Here's What EVERYONE Is Missing About Candace Owens Investigation!
Is Candace Owens being unfairly attacked for hosting an open-source investigation rather than presenting finalized conclusions? Jimmy thinks so, emphasizing that Owens' role is to surface leads and tips that the broader community can then investigate. He highlights commentary from "Jesse On Fire," who explains that Owens acts as a central hub for vetted clues, while viewers collectively verify, debunk, or confirm them without turning disagreements into infighting. Jimmy goes on to criticize media figures and influencers who frame unverified leads as proof of incompetence or malice, claiming this division serves institutional interests that want investigations shut down. He concludes that discrediting Candace is a strategy to derail collective inquiry, arguing that real investigations require following every lead to its end—even ones that go nowhere. Plus segments on comments from a prominent Israeli billionaire that the US will have to forgo free speech rights for Israel and the Trump administration's insane charges against Maduro. Also featuring Russell Dobular, Max Blumenthal, Stef Zamorano and Mike MacRae. Plus a phone call from Andrew Cuomo!
Come see me on tour in Waikiki, Hawaii, and the comedy store in Los Angeles.
Go to jimidore.com for a link for tickets.
Establishment media sets of artists fighting so good luck.
Bullshit, they can't fall like fomenting this food.
Watch and see as a jet golf comedian who speeds and jumps the medium and hits him hit on.
It's the chimney tour show.
So we've heard it, we've seen the controlled AstroTurfed paid-for attacks on Candace Owens, and they make no sense because what she's doing is what you're supposed to do: follow leads wherever they go.
And if they go to a dead end, then it's a dead end.
But people don't want her following leads because it will lead somewhere that they don't want.
Possibly Israel, possibly the FBI, possibly the military, possibly the people at TPUSA, possibly the head of his own security, Brian Harpel.
We don't know where it's going to lead, but that's what they're afraid of us finding out.
And here's the best defense.
So this guy, he does a great job here.
This is Jesse on Fire.
Let's listen to how he defends Candace Owens.
And I think he makes a lot of sense here.
The people who are attacking Candace fundamentally do not understand what her role in this entire thing is.
She is the magnetic center of an open source investigation.
She is not supposed to only put pure factual information on her show.
She puts clues on her show.
That's right.
She has a tip line getting thousands of tips every single day.
She does her best to vet the ones that come in and then she puts those on her show and then the community chases them down.
It doesn't matter if you don't believe this one or you do believe this one.
It's your responsibility to chase down the ones that you do believe.
And you look into them and then you share them with other people and then they share them with Candace and then we develop the case that way.
We're solving this together.
Stop attacking her.
The only way that we allow this whole thing to fall apart is if people start fighting with each other over individual clues.
Which is exactly what's happening.
So there's the Mockingberg 2.0 media that are just controlled to go after her.
Some of them are being paid.
Some of them are being threatened, whatever.
Then you have the people who are in good faith thinking, oh, what she said there doesn't make sense.
Yeah, well, so what?
You don't fight each other over it.
That's what they want us to do.
E are an open source detective agency.
We've never had the opportunity to do this before.
Okay.
From this point forward, if people are attacking Candace because she put something on her channel, they are blowing it.
And people who are on Candace and you're attacking people who did an investigation into a clue that she put on the platform, you're also blowing it.
That is not what this is supposed to be.
She's doing exactly what she's supposed to do.
Okay.
If you took money to attack Candace, I guess that is that ship is sailed.
Attack her all you want.
You know, don't expect people to put a lot of faith in the credibility of things that you say going forward.
Okay.
Here, let me start by saying this.
Alex Jones is going full throttle on Candace right now.
He's like, he's going hard in the paint.
He started off, you know, like he's like, Candace is my friend.
I wanted to reach out to her because she's going crazy.
She's doing whatever.
And bottom line is, even with that, he doesn't understand what Candace's show is and what it's not.
Okay.
Like I said yesterday in my video that I did about the TPUSA financials that Wolves and Finance did.
I called this the first ever open source investigation.
Okay.
And I meant exactly that.
Okay.
What this is, we never have had the opportunity to get the collective internet, all of the all of the mommy sleuths, all of the, you know, all the men who are interested in the gun stuff, interested in the 30 ought six stuff, interested in the lies that this person told, this person told, people looking into this string, they pull on this string, they pull on this thing, they pull on this string, they pull on this string, okay?
And all of us collectively, we figure out what's real and what's not, okay?
So when Candace says something on her show or puts someone on her show, and then that tip ends up not being accurate, that doesn't mean anything negative about Candace because that's not her job, okay?
Her job, Candace is the lightning rod magnet of all of the community tips, okay?
Like everyone wants to give her their information and ultimately what she is doing.
I don't even know if this is how she looks at her show, but I know that's how everybody should be looking at it.
And it's how I look at it, which is why I couldn't understand why anyone saw what I was, what myself or Nate was doing as attacking Candace.
I didn't understand.
I'm like, what?
Because the way I see her show is Candace will, she gets every tip on earth and she vets them.
And if she can verify enough about a tip or about a person or whatever, then she puts it on her show and she says, this guy says that he saw this and he saw this.
I verified he's at Fort Wachuka.
I verified that he was a Green Beret.
Here is his story.
And the reason he's on there, like what no one knows what that would mean.
What she's, she puts him up and then we go investigate him.
That's the whole point.
That's the whole entire point.
Okay.
She said that 50 times.
She's like, I'm not saying that he saw Erica or he saw Brian Harpole.
I'm saying he saw that he did.
And I verified that he was actually at Fort Wachuka and I verified that he really was a Green Beret.
So like, here it is.
And everybody's like, well, so what does it even mean?
Like last night, you know, everybody's like, so what does it even mean if he's at Fort Watchuka?
It doesn't matter.
That's the whole point.
That's for all of us to figure out if it matters.
Like this, that's what this entire thing is.
We're investigating this together, all of us.
Every single person that's interested in this case, this is not about fighting with each other about who's right and who's wrong.
Okay.
If a string gets, you know, put on her platform and it's like, I heard that this, this, and this, I heard that there are Egyptian planes that are following.
I heard that there are this that are falling.
I heard this.
Then everybody goes and investigates it.
If you find out that the Egyptian planes were not following Erica Kirk, that doesn't mean it.
That's not like, that's not a gotcha on Candace.
That's not her fucking job.
How many people does Candace have working for you?
You have any idea how much stuff we've learned about the Charlie Kirk case since this happened?
The number of people who are pulling on strings and chasing down leads and looking at this stuff.
She should be putting every credible tip that she gets on her platform.
And then we go run them down.
Okay.
Then we go run them down.
Okay.
Now, I understand why she's defending herself because there's like people who are like, listen, this guy's not real.
And they use it to attack her with.
Okay.
But the point that I'm making is that's not an attack.
It doesn't matter.
If you figure out that he's not real, then you just put it out and you're like, hey, man, we looked into this guy.
He's not real.
And then that's the end.
Okay.
What Candace said, like, if you go and look at what she said online, she said, this is turned into this huge thing.
I think it would be best if Erica and Brian Harpole just provide alibis so we can all move on.
The only thing that matters about this case right here is whether or not Erica and Brian Harpole were actually at Fort Wachuka.
And if they weren't, we're done with it.
That's it.
Okay.
This is not some like like there's no war here.
There's no conflict here if everybody is understands what Candace's show actually is.
You think Candace is going to solve this by herself?
She can't.
No one can, dude.
No one can.
Okay.
Tomorrow, me and Heavy Duty Country are going to take fragment, you know, frag rounds, 30 out six frag rounds.
We're going to go out to his ranch and we're going to shoot them into meat with bone and other stuff to see if that theory holds water.
How do we know that the story is that they were frag rounds?
Because Candace fucking told us, dude.
Okay.
Do you guys get it?
This is how this works.
We're all on the same team.
Everyone is on the same team.
Fighting is not allowed, dude.
Okay.
Anyone who is, anyone who's like going to other people's social media and they're lighting them up, okay?
You like this is this is not a good use of your time.
You're not helping anything.
Okay.
This is not a war between people.
There's certainly no world where I'm at.
I have no conflict with anyone.
Zero.
I love Nate.
I love Candace.
Okay.
I love Alex Jones.
I love all of these people.
I want for all of us to be collectively moving in the right direction so we can solve this fucking thing because clearly the FBI cannot be relied on to do that.
Okay.
If they can't, like, there's the, we've never had an opportunity like this ever.
Never in history has there been an opportunity for a murder like this, a case this public, okay?
With the internet, we all have access to all of the evidence and collectively we can chase down every single lead.
Okay.
Now, you guys know, I don't think that Mitch is real.
I think that he's lying.
I think he's lying about what he saw.
Who cares?
That doesn't mean I, that doesn't mean he's lying.
Maybe he's telling the truth.
It's irrelevant.
Okay.
It doesn't matter.
I'm one person.
Okay.
So if I think he's lying, then I'm going to do what?
I'm going to go focus on the 30 out six rounds and I'll chase that down.
There's a million of us, dude.
There's a million of us.
We don't all need to like it's like whether he was there, not there, whether he saw what he saw, any of those things, none of it matters as long as someone who is doing the right thing is looking into it.
As long as someone's looking into it, go and go chase down their alibis, right?
Like if you, if you believe that he was really, then you guys take it on, do your part, and go chase down his alibi.
Chase down, you know, Brian Harpole and Erica's alibis.
That's your job then.
Okay.
We have decided we don't think he's that credible.
So we're going to go work on the 30 out six, you know, the frag rounds that Candace told us about, and which is why we know we need to go test them.
Why is everyone fighting?
Here's the other thing.
Okay.
If we are fighting, that is the goal of the actual enemies of this entire thing.
This is the most important thing that I could possibly communicate to people.
Okay.
So when Alex Jones says what he says, him and like, look, dude, this is a very simple equation.
Candace is a dragon.
Candace, never going to take a backward step.
Never.
Never.
Okay.
If you come at Candace aggressive, she is going to fight you.
That is what she's going to do.
There is no question about this.
It does not matter.
It makes no difference.
You could, she literally could put on a red hat and go, this hat's blue.
And if someone's like, that hat's not blue, and they're disrespectful, she's going to fight them to the death that the hat's blue, right?
They're going to be like, it's red.
What is wrong with you?
It's red.
And she will literally fight them to the death.
She'll slit their throat over them saying that it's, you know, saying it's a red hat, even if it's red.
She's a killing machine.
She's a dragon.
This is what she does.
Okay.
Alex Jones, okay?
He's a steamroller, dude.
So what happens when a steamroller hits a dragon?
If they go at each other aggressive, it only escalates and the two sides are going to fight.
Like there's no upside in the two of them fighting at all.
Everyone wants the same thing.
And I'm going to prove it to you right now as we look at what Alex Jones is saying about the Candace.
I'm going to show you a few minutes of, you know, what Alex is saying because I will prove the point.
His intro verifies all of us want the same thing.
But now he's out there saying that she's an MI6 agent.
Dude, Candace is not an MI6 agent.
I know he has sources on this, whatever.
They're not, whoever his source is, bad actor, dude.
Okay.
Bad actor.
She's not an MI6 agent.
That's absurd.
That is absurd.
What would her end game be?
Okay, like as it's like, if you show me an agent and you show me what they're doing, I can back into what the purpose of what they're doing would be.
What would Candace be doing?
What would the purpose of what Candace is doing be if she's an MI6 agent?
Makes no sense.
Okay, makes no sense.
The reason I've always had her back is because I have always believed that she believes what she's doing is moving in the direction of solving a case and she's working in good faith.
The end.
Okay.
That's why I always, and Alex John, I think the same thing.
People have been telling me, it just doesn't even matter.
Like, it doesn't matter.
I am right about what this is.
And if everybody can kind of accept that, then we can get back to chasing down leads.
Chase down the Wachuca thing.
All you got to go ahead and do, chase it down.
If you guys need help with what the next step is, the next step is to put pressure on TPUSA to get legitimate alibis from Erica Kirk and from Brian Harpool.
I know he shared his, you know, for people who are like, they already provided that.
Okay.
Right.
He provided his flight, his flight log, or, you know, like that he bought these tickets.
They're saying, well, that doesn't prove that he was actually on the flight.
So just show them that you were on the flights, dude.
Show them that you were on the flights or show them, you know, like, I don't know, figure out a way that like in your hotel room in the morning in Dallas, there's security footage of it.
You know what I mean?
Or whatever.
And Erica, in their, what they said, you know, and in their defense, they're like, dude, she showed a picture from the morning of the ninth, not the eighth.
Okay, well, I even thought that what the, what he was saying was that she was there on the ninth.
So if I didn't know that, I'm sure she also didn't know.
And she just sent the wrong day.
So if she's waking up there on the ninth, she should probably be able to easily show where she was on the eighth.
So just provide it.
We're done.
It's over.
That's the end of all of it.
Or if you can't, then, you know, the people who think that this guy Mitch is credible, they can continue to chase down whatever they think comes from this, right?
But like, this is how this needs to go.
This is how the investigation goes.
Candace is not responsible for every single thing that she puts on her show being accurate.
That's not what she does.
She, that's why people who watch it, they're like, she's never even saying anything.
She's not even like, she's not even like saying what her theory is.
That's exactly right.
She is the central point of an open source investigation.
She is putting on her platform what the clues are and then we go chase them down.
Okay.
She has a tip line that is getting thousands of tips a day.
Okay.
Do you really think that they can simultaneously vet every single one of these and then also like chase it down with the surgical precision that like other people can if they, if this is the only thing that they're focused on is like this one clue, she vets the clues.
She puts the clues on her platform.
We go chase down whether or not these clues hold merit.
Okay.
And Nate, everybody's mad at Nate.
Okay.
Like, look, I will acknowledge I have no idea what the exact interaction between Nate and Candace was.
Ian, I know, was defending Nate.
I can tell you right now, Nate is a good actor, dude.
Okay.
Nate's a Green Beret American hero.
And what he was doing is what he should have been doing.
That's why he said a thousand times, I'm not attacking Candace.
He's saying what he pulled about Mitch is this, and he doesn't believe Mitch.
It's fine if everybody still believes Mitch.
It doesn't matter.
He just said, I'm going to show you what I have on him.
And then you can choose to believe him or not.
If there's, you know, if there's, let's just say 70% of Candace's people think that Mitch is solid, fine.
So what are you guys going to go do?
You're going to go find the next thing that we would chase down from that, which is an alibi for Erica and an alibi for Brian Harple.
End of story.
If you don't believe Mitch, then you move on to the other thing.
There's a million things for everybody to look into.
That's what I'm doing.
I'm going to test the 30 got six theory tomorrow.
Okay.
With the frag rounds at heavy duty countries ranch.
Like everybody, like this, this Fort Huachuka thing splitting everybody, that's on purpose.
Stop attacking Candace.
She didn't say that she believes that this guy really saw them.
Did not say that.
That's not what her role is.
Her role is the open source center of the entire investigation.
Okay now.
So well said, Jesse on fire.
Well said, and it's what i've been saying.
And people are wanting to divide us.
Uh, because that's what the deep state wants.
They want us fighting each other.
So, of course, so we'd all come together and start looking into it.
They want us to stop looking into it.
And the way to do it is to discredit Candace Owens.
So then we go, oh, it's all crazy.
That's not how an investigation works.
Exactly what he says.
You pull a string, you have a lead, you follow it to its conclusion.
And if it ends up there's nothing there, then we move on to the next thing.
That's how any good investigator follows every lead until it comes to a dead end.
And people trying to say she shouldn't talk because it's just not 100% accurate or that lead led to a dead end is exactly what they want.
They want us to fight each other and stop doing the investigation.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So here is Israeli billionaire Shlomo Kramer.
And he was on CNBC.
And he's going to let you know that First Amendment is a nuisance to people like him.
And he's going to tell you we got to get rid of it.
You ready?
Let's listen.
Network, Slomo Kramer, also one of the founders of Checkpoint, another big cyber company, Shlomo.
It's great to have.
He's the founder of these big Checkpoints.
It doesn't sound good, right?
Sounds like another mossad operation.
Oh, Checkpoint.
What?
Okay, here we go.
It sounds like Palantir, Checkpoint.
Have you here?
Welcome.
Thank you for having me.
How is AI cyber warfare shaping geopolitics right now?
So AI is going to revolutionize cyber warfare, is revolutionized cyber warfare from critical infrastructure to the fabric of society and politics and undermining it, giving unfair advantage to authoritarian governments against democratic countries, First Amendment type of seeing the polarization in countries that allow for the First Amendment and protect it, which is great.
And I know it's difficult to hear, but it's time to limit the First Amendment in order to protect it and quickly before it's too late.
What do you mean?
I mean that we need to control the platforms, all the social platforms.
We need you here.
This is amazing, all the stuff he's packing in in just a few minutes.
He's really packing it in.
He's the founder of Checkpoint.
Was the name Totalitarian Surveillance State already taken?
So, okay, here we go.
To stack rank the authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online.
So every person who's online, you cannot go online unless you are already verified by the government who you are.
That's what they're saying.
So no more anonymous posting, nothing.
Really?
Does that even pen names?
So, like, Mark Twain would have to say, I'm really Samuel Clemens if he was writing today.
Yes, according to for this guy, yeah.
And take control over what they are saying based on that ranking.
So, he just said everybody needs to be verified by the government to be able to post on social media, and then we control what they're saying by their rankings.
She cuts him off.
I wish she didn't cut him off because he was going to tell you it's a social credit score by their rankings.
It's their social credit score.
So, we become more and more like China without the flying cars and the high-speed rail and the healthcare for everybody.
I'll back this up a little bit.
Just so you can hear it against the one-year-old.
The authenticity of every person that expresses themselves online and take control over what they are saying based on that ranking.
And take control.
He's literally just saying it out loud.
And you watch the two CNBC news tweets.
Not only do they not push back on this, they just keep kind of, it's like they're cheering it on.
They don't go, whoa.
I'm in the news business in America.
I know the importance of a First Amendment.
Government.
The government should.
So she just clarifies.
So the government, you're talking about the government should control social media.
He's like, yeah.
It's like, okay, yeah, that sounds good.
Yeah, that's okay.
She doesn't go, are you nuts?
Do you know that undermines the whole basis of this country?
Do you not get that?
That we're not supposed to be the Soviet Union.
We're not supposed to be China.
We're not supposed to be Saudi Arabia.
That we're about freedom.
And the First Amendment, that's why it's first, because it's the most important, freedom of speech.
But they don't go, whoa, they don't.
They go, oh, yeah, so you're just saying government controls it?
Yeah, yeah, it makes sense.
To do that.
I'll take control over what they are saying based on that ranking.
The government.
The government should do it.
Yeah.
And this guy's not even flinching.
That guy doesn't flinch.
She doesn't flinch.
She's just like, yeah, okay.
Well, I'm certainly not going to go against an Israeli billionaire who's into cybersecurity.
They know.
They know where their bread is buttered and how to stay safe.
And we need to educate people against ICE.
And government needs to develop cyber defense programs that are as sophisticated as the cyber attack.
Today it's a 1 to 100 ratio.
And really, government are not doing this today at any rate.
And enterprises are left fending for themselves.
Technology is moving much faster than the political system typically can to respond.
So you need to use technology to stabilize the political system.
And you need to put adjustments that are perhaps not.
I mean, we're at a point, though.
Right.
I mean, I can go on Instagram.
So I think he's getting ready.
Yeah, but come on.
We live in a country with the First Amendment.
And there's already been censorship that people voted against in 2024.
That's what I thought he was going to say.
No, but what he says, he goes to give an example of why what this guy's saying would be a good idea.
Watch this.
I mean, we're at a point, though.
Right.
I mean, I can go on Instagram or TikTok.
And frankly, it already is becoming unclear what is fake and what is real.
Exactly.
And once you eliminate that ability to discern truth from fiction, then what are you left with?
Well, then you just get the government to control everything.
Right?
That's what he's saying.
The government controls everything.
You think I'm kidding?
Listen, it gets even worse.
You're left with polarization of society and inner fighting.
So he's saying because of people making AI videos and posting them, that leads to polarization and infighting in your society, which, by the way, is exactly what they want.
But guess what his solution is?
Have to control that.
And you see that.
You have to control it.
Meaning the government has to control what people are posting on social media, meaning the government has to police your speech.
Happening across the world.
So this is an urgent need by the government to do that.
And until then, enterprises are buying by themselves more and more cybersecurity solutions, but they can't afford all these solutions by themselves.
So they are looking for ways to deliver more efficient consumption.
And I assume you have some of those ways, obviously.
And that drives really the next generation of companies such as Wiz, CrowdStrike, Cato Networks on the network that are platforms and are able to deliver this extended need for security in an affordable way for enterprises.
For enterprises.
Not for governments.
Not for government.
But governments need to start building their programs.
And the same tools can be used also by government.
But the two leaders in AI, one is China, which obviously already is using AI to control the population.
And here we're all out in a race with China.
And so we're not as interested in regulation right now.
Certainly not at the state level, for example.
First of all, Trump just signed an order saying that the states cannot regulate AI.
So they're taking the exact opposite of what conservatism usually is about.
It's about local control.
Trump is taking the control away from people in their local municipalities and giving it to the central government, the federal government, which is the opposite of what conservatives are supposed to be for.
They're already doing that.
So they're already saying no control of AI.
A big mistake, because if China has a single narrative that protects its inner stability and the U.S. has multiple allows for multiple narratives, it puts them in an unfair advantage that long term is going to cost the stability of the nation.
So what he just said is, well, if China controls everyone's speech and they can have one narrative get out into their communities, into their society, just one narrative that the government controls, while the United States has everybody being able to say whatever they want, and that's bad.
And that gives an advantage to China, and that's going to come back to hurt us.
So in order to fight back against China, we have to have one narrative also, meaning we have to censor everybody and have the government control our social media and speech.
And they're sitting there going, oh, yeah.
Yeah, it makes sense.
That's why we're news people.
Not an original thought in their brains.
Not a skeptical question.
Nothing.
Isn't that amazing?
I think it's amazing.
So changes must be made.
So because the First Amendment, we have to get rid of it to save it.
We have to burn down that village so we could save that village.
Isn't that what that sounds like?
That's exactly what that sounds like.
I wonder where I heard that from.
Was it Vietnam?
So I just hate to tell you, Israel, you already blew it.
You blew it by committing a genocide and bullying everybody to go along with censorship.
You're like the white comic who opened with the wrong bit at the Apollo.
And there's no coming back from that.
You got to bug out.
So you should be in your hideouts writing documents and faking your demise for the media.
Here's what Glenn Greenwald said.
He said, genuine thanks to Israeli billionaire Shlomo Kramer for starting, for stating so explicitly and unflinchingly what so many other top Israelis and their U.S. loyalists are saying, albeit a bit more subtly.
Americans must learn to accept limits on our First Amendment rights.
And that's what Benjamin Netanyahu has been screaming about.
Remember, and that's why they did the false flag in Australia, was to pressure people to get down to one narrative and censor people who were saying negative things about Zionism in Israel.
And that's what this is all about.
So you remember that, right?
Do you remember they did that, right?
Okay.
So Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing up, and Trump's doing it for them.
He's got the colleges to do it.
He's gotten hate speech implemented for Zionists on college campuses.
He's got DEI for Zionists on college campuses.
He's deporting people who speak critically of Israel.
He's doing all that stuff already.
He's threatening funding to colleges if they don't censor on behalf of Israel.
Stuff like that.
And let's remember what Mersheimer said.
The single greatest threat to freedom of speech in the United States at this point in time is Israel and its supporters here in the United States.
March 13th, 2025, he said that.
Okay.
All right.
Well, here's a little bit more.
Village Crazy Lady Mel says, this guy, Jay Collins, he's a lieutenant governor of Florida, which a lot of people are saying Florida is like a vassal state to Israel, or it's the new Israel.
So here's what he has to say.
Let's listen to what he had to say.
Okay, ready?
You don't have the right to harm other people.
So you don't have the right to harm other people, even with your words.
Watch this.
You don't have the right to harm other people with your words.
You don't have the right to say things that have really negative, really horrible meanings.
When you want people to destroy Israel, that matters.
I like what Mel says.
She says, yes, I do, Jay.
I absolutely do.
Full stop.
God gave me that right, and only God can take away that right of me saying whatever I want, no matter whose feelings it hurts.
Dude, had one private meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu, and now he's got a full-blown God complex, WTAF.
What?
In the actual F?
So where do we draw the line at the sensitivities of others?
When does it become an actionable by the government to shut you down?
What about the nutcase sitting across from you on the bus who gets offended every time you use the word the in a sentence?
What about that guy?
So here, they're going after the First Amendment in broad daylight.
This is even worse than taxing us for Israel without our representation or consent, which alone warrants revolution.
They're finally going for the vault, as the saying goes.
This is it.
This is it.
So remember what Elon Musk said about free speech.
I acquired X in order to preserve freedom of speech in America, the First Amendment.
And I'm going to stick to that.
And if that means making less money, so be it.
And when this got tweeted out, he said, without freedom of speech, the West will fall.
He said that December 5th of this year.
But of course, we know he's also what they call subservient to Israel.
We also know that.
So will he stand by his free speech?
Will he stand up to this garbage?
Will he stand up to the lieutenant governor of Minnesota?
Fascinating seeing these so-called anti-woke warriors change on a dime to become special DEI snowflakes for Israel's genocide program.
Kiraly says, already failed in Australia.
I have $95,000 in damages I have to pay for identifying two males in a female sport.
Truth speech has been rebranded as vilification and hate speech.
Truth speech is now hate speech.
Newsmax, Harvard University began punishing students who are involved in campus anti-Israel protests.
There it is.
That's at the behest of Trump.
Yeah, they definitely should get rid of those critical thinkers protesting.
That should be chilling.
The Patriot voice says, remember that Trump has tapped Palanta to create an entire database of all American citizens.
It brings no pleasure for me to inform you that Donald Trump is actively working with the very same deep state he claimed he would obliterate to create the largest surveillance database of Americans ever created.
The plan is in lockstep with the UN Agenda 2030 goals and the WEF fourth industrial revolution.
Wait, remember the first time I heard about the fourth industrial revolution?
Remember who it was who told me about that?
Isn't that interesting?
Not Kathleen Madigan.
MAGA, if you're observing this from afar and holding on to any semblance of hope that Trump is who he said he was, sadly, it's time to wake up to a brutal realization.
So this is what's coming.
You're in a complete surveillance state.
Palanter has been set up to create a database on every American.
So this is coming.
And you see how much the news people are going to push back on this, right?
zero because they're controlled by Zionists.
Wow.
Okay.
Well, I'm going to cover more of this in my next segment.
So there you go.
Zionism is your enemy.
Zionism is the enemy of the world.
Zionism is the enemy of freedom of speech.
Zionism is the enemy of freedom and truth.
And there you go.
And Trump is 100% Zionist.
Congratulations.
You got suckered.
Let's start here with the charges, the so-called charges.
Is there any kind of legal basis for what they have done?
Elon was very proud that Grok kind of went head to head with ChatGPT, claiming that U.S. law applies to everybody, everybody in the world, because the executive has power to enforce law, you apparently have the right to enforce 1934 gun laws on foreign leaders.
So maybe the craziest charge, possession of machine guns and destructive devices was one of the charges.
And if you look at the indictment, they made a mistake right on the first line.
They claimed that the institutions were importing tons of cocaine to the United States rather than exporting.
Now, this is a small matter, but if you know anything about law school and the legal world, you know that largely it is about not making mistakes like that.
That is really the thing that qualifies you to be in that field because that's the kind of thing that a good lawyer can drive a truck through in a court.
Now, I personally think that's probably related to this.
The Justice Department has had thousands of people exit because if you're a lawyer, you look at this administration and you say, yeah, I mean, this is like me in The Hague waiting to happen.
I'm not going to work for these people.
So the only people they can get to do the kind of law that's going to give you a justification for this kind of action are the kind of people who are going to make mistakes like that.
So is there any basis for the claim, the drug claims or any of the rest of it?
Is there any legal interpretation that would allow for this?
Well, on the importation claim, it's a proceed.
It's something you have to say in statutory law.
You have to say import because the way U.S. drug laws are written is from the perspective of American jurisdiction.
And so in order to prosecute Maduro or accuse him of drug exportation, you actually have to say import.
So it's really.
It's legalese.
And the indictment was written by the same guy who wrote the indictment of Juan Orlando Hernandez, the Honduran president, who was convicted of exporting or presiding over the transfer of over 400 tons of cocaine to the United States and was pardoned by Trump after a lobbying campaign from Trump business cronies.
So, I mean, they've written it.
They actually did write a good indictment in that case.
We reviewed it very carefully in a two-part series at the Gray Zone.
And Donald Trump now has says, oh, well, Ron Orlando Hernandez was persecuted, except he was persecuted by Trump's people.
And at the same time, the indictment of Maduro, I've been working for the last 12 hours on a piece that's about to come out, analyzing the indictment and dismantling it.
It is a pile of politicized slop.
It's like a 25-page rant that is designed to construct a narrative against Maduro in the place of a concrete legal case because they need this trial and the spectacles surrounding it to frame the lawless Don Roe doctrine in which Trump intends to march across the Western hemisphere, intimidating and even bumping off leaders who stand in the way of himself and Trump Incorporated.
Frame it as aggressive enforcement of legal standards.
And so that's what this trial is about.
So they've constructed a narrative about Maduro that he's involved in narco-traffic, not just narco-trafficking, but narco-terrorism.
And they've, in order to juice up the indictment, they've stacked the firearms charges in order to get a mandatory minimum on firearms.
And as you said, it's an antiquated 1934 law that they're accusing him of violating possessing machine guns in a foreign country and then putting him on trial in a country where like hundreds of thousands of people own assault weapons.
The 1934 law explicitly bans even sawed-off shotguns, which would mean, I don't know, B-Real from Cypress Hill would have to be jailed.
Half of Trump's base would have to be jailed under this law.
These are the Second Amendment people.
And then, you know, you have the narco-terrorism conspiracy, which alleges that Nicolas Maduro was in a conspiracy with a Venezuelan gang called Trend de Aragua alongside the Sinaloa cartel and the Mexican Zetas to ship cocaine into the United States.
There are several problems with that, which is that Maduro is accused of very, or his inner circle are accused of various incidents in which they're moving drugs around or providing diplomatic cover to drug traffickers from Venezuela to Mexico, where these cartels supposedly pick up the cocaine and then take it to the U.S.
The first problem is that's not U.S. jurisdiction.
The U.S. has no ability to prosecute anything that takes place in Venezuela or Mexico.
Those are sovereign states.
There's one kind of throwaway claim that Maduro's son decided to take low-grade cocaine that wasn't good enough for Mexico and take it to New York instead.
I think a lot of bartenders in New York would dispute the idea that the cocaine is low-grade, but, you know, or, you know, people who are just trying to go there, it's not a credible claim.
And these all date back to the era when the U.S. controlled the Mexican government between the Vicente Fox, Enrique Peña Nieto, and Calderón era, when the United States knew that the top cop in Mexico was actually working with the Sinaloa cartel, but decided to look the other way.
Kind of another story, but they inadvertently implicate the Mexican government in this.
They have no grounds to prosecute any of this.
And so it all took place back between 2002 and 2011.
The narco-terrorism designations for these cartels, including Train de Aragua, came in in 2025, months ahead of the Maduro trial as the U.S. was planning an invasion of Venezuela.
So it's all a retroactive designation in order to get terrorism charges so they can circumvent international law.
And they inadvertently implicate Honduras as well by referring to it as a transshipment point in the indictment.
So the guy that Trump just pardoned is referred to in this indictment as a major criminal who has been corrupted and paid off by major cartels.
In the indictment?
In the indictment, because it was written by the same guy who prosecuted Juan Orlando Hernandez.
So it doesn't make sense.
There's no clear data on how much cocaine was supposedly shipped through Venezuela to the United States.
They say tons.
Then they say thousands of tons, which could generate, I don't know, $400 billion in revenue, which is more than most countries' GDP.
And then at another point, they say 250 tons a year, which actually is less than the amount of cocaine coming out of U.S.-allied Ecuador right now.
It's all very vague, politicized, subjective, highly charged language.
They refer to Maduro as corrupt, illegitimate, but they fail to establish that he is illegitimate under Venezuelan law, which means that under the International Court of Justice's decision of Democratic Republic of Congo versus Belgium, which holds that heads of state enjoy immunity in national courts, which is why they have to be prosecuted at the ICC.
Right.
They cannot establish that Nicolas Maduro did not control the Venezuelan government, its borders, its military, its elections, and so on.
And it doesn't even matter if you say he stole an election.
He was in control of the institutions.
He was the head of state.
There was nobody else.
So you cannot, if the judge decides to consult international law, then the ICJ decision is pretty important there.
I mean, just consider how many, how somehow a more powerful China could just extract Donald Trump and accuse him of corruption and supporting genocide in Gaza.
It would be like that.
And they try him in Beijing.
That's what's taking place here with Maduro.
And then finally, remember that I said this because this is what is probably going to happen in this trial.
The star witness in this trial is going to be a former general in the Venezuelan military named Jugo El Poyo Carvajal.
They called him the chicken because he kind of looked like a chicken.
He was a really close confederate of Ugo Chavez, and he was the head of military intelligence under Chavez for almost 10 years.
He was seemingly, he was seemingly compromised by the U.S. and they started accusing him of drug traffickings.
He was arrested first in 2014 in Aruba, but he made it back to Venezuela.
Then in 2017, after Maduro is president and Chavez is dead under suspicious circumstances, Carvajal comes out and starts attacking Maduro inside Venezuela, condemning him because he's facing two indictments suddenly in the United States.
So he's trying to proffer himself to put himself forward as the ultimate collaborator to save his own skin.
Two years later, he tries to get asylum in Spain and the U.S. extradites him.
And then Senator Marco Rubio says, Hugo Carvajal will be coming to the United States soon to supply damning evidence against the Maduro crime regime.
So they were trying to jail him all this time in order to force him to produce some testimony as the star witness against Maduro because they needed some insider witness.
Four years later, he's finally extradited to the U.S.
This year, Carvajal was convicted in the same Southern District Court of New York where Maduro will be put on trial of drug trafficking.
And he signs a secret plea deal, a secret agreement with his prosecutors to provide testimony on Maduro in exchange for reducing what could be a 50-year sentence.
He may get like two years, but he's going to be the star witness and he will say anything.
In fact, in a letter to Trump after his conviction, he told Trump that he has evidence that Venezuela's smartmatic voting machines played a role in rigging or hacking the U.S. election in 2020 to rig it in favor of Joe Biden, which is like Donald Trump's wet dream.
It's everything crack.
So this is going to be the star witness against Maduro.
I mean, and I've uncovered some evidence that he was initially compromised by the CIA through a possible drug running operation run by the CIA.
Then finally, I guess I already said finally, but I wanted to make another point.
The Department of Justice.
I certainly appreciate the depth of your knowledge, man.
Thank you.
Yeah.
I mean, I've just been working on this all day going down the rabbit hole.
So, you know, this is, you know, me getting it.
This is catharsis.
The cartel of the suns is the cartel that Nicolas Maduro is said to be the head of.
Hugo Carvajal, who's going to be the star witness, was one of these generals they say was in the cartel of the suns.
And Dios Dado Cabello, who's also indicted with Maduro, is in it.
They say it's a network of corrupt Venezuelan generals and politicians who are moving drugs through Venezuela into the United States.
The cartel, and they say in the indictment, it was created in 1999, which is the year Hugo Chavez was elected when they did away with the old kind of centrist U.S.-run IMF governments.
That's a lie.
The Cartel of the Sons was created in the Reagan era by the CIA, as reported by the New York Times in 60 Minutes.
The Cartel of the Sons was a handful of Venezuelan National Guard officers who served in an administration before Chavez, a pro-U.S. administration, and they were the main CIA assets in Caracas, who were told to preside over shipments of cocaine, uncontrolled shipments into the United States to let the dope walk in U.S. cities.
So supposedly, then the DEA could learn more about drug gangs inside the United States.
I actually think the CIA was trying to fund black operations, but it's just an established fact that the Cartel of the Sons was created by the CIA, and now it no longer exists.
It simply does not exist.
No credible expert or U.S. official who served in this capacity would ever say it exists.
Basically, what Trump did in his first term under the guidance of Attorney General William Barr, the former CIA officer who wrote the pardons for all the Iran Contrafelons who were overseeing CIA drug running, Ali North and company, was get the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the DEA to tell Trump that the cartel of the Sons was a real thing and that he should issue a bounty for Maduro and an indictment.
So the whole indictment from top to bottom is phony, contains smears, speculation, and testimony from coerced witnesses who are telling the Trump administration whatever it wanted to hear, introducing any charges it wanted to weaponize in its maximum pressure campaign against Venezuela to prevent themselves from serving long sentences in a U.S. federal penitentiary.
And it has all ended up with this trial where a kidnapped president and his wife, who appears to have been injured in her abduction, are going to face this years-long phony legal spectacle in order to justify the Don Rowe doctrine.
Now, given that the case has this many flaws, is there any chance of them getting a fair trial and being found not guilty?
And what would the outcome of that be?
I mean, this Southern District Court seems to convict any Latin American figure the U.S. wants to indict there.
It's like their special court for these kinds of drug conspiracy cases.
But the Maduro case is special because it's, as I said, it's a test of international law and whether the Trump administration can simply invalidate international law on head of state immunity.
The case will be presided over by a 93-year-old Clinton appointee who is considered very procedural, which is interesting.
And I think that discovery could prove very interesting and embarrassing to the U.S. government if Maduro's team wants to bring in this role, for example, of the CIA in drug running, or they want to impugn the credibility of the star witness, Hugo El Pollo Carvajal.
There are a lot of angles that I could see the defense approaching this from.
And at the same time, the indictment that I've seen, it's not strong.
So you have to have a heavily biased judge to actually make this case work for the prosecution.
And he has to prevent political context from being introduced in this case, as well as to accept the illegitimacy of Maduro.
Hey, this is Jimmy Who's this?
Hello, Jimmy.
This is Andrew Cuomo calling.
Let me add my voice to the chorus and wish you a happy new year.
No, happy new year to you, Governor.
Did you do anything on January 1st?
No, just stayed home.
Not much interesting was happening here in New York City on New Year's Year's Day, which is typical.
Basically, the entire city was exhausted from partying the night before and staying up so late.
And, you know, the older you get, the more that takes a toll on you.
Tell me about it.
Well, there was Zoran Mondamni's inauguration as mayor and the festivities surrounding it.
That was going on.
Oh, yeah, I think I saw something about that on the TV.
You didn't attend?
Chuck Schumer was there.
Bernie Sanders was there.
Oh, well, good for them.
I hope they had a nice time.
I was at home reading the newspapers, as I am now.
And Jimmy, I am blown away by what I'm seeing.
Yeah, what's that?
There's this little crime report section here on page five for all five boroughs.
And yesterday alone, there was a murder in Far Rockaway, a carjacking in the Bronx, numerous petty larcenies and sexual assaults.
It's just very disheartening what's happening to this city.
Is that more crime than normally occurs in New York City in one day?
I don't know.
I've never actually read this little section of the newspaper before.
But one thing is very clear.
What's that?
This is just the new normal in Zoron Momdami's New York.
A wasteland of senseless violence.
One day, Governor, he's been mayor for one day.
How could that possibly be enough time to change the crime patterns in New York?
A communist who doesn't even believe in prisons becomes mayor.
And of course, that's going to be a signal, a flare, for all the criminal scum of New York to go crazy to unleash a crime wave on our city, the likes of which we've never seen.
Okay, well, what was the crime report for December 31st?
Well, that's New Year's Eve, Jimmy.
That day is an outlier.
There's always more crime incidents.
Okay, how about December 30th?
I don't know.
I threw that paper away already.
Oh, for crying out loud.
Put aside how insane it is to go by one day of crime statistics.
How about the fact that he's keeping Mayor Adams police commissioner, Jessica Tish, who herself was never even a police officer?
She's a Zionist and from a family of billionaires.
Doesn't sound like the move of a radical communist Muslim mayor with a secret agenda to gin up crime.
Jimmy, these January 1st crime reports don't lie.
Now, despite the fact I personally committed several of these crimes myself in order to jack up the numbers, the message here is clear.
Zoron is soft on crime, bad for New York.
Oh, brother.
And you better believe everyone opposing him is going to softly imply that every crime that occurs in this city is because of Zoron, which is great because this is New York.
There's always crime.
Yes, that's my point.
But now we can blame it on a brown mayor with a funky name.
Don't you think the strategy's going to backfire?
Not really.
Not really.
Look at what he said during his inauguration speech.
I thought you said you weren't there.
Well, I wasn't there there.
I was on a rooftop about a block away in disguise, watching with binoculars.
Anywho, he said we are going to reject the ideology of rugged individualism and embrace collectivism after being sworn in on a Quran.
He may have well banged his shoe on the podium, screaming, we will bury you, and then threw that shoe at George W. Bush.
Oh, come on.
Anyone who thinks he's going to enact an actual far-left program for New York City is going to be sorely disappointed.
I don't give a shit about that.
This is about what we can imply.
Collectivism?
What do you think that means?
Collectively do crime.
That's what.
He's calling for a crime wave with a pinko-tink to it.
Sure.
And honestly, Jimmy, I'm not sure if New York can survive Zoron.
Oh, my God.
By the time he's done, the only person who could clean up this town would be Snake Pliskin.
Is this what you're going to do for the next four years?
Hyperbole and scare tactics?
Absolutely.
You better believe it, Buster Brown.
You know, I used to cow Zoron by saying he has no balls.
Not like you and me, at least.
Well, I take that back.
It takes massive balls to get elected mayor and then unleash a massive crime wave on the very city that elected you.
Unprecedented cojones.
Unlimited stugats.
Respect words do, Jimmy.
Okay, great, Governor.
We got to get going.
Happy New Year.
Same to you, Jimmy.
Have a good show, but hey, maybe stay inside for a while.
I fear that this communist conflagration of crime instigated by Zoron Kwame Mamdami might go nationwide.
Stay safe out there, Jimmy.
Arrived.
Arrived.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.