All Episodes
Previous Next
April 10, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
52:38
False Flags & Conspiracies 2020: Scientific Reasoning about False Flags! (5-6 December 2020)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
As I mentioned yesterday, we intend to make this an annual event, so there'll be a False Flags and Conspiracies 2021, False Flags and Conspiracies 2022, and so forth.
And I hope you'll all be eager to join next year for the same event, When I got up this morning, I turned to my wife and said, did you ever expect to be married to an 80-year-old man?
And she had to admit that hadn't been on her agenda, but there it is.
We've been married since 1977.
And I say, she's the one who deserves a medal because I'm not the easiest guy in the world to live with.
We were to begin with Gary King talking about the Boston Marathon bombing, but Gary's missing in action.
So...
What I can do is talk about how to spot a false flag and give a number of events.
And if Gary shows, we can move forward with it.
There are two rather extended versions of how to spot a false flag on my blog at Jim the Conspiracy Guy.
I originally had this set up for yesterday, but it works today.
You all know me now, the former Marine Corps officer and retired university professor.
I emphasize again the methodological difference of looking for falsifying evidence rather than confirming evidence.
Typically in these false flags they provide a mess of what is apparent confirming evidence, most of which, if not all, turns out to be fabricated, phony, or fake.
And whereas David Gehry will explain later today, well we published Twelve books with Moonrock Books, which Mike Palachuk and I founded in the wake of Amazon banning Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, astonishingly
Amazon has now banned sex, which I think must be the indoor record.
Meanwhile, it's worth noting the difference between truth and evidence.
Truth can be defined as correspondence to reality or the way things are.
The problem becomes sorting out reality from illusion in a time of universal deceit.
The criterion or measure of truth is the coherence of the evidence when the evidence is authentic.
And as I've been explaining, discovering certain evidence is fabricated can be extremely telling in terms of who would have been possible been in a position to make the fabrication.
Remember to emphasize worth, four stages of scientific reasoning, puzzlement, something doesn't fit in with your background knowledge or experience.
Think about Sandy Hook, all the contradictory broadcast speculation.
Consider the full range of alternative explanation.
It was real, it was fake, and so forth.
Then crucially, when you have the evidence laid out, what's the probability of that evidence on the hypothesis That it was real, or versus the probability on the hypothesis it were fake.
We'll see this immediately when I use this in my first illustration, the moon landing.
That explanation, when the evidence is settled down, it all tends to point in the same direction.
We're entitled to accept as true The best supported hypothesis, but in the tentative, infallible fashion of science, as I have previously explained.
Again, I recommend, for those who want a fairly thoroughgoing explanation of how to apply scientific principles of reasoning to conspiracy theories, check it out, Thinking About Conspiracy Theories, 9-11 and JFK.
Now, it's very important, by the way, to bear in mind three kinds of impossibilities that tell you what you're seeing cannot possibly be real.
Logical impossibilities cannot be the case because their description is contradictory.
This is why there can't be any round squares, or humorously, why there can't be any honest politicians.
Physical impossibility.
These cannot be the case because they violate the laws of physics, chemistry, biology, melting points, freezing points, causal relations, laws of material science.
Think of 9-11.
Technical impossibilities could not have happened because the technology had yet to be developed.
So we couldn't have airborne flight before the Wright Brothers, electric light before Edison, automobiles before Ford, and so forth.
Now, I first became interested in the moon landing when I invited my wife.
We went to the Morgan Hotel on Bloomsbury Street in London.
This is in 2001.
I had been there the year before for a conference, and I knew she would love it.
And I picked the Morgan because that was her maiden name, Janice Morgan.
It backs onto the British Museum.
And while we were there, I just happened to flip through the BBC channels and was utterly captivated by the first broadcast of Conspiracy Theory, Did We Land on the Moon?
Utterly captivating because it provides one scientific proof after another that we did not go.
Meanwhile here, let me just mention a few.
Some moon photographic anomalies.
We got the situation with moon dust, which because the moon has no atmosphere and no moisture, it either retains imprints or it does not.
I believe moon dust is no more capable of retaining imprints than the sands of the Sahara.
There was only one extremely distant source of light, which of course would be the sun.
But that means any shadows cast on the moon ought to be parallel to one another, given the extreme distance of the sun from the moon, so that if we have multiple or intersecting lines, then we know something is wrong because there's more than one source of light.
And in addition, the number of photographs was astonishing given the amount of time available.
This is an argument developed by Jack White, who is a dear colleague of mine in relation to JFK research.
So take a look.
We got moon rovers that are leaving no tracks in the moon dust, okay?
In other words, there's no tracks in front, before, or between the wheels, suggesting it must have been lowered by means of a crane.
Interestingly, some footprints are retained in the moon dust.
Those are supposed to be the boots of the astronaut.
But interestingly, circled there, there's a print of a sneaker from someone on the set who inadvertently stepped into the pseudo-moon dust to retain the impression.
Here you see the problem with lights.
You got a flag that's casting no shadow at all.
That's certainly anomalous.
But you also have different and conflicting shadows here that indicate multiple sources of light.
Jack White, as I said, was absolutely brilliant in offering a purely quantitative argument of how many photographs were taken and how much time was available to take them during the various alleged ventures on the moon.
The simplicity of his argument is considerable for us because it doesn't presuppose any special knowledge of photographic anomalies or defects.
The agency, NASA, wants the world to believe that 5,771 photographs were taken in 4,834 minutes.
If nothing but photography had been done, such a feat is clearly impossible, made even more so by all the documented activities of the astronauts.
Imagine, 1.19 photos every minute men were on the moon, one picture every 50 seconds.
The secret NASA tried to hide has been discovered.
The quantity of photos purporting to record the Apollo lunar EVAs could not have been taken on the moon in such an impossible time frame.
So why do these photos exist?
How did these photos get made?
Did any men go to the moon?
Or was it truly the greatest hoax ever, as I have believed prior to the coronavirus?
But it's not merely the staggering number of photographs that undermines this evidence, but the existence of any photographs at all.
Cosmic rays, I suspect.
Would have contaminated photographic plates and made moon photography impossible.
There's much more that could be said about it.
Some is in the book, my favorite, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Not least of all, because it features a photograph on the back cover of the UK soccer team at Auschwitz.
If that comes as a surprise, this is a book you really need to get.
From, of course, moonrockbooks.com.
And, needless to say, it too has been banned.
Meanwhile, here we have anomalies in Nice, faking bodies in a truck massacre.
We have an 18-wheeler in an area where large trucks were not legally allowed after allegedly hitting of 84 persons, not a speck of blood on the front of the truck.
They cut a pig for blood, but the bodies in the street, believe it or not, turned out to be mannequins.
So here's the situation in Nice.
Ole Dommegaard, who will be speaking this evening, did the research on this.
Completely brilliant.
There's this area here along the waterfront where the truck attack took place.
Notice, there you have at the top, the blood on a truck from having hit a single deer.
At the bottom, the truck that's alleged to have hit 84 persons in Nice.
Not a sweat of blood.
And when we take a closer look, it turns out, believe it or not, they were using mannequins.
You'll find this kind of fakery again and again and again.
Stunning stuff.
You can learn about this.
Nick Colerstone has this wonderful book, Chronicles of False Flag Terror, where Nick, who also will be speaking this afternoon, discusses 13, 13 count of false flag attacks in Europe.
This book has not yet been banned by Amazon.
I highly recommend it.
Meanwhile, El Paso anomalies.
You may or may not remember this.
Blatant fakery in Dayton and Philly, too.
There were cargo pockets on his pants coming into the Walmart, but they're no longer there coming out.
The alleged Dayton shooter actually died in Connecticut in 2014.
Philadelphia cops sprayed each other with fake blood for dramatic effect.
How bad is this?
Ignoring eyewitness accounts of three or four shooters for a moment, releasing all the security cam could prove or disprove it.
Here are a couple of questions.
Why would the shooter drive 600 miles to shoot up this Walmart?
And are the pants on the right?
Why are they?
Notice he's got the cargo pants here, but he doesn't have the cargo pants here.
So what did he do?
Figure, well gee, while I'm here in Walmart, I guess I'll pick up a pair of new trowel while I'm shooting up the place.
Here are questions from Jim Stone, who's really quite a brilliant guy.
Walmart questions no one's asking.
How many cameras are in a Walmart?
If the shooting lasts at 20 minutes, aren't there at least 10 consecutive hours of shooting video from 30 cameras?
But where is it?
How did the shooting continue for 20 minutes?
How long does it take for people to bail from a Walmart?
That would be the reaction of people hearing gunshots, surely.
My guess is all opportunities to nail people would be over in a minute and 30, because they'd have evacuated, yet it continued for 20 minutes.
Suppose the shooting really did happen for 20 minutes.
Why did this shooter not get a can of cream of mushroom soup in his left ear at 57 miles an hour from weak throw Willie?
I'd have probably delivered one at about 81 miles an hour.
In other words, surely people would have responded to defend themselves.
They claim Walmart had no guns on the site, so the shooting continued and continued and continued.
When the store was full of places to hide and throw something back, like a cordless drill, a can of spray paint, how about a small exercise weight?
No, that didn't happen.
Instead, everyone went back to the toilet paper aisle rather than run out the door and waited there in the paper aisle because there was enough paper towel and nearby cat litter to clean up the biggest blood spill.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
Meanwhile, it seems the Ohio shooter, Connor Betts, passed away in 2014.
Not only that, but he lived in Connecticut, not Ohio.
He even had a sister named Megan Betts.
What are the odds?
One more staged shooting to illustrate why we must give up our guns.
They are reducing it to third grade level to make sure we get the point.
Had it been real, he would have been taken out ASAP.
It makes sense when you see the pattern of fakery.
Get this.
Philadelphia mayor.
I'm a little angry about someone having that much firepower.
Total bullshit.
Meanwhile, Parkland anomalies.
This'll blow you away.
The staged classroom shooting.
At the Parkland School, they actually let the kids go at 1pm because it was Valentine's Day.
They actually forgot to post the obituaries for the 17 alleged decedents.
They even use a training dummy with no head and no arms.
Here are the records.
Notice it goes up.
This is well past the date of 14 Feb when the shooting allegedly took place.
So all the way up to March 7th, you don't have any obituaries.
Alice Levinson is an older woman who died about the age of 84.
Meanwhile, here you have Inside a Classroom.
We have actual video from Inside a Classroom, and you're going to hear girls screaming out to try to make it sound as though they're in fear.
You'll notice one's on her iPod, another's worried about his bottled water, there's a kid pulling his pots.
You see persons in police uniforms rushing in and out and you think, wow, those Parkland cops are really Johnny on the spot, unless you know that Parkland gave up its police force in like the year 2000 to save money.
Check it out.
Oh, yeah.
and mom
Oh, no.
I'm here.
Let's go, let's go, let's go!
I'll play it again with some commentary.
Here you see the girls trying to call.
There's one on her iPod.
You'll see another talking about her bottled water.
Notice the kid pulling his putts.
That's just what you would do in a state of maximum anxiety when someone has just been shot and killed right in front of you.
Cops carrying out a wounded, that's improper too.
You need EMTs to treat them.
You might be aggravating their injuries.
You see what's supposed to be the body there when the camera pans.
You see it's a training dummy with no head and no arms.
No head.
Kid faking, you know, his hand on his arm.
I mean, how ridiculous is that?
And then as I mentioned, you have all these persons in police uniforms and you think, wow, those Parkland cops are really Johnny on the spot.
Until you realize that Parkland gave up its police force like in the year 2000.
Here is an interview with Kelsey Friend, of course, with the ubiquitous David Hogg.
It's very interesting.
After the March for Our Lives, which was like a couple of weeks later, very elaborate, David Hogg actually was interviewed by CBS, and he explained that he had actually been at home, and then he realized he had to get on his bicycle and drive back to school.
Why?
Because he, with everyone else, had been released at one o'clock.
And he forgot they were going to do this stage shooting with only a couple of dozen.
Meanwhile, Kelsey Friend gave an extremely revealing report.
Kelsey said, it was like a movie.
It looked so real, but it felt so fake.
Spot on, Kelsey, you had it right.
I have a whole book about it, the Parkland Puzzle, how the pieces fit together.
Yes, yes, again, it has been banned.
Meanwhile, Orlando Anomaly is an obvious case of how it's done.
As Dr. Ewan, a Fellowship of the Minds, discovered, the permit for the club had expired three years earlier.
In other words, just as Sandy Hook, we had an abandoned school in Orlando, we had an abandoned club.
This is when the club was repainted from white to black to show that it was closed.
It had a legal occupancy of 150, but there were over 300 alleged to be there.
They would have been crammed in like sardines.
We had crisis actors in Orlando, and guess what?
The Orlando Emergency Medical Center didn't send out any billing for medical services.
Why?
Because none were rendered.
So here's a club, but when it was still open, it's still wide.
It only had 11 parking spaces, okay?
That means if you had over 300 there, there would have been abandoned cars all over the place, but there weren't any.
Here's a club showing it had a number of exits.
Allegedly, there were 50 dead, 50 injured from one shooter.
Doesn't add up.
People ought to have been streaming out of every exit possible, but they weren't.
Here's footage that is alleged to be real.
Now, notice some of it has a date and time, but it's innocuous footage.
When you get to the video part showing the alleged shooter, not only are there no bodies present, but it has no date or time.
Check it out.
This is how they synthesize or put together phony videos to try to support a completely fabricated illusory event.
So here you see just people coming into the club, right?
Notice how spacious it is in there.
These are people dancing.
It's a gay club, no date time.
It wouldn't have been possible to have that open kind of dancing if you had over 300 in a club with 150 occupancy.
Here's some external footage, fairly innocuous.
So of course it has a date and time.
But it doesn't show anything of significance, right?
And And where are the cars for all the, you know, the 300 and so forth?
As I said, they only had parking space for 11.
Now, here's inside.
This is supposed to be the shooter.
Notice no date time.
Where are the bodies?
Where are the bodies?
Now, this is law enforcement allegedly coming in to apprehend or deal with him.
There is a date time, because they were just filming themselves doing this.
No date time, no date time, no date time.
You might as well have a clipboard that says Act 1, take 2, or Act 2, take 3, or what have you.
This is embarrassingly bad.
Here you have, who knows what, there is a date time, there is some external footage, but notice you don't have the large number of vehicles that would have had to have been present if you had, you know, over 300 packed in when you had only 11 parking spaces.
They aren't there because it didn't happen.
This is very similar to what we had at Sandy Hook, where they claimed the evacuation was taking place at specific times and places, and we went to those times and places, there was nothing there, leading us to infer that's because no evacuation was taking place.
Similarly here.
Meanwhile, you had ridiculous crisis actors.
Here's one, may even be carrying a mannequin, These guys were a joke.
They're actually carrying the victim toward the Pulse Club rather than away.
You'll notice down below, the Pulse has been repainted black now, the black sign, because it's closed.
But the fact is, these crisis actors, after they got out of view of the camera, put down, in one case, they put down the guy they were carrying who did a little dance.
I mean, it was just absurd.
So you don't want to let yourself be played.
Once again, I have a whole book about it from Orlando to Dallas and beyond.
But yes, of course, it has been banned.
Meanwhile, Charlottesville anomalies.
This is pretty fascinating stuff.
Two cars, two drivers, two takes.
Totally fake.
There were two cars involved, both of which were Dodge Challengers, one with a black stripe and a sunroof, one without.
There were two drivers, an age 20 schizophrenic wearing dark thick glasses who was supposed to have driven the car, but the actual driver, who was a 32-year-old military veteran who commands a battalion of reservists in Ohio, There are at least two takes, one with one car and no vans, another with one car and two vans.
Let me show.
Here are the two vehicles.
There was this absolutely wonderful video by a woman who liked to feature her cat.
Two completely different cars.
Here you see the two drivers.
This is the driver in the car at the time.
Obviously, he resembles this guy.
He does not resemble this.
But this is the guy who was prosecuted while this is the guy who was driving the car.
Here you have it all set up.
We have two vans.
Notice there's no drivers in either of these vans.
They were sitting there for several minutes before the Dodge Challenger crashed into them.
That was, of course, so they wouldn't suffer whiplash or some kind of problem with their back.
Notice the vehicles.
Because here's another take.
Look on the left.
Look at the contrast.
No vehicles.
Not crashing into any vans.
So that's at least two takes.
Then we have the cover of the New York Times.
We have the cover of the New York Times, which is yet a third take, because you got crisis actors flying through the air.
Real attack, perhaps, or talented acrobats in a bunch of flying sneakers used to stage a video.
Notice how lean and fit the two somersaulting pedestrians are, and note the occult numerology in the license plate, 1111.
Absolutely preposterous.
We were also told State troopers died in a helicopter crash.
This was according to Timothy Heapy who did a review of the Charlottesville case and gave it his imprimatur as though it were all accurate and authentic.
Two Virginia state troopers were killed that afternoon during a crash of the chopper they were using to conduct surveillance related to the events taking place in Charlottesville.
This case is especially striking because HEFI cites a preliminary report by the NTSB released on 5 September 2017 that doesn't identify the cause of the crash, but that confirms that Lt.
H.J.
Cullen and Trooper Pilot J.M.
Bates were both killed in the crash.
Well, that's pretty good because we have video footage of the two of them walking away from the crash scene.
I mean, this is embarrassingly bad.
This is how bad it gets.
They just lie and lie and lie.
The two guys in their flight suits walking away from the crash, not killed.
If you think that's not insulting enough, look at this.
This is the mother of alleged victim Heather Heyer, top left.
But haven't we seen this woman before?
Please compare with this Sandy Hook mother.
We let the two images overlap with each other, change of transparency.
It's a perving mat.
So it seems that Susan Brough, the mother of Heather Heyer, and Donna Soto, the mother of Victoria Soto, was supposed to be a teacher at Sandy Hook, is one and the same crisis actor.
I mean, how about that?
Right in our face.
We have a book about it again because that's what I do.
I bring groups of experts together to sort these things out.
Political theater in Charlottesville, faux terrorism in three acts produced by leftist zealots, and yes, guess what?
It too has been banned by Amazon.
Here are some 9-11 anomalies at the Pentagon.
There's an absence of aircraft debris anywhere near the Pentagon.
It was an aerodynamically impossible approach with a Boeing 757.
Jamie McIntyre at the Pentagon reported from his up-close personal inspection, no signs of a plane having hit anywhere near the Pentagon.
Take a look.
This is the alleged hit point.
It's only about 10 feet high, 17 feet wide.
We have a, you know, chain link fence, couple of automobiles, there's two very large spools of cable there, but it's surrounded with unbroken windows, and guess what?
No aircraft debris, no pile of aluminum fuselage from a hundred ton airliner, no wings, no bodies, no seats, no luggage, not even the engines were recovered from the Pentagon.
It just so happened a couple of lime green civilian fire trucks were in the vicinity and they showed up to extinguish the very modest fires.
But notice especially the Pentagon lawn.
Clear, clean, free of all debris.
Check that out.
Meanwhile, we had a report from Jamie McIntyre.
How much of the plane actually impacted the building?
You know, it might have appeared that way, but from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
The only site is the actual site of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left That you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand.
There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse.
Now, even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon, you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn't happen immediately.
It wasn't until almost about 45 minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.
He makes a nice point that the floors didn't collapse for 45 minutes later.
I think they looked at the damage and decided it didn't look bad enough, so they brought down a chunk of the Pentagon.
Scott Bennett drove past the Pentagon the following morning and has confirmed in his own eyewitness report no plane that hit the Pentagon.
This is the official trajectory.
This is a Boeing 757 purportedly barely skimming the ground at over 400 miles an hour and taking out a series of lampposts.
Well, number one, if a Boeing 757 had taken out a series of lampposts and by Newton's third law the impact of the plane flying over 400 miles an hour hitting stationary lampposts would be the same as if the plane were stationary hit by lampposts traveling over 400 miles an hour They would have ripped open the wings, the fuel stored there would have mixed with air, exploded, and you would have had debris all over the Pentagon lawn.
So clearly that did not happen.
The debris was not there.
I've shown you the photographs.
There are many, and Scott Bennett confirmed it as a witness himself.
Moreover, I have discussed this trajectory with pilots and aeronautical engineers, and it turns out that because of the phenomenon known as downdraft, sometimes also called ground effect, that a Boeing 757 traveling over 400 miles an hour could not have got closer than 60 or even 80 feet to the ground, where 80 feet is higher than the Pentagon at some 77 feet is tall.
I have a whole book about it, America Nuked on 9-11, which also incorporates the kind of results that Joe Olson was reporting with us yesterday.
Somewhat to my surprise, this book has not been banned by Amazon.
How about more Parkland anomalies?
The injured students.
Students with AR-15 wounds that healed miraculously rapidly.
This was done using fake bullets that are called Simunition, that sting like a bee but don't actually penetrate the skin.
And then, of course, we have Alice and I've already reported, actually, it was like a movie.
It looked so real, but it felt so fake.
Get this.
I mean, this is embarrassingly bad.
This is a Dr. Nichaprenko who said wounds on Maddy Wilford's chest and abdomen had already healed.
Young people have a tendency to heal very fast, he said.
A bullet wound on her upper arm, which had injured two tendons, would take more time.
Listen to this.
She's very, very lucky, Dr. Nichaprenko said.
We're talking about large caliber bullets penetrating through chest and abdomen.
Those are serious injuries.
Well, they certainly are, but the AR-15 fires a small caliber .223 bullet at high velocity.
So it's not large caliber, but it is at high velocity.
And if anyone were hit in the chest or the abdomen, they would not be walking around, they would be dead.
I mean, it's just stunning for him to make this claim.
She's very, very lucky.
Yes, lucky indeed.
It's a miracle.
He said she believes she'd be ready to return to school next week and make a full recovery.
I mean, this is absurd beyond belief.
Here's the AR-15.
As I say, it fires a .223 Remington or the 5.56 NATO round.
It's a wonderful weapon because it's lightweight, it's very versatile.
It's the ideal weapon for home defense or if you have to deal with mob, rioters, so forth.
Remember the two attorneys who came out in St.
Louis to defend their home?
They've of course been prosecuted by District attorney who's there because George Soros funded across the country district attorneys to invert American legal system.
Here's another.
This is Fuentes.
Amazingly, she was released from the hospital and is walking and being interviewed by reporters after only one week.
And her two legs now require only band-aids for the AR-15 wounds.
I mean, Yes, this is not only amazing, it's a complete and utter miracle.
Even the New York Times actually published a piece about the traumatic damage to legs when they're hit by an AR-15.
Trauma surgeons tell what it's really like to try to repair such devastating injuries.
Bones are exploded, soft tissue is absolutely destroyed.
The idea that these But these alleged victims would be walking around, you know, days later with band-aids on their wounds or fully recovered from abdominal or chest work is a medical absurdity.
It's impossible.
Meanwhile, here was one of the students.
This was fairly astonishing.
I mean, this is how they pile on.
She was in Holocaust class.
Holocaust class.
Give me a break.
And here's this ammunition, it's made out of laundry detergents and beeswax, so that, as I say, you can fire it at a person and it will create a welt, but it won't penetrate the skin.
So, here we had a teacher, Stacey LaPelle, reporting that she saw the shooter in full metal garb, helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor, And it turns out that if it had been Nicholas Cruz, who was alleged to have been the shooter, then he managed to watch from the curb before the Uber driver had dropped him off, to the east stairway, put on full metal garb of helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor, begin shooting in 2 minutes and 33 seconds.
This is completely absurd.
The teacher said she didn't recognize the weapon he was using, and that appears to have been because it was a SIM gun firing simulated ammunition.
Now, if you want to appreciate the enormity of false flag attacks, here's a wonderful piece by Harrison Hanks you want to appreciate.
Are you an elite?
Are your staged attacks not going as planned?
Are your globalist agendas failing because you're using subpar crisis actors?
Well then look no further.
Hi, I'm Harrison Hanks, the ultimate crisis actor.
Need a medical doctor?
In 18 years as a medical examiner, I've never seen anything like it.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's over the top.
33 children died.
Do you need a grieving husband?
Did a right-winger set off a bomb?
Well, yeah, we were just meeting about it and it had a massive explosion.
And I'm your man.
Tired of melodramatic acting.
There's light away from the darkness.
I'm just trying to figure out if he's okay.
I lost my 20-year-old, but I had 20 years with my son.
It's just tragedy.
Horror.
Or maybe you need me to tone down my good acting to match your sorry lot of wannabes.
In that case, I can go from this.
My name is Bobby Parmer.
My family is one of the families that lost a child.
To this.
My name is Bobby Parmer.
And my family is one of the families that lost a child.
Going for the guns takes subtlety.
Like this.
I don't know how many more need to die before the President does something.
Not this!
Please, could we do something with the assault weapons?
And every one of those hands is a reason why those weapons should not be out in the general public.
Because in this kind of a situation, what has changed?
Have we learned nothing?
Tired of green screen mishaps and disappearing noses?
Me too.
Is there anything else you want to say?
I'm green screen ready, bonded, and insured.
I can morph into a thousand different faces, I offer reasonable rates, and I have no conscience.
Just pick your card to play on the world stage.
From homeless to police officer, from doctor To witness, to your ace card, the grieving father.
You can count on Harrison Hanks to push through your agenda.
Regain their trust.
Call Harrison Hanks for all your crisis needs.
Thank you and good luck.
Harrison Hanks is sensational.
Meanwhile, we have the New Zealand shooting, the fake attacks on two mosques.
Even more amateurish than the Boston bombing scam.
We have footage showing shell casings disappearing in midair.
Crystal clear case of staging an attack to grab the guns, which they've got.
Here's a piece by Robert David Steele talking about the New Zealand Falls flag.
My bottom line up front, a sailor tapes himself driving to a mosque.
Nazi-era music playing from the start.
Feel of a video game or a whole movie.
Three fake weapons on the floor of the car.
Turns in after passing three red cars.
An officer there directing him to turn.
Opens trunk to see plastic fake guns.
Walks up to Moss and fires blast.
No blood, no screams, no bullets.
Piles of bodies before entering the room.
There are exits, but no one tries to escape.
Close-up shots, no entry wounds, fires down an alley when no one's there, even a photo of a director with a crew.
The New Zealand government should fall over this.
A formal post is being created by Dr. James Fetzer.
Well, he says a nice thing here.
One of America's foremost scholar investigators with respect to false flag operations.
Here you see, I have the video which has been banned in New Zealand.
You can get 10 years in jail for merely having this on your computer.
But you see, he walks into a room, he's not even fired, and there are already piles of body there.
You can check it out if you go to jimtheconspiracyguide.com.
Meanwhile, what are they trying to hide?
Out of all the violent videos on the net, possessing the New Zealand moss shooting can now get you 10 years in prison.
That's the alleged shooter.
That's one of the moss.
Meanwhile, here, just to see how they fake shell casings coming out of a fake gun.
to watch this.
Notice the ejected brass disappear in midair.
you.
Never hits the ground.
There's even an arrow.
Look at the arrow here on the weapon to show where the ejection has to be added by CGI.
This is a computer-generated image.
It's total fakery.
They use this fake event in order to confiscate weapons throughout New Zealand.
At the other mosque, you have similar fakery taking place.
Very embarrassing.
Check it out at jimtheconspiracyguy.com.
Here you have New Zealand mosque shooting, cabinet backs, gun laws change within 10 days.
Robert Steele, I published on my blog, New Zealand falls flag to disarm America or even start World War Three.
Robert David Steele, a former Marine Corps infantry officer and CIA spy as well as an activist for open source everything engineering.
Regularly answers questions for the Tehran Times.
That's very nicely done.
Meanwhile, we have after multiple reports about New Zealanders turning in guns, guess how many actually did it?
Out of an estimated 1.2 million registered guns, New Zealand police reported that as of Tuesday night, 37 37 firearms have been surrendered and as well as well they should not be given up.
Meanwhile, more 9-11 anomalies.
This is a South Tower crash.
What we see in the videos, and there are some 52 of them, is a aerodynamically impossible approach with a Boeing 767, violations of the laws of physics and of engineering at the entry, no airplane debris beneath the facades of either of the towers.
Here you see the plane approaching the building.
You see the plane approaching the South Tower.
It turns out that it's traveling at a rate that is too fast for the Boeing 767 to retain its structural integrity.
The pilots for 9-11 Truth, which have done brilliant research on the aircraft on 9-11, I found that the plane would have physically come apart in the air at the speed shown in the video.
Check it out.
9-11 Intercepted.
Brought to you by Pilots for 9-11 Truth.
Here you see a frame of the plane disappearing into the building.
It's sometimes been, you know, talked about a ghost plane or a butter plane as though the 110-story massive steel and concrete building were made out of butter.
It turns out the plane was intersecting with eight different floors.
Each floor had a steel truss connected at one end to the massive core columns at the other to the external steel support columns, which as Joe Olson emphasized, were quite formidable in and of themselves, filled with Four to eight inches of concrete.
The variance being because the depth of the grooves and the trusses were four inches deep, so at some location four, at other eight.
Because the buildings were 208 feet at a side, that means each floor represented an acre of concrete on a steel truss.
The plane was intersecting with eight of them.
It ought to have crumpled external to the building, as Ace Baker has shown in his 9-11 Psy Opera, which I highly recommend.
Ought to have crumpled external to the building, but we have plenty of photographic evidence beneath the facades, and there's no aluminum debris, no bodies, no seats, no luggage, no wings, no tail.
Here you see Jack White illustrating how the jetliner melts through steel.
Now what's fascinating is that we've done studies of the two of the videos, the Evan Fairbanks and the Hazard Connie video, and the plane disappears its entire length into the building in the same number of frames it passes its entire length through air, Which is a physical impossibility, a complete absurdity, unless a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building poses no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air.
Jack even noticed the oddity that the cameras actually showed the nose of the plane breaking through here at the lower left When the video, the TV feed, went to black.
They put fade to black.
So here you have what ought to be the most historic footage in American history being taken, and the studios fade to black.
Why?
Because of some hand-eye coordination problem.
The nose perked out, which is, of course, complete rubbish.
The nose of an aircraft is among its most fragile features, because it has all the electronic stage there.
There have been various debates about how this was done.
Three different theories, one by Rosalie Grable, known as the Web Fairy, now departed this earth, thought it was done with CGI.
Ace Baker, who, as I say, produced the 9-11 Psy Opera, thought it was done with video compositing, meaning between the time the actual footage was taken and the 17 seconds later its release, the images of the planes were added.
However, the actual explanation appears to be more complex.
It appears to have been a sophisticated hologram using a technology, the existence of which isn't known to the public, and that is the reason why you had the nose out.
The basic evidence refuting Both Rosalie Gable and Ace Baker's theory is that we had hundreds of witnesses reporting seeing a plane approach the building in real time.
Now they differed in their descriptions.
Some said it was a large plane, some said it was a small plane, some said it was a military plane, some said it was a commercial plane.
But this includes like about 200 firemen who are not known for being duplicitous or other than truthful.
Had it been done with CGI or with video compositing, however, you would have only seen the plane in the broadcast footage, not in real time.
Jack also noticed that there was an engine found at church in Murray.
It was simply sitting on the sidewalk.
It was under a steel scaffolding and a canopy, which were undamaged.
He very resourcefully discovered Fox News footage of a white van We had a group of four or five individuals in FBI vests unloading something heavy from the van.
Now, several comments.
It turns out this piece of engine was antiquated, not currently in use in Boeing 767s, obviously a plant.
If it had hit the sidewalk with such mass at velocity, it would have torn up the sidewalk.
It's just sitting on the sidewalk.
It's pretty obvious that this was an attempt to deceive the public by planted evidence, which once again leads you to ask, who exactly was involved in bringing us 9-11?
And the answer becomes increasingly clear.
Here's what I'm suggesting, that it was actually done with an airborne holographic projector.
I was sent this page from an Australian military manual.
The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator.
The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management.
Also useful for optical deception and cloaking, notice you have the plane projecting the image of another plane.
I go into this in great detail in other of my reports about 9-11, which you can find, for example, a recent On Jim the Conspiracy Guide.
Meanwhile, there's a lot of reports about all of this.
In America Nuked on 9-11, Joe Olson laid out some of the basics, which again, I report, it turns out that Amazon has not yet banned.
Meanwhile, JFK anomalies.
I'm actually going to be dealing with this with David Bantik later today, but let me go forward now.
Witnesses were discounted by the x-rays.
Many witnesses reported a blowout at the back of the head.
This was discounted on the ground that the cranial x-rays did not show it.
But the x-rays were patched in order to conceal the blowout.
Here you have witness after witness from Parkland and elsewhere, Beverly Oliver, Phil Willis, Marilyn Willis, right there at Dealey Plaza, saw his brains blown out the back of his head.
Ed Hoffman was on the triple underpass, he too.
Physician after physician, Dr. McClellan, Dr. Peters, Dr. Salyer, Dr. Carrico, Dr. Delaney, Dr. Carrico, Dr. Jones, Nurse Aubrey Bell, all saw this fist-sized blowout at the back of the head.
Theron Ward, the justice of the peace, observed it too.
Aubrey Wright actually helped to pick up the body when it was wrapped in sheets and put into the bronze ceremonial casket, and he could feel the blowout with his hand.
Charles Crenshaw was the last physician to observe the body prior to its being placed, and he closed JFK's eyes and, as I recall, even removed his wedding ring.
Meanwhile, even at Bethesda, several of the medical techs involved Gerald Custer, Paul O'Connor, Floyd Reby reported the blowout.
David Mante, who has both a Ph.D.
in physics from Wisconsin and an M.D.
from Michigan, is board certified in radiation oncology, which is treatment of cancer using x-ray therapy.
He told me when our first conversation before I went into the archives, this is in late 1992, that he thought he'd discover that the autopsy x-rays had been altered, and also that he'd find evidence of a second shot to the head.
He, in fact, found both.
He discovered, using a technique from physics known as optical densitometry, that enables you to measure the relative amount of light that passes through an x-ray when you examine it to establish a relative density of the objects whose exposure created the image, that there was an area at the back of the head called area P for patch that was much too dense.
To be human bone.
It occurred to me that even though in the Zapruder film they'd gone to great lengths in order to eradicate, to black out the blowout at the back of the head, that it might be possible that in later frames they overlooked, and indeed in frame 374, I discover you can actually see the blood at the back of the head.
It's this bluish gray.
Remember, we refer to brain as gray matter.
This is a skull flap that's blown open.
I explain all this in detail if you go to Jim the Conspiracy Guy.
Here you have some hair hanging over.
But notice the striking resemblance between David's definition of Area P and what we captured.
On the, in frame 374.
Here you can see it's actually been blacked out in the back.
There you can see it in frame 374.
Once again, and this would turn out to be the fourth of my books on JFK, Who, How, and Why?
Solving the World's Greatest Murder Mystery.
▲
Export Selection