All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 1, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
45:50
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report 30 September 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin with Giuseppe Vafangiulo from the District of Criminals and Michael Ivey.
I'm pleased to have back again from Asheville, North Carolina.
We're bringing you the news you need to know.
The AMRAP Program TDC 2016 The AMRAP Program TDC 2016
Here's seven takeaways for New Yorkers from the presidential debate.
This is one written, really, I think, with a bias in favor of Joe Biden.
Moderator Chris Wallace could not control the interruptions.
We have more to say about Chris Rose here.
While Giuseppe and I were doing it live, he looked as though he'd handle it fairly well.
But upon reflection, I think he seriously intervened to benefit Biden.
Biden and Trump explain how they'll handle delayed and disputed election results.
The issue with the ballots is very serious.
Biden is seeking to minimize it.
Trump would not explicitly disavow white supremacy during the debate over race.
Well, I think it's a real tricky issue because these people, I think for the most part, really aren't white supremacists at all.
Propagandistic depiction thereof.
Meanwhile, Biden tried to nail him, claiming people have to be made aware that this is the man who told you to inject bleach, where Trump pointed out that he was being sarcastic.
This may have been the biggest, most significant development.
Trump sought to portray Biden as a radical socialist, puppeteered by Bernie Sanders, when Biden refused to support some ideas backed by progressives.
Trump jeered that Biden was now losing them.
I think that he got Biden to say, I don't support the Green New Deal.
I support the Biden plan that I put forward, which I think is going to create great problems.
In other words, Trump, I think, was successful.
He said nothing that would discourage any of his supporters.
On the other hand, he got Biden to make concessions that I think are going to cause division and a loss in enthusiasm because the progressives who are supporting Biden have acknowledged he's not the strongest candidate, but he's the one they believe is most amenable to pressure to promote The progressive idea is the centerpiece of which is the Green New Deal.
Trump actually denied the latest story, which of course was published by the New York Times
just in time for the debate, asserting he'd only paid $750 in taxes in 2016 and 2017,
where Trump denied it and asserted he has paid millions.
They could not hide their disdain for one another, but even Biden made a number of remarks
that I thought were inappropriate.
He called Trump a clown more than once, claimed he was the worst president America has ever had.
Trump suggested Biden graduated last in his college class attack.
Actually, that law school class attacked his intellect, called Biden a socialist, brought up Biden's son, Hunter.
And when those things happened, Chris Wallace was eager to change the topic.
In other words, he was impaling Biden.
He couldn't cope with it.
And Chris Matthews came to the rescue.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Jim, everything you said is accurate as far as the bias Wallace showed.
I thought Trump made one strategic error, a major error.
He should have waited about 20 minutes and been reserved and let Wallace Control the debate and then had he unleashed his justifiable rage because this guy has been attacked He said as much during the debate.
This guy has been attacked non-stop since even before he took the office once he was elected and he's Justifiably angry if he would have just waited like 20 minutes and then laid into Biden It would have been so much more powerful And I thought that Biden is such an empty suit, such a career politician, and it was just, you know, it's painful to watch in hindsight.
We were watching it live and we were so focused on what they were saying, but that whole time I felt a certain subtle uncomfortableness.
It's like, where is, these two men are running for President of the United States, where's the decorum like, you know, Kennedy-Nixon or even There's much more to come.
You're going to have ample opportunity.
They went at each other, but at least they gave each other pause.
And I think that, but Trump's very angry, clearly.
There's much more to come.
You're gonna have ample opportunity.
Michael, your reaction so far?
I think Giuseppe's suggestion as to the strategy that Trump should have applied is right on.
I hadn't thought about that, but that sounds perfectly logical to me.
That was about the farthest thing from an actual intellectual debate I've ever seen in public.
Just two guys carping at each other for two hours.
I wanted to say something about the entire construct of white supremacists.
Basically, there are no white supremacists to speak of.
Maybe there's 15 in the nation.
I don't know.
I've never seen one.
I've never been in contact with one.
I've never known one.
And anytime you hear people pushing that concept, like the head of the FBI just did, you know you're dealing with somebody who's on board with the Bolshevik color revolution that's trying to overthrow the United States.
Excellent point.
Now, back to the The debate itself, it's been a big subject of speculation today why and how Joe was able to perform as well as he did because he was a heck of a lot better than practically any other public appearance that you've seen him in over the last
I don't know, three months?
So the various types of aids have been discussed, and one of which that I saw in an email thread the day that I think you were on, Jim, was the idea of these contact lenses that can actually project text right into the visual field.
So I just thought that was an interesting sidelight.
Well, we'll get We'll get there, Michael.
No, I wasn't a part of that.
Meanwhile, we did have reports in advance, I mentioned during the few minutes we had before it began, that Joe Biden had been given the debate questions in advance.
That was the word on the street.
Happened before Donna Brazile gave the debate questions to Hillary Clinton in 2000.
17.
Joe Biden reversed course, declined to have his ears inspected.
We have the story that he's actually had a skull implant of a device that goes directly to his ear so he can be given answers from off the stage.
I believe that was taking place there.
The occasion when you saw Biden sort of looking downward as though his eyes were closed and concentrating, he was Trying to absorb what he was being told.
According to reports, Biden's team also requested breaks every 30 minutes, a request that was ultimately denied.
I believe that's because, as one of the unfortunate side effects of his anti-dementia medication, he's incontinent.
His staff, a former staff member has explained, actually has debated what type of adult diaper he ought to be wearing that would not reveal its presence and would not crinkle when he urinates, leading me to speculate that Joe has a life after politics doing commercials for the pants.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well Jim, I think that Biden has a lot of senior moments just about every moment, and as I predicted, they gave him a potent intravenous cocktail.
He was lucid, he was pretty functional.
I don't know about the contact lenses, but I do know that at least a dozen times I saw him Uh, put his head down slightly, closed his eyes because he was listening to instructions and he did that at least a dozen times that I saw.
So he, he was all wired up in some capacity.
And even then he came so close so many times to faltering and he did falter, but nowhere near as painfully as the campaign trail.
So they had him, uh, pretty hepped up and, uh, you know, he's just a frail old man and, and this guy should not be the candidate.
for the presidency of the United States under the Democratic wing of the Money Party.
So I don't know. I don't think he's going to make it the full run.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, there was also another photograph of a little wire showing under the part of his lapel
right there at one time. So...
So that is another possible answer as to how he was able to perform as well as he did.
But I think the primary culprit is, as Giuseppe suggests, pharmaceutical.
Yeah, that wouldn't surprise any of us at all.
Meanwhile, Delaware College fact check.
Biden said he never was a student.
This is interesting.
An historically black college in Delaware.
So Joe Biden never attended this school despite his claim he got started there.
This is very, very bad, but it's in a long trail of Where Trump was calling him out on several of his misstatements about graduating at the top half of his law school class, having been on a full scholarship, having been the outstanding student in the political science program, none of which were true.
He was on a partial scholarship, graduated in the bottom half, and was never outstanding student.
Here are questions that needed to be answered.
Trump brought up some of these.
Can Biden explain why his son Hunter reportedly received $3.5 million from the former mayor of Moscow's wife?
Here was another.
Does Biden still believe Supreme Court nominees can be voted on during an election year as he did in 2016?
Here's a third.
Will Biden institute a national mask mandate as president?
I think this was significant.
bring US troops home from Afghanistan and Iraq of him, as Biden support the Green New Deal,
which could destroy jobs in states like Kentucky and West Virginia.
I think this was significant.
Trump brought up the donation from the Moscow mayor's wife right off the bat.
And I believe his intention with the repeated attacks on Biden
was to throw him off his game plan from the start, which we'll see the second half, actually,
when they were more substantial and less bickering was very positive for Trump.
As far as these issues are concerned, Giuseppe, your thoughts?
I thought one of Trump's brilliant moves of the debate was when Biden tried to use his dead son Bo Biden's service record and Trump did a judo flip and took it right to Hunter Biden and his addiction and his Burisma scandal.
I thought that was brilliant.
Yeah, I said I don't know Biden, but I do know Hunter.
That was really well done.
And I thought, I can't think of one moment other than when Joe Biden used the tired and now lying, maudlin claims of the Democratic Party that we want equality for everybody and opportunity, you know, and here he is, he's literally a marionette for A man, George Soros, whose avowed goal is to destroy the United States Republic and have it become a communist color revolution part of the North Atlantic Union.
And so, it's so funny that 20 years ago you could believe those Democratic chestnuts and now they're so pale and hollow and phony because of what's really going on and who really controls the party.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, wait a minute.
Am I to understand that Giuseppe doesn't like George Soros?
What's the deal?
No.
Yeah, it was probably a mistake by Biden to bring up his other son in the first place because Hunter represents not just a skeleton in the closet, but a whole graveyard in the closet in his dealings with Burisma and Russia and Ukraine.
So, Joe should not even come close to saying anything about his own family because there's lots of information there.
Well, he's got in this groove of talking about the accident that killed his wife and his It was his daughter and then talking about Beau and his cancer.
And so he's making this appeal to pity.
Oh, it's an emotional appeal.
Sorry for the guy, and therefore we're supposed to vote for him for president.
That's the illogic.
It is a mistake, but it's a part of the deliberately planned Democratic campaign strategy.
In that respect of emotional appeals, it crossed my mind that even running Biden for president and making him do these things seems like elderly abuse to me.
Elder abuse, yeah.
I like that.
You're right.
You're right.
Meanwhile, Giuseppe and I did our live debate coverage.
It was just wonderful, Giuseppe.
Just look visually at the comparison there.
Trump came across as robust, as vigorous, as in control.
Biden came across as old, as feeble.
In it as weak, I thought it was a very commanding performance.
Here's a brilliant piece by a fellow named Joe Shafer that I just republished on my blog.
Trump wins on issues as Wallace torches his own reputation.
I think he got it right.
Uh, once things transitioned from temperamental bickering to substantial discussion, President Trump had an easy walk in the first 2020 presidential debate in Cleveland.
All the blatant efforts to aid the Democratic challenger made by his unofficial corner man, Chris Wallace, failed to stem the incumbent's
momentum.
The Fox News host and allegedly impartial debate moderator repeatedly sought to rescue Biden,
just as a candidate was noticeably struggling. One moment stands out as the most crucial and
is enough by itself for the president to claim victory.
When Wallace tried to equate the rioting and street violence that has plagued American cities since
the death of George Floyd with an alleged white supremacist threat, Trump definitely turned
the conversation to Antifa. Biden then proceeded to carry water for the destructive leftist
revolutionary group, calling it an idea, not an organization.
It was a devastating mistake, and his media protector sensed it immediately.
We're done, sir.
Wallace instantly pronounced shutting down conversation on the topic as Trump eagerly prepared to pounce on Biden's major misstep.
But the damage had been done.
Yet, here again, Biden imploded.
Trump was unflappable and eventually managed to maneuver Biden, who's been desperately trying to pivot away from the progressive stridency of his party's primary process, into disavowing the Green New Deal, that is sacred policy among the left-leaning Democrats, that his campaign will need to turn out.
The Green New Deal will pay for itself as we move forward, Biden began.
He then confusedly backed away.
No!
I don't support the Green New Deal he proclaimed.
I support the Biden plan I put forward, which is different than what he, Trump, calls a radical Green New Deal.
Of course, this is a direct contradiction to statements he's made in the primary.
In fact, Biden's official campaign website at this very moment Specifically touts his support for the progressive plan.
Biden believes the Green New Deal is a crucial framework for meeting the climate challenges we face.
James Wood was very effective.
This guy's brilliant in his tweets.
President Trump crushed his opponent, Chris Wallace, head to head in the debate.
There was also another fellow wandering around muttering to himself.
A second.
Interesting.
A person who is not a Trump supporter gives a sober and damning assessment of the appalling bias by Democratic Party fluffer Chris Wallace.
It was truly shameless.
And this is from Sue Miller Sugar.
I'm no Trump fan.
He personally bugs me.
I give Trump some slack because it was a two against one scenario tonight, and I'm less annoyed by Donald Trump's interruptions than I am the craven and biased display by Chris Wallace, which was a Democratic candidate anyway.
Wallace or Biden?
James Wood, two takeaways from tonight.
Trump, I will open the economy and the vaccine is weeks away.
Biden, I will close down the country again and stop hurricanes with electric cars.
John Rappaport has tweeted, Could the COVID vaccine be canceled before the first injection?
The astounding failure of all three COVID vaccine clinical trials.
Kellyanne Conway.
Thanks for debate.
Shout out, creepy, sleepy, weepy Joe, but you lied.
And don't snip my hair either.
Trump again.
Biden tonight.
The Green New Deal is not my plan.
Biden website.
Biden believes the Green New Deal is a crucial framework.
Here I think captures it all.
Choose your president.
One guy endorsed by the NRA and law enforcement, the other by BLM and Tief and Planned Parenthood, where one of the other devastating exchanges was when Trump observed he's been endorsed by one law enforcement agency after another and asked Biden to name even one Police unit that had supported him, which Biden could not do.
That was another devastating moment.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
James Woods is a brilliant guy.
I always liked him as an actor, and I don't know if everybody watching this understands the devastating insult when he called Chris Wallace a fluffer.
A fluffer is the person in porno movies who gets the actor ready.
We know.
I did not know that.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
So that's a brilliant description.
We won't go into all the details.
I didn't find any details, Jim.
I handled it very tactfully.
How do porno movies work again?
Well, you get a couple Democrats.
But anyway, Woods, Mel Gibson, Kevin Sorbo, there's a handful of actors who are not under the whole elite Hollywood liberal sway and Woods is a vociferous Twitter advocate and he is just tearing Biden apart and it's really enjoyable.
And some of those other tweets I had not seen, that's a great one by Kellyanne Conway about, then don't sniff my hair either.
That was really good.
I mean, that's the amazing thing about social media is you get so many divergent opinions.
But going back to the article, that fellow hit it on the head, man.
It was so blatant that Wallace, who's a member of that globalist media leftist Rainbow color revolution thing.
And he, he, it was two on one against Trump.
And I found that very annoying.
Everyone can find that article on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
I just put it up this morning as soon as I discovered, cause it was so sensational.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, I was surprised to see Joe, um, turned down, not go along with the Green New Deal.
I thought that was part of the democratic platform.
Am I wrong about that?
No, of course you're right.
Of course you're right.
And the fact is, Michael, that the progressives have been supporting him because of the Green New Deal, and for him to repudiate it, they may not even vote for him.
The Democratic Party has taken a huge hit because of this exchange.
It's fascinating.
This was the greatest blunder of the evening, right there.
Do you think that was a strategic move on the part of Joe's handlers, or did he just freak out and decide to say, no, I have my own plan?
With Joe Biden, it's very hard to tell.
He's a confused guy.
And what's astonishing is that he's even the candidate of a major political party here in the United States.
He's certainly the wrong guy.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
I just mentioned I have a book exposing the Russia hoax.
It's a relatively short book, about 112 pages, but it really exposed years ago That for which we are getting confirmation today, indeed on our very next story.
So I just mention in passing, we've known this for a long time.
We now return to Intel Chief.
Obama administration knew of Hillary's plan to smear Trump with a Russia scandal as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.
This was all known in a letter summarizing the relief Ratliff sent in July 2016, shortly after the DNC announced its servers had been breached.
U.S.
intel officials obtained a Russian intel analysis saying Clinton had approved the smear campaign linking Trump to Putin.
Very serious, coming out, regardless of what the Russians may have known about the role they played in assisting the campaign.
Radcliffe noted the NCI director John Brennan had acknowledged taking the information to the highest level According to his handwritten notes, Brennan subsequently briefed President Obama and other senior national security officials on the intelligence, including the alleged approval by Hillary Clinton to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.
That's right.
Russia hoax was total bullshit.
Here's Russian intelligence saying Hillary approved the campaign to tie Trump to Russian election interference.
Radcliffe made the admission in a letter to Senator Lindsey Graham.
The intelligence community does not know the accuracy of the allegation when they were telling him about what they were going to use to smear.
Went on to say that CIA director had briefed Obama on the claims.
Graham told CBS News he would seek to have the notes declassified, that Catherine Herridge of CBS News reported the notes were discovered by U.S.
Attorney John Durham opening up a new line of inquiry in his investigation.
I would not have thought it was a new line since I and many others, including especially Greg Jarrett in his brilliant book, The Russia Hoax, have documented all of this years ago and published books about it.
But there we are.
Today it's coming out.
I guess, better late than never.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, it's coming out because up until now, the lying Mind control media, the globalist media, hadn't allowed it to be in the Overton window.
And so now, suddenly, Lindsey Graham is pushing in the public eye, which is great.
I mean, we all knew this years ago.
It was so obvious from day one.
It was projection, blaming Trump for what Killary had done.
The other thing I thought, going back to the debate for a second, was amazing.
And shows just what a career 47-year pathological liar, professional politician Biden is.
He takes a stand one moment, he goes, I am the Democratic Party.
Well, why don't you do something about all the writing, Joe?
I'm just a private citizen.
That's right.
That's a nice point, Giuseppe.
He could have spoken out.
After all, he was declaring he is the Democratic Party.
So the Democratic Party evidently wasn't speaking out to resist the riots and the looting and the arson.
Outrageous.
Michael, your thoughts.
Um, I thought the most amazing thing about the information that you just covered in that segment, Jim, was the fact that you have the time to put a book out.
I don't know how you do it.
You're a machine.
Oh, there we go.
Nothing better to do with my copious free time.
Yeah.
That's all I got.
Okay.
Meanwhile, as Minneapolis City Council pledges to abolish police collapses, members claim the vow was made in spirit.
They're getting so much massive opposition.
Four months after submitting those promises amid national racial unrest, some members of the council are now claiming their promises didn't really mean what they said they meant.
According to the New York Times, some council members would like a do-over.
Councilor Andrew Johnson, one of the nine members who supported the pledge in June, said in an interview he meant the words in spirit.
Not by the letter.
Another, Felipe Cunningham, said the language in the pledge was up for interpretation, even among council members soon after the promise was made.
It was very clear most of us had interpreted that language differently.
Lisa Bender, the council president, paused for 16 seconds when asked if the council statement had led to uncertainty at a pivotal moment for the city.
I think our pledge created confusion in the community and in our wards.
After the tragic death of George Floyd, which was faked and staged, The City Council of 12 Democrats and zero Republicans promised to replace the Minneapolis Police Force with an alternative community-based law enforcement model.
Yes, we are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department and replace it with a transformative new model of public safety, Lisa Bender said in June.
Days later, the majority signed a pledge to formally abolish their city's police department.
The Blaze has now reported the Minneapolis City Council learned that rhetoric does not translate into functional policy.
During a meeting with Minneapolis Police Chief Mattaria Arredondo earlier this month, council members asked, where are the police?
That's because Minneapolis is experiencing abnormally high levels of violent crime, leaving residents stuck for law enforcement.
Residents are asking, where are the police?
Councilman Jamal Osman said.
That is the only public safety option they have at the moment, Minneapolis Police Department.
They rely on the Minneapolis Police Department and they are saying they are nowhere to be seen.
Giuseppe, just one of the calamitous blunders Democrats have made in this election year.
Your thoughts?
I think that anyone who is a Republican who aspired to be on the Minneapolis City Council has got a good shot at it this year.
I think they're all going to get voted out and it's just ridiculous that I don't know, Jim.
I don't understand the whole democratic strategy from national to local with supporting these outlying, violent, mentally unstable individuals.
BLM, we've all seen the video, does stand Or burn, loot, and murder.
And what especially offends me is when they try to block roads and then pull the innocent driver out of the car.
In a couple instances, they killed the driver.
And if it were me, man, I'd be the bowling ball and my car would be plowing through those pins.
It's insane.
And these people need to be removed from being out in the public.
They need to be imprisoned.
Michael, your thoughts?
Uh, hold on.
Did you say that after they've defunded and demonized their police department that violent crime went up?
Who would have guessed?
That's a surprise, isn't it?
Shocking.
Who would have thought?
Who would have thought?
I've never seen that coming.
Yeah, this seems like a nice spot to read a quote from Candace Owens.
Yes, she's wonderful.
Yeah, the quote is, there are millions of black people who wake up every day and do the right thing.
We do not riot.
We do not loot.
We do not do drugs.
We do not disrespect law enforcement.
We are tired of having our image tainted by this radical leftist anarchist Black Lives Matter movement.
Just before Giuseppe and I went on to cover the live debate, Candace was on Tucker, and she made the very deft point that you have to distinguish between the organization Black Lives Matter and whether or not Black Lives Like white lives, like Asian lives, like Latino lives matter.
Obviously, all lives matter.
But the organization Black Lives Matter is despicable in performing illegal acts.
And Biden might like to play the same game he did with Antifa and describe Black Lives Matter as an idea.
But it's not only an organization.
If you donate to Black Lives Matter, it goes directly to ActBlue, which is a Democrat fundraising apparatus, and into the pockets of Beto O'Rourke, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren.
It's outrageous.
They've been using Black Lives Matter as the vanguard of the Democratic Party for fundraising and as a voter registration drive, but it's backfiring massively.
Massively.
Yeah, organizations like Black Live Matter and Antifa I see as total tools of the What do you call them?
New World Order?
Bolshevik World Order?
I don't know what it is.
It's the 2.0 Color Revolution.
And another point is a woman, a white woman, was murdered for saying nothing more to the burn loot and murder thugs that White Lives Matter and they murdered her for it in cold blood.
It is disgusting, Giuseppe, and the American people aren't going to stand for this.
I'd be surprised if Democrats could win dog catcher this time around.
It's bad.
Meanwhile, a coalition of black pastors rips Kamala Harris for celebrating the brilliance of the Black Lives Matter founders.
It's heartening to see a U.S.
Senator and a candidate for Vice President give such high praise to a group that's trying to destroy our country.
A group of black pastors slammed Democratic VP nominee Kamala Harris for praising the so-called brilliance of the BLM.
During an interview with CNN commentator Angela Rye for the ACP's Fall Leadership Conference, Harris lauded the brilliance of Black Lives Matter co-founders Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza, and Opal Tometi, the post said.
Praising their brilliance.
Harris told Rye that one day we'd see BLM as an inflection point in the ongoing fight for justice and to reform the criminal justice system.
She goes on about it.
I actually believe as a former prosecutor that Black Lives Matter has been the most significant agent for change within the criminal justice system because it's been a counter force to the force within the system so grounded in the status quo in its own traditions Many of which have been harmful and have been discriminatory in the way they've been enforced, which is her conception of systemic racism.
The conservative clergy of color, however, a group of black pastors, took serious issue with Harris's praise for the Black Lives Matter movement and its founders.
In a statement to The Post, the coalition's co-founder, Bishop Aubrey Shine, said BLM is not an organization Harris ought to be commending in any way.
It's extremely disheartening to see a U.S.
Senator and candidate for Vice President give such high praise to a group trying to destroy our country.
Does Harris, Senator Harris, not watch the news?
Has she not seen the businesses burning?
The livelihoods that have been wrecked by this organization, the Bass Direct?
People are terrified.
Will we have to praise the organizers because it's a cool thing to do?
Went on to point out that BLM has recently tried to scrub much of its more insidious agenda from its public face.
The group was caught removing anti-nuclear family and cisgender privilege content from its statement of beliefs.
Until recently, these people made no secret about their agenda.
They were loud and proud about their anti-American goals until the violence they've instigated started affecting their favorability.
The only brilliant thing I can see is how quickly BLM's website operators scrubbed their agenda to be more appealing.
This is not a group that needs to be praised.
More Americans are beginning to see that, and I hope Senator Harris will too.
Meanwhile, we know about Kamala.
Married 60-year-old Willie Brown and his 29-year-old witness were having that affair, led to an appointment to a couple of prominent commissions in California, and launched her political career.
That's what you need to know about Kamala, the Democrats' nominee for Vice President of the United States.
Giuseppe, your thoughts?
Well, speaking of fluffers, The Kamala Harris made her bones taking care of downtown Willie Browns.
And that just shows the level of her character.
Shows the level of her character and she is, you know, a female woman of color, Joe Biden.
She's an empty suit who's figured out how to maneuver and marry.
She married a wealthy Zionist and so now she's got that pushing her I think you're certainly right about that.
It's a classic Peter principle.
And so I would say that the Democrats, this is the worst ticket.
Well, no, Hillary and that lowlife Tim Kaine was worse, but this is one of the worst tickets
I've ever seen for the Democratic Party.
I think you're certainly right about that.
Michael, your thoughts?
That was a fabulous statement by that group of black pastors.
Yeah.
I didn't know about that, and I'd like to examine it and send it out to my own list.
Regarding Kamala Harris, there's a hilarious meme that I saw a couple of days ago where Joe is talking to Kamala, and Joe says to her, Kamala, what state should we campaign in first?
And she answers, Idaho.
And Joe answers, well, I'm aware of that, but I mean, what state should we go to first?
Yes, nice.
Very nice.
Sums it up beautifully.
Meanwhile, We want to hear from you.
Send us fan mail, pro or con.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's something we got.
John Doe commented on your video.
This is our Libate coverage.
The comment by Donald Trump regarding the distribution of a vaccine.
Not the first time he's stated that.
He wants to get elected, so he's willing to do anything to achieve that goal.
I think the vaccine will be a placebo.
Once distributed, the test results will be changed and the CV disappears.
But another comes which will require a microchip.
That's the endgame.
Will DT stand in the way?
Maybe.
Joe Biden?
Certainly not.
Meanwhile, justifiably paranoid sent.
Overall, you and Giuseppe did a great job last night.
Appropriate remarks at an opportune time add to the experience.
But Giuseppe's microphone seemed much too loud compared to yours when he said something.
The debate was simply drowned out.
Could be why you waved him off a couple of times.
Just my unsolicited observation.
Otherwise, well done.
Meanwhile, moving to final thoughts.
You know, if you're eager to support my legal efforts, none of this goes to the judgments against me, only to assist with my attorneys.
Zelle appears to be working now so that you could make an electronic transfer to jfetzer at d.umn.edu using Zelle.
Giuseppe, final thoughts?
Yours.
Well, first reply to that gentleman who was describing the volume on.
We typically use either Zoom or Skype, and in both cases I have to really pump the volume.
And with StreamYard, evidently they run right through my processor, and I had no idea it was that loud, but that's easily fixable.
Yeah, that was sympathetic.
That was a sympathetic criticism, obviously.
Right, right.
Easily fixable.
And I would say that the takeaway from that debate, Jim, is I don't think either candidate changed anybody's mind.
And the people who have Trump derangement syndrome could watch Biden sacrifice puppies to Moloch and they'd still vote for him.
And that's just the nature of the culture wars, the nature of the The civil war that could potentially erupt over all this.
And it's sad.
It's really sad that so many people, especially on the left, are so hypnotized, so mind-controlled, to think that a communist, anarchistic state is a better choice than the sovereign republic of the United States.
Michael, your final thoughts.
I have been drawing attention to the good writers and good articles at UNS Review recently, and especially Mike Whitney.
But there was one that I came across yesterday by one of their terrific writers, whose name is Israel Shamir, who is on my list of extremely good truth-telling Jews.
And the name of the article is Trump did not flinch.
He's talking about his going ahead with the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice.
And let me read just a little excerpt from that.
He did not flinch.
He chose the good-looking Amy Barrett to replace the departed witch in the Supreme Court.
What a difference!
A devout Catholic instead of an atheist Jew.
A flourishing wife and mother of seven instead of a bossy Herodan, which Expanded my vocabulary a little bit.
I had to look that word up.
It means a scolding, vicious woman, a hag or a shrew.
Keen, continuing his description of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, keen on same-sex marriages and abortions, summer instead of winter, meaning summer is Amy Barrett, winter was Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
RBG, oh, and this is another thing.
Are you guys familiar with the Oscar Wilde Gothic novel called The Picture of Dorian Gray?
Oh, without a doubt.
I won't go into it, but the basic idea is that one's deeds throughout one's life are reflected in one's countenance and visage.
And so he makes a reference to it here.
He says, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was as ugly as her deeds.
Beauty and ugliness count, as Oscar Wilde explained.
That's what he means.
He's referring to the picture of Dorian Gray.
Probably nobody in history exceeded her contribution to destroy the family, to profane marriage, to slaughter children.
Wow.
Let me thank Giuseppe Vefangelo from the District of Criminals and Michael Ivey from Nashville, North Carolina, for their excellent comments.
I would assess the impact of the debate, the first debate, as follows.
It has strengthened the confidence and enthusiasm of supporters of the President Donald Trump.
It has weakened, even divided, supporters of Joe Biden because he's not pursuing the progressives' most core agenda of the Green New Deal and More significantly than strengthening Trump's hand and weakening Biden's, the independent voters, Latinos and blacks, are going to be decisively affected in strengthening their enthusiasm for Donald Trump.
Uh, Hannity last night after the debate was reporting the earliest results from a Latino station showing 66% believe Trump had prevailed over Biden at 34.
And I think that two to one assessment.
Is gonna have resonance and make a difference with more to come.
Thank you all for watching.
We'll be back tomorrow with what you need to know.
We hope to see you then.
▲
Export Selection