All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:03:14
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 29 September 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with Giuseppe Vaffanjulo from the District of Criminals,
and I'm delighted Rebecca Carnes from Newtown, Connecticut, we're back with the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ Unsurprisingly, today's reports have a lot to do with the
first presidential debate which takes place this evening.
Trump and Biden race for a vicious matchup in the first debate.
It's going to be very, very interesting.
We know that the host is going to be Chris Wallace, who is not the equal of his father, Mike.
But may do a perfunctory job tonight, including the following topics, the Trump and Biden records, the Supreme Court, COVID-19, the economy, race and violence in our cities, and the integrity of the election.
Those are a pretty good choice.
Wallace will moderate six segments, about 15 minutes each.
Each segment will open with a question.
The President and his opponent will have two minutes to respond.
After that, they can converse with each other while he will balance time between the two.
We know that Joe Biden is in difficult straits intellectually and that he's on an anti-dementia medication that has the unfortunate side effect of incontinence, so that there have even been staff meetings to discuss what type of adult diaper he ought to be wearing, one that won't be so evident, visible through his clothing, and won't crinkle when he urinates.
Leading me to anticipate he has a future in commercial television for the pens.
When all this is over, they found a method to deal with it.
When Hillary Clinton was debating with Trump, she, of course, was at a great disadvantage.
So they set her up with a box under her red pantsuit that had wires running up to her head so that someone offstage could give her answers to questions.
The author was working in TV.
He recognized it.
Even Donald Trump knew what was going on.
He patted her on the back, went ahead and took her out anyway.
What's going on now?
We know Biden's been using a teleprompter, computer screens, any other resource to make it look he's not like an old man with bad Alzheimer's.
What they've done, believe it or not, is implant a medical device in his skull.
It's called a steam hearing implant.
It goes into the skull above the ears, has two micro wire probes inserted into the nerves so that they vibrate off of the bones in the skull.
Experts at Bomber's Body Language spotted the trick.
Biden gets really addled and he reaches into his right pocket when he doesn't know what to do to turn on the device.
He then looks down.
He can't look at the party asking the question.
He looks down to absorb the information he's being given, then he smiles and
answers the question.
Donald Trump almost certainly is going to know this is going on.
But nevertheless, I expect, as in the case of Hillary, he will do the job of taking him out.
Trump is in excellent fighting trim doing all these rallies and debates.
Meanwhile, we know why Joe Biden vanished from the campaign trail during July.
He wasn't just hiding in his basement, he was getting his implant installed and recovering from surgery.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, I think it's going to be quite the spectacle for 90 minutes.
I think that Biden's handlers are going to have him on such a powerful Dr. Feelgood cocktail that for the first 30 minutes or so, Biden's going to be all vintage Joe Biden, the consummate lying politician professional.
And then something's going to start to wear off a little bit.
It could be the extra Cortisol release from the stress of doing live TV.
It's so intense when you do live media.
And something's going to crack, and then I think Trump will recognize it and really, really go in for the kill.
I think that possibly, and this may not happen until the second or the third debate, but I think that there's no way that Joe Biden can present a presidential figure for 90 straight minutes.
Oh, I agree.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, Joe Biden definitely needs more than the caffeine from a cup of coffee to make him come alive.
So they're handling him in a very advanced tech way.
And, you know, I have to say, I just saw a few Donald Trump speeches and he's at the top of his game, you know, and Biden's going to have a very tough time.
I mean, but you know what I have to say about both of them?
I kind of Kind of wish that we could go back to the fine orators of the past, like Lincoln and FDR, who didn't need teleprompters or any of this fancy tech stuff, right?
But I have to say, Biden's gonna have a tough time, that's for sure.
Yeah.
Well, while you're right about the oratorical quality, Trump is a genius with the media and he knows how to connect with the public.
I think he's the most sensational we've ever had, even exceeding Ronald Reagan, who of course was adored as the great communicator.
Anyway, this is a big event tonight.
Don't miss it.
Meanwhile, CNN, and I gotta give Wolf Blitzer credit for this, as a Democratic senator explained how the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett is illegal or illegitimate, which he's been repeating over and over again, This is your Senator, Rebecca Richard Blumenthal, whom I regard as among the most despicable of the despicable.
Blumenthal tweeted moments after Trump's announcement, the whole process was illegitimate.
I will oppose a confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett as I would any nominee proposed as part of this illegitimate sham process.
Barely one month before an election as Americans are already casting their votes.
Americans deserve a voice in this hugely consequential decision.
Well, Wolf Blitzer asked the Senator to explain exactly how the nomination was either illegal or illegitimate, but he couldn't answer the question.
Blitzer was persistent.
The Constitution says if the President nominates, the Senate gives advised consent and confirms, so what's illegitimate about it?
Blumenthal danced around the question, noting the vote on this nominee will occur literally at the end of October, a handful of days before the election.
Blitzer finally forced Blumenthal to concede that indeed there's nothing illegal or actually illegitimate about the Barrett nomination.
What I hear you saying, Senator Blumenthal, It may be inappropriate, it may be wrong, especially so close to an election, but you agree there's nothing illegal or totally illegitimate as to what they're doing.
It may not violate the letter of the Constitution Blumenthal conceded.
It violates the spirit.
I think, well, Blitzer deserves accolades.
I mean, the guy is known to have ties to the CIA, as does Anderson Cooper.
But in this instance, he performed admirably.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, Blumenthal is a complete globalist traitor.
He serves the international banksters more than he serves his constituents or the United States.
So it's so ridiculous to say that it's an illegal process.
It's completely within the rules of the federal government to do this.
So you could argue that In days past, there was a certain decorum and respect, and the presidents say President Kennedy would have waited until the re-election had he been re-elected.
But those days are gone.
This is dog-eat-dog in a ring now.
It's horrible, the level of despicable viciousness we're watching every day.
these democratic and republican but especially democratic operatives
they're brazen liars and so this guy Blumenthal he's the he's the attack dog
now with this and he's just blatantly lying. Rebecca your thoughts?
Yeah I can't believe Wolf Blitzer went hard against any democratic senator.
I feel like it was personal and he lost a big hand in poker with him or something, but I don't know.
And you know what?
That's right.
Blumenthal, his point that it was illegitimate, this process that they're undertaking
for the selection for the Supreme Court, it's entirely legitimate.
And they're going about it the right way.
The Democrats just know everything's stacked against them.
And Blumenthal is doing his globalist, the job of his globalist controllers
and attacking it unwarrantedly.
Yeah.
I think you're right.
And there are additional reasons why it's very appropriate to proceed.
Meanwhile, by the way, further reflections on the nomination.
It must have been quite disappointing those who were expecting Amy Coney Barrett to appear in a red-habanded veil to take the oath of subservience to the patriarchy But Trump and the nominee both gave fine speeches.
Was the Trump presidency worth it for conservatives?
History will tell.
Will it help Trump win in 2020?
I'm no prognosticator, but politics has to be about more than always situating a party for the next win.
It should not be forgotten that if Barrett's confirmed, Mitch McConnell will become one of the most effective and consequential conservative politicians.
Nay, politicians, period, in American history.
Three years ago, Barrett was confirmed by the Senate.
The path of least resistance for the Democrats would be to argue she's a jurist with some bad opinions but competent and decent.
In the long run, the idea that the confirmation process is broken because the President follows a prescribed constitutional process is also going to be a heavy lift.
Merritt will not be susceptible to the kind of insidious personal attacks the media Democrats launched during the Kavanaugh hearings, but Democrats also need to excite their base.
If they go after her on the Catholic dogma stuff or her big family, they're going to look nuts, considering the ugly rhetoric that regularly flows from the like of Maisie Hirono from Hawaii and Kamala Harris of California.
It'll be interesting to see if they can maintain discipline.
The Senate Judiciary Committee starts its four-day hearing on October 4th.
It seems likely that few votes are going to be thinking about process arguments once she begins.
And when Democrats claim Republicans are ramming through the nomination, they can point out that Justice Ginsburg herself was confirmed in 42 days, two fewer than Coney is scheduled.
You can see them grappling with the problems.
The latest line of attack asks what kind of person would accept this nomination under these circumstances.
Well, the conditions are the same as they've been for every justice sitting on the court.
But I suppose the best answer is an accomplished jurist who says things like, I love the Constitution of the United States, which is more, we can say, for the partisan activists making those arguments against her.
Giuseppe, your further thoughts?
I believe, in case there are controversial issues arising from the election which the Democrats are planning, that we need to have a ninth jurist on the court so they won't be divided four to four.
Your thoughts?
That's exactly right, Jim.
My biggest concern with Coney Barrett, who has absolutely got the gravitas and the bona fides to be an excellent Supreme Court Justice.
Unfortunately, in her 7th Court ruling, she used the draconian Misinterpretation of the 1905 Jacobson Rule, which Dershowitz also cited as a reason why the federal government can mandatory vaccinate you if they need to, and she ruled in favor of that, which is actually a misinterpretation.
The 1905 ruling, where a gentleman named Jacobson said he didn't want to have a vaccine, and the court just said, well, okay, we're going to fine you $5, which was a lot of money back then for someone like Jacobson,
but then you don't have to have this vaccine.
And in the ensuing 115 years, the Supreme Court always cites this mundane ruling to,
as legitimacy for the draconian efforts of the federal government.
And she used it again to validate the whole, when, I forget which state it was, was suing to block the
lockdown and the mass stuff, and she cited that.
So to me, that's not a good precedent and show she is definitely going to side.
I sure hope you're wrong about that.
of this facade, which concerns me.
But other than that, she's going to make a good Supreme Court
justice.
Yeah, well, I sure hope you're wrong about that.
I think the idea of mandatory vaccinations is insanity.
It's an intrusive medical process.
Even the Hippocratic Oath do no harm.
You must have informed consent that's been established since the Nuremberg Code
against the McNeely experiments on Nazi prisoners, were found to be morally repugnant, as indeed they
were.
But with these vaccines, they potentially do so much harm that if you're not informed of the pros and cons,
you're perfectly entitled to reject them.
I was insulted when Dershowitz made that argument and damned him to hell as a consequence.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, if Kony Barrett's gonna uphold these COVID mayonnaise like she did, and is kind of falling lockstep with this, and probably with forcing vaccinations on people without informed consent, listen, then she's falling in line with a foreign globalist agenda, And is not looking out for Americans and the U.S.
Constitution that protects us.
So that is very concerning to me.
And I think Giuseppe said it very well.
She's, you know, what, who is she aligned with?
You know, the U.S.
Constitution and protecting Americans or some globalist foreign agenda?
Yeah, that's right.
Yeah.
Let me add, by the way, and this is a totally legitimate concern.
That I do not believe she's gonna vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.
I believe profoundly in a woman's right to choose, but I do believe she will move against federal funding for abortions.
I think that that is going to fall and is therefore a part of the Democrat agenda with the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare that they're unhappy that she should even go that far.
But I do not believe, actually, that Roe v. Wade is in jeopardy.
Meanwhile, Pelosi is telling the Democrats to prepare to decide the presidency if neither candidate wins the Electoral College.
The Constitution says a candidate must receive a majority of the state delegations to win We must achieve that majority delegation or keep the Republicans from doing so.
I think it's going to turn out to be too little too late.
This is a sequel to our reporting of yesterday about the Democrats' seven-step strategy to steal the election.
Use a pandemic to push for nationwide vote-by-mail.
Enlist the messengers at your disposal to promote it.
Get millions of mail-in, questionable mail-in ballots into the system.
That's the key.
Send Democrat lawyers into key districts to fight, to drag it out, drag it out, drag it out.
Set expectations the election not be decided on November 3rd.
Plan for mass protests.
Tell people Trump won't leave office should he attempt to challenge your results.
Then yourself, take legal action with the help of election officials.
District Attorney Soros spent years getting elected.
Let Chief Roberts or the new Justice Department ex-president Nancy Pelosi.
Well, it's not quite like that.
But if the court were not to intervene, or if the court were split four to four, the reason why I think Barrett's nomination is so important, and neither Trump nor Biden have an electoral majority by December 14th, the date the electors must cast their vote, then the House could decide the election.
The 12th Amendment states, if no candidate has an electoral college majority, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately by ballot the president.
This appears to be what Pelosi has in mind.
As Breitbart's Joel Pollack recently noted, the word immediately suggests the current Congress, led by Pelosi, should choose.
But there's a catch.
The 12th Amendment makes it clear in choosing the votes taken by the states, the representation from each state shall have one vote.
So even though the House has 435 representatives, most of whom are Democrats, There will be only 50 votes cast, one for each state delegation, and guess what?
The Republicans control more state delegations than do the Democrats, with 26.
So the Democrats only have 23, and even if Michigan split 7-7 were to turn for the Democrats, because Justin Amash would throw in with them, they can't do it.
I solicited the opinion of John Remington Grant, a retired professor of law, about the whole scenario here.
He observed the following.
The fourth clause of Article 2, Section 1, which survived the 12th Amendment, remains in effect today, says Congress may establish a day, universal across the nation, when presidential electors shall be appointed and on which they shall cast their votes.
Several states this year have delayed the counting of popular votes until mail ballots arrive, which they can do for a short time if state courts in those states have upheld.
But Congress enacted a Statute 3 U.S.
Code Section 7 stipulating, plainly enough, electors in each state must cast their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December.
So, a delay in counting popular votes can't exceed that deadline.
Hence, Bush v. Gore, the court handed down their decision before the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December, so the electoral votes of Florida could be counted.
Also, the first section of Amendment 20 says the term of Congress ends on the 3rd January and a new session begins.
Meaning the term of the President ends at noon on the 20th of January, but Nancy Pelosi has no longer been Speaker since the 3rd, by the time Trump completes his current term in office.
That means Nancy could not automatically become Acting President under the fantastic scheme of the DNC.
That's a scenario where it's still not decided by the 20th.
In which case, the Constitution says the Speaker of the House shall become Acting President.
My conclusion is those on the DNC are as incompetent in their understanding of the Constitution as they are nutty in their political ideas.
My message to them is, it won't work, guys.
John Remington Graham, Professor of Law, retired.
Giuseppe, your further thoughts about this, my friend?
Well, Jim, the election is so polarized, I think there's going to be extremely high turnout, both physically and via mail-in ballot.
I know my wife and I don't want to stand in long lines here, 11 miles outside of the District of Criminals in Northern Virginia, so we both got mail-in ballots that we're going to be mailing in in the next week or two.
I think, though, that in reality, Because it is so polarizing and because so many people, the great silent majority in America, is so offended by this communist attack, by the vile internationalist sorrows, that there's going to be
A pretty significant win by Donald Trump and I don't think that with Trump's savvy and his team's acumen that there's going to be a big sudden rush for mail-in ballots to tip the scale.
I think Trump will probably win By the popular vote and the Electoral College by somewhere between 6 to 12 percent.
And there's no way that mail-in ballots will overturn that because I'm not voting for Biden and I'm mailing it in.
I know many other people are of the same ilk so it's probably going to be about a 50-50 mail-in split.
There's not going to be this great wave for Biden.
You're assuming an honest count.
I think there's every intention by the Democrats to take the opportunity between the time the ballots are cast and they're actually counted to manipulate the situation.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Well, I think Giuseppe made an excellent point.
Even Trump voters are going to use mail-in ballots.
They don't want to wait in the long lines and compact that with the whole COVID thing and people wanting to, most people unfortunately, wanting to be six feet apart from each other.
They are entirely setting the stage for this to be a contested election with the outcome
having to be counted through ballots and being pretty close.
And if you think the divisiveness and polarization going on politically now in this country is considerable,
just times that by 1,000 after the election, it's going to drag out probably.
It's going to be contested.
That's right.
They're setting the stage for that.
And I would ask everyone to consider what's going to be going on while we're all
fighting and pointing the finger over the contest election.
I would advise people to look at what's going on with the economy, because I think that's going to come crashing down the stock market pretty soon.
The Federal Reserve, I would probably say October 22nd, 23rd.
They've done that in the past throughout history.
And I would be very leery of what's going to happen with our economy and stock market soon.
And the whole contested election thing is going to be us being too distracted and pointing the fingers and fighting.
Rebecca, you think they're going to do that to try to trash Trump?
That's true, too, because they blame him for the COVID numbers going up, and they'll probably blame him, obviously, for the economy crashing, too, and that's going to, you know, be a considerable force in the election, although I agree with Giuseppe.
It's going to be pretty split because Trump supporters are going to do use mail-in ballots, too, as Giuseppe and his wife are doing.
They don't want to stand in the long line, so it is going to be counted.
ballots, mail-in ballots is going to be drawn out, contested, and it's going to be a long,
horrific process.
Yeah.
You're raising some significant issues here.
We'll see what happens.
Meanwhile, I'd like to recommend those who want to know more about the current politics, check out the DNC COVID Conspiracy to Kenosha and Louisville with Danny Serra's extensive background in law enforcement.
This was broadcast live over my Twitter account at Jim Fetzer.
You can also watch by going to jimtheconspiracyguy.com.
And it will link you to the program.
I think this is important that every American should watch this show.
Meanwhile, woke means broke.
The impact of cultural Marxism on pro sports.
I've been predicting that since most of us enjoy sports as a diversion, From the distractions of real life, including politics, that the politicalization of sports was going to have adverse effects.
You got celebrity athletes, entire teams making headlines, kneeling during the national anthem.
The media has been on them themselves, been overwhelmingly positive, but viewers and attendees tell a different story.
As pro sports shifts even further left, it's leaving key demographics behind.
Ratings are plunging.
Means advertising dollars and other important metrics are plummeting as well.
This is significant.
Lyndon Johnson used to observe that every time he made a decision, he lost support because there were some people didn't like what he was doing.
Well, with the country polarized, the sports are being politicized too.
It's going to lose as much as half of their support, it seems to me.
Home viewers tuned out entirely.
To the new NFL with an astonishing 16% drop for the season opening game.
The game which launched the season was not an anomaly.
Just three nights later, all Sunday games were well off of last year's rating as well.
And a clue comes from Gallup, which recently polled adults about different industries and how they're perceived.
professional sports saw a significant drop in overall opinion
with few positive results.
Other professions, including healthcare, improved during the same period.
The biggest slide is seen from the sports industry with its positive point, 15 points from 45% of 30.
Giuseppe, I've been talking about this, that the reason these athletes get these huge salaries
is because the networks can charge advertisers fantastic sums based upon their ratings.
They lose their ratings, they lose their advertising, they can't give the big contracts, the athletes are going to suffer, their salaries are going to be cut.
This is not only, in my opinion, massively stupid by compromising professional sports, but it's going to have deleterious effects to them themselves.
Your thoughts?
That's exactly right, Jim.
Viewers need to keep in mind that even though they're athletes playing a game, they're paid to be entertainers.
They're paid millions of dollars to be an entertainment for the viewing masses and now the viewing masses don't want to their bullshit communist politics and it's even worse of a drop for the NBA the Negro Basketball Association who totally markets to the urban thug type who wears his pants down below his ass and uh...
is just basically a parasite on society.
That's who, insanely, they market to.
And what's funny is the NBA ratings have gone through the floor, and even Tucker Carlson's show is now outdrawing LeBron James, who's the marquee attraction of the Negro Basketball Association.
So, I think it's deserved.
I think that the globalists who control the media are trying to destroy the sovereign nation
of the United States, and they think they can do it by agitating the weak-minded urban types
and the weak-minded white malcontents who dye their hair multicolor
and pierce all parts of their body and tattoo their body.
And they all look the same, but they all feel like they're different
and a special snowflake so unique.
So I think that I would like nothing more than to see the Negro Basketball League go out of business.
Giuseppe, how can these pampered black athletes who get staggering salaries, you know, think there's racial animus here in the United States?
I mean, we elected a black guy president twice.
We got all kinds of black celebrities.
We got black mayors and officials all over the country.
It's ridiculous!
On his face, it makes no sense.
There is no systemic racism that I can discern.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I'm not a big professional sports fan, but when I talk to guys about what they're watching now, they say, you know, that's right, they don't want the politics in it.
These commentators, you know, they go off on these political leftist agenda items during the game, and they're sick of it.
And they're especially sick, of course, of the athletes who it's probably in their contract to do these leftist socialist agendas and activities and stances.
They're sick of it all.
And I just have to say one other thing, as when I do listen to games with my husband, The ratings are going down because it's also dehumanizing.
There's no one in the stands.
When you listen to the canned applause and the canned moaning and the canned cheering, it's creepy.
And, you know, even for casual fans like myself, I don't even want to watch it on TV and I'm not surprised the ratings are plummeting, yeah.
Rebecca, those are wonderful points.
Yeah, absolutely.
100%.
And they even have the case where fans can pay to have their image shown as they were actually in the stands.
They have them paid for those video reports.
I have an update on the Question Everything conference, which I've organized for Austin, Texas on the 7th and 8th of November, where Rebecca will be one of my keynote speakers.
We're now being joined by Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers, so we're going to have a mini 9-11 conference with Richard Gage.
And two alternatives who are representing diverse points of view about how the World Trade Center was destroyed, Joe Olson and Jeff Prager.
And then that's on Saturday.
And on Sunday, we'll have a mini JFK conference with three of the best researchers doing the most original We've got Ralph Sinque talking about whether it was actually Jack Ruby who shot Lee Oswald.
You'll be surprised by that.
Larry Rivera, who's done the most sensational work showing that, indeed, Lee Oswald was standing in the doorway as the motorcade passed by.
And David W. Mandic, MD, PhD, the leading expert on the medical evidence in the world today.
This is going to be a fantastic conference.
And you don't even have to actually be there.
There are only 200 seats available, but you can watch it on pay-per-view from the comfort of your own home.
Check it out at MixedEndStream.com.
MixedEndStream.com.
I'm updating the program even now as Richard Gage is a new addition.
We now return.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is sanctioning Iran's court system over abuses.
I find this very, very peculiar and regarded as highly inappropriate.
This marks the first time the U.S.
has sanctioned foreign judges or legal systems for purported human rights abuses.
A revolutionary court system has attracted criticism from several angles.
Before the government executed Navid, he was repeatedly tortured, his confession televised.
You torture all your political prisoners or just when you want to televise their confessions to make sure they comply.
Well, if he was tortured, that's obviously serious, but I've been very, very puzzled.
Why?
Given that Trump has been so generous toward Israel, Moving the U.S.
Embassy to Jerusalem, declaring the Golan Heights to be Israeli territory, defunding the UN organization assisting Palestinian refugees, even redefining anti-Semitism by executive order.
That most Jews are actually supporting Biden.
I don't understand this.
While nearly three in four, 73% to 10, feel the president's efforts are likely to bring peace to Israel, they are overwhelmingly not willing to support his re-election.
According to Zogby, Jewish voters support the former vice president over Trump by 69 to 25.
Then, when those who were initially undecided were re-questioned to offer who they lean his elite increase to 73 to 26, a surprising 44% of U.S.
Jews say they know friends or family who are voting for Trump but won't say it publicly.
I find this pretty bizarre.
All kinds of indications.
89% of those voting for Biden say it's impossible they could change their mind.
Biden's supported by 94% of Democrats, leading 59% to 30% among independents.
Overall, 90% of the small number of Jewish Republicans support Trump.
Biden's receiving substantial majorities of Orthodox, conservative, and Reform Jew support.
Despite all of his efforts, 48% still say Biden is best at protecting Israel.
33% say Trump.
There's more evidence here.
I'm just dumbfounded.
I asked a friend who I admire, what's going on here?
My interpretation, he wrote, is that Trump has given them only 90% of what they want.
They want someone to the White House who will give them 100%.
Including, they want the U.S.
to nuke Iran.
Trump is not prepared to do that yet.
Giuseppe, I am baffled.
Your thoughts?
Well, I'm not baffled at all, Jim.
I mean, Jews are parasites.
They're like a cancer on this country.
And so, they only are interested in what serves the Jew.
They're not interested at all what's good for America.
And so now that through the last century and the Zionist traitorous efforts to get the U.S.
into World War I and World War II, which both benefited the globalist bankers, not the United States.
And now you look at how Israel and the Jews were one of the driving forces in the 9-11 traitorous attack.
I think that the amount of power that 2% of the population, which is how many Jews live in the United States, is so overwhelmingly inflated, it shouldn't matter what the Jews want.
It shouldn't matter.
Every dual citizen trader should be removed from office.
And so, if you think that the Zionist or the Bolshevik Jews are ever going to be happy with Trump, that's just not going to ever happen.
Well, I do think there's a problem with the dual citizens that say should not be in decision-making or policy-shaping positions in the government.
I do distinguish between Jews and Zionists per se.
While many Jews are Zionists, there are also Zionists who are non-Jews, and it's the Zionists who, in my judgment, represent the major problem.
I still find this positively.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, that news article, the numbers in that news article don't make any sense.
That's right.
And I suspect it's probably to obscure how much Trump has done for the Jews.
And I think he, you know, it's suspicious.
He's had some top Zionists in his cabinet on his foreign affairs.
My most severe criticisms of this president have been regarding his foreign policy and all this largesse toward Israel.
of appease Netanyahu, and that is not what we need.
We need a president that's going to stand up to this Zionist control, yeah.
Yeah, my most severe criticism to this president have been regarding this foreign policy
and all this largesse toward Israel.
I mean, it's totally inappropriate.
Nevertheless, if it comes to Trump versus Biden, it's no contest.
I mean, the one guy is competent and doing a lot of good for America, notwithstanding his shortcomings, which in this instance, in my opinion, are severe.
But where Joe Biden is just a stooge, and you know, when Giuseppe talks about the communist movement, they have taken control of the Democratic Party.
It is, to me, Stunning, even dumbfounding and catastrophic to them politically.
Meanwhile, here's part of the problem with voting by mail.
Cash for ballot fraud uncovered in Ilhan Omar's Minnesota district by Veritas.
Money is everything.
Money is the king of the world if you ain't got money.
A scheme to run ballot harvesting in representative Ilhan Omar's Minneapolis district was uncovered in a shocking exposé by Project Veritas.
In one segment, an alleged ballot harvester, Liban Mohamed, the brother of Minneapolis City Council member Jamal Osman, can be seen sifting through piles of ballots in his car.
What they do is they collect ballots from elderly people especially, and then cast them.
They cast them on their behalf or get rid of them.
It's a stunning scheme.
Attorney Jeffrey Wolchowski of Hennepin County told Project Veritas the ballot harvesting described in the video appears illegal and that we will be investigating.
He was collecting the ballots to help his brother win the city's August 11th special election for a vacancy in Ward 6.
Our investigation found that among the three locations inside Ward 6, a balloting-harvesting triangle where the scheme operates, the Riverside Plaza Apartments, the Senior Citizen Community at Horn Towers, and the Minneapolis Elections and Voter Service Office on Hennepin Avenue, money is everything.
Money is the king.
Muhammad opined what it takes to run a campaign.
You cannot campaign with 200 and 100.
You got from your grandmother or grandfather.
You got to have an investment to campaign.
The scheme was uncovered by Omar Jamal, a chairman of the Somali Watchdog Group.
He works with the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department.
Jamal said he was motivated to reach out to Project Veritas because he wants to eliminate the corruption that weakens his community.
It's an open secret.
She, Omar, will do anything she can to get elected.
She has hundreds of people on the streets doing that.
The regulations, if you ignore and let corruption and fraud become a daily business, then tough luck.
A lot of people are invested in this.
As part of his participation, the Harvester told him he was paid to vote in the August 11th special election that Somali-American vote buying operates from, whom our machine came to his apartment building to make sure ballots were correctly filled out, often doing it themselves.
They come to us, they come to our homes, they said, this year you will vote for Elon.
They said, we will make the absentee ballots, we will fill out the forms for you, and when you get back, we will again fill it out and send it.
Somali-Americans were told they didn't need to go to the voting site.
Because the Omar operatives told him, you just stay home, don't go to the place.
After the ballots and signed and documented, the harvester said he would then be paid.
Giuseppe, this is shocking and part of what I see is the problem to which the president is legitimately, appropriately objecting.
Your thoughts?
Well Jim, Ilan Omar is the bitter fruit of the traitor George Soros' color revolution.
And how did it work?
Well, Soros puts millions upon millions of dollars into these 503C nonprofit NGO, non-government organizations.
They airdrop thousands of Somalias into a focused region in Minnesota.
The weak-minded Minnesota liberals say, oh, we're glad to help them.
Oh, they're starving.
So what they have now is like surgically inserting a little cancerous tumor.
And so now, because they have such a focused voting bloc that's traitorous to the good people of the United States, they get Ilhan Omar, who was married to her brother, elected in a sham election.
And so now she's got a taste of the good life, La Dolce Vita, and so she wants to do anything to stay there, including this ballot harvesting scheme, which is like a bad effort by Tammany Hall of New York in the 1910s.
I mean, it's so corrupt, and yet this all comes from George Soros and his color revolution.
That's why that traitor should be tried.
Well, fascinating to me, Giuseppe, because I look at her, and she's very attractive.
I like her manner.
I thought she added a lot to the mix.
But if this is her corruption or character, it reminds us of Martin Luther King's observation that judge men not by the color of their skin, but by the content of her character, and she fails miserably.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I was wondering when Ilhan Omar would come scurrying back onto the center of media stage.
And that's right, she's doing some corrupt and highly questionable stuff with this ballot harvesting, preying on older people.
It reminds me of these telephone scammers that prey on older people to rob them of their money, right?
I mean, she's basically, you know, using deception.
And tampering with ballots, kind of like how we just saw Bloomberg pay off the fines of these inmates, prisoners, to kind of, you know, coerce them into voting Democratic.
It's along the same kind of dirty trick lines, you know?
Yeah.
You're 100% right, and Bloomberg's only paying the fines for Latino and blacks because he thinks they're going to vote Democrat.
I think he's going to pay for that.
I don't think he's going to get away with it, and he should not.
Meanwhile, a poll.
Support for BLM protests plunges just as Kamala Harris voices support for the protests as essential.
According to a poll released by the AP Nork Center for Public Affairs at the University of Chicago, support for BLM protests has plunged from 54 to 39 percent in the last three months.
Kamala has just spoken out on what she calls a protest.
According to Harris, the violence, death, looting, destruction, and anarchy are necessary For the evolution of America.
She must have forgotten about the towns, businesses, and lives that have been destroyed by these organized groups of domestic terrorists.
Good to know she endorses a two billion in destruction across America.
The poll showed a huge drop of 27 points against a BLM protest by black and white voters.
Strong disapproval for BLM is also increased by 12 percent.
Also interesting to note, Joe Biden's lead with the people polled has dropped significantly as well.
It is about, I think, a community and the country speaking out, understanding that nothing that we have achieved that has been about progress in this country has come without a fight.
This is Kamala, of course, in particular around civil rights.
And so I'm going to interpret these protests as an essential component of evolution in our country.
I don't think it's going to work.
And of course, we know already we've addressed the impact of cultural Marxism on pro sports.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Jim, I think that...
Blacks comprise 13% of the American population.
80% of those blacks are at least working class level.
So you're talking about 2% of the 13% that are problematic, living below poverty standards.
Jim, there's been a poverty class in the history of man.
There is always a poverty class.
You go back to the ancient Egyptians, there was a poverty class.
The Roman Empire, there was a poverty class.
Throughout the monarchies and empires, there's always a poverty class.
Why in the world are we focusing on a truly small percentage of the great American spectrum?
Why don't we focus on the 80% of the blacks who figured it out, who are doing pretty well for themselves.
We're all struggling now with this COVID scandemic and this plan to destroy the sovereignty of the United States with the Great Reset.
Uh, uh, uh, satanic agenda.
But why is it that every election the weak-minded sheep have to, oh, I feel so bad, oh, my heart, my heart.
It's not about the heart.
Just do, step back for a second, use that lazy brain of yours and actually calculate how few people this is and how much attention we're focusing on such an outlier. Let's focus on
the great middle, the decent people, the silent majority of this country.
That's who really counts.
In any group you can have disparities of any quality whatsoever whether it's
economic or intellectual or physical ability.
You're going to have people who are better and people who are worse.
Right.
So you can't get away from the fact that you're going to have that kind of structure that's going to reflect the distribution.
It's the normal phenomenon.
Nothing surprising about it.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Yeah, well this Black Lives Matter movement is entirely contrived, that's right, and I suggest people listen to Candace Owens.
She is a whip-smart black woman.
She was just a guest on Tucker Carlson, and she really went hard against this Black Lives Matter-controlled on contrived writing and she said listen the the liberal
leftist democrats are all about disempowering black
and making them dependent on the state if they really cared about saving or improving black lives
uh... they would do some very constructive and on effective measures not this contrived writing
that's just a nice and does nothing but make us on hate each other point the
finger racially at each other and and create chaos that's right
right the most vulnerable group that need the police protection the most
is the poor blacks and and whites as well
which which they want to defund and destroy leaving them totally vulnerable
such that you know interviews in harlem When the residents were asked what they felt about defunding the police or dispatching, they were alarmed.
Some even said that would be suicide.
And many of the businesses they're destroying are small businesses owned by people who aren't particularly wealthy but are having their lives destroyed by these movements.
Kamala Harris is so out of touch.
What an unsuitable candidate.
To be running on the Democratic ticket, though I suppose the fact that she's on the Democratic ticket is what tells us all.
Jim, and again, that's all paid for and driven by the traitor George Soros.
Yes, yes, Giuseppe, you're right that Soros has been very much involved in all this.
Meanwhile, why mayors are telling police chiefs not to make arrests?
This is very puzzling.
Eight-year-old Dolores Wilson was murdered in Chicago last week, shot in the back while riding in a car with her mother.
Less than 24 hours later, Olga Calderon, a 32-year-old mother of two, was stabbed to death while stocking the shelves at a Walgreens drugstore in Chicago's Wicker Park neighborhood.
That same week, a U.S.
postal worker was shot in the head and in both legs while on her usual rounds on Chicago's South Side.
But you didn't hear about any of these victims.
So frequent have been the murders of children and other innocents that you barely hear about them.
Chicago's problems aren't isolated since the death, really the staged deception, the apparent death of George Floyd.
Municipalities witnessed peaceful protests turning violent, widespread looting, rioting, vandalism.
Many businesses had to close for prolonged periods.
Frequently, their insurance policies cover little or none of the damage.
Twenty city police chiefs across the country have resigned since the unrest began.
Most of them were forced out by their mayors due to political pressure, not because of incompetence or inability to lead.
Why did this happen?
Because of stand-down orders from mayors like Chicago's Lori Lightfoot, one of the black politicians we've been talking about, unwilling to expose protesters to the law, and complicit state attorneys like Cook County's Kim Foxx, another black figure in law enforcement unwilling to prosecute them.
According to their own statistics, the Chicago PD solves only one out of six homicides.
Commit a crime in the Windy City, you're almost certain to get away with it.
Most police chiefs, no matter the size of the city, don't want to give their officers orders to stand down.
They want safe streets in schools and business districts.
In fact, businessmen are fleeing from the cities such as New York and Chicago too, where looting takes place, and they're at risk, affecting the tax base for the community, which will haunt them for decades to come.
What's the answer?
Take the politics of political appointments out of policing.
A sheriff, unlike the city police officer, answers only to the voters.
The residents of the community he or she serves in is therefore liberated to do the job without political pressure.
What's hard, police chiefs should have no direct contact with the mayor, who should have no ability to instruct the police.
The residents of our cities would be better served if the police chiefs reported to a civilian review board composed of independent law enforcement officials and specially selected members of the public.
Attorney General Barr has attributed a recent and modest decline in homicide to the federal government's Operation Legend initiative, a nationwide program to stem illegal gun sales and transport of firearms across state lines.
Hours after, which should have been a moment of encouragement, Mayor Lightfoot instead Turned it politically, noting that the President should not use Chicago as a prop, and disputing Barr's claims about the success of the initiative.
It happens again and again.
Meanwhile, however, ordinary citizens are responding to the facts of the matter, the real situation, not the politics.
Kyle Rittenhouse's mother received a standing ovation at a Wisconsin GOP event.
The 17-year-old charged with fatally shooting two people in Kenosha during protests following the shooting of Jacob Blake received a standing ovation Thursday while attending a Wisconsin event.
Wendy Rittenhouse and her son's lawyer, John Pierce, attended the Waukesha County Republican event and were applauded by the crowd after being brought on stage.
Kenosha County GOP Chairwoman Erin Decker said earlier that talking to people around the area, she believes 80% of those support Kyle Rittenhouse.
It looks like it was self-defense.
And according to people I'm talking to, I'd say 80% support what he did.
I think that's a very positive, encouraging sign.
Your thoughts, Giuseppe?
Jim, today I'm not Giuseppe, today I'm a broken record.
George Soros, traitor, color revolution, wants to destroy the United States.
Every story is the root cause is from that lying subhuman piece of feces, George Soros.
George Soros funded Lori Lighthood and Kim Foxx, both mentally imbalanced, mentally weak, radical blacks who are now in positions of power in the third or fourth largest city in America.
They got there because George Soros, Color Revolution, filled their political coffers to such an extent that they were positioned in.
People don't wake up and see that there is no Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party is George Soros' golem.
The Democratic Party now wants to destroy the sovereign nation of the United States.
The Democratic Party, I'm not really in favor of authoritarianism, but if Trump gets re-elected, I hope he drops the hammer on these protesters and on these traitors in government and takes them off the chessboard, arrests them and imprisons them.
This is sedition!
And for those who missed the memo, Kim Foxx was the attorney in position to dismiss the charges against Jesse Smollett for staging a hate crime, which was so blatant he hired two Nigerian bodybuilders to pretend to be rednecks at 2 a.m.
on the coldest night in Chicago.
Put a noose around his neck when one of them was his personal trainer, the other was an extra on the set of his television show and where he paid them with a personal check for $3,500.
I mean, outrageous, totally political, inappropriate.
Fortunately, it's been reversed and she herself is now under scrutiny.
Rebecca, your thoughts?
Well, these police chiefs in places like Chicago have decided to stand down, so to speak, because they have been absolutely set up for failure by the leftist Democrats.
I mean, this is a racially fueled white versus black, mostly, rioting going on.
And anything they do to try and counteract those riots, it will be entirely filmed and construed in the mainstream media as white on black violence.
And you know what?
People forget is that most of the violence in the black communities is black-on-black violence.
These cities have thousands of deaths and other crimes, these major cities like Detroit and Chicago, every weekend.
But no one wants to talk about that.
And you know what?
Interesting point, Jim.
That was the major reason I stood up to Beto O'Rourke when he came to my hometown of Newtown when he was running for president in the presidential campaign a year ago.
The only black man in the room asked a question about urban violence, and when Beto O'Rourke gave a bullshit answer, that's when I said, listen, the Democrats don't care about you, sir.
and I was pointing to the one black man in the room.
The Democrats do not care about violence against blacks.
Otherwise, they would be, I said, debatable.
Otherwise, you would be in Bridgeport or New Haven, Connecticut.
And that's right.
If they really wanted to do something about black-on-black crime and violence and killings
in major cities like Chicago, they would be handling the problem in an effective way,
not just brewing up absurd and contrived racial wars against mostly whites versus blacks.
That's right.
Yeah, maybe going to communities in Connecticut where there is a large black population,
not a virtually all-white suburb areas like Newtown, Connecticut.
Points well made, Rebecca, and you were completely brilliant in taking on Beto O'Rourke.
Sensational.
And of course, it was immediately thereafter he dropped out of the race.
I think you made a contribution.
Jim, there's an interesting point.
I don't believe there's one police union that has endorsed Biden.
Yeah, no, Giuseppe, you're correct.
That's right.
That's right.
The police are all respecting the man who cares about law and order, which I believe, frankly, the Democrats lost the election for uncertainty when during their four-day virtual convention, they never spoke a word about urban violence.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you, Sam Fanmail, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
We have a JBC Collin message.
Dr. Fetzer, awesome truth you discuss.
Well done, sir.
Thank you for including my insightful voter fraud awareness.
Currently, Gmail's in the news regarding the FBI.
Deep state communications are often using draft email messages, purposely not sent, so those with password access to the Gmail account can log on and read the graph, respond to the draft, etc., never sending the Gmail.
Another way possible is to type the message and highlight the text color as white, then send.
Then the person opening the email highlights the white message black, and the hidden text becomes a parent example.
Right there.
Highlight above in the blank space to see the text that'll appear when highlighted.
Very good.
Meanwhile, for our final thoughts, let me just add, you can contribute to my legal defense fund, if you're so inclined, at 800 Violet Lane, Oregon, Wisconsin, 53575, or use an electronic donation via Zelle, it actually works, to jfetzer at d.jfetzer.org.
Check out my research on Sandy Hook and related issues to understand what's going on here and why it might be worth the effort.
Meanwhile, for our final thoughts, Giuseppe, yours.
I think that the criminal censorship, Jim, my Zelda test donation bounced back to me, I found today.
So they are blocking you, these traitorous nerd tech giants are blocking you, and it's illegal, it's criminal, and I hope Trump is elected just to Destroy those monopolies.
And secondly, I think tonight's debate will really expose Biden's weaknesses and hopefully open the gates for a Trump landslide.
Because Biden, again, is just a puppet of the Soros color revolution.
And Biden is also an avowed Zionist.
I can play the clip where he's being interrupted, interviewed on Israeli TV and says, I'm a Zionist.
I'm a Zionist.
So Joe Biden is the most despicable kind of career politician.
He does not deserve to be president of the United States.
He is an anachronism.
He is everything that is bad about the Democratic Party.
Rebecca, your thoughts.
Yeah, I'm just ready to get out my popcorn for the debate tonight, and I'm sure it's going to be quite the Broadway show, which is kind of how I look at it.
But I would just ask people to pay particular attention, as I am, to the economy segment.
I know you did a highlight of the questions that are going to be asked by Chris Wallace tonight.
Let's really perk our ears up at the economy.
I feel like with the small businesses that are struggling, the Federal Reserve printing off trillions of dollars inflation, that's going to be where my ears perk up.
Very good.
I think the Democrats believe that with the coronavirus they were going to destroy the economy and take away what is usually the strongest reason to re-elect an incumbent.
But I think that appearing, you know, looking around at the rubble of the American economy today, voters are going to say, who's the best to bring us back?
It's going to be the man who brought us the most robust economy in our history and the most sowing stock markets, Donald J. Trump.
And with regard to Zelle, Giuseppe, actually, another attempted donation, just a test, bounced, so I contacted Zelle, and they claimed it was working now, but if it's not, I'll be glad to check it out, and anyone can write to me.
Yeah, anyone can write to me at that very address, since that is my email address, not on Zelda.
Tell me the problem, and I'll see if I can get it squared away.
Oh, okay, I'll retest it.
Yeah.
Meanwhile, this is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, thanking Giuseppe Vavangiolo from the District of Criminals and Rebecca Corens from Newtown, Connecticut, for joining me today to bring you all the news you need to know.
We'll be back tomorrow with more from the front.
See you then.
▲
Export Selection