All Episodes
Jan. 2, 2026 - Jimmy Dore Show
01:00:24
Massive Astroturf Campaign To SHUT UP Candace Owens

In this podcast, Jimmy argues that a coordinated, "astroturfed" media and influencer campaign was launched to discredit Candace Owens and whistleblower Mitch Snow after Snow claimed to witness key TPUSA security and political figures at Camp Huachuca shortly before Charlie Kirk's assassination. He highlights posts from Evan Kilgore and others who reversed their support for Owens while allegedly coordinating messaging, and shows claims that many of these same accounts promote the betting platform PolyMarket. He goes on to review accusations that PolyMarket is financially tied to Trump-world, citing Donald Trump Jr.-linked investments and the DOJ dropping charges against the company, while also noting pushback involving Tim Pool, Ian Miles Cheong, and other right-wing influencers. Jimmy frames the backlash as evidence that powerful interests are panicking over Owens' investigation, asserting that coordinated smears typically indicate someone is "over the target." Plus segments on the additional reporting about shady financial dealings at Turning Point USA and online "bounty" deals that reward influential social media operators for spreading propaganda. Also featuring Ryan Matta and Stef Zamorano!

|

Time Text
Come see me on tour in Potts Town, Pennsylvania, Waikiki, Hawaii, and the comedy store in Los Angeles.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets.
Establishment media sets August lighting, so good luck.
Bullshit they can't afford lights.
Watch and see as his jet dog.
The medium speeds and jumps the medium and hits them head on.
It's the chimney tour show.
So if you want to see how this paid for Mockingbird 2.0 media works going against Candace Owens, we'll show you.
But first, let me show you this.
This is a guy named Evan Kilgore, who at first was posting lots of stuff that was supportive of Candace Owens, asking questions and investigating every lead, because that's what she's doing.
People are like, well, what's her theory?
It doesn't matter what her theory is.
She wants to invest.
An investigator investigates every lead and sees where it goes.
And if it goes nowhere, then it goes nowhere.
Yeah, my theory is you're lying to me.
That's my theory.
Her theory is she's being lied to, and she's trying to find out why.
Evan Kilgore says, I mean, this is a quick example of how things work.
Never heard of him, by the way.
I wanted to get on here to say something and know I will open myself up to thousands of hate comments for it.
That's okay with me.
What I want to tell you is all I know is that after a great deal of thought and conviction, I can no longer support the direction of Candace Owens' investigation.
You can't support the direction of what?
You mean her asking questions and why we're being lied to?
It's not the Candace Owens investigation, dipshit.
It's the thing about Charlie Kirk.
Yeah.
So let's say that she got it wrong with Mitch, whatever his name is.
What bearing does that have on I'm being lied to?
Nothing.
On the fucking FBI.
Nothing to nothing.
I have always been interested in possible alternative narrative to Charlie Kirk's assassin.
That's the new line, by the way.
Yeah, I don't trust the FBI either, but Candace is crazy.
That's the new one, right?
Okay, it doesn't matter, though.
She's crazy.
It has nothing to do with it.
I know, it's the thing I care about.
I have likely been her biggest supporter on X, sharing her clips, blah, blah.
Many of her questions, concerns, and criticisms, I have agreed with.
In fact, virtually all of them, until Mitch Snow.
So obviously, she's over the target with Mitch Snow because the meltdown, there's a couple things.
When she started talking about Egyptian planes, they melted down over that.
And when she started talking about Mitch Snow, whoa, everybody came out against her.
I cannot justify the thrust of that investigation, okay?
Mitch Snow genocided Gaza.
That's a crime, Jimmy.
While watching Mitch share, so if you don't know who this Mitch guy is, Mitch is the guy who was the former special ops military guy.
He was at that camp Chahuka.
Is that how you say it?
Wahuka?
Huachuka.
Wachuca.
That's how you say it.
Huachuca.
And he claims he saw Erica Kirk and the head of Charlie's security team there at this military base where they do all psyops and drone stuff.
Nothing feels off about that at all to me.
On the 8th of September, two days before Charlie was killed.
And on the 9th of September, he said he stumbled onto this big high-level meeting where a congressman came out and he was blah, blah, blah.
So that's who this Mitch guy is.
So while Mitch was sharing his testimony of what he allegedly saw at Fort, how do you say this?
Wachuca, everything felt off about it to me.
She's also said, by the way, Candace Owens has said, hey, I don't know if his memory is correct or what, but we're going to follow this lead and see where it goes.
So I guess.
By the way, nothing hinges on this.
And nothing hinges on.
Nothing.
Nothing.
We already know we're being lied to.
We already know the FBI narrative is already a lie.
And so she's just following another lead.
This is a lead she's following.
See where it goes.
So they're acting like Candace has come to conclusions.
And she hasn't.
She's just following leads, which is what every good investigator does until it comes to a dead end.
You stop following it.
And this might come.
Mitch's story might come to a dead end, but right now it hasn't.
In fact, all the stuff they're saying about it, she keeps disproving.
They're trying to debunk her, but the debunkers actually end up unwittingly reinforcing Mitch's story.
We're going to show you that in a second.
The burden improves on the government.
It always has been, even in a legal sense, with a court case, the burden improves on the government.
Does everybody understand that?
It's not on Candace Owens.
She could just raise a reasonable doubt if she wants, if you want to be all legal about it.
So he says, I simply voiced my concerns that Mitch might be lying to Candace and was immediately met with hundreds of hate replies and even Candace Owens herself condemning me, looking into his past and who he says he is.
That immediately felt like maybe there was some legitimacy into looking into Mitch if Mitch could be considered a credible source.
So I reached out to several of Mitch's former partners.
So no, what you don't do is you, what you do is you look into his story and if you could verify his story.
Was he there that day?
Yeah.
Were those people there that day?
Is there a record of him being there that day?
You know why?
That's how you check.
He's a scumbag.
You don't call up his high school sweethearts and ask if they have any dirt on him.
That's not how you investigate this.
But anyway, this is what this guy did.
So I reached out to several of Mitch's former partners and friends to verify the story that Mitch is telling to the world.
First, they tried to say he wasn't a military.
He was.
Okay.
Two nights ago, they responded to me and shared dozens of messages, stories, debunked many claims Mitch has made.
They even provided me with a police report about an active case against him.
Okay.
Mitch, on all accounts, everyone who knows him personally, including his own family, is a compulsive liar, manipulator, abuser, victim, and all-around fraud and horrible human being.
Sounds like the stuff they say about RFK.
Sounds like a Cheney, is what it sounds like.
Yeah.
He's a psychopathic narcissist, I believe, in the true sense.
He worked for the government.
After sharing what it sounds like he's perfect for politics.
After sharing what those in his life told me about him, I have been met with thousands of hate comments completely smearing me and making the most of it.
So what?
I know this is not Candace directing her followers to say these things, but it is a culture she's created.
No.
No, it's the exact opposite.
The exact opposite.
Now I know you're a fake.
And I can't believe that.
She is not responsible for the behavior of her followers, though.
So he's trying to hit, that's called speaking out of both sides of your mouth.
In the past 48 hours, I've been accused of being paid off, being a pedophile, getting the call, being a Fed, being a CIA asset, and many more things.
Those are the optimistic ones, dipshit.
Wait till you get called an anti-Semite.
Do you all realize how insane and delusional you're getting for merely questioning and looking into Mitch Snow is being honest?
You don't understand that that's what they're literally doing to Candace Owens for the last three months is exactly what you're complaining about.
They've been doing to her for just following leads to see where they lead because no one else is doing this investigation.
Because there's a cover-up happening with the FBI, which is why Candace Owens has to do this.
Jimmy, if it turns out that Mitch Snow is actually an undercover satanic PDF file, all that would prove to me is he definitely worked at Fort Horchada.
Yeah, yes.
Do you not see the irony, hypocrisy here of behaving when people ask their questions?
Some of you are not actually interested in the truth and aren't interested in your blah, blah, blah.
It's not a conspiracy.
Mitch is just likely a fraud, like he always has been.
And people are cautioning Candace.
I know she truly believes she's onto something, and it's okay to disagree with her on this one.
I do not believe Mitch Snow is the lead we have been trusting.
His story is falling apart.
People he claims to have seen are providing alibis.
All those alibis have been debunked.
All their alibis.
By the way, the congressman says he was at a roll call.
He wasn't.
He wasn't there.
He missed two roll calls.
So the congressman wasn't there.
And nobody else had.
Anyway, I do not think that.
There won't be a record if you're doing off-the-book black ops, like, you know, murdering someone in broad daylight, which is a thing the government engages in on the regular.
So I also know many of you, like thousands, will hate on me for this and continue to be.
But of course, I do not support where Candace is headed and caution her to prayfully take to some of her biggest supporters' concerns about Mitch Snow and provide more public evidence about his past.
The government case again, blah, blah.
Candace Owens says, hey, Evan, out of curiosity, why were you coordinating your Twitter posts yesterday via text with other influencers?
Oh.
Evan Kilgore, like from that movie Full Metal Jacket.
That's a weird fake name to have, isn't it?
Colonel Kilgore.
Narrator, don't deny.
Don't deny it, Evan, or she will drop the receipt.
Oh, she is narrating his life.
Yes.
Yes.
So, and then Diligent Denizen says, evidence is emerging that right-wing influencers were coordinating with each other in a smear campaign Friday and Saturday against the Fort Wachuka whistleblower Mitch Snow.
The fact that entities would go through so much effort to shut down Mitch proves that we are over the target.
Yes, it does.
Yes, exactly what that does prove.
Otherwise, you're like, why would this guy's a nut?
He's always been a nut.
No, but this guy, what do you what?
Why would you pay him any mind?
I don't like the direction this is going into a rabbit hole.
Yeah.
What a gaping rabbit hole these people leave.
So here it is.
There appears to have been a paid influencer campaign against Candace Owens for Wahuka Charlie Kirk whistleblower Mitch Snow.
Yesterday, a coordinated personal smear and disavow campaign launched across social media against Mitch Snow with some surprising right-wing accounts coming out against him.
What's interesting is that these same accounts also appear to be doing paid promotions for polymarket.
It begs the question, were they paid to come out against Mitch Snow?
So this is what Diligent Denizen is saying, right?
I am now speaking with one of Mitchell Snow's ex-best friends.
Spoiler alert, there's nothing trustworthy about what Mitch says about his past and no reason to believe him now.
I'm sorry.
You can hate me all you want.
I'm interested in the truth.
That's Evan Kilgore.
So that's not how you do an investigation about what if a guy's saying is true.
So here it is.
So he's one of, here's the polymarket.
Evan Kilgore reposted the polymarket breaking.
The odds of Tim Waltz being criminally charged are soaring amid the expose revealing fake Somalian daycare centers.
I love and support Candace Owens and have immense respect for her and her work and the investigation to Charlie Kirk.
I cannot, in good faith, get behind Mitchell Snow.
So this has been had, so this is their showing.
And then let's watch the poly.
Oh, there she is retweeting Polymarket.
So they're also even accusing Tim Poole of this.
So I can't.
I can't.
I'm not vouching that this connection is real.
I mean, it's real that they're connected, but whether they're being paid by Polymarket to launch this obvious astro-turf campaign against Candace Owens and Mitch, I can't verify the veracity of that.
And so they even go after Tim Poole, which, come on, really?
So, Trump is up 11% on polymarket.
Holy shit.
So, they're insinuating that Tim Poole is on the take going after Candace Owens because of polymarket.
I find that hard to believe.
Oh, my goodness.
Extremely hard.
And that explains the red heifer nonsense.
I wonder if they had to hit a red heifer dust bounty when they played that weirdo.
That was on Tim Poole.
Couldn't believe it.
You ever hear that craziness?
No.
That millennial Israel thing with the third temple and they sacrificed the red.
You should Bill Maher was complaining about, but apparently he also is into.
Tim Poole had that on his show.
Fucking so they're showing all the polymarket tweets he makes.
Is this a fixed gambling market, Jimmy?
I don't know.
That you can affect with your tweets and make bets.
So this is what they're claiming.
So this is what they're claiming that somehow.
I don't, again, I can that seems hard to believe.
Tim Poole's worth a lot of money.
I don't know.
I don't think he would.
No, he only got tricked once by Lauren Chen's Russian people.
Yeah.
I'm sure he knows better by now, right?
He keeps his park funded with other means.
So Diligent Denizen says exposed another one.
Ian Miles, polymarket promoter, attacking anyone investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination.
And Mitch Snow has been outed.
This polymarket network is massive and seems to be working with the Trump administration.
Ian Miles is a foreigner.
How is this legal?
So here, let's.
Oh, this fetal alcohol syndrome phase guy.
So they're always sucking up to Elon.
So there he is.
Yeah.
Polymarket, polymarket, polymarket.
They will do anything for money.
So I think this guy lives in, where does he live?
Somewhere in like Singapore?
Okay.
He got in trouble for being too pro-Israel because I guess you're not allowed to be in Singapore.
Why?
Really?
Or Malaysia?
Really?
Either Malaysia or Singapore.
The other Singapore.
So that's a lot of polymarket tweets by that guy.
Well, he's a well-known scumbag that pretends to live in America and be abundant and sucks up to Elon.
So he tweeted out, Kurt, Candace Owens thinks everyone who's debunking her claims or criticizing her is part of some vast paid conspiracy to denigrate her credibility.
No, she's wrong.
Everyone is doing it for free because she's blatantly telling lies about Erica Kirk.
They never say what the lies are.
Okay, for Ian Moo.
They never say what the lies are.
Yeah, of course.
But for this guy to even weigh in is just one of the funniest things.
I mean, this guy is one of the biggest lying sacks of shit that has ever been.
Anybody that's spent any time online with these personalities knows this about him.
Even that pie-faced idiot, Jeremy from the quartering, knows he's a fraudster.
Even Jeremy, who's also on here.
So almost all of these con Inc. or right-wing influencers defending the Fed slop narrative of the Charlie Kirk assassination promotes polymarket.
Here's another one.
Jeremy, there he is.
Oh, this is the quartering guy?
Yeah.
That you were just talking about?
Yeah.
So these are the people who promote polymarket are defending the Charlie Kirk Fed slop narrative and attacking Mitch Snow.
Boy, the Mitch Snow thing is a real tell.
So when I saw them all coming out at the same time in the same coordinated effort to obviously Astro Turf to go after Mitch Snow at the exact same time, I'm like, oh, this is there's they're really afraid of this, just like they're afraid of the Egyptian planes.
So they're really afraid of it.
So again, if this was, if he was garbage, no one would care.
And there certainly wouldn't be tons and tons and tons of posts about it.
No one would care.
Did you ever see the original Get Carter with Michael Caine?
No.
Oh, well, he got the best ins of all time, which applies to Jeremy.
Jeremy's eyes look like piss holes in the snow.
Okay, here we go.
Now, if you don't believe Candace Owens, not only are you not Christian, but you're part of a paid influencer campaign.
Ha ha ha.
Whatever happened to that elite squad of French assassins, by the way.
Oh, not since Michael Rappaport was laughing about the idea he's a paid Hasbara person.
Right?
Have I heard such convincing laughter from piss hole eyes here?
Here we go.
There's all the polymarket tweets, Mike.
The quartering.
Look at this artless giveaway.
What a jerk off he is.
Look what it says.
Same thing.
Oh, yeah.
This was all to glorify Candace's podcast, Jeremy.
That's a great take on the notes you were told to give.
No one cares about Candace like that, other than when she's telling the truth, everyone would back her.
When she stops, it'll be just like you.
So, guess what?
Important to note that Polymarket is extremely tight with the Trump administration, with the Trump DOJ just randomly reversing charges against the betting platform this summer and Trump family.
So that's, I didn't know that.
Trump Department of Justice randomly reversing charges against the betting platform this summer.
And there it is: Polymarket secures investment from Trump Jr. backed 1789 Capital.
Well, you think of the insider trading you could do on world events and social things when you control all that.
There it is.
Polymarkets.
Wow, that was August 26, 2025.
This is recent.
Yet another, he's going to hawk to the country yet again.
That's the new thing now: hawk to a coin your own country.
Trump administration ends polymarket investigation without charges.
There it is.
That was July 15th.
And then just a month later, boom, Trump Jr. gives a shit crap ton of money.
I don't think they're lamely going after Tim Waltz's corruption.
Here they are going after they're going after Tim Poole again here.
Tim Poole exposed as another node in the Polymarket Influence Network attacking Candace Owens or skeptics of the official Charlie Kirk assassination narrative.
This is a huge problem.
This is essentially a propaganda network linked back to the administration and the government.
Now, come on, when Tim got really mad at Candace for ruining the midterms, that seemed like genuine, sincere rage to me and not some kind of performative thing, Jimmy.
I still don't.
Tim's worth a lot of money.
Yeah, his great music is how he supports his empire.
Let's watch.
Update.
Update: both Evan Kilgore and it's Morgan Neria have admitted to working for Polymarket.
No kidding.
Both claim to have not been paid to promote anti-Mit Snow content.
The transparency about Polymarket is appreciated.
Do what you will with it.
So they're saying they aren't.
But my question is: why are you coming so hard?
So love your brother as yourself says.
My question is: why are they coming so hard at Candace?
Does this have to do with the fact that she's black?
Christ.
Come on.
Are these guys so narcissistic that they can't stand the thought that a black woman keeps outsmarting them?
I think these are important questions to ask.
It's because she's effing with their narrative.
That's what it's got nothing to do with her being black.
This has to be fake.
I think it's someone being sarcastic because it actually is not an important question to ask.
No, it's not.
There's something fake about it, whatever it is.
But let's remember, and the narrative is the precious thing.
So they can't lose the narrative.
That is exactly what this is.
Aka the Matrix.
That's what the stupid matrix is, the idiot narrative that the government has spun around people that they still believe to this day.
Did you ever see this clip from Charlie Kirk?
The Central Intelligence Agency is actively involved in mind manipulation of people here domestically, and that is completely against the CIA charter.
You must understand: we have Congress, and they're just kind of like a peanut gallery.
And then we have a super government that exists above Congress of the Department of Defense, which is the Pentagon, the Central Intelligence Agency, which is owned thing out in Langley, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, they run the country.
The intel agencies run the country.
Don't forget Israel.
When did he say that?
How soon before he died?
I don't know.
Let's listen to it again.
The Central Intelligence Agency is actively involved in mind manipulation of people here domestically.
And that is completely against the CIA charter.
You must understand: we have Congress, and they're just kind of like a peanut gallery.
And then we have a super government that exists above Congress of the Department of Defense, which is the Pentagon, the Central Intelligence Agency, which is owned thing out in Langley, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, they run the country.
They run the country.
Intel agencies run the country.
So he, so no, no wonder this guy got offed.
He was on to all of it.
He was on to that there was a stand down order given on October 7th.
He was on to it that it was a genocide.
He was on to it that he could no longer support the Israel Project.
He was on to it that the fact that the intelligence agencies actually are above Congress.
I've been saying this forever.
When you see people are like, oh, they have secret meetings.
No, it's called a session of Congress.
When they get together at a session of Congress, you think they're there doing the bidding of students, of workers, of poor people, of the medically informed, of elderly.
You think they're doing the bidding of the.
No, they're there doing the bidding of the billionaire class that also runs the intelligence agencies.
Right.
The other stuff, Jimmy, I believe they handle at Epstein Island.
Yeah, that's right.
So, again, I'm not.
They really went hard at Tim Poole.
I don't think it's, I don't think Tim Poole is being paid by Polymarket to.
Yeah, I know.
It's weird.
He's been every civil unrest around the world going back to the Erdogan riots and including the Maidan coup.
It's weird to see all that and come to these conclusions after you've seen all the stuff Max Limenthal and Aaron Mate have seen to come to such a bizarrely milquetoast, supposedly fencing conclusion.
How could that be?
I'm not like that from just hearing the actual real story.
Imagine being there and seeing it up close and coming back and talking that bullshit.
Now, I can't.
Now, again, I'm not.
It's obvious to me that it was astro-turfed.
The campaign against Mitch and Candace this weekend on social media.
It's obvious it was AstroTurfed by who I don't know exactly.
And it was coordinated and it was astro turfed.
I'll know which of my friends is stupid from who repeats it.
So I don't, right?
So I don't know who did it or what or who's taking money and who's not.
I'm not making those accusations.
I'm just saying that it's obvious that this was an astroturfed, coordinated hit job because the powers that be are freaking out over the fact that Mitch Snow caught them at Camp Huachuca.
That's what this is about.
Jimmy, do you know how overly optimistic I was that the government was using some kind of carrier wave system over your phone and TV to somehow program people when, in fact, most of these fuckers are doing it to hit a bounty on a fucking website?
Most of these people are just scum.
I mean, you saw how little it took for them to buy off Mockingburg 2.0 to get them to be pro-soda, sugar soda.
Yeah.
Remember what?
So when RFK was going to get SNAP, which is food stamps, to stop selling garbage food or stop letting them buy garbage like sugary sodas and processed tweets and stuff.
We covered that.
And so then there was this, again, one of these coordinated AstroTurf campaigns where people came out in favor of people being able to buy whatever they want, which is the same people.
And then it turned out that Nick, what's that guy's Nick something?
He discovered that they were all being paid and pittance, hundreds of dollars, not thousands.
They were being paid hundreds of dollars to go and post on social media, being pro snap benefits, being able to buy junk food.
Hey, your doctor only got $750 a head to put poison in your kids.
That's it.
That's all it costs for your doctor to put a bioweapon in your chest.
Oh, Nick Sortor.
Nick, that's the guy.
Nick Sortor was the one who outed it, who's also a right-wing media guy who has done good work.
He discovered this and he outed.
I couldn't believe it.
So the fact that obviously there's a coordinated AstroTurf campaign.
Now, by the way, this Kilgore idiot, if you go to his ex profile, you can see immediately he's a phony.
I don't know who thought he was good this whole time, but his name sounds fake.
And going to his website, he was always a Zionist dipshit the whole time.
So you should have expected that from him.
And the fact that someone retweets a polymarket is not evidence.
I mean, he even, that Evan Kilgar even agrees that he even admits, yeah, I work for them or that I do work for them.
Not that he's an employee of theirs, but he's anyway.
So that's interesting.
But there's obviously, I'll say it one more time, an AstroTurf coordinated hit job, and they're freaking out about Mitch Snow's testimony about who he saw at Camp Huachuca.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Maybe you remember we showed this wolfinfinance.com.
They've been doing deep dives into the finances behind TPUSA and they found a lot of shell companies.
And they found one company that's getting millions of dollars from TPUSA that went to a parking lot.
But now they say it's not a parking lot.
They say it goes to a UPS mailbox.
That's their company.
So let's listen to, he's got a follow-up on this.
So let's listen.
And it's about, I'll stop and start it, but it's, it's a, here we go.
In my videos, I've been talking about a company named 110LLC.
This was listed as one of the top independent contractors for Turning Point with payments of $1.5 million.
I tracked down the address for 110 LLC to the parking lot of a strip mall.
This address is also listed in the financial disclosure statement of Arizona State Senator Jake Hoffman.
I have seen everyone's comments and the internet has spoken that the most likely explanation is that the money is being sent to a UPS door mailbox in that strip mall.
So I think it is fair that we make that assumption that it is not being sent to the parking lot, but the mailbox in the UPS store.
Because the address they gave didn't exist.
The address they gave for that business that they're sending the millions of dollars with Jake Hoffman, the state senator, he listed every suite in that strip mall as his office.
So now they're like, no, no, no, it's going to a UPS mailbox.
Okay.
Turning point has not confirmed this.
I don't know why, because that's such an easy thing for them to say, but they remain silent.
For some reason, they're doing everything to avoid talking about this UPS store mailbox.
What I find extremely disturbing is that since these questions have been raised, not a single person from the accounting department at Turning Point has made any statements.
The chief financial officer is a politician, Justin Olson.
He's an Arizona state representative.
Why has the CFO said nothing?
Not a single person from the accounting department has said anything.
We have heard from Andrew Colvet.
We've heard from Blake Neff.
We've heard from Tyler Boyer.
We've heard from all these marketing people, but no one from the accounting department.
I'm beginning to wonder if the accountants are silent because they know that anything they say can be used against them in a court of law.
Arizona State Senator Jake Hoffman on X.com has now made seven posts confirming that he uses the UPS door mailbox for 110 LLC.
I will show you just one example.
He says, you're a clown.
110 is a decade-old marketing company with many clients.
The address I use for mail and public disclosures is a UPS door private mailbox at that address.
So just so you know what's going on, TPUSA is sending millions of dollars to this guy's company that he says he's operating out of the strip mall, but there was no office.
And now he's saying it's operating out of a UPS mailbox.
Okay, just so you just, okay.
By the way, tinfoil hat, just for the record, Jake Hoffman, that's a victim of CIA testing microwave energy weapons on a guy.
They put a chip in his head, Leonard Kyle, and it mutilated his brain.
And he was smart enough to know a metal trash can could block it.
And then the funny form gave him tinfoil.
So we get that humorous thing about kooky people from a victim of the CIA.
Just, I think everyone should know that every time I hear tinfoil hat.
Information the losers who created their video hid from you.
Take off the tinfoil hat.
First of all, it is not a decade-old company, which I will prove in a minute.
That is a massive lie.
It is very strange that he would lie about that.
It's like he doesn't want people to know how his company was formed.
The second thing that is strange is that in all of his seven posts, he never mentions Turning Point.
That's the whole point.
The IRS forms tell us that Turning Point sent $1.5 million, and the only evidence this company even exists is a UPS store mailbox.
Why is everyone going out of their way to avoid talking about this $1.5 million?
We are back here in the parking lot, and Jake Hoffman is concerned that I am hiding information from you.
So let's talk about the UPS mailbox.
Jake Hoffman wants us all to talk about the UPS mailbox.
So I'm going to show it to you.
One of the reasons I've been so hesitant to make this connection is because of the massive implications.
I understand that small businesses use UPS door mailboxes all the time, but this is different.
This is not your mom and pop shop.
This is not your typical small business.
This is an Arizona state senator.
He has a UPS door mailbox where people are dropping off millions of dollars.
This is the mailbox.
He is operating his multi-million dollar business out of this UPS door mailbox.
There's no location.
There's no evidence for this business other than this mailbox.
I do have to correct a mistake I made in my previous videos.
I made the statement that there was no website for 110 LLC.
I have discovered that is not correct.
There is a website.
It's just very hard to find.
It is at 110.io.
And I think it is very revealing.
So the website for this millions of dollars business that they're getting from TPUSA is 110.io, not .com, not .anything, .io.
And it's, watch, watch how hard it is to find this.
On the website, you can see a sample marketing example with Turning Point Action listed on the ad.
I think it is very suspicious that he is advertising that if you pay him money, you are also going to get the support of Turning Point Action.
You should go check this website out.
There's not a lot on it.
It is literally one page.
What is even crazier is that if you look the website up using the Wayback Machine, you will see that the website has not changed at all since 2021.
I will repeat, this marketing company has not made a single change to its website since 2021.
Additionally, the reason the website is so hard to find is that it is not indexed by Google.
If you search on Google, site colon 110.io, you will receive zero results.
So this supposed marketing company has a website that you cannot search for on Google.
This really does not do anything to convince me that this is anything other than a fake shell company.
Jake Hoffman has also explained that he does not give out the address or details of his operations because of political persecution from what he calls the insane murderous left.
I'm sorry, Jake Hoffman, but that explanation is not good enough.
You are a state senator and you have to prove you are not taking bribes.
You cannot claim security reasons as a shield to stop anyone from knowing the details of your suspicious business.
This would be like if Donald Trump decided not to let anyone know the addresses for his hotels.
You could not know anything about his golf courses for security reasons.
That would be ridiculous.
You chose to live a public life.
You do not get to keep your business a giant secret.
There's nothing wrong with a state senator running his own company, but it has to be an actual business and not a way for him to launder money.
Let's assume that Jake Hoffman is completely innocent.
This is still a stupid thing for him to do.
It is stupid.
Just for appearance's sake, it looks really shady.
Imagine if Joe Biden had a UPS store mailbox where people would walk in and drop off millions of dollars.
Oh yeah, Joe Biden did have multiple shell companies that didn't seem to do anything, and we had hearings about it for two years.
How come all these Republicans got upset over Joe Biden, but no one wants to talk about what Jake Hoffman is doing?
So let's take a closer look at 110 LLC.
You can go to transparencyusa.org, which shows election-related expenditures in the U.S. and state elections.
110 LLC received over $4 million from Arizona election campaigns and a small amount related to Wisconsin campaigns.
Now, this is just a portion of the revenue that was reported as part of state elections.
We know the actual revenue numbers for 110 LLC are much higher because this doesn't even include all the money paid to them by Turning Point.
Another person I talked about in my videos is someone named Tyler Boyer.
Just as a reminder, Turning Point is made up of four main shell companies, and Tyler Boyer is the COO of Turning Point Action and America's Turning Point.
Tyler Boyer is important because the Turning Point shell companies that Tyler Boyer managed just happened to be the same shell companies paying 110 LLC.
Let me show you how Tyler Boyer describes the first time that he met Charlie Kirk.
And I walked away from that and I'm going, I can hitch my wagon to this guy.
I can hitch my wagon to this guy.
He was confused by this guy.
We went out and we went.
He says that he was going to hitch his wagon to Charlie Kirk.
He said that he was Charlie Kirk's best friend.
We're going to see how good a friend he was.
And does anyone know what this hand signal is?
This is very strange.
Then there is this clip where he talks about Candace Owens.
What is a story that you have about Charlie and Candace that Candace didn't share?
Oh, there's a lot.
I put one out.
That was right away.
I was there with them.
It was like, you know, the three amigos.
I was with Charlie and Candace when we went to TMZ that day with Candace and Kanye.
And, you know, Kanye was immediately obsessed with Candace.
Tyler Boyer describes himself, Charlie Kirk, and Candace Owens, as the three amigos.
And for proof of this, he explains that he was there the day that Candace met Kanye West.
I find this extremely strange because this is how Candace Owens describes Tyler Boyer.
But it didn't make sense to me that Tyler Boyer lied about it.
And I don't trust Tyler Boyer, and that does not, that is never going to change.
Similarly with Rob McCoy, he makes my skin crawl.
I can't explain it.
This is a, I look at him and he's a bad person and nobody can make me feel one way or the other about that.
Candace says that she does not trust Tyler Boyer and compares him to Rob McCoy, who she says makes my skin crawl.
So which one is it?
Were they the three amigos?
Or is Candace correct in saying that you cannot trust Tyler Boyer?
Which one is it?
I want to go back in time to 2017.
A company was created called We the People USA Inc.
This was a nonprofit corporation formed in Arizona.
This company is important because when you understand what people have done in the past, it becomes a template for what they're likely to do in the future.
This company was created with five directors, Mike Miller, Doug DeGroot, Jake Hoffman, Dwayne Farnsworth, and Tyler Boyer.
Mike Miller and Doug DeGroot are both current board members of Turning Point USA.
That is why they are on there.
I've already explained who Jake Hoffman and Tyler Boyer are.
I find Dwayne Farnsworth very strange.
He is a bankruptcy attorney in Mesa, Arizona.
Why is this random bankruptcy attorney a director in this company with Jake Hoffman and Tyler Boyer?
It seems unusual.
Well, you might have noticed that he has the same last name as the IT guy, Terrell Farnsworth, who was present at Charlie Kirk's murder.
And he's the guy who took the SD cards out of the cameras behind Charlie and then lied about why he did it.
He said the cops told him to do it and the cops said, we didn't tell.
Then he said, oh, I was afraid they were going to steal stuff.
Well, why wouldn't you just take the whole camera?
So that's who this guy is.
And he's related.
They got the same last name as that guy who was on the board of this shell company.
All right, here we go.
Now, I don't know if these two people are related.
Maybe you internet sleuths at home can figure that out.
But a lot of people have questions about the IT guy, Terrell Farnsworth.
Like, why did he move the chair at the crime scene to remove the SD cards with the footage of the murder?
Why did he film a selfie video of himself directly after the shooting?
God help him.
I find this extremely strange.
That was weird.
I don't know if you saw that.
Kurt, did you see that?
That guy brought it up.
He made a selfie video of himself reacting.
What?
At the time, before we were doing the other guy walking off in the distance without blood on him.
That was the Mikey McCoy.
Why did this guy do a selfie of himself saying that?
That's very strange.
Yes.
Okay, here we go.
Who witnesses a shooting and immediately thinks to themselves, I want to film a selfie video of myself?
I think that's odd.
So a lot of people have been questioning why this IT guy acted so strangely.
Well, I can give you one possibility.
If his relative was involved in shady business dealings on the side with Tyler Boyer, that could explain it.
But again, I don't know if they're related or not.
The main point is to show that Tyler Boyer and Jake Hoffman have a history of doing these side businesses together.
We have the paperwork.
This company was formed in 2017 and then it was dissolved in 2021.
That is strange because 110 LLC was created in 2021.
Here is the formation paperwork signed by Jake Hoffman.
I do not know why he lied about this in his post on X.com and said it was a decade-old company.
This was formed four years ago.
It was formed at this address in Delaware next to several other buildings Candice Owens has identified in her podcast.
Now, that's probably unrelated, but it is still a pretty strange coincidence.
Just to be clear, the Delaware address Jake Hoffman is using is for Incorp Services, which is listed on Delaware's website as a registered agent who can set up one of these shell companies.
My question is, why does all this shady stuff happen in Delaware?
So at the same time the old company was being shut down in Arizona, this new company was being formed in the state of Delaware.
Because it was formed in Delaware, all the partner information is kept secret.
We cannot see who is involved.
That's why.
But I don't think it is a stretch to say that it is my opinion that Tyler Boyer was likely involved in the creation of 110 LLC.
If Tyler Boyer is a partner, that means that he would receive a share of the profits of every dollar that flows through that UPS store mailbox.
Now, I don't have any evidence of this, but there are some interesting facts that you should know.
I mentioned in my previous video that Tyler Boyer lives in a massive mansion.
I'm not going to show it on the video, but you can go look for it yourself.
His address is listed on the IRS 990 forms.
His house is luxurious.
There are multiple buildings, a pool, a private basketball court.
Well, I have the paperwork from when he bought his house.
And this is pretty shocking.
It was also purchased in 2021, four months after 110 LLC was created.
The property was worth $1.95 million, and he put a down payment of $650,000.
Let me explain how wild this is.
Here is court paperwork from 2017 of a lawsuit where Tyler Boyer was involved.
He had been fighting this lawsuit since 2010 over some unpaid fees from a condo development.
The court order says, the exact condition of the judgment is $11,401.32 as of June 8th, 2017.
So Tyler Boyer owes this money and he was taken to court.
It was reported in the news that his wages were garnished because of this debt.
So as of 2017, Tyler Boyer was struggling financially.
This is not the type of thing you see from someone who has a lot of money.
This begs the obvious question.
How in the world did he get $650,000 in cash to use as a down payment on his house?
Do any of you find this suspicious?
That someone in 2017 can be broke and in four years have $650,000 in cash?
Tyler Boyer needs to answer the simple question, where did he get the $650,000?
The first major customer of 110 LLC was Carrie Lake.
Carrie Lake at this time was running for governor of Arizona.
Carrie Lake had a super PAC called Put Arizona First.
Right before the primary, Put Arizona First received a $2.3 million donation.
Put Arizona first, then turned around and gave the $2.3 million to 110LLC.
Whoa!
Whoa!
Okay.
And then the Cabal told her not to run, remember?
Yeah, and then her friends back east said, Dave don't want you running.
Then Carrie Lake got visited and they offered her lots of money to not run.
You remember that chic recorder?
That's how we know about it.
Okay.
So this is Intel shit is what this is.
Yes.
We still do not know who was behind this $2.3 million donation.
It came from a company called SPH Medical LLC.
Now, if you were doing research, there's a company in California called SBH Medical that sells medical supplies.
This is not the same company.
SPH Medical LLC is another shell company out of Delaware.
And once again, everyone involved in the company is secret.
So we have no idea where the money came from.
I find this outrageous.
I think the American people deserve to know who gave $2.3 million to Carrie Lake.
Who was it?
Someone knows who it was.
Someone knows either at Turning Point, Carrie Lake's campaign, or the Republican elite.
Someone should be able to tell us who gave this money and why it all ended up going to a UPS store mailbox for 110 LLC.
Isn't that wild?
Now, of course, Carrie Lake won the primary election.
But what is interesting is that her official campaign did not hire 110 LLC to do their marketing for the general election.
Carrie Lake hired major legitimate marketing companies with active websites and offices and employees.
She still continued to pay 110 LLC, but at a much lower level.
And she ended up losing the general election.
This was the start of a lot of different campaigns that 110 LLC received money from in Arizona politics.
For instance, one customer was David Farnsworth.
Here's a poster from Turning Point Action for David Farnsworth.
Why are all these people with the last name Farnsworth doing business with Tyler Boyer?
So we have all these candidates paying money into this UPS door mailbox to send a 110 LLC, and then Turning Point is also supporting their election campaigns.
It is almost like they are all working together.
Here's the problem.
If any Turning Point employees are also receiving money from 110 LLC, that would be kickbacks.
Yes.
That would be Turning Point employees getting rich off these election campaigns.
Again, I don't have any direct evidence of this, but we could know for sure with a simple question.
Are any Turning Point employees receiving money from 110 LLC?
I'm going through all of this history so that you understand that this was the financial infrastructure that was already in place when Charlie Kirk was murdered.
So the old company was closed.
This new company was formed in Delaware.
Suddenly, Tyler Boyer has $650,000 in cash, and 110 LLC receives $2.3 million from Carrie Lake's Super PAC.
The obvious question is, did any of that $2.3 million somehow make it into Tyler Boyer's pocket?
But there is another shell company that we have not even talked about yet, Turning Point PAC.
This is a political action committee, and we know from Tyler Boyer's Instagram profile that he is also involved in this company.
We can see how Turning Point PAC spends money on federal campaigns by looking on opensecrets.org.
And surprise, surprise, we can see that the majority of the expenditures for Turning Point PAC are being sent to the UPS Door mailbox for 110 LLC.
What?
They paid $1.1 million in the 21-22 election cycle and $2.1 million in the 23-24 election cycle.
So if you've been keeping track, the amount of money Turning Point has sent to 110 LLC has now increased from $1.5 million to $4.7 million.
How is this Arizona state senator with no office helping out on all of these federal campaigns?
No office.
Am I the only person who finds it crazy that there are millions of dollars flowing through this UPS store mailbox?
The person who could answer these questions very easily is Arizona Attorney General Chris Mays.
She could issue a subpoena for the accounting records at 110 LLC and Turning Point and give us the answers to everyone's questions.
Since people have been raising these questions, she has done nothing.
We have not heard a word from Chris Mays.
What is she doing?
Honestly, what does she do all day long?
Is she in her office drinking margaritas?
Is she going to look into the questions about Turning Point?
Can we at least get a strongly worded statement from her?
Anything?
Fast forward to Charlie Kirk's murder.
What I pointed out in my previous videos is that in the months leading up to Charlie Kirk's murder, there were strange things happening in the financials at Turning Point.
There was an unusual transfer of $8.6 million from Turning Point USA.
So $8.6 million from Turning Point USA to America's Turning Point that Tyler Boyer ran, but Charlie Kirk was not on that.
Isn't that wild?
Okay, just so you know, these are, okay, that's the main turning point, Turning Point USA.
And there's all these other companies.
America's Turning Point.
There was the unusually high employee expense for Tyler Boyer's shell company that we still cannot explain.
There was all the money that was sent from Tyler Boyer shell companies to 110 LLC.
I believe these transactions culminated in the memo that Charlie Kirk issued eight days before he was murdered, where he appointed a new COO of Turning Point USA, Justin Strife, and requested a new Doge-style audit.
So he caught on to this.
He caught on to the millions and millions of dollars coming in and being funneled around.
That's what and then he orders a Doge style audit of Turning Point USA and all their shell companies.
And eight days later, he's killed.
And by the way, they're not doing the Doge style audit.
Erica Kirk is not doing it.
Why would they?
Why would they?
Well, it's her family.
It's her family, yeah.
I was told it belongs to Intel.
That's what I was told.
Yeah, here we go.
Now, anyone who has worked in corporate America knows what that memo implies.
That is the typical memo that you see when you discover someone is stealing money from the company.
Yes.
You replace their position, you start a new audit, and you work on moving that person out of your company.
Now, Tyler Boyer has responded to this allegation with this post on X.com.
He says, made up.
I haven't been COO of TPUSA for over three years.
You're listening to people making things up.
He posts a screenshot of his LinkedIn profile as evidence showing that he was the chief operating officer of Turning Point Action since July 2022, implying that he had nothing to do with Turning Point USA or Charlie Kirk's memo.
I find Tyler Boyer's post ridiculous.
We were not born yesterday.
To my knowledge, since Tyler Boyer's change in title in 2022, no one has held the position of COO at Turning Point USA until Charlie Kirk's memo appointing Justin Strife.
And anyone who has worked in Corporate America knows that if you get a title change and no one backfills your position, you still end up doing your old job.
So it is still likely that Charlie Kirk's memo was attempting to minimize Tyler Boyer's influence at the company.
What is even more compelling is that Tyler Boyer's post is contradicted by his own words.
The Washington Post obtained a secret audio recording of Tyler Boyer.
This is from late 2022 after his supposed change in title.
Take a listen.
I'd have to share with you the history of Turning Point USA because like I've heard all the from the bottom up.
So you didn't realize you're talking to the guy basically around there.
Notice, he is talking specifically about Turning Point USA, not the other shell companies.
And he says, you are talking with the guy who basically runs everything.
This is Tyler Boyer in his own words, months after he supposedly changed his title.
So which one is it, Tyler?
Were you lying then or are you lying now?
Or are you just lying all the time?
The Washington Post also recorded Tyler Boyer saying this.
And honestly, I have giant balls and I don't care.
I'll walk in and talk to anybody.
I'm a transparent piece of glass here on everything that I do and everything I'm involved with.
So apparently, he has giant balls.
I'm just going to put this out there.
He does not sound like a very nice person.
And if he's so transparent, why doesn't he explain why he is sending $4.7 million of Turning Point's money to a UPS store mailbox?
What makes all of this so suspicious is the actions of Erica Kirk.
She still refuses to do Charlie Kirk's final wish that he wrote in that memo, a Doge style audit of the finances at Turning Point.
This would be so easy to do.
You bring in an independent third party.
It takes a couple of months.
It would calm everyone's concerns over the finances.
Why does she refuse to do an audit?
The only reason I can think of is that it will uncover criminal activity.
When Erica Kirk is asked about the issues at Turning Point, she says something like this.
It reminds me so much of chapter six in the book of Nehemiah.
He is building a wall, and the townspeople are at the base of that hill saying, Nehemiah, calling him all these names, saying all these things, come on down.
Every single time, he had the same message four times in a row.
I cannot come down.
I am busy building.
That is how I feel.
I do not have time to address the noise.
My silence does not mean that I am complacent.
My silence does not mean that somehow Turning Point USA and all of the handpicked staff that loved my husband and my husband loved them is somehow in on it.
Apparently, we cannot ask about the finances because of a Bible verse.
Well, Erica Kirk, how about this Bible verse?
Proverbs 29, 1.
Whoever stubbornly refuses to accept criticism will suddenly be destroyed beyond recovery.
Turning Point is a taxpayer-subsidized nonprofit.
We have every right to demand the CEO answer our questions about some pretty obvious financial irregularities.
Turning Point keeps claiming that they already do an annual financial audit with the accounting firm Baker Tilly.
In the opinion letter from Baker Tilly, they say that nothing is wrong and there are no problems at Turning Point.
Of course they did.
But sometimes annual audits miss things.
They make mistakes too.
And if they did miss something, they are actually incentivized not to report it because then it makes them look bad.
That is why it is a good idea to rotate your audit firms occasionally to new firms.
Bringing in an additional Doge style audit would be such an easy, simple thing for Erica Kirk to do.
It's clearly what Charlie Kirk wanted.
I think it is extremely suspicious that she still refuses to do an audit.
Now, to be clear, all of this is circumstantial evidence.
Currently, I do not have any direct evidence of a crime.
But the real question is this.
Given all the facts I have laid out, what is the more likely possibility that Tyler Boyer is completely innocent or that he's doing something shady?
Let me know in the comments down below.
If you have more information about...
So there you go.
Great job.
Yeah, he's clearly a handler.
That's what that's called.
A handler.
You have to be ones sometimes.
Of course, I'm in charge of turning point.
Officially, he's in charge of two shell companies and turning point not, but he's telling people he's in charge of the whole thing because he's a handler.
That's what they call that in Intel work, which is what this shit is.
It certainly looks like they were getting kickbacks.
It looks like, again, I can't say that, just like he said on the video.
All those faith leaders, those worthless, phony Christian faith leaders that go to TPUSA that aren't Christian and are in fact devil worshipers, those fucks, they all get in on that scam of being tax-free.
And then they get money from the fucking Moonies in South Korea.
Steve Bannon knows all about, dude, their connections are so dirty and bad.
It's like, it's Tim Waltz level bad.
Just like Joe Biden, his creepy son was a bad man for the CIA.
That's why the pardon's going to stand and nothing's going to happen.
Any of them.
You understand?
Like the Cabal.
Yo, you can't spell Cabal without it.
It's Kabbalah.
It's short for Kabbalah.
That's what Cabal means.
Great job by Wolf and Finance, Wolves and Finance.
And it's just that Jake Hoffman guy, that the state senator, it's like, no, it's my business.
We had it for 10 years, only four years.
Oh, no, I run this multi, multi, multi, multi-million dollar operation out of a mailbox at the UPS in a strip mall.
Remember, they sold all their water to some fucking Arab vote.
Oh, remember that?
Remember that?
Yes.
Yeah, no, they're a real bad, corrupt state.
I mean, Arizona was selling water rights.
Yeah.
And so, and so, yeah, I just happened to do it out of a mailbox in a strip mall.
And the website for my business hasn't been changed for five years.
And you can't find it, by the way, if you Google it.
I'm a marketer guy, and I made sure nobody can find my marketing website.
Really?
That's my script is about a cutout that is just like that.
If you can find them, maybe you can hire my cutout member.
Yes.
You're going to be playing the creepy oligarch in that.
I'm looking forward.
Ryan Matta did a.
He's going to tell you.
So I don't know if you've noticed there's been an obvious, coordinated, astro-turfed, paid-for campaign of social media influencers to attack Candace Owens.
This is not organic, except for Matt Taibbi.
But everybody else, Matt Taibbi's doing it for nothing.
Matt just gave it consideration, due consideration.
He fell on the side of Fell on Jesus.
Yeah, and he just happens to agree with the FBI's narrative, I guess.
Anyway, I'm not kidding.
He sent me a DM saying that he's not being paid.
Like, you're doing this for free.
You're a sucker.
You've got a more impressive resume than Catherine Maher of NBR fame, who's an obvious CIA State Department plant.
So he's going to tell you.
So I have two quick videos here from Ryan Motto, who I tried to get on the show today, but he is busy.
I didn't give him enough heads up.
I suppose it's my fault.
But anyway, he's doing great work on this.
So here, let's listen to what he says about how this all works, how this obvious, coordinated, astro-turfed, paid-for Mockingbird Media 2.0 anti-Candice campaign works.
Let's listen.
So I want to explain how the pay-to-play game works here in the influencer world, especially in the digital age.
And they have these things which are called clipping sites.
So a clipping site will basically, I'm going to give you the rundown because I kind of made a slide to actually break it down, but these sites out there, some are anybody can join, and then some are invite only.
So, this is how the PACs use, and they basically hide behind these sites and they use these sites to directly.
So, he's saying PACs use these, meaning political PACs.
They use these clipping sites and they put out, hey, look, here's how much money we'll give you if you clip this video and say this exact thing.
And so, let's watch.
Pay influencers to do work on behalf of a political opponent without actually having to report it.
So, this is how they're like adding that middleman in the barrier and why it's so hard to determine who's paying who and how they're getting paid.
So, let me explain this to you.
It's a little slide, right?
So, let's just say they have a bounty.
Let's just say, I want to put out $50,000.
I want to put a $50,000 bounty out, and I'm willing to pay $10 per 100,000 views.
Now, you don't have to get 100,000 views to earn $10.
You can get 10,000 views and you could earn $1, right?
Because all the accounts are different.
You want as many accounts as humanly possible, basically competing to earn their share of the $50,000.
So, along with the bounty, so the bounty, this is the actual job itself, will have requirements.
So, the requirements for this specific job that I just made up would be a 39 to 90 second video attacking Candice Owens.
The keywords that you need to put in the actual title of the post, Candace Owens lied about Erica Kirk.
Now, I could go on and say, Candace Owens is crazy and she lied about Eric Kirk.
I don't have to put keyword word for word, but those specific keywords have to be used for my tweet to actually be eligible to earn a percentage of this bounty, right?
And then the platforms that I need to post it on can be X, IG, TikTok, YouTube.
Now, if I post the same video and I post it on X and IG, I'm gonna get two links, right?
So, each one of those videos is gonna be earning its portion.
It's not combined, it'll be on each.
So, if you post IG, TikTok, YouTube, and on each platform, you get a million views.
Or just say each platform get $100,000 views, then you'd earn $40, $10 per 100,000 views, okay?
And then, so what does that get?
Like, why are people incentivized to do that?
So, let me just break this down.
If you put a $50,000 bounty and you're paying $10, right, per 100,000 views, you get 10 divided by 50,000 is 5,000.
5,000 times 100,000 gives you 500 million views total.
Now, if nobody earns that, that bounty will stay open.
So, sometimes you'll see like a job that'll say bounty/slash, you know, 25,000 remaining or 4,000 remaining or whatever the amount of remaining money is.
And the job that I didn't put the data there, but you'll have to say that was posted a month ago.
You know, that might be an old job, but something might start trending.
You're going by like, Candace might put on a new video.
And you go back and they're like, oh, shit, nobody's actually competing for that.
Oh, I'm going to, you know, take a stab at it.
I'm going to try to earn my percentage of that bounty.
And so what it looks like is basically you have your bounty, which is the job attack Candice Owens.
You submit your link here.
And then once you submit your link there, it'll attach it to basically like your profile and you'll have like a scrolling percentage counter.
So it might be like every, you know, like the minimum might be a thousand views.
So every thousand views, you earn 10 cents or whatever the equation is, right?
And then you won't see it, but there's just like everybody.
This person, let's just say they put out 50,000 views, they get 5 bucks, 100,000 views get 10, 50, 55, 10 bucks, 10 million views get you a thousand bucks, 100k views, 10, you know, 20 million views get you $2,000.
And then you just basically will have a running total on that bounty.
You notice like $39,000 left, $10,000, left $5,000 left.
And once it runs out, you're done, right?
So once the bounty bottoms out, like, so that's why, you know, if you're doing this, you're probably like, if there's only a thousand dollars remaining at that bounty, you might not want to create a video because if your video gets a million views, you're only going to earn, you know, you still start.
Okay.
So yeah, so you put a video gets 10 million views and there's only a thousand dollars left in that bounty.
You're only going to get paid for the first million views because once that caps out, you're done.
There's no additional payouts after the bounty ends.
It's first come, first serve.
And that's how these sites work, guys.
And I made a video that actually, so if you just wait, hang on.
It's just going to pause for a second.
Hang on.
Search on Grock and say, Grock, what are the best clipping sites for influencers?
It'll pull up the list like the top five or 10.
And there's not a ton of them out there, but those are just the public ones that we know about.
That doesn't include the ones that like, if I was APAC, APAC, I would almost guarantee has their own version of this.
That's invite only, right?
So when Israel wants to make something trend, you just put up a bounty.
And when you put up the bounty, if you're like logged in your app or you have the app on your phone or using any one of these sophisticated platforms, it most likely sends you a text message or you submit your number because it's such a small group of people.
And all of a sudden, 100 people get a DN get a text message.
It's this book, new bounty position, new bounty.
Click the link to see.
You know, doing $50,000 bounty out, they probably click the link and it shoots them right over to the website and like, oh, here's a job.
Here's a description.
That's how it's so timed out, right?
That's why when you see people, I don't want to use any names, they don't want to get any lawsuits, being on the White House water boys, on how one person will tweet them.
It's all of them are tweeting almost the exact same thing, similar keywords, similar topics, using similar photos, right?
And we can take a step further, right?
Let's go back over here.
All right, requirements could be you have to use this photo, right?
So in the video, they want you to use this photo, or it could just be a word tweet.
It could be word or video, it could be anything, right?
The requirements can be anything, and they can provide you any type of requirements they want.
So you got to use this video, you got to use these turtle keywords, it has to be this length.
You know, anything that you got, this could be, you got to use this as a cover photo, whatever the case may be.
This is how the game's played, guys.
So just hopefully you guys are up to date.
So that's Ryan Madda.
So he's, so what do you want to say, Kurt?
Go ahead.
And now we solve the mystery of why when X started showing where tweets are coming from, all these political tweets from India and Sri Lanka, all these other places for some reason, because they're going for these bounties.
Yep.
That's right.
So here, and here's so here.
And if you couldn't follow that, here's one he made, I think, a month ago that kind of explains.
Just waking up, it's really important to understand how the fake new media, right?
You are the new media or MAGA or the new MAGA media, how all of these influencers are all getting paid via these different platforms that pay content creators and put up bounties for specific keywords or topics.
For example, you talk about the Trump assassination or you talk about Charlie Kirk's shooter being trans and you all put out the same keywords in your title.
And then once you create that post, you add your link to these platforms and then you get paid a percentage of that bounty.
Let me show you how this works.
Okay, so the first thing I want to do is I want to go to Grock and say, what websites pay influencers for clipping and posting content?
Platforms that pay influencers for clipping and posting content are.
And it says whoop content, BICS, Starlit Clips, and Clips.
And now there's probably a ton of others.
But so I set up and I went and got into Starlet clips.
So whatever's when you go to Starlit Clips, so check this out.
So this is in their Discord.
So they basically post here and they show you, okay, if you post on TikTok, we're paying $30 for 100,000 views.
We're paying for reels on Instagram, I believe, $30 for 100,000 views.
Shorts are paying $30 for $100,000 views.
And Twitter and X are paying $15 per 100,000 views.
Okay.
Now it's funded or clip for Bardan.
So here's a Bardan.
Post Vardan's clips everywhere.
So basically, this guy creates a video.
And if you take his video and you cut clips from his video or his podcast or whatever the case may be, and then you submit your links, every time your link gets 100,000 views, there's a total bounty.
And I don't know if they're where the bounty is.
We'll have to look into it a little bit.
But basically, if there was like, say, this would be like a $5,000 bounty.
So they're going to pay up to $5,000 for the first person that actually submits and gets X amount of views for every $100,000.
So if you've got a video that got like, you know, say 50 million views and you use one of his clips, you submitted it, you might be able to drain that entire bounty before anybody else even gets their clips submitted.
And there's tons of these different websites out there.
Like I said, I showed you just a few.
Now, another one is a different style, which is Bix.
So you go into Bix and you basically, you add a service.
Like, I'm willing to create content on politics or whatever.
And then brands or PAX could actually come over here and go, boom.
We want to automatic your service.
So you say, boom, here's $1,000 to make a tweet on whatever, right?
So you could put up a service as I post tweets on X, you know, for $100 a tweet, and it goes, boom, they could send you the information.
They would pay you for the gig.
They would tell you what to post it.
And you would post it.
And once you post it, you submit the link.
And then these platforms act like an aggregator or these websites act like an escrow account, right?
Like, so when you're doing a real estate deal, you're closing on your house and it's transferring the deed from one person's name to the X, your money basically goes in escrow.
So it's in limbo there.
So neither party controls it.
The banks actually control it.
And when you sign the documents or you pay the loan, then it transfers ownership, right?
So this is the same thing.
There's a bounty, there's a reward that's put up, and then that reward is already in a third party.
So once you submit your link, and if your link meets all the criteria, keywords, blah, blah, blah, blah, as soon as that gets 100,000 views, you're instantly getting paid.
Boom, And that's how you see all the fake MAGA media all using the same exact talking points, saying the same exact script.
It's not because they're getting views, they're getting paid on X for their views, guys.
Come on.
Are you really going to kill your timeline and put out some stupid shit that you don't even care to report on just to put it out for fun?
Because you want to help the Trump administration.
You're an independent journalist.
Of course you're not.
You're only going to report on things if you think they're valuable or you're getting paid for it.
Okay.
So now let's do this.
Let's show you guys how much money and how easy it is to clean up on shit like this and how much these dudes actually make.
So it's $30,000 or it's $30 for 100,000 views.
Okay, let's go here.
Charlie Kirk, assassinated by a leftist trans activist.
This is Benny Johnson, 2.5 million views.
So 2.5 million divided by 100,000 is 25.
25 times 30 is what?
$750 just for one post.
So if somebody put up a bounty for anybody that was talking about the activist being a trans shooter, okay, and you're getting paid roughly $30 for 100,000 views, you're literally going to make $750.
Benny Johnson got that one post would have.
Now, not saying he did.
I'm not saying that that's one.
I'm just giving you an example of how much money these influencers could be making.
So he's not saying Benny Johnson's getting paid.
He's saying this, for example.
Okay.
If there's bounties on shit like this, and sometimes when we see all of them, the MAGA media, all of them echoing the exact same talking points, word for word.
How many times have you seen a screenshot of MAGA?
And there's like 20 different people that are all saying literally almost the exact same thing identically.
Like word for word.
It's almost like it's scripted, right?
Are we really buying this trans shooter bullshit?
Why isn't Benny Johnson?
Why isn't it?
Why aren't any of these people talking about the fact that most likely this was a professional hit job carried out by Israel?
Everybody's silent on it except for Candace Owens and Ian Carroll and the OGs, right?
God bless you guys.
Boost.
He also tweeted out this.
He says, yeah, one of my buddies owns a massive crypto coin marketing company.
So he was schooling me on how these bounties work, how the sites work, how people get paid, and how they use bot farms and IG TikTok and X posts to boost, make viral content.
One of his buddies bought 400 plus iPhone at a time, then uses VPNs and bot farms to create TikTok accounts.
He can make anything go viral.
He has so many fake accounts that anything you want to make go viral and trend on Twitter, he can make it happen.
So if you were wondering, when you go, I only go on Twitter.
I don't go really anywhere else.
So I was going on Twitter and I would see this.
I'm seeing like all these Mockingbird 2.0 at the exact same time with the exact same talking points going after Candace Owens.
And now you know how, so now you know how it works.
And next, in the next video, I'm going to show you how they actually caught people doing this, tweeting about Candace.
Yeah, some of my favorites are in there.
Somebody from Polymarket.
So I'm going to show you that.
And you know, if she's so crazy, if she's so crazy, she's so out of her mind, why respond?
Why would you care?
Why would anybody care?
Again, this is obvious what's happening.
It's obvious this is coordinated.
It's obvious this is AstroTurf.
It's obvious this has a lot to do.
Anyway, that's the part that's obvious.
And the same influencers who seem to be in the tank for Israel seem to be the same influencers doing this.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
Export Selection