Chomsky's Disgusting Epstein Ties Prove He Was COMPROMISED ALL ALONG!
Noam Chomsky’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein—including 2019 media advice, 2016 vacation emails, and alleged coordination with figures like Woody Allen—expose a pattern of dismissing conspiracy theories while aligning with oligarchic interests. His pro-mandate COVID vaccine stance, opposition to Medicare for All pressure, and support for U.S. interventions in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine (described as a "Nazi regime") suggest deep state complicity, undermining leftist movements. Whistleblowers like Aubrey Lage at TPUSA also claim authoritarian suppression of dissent, while Lindsey Graham’s slurred Fox News rant hints at deeper establishment dysfunction. Chomsky’s history—from defending liberal Zionism to meeting with alleged war criminals like Ehud Barack—implies a long-standing role as a proxy for power, not truth. [Automatically generated summary]
I'll be in Lansing, Milwaukee, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets.
If you go anywhere, you're going to pay more.
Establishment media sets on its fight and so good luck.
Bullshit, they can't afford the medium speeds and jumps the medium and hits him head on.
It's the chimney tour show.
So it turns out Chomsky was exactly as I suspected.
He was most likely compromised by the intelligence community, not only because he comes straight out of MIT, but because of the things he did and said, I'm going to show you how he said it didn't matter who killed JFK, so stop looking into it.
He said that what Dick Cheney said about 9-11, how it happened, is exactly how it happened.
And you're a conspiracy theory if you think otherwise.
He said that people who want health care are kids who want candy.
And he said that you should take the COVID vaccine.
And if you don't, you should be separated from society.
And how you get food is your own problem.
These are all things that not a guy who pretends to be a lefty and speaking up for the working man would say.
This is that something that you would say if you were compromised by the oligarchy, the establishment, and the deep state, which I'm pretty sure Chomsky was at this point, because that's exactly the type of people that the deep state need.
They need somebody who seems so far left.
He's so out there that anybody any farther left than him is just crazy.
And in fact, he'll tell you they're crazy.
So that's his function.
And he did it.
And every four years, he told you you were crazy if you didn't vote for a Democrat.
So he kept you in the two-party duopoly, which he could never get you out of.
So here, come back, Chomsky taught a generation to dismiss ruling class coordination as a conspiracy theory while dining with the man who coordinated blackmail operations for that same ruling class.
So that's another reason why you know that he's probably compromised by the deep state.
Noam Chomsky was because his whole thing was dismiss the conspiracy theory that the ruling class coordinated.
But here he is.
Okay.
All right.
You know what they say about Chomsky?
Know him?
Ah, I didn't know him until you got him on an island with Jeffrey Epstein.
Come on.
Know him.
I hardly fucked him.
Yeah.
Newly released files shed light on Chomsky and Epstein's relationship.
The latest communications undermine Chomsky's earlier claims that he primarily had financial dealings with Epstein because he's already been approached with this and Chomsky dismissed him.
I don't have to answer for anything.
It was his finances.
So perhaps most strikingly, in late February 2019, Epstein represented to an associate that he had gotten advice from Chomsky over how to navigate the horrible way you are being treated in the press and the public.
So Chomsky's giving advice.
He's giving advice to Epstein on how to handle his public relations problem now that he's been convicted of his crimes with girls.
And he had to say that.
Did he say do a fluff interview with Steve Bannon?
Because it happened around this time and they busted him.
Hey, God.
That was 11 years after Epstein had pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl for prostitution.
And months before he would reportedly die by suicide while in federal custody awaiting trafficking charges.
So this is Chomsky.
Says, 11 years after Epstein pled guilty to soliciting underage girl for prostitution, this is what Chomsky said.
So here it is, Noam Chomsky giving Epstein advice on how to outlast the PDF file allegations against him.
So here it is, so you can read it.
This is Chomsky speaking to Epstein.
I've watched the horrible way you are being treated in the press and public.
It's painful to say, but I think the best way to proceed is to ignore it.
I've had plenty of experience, though, of course, not on this scale.
A Google search will bring up tons of hysterical accusations of all sorts, even groups devoted to vilifying me.
I pay no attention unless I'm approached for a comment on a specific matter.
It's a nuisance, but it's the best way.
The same conclusions from experiences of others, in some cases, close friends.
What the vultures, vultures, he's calling them vultures.
Okay, just so you know.
And by the way, Chomsky's not, he's an intellectual force of nature to throw good advice out with the bathwater, actually containing a baby.
Anyway, so Chomsky is telling Epstein that everyone and anyone picking on him is a vulture.
But remember, vultures only gather when you're already rotting.
So they don't attack anything that's alive.
Anyway, so here we go.
They're a vital part of the ecosystem, as a matter of fact.
That's right.
What the vultures darely want is a public response, which then provides a public opening for an onslaught of venomous attacks, many from just publicity seekers or cranks of all sorts, which are impossible to answer.
How do you prove that you are not a neo-Nazi who wants to kill the Jews or a grapist or whatever charge comes along?
That particularly true now.
That's particularly true now with the hysteria that has developed about abuse of women, which has reached the point that even questioning a charge is a crime worse than murder.
For virtually everyone who sees any of this, the reaction will be: where there's smoke, there's fire.
Maybe a raging fire.
Whatever the facts, which few will even think of investigating.
In general, it's best, I think, not to react unless directly questioned, particularly in the current mood, which I presume will fade away, even if not in time to prevent much torture and distress.
Hard to say, but it's the best advice I can think of.
So that is Noam Chomsky.
So you can come to me now.
He said the same thing to me, Jimmy, when I was on the Epstein list, as I told you, and it was comforting me a lot.
He said, just Netflix and chill, get a pizza.
So there he is advising Epstein on how to after he's already been 11 years after he's already pled guilty to procuring an underage girl for prostitution.
This is the second one.
And now this is him.
This is him after.
Okay, so just to look, just to let you know, the best, so this, there it is, the best way to proceed is to ignore it, Chomsky wrote, according to the text signed under his name that Epstein sent to a lawyer and publicist.
That's particularly true now.
So that's it.
Neither Chomsky nor his second wife and spokesperson, Valeria Chomsky, immediately responded to inquiries about the Epstein-related emails in question, including whether they disputed the authenticity.
So he's not saying anything about them because they are authentic.
Wait, the hysterical thing about women, remember Chomsky was hysterical about Steve Bannon, but here they all are, all Chummy.
Yes.
And he was hysterical about that he's a Nazi.
Remember that?
I do remember that.
Chomsky's affiliation with Epstein netted him invitations to vacation together and recognizable names to his orbit.
Instance, after the email showed him and the Chomsky's making plans to meet up in 2016, Epstein wrote to Noam Chomsky, enjoyed as always, come to New York or the Caribbean, enjoy the food.
We did too very much, Chomsky replied to Epstein.
Valeria is always keen on New York.
I'm really fantasizing about the Caribbean island.
That's Chomsky.
That's Chomsky.
In my mind, I'm already on vacation, Jimmy.
And it's not because of anything nefarious.
It's just that Chomsky always secretly longed to be a pirate.
He's got a case of the Mondays.
Yeah.
At another point the same year, the same year, Epstein, a Brooklyn native, discussed being free anytime to meet up with Chomsky in New York City because everyone in the city besides us will be gone separate from Woody.
Maybe we can do it again, meaning Woody Allen.
Imagine three of them together, what kind of Woody Allen movie that would make?
Wow.
I don't know.
She said, I did it somebody.
It's crazy.
Well, what did you say?
Maybe just stick it out.
I don't know.
Chomsky replied that it would be great to grab dinner with Epstein and the Allens, meaning Woody Allen and his wife, I guess.
And so Manufacturing Consent has a whole new meaning now.
Yeah, and so I just want to show you, this is Chomsky talking about 9-11 and the JFK murder.
And listen to what he says about 9-11 and listen to what he says about JFK's assassination.
Real shoo, isn't he?
Yeah.
You know, I'm pretty isolated on this in the West.
I mean, a large part of the left completely disagrees on this and has all kind of elaborate conspiracy theories about how it happened and why it happened and so on.
But I think they're just frickled, I think, completely wrong.
But also, I think it's diverting people away from serious issues.
I mean, it just doesn't make it.
I mean, even if we're true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares?
I mean, the main significance.
But it's a little bit like the.
So there he is saying it's ridiculous.
Even if it were true, who cares?
if it's true who cares he's talking about does he work from assad he's That's awfully massad of him to say.
What?
Who cares about JFK and 9-11?
Ben Shapiro said that.
Yeah, that's what Ben Shapiro.
Exactly, Kurt.
He sounds exactly like Ben Shapiro.
Oh, JFK.
Well, here's who he goes into JFK.
He goes, it's just like the huge energy that's put out.
I'm trying to figure out who killed John F. Kennedy.
He goes, it's just like the huge energy put out on trying to figure out who killed JFK.
So what he's saying is that's a misappropriation of your energy to try to figure out who assassinated and did a coup of the United States government.
That it's misplaced energy to try to figure out who actually couped the United States government, which is what that was.
That was a coup.
This is crazy.
And this is him saying that's a misappropriation of your energy.
Listen to what he says next.
Yeah, who knows?
And who cares?
I mean, plenty of people get killed all the time.
Why does it matter that one of them had to be Don F. Kennedy?
Who knows?
And who cares who killed people get killed all the time?
What does it matter that one of them was John F. Kennedy?
Because it was a coup of our government.
If it doesn't matter, why should I vote then?
I mean, like, of course, that's not the biggest deal in the world that somebody killed the leader of a nation and took it over.
I mean, I know it's not a big deal when we do it, but it happened to us.
That's crazy.
Who cares?
So who cares that maybe a foreign country or our own CIA or Lyndon Baines Johnson, who became president, was in on murdering the president and overthrowing the government?
The will of the people, the duly elected government of the United States, someone overturned an election and did a coup on.
So that's who cares.
So that's why if that doesn't make you think, and he's not a dumb guy, he's an intellectual.
That's crazy that as a smart guy like that.
So who cares?
Let the boys kill each other, right?
No.
So he knows what he's saying is crazy.
He's doing that for a purpose.
And if you can give me a better reason than he's compromised by the intelligence community, I'll listen to it.
But I haven't heard of a better explanation of why he would say this crazy, stupid stuff.
Even if it's true, 9-11.
What does it mean?
Who cares?
All of the dead people, they're dead now.
And we all know now for a fact that 9-11 did not happen any way they try to pretend it did.
Okay, here.
Let's see.
If there was some reason to believe that there was a high-level conspiracy, it might be interesting.
He said, if there's reason to believe that it was a high-level conspiracy, it might be interesting.
Okay.
The evidence against that is overwhelming.
But the evidence against that is overwhelming.
What evidence against that are you talking about?
You're talking about the Warren Commission?
Are you talking about another miracle bullet?
What evidence?
Hey, Michael Tracy.
What's this mountain of evidence?
Sounds like Michael Tracy.
The evidence that Epstein wasn't a trafficker is overwhelming.
Do you see that dipshit posted like the report from the Kash Patel fucking lied?
Yeah.
It's unreal.
This to me is on.
And this, right, would be enough for me to think, oh, of course, the guy who comes from MIT who dismisses 9-11 conspiracy theories, even if they're true.
And JFK conspiracy theories, even if they're true, dismisses them.
Who cares?
Well, he knows why it's important.
He knows what it means.
He knows why it matters.
He knows that cooing a government matters.
He knows, especially if it's a foreign country.
He knows, especially if it's a vice president who took over for him, who's working for that foreign country.
He knows also if it's our own intelligence community.
That means that the intelligence community is running the country and not the duly elected politicians.
That's why it matters.
That's why it's all important.
And he knows this.
And so there's nothing that makes me crazier than when a guy who I know is 10 times smarter than me acts like he's dumber than me.
Yeah, well, Israel does their propaganda, isn't it?
And after that, it's just a matter of, you know, if it happened to be a jealous husband or the matthew or someone else, what difference does it make?
It's just taking energy away from serious issues of the ones that don't matter.
And I think the same is true of your personal.
So there you go.
What does it matter?
Force To Vote Debate00:14:34
It doesn't matter.
Who cares?
Who killed the president?
We got to worry about serious issues, Jimmy.
Yes, we got to worry about serious.
Okay.
Building concentration camps for the unvaccinated.
So he's participating in the conspiracy.
If the only reason why he would do that is because he's compromised by the deep state, him doing that is his participation in the conspiracy to kill JFK.
Right?
By extension, am I being.
I think he participated in the stuff Epstein was doing from the looks of the emails to me.
So he's telling you that one of the worst conspiracies in the history of humankind doesn't matter.
And in fact, it's just a crazy conspiracy.
Let me hear what he says.
What are your thoughts on mandating vaccines?
Well, it's a mixed story.
I think we people who refuse to accept vaccines, I think the right response for them is not to force them to, but rather to insist that they be isolated.
If people decide I am willing to be a danger to the community by refusing the vaccine, they should then say, well, I also have the decency to isolate myself.
Okay.
I don't want a vaccine, but I don't have the right to run around harming people.
I'll just, that should be a convention.
Enforcing is a different question.
So he's saying that the people who didn't want to take the experimental medical treatment that is not a vaccine and had horrible side effects and didn't stop transmission or contraction.
So there's no reason to have someone else take.
And by the way, you're going to take the vaccine.
Why do you need someone else to take the vaccine?
I'll never, you'll never be able to explain that to me.
And he can't explain it, but he said they want to harm me.
Well, if the vaccine really works the way you say it works, then why do you need someone else to take it?
I don't need someone else to take a Tylenol when I get a headache.
I take the Tylenol.
I don't need someone else to drink booze for me to get drunk.
I drink it.
So again, this is him doing the bidding of the deep state because the deep state was behind COVID.
100%.
100%.
Yeah.
Above the deep state.
Look at, look at, yo, did he wear a mask and check the girls at the island to make sure they're vaccinated?
Right.
So here he is.
Here he is.
He doubles down on this.
Here he is.
So Primo Nutmeg, he asks him about this again.
Like, do you really?
So listen.
You talk about folks having the freedom to separate if they don't want to abide by these vaccine mandates.
What would that look like on a practical level?
Does that mean that folks need to stay home and have like rosaries delivered to them?
Does it mean like separated communities of folks who are unvaccinated?
Or just, you know, how do you think this would practically play out?
Same way as with people who say that I don't want to accept traffic rules.
I suppose there were people who said it's an attack on my liberty to make me stop at a red light.
It's government overreach.
I don't want the state to have that power over my private life.
Well, such people have to be, they should have the decency to remove themselves from the community.
If they refuse to do that, then measures have to be taken to safeguard the community from them.
Then comes the practical question that you ask.
So he's saying, if they don't remove, if you don't take this experimental medical treatment, that doesn't do anything that they say it does, meaning stopping transmission and contraction.
And in fact, the more, according to the Cleveland Clinic, the more of these shots you take, the more likely you are to get COVID and more likely you are to get sick.
Oh, no shit.
So the exact opposite.
And he's saying that we have to then take measures to protect ourselves from them, meaning isolate them.
He's saying it.
Don't get away to a private island or something, no?
Maybe a private island.
How can we get food to them?
Well, that's actually their problem.
So then he says, how would we get food to them?
Listen to what he says.
Hang on.
Then comes the practical question that you ask.
How can we get food to them?
Well, that's actually their problem.
That's their problem.
How do we get food to the people who we just kicked out of society because they wouldn't go along with big pharma and the CIA COVID narrative?
Very Gaza of him, isn't it?
In fact, I'm hearing the Israeli intel oozing out of him now that I didn't spot at the time.
At the time, remember, you go, I guess he's old and he's afraid of dying or something because he seemed to be this is straight up propaganda.
This is straight up.
He's in on it.
He's in on it.
He's a piece of shit.
He's always been on it.
Yes, he's always been in on it.
So the most important thing in the world, I brought on leftist economists.
I brought on Dr. Who did I bring on?
Richard Wolf, Dr. Richard Wolfe.
And he said, of course, you shouldn't give in to mandates for workers because you should never give more power to your employer over controlling your body.
And that's what this is.
And so just from a worker's perspective, which Chomsky always claims to champion the workers, but he doesn't really, here he is.
Here he is screwing the workers and screwing anybody who doesn't go along with big pharma and the deep state's agenda.
Screw them, separate them from society.
How do they get food?
That's their problem.
Hey, maybe you and your pals could eat food in front of them as they starve, right?
Rabbi Chomsky.
And he gives you that stupid argument that not taking an experimental medical treatment is somehow akin to not following traffic lights.
They got nothing to do with it.
Hey, you know the difference between a traffic light and a experimental medical treatment?
When I go through a traffic light, I don't have to wait 15 minutes to see if I die.
Yeah.
Well, so that's the big difference.
So that's that horrible, horrible analogy that comedians.
I heard comedians make this stupid argument that he's making.
It makes no sense.
Why is it follows authority?
Of course.
He looks at you as cattle.
That's why he's talking this way.
So all that Zillium thing where they lick his cattle, that's why, oh, let him get food.
He sounds like Randy Fine, don't he?
Yep.
And so here he is being asked about when during COVID, when the Democrats took over the House, they had a majority of like eight votes, which was the squad.
It was AOC, Rashida Talib, Pramila Jayapel, all those people that are in the squad, right?
So if they all voted together, they could force Nancy Pelosi to give them something for their vote for her as speaker.
It's the same thing the Republicans did to McCarthy.
The Freedom Caucus, they wanted certain things before they voted for him, and he couldn't become the Speaker without their votes because it was such a narrow majority in the House.
They needed every vote of every Republican.
So they had power over the Speaker to extract things for their vote.
That's what we wanted.
The Democrats, the squad, AOC and all those people, we wanted them to extract something from Nancy Pelosi for her vote.
Well, everybody in the Democratic Party had always said we want to vote for, especially AOC, even Nancy Pelosi said they wanted to have a vote for Medicare for All on the House floor.
Let's have a vote.
And what's the good thing about that?
Well, we have a discussion about Medicare for All on a national stage that everybody's watching during a pandemic.
So that would be a great time to have this discussion and then have a vote on it and see where people fall because 100 Democrats in the Congress say they're for Medicare for all.
Well, let's see how they vote.
Let's see.
So now, and AOC and everybody said it's good to have a vote to see where people stand.
So now we're like, well, you campaigned on that, which they did.
So we're asking you to actually do that.
It was called force to vote.
We wanted AOC and the squad to say, hey, we're not going to vote for Nancy Pelosi to become Speaker, and she can't become Speaker without our votes unless they have a vote for Medicare for All on the floor.
Not that we thought it would win, but we thought it would be a great move forward for the movement for Medicare for All to get a discussion on this and have a vote on it on the House floor because everybody in the Democratic Party, in the DSA, in the Progressive Caucus have said that we AOC famously said it when she was running for office, that we can't even get a vote for Medicare for all on the House floor.
We can't even get a vote.
So this is what he's talking about.
So we started at this show a thing called force to vote.
It became a big movement and they didn't do it.
And then two years later, when the Republicans took over, they did it.
They actually did a force to vote.
And it's because we were told we couldn't do it.
So here he is being asked about that force to vote and what he thought of it.
Let's take a look at the real world, not a dream world, the world we live in.
So that's what every establishment hack would say.
We live in the real world.
We don't live in a dream where you can't just have everything you want, that the Medicare for All vote would fail.
We know it's going to fail, but the point is to get everybody on the record in the middle of a pandemic and have people start talking from coast to coast about Medicare for all and our health care system.
That was the point of that.
And that would be a victory, even if the bill got voted down, which we knew it would, because everybody in Congress is corrupt and bought by the health insurance company and big pharma.
So we knew it would fail.
That's not why we asked for it.
We asked for it because it would be a big step forward and start a conversation and would get everybody on the record.
And now we know where you stand.
You can sign a petition saying you're for it, but now vote for it.
So here he is trying to say that that is not in the real world.
So what he's doing is using the framing of the establishment.
He's framing this not as an activist, not as a person who stands up for workers or poor people or regular voters.
He's framing this as an oligarch frames this.
Who framed it this way?
Hillary Clinton framed it this way.
And that's what he's doing.
So let's listen.
Let's take a look at the real world, not a dream world, the world we live in.
Suppose you manage to push Pelosi to say, let's have a vote on Medicare for all.
And the Senate pushed Schumer to have it.
We know exactly what's going to happen.
50 Republicans will vote against it.
Large number of Democrats will vote against it.
Two, certainly.
Not June and Cinema, probably plenty of others.
So he's mixing it.
We weren't asking for a vote in the Senate.
We're asking for a vote in the House.
And so he's completely trying to muddy the issue so you don't know what he's talking.
So you don't know what the issue is really about.
That's a trick of a propagandist.
And this is Noam Chomsky doing propaganda.
That's a trick of a propagandist.
He's completely misframing it.
He's saying, well, all you need is to get two Democrats to vote against it in the House.
No, no, it's that we're not talking about the Senate.
We're talking about the House.
So we can weed out the people that vote against it.
That's right.
You know what you want to do with the unvaccinated?
Well, take that thought.
And now the pieces of shit there who work for fucking Israel like you.
Here we go.
And is let's do something to be defeated.
Is that a strategy?
So he wouldn't come on my show.
He would go on everybody else's show during Force to Vote.
He wouldn't come on my show because he knew that I would see right through his BS and I would expose him for going against the things he claims to be.
He's not those things.
He turns out he was compromised all along by the deep state.
So here's.
I just want to get Mumford in Sunday.
So let's, yeah, so let's listen to this.
I'll play it all the way through.
Let's take a look at the real world, not a dream world, the world we live in.
Suppose you manage to push Pelosi to say, let's have a vote on Medicare for all.
And the Senate push Schumer to have it.
We know exactly what's going to happen.
50 Republicans will vote against it.
Large number of Democrats will vote against it.
Two, certainly.
Not June and Cinema, probably plenty of others.
So what we're saying is, let's do something to be defeated.
Is that a strategy?
That's not our strategy.
I mean, you know, it's nice to have, to say, I want this.
It's nice to say, I want this.
What he's talking about is healthcare, healthcare that he's had his entire life.
And in fact, he's had at least Medicare for 40 years at this point, 30 years at this point, because you get it at 65 and he's around 95 or so.
So he's had it for 30 years.
He's had unlimited health care, but he doesn't.
But if you want it, guess what?
It's unreasonable.
Let's listen to what he says.
If you want it.
Not children who say, I want this piece of candy.
Then you're like children who say you want this piece of candy.
That's the verbatim what Hillary Clinton would say about Medicare for all.
That's verbatim what she would say, that you're like a child who wants candy.
He's referring to healthcare in the middle of a pandemic as candy.
That's the exact talking points that came directly from the deep state, which Hillary Clinton said all the time.
That is not an activist.
That is not a guy who stands up for the working people.
That is not a guy who stands up for you.
That is a guy who's there to trick you.
That is a guy who's 100% compromised.
That's who Joam Chomsky is to this day because he's still alive.
And that's why he wouldn't come on my show.
He would go on shows that had five subscribers.
I had millions of subscribers.
He wouldn't come on my show.
Yeah.
Is that weird?
The guy who set up Force the Vote, the guy who was having hit pieces written about him in all the establishment magazines and rags, everybody was coming.
I was trending on Twitter almost every day for months because of it.
He wouldn't come on my show because he knew I would expose him.
It wouldn't take much.
I'm going to ask for it even if I'm fucked up in my room.
So that's Noam Chomsky equating healthcare activists with children who want candy.
Well, what does he call pizza, I wonder?
I wonder what he calls pizza.
So he was also just, I don't want to spend too much time on this, but he was against, you know, that BDS, which sounds like it's got to do with spanking sex, but it's not.
It's boycott, divestment, and sanctions.
So that's that BDS is when people say, hey, let's get together and boycott Israel.
Let's not buy any of the goods that are produced in Israel, and this will be a way for us to pressure their government.
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions?00:04:36
The same thing we did with South Africa, 40 years ago, we did that.
They had a big song by all the musicians, and the song was, I'm not going to play Sun City, meaning I'm not going to go there.
We're going to boycott South Africa.
Guess what?
It worked.
Yeah, it worked so well that Israel had to secretly give them nuclear weapons or pretend to not like apartheid.
So I just want to let you know he's against it.
It's not suspicious, so he's against a nonviolent way to protest a genocidal government.
So Jason Zaharis, I'll just read this because it's perfect.
He says, Noam Chomsky was a poison on the American left.
He taught many generations to dismiss ruling class coordination as a conspiracy theory, often smearing those who risked their careers like Michael Parenti.
Now, we already told you that he was the GOAT.
He was the real deal.
And Chomsky's a phony.
Meanwhile, he was dining with Jeffrey Epstein and flying on his private jet.
Chomsky was the perfect encapsulation of the deep state's proxy dissident because he was firmly anti-communist and anti-Soviet.
So the CIA erased his previous activism against the Vietnam War and solidified his position at MIT, which is a CIA-run institution.
And their formosadrun.
Then their formosad run.
He then went on to support a number of Washington's imperial objectives, meaning imperialism.
He repeated the State Department's propaganda lines on Libya, on Syria, on Yugoslavia, on China, and on Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela in a way that would give the United States justification for sanctions or intervention.
He supported two-state solution, liberal Zionism, essentially formalizing Israel's 1948 NACBA against the Palestinians.
He also strongly backed arms to the Ukrainian Nazi regime as they carried out genocide against the ethnic Russians and the Donbass.
Who saw that coming?
Who saw that coming?
He supported forced vaccinations during COVID and placing the unvaccinated in concentration camps.
He denounced force to vote and called universal health care advocates children wanting candy.
He funneled left-wing energy back into the DC establishment by endorsing Democrats every four years.
He would never endorse an independent.
He would never tell you to get in the streets.
He would never tell you to protest for anything.
He would tell you to keep voting for the people oppressing you.
It was these positions that led to further smears against Michael Parenti and other principled authors who not only denounced but also exposed and analyzed the class structure of U.S. imperialism.
So it's no wonder that as he was condescendingly talking down to the Palestinian-led BDS movement, he was meeting privately with one of history's worst Israeli war criminals, Ehud Barack.
And worst of all, the meetings were brokered by Jeffrey Epstein himself, the PDF file oligarch and Mossad agent who mass abused and trafficked young girls and coordinated S blackmail operations for the same ruling class that Noam Chomsky defended by dismissing the ideas of coordination as conspiracy theories.
Yeah, the organ thieving class, we'll call them.
You're a scumbag from the start.
So I know that there's a lot of people and people I like and respect that still want to praise Noam Chomsky, but I knew he was full of shit during Force to Vote.
That was it for me.
JFK, 9-11, Force to Vote every four years telling you to vote for the duopoly, the same corporatists.
But then when Force to Vote, I didn't know he had those positions on Syria and Libya.
I didn't even know that.
Well, remember, he was on the wrong side of Cambodia.
He was on the side of Pol Pot famously.
So he's never gotten it right.
Who is he working for?
Unbelievable, man.
That's just unreal.
First of all, never believed Israel killed JFK until now.
I've just heard two scumbag Mossad agents say, who cares who killed Joe?
It sounds like Benjamin.
Which indicates to me definitive proof Israel did it.
You tell me how else to take that because that's the only way I could see.
Lindsey Graham's Controversy00:13:00
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So Lindsey Graham has been going on TV and he sounds like Kamala Harris.
He sounds like he's mixing booze and Xanax and he's slurring a lot.
So here he is from Fox News Sunday.
Let's look.
Market says they're going to push for it.
There's no sound.
Markets say they're going to push for it.
Ready?
Market says they're going to push for it.
Well, what we're going to do is, well, I'm not going to agree.
That would grind it to a halt.
If you had a judicial warrant in all these things, you couldn't deal with mass.
We're not dealing with the, we're trying to get people out of the country who have no right to be here, judge.
Have people who are illegal in rents.
You remember Kim Davis?
I mean, he's slurring a lot.
Now, if this is a neurological problem, I don't want to make fun of it because that's not right.
But what is going on?
He is slurring his speech.
And it does sound like he's drinking and taking Xanax.
So let's legal in Rinse.
You remember Kim Davis?
Have people who are illegal in rents.
You remember Kim Davis?
I do.
Okay, who's Kim Davis, folks?
Nothing to do with illegal immigration.
There's nothing to do with illegal immigration.
Exactly.
And that's exactly how someone talks when they're drinking.
That's exactly what someone sounds like when they're drinking.
Kim Davis was a clerk of court in Kentucky.
The Supreme Court ruled that the law of the land was that gay marriage was legal.
That gay marriage was recognized under the U.S. Constitution.
If you didn't recognize gay marriage, you violated the Equal Protection Clause.
She's a religious conservative.
People applied.
Two gay guys applied for a marriage license.
She said she wouldn't issue it, even though it was the law of the land.
She went to jail.
I was asked, what about it?
Well, I agree with her political, philosophical, not her religious views, but she's a public official.
He couldn't come up with the word philosophy.
I didn't agree with her political philosophy.
I didn't go along with her thing.
That's wild.
This is wild.
Has to do this.
You can't change the law because you disagree with it.
She went to jail.
She should have.
I think it's a dividing moment in his presidency.
Ronald Reagan went to the Berlin Wall and he said, tear down this wall.
He didn't say, could you make it lower?
Biggest thing you could possibly ever do to the Mideast is take this regime down and they're as weak as they've ever been since 1979.
Mr. President, you can do it.
I hope you will do it.
And if you do it, this is Reagan blessed.
Okay.
This is Reagan what?
Blessed.
Is that what he said, Reagan blessed?
It sounded like that.
Well, then let's definitely not do it.
So let's listen to the exact beginning again.
And this is what you get for letting Kamala Harris coach you at lunch before your interview.
Don't try to keep up with her.
You don't have the tolerance, Lindsey.
How much is we're going to push for it?
Well, what we're going to do is, well, I'm not going to agree.
That would grind it to a halt.
I'm not going to try to grind it off.
I mean, he can't.
He's literally slurring like a drunk.
So let's.
Here's another one.
Lindsey Graham attempting to say he wants sanctuary city policies to end.
Let's listen.
I want sanctuary city policy.
I want sanctuary.
Sanctuary.
Here we go.
I want sanctuary city policy.
I want to sanctuary.
Listen.
Barney, can you put me in the trunk tank and then I will get up in the morning?
It's like a scene from Andy Griffith's show where Otis would come in drunk and put himself in jail, sleep there, and wake up sober, and they'd let him up.
I mean, I find it hard to believe that Miss Lindsey Graham don't have a tolerance.
Come on.
Lindsey Graham, that's a chem sex guy if I've ever seen one in my life.
I want sanctuary city policy to end.
Here's another one.
He's on the, I'm not going to say Senator Graham is drunk because that would be unprofessional.
Okay, here we go.
But they got to see us fighting.
We've got to give them a chance to see the difference between us and liberal Democrats.
In two weeks, we're going to have.
Sounds like Foster Brooks.
I mean, you know who that is.
He's a famous comedian.
His whole gig was he.
He would pretend he was drunk.
He showed up and he would talk like, and that's what he's doing right here.
But they got to see us fighting.
We've got to give them a chance to see the difference between us and liberal Democrats.
The difference between.
Yo, have the decency and gravitas to get some coke and even out before your big fox.
No kidding.
Come on.
This is Bushley.
But they got to see us fighting.
We've got to give them a chance to see the difference between us and liberal Democrats.
In two weeks, we're going to have that chance.
And I can't wait till John Kennedy gets on the floor and sticks it to them about the insanity of sanctuary cities.
I can't wait till he comes up here tonight.
Yeah.
Let's listen to that first one again.
I think that was the best.
This is the best one.
I'd say they're going to push for it.
Well, what we're going to do is, well, I'm not going to agree.
That would grind it to a halt.
If you had a judicial warrant in all these things, you couldn't deal with mass.
We're not dealing with it.
We're trying to get people out of the country who have no right to be here, Judge.
Have people who are illegal immigrants.
You remember Kim Davis?
I do.
Okay, who's Kim Davis, folks?
Nothing to do with illegal immigration.
That's two times in a row.
That's like two times within five seconds.
I got legal immigration.
Was a clerk of court in Kentucky.
The Supreme Court ruled that the law of the land was that gay marriage was legal.
That gay marriage was legal.
Okay?
It's legal.
They really ruled gay marriage is legal.
Okay.
Recognized under the U.S. Constitution.
If you didn't recognize gay marriage, you violated the Equal Protection Clause.
She's a religious conservative.
She's a religious conservative.
She's conservative.
She's religious conservative.
Look at Steve Bannon laughing at him.
Steve Bannon is laughing at him.
I see.
You hide your head.
Very amused by me.
Chomsky thinks it's funny, too.
What's that, Chomsky?
It is funny.
It is funny.
People apply.
Two gay guys applied for guys are too gay.
Too gay.
Let's listen.
Let's listen to this.
She's a religious conservative.
People apply.
Two gay guys applied for hammers.
Like, if he did one of these, it would be all right.
If he did two of them, okay.
These are unbelievable.
Marriage license.
She said she wouldn't issue it, even though it was the law of the land.
She went to jail.
I was asked, what about it?
Well, I agree with her political, philosophical, not her religious views.
Her religious views.
This is.
I hope he gets a wellness check, because if he's not drinking, then there's something seriously wrong with him, right?
Kirk, have you, now you've been around the block.
I've been spent my whole life in nightclubs.
I can't fathom it, Jimmy.
I cannot fathom it because if you're who was the guy in the wheelchair, Madison Cawthorne, that said, you know, people were offering him to do Coke at parties, people that he looked up to.
So I don't know which Republican, but I would bet it's Lindsey Graham.
I would have bet it was Lindsey Graham.
I would say.
Because he's like a guy whose mouth still works at that sex party and he's a beautiful.
Anyway, he doesn't have blow.
What happened?
Were we really getting blow from Venezuela?
You know, he I think he drinks because we let him down.
That's what I we won't we won't go in.
We won't, we're against the war in Iran.
And I'm sorry.
We didn't put boots on the ground in Venezuela yet.
And that's why I think he's drinking because we really thought we're going to get the boots on the ground.
It's myrrhs.
But all those murals are in Iran.
They got murals.
I just bought a carpet for five bucks.
Remember, he was he went to Iraq and I got a carpet for five bucks.
Yep.
Yeah.
Okay.
That's let's let's Lindsey Graham as a public official.
She has to do this.
You can't change the law because you disagree with it.
She went to jail.
She should have.
I think it's the dividing moment in his presidency.
Ronald Reagan went to the Berlin Wall and he said, tear down this wall.
He didn't say, could you make it lower?
Biggest thing.
Can you make it a little lower?
By the way, pretty sure Ronald Reagan was when they instituted Sanctuary Cities.
The Republicans did.
Yes.
To lower your goddamn wages.
So, like, he was there for this.
He don't remember what happened.
You could possibly ever do to the Mideast is take this regime down, and they're as weak as they've ever been since 1979.
Mr. President, you can do it.
I hope you will do it.
And if you do, if you do it, this is Reagan Bluss.
Okay.
This is Reagan Bluss.
I think he was trying to say plus.
And his eyes look hammered.
He looks hammered.
And when he says, this is Reagan Bluss.
I think he meant to say plus.
So it's Reagan who instituted Sanctuary Cities.
Plus, we're getting rid of them.
He's hammered.
Guy's shithammered.
He's on something.
I mean, we made fun of Kamala Harris when she was obviously on Taking Too Mini Xanax.
And so we got to bring it to.
I don't want to be optimistic, Jimmy, but are we not going to have war in Iran?
Because he has not been the same since the first day of not having war in Iran.
I know.
He's been different.
No kidding.
That's why I trust what Professor Zhang said to me because he said Russia and China helped Iran go through Starlink and track all those mossads that were starting the BLM riots, but worse because they were shooting at cops and shit.
So that's probably why we didn't go in.
If I had to guess why, is because they knew they killed all the violent actors.
So that's who was keeping it going.
He was really depressed, dude.
He was like, no, we stand with you.
Yeah.
So they got, so do you think they successfully weeded out most, if not all, of the Mossad violent actors that were making the protest violent?
I'm not even sure Professor Zhang is even a professor.
Dude From Think Tank00:02:17
It was unclear.
I think he's just a high school teacher, but apparently that's open news that's known, pretty well known.
He told me China and Israel are very close.
I know it might seem like they're against each other to peasants, but they're cool.
But China and Russia help with that Iran thing, and they traced him through the Starlink.
He was very specific.
It's on the episode of Derp with Curb.
And, okay, the coincidences were, I heard about the Venezuela interfering with our elections thing, which sounded like nonsense early on.
And he brought that up.
And he said, how would Maduro be there unless him and his wife are both kidnapped, unless he's in on it?
And then this guy is upset because they killed all those Kurds that the Mossad ran.
It was mostly Kurds doing that.
Do you know that?
Mossad-run Kurds.
No, I didn't know that.
Professor Zhang, can you again?
Let's what do maybe he's a Chinese spy that's just giving me information.
I don't give a shit.
It looks like it's bearing out, does it not?
Oi!
I don't want any trouble.
That's all.
Dude, Lindsay, we got to get him.
We stand with you.
That's such a funny clip.
I got to put that on the soundboard.
We stand with you.
Let's just get it after.
Oh, where do you see the argument I had today?
Oh, really?
Oh, you were on a podcast before this, right?
Okay.
What was the podcast?
Oh, it was my friend Lev, but he wanted me to talk to his other friend from an institute from a think tank.
Oh, about.
Oh, boy, get this, Jimmy.
He's both a hardcore Zionist and he wants to keep Ukraine going.
So, like, the best of both worlds.
Oh, my God.
I wish I would have been there.
That would have been fun.
It was just really me yelling at someone a lot.
But I feel very entertaining.
I couldn't believe the shit they were saying.
Dude, these people have no, and the think tank ones are dumb as shit.
Like, they don't really know anything.
How many of these people high up do you realize don't know anything?
Because they're trained to never look at the big picture on purpose.
It's a virtue.
But they do say things like we should have the only standing Blue Water Navy.
That's right.
They'd call it Blue Water Navy.
I've never heard of it.
He told me Max Blumenthal is a scumbag.
This Kabad plant of a dude from a think tank.
Charlie's Challenge00:09:39
Oh, my God.
At one point, I'm like, why does that have the foreign accent telling me where my money should go to what country?
That's the most galling part of all.
They always hate the journalists who the establishment media also hate.
Isn't that funny?
It's like, really?
So the establishment media hates this guy, but you also hate this guy.
I think I get it.
Dude, a bunch of these people are under the impression.
You know how everybody hated that Joe Rogan had a podcast that did better than the news?
Yes.
And but couldn't somehow put together that maybe your side is so obviously wrong to anyone with less money than you at this point that that might be why then you fucked up.
They cannot get that in their head.
It's that.
They have in their head, like, oh, I know it's pop, I know it's popular to say that APAC's problem.
I know it's really like, why do you think that is?
I know.
Why do you think it is popular to say that?
Oh, I know it's cool to say Ukraine's not working out.
Yeah, now it is, now that it's obviously not working out, asshole.
I said it the whole time.
Yeah, we said it day one that this war is going to end on Russia's terms the way they want it.
The latest whistleblower from Inside TPUSA, there's been a lot of whistleblowers from inside TPUSA.
Here's the latest.
Now we know that Erica referred, she pretended to be upset at Candace Owens looking into who really killed Charlie Kirk.
She pretended to, what made her upset about that was that people were casting aspersions on people who worked for TPUSA and she called them her family.
And if you go after my family, which of course we know they're not your family, they're employees at a giant quarter billion dollar corporation.
They're not your family.
But that was her.
That's how she referred to the employees at TPUSA as her family.
And then we find out that they're firing everybody at the TPUSA in the most disgusting ways, right?
So we've already played a video that one woman, when she was being fired, she was pleading for a reason, and they wouldn't give her a reason why they were firing her.
They just were firing her.
And that's that after she got done working for weeks and weeks, if not months, at 20 hours a day, making sure everything.
So she was certainly part of the TPUS family and she certainly worked at a high level.
And they just fired her and she was really beside herself.
It was evil what they did.
It was beyond distasteful or rude.
It was evil.
And now here's another woman who got fired because of a TPUSA executive having a conversation with an Uber driver.
And an Uber driver implicated said this woman was saying bad things about, didn't believe the official TPUSA story about the assassination.
So they fired her.
Here she is.
She's going to talk.
She's going to got something to say.
I was terminated from Turning Point because I am questioning the narrative of what happened to my role model and CEO, Charlie Kirk, on the day of his assassination.
What is being told to us in the mainstream media just really doesn't add up to me.
And I'm really hopeful that one day it will.
But as it stands right now, it just doesn't.
And so I've been here in the background talking with people, expressing how I truly feel, because as an American citizen, I have the right to my freedom of speech and my freedom of thought.
And I have a lot of concerns and a lot of questions about what took place that day and the events leading up to that day.
It is from my own experience that you can't question the narrative and work at Turning Point.
That is how I feel.
That is how other people I've talked to feel.
It goes against everything that Charlie ever stood for.
Charlie was someone who did question things, who did challenge the narrative.
And I know that if anything, anything at all were to have happened to myself or another employee or any other peer within the Turning Point family, that Charlie would be doing the same thing if we were brutally assassinated in the way that he was.
He would have never lived it down.
And that is what I'm standing by as well.
I am not going to just idly sit by and hope that the truth comes to light.
I'm going to take action.
I'm going to ask questions.
I'm going to talk to other people.
And I refuse to apologize for having my own freedom of thought, which is something that Charlie ingrained in me and so many other young people.
So really the purpose of me coming on here and speaking with you today is to just bring light to the situation of the treatment happening inside the organization.
All of these people who have been terminated were the most hardworking, loyal, honest employees that Turning Point has ever had.
And I know that because I've actually been at Turning Point longer than most people.
You can, that's public record.
You can see it for yourself on these job websites.
Turning point's average length of employment is about a year and a half to two.
And so to be there for almost five years is actually quite some time.
I've seen the media and marketing team, for example, turn over at least twice, consuming of about 40 people.
And so I know that these people have been some of the most loyal, hardworking, and honest individuals to ever pass through the organization because I've been there, done that, and seen it all.
I'm doing this for them.
And I'm doing this for my friends who I consider family who are still there in hopes that they will start to receive better treatment by the leadership there because nobody deserves to be let go without cause.
And frankly, it's a loss for Turning Point.
We're all going to be better off because of this because we have removed ourselves from an environment that was no longer serving us.
And in my opinion, no longer serving the Lord, which was Charlie's entire intention.
So, Baron, what's your reaction to that video and the fact that they've turned Turning Point into the exact opposite thing that Charlie Kirk was about, which was about freedom of thought, asked me question everything.
And now they're firing summarily people without cause because they just don't think exactly the way Erica Kirk does.
What's your response?
Well, first, I find that woman eminently believable.
Yes.
Like, you know, you get a sense when someone's talking, whether you believe them or not.
That's why I don't believe anything Erica Kirk says.
You just get this sense when someone's talking, whether they're full of it or not.
And I find that woman very believable right there, Aubrey Lage.
So I took everything she said.
I actually watched that video about 10 times before I talked about it last night.
And I, the conclusion I came to was that Charlie had lost complete control of the organization.
And he had become an impediment to the mission of the people who he initially surrounded himself with, but who had squeezed him out of operational control over his own organization.
He didn't have control over his messaging.
He didn't have control over his schedule.
He didn't have, he lost control of absolutely every aspect of TPUSA by the time he passed away.
And so finally, he just had to be squeezed out for good.
And you would think, I mean, to me, this seems that the people at TPUSA, not only are they corrupt and probably, probably criminally corrupt,
they're definitely covering up what happened at the assassination, but they're some of the dumbest people in the world because of how badly everything they're saying and doing looks to normal people who aren't on the take, right?
And so did they really think they were going to be able to fire their most loyal employees in such a heinous way without cause and have it not blow back on them?
So, I mean, what, do you, do you have any special take on how bad they are just at PR?
Well, all you have to do is look.
I mean, they could have come out and really taken control of the narrative initially as soon as they realized people didn't buy the official FedSlop narrative right out of the gate.
They could, you know, TPUSA had every opportunity to come out and say, look, we've got a lot of different camera angles.
We're going to edit this down so it's not gory.
We don't want to disrespect Charlie's legacy, but we'll let you know absolutely everything everybody was doing every step of the way.
When the widow is lying and getting caught lying over and over and over again, and I believe she was.
Obviously, I don't have access to her personal conversations, but I believe the reporting that she's being dishonest.
It raises the specter that everybody around her is also being dishonest because none of them are calling her out.
Andrew Colvet, who is the lead spokesperson and frankly doing a horrific job.
But he's the lead spokesperson.
Yeah.
He's allowing Erica Kirk to lie about conversations he supposedly had about Twitter messages he put out.
And she's just running over him with the bus and he's not stopping it.
And it makes her look bad.
It makes the entire organization look bad.
I've talked to employees about how the employees are treated, how they're paid.
It is a nightmare below the upper, upper levels, the highest levels of TPUSA.
The employees don't feel like they're being respected, listened to, believed, or heard in any manner whatsoever.
Affordable Premium Program00:00:57
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDorkomedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.