hour and taking out a series of stationary lampposts is a physical absurdity.
The effect of The plane moving 400 miles an hour hitting the stationary lamppost would have been the same had the plane been stationary, hit by lampposts going over 400 miles an hour.
They would have ripped the wings open because the fuel is stored there in the wings.
They would have mixed with oxygen, burst on fire.
You would have the plane catapulting across the Pentagon lawn.
There would have been debris everywhere.
But as we discovered during our first hour, There was no debris at all for at least 45 minutes when it began to show up, and some of it was clearly planted, including a piece from a fuselage of a Boeing 757 that, of all things, crashed in Cali, Colombia in 1995.
Moreover, A Boeing 757 at over 400 miles an hour, because of the phenomenon known as downdraft, sometimes called ground effect, could not have got closer than 60 or even 80 feet to the ground, which is even higher than the Pentagon at 71 feet is tall.
Now, I began explaining what had happened with the North Tower.
We're going to turn to the South now and continue our analysis, but let me make one point of clarification.
There is something known as no-planes theory.
And people hearing that phrase think it sounds absurd, because after all, we saw the planes in New York.
So how can it be the case that no planes were involved?
What it means is, four sub-theses, that Flight 93 did not crash in Shanksville, that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, that Flight 11 did not hit the North Tower, and Surprisingly enough, that flight 175 did not hit the South.
So it's the conjunction of those four theses that define no-planes theory.
Not that no planes were involved.
As we discussed last week, a plane did fly toward the Pentagon and then swerved over it to create the impression of a plane hitting the Pentagon.
There was a plane, and we obviously have images of planes in both the North and the South Tower.
Indeed, if we look at our first slide, we'll see a very familiar image of what purports to be Flight 175 approaching the South Tower.
Now I've mentioned several times the important work of pilots for 9-11 Truth.
Among their other findings, Scott, as we see in the very next slide, is that what we're witnessing there is an aerodynamic impossibility.
In other words, Flight 175 is traveling at an altitude of 700 to 1,000 feet faster than is aerodynamically possible.
The plane literally would have come apart.
The mistake they appear to have made, Scott, is to assume that the cruising speed of a 767 at
35,000 feet could be replicated at 700 to 1,000, where the air is three times more dense, meaning
the turbines cannot suck it through fast enough and the engines begin to function as brakes.
If you see the next slide portrays, in pilot's study, 9-11 Intercepted, what would have happened to a Boeing 767 had it been approaching the South Tower at that speed, at that altitude?
Now, what we actually saw, therefore, cannot be a physical reality.
We must be subject to some sort of fraud, deceit, or deception, the exact character of which has been challenging to sort out.
Moreover, for example, if you look at the next frame you'll see this plane just effortlessly disappeared into the South Tower.
Now this is quite incredible given the design of the tower.
It's led this plane to be referred to as a ghost plane or a butter plane.
It's as though we had a 110-floor gigantic cube of butter that a plane could just disappear into.
If you want to see where, from an engineering point of view, this is preposterous, the next slide shows that the plane was intersecting with eight different floors.
As I explained in relation to Flight 11 and the North Tower, which was intersecting with seven, Flight 175 was intersecting with eight, where each of the floors consisted of a steel truss with four to eight inches of concrete, Meaning, since the buildings were 208 feet on a side, each floor consisted of an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
Since they were connected at one end to the massive core columns and the other to the external steel support columns, there's no possible way a plane could have entered the building.
And yet, as a next series of This is from the Evan Fairgabe's video taken from the base of the South Tower looking up.
The plane disappears its complete length into the South Tower in the same number of frames it passes its complete length through Airscot, which is physically preposterous unless a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building.
poses no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air.
That represents a reductio to absurdity, that this cannot be a physical possibility.
Indeed, as the next slide shows, what ought to have happened, had this been a real plane, it would have crumpled external to the building, body seats, luggage would have fallen to the ground, Uh, we would have had a tail, wings, engine might have penetrated, but most of the plane would knock.
Instead, what we had, as the next slide shows, was a spectacular fireball, and when it was extinguished within 15 seconds or so, there was a very modest fires that remained, but gashes in the side of the building to which we shall return.
Meanwhile, if you looked at the roadway beneath the facade, you would see, in fact, there is none of the debris we would have expected beneath either the north or the south tower.
In the very next slide, we will see.
Yes.
Here you have the sidewalk, the roadway.
Had these crashes been real, there would have been bodies, seats, luggage.
I mean, these are planes.
These 767s are even more massive than the 757s.
But in fact, we have nothing, nothing there.
Clearly, planes did not actually hit either the North or the South Tower.
They did, however, seek to plant fake debris, as the next slide shows, at the intersection of Church and Murray on the right.
You'll see what turned out to be an antiquated engine from a Boeing 767.
In other words, The people who are carrying this out were not rocket scientists.
They made mistakes.
This was an engine from a 767, but it was not currently in use.
There are features there at the top of the engine that reveal that it was that type of engine and not one that would have been involved had this crash been real.
Notice it's sitting on the sidewalk underneath steel scaffolding and a canopy, both of which
are undamaged.
Now, just to make an obvious physical observation, had anything that massive hit the street at a high velocity,
it would have just dug up the sidewalk.
But as you notice, the sidewalk is perfectly undamaged.
Jack White, who is a brilliant student of JFK, with whom I collaborated on many different issues,
discovered Fox News footage of a white van at the intersection
where four or five agents wearing FBI vests were unloading something heavy.
He says, pick up or delivery.
It was a delivery they appear to have made even using the dolly you can see in the foreground.
In the photograph on the right.
Now, if you turn to the next slide, you'll see we had the gashes on both the North and the South Tower.
It was kind of funny where these gashes came from.
They don't exactly look like planes, but you can see they were meant to look like planes.
I mentioned before the gelatin group that were in the various buildings.
They had boxes of fuse holders.
I believe it was the role of the gelatin group to plant explosives to blow out this kind of image.
You know, this kind of a hole, shaped vaguely like a plane, To make it appear that an aircraft had actually hit there, when in fact it wasn't the case at all.
It's like a Hollywood routine where we have, say, Rambo going into a, you know, North Korean prisoner of war camp, and you see the bodies flying in the air and blood gushing and all that.
Remember, they're using little packets of blood, little tiny explosives.
After all, Were they not doing that?
Were they not faking it?
They'd never be able to hire actors to play in a war scene movie again.
So this is a Hollywood-style effect where they put together events in such a way to create a false impression of the causation.
And just to make another key point here, notice in neither of the holes in the north or the south tower do you see any parts of an aircraft.
No remnants of an aircraft are found there.
The next slide shows a scene of the kind we had when the plane was approaching the tower.
And actually, there you may or may not notice that the left wing doesn't appear to be in evidence.
I'll return to that point.
Meanwhile, in the very next slide, I had a debate with a fellow named Steve Dawk about how this was done.
And we talk about how the holes were created.
Notice on the left, you have damage that was done by aircraft hitting small birds in flight.
Were the small birds only weighed a few ounces, Scott?
I mean, imagine, in contrast to the small birds in flight, they had hit an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
I mean, the aircraft would have been obliterated.
Take a look at the next and you see again further damage from birds having hit planes.
I mean, it can be very substantial.
And yet these birds are not at all comparable to the enormity of the resistance that would have been encountered.
Just notice on the bottom left there.
That is a portion of one of the external steel support columns.
They were massive!
And remember how they were backed up By all of the floors, the steel trusses and the acres of concrete on each.
If you go to the next slide, then you'll see another indication of What we have here, this is an effort that's been made to try to explain away why we don't see the debris, suggesting based upon an experiment where a fighter aircraft made out of synthetic material was filled with water and was loaded aboard a rocket-propelled railway truss and run into a concrete-resistant, nuclear-resistant bunker.
Now what's crucial about this is, in the first place, it blew into millions of little tiny pieces, millions of little tiny pieces.
In the second place, it did not pass through the concrete bunker.
So we clearly have a Faulty analogy by those who would like to suggest that this Sandia crash test bore any resemblance to what happened on 9-11 or could explain away how the plane effortlessly disappears into the tower.
In fact, if you want to think about a simple model, imagine Throwing an empty beer can against a brick wall.
No matter how hard you throw the empty beer can against a brick wall, it's not going to enter or pass through the brick wall.
It's going to crumble.
And even if you filled it with water, as happened in the Sandia test site, the result is going to be similar.
You may have the can crunch and the water spray apart, but notice that's nothing like what happened on 9-11.
Now, when it comes to theories about how it was done, there have been three different hypotheses advanced, which we can see on the next slide, for example.
Some would have us believe it was done by CGI, or computer-generated images.
There's a second account, that was the web fairy, as she called herself, Rosalie Grable, suggested it was done using CGI.
The next slide, coming from Ace Baker, he refers to the theory of ghost planes, suggests it was done using video compositing.
Now that occurs when you add additional images to footage that's already been shot during the 15-second interval between which footage is originally taken and is broadcast.
There would be an opportunity there by way of what is known as video compositing.
to add images or if you go to the third What we're talking about here is the possibility that we might have had an image that was holographic, including the idea that it was not a real plane, but an image that hit the building.
It's well illustrated in the next slide, which is regarded itself as proof that we had a hologram involved here.
Uh, in the following, yes, where many think that as in some images we have, there are missing parts of the airplane, which presumably would not have been possible had it been a real aircraft, but where by virtue of the holographic projection, depending on the lighting and the angle, it could have been the case that some parts of the image that was being projected could not be seen.
Now, a reason why the holographic hypothesis appears to be plausible, more plausible than either CGI or video compositing, is the following.
If it were CGI or video compositing, Scott, then you would not have seen the plane in real time approaching the building, but only during the broadcast.
Because it would only have been added during the CGI or video compositing process.
That lays a foundation for believing that it may well have been a hologram.
Though it still is puzzling, since most believe that holograms are impossible unless they're being projected against a hard surface.
Now, a fellow by the name of Richard D. Hall did a quite brilliant work that he referred to as his 9-11 Flight 174 Radar Data 3D Analysis we see illustrated by the next slide.
Richard is quite a brilliant guy.
Now there are some 52 videos apart of Flight 175 approaching the building.
It turns out that 27 or 28 are sufficiently precise where the timing is exact enough that you could create a sequence.
You could plot the approach of the plane to the building.
And Richard did precisely that.
He created a plot.
Now, he discovered that NIST had a similar plot, which it claimed was based upon radar data.
Richard looked at the radar data they claimed to have been involved, and he found it implausible.
Nevertheless, he discovered there was radar data, but as the next slide shows, it was for a plane approaching the tower that was actually 1,200 feet to the right of the plane that allegedly hit the building.
In other words, it approaches but then goes past the tower, does not actually intersect.
If you look at the next slide, you'll see we have an explanation of how it appears this may have been done that could account for the data, the impossible speed, the impossible entry, and why military radar did not detect the plane in the observed position.
Just to review the bidding here, It appears that the plane 1,200 feet to the side was projecting the image that we saw approach the building.
The plane itself was making sounds that were heard by pedestrians on the street who attribute it to the image they saw approaching the South Tower.
The plane was traveling faster than a 767 could travel at that altitude to preserve the integrity of the holographic image.
Because it was only a holographic image, it was able to enter the South Tower without any collision effects, because it was only an image and not a real physical plane.
Plus, it explains why the radar, which is radio waves, bounced off the real plane projecting the image, but not from the image.
Thus, Richard D. Hall's hypothesis is exemplified by the following slide, where I believe he has it right, showing us the one plane projecting the image of another.
Now, during the course of my research, I was actually sent a page from an Australian military manual, which you can find in the next slide, for an airborne holographic projector.
And this indeed appears to be exactly what was done on 9-11.
Now, We all know that military technology tends to be 10 or 15 years more advanced than what the public is allowed to know.
And only in recent years has it been revealed.
There's a new form of holographic projection that uses air molecules as a temporary screen so it can project without having a physical image.
If you turn to the next slide, we get another result from pilots for 9-11 Truth.
Well, they discovered that Flight 175, like Flight 93, remained airborne and was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
It did not crash.
The next slide shows how Edward Hendry was able to capture pages from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics records where they keep very meticulous details of every plane, that it's time it's supposed to depart, the actual pull away from the gate, the actual time it has wheels up, the actual time it has wheels down, and all that very meticulous data on every commercial flight.
And what we have here shows that Flight 11, which purportedly hit the North Tower, was not even in the air on 9-11.
Moreover, we also have similar data in the next slide to show that Flight 77 not only did not hit the Pentagon, it too, like Flight 11, wasn't even in the air that day.
I went forward And sought out Federal Aviation Administration registration records and discovered that the planes that were used for those two flights, and remember the same aircraft could be used one day to fly from Tampa to Chicago, the next from New York to LA.
The two planes used for those flights, 93 and 175, were not even formally registered until 28 September 2005,
which raises a question.
How can planes that were not even in the air have crashed on 9-11, and how could planes that crashed on 9-11 have still been in the air four years later?
What we have in the next slide, of course, is our list of the... Yep, this is the Federal Aviation Administration records for flights 93 and 175, showing they were not even formally de-registered until 28 September.
The next slide now shows the perps we were told who were responsible.
The 19 Islamic terrorists who are supposed to have hijacked these aircraft and perpetrated these atrocities under the control of a guy in a cave off in Afghanistan.
Well, it turns out that 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia, and although we immediately moved to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, none of them were for Iraq.
And our man, Osama bin Laden, was our man in Afghanistan.
He was instrumental in getting Stinger missiles into the hands of the Mujahideen.
Which they used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes, and where he was actually an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman, where an official from the agency visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death from his medical maladies in Afghanistan on 15 December 2001.
It's tough to get dialysis machines in and out of those caves in Afghanistan, and where there were local obituaries, he was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim tradition, and where even Fox News and CNN both, on the 26th of December 2001, reported the death of Osama bin Laden.
Meanwhile, The day following 9-11, we had half a dozen or more of these guys turn up alive and well and make contact with the British media.
where even the leader, his father said, Muhammad Ata had called him and was terribly worried
he had not been involved in this event, but he was in fear of his life.
Now notice what we have here as summarized by the following slide.
If no planes crashed, then no passengers died and no Islamic hijackers caused them to crash.
And if no Islamic hijackers caused them to crash, then there was no warrant or any justification for the War on Terror, which the United States proceeded to launch immediately.
Now it's fascinating historically and in retrospective to see in the next slide that Donald Trump was really the first prominent American figure to cast doubt on the official account.
In the next slide we see, on the television that very day, after having noted the engineers who built the Twin Towers were now working for him, He declared on New York's Channel 9 that it was impossible that Boeing's could have burst through the steel structure of the towers.
He continued by stating it was also impossible that Boeing's could have caused the towers to collapse.
He concluded, affirming that other factors had to be involved.
He actually used the word bombs.
Now, if we take a look at the next slide, we'll see Here we had what was in fact early explosions in the sub-basement.
It's terribly interesting.
These explosions in the sub-basement occurred roughly coincident with the time that the planes were supposed to have hit the building.
And there is to be explained away by jet fuel falling through the elevator shafts.
In fact, they had a different objective, as I shall momentarily explain.
But as the next slide shows, they did damage to the lobbies.
These were significant explosions.
And as the following slide shows, you'll see they even had recorded on the Richter, we had the early on, you had these early explosions toward the top, versus the far more massive for the South Tower and eventually the North toward the bottom.
Where brilliant work was done by two members of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, Gordon Ross and Craig Furlong, we'll see in the next slide, they discovered there was a hand-eye coordination problem.
That using the commission recording for the seismic event and the impact of the plane for each of the towers, there was a significant discrepancy.
That the explosions were occurring 14 seconds too early in the case of the North Tower and 17 seconds too early in the case of the South.
They entitled their study, uh, seismic proof.
9-11 was an inside job and they got it exactly right.
I had a conversation with a head custodian of the North Power, Willie Rodriguez, who explained that water was filling up the sub-basements, which gave me the clue to understand why they had these early explosions.
They were to drain the water from the sprinkler systems That had been installed after a massive fire had occurred in the Twin Towers, which burned at an intense temperature, actually 2,000 degrees, but didn't melt or cause any of the steel to be replaced.
They installed at that time the sprinkler systems, which would otherwise have extinguished the very modest fires.
Now, if we look at the next slide, we see a diagrammatic side of the buildings, and why it was a bit of a reach to think that jet fuel could have gone all the way from the upper floors down to the sub-basements, because they were built as 30-story buildings stacked on one another with addenda, and where you see you had to get off the elevators if you came down 30 floors and get on a whole new set of elevators, so there are only a couple of Elevator shafts that went all the way from the top of the building down, and where Willie Rodriguez explained one of his colleagues had been trapped in one of those elevator shafts but survived, and where also he had another colleague who'd been affected by the enormous explosion who came up with a flesh hanging off of his body.
Now if we look at the next slide, we'll see why they had to use an ingenious method to destroy the Twin Towers.
They were built in what was known as the bathtub, a kind of a moat, in order to keep Hudson River water out.
Had the Twin Towers actually collapsed, and remember the government claims that they did collapse, they would have shattered the bathtub and Hudson River water would have flooded beneath lower Manhattan, the most valuable real estate in the world.
So they had to figure out an ingenious technique to destroy the Twin Towers without damaging the bathtub.
And in the next slide you see the remnants of the bathtub as excavation was taking place where the Twin Towers respectively had stood.
Now, the next slide shows what's taking place here in relation to the North Tower.
You can see it was actually exploding in every direction from the top down.
All the floors remained stationary, awaiting their turn to be blown to kingdom come in the memorable phrase of Morgan Reynolds.
The South Tower was different, because the top 30 floors of the South Tower started to tilt, and then were blown!
They were just blown!
Evaporated!
Even Steve Jones, the physicist from BYU, whom I invited to be my co-chair when I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth, was dumbfounded.
He was never able to explain how it happened.
And has, in fact, been a proponent of the nanothermite hypothesis, which turns out to have no merit whatsoever, because as T. Mark Hightower and I explained in three articles published in 2011, nanothermite is a feeble explosive.
It's only 1 13th as powerful as TNT.
Not only that, But in order to destroy a material, it's a law of material science that an explosive must have a detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material.
The speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 meters per second.
In steel, 6,100 meters per second.
But the highest attributed detonation velocity for nanothermite is only 895.
In other words, you can't get there from there.
One of the proponents of the nanothermite hypothesis, by the way, Niels Herreth, who's an associate professor of chemistry emeritus from the University of Copenhagen, estimated the quantity of thermite necessary to destroy a twin tower was 29,000 metric tons.
Think about it.
That's huge!
It would be like filling a Twin Tower with circus peanuts.
Simply absurd to believe that nanothermite could have been responsible.
Now the next slide shows what the government wants us to believe to wit that there was what you might call a pile driver theory of destruction where the top floors collapse and then called floor floors to collapse and lower floors But you will recall that I explained how the relative thickness of the steel was so great, six inches at the lowest up to a quarter inch at the top, that the mass of the top part was only a tiny fragment of the mass of the whole.
And as the next slide shows, Chuck Baldwin, who's a retired high school physics and math instructor, calculated that for every unit of downward force,
there would have been 199 units of upward.
In other words, it was impossible, physically impossible, for the Twin Towers to have collapsed.
Look at the next slide, and you'll see a stunning illustration of what I'm talking about.
How could anyone, looking at this photograph of the destruction of the North Tower,
mistake that for a collapse.
And by the way, notice you have Building 7 there in the foreground in the lower right-hand corner, which was among the most robust buildings ever designed by the hand of man.
In the next slide you'll see, if it will play for us, there's actually a GIF here where you can see the spires, the lingering spires of the North Tower turn into dust.
You cannot see it because it's not playing, but that's the way it happened.
Something caused molar dissociation, caused these buildings to turn into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.
And as the next slide shows, the dust cloud was simply enormous.
It enveloped all of lower Manhattan.
Indeed, going further, you'll see an alternative theory of how it was done involved a distribution of bombs throughout the World Trade Center.
It now appears, based upon the latest research, That it was a powerful mini-nuke in the sub-basement, actually at the ground level, the rock beneath the sub-basement of the North and the South Tower that blew upward.
Remember, the design was a tube within a tube.
So you had the 47 core columns at the center and then the 230 external steel support columns surrounding it to create all that open office space.
So it was destroyed by blowing the inner tube from the ground up.
And then what we observed externally was the destruction of the outer tube from the top down.
It's truly fascinating.
Let me point out a crucial aspect of this is when it was over, there was no pile of debris for either the north or the south tower.
Moreover, as you'll see in the next slide, Yeah, here was the slide I was speaking of, yes.
As you'll see in the next slide, we had this massive section, about 200 tons ejected from the North Tower at a 45 degree angle.
Now, that's incompatible, completely inconsistent with the idea of any kind of collapse.
I'm explaining why it wasn't even physically possible for the buildings to collapse.
But when you had this massive quantity of debris ejected, you have the result that my colleague Don Fox has described in the next slide as a winter garden where dews and nanothermite go to die, because it was this massive steel assembly that was blown 600 feet through the air, which required an enormous source of energy.
Now if you check out the next, we have a summary of some of the key features here.
Ah, here it is.
Here it is.
Winter Garden.
Where dews and nanothermite go to die.
I love it.
Meanwhile, we now have in the following slide a summation of some of the key physical evidence.
Jet fuel fires, even if they burned hot enough and long enough, would cause a building to sag and gradually collapse.
Jet fuel could not have ejected 300 tons up at a 45 degree angle 600 feet outward into the winter garden to explode steel.
An explosive needs to have a detonation velocity of 6,100 meters per second.
to explode concrete, a detonation velocity of 3200 meters per second.
Kerosene, which is jet fuel, the basic component, has a detonation velocity of over 1600 meters,
but nanothermite, far worse.
Has a detonation velocity of only 895 meters per second.
Many nukes, however, would have had the observed effects.
If you go to the next slide, you find, in fact, that there was access to the building because of a project for renovation ...of the World Trade Center.
There were two aspects of it, the most important of which was actually an Ace Elevator reconstruction, which is supposed to be the largest renovation project for elevators in history, that gave them access to all aspects of the building.
So, the renovation records, of course, now have just disappeared.
Isn't it an amazing coincidence?
If you look at the next slide, by the way, you'll see something that resembles what just happened down in Florida, where the steel slab structure collapsed.
It did look a lot like a controlled demolition.
I've had an expert engineer all over this, and he's explained how this building was constructed in 1981, that its design has an expected 40-year lifespan, that it's now 2021, and it expired, and that because of the sea water in the atmosphere, corrosion would have taken place.
In any case, this is what a collapse would have looked a lot like, had it happened, which is totally different than what we had at the Twin Towers, where Fr.
Frank Morales, who was a first responder from St.
Mark's Episcopal Church, came on my programs twice to explain that the buildings were destroyed too, or even slightly below ground level.
Now, if you turn to the next slide, we'll see What happened with Building 7 was completely different.
It came down very smoothly.
It came down very symmetrically.
Notice it's not blowing apart in every direction from the top down.
All the floors are coming down at the same time.
And when it's over, we have a debris pile equal to about 12% of the 47 floors of the original height.
Take a look at the next slide.
Dan Rather watching this go down live compared it to what we see with resorts and casinos in Las Vegas, meaning that we're the result of a controlled demolition.
Dan Rather got it exactly right.
Now, if you go to the next slide, you'll find there was a man actually inside the building that morning.
His name was Barry Jennings.
He went to Building 7 because Rudy Giuliani, the mayor, had created a command and control center there with two floors with their own air and water supply.
Instead, he found basically they had been abandoned.
There were still steaming cups of coffee, half-eaten sandwiches.
A fireman came along and said, we've got to get you out of here.
He heard explosions going off in the building.
While he was inside the building, a stairwell was blown out from under him.
At one point he felt himself stepping over bodies.
He could not see them, but he could feel them.
And when he got out, he gave interviews, some of which are still available online today.
Next slide.
You see here the striking contrast, the striking contrast between the debris from Building 7 in the background versus in the foreground, Building 1, the North Tower, there is nothing there.
Nothing there.
Next slide.
And we find what was going on, that the U.S.
Geological Survey conducted dust studies, dust studies, from 35 locations in lower Manhattan.
And they found a host of elements.
Barium, lithium, lanthanum, yttrium, chromium, tritium, some of which only exist in radioactive form that would not have been there had this not been a radioactive, a nuclear event.
So the evidence we have is tremendous that in fact this was a very sophisticated nuclear event using a form that gives off relatively minimal radiation and we have so many kinds of nukes it's difficult to keep up with them.
Further confirmation is seen in the next slide, which reports that there have been a massive number of deaths of cancer cases among 9-11 responders, tripling to more than 5,400 in less than three years.
By now, in fact, the number from the residents and first responders is close to 70,000, and they include highly unusual cancers, esophageal, pancreatic, Multiple myeloma, very analogous to what occurred in Russia following the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown.
So the evidence that this was a nuclear event is multiple, from multiple directions, and all converge on the same conclusion.
The next slide is fascinating because it shows that a British reporter, Jane Standley,
was reporting that building 7 had collapsed at 4.57, which was 23 minutes before it would actually
go down at 5.20, which means that there was foreknowledge this was about to take place.
Indeed, if you look at the next slide, you'll see as she's speaking about Building 7, to which she referred as the Solomon Brothers Building, because the Solomon Brothers had purchased a big chunk of the building, it was still standing.
So here you see a nice example of how the mainstream media is in collusion.
The next slide shows how, in my opinion, the Israelis overdo it.
They treat us like children.
They had to have a national television video of Palestinians rejoicing and celebrating and have a phone call in from someone claiming responsibility for the Popular Front of the liberation of Palestine.
It was all absurd.
This is a very sophisticated high-tech operation.
The Palestinians could not possibly have pulled it off, nor would they have had the motive.
In fact, the Palestinians were just as stupefied and slack-jawed as everyone else in the world.
Meanwhile, you see some of the key participants in the following sequence of slides.
Rudy Giuliani, who is touted as America's mayor, was hoping he might even get a third term out of it.
Rudy Giuliani, I'm sorry to say, was deeply involved in 9-11.
Other players are also shown here in the very next.
This is Philip Zelikow.
Today he's a professor of history at the University of Virginia.
He was made the executive director of 9-11.
He completed an outline of the entire report for 9-11 a year before he shared it with any member of the staff.
His area of academic specialization before he came into the government was the creation and maintenance of public myths.
M-Y-T-H-S.
If you want a candidate for the man who wrote the script for 9-11, there he is.
Philip Zelikow.
His credentials were impeccable.
The next slide shows how they bottled up any lawsuit.
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has ensured that any 9-11 related case went nowhere.
He's handled a whole range of them and has guaranteed that they would make no progress through the judicial system.
If we go further, then, you see, Ehud, Omar, and Bibi Netanyahu, who I believe were the brains behind 9-11, it was their idea, and they carried it out in complicity with their American counterparts in the next slide you see.
Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, who by the way really wasn't well informed.
They kept him pretty much out of it for good reason, because he was a dim bulb.
But those are the primary players who brought us 9-11.
For those who want more, the final slide shows my book.
America nuked on 9-11.
It lays it all out.
You'll find all the evidence I presented there, here, there, in that book, which is available from moonrockbooks.com.
And I must say, you know, this may be the most important of the books I publish there, which include on Sandy Hook, on the Boston bombing, on the moon landing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville and Parkland.
All of which have been banned by Amazon.com but remain available today at moonrockbooks.com.
Scott, I cannot thank you enough for the opportunity to review what happened on 9-11.
Yeah, very solemn subject.
I think we'll have to return on Friday for a clean-up version and follow-up with some of these subjects.
I wanted to ask one area if you could comment on, Jim.
There has been a lot of commentary and questions about directed energy weapons, and I know Judy Wood's book, Where Did the Towers Go?, she had photographs of vehicles that had allegedly been turned upside down.
Paint had been burned off in certain parts of the vehicle.
Police cars had half of their paint on the door burned away.
There were vehicles in a parking lot that had their engine blocks allegedly disintegrated.
And their steel bodies looking like they've been rusted.
So that was a very odd phenomenon relating to the 9-11 event.
I know Judge Jeanine Pirro recently had that photograph behind her when she was commenting on 9-11.
So they have had photographs of these cars that some weird things have happened to them.
And I wonder if you could just comment on your thoughts on that aspect.
Oh, absolutely, Scott.
I featured Judy Wood 15 times on my radio shows, beginning on the 11th of November of 2006, where I was pioneering interaction between computer, the Internet, and radio.
So we'd go to her website on the computer and we'd go through all of her studies, her photographs, her diagrams, and other research, which is a fabulous compendium.
The problem with Judy is she's been unwilling to acknowledge the information provided by the U.S.
Geological Survey, where we have a case where the government's own evidence contradicts the government's own account.
There is no aspect of the evidence she has cited that cannot be better explained by the nuclear hypothesis and much evidence that can be explained by the nuclear hypothesis that cannot be explained by directed energy weapons.
My suggestion, Scott, and it's perfect for Friday, is that we invite Joel Olson, Who's a professional engineer.
He's qualified in mechanical, structural, electrical, and civil.
Who spoke on this very topic, where did the towers go, during my false flag and conspiracies conference held on the 5th and the 6th of December.
Where everyone can go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com and download as many of the presentations as you like.
There were two dozen altogether, including by Joel Olson.
I suggest, Scott, at your invitation, we have him join us on Friday to address this question.
He's the best guy to do it.
But the bottom line is, the nuclear hypothesis can explain everything the directed energy hypothesis can, but the directed energy hypothesis cannot explain everything the nuclear hypothesis can.
Very good.
Well, we'll try and do that because I think we need to answer every question, explore every rabbit trail, expose every party, every person, every government, every country, every military branch, every military officer, every media person, everyone that has been associated with this obvious, physically impossible event, phenomenon, the 9-11 attacks, And the inclusion of that is the Shanksville, Pennsylvania missing plane crashing into the ground with no structural evidence of the plane.
The Pentagon strike with no structural evidence of the plane.
No wheels, no baggage, no wings, no engines.
The impossibilities of the aerodynamics of a plane flying at that altitude and speed and crashing into the Pentagon and then disappearing.
I was, I drove by the Pentagon the next day and I can confirm there was no Debris of any kind and then the the Twin Tower issue that you laid out very well tonight and the impossibility of planes crashing into this incredibly well-structured reinforced 1960s building where political correctness wasn't even invented so they really didn't even care about you know the asbestos and all those things.
They made a very powerful fire retardant building That would have endured these hits and yet we're they they try and lead us to believe that it suddenly
Blows up into a massive dust cloud that fills the entire basis of Manhattan.
A dust cloud instead of a pancaking phenomenon?
I don't think so.
And then, of course, Building 7, the Solomon Building that simply falls into its own footprint in a perfect demolition.
And then many, many other pieces of evidence and testimony.
Rudy Giuliani having a role.
Carrick is an interesting figure too.
Carrick was his security guy.
And alleged he had went to jail, but he was in a very strange position.
And I know Carrick has also been instrumental in a lot of the Trump issues from the 2020 election recount issues and the election fraud.
I was very disturbed to see Carrick Back there working with Giuliani and working with Trump on this election issue.
So there are some very suspicious characters, unsavory characters that I'm very skeptical about.
That have surfaced again.
But again, Jim, in closing, this is the greatest attack, the greatest war crime, the greatest crime against humanity that has ever occurred because it instantly destroyed our Pollyanna America image to whatever degree we wanted to maintain it.
Destroyed it and set us on a course of Frankenstein, destruction of the world, destruction of our reputation, destruction of how many people and lives from Afghanistan to Iraq to Syria to Libya.
And this whole thing has been a nightmare birthed out of the dreams of fanatics.
So I look forward to Friday and finishing this up.
I'm going to give it back to you, Jim, and give us your closing thoughts before we end the show tonight.
Well, the questions you raised were excellent ones, Scott, indeed.
And Joe Olson is a perfect guy to address the difference between the nuclear hypothesis and the directed energy, which is precisely what he addressed during my false flag and conspiracies conference.
I'm very grateful to you for this opportunity, and I encourage everyone to go to False Flag Conspiracies 2020 Conference and pick up as many of the presentations there as you like.
They are available for free at no charge whatsoever.
Go in in the upper right-hand corner, you'll see you can access the archives.
You do fill out some personal information just to keep a record who's downloading, and then go and pick it up, fill up your cart, And then when you check out, you can click on each of the individual presentations and they'll download directly to your desktop.
Scott, great pleasure being here with you.
I'll invite Joe to join us on Friday.
Please do.
And remember, you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
This is a very difficult and traumatic and emotional issue for a lot of people.
When you discover the 9-11 events are not as described by the government, how they are physically, scientifically impossible to have occurred the way the government narrative explains.
When you see the handwriting on the wall of the conspiracy and the treason and the criminality behind this, it is not a pleasant thing.
It challenges the core of your being it challenges the core of our American identity because this was not the country or the the idea or the purpose for America and yet in one fell swoop.
This great nation, in a sense, was destroyed with the destruction of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon section and the Solomon Building and everything else that's covered it.
So I just wanted to say to people, this is a traumatic experience, but remember, This is a transformation that you must examine, understand, and be patient with yourself about and let it settle.
Many people in your family and friends will never be able to handle this.
They will run from it.
They will hate you for it.
But if you feel called and strong enough and you are seeking truth, Then this is one of those essential steps to awakening and from that awakening helping awaken others.
So that is why we're here is to present the great awakenings that are happening and that must continue to happen in this country and in this world if we are to be a nation and a people of love and truth and peace And exposing the traitors and the criminals and the evil that was behind a lot of this.
We will end it here tonight.
Thank you very much, Dr. Fetzer for being with us, and thank you for all of you who support us at American Media Periscope.
We will be back on Friday, and we will be concluding this, but also opening up other Great Awakenings and these other false flag events that Dr. Fetzer and many others have exposed.
This is the critical information that we need to know, and we will know it.
So, thank you for joining us, and we will see you on Friday.
▲
Export Selection