The REAL Story Behind Minnesota's Somali Welfare Scandal!
The widely publicized Somali daycare fraud scandal in Minnesota is being deliberately amplified now to stoke outrage while obscuring larger geopolitical moves involving Israel, Somaliland, and the Middle East. As Jimmy points out, the fraud storyis linked to claims that Israeli intelligence, U.S. officials, and Gulf states are coordinating around recognizing Somaliland, building military facilities near the Red Sea, and countering Houthi activity tied to Yemen and Iran. Jimmy shares past statements from General Wesley Clark, allegations about redirected U.S. aid money, and accusations that elite corruption and pardons for large-scale Medicare fraud receive far less scrutiny. These claims, he says, serve as a "distraction" narrative, suggesting the scandal serves broader strategic interests rather than being an isolated case of domestic fraud. Plus segments on President Trump saying he'll bomb Iran, Alex Jones' recent unhinged attacks on Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson's questions about the FBI's investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination. Also featuring Stef Zamorano!
Come see me on tour in Potts Town, Pennsylvania, Waikiki, Hawaii, and the comedy store in Los Angeles.
Just go to jimmydor.com for a link for tickets.
So we've all heard about the Somali daycare scandal that's happening in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
That's happening in Minnesota.
Right now, I'm going to show you this, and I'm going to tell you how this ties into that scandal.
You ready?
So, it's a big scandal, billions of dollars being funneled to Somali daycares and all, and billions, right?
And it's and all of a sudden, we're just hearing about it now.
What?
Well, guess what?
Let's remember this.
So, I came back to see him a few weeks later.
So, this is right after 9/11.
This is General Wesley Clark talking to people at the Pentagon right after 9-11.
And guess what they told him?
And by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan.
I said, Are we still going to war with Iraq?
And he said, Oh, it's worse than that.
He said, He reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper, and he said, I just said, I just got this down from upstairs, meeting the Secretary of Defense office today.
And he said, This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.
He said, Somalia.
What?
What?
Somalia?
Why would we be going into Somalia?
What the heck is that about?
Okay, so here's a guy.
This is Maddie Shoshani, and he's the host of TBN Israel.
And here's what he's going to tell you that you don't know about the Somali daycare scam.
Here we go.
How is the Israeli Mossad related to the recent corruption that was discovered in Minnesota?
You're not going to believe it, but there actually is a substantial connection, and it runs through the Israeli Prime Minister office.
I'll start from the end.
Israel just established relationships with Somaliland, which is not Somalia.
But the backstory to the whole Minnesota corruption story is that much of those funds-and again, I think the initial number that came out is about $9 billion.
Again, this is crazy-American taxpayer money of, let's say, 15 billion that they imagine were stolen or misdiverted from public funds.
About 9 billion of those were sent back to support terrorism or what they would call the Muslim Brotherhood actions.
And this is tied into Qatar.
And Israel, of course, was behind the scenes, and I know people love these conspiracies in leaking some of the information that is responsible or related to the funding of terrorism using that exact money.
So the fact that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has a phone call and recognizes Somaliland is tied into Qatar being a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood, tied into the Somali funds that were stolen in Minnesota funding terrorism in the Middle East.
That is a story that came out right now.
It really blows my mind how global terrorism works, but it's such an amazing thing that it was uncovered.
And I'm sure there's more news to come on this topic.
Okay, so here's where Gen X Girl comes in.
She says the timing, who benefits from amplifying a scandal now that wasn't covered back in 2020?
Because it was.
Isn't that weird?
So, and she links to this.
She says, so how beneficial do you think it is for Americans to be outraged at Somalis right now when Israel wants the U.S. government to support its effort to break up Somalia into two countries where Israel has a military base and is really in the Israel-backed portion of Somalia, which is called Somaliland.
Wait, what?
Yeah.
So there's a big idea that they want to send the Palestinians to Somalia, but not the Somalia, but the Somaliland, which, by the way, they've been talking about Somaliland, who has the Zionist for 80 years.
This is not a new thing.
So here, notice how quiet suddenly it got about that Hugh Jepstein drop that's getting dipped wholesale into a vat of black ink as we speak.
Gen X, 100%.
So they're about to pull out more distractions than a magician at a child's birthday party.
So Israel says Mossad was behind the Somali fraud story.
Really?
It causes mass outrage in the United States.
Boy has it.
Israel claims money going to terrorism.
Israel claims Qatar is behind it.
Israel built military site in Somaliland.
Israel recognized Somaliland, breaking Somalia into two rival.
So that just happened, where Israel recognized Somaliland.
That's something.
Israel built advanced military facilities in Somalia.
No, in Somaliland.
Satellite images reveal that Israel built an advanced military facility at the Barbera airport in Somaliland.
The United Arab Emirates has developed a strong military presence at this airport since 2017.
So do you see how they're all working together?
Just like ISIS and Al-Qaeda is working with the Mossad, Israel, and the CIA?
Just like Benjamin Netanyahu begged Qatar, Qatar, to fund Hamas.
Do you see how they're all working together?
They have military bases in the same Somaliland, Qatar and Israel?
What?
So do you see this game that's happening now?
I hope you do.
Valastian says, if you said this before, you'd have been called anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists.
Israel media, Mossad, has been involved in paving the way for breakaway Somaliland for years.
Behind Israel's recognition of Somaliland, years of quiet Mossad involvement.
Israel becomes the first UN member to recognize Somaliland as a sovereign state, drawing condemnation from Somalia, from Turkey, and Egypt.
The move reflects strategic interests near Houthi-controlled areas and years of quiet Mossad engagement.
Huh, really?
No kidding.
And by the way, when Israel recognizes you, how they are recognizing Somaliland, when they recognize you, it's kind of like when a mountain lion sees you.
It just means that they're coming for you next.
That's what that means.
So here, Mark Dubowitz says: for those mocking why Israel would engage Somaliland, look at the map.
Somaliland sits on the Gulf of Aden next to the Bab el-Mandeb, a chokepoint for global trade and energy.
Across the water are Iran-backed Houthis firing on Israel and shipping.
Somaliland offers stability.
It offers ports, intelligence access, and a non-Iranian platform on the Red Sea.
Similar reasons why the U.S. has a military base in Djibouti.
Really?
Okay.
There it is.
Somaliland.
Somalia, Somaliland.
There's Yemen.
Those are the people who were bombing Israeli boats because Israel is committing a genocide against the Palestinians.
So the people in Yemen, the Houthis in Yemen, are doing what the rest of the world should be doing, sanctioning Israel over a genocide it's committing.
But they're not.
Of course they're not.
Of course they're not.
So there it is.
Somaliland is Israel's 80-year-old project.
The project was called Harar Council, the 34-page documents on his link tree, LinkedIn bio.
So what does this say?
Here, I'll just read a little bit to you.
My proposal is to unite the so-called Harar territory of Ethiopia with parts of the British Somaliland and create there a state for the European Jews.
This territory is large enough.
It would be easy to devote 60,000 to 70,000 square miles there for this purpose.
This territory is inhabited by a small agricultural population who are not likely to raise great difficulties, unlike the Palestinians.
Nevertheless, it will be necessary to remember the lessons learned by the Palestine experience, namely to prevent the territory being overrun by people from other parts of Ethiopia and to keep out foreign agitators, like Palestinians that were the foreign agitators in Palestine.
The climate on the plateau is absolutely healthy and suitable for Europeans.
Those parts of the Somali coast which have a bad climate could be improved in measurable time by irrigation.
The Harar, so there you go.
Politically, these territories belong, as already stated, to Great Britain and the Empire of Ethiopia.
In July of 1935, the British government proposed to the Emperor of Ethiopia that the port of Zildia and certain other parts of the British Somalia land be ceded to him if he were prepared to make certain concessions to Italy.
It is therefore not impossible that the British government may today be ready to cede a rather larger portion of Somaliland together with the port of Berbera to the European Jewish state we have in mind.
So it was already not going well for Israel and Palestine in 1935, and they were looking to go to Somaliland.
Well, now it seems like they're looking to send all the Palestinians to Somaliland where they already have military bases and Qatar.
That's what it kind of looks like.
That's all I'm saying.
It kind of looks that way.
And the Somali fraud story will blaze all the headlines and obscure the entire narrative of resettling the Palestinians to Somalia.
This is the magician's trick twirling around while a magician sets up the trick.
This is the magician's assistant twirling around while a magician sets up the trick.
It's all smoke and mirrors, and it's so glaringly obvious.
There it is.
There it is.
Gen X Girl goes on.
Everyone's outraged over the Somalia scam, understandably, but where is the outrage over Trump's pardons of wealthy criminals who scammed billions from Medicare?
So we've already covered this.
No one cared about this.
So people stole billions of dollars from Medicare.
Trump pardoned them.
Why?
Well, one of them was at the behest of Israel for sure.
This one here, Philip S. Teformas.
He bilked $1.3 billion from Medicaid.
He got a full pardon from Trump.
So now we're supposed to care about $9 billion, everybody's outraged, and rightly so, but nobody was upset that Trump pardoned a guy who stole $1.3 billion from Medicaid and Medicare.
No one cared about that, but everybody cares about the $9 billion in Minnesota.
Isn't that weird?
It's weird that no one cares about this.
There's another guy, $1.7 billion.
There's another guy, $4.3 billion.
HDR Clobe, $100 million, $1.2.
So there you go.
So there you go.
So now you know a little bit more about the story.
Do you really think that this just broke now, that they didn't know about this?
Project Veritas, I'm pretty sure, broke this story in 2020 about the daycare centers in Minnesota.
Joe Biden's Justice Department was investigating it.
I think they might have even prosecuted some people.
Don't hold me to that.
But here's, so now you know the rest of the story.
Well, here, here's what this guy has to say.
About the Somali fraud in Minnesota, USA.
I really think people need to start seeing the bigger picture here.
Do you really believe that some Somali people living there in Minneapolis could get away with defrauding the state for, say, $9, $10 billion a year?
No.
My answer would be no.
I don't think they could be doing that without help from the deep state.
Of course not.
Washington, D.C. is totally involved in this and not only allowed it to happen, but made it happen.
So that's because Israel recently recognized Somaliland, part of Somalia, as an independent state.
Why would Israel do so?
Well, they need a place to deport the Palestinians to.
But you don't just get a piece of land where you can deport 2 million people to.
You have to pay for it.
And that's what this is.
The U.S. is the greatest ally of Israel.
Remember, the United States citizens, middle-class people, taxpayers are going to pay for that.
This whole scam, the Somali care system scam, whatever, to me looks like an annual rental agreement where the U.S. taxpayer is now forced to pay $10 billion a year to the Somali elites, to al-Shabaab, the terrorist organization and so on, in exchange for a piece of land where Israel can then deport the Palestinians too.
Your whole government is corrupt, okay?
And this is just Somalia.
Imagine what the USA is doing with India.
Imagine how much money you're bleeding to India.
So that comes from this guy, Johannes M. Cohenbrat, and he wrote a substack called, Is the FBI Investigating or Organizing the Somali Fraud?
Ah, well, here's what he said.
I find it hard to believe that Somalia could pull this off on their own where no one else could.
How come Mexicans or Puerto Ricans never could do this?
Are Somalis with their average IQ below 70 such law-tech geniuses that only they could pull off such a massive fraud and apparently get away with it fairly undetected ever since Obama sent Somalis to Minnesota in 2014?
At the same time, as I said, Israel recently became the first country worldwide to recognize Somaliland, a breakaway region of the northwest of Somalia, as a sovereign nation.
This raised my suspicion.
Why would Israel care to recognize some breakaway region as a sovereign nation?
Well, for starters, Somaliland is close to the Gulf of Aden, the entry point into the Red Sea, which leads up to the Suez Canal.
This Gulf is one of the crucial linchpins supplying the West with international trade coming out of India and China oversea.
Apparently, funded by the United Arab Emirates, Israel is already building military bases in Somaliland.
The U.S. has bases in neighboring Djibouti.
The location near the Gulf of Aden appears only extra crucial vis-a-vis the incessant attacks coming out of Yemen across the Gulf, where the Houthi rebels have been using Iranian or even Chinese-backed drone systems to attack the U.S. Navy's, Israel's, and NATO's vessels.
The cheap rebel drones have been wreaking a ton of havoc and have also made the West lose some face since its super advanced systems are no match against the primitive sticks and stones being thrown at it.
But one does not simply acquire a piece of land the size of a country, not without war or without bribery.
To secure Somaliland in the ever-complexifying geopolitical struggle for Western dominance, Israel and its greatest ally, the USA, if not Britain, would have to have offered the Somali elites something of value.
And that's how I made the connection to the Somali fraud cases in Minnesota.
Wait, did Obama really send Somalis to Minnesota in 2014?
Yes, he did.
The problem was neither the USA nor Israel could be seen bribing Somali elites to give up Somaliland.
So I think the whole migration of people to Minnesota served as a payment scheme, perhaps a rental scheme.
The people who would later commit massive fraud against U.S. authorities were being shipped in under Obama, but this doesn't let Trump off the hook.
Trump, the narcissist, is more concerned about winning his Nobel Peace Prize, which Israel's netanyahu personally promised him to get.
Trump seems controlled by Israeli interests, you think.
What I find hilarious, though, is that the U.S. ruling circles chose to do a fraud scheme to the benefit of terrorist organizations such as Al-Shabaab in Somalia.
Why didn't they just give the Somali leaders some theme parks, landmarks, or skyscrapers?
I guess that too much of U.S. real estate has already been promised to Arabs, Russians, and Chinese investors.
They're running out of options to bribe foreign partners unless they start taking the money directly out of the social services coffers.
Yes, in short, I believe the Somalis that Obama brought in were henchmen.
And I believe these henchmen were given free reign by both Washington, D.C. and the FBI to commit fraud.
And no, I don't think the FBI director Kash Patel is going to do anything about it because the FBI isn't investigating the fraud.
The FBI is organizing it.
So that's this guy's theory.
Now, I can't vouch for the veracity of his theory or any of these theories.
But it certainly is interesting.
There's definitely a connection between the fraud of Somalian people in Minnesota with Israel recognizing Somaliland and wanting to get the Palestinians to Somalia.
There's definitely a connection there.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So it looks like BB's going to get Trump to do another war on Iran.
That's the last one on the this is what General Wesley Clark said.
They had this in the works before 9-11.
Okay, so they had this in the works.
And so at every country we've got, we've got, we've bombed, I think, Yemen.
So let's go Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Lebanon, and Yemen.
So that's seven.
I think that's the seven.
But anyway, Disclose TV says Trump says the U.S. will support strikes on Iran if they continue with their ballistic missile program.
Just like a Zionist Israeli comedian trying to work a regular club, Trump will continue to bomb until we are out.
Ah, good joke, right, Chris?
That's comedy's Chris Keenelays.
Let's listen.
Will you support an attack?
Israeli attack on Iran if Iran will not have a deal.
If Iran will continue with their ballistic missiles and also nuclear weapons, if they will continue with the missiles, yes, the nuclear, fast.
Okay, one will be yes, absolutely.
The other was we'll do it immediately.
Now, did they dress like that just to show how much they love each other?
Is that some kind of solidarity thing happening?
I mean, if two women showed up wearing the same dress, one of them would go home and change.
But this kind of stuff you see happen all the time.
Hey, get more lapel pins, by the way.
More lapel.
What is with the lapel pins?
It's like do you guys work at DGI Fridays?
What are you doing?
Is that your flare?
I need to have my 36 pieces of pro-war flare.
So there's Donald Trump saying yes.
Yes, if Iran continues developing ballistic missiles.
Again, okay.
You're being force-fed fear of a Muslim takeover, so you won't realize Zionism already has.
Here's what Ian Carroll says.
Who do you think has the blackmail Epstein collected?
Who do you think has that?
Who do you think has the blackmail that Epstein collected?
You don't think Benjamin Netanyahu has it?
You don't think the Mossad has it?
Of course they do.
Who did he work for?
Who did Epstein work for?
He worked for, I'm going to say, Mossad, number one.
That's where his Ghelane Maxwell comes in because her father was Mossad.
And, of course, you know, Mossad works hand in hand with the CIA.
So there you go.
That's who I think he worked for.
And you know the old saying, behind every great man?
Well, there it is.
Come on.
Am I right?
I mean, they're even wearing the same clothes there.
Even in that one.
Look at that.
This looks so weird.
They're both dressed the exact same shade of blue.
Am I wearing the exact same shade of blue that they are?
No.
This is a little different.
That's a little lighter.
This is a little darker.
This color, by the way, I bet you nobody can guess this color.
I know.
Midnight Blue, Jim?
Close.
Oh.
Close.
Here's what, uh, I, I could, I could have told you the playbook, but you just, so this is a guy I sent for Satoshi.
This sounds like a guy who was super chatting me last week, and I dismissed that super chat because I didn't really understand it.
But here, Simpfor Satoshi at I Am Ginger Trash says, I kind of told you the playbook, but you probably didn't pay attention.
Venezuela is a call option.
Once they seize control, expect the Iranian ground invasion.
Bookmark this post and prepare accordingly.
So this is what that person was trying to tell me, and I couldn't get it through my head last week in the super chat.
Do you remember who that was?
Yeah, I can find it.
So here, so this is what they're saying.
Everyone knows that Iran will eventually block the Strait of Hormuz, sending oil prices sky high.
If this occurs, Trump must send boots on the ground.
By taking Venezuela, however, he gets a call option on oil, allowing the U.S. to turn down an Iranian invasion request by Israel.
So that's what he's saying?
You're watching the deep state play chess while predicting the future.
This way, the U.S. can sell weapons to Israel to back them while avoiding conflict altogether.
Trump may be incompetent, but his administration is likely the best ever.
I wouldn't go that far.
I wouldn't go that far.
This changes things, and it's possible that the U.S. escapes the potential three-front war it's currently facing, Ukraine, Taiwan, and Iran.
Oh, oh.
But let's just remember what Charlie Kirk said.
Should the U.S. get involved in Israel's war against Iran?
Nope.
Nope.
So that had probably a lot to do with why he got killed.
He's turning down Benjamin Netanyahu's offer of hundreds of millions of dollars.
He's pissing off his Jewish donors.
He's turning against Israel.
And lo and behold, and he's going to do a Doe-style accounting to find out who's stealing from him inside of TPUSA.
And before you know it, he got killed by a lone nut.
Isn't that something?
It's almost too perfect.
A lone nut with a 30-odd six that just left a little tiny itty-bitty hole.
Tiny.
Like as if he was struck with a lower caliber thing from close up, which is what Kroc says.
Kroc says that he wasn't shot with a 30-odd six.
Anyway, there you go.
So Trump has one meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu, and the next thing you know, he's ready to bomb Iran again.
So what they're saying is the reason why they're trying to secure Venezuela and the Venezuelan oil is so that when Iran blocks off the Strait of Hormuz, that we don't have to go to war with Iran because we got our oil over here.
I get it.
It makes sense, but I don't think that's it.
I think he's going into Venezuela.
I'm going to say 90, 80% for Benjamin Netanyahu because they are afraid of Venezuela turning the region anti-Israel.
And so you know the next person that they have in line to take over, just like Juan Guaido, this new person, I forget her name, she's the one that got.
Yeah, she got the Nobel Prize, Mikado, what's her name?
She's a Zionist.
She's very pro-Israel.
So do you see this game be and Maria Mikado?
Is that it?
Maria Machado.
Machado.
I say Mikado because I'm a fan of the theater.
You ever see the Mikado?
It's great.
So, yeah, that's what's so to me.
And then the other 20% is for the American economic hitmen.
They've been wanting to overthrow Venezuela, at least for the last, I don't know, 25, 30 years.
And here's Trump telling us he's really going to go into Iran.
He's looking for any reason to go in, just anything.
So if Iran shoots and violently kills peaceful protesters, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue.
We are locked and loaded and ready to go.
Nobody voted.
Here's what Marjorie Taylor Green says.
An Israeli cybersecurity billionaire demanding to take away Americans' guaranteed First Amendment speech and President Trump threatening war and sending in troops to Iran is everything we voted against in 24.
Trump voters spent the week threatening a tax revolt because they are so furious about the never-ending waste, fraud, and abuse of their hard-earned money going to foreigners and foreign wars.
The focus should be on tax dollars here at home and defending our God-given freedoms and rights.
But this is what Trump is doing.
He's going to do whatever Israel wants.
That's why he's going into Venezuela.
That's why he bombed Yemen.
That's why he bombed Iran the first time.
That's why he's welcoming Al-Qaeda guy at the White House because he runs Syria now.
This is all at the behest of Israel.
This is mega.
This is make Israel great again.
This is not America first.
This is unbelievable, kind of almost.
It's so transparent.
And guess what?
Trump doesn't care.
He doesn't care that you know.
He doesn't care that you think he's owned by Israel.
Who cares?
All the best people are owned by Israel.
This should be outrageous to people who call themselves MAGA.
This should be outrageous.
And you want to know who's splitting the MAGA base?
It's not Candace Owens.
It's not Tucker Carlson.
It's not Marjorie Taylor Green.
It's Trump.
Trump is doing that.
Trump is betraying you.
And again, you're not supposed to be loyal to a politician.
The politician is supposed to be loyal to you.
And when he betrays you, you're supposed to put pressure on him or else you're in a cult.
As you know, Alex Jones is upsetting lots of his fans.
And he's doing it because I feel like he's taking the side of the deep state and attacking Candace Owens.
And that he's flipped 180 on what he normally does.
So now, you know, I have great affection for Alex.
And I just want to show you what he's saying now about Candace Owens.
It's pretty strong, pretty out there.
Let's listen.
I remember saying that, like I said, I got to investigate her now.
I got a bad feeling.
I didn't have a bad feeling.
God gave me a good brain.
I already knew.
I dropped the ball.
I apologize.
She's a globalist agent.
I dropped the ball and I failed you.
And I'm sorry.
I got to follow my gut every time.
It's never wrong.
And I saw so much more she did.
And I love her people threatening me and all their doxing of people and all of it.
You think that's going to make me go away?
All you did was wake me up like a nuclear test site waking up Godzilla.
So just get your asses ready because you want a war.
I want your war.
I want it all.
I want the doxing.
I want the lies.
I want the attacks.
I'm going to take you on because you aren't for the deep state and the Democratic Party and the CIA and MI6.
And I see your ass.
So you just get ready.
This ain't my first rodeo.
Wow.
He says that she's a WF globalist working for the deep state.
And now he has to investigate her.
Wow.
Well, here's what people say when he says stuff like that online.
Just retire.
You're pathetic, embarrassing.
Dude has officially lost it.
There's a difference between believing in rational conspiracies backed by massive evidence and whatever the hell this is.
The guy is a tinfoil hat loony tune.
Well, they've been saying that about him forever.
And he's been right about a lot of stuff.
So what an effing loser, LMFAO.
this is kind of funny that's kind of funny uh alex jones got the call and answered And then JR puts that up.
That's kind of funny.
You got to give it to him.
That's funny.
That's called flat broke back mountain.
Because when you get sued for a billion dollars, you're flat broke.
Flat broke back mountain.
Wow.
Here's what Mel, our favorite village crazy lady says.
Dude just went harder on Candace for investigating Charlie's murder than he ever has on Israel for anything.
Like, F off.
We get it.
You're broke.
You're beat down.
File bankruptcy.
Do whatever you got to do.
No one cares.
Herder, CIA, MI6, Democrats, globalists.
This isn't even Fed slop.
This is gruel he's spewing.
He's spooning up.
Have some self-respect and just retire.
So that's the kind of thing people are saying about Alex.
Again, I want to get Alex back on the let's investigate this instead of let's investigate Candace Owens because I don't it doesn't matter what you find out about Candace Owens.
What matters is if we find out about who really killed Charlie Kirk and who's covering it up.
I can tell you who's covering it up.
TPUSA is definitely covering it up.
And so is the FBI definitely covering it up.
So there's at least two things.
But the country is being effing destroyed by everyone in D.C. is an effing criminal.
And these weak ass men are screaming about a 35-year-old mother of four asking questions about an assassination we're all being lied to about.
America will fail because this is men today.
They fail to even identify their enemies, much less defeat them.
Well said, Citizen Grace.
Again, the real that our enemies are not people who are also investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Our enemies are the people covering it up.
And they want to split us.
And it's working.
To some extent, it's working.
Sneeko, I don't know if you follow Sneeko on the Twitters, but Sneeko also retweeted this rant that I just played for you.
And he said, the bro spent three decades claiming there was a shadow PDF file ring controlling the world.
And when it ended up exposing his friends, he pivoted to Candace Owens and Muslims time to so that's Sneeko.
Sneko's a big account.
So this is, and here's, this guy makes a great point, and he speaks right to what Alex is saying.
Let's listen to Jesse on fire.
We don't all need to, like, whether he was there, not there.
Talking about Camp Huachuca.
So that's the big thing.
Was what was his name?
The guy who was at Camp Huachuca?
Mitch Snow, right?
Yes.
Was he there?
Was he there?
So this is what he's talking about.
We don't all need to, like, whether he was there, not there, whether he saw what he saw, any of those things, none of it matters as long as someone who is doing the right thing is looking into it.
As long as someone's looking into it, go and go chase down their alibis, right?
Like if you, if you believe that he was really, then you guys take it on, do your part, and go chase down his alibi.
Chase down, you know, Brian Harpole and Erica's alibis.
That's your job then, okay?
We have decided we don't think he's that credible, so we're going to go work on the 30 out six, you know, the frag rounds that Candace told us about, and which is why we know we need to go test them.
So what he's saying is, hey, I don't find that Mitch Snow character to be credible.
So I'm not going to follow that lead.
I'm going to do this other thing.
And if you want, and if they want to, go make sure Erica and Kirk and Brian Harpaul, the head of security, go make sure their alibis check out if you want to follow that.
He goes, I'm not going to follow that because I don't really have faith in that guy who's saying this.
So I'm going to go check out something else.
Let's not fight each other.
Why is everyone fighting?
Here's the other thing.
Okay.
If we are fighting, that is the goal of the actual enemies of this entire thing.
This is the most important thing that I could possibly communicate to people.
Okay.
So when Alex Jones says what he says, him and like, look, dude, this is a very simple equation.
Candace is a dragon.
Candace, never going to take a backward step.
Never.
Never.
Okay.
If you come at Candace aggressive, she is going to fight you.
That is what she's going to do.
There is no question about this.
It does not matter.
It makes no difference.
Literally, she could put on a red hat and go, this hat's blue.
And if someone's like, that's not blue, and they're disrespectful, she's going to fight them to the death, that the hat's blue, right?
They're going to be like, it's red.
What is wrong with you?
It's red.
And she will literally fight them to the death.
She'll slit their throat over them saying that it's, you know, saying it's a red hat, even if it's red.
She's a killing machine.
She's a dragon.
This is what she does.
Okay.
Alex Jones, okay, he's a steamroller, dude.
So, what happens when a steamroller hits a dragon?
If they go at each other aggressive, it only escalates and the two sides are going to fight.
Like, there's no upside in the two of them fighting at all.
Everyone wants the same thing, and I'm going to prove it to you right now as we look at what Alex Jones is saying about the Candace.
I'm going to show you a few minutes of what Alex is saying because I will prove the point.
His intro verifies all of us want the same thing, but now he's out there saying that she's an MI6 agent, dude.
Candace is not an MI6 agent.
I know he has sources on this, whatever.
They're not, whoever his source is, bad actor, dude.
Okay, bad actor.
She's not an MI6 agent.
That's absurd.
That is absurd.
What would her end game be?
Okay.
Like, it's like, if you show me an agent and you show me what they're doing, I can back into what the purpose of what they're doing would be.
What would Candace be doing?
What would the purpose of what Candace is doing be if she's an MI6 agent?
Makes no sense.
Okay.
Makes no sense.
The reason I've always had her back is because I have always believed that she believes what she's doing is moving in the direction of solving the case and she's working in good faith.
The end.
Okay.
That's why I always, and Alex Jones, I think the same thing.
People have been telling you, it just doesn't even matter.
Like, it doesn't matter.
I am right about what this is.
And if everybody can kind of accept that, then we can get back to chasing down leads.
Chase down the Wachuca thing.
Go ahead.
Dude, chase it down.
Like, if you guys need help with what the next step is, the next step is to put pressure on TPUSA to get legitimate alibis from Erica Kirk and from Brian Harpoo.
I know he shared his, his, you know, for people who are like, they already provided that.
Okay.
Right.
He provided his flight, his flight log, you know, like that.
He bought these tickets.
They're saying, well, that doesn't prove that he was actually on the flight.
So just show them that you were on the flights, dude.
Show them that you were on the flights or show them, you know, like, I don't know, figure out a way that like in your hotel room in the morning in Dallas, there's security footage of it.
You know what I mean?
Or whatever.
And if Erica, in their, what they said, you know, and in their defense, they're like, dude, she showed a picture from the morning of the ninth, not the eighth.
Okay, well, I even thought that what the, what he was saying was that she was there on the ninth.
So if I didn't know that, I'm sure she also didn't know.
And she just sent the wrong day.
So if she's waking up there on the ninth, she should probably be able to easily show where she was on the eighth.
So just provide it.
We're done.
It's over.
That's the end of all of it.
Or if you can't, then, you know, the people who think that this guy Mitch is credible, they could continue to chase down whatever they think comes from this, right?
But like, this is how this needs to go.
This is how the investigation goes.
Candace is not responsible for every single thing that she puts on her show being accurate.
That's not what she does.
She, that's why people who watch it, they're like, she's never even saying anything.
She's not even like, she's not even like saying what her theory is.
That's exactly right.
She is the central point of an open source investigation.
She is putting on her platform what the clues are, and then we go chase them down.
Okay.
She has a tip line that is getting thousands of tips a day.
Okay.
Do you really think that they can simultaneously vet every single one of these and then also like chase it down with the surgical precision that like other people can if they, if this is the only thing that they're focused on is like this one clue, she vets the clues.
She puts the clues on her platform.
We go chase down whether or not these clues hold merit.
Okay.
And everybody's mad at Nate.
So I'll stop.
You get the point.
If you if you find yourself making this about Candace Owens, they win.
If you find yourself following a lead that she has given on her show and it leads nowhere and then you just go, well, then she's discredited.
That's exactly what they want.
That's how they win.
They win by you not understanding how an investigation works.
An investigation works by you following every lead.
And if it leads nowhere, then it leads nowhere.
And who cares?
And it doesn't matter if you think Candace Owens is a liar or not.
Look at her leads.
Is there something to them?
And of course, we all know there's a lot to them, which is why there's a freak out about her.
If there was nothing to anything she was saying, nobody would care.
Nobody would care.
The only reason there's such a freak out happening over Candace Owens looking into this is because she keeps catching them in lie after lie after lie.
And I asked Alex Jones on Twitter, don't you think it's weird that she's caught all these people in lies from like Josh Harwood to Bowers to Tyler, Tyler, to everybody.
She's caught them all lying multiple times.
Brian Harpole, the head of his security, lying.
And why don't you think it's interesting?
Don't you think it's weird?
I asked Alex, don't you think it's weird that nobody cares about that and there isn't a bigger focus on that and that the mainstream media isn't reporting that these people are lying?
Why is it that?
Why aren't they covering it?
So he didn't respond.
Don't you think it's weird?
He responded with a change of subject.
I'm like, no, the point was this.
Don't you think it's weird that Candace Owens catches these people lying and no one cares about that?
They all want to find a way to make her the subject.
She's not the subject.
The subject are the people who are covering this up.
That's the subject.
And Candace is just the conduit for us to look into these leads.
And if the leads go nowhere, if Erica Kirk and Brian Harpole are not at Camp Wachuca, as Mitch Snow said, then just provide the data.
And okay, dead end.
We move on to another thing.
We move on to the 30-out six round.
We move on to why they paved over the crime scene.
We moved on to where's the video of him taking the shot?
We move on to how did he put the gun together if he left a screwdriver on the roof.
We put the why did why did they say they had a drone coverage and then they said they didn't have drone coverage.
Why did they say they, why did the head of security say they walked the whole campus and then they didn't put anybody at the door leading to the roof?
Why didn't they have anybody looking at the roofs?
There's only a few roofs there.
Nobody has binoculars?
Again, they have to, again, so these are, so that's what we, so we should be looking at all these questions.
And it doesn't matter if you like Candace Owens, hate Candace Owens, or if you think Candace Owens is a liar or if her leads go nowhere.
That doesn't matter.
The fact that people are making it about Candace Owens shows that she's over it, over the target, and they're trying to shut people down.
This is classic.
They did this to me during Force the Vote, the Democratic Party and the establishment media.
They made it about me instead of about the substance, which was the Democratic progressives and Force the Vote.
That's what it was about.
It was about pressuring Nancy Pelosi, using their power to pressure her to call and to get it extract something for their vote for her as speaker.
Well, they didn't make it about that because if they made it about that, they would lose because they all campaigned on doing that very thing.
So what did they do?
They made it about me.
They made it about Jimmy Doar's a jerk.
Jimmy Dore is a meanie.
Jimmy Dore is here to divide people.
Jimmy Dore, so they made it about me.
That's what they're doing right now with this Charlie Kirk investigation.
They're making it about Candace, which is exactly what the people covering this up want.
They want us to make it about Candace instead of about all the lies they've told and all the leads we have and all the things in the official narrative that make absolutely no sense, not to mention the stupid text messages the FBI concocted and said he sent, Tyler Robinson sent.
There's a million things.
No matter where you point your focus at this Charlie Kirk assassination investigation, there's a million things that don't add up and don't make sense.
So my plea to Alex Jones is to stop investigating Candace Owens because it doesn't matter.
What matters is where it leads.
If she's crazy and making stuff up, it will lead nowhere.
It will lead nowhere.
Candace doesn't have the power to subpoena people.
Candace doesn't have the power to arrest people, to charge people, to take people to trial.
She doesn't have any of that power.
So it doesn't mean anything.
What means something is if we all come together to investigate what really happened.
And it doesn't matter if you think she's MI6 or if MBA, nothing, that doesn't matter.
Jesse on fire is exactly right.
So Ian Carroll went on Tucker Carlson, and it's trending right now on Twitters.
And here's what they say.
Tucker Carlson interview questions Charlie Kirk assassination narrative.
On January 2nd, Tucker Carlson interviewed podcaster Ian Carroll, who questioned the official account of Charlie Kirk's September 10th shooting at Utah Valley University.
Authorities say 22-year-old Tyler Robinson acted alone, backed by DNA, ballistics, video, and his confession.
He didn't confess.
There's no confession.
Tied to anti-Kirk and they're talking about his Discord posts and that fake text messages he sent to his tranny girl, trans girlfriend.
That's supposed to say tranny.
That's offensive.
Don't mean to defend.
The discussion demands more evidence, like unreleased footage fueling online theories and conspiracies involving TPUSA scandals or foreign actors, though critics label them baseless and anti-Semitic.
Of course they do.
With Robinson's trial pending as early as 26, the case stirs tensions between grief, evidence, and calls for transparency.
So here's what Tucker Carlson put out.
Here's the video they put out, a teaser from that interview.
Let's listen to it.
Charlie Kirk is months, months ago now.
And to this day, I think the most Americans still feel like we don't have an honest set of answers.
Whether you believe it was Tyler Robinson or you believe it was some version of some other conspiracy, I think that a lot of people feel very underwhelmed by the way it was handled by cash, the way it was handled by every government official involved.
And that should have been the most basic one.
Well, Sue, I didn't want to talk about this because I'm, you know, I know everyone involved very well, and I feel emotional about it.
And I'm going out, you know, day after tomorrow to speak a turning point at Charlie's request.
But I don't, so my, the hostility that I, I don't know what that was.
The onus is on the government to prove it was a lone gunman.
Okay.
It's that's up to them, not up to me.
That's their job.
I'm not accusing anybody.
I don't know exactly what happened.
There is a lot of evidence that Tyler Robinson was involved, at least from what I read.
If those text messages are real and the murder weapon is, you know, like I'm willing to believe anything, but I do think it's up to them to prove it to us.
Here's what I don't understand.
There's been an enormous amount of rage, you know, different people with different views getting mad at each other.
There's been almost no pressure on federal law enforcement to cough up the freaking facts and to tell a story that makes sense.
Just in this got internal coherence that, like, oh, that makes sense.
Like, I get it.
Exactly.
And there's no pressure on them.
Even the question of motive, like, again, I want to believe it was a lone gunman who was a tranny or something.
I want to believe that.
That is a lot better of an answer, a lot more comfortable.
100%.
I want that.
By the way, I'm a middle-aged man.
I'm a normie.
I don't want to believe anything other than what they tell me.
But they've made it impossible for me.
So, but I don't understand the motive.
Like, they're like, well, transgenderism, which obviously I'm opposed to.
But okay, was he transgender?
Was he on hormones?
Was he, how do you go from being this seemingly normal person to murdering a stranger with almost a dead certainty?
You'll be punished.
You'll spend life in prison or be executed for it.
Like, that's a lot.
That's a deep commitment.
Okay.
Yeah.
I'm not saying it doesn't happen.
Of course it does.
But like, how did it happen in this case?
Yeah.
And tell us the facts, right?
Yeah, yeah.
And it's like, shut up.
Yeah.
And it's like, it's a parallel to the Las Vegas in the sense that just one piece of evidence in the case of Charlie Kirk, it's one piece of evidence.
In the case of Las Vegas, it's like 5 trillion.
Well, the Las Vegas thing, the story is just like, well, what I was going to say is that the video is, we know they have it.
Like in Vegas, we know that there's surveillance footage of the entire city.
We know that every hotel has footage of everything that happened.
And we know that they could release it.
And we could see these alleged gunmen.
We could see these fake 911 calls, right?
And in Charlie's case, we know that the camera that they release footage of of this guy running across the roof, that camera sees the whole roof.
That camera sees the shooting position clearly.
I went there myself.
And so it's like, if you have the video of the shooter running to get off the roof, you have the video of him taking the shot.
And so it's these little things where you don't take that step to release the evidence that is so in our faces to just give a little bit of trust to the public to clarify things.
It's like, why don't you take this step for trust?
Well said.
And I like that he talks about there's been an enormous amount of rage, different people with different views getting mad at each other.
There's been almost no pressure on the federal law enforcement to cough up freaking facts and to tell a story that makes sense.
That's exactly right.
Again, as I've said over and over today, if we're fighting each other, the people covering up the Charlie Kirk assassination win.
That's exactly what they want.
Does it matter that Candace Owens is right or that she's wrong?
It doesn't matter.
What they want us to do is focus on Candace instead of the leads she's uncovering.
They want us to make it about Candace instead of the people covering up the assassination.
That's what they want.
I've been involved in stuff like this firsthand.
When I started asking questions about Seth Rich back in 2016, I got put immediately, they made it about me.
They didn't go, hey, here's the questions Jimmy Doors asked about the Seth Rich murder.
And here's the answers to them.
They immediately had Dave Weigel put me in a hit piece in the Washington Post next to PDF files and white supremacists and Nazis and KKK people.
They made it about me.
They didn't make it about the Seth Rich murder or the unanswered questions to an unsolved murder.
Since when haven't reporters been able to ask questions about an unsolved murder?
The only time in my lifetime was Seth Rich, and now it's this.
So it's very similar.
They make it about the person.
It's easy to make it about a person, get people to project their hatred onto this person.
And then through doing that, you dismiss any investigation.
That's what they want.
So, if you get, if you find yourself fighting with people, just as Tucker Carlson says there, the enormous amount of rage at different people within the view getting mad at each other with no pressure.
So, all the people screaming about Candace Owens, imagine if they were all coming together with one voice to scream at the FBI about their obvious BS narrative.
Imagine if they were all coming together to say, where is the video of the guy taking the shot?
Why haven't you interviewed the ballistics expert who found that guy on the roof before he took the shot and said the guy never took that shot?
How come he's never been interviewed?
How come they paved over the crime scene two days afterwards?
What?
How come they didn't have a security guy looking at the roof?
How come the security guy, Harpel, lie?
Why did he lie about having drone coverage?
He lied about it.
Why did they lie about why they took the SD cards out of the cameras behind where he got shot?
Why did they lie?
Why did they lie about Charlie turning on Israel?
They said he didn't.
He did.
There's a million questions that you should ask.
And once you start making it about a person, they win.
They win.
Imagine if all those people asking those questions about Candace Owens.
Imagine if they all came together and put pressure on the FBI and the police doing the investigation into this to come up with answers to these questions.
Imagine if they all did that.
Imagine if with one voice, we were all saying, hey, of course those text messages were obvious BS.
Of course, a 30-ot-6 would have left a drive-through window in the back of his neck, if not take his head clean off.
Why did you pave over the crime scene?
Why did they lie about that?
Imagine if everybody was coming together to ask those questions instead of just Candace Owens, and then you all make it about Candace Owens.
Imagine that.
Imagine what would happen.
So that's the last thing they want.
The last thing they want is us all, again, coming together to fight the people doing a cover-up of an assassination.
That's the last thing they want.
They want us all fighting each other, and that's how they win, which is why there's only two political parties in the United States.
So you get half the country to hate the other half of the country instead of us coming together around shared interests to oppose the people running the country, which is a handful of billionaires and corporations.
So you see people, there's Laura Loomer.
Tucker Carlson's doubling down on mainstreaming people who falsely stated.
So again, she's making it about a person.
She's making it about Ian Carroll.
She's not making it about what they're saying.
So it's another example of Tucker Carlson deciding to entertain and mainstream Platinum and virulent Jew hatred and anti-that's not what this is about.
So they always have to make it about the person.
So whenever you see someone making it about the person, they're doing the work of the people covering up the assassination.
I'll keep going.
Here's A.G. Hamilton.
This is Tucker's latest guest talking about Ian Carroll.
At some point, TPUSA is going to have to face that Tucker is an enemy who is actively part of promoting the operation to destroy everything Charlie built.
So they're making it about Tucker.
They make it about Candace.
They make it about Ian Carroll.
They don't make it about the people covering up and lying who have been caught lying multiple times already.
They don't make it about them.
And that's when and when you make it about a person instead of the investigation in the cover up, you're doing the bidding of your oppressors.
Yashir Ali says Tucker Carlson's guest today is Ian Carroll.
Perfect.
I don't know what that means.
This guy, oh, this guy's the worst.
Eyal Jacobi says, Tucker Carlson honors Charlie Kirk by inviting on someone who relentlessly attacked him while he was alive and who now continues to attack his family.
So they make it about the person.
in so you can tell they're fake when they make it about the a person instead of about the investigation and the people covering it up uh uh so they're calling them king grifter uh So I don't have to go through any more of this, but there's one more video I want to show you.
Here, here's this video.
Yeah.
Here's what I don't understand.
There's been an enormous amount of rage.
You know, different people with different views getting mad at each other.
There's been almost no pressure on federal law enforcement to cough up the freaking facts and to tell a story that makes sense.
Just that's got internal coherence that, like, oh, that makes sense.
Like, I get it.
Well said.
And how come no one else is pointing that?
I mean, I've been saying that.
So good for Ian, good for Tucker.
Tucker's used to this.
Rich Barris says, of course, I think this is all cute and kind of BS since Ian has been pushing bullets don't do weird things BS for weeks.
What?
Bullets don't do weird things.
But at the same time, because of how the Fed, the Fed deeply effed up on Vegas and other cases, I understand why people listen to that stuff.
Okay.
Okay.
Clint Russell says, since Laura Loomer is upset, you know Tucker's interview with Ian Carroll was excellent.
I'm about halfway through.
Great stuff.
I can't wait to listen to it.
I'm going to listen to it on my plane ride when I go to do comedy in Waikiki.
And when is that?
January 11th.
That's a Sunday in Waikiki.
Also, February 20th in Lansing, Michigan, February 21st in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
And to get tickets for that, go to JimmyDoor.com.
You go anywhere else, you're going to pay too much money.
So good on you, Clint.
That's exactly right.
Sneeko drops truth bomb.
Candace Owens is the tip of the spear uncovering Charlie Kirk's assassination.
She saved his legacy from Zionist hijacking.
Wow, let's listen to what Sneeko says.
Charlie Kirk phenomenon is going to keep on creeping into 2026.
We got to figure out the full details of this.
And I think one of the most important takeaways is what the fuck is going on with Erica Kirk.
And you know, she's seeing the response.
The fact that everybody's making memes about her shooting fireworks out of her tits on every stadium in the world right after her husband got assassinated.
That stuff's strange.
This is not normal.
And the more we uncover about this, and I do think that Candace Owens did a good job and deserves some credit.
She's getting a lot of people are criticizing her for being too conspiracy-minded and being wacky.
But I think Candace Owens deserves credit for being the sole creator, the sole voice to not let Charlie Kirk's legacy be hijacked by the Zionist movement because they really did try to do it.
Ben Shapiro was never invited to turning point before Charlie Kirk.
And then once he dies, Ben Shapiro is like the host.
He's there with every, he's introducing guests.
He's yelling at his ops.
He's trying to change the narrative.
JD Vance is there using.
They tried to use Kirk's legacy for the GOP Zionist movement.
And I think without Candace Owens, it would have been hijacked a lot, a lot more easily.
And without her, without doing that, people started to look into this a lot more and see what Kirk was saying about October 7th.
See what he was saying about being bullied.
See the contracts that he rejected.
That was important to get out there.
Well said, Sneeko.
Nice job.
Okay.
Tucker and others are trying to fracture TPSA.
So, okay.
So some fragments will gravitate towards him.
Believe me, Tucker.
It's like people try to accuse Joe Rogan of doing things for money.
Those people, Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan do not need money.
I opened up for Tucker Carlson when he was here at the duck pond in Anaheim.
It's a huge, what would you call it? Stadium.
And he filled it.
And so he doesn't need money.
Okay.
Tucker Carlson does not need money.
And neither does.
And he doesn't need to get somebody else's audience.
He's the most popular news guy in the country.
Anyway, so sorry, shipwreck crew.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.