All Episodes
Previous Next
April 10, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:50
Free Range Gail of Gaia (9 April 2021)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, whatever time it is wherever you are.
This is Gail of Gaia and this is Free Range where we graze on wild ideas and actually conspiracy facts you might say today.
I'm here with James Petzer, who is a serious investigator into false flags.
We're going to take a look at a couple of them.
And then we're also going to take another look at what's going on in the gun control area and what happens to every civilization when guns are taken away from the people.
Anyway, James, let's start with our Jim, whichever you prefer.
Let's start with Jim.
Yeah.
Okay, Jim, let's start with, what about the James Floyd incident?
What do you know about that?
George.
George.
What did I say?
Did I say James?
I'm sorry, George Floyd!
Now listen, when you mention about false flags, you know, I mean, I've been doing serious research on these issues actually since 1992.
I began with JFK, 9-11, founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth, Paul Wellstone.
Since my retirement in 2006, I've actually been devoting myself to bringing together experts, groups of experts on these various cases that take them apart, and that includes Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas,
And Gail, I can guarantee you they're orchestrating these events to promote their political agenda, especially with like an emotional, oh my God, 20 children, little children, first graders shot at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.
But it all turns out to be nonsense.
You know, a lot of these kids wound up singing at the Super Bowl.
They were faking the children by using photographs of older children when they were younger.
One of my colleagues even found reason to believe some of the parents were using photographs of themselves when they were children.
It's unbelievable what people will do for money and fool the rest of their brothers and sisters in the country and doing great harm, in my opinion.
But there was a recent shooting, too, in Boulder.
I mean, these shootings are set up for a reason.
But back to George, George Floyd, have we had any information on that?
And you can share.
I was leading up to explain that.
With my background, you know, I look at these things a little differently and tend to dissect them from beginning to end.
And I also organize conferences.
I have had a website, jimtheconspiracyguy.com.
I saw that.
That's great.
65 presentations, Gail.
What I recommend especially For those who are getting their feet wet, you know, or getting their minds open to what really is going on behind the scene, rather than the mere media narrative thereof, is how to spot a false flag part one and how to spot a false flag part two.
Oh, that's awesome.
You also find a variation on that, I think it was three parts, with Dr. Katherine Horton, who is a PhD in particle physics from Oxford, who is the leading expert on the legal issues surrounding targeted individuals, where she's doing her best to bring This practice to an end of using directed energy weapons to harass and torment, of which she herself has been a target, a victim.
She's a marvelous person.
So there are two options.
There's my original, How to Spot a False Flag, Part 1 and Part 2, where all together I'm going through a dozen or 16.
And then I have the second version with Katherine Horton.
It may even be four parts.
Oh wow, I haven't seen anything from her and that's very interesting about targeted individuals and those directed weaponry and what that does to people.
And let me add, you see, so I organized a conference on false flags and conspiracies held on the 5th and the 6th of December last And I moderated, organized 24 presentations.
Now, what makes this so relevant is that I've made them all available to the public for free, Gail.
That's awesome.
So anyone can go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
Falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
And if you go to the upper right hand, there's a little, you know, access the archive.
You go in there and you put in some personal information just so we know who's actually downloading.
It's not financial.
This has nothing to do with money.
Everything's free.
But you just go there, fill in your personal information, fill up your shopping cart with as many of these 24 programs as you like.
And of course, you can come back and pick up more.
And then you can, it'll show up on your shopping cart.
You just press the red dot for each of them and they download directly to your computer desktop.
Oh, wow.
That's awesome.
I haven't been there myself.
I'll have to check that out.
Couldn't be simpler.
And I mentioned this because I give the very first speaker, Kelly Watt is an expert.
She just got drawn into it inadvertently.
She has her own commercial and home cleaning service so that she knew that blood is a biohazard,
that the proper disposition of blood requires documentation from source to disposition.
And she began making inquiries just out of curiosity as to who cleaned up the blood.
And none of the Connecticut agencies could answer the question.
And she was eventually directed to Lieutenant Paul Vance, who
was in charge of the Connecticut State Police on that occasion.
And she asked him who cleaned up the blood, and Vance just blurted out, what blood?
Because, of course, there wasn't actually any blood, but he wasn't supposed to make it so obvious, so it was just wonderful.
Kelly's the very first speaker, and I give an overview about Sandy Hook, and I just want everyone to know that if they're Interested in kind of a distillation of what happened at Sandy Hook.
It's right there already available when you go to falseflyconspiracies2020.com.
But so too is Dr. Katherine Horton, one of my speakers about targeted individuals.
So you've got her right at your fingertips.
You also have Dina Pollard's hat.
Can I stop you for one minute there?
I'm just out of curiosity.
What happens if somebody is hit with a directed energy weapon?
Or how do they use that against an individual, if I might ask?
Just out of curiosity.
Well, if you want to hear something very odd, they've used it to induce orgasms in Catherine.
So she'd just be walking along, they hit her, and she has an orgasm.
How about that?
They can do all kinds of damage, Gail.
I mean, this is really serious, serious mischief.
Really bad.
She's actually had to try to defend herself from a torrent, you know.
I mean, she's a true expert in this area.
I'll have to look her up.
I'll look her up.
Oh yeah.
She's fabulous.
She's absolutely fabulous.
Wonderful person.
We met, actually, in the original planning for this event on False Flags and Conspiracy 2020.
It was going to be held in New Orleans, and we had a planning session in Bay St.
Louis, which is nearby.
And Catherine was among those who joined with me to participate in the planning.
It turned out because of the coronavirus, we couldn't go forward in New Orleans.
Yeah, they've messed stuff up.
I wound up doing it virtually, and it worked out wonderfully, and now everyone has it all at their fingertips.
Another case that I think people would want to follow up on is Dina Pollard Sachs, who's just a brilliant attorney who has published two volumes on the godfathers of sex abuse.
Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, and Jeffrey Epstein.
And you'll love her talk.
She's just a dynamo.
Gives an absolutely sensational presentation.
What's her name again?
Dr. Paula?
Dina Pollard-Sacks.
Dina D-E-N-A Pollard-Sacks.
S-A-C-K-S.
And then I give another presentation about Deception galore, where I go into how recent Democrat presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden have used body doubles
Even in their national debates, when the debate of Hillary with Bernie Sanders, it wasn't Hillary, it was a body double.
The debate with Donald Trump, it wasn't Hillary, it was a body double.
And when you look at Hillary's condition at the time, the body double was the right choice because she was younger, healthier, much more attractive.
You know, she made a much better, more appealing candidate than Hillary, who was in very bad shape.
I also do an expose about our most admired woman, Michelle Obama, who was actually born Michael LeVon Robinson, Gail.
I know that one, yeah.
It's not a man who underwent a sex change, but a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
But I also suppose the hate crimes, the Democrats are just faking this stuff right and left.
So there's an expose of the Jesse Smollett hate crime in Chicago on the coldest day of the year, where he's supposed to be assaulted by two rednecks carrying a bottle of bleach and a noose.
Who's gonna be out at 2am in the morning, you know, to run into a black gay actor who's coming out of a subway to assault him, and you're already carrying a bottle of bleach, it's so cold it's frozen, and you got a noose to put around his neck?
Gail, it was two Nigerian bodybuilders, one of whom was Jussie Small's personal trainer, the other an extra on the set of Empire, where he was an actor.
They have video of them buying this stuff at a hardware store and he paid them with a personal check for $3,500.
Gail, he paid him with a personal check for $3,500.
Oh my God.
personal check for $30,500.
Oh my God, I don't believe it.
You gotta watch it.
You know, I lay it all out.
And where is that one?
Where's that one at?
That's also at the False Flags and Conspiracies.
I have three presentations.
The first on Sandy Hook, the second Deception Galore, which includes this, and then the third is about scientific reasoning, how you reason scientifically to take apart false flags and so forth.
Mm-hmm.
Wow.
All there for free.
And it included, now, when I did the three hate crimes, I did the Jussie Smollett, but also George Floyd, and then Bubba Wallace.
The Bubba Wallace thing was trivial.
This was a hang cord just to pull down a garage door.
It didn't even look like a noose.
Yeah, I remember that.
I remember that, too.
Tied it to look like a noose.
In other words, NASCAR's complicit.
In this fraud on the American people.
And then George Floyd, it will, you know.
What I discovered about George Floyd is rather stunning because based on the evidence available, it turned out that when he was arrested and handcuffed behind his back and put into the police car, that would normally be the occasion for driving him to the precinct.
Where he would be booked and fingerprinted and mug shots.
But instead, and heretofore I'd never seen any video of the other side, he was taken out the other side, very odd in and of itself, placed on the ground.
And then we had the whole exercise with this officer, Derek Chauvin, putting his knee on his neck.
What I noticed and I was not alone.
I mean, he lost his hair in the meanwhile.
In other words, a guy had, you know, when he's lying on the ground, he's got a shiny palette, not a hair on his head.
Exactly.
Exactly.
He's been handcuffed behind his back.
Now his hand is in front of his chest.
And it turns out they were using a Sigma-7 African-American windpipe training dummy for the exercise.
When he's lifted up to be put on a gurney, he has no legs.
He has no legs, Gale.
So I expose all this now.
What we have going on at the trial has assumed a rather different character.
Where, by the way, even the identity of Officer Chauvin has been in doubt because there are any number of studies that suggest the guy who's on trial isn't the same guy who had his knee on the body.
Now, This this trial is sweeping America very much like OJ.
I actually sacrificed a whole sabbatical to the OJ Simpson trial.
I became so engaged that Gail, I recorded every episode of the trial, but also Geraldo Rivera at the time was doing something useful.
He was actually having experts on his show to talk about and dissect what was taking place in the trial.
He was doing fringe issues that make a difference to the American people, and he had very good people talking about him to sort him out.
It was like he was doing false flags and conspiracies of his time.
Maybe not as systematically and deliberately as I, but frequently he was doing very, very good reporting and unearthing lots of important details.
The mainstream was missing.
Yeah, they don't seem to do that anymore.
They seem to... investigative reporting has really gone out the window.
Since Geraldo became a legitimate journalist, he hasn't been worth a damn.
Honestly, he hasn't done anything significant.
I mean, it's just a waste, because he actually was doing something really good when he was sort of the gonzo journalist.
He was, you know, Al Capone's vault.
I mean, some of this stuff was silly, but a whole lot of it was really very significant.
Maybe he got bought out.
That's usually what happens.
Say again?
I said maybe he got bought out.
Well, yeah, he went legit and he became worthless.
I mean, the guy's a tool.
I see him on Fox, you know, because I watch, they're doing a better job of dealing with issues, at least Tucker and Hannity and Laura.
Those are probably the only three shows worth watching.
And I think Tucker is the best, Laura and Hannity third, but Hannity often has good interviews, even including with Donald Trump that no one else is getting.
So, you know, there's a lot of good stuff there on Fox.
But when they have Geraldo on as a commentator, he's just a waste.
He's just a waste.
I haven't yet to see him say anything that was both significant and true in his role as a legitimate journalist.
I mean, it's very disappointing.
Now, yeah, he was better when he was younger or money before he became a legitimate journalist.
What is that?
Yeah.
Somehow that corrupts you, apparently.
So after the event in Minnesota, of course, we had all this massive looting and rioting, even people were getting killed.
And the Democrat political leaders of Minneapolis, Portland, Seattle went right with the flow.
They let it happen.
They wouldn't allow the police to respond.
I mean, it was a chaos, a summer of chaos.
And the damage it did to businesses in all three of those communities was terrible.
Probably the most horrific, right, in Minneapolis.
Or Sigma-7, by the way, the company that manufactured this African-American Well, do we know what happened to the real George Floyd?
out of Minneapolis almost immediately when the riots took place, maybe worried that they
were going to be implicated in the whole.
Well, do we know what happened to the real George Floyd?
Well, that's a great question because there's an attorney in Texas who says he represented
George Floyd, who died three years ago.
So that does that imply the possibility that the guy was not the original man to begin
with an actor or something of that nature or someone that could pass for him, maybe
a body double or whatever, because why else would they have him in the car?
And then all of a sudden there's a dummy out that he's leaning on his neck over.
Let me give you two or three commentaries about that.
Okay.
The George Floyd who's shown in the video is the same as a George Floyd who's a porn actor.
Okay.
They actually got some of his films out there and it's clearly the same guy.
Now he's also someone who's been involved in dealing drugs.
In fact, there's a very significant aspect to this because it may well be that the death
of this man was not caused by asphyxiation by a knee on the neck, but by his ingesting
drugs he had in his possession.
He didn't want the police to secure his evidence that he'd been dealing drugs, so he ate them.
In fact, the defense has now put out a video, Gail, where you can hear George Floyd saying, I ate too many drugs.
I ate too many drugs.
I mean, think of the stupidity of this, taking this, you know, powerful, that's probably fentanyl or methamphetamines and ingesting it as though your stomach wasn't going to dissolve them.
You know, we have this problem with mules who are transporting heroin inside their bodies where the heroin is in prophylactics.
They put them in rubbers, you know, they fill up a rubber with heroin or whatnot, and they put it in the rectum or the stomach of the mule.
And if it breaks, the mules die of a drug overdose.
And it may be analogous in the case of George Floyd.
Now, let me give you the official recap here, because according, you know, to the prosecutors, this is now the prosecution case.
And this is being broadcast every day now on television.
My wife's typically watching, even if I'm down doing a show, she's watching the trial.
So I go up there and I pick up bits and pieces, but I'm also following the reports.
You know, in the media and to sift and sort them for my own shows because I'm reporting on this sort of thing as a
regular matter.
According to the police, and we see this on the video when he's first apprehended in the car. It's bizarre Gail.
He's like a little girl.
He's just whining.
He's whining.
He doesn't want to be arrested.
I mean, this is a great big guy.
I mean, he's probably 6'3", 6'4", you know?
And here he is whining like a little girl.
He doesn't want to be arrested.
He won't let go of the steering wheel to his car.
They have to kind of force him out.
And then once they get him manacled and put him into the car, he's still struggling.
Now, it's very significant that even before they get him into the backseat, he's saying, I can't breathe.
He says this about 18 different times, Gail, altogether.
And what's significant is that turns out to be a symptom of drug overdose.
They have difficulty with your respiratory system because it's, as it were, shutting down, so you can't breathe.
Well, the fact that he's always saying he can't breathe means when, you know, Officer Chauvin has his knee on the body and he's saying he can't breathe, that's not necessarily a result of Chauvin having his knee on his body, in fact.
According to the judge now, they've actually established that his knee was not on his neck, but actually was on his shoulder blades, or his shoulder, so that the judge will not allow the prosecution to say the knee was on the neck.
So they've reverted to saying the knee was in the area adjacent to the neck, or the neck adjacent area, or the area of the neck.
Can they prove that with the pictures or what?
That it was not actually on the neck.
Yes, yes, yes.
What about that being a dummy?
Where does the dummy come in?
Well, this is very interesting because during the trial now, they've shown footage that I'd never seen before.
And you do see what appears to be the actual George Floyd coming out of the other side.
And it's all bizarre.
See, if we take the dummy business, To one side, if you just follow now what's taking place during the trial and accept it at face value, assume this actually is George Floyd, didn't die three years ago, because all these questions about the authenticity of evidence are legitimate questions, but they're not present during the trial.
My diagnosis of the way the trial is unfolding is as follows.
The prosecution has introduced some witnesses who are testifying that this was excessive use of force, even the chief of police or the former chief of police of Minneapolis.
However, it's also the case that this is what Minneapolis police officers are instructed to do to subdue a subject who is resisting arrest.
Wait a minute.
Let me stop you right there.
How can you say he was really resisting arrest when he's whining like a child and he's not really...
Yeah, he's lying on the ground.
He doesn't appear to be resisting at all.
And that's their excuse for everything, no matter what they do.
I mean, I have issues with the police.
Yeah, he's lying on the ground.
He doesn't appear to be resisting at all.
And he's still managing to say, I can't breathe, which other witnesses have observed or commentators.
You know, if you can say you can't breathe, you can breathe.
I mean, you couldn't say you can't breathe if you couldn't actually breathe.
So what he's saying.
That's true, because you know how you could compare that.
Like if you're running, you get to a certain point.
You can't talk anymore because you can't you have to all your breathing has to be for Excellent.
Continuing what you're doing.
So in a way, he can't talk.
But it is consistent.
No, I like it.
But it is consistent with his respiratory system shutting down, see?
As from a drug overdose.
So that, you know, You've got the kneeling, but not only are there witnesses saying it was excessive use of force, there are also witnesses saying he died of asphyxiation, but there are other witnesses that are contradicting those accounts.
For example, saying that you have the two major arteries, the carotid artery on each side.
Carotids, yeah.
Yeah.
If you shut off one, you still have blood flow for the other.
So the witness was saying, yeah, if you shut down one, it's not going to cause him to be rendered unconscious because he still has blood flow from the other side.
And we have a toxicology report that he had more than enough fentanyl and amphetamines and cannabis.
I mean, he was loaded.
He was a walking chemical laboratory, Gail.
I mean, this guy had all kinds of drugs, okay?
They brought in this somewhat controversial medical examiner, Michael Batten, who'd been a temporary medical examiner for New York City for maybe a couple of months.
I actually called them up, the New York Medical Examiner's Office, to ask about Batten because he was the head of the medical panel for the House Select Committee on Assassinations when they reviewed the assassination of JFK.
He gave a report that was published in 1979 that in terms of the head wound to JFK, and he had actually more than one, he was hit in the back of the head by a shot that caused him to slump forward, which was fired from the Daltex.
So this was the guy that was involved with that?
Is that what you're saying?
He was the head of the medical panel for the House Select Committee when it reinvestigated the deaths of JFK and MLK.
And he's involved in this other one now?
Yeah, they brought him in to do an autopsy on George Floyd.
How old is he?
Oh, he's up there.
But I mean, the point is, he has seemingly impressive credentials.
And he concluded that he died from a drug overdose.
And frankly, there's a lot of evidence to substantiate.
The point I'm making is that he had a dubious role in this reinvestigation because at Parkland, The physicians who were observing Jack reported, consistent with eyewitnesses in Dealey Plaza and some of the medical technicians at Bethesda, that Jack had a fist-sized wound at the back of his head.
You know, right about here, where if you, you know, rest in a tub, you have that little bump there.
There was a fist-sized wound there.
Fist-sized.
We have drawings of it.
When I published my first book on the assassination, bringing together a group of experts, I had one of the physicians draw the wound from the side and the back.
It was a very substantial wound.
It corresponds very closely with another drawing.
The one I had was from Charles Crenshaw, MD.
There's one by Dr. Robert McClellan.
He didn't actually draw it, but he told the sketch artist how to draw it, and then they proved it.
They'd have this fist-sized blowout at the back of the head.
Well, if you looked at the official autopsy for Bethesda Gale, the whole back of the head is missing,
all the way upward to the top of the head.
What happened?
James Humes, who was a Navy officer, had never performed an autopsy on a gunshot victim before,
took a cranial saw to the skull of JFK, and enormously enlarged the wound,
so it would look like something that could have happened if JFK had been leaning forward by a shot from behind.
Because remember, the government committed itself to three shots from behind.
They actually changed the body physically by enlarging the wound, but you can find the description in the Bethesda autopsy report in medical detail.
So this same guy has something to do with George?
Let me come to the point.
When the House Select Committee reinvestigated They reconstituted the back of the head.
There's no fist size wound.
There's no missing back of the head.
It's now all of a piece.
It's all back together.
And the hole from that shot lower down is now moved up to the top of the head.
I mean, it's absurd.
Anyone who looks at this says there's something grossly wrong here.
And Michael Batten, whom the Floyd family hired to do a second autopsy, was the head of the medical panel that perpetrated that fraud on the American people.
Wow.
Okay.
I see where you're at.
Now get, now get this.
The Floyd family has been given $27 million by the city of Minneapolis.
And I would suggest that's hush money to just go along with the program.
Okay.
There's something terribly, terribly wrong.
I mean, look, there are ways that actuaries go ahead.
No, I saw pictures of the casket, which was the size of a child, not of a grown, very tall man.
Excellent!
Gail, you're right on top of this.
That's right.
That's wonderful.
Let me give you a parallel.
I'm going, what?
At the Charleston, you remember the church shooting where all these black people were supposed to have been killed?
They had an open casket for their minister, who was supposed to be a celebrated preacher.
But when you looked at the guy in the casket, he didn't look at all like their celebrated preacher.
He had a much darker skin tone.
He had different physical features.
He looked more like a Haitian.
This guy looked more like an African-American.
You know, I'm telling you, they do these things.
And you're exactly right.
You know, in Sandy Hook, one of the deceased children turned up at his own funeral.
I mean, you just couldn't keep away.
Yeah, that's what they said about George Floyd there for a while, too.
Right, he's supposed to... Suddenly he has a twin brother?
No one had ever heard of him before?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, I mean... How dumb?
How dumb?
Was this whole thing... What was the purpose of this?
Was this to defund the police?
Or was this to... How dumb are we supposed to be, Gail?
He's got a twin brother?
Yeah, right.
Yeah.
And if you observe, the casket was much too small.
This was a big guy.
They would have cut off his legs and put him on the side!
I mean, come on!
Listen, I didn't say, but the last time I discussed, I meant to mention, if you had detached his body parts, you couldn't have crammed them all into this little casket.
It's ridiculous!
I mean, it's just ridiculous!
Okay, now here's the deal.
The jury, in order to find him guilty, has to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now, Sometimes that said, well, to a moral certainty, but that's vague language.
I can explain it very clearly.
It's beyond a reasonable doubt when no alternative explanation is reasonable.
In other words, there's not actually a credible alternative explanation of what happened.
But in this case, there is.
Because the explanation that he took these drugs, that he couldn't breathe because his respiratory system was shutting down, that he actually died from the dog overdose is, I would suggest, at least as reasonable as the idea that he was asphyxiated by this officer putting his knee on his neck.
And in fact, you know, we've got experts who say it wasn't even the judge, it wasn't actually on his neck.
But let me bring this up.
Isn't that an excellent way to manipulate the emotions of the black people?
For injustices that have been served to them by some police to cause all kinds of upset and riots and you name it.
I know that's just that's just a thought that comes to my mind because everything that happens in that realm sometimes it with false flags and so on and so forth.
It's so nefarious.
You're absolutely right.
But I mean, this whole thing was, appears to have been manufactured from the beginning, you know, by the selective editing, you can really change the context and leave out relevant information, create whatever impression you want.
It's very bad, but it's done a lot now.
And the media, you know, have become so totally political and, and.
I mean, it's just pushing their agenda.
Yeah.
We used to have a media that was responsible and reported more or less accurately on political developments.
In fact, Thomas Jefferson was once asked if he'd rather have a Government without newspapers or newspapers without a government.
And he said, actually, he'd prefer the latter to the former.
But he never contemplated the state of the media we have today, which is so grossly and massively corrupt that the only way you can find out what's actually going on is to turn to the alternative media and do research for which most Americans are ill-equipped and not prepared.
Yeah, and you know what, another thing that just reminded me of a saying that Candace Owen put out, let's stop calling them the leftist media and the leftist groups and so on.
Let's call them for what they are, American communists.
Well, I'm sorry to say that- Or Marxists.
That's certainly the way things have gone, and it's tragic what's taking place.
I mean, this new, by the way, massive infrastructure bill has practically nothing to do with infrastructure, just as the coronavirus stimulus bill had practically nothing to do with coronavirus stimulus.
It was only 9% of the bill.
Gail, only 9% of that $1.9 trillion actually went for coronavirus stimulus to economic stimulus.
The rest was a Democratic Party wish list.
Yeah, to the people.
That was only 9% that went to the actual people, correct?
Yes, yes.
And now this new infrastructure is really the Democrats trying to convert us into a green society, because they don't understand that gas and oil aren't actually fossil fuels, but are produced by Earth, and there's a virtually endless supply.
That's a biotic or something like that.
I can't remember how.
Yeah.
Yes, exactly right.
I mean, they bought into the climate change, which is frankly nonsense, and they're going to change America because... They never talk about geoengineering when they talk about climate change either, as if that doesn't have a major impact on it.
Well, you know, I used to be open about climate change because, after all, since the 1850s, the Industrial Revolution, we've been dumping a lot of pollution into the atmosphere, and I presume that would make a difference.
But it turns out, from a global perspective, that Earth goes through various cycles of warming and cooling, and we're actually in a period of cooling.
Yeah, isn't it just the opposite of what they're saying?
That's the opposite of what they're saying.
And actually the crackpot idea of this guy, Bill Gates, who wants to create a reflective, uh, kind of like a nuclear dimming.
Yeah.
The dimming, right.
The dye flex sun's rays that could kill all life on earth.
Exactly.
Yeah.
The very insanity of that is, is unbelievable.
Gail.
It is completely, utterly insane.
Utterly insane.
Now, The Democrats want to move forward with a gun control agenda.
I mean, I'll explain to you why it's going to fail, but it won't be for lack of trying.
And it's going to fail because it was the Democrats themselves that promoted this idea of defunding the police.
And if you defund the police, who's going to protect you if you cannot protect yourself?
There's going to be no way around it.
If you can't protect yourself, you're out of it.
You're helpless.
You're at a loss.
We know when you call the police because, say, there's an intruder attempting to break into your home and you can't defend yourself, you're calling the police because they have guns when you do not.
But if you can't defend yourself, the police, even for emergencies, cannot show up for as long as 20 minutes.
Yes, I can understand people.
I'd like to make a point here.
One of the things that I can understand, or that I feel people have felt, that police have abused their positions of authority.
And many have.
And all police, I think, Um, if they're going to be police, I kind of prefer sheriffs because they're voted in, but you know, they all should have to retake an oath to the constitution and be required to abide by it.
And rather than defunding, you know, that's kind of crazy.
Well look, our political figures take oaths to the Constitution and they violate it regularly.
In fact, Biden's come out and said, and by the way, I don't believe this is the real Joe Biden.
I believe this is a fake.
He's an actor, but the point is he's the one in the role, playing the role of president.
He came out and said, none of the amendments to the Constitution are absolute.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
Yes, there is a history in court cases about, but you know, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, those are intended to be absolute with minor exceptions.
And the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, does not depend upon being a member of a militia, which the court has already ruled upon and can't even extend to military weapons.
The court has actually left that open.
Where, you know, there's this endless barrage of nonsense.
I mean, you mentioned Boulder, Colorado.
That's a completely fascinating case.
But the point I want to reiterate is I've done all this work, collaborative research on Sandy Hook, a Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas.
Those were all fake.
Every one of them was a staged event.
Now this woman, Heather Heyer, is supposed to have died as a result of an automobile accident in Charlottesville, actually appears to have died the day after from a heart attack.
But I'm and just this guy, you know, Steven Paddock, as I'm saying, we got a body line there.
But I mean, those are exceptions.
I mean, those are two individual featured players in these events.
Would you believe, Gail, that the woman, Susan Brough, who's supposed to be the mother of Heather Heyer, is a crisis actor who also played the role of the Donna Soto, the mother of Victoria Soto, a Sandy Hook teacher.
It's the same woman.
Oh, my God.
See, these same people keep doing this over and over again.
Now, they said that there was some police officer that died at the Boulder shooting.
What was that all about?
Oh, yeah.
I'll go there.
Let me just add, if anyone wants to get the idea about this crisis acting, it took me a long time to wrap my mind around it.
There's a wonderful video out there by Harrison Hanks.
Harrison Hanks.
Talking about the ultimate crisis actor.
He says, hey, have your crisis acting been subpar?
Do you want somebody better?
Then call Harrison Hanks.
And he talks about how he can play the grieving father.
He can play the medical expert.
He can play the eyewitness.
And he goes through.
Oh my God.
Gale, he intersperses actual crisis actors and shows how he would do it better.
Oh my God.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
In Orlando.
And they're okay with totally fooling the public and presenting a false narrative and getting paid for it.
I have issues with that.
They're getting paid for it.
Mark my words, they're getting paid for it.
In Las Vegas, this LA outfit called Crowds on Demand brought in I think as many as 500 crisis actors to seed the audience there.
So that when they heard the pre-recorded soundtrack, which had the sound of machine gun firing interspersed with military weapons which fire in three-shot blasts, and coordinated with special visual effects right in the center of the Mandalay Bay on the fourth floor, There was a light flashing to simulate a machine gun.
So you see the light flashing and you hear the sound from what is actually a pre-recorded soundtrack being played over the PA system and you assume the flashing light was a source of the sound.
I had a brilliant IT guy who realized The quality of the sound all over Las Vegas was too high.
You know, as they were real acoustics, you'd have significant variations, but because it was pre-recorded and being played through the PA system, they got a very high uniform rate, and it was just much too good a quality production.
And then they coordinate with the visual lights.
Would you believe the sheriff of Clark County claims there's no evidence of shots being fired from any other location than the 32nd floor of that wing of the hotel?
When we have the flashing lights right on the fourth floor in the middle of the hotel, with that coordinated with a soundtrack?
I mean, the sheriff, you know, he deserves to be run out of town, tarred and feathered, and put on a pole.
I mean, I'm telling you, it's outrageous.
Yeah, we have a lot of that all over, unfortunately, and I hope that we do get our constitutional republic back and these people are removed from their positions and held accountable for the things that they have done.
Gail, I'm with you.
Now, to turn to Boulder, the point of that preface was just that.
Don't be surprised if this is another fake attack.
You should anticipate, okay?
Because Biden's now coming out with a new gun control agenda, right?
This is the Democrats have wanted.
And it's a terrible, terrible idea.
And as I have already observed, they're not going to succeed because their defund the police agenda made it very clear to every American that they have to be able to defend themselves.
And where you have, you know, a stunning increase in gun sales, Gail, that includes a lot of Democrats who've never owned guns before and who recognize how they got to be able to defend themselves.
So here we have this situation where The Democrats' own political propaganda about defunding the police undermines the other move they want to make of taking guns away from the American people.
On that note, on that note right there, Jim, I'd like to, if you don't mind, I'd like to read what Jack Mullen wrote to Congressman McKinley, because people, listeners and so on, always want to, well, what can I do?
What can I do?
You can do exactly what Jack has done here, and that is, dear Congressman McKinley,
H.R. 127 is fundamentally repugnant to the Constitution for the United States of America.
The bill, if passed, is in violation of the highest law of the land and as such would be
void and without power of law. An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights. It imposes
no duties, affords no protection. It creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as
inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Norton and Shelby, 118 U.S.
425 and 1886.
That's one.
I know there's a Madison and Marbury too.
Now that communist leaning left has full control of the U.S.
federal government.
These four years will include endless obsessive and dangerous attacks on the right to free speech and to keep and bear arms.
As an American, and because of your sworn oath to the Constitution, you must oppose this bill and others like it.
Going forward, it bears repeating.
You are duty-bound to vote against this bill.
Furthermore, you must vigorously and voraciously Stand against color of law attempts to undermine constitutional law and the sovereignty of the American people.
No free people exist without the means to defend their rights.
Disarming Americans is a crime against the Constitution and the people and is a disgrace to those who created and defended American constitutional government.
Disarming a nation is always the stratagem of tyranny.
There are no exceptions.
Disarming Americans using vacuous claims and legal fictions, asserting national gun registration or the use of arbitrary and weaponized psychological evaluations to disqualify gun ownership is pure tyranny.
Please do the right thing and do your duty.
And the other thing related directly to that is Every population that ever gave up their guns, their government was up to something and it usually involved the murder and slaughter of thousands of their citizens.
Is that not true?
You got that right, Gail.
Dave Hodges, a couple of years ago, reminded us that in the 20th century, there were 19 demo sides.
That is to say, the slaughter of a whole society by its own government.
19, each of which was preceded by gun confiscation.
We must make sure that America does not become number 20.
They're working on it.
They're working on it.
They're trying to do that.
How insane!
Look, look, look.
Guns are important for so many different purposes, not just self-defense and your family.
Defend your home and your family.
That's obvious.
Also, to defend your community.
What if you're, you know, infiltrated by a gang of bikers and they start looting and raping or the riot spells over, you know, and you get a bunch of people in a suburban area who have come from an urban area.
You have to be able to defend your community.
And on a larger scale, the nation benefits from having a massive reserve of citizen soldiers, minimally 130 million strong,
who are armed and can come to the defense of the nation.
Emperor Hirohito, for example, was contemplating a Japanese invasion of the US mainland.
But it's by his right- I'm glad you're bringing that up.
Military advisors warned against it.
They said there'd be a sniper behind every blade of grass.
And today, of course, it's much, much worse, meaning we have many more armed Americans than were the case then.
So, of course, instead, he backed up and hit Pearl Harbor, which was a dastardly act.
But frankly, it's not more dastardly than the Democrats trying to take guns away from Americans.
Absolutely.
It turns out, Gail, that Americans use guns for defensive purposes millions of times every year.
And the estimates have it that we're saving the lives of 200,000 Americans every single year through the defensive use of guns.
The Democrats will never talk about that.
In fact, oddly, they only focus on AR-15s, which they falsely describe as weapons of war and as assault rifles, which is untrue.
Assault rifles and weapons of war are fully automatic.
But automatic weapons haven't been legal in the United States for, I don't know, 85 years or more.
You cannot own a fully automatic weapon.
Which, of course, the difference is you pull the trigger and it continues to fire automatically, loads the ammunition until you run out.
With a semi-automatic, it only fires one bullet for each one trigger pull.
And that's a standard.
This AR-15 they're going after is the most popular and versatile weapon.
It's surprisingly lightweight.
I fired one about six months ago.
I was very impressed with its versatility.
It's a perfect weapon for home defense, or for community defense, or for the national defense.
It's really good.
And that's why the Democrats want to take him, because they want to sabotage the United States.
Gayle, there's no other explanation.
Why would you take guns away from law-abiding citizens unless you had a nefarious objective?
They do have a nefarious objective, and they've already come out and said it indirectly when they said they were going to go after Trump supporters.
Oh, I know.
Think about that, you know.
Oh, what do you mean go after them?
You're going to kill them?
Is that what the plan is?
It really has those aspects and overtones, doesn't it?
It certainly does.
Now, it turns out that one of my brilliant colleagues, Dr. Ewan, who maintains the Fellowship of the Minds blog, years ago superimposed a 2016 electoral map over a 2014 murder map.
And would you believe all the areas where murders were most prevalent were controlled
by the Democratic Party, because they create these free fire zones that let the criminals
know, they're not going to be opposed by law abiding citizens that they can kill anyone
they want.
And, and it's just insane.
In other words, it's the Democrats' failure of government by stupidly assuming that an armed civilian is going to be more hazardous rather than more beneficial to the American public that has motivated these absurd moves.
And where the history of Chicago, Los Angeles, Another Democratic-controlled city demonstrates these are pilot studies for what they'd like to do for the entirety of the United States by taking weapons away from law-abiding citizens.
It's outrageous.
And here's another consideration, Gail.
The overwhelming majority of crimes are done with handguns.
Not only that, but, and the overwhelming majority of crimes are committed by blacks on blacks.
I mean, overwhelming.
I'm talking about statistics showing 55 times more crimes are committed by blacks on blacks than say by whites on blacks, which are very rare.
Let's see how the media can twist it to make it look a different way, to manipulate black people to believe something that's really not true.
You're 100% correct.
There are black people who have come out and pointed this out themselves and hopefully they are the leaders because I mean, the situation is bad for everybody.
I mean, people don't realize that every race has been assaulted and mistreated in various ways by this party.
I mean, the Ku Klux Klan was created by the Democrats.
Yes, yes, absolutely.
Robert Byrd, whom Joe Biden has expressed profound admiration, was a wizard.
He was a wizard in the Ku Klux Klan.
I mean, you know.
See how they fool people, you know, and people think that He's their man because he's not a racist, and he's a worse racist than anybody.
Look, he's the primary figure in the Biden crime family.
And if it had not been for Christopher Wray concealing the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop, just as James Comey before him had concealed the contents of the- How did they get away with that?
How can they be in a position like that?
Listen, I'm telling you, the FBI is not what we have thought it would be.
The FBI is very politicized.
The FBI is perpetrating a lot of these false flags and phony events.
The FBI itself is doing it.
Gail, it's embarrassing.
Let me give you an illustration.
Las Vegas, there were a lot of those who were not crisis actors who actually had cell phone videos and laptop recordings of what happened.
They gave them to the FBI, which wiped them all clean.
They wiped them!
In other words, they destroyed the evidence from the other participants.
And of course, that's because they knew it was a phony event, and therefore the more evidence would reveal that it was fake.
So this is your FBI.
On the other hand, in their consolidated death statistics for all the states and cities of the United States in 2012, when it came to Newtown, Connecticut, of which Sandy Hook is a subdivision, it showed in the category of murder and non-negligent homicide, the number was zero, zero, zero.
Nobody died in Newtown from a murder, according to the FBI, in 2012, which is really fascinating.
Because that's the locale where Sandy Hook was alleged to have occurred on 14 December.
I mean, it's just outrageous.
Now Gail, let's turn to Boulder, okay?
What we had there, and it's utterly fascinating, was an apparent citizen journalist who began
He was taking a cell phone video of what was going on.
And when he came up to the grocery store, he was in a state of urgency.
He looked outside and he saw two bodies.
There was one right at the wheelchair ramp.
There was another out in the street, neither of which displayed any blood.
He turned to a guy who was casually standing in the doorway, the entrance of the grocery store, who was texting.
And he said, are there any more bodies?
Is the gunman still here?
And he just put his thumb to say, you know, inside.
So the guy stepped in and there's another body.
And he's, of course, shocked.
And then he hears two shots in the grocery store, two shots.
Now, Gail, this is supposed to have been with an AR-15, which is a high-velocity, small-caliber .223.
Over 3,000 foot per second, it makes a distinctive sound.
These were not the sounds of an AR-15.
They sounded like blanks.
But from a handgun, without any question.
This guy just continued to text.
So our citizen journalist is the only guy who's showing any urgency.
He rushes out, he shouts out to others, active shooter, active shooter, stay away!
He walks all the way around the building and he finds two elderly citizens with a grocery card.
We're just talking.
I mean, there's nothing unusual.
He comes back.
In the video, you see the SWAT team there with a car.
They seem to be there too early, but this may be an element of editing because it turns out he actually took like three hours.
And what we see and what I broadcast has been like 20 minutes.
But the point is a SWAT team is just real casual, like they're having a social event.
They're not showing any urgency.
And would you believe they show more concern with getting him out of the area than they do for the active shooter?
And I have no doubt the explanation is because there wasn't an active shooter.
It was all just a staged event where the grocery store was the set.
But where this guy, because he's filming it all, is blowing their cover.
So they're much more concerned about him than they are with the active shooter.
Now, I've got a guy who is an expert in law enforcement.
OK, many years.
We've done many programs together.
And there is no actual police officer who corresponds to the description they've got of the guy who is supposed to have been shot and killed in Boulder.
Nobody.
So, Gail, it's more fraud and fakery, and the Democrats are doing this again and again.
And I tell you, it's going to happen on the order of— More than one a week.
We may even get down to two or three a day.
I wouldn't even—two or three a week.
I wouldn't even be surprised if the Democrats went for one a day.
Just understand, it's bullshit.
Don't let yourself be played.
And that's why I want everyone to go and take advantage of all my work on how to spot a false flag.
If you want to get deeper into it, I have also brought together experts to produce books about these events.
On Sandy Hook, on the Boston bombing, on Orlando and Dallas, on Charlottesville, on Parkland, even on the moon landing.
Gail, go to moonrockbooks.com and you'll find those six books I just enumerated have all been banned by amazon.com, I'm telling you.
This has got to be the indoor record.
The only other case I've heard of anything close is Dr. Seuss.
Can you believe, Gail, that they would ban six Dr. Seuss books?
Well, those are little cartoon things because they didn't like the way the Asian girl was drawn, which is ridiculous.
Mine are serious scholarly books where I bring together multiple experts that dissect what happened on each of these occasions.
And believe me, it was all bullshit.
And on that note, I'd like to say that the disarmers are here.
They appear to be in charge.
Whatever you do, don't give up your arms.
Know that 11 million German citizens were killed after their arms were removed.
60, their firearms, that 60 million white Christians in the Soviet Gulags, among others, were killed.
60 million.
They staged these massacres and it's, it's, Americans got to wake up.
They got to see it.
They got to believe it.
They don't realize that some of these things were false flags and they get these, they play on people's emotions.
Absolutely.
And look, I mean, I'm really tickled to be doing these shows with you because you're very thoughtful and you care about America and informing our fellow citizens In which case, I am a resource at your disposal, and I'm so glad we have these opportunities to get together for these conversations on a regular basis.
Thank you so much, Jim.
We will keep doing it, if you know, every other week.
How's that sound?
Excellent, Gail.
I'm delighted.
I appreciate it very much.
I love it that you do this deep research, and we can bring this information out to the To the people.
Please feel free to share the recording in any way that you can.
I'm abandoned in Facebook jail again.
So they do everything they can.
Well, they're being merciless about it.
And, you know, it's outrageous because they got special exemptions because they were serving the public, but they're no longer serving the public.
They're promoting a political agenda.
And I believe That will change and the sooner the better.
I agree.
I agree.
I think change is on the horizon and it won't be too much longer before it becomes more and more obvious and people are given more and more of the truth.
It's coming.
You agree?
Thank you, Gail.
Thank you so much.
You have a great, wonderful rest of the day.
Thank you everyone for listening and we'll be back again.
▲
Export Selection